Table 1.
Sterility of the gastrointestinal tract in neonatal animals
| Model | Method | Key findings | Controversies | Study |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cattle | 16S rRNA gene sequencing | Microbiota, dominated by Proteobacteria and Firmicutes, were detected in bovine fetal tissues and fluids at 12 weeks gestation | The findings challenge the sterile womb hypothesis but face scrutiny regarding contamination risks and the biological implications of detected low-biomass microbiomes | Amat et al. [17] |
| Lamb | 16S rRNA gene sequencing | The study found no evidence of bacterial DNA in the fetal environment or intestine during the third trimester of sheep pregnancy, reinforcing the concept of a sterile fetal environment | The findings challenge recent claims of in utero microbial colonization, sparking debates over the reliability of low-biomass DNA sequencing and the influence of contamination on reported microbiomes | Malmuthuge and Griebel [18] |
| Lamb | Multi-omics analysis | Detected Escherichia coli as predominant species in fetal lamb intestines, suggesting maternal microbial transfer | Data might be questioned due to contamination or errors in low-biomass sample analysis | Bi et al. [19] |
| Calves | 16S rRNA gene sequencing | Fetal calf GIT and amniotic fluid harbor distinct, viable microbial communities, with colonization starting as early as 5 months of gestation | The study's findings contradict the sterile womb hypothesis and face skepticism regarding contamination control | Guzman et al. [20] |
| Sheep | 16S rRNA gene sequencing | With strict contamination controls, this study identified trace bacterial DNA in fetal tissues, supporting the potential for maternal–fetal transfer of bacteria or their genetic material | The detection of low-biomass bacterial DNA raises concerns about contamination, and the functional significance of this DNA in fetal development remains uncertain | Rodriguez et al. [21] |