Skip to main content
Journal of Diabetes logoLink to Journal of Diabetes
editorial
. 2026 Mar 5;18(2):e70204. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.70204

Beyond GLP‐1

Zachary Bloomgarden 1,
PMCID: PMC12961913  PMID: 41784368

1.

The prevalence of obesity in the United States increased from 19.3% of the adult population in 1990 to 42.5% in 2022, with a forecasted increase to 46.9% in 2035 [1]; globally the trends appear similar [2]. The glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP1‐RAs) have shown remarkable success in treating overweight and obesity, with 12% of adults in the United States said to have at least temporarily received one of these agents [3]. However, a number of issues should be considered in GLP‐1RA use. Not all treated individuals have the desired degree of weight loss; this is particularly an issue for people with type 2 diabetes, for whom the degree of weight loss is less than that among people not having diabetes [4]. Gastrointestinal intolerance prevents a sizable number of people from using these agents or necessitates their use in lower doses. We have reviewed the question as to whether weight loss‐associated decrease in muscle mass may lead to clinical sarcopenia, in turn associated with frailty and susceptibility to a variety of adverse consequences [5]. It is likely that these considerations are relevant to important subsets of treated individuals as we further extend weight control agents to address more chronic illnesses. The development of novel approaches to attain weight loss, with greater gastrointestinal tolerability, and without reduction in muscle mass should then be seen as a priority. The approaches being evaluated span a variety of different mechanisms. Their use will almost certainly be developed in conjunction with GLP‐1RAs, potentially allowing more tolerable dosing and a greater degree of weight loss in.

Over the coming issues of the Journal of Diabetes, we will review some potential adjunctive agents that may find efficacy in combination with the GLP‐1RA in an effort to stimulate discussion of these approaches (Figure 1). We look forward to contributions to the Journal addressing these approaches.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Non‐incretin adjunct targets that could complement GLP‐1 / multi‐agonists in obesity.

Funding

The author has nothing to report.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1. DeCleene N. K., Kahn E., Yuan C. W., et al., “US State‐Level Prevalence of Adult Obesity by Race and Ethnicity From 1990 to 2022 and Forecasted to 2035,” Journal of the American Medical Association (2026. Jan 28): e2526817, 10.1001/jama.2025.26817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD‐RisC) , “Worldwide Trends in Underweight and Obesity From 1990 to 2022: A Pooled Analysis of 3663 Population‐Representative Studies With 222 Million Children, Adolescents, and Adults,” Lancet 403, no. 10431 (2024. Mar 16): 1027–1050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Harris E., “Poll: Roughly 12% of US Adults Have Used a GLP‐1 Drug, Even if Unaffordable,” Journal of the American Medical Association 332, no. 2 (2024): 8, 10.1001/jama.2024.10333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Vosoughi K., Salman Roghani R., and Camilleri M., “Effects of GLP‐1 Agonists on Proportion of Weight Loss in Obesity With or Without Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Obesity Medicine 35 (2022): 100456, 10.1016/j.obmed.2022.100456. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Bloomgarden Z. T., “Monitoring Sarcopenia With Incretin Receptor Activator Treatment,” Journal of Diabetes 17, no. 6 (2025): e70117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Diabetes are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES