Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2026 Feb 20;18(8):12643–12649. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5c22726

Methyl Viologen Lead Iodide for Photocatalytic Reductive Coupling of Aromatic Carbonyls via Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer

Minyang Yin 1, Ruichen Wan 1, Tsu-Hao Wang 1, Yiying Wu 1,*
PMCID: PMC12964341  PMID: 41716029

Abstract

Organic–inorganic metal halides (OIMHs) have emerged as promising photocatalysts for organic transformations due to their excellent optoelectronic properties. However, their instability, particularly under protic conditions, has limited their broader applications. Here, we report that a facilely prepared methyl viologen lead iodide (MVPb2I6) powder can efficiently catalyze the visible-light-driven reductive coupling of aromatic aldehydes and ketones in protic solvents. Remarkably, MVPb2I6 retains its structural integrity after photoreduction, highlighting its robustness. These results suggest that incorporating quaternary pyridinium cations into the OIMHs can enhance their stability and expand their applicability in photocatalytic organic synthesis.

Keywords: organic−inorganic hybrid composites, proton-coupled electron transfer, photosynthesis, pinacol coupling


graphic file with name am5c22726_0010.jpg


graphic file with name am5c22726_0008.jpg

Introduction

Harnessing solar energy for photocatalysis has long been of interest to the chemistry community. Following the pioneering work by MacMillan and Yoon, who demonstrated successful photodriven C–C bond formation using ruthenium-based photocatalysts, a widespread application of photocatalysts in the field of organic transformation has been witnessed in the last two decades. , The design of photocatalysts plays a pivotal role in developing robust and reliable protocols for photoredox organic transformations. Various systems, including Ru/Ir-based metal complexes, ,− organic dyes, , and semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) , etc., have been employed. However, these systems often require either noble metals or complex photocatalyst designs, which are less desirable for industrial applications.

In recent years, organic–inorganic metal halides (OIMHs) have attracted significant attention due to their remarkable optoelectronic properties, including high photoconversion efficiencies, long-range carrier migration, , and prolonged excited-state lifetimes. , These advantages have enabled the successful application of OIMHs in various optoelectronic applications, such as photovoltaics, photodetectors, transistors, laser-emitting diodes, and other optoelectrical devices. Notably, the properties that enhance optoelectrical applications are also expected to benefit photocatalytic applications. , Compared to conventional semiconductor photocatalysts, the use of OIMHs offers simpler material preparation and greater tunability of the band structures through compositional control. Although still in its early stages, the use of OIMHs as photocatalysts for organic transformations has shown promising potential. Several reports have demonstrated that halide perovskite nanocrystals can effectively photocatalyze C–C, C–N, C–P, S–S, and C–O bond formations. However, a major challenge hindering the broader applications of OIMHs in photoredox organic transformation is their sensitivity to polar and protic solvents. ,, This limitation not only constrains the choice of reaction media but also narrows the scope of accessible organic transformations.

Stability improvement for OIMHs has been pursued through heterojunctions, composite architectures, and double-perovskite platforms to enhance charge separation and mitigate degradation. ,, Recently, several groups have reported that by exploiting the dynamic equilibrium between the dissolution and reprecipitation of MAPbI3, perovskite materials can exhibit considerable photocatalytic stability in aqueous solutions for hydrogen evolution reactions. However, such conditions typically require a highly acidic environment and a saturated concentration of primary ammonium salts, which are generally incompatible with most organic transformations.

An effective strategy to address these stability issues is using quaternary ammonium to construct OIMHs. Due to the full substitution on the N atom, quaternary ammoniums exhibit weak H-bonding donating and accepting ability. Therefore, 1D OIMHs constructed from quaternary ammonium cations generally exhibit superior stability in polar organic solvents and even in water. Compared to other 1D OIMHs, methyl viologen lead iodide (MVPb2I6) stands out as a potential photocatalyst due to its relatively small bandgap (∼2.1 eV). This property is attributed to the use of conjugated organic cations for charge-transfer excitation.

Here, we report the first demonstration of an OIMH-based photocatalytic system utilizing MVPb2I6 powder for photoredox organic transformations under visible-light irradiation via a proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) mechanism (Figure ). We selected the pinacol coupling of aromatic carbonyls as a model reaction, given that the activation of aromatic carbonyls to generate ketyl radicals is a common method for C–C bond formation. However, the large mismatch between the reduction potentials of aromatic carbonyls (e.g., benzaldehyde: E1/2red=1.93VvsSCE ; acetophenone: E1/2red=2.11VvsSCE ) , and the conduction band edges of typical photocatalysts makes direct electron transfer highly endergonic. Established protocols typically involve a concerted PCET step to lower the activation barrier by either adding Brønsted acids or generating Brønsted-acidic α-ammonium radicals from the oxidation of amines within the system. ,, Although the pinacol coupling of aromatic carbonyls is well established, conventional OIMH photocatalysts are typically incompatible with these protocols due to their instability under acidic conditions, which arises from acid–base equilibria involving ammonium cations within their structures. Therefore, to enable the use of the PCET mechanism with OIMHs, a new material design strategy was required. In this study, we demonstrate that our photocatalytic system can efficiently generate ketyl radicals from aromatic carbonyls via a PCET process. These radicals then underwent homocoupling to afford vicinal diols, as illustrated in Figure . Furthermore, MVPb2I6 photocatalyst exhibits excellent stability in protic media, positioning it as a promising candidate for a broader range of photoredox organic transformations.

1.

1

Postulated mechanism for MVPb2I6-catalyzed pinacol coupling of aromatic carbonyls through a PCET mechanism.

The PCET redox mechanism underpins energy conversion processes in biological systems, and facilitates the interconversion of important small molecules such as O2/H2O, N2/NH3 and CO2/alkane. The PCET process involves the concerted movement of electrons and protons in a single chemical step, offering both thermodynamic and kinetic advantages by avoiding high-energy intermediates typically formed in sequential electron transfer (ET) and proton transfer (PT) processes. Thus, PCET is also a general mechanism for photoredox organic transformations and has been utilized in various reactions. , Therefore, our findings also highlight a novel perspective for employing OIMHs in organic transformations that have conventionally been overlooked or deemed incompatible.

Methods

PbI2 (>99.99%) was purchased from TCI America. All other chemical reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. All solvents were used as received unless otherwise stated. All commercial reagents were used without further purification. Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) on silica gel plates (Select Scientific, 200 Micron, Cat. No. 31028, Silica Gel 60, F-254) was employed to monitor the reactions, visualized by ultraviolet (UV) light at a 254 nm wavelength. Flash column chromatography was performed on silica gel with a particle size of 40 to 63 microns. NMR spectra were recorded on a 400 MHz AVANCE III spectrometer and calibrated with residual chloroform (δ H = 7.26 ppm, δ C = 77.0 ppm) or dimethyl sulfoxide (δ H = 2.50 ppm, δ C = 39.5 ppm) as internal references. Chemical shifts were reported in ppm δ. The following abbreviations are used to indicate multiplicities: s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, q = quartet, m = multiplet, br = broad.

A xenon lamp was used as the light source with an AM 1.5G filter for solar light simulation. The light intensity was calibrated to be one sun intensity (100 mW/cm²) by a power meter (Newport optical power meter) and a silicon photodiode (818-UV). Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) was recorded by a Bruker D8 ADVANCE X-ray diffractometer with a Cu Kα source (λ = 1.5406 Å), operated at 40 kV and 40 mA.graphic file with name am5c22726_0007.jpg

Synthesis of Methyl Viologen Diiodide (MVI2)

2 mmol 4,4’-bipyridine and 4 mmol iodomethane were added to 10 mL of acetonitrile. The solution was stirred at 60 °C for 2 h to obtain an orange precipitate. After cooling, the crude product was collected by vacuum filtration and washed with acetonitrile. The collected orange solid was used directly without further purification.

Synthesis of Methyl Viologen Lead (II) Iodide (MVPb2I6)

MVPb2I6 was synthesized by simply reacting PbI2 and MVI2 in solution. To be more specific, a precursor solution of PbI2 (1 mmol) was prepared in 2 mL of 57 wt % hydriodic acid, and MVI2 (0.5 mmol) was added to the solution under stirring. A maroon powder was collected and washed with diethyl ether three times by centrifugation. The powder samples were then dried under vacuum at 50 °C for further experiments. PXRD was conducted and compared with the reported CIF file to confirm the structure.

Results and Discussions

The MVPb2I6 photocatalyst was synthesized following a reported procedure by simply reacting lead iodide (PbI2) and methyl viologen (MVI2) in solution. The resulting powder was used directly as a photocatalyst after rinsing and drying, without the need for surface passivation, which is typically required for other perovskite-type photocatalysts reported to date in photoredox organic transformations. ,, The facile-prepared, modification-free features of MVPb2I6 further offer an example of a low-cost, user-friendly approach for photoredox organic transformations compared to other semiconductor-based protocols.

The crystal structure of MVPb2I6 was depicted in Figure , it consists of 1D chains of face-sharing [Pb–I6/2] octahedrons surrounded by MV2+ cations (plotted from its reported CIF file). The conduction band and valence band were previously characterized to be −1.24 and 0.86 V vs SCE, respectively, according to previous reports.

2.

2

(a) Crystal structure of 1D MVPb2I6; (b) view of lead iodide quantum wire wrapped with MV2+ organic cations; and (c) PXRD of MVPb2I6 before (red) and after (gray) photocatalytic experiment for entry 6 in Table .

We commenced our investigation by exploring the photoreduction of benzaldehyde (E1/2red=1.93VvsSCE) . Selected results are summarized in Table . We first tested the use of tertiary amines as hole scavengers in photocatalytic systems. Upon oxidation, the obtained amino radical cation would undergo a [1,2]-H shift to generate Brønsted-acidic α-ammonium radicals (illustrated in Figure S3), which would then initiate the PCET process through H-bonding to the CO bond, in coordination with previous reports. Pinacol product was observed (Table S1, entries 2 and 3). 1H NMR spectral analysis was employed to determine the yield and diastereoselectivity (dl:meso ratio). However, while amines were present in the system, noticeable degradation of the photocatalyst occurred, as reaction solutions turned orange after irradiation (Figure S2a). Notably, MVPb2I6 was completely dissolved when acetonitrile (MeCN) was used as the solvent (Table S1, entry 1). Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) analysis was also conducted after irradiation, and new peaks were present (Figure S2b), which might be due to cation exchange between the methyl viologen cation and the α-ammonium radical. These findings suggest that tertiary amines are not suitable hole scavengers for our system.

1. Optimization Studies of the Photocatalyzed Pinacol Coupling of Benzaldehyde­[].

Entry Solvent[] Acid[] Yield (%) [] meso:dl
1[] H2O Acetate buffer 73 1:1.23
2 H2O CH3COOH 54 1:1.21
3 MeCN CH3COOH n.r. -
4 Toluene CH3COOH n.r. -
5[] EtOAc/H2O CH3COOH 14 1.05:1
6 EtOAc/H2O CH3COOH 85 1:1.2
a

Reaction conditions: 1a (1 mmol), MVPb2I6 (13.6 mg; 1 mol %), room temperature, Xeon lamp (350 W), 16 h.

b

Degassed solvent, 4 mL.

c

10 mmol of acetic acid.

d

Determined by NMR analysis. n.r. = no reaction.

e

1 mL of pH = 4 acetate buffer (0.1 M) was used instead of glacial acetic acid.

f

EtOAc:H2O (v/v = 9:1) 4 mL.

g

EtOAc:H2O (v/v = 3:1).

In Table , ethanol was employed as the hole scavenger, and no noticeable color change was observed after irradiation (Figure S2a), indicating the stability of the photocatalyst under these conditions. The diol product 2a was observed only when water was present in the system, suggesting that water plays a critical role in facilitating the reaction. Since the proposed mechanism involves carbonyl activation via the PCET process, the acid’s pK a is a critical factor. Notably, the pK a of acetic acid is approximately 4.76 in water, but increases significantly in less polar solvents. This increase suppresses acetic acid dissociation, thereby reducing proton availability in these media. The acid concentration was found to affect not only the reaction yield but also product selectivity. In entry 2, where water was used as the sole solvent, both 1,2-diphenylethane-1,2-diol (the pinacol product) and benzyl alcohol (the competing product) were observed with yields of 54% and 27%, respectively. To improve substrate solubility, a mixture of ethyl acetate (EtOAc) and H2O (v/v = 3:1) was selected for subsequent experiments. Meanwhile, the PXRD patterns of MVPb2I6 exhibit no noticeable changes before and after the reaction, indicating that MVPb2I6 retained its structural integrity following photoreduction (Figure b). The stability of MVPb2I6 in protic media is consistent with the known stabilizing role of the quaternary ammonium cations. A primary failure mode of OIMHs constructed by primary ammonium salt is acid–base chemistry, which facilitates lattice decomposition; viologen cations, in contrast, are fully quaternized and thus do not undergo analogous acid–base equilibria with water. Indeed, viologen-based lead iodides have been reported to tolerate prolonged water exposure compared to primary ammonium analogues. ,, In addition to stability under photocatalytic conditions, we also investigated the compatibility of MVPb2I6 with a range of common solvents such as ethanol, DCM, hexane, toluene, acetone, MeCN, IPA, and ethyl acetate by 1H NMR and PXRD analyses (Figures S5–S15, Supporting Information). The crystalline phase was retained, whereas partial dissolution was observed in strongly coordinating solvents such as DMF and DMSO. These results further highlight the robustness of MVPb2I6 in protic media and rationalize its unique applicability in photoredox organic transformations.

Furthermore, the recyclability of MVPb2I6 was evaluated through scaled-up catalytic runs (200 mg under standard conditions, proportionally scaled). The catalyst was subjected to three consecutive photocatalytic cycles, affording consistent activity and structural integrity. After the first cycle, the recovered powder weighed 193 mg (96.5% recovery), which we attribute to inevitable handling losses. The PXRD patterns of the recycled samples remained identical to the pristine material, with only minor intensity variations, confirming the robustness of MVPb2I6 as a recyclable heterogeneous photocatalyst.

The reproducibility of the reaction was also validated through repeated experiments, and a series of control experiments were conducted (Table S2, entries 2–6). These results highlighted the essential interplay between light irradiation, ethanol, the photocatalyst, acetic acid, and oxygen exclusion in achieving the desired photoredox organic transformation.

After establishing the optimized reaction conditions, we investigated the feasibility of extending our system to ketone substrates, specifically acetophenone (E1/2red=2.11VvsSCE) and benzophenone (E1/2red=1.52VvsSCE) . It was observed that benzophenone readily underwent conversion to the corresponding diols in high yield without further modification. In contrast, acetophenone showed no reactivity, even when acetic acid was replaced with trifluoroacetic acid (pK a = 0.52 in water), a significantly stronger Brønsted acid. This lack of reactivity is likely due to the reduction potential of acetophenone exceeding the reducing capacity of MVPb2I6. We further accessed the scope of this protocol, and the results are summarized in Table . The presence of electron-withdrawing and -donating groups was found to significantly influence the reaction yield. While acetophenone itself remained unreactive, substrates bearing electron-withdrawing groups, such as −F and −CF3, facilitated successful pinacol coupling. In contrast, substrates containing electron-donating groups such as −OH, −OCH3, or −SCH3 were found to be inert to the protocol, even for the aromatic aldehydes. Substituents influence reactivity and yields by shifting the carbonyl reduction potential. Electron-withdrawing groups lower the carbonyl π* (LUMO) energy and shift the first reduction to more positive potentials, whereas electron-donating groups raise the π* (LUMO) energy and shift the reduction to more negative values; consequently, ketyl intermediate formation is slower, and back electron transfer/recombination becomes more competitive under identical irradiation conditions, leading to diminished isolated yields. This limited applicability primarily arises from the relatively low reducing power of MVPb2I6, confining the protocol to a narrow scope of aromatic carbonyl compounds.

2. Scope of Photocatalytic Pinacol Coupling of Aromatic Carbonyls­[].

graphic file with name am5c22726_0005.jpg

graphic file with name am5c22726_0006.jpg

a

Reaction conditions: aromatic carbonyls (1 mmol), EtOAc:H2O (v/v = 3:1) 4 mL, MVPb2I6 (1 mol %), EtOH (5 equiv.), AcOH (10 equiv.), Ar, RT, Xeon lamp, 16 h.

b

Trifluoroacetic acid (10 equiv.) was used instead of acetic acid.

c

1 mL pH = 4 acetate buffer (0.1 M) was used instead of glacial acetic acid.

We also observed remarkable tunability in product selectivity when the substrates contained a pyridine moiety. As shown in Scheme , under the established protocol, the reaction predominantly yielded alcohol as the final product. However, when the Brønsted acid was replaced with 1 mL of pH 4 acetate buffer (0.1 M), the diol product was obtained solely. This difference in selectivity suggests the involvement of an alternative pathway during the photoreduction of pyridine-containing substrates. This marked difference in selectivity suggests the involvement of an alternative reaction pathway during the photoreduction of pyridine-containing substrates, as shown in Scheme . Specifically, in the presence of acetate buffer, the majority of 4-acetylpyridine remains unprotonated and undergoes a one-electron–one-proton proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) process to generate the ketyl radical (A), as supported by a TEMPO radical trapping experiment (see Supporting Information, Figure S4), Conversely, under sufficiently acidic conditions, the predominant species is the protonated pyridinium ion (1f/i-H), which undergoes a two-electron–one-proton reduction to form a relatively stable enol intermediate (B). This intermediate subsequently undergoes protonation to yield the corresponding alcohol, as depicted in Scheme . These observations are consistent with previous reports on the electroreduction of 4-acetylpyridine under acidic conditions. To further substantiate our mechanistic rationale, we directly monitored the product distribution of 4-acetylpyridine under varying acetic acid concentrations by ^1H NMR spectroscopy (Figure S16 and Supporting Information). A monotonic shift was observed between the diagnostic pinacol OH resonances (δ 5.3–5.5 ppm) and the alcohol quartet (δ ∼ 4.9 ppm), providing clear spectroscopic evidence that proton availability governs the reaction pathway. This observation is fully consistent with established proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) mechanisms for ketyl radical chemistry. Notably, prior electrochemical studies by Köster and coworkers72 demonstrated a formal second-order dependence of the 4-acetylpyridine reduction on proton concentration and proposed a stepwise sequence of (i) rapid protonation, (ii) concerted two-electron/one-proton reduction to a stabilized carbanion, and (iii) subsequent protonation to yield the alcohol. We therefore infer that the photoelectrochemical pathway under our conditions follows an analogous PCET-controlled process, in line with both our spectroscopic evidence and authoritative literature precedents.

1. Product Tunability Under Different pH Conditions for Pyridyl Ketone Substrates.

1

2. Photocatalytic Pathways for Photoreduction of Pyridyl Ketone Substrates Uunder Different pH Environment.

2

Conclusions

In conclusion, we developed a photocatalytic system based on OIMHs that leverages a PCET mechanism during photocatalysis, representing a novel strategy for photoredox organic transformations enabled by OIMHs. The photocatalyst MVPb2I6, obtained by facile preparation, demonstrated the ability to effectively promote the pinacol coupling of aromatic carbonyls in the presence of Brønsted acids. The incorporation of quaternary ammonium cations into the OIMH structure proved to be an effective strategy in improving stability under protic conditions, which traditionally limit the use of OIMHs in photocatalysis. The MVPb2I6 photocatalyst maintained its structural integrity throughout the reactions, highlighting its robustness and potential for broader applications. While the reaction scope is limited by the relatively low reducing power of MVPb2I6, the inherent tunability of the OIMHs suggests that the photocatalytic capability could be enhanced through rational compositional design.

Our findings demonstrate that employing a PCET strategy with OIMHs can expand their application scope in photoredox organic transformations, particularly in environments previously considered challenging due to the stability concerns of conventional OIMHs. Moreover, despite the relatively low photoreducing power of MVPb2I6, PCET allows it to access reactions that are not accessible without proton transfer. Future efforts should focus on optimizing the band structure of OIMHs by rational compositional design, potentially broadening the range of accessible photoredox organic transformations. In addition, the presence of Pb raises environmental and health concerns, motivating future work on lead-leaching quantification under operational conditions, immobilization/encapsulation strategies to mitigate release, and the development of lead-free OIMH analogues. Finally, although MVPb2I6 retains crystallinity over the reaction times examined here, systematic long-duration irradiation studies (activity decay, structural evolution, and leaching analyses) are important to establish durability under extended operation.

Supplementary Material

am5c22726_si_001.pdf (1.4MB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge funding support from the U.S. Department of Energy (Award No. DE-FG02-07ER46427).

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.5c22726.

  • Experimental details are included in the Supporting Information (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Lewis N. S., Nocera D. G.. Powering the planet: chemical challenges in solar energy utilization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006;103(43):15729–15735. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603395103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Nozik A. J., Miller J.. Introduction to Solar Photon Conversion. Chem. Rev. 2010;110(11):6443–6445. doi: 10.1021/cr1003419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kamat P. V., Jin S.. Tell Us the Complete Story! ACS Energy Lett. 2018;3(3):622–623. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00196. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Reischauer S., Pieber B.. Emerging concepts in photocatalytic organic synthesis. iScience. 2021;24(3):102209. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cismesia M. A., Yoon T. P.. Characterizing chain processes in visible light photoredox catalysis. Chem. Sci. 2015;6(10):5426–5434. doi: 10.1039/C5SC02185E. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Prier C. K., Rankic D. A., MacMillan D. W. C.. Visible Light Photoredox Catalysis with Transition Metal Complexes: Applications in Organic Synthesis. Chem. Rev. 2013;113(7):5322–5363. doi: 10.1021/cr300503r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Shaw M. H., Twilton J., MacMillan D. W. C.. Photoredox Catalysis in Organic Chemistry. J. Org. Chem. 2016;81(16):6898–6926. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.6b01449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Nicewicz D. A., MacMillan D. W.. Merging photoredox catalysis with organocatalysis: The direct asymmetric alkylation of aldehydes. Science. 2008;322(5898):77–80. doi: 10.1126/science.1161976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pirnot M. T., Rankic D. A., Martin D. B., MacMillan D. W.. Photoredox activation for the direct β-arylation of ketones and aldehydes. Science. 2013;339(6127):1593–1596. doi: 10.1126/science.1232993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Twilton J., Le C., Zhang P., Shaw M. H., Evans R. W., MacMillan D. W. C.. The merger of transition metal and photocatalysis. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2017;1(7):0052. doi: 10.1038/s41570-017-0052. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Romero N. A., Nicewicz D. A.. Organic Photoredox Catalysis. Chem. Rev. 2016;116(17):10075–10166. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Okamoto S., Nagai D.. Pyrene-Based Organic Photoredox Catalysts for Carbon–Carbon Bond-Forming Reactions: Reductive Coupling of Aromatic Carbonyl and Imine Compounds. Org. Lett. 2024;26(36):7718–7722. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.4c02845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Caputo J. A., Frenette L. C., Zhao N., Sowers K. L., Krauss T. D., Weix D. J.. General and Efficient C–C Bond Forming Photoredox Catalysis with Semiconductor Quantum Dots. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139(12):4250–4253. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b13379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Xi Z.-W., Yang L., Wang D.-Y., Feng C.-W., Qin Y., Shen Y.-M., Pu C., Peng X.. Visible Light Induced Reduction and Pinacol Coupling of Aldehydes and Ketones Catalyzed by Core/Shell Quantum Dots. J. Org. Chem. 2021;86(3):2474–2488. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.0c02627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Yang Y., Yang M., Moore D. T., Yan Y., Miller E. M., Zhu K., Beard M. C.. Top and bottom surfaces limit carrier lifetime in lead iodide perovskite films. Nat. Energy. 2017;2(2):16207. doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2016.207. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Yang Y., Ostrowski D. P., France R. M., Zhu K., van de Lagemaat J., Luther J. M., Beard M. C.. Observation of a hot-phonon bottleneck in lead-iodide perovskites. Nat. Photonics. 2016;10(1):53–59. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2015.213. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Semonin O. E., Elbaz G. A., Straus D. B., Hull T. D., Paley D. W., van der Zande A. M., Hone J. C., Kymissis I., Kagan C. R., Roy X.. et al. Limits of Carrier Diffusion in n-Type and p-Type CH3NH3PbI3 Perovskite Single Crystals. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016;7(17):3510–3518. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b01308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dong Q., Fang Y., Shao Y., Mulligan P., Qiu J., Cao L., Huang J.. Solar cells. Electron-hole diffusion lengths > 175 μm in solution-grown CH3NH3PbI3 single crystals. Science. 2015;347(6225):967–970. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa5760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Xing G., Mathews N., Sun S., Lim S. S., Lam Y. M., Grätzel M., Mhaisalkar S., Sum T. C.. Long-range balanced electron- and hole-transport lengths in organic-inorganic CH3NH3PbI3. Science. 2013;342(6156):344–347. doi: 10.1126/science.1243167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhao Y., Zhu K.. Organic–inorganic hybrid lead halide perovskites for optoelectronic and electronic applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016;45(3):655–689. doi: 10.1039/C4CS00458B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Saparov B., Mitzi D. B.. Organic-Inorganic Perovskites: Structural Versatility for Functional Materials Design. Chem. Rev. 2016;116(7):4558–4596. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Dou L., Yang Y., You J., Hong Z., Chang W.-H., Li G., Yang Y.. Solution-processed hybrid perovskite photodetectors with high detectivity. Nat. Commun. 2014;5(1):5404. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Cho H., Jeong S.-H., Park M.-H., Kim Y.-H., Wolf C., Lee C.-L., Heo J. H., Sadhanala A., Myoung N., Yoo S.. et al. Overcoming the electroluminescence efficiency limitations of perovskite light-emitting diodes. Science. 2015;350(6265):1222–1225. doi: 10.1126/science.aad1818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhu H., Fu Y., Meng F., Wu X., Gong Z., Ding Q., Gustafsson M. V., Trinh M. T., Jin S., Zhu X.-Y.. Lead halide perovskite nanowire lasers with low lasing thresholds and high quality factors. Nat. Mater. 2015;14(6):636–642. doi: 10.1038/nmat4271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Xu Y.-F., Yang M.-Z., Chen B.-X., Wang X.-D., Chen H.-Y., Kuang D.-B., Su C.-Y.. A CsPbBr(3) Perovskite Quantum Dot/Graphene Oxide Composite for Photocatalytic CO(2) Reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139(16):5660–5663. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b00489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Chen K., Deng X., Dodekatos G., Tüysüz H.. Photocatalytic Polymerization of 3,4-Ethylenedioxythiophene over Cesium Lead Iodide Perovskite Quantum Dots. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139(35):12267–12273. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b06413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhu X., Lin Y., Sun Y., Beard M. C., Yan Y.. Lead-Halide Perovskites for Photocatalytic α-Alkylation of Aldehydes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019;141(2):733–738. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b08720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhu X., Lin Y., San Martin J., Sun Y., Zhu D., Yan Y.. Lead halide perovskites for photocatalytic organic synthesis. Nat. Commun. 2019;10(1):2843. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10634-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wu W.-B., Wong Y.-C., Tan Z.-K., Wu J.. Photo-induced thiol coupling and C–H activation using nanocrystalline lead-halide perovskite catalysts. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2018;8(16):4257–4263. doi: 10.1039/C8CY01240G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Cao Q., Song R., Chan C. C. S., Wang Z., Wong P. Y., Wong K. S., Blum V., Lu H.. Chiral Perovskite Nanoplatelets with Tunable Circularly Polarized Luminescence in the Strong Confinement Regime. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2023;11(12):2203125. doi: 10.1002/adom.202203125. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mishra K., Hendrix I., Gerardo J., Yamamoto N., Yan Y.. Merging of Two Photoredox Cycles with One Perovskite Catalyst Achieving Dual Functionalization: N-Heterocyclization and Site-Selective Bromination of N-Arylamines. J. Org. Chem. 2025;90(12):4244–4253. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.4c03045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lin Y., Yan Y.. CsPbBr­(3) Perovskite Nanocrystals for Photocatalytic [3 + 2] Cycloaddition. ChemSusChem. 2024;17(1):e202301060. doi: 10.1002/cssc.202301060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Shaikh M., Rubalcaba K., Yan Y.. Halide Perovskite Induces Halogen/Hydrogen Atom Transfer (XAT/HAT) for Allylic C–H Amination. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2025;64(1):e202413012. doi: 10.1002/anie.202413012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Dai Y., Poidevin C., Ochoa-Hernández C., Auer A. A., Tüysüz H.. A Supported Bismuth Halide Perovskite Photocatalyst for Selective Aliphatic and Aromatic C-H Bond Activation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020;59(14):5788–5796. doi: 10.1002/anie.201915034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Huang H., Yuan H., Zhao J., Solís-Fernández G., Zhou C., Seo J. W., Hendrix J., Debroye E., Steele J. A., Hofkens J.. et al. C­(sp3)–H Bond Activation by Perovskite Solar Photocatalyst Cell. ACS Energy Lett. 2019;4(1):203–208. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b01698. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Mohamadpour F.. Recyclable photocatalyst perovskite as a single-electron redox mediator for visible-light-driven photocatalysis gram-scale synthesis of 3,4-dihydropyrimidin-2-(1H)-ones/thiones in air atmosphejre. Sci. Rep. 2023;13(1):10262. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37526-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Hong Z., Chong W. K., Ng A. Y. R., Li M., Ganguly R., Sum T. C., Soo H. S.. Hydrophobic Metal Halide Perovskites for Visible-Light Photoredox C-C Bond Cleavage and Dehydrogenation Catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019;58(11):3456–3460. doi: 10.1002/anie.201812225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhao H., Sun J., Kumar S., Li P., Thalluri S. M., Wang Z. M., Thumu U.. Recent advances in metal halide perovskite based photocatalysts for artificial photosynthesis and organic transformations. Chem. Commun. 2024;60(46):5890–5911. doi: 10.1039/D4CC01949K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wang C., Han N., Ding Y., Ng Y. H., Su B.-L.. Metal halide perovskites for photocatalytic applications: opportunities and challenges. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2025;12(10):nwaf376. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwaf376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Callegari C., Tedesco C., Corbo A., Prato M., Malavasi L., Ravelli D.. Application of Lead-Free Metal Halide Perovskite Heterojunctions for the Carbohalogenation of C–C Multiple Bonds. Org. Lett. 2025;27(14):3667–3672. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5c00780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ji L., Kou J., Wang S., Xing Z., Xin Z., Skrydstrup T., Huang Y.. Octahedral Cs2AgBiBr6 Double Perovskite Microcrystals for C–C Coupling Reactions under Visible-Light Irradiation. Inorg. Chem. 2025;64(36):18401–18410. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5c02942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Lu L., Wang Y., Zhang W., Zhang W., See K. A., Lin S.. Three-Component Cross-Electrophile Coupling: Regioselective Electrochemical Dialkylation of Alkenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023;145(41):22298–22304. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c06794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Zheng Y., Zhu H., Xie X., Yang L., Fan Q., Le Z., Xie Z.. Lead-free perovskite Cs3Bi2Br9/TiO2 composites for atmospheric photocatalytic oxidation of sulfides. Green Chem. 2024;26(12):7031–7037. doi: 10.1039/D4GC01758G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Yue T., Zhang S.-Z., Li M.-M., Zhang Z.-H.. Lead-Free Cs3Bi2Br9 Perovskite as Heterogeneous Photocatalyst for Oxidative Dehydrogenative Coupling of Thiols and P­(O)H Compounds. ChemSuschem. 2025;18(21):e202501607. doi: 10.1002/cssc.202501607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Lin Y., Guo J., San Martin J., Han C., Martinez R., Yan Y.. Photoredox Organic Synthesis Employing Heterogeneous Photocatalysts with Emphasis on Halide Perovskite. Chem. - Eur. J. 2020;26(58):13118–13136. doi: 10.1002/chem.202002145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Wang C., Xie Z., Wang Y., Ding Y., Leung M. K. H., Ng Y. H.. Defects of Metal Halide Perovskites in Photocatalytic Energy Conversion: Friend or Foe? Adv. Sci. 2024;11(29):2402471. doi: 10.1002/advs.202402471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Hsu H.-Y., Ji L., Du M., Zhao J., Yu E. T., Bard A. J.. Optimization of PbI2/MAPbI3 Perovskite Composites by Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2016;120(35):19890–19895. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b07850. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wan R., Yin M., Wang T.-H., Moore C. E., Wu Y.. Chiral Methylbenzylpyridinium-Based Organic–Inorganic Lead Halides for Water-Resistant Photoluminescence Materials. Inorg. Chem. 2025;64(6):2868–2877. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.4c04989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Lyu R., Wan R., Moore C. E., Wu Y.. Chiral Viologen-Derived Water-Stable Small Band Gap Lead Halides: Synthesis, Characterization, and Optical Properties. Inorg. Chem. 2024;63(13):5885–5896. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c04413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Huang G., Zhou H., Wang C., Kashi C., Ye X., Li W., Wang G.-E., Xu G.. A new 1D inorganic–organic hybrid perovskite-like semiconductor with high stability and humidity response. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2021;128:108581. doi: 10.1016/j.inoche.2021.108581. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Wang C., Yang S., Chen X., Wen T., Yang H. G.. Surface-functionalized perovskite films for stable photoelectrochemical water splitting. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2017;5(3):910–913. doi: 10.1039/C6TA08812K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Latini A., Quaranta S., Menchini F., Lisi N., Di Girolamo D., Tarquini O., Colapietro M., Barba L., Demitri N., Cassetta A.. A novel water-resistant and thermally stable black lead halide perovskite, phenyl viologen lead iodide C22H18N2­(PbI3)­2. Dalton Trans. 2020;49(8):2616–2627. doi: 10.1039/C9DT04148F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Lyu R., Cui Z., Elgin J., Co A. C., Wu Y.. Photoelectrochemistry of Methylviologen Lead Iodide: Achieving Stability inside a Polar Solvent. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2023;127(32):15852–15860. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c04054. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Péter Á., Agasti S., Knowles O., Pye E., Procter D. J.. Recent advances in the chemistry of ketyl radicals. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021;50(9):5349–5365. doi: 10.1039/D0CS00358A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Chatterjee A., Joshi N. N.. Evolution of the stereoselective pinacol coupling reaction. Tetrahedron. 2006;62(52):12137–12158. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2006.09.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Calogero F., Magagnano G., Potenti S., Pasca F., Fermi A., Gualandi A., Ceroni P., Bergamini G., Cozzi P. G.. Diastereoselective and enantioselective photoredox pinacol coupling promoted by titanium complexes with a red-absorbing organic dye. Chem. Sci. 2022;13(20):5973–5981. doi: 10.1039/D2SC00800A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Dang V. Q., Teets T. S.. Visible-Light Photohydrogenation of Ketones, Aldehydes, and Imines Using a Strongly Reducing Photosensitizer. Organometallics. 2024;43(16):1698–1705. doi: 10.1021/acs.organomet.3c00491. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  58. Nakajima M., Fava E., Loescher S., Jiang Z., Rueping M.. Photoredox-Catalyzed Reductive Coupling of Aldehydes, Ketones, and Imines with Visible Light. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015;54(30):8828–8832. doi: 10.1002/anie.201501556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Rouch W. D., Zhang M., McCulla R. D.. Conjugated polymers as photoredox catalysts: a new catalytic system using visible light to promote aryl aldehyde pinacol couplings. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012;53(37):4942–4945. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2012.06.144. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Manbeck G. F., Fujita E., Concepcion J. J.. Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer in a Strongly Coupled Photosystem II-Inspired Chromophore–Imidazole–Phenol Complex: Stepwise Oxidation and Concerted Reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016;138(36):11536–11549. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b03506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Warren J. J., Tronic T. A., Mayer J. M.. Thermochemistry of proton-coupled electron transfer reagents and its implications. Chem. Rev. 2010;110(12):6961–7001. doi: 10.1021/cr100085k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Murray P. R. D., Cox J. H., Chiappini N. D., Roos C. B., McLoughlin E. A., Hejna B. G., Nguyen S. T., Ripberger H. H., Ganley J. M., Tsui E.. et al. Photochemical and Electrochemical Applications of Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer in Organic Synthesis. Chem. Rev. 2022;122(2):2017–2291. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Hammes-Schiffer S.. Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer: Moving Together and Charging Forward. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137(28):8860–8871. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b04087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Tyburski R., Liu T., Glover S. D., Hammarström L.. Proton-coupled electron transfer guidelines, fair and square. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021;143:560. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c09106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Lennox J. C., Kurtz D. A., Huang T., Dempsey J. L.. Excited-State Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer: Different Avenues for Promoting Proton/Electron Movement with Solar Photons. ACS Energy Lett. 2017;2(5):1246–1256. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00063. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  66. Bediako D. K., Solis B. H., Dogutan D. K., Roubelakis M. M., Maher A. G., Lee C. H., Chambers M. B., Hammes-Schiffer S., Nocera D. G.. Role of pendant proton relays and proton-coupled electron transfer on the hydrogen evolution reaction by nickel hangman porphyrins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2014;111(42):15001–15006. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1414908111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Parada G. A., Goldsmith Z. K., Kolmar S., Pettersson Rimgard B., Mercado B. Q., Hammarström L., Hammes-Schiffer S., Mayer J. M.. Concerted proton-electron transfer reactions in the Marcus inverted region. Science. 2019;364(6439):471–475. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw4675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Tang Z., Guloy A. M.. A Methylviologen Lead­(II) Iodide: Novel [PbI3-]∞ Chains with Mixed Octahedral and Trigonal Prismatic Coordination. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999;121(2):452–453. doi: 10.1021/ja982702i. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. Kütt A., Leito I., Kaljurand I., Sooväli L., Vlasov V. M., Yagupolskii L. M., Koppel I. A.. A Comprehensive Self-Consistent Spectrophotometric Acidity Scale of Neutral Brønsted Acids in Acetonitrile. J. Org. Chem. 2006;71(7):2829–2838. doi: 10.1021/jo060031y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Ciccioli A., Panetta R., Luongo A., Brunetti B., Vecchio Ciprioti S., Mele M. L., Latini A.. Stabilizing lead halide perovskites with quaternary ammonium cations: the case of tetramethylammonium lead iodide. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019;21(44):24768–24777. doi: 10.1039/C9CP04051J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Namazian M., Zakery M., Noorbala M. R., Coote M. L.. Accurate calculation of the pKa of trifluoroacetic acid using high-level ab initio calculations. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2008;451(1):163–168. doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2007.11.088. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  72. Köster K., Wendt H., Lebouc A.. Heterogeneous catalysis and electrosorption phenomena in the cathodic reduction of acetylpyridines: Part II. Electrode kinetic investigations. J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem. 1983;157(1):89–111. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0728(83)80378-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  73. Kopilov J., Kariv E., Miller L. L.. Asymmetric, cathodic reduction of acetylpyridines. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977;99(10):3450–3454. doi: 10.1021/ja00452a043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  74. Köster K., Wendt H., Lebouc A.. Heterogeneous catalysis and electrosorption phenomena in the cathodic reduction of acetylpyridines: Part III. Preparative investigation of reduction of 2-, 4- and 3-acetylpyridine. J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem. 1983;157(1):113–121. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0728(83)80379-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

am5c22726_si_001.pdf (1.4MB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES