Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2026 Mar 4;21(3):e0321434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321434

Impact of demographic factors and HIV status on Hepatitis B vaccination adherence and completion rate among high-risk populations in Lagos State, Nigeria

Elizabeth Shoyemi 1, Ojore Godday Aghedo 1,*, Collins Obi 1, Chukwuebuka Peter Kelvin Uwaoma 1, Oluwafisayomi S Azeez 1, Okikiola Oyeniyi 1
Editor: Jason T Blackard2
PMCID: PMC12959706  PMID: 41779730

Abstract

Hepatitis-B-Virus (HBV) remains an important global public health concern, as well as a primary cause of both acute and chronic liver diseases, with over 18 million people infected by the virus in Nigeria. This study evaluated the impact of HIV status, age, and gender of high-risk populations on HBV vaccination adherence and completion rate in Lagos state, Nigeria. A retrospective study design was utilized to access the clinic data of 641 study participants who participated in the HBV program at the one-stop-shop clinic between June 2021 to June 2024. Data on age, HIV status, gender, population type, and the date of each dose of administered vaccine were recorded. To estimate the odds-ratios (ORs) and adjusted-ORs at 95% confidence intervals (CIs), bivariate/multivariate logistic regression models were utilized, and the association between age, gender, HIV status, and HBV vaccination adherence and the completion rate was examined. The study participants had a mean age of 21.7 ± 8.8 years and were composed of 510 (79.6%) males, 131 (20.4%) females; 162 (25.3%) participants living with HIV, 423 (66.0%) HIV-negative participants, 500 (78.0%) MSM, and 115 (17.9%) FSW. The overall vaccination completion rate was 45.4%, with significant variation by age group (p = 0.004). The highest completion rates were observed among participants aged 30–34 years (58.4%) and 35–39 years (57.8%), while younger participants aged 15–29 had lower adherence. Gender and HIV status were not independently associated with vaccination completion (p > 0.05). Age was the only factor significantly affecting completion (AOR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.23, 3.03). HBV vaccination coverage in high-risk populations is low in Lagos State. This suggests that the HBV vaccination program in the state is still facing significant challenges. Creating awareness about HBV infection and strengthening the availability, accessibility, and cost effectiveness of HBV service uptake will enhance the program's success.

Introduction

Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) remains an important global public health concern, as well as a primary cause of both acute and chronic liver diseases [1]. Late detection and poor management of HBV infection can lead to life-threatening complications like the liver cancer also called hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), liver cirrhosis, and eventual death [2]. The transmission routes for HBV are essentially the same as those of HIV, which include contact with infected blood or body fluids, unsafe injections, exposures to contaminated sharp instruments, and mostly through mother-to-child-transmission (MTCT) during birth [1,3]. More than 250 million people lived with HBV in 2022, causing more than 1 million deaths in the same year, a decline from over 1.2 million deaths recorded in 2015, according to the World Health Organization (WHO) [1]. However, there are safe, readily accessible, and effective vaccines for preventing HBV in both children and adults [2,4].

The prevalence of HBV in Sub-Saharan Africa is quite high due to behavioral risk factors, and particularly as high as 11% − 13% in Nigeria [5,6]. Globally, the widespread administration of the safe and effective HBV vaccine has proven to be resourceful in preventing new HBV infections [4]. While global vaccination programs aim to achieve over 90% coverage, many sub-Saharan regions, including Nigeria, remain significantly behind, posing a persistent public health risk [7]. Hepatitis B vaccination is widely available and administered to infants routinely across many health facilities in Nigeria, both private and public health sector. It is offered free of charge in public primary healthcare centers (PHCs) as part of the pentavalent vaccine schedule under Nigeria’s National Program on Immunization (NPI). However, outside routine infant immunization, fees are charged for adolescents and adults receiving HBV vaccination, especially in private healthcare facilities. The costs of HBV vaccination differ in the private health sector depending on the categories of the healthcare provider and the location. This potentially constitutes a financial barrier to vaccine uptake in Nigeria [5,8]. All HBV vaccination in Nigeria is guided by the National Policy on Viral Hepatitis, the NPI guidelines, and alignment with the recommendations based on WHO hepatitis elimination targets. The vaccines are administered in three doses at 0-1-6 schedule (baseline, one month and six months) to be considered full or complete vaccination, but there have been reports of suboptimal completion rates, especially amongst the key populations in Nigeria and Sub-Sahara Africa [2,4,8].

There are over 18 million people living with HBV in Nigeria, making it a high burden country for HBV [5,6,9]. Suboptimal knowledge of HBV prevention and transmission routes in more than 80% of hospital janitorial staff in Nigeria, has been reported in a cross-sectional study involving tertiary hospital cleaners in Nigeria [10]. Low level or absolute lack of awareness of hepatitis B, and suboptimal knowledge of its prevention and transmission routes, were identified in the study, as a reason for poor participation in vaccination programs by individuals [10]. Previous studies have associated level of knowledge and status of HBV vaccination with sociodemographic factors like age and marital status [11–13].

Lagos State is the economic hub of Nigeria. However, high-risk groups, like people living with HIV (PLHIV), and key populations like female sex workers (FSW) and men who have sex with men (MSM) are extremely affected by Hepatitis B virus, and they constitute substantial healthcare challenges faced in the state [14–16], forming a basis for this study.

The immuno-compromised state associated with HIV increases the vulnerability and susceptibility of PLHIV to infections like Hepatitis B virus [14,17]. Barriers to vaccination, competing healthcare priorities, absolute lack of or low awareness levels, and healthcare services access limitations are additional challenges PLHIV encounter [17].

A long-term protection against HBV largely depends on the completion rate of HBV vaccination series, which are often influenced by demographic factors like age, gender, and HIV status [4,8]. Younger persons who believe that they are less vulnerable to Hepatitis B, are less likely to complete the HBV vaccination regimen compared to older individuals with the perception of higher risk of HBV infection [18]. Gender and culture related factors have been reported to affect healthcare access and vaccine uptake [19]. Given that PLHIV face exclusive challenges like side effects of their medication and challenging healthcare requirements, HIV status is considered a key determinant of vaccine completion [20].

The impact of demographic variables on vaccine uptake has been studied in the past, but only few studies have been conducted on how the demographic variables directly impact HBV vaccine completion rate in high-risk populations, especially in Lagos state, Nigeria. The development of data-driven strategies and interventions aimed at both improving vaccination coverage and shrinking the prevalence of HBV, is predicated on the knowledge of the impact of factors such as age, gender, and HIV status on HBV vaccine uptake, especially among high-risk populations [21,22]. The aim of this study is to assess the influence of selected demographic factors on the HBV vaccine completion rate among high-risk populations in Lagos State, Nigeria. Future vaccination campaigns targeted at improving vaccine completion rates in vulnerable populations, will benefit from the findings of this study as a guide. The ambitious global target of exterminating HBV by 2030 is achievable if public health strategies and interventions directly improve vaccination coverage and reduce the prevalence of Hepatitis B virus [21].

Scope and limitation of this study

This study was conducted with only the clients who voluntarily accessed HBV vaccination services at the One-Stop-Shop (OSS) Clinic of Centre for Population Health Initiatives (CPHI) in Lagos State. Therefore, the findings may not be generalizable to other regions or healthcare settings across Nigeria or sub-Saharan Africa. Being a retrospective study, it relied on secondary data collected from clinic records, which may limit the researcher from capturing other sociodemographic, cultural, or behavioral factors influencing vaccination adherence and completion. The number of observed subjects was disproportionate across the gender and population types.

Materials and Methods

Study location

Lagos State is arguably the most populous state in Nigeria. According to the 2021 edition of ‘Spotlight on Lagos Statistics,’ by Lagos State Bureau of Statistics, the commercial hub boasts of an estimated population figure of more than 25 million inhabitants, which is higher than the official 2006 census figure of 9,013,534 inhabitants. Lagos State has 20 local government areas (LGAs), and its annual growth rate is between 2.5% and 3.5%, with a population density of more than 4,139 persons per square kilometer [5]. Research activities took place at the OSS Clinic in Yaba, Lagos State, managed by CPHI, which has recorded a high volume of high-risk populations accessing health services. CPHI is a non-profit, non-governmental organization that conducts cutting-edge research activities and implements various funded public health projects with a special focus on high-risk populations. The study incorporated participants from all the 20 LGAs of the state who accessed health services at the facility.

Study design

The study employed retrospective design by accessing participants’ clinic data from June 1st, 2021, to June 30th, 2024. The vaccination program started in 2021, so no routinely collected programmatic data prior to 2021 was available for inclusion in this study. Complete secondary data was accessed on January 6th, 2025, for the purpose of this study. The documentation tools (such as the registers, HBV enrolment forms) were reviewed for participants who started the vaccine regimen within the period of interest. Afterwards the adherence level and completion rate for the recommended doses of Hepatitis B vaccine was examined. This study design is suitable for evaluating the rate of adherence and completion of HBV vaccine, and how it is influenced by sociodemographic factors like age, gender and HIV status. A validation process such as double-checking records for accuracy and consistency was employed to mitigate potential biases associated with the study design. Also, authors did not have access to information that could identify individual participants during or after data collection process.

Sample size and study population

The study involved 641 participants who initiated their doses of the HBV vaccine at the OSS Clinic within the cohort period of interest, across all age groups. The standard vaccination schedule of 0-1-6 was adopted. This sample size of participants was determined based on prior studies on HBV vaccine adherence within high-risk populations by LaMori et al., [8], highlighting a minimum of 500 participants being required to detect the meaningful associations between demographic factors and vaccine adherence. The study population was constituted by Men who have Sex with Men (MSM), Female Sex Workers (FSW) and partners of MSM and FSW representing the general populations.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Participants who received the first dose of the HBV vaccine at least six months prior to the commencement of the study at the CPHI’s OSS clinic were included. This is to ensure accurate assessment of adherence and completion rate of all three doses of the vaccines. Participants must have complete record of age, sex, dates of each dose of vaccine received, population type, and vaccination outcome. Participants with incomplete records, or received vaccinations outside the defined timeframe, and participants with inconsistent or conflicting data were excluded from the study.

Ethics Statement

The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Nigerian Institute for Medical Research (NIMR) issued the ethical clearance for this study. Approval number: IRB/24/083. Consent was not required as the study team had no direct contact with the subjects. Confidentiality and privacy of data was maintained throughout the research processes, and personally identifying information was not collected, unique IDs were used instead. Both national and institutional ethical guidelines were strictly observed in the conduct of this research.

Data collection process

Study data of all participants who received HBV vaccinations from the CPHI’s OSS clinic were retrieved from HBV vaccination registers and enrollment forms. Data was entered into a specially formatted Microsoft Excel template and revalidated by a study staff for data accuracy and completeness. Data cleaning and coding were carried out using Microsoft Excel spreadsheet (version 2024) and then imported into IBM SPSS Statistics (version 26) for further statistical analysis. To estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and adjusted ORs at 95% confidence intervals (CIs), bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was deployed, and the association between age, gender, HIV status and HBV vaccination adherence and completion rate was assessed.

Operational definition of HBV vaccination outcomes

  • Completed: All persons who received all the expected doses of the HBV vaccine in line with the standard vaccination schedule of 3 doses within 6 months, are considered to have “completed” the HBV vaccination regimen.

  • Not completed: All persons who did not receive all the expected 3 doses of the HBV, are considered to have “Not completed” the HBV vaccination regimen, regardless the number of doses they have taken already.

  • Adherent: All persons who received all the expected 3 doses of the HBV vaccine by following the stipulated vaccination schedules, are classified as “Adherent”. This means, they received the vaccine doses at the proper intervals or within acceptable delays between doses, typically 14 days.

  • Not adherent: All individuals who failed to receive all the expected 3 doses of the HBV vaccine within the recommended vaccination schedules, are classified as “Not adherent”.

Data variables and analysis

The variables collected were categorical variables and continuous variables, such as Gender, Age group, HIV status, Vaccination status, Dates of First, Second, and Third doses. All data analyses were done using Microsoft Excel pivot tables and SPSS version 26. Descriptive statistics in the form of frequency and percentages were completed for categorical variables.

The completion rate was calculated as:

Number of participants who completed the vaccine series within specified timeNumber of participants who initiated the first dose of vaccineX100

Adherence was measured by noting the participants who took their second and third doses of the vaccine within the stipulated time including a window period of 14 days. The association between demographic factors, adherence and vaccine completion rate was tested using Chi-square, at a statistically significant level of less than 0.05.

Results

A total of 641 persons were vaccinated within the period under review at CPHI and they met the inclusion criteria for this study. See Table 1 below for participants’ demographic features.

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the participants.

Characteristics Gender
Male n (%) Female n (%) Total n (%)
Age(years)
15-19 14(2.7) 4(3.1) 18(2.8)
20-24 112(22.0) 38(29.0) 150(23.4)
25-29 208(40.8) 55(42.0) 263(41.0)
30-34 122(23.9) 15(11.5) 137(21.4)
35-39 38(7.5) 7(5.3) 45(7.0)
40-44 13(2.5) 5(3.8) 18(2.8)
45-49 2(0.4) 4(3.1) 6(0.9)
50-54 1(0.2) 1(0.1) 2(0.3)
55-59 0(0.0) 1(0.1) 1(0.2)
≥ 60 0(0.0) 1(0.1) 1(0.2)
HIV Status
Positive 142(27.8) 95(72.5) 162(25.3)
Negative 328(64.3) 16(12.2) 423(66.0)
Not Disclosed 40(7.8) 20(15.3 56(8.7)
Population Type
MSM 500(98.0) 0(0.0) 500(78.0)
FSW 0(0.0) 114(87.9) 114(17.8)
GP 10(2.0) 17(12.1) 27(4.2)
Total 510(100.0) 131(100.0) 641(100.0)

The mean age of study participants was 21.7 ± 8.77 years, with most participants within the age groups of 20–24 years and 25–29 years old. Out of the eligible participants, 79.6% (n = 510) were males while 20.4% (n = 131) were females. 25.3% (n = 162) of the participants were persons living with HIV, 66.0% (n = 423) were HIV negative and 8.7% (n = 56) did not disclose their HIV status. Most participants were MSM, 78.0% (n = 500), followed by FSW, 17.9% (n = 115) and then the general population, 4.1% (n = 26). The HBV vaccination status across key demographic characteristics is presented in Table 2.

Table 2. Hepatitis-B vaccination status among the subjects.

Characteristics Vaccination
First Dose n (%) Second Dose n (%) Third Dose n (%)
Gender
Male 510(79.6) 299(78.1) 228(78.4)
Female 131(20.4) 84(21.9) 63(21.6)
Total 641(100) 383(100) 291(100)
Age (Years)
15-19 18(2.8) 9(2.3) 6(2.1)
20-24 148(23.4) 85(22.2) 63(21.6)
25-29 263(41.0) 150(39.2) 108(37.1)
30-34 137(21.4) 94(24.5) 80(27.5)
35-39 45(7.0) 29(7.6) 26(8.9)
40-44 18(2.8) 9(2.3) 4(1.4)
45-49 6(0.9) 4(1) 2(0.7)
50-54 2(0.3) 1(0.3) 0(0)
55-59 1(0.2) 1(0.3) 1(0.3)
≥60 1(0.2) 1(0.3) 1(0.3)
Total 641(100) 383(100) 291(100)
HIV Status
Positive 162(25.3) 94(24.5) 75(25.8)
Negative 423(66.0) 265(69.2) 196(67.4)
Not Disclosed 56(8.7) 24(6.3) 20(6.8)
Total 641(100) 383(100) 291(100)
Population Type
MSM 500(78.0) 293(76.5) 224(77.0)
FSW 114(17.8) 71(18.5) 50(17.2)
GP 27(4.2) 19(5.0) 17(5.8)
Total 641(100) 383(100) 291(100)

There was a significant drop out in the number of persons who followed through the vaccination series. Out of the 641 participants, 59.8% (n = 383) and 45.4% (n = 291) took the second and third doses of the HBV vaccine respectively. Higher uptake of HBV vaccination was observed among male subjects, those within the age group of 25–29 years, the HIV-negative individuals, and participants classified as MSM. The vaccine coverage was significantly lower in older age groups. Table 3 compares the vaccination completion rate across the various features, including the statistical significance level.

Table 3. Completion rate by demographic characteristics.

Characteristics Vaccination Status
Total Completed n (%) Not Completed n (%) χ2 df p-Value
Gender
Male 510(100.0) 228(44.7) 282(55.3) 0.482 1 0.488
Female 131(100.0) 63(48.1) 68(51.9)
Total 641(100.0) 291(45.4) 350(54.6)
Age (years)
15-19 18(100.0) 6(33.3) 12(23.4) 2.321 9 0.004
20-24 150(100.0) 63(42.0) 87(24.9)
25-29 263(100.0) 108(41.1) 155(44.3)
30-34 137(100.0) 80(58.4) 57(16.3)
35-39 45(100.0) 26(57.8) 19(5.4)
40-44 18(100.0) 4(22.2) 14(4.0)
45-49 6(100.0) 2(33.3) 4(1.1)
50-54 2(100.0) 0(0.0) 2(0.6)
55-59 1(100.0) 1(100.0) 0(0.0)
≥60 1(100.0) 1(100.0) 0(0.0)
Total 641(100.0) 291(100.0) 350(100.0)
HIV Status
Positive 162(100.0) 75(46.3) 87(53.7) 2.321 2 0.313
Negative 423(100.0) 196(46.3) 227(53.7)
Not Disclosed 56(100.0) 20(35.7) 36(64.3)
Total 641(100.0) 291(45.4) 350(54.6)
Population Type
MSM 500(100.0) 224(44.8) 276(55.2) 3.074 2 0.079
FSW 115(100.0) 51(44.3) 64(55.7)
GP 26(100.0) 16(61.5) 10(38.5)
Total 641(100.0) 291(45.4) 350(54.6)

The male participants had 44.7% vaccine adherence and completion rate, which is slightly lower than 48.1% recorded by the female participants. The completion rate was highest amongst participants in the 30–34 years age group, at 58.4%, followed by 35–39 years at 57.8%. Both HIV positive and HIV negative participants recorded the same level of adherence and completion rate (46.3%), while those with undisclosed HIV status had the lowest completion rate of 35.7%. The MSM group had a slightly higher adherence and completion rate (44.8%) than the FSW group (44.3%). Participants in the General Population (GP) group had the highest vaccine adherence and completion rate (61.5%). However, no statistically significant association existed amongst the gender, HIV status, and ‘population types’ categories (p > 0.05), apart from the age categories (p = 0.004).

Discussion

This study’s findings provide essential insights into the factors influencing the completion rate of the Hepatitis B vaccine among high-risk populations in Lagos State, Nigeria. The vaccine completion rate is 45.4%, which is lower than the HBV vaccination coverage achieved in Germany and the global target of 95% by 2023 [7]. The implication of this finding is that there are either existing or potential challenges directly hindering optimal HBV vaccination amongst high-risk populations. The integration of HBV vaccination into routine clinical services and health programs will address some of the existing and potential challenges.

Effect of age on vaccination adherence and completion rate

Previous studies in Northeastern Ethiopia [6] in China [23] and in Sierra Leone [24], reported that age has statistically significant impact on Hepatitis B vaccination adherence and completion rate. This is corroborated by findings from this study, which found that younger individual between the ages of 15–29 years, and older individuals between the ages of 40–60 years, had a lower vaccine completion rate compared to those between the ages of 30–39 years (χ2 = 2.321, df = 9, p-value = 0.004). Another study proved that younger persons are subject to vaccination barriers, which can include health services access restrictions and inaccurate perception of lower risk of infection [18,25]. Despite these barriers, a study on adult HBV vaccination coverage conducted in China, found that vaccine completion rate among the older population was lower than in younger populations [23]. But a study conducted in Guinea and Liberia, did not report any statistically significant relationship between age and HBV vaccine completion rate in both countries, with p-values of 0.104 and 0.419 respectively [24].

Meanwhile, at a p-value less than 0.05, participants within the age group of 30–39 years in this study were twice more likely to complete the vaccination series, when compared to other age groups (AOR: 1.92, 95% CI:1.23, 3.03). Higher level of awareness and knowledge of the risks associated with Hepatitis B may have contributed to this difference [25]. Lower HBV vaccination completion rate in younger populations is also attributable to demographic, parental influence, socio-economic and cultural factors [21,22,25]. From general stands, migration, and non-permanent employment or living conditions appear to be more common in the younger populations, and it can pose additional obstacles to completion of HBV vaccination series [21]. In urban areas like Lagos state where fleeting accommodation arrangements are common, to effectively target this age group, public health strategies should focus on increasing awareness of the risks of Hepatitis B and the benefits of vaccination [21,22].

Effect of gender on vaccination adherence and completion rate

From table 3 above, female participants scored vaccination completion rate of 48.1% which is higher than the overall 45.4% and the 44.7% for male participants (AOR: 0.8, 95% CI: 0.6, 1.1). Females in sub-Sahara Africa have previously been reported to have higher tendency of seeking proper health-seeking behaviors like routine medical checkups, adherence to medication and vaccine uptake, than their male counterparts [26–28]. Nevertheless, no statistically significant association was observed between gender and Hepatitis B vaccine completion rate (χ2 = 0.482, df = 1, p-value = 0.488). This is consistent with the report of no gender influence on the completion of vaccination series in another study that systematically assessed the factors affecting completion of multi-dose vaccine schedules by adolescents [29]. With a p-value of 0.865, no association between gender and HBV vaccination completion rate was observed amongst children or younger populations in study conducted in Guinea [24]. However, this is in sharp contradiction to the findings of the study by Nnaemeka and Mbadiwe [19].

Despite women having more probability of initiating vaccination series, this study reveals a comparatively small gender gap in adherence and completion of HBV vaccination program. This suggests that comparable barriers to vaccine uptake, such as long waiting times at vaccination centers, transportation costs, misinformation about the vaccination program or lack of correct information, lack of adequate institutional supports, and economic problems, are common to both genders [7,25].

Effect of HIV status on vaccination adherence and completion rate

Contrary to expectations, participants who lived with HIV had the same completion rate of 46.3% as the HIV-negative participants, while those with undisclosed HIV status had a completion rate of 35.7%. However, HIV-positive participants were 1.1 times more likely to adhere and complete the vaccination series than HIV negative participants (AOR: 1.1, 95% CI: 0.9, 1.3). Increased knowledge of the effect or consequences of HIV/HBV co-infection may have contributed to this tendency, though not statistically significant (χ2 = 2.321, df = 2, p-value = 0.313). In line with results of this study, a previous study observed that there was no statistically significant relationship between HIV status and HBV vaccination completion rate [15]. On the contrary, other previous studies have reported that people living with HIV are exposed to unique challenges which can affect their ability to successfully adhere or complete HBV vaccination programs [20,29,30]. In addition, some studies have strongly attributed prevailing challenges suffered by HIV positive participants in terms of access to healthcare services and vaccination programs, to factors like stigma, financial barriers, and comorbidities [29–31]. Therefore, according to Adelekan et al., [30], proper integration of Hepatitis B vaccination into the routine HIV care and treatment programs across the nation, sending reminders about vaccination appointments, and improving access to lifesaving healthcare services, would significantly improve health services uptake, including HBV vaccination, amongst HIV positive individuals [30].

Effect of ‘population type’ on vaccination adherence and completion rate

A cross-sectional study amongst MSM and Transgender Women (TGW) which was conducted in Lagos and Abuja in Nigeria, reported just 5% self-reported HBV vaccination coverage [15]. This is far lower than the 44.8% vaccination completion rate amongst the MSM in this study. MSM are slightly more likely to adhere, and complete HBV vaccination series compared to FSW and the general population (AOR: 1.2, 95% CI: 0.9, 1.5), but this result is not statistically significant (p-value = 0.079). MSM is a high-risk population and increased awareness of this reality can contribute to a higher likelihood of adherence to HBV vaccination schedules leading to higher vaccination completion rate, than other vulnerable populations [14,15].

Conclusion

This study unveils the intricacy of attaining high vaccination completion rates among high-risk populations in Lagos State, Nigeria. Though gender, population types and HIV status did not show significant influence on HBV vaccination adherence and completion rate, it is noteworthy that men, and those who are HIV-negative were less likely to adhere and complete their vaccination schedules. This is attributable to suboptimal health-seeking behavior, nonchalant attitude or complacency towards uptake of healthcare services, especially in people who do not experience any pains or sickness. Giving that age is a strong factor that influences HBV vaccination adherence and completion rate, tailored interventions that address barriers faced by younger and older people, will tremendously improve HBV vaccination adherence and completion rates. Through such targeted programs, attaining behavioral change in men and HIV-negative people, public education, along with improved healthcare access, will help move Nigeria closer to achieving the WHO’s vaccination targets and reducing the burden of Hepatitis B in high-risk populations.

Implications and recommendations for public health policy

Based on the results from this study, the following recommendations will help to increase vaccine uptake and completion rates among high-risk populations in Lagos State.

  1. Initiating targeted vaccination campaigns for younger and older populations through the various social media platforms and community outreach programs, will reduce the impact of age difference on the success of vaccination programs.

  2. Institutionalizing the integration of Hepatitis B vaccination programs into the routine HIV care and treatment continuum, will increase access to and health service uptake

  3. Establishing strong community engagement and education routine, will address common misconceptions about the Hepatitis B vaccine and strengthen the decision-making process the target population.

  4. Exploring the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) tools and digital platforms to help create reminders for vaccination programs or other medication regimen.

Limitations and future research

Despite the valuable findings from this study, the following limitations have been observed. First, as a retrospective study, relying on secondary data may not fully capture all relevant sociodemographic and cultural factors which can impact the success of vaccination programs. Also, data was collected only from the OSS Clinic in Lagos State and may not be generalizable to other regions in Nigeria or sub-Saharan Africa, consequently. A future prospective study that explores other socio-economic factors like income, educational level, and health literacy, would help to provide a more holistic view of the barriers to vaccine adherence and completion rates. We also recommend a post-vaccination antibody titre (anti-HBs) assessment in future studies, to evaluate immunological response and sero-protection in addition to vaccination completion.

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the contributions of the data clerks, the program officers, the nurses, the doctors, the pharmacists and management of the OSS Clinic, where this research took place.

Data Availability

The secondary data used in this study was generated from the community-based vaccination program implemented by CPHI. The data are available at the OSS clinic of CPHI, and publicly available at Figshare: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30998749. Also, all data related requests or inquiries can be sent to info@cphinigeria.org or to the corresponding author.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.World Health Organization. Hepatitis B. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2024. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hepatitis-b
  • 2.Ochu CL, Beynon CM. Hepatitis B vaccination coverage, knowledge and sociodemographic determinants of uptake in high risk public safety workers in Kaduna State, Nigeria: a cross sectional survey. BMJ Open. 2017;7(5):e015845. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015845 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shivakumar M, Moe CA, Bardon A, Krows M, Govere S, Moosa MYS, et al. Hepatitis B prevalence and risk factors among adults living with HIV in South Africa: a clinic-based cohort study. BMC Infect Dis. 2024;24(1):891. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09746-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pattyn J, Hendrickx G, Vorsters A, Van Damme P. Hepatitis B Vaccines. J Infect Dis. 2021;224(12 Suppl 2):S343–51. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa668 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Odukoya OO, Odeyemi KA, Odubanjo OM, Isikekpei BC, Igwilo UU, Disu YM, et al. Hepatitis B and C seroprevalence among residents in Lagos State, Nigeria: A population-based survey. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2022;29(2):75–81. doi: 10.4103/npmj.npmj_776_21 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mohammed H, Eshetie A, Melese D. Prevalence of hepatitis B virus and associated risk factors among adults patients at Dessie referral and Kemise general hospitals in northeastern Ethiopia. Health Sci Rep. 2022;5(3):e659. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.659 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Steffen G, Sperle I, Harder T, Sarma N, Beermann S, Thamm R, et al. Hepatitis B vaccination coverage in Germany: systematic review. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21(1):817. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06400-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.LaMori J, Feng X, Pericone CD, Mesa-Frias M, Sogbetun O, Kulczycki A. Hepatitis vaccination adherence and completion rates and factors associated with low compliance: A claims-based analysis of U.S. adults. PLoS One. 2022;17(2):e0264062. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264062 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ajuwon BI, Yujuico I, Roper K, Richardson A, Sheel M, Lidbury BA. Hepatitis B virus infection in Nigeria: a systematic review and meta-analysis of data published between 2010 and 2019. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21(1):1120. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06800-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rapthap K, Barman H, Sangla L. Sporadic heath camps for children: Are we reaching the unreached?. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health. 2019;7(3):399–401. doi: 10.1016/j.cegh.2018.07.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lee Y-N, Kim M-C, Lee Y-T, Hwang HS, Cho M-K, Lee JS, et al. AS04-adjuvanted virus-like particles containing multiple M2 extracellular domains of influenza virus confer improved protection. Vaccine. 2014;32(35):4578–85. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.06.040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rajamoorthy Y, Taib NM, Munusamy S, Anwar S, Wagner AL, Mudatsir M, et al. Knowledge and awareness of hepatitis B among households in Malaysia: a community-based cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6375-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Aber JO, Bongomin F, Opio SL, Ochola E. Hepatitis B vaccine uptake and associated factors among adults of Gulu city in Northern Uganda: A community-based cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2024;19(3):e0297617. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297617 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Catherine F-X, Piroth L. Hepatitis B virus vaccination in HIV-infected people: A review. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017;13(6):1–10. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2016.1277844 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Adeyemi OA, Mitchell A, Shutt A, Crowell TA, Ndembi N, Kokogho A, et al. Hepatitis B virus infection among men who have sex with men and transgender women living with or at risk for HIV: a cross sectional study in Abuja and Lagos, Nigeria. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21(1):654. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06368-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Moradi G, Soheili M, Rashti R, Dehghanbanadaki H, Nouri E, Zakaryaei F, et al. The prevalence of hepatitis C and hepatitis B in lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Med Res. 2022;27(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s40001-022-00677-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ashraf K, Ng CJ, Teo CH, Goh KL. Population indices measuring health outcomes: A scoping review. J Glob Health. 2019;9(1):010405. doi: 10.7189/jogh.09.010405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mushi L, Kairuki K, Lubaba M. Age-related factors influencing hepatitis B vaccine completion in sub-Saharan Africa. Glob Health Action. 2018;11(1):1494570. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2018.1494570 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nnaemeka I, Mbadiwe F. Gender differences in the uptake of hepatitis B vaccination: a study from Nigeria. J Public Health Afr. 2016;7(2):645. doi: 10.4081/jphia.2016.645 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Khan M, James R, Sundaram N, Wu S, Eang MT, Vonthanak S, et al. Less research on tuberculosis than HIV and malaria when research agendas are poorly coordinated: a systematic review of research outputs from Cambodia. Int J Infect Dis. 2017;56:25–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2016.11.417 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.World Health Organization. Global health sector strategy on viral hepatitis 2016–2021: towards ending viral hepatitis. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2016.
  • 22.Freeland C, Kanu F, Mohammed Y, Nwokoro UU, Sandhu H, Ikwe H, et al. Barriers and facilitators to hepatitis B birth dose vaccination: Perspectives from healthcare providers and pregnant women accessing antenatal care in Nigeria. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023;3(6):e0001332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001332 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bai X, Chen L, Liu X, Tong Y, Wang L, Zhou M, et al. Adult Hepatitis B Virus Vaccination Coverage in China from 2011 to 2021: A Systematic Review. Vaccines (Basel). 2022;10(6):900. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10060900 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yendewa GA, James PB, Mohareb A, Barrie U, Massaquoi SPE, Yendewa SA, et al. Determinants of incomplete childhood hepatitis B vaccination in Sierra Leone, Liberia, and Guinea: Analysis of national surveys (2018-2020). Epidemiol Infect. 2023;151:e193. doi: 10.1017/S0950268823001735 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mohanty P, Jena P, Patnaik L. Vaccination against Hepatitis B: A Scoping Review. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020;21(12):3453–9. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.12.3453 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Otwombe K, Dietrich J, Laher F, Hornschuh S, Nkala B, Chimoyi L, et al. Health-seeking behaviours by gender among adolescents in Soweto, South Africa. Glob Health Action. 2015;8:25670. doi: 10.3402/gha.v8.25670 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Obilor NM. Gender and health-seeking behavior in rural Nigeria. Unizik J Gender Res. 2023;2(1). [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Aghedo OG, Akwolu CC, Oluka PO, Nwankwo AU, Achime NE. Investigating the Relationship between Medication Adherence Behaviors and the Achievement of Sustained Viral Load Suppression among People Living with HIV (PLHIV) on Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) in Akwa Ibom State, from 2018 - 2022. Public Health Open Access. 2024;8(1):1–9. doi: 10.23880/phoa-16000270 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gallagher KE, Kadokura E, Eckert LO, Miyake S, Mounier-Jack S, Aldea M, et al. Factors influencing completion of multi-dose vaccine schedules in adolescents: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:172. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2845-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Adelekan B, Andrew N, Nta I, Gomwalk A, Ndembi N, Mensah C, et al. Social barriers in accessing care by clients who returned to HIV care after transient loss to follow-up. AIDS Res Ther. 2019;16(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12981-019-0231-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bouabida K, Chaves BG, Anane E. Challenges and barriers to HIV care engagement and care cascade: viewpoint. Front Reprod Health. 2023;5:1201087. doi: 10.3389/frph.2023.1201087 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Jason Blackard

27 Nov 2025

Dear Dr. Aghedo,

plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Jason T. Blackard, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following in your manuscript:

[The HBV vaccination program that gave rise to the data used in this research was funded by the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), through the Henry M. Jackson Foundation Medical Research International (HJF-MRI). However, the findings and opinions expressed in this article do not represent opinions of DoD or HJF-MRI, they are solely those of the authors. No specific external funding was received for this research. ]

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

[The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.]

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

3. In the online submission form, you indicated that [We have not made the data used in this research publicly available yet, to protect the participants who are high-risk populations from possible breach of confidentiality, and stigma associated with same-sex behavior and commercial sex work. However, the data are available at the OSS clinic of CPHI, upon reasonable request it will be made available. All requests should be sent to info@cphinigeria.org or to the corresponding author. Also, no online supplemental information is required because all data collected has been analyzed and reported in this article.].

All PLOS journals now require all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript to be freely available to other researchers, either 1. In a public repository, 2. Within the manuscript itself, or 3. Uploaded as supplementary information.

This policy applies to all data except where public deposition would breach compliance with the protocol approved by your research ethics board. If your data cannot be made publicly available for ethical or legal reasons (e.g., public availability would compromise patient privacy), please explain your reasons on resubmission and your exemption request will be escalated for approval.

4. Your ethics statement should only appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please move it to the Methods section and delete it from any other section. Please ensure that your ethics statement is included in your manuscript, as the ethics statement entered into the online submission form will not be published alongside your manuscript.

5. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited. There is no requirement to cite these works unless the editor has indicated otherwise.

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

This is a cross-sectional study of HBV vaccination rates conducted in Lagos, Nigeria.

The methods and results are described well, although the findings are not particularly surprising.

In addition to the comments raised by the two reviewers, additional clarifications below would strengthen the manuscript further:

  • The introduction must include information about the availability of HBV vaccination in the public and private sectors across Nigeria as well as any associated cost.  Similarly, what are the nationwide policies/guidelines on HBV vaccination?

  • Are HBV medications available in the public and private sectors?

  • It is unclear why data prior to 2021 were not included.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: This is an automated report for PONE-D-25-10988. This report was solicited by the PLOS One editorial team and provided by ScreenIT.

ScreenIT is an independent group of scientists developing automated tools that analyze academic papers. A set of automated tools screened your submitted manuscript and provided the report below. Each tool was created by your academic colleagues with the goal of helping authors. The tools look for factors that are important for transparency, rigor and reproducibility, and we hope that the report might help you to improve reporting in your manuscript. Within the report you will find links to more information about the items that the tools check. These links include helpful papers, websites, or videos that explain why the item is important. While our screening tools aim to improve and maintain quality standards they may, on occasion, miss nuances specific to your study type or flag something incorrectly. Each tool has limitations that are described on the ScreenIT website. The tools screen the main file for the paper; they are not able to screen supplements stored in separate files. Please note that the Academic Editor had access to these comments while making a decision on your manuscript. The Academic Editor may ask that issues flagged in this report be addressed. If you would like to provide feedback on the ScreenIT tool, please email the team at ScreenIt@bih-charite.de. If you have questions or concerns about the review process, please contact the PLOS One office at plosone@plos.org.

Reviewer #2: The study investigated the impact of demographic factors and HIV status on HBV vaccination adherence

and completion rate among high-risk populations such as MSM and FSW in Lagos State, Nigeria. The study has been conducted and analysed the data appropriately. The study concluded that there are certain demographic factors playing a role in the uptake of HBV vaccinations among high-risk populations. The manuscript may be accepted for publication after making some minor changes as listed below:

1. It is assumed that the vaccination schedule followed in this study was 0-1-6 and it is important to include these details in the methodology section.

2. In line No.189, the age range mentioned is 5 - 29 years and this typo may be corrected.

3. In line 322, is it 'holistic' or 'wholistic'?

4. In futurology, maybe the authors could consider including antibody titre post vaccination, and this will assess the respondent rate.

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Pachamuthu Balakrishnan

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

To ensure your figures meet our technical requirements, please review our figure guidelines: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures

You may also use PLOS’s free figure tool, NAAS, to help you prepare publication quality figures: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-tools-for-figure-preparation.

NAAS will assess whether your figures meet our technical requirements by comparing each figure against our figure specifications.

Attachment

Submitted filename: report_10.1101+2025.03.09.25323632.pdf

pone.0321434.s001.pdf (591.6KB, pdf)
PLoS One. 2026 Mar 4;21(3):e0321434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321434.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 1


8 Jan 2026

We sincerely thank the academic editor and the reviewers for the constructive and insightful comments on our manuscript. We have carefully addressed all editorial and reviewer comments. We believe the revised manuscript has been substantially improved as a result, and both the tracked-changes version and an unmarked clean copy have been uploaded. Our point-by-point response to the journal requirements, additional editor’s comments and the reviewers’ comments are provided in a file named, "Responses to Reviewers" and uploaded too for your reference.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response_to_Reviewers.docx

pone.0321434.s003.docx (25.5KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Jason Blackard

1 Feb 2026

Impact of demographic factors and HIV status on Hepatitis B vaccination adherence and completion rate among high-risk populations in Lagos State, Nigeria

PONE-D-25-10988R1

Dear Dr. Aghedo,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager®  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. For questions related to billing, please contact billing support .

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Jason T. Blackard, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

None

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions??>

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

Reviewer #2: All the responses to the queries raised have been addressed appropriately. However, some minor corrections may be needed as follows:

1. Line 153: "subjects" may be replaced with "study participants".

2. If available, the manufacturer details of the vaccine used may be included in the methodology section appropriately.

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #2: Yes: Pachamuthu Balakrishnan

**********

Acceptance letter

Jason Blackard

PONE-D-25-10988R1

PLOS One

Dear Dr. Aghedo,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS One. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

You will receive further instructions from the production team, including instructions on how to review your proof when it is ready. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few days to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

You will receive an invoice from PLOS for your publication fee after your manuscript has reached the completed accept phase. If you receive an email requesting payment before acceptance or for any other service, this may be a phishing scheme. Learn how to identify phishing emails and protect your accounts at https://explore.plos.org/phishing.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Jason T. Blackard

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: report_10.1101+2025.03.09.25323632.pdf

    pone.0321434.s001.pdf (591.6KB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response_to_Reviewers.docx

    pone.0321434.s003.docx (25.5KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    The secondary data used in this study was generated from the community-based vaccination program implemented by CPHI. The data are available at the OSS clinic of CPHI, and publicly available at Figshare: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30998749. Also, all data related requests or inquiries can be sent to info@cphinigeria.org or to the corresponding author.


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES