Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2026 Feb 12;60(8):5927–5933. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6c01714

Advances in Emissions, Modeling, and Source Apportionment

Xiao Fu , Guannan Geng , Philip K Hopke §,∥,*, Huizhong Shen
PMCID: PMC12961920  PMID: 41677328

graphic file with name es6c01714_0003.jpg

Keywords: air pollution, climate change, source apportionment, emissions inventory


graphic file with name es6c01714_0002.jpg


Air pollution is a major environmental problem leading to impacts on human and ecosystem health. To effectively manage the problem, it is essential that the origins of the pollutants be identified and quantified so they can be targeted for policy actions. Time-resolved, spatially complete, high-resolution concentration and emission data sets for major air pollutants are now fundamental for meaningful health impact assessments, climate change analysis, and environmental policy evaluations. This Viewpoint considers how advances in emissions, modeling, and source apportionment have evolved over the past 60 years with Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) publishing some of the seminal papers.

Source Apportionment

The earliest efforts to apportion air pollution data were in the 1960s just before and just after 1967 when ES&T was first published. Specific elemental tracers were applied to obtain quantitative estimates of source contributions. , However, with the advent of multiple species analysis methods like instrumental neutron activation, X-ray fluorescence, ion beam analysis, and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, Friedlander recognized that any given element could be emitted by multiple source types, and thus, a least-squares regression was needed. This approach was applied in several papers until Kowalczyk et al. , recognized that it was necessary to perform a weighted least-squares fit. Subsequently, Watson et al. extended the analysis by incorporating the uncertainties in the measurement of the species concentrations in the profiles of the particulate emissions from the various sources. This effective variance least-squares approach has been incorporated into the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Chemical Mass Balance software (USEPA CMB Model version 8.2).

However, the CMB model requires information about the profile of chemical species in the emissions from the likely sources in an air shed and has problems dealing with secondary species formed in the atmosphere from gaseous emissions. Thus, another class of models based on factor analysis has been developed beginning in the late 1970s. , These methods initially apportioned variance and not species variation so that a modified approach called target transformation factor analysis was developed and applied in a number of studies. Subsequently, it was recognized that these eigenvector-based methods were inappropriate given the nature of the error structure of environmental data giving rise to an explicit least-squares approach to the factor analysis problem, positive matrix factorization (PMF). , This methodology has increasingly been used particularly after the release of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s version of PMF (USEPA PMF version 5.14) that has now become the most widely used software for source apportionment for a variety of problems in air, water, and soils. , Thus, the combination of multiple species analytical methods and advanced data analysis tools has enabled development and application of source apportionment to support management strategies leading to environmental improvements and better human and ecological health, with ES&T publishing multiple seminal papers supporting these developments such as the addition of dispersion normalization for preprocessing atmospheric data for PMF analyses , and uncertainty analyses for the resolved source-specific concentrations. ,

Emissions Inventory

Beyond receptor-based source apportionment, comprehensive air quality assessment requires detailed bottom-up emission inventories to drive atmospheric models. Over the past 60 years, ES&T has documented substantial advances in emission inventories, with spatial and temporal resolutions progressing from coarse annual country totals to finely gridded, near-real-time maps at subkilometer and hourly scales. This enhanced granularity supports more accurate air quality simulations through better model inputs.

Sectoral details have also deepened. Specialized inventories now target specific sources that were previously embedded in aggregate totals, exemplified by dedicated emission assessments, for example, for road dust, aviation, , and the iron and steel industry. Long time-series reconstructions of key pollutants (e.g., global NO x , SO2, and PM from 1960 onward) have provided an empirical backbone for attributing observed air quality changes to technology shifts and policy interventions across regions and decades. ,− The chemical scope of inventories has expanded beyond classical pollutants (SO2, NO x , and PM) to encompass hazardous species such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and trace metals, as well as the full volatility spectrum of organic compounds. ,− Taken together, advances in resolution, temporal detail, speciation, sectoral coverage, and integration with geospatial big data have helped transform emission inventories into dynamic, high-detail tools that underpin more effective air quality management and atmospheric chemistry research.

A good example of this broadening inventory includes reactive halogens. Early studies have mainly focused on halogen sources and chemistry in polar or marine regions. However, facilitated by the development of measuring technologies (e.g., chemical ionization mass spectrometry (CIMS)), intensive field campaigns have been conducted in continental regions, detecting ClNO2, Cl2, Br2, BrCl, etc. Unexpectedly high concentrations and different diurnal variations cannot be explained by the traditional halogen sources and chemistry mechanism established in marine or polar areas. In addition, based on field evidence and laboratory experiments, potential new mechanisms are proposed, ,, such as the production of Cl2 and Br2 from halogen activation via aerosol iron or nitrate photochemistry. However, additional measurements of the halogen emission characteristics from anthropogenic sources and more laboratory experiments are required to identify kinetic parameters, especially under nearly ambient conditions.

Fusion of Complementary Data Sources

Emission inventories drive chemical transport models to simulate pollutant concentrations, but model uncertainties have motivated fusion approaches that combine simulations with space- and ground-based observational data. Over the past several decades, ES&T has recognized the key importance of the evolution of methodologies that fuse complementary data sources together to generate high-accuracy, high-resolution concentration fields, initially focused on PM2.5 , and then extended to O3, , NO2, and, more recently, PM2.5 composition.

This fusion of complementary data sources has unlocked great potential. Using satellite-retrieved aerosol optical depth and trace-gas columns, previous studies have established statistical and hybrid statistical–physical models that link satellite observations with ground measurements and auxiliary predictors (e.g., meteorology and land use) to derive gridded surface concentrations. ,, Recently, machine-learning and deep-learning approaches have been applied to this problem, substantially improving the spatial and temporal resolution and accuracy of satellite-based estimates, with spatial grids refined to 1 km or even hundreds of meters and temporal resolution reaching hourly scales. In parallel, satellite-derived information about aerosol size distributions and absorbing properties, as well as model-based speciation, has opened pathways to infer PM2.5 chemical composition from space. − ,

Air Quality Modeling

Air quality modeling has evolved continuously over the past 60 years from traditional forward chemical transport simulations toward a suite of sensitivity-capable modeling systems that can diagnose, attribute, and optimize. Advances in forward sensitivity methods, such as implementation of the decoupled direct method (DDM) in three-dimensional models, have enabled efficient, first-principles quantification of how concentration metrics respond to emissions and parameter perturbations. , Methodological extensions to higher-order direct sensitivities and the characterization of nonlinear responses (notably for ozone) have clarified when linear approximations break down and why control strategies need to be regime-aware. , The development of adjoint frameworks, exemplified by the CMAQ adjoint, has further shifted the field from “what happens if” experiments toward gradient-informed attribution and optimization, enabling source–receptor analysis at scale and laying groundwork for policy-relevant benefit-per-ton and control design applications. ,

As our knowledge of atmospheric processes and chemistry improves along with computational power, the models can continue to improve. As an example, atmospheric models, including box models and chemical transport models, have been used to investigate the impacts of reactive halogens in continental regions. Recent work has highlighted the role of hydroxymethanesulfonate in ambient aerosol particularly in colder, more humid conditions and provided information that is needed to be able to effectively model its atmospheric behavior.

Linking Exposure to Air Pollution with Health Outcomes

A major milestone in air quality research has been the quantitative linking of air pollution to exposure and health, supported by rapid progress in spatiotemporal exposure fields and impact assessment. Satellite-enabled and data fusion approaches have steadily improved the resolution and coverage of air pollutant concentration fieldsfrom regional satellite-based estimation to global, long-term reconstructions and near-real-time productsproviding a consistent basis for epidemiology, inequality analysis, and accountability studies. ,,,,, These data fusion advances have, in turn, enabled more comprehensive burden estimation frameworks for global assessments, ,,, while integrated modeling has made it increasingly feasible to connect marginal precursor emissions to population health outcomes, both globally and within fast-changing regions. Taken together, these developments appear to have moved ES&T’s air chemistry corpus toward a full chain of evidence: emissions → chemistry/transport → exposure → health impact.

Future Research

Looking ahead, a key research need is to develop unified multipollutant, multicomponent frameworks that simultaneously estimate PM2.5, O3, NO2, SO2, and speciated PM2.5 at fine spatial and temporal scales, while providing robust and transparent uncertainty characterization. The rapid emergence of new satellite platforms, including geostationary missions, multiangle imagers, and hyperspectral sensors, creates opportunities and challenges for integrating heterogeneous data streams into consistent long-term records that remain stable under changing emission patterns and climate conditions. Capturing extreme events such as wildfires, dust storms, and heat waves is particularly important, as these episodes are becoming dominant drivers of short-term health risks but their impacts on air pollution are often difficult to quantify with existing data sets and methods. Finally, there is a need to embed these high-resolution pollution data sets more deeply into health, climate, and socioeconomic analyses, so that satellite-based products not only map exposure but also support source attribution, policy evaluation, and the design of equitable, evidence-based mitigation strategies, an area where ES&T will continue to play a leading role.

Another leap is likely to come from making each link of that chain dynamic, multisource, and uncertainty-aware. For emissions, a central need is a new generation of inventories that fuse bottom-up activity and technology data with satellite retrievals and ground observations using AI/ML, while preserving physical and chemical consistency. ES&T’s recent demonstrations of ML-enabled top-down inference of NO x emissions from satellite NO2 highlight the feasibility of near-real-time updates and scalable deployment, and work on observation-constrained, physically informed fusion for surface concentrations illustrates the importance of hybrid constraints (rather than purely “black-box” prediction) for operational products. , At the modeling layer, a key research priority is not to replace CTMs, but to build hybrid systems: CTMs for causal fidelity, sensitivity-enabled methods (DDM/adjoint) for attribution and optimization, and emulators/surrogates for speed, ensemble uncertainty quantification, and scenario exploration. ,,,

Finally, if air chemistry is to remain policy-relevant under rapid decarbonization, tighter coupling of climate–air pollution–socioeconomic dynamics in integrated assessment will be required, explicitly valuing health cobenefits and distributional outcomes across pathways and regions. These frontiers collectively suggest a discipline that is becoming increasingly predictive, actionable, and equity-aware, while retaining the mechanistic rigor that has characterized ES&T’s contributions for six decades.

Biography

graphic file with name es6c01714_0001.gif

Professor Philip K. Hopke has been studying atmospheric aerosol properties for more than 55 years and has been a leader in the development of mathematical methods to identify and quantify air pollution sources. Prof. Hopke has held faculty positions at the SUNY College at Fredonia, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Clarkson University, and the University of Rochester. He has published 72 papers in Environmental Science & Technology.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Published as part of Environmental Science & Technology special issue “60th Anniversary of Environmental Science and Technology”.

References

  1. Colucci J. M., Begeman C. R.. The automotive contribution to air-borne polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in Detroit. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 1965;15:113–22. doi: 10.1080/00022470.1965.10468342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blifford I. H., Meeker G. O.. A factor analysis model of large scale pollution. Atmos. Environ. 1967;1:147–57. doi: 10.1016/0004-6981(67)90042-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Prinz B., Stratmann H.. The possible use of factor analysis in investigating air quality. Staub-Reinhalt Luft. 1968;28:33–39. [Google Scholar]
  4. Winchester J. W., Nifong G. D.. Water pollution in Lake Michigan by trace elements from pollution aerosol fallout. Water Air Soil Pollut. 1971;1:50–64. doi: 10.1007/BF00280779. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Miller M. S., Friedlander S. K., Hidy G. M.. A chemical element balance for the Pasadena aerosol. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1972;39:165–176. doi: 10.1016/0021-9797(72)90152-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Friedlander S. K.. 1973. Chemical element balances and identification of air pollution sources. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1973;7:235–240. doi: 10.1021/es60075a005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kowalczyk G. S., Choquette C. E., Gordon G. E.. Chemical element balances and identification of air pollution sources in Washington, D.C. Atmos. Environ. 1978;12:1143–1153. doi: 10.1016/0004-6981(78)90361-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kowalczyk G. S., Gordon G. E., Rheingrover S. W.. Identification of atmospheric particulate sources in Washington, D.C. using chemical element balances. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1982;16:79–90. doi: 10.1021/es00096a005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Watson J. G., Cooper J. A., Huntzicker J. J.. The effective variance weighting for least squares calculations applied to the mass balance receptor model. Atmos. Environ. 1984;18:1347–55. doi: 10.1016/0004-6981(84)90043-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency . Chemical Mass Balance (CMB) Model, ver. 8.2. https://www.epa.gov/scram/chemical-mass-balance-cmb-model.
  11. Hopke P. K., Gladney E. S., Gordon G. E., Zoller W. H., Jones A. G.. The use of multivariate analysis to identify sources of selected elements in the Boston urban aerosol. Atmos. Environ. 1976;10:1015–25. doi: 10.1016/0004-6981(76)90211-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gaarenstroom P. D., Perone S. P., Moyers J. P.. Application of pattern recognition and factor analysis for characterization of atmospheric particulate composition in Southwest desert atmosphere. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1977;11:795–800. doi: 10.1021/es60131a003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hopke P. K., Lamb R. E., Natusch D. F. S.. Multielemental characterization of urban street dust. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1980;14:164–72. doi: 10.1021/es60162a006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Paatero P., Tapper U.. Analysis of different modes of factor analysis as least squares fit problems. Chemomet. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1993;18:183–194. doi: 10.1016/0169-7439(93)80055-M. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Paatero P., Tapper U.. Positive Matrix Factorization: a non-negative factor model with optimal utilization of error estimates of data values. Environmetrics. 1994;5:111–126. doi: 10.1002/env.3170050203. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency . Positive Matrix Factorization Model for Environmental Data Analyses. https://www.epa.gov/air-research/positive-matrix-factorization-model-environmental-data-analyses.
  17. Hopke P. K., Dai Q., Li L., Feng Y.. Global review of recent source apportionments for airborne particulate matter. Sci. Total Environ. 2020;740:140091. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hopke P. K., Feng Y., Dai Q.. Source apportionment of particle number concentrations: a global review. Sci. Total Environ. 2022;819:153104. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Yang Y., Liu B., Hua J., Yang T., Dai Q., Wu J., Feng Y., Hopke P. K.. Global review of source apportionment of volatile organic compounds based on highly time- resolved data from 2015 to 2021. Environ. Int. 2022;165:107330. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Li H., Hopke P. K., Liu X., Du X., Li F.. Application of positive matrix factorization to source apportionment of surface water quality of the Daliao River basin, northeast China. Environ. Monitor. Assess. 2015;187:80. doi: 10.1007/s10661-014-4154-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Chen S., Wang S., Yu Y., Dong M., Li Y.. Temporal trends and source apportionment of water pollution in Honghu Lake, China. Environ. Sci. Pollut Res. 2021;28:60130–60144. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14828-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Yu E., Li Y., Li F., He C., Feng X.. Source apportionment and influencing factors of surface water pollution through a combination of multiple receptor models and geodetector. Environ. Res. 2024;263(Part 2):120168. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.120168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jiang H. H., Cai L. M., Wen H. H., Luo J.. Characterizing pollution and source identification of heavy metals in soils using geochemical baseline and PMF approach. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:6460. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63604-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Zeng T., Ma L., Li Y., Abuduwaili J., Liu W., Feng S.. Source apportionment of soil heavy metals with PMF model and Pb isotopes in an intermountain basin of Tianshan Mountains. China. Sci. Rep. 2022;12:19429. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24064-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Dai Q., Liu B., Bi X., Wu J., Liang D., Zhang Y., Feng Y., Hopke P. K.. Dispersion Normalized PMF Provides Insights into the Significant Changes in Source Contributions to PM2.5 after the COVID-19 Outbreak. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020;54(16):9917–9927. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c02776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu B., Gu Y., Wu Y., Dai Q., Song S., Feng Y., Hopke P. K.. Review of source analyses of ambient volatile organic compounds considering reactive losses: methods of reducing loss effects, impacts of losses, and sources. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2024;24:12861–12879. doi: 10.5194/acp-24-12861-2024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Song L., Dai Q., Feng Y., Hopke P. K.. Estimating uncertainties of source contributions to PM2.5 using moving window evolving dispersion normalized PMF. Environ. Pollut. 2021;286:117576. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Chen J., Dai Q., Zhang X., Tian Y., Feng Y., Hopke P. K.. PMF Source Contribution Uncertainty Estimation via Effective Variance Least Squares. ACS ES&T Air. 2025;2(12):3045–3053. doi: 10.1021/acsestair.5c00312. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Chen S., Zhang X., Lin J., Huang J., Zhao D., Yuan T., Huang K., Luo Y., Jia Z., Zang Z., Qiu Y., Xie L.. Fugitive Road Dust PM2.5 Emissions and Their Potential Health Impacts. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019;53(14):8455–8465. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b00666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhang J., Zhang S., Zhang X., Wang J., Wu Y., Hao J.. Developing a High-Resolution Emission Inventory of China’s Aviation Sector Using Real-World Flight Trajectory Data. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022;56(9):5743–5752. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c08741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Han Y., Shen H., He X., Mai Z., Zhang R., Zheng Z., Liu Y., Zhang X., Li G., Zhang Z., Liang Z., Chen Y., Xie Y., Li M., Shen G., Wang C., Ye J., Zhu L., Fu T.-M., Yang X.. A Comprehensive Analysis of Interflight Variability in Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Global Aviation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2025;59(12):6179–6191. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5c02371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wang K., Liu S., Liu K., Dan M., Ji X., Lu Y., Xing Y.. Tracking Carbon Flows in China’s Iron and Steel Industry. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023;57(31):11510–11519. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c02624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Huang Y., Shen H., Chen H., Wang R., Zhang Y., Su S., Chen Y., Lin N., Zhuo S., Zhong Q., Wang X., Liu J., Li B., Liu W., Tao S.. Quantification of Global Primary Emissions of PM2.5, PM10, and TSP from Combustion and Industrial Process Sources. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014;48(23):13834–13843. doi: 10.1021/es503696k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Huang T., Zhu X., Zhong Q., Yun X., Meng W., Li B., Ma J., Zeng E. Y., Tao S.. Spatial and Temporal Trends in Global Emissions of Nitrogen Oxides from 1960 to 2014. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017;51(14):7992–8000. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b02235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhong Q., Shen H., Yun X., Chen Y., Ren Y., Xu H., Shen G., Du W., Meng J., Li W., Ma J., Tao S.. Global Sulfur Dioxide Emissions and the Driving Forces. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020;54(11):6508–6517. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b07696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Shen H., Huang Y., Wang R., Zhu D., Li W., Shen G., Wang B., Zhang Y., Chen Y., Lu Y., Chen H., Li T., Sun K., Li B., Liu W., Liu J., Tao S.. Global Atmospheric Emissions of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons from 1960 to 2008 and Future Predictions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013;47(12):6415–6424. doi: 10.1021/es400857z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Shan M., Dai R., Zhu Y., Zheng S., Wang J., Zhang H., Chen Y., Chen R., Ma J., Shen G., Cheng H., Zhong Q., Shen H., Wang C., Tao S.. Trends in Global Black Carbon Emissions and Population Exposure from 1700 to 2021. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2025;59(24):12211–12220. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5c03352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Huang L., Zhao B., Wang S., Chang X., Klimont Z., Huang G., Zheng H., Hao J.. Global Anthropogenic Emissions of Full-Volatility Organic Compounds. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023;57(43):16435–16445. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c04106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Tian H., Liu K., Zhou J., Lu L., Hao J., Qiu P., Gao J., Zhu C., Wang K., Hua S.. Atmospheric Emission Inventory of Hazardous Trace Elements from China’s Coal-Fired Power PlantsTemporal Trends and Spatial Variation Characteristics. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014;48(6):3575–3582. doi: 10.1021/es404730j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Cheng K., Wang Y., Tian H., Gao X., Zhang Y., Wu X., Zhu C., Gao J.. Atmospheric Emission Characteristics and Control Policies of Five Precedent-Controlled Toxic Heavy Metals from Anthropogenic Sources in China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015;49(2):1206–1214. doi: 10.1021/es5037332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Reff A., Bhave P. V., Simon H., Pace T. G., Pouliot G. A., Mobley J. D., Houyoux M.. Emissions Inventory of PM2.5 Trace Elements across the United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009;43(15):5790–5796. doi: 10.1021/es802930x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Liu K., Wang S., Wu Q., Wang L., Ma Q., Zhang L., Li G., Tian H., Duan L., Hao J.. A Highly Resolved Mercury Emission Inventory of Chinese Coal-Fired Power Plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018;52(4):2400–2408. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b06209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhang L., Wang S., Wang L., Wu Y., Duan L., Wu Q., Wang F., Yang M., Yang H., Hao J., Liu X.. Updated Emission Inventories for Speciated Atmospheric Mercury from Anthropogenic Sources in China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015;49(5):3185–3194. doi: 10.1021/es504840m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Chang S., Allen D. T.. Atmospheric Chlorine Chemistry in Southeast Texas: Impacts on Ozone Formation and Control. Environmental Science & Technology. 2006;40(1):251–262. doi: 10.1021/es050787z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Chen X. R., Jiang Y. F., Zong Z., Wang Y. N., Sun W. H., Wang Y., Xia M., Guan L. W., Liu P. F., Zhang C. L., Chen J. M., Mu Y. J., Wang T.. Atmospheric Reactive Halogens Reshaped by the Clean Energy Policy and Agricultural Activity in a Rural Area of the North China Plain. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2025;59(25):12775–12785. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c13986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Liu X. X., Qu H., Huey L. G., Wang Y. H., Sjostedt S., Zeng L. M., Lu K. D., Wu Y. S., Hu M., Shao M., Zhu T., Zhang Y. H.. High Levels of Daytime Molecular Chlorine and Nitryl Chloride at a Rural Site on the North China Plain. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017;51:9588–9595. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b03039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Mielke L. H., Furgeson A., Osthoff H. D.. Observation of CINO2 in a Mid-Continental Urban Environment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011;45(20):8889–8896. doi: 10.1021/es201955u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Peng X., Wang W., Xia M., Chen H., Ravishankara A. R., Li Q., Saiz-Lopez A., Liu P., Zhang F., Zhang C., Xue L., Wang X., George C., Wang J., Mu Y., Chen J., Wang T.. An unexpected large continental source of reactive bromine and chlorine with significant impact on wintertime air quality. National Science Review. 2021;8:nwaa304. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwaa304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Peng X., Wang T., Wang W., Ravishankara A. R., George C., Xia M., Cai M., Li Q., Salvador C. M., Lau C., Lyu X., Poon C. N., Mellouki A., Mu Y., Hallquist M., Saiz-Lopez A., Guo H., Herrmann H., Yu C., Dai J., Wang Y., Wang X., Yu A., Leung K., Lee S., Chen J.. Photodissociation of particulate nitrate as a source of daytime tropospheric Cl-2. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:939. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28383-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Thornton J. A., Kercher J. P., Riedel T. P., Wagner N. L., Cozic J., Holloway J. S., Dubé W. P., Wolfe G. M., Quinn P. K., Middlebrook A. M., Alexander B., Brown S. S.. A large atomic chlorine source inferred from mid-continental reactive nitrogen chemistry. Nature. 2010;464(7286):271–274. doi: 10.1038/nature08905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Xia M., Peng X., Wang W. H., Yu C. A., Wang Z., Tham Y. J., Chen J. M., Chen H., Mu Y. J., Zhang C. L., Liu P. F., Xue L. K., Wang X. F., Gao J., Li H., Wang T.. Winter ClNO2 formation in the region of fresh anthropogenic emissions: seasonal variability and insights into daytime peaks in northern China. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 2021;21(20):15985–16000. doi: 10.5194/acp-21-15985-2021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Xia M., Wang T., Wang Z., Chen Y., Peng X., Huo Y., Wang W., Yuan Q., Jiang Y., Guo H., Lau C., Leung K., Yu A., Lee S.. Pollution-Derived Br2 Boosts Oxidation Power of the Coastal Atmosphere. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022;56(17):12055–12065. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c02434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Chen Q. J., Wang X., Fu X., Li X. X., Alexander B., Peng X., Wang W. H., Xia M., Tan Y., Gao J., Chen J. M., Mu Y. J., Liu P. F., Wang T.. Impact of Molecular Chlorine Production from Aerosol Iron Photochemistry on Atmospheric Oxidative Capacity in North China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2024;58(28):12585–12597. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c02534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Ma Z., Hu X., Huang L., Bi J., Liu Y.. Estimating Ground-Level PM2.5 in China Using Satellite Remote Sensing. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014;48(13):7436–7444. doi: 10.1021/es5009399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Liu Y., Sarnat J. A., Kilaru V., Jacob D. J., Koutrakis P.. Estimating Ground-Level PM2.5 in the Eastern United States Using Satellite Remote Sensing. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005;39(9):3269–3278. doi: 10.1021/es049352m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Requia W. J., Di Q., Silvern R., Kelly J. T., Koutrakis P., Mickley L. J., Sulprizio M. P., Amini H., Shi L., Schwartz J.. An Ensemble Learning Approach for Estimating High Spatiotemporal Resolution of Ground-Level Ozone in the Contiguous United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020;54(18):11037–11047. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c01791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Xue T., Zheng Y., Geng G., Xiao Q., Meng X., Wang M., Li X., Wu N., Zhang Q., Zhu T.. Estimating Spatiotemporal Variation in Ambient Ozone Exposure during 2013–2017 Using a Data-Fusion Model. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020;54(23):14877–14888. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c03098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. de Hoogh K., Saucy A., Shtein A., Schwartz J., West E. A., Strassmann A., Puhan M., Röösli M., Stafoggia M., Kloog I.. Predicting Fine-Scale Daily NO2 for 2005–2016 Incorporating OMI Satellite Data Across Switzerland. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019;53:10279–10287. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b03107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Liu S., Geng G., Xiao Q., Zheng Y., Liu X., Cheng J., Zhang Q.. Tracking daily concentrations of PM2.5 chemical composition in China since 2000. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022;56(22):16517–16527. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c06510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Philip S., Martin R. V., van Donkelaar A., Lo J. W.-H., Wang Y., Chen D., Zhang L., Kasibhatla P. S., Wang S., Zhang Q.. et al. Global chemical composition of ambient fine particulate matter for exposure assessment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014;48(22):13060–13068. doi: 10.1021/es502965b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. van Donkelaar A., Martin R. V., Li C., Burnett R. T.. Regional Estimates of Chemical Composition of Fine Particulate Matter Using a Combined Geoscience-Statistical Method with Information from Satellites, Models, and Monitors. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019;53(5):2595–2611. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b06392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Brauer M., Amann M., Burnett R. T., Cohen A., Dentener F., Ezzati M., Henderson S. B., Krzyzanowski M., Martin R. V., Van Dingenen R., van Donkelaar A., Thurston G. D.. Exposure Assessment for Estimation of the Global Burden of Disease Attributable to Outdoor Air Pollution. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012;46(2):652–660. doi: 10.1021/es2025752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Hammer M. S., van Donkelaar A., Li C., Lyapustin A., Sayer A. M., Hsu N. C., Levy R. C., Garay M. J., Kalashnikova O. V., Kahn R. A., Brauer M., Apte J. S., Henze D. K., Zhang L., Zhang Q., Ford B., Pierce J. R., Martin R. V.. Global Estimates and Long-Term Trends of Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations (1998–2018) Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020;54(13):7879–7890. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c01764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Brokamp C., Jandarov R., Hossain M., Ryan P.. Predicting Daily Urban Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations Using a Random Forest Model. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018;52(7):4173–4179. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b05381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Geng G., Xiao Q., Liu S., Liu X., Cheng J., Zheng Y., Xue T., Tong D., Zheng B., Peng Y., Huang X., He K., Zhang Q.. Tracking Air Pollution in China: Near Real-Time PM2.5 Retrievals from Multisource Data Fusion. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021;55(17):12106–12115. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c01863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Hu X. F., Belle J. H., Meng X., Wildani A., Waller L. A., Strickland M. J., Liu Y.. Estimating PM2.5 Concentrations in the Conterminous United States Using the Random Forest Approach. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017;51(12):6936–6944. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b01210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Xiao Q., Chang H. H., Geng G., Liu Y.. An ensemble machine-learning model to predict historical PM2.5 concentrations in China from satellite data. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018;52(22):13260–13269. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b02917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Huang C., Hu J., Xue T., Xu H., Wang M.. High-Resolution Spatiotemporal Modeling for Ambient PM2.5 Exposure Assessment in China from 2013 to 2019. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021;55(3):2152–2162. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c05815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Pruthi D., Zhu Q., Wang W., Liu Y.. Multiresolution Analysis of HRRR Meteorological Parameters and GOES-R AOD for Hourly PM2.5 Prediction. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2024;58(45):20040–20048. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c03795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Wei J., Li Z., Chen X., Li C., Sun Y., Wang J., Lyapustin A., Brasseur G. P., Jiang M., Sun L., Wang T., Jung C. H., Qiu B., Fang C., Liu X., Hao J., Wang Y., Zhan M., Song X., Liu Y.. Separating Daily 1 km PM2.5 Inorganic Chemical Composition in China since 2000 via Deep Learning Integrating Ground, Satellite, and Model Data. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023;57(46):18282–18295. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c00272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Dunker A. M., Yarwood G., Ortmann J. P., Wilson G. M.. The Decoupled Direct Method for Sensitivity Analysis in a Three-Dimensional Air Quality Model Implementation, Accuracy, and Efficiency. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002;36(13):2965–2976. doi: 10.1021/es0112691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Koo B., Dunker A. M., Yarwood G.. Implementing the Decoupled Direct Method for Sensitivity Analysis in a Particulate Matter Air Quality Model. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007;41(8):2847–2854. doi: 10.1021/es0619962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Hakami A., Odman M. T., Russell A. G.. High-Order, Direct Sensitivity Analysis of Multidimensional Air Quality Models. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003;37(11):2442–2452. doi: 10.1021/es020677h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Cohan D. S., Hakami A., Hu Y., Russell A. G.. Nonlinear Response of Ozone to Emissions: Source Apportionment and Sensitivity Analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005;39(17):6739–6748. doi: 10.1021/es048664m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Hakami A., Henze D. K., Seinfeld J. H., Singh K., Sandu A., Kim S., Byun, Li Q.. The Adjoint of CMAQ. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007;41(22):7807–7817. doi: 10.1021/es070944p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Lee C. J., Martin R. V., Henze D. K., Brauer M., Cohen A., van Donkelaar A.. Response of Global Particulate-Matter-Related Mortality to Changes in Local Precursor Emissions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015;49(7):4335–4344. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Fu X., Sun X. Y., Travnikov O., Li Q. Y., Qin C., Cuevas C. A., Fernandez R. P., Mahajan A. S., Wang S. X., Wang T., Saiz-Lopez A.. Anthropogenic short- lived halogens increase human exposure to mercury contamination due to enhanced mercury oxidation over continents. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2024;121:e2315058121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2315058121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Gunthe S. S., Liu P. F., Panda U., Raj S. S., Sharma A., Darbyshire E., Reyes-Villegas E., Allan J., Chen Y., Wang X., Song S. J., Pöhlker M. L., Shi L. H., Wang Y., Kommula S. M., Liu T. J., Ravikrishna R., McFiggans G., Mickley L. J., Martin S. T., Pöschl U., Andreae M. O., Coe H.. Enhanced aerosol particle growth sustained by high continental chlorine emission in India. Nature Geoscience. 2021;14:77–84. doi: 10.1038/s41561-020-00677-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  79. Li Q. Y., Borge R., Sarwar G., de la Paz D., Gantt B., Domingo J., Cuevas C. A., Saiz-Lopez A.. Impact of halogen chemistry on summertime air quality in coastal and continental Europe: application of the CMAQ model and implications for regulation. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 2019;19(24):15321–15337. doi: 10.5194/acp-19-15321-2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Li Q. Y., Badia A., Wang T., Sarwar G., Fu X., Zhang L., Zhang Q., Fung J., Cuevas C. A., Wang S. S., Zhou B., Saiz-Lopez A.. Potential Effect of Halogens on Atmospheric Oxidation and Air Quality in China. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres. 2020;125(9):e2019JD032058. doi: 10.1029/2019JD032058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Li Q. Y., Fu X., Peng X., Wang W. H., Badia A., Fernandez R. P., Cuevas C. A., Mu Y. J., Chen J. M., Jimenez J. L., Wang T., Saiz-Lopez A.. Halogens Enhance Haze Pollution in China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021;55(20):13625–13637. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c01949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Liu X., Liu L. Y., Zhang B. Q., Liu P. F., Huang R. J., Hildebrandt Ruiz L., Miao R. Q., Chen Q., Wang X.. Modeling the Global Impact of Chlorine Chemistry on Secondary Organic Aerosols. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2024;58(52):23064–23074. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c05037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Ning A., Shen J. W., Zhao B., Wang S. X., Cai R. L., Jiang J. K., Yan C., Fu X., Zhang Y. H., Li J., Ouyang D. W., Sun Y. S., Saiz-Lopez A., Francisco J. S., Zhang X. H.. Overlooked significance of iodic acid in new particle formation in the continental atmosphere. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2024;121(31):e2404595121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2404595121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Wang X., Jacob D. J., Fu X., Wang T., Le Breton M., Hallquist M., Liu Z. R., McDuffie E. E., Liao H.. Effects of Anthropogenic Chlorine on PM2.5 and Ozone Air Quality in China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020;54(16):9908–9916. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c02296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Moch J. M., Dovrou E., Mickley L. J., Keutsch F. N., Liu Z., Wang Y.. et al. Global Importance of hydroxymethanesulfonate in ambient particulate matter: Implications for air quality. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 2020;125:e2020JD032706. doi: 10.1029/2020JD032706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Liu J., Gunsch M. J., Moffett C. E., Xu L., El Asmar R., Zhang Q., Watson T. B., Allen H. M., Crounse J. D., St. Clair J.. et al. Hydroxymethanesulfonate (HMS) Formation during Summertime Fog in an Arctic Oil Field. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2021;8(7):511–518. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00357. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  87. Xu Y., Ma T., Wang H., Song S., Qu Q., Wang S., Jiang J., Duan X., Li X., Tang G., Zhu L., Zhang Q., Ma Y., Kimoto T., Huang T., An T., Duan F., He K.. Aerosol Water Content Drives Changes in Hydroxymethanesulfonate in Beijing Winter from 2015 to 2021. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2025;59:13903–13911. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5c01170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. van Donkelaar A., Martin R. V., Brauer M., Hsu N. C., Kahn R. A., Levy R. C., Lyapustin A., Sayer A. M., Winker D. M.. Global Estimates of Fine Particulate Matter Using a Combined Geophysical-Statistical Method with Information from Satellites, Models, and Monitors. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016;50(7):3762–3772. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b05833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Xiao Q., Geng G., Xue T., Liu S., Cai C., He K., Zhang Q.. Tracking PM2.5 and O3 Pollution and the Related Health Burden in China 2013–2020. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022;56(11):6922–6932. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c04548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Shaddick G., Thomas M. L., Amini H., Broday D., Cohen A., Frostad J., Green A., Gumy S., Liu Y., Martin R. V., Pruss-Ustun A., Simpson D., van Donkelaar A., Brauer M.. Data Integration for the Assessment of Population Exposure to Ambient Air Pollution for Global Burden of Disease Assessment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018;52(16):9069–9078. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b02864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Beddows A. V., Kitwiroon N., Williams M. L., Beevers S. D.. Emulation and Sensitivity Analysis of the Community Multiscale Air Quality Model for a UK Ozone Pollution Episode. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017;51(11):6229–6236. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b05873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Hu J., Huang L., Chen M., Liao H., Zhang H., Wang S., Zhang Q., Ying Q.. Premature Mortality Attributable to Particulate Matter in China: Source Contributions and Responses to Reductions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017;51(17):9950–9959. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b03193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Hu W., Zhao Y., Lu N., Wang X., Zheng B., Henze D. K., Zhang L., Fu T.-M., Zhai S.. Changing Responses of PM2.5 and Ozone to Source Emissions in the Yangtze River Delta Using the Adjoint Model. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2024;58(1):628–638. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c05049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Koplitz S. N., Jacob D. J., Sulprizio M. P., Myllyvirta L., Reid C.. Burden of Disease from Rising Coal-Fired Power Plant Emissions in Southeast Asia. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017;51(3):1467–1476. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b03731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Wang Y., Bastien L., Jin L., Harley R. A.. Responses of Photochemical Air Pollution in California’s San Joaquin Valley to Spatially and Temporally Resolved Changes in Precursor Emissions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022;56(11):7074–7082. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c07011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Childs M. L., Li J., Wen J., Heft-Neal S., Driscoll A., Wang S., Gould C. F., Qiu M., Burney J., Burke M.. Daily Local-Level Estimates of Ambient Wildfire Smoke PM2.5 for the Contiguous US. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022;56(19):13607–13621. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c02934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Xing J., Li S., Zheng S., Liu C., Wang X., Huang L., Song G., He Y., Wang S., Sahu S. K., Zhang J., Bian J., Zhu Y., Liu T.-Y., Hao J.. Rapid Inference of Nitrogen Oxide Emissions Based on a Top-Down Method with a Physically Informed Variational Autoencoder. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022;56:9903–9914. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c08337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Wei J., Liu S., Li Z., Liu C., Qin K., Liu X., Pinker R. T., Dickerson R. R., Lin J., Boersma K. F., Sun L., Li R., Xue W., Cui Y., Zhang C., Wang J.. Ground-Level NO2 Surveillance from Space Across China for High Resolution Using Interpretable Spatiotemporally Weighted Artificial Intelligence. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022;56(14):9988–9998. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c03834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Xing J., Baek B. H., Li S., Wang C.-T., Song G., Ma S., Zheng S., Liu C., Tong D., Woo J.-H., Liu T.-Y., Fu J. S.. A Physically Constrained Deep-Learning Fusion Method for Estimating Surface NO2 Concentration from Satellite and Ground Monitors. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2024;58(48):21218–21228. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c07341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Snyder E. G., Watkins T. H., Solomon P. A., Thoma E. D., Williams R. W., Hagler G. S. W., Shelow D., Hindin D. A., Kilaru V. J., Preuss P. W.. The Changing Paradigm of Air Pollution Monitoring. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013;47(20):11369–11377. doi: 10.1021/es4022602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Xing J., Zheng S., Ding D., Kelly J. T., Wang S., Li S., Qin T., Ma M., Dong Z., Jang C., Zhu Y., Zheng H., Ren L., Liu T.-Y., Hao J.. Deep Learning for Prediction of the Air Quality Response to Emission Changes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020;54(14):8589–8600. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c02923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Garcia-Menendez F., Saari R. K., Monier E., Selin N. E. U.S.. Air Quality and Health Benefits from Avoided Climate Change under Greenhouse Gas Mitigation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015;49(13):7580–7588. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b01324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Hsieh I.-Y. L., Chossière G. P., Gençer E., Chen H., Barrett S., Green W. H.. An Integrated Assessment of Emissions, Air Quality, and Public Health Impacts of China’s Transition to Electric Vehicles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022;56(11):6836–6846. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c06148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Li N., Chen W., Rafaj P., Kiesewetter G., Schöpp W., Wang H., Zhang H., Krey V., Riahi K.. Air Quality Improvement Co-Benefits of Low-Carbon Pathways toward Well Below the 2 °C Climate Target in China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019;53(10):5576–5584. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b06948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Shen J., Chen X., Li H., Cui X., Zhang S., Bu C., An K., Wang C., Cai W.. Incorporating Health Cobenefits into Province-Driven Climate Policy: A Case of Banning New Internal Combustion Engine Vehicle Sales in China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023;57(3):1214–1224. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c08450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Zhao B., Wang T., Jiang Z., Gu Y., Liou K.-N., Kalandiyur N., Gao Y., Zhu Y.. Air Quality and Health Cobenefits of Different Deep Decarbonization Pathways in California. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019;53(12):7163–7171. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b02385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Science & Technology are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES