Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2026 Jan 31;17:2217. doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-68728-2

Vertical chiral emission from an intrinsically achiral metasurface enabled with anisotropic continuum

Yuwei Sun 1,2,#, Zhipeng Hu 1,#, Mengqi Liu 2,3,#, Jianfeng Chen 2, Dmitrii Gromyko 2,4, Kezhang Shi 1, Lin Wu 4, Yi Jin 1,5,, Sailing He 1,5,6,, Cheng-Wei Qiu 2,7,
PMCID: PMC12963570  PMID: 41620446

Abstract

Manipulating emission polarization is crucial for advanced applications such as polarized fluorescence and lasing, thermal radiation control, stereochemistry and spintronics. Existing approaches for generating circularly polarized emission primarily rely on nanostructures with true chirality, where the far-field polarization at the Γ point is believed to require out-of-plane symmetry breaking. This raises a question: can an intrinsically achiral metasurface that preserves out-of-plane symmetry generate chiral emission? Here, we introduce the concept of anisotropic continuum, defined as a continuum state exhibiting distinct responses for orthogonal polarizations of incidence, as a new degree of freedom for intrinsically achiral metasurfaces. In such metasurfaces, chiral emission arises from manipulating the anisotropic continuum together with the metasurface’s in-plane perturbations. Degrees of circular polarization of 0.83 for upward emission and −0.9 for downward emission are achieved experimentally by integrating the fabricated silicon metasurface with fluorescent organic dyes. Our findings not only address a long-standing gap in the understanding of structural chirality, but also open new opportunities for high-performance applications in polarized fluorescence and thermal emission.

Subject terms: Optical materials and structures, Metamaterials


Chiral light emission usually requires twisted or asymmetric nanostructures. Here, the authors show that even out-of plane symmetric metasurfaces can emit circularly polarized light, achieved by tuning an anisotropic continuum rather than breaking symmetry.

Introduction

Electromagnetic chirality refers to the phenomenon in which an object interacts differently with right and left circularly polarized (RCP/LCP) light14, a property commonly observed in natural materials with three-dimensional asymmetric structures. This chiral behavior gives rise to a distinct chiroptical response, which can be characterized by circular dichroism (CD) or optical rotation5. While natural materials have been used to generate chiral emission, their low chirality and limited tunability constrain practical applications6,7. Metasurfaces, however, offer a powerful platform to enhance and control chiral emission, enabling new opportunities in polarized emission813, chirality tuning14,15, chiral sensing16,17, and photodetection18,19.

Recent advances in chiral metasurfaces and their ability to generate chiral emission have been driven by the incorporation of nonlocal resonances, especially bound states in the continuum (BIC)2029 and guided modes30. In such systems, light remains confined within the metasurface while coexisting with a continuum of electromagnetic waves. Typically, intrinsic chirality in metasurfaces, characterized by chiroptical responses at the Γ point, is achieved in geometrically chiral structures through symmetry breaking across all mirror planes6,3134. To break the out-of-plane mirror symmetry (σz symmetry) and achieve chiral quasi-BIC, various methods have been employed, including slant-etching9,24, grayscale lithography10,25 and bi-layer design35. In these structures, chiral emission arises when the quasi-BIC aligns with a high-transmission background. With mirror symmetry breaking in all planes, chiral emission occurs when near-unity CD is observed (indicated in the left panel of Fig. 1a)24,28. Here, chiral emission refers to a radiative process in which the far-field degree of circular polarization (DCP = (IRIL)/(IR + IL)) approaches unity. Planar chiral metasurfaces represent another route, where near-unity CD29,36,37 at normal incidence has also been reported. However, these designs primarily focus on transmission properties, and their potential for controlling emission remains largely unexplored (see Supplementary Section 1). Moreover, recent studies have revealed that a large CD in transmission does not necessarily correspond to chiral emission24, highlighting a gap in understanding the emission mechanism of planar chiral systems. In our earlier work, chiral emission was observed in the presence of a dielectric substrate that perturbed σz symmetry12. Conventionally, σz-symmetric metasurfaces are believed to support only extrinsic chiral emission away from the Γ point, typically enabled by breaking in-plane inversion symmetry3841. The far-field polarization at the Γ point, by contrast, is generally considered nearly linear due to the absence of geometric chirality21,24,28,42. An interesting question arises: can a metasurface with σz symmetry, which is intrinsically achiral, generate circular or even arbitrary polarization at the Γ point? Our answer is yes.

Fig. 1. Illustration of chiral emission in geometrically non-chiral metasurfaces.

Fig. 1

a Schematic illustration of chiral emission from metasurfaces without (left) and with (right) σz symmetry. The unit cell consisting of a silicon dimer is shown in the top-right corner. b The conceptual relationship between transmission spectra in σz-symmetric metasurface (top), eigenstate emission phase difference φ = arg(Ey/Ex) (middle) and emission intensity of RCP and LCP (bottom). Tx and Ty denote the transmission spectra under x- and y-polarized incidence, respectively. IL and IR represent the LCP and RCP components of the emission. c Transmission and reflection properties for σz-symmetric metasurfaces under RCP/LCP incidence. d Steps of structure transformations for the generation of chiral emission. The condition of φ = π/2 and η = 1 yields circularly polarized emission at the Γ point. e The Poincare sphere and corresponding polarization map for continuum-assisted eigenstates.

Here, we demonstrate theoretically and experimentally that breaking σz symmetry is not required to generate chiral emission at the Γ point, using a vertically etched silicon metasurface embedded in a uniform environment (right panel of Fig. 1a). An additional degree of freedom is introduced by leveraging anisotropic continuum, characterized by distinct responses for orthogonal polarizations in the continuum, e.g., x-polarized and y-polarized light. The term continuum refers to a range of states that are closely connected and form a smooth, uninterrupted spectrum43. In metasurfaces, the continuum is characterized by a slowly-varying reflection/transmission spectrum, induced by Fabry-Perot resonances44, Mie resonances45, high-contrast grating effects46, and other mechanisms. We show that when a bound mode is embedded within an anisotropic continuum, in-plane perturbations can induce radiative coupling. This leads to chiral emission within a specific continuum, where the radiated polarization exhibits opposite chirality in the upward and downward directions. While ultrahigh-Q modes in metasurfaces, such as quasi-BIC47,48 and leaky guided modes30,49,50, have been extensively studied and widely applied in photonics, the specific influence of the continuum on emission polarization remains largely unexplored. Related work has examined its effect on linearly polarized emission51, whereas its contribution to chiral emission remains an open and critical question. Understanding the role of these states could open new avenues for designing metasurfaces with customized polarization properties.

Results

To show the importance of anisotropic continuum in realizing chiral emission in σz-symmetric metasurfaces, we decompose the far-field polarization of a resonant mode in the σz-symmetric metasurface into Cartesian components |Ex|eiθx and |Ey|eiθy. It is determined by two critical parameters: (i) the phase difference between the x- and y-components Ex and Ey, expressed as φ = θy− θx = arg(Ey/Ex) and (ii) the magnitude ratio of Ex and Ey, denoted as η = |Ey|/|Ex|. We start with a structure that exhibits no polarization conversion in either transmission or reflection between the x- and y-polarized channels to simplify the analysis. For a discrete localized state, the phase difference φ can be expressed in terms of background reflection and transmission coefficients (rx, ry, tx, ty) as follows (Supplementary Section 2)44,52

φ=argry+αztyargrx+αztx2+nπ, 1

where n is an integer and αz = ±1 is a parity number. This equation establishes a connection between the eigenstate far-field polarization and the scattering coefficients of the continuum.

The relation between the eigenstate phase difference φ and the continuum transmission spectra in a σz-symmetric structure is conceptually demonstrated in Fig. 1b. For metasurfaces with a transmissive background or an isotropic continuum (left panels of Fig. 1b), φ is always zero and the vertically radiated polarization remains linearly polarized. For instance, metasurfaces with the unit cell composed of cylinders or circular apertures are unable to generate an arbitrary phase difference φ as they inherently satisfy arg(ry + αzty) = arg(rx + αztx). In contrast, a nonzero phase difference between the x- and y-components of the radiated electric field can be generated with the assistance of the anisotropic continuum (right panels of Fig. 1b). To achieve chiral emission, φ = π/2 should be satisfied first. This requires that the metasurface should generally be geometrically anisotropic in a certain direction.

Due to the presence of anisotropic continuum, the transmission and reflection spectra of σz-symmetric metasurfaces exhibit unique features compared with σz-asymmetric ones. As shown in Fig. 1c, under the condition of DCP = 1, RCP incidence excites a strong resonance; however, its transmission remains identical to the non-resonant direct transmission under LCP incidence, due to destructive interference with the background (Supplementary Section 3). Consequently, the transmission CD at the C point ideally vanishes when the resonant and background scatterings are exactly out of phase.

We consider a σz-symmetric dielectric metasurface, schematically shown in Fig. 1d. The unit cell consists of a silicon dimer embedded in a silica environment, preserving σz symmetry regardless of in-plane variations. This adopted structure follows our earlier work to isolate and emphasize the role of out-of-plane mirror symmetry12. The phase difference φ of the structure is governed by anisotropic continuum modulation, while the ratio η = |Ey|/|Ex| is influenced by in-plane perturbations. Initially, with α = 0 and δt = 0, no symmetry breaking occurs, and the mode remains embedded in an anisotropic continuum with φ = π/2. Introducing a nonzero δt renders the mode radiative, allowing coupling to x-polarized waves. Further introducing nonzero α induces simultaneous non-zero |Ex| and |Ey|, producing circular polarization. In this step, breaking the in-plane mirror symmetry to make the structure “2D-chiral” is essential for generating both |Ex| and |Ey|, as the in-plane mirror symmetry guarantees linear polarization. Figure 1e provides a clearer illustration of the role of the anisotropic continuum. The polarization of the far-field radiation can be fully described by a set of Stokes parameters: S1 = (|Ex|2−|Ey|2)/(|Ex|2+|Ey|2), S2 = 2|Ex||Ey|cosφ/(|Ex|2+|Ey|2), S3 = 2|Ex||Ey|sinφ/(|Ex|2+|Ey|2). Once φ is fixed, the Stokes parameters trace an arc on the Poincare sphere connecting two opposite points on the S1 axis as |Ex| and |Ey| vary. In this case, the phase difference φ is the angle between the arc and the equator, while |Ey|/|Ex| controls the distance between the observed point and the pole along the S1 axis. Without the contribution of anisotropic continuum, radiative modes induced by in-plane symmetry breaking trace a line along the equator of the Poincare sphere (gray line in Fig. 1e). When anisotropic continuum is introduced, this line is lifted toward either the northern or southern hemisphere. Under specific structural parameters, the trajectory intersects the pole, marked by a red star. This evolution is further depicted in the right panel of Fig. 1e, highlighting the changes in the radiated polarization as the structural parameters vary.

To demonstrate control over the phase difference φ, we select an unperturbed metasurface with α = 0 and δt = 0, and then vary the pillar length L. This variation induces anisotropy of the background response, which results in nontrivial values of φ according to Eq. (1). Note also that the phase difference φ depends on the relative positions between the bound mode and the broad transmission dip of Ty. The variation of φ with L is shown in Fig. 2a, where φ decreases with increasing L and reaches φ = π/2 when L = 190 nm. The corresponding transmission spectra Tx and Ty for L = 190 nm are shown in the inset of Fig. 2a, with the position of the bound mode marked as a red star. Under this condition, further modulation of the asymmetric parameters α and δt transforms the bound mode into a bright mode that radiates into the far-field. The far-field polarization distribution in k-space is shown on the right side of Fig. 2b, revealing a C point at the Γ point.

Fig. 2. Operating principle and characterization of the proposed silicon metasurface.

Fig. 2

a The variation of the phase difference φ as a function of the pillar length L, with the point where φ = π/2 marked by a red star. The z-component of the electric field (Ez) distribution for the observed guided mode is shown in the inset. The other size parameters are: p = 350 nm, w = 90 nm, h = 210 nm. b The band folding process and polarization map in the vicinity of the Γ point. c Overall SEM image of the fabricated silicon metasurface, with a schematic illustration in the x-z plane shown in the lower left. Scale bar: 200 nm. d Simulated (top) and experimental (bottom) transmission spectra of the silicon metasurface for TE and TM incidence in the x-z plane.

A silicon metasurface with α = 0.09 and δt = 11 nm is fabricated on a silica substrate to experimentally verify our theoretical predictions. The metasurface is subsequently covered with a 50 μm layer of PMMA to achieve refractive index matching with the silica substrate24 (so that the silicon metasurface is symmetric along the vertical direction) and to minimize the impact of Fabry-Perot resonance on the spectrum. Figure 2c presents the overall scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the silicon metasurface together with a schematic illustration in the x-z plane, revealing vertically etched structures that preserve the out-of-plane mirror symmetry. Angle-resolved transmission spectra for transverse electric (TE) and transverse magnetic (TM) polarized incident light, denoted by TTM and TTE, respectively, are confirmed by simulations and experiments in Fig. 2d. Under TM-polarized incidence, only the TM1 mode is excited, whereas TE-polarized incidence excites TM1, TE1, and TM2 modes (note that TE/TM incidence refers to the incident polarization, while TE/TM modes refer to the eigenmodes). The TM1 mode couples to TE and TM components, residing within the broad transmission dip observed under TE incidence. The experimental results closely align with the simulations, confirming the coupling of the TM1 mode to both the x- and y-polarization components and its modulation by the continuum. While the primary discussion in the main text focuses on the TM mode, the TE mode also holds potential for chiral emission, as elaborated in the Supplementary Section 4.

To investigate the evolution of radiated polarization, we fabricated a series of metasurfaces with varying configurations: zero α and δt, nonzero δt only, and both nonzero α and δt. Transmission spectra of these metasurfaces were simulated (solid lines in Fig. 3), theoretically derived with TCMT (indicated by “×” in Fig. 3), and experimentally measured (indicated by “Δ” in Fig. 3) to provide insight into the continuum and bound modes. For α = 0 and δt = 0, the transmission spectrum Ty exhibits a broad dip between 700 nm and 900 nm, while Tx maintains high transmission (Fig. 3a). In this configuration, no bound mode is excited due to symmetry protection. The phase difference φ is calculated through Eq. (1) with αz = −1, and is depicted as a dotted gray line in the upper panel of Fig. 3a. Although a nonzero φ is generated across the wavelength range, we have |Ex| = |Ey| = 0. For α = 0 and δt = 11 nm, the bound TM1 mode becomes leaky, experimentally resulting in a sharp transmission dip at λ = 778 nm for Tx, while the line shape of Ty remains nearly unchanged (Fig. 3b). This leakage, independent of C2 symmetry breaking, indicates that the mode is a quasi-guided mode arising from band-doubling rather than a symmetry-protected BIC. For α = 0.09 and δt = 11 nm, the transmission spectra exhibit resonant features under both x-polarized and y-polarized light illumination. At λ = 775 nm, a transmission dip appears for Tx while a transmission peak emerges for Ty, located near the broad dip of Ty (Fig. 3c). The simultaneous presence of the dip and peak signifies coupling to both x- and y-polarizations. The TCMT-fitted spectra show excellent agreement with numerical simulations, validating that the model accurately describes the key features of vertical chiral emission.

Fig. 3. Evolution of the transmission spectra for the perturbed metasurfaces in Fig. 1d.

Fig. 3

a α = 0 and δt = 0. b α = 0 and δt = 11 nm. c α = 0.09 and δt = 11 nm. For comparison, the transmission spectra for x- and y-polarized incidence (Tx and Ty) are obtained by three approaches, including fitting based on the TCMT, numerical simulation and experimental measurement. The upper panels show simulated (solid) and fitted curves (marked by “×”), and the lower panels show experimentally measured curves.

In terms of the resonant mode field distribution, the coupling behavior can be directly understood from the overlap integral between the incident field and the resonant mode: symmetry enforces zero overlap, δt alone allows coupling only to x-polarization, and the combination of δt and α yields finite overlap for both x- and y-polarizations with a phase difference close to π/2. Full derivations and supporting figures are provided in Supplementary Section 5.

The chiral emission capabilities of metasurfaces play a significant role in modulating fluorescence, laser emission and thermal radiation. Here, we further examine the fluorescence properties enabled by the σz-symmetric dielectric metasurface, with the absorption characteristics shown in Supplementary Section 6. As shown in Fig. 4a, in the case where L = 190 nm, the long and short axes of the radiated polarization consistently align with the x or y axis, with only the ellipticity changing as α and δt vary. Thus, the phase difference φ remains nearly π/2 for small values of α and δt. This variation demonstrates that the phase difference φ induced by continuum scattering coefficients is robust against in-plane perturbations. Since δt and α control |Ex| and |Ey| independently, there are multiple instances where |Ey|/|Ex| = 1, resulting in C points (Fig. 4b). Larger values of α and δt introduce greater symmetry breaking, which leads to lower Q-factors. In the experiment, a thin layer of IR140 organic dye is first spin-coated onto the fabricated metasurface, followed by a 50 μm PMMA coating. The sample is then excited with a 532 nm laser, and its photoluminescence (PL) characteristics are analyzed (Supplementary Section 7). The PL from the dye is strongly modulated by the TM1 mode supported by the metasurface, with its polarization determined by the eigenstate. Figure 4c displays the polarization-resolved upward PL spectra for three cases with different α values at a fixed δt of 11 nm. For α = 0, the RCP and LCP components of the PL spectrum are nearly equal, indicating linearly polarized emission. As α increases, the proportion of the LCP component decreases, resulting in an increased DCP.

Fig. 4. Fluorescence modulation with the fabricated metasurfaces.

Fig. 4

a Evolution of the radiated polarization with the asymmetric parameters α and δt. b Relation between α and δt corresponding to the formation of C points. c Polarization-resolved upward PL spectra for cases with α = 0, 0.04, and 0.09, with δt fixed at 11 nm. d Circular polarization components of the x-z cross section, showing the opposite spins for upward and downward emissions. e Upward and downward PL spectra for the metasurfaces coated with organic dyes.

Figure 4d demonstrates the x-z cross sections of Ex ± iEy of the eigenstate in the case of α = 0.09 and δt = 11 nm. The upward and downward leaky waves are RCP (red circular line) and LCP (blue circular line), both represented by Ex − iEy due to the change in direction21. The reversal of radiated circular polarization is expected, given that the structure exhibits opposite chirality when viewed from above and below. Experimentally, a prominent RCP peak is detected in the upward emission, with negligible LCP contribution, resulting in a DCP of 0.83 (upper half of Fig. 4e). Conversely, for downward emission, the LCP component dominates, yielding a DCP of −0.9 (lower half of Fig. 4e). This reversal in circular polarization confirms the absence of net chiral flux in the far field, consistent with the preserved σz symmetry. The small difference in absolute DCP between the upward and downward emissions may be attributed to the coated thin dye layer, which degrades the out-of-plane symmetry to some extent.

Discussion

In conclusion, we demonstrated vertical chiral emission in metasurfaces that preserve σz symmetry and presented a versatile approach for generating arbitrary radiated polarization in such systems, exemplified by a silicon metasurface design. Circularly polarized emission at the Γ point is not constrained by σz symmetry breaking; instead, the polarization state can evolve from linear to elliptical and eventually to circular on the σz-symmetric metasurface by introducing the anisotropic continuum as a new degree of freedom. This is experimentally validated by integrating the metasurface with fluorescent organic dyes, achieving PL with a maximum DCP of 0.83 for upward emission and −0.9 for downward emission. The metasurface geometry follows the same in-plane design as our earlier work, which involved an unbalanced refractive index between the substrate and superstrate. In contrast, the present study maintains σz symmetry, isolating the role of the anisotropic continuum in generating vertical chiral emission. This distinction clarifies the fundamental difference between substrate-induced and symmetry-preserved chirality. Furthermore, as a general theoretical framework, the present theory is applicable to metasurfaces with arbitrary refractive indices (Supplementary Section 8) and metasurfaces with a substrate, provided that the substrate refractive index is close to that of the superstrate medium (Supplementary Section 9), thereby enhancing its suitability for practical applications. Our findings establish a novel methodology for designing metasurfaces that achieve vertical emission of arbitrary polarization while maintaining σz symmetry, paving the way for promising applications in fields such as thermal radiation manipulation, chiral sensing, and polarized photodetection.

Methods

Numerical simulation

All simulations are performed using COMSOL Multiphysics 5.6 “Electromagnetic Waves Frequency Domain” module. The refractive indices of silicon and surrounding materials are taken as nSi = 3.9 (Supplementary Section 10) and nPMMA = nSiO2 = 1.45, respectively. Periodic conditions are applied in the x and y directions of the simulated unit cell, and perfectly matched layers are employed along the z direction. The far-field eigen-polarization is calculated through COMSOL Multiphysics 5.6 with MATLAB. In the calculation of continuum transmission, the incidence port is set as x/y polarization by setting the electric mode field to (1, 0, 0) or (0, 1, 0). Equation (1) is calculated through the polarization-resolved scattering coefficients obtained from ports.

Sample fabrication

A layer of 210 nm silicon is deposited on a 4-inch silica substrate through plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition and subsequently cleaved into small 1 cm × 1 cm slices. Each sample is cleaned sequentially in acetone, isopropyl alcohol, and deionized water, and then spin-coated with 270 nm electron-beam resist (PMMA 679.04). The pattern is defined by E-beam exposure (Raith150 EBL) and developed in methyl isobutyl ketone and isopropyl alcohol. A 30 nm Al film is deposited using electron beam evaporation (Denton) as the hard mask onto the patterned resist and is lifted off by ultrasonic cleaning in acetone. The pattern is then transferred to the silicon by dry etching (Multiplex ICP STS) using C4F8 and SF6, and the residual Al is finally removed in the Al etching solution. The fabrication process of the sample is summarized in Supplementary Section 10.

Covering of IR140 and PMMA

The fabricated sample is cleaned first with acetone and isopropyl alcohol, and then baked on a hot plate at 120 °C for 10 min. The clean sample is spin-coated with a drop of 20 μL IR140 dissolved in ethanol in the following steps: starting at 500 rpm for 3 s, followed by 2000 rpm for 30 s, and lastly at 0 rpm for 3 s. The coated sample is left for stand for 5 min to evaporate the ethanol and improve the film uniformity. To form a thick PMMA layer on the metasurface, the PMMA solution is concentrated through solvent evaporation. Then, the PMMA is spin-coated on the metasurface in the following steps: starting at 500 rpm for 3 s, followed by 4000 rpm for 60 s, and lastly at 0 rpm for 3 s. A layer of 50 μm PMMA is formed by repeating this procedure five times.

Optical characterization

In the transmission measurement, the sample is fixed on a rotating sample stage (Supplementary Section 6). A white light source is turned on and the light passes through a polarizer and an aperture before being focused onto the sample by an objective lens of a low numerical aperture, in which case the incident wave can be treated as an approximate plane wave. The incident polarization is switched between x and y by rotating the polarizer. The transmission spectra for different incident angles are collected by rotating the sample stage. In the PL measurement, a 532 nm continuous-wave laser is used to stimulate IR140 organic dyes. The PL is collected by a 20× objective lens, and analyzed by a zero-order quarter-wave plate, a half-wave plate and a linear polarizer. The fast axis of the quarter-wave plate is fixed to 45° with respect to the polarizer. When the fast axis of the half-wave plate is rotated to 0°/45°, RCP/LCP light is selected.

Supplementary information

Source data

Source Data (2.5MB, xlsx)

Acknowledgements

S.H. acknowledges the support from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFB2804100, 2022YFC3601002, 2022YFC2010003), the “Pioneer” and “Leading Goose” R&D Program of Zhejiang (Nos. 2025C02159, 2024C03045, 2025C02140, 2023C03135), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (W2412107 and 91233208). C.-W.Q. acknowledges the financial support by the Ministry of Education, Republic of Singapore (Grant No.: A-8002152-00-00 & A-8002458-00-00 & A-8003643-00-00), and the Competitive Research Program Award (NRF-CRP26-2021-0004 & NRF-CRP30-2023-0003) from the National Research Foundation, Prime Minister’s Office, Singapore. Y.J. acknowledges the support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U24A20313) and Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. LDT23F05014F05). M.L. acknowledges the support from National Natural Science Foundation of China (52306103). K.S. acknowledges the support from National Natural Science Foundation of China (Youth Science Fund, No. 52406113), Natural Science Foundation of Ningbo (2024J429), Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LMS25E060003), Ningbo Talent Project (2023A-392-G), Key Research and Development Program of Ningbo (2024Z146), and Research Start-up funds of Ningbo Innovation Center (NBGD2023X009).

Author contributions

Y.S., Y.J., S.H., and C.-W.Q. conceived the main ideas. Y.S., M.L., and J.C. developed the theoretical framework, with input from D.G. under the supervision of L.W. Y.S. performed the numerical simulations and designed the experiments. Z.H. fabricated the samples. Y.S. and Z.H. carried out the optical characterization measurements. Y.S., M.L., Z.H., and K.S. analyzed the data, and all authors discussed the results. Y.S. wrote the manuscript with comments and revisions from all authors. Y.J., S.H., and C.-W.Q. supervised the overall project.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Data availability

All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in this paper are present in the paper or the Supplementary Information. Additional data related to this paper may be requested from the corresponding authors upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Yuwei Sun, Zhipeng Hu, Mengqi Liu.

Contributor Information

Yi Jin, Email: jinyi_2008@zju.edu.cn.

Sailing He, Email: sailing@kth.se.

Cheng-Wei Qiu, Email: chengwei.qiu@nus.edu.sg.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-026-68728-2.

References

  • 1.Tang, Y. & Cohen, A. E. Optical chirality and its interaction with matter. Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 163901 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schäferling, M. Chiral Nanophotonics: Chiral Optical Properties of Plasmonic Systems Vol. 205 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017).
  • 3.Rodrigues, S. P. et al. Intensity-dependent modulation of optically active signals in a chiral metamaterial. Nat. Commun.8, 14602 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kang, L. et al. Preserving spin states upon reflection: linear and nonlinear responses of a chiral meta-mirror. Nano Lett.17, 7102–7109 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mun, J. et al. Electromagnetic chirality: from fundamentals to nontraditional chiroptical phenomena. Light Sci. Appl.9, 139 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Deng, Y. et al. Circularly polarized luminescence from organic micro-/nano-structures. Light Sci. Appl.10, 76 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sang, Y., Han, J., Zhao, T., Duan, P. & Liu, M. Circularly polarized luminescence in nanoassemblies: generation, amplification, and application. Adv. Mater.32, 1900110 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Konishi, K. et al. Circularly polarized light emission from semiconductor planar chiral nanostructures. Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 057402 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhang, X., Liu, Y., Han, J., Kivshar, Y. & Song, Q. Chiral emission from resonant metasurfaces. Science377, 1215–1218 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lim, Y. et al. Maximally chiral emission via chiral quasibound states in the continuum. Laser Photonics Rev.17, 2200611 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wang, X. et al. Observation of nonvanishing optical helicity in thermal radiation from symmetry-broken metasurfaces. Sci. Adv.9, eade4203 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sun, Y. et al. Enhancing circularly polarized emission by a planar chiral dielectric metasurface. Adv. Opt. Mater.11, 2300197 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mendoza-Carreño, J. et al. A single nanophotonic platform for producing circularly polarized white light from non-chiral emitters. Nat. Commun.15, 10443 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kim, A. S., Goswami, A., Taghinejad, M. & Cai, W. Phototransformation of achiral metasurfaces into handedness-selectable transient chiral media. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.121, e2318713121 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sha, X. et al. Chirality tuning and reversing with resonant phase-change metasurfaces. Sci. Adv.10, eadn9017 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wu, T. et al. Vector exceptional points with strong superchiral fields. Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 083901 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chen, Y. et al. Can weak chirality induce strong coupling between resonant states?. Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 146102 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Li, W. et al. Circularly polarized light detection with hot electrons in chiral plasmonic metamaterials. Nat. Commun.6, 8379 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wei, J. et al. Geometric filterless photodetectors for mid-infrared spin light. Nat. Photonics17, 171–178 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gorkunov, M. V., Antonov, A. A. & Kivshar, Y. S. Metasurfaces with maximum chirality empowered by bound states in the continuum. Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 093903 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Overvig, A., Yu, N. & Alu, A. Chiral quasi-bound states in the continuum. Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 073001 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dixon, J., Lawrence, M., Barton, D. R. & Dionne, J. Self-isolated Raman lasing with a chiral dielectric metasurface. Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 123201 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kim, K.-H. & Kim, J.-R. High-Q chiroptical resonances by quasi-bound states in the continuum in dielectric metasurfaces with simultaneously broken in-plane inversion and mirror symmetries. Adv. Opt. Mater.9, 2101162 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chen, Y. et al. Observation of intrinsic chiral bound states in the continuum. Nature613, 474–478 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kühner, L. et al. Unlocking the out-of-plane dimension for photonic bound states in the continuum to achieve maximum optical chirality. Light Sci. Appl12, 250 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tang, Y. et al. Chiral bound states in the continuum in plasmonic metasurfaces. Laser Photonics Rev.17, 2200597 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhang, D. et al. Tailoring intrinsic chirality in a two-dimensional planar waveguide grating via quasibound states in the continuum. Phys. Rev. B109, 205403 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chen, W. et al. Uncovering maximum chirality in resonant nanostructures. Nano Lett.24, 9643–9649 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shi, T. et al. Planar chiral metasurfaces with maximal and tunable chiroptical response driven by bound states in the continuum. Nat. Commun.13, 4111 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sun, K. et al. Infinite-Q guided modes radiate in the continuum. Phys. Rev. B107, 115415 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hentschel, M., Schaeferling, M., Duan, X., Giessen, H. & Liu, N. Chiral plasmonics. Sci. Adv.3, e1602735 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhu, A. Y. et al. Giant intrinsic chiro-optical activity in planar dielectric nanostructures. Light Sci. Appl.7, 17158 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chen, Y. et al. Multidimensional nanoscopic chiroptics. Nat. Rev. Phys.4, 113–124 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Döring, A., Ushakova, E. & Rogach, A. L. Chiral carbon dots: synthesis, optical properties, and emerging applications. Light Sci. Appl.11, 1–23 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gromyko, D. et al. Unidirectional chiral emission via twisted bi-layer metasurfaces. Nat. Commun.15, 9804 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Semnani, B., Flannery, J., Al Maruf, R. & Bajcsy, M. Spin-preserving chiral photonic crystal mirror. Light Sci. Appl.9, 23 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Duan, Q. et al. Photonic crystal slabs with maximal chiroptical response empowered by bound states in the continuum. Photonics Res.11, 1919–1933 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Liu, W. et al. Circularly polarized states spawning from bound states in the continuum. Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 116104 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wang, J. et al. Routing valley exciton emission of a WS 2 monolayer via delocalized Bloch modes of in-plane inversion-symmetry-broken photonic crystal slabs. Light.: Sci. Appl.9, 1–8 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Tian, J. et al. Optical Rashba effect in a light-emitting perovskite metasurface. Adv. Mater.34, e2109157 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Chen, Y. et al. Compact spin-valley-locked perovskite emission. Nat. Mater.22, 1065–1070 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Qin, H. et al. Arbitrarily polarized bound states in the continuum with twisted photonic crystal slabs. Light Sci. Appl12, 66 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Miroshnichenko, A. E., Flach, S. & Kivshar, Y. S. Fano resonances in nanoscale structures. Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 2257–2298 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Fan, S., Suh, W. & Joannopoulos, J. D. Temporal coupled-mode theory for the Fano resonance in optical resonators. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A20, 569 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Limonov, M. F., Rybin, M. V., Poddubny, A. N. & Kivshar, Y. S. Fano resonances in photonics. Nat. Photonics11, 543–554 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Qiao, P. F., Yang, W. J. & Chang-Hasnain, C. J. Recent advances in high-contrast metastructures, metasurfaces, and photonic crystals. Adv. Opt. Photonics10, 180–245 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hsu, C. W. et al. Observation of trapped light within the radiation continuum. Nature499, 188–191 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hsu, C. W., Zhen, B., Stone, A. D., Joannopoulos, J. D. & Soljačić, M. Bound states in the continuum. Nat. Rev. Mater.1, 1–13 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Johnson, S. G., Fan, S. H., Villeneuve, P. R., Joannopoulos, J. D. & Kolodziejski, L. A. Guided modes in photonic crystal slabs. Phys. Rev. B60, 5751–5758 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Fan, S. H. & Joannopoulos, J. D. Analysis of guided resonances in photonic crystal slabs. Phys. Rev. B65, 235112 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Hsu, C. W., Zhen, B., Soljačić, M. & Stone, A. D. Polarization state of radiation from a photonic crystal slab. Preprint at 10.48550/arXiv.1708.02197 (2017).
  • 52.Suh, W., Wang, Z. & Fan, S. H. Temporal coupled-mode theory and the presence of non-orthogonal modes in lossless multimode cavities. IEEE J. Quantum Electron.40, 1511–1518 (2004). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Source Data (2.5MB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in this paper are present in the paper or the Supplementary Information. Additional data related to this paper may be requested from the corresponding authors upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.


Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES