Skip to main content
Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology logoLink to Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
. 2026 Mar 4;17:37. doi: 10.1186/s40104-026-01354-6

Unraveling the dynamic changes in the intestinal microbiome: impacts on pre-weaning calf health and productivity

Yang Song 1,2,#, Shubo Wen 1,#, Le Luo Guan 2,3,
PMCID: PMC12958607  PMID: 41776699

Abstract

The early life gut microbial colonization in pre-weaning calves plays a pivotal role in shaping their health, growth, and productivity. This review delves into the dynamic changes of intestinal microbiota during early life, emphasizing key factors such as colostrum management, feeding strategies, roughage supplementation, and microbial interventions including probiotics, prebiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), and non-nutritional stressors that can shape the early life microbial colonization. We highlight the microbiota's critical functions in nutrient metabolism, immune development, gut barrier integrity, and gut-brain axis regulation. Additionally, the consequences of microbial dysbiosis on calf health and its long-term effects on production performance in beef and dairy cattle are discussed. While current research has provided valuable insights, understanding causal mechanisms remains a challenge. This review aims to guide practical strategies for targeted microbial management, offering a pathway to optimize early-life interventions for improved calf health and productivity.

Keywords: Fecal microbiota transplantation, Intestinal health, Microbial colonization, Nutritional management, Pre-weaning calves

Introduction

The gastrointestinal tract harbors a complex and dynamic community of microorganisms, that exerts profound influences on host physiology across the lifespan. The establishment and maturation of this ecosystem during early life represents a critical developmental window with long-lasting implications for the host immune system, metabolic capacity, behavior, and nervous system development [13]. Understanding the mechanisms governing this foundational process is essential not only for fundamental biology but also for the practical application of improving animal health and productivity.

In pre-weaning calves, the significance of early intestinal microbial colonization is particularly pronounced. This period coincides with the development of the rumen, a specialized fermentation chamber whose functionality is dependent on its resident microbial consortium [4]. The establishment of a balanced intestinal microbiome during the pre-weaning phase lays the groundwork for efficient nutrient utilization, robust immune defenses, and optimal growth trajectories, ultimately influencing long-term productivity in both beef and dairy systems [5, 6]. Thus, the interplay among nutritional inputs, environmental factors, and microbial succession during this early window offers opportunities for targeted interventions aimed at optimizing calf health and performance.

However, unraveling the causal relationships among specific microbial shifts, host physiological development, and downstream outcomes in calves remains challenging. Significant progress has been made in characterizing microbial community structures and identifying key influencing factors such as colostrum management, starter feeding, roughage introduction, probiotics, prebiotics, antibiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) [712]. These factors influence not only microbial composition but also host key physiological processes, including gut barrier maturation, immune priming, and nutrient metabolism [1316]. Comprehensive understanding of the underlying mechanisms linking microbial dynamics to host health and productivity is still evolving. Much of the current evidence remains correlative, and translating these observations into effective management strategies requires deeper mechanistic insights.

This review synthesizes the current body of knowledge concerning the intestinal microbiome development of pre-weaning calves. We examine the process of microbial colonization, emphasizing the critical factors (nutritional and non-nutritional) that shape this ecosystem during early life. Furthermore, we will explore the functional impacts of the developing microbiome on key aspects of calf physiology, including nutrient metabolism, immune maturation, gut barrier integrity, and gut-brain axis signaling. The consequences of dysbiosis on calf health and its potential long-term effects on productive performance are also discussed. By integrating findings on colonization patterns, influencing factors, and functional outcomes, this review seeks to provide a foundation for developing evidence-based strategies for early life microbial management. Ultimately, we aim to identify opportunities for optimizing early-life interventions that promote calf health and productivity.

Fetal gastrointestinal sterility: evidence and controversies

The traditional paradigm of fetal gastrointestinal sterility has been challenged by the molecular detection of bacterial signatures in prenatal compartments, including placental tissue, amniotic fluid, and meconium (Table 1). However, these findings warrant critical scrutiny regarding whether DNA signals reflect authentic colonization or technical artifacts.

Table 1.

Sterility of the gastrointestinal tract in neonatal animals

Model Method Key findings Controversies Study
Cattle 16S rRNA gene sequencing Microbiota, dominated by Proteobacteria and Firmicutes, were detected in bovine fetal tissues and fluids at 12 weeks gestation The findings challenge the sterile womb hypothesis but face scrutiny regarding contamination risks and the biological implications of detected low-biomass microbiomes Amat et al. [17]
Lamb 16S rRNA gene sequencing The study found no evidence of bacterial DNA in the fetal environment or intestine during the third trimester of sheep pregnancy, reinforcing the concept of a sterile fetal environment The findings challenge recent claims of in utero microbial colonization, sparking debates over the reliability of low-biomass DNA sequencing and the influence of contamination on reported microbiomes Malmuthuge and Griebel [18]
Lamb Multi-omics analysis Detected Escherichia coli as predominant species in fetal lamb intestines, suggesting maternal microbial transfer Data might be questioned due to contamination or errors in low-biomass sample analysis Bi et al. [19]
Calves 16S rRNA gene sequencing Fetal calf GIT and amniotic fluid harbor distinct, viable microbial communities, with colonization starting as early as 5 months of gestation The study's findings contradict the sterile womb hypothesis and face skepticism regarding contamination control Guzman et al. [20]
Sheep 16S rRNA gene sequencing With strict contamination controls, this study identified trace bacterial DNA in fetal tissues, supporting the potential for maternal–fetal transfer of bacteria or their genetic material The detection of low-biomass bacterial DNA raises concerns about contamination, and the functional significance of this DNA in fetal development remains uncertain Rodriguez et al. [21]

Evidence for prenatal microbial colonization​

Studies utilizing advanced molecular techniques have reported detectable microbial DNA signatures within fetal-derived specimens such as placental tissue, amniotic fluid, and meconium. Pioneer microbiota, including archaea and bacteria, have been reported to colonize in the intestine of bovine fetuses as early as d 83 of gestation, 39 archaeal and bacterial phyla were detected in the fetal calf intestine in studies employing rigorous contamination controls, including no-template controls and environmental sampling [17]. During the mid-gestation, Actinomycetales and Methanobacteriales were the most predominant bacterial and archaeal orders, respectively. In the cecal fluid and tissue of Angus × Friesian crossbred calf fetuses, suggesting distinct bacterial and archaeal communities may exist in the fetal calf gut [20]. Similarly, Husso et al. [22] detected bacterial DNA in cesarean-delivered calf meconium using deep sequencing with culture validation. Parallel observations have been reported in ovine models. Escherichia coli was the most predominant bacterial species detected in the fetal gut of full-term lambs delivered by aseptic hysterectomy, as determined by multi-omics analysis [19]. Maternal–fetal microbial transmission may contribute to bacterial detection in fetal lambs, as suggested by Rodriguez et al. [21], whose optimized sequencing protocols indicated in utero bacterial transfer. Collectively, these reports challenge the traditional sterile womb paradigm, suggesting potential in utero microbial transfer via placental or umbilical routes. However, these findings require critical evaluation against the contamination risks inherent in low-biomass microbiome studies.

Methodological limitations and contamination concerns

Ongoing methodological challenges plague low-biomass research, casting significant doubt on these findings.​ Bihl et al. [23] questioned the reported presence of microbes in the fetal lamb gut by reanalyzing the original metagenomic and metatranscriptomic sequence data. They proposed that the dominant bacteria and viruses detected in the previous publication could be attributed to contamination, arising from the environment, DNA extraction kits, or experimental procedures, issues common to low-biomass microbiome studies. Malmuthuge and Griebel [18] reported that the maternal placenta, amniotic fluid, and fetal lamb intestine were sterile in late pregnancy, based on PCR, quantitative real-time PCR, and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Kennedy et al. [24] demonstrated that most reported "fetal microbiota" signals align with common contaminants rather than biological signals. Crucially, the successful derivation of germ-free mammals via hysterectomy provides biological counter-evidence: ubiquitous fetal colonization would render such models impossible. Reanalysis of prominent studies reveals that batch effects and contamination largely explain the purported fetal-specific microbiomes.

Current consensus

Evidence from multiple disciplines now supports the sterility of the fetal gastrointestinal tract in healthy pregnancies [24]. Methodological artifacts dominate low-biomass studies, with Kennedy et al. [25] demonstrated that > 90% of sequencing signals in cesarean-derived fetal meconium matched environmental and kit contaminants, showing compositional identity with negative controls. Walter and Hornef [26] noted that, although some studies claim the existence of a fetal intestinal microbiome, these reports often fail to adequately address methodological limitations and contamination, thereby strengthening the consensus that the fetal gastrointestinal tract is sterile in healthy pregnancies. Notably, contaminants from laboratory reagents dominate initial samples, masking biological signals that only emerge postnatally. Re-evaluation of fetal microbiome studies has attributed previously reported signals primarily to technical artifacts, including batch processing inconsistencies [27], sampling methods, sequencing technologies, and interpretation biases may have further contributed to spurious findings. Current research priorities emphasize species-specific verification (e.g., FISH/qPCR), metabolic activity assays (e.g., RNA-seq), and standardized contamination tracking across sequencing batches [24].

Microbial colonization during the pre-weaning period

Importance of early microbial colonization

Early microbial colonization is a dynamic process, that contributes to various physiological functions, including nutrient absorption, metabolism, intestinal immune maturation, and gut barrier development [1315]. This process also exerts significant effects on overall health [28] and long-term productivity [29]. The early postnatal period as a critical window for implementing effective management strategies. Improved characterization of colonization patterns in neonatal ruminants, coupled with the application of targeted interventions during this period, may confer long-term health benefits.

Colonization patterns in pre-weaning calves

Initial colonization after birth

Previous studies have suggested early microbial presence in the gut. Mayer et al. [30] identified Leuconostoc species as the predominant colonizers in the meconium of neonatal calves using PCR single strand conformation polymorphism (PCR-SSCP) analysis (Fig. 1). Song et al. [5] reported that mucosa-attached Bacteroides and Escherichia-Shigella were the predominant bacterial genera in the large intestine of neonatal calves. Klein-Jöbstl et al. [31] observed dynamic changes in calf fecal microbiota during the first 48 h of life, suggesting that the fecal microbiota of newborn calves may originate from the maternal birth canal. These findings indicate that bacterial communities are detectable in the calf intestine within hours of birth, with initial colonizers likely derived from maternal and environmental sources.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Core microbiota at genus and species level of calves. Adapted from previous reports [4, 5, 17, 30, 32]

The intestinal microbiota of calves during the pre-weaning period exhibits dynamic changes comparable to those documented in piglets. Because the rumen is not yet functionally developed, pre-weaning calves are physiologically similar to monogastric animals. The early microbial colonization in newborn calves shows significant variation across studies [33]. Some investigations suggest that early microbial diversity is largely shaped by maternal and environmental factors, while others emphasize the role of specific feeding strategies such as colostrum or starter feed introduction. For instance, Guo et al. [34] and Dunière et al. [35] highlighted maternal influence as a primary determinant, whereas Mayer et al. [30] and Song et al. [5] reported that feeding practices exerted a more pronounced effect. These discrepancies underscore the multifactorial nature of microbial succession and highlight the need for standardized methodologies and targeted interventions.

Similar to monogastric animals, pre-weaning calves were firstly colonized by facultative anaerobic bacteria, followed by obligate anaerobes [30]. Immediately after birth, Citrobacter, Lactococcus, Leuconostoc and Lactobacillus are the initial gut colonizers in the calf meconium, potentially originating from the maternal vagina, feces and the surrounding environment. Citrobacter species are detected in all calves immediately after birth but disappear within 24 h. From 24 to 48 h of life, Clostridium species dominate the gut microbiota. Between d 1 and 7, E. coli becomes the predominant genus, with its abundance declining progressively between d 3 and d 7. During this period, the populations of Bacteroides fragilis and Bacteroides vulgatus increases [30].

Guo et al. [34] observed similar microbial dynamics in goat kids, where early colonizers, such as Escherichia-Shigella and Citrobacter, were primarily derived from the maternal vagina and colostrum. As the kids aged, microbial diversity increases, with Lactobacillus and Butyricicoccus becoming dominant during the non-rumination stage (7–21 d). By the transition stage (28–56 d), when solid feed intake increases, Prevotella and fiber-degrading bacteria (Lachnospiraceae, Ruminococcaceae) become more prevalent. In ovine models, Dunière et al. [35] reported that lambs raised by their dams exhibited a more diverse microbiota compared to artificially-reared lambs, with a delayed establishment of key fibrolytic bacteria, such as Fibrobacter succinogenes, particularly during the first 28 days of life. This delay in microbial colonization is influenced by the rearing system and may have significant implications for subsequent health and growth performance.

Changes following solid feed introduction

The introduction of calf starter initiates substantial changes in the gastrointestinal microbiota. Longitudinal studies of pre-weaning dairy calves have demonstrated that Firmicutes, followed by Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria, dominate the fecal microbiota. These studies also report a progressive increase in bacterial richness and diversity from the first to the seventh week of life, coinciding with solid feed introduction [31, 36].

Following calf starter introduction, microbial colonization continues to evolve in both the ileum and cecum. While Firmicutes remains the predominant phylum in both regions, a shift occurs by the third week, with Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria becoming the dominant phyla in the mucosa. At the genus level, Prevotella and Burkholderia are the most abundant genera in the mucosa of the ileum and jejunum respectively [4]. These findings indicate that microbial composition varies depending on sample type, reflecting the distinct functional niches occupied by luminal versus mucosal communities. For example, Bacteroides and Prevotella genera are involved in carbohydrate fermentation and fiber degradation [4, 8, 32], whereas Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium contribute to immune modulation through the production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) which enhance intestinal barrier integrity and attenuate inflammation [13, 37]. Recognition of these compositional and functional distinctions is fundamental to designing targeted nutritional interventions during early development.

The large intestine serves as a primary site for the fermentation of indigestible dietary substrates. Consistent with this function, Song et al. [5] reported that in 3- to 6-week-old calves, mucosa-associated taxa, including BacteroidesBlautiaFaecalibacterium, and Ruminococcaceae UCG-005 were enriched, whereas Lactobacillus, BlautiaFaecalibacterium, and Ruminococcaceae UCG-005 predominated in the large intestinal digesta. This spatial differentiation highlights the adaptation of microbial communities to local microenvironments and functional demands.

Factors influencing microbial colonization

Nutritional interventions represent a primary strategy for modulating intestinal microbial colonization in pre-weaning calves.​​ These include colostrum management, starter feed formulation, roughage/silage provision, and supplementation with prebiotics and probiotics. Collectively, these dietary inputs exert substantial influence on the establishment of the neonatal gut microbiota. Beyond nutritional factors,​​ antibiotic administration, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), and non-nutritional stressors, such as transportation, and heat stress also shape gut microbial community structure. Together, these interacting nutritional and non-nutritional factors form a conceptual framework for understanding early-life microbial colonization in calves, as illustrated in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Conceptual framework of key factors shaping early-life gut microbial colonization in calves

Colostrum management

Colostrum is the first external nutrient source for neonatal calves. Beyond its recognized role in passive immunity transfer, colostrum feeding practices shape the early intestinal microbiota through the provision of colostrum, colostrum feeding time and its thermal processing. The act of colostrum feeding, independent of processing method, appears to favor the establishment of specific bacterial populations. Song et al. [38] reported that calves receiving fresh colostrum harbored higher proportions of Clostridium cluster XIVa and Bifidobacterium, alongside reduced E. coli abundance, compared to colostrum-deprived controls. Clostridium cluster XIVa contributes to butyrate production, while Bifidobacterium is associated with competitive exclusion of pathogens. A parallel analysis from the same trial by Malmuthuge et al. [7] demonstrated that heat-treated colostrum also elevated Bifidobacterium and suppressed E. coli in the small intestine. The likely explanation is that pasteurization reduces viable pathogen load while preserving milk oligosaccharides and immunoglobulins that selectively support commensal bacteria. These observations, however, derive from a single experimental cohort with modest sample sizes, and whether such compositional shifts persist beyond the neonatal period or translate into improved health outcomes needs confirmation in larger, longitudinal studies.

The timing of first colostrum feeding constitutes an additional determinant of early microbial colonization. Fischer et al. [6] demonstrated that delaying colostrum administration to 12 h post-birth attenuated mucosal attachment of Bifidobacterium spp., Lactobacillus spp., and E. coli in calves examined at 2 days of age, relative to counterparts fed within the first hour. Extended analyses from the same cohort revealed that delayed feeding perturbed mucosa-associated communities throughout the ileum and colon [39], coinciding with differential expression of host genes implicated in innate immune signaling and epithelial barrier maintenance [40, 41]. The neonatal mucosa likely undergoes a transient period of heightened receptivity to bacterial adhesion, reflecting immature barrier function and available epithelial binding sites. Delayed colostrum feeding may truncate this window, limiting pioneer colonizer establishment.

Milk replacer and whole milk feeding

Following the colostrum period, liquid feed—whether milk replacer or whole milk—becomes the primary nutrient source for pre-weaning calves. Emerging evidence suggests that both the nutritional composition and the quantity of liquid feed may influence intestinal microbial colonization [42, 43]. With respect to composition, Badman et al. [42] reported that milk replacer containing 74% crude protein from whey protein phospholipid concentrate, enriched with conjugated milk oligosaccharides, promoted Bifidobacterium and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii colonization by d 7. And the beneficial effect is attributed to oligosaccharide-mediated pathogen suppression and enhanced short-chain fatty acid production. Additionally, the amount of milk replacer or whole milk provided, also affects the intestinal microbiota and its metabolites [43, 44]. Greater bacterial diversity and three-fold higher Faecalibacterium abundance in calves offered ad libitum milk replacer compared to those restricted to 10% body weight were observed [43]. Similarly, Alimirzaei et al. [44] found elevated Lactobacillus and reduced Escherichia coli in calves receiving whole milk at 20% compared to 10% body weight during the first three weeks. Higher nutrient availability likely favors fermentative bacteria while suppressing opportunistic pathogens. However, confounding factors under ad libitum regimens, such as altered gut transit and luminal pH, complicate interpretation, and the relative contributions of oligosaccharides versus protein source remain to be determined.

Starter feed and weaning

The introduction of solid feed marks a pivotal nutritional shift during the pre-weaning period. Starter feed, typically a grain-based formulation providing starch, protein, and fiber, is generally offered from approximately 7 days of age to stimulate rumen development. This dietary transition reshapes the intestinal microbial landscape. In yak calves, starter supplementation enriched starch-degrading taxa such as Prevotella, Synergistes, and Sphingomonas, coinciding with elevated cecal volatile fatty acid concentrations and improved growth performance [8]. In dairy calves, starter introduction increased bacterial phylotype diversity and upregulated mucosal immune gene expression, though total bacterial density remained unchanged [45]. These findings indicate coordinated microbiota-host responses to dietary transition. However, direct causal relationships between specific taxa and functional outcomes were not established in either study.

Beyond starter introduction, the weaning transition further reshapes gut microbial assembly. As calves shift from milk-starter combinations to starter and forage, the gut microbiota undergoes reorganization favoring fibrolytic and saccharolytic taxa. In the feces of 54-day-old weaning calves, Bacteroidetes (44.8%) and Firmicutes (41.8%) were identified as dominant phyla, with Bacteroides (17.78%), Ruminococcus (10.51%), and Blautia (9.82%) prevailing at genus level [32]. However, the persistence of such diet-induced changes remains uncertain, as early dietary interventions altered rumen microbiota but these shifts did not persist into adulthood [46]. Notwithstanding this limitation, these genera play recognized roles in complex carbohydrate degradation [5], a function consistent with the metabolic demands of the weaning transition [47]. Moreover, a study by Scully et al. [48] suggested the BacteroidetesFirmicutes dominance represents a conserved post-weaning feature. Furthermore, confounding between dietary composition and nutrient intake, coupled with absent clinical endpoints, leaves the functional significance of these shifts unresolved.

Roughage and silage supplementation

Given the limited fermentative capacity of the developing rumen, roughage consumed during the pre-weaning period is largely digested by hindgut microbiota [5, 49], positioning the large intestine as the primary site for fiber fermentation in young calves. Available evidence suggests that hay supplementation enriches fiber-degrading taxa. In yak calves, alfalfa hay increased cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic genera such as Eubacterium, Psychrobacter, Butyrivibrio, and Lachnospira, with concurrent elevations in cecal acetate and propionate [8]. The proposed mechanism centers on volatile fatty acid production, which has been implicated in epithelial barrier maintenance [50], and colonocyte proliferation [51]. Consistent with this, early oral fiber administration promoted Lactobacillus while suppressing Clostridium perfringens, and was associated with greater body weight at 21 d [52]. Similar modulatory effects have been observed with silage supplementation. Silage supplementation may exert similar effects. Calves receiving silage achieved microbiota compositions more closely resembling adult cattle by weaning [53]. suggesting accelerated community maturation. However, direct causal evidence linking these microbial shifts to health outcomes remains limited, and whether adult-like composition confers functional advantages has not been established. Moreover, silage quality depends on feedstock and fermentation conditions, and this variability warrants standardization in future studies.

Prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics

Apart from the dietary factors discussed above, supplementation with prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics has been investigated as a means to modulate gut microbial colonization in pre-weaning calves.

Prebiotics

Prebiotics promote short-chain fatty acid and bacteriocin production, contributing to pathogen suppression [54]. These non-digestible substrates resist host enzymatic degradation but are selectively fermented by beneficial microbes [55]. Galactooligosaccharide (GOS)-enriched milk replacers supplementation increased Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium abundance in Holstein calves [9], consistent with the selective fermentation hypothesis [56]. Trehalose supplementation reduced potentially pathogenic Clostridium species while elevating butyrate concentrations in 3-week-old calves [57], with butyrate implicated in intestinal barrier integrity and immune modulation [58]. Nevertheless, prebiotic efficacy depends on dosage and substrate selection, and optimal supplementation regimens have not been established. Whether these effects persist beyond the supplementation period remains unexplored.

Probiotics

Probiotics, including bacterial and yeast strains, are widely used in calf production, with approximately 41% of pre-weaning calves receiving supplementation [59]. Evidence suggests strain-specific effects on gut microbiota composition and health outcomes. Multispecies formulations containing Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bacillus subtilis, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae increased beneficial taxa while reducing Bacteroidetes and diarrhea incidence [60]. Single-strain Lactobacillus supplements have shown similar patterns. Lactobacillus johnsonii TP1.6 or Limosilactobacillus reuteri TP1.3B elevated Bifidobacterium and Akkermansia in calf feces [61]. While Limosilactobacillus reuteri BF-E7 and Ligilactobacillus salivarius BF-17 enhanced Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium populations and fecal lactate concentrations in buffalo calves [62]. Heat-killed Lactobacillus sakei HS-1 reduced Escherichia coli loads and medical interventions in Japanese Black calves [63], and oral Lactobacillus reuteri administration conferred protection against neonatal diarrhea [64].

Yeast-based probiotics have also demonstrated modulatory potential. Saccharomyces cerevisiae boulardii (SCB) supplementation at 5 g/d increased ileal species richness and phylogenetic diversity in Holstein calves, correlating with elevated secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA) secretion [65]. SCB also stimulated fecal lactobacilli populations and altered colon morphology, including reduced crypt depth and enhanced mucin production [66]. Despite these promising observations, variability in probiotic strains, dosages, and host breeds across studies complicates direct comparisons and limits the generalizability of current findings.

Synbiotics

Synbiotics combine prebiotics and probiotics to theoretically enhance efficacy through complementary mechanisms. Fructooligosaccharide combined with Lactobacillus plantarum CRD-7 increased fecal Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium while reducing diarrhea incidence by 42% [67]. Mannan-oligosaccharides (MOS) with Lactobacillus acidophilus decreased fecal E. coli counts and improved body weight gain in crossbred calves [68], with similar microbial shifts observed in Murrah buffalo calves over 120 d [69]. MOS combined with Bacillus subtilis yielded 78 g greater daily weight gain between 42 and 56 days of age [70]. These observations indicate that synbiotic supplementation may benefit both gut health and growth performance in pre-weaning calves. Nevertheless, the additive or synergistic nature of these effects has rarely been tested against single-component controls.

Antibiotic exposure

Pre-weaning calves may be exposed to antibiotics through multiple routes, including therapeutic treatment for diarrhea or respiratory disease, and consumption of waste milk from cows undergoing antibiotic therapy. While waste milk offers economic advantages, its effects on intestinal microbiota warrant careful consideration. Studies examining rumen microbiota reported only minimal changes in calves fed waste milk at 49 and 63 days of age [71], but the impact on hindgut communities has received less attention. Waste milk may contain both pathogenic microorganisms and residual antibiotics. Although pasteurization eliminates most pathogens, antibiotic residues can persist and potentially disrupt beneficial microbial populations [72]. Calves receiving waste milk from cows treated for intramammary infections exhibited reduced abundance of Faecalibacterium alongside increased Campylobacter, Pseudomonas, and Chlamydophila, with higher diarrhea incidence [73]. Even low antibiotic concentrations can inhibit beneficial taxa such as Bifidobacterium and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii [74], suggesting that subtherapeutic exposure may carry underappreciated consequences.

Experimental studies have further characterized antibiotic-induced microbial perturbations. Milk supplemented with antibiotics produced significant compositional differences at the genus level in fecal microbiota [11]. Low concentrations of antibiotic mixtures containing penicillin, streptomycin, tetracycline, and ceftiofur in milk replacers induced similar genus-level alterations [75]. In Japanese Black calves, chlortetracycline supplementation reduced the relative abundance of butyrate-producing Lachnospiraceae while increasing methanogenic taxa at 60 days of age [76], raising potential concerns regarding both gut health and environmental impact. Antibiotic exposure disrupts gut microbial development in pre-weaning calves, but the durability and health implications of these changes remain unclear due to short study durations and confounding nutritional factors.

Fecal microbiota transplantation

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been investigated as a therapeutic approach for diarrhea in pre-weaning calves, based on the premise that transferring gut microbiota from healthy donors can restore microbial homeostasis in diseased recipients. A trial with 57 calves suggested increased Porphyromonadaceae abundance and decreased amino acid concentrations following FMT, with shifts in microbial composition and metabolite profiles correlating with clinical improvement [12]. Another study observed elevated proportions of Blautia, Lactobacillus, Ruminococcus, and Romboutsia in Chinese Holstein calves, alongside reduced diarrhea incidence at a dose of 1 × 108 CFU/mL [47]. Pre-treatment abundance of Sporobacter and reduced concentrations of glycerol-3-phosphate and dihydroxyacetone phosphate have been proposed as predictive markers of treatment success [77].

However, conflicting outcomes limit confidence in FMT's therapeutic value. In one cohort, recipients displayed microbial community alterations linked to delayed recovery and elevated mortality [78]. Explanations for these disparities likely include heterogeneity in donor selection criteria, fecal processing methods, recipient baseline health, and underlying diarrhea etiology. Inconsistent protocols for material preparation, storage, and dosing across studies complicate efforts to replicate findings [12, 77]. Most trials have used small cohorts with limited follow-up, precluding assessment of long-term outcomes or rare adverse events. Given the variable natural history of calf diarrhea, large-scale controlled studies are needed to establish FMT's efficacy before clinical use.

Environmental stressors

Beyond dietary factors, environmental stressors such as transportation and heat exposure can disrupt gut microbial communities in pre-weaning calves. Transportation stress has been associated with bovine respiratory disease (BRD), with bovine coronavirus (70.1%) and Histophilus somni (86.6%) identified as prevalent pathogens in transported cattle [79]. The duration of transportation also modulates microbial communities, calves transported for 16 h exhibited significantly greater reductions in Fusobacteria abundance compared to those transported for 6 h, accompanied by decreased Lactobacillus and increased Bacteroides and Butyricicoccus over time [80]. Post-transport interventions may mitigate these effects. Placement strategies incorporating brown sugar and ginger supplementation reduced BRD-associated pathogen abundance [81], while alkaline mineral water administration improved health indicators and decreased H. somni colonization prior to transport [82]. These findings indicate that strategic interventions before and after transportation can effectively mitigate transport-induced microbial dysbiosis and reduce BRD susceptibility in calves.

Heat stress (HS) also affects respiratory and gastrointestinal microbial communities in neonatal calves. Ventilation via barn fans reduced the mean relative abundance of Mycoplasma and Moraxella at 5 and 9 weeks, respectively [83], genera previously linked to pneumonia in calves [84]. HS has been associated with increased diarrhea, elevated rectal temperature and heart rate, and higher abundance of Escherichia coli and Enterobacteriaceae in the gut. Supplementation with Saccharomyces boulardii reduced these effects [85], though whether this reflects direct microbial modulation or indirect metabolic buffering requires further investigation. Individual variation in HS responses has also been documented. Calves with high versus low HS sensitivity exhibited differences in gastrointestinal microbiota and serum metabolite profiles, particularly in the abundance of Ruminococcus and Olsenella and concentrations of malic acid and fumaric acid [86]. These biomarkers may serve as predictive indicators, although their mechanistic relationship to HS tolerance is not yet established.

Functional roles of early-life microbiota

The intestinal microbiota established during the pre-weaning period has been implicated in multiple aspects of calf physiology, including nutrient digestion, immune development, intestinal barrier function, energy metabolism, and gut-brain axis maturation [28, 87]. Disruptions to microbial communities during this period have been associated with health complications and reduced productivity, though mechanistic understanding in ruminants remains limited. Much functional evidence derives from germ-free mouse models, but ruminants' distinct gastrointestinal anatomy and developmental trajectories complicate cross-species extrapolation. Direct investigations in calves are scarce, and whether rodent-derived mechanisms apply to ruminants remains untested. Below, we review proposed functional roles of early-life microbiota in calves, acknowledging the predominance of correlative evidence.

Taken together, evidence from nutritional interventions, microbial manipulations, and environmental stressors demonstrates that early-life gut microbial colonization in calves is shaped by a wide range of interacting factors. Representative studies supporting these influences, including experimental conditions and reported microbial responses, are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2.

The main factors affect the microbial colonization of young calves

Factors Age and breed Treatment Conclusions
Colostrum Holstein calves at 6 h and 12 h after birth Calves were in three groups: fresh colostrum (FC, n = 12); heat-treated colostrum (HC, 60 °C for 60 min, n = 12); no colostrum (NC, n = 8) Fresh and heat-treated colostrum feeding increased Bifidobacterium and inhibited E. coli colonization in the colon of newborn calves [38]
Holstein calves at 6 h and 12 h after birth Calves were in three groups: fresh colostrum (FC, n = 12); heat-treated colostrum (HC, 60 °C for 60 min, n = 12); no colostrum (NC, n = 8) Heat-treated colostrum feeding enhanced tissue-attached Bifidobacterium colonization while reducing E. coli colonization in the small intestine of calves [7]
Holstein calves at 51 h after birth Calves (n = 27) were randomly assigned to three groups: fed colostrum at 45 min (0 h, n = 9), 6 h (n = 9), or 12 h (n = 9) after birth Delayed colostrum feeding by 6 or 12 h reduced IgG absorption efficiency and delayed mucosa-attached Bifidobacterium spp., Lactobacillus spp., and E. coli colonization [6]
Holstein calves at 51 h after birth Calves (n = 27) were randomly assigned to three groups: fed colostrum at 45 min (0 h, n = 9), 6 h (n = 9), or 12 h (n = 9) after birth Delaying first colostrum feeding to 12 h after birth significantly increased the relative abundance of ileum mucosa-associated Enterococcus and Streptococcus, while reducing colon mucosa-associated Lactobacillus [39]
Milk replacer/whole milk Holstein–Friesian dairy calves at 0, 7, 14, 28, and 49 d after first consumption of milk replacer Calves (n = 10) were assigned to two groups fed different milk replacers: MR1 (n = 5, 55% crude protein from whey, higher free milk oligosaccharides) or MR2 (n = 5, 74% crude protein from whey protein phospholipid concentrate, higher conjugated milk oligosaccharides) Calves fed MR2 showed significantly greater relative abundance of Bifidobacterium spp. and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii at d 7 compared to MR1-fed calves [42]
Kiwi cross calves (Holstein–Friesian x Jersey) at pre-weaning (67 ± 3 d on trial) Calves (n = 199) were assigned to three milk replacer allowance groups using automated feeders: low allowance (LA, 10% of initial body weight/d, n = 67), high allowance (HA, 20% of initial body weight/d, n = 65), or ad libitum (ADLIB, n = 66) Higher milk replacer allowances increased hindgut bacterial diversity, and abundances of beneficial Faecalibacterium spp. [43]
Holstein female calves from birth to 98 d of age Calves (n = 48) were randomly assigned to two groups: high milk (HM, n = 24, 20% of birth BW for the first 3 weeks, then gradually reduced to 10% until weaning on d 51) or low milk (LM, n = 24, 10% of birth BW throughout). Fecal samples were collected on d 7, 14, and 21 Higher milk allowance improved fecal Lactobacillus, and inhibited Escherichia coli. Higher milk allowance calves exhibited lower serum TNF-α and cortisol levels on d 14 and 28, fewer days with fever and greater body weight at d 21, 56, and 98 [44]
Calf starter Male yak calves (Bos grunniens) from 30 to 120 d of age Calves (n = 20) were randomly assigned to four groups: milk replacer only (CON, n = 5), milk replacer + alfalfa hay (A, n = 5), milk replacer + starter feed (S, n = 5), or milk replacer + starter feed + alfalfa hay (SA, n = 5) Co-supplementation with alfalfa hay and starter feed (SA group) significantly improved growth performance and increased caecal VFA concentrations while maintaining immune homeostasis. While starter feed alone (S group) significantly increased caecal lactate and LPS contents, leading to elevated plasma cortisol, NO, TNF-α, and IFN-γ levels indicative of inflammation [8]
Holstein bull calves at 49 ± 5.2 d of age Calves (n = 8) were paired by BW and assigned to two groups: milk replacer only (MR, 750 g/d, n = 4) or milk replacer + calf starter (MR + S, starter ad libitum, n = 4) Calf starter feeding tended to increase bacterial phylotype richness along the GIT and significantly altered mucosal immune gene expression [45]
Roughage Holstein calves from 3 d to weaning (50 d) Calves (n = 20) were divided into control (n = 10) or treatment (n = 10) groups. Treatment calves received oral administration of ground timothy hay and psyllium (50:6 ratio) at 50 g/d from 3–7 d and 100 g/d from 8 d until weaning. Fecal samples were collected at 7, 21, 35, 49, and 56 d Oral fiber administration improved ADG during the first 21 days of life and increased fecal propionate proportion at 7 d. Lactobacillus and Prevotellaceae were enriched at 7 d, while C. perfringens detection was reduced [52]
Holstein dairy cows from 2 weeks to first lactation cycle (~ 2 years) Holstein calves (n = 45) were assigned to three groups: calf starter grains, corn silage, or a 25:75 starter/silage mixture Significant diet-associated differences in fecal archaeal and bacterial communities were observed by weaning (8 weeks), with silage-fed calves achieving a more adult-like microbiota composition earlier than starter-fed calves [53]
Prebiotics/Probiotics/Synbiotics Holstein calves from 1–4 d to 8 weeks of age Calves (n = 80) were randomly assigned to two groups: control milk replacer (CON, n = 40) or GOS-supplemented milk replacer (GOS, n = 40). At 2 and 4 weeks, 8 calves per treatment were euthanized for intestinal digesta and tissue collection. The remaining 48 calves continued to week 8 GOS supplementation significantly increased colonic Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium relative abundance at 2 weeks of age, while reducing Fecalibacterium, Oscillospira, and Clostridium. Additionally, GOS-fed calves showed greater intestinal villus length in duodenum, jejunum, and deeper colonic crypts, but also exhibited lower colonic digesta DM [9]
Crossbred calves (Japanese Black × Holstein) from approximately 11–20 d of age to weaning (~ 72 d) Experiment 1: Calves (n = 173) were divided into control (n = 83) and trehalose (n = 90) groups. Experiment 2: Male calves (n = 20) were divided into control (n = 10) and trehalose (n = 10) groups Trehalose significantly reduced medication frequency, reduced Clostridium spp. and enriched fiber-degrading bacteria Prevotella and Lachnospira by weaning [57]
Chinese Holstein female calves from 6 ± 3 d to 8 weeks of age Calves (n = 40) were assigned to four groups: control (C, n = 10), T1 (0.5 g MSP/calf/d, n = 10), T2 (1 g MSP/calf/d, n = 10), or T3 (2 g MSP/calf/d, n = 10). MSP contained Lactobacillus acidophilus (3 × 109 CFU/g), Bacillus subtilis (3 × 109 CFU/g), and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (1 × 109 CFU/g). Fecal samples were collected at week 2, week 4, week 6 and week 8 High-dose MSP (2 g/d, T3) increased Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, and Collinsella abundances and reduced diarrhea incidence in pre-weaning calves at week 2 [60]
Holstein calves from 5–9 d to 21 d Calves (n = 30) were assigned to three groups: control (n = 10), Limosilactobacillus reuteri TP1.3B (n = 10), or Lactobacillus johnsonii TP1.6 (n = 10) High relative abundance of Bifidobacterium and Akkermansia were displayed in both treated groups compared to control [61]
Murrah buffalo calves from 5–7 d to 60 d of age Calves (n = 16) were in four treatments: control (CT, n = 4), Limosilactobacillus reuteri BF-E7 (LR, 1 × 108 CFU/g/d, n = 4), Ligilactobacillus salivarius BF-17 (LS, 1 × 108 CFU/g/d, n = 4), or consortium of both strains (CS, 1 × 108 CFU/g/d, n = 4) Probiotics supplementation increased dry matter intake (DMI, g/d), average daily gain, net body weight gain, feed conversion efficiency, and structural growth measurements, as well as the relative abundance of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacteria compared to control [62]
Japanese Black calves from 2–12 d to 3 weeks after separation Calves (n = 10) were in two treatments: control (n = 5) or HK-LS HS-1 supplement (n = 5) HK-LS HS-1 supplementation significantly increased fecal lactic acid bacteria counts on d 21 and reduced medication frequency and treatment costs compared to control [63]
Newborn Simmental calves from 2 to 14 d of age Calves (n = 166) from 10 dairy farms were assigned to two groups: control and L. reuteri group L. reuteri administration significantly reduced diarrhea incidence within the first 2 weeks of life, with the protective effect most pronounced between d 3 and 10 [64]
Male Holstein calves from birth to 1 week of age Calves (n = 20) were randomly assigned to two groups: control (CON, n = 10) or SCB (n = 10, 5 g/d live S. cerevisiae boulardii CNCM I-1079, 10 × 109 CFU/d). At 1 week, calves were euthanized and digesta/tissue samples from proximal jejunum, ileum, and colon were collected SCB supplementation significantly increased species richness and phylogenetic diversity in ileum digesta. SCB enriched Eubacteriaceae, Corynebacteriaceae, Eggerthellaceae, Bacillaceae, and Ruminococcaceae families [65]
Dairy calves from 2–7 d to 96 d of age Calves (n = 32) were randomly assigned to four groups: control (CTL, n = 8), S. cerevisiae boulardii CNCM I-1079 (SCB, 7.5 × 108 CFU/L milk replacer + 3 × 109 CFU/kg starter, n = 8), L. acidophilus BT1386 (LA, 2.5 × 108 CFU/L milk replacer + 1 × 109 CFU/kg starter, n = 8), or antibiotic growth promoter (ATB, chlortetracycline + neomycin, n = 8). Digesta from rumen, ileum, and colon, and mucosa from ileum and colon were collected at d 33 (pre-weaning) and d 96 Both SCB and LA reduced pathogenic Streptococcus and Tyzzerella_4 and increased beneficial Fibrobacter, with effects predominantly in the ileum during pre-weaning. SCB specifically enriched Roseburia and Olsenella. SCB and LA had similar impact on diversity as ATB but more diverse effects on bacterial composition [66]
Murrah buffalo calves from 5 to 80 d of age Calves (n = 24) were divided into four groups: control (CON, n = 6), SYN1 (3 g FOS + L. plantarum CRD-7 in 150 mL fermented milk, n = 6), SYN2 (6 g FOS + L. plantarum CRD-7 in 100 mL fermented milk, n = 6), or SYN3 (9 g FOS + L. plantarum CRD-7 in 50 mL fermented milk, n = 6). Synbiotics were administered daily for 75 d Calves in SYN3 displayed improved digestibility, antioxidant enzymes, and immune status, along with increased Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium counts and reduced diarrhea incidence [67]
Crossbred (Sahiwal × Holstein Friesian) calves from 15 to 105 d of age Calves (n = 24) were divided into four groups: control (T0, n = 6), probiotic (T1, n = 6, L. acidophilus 2 × 1010 CFU/g @ 1 g/calf/d), prebiotic (T2, n = 6, MOS 4 g/calf/d), or synbiotic (T3, n = 6, L. acidophilus 0.5 g + MOS 2 g/calf/d). Additives were mixed in milk and fed for 90 d Probiotic and synbiotic groups showed significantly higher total body weight gain and DM digestibility. All treatment groups reduced fecal coliform and E. coli counts at d 15 and 30 [68]
Murrah buffalo calves from 5–7 d to 120 d of age Calves (n = 20) were divided into four groups: control (CON, n = 5), prebiotic (PRE, n = 5, MOS 4 g/calf/d), probiotic (PRO, n = 5, L. acidophilus fermented milk 200 mL/d containing 108 CFU/mL), or synbiotic (SYN, n = 5, MOS + L. acidophilus at same doses). Fecal samples were collected at d 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 Synbiotic supplementation significantly improved ADG and NDF digestibility compared to control. All treatments increased fecal Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium while reducing coliform counts. Fecal pH and ammonia decreased, while VFA (acetate, propionate, butyrate) increased. Synbiotic showed greatest effects, suggesting MOS and L. acidophilus combination optimally improves performance and gut health [69]
Holstein heifer calves from 4–12 h of age to weaning at 60 d Calves (n = 1801) were in four groups: control (CON, n = 450), prebiotic (PRE, 14 mL yeast culture enriched with MOS, n = 450), probiotic (PRO, 1 g Bacillus subtilis + Lactobacillus plantarum, 1 × 109 + 2.5 × 108 CFU/d, n = 451), or synbiotic (SYN, combination of PRE and PRO, n = 450) Synbiotic supplementation increased overall ADG by 19 g/d compared to control. During late preweaning (42–56 d), PRE and SYN increased ADG by 85 and 78 g/d, respectively. Probiotic reduced Cryptosporidium shedding 100-fold at 14 d. Prebiotic reduced fecal E. coli and pathogenic E. coli at 42 d [70]
Antibiotics Male Holstein calves from birth to 6 weeks of age Calves (n = 30) were randomly assigned to two groups: no drug residues (NR, n = 15, raw milk without antimicrobials) or drug residues (DR, n = 15, raw milk spiked with ceftiofur 0.1 μg/mL, penicillin G 0.005 μg/mL, ampicillin 0.01 μg/mL, and oxytetracycline 0.3 μg/mL). Fecal samples were collected weekly from birth (pre-treatment) to 6 weeks Discriminant analysis showed clear separation between DR and NR calves at the genus level from week 1 onwards, indicating that drug residues at FDA tolerance levels affect gut microbiota composition. Additionally, Clostridium (P = 0.03) and Streptococcus (P = 0.004) were significantly reduced in DR calves [11]
Male Holstein calves from birth to 6 weeks of age Calves (n = 14) were assigned to two groups: control (NR, n = 7, raw milk without antimicrobials) or drug residues (DR, n = 7, raw milk spiked with ceftiofur 0.1 μg/mL, penicillin G 0.005 μg/mL, ampicillin 0.01 μg/mL, and oxytetracycline 0.3 μg/mL). Calves were bucket-fed one gallon of milk twice daily. Fecal samples were collected at weeks 0, 1, 3, and 6 Drug residues significantly altered fecal microbiota functional profiles, with decreased "Stress Response", "Regulation and Cell Signaling", and "Nitrogen Metabolism" genes in DR calves at week 1. Drug residues also resulted in more homogeneous RATC profiles over time, suggesting selective pressure on resistance gene distribution [74]
Holstein calves from 1 to 35 d of age Calves (n = 12) were assigned to three groups: control (CON, n = 4, milk replacer without antibiotics), low cocktail of antibiotics (LCA, n = 4, penicillin 0.024 mg/L + streptomycin 0.025 mg/L + tetracycline 0.1 mg/L + ceftiofur 0.33 mg/L), or low single antibiotic (LSA, n = 4, ceftiofur 0.33 mg/L only). Antibiotics were added to MR and fed twice daily. At 35 d, calves were euthanized and digesta from ileum, colon, and rectum were collected LCA significantly reduced ileal Enterobacteriaceae and Escherichia coli, while LSA reduced Comamonas. In the rectum, both LCA and LSA reduced Acidaminococcaceae and Phascolarctobacterium [75]
Japanese Black calves from 3 to 60 d of age Calves (n = 12) were assigned to CON (n = 6, milk replacer containing CTC at 10 g/kg) or EXP (n = 6, antibiotic-free milk replacer). Fecal samples were collected at 3, 30, and 60 d CTC altered weighted UniFrac distances at 60 d and increased methanogens Methanobrevibacter, while antibiotic-free calves showed higher Lachnospiraceae [76]
Fecal transplantation Korean brown cattle (Bos taurus coreanae) calves aged 5–50 d with moderate-to-severe diarrhea Diarrheic calves (n = 57) were assigned to three groups: control (CON, n = 14, saline), antibiotic (ABX, n = 23, neomycin ± other antibiotics), or FMT (n = 20, 5 g feces as bolus at 0.1 g/mL, administered orally 5 times). Healthy donor calves (n = 6, aged 21–50 d) were rigorously screened. Fecal samples were collected at d 0, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, and 48 FMT achieved 95% complete remission rate vs. 35.7% (CON) and 26.1% (ABX), with 0% mortality vs. 14.3% and 17.4%. FMT increased Porphyromonadaceae abundance, which negatively correlated with diarrhea (r = −0.714, P = 0.041), while reducing Enterobacteriaceae [12]
Chinese Holstein calves from 50 d (weaning) to 80 d of age Calves (n = 50) were divided into five groups: NC (n = 10, no supplementation), Control (n = 10, 5 mL saline), LFMT (n = 10, 5 mL of 1 × 108 CFU/mL fecal suspension), HFMT (n = 10, 5 mL of 1 × 109 CFU/mL), or SFMT (n = 10, sterilized fecal suspension). Treatments were administered orally every other day from d 50 to 60. Fecal samples were collected at d 5, 10, 15, and 20 post-weaning FMT significantly enhanced the relative abundance of beneficial bacteria, such as Blautia, Lactobacillus, Ruminococcus and Romboutsia. Diarrhea rates were significantly reduced, with the LFMT group showing the most pronounced effect [47]
Holstein, Jersey, and Jersey-cross heifer calves from 4–12 d to 21 d of age Calves (n = 227) were assigned to control (n = 115, standard farm protocol) or FMT (n = 112, ~ 36 g processed fecal matter orally once daily for 3 d) Calves were less likely to recover from diarrhea and more likely to die after FMT. Higher relative abundance of Lactobacillus and Lactobacillus reuteri and lower relative abundance of Clostridium nexile and Bacteroides vulgatus on d 10 were detected [77]
Health and diarrheic calves, and the trail lasted for 7 d after FMT Twenty FMT treatments were conducted: healthy donors (n = 20) and diarrheal recipients (n = 20) were selected from the same farm Sporobacter genus and metabolites such as glycerol 3-phosphate, dihydroxyacetone phosphate, and isoamylamine could serve as biomarkers for donor selection [78]
Transportation Limousine beef steers, approximately of 6–10 months Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from 231 calves at three time points: before transportation from the origin farm, within four days of arrival at the feedlot, and during clinical examination of each calf at the feedlot Bovine coronavirus (BCoV, 70.1%) and Histophilus somni (86.6%) were the most prevalent viral and bacterial pathogens in nasopharyngeal swabs of transported cattle, with a significant association observed between Mannheimia haemolytica positivity and respiratory clinical signs. The nasopharyngeal microbiota was significantly affected by long-distance transportation, suggesting that enhancing calf immunity prior to loading may be more effective in reducing BRD risk [79]
Surplus dairy calves at 1–19 days old from 5 commercial dairy farms in Ontario, Canada Calves (n = 177) were randomly assigned to three transport duration groups: 6 h (T1, n = 59), 12 h (T2, n = 60), and 16 h (T3, n = 58). Fecal samples were collected at four time points: before transport (0 h), immediately after transport (AT), 24 h post-transport, and 72 h post-transport Longer transport duration (16 h) significantly reduced Fusobacteria abundance compared to 6 h. Lactobacillus decreased while Bacteroides and Butyricicoccus increased over time, with Firmicutes declining within 72 h post-transport [80]
Simmental calves, approximately 0.5 years old Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from calves (n = 112) at three key time points: 6 h prior to loading (Group A), immediately after unloading (Group B), and after 7-day placement (Group C) Prior to transportation, the nasopharyngeal microbiota of calves was dominated by potential bovine respiratory disease (BRD)-related pathogens, such as Moraxella, Mannheimia, and Acinetobacter. After 7 days of adaptive placement, there is a noticeable decrease in the abundance of these pathogens [81]
Simmental crossbred calves (~ 8 months old) subjected to 30 h road transportation Calves (n = 60) were transported 30 h from Jilin Province to Sichuan Province, China. The AMW group (n = 30) received AMW supplementation (30 mL/calf/d) for 3 d before and 30 d after transportation, while the Control group (n = 29) received no supplementation. Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected on d −3, 30, and 60 AMW-supplemented calves showed significantly lower rectal temperatures, respiratory scores, and nasal discharge scores, with higher body weight gain. compared to controls. AMW supplementation altered nasopharyngeal microbiota composition and enhanced peripheral immunity, intestinal absorption, and lipogenesis [82]
Heat stress Male Holstein calves from birth to 68 days of age Calves (n = 60) were divided into three groups: control (n = 20, wire hutches outdoors with 50% plywood cover), SH (n = 21, wire hutches in open-sided barn without fans), or SHF (n = 19, wire hutches in open-sided barn with ceiling fans). Nasal swabs were collected at week 5 and week 9 On week 5, the SHF group showed significantly lower mean relative abundance of Mycoplasma compared to the control and SH groups, on week 9, Control calves exhibited a lower mean relative abundance of Escherichia compared to the SHF calves, while showing a higher mean relative abundance of Moraxella than those in the SH and SHF groups [83]
Holstein calves at 1–28 days of life Calves (n = 16) were divided into four groups: Control (n = 4); low SB (LSB, n = 4), control milk replacer supplemented with 0.5 g of SB (n = 4); medium SB (MSB, n = 4), control milk replacer supplemented with 1.0 g of SB n = 4; high SB (HSB, n = 4), control milk replacer supplemented with 2.0 g of SB SB supplementation decreased the fecal densities of E. coli and Enterobacteriaceae during the thermal neutral (TN) period, but no significant effects were observed during the heat stress (HS) period [85]
Pre-weaning Holstein calves during summer Calves (n = 20) were divided into two groups based on their response to heat stress: a high HS response group (H, n = 10) and low HS response group (L, n = 10) Calves in H group had higher rectal temperatures and respiratory rates, as well as higher serum concentrations of IL-2, HSP-70, and total fatty acids (TFA) and etc., lower abundance of ruminal Ruminococcus and Olsenella, and downregulated pathways related to pyruvate metabolism and the TCA cycle [86]

Gut barrier development

Early life microbiota is fundamental for the development and maintenance of the host's intestinal barrier function, immune system, metabolism, central nervous system, and overall health in mammals [1316]. Evidence from germ-free mouse models indicates that microbial colonization influences epithelial proliferation and mucus layer formation. Germ-free mice exhibit reduced cell proliferation rates compared to conventionally raised animals [88], and their colonic mucus layer is thinner, though thickness is partially restored following administration of microbial-derived lipopolysaccharides and peptidoglycans [14]. These observations suggest that microbial products can stimulate barrier-related functions, though the specific taxa and metabolites responsible remain incompletely defined.

Evidence in pre-weaning calves is more limited but supports a role for microbiota in barrier integrity. Ileal mucosa-associated bacteria correlated with markers of gut barrier function under different colostrum feeding regimens [40]. Supplementation with fecal-extracted Lactobacillus reuteri L81 increased the expression of tight junction proteins, including ZO-1, Claudin-1, and Occludin in the small intestine [37]. However, whether these microbial interventions directly cause improved barrier function or reflect downstream consequences of other physiological changes has not been established. Additionally, the reliance on correlation-based evidence and the limited number of studies in calves preclude definitive conclusions about causal mechanisms.

Immune system maturation

The early intestinal microbiota plays a critical role in shaping immune system development by influencing the production of immune cells and the secretion of immune molecules. These processes are critical for regulating gut immune responses, maintaining a balanced and effective immune system that can protect against infections while maintaining tolerance to beneficial microorganisms. Studies in gnotobiotic mice show that microbial absence is linked to multiple immune defects, including increased proinflammatory T-helper cells, altered regulatory T-cell responses [13], impaired T-cell differentiation [89], underdeveloped intestinal Peyer’s patches and mesenteric lymph nodes [90], and reduced immunoglobulin A (IgA) secretion [91]. Many of these defects are reversed following microbial reconstitution [89, 92, 93], suggesting that specific microbial signals contribute to immune maturation.

Evidence in pre-weaning calves is more limited. Supplementation with Lactobacillus reuteri L81 and Lactobacillus johnsonii L29 altered serum cytokine profiles [37], and intraepithelial T-cell populations correlated with the abundance of several bacterial genera, including Lactococcus, Streptococcus, Succiniclasticum, Campylobacter, Gallibacterium and Akkermansia [94]. However, these correlations do not establish causation. Whether these taxa directly influence immune development or simply co-occur with other factors that drive immune maturation remains unknown. Limited controlled trials and the difficulty of producing germ-free calves preclude causal inference, requiring mechanistic validation of rodent-derived principles and identification of key taxa in ruminants.

Central nervous system development

Research indicates that the composition of the gut microbiota and its metabolites during early life plays a pivotal role in central nervous system (CNS) development, including blood–brain barrier maturation, neurotransmitter production, and neural circuit formation [16, 95]. Studies in germ-free (GF) animals show that microbial absence alters neurotrophic factor expression and behavioral phenotypes [16, 95, 96], and dysregulation of the gut-brain axis has been associated with mood disorders in humans and rodents [97, 98]. However, the specific microbial taxa, metabolites, and signaling pathways responsible for these effects remain poorly characterized, and most evidence is correlative rather than mechanistic.

Evidence linking microbiota to CNS development in neonatal calves is extremely limited. One study reported correlations between the abundance of Lactobacillus spp. and E. coli and colonic expression of serotonin receptors HTR2B and HTR4 under extended colostrum feeding [99]. While these receptors are serotonin receptors involved in regulating gut motility and intestinal barrier function. These results suggest that feeding management may influence the interaction between gut microbiota, host endocrine functions, and the gut-brain axis in neonatal calves.

Nutrient metabolism

Gut microbiota has been associated with nutrient digestion and metabolism in pre-weaning calves, including carbohydrate fermentation, vitamin synthesis, and short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production [5, 100, 101]. Metagenomic profiling of colonic digesta from 2-day-old calves identified carbohydrate metabolism, amino acid metabolism, and vitamin metabolism as predominant functional pathways [100], though such gene-based predictions do not confirm active metabolic contributions. Correlations have been reported between SCFA concentrations and the abundance of bacterial genera such as Coprococcus, Blautia, and Lachnospiraceae [5], as well as between Bacteroides and Prevotella abundance and pathways related to carbohydrate and energy metabolism [102]. Early-life dietary interventions altered populations of fiber-degrading genera including Blautia and Ruminococcus [28], and administration of the triterpenoid glycoside Anemoside B4 correlated with increased Prevotella abundance and predicted metabolic functions [101]. However, the majority of studies investigating the impact of intestinal microorganisms on nutrient metabolism predominantly rely on correlation analyses and gene function annotations. Direct experimental evidence linking specific microorganisms to nutrient metabolism in pre-weaning calves remains limited.

Intestinal health

Microbial dysbiosis in pre-weaning calves has been associated with diarrhea and gastrointestinal disorders [28, 103], which is often linked to overgrowth of Escherichia coli or Salmonella [29, 104, 105]. Interventions including nutritional supplements and probiotics have shown variable efficacy in reducing diarrheal incidence. Supplementation with sodium humate and glutamine reduced fecal scores and diarrhea incidence during the first 57 d [105], prebiotics or probiotics have been used to prevent and treat diarrhea [104, 106109], and additional immunoglobulin G during the first two weeks decreased diarrheal risk compared to milk or milk replacer alone [109]. Probiotic supplementation has been associated with reduced incidence and duration of neonatal diarrhea [110], though efficacy varies by strain and environmental context. Studies by Wu et al. [60] and Schwaiger et al. [64] demonstrated that multispecies probiotic mixtures improved gut health and reduced diarrheal rates, yet the causal mechanisms driving these phenotypic outcomes remain incompletely defined. Proposed mechanisms include lactic acid production, niche competition, direct antagonism via antimicrobial metabolites, and immunomodulation through enhanced secretory IgA production or regulatory cytokine signaling. However, these mechanisms likely act synergistically and context-dependently, yet most studies report phenotypic outcomes without elucidating the underlying microbial functions or host pathways, underscoring the need for multi-omics approaches to link specific probiotic activities to disease resistance.

Long-term productivity

Early-life microbial composition has been associated with long-term production outcomes in dairy and beef cattle, though causal relationships remain poorly established. In dairy cattle, lower abundance of Fusobacterium, Ruminococcaceae UCG-001, and Actinobacteria in early life were significantly correlated with reduced milk yield, milk fat, and milk protein during the first lactation [111]. Early probiotic supplementation in milk or milk replacer has been linked to improved preweaning growth performance and potential feed efficiency gains [67, 112]. Studies identifying microbial taxa associated with feed efficiency in adult beef cattle suggest that early-life microbial manipulation might influence feed conversion rates [113115]. However, these associations are largely correlative, and whether early microbial shifts directly cause long-term productivity changes remains unclear. The temporal distance between early-life microbiota and adult performance introduces numerous confounding factors, including diet, health events, and environmental conditions. Controlled trials demonstrating that neonatal microbial interventions produce measurable improvements in adult productivity are lacking.

Conclusion and future perspectives

Limitations and future perspectives

Current evidence linking early-life microbiota to calf health and productivity faces significant methodological constraints. Most studies rely on 16S rRNA gene sequencing and correlative analyses, which cannot establish causation or distinguish between active microbial contributors and passive bystanders. Sample sizes are often small, longitudinal studies tracking microbiota from birth through productive life are rare, and significant heterogeneity exists across studies in management practices, dietary regimens, and analytical methods, complicating generalization. Mechanistic validation methods common in rodent research remain impractical in cattle, and cross-species extrapolation from rodents to ruminants is complicated by fundamental physiological differences.

Advancing the field requires mechanistic studies employing multi-omics approaches combined with controlled interventions to identify causal microbial taxa and metabolites. Large-scale, longitudinal cohort studies incorporating standardized protocols are needed to track microbial dynamics from birth through first lactation or market weight and enable meta-analyses. Strain-specific validation of probiotic efficacy under varied environmental and management conditions is necessary to move beyond generalized recommendations.

Conclusion

Early-life microbial colonization influences calf health and development, and management practices including nutrition, hygiene, and microbial supplementation can modulate microbiota composition. However, translating these associations into reliable strategies for improving long-term productivity requires more rigorous experimental designs, mechanistic validation, and demonstration of economic viability. While microbiome-based management shows potential, its practical implementation in livestock production requires further development.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

ADLIB

Ad libitum milk replacer

BRD

Bovine respiratory disease

CNS

Central nervous system

FMT

Fecal microbiota transplantation

GOS

Galactooligosaccharide

HS

Heat stress

IgA

Immunoglobulin A

LFMT

Low-concentration FMT group

MOS

Mannan-oligosaccharides

PCR-SSCP

PCR single strand conformation polymorphism

SCB

Saccharomyces cerevisiae boulardii

SCFA

Short-chain fatty acid

VFA

Volatile fatty acid

Authors’ contributions

YS, SW co-wrote this manuscript. LG revised the main manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32260848), the Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolian (2024MS03002, 2022LHQN03009), 2024 ​​Horqin Talent Program (KEQYC240108)​​, Inner Mongolia Science and Technology Tackling Project (2025YFDZ0129), Central Guidance for Local Science and Technology Development Funds Project (2025ZY0045). Program for Young Talents of Science and Technology in Universities of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (NJYT22053, NJYT23095), Innovation and Entrepreneurship Program for Returned Overseas Scholars in Inner Mongolia (2024LXCX002).

Data availability

Not applicable.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors have approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Yang Song and Shubo Wen contributed equally to this work.

References

  • 1.Round JL, Mazmanian SK. The gut microbiota shapes intestinal immune responses during health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9(5):313–23. 10.1038/nri2515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cox LM, Yamanishi S, Sohn J, Alekseyenko AV, Leung JM, Cho I, et al. Altering the intestinal microbiota during a critical developmental window has lasting metabolic consequences. Cell. 2014;158(4):705–21. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cryan JF, O’Riordan KJ, Cowan CSM, Sandhu KV, Bastiaanssen TFS, Boehme M, et al. The microbiota-gut-brain axis. Physiol Rev. 2019;99(4):1877–2013. 10.1152/physrev.00018.2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Malmuthuge N, Griebel PJ, Guan leL. Taxonomic identification of commensal bacteria associated with the mucosa and digesta throughout the gastrointestinal tracts of preweaned calves. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;80(6):2021–8. 10.1128/AEM.03864-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Song Y, Malmuthuge N, Steele MA, Guan LL. Shift of hindgut microbiota and microbial short chain fatty acids profiles in dairy calves from birth to pre-weaning. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2018;94(3):fix179. 10.1093/femsec/fix179. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 6.Fischer AJ, Song Y, He Z, Haines DM, Guan LL, Steele MA. Effect of delaying colostrum feeding on passive transfer and intestinal bacterial colonization in neonatal male Holstein calves. J Dairy Sci. 2018;101(4):3099–109. 10.3168/jds.2017-13397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Malmuthuge N, Chen Y, Liang G, Goonewardene LA, le Guan L. Heat-treated colostrum feeding promotes beneficial bacteria colonization in the small intestine of neonatal calves. J Dairy Sci. 2015;98(11):8044–53. 10.3168/jds.2015-9607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wu SR, Chen XD, Li JL, Yang YT, Cui ZH, Yao JH. Effect of alfalfa hay and starter feed supplementation on caecal microbiota and fermentation, growth, and health of yak calves. Animal. 2021;15(3):100019. 10.1016/j.animal.2020.100019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Castro JJ, Gomez A, White BA, Mangian HJ, Loften JR, Drackley JK. Changes in the intestinal bacterial community, short-chain fatty acid profile, and intestinal development of preweaned Holstein calves. 1. Effects of prebiotic supplementation depend on site and age. J Dairy Sci. 2016;99(12):9682–702. 10.3168/jds.2016-11006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bidarkar VK, Swain PS, Ray S, Dominic G. Probiotics: Potential alternative to antibiotics in ruminant feeding. Trends Vet Anim Sci. 2014;1(1):1–4.
  • 11.Van Vleck Pereira R, Lima S, Siler JD, Foditsch C, Warnick LD, Bicalho RC. Ingestion of milk containing very low concentration of antimicrobials: longitudinal effect on fecal microbiota composition in preweaned calves. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(1):e0147525. 10.1371/journal.pone.0147525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kim HS, Whon TW, Sung H, Jeong YS, Jung ES, Shin NR, et al. Longitudinal evaluation of fecal microbiota transplantation for ameliorating calf diarrhea and improving growth performance. Nat Commun. 2021;12:161. 10.1038/s41467-020-20389-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gaboriau-Routhiau V, Rakotobe S, Lécuyer E, Mulder I, Lan A, Bridonneau C, et al. The key role of segmented filamentous bacteria in the coordinated maturation of gut helper T cell responses. Immunity. 2009;31(4):677–89. 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.08.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Petersson J, Schreiber O, Hansson GC, Gendler SJ, Velcich A, Lundberg JO, et al. Importance and regulation of the colonic mucus barrier in a mouse model of colitis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2011;300(2):G327–33. 10.1152/ajpgi.00422.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sommer F, Bäckhed F. The gut microbiota–masters of host development and physiology. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013;11(4):227–38. 10.1038/nrmicro2974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bercik P, Denou E, Collins J, Jackson W, Lu J, Jury J, et al. The intestinal microbiota affect central levels of brain-derived neurotropic factor and behavior in mice. Gastroenterology. 2011;141(2):599–609.E3. 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.04.052. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 17.Amat S, Holman DB, Schmidt K, McCarthy KL, Dorsam ST, Ward AK, et al. Characterization of the microbiota associated with 12-week-old bovine fetuses exposed to divergent in utero nutrition. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:771832. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.771832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Malmuthuge N, Griebel PJ. Fetal environment and fetal intestine are sterile during the third trimester of pregnancy. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2018;204:59–64. 10.1016/j.vetimm.2018.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bi Y, Tu Y, Zhang N, Wang S, Zhang F, Suen G, et al. Multiomics analysis reveals the presence of a microbiome in the gut of fetal lambs. Gut. 2021;70(5):853–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Guzman CE, Wood JL, Egidi E, White-Monsant AC, Semenec L, Grommen SVH, et al. A pioneer calf foetus microbiome. Sci Rep. 2020;10:17712. 10.1038/s41598-020-74677-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rodriguez MD, Yu KK, Paul ZS, Keller-Wood M, Wood CE, Triplett EW. Contamination is not linked to the gestational microbiome. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019. 10.1128/AEM.01127-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Husso A, Lietaer L, Pessa-Morikawa T, Grönthal T, Govaere J, Van Soom A, et al. The composition of the microbiota in the full-term fetal gut and amniotic fluid: a bovine cesarean section study. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:626421. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.626421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bihl S, de Goffau M, Podlesny D, Segata N, Shanahan F, Walter J, et al. When to suspect contamination rather than colonization - lessons from a putative fetal sheep microbiome. Gut Microbes. 2022;14(1):2005751. 10.1080/19490976.2021.2005751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kennedy KM, de Goffau MC, Perez-Muñoz ME, Arrieta MC, Bäckhed F, Bork P, et al. Questioning the fetal microbiome illustrates pitfalls of low-biomass microbial studies. Nature. 2023;613(7945):639–49. 10.1038/s41586-022-05546-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kennedy KM, Gerlach MJ, Adam T, Heimesaat MM, Rossi L, Surette MG, et al. Fetal meconium does not have a detectable microbiota before birth. Nat Microbiol. 2021;6(7):865–73. 10.1038/s41586-022-05546-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Walter J, Hornef MW. A philosophical perspective on the prenatal in utero microbiome debate. Microbiome. 2021;9:5. 10.1186/s40168-020-00979-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.de Goffau MC, Lager S, Sovio U, Gaccioli F, Cook E, Peacock SJ, et al. Human placenta has no microbiome but can contain potential pathogens. Nature. 2019;572(7769):329–34. 10.1038/s41586-019-1451-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ma T, Villot C, Renaud D, Skidmore A, Chevaux E, Steele M, et al. Linking perturbations to temporal changes in diversity, stability, and compositions of neonatal calf gut microbiota: prediction of diarrhea. ISME J. 2020;14(9):2223–35. 10.1038/s41396-020-0678-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chen H, Liu Y, Huang K, Yang B, Zhang Y, Yu Z, et al. Fecal microbiota dynamics and its relationship to diarrhea and health in dairy calves. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2022;13:132. 10.1186/s40104-022-00758-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mayer M, Abenthum A, Matthes JM, Kleeberger D, Ege MJ, Hölzel C, et al. Development and genetic influence of the rectal bacterial flora of newborn calves. Vet Microbiol. 2012;161(1–2):179–85. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.07.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Klein-Jöbstl D, Quijada NM, Dzieciol M, Feldbacher B, Wagner M, Drillich M, et al. Microbiota of newborn calves and their mothers reveals possible transfer routes for newborn calves’ gastrointestinal microbiota. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(8):e0220554. 10.1371/journal.pone.0220554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Meale SJ, Li S, Azevedo P, Derakhshani H, Plaizier JC, Khafipour E, et al. Development of ruminal and fecal microbiomes are affected by weaning but not weaning strategy in dairy calves. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:582. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Uyeno Y, Sekiguchi Y, Kamagata Y. rRNA-based analysis to monitor succession of faecal bacterial communities in Holstein calves. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2010;51(5):570–7. 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2010.02937.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Guo J, Li P, Zhang K, Zhang L, Wang X, Li L, et al. Distinct stage changes in early-life colonization and acquisition of the gut microbiota and its correlations with volatile fatty acids in goat kids. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:584742. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.584742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Dunière L, Ruiz P, Lebbaoui Y, Guillot L, Bernard M, Forano E, et al. Effects of rearing mode on gastro-intestinal microbiota and development, immunocompetence, sanitary status and growth performance of lambs from birth to two months of age. Anim Microbiome. 2023;5:34. 10.1186/s42523-023-00255-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Oikonomou G, Teixeira AG, Foditsch C, Bicalho ML, Machado VS, Bicalho RC. Fecal microbial diversity in pre-weaned dairy calves as described by pyrosequencing of metagenomic 16S rDNA. Associations of Faecalibacterium species with health and growth. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(4):e63157. 10.1371/journal.pone.0063157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Li Y, Li X, Nie C, Wu Y, Luo R, Chen C, et al. Effects of two strains of Lactobacillus isolated from the feces of calves after fecal microbiota transplantation on growth performance, immune capacity, and intestinal barrier function of weaned calves. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1249628. 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1249628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Song Y, Malmuthuge N, Li F, Guan LL. Colostrum feeding shapes the hindgut microbiota of dairy calves during the first 12 h of life. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2019. 10.1093/femsec/fiy203. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 39.Ma T, O’Hara E, Song Y, Fischer AJ, He Z, Steele MA, et al. Altered mucosa-associated microbiota in the ileum and colon of neonatal calves in response to delayed first colostrum feeding. J Dairy Sci. 2019;102(8):7073–86. 10.3168/jds.2018-16130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Song Y, Sun H, He Z, Fischer-Tlustos A, Ma T, Steele M, et al. Transcriptome analysis revealed that delaying first colostrum feeding postponed ileum immune system development of neonatal calves. Genomics. 2021;113(6):4116–25. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2021.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.He Z, Fischer A, Song Y, Steele M, Guan LL. Genome wide transcriptome analysis provides bases on colonic mucosal immune system development affected by colostrum feeding strategies in neonatal calves. BMC Genomics. 2018;19:635. 10.1186/s12864-018-5017-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Badman J, Daly K, Kelly J, Moran AW, Cameron J, Watson I, et al. The effect of milk replacer composition on the intestinal microbiota of pre-ruminant dairy calves. Front Vet Sci. 2019;6:371. 10.3389/fvets.2019.00371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kumar S, Khan MA, Beijer E, Liu J, Lowe KK, Young W, et al. Effect of milk replacer allowance on calf faecal bacterial community profiles and fermentation. Anim Microbiome. 2021;3:27. 10.1186/s42523-021-00088-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Alimirzaei M, Alijoo YA, Dehghan-Banadaky M, Eslamizad M. The effects of feeding high or low milk levels in early life on growth performance, fecal microbial count and metabolic and inflammatory status of Holstein female calves. Animal. 2020;14(2):303–11. 10.1017/S1751731119001691. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 45.Malmuthuge N, Li M, Goonewardene LA, Oba M, Guan LL. Effect of calf starter feeding on gut microbial diversity and expression of genes involved in host immune responses and tight junctions in dairy calves during weaning transition. J Dairy Sci. 2013;96(5):3189–200. 10.1017/s1751731119001691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Cristobal-Carballo O, McCoard SA, Cookson AL, Laven RA, Ganesh S, Lewis SJ, et al. Effect of divergent feeding regimes during early life on the rumen microbiota in calves. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:711040. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.711040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Li Y, Li X, Wu Y, Zhang W. Effects of fecal microbiota transplantation from yaks on weaning diarrhea, fecal microbiota composition, microbial network structure and functional pathways in Chinese Holstein calves. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:898505. 10.3389/fmicb.2022.898505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Scully S, Earley B, Smith PE, McAloon C, Waters SM. Health-associated changes of the fecal microbiota in dairy heifer calves during the pre-weaning period. Front Microbiol. 2024;15:1359611. 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1359611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Virgínio Júnior GF, Silva APD, Toledo AF, Poczynek M, Cezar AM, Montenegro H, et al. Ruminal and fecal bacteriome of dairy calves fed different levels and sources of NDF. Animals (Basel). 2021. 10.3390/ani11092705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 50.Pérez-Reytor D, Puebla C, Karahanian E, García K. Use of short-chain fatty acids for the recovery of the intestinal epithelial barrier affected by bacterial toxins. Front Physiol. 2021;12:650313. 10.3389/fphys.2021.650313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Zhen Y, Rahmat A, Zhang C, Lin J, Ma J, Zhong Y, et al. Multi-level regulation of hindgut homeostasis by volatile fatty acid administration in dairy goats: linking microbial metabolism to epithelial inflammation and barrier function. mSystems. 2025;10(7):e0011625. 10.1128/msystems.00116-25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 52.Kodithuwakku K, Owada H, Miura H, Maruyama D, Hirano K, Suzuki Y, et al. Effects of oral administration of timothy hay and psyllium on the growth performance and fecal microbiota of preweaning calves. J Dairy Sci. 2021;104(12):12472–85. 10.3168/jds.2021-20259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Dill-McFarland KA, Weimer PJ, Breaker JD, Suen G. Diet influences early microbiota development in dairy calves without long-term impacts on milk production. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019. 10.1128/AEM.02141-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Gibson G, Roberfroid M. Handbook of prebiotics. CRC Press; 2008.
  • 55.Gibson GR, Probert HM, Loo JV, Rastall RA, Roberfroid MB. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: updating the concept of prebiotics. Nutr Res Rev. 2004;17(2):259–75. 10.1079/NRR200479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Markowiak P, Śliżewska K. Effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on human health. Nutrients. 2017. 10.3390/nu9091021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Miura H, Mukai K, Sudo K, Haga S, Suzuki Y, Kobayashi Y, et al. Effect of trehalose supplementation in milk replacer on the incidence of diarrhea and fecal microbiota in preweaned calves. J Anim Sci. 2021. 10.1093/jas/skab012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Peng L, Li ZR, Green RS, Holzman IR, Lin J. Butyrate enhances the intestinal barrier by facilitating tight junction assembly via activation of AMP-activated protein kinase in Caco-2 cell monolayers. J Nutr. 2009;139(9):1619–25. 10.3945/jn.109.104638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kim MK, Lee HG, Park JA, Kang SK, Choi YJ. Effect of feeding direct-fed microbial as an alternative to antibiotics for the prophylaxis of calf diarrhea in holstein calves. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2011;24(5):643–9. 10.5713/ajas.2011.10322. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Wu Y, Wang L, Luo R, Chen H, Nie C, Niu J, et al. Effect of a multispecies probiotic mixture on the growth and incidence of diarrhea, immune function, and fecal microbiota of pre-weaning dairy calves. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:681014. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.681014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Fernández-Ciganda S, Fraga M, Zunino P. Probiotic Lactobacilli administration induces changes in the fecal microbiota of preweaned dairy calves. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2022;14(5):804–15. 10.1007/s12602-021-09834-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Varada VV, Tyagi AK, Banakar PS, Das A, Tyagi N, Mallapa RH, et al. Autochthonous Limosilactobacillus reuteri BFE7 and Ligilactobacillus salivarius BF17 probiotics consortium supplementation improves performance, immunity, and selected gut health indices in Murrah buffalo calves. Vet Res Commun. 2022;46(3):757–67. 10.1007/s11259-022-09896-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Sasazaki N, Obi T, Aridome C, Fujimoto Y, Furumoto M, Toda K, et al. Effects of dietary feed supplementation of heat-treated Lactobacillus sakei HS-1 on the health status, blood parameters, and fecal microbes of Japanese Black calves. J Vet Med Sci. 2020;82(10):1428–35. 10.1292/jvms.20-0181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Schwaiger K, Storch J, Bauer C, Bauer J. Lactobacillus (Limosilactobacillus) reuteri: a probiotic candidate to reduce neonatal diarrhea in calves. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1266905. 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1266905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Rostoll Cangiano L, Villot C, Amorin-Hegedus R, Malmuthuge N, Gruninger R, Guan LL, et al. Saccharomyces cerevisiae boulardii accelerates intestinal microbiota maturation and is correlated with increased secretory IgA production in neonatal dairy calves. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1129250. 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1129250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Fomenky BE, Do DN, Talbot G, Chiquette J, Bissonnette N, Chouinard YP, et al. Direct-fed microbial supplementation influences the bacteria community composition of the gastrointestinal tract of pre- and post-weaned calves. Sci Rep. 2018;8:14147. 10.1038/s41598-018-32375-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Sharma AN, Chaudhary P, Kumar S, Grover CR, Mondal G. Effect of synbiotics on growth performance, gut health, and immunity status in pre-ruminant buffalo calves. Sci Rep. 2023;13:10184. 10.1038/s41598-023-37002-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Dar AH, Singh SK, Rahman JU, Ahmad SF. The effects of probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus and/or prebiotic mannan oligosaccharides on growth performance, nutrient utilization, blood metabolites, faecal bacteria, and economics of crossbred calves. Iran J Vet Res. 2022;23(4):322–30. 10.22099/ijvr.2022.42992.6259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Sharma AN, Kumar S, Tyagi AK. Effects of mannan-oligosaccharides and Lactobacillus acidophilus supplementation on growth performance, nutrient utilization and faecal characteristics in Murrah buffalo calves. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2018;102(3):679–89. 10.1111/jpn.12878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Lucey PM, Lean IJ, Aly SS, Golder HM, Block E, Thompson JS, et al. Effects of mannan-oligosaccharide and Bacillus subtilis supplementation to preweaning Holstein dairy heifers on body weight gain, diarrhea, and shedding of fecal pathogens. J Dairy Sci. 2021;104(4):4290–302. 10.3168/jds.2020-19425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Zhang X, Cheng C, Lv J, Bai H, Sun F, Liu C, et al. Effects of waste milk feeding on rumen fermentation and bacterial community of pre-weaned and post-weaned dairy calves. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:1063523. 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1063523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Aust V, Knappstein K, Kunz HJ, Kaspar H, Wallmann J, Kaske M. Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2013;97(6):1091–103. 10.1111/jpn.12019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Penati M, Sala G, Biscarini F, Boccardo A, Bronzo V, Castiglioni B, et al. Feeding pre-weaned calves with waste milk containing antibiotic residues is related to a higher incidence of diarrhea and alterations in the fecal microbiota. Front Vet Sci. 2021;8:650150. 10.3389/fvets.2021.650150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Pereira RVV, Carroll LM, Lima S, Foditsch C, Siler JD, Bicalho RC, et al. Impacts of feeding preweaned calves milk containing drug residues on the functional profile of the fecal microbiota. Sci Rep. 2018;8:554. 10.1038/s41598-017-19021-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Yousif MH, Li JH, Li ZQ, Maswayi Alugongo G, Ji SK, Li YX, et al. Low concentration of antibiotics modulates gut microbiota at different levels in pre-weaning dairy calves. Microorganisms. 2018. 10.3390/microorganisms6040118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Okada S, Inabu Y, Miyamoto H, Suzuki K, Kato T, Kurotani A, et al. Estimation of silent phenotypes of calf antibiotic dysbiosis. Sci Rep. 2023;13:6359. 10.1038/s41598-023-33444-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Islam J, Tanimizu M, Shimizu Y, Goto Y, Ohtani N, Sugiyama K, et al. Development of a rational framework for the therapeutic efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation for calf diarrhea treatment. Microbiome. 2022;10:31. 10.1186/s40168-021-01217-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Slanzon GS, Ridenhour BJ, Parrish LM, Trombetta SC, Moore DA, Sischo WM, et al. Effects of a farm-specific fecal microbial transplant (FMT) product on clinical outcomes and fecal microbiome composition in preweaned dairy calves. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(10):e0276638. 10.1371/journal.pone.0276638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Pratelli A, Cirone F, Capozza P, Trotta A, Corrente M, Balestrieri A, et al. Bovine respiratory disease in beef calves supported long transport stress: An epidemiological study and strategies for control and prevention. Res Vet Sci. 2021;135:450–5. 10.1016/j.rvsc.2020.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 80.Vinayamohan PG, Poelstra J, Cheng TY, Goetz H, Renaud DL, Gomez DE, et al. Exploring the effects of transport duration on the fecal microbial communities of surplus dairy calves. J Dairy Sci. 2024;107(6):3863–84. 10.3168/jds.2023-24002. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 81.Cui Y, Qi J, Cai D, Fang J, Xie Y, Guo H, et al. Metagenomics reveals that proper placement after long-distance transportation significantly affects calf nasopharyngeal microbiota and is critical for the prevention of respiratory diseases. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:700704. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.700704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 82.Qi J, Gan L, Huang F, Xie Y, Guo H, Cui H, et al. Multi-omics reveals that alkaline mineral water improves the respiratory health and growth performance of transported calves. Microbiome. 2024;12:48. 10.1186/s40168-023-01742-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 83.Montevecchio AB, Jones KL, Galvão KN, Casaro S, Maunsell F, Liu T, et al. Heat abatement during the pre-weaning period: effects on the nasal microbiota of Holstein male calves. J Anim Sci. 2025. 10.1093/jas/skaf121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 84.Lima SF, Teixeira AG, Higgins CH, Lima FS, Bicalho RC. The upper respiratory tract microbiome and its potential role in bovine respiratory disease and otitis media. Sci Rep. 2016;6:29050. 10.1038/srep29050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 85.Lee JS, Kacem N, Kim WS, Peng DQ, Kim YJ, Joung YG, et al. Effect of Saccharomyces boulardii supplementation on performance and physiological traits of holstein calves under heat stress conditions. Animals (Basel). 2019. 10.3390/ani9080510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 86.Zhang Z, Zhao G, Niu S, Jia Y, Wu D, Xu M. Gastrointestinal microorganisms and blood metabolites in holstein calves with different heat stress responses in the same hot environment. Microorganisms. 2025. 10.3390/microorganisms13040801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 87.Huuki H, Vilkki J, Vanhatalo A, Tapio I. Fecal microbiota colonization dynamics in dairy heifers associated with early-life rumen microbiota modulation and gut health. Front Microbiol. 2024;15:1353874. 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1353874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Nowacki MR. Cell proliferation in colonic crypts of germ-free and conventional mice–preliminary report. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 1993;31(2):77–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Atarashi K, Tanoue T, Shima T, Imaoka A, Kuwahara T, Momose Y, et al. Induction of colonic regulatory T cells by indigenous Clostridium species. Science. 2011;331(6015):337–41. 10.1126/science.1198469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Renz H, Brandtzaeg P, Hornef M. The impact of perinatal immune development on mucosal homeostasis and chronic inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;12(1):9–23. 10.1038/nri3112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Talham GL, Jiang HQ, Bos NA, Cebra JJ. Segmented filamentous bacteria are potent stimuli of a physiologically normal state of the murine gut mucosal immune system. Infect Immun. 1999;67(4):1992–2000. 10.1128/IAI.67.4.1992-2000.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Ivanov II, Atarashi K, Manel N, Brodie EL, Shima T, Karaoz U, et al. Induction of intestinal Th17 cells by segmented filamentous bacteria. Cell. 2009;139(3):485–98. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.09.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Shao TY, Ang WXG, Jiang TT, Huang FS, Andersen H, Kinder JM, et al. Commensal Candida albicans positively calibrates systemic Th17 immunological responses. Cell Host Microbe. 2019;25(3):404-17.e6. 10.1016/j.chom.2019.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Lyons T, Jahns H, Brady J, O’Hara E, Waters SM, Kenny D, et al. Integrated analyses of the microbiological, immunological and ontological transitions in the calf ileum during early life. Sci Rep. 2020;10:21264. 10.1038/s41598-020-77907-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Spichak S, Guzzetta KE, O’Leary OF, Clarke G, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Without a bug’s life: Germ-free rodents to interrogate microbiota-gut-neuroimmune interactions. Drug Discov Today Dis Model. 2018;28:79–93. 10.1016/j.ddmod.2019.08.002. [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Diaz Heijtz R, Wang S, Anuar F, Qian Y, Björkholm B, Samuelsson A, et al. Normal gut microbiota modulates brain development and behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(7):3047–52. 10.1073/pnas.1010529108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Desbonnet L, Clarke G, Traplin A, O’Sullivan O, Crispie F, Moloney RD, et al. Gut microbiota depletion from early adolescence in mice: Implications for brain and behaviour. Brain Behav Immun. 2015;48:165–73. 10.1016/j.bbi.2015.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Foster JA. Is anxiety associated with the gut microbiota? Mod Trends Psychiatry. 2021;32:68–73. 10.1159/000510418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Hromádková J, Suzuki Y, Pletts S, Pyo J, Ma T, Chen Y, et al. Effect of colostrum feeding strategies on the expression of neuroendocrine genes and active gut mucosa-attached bacterial populations in neonatal calves. J Dairy Sci. 2020;103(9):8629–42. 10.3168/jds.2019-17710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Song Y, Wen S, Li F, Fischer-Tlustos A, He Z, Guan LL, et al. Metagenomic analysis provides bases on individualized shift of colon microbiome affected by delaying colostrum feeding in neonatal calves. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:1035331. 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1035331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Lu M, Hu F, Bi Y, Ma T, Diao Q, Jiang L, et al. Effects of anemoside b4 on diarrhea incidence, serum indices, and fecal microbial of suckling calves. Front Vet Sci. 2022;9:851865. 10.3389/fvets.2022.851865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Guo W, van Niekerk JK, Zhou M, Steele MA, Guan LL. Longitudinal assessment revealed the shifts in rumen and colon mucosal-attached microbiota of dairy calves during weaning transition. J Dairy Sci. 2021;104(5):5948–63. 10.3168/jds.2020-19252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Obregon-Gutierrez P, Bague-Companys J, Bach A, Aragon V, Correa-Fiz F. Longitudinal study of fecal microbiota in calves with or without diarrhea episodes before weaning. Vet Sci. 2022. 10.3390/vetsci9090463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Chen H, Jia Z, He M, Chen A, Zhang X, Xu J, et al. Arula-7 powder improves diarrhea and intestinal epithelial tight junction function associated with its regulation of intestinal flora in calves infected with pathogenic Escherichia coli O1. Microbiome. 2023;11:172. 10.1186/s40168-023-01616-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Wang D, Jia H, Du Y, Liu Y. Effects of sodium humate and glutamine on growth performance, diarrhoea incidence, blood parameters, and faecal microflora of pre-weaned calves. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2023;107(1):103–12. 10.1111/jpn.13703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Ma L, Zhu Y, La ATZ, Lourenco JM, Callaway TR, Bu D. Schizochytrium sp. and lactoferrin supplementation alleviates Escherichia coli K99-induced diarrhea in pre-weaning dairy calves. J Dairy Sci. 2023. 10.3168/jds.2023-23466. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 107.Fresno AH, Alencar ALF, Liu G, Wridt MW, Andersen FB, Pedersen HS, et al. Effect of feeding dairy calves with milk fermented with selected probiotic strains on occurrence of diarrhoea, carriage of pathogenic and zoonotic microorganisms and growth performance. Vet Microbiol. 2023;286:109885. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2023.109885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Scaglia E, Reggi S, Canala B, Frazzini S, Dell'Anno M, Hejna M, et al. The effects of milk replacer supplemented with ascophyllum nodosum as a novel ingredient to prevent neonatal diarrhea in dairy calves and improve their health status. Vet Sci. 2023. 10.3390/vetsci10100618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 109.Nussbaum O, Gross JJ, Bruckmaier RM, Eicher R. Efficacy of oral administration of specific immunoglobulins in preventing neonatal calf diarrhoea in dairy herds. Vet Rec. 2023;193(12):e3559. 10.1002/vetr.3559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Fernández S, Fraga M, Silveyra E, Trombert AN, Rabaza A, Pla M, et al. Probiotic properties of native Lactobacillus spp. strains for dairy calves. Benef Microbes. 2018;9(4):613–24. 10.3920/BM2017.0131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Monteiro HF, Zhou Z, Gomes MS, Peixoto PMG, Bonsaglia ECR, Canisso IF, et al. Rumen and lower gut microbiomes relationship with feed efficiency and production traits throughout the lactation of Holstein dairy cows. Sci Rep. 2022;12:4904. 10.1038/s41598-022-08761-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Koike S, Ueno M, Ashida N, Imabayashi T, Kobayashi Y. Effect of Bacillus subtilis C-3102 supplementation in milk replacer on growth and rumen microbiota in preweaned calves. Anim Sci J. 2021;92(1):e13580. 10.1111/asj.13580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Lopes DRG, La Reau AJ, Duarte MS, Detmann E, Bento CBP, Mercadante MEZ, et al. The bacterial and fungal microbiota of nelore steers is dynamic across the gastrointestinal tract and its fecal-associated microbiota is correlated to feed efficiency. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1263. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Liu Y, Liu C, Wu H, Meng Q, Zhou Z. Small intestine microbiome and metabolome of high and low residual feed intake Angus heifers. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:862151. 10.3389/fmicb.2022.862151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Freetly HC, Lindholm-Perry AK. Rumen and cecum bacteria of beef cattle that differ in feed efficiency fed a forage diet. J Anim Sci. 2023. 10.1093/jas/skad292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES