Skip to main content
Biological Procedures Online logoLink to Biological Procedures Online
. 2026 Mar 3;28:11. doi: 10.1186/s12575-025-00267-4

Differential Diagnosis between Sintilimab-related Autoimmune Myocarditis and Acute Myocardial Infarction

Yihe Wu 1,2, Jiayun Nian 1, Hongxu Liu 1,✉, Xiaolei Lai 1, Zihao Liu 1, Tengfei Li 1, Shenglei Qiu 1
PMCID: PMC12964628  PMID: 41776397

Abstract

Objective

To analyze the regularities and clinical features of sintilimab-related autoimmune myocarditis, and to summarize the differential diagnosis key points between sintilimab-related autoimmune myocarditis and acute myocardial infarction.

Methods

The case reports about sintilimab-related autoimmune myocarditis were searched on databases from the establishment of the database to April 1st 2024. The relevant medical records were searched on the hospital information system of Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine in the past 3 years. The case reports and medical records were collected for statistical analysis.

Result

Twenty three cases were collected including 22 case reports and 1 case record. Most of the sintilimab-related autoimmune myocarditis were in elderly men aged 60–75 years old and occurred between the end of the first dose of treatment to the beginning of the second dose. The symptom was nonspecific such as chest tightness and palpitation, sometimes with symptom of myasthenia as muscle weakness or myositisand as muscle soreness. Elevated cardiac biomarkers and changes in electrocardiogram were common, and decreased left ventricular ejection fraction was rarely seen in echocardiography. 9 cases underwent coronary angiography or computed coronary tomography angiography, and 3 cases underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Conclusion

The manifestations of sintilimab-related autoimmune myocarditis are not specific. The medication history and concomitant symptoms are of warning value. Coronary angiography or coronary computed coronary tomography angiography can be helpful when ruling out acute myocardial infarction. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and myocardial biopsy can confirm the diagnosis. Cardiac biomarkers and the electrocardiogram can assist in diagnosis and prognosis assessment.

Keywords: Sintilimab, Immune checkpoint inhibitor, Autoimmune myocarditis, Acute myocardial infarction, Differential diagnosis

Introduction

Cardiovascular diseases and malignant tumors are two of the major diseases threatening human life and health, with their high morbidity and mortality [1]. The innovative development of cancer therapies has led to an unprecedented improvement in survival outcomes, and cardiovascular disease has become the second leading cause of mortality in cancer survivors after recurrent malignancy [2]. The development of onco-cardiology is in the ascendant, and cardiovascular adverse reactions caused by antineoplastic drugs are the research focus in this discipline.

Sintilimab (trade name: Darbosux) is a kind of Immune Checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) which enhances T-cell responses in recognizing the specific tumor antigens and killing tumor cells, and thereby restore the antitumour T-cell response, and consequently plays an inhibitory role in tumor growth and immune escape [3, 4]. Sintilimab has been approved in China for the treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma and a variety of solid tumors, including non-small-cell lung cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma and esophageal cancer, which has brought hope to many tumor patients [5–10]. However, adverse reactions introduced by the immunotoxicity of sintilimab have emerged during the treatment [11–13].Wherein autoautoimmune myocarditis characterized by acuteness, rapid transmission and high mortality after ICI therapy attracts increasing concern [14–17]. And the rapidly rising number of related case reports suggests that the incidence of autoimmune myocarditis may be underestimated [18]. Therefore, the identification and differential diagnosis of sintilimab-related autoimmune myocarditis has become a clinical challenge.

Sintilimab is a fully human IgG4 monoclonal antibody that binds to programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1), thereby blocking the interaction of PD-1 with its ligands (PD-L1) and consequently helping to restore the endogenous anti-tumour T-cell response [19]. However, the autopsy results of patients with myocarditis after using PD-1 inhibitor shows that the same T-cell recognition antigens are present in the infiltrating T cells of both myocardium and tumors. And this finding indicated that the T cells activated by sintilimab recognize not only the antigens on tumor cells, but also the high-isogeneic antigens on cardiomyocytes, resulting in autoimmune myocarditis [20–22]. In addition, PD-1/PD-L1 plays an important role in cardiac protection. PD-L1 can restrict the activation of specific-cardiac antigen cytotoxic T cells (CTL), thereby inhibiting their killing effect on cardiomyocytes. After the treatment of PD-1/PDL-1 inhibitors, the balance of cardiac peripheral immune tolerance is broken, and unrestricted CTLS are heavily activated and attack the heart, exacerbating the cardiomyocytes damage [23–25]. Meanwhile, inhibitions of PD-1 cause Treg cells turning into pro-inflammatory state, and the activity of CD4/CD8 increases. Activated immune cells release a large amount of inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-17 and IL-6 into the circulatory system, leading to further damage of myocardial tissue [22].

Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) is a group of clinical syndromes caused by acute myocardial ischemia, usually presenting with acute episodes of chest pain, chest tightness, palpitations, fatigue and other symptoms, accompanied by elevated cardiac biomarkers and a series of characteristic electrocardiographic changes of myocardial ischemia or necrosis [26]. Appearing similar to AMI in clinical symptoms, elevated serum indexes, electrocardiogram (ECG) changes, and other aspects, sintilimab-related autoimmune myocarditis is easily misdiagnosed as AMI in clinical practice, thus missing the ptimal treatment stage [27]. Moreover, the therapeutic principles of autoimmune myocarditis and AMI contradict each other. The former is mainly treated with glucocorticoid for anti-inflammatory therapy [28], while glucocorticoid may increase the risk of complications such as heart rupture in AMI [29]. Therefore, rapid identification of sintilimab-related autoimmune myocarditis and accurate differentiation of AMI is of significant clinical importance.

In this work, case reports of sintilimab-related autoimmune myocarditis were collected academic resource retrieval websites and relevant medical records were collected from the hospital information system of Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University. The clinical features of sintilimab-related autoimmune myocarditis were extracted, and the key points of differential diagnosis of sintilimab-related autoimmune myocarditis and AMI were summarized to offer guidance for clinical recognition.

Methods and Materials

Data Source

The data of this study derived from case reports retrieval and medical record review in hospital information system of Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine. The screening process is depicted in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Flow chart of screening cases

The following literature retrieval webs were employed, including: CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, Pubmed and Cochrane Library. Data retrieval was limited to studies in Chinese or in English published before April 1st 2024. The search strategy used terms relating to “sintilimab”, “myocarditis”, “Sindili”, “myocarditis”, “cardiovascular” and “myocardial injury”. A total of 101 Chinese literature and 16 English literature were retrieved. After removing duplicates, 61 studies were retained for further examination. After screening the titles, abstracts and text, 36 studies were excluded because they were not case reports. Consequently, 25 literatures (11 in Chinese and 14 in English) were retained, in which 22 case reports of sintilimab-related autoimmune myocarditis were included with 3 repeated cases removed.

Cases adopting sintilimab in the past three years were searched in the hospital information system of Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Included cases fulfilled the Chinese Expert Consensus on the Surveillance and Management of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Myocarditis (2020 version)clinical diagnostic criteria for ICIs-related autoimmune myocarditis [28]. One case diagnosed as sintilimab-related autoimmune myocarditis with elevated cardiac biomarkers and ECG changes after sintilimab treatment was included.

Methods

Data extraction was performed using Excel Microsoft software to sort out the data of gender, age, comorbidities, drug dosage, concomitant medications, time of onset, related clinical manifestations and auxiliary examination, treatment, prognosis and other information of the included 23 cases.

Statistical methods: Accordingly, statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics version 27 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA; account name: Beijing Hospital of TCM, CCUM). Composition ratio, incidence ratio, mortality ratio was presented. Categorical data were compared using the Pearson exact test. Data of coronary heart disease (CHD) and AMI were from China Cardiovascular Health and Disease Report 2023 [30].

Result

Distributions Age and Gender

As listed in Table 1, among the 23 cases of sintilimab-related autoimmune myocarditis, 16 cases (69.57%) were male and seven cases (30.43%) were female. The cases were all aged between 33 and 85 years old, and most of them were elders aging 55 to 85. There was no significant difference between sintilimab-related autoimmune myocarditis and AMI (Table 1).

Table 1.

The distributions of gender and age of cases with sintilimab-related autoimmune myocarditis comparing with acute myocardial infarction

Sintilimab-related autoimmune myocarditis (n = 23) Acute myocardial infarction P
Gender
 Male 16 (69.57%) 70.7% 0.520
 Female 7 (30.43%) 29.3%
Age
 < 55 years 7 (30.43%) 23.4% 0.905
 55 ~ 85 years 16 (69.57%) 71.5%

Comorbidities, Drug Dosage and Concomitant Medications

Among the included 23 cases, all the primary diseases were tumors. The types of tumors included lung cancer (nine cases), thymoma (five cases), liver cancer (two cases) and kidney cancer (two cases) (Fig. 2). Some cases complicated by cardiovascular or cerebrovascular diseases (1 case of coronary heart disease, 1 case of old cerebral infarction) or related with risk factors such as smoking history (four cases), type 2 diabetes (three cases), and hypertension (two cases) (Fig. 3). The doses of sintilimab were all 200 mg, and 14 cases were treated with combination antineoplastic therapy. According to reports, sintilimab was identified as the main cause inducing myocarditis in 14 cases (Tables 2 and 3).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Primary diseases of cases with sintilimab-related autoimmune myocarditis

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Underlying diseases and cardiovascular risk factors of cases with sintilimab-related autoimmune myocarditis

Table 2.

Comorbid conditions of sintilimab-related autoimmune myocarditis comparing with acute myocardial infarction

Sintilimab-related autoimmune myocarditis (n = 23) Coronary heart disease P
Type 2 diabetes 3 (13.04%) 26.30% 0.146
Hypertension 2 (8.696%) 60.90%  < 0.0001

Table 3.

Comorbidities of cases with sintilimab-related autoimmune myocarditis

Comorbidities Case
Carboplatin 5
Paclitaxel 5
Anlotinib 2
Gemcitabine 2
Oteracil potassium 2
Epirubicin 1
IBI310 1
Axitinib 1
Oxaliplatin 1
Cyclophosphamide 1
Lenvatinib Mesilate 1
Nedaplatin 1
Alimta 1

Onset Time

As listed in Table 3, most of the sintilimab-related autoimmune myocarditis occurred between the completion of the first treatment cycle and the initiation of the second, especially in 14 days after the end of the first dose. Notably, onset time varies greatly from five days after the first dose of treatment to the end of the fifth dose (Table 4).

Table 4.

Onset time of sintilimab-related autoimmune myocarditis

Onset time case(%)
End of the first dose 1 ~ 6 days 1(7.14%)
7 ~ 13 days 3(21.43%)
14 days to the beginning of second dose 10(71.43%)
End of the second dose 5(21.74%)
End of the third dose 2(8,70%)
End of the fourth dose 1(4.35%)
End of the fifth dose 1(4.35%)

Related Clinical Manifestations and Auxiliary Examination

As listed in Table 5, the common clinical manifestations of sintilimab-related autoimmune myocarditis were non-specific symptoms such as chest tightness and shortness of breath (65.22%) and palpitation (30.43%). 47.83% of the patients experienced muscle weakness, ptosis, or dysarthria due to myasthenia, and 17.39% of the patients experienced muscle soreness due to myositis (Table 4). For almost all cases, Cardiac Troponin (Tn), Creatine Kinase (CK), Creatine Kinase isoenzyme MB (CKMB) and Myoglobin (Mb) were significantly elevated in clinical presentation, among which CK and CKMB were elevated in different proportions with CK-MB/CK ratio decreasing. Some cases showed elevated Aspartate Transaminase (AST) and Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH). A few cases showed the decrease in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) under transthoracic echocardiography. ECG changes can be observed in the majority of the cases, manifesting as various types of arrhythmias (sinus tachycardia, frequent premature beats, atrioventricular block, bundle branch block, ventricular rhythm, etc.), low voltage in limb leads, QT interval prolongation, ST segment elevation or depression, and T wave deformed. Coronary Angiography (CAG) or coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) was performed for 9 patients to rule out coronary heart diseases. Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) wad performed in 3 patients to confirm myocarditis, and CMR showed old myocardial injury in 1 patient after treatment improvement (Table 6).

Table 5.

Manifestations of cases with sintilimab-related autoimmune myocarditis

Manifestations case proportion
Chest tightness and shortness of breath 15 65.22%
Muscle weakness, ptosis, dysarthria, etc 11 47.83%
Palpitation 7 30.43%
Muscle soreness 4 17.39%
Cough 2 8.70%
Dizziness 2 8.70%
Abdominal pain 1 4.35%
Fever 1 4.35%
Gross hematuria 1 4.35%
Cognitive decline 1 4.35%
Loss of appetite and weight loss 1 4.35%
Asymptomatic 2 8.70%

Table 6.

Auxiliary examination of cases with sintilimab-related autoimmune myocarditis

Nomber TNT
(ng/mL)
TNI
(ng/mL)
hsTNI
(ng/mL)
CK
(ng/mL)
CKMB
(ng/mL)
MB
(ng/mL)
LDH
(ng/mL)
ALT
(ng/mL)
AST
(ng/mL)
BNP
(ng/L)
NT-proBNP
(ng/L)
LVEF% CAG /CTA CMR Eltromyogram ECG ECG changes Refere-nce
Peipei Rong 2021 [31] - - 44.228 - 137.3  > 1000 - - - - 124 - - - - Sinus tachycardia without any ST-segment changes - [31]
Bo Xu 2021 [32] - 1.68 - 1010 46.3  > 2000 58.9 71.3 - 0.894 - - - - - - [31]
Ling Wu 2022 [33] - - 740.4 3864 216.7 - 768.3I 152 281.9 - - 63 - - - Sinus tachycardia with CRBBB - [33]
Fenfen Xu 2022 [34] - 4.22 - 3425 100  > 2000 584 - - - - - - - - Sinus tachycardia with ventricular premature with CRBBB Severe atrioventricu-lar block [34]
Huiping Zhou 2022 [35] - 0.1 - - - 54 431.2 - - 11,914 - - - - - Sinus tachycardia - [35]
Min Chen 2023 [36] - 0,1 - 1704 - - - - - - - - - - - New atrial premature beat without any ST-segment changes - [36]
Ningfu Li 2023 [37] - - 0.322 - 117 1975 - - - - 53.29 - CAT(-) - - Sinus tachycardia with CRBBB FEPB, NSVT [38]
Bin Liu 2023 [39] - - 0.83 1179 77 - 1182 - 149 - 480.7 - CAG (-) - - Sinus rhythm with ST segment depression in leads V1-5 with prolongation of QTc interval - [39]
Shuangyan Zhang 2023 [40] 0.08 - - 7830 146  > 2000 937 148 350 57 - 62 - - - Sinus rhythm with T wave low-flat - [40]
Yu Zhang 2023 [41] - - 109 1821 33.7 313.7 396 51 107 9.13 - 62 CAG (-) Myocardial edema in ISV and inferior wall Peripheral Sinus rhythm with pre-excitaion syndrome type A - [41]
Qian Xing 2020 [42] 0.916 - - 11,919 223.1  > 3000 1210 - - 117.4 - - - - - CRBBB - [42, 43]
Huanhuan Bi 2021 [44] - 2.2 - 2500 140 - - - - - - - CAG (-) - - Ventricular rhythm with CRBBB with atrioventricular block II°with ST segment depression in multiple leads - [44, 45]
Yukai Chen 2021 [46] 1.5 - - 706 140.7 - - 168 403 - 581.8 61 - PET-MR: demonstrated increased FDG metabolism at the base of the left ventricular wall and increased T2WI signals at the base of the ventricular septum - Sinus rhythm with ST segment depression in leads I, II, aVF, V4-6, T wave changes inleads I and aVL - [46]
Zixuan Yang 2021 [47]  1.566 - - 25,692 - - - - - - 1339 61 - - - Sinus rhythm with new CLBBB - [47]
Beibei Yin 2022 [48] - 2.35 - 1658 124.5 965.4 1616 309.1 154.9 - - 65 - CMR 3 months later: old myocardial injuries - Atrial rhythm - [49]
Shiwei Liu 2022 [49] - - 1423.7 7603 53.37 - 805 97 308 - - 67 - - -

Sinus tachycardia with low voltage of the QRS

complex in the limb leads

CRBBB, prolongation of QTc interval with changed ST segment [49]
Yi, Tang 2022 [50] - 4.1 - - - - - - - - 1050 45 CAG (-) - - BVT Advanced atrioventricular block [50]
Yunling Lin 2022 [51] - 9.4 - 922 109 - - - - - 8290 35 CAG (-) - - Sinus rhythm with ST segment elevating in leads V5-9 - [51]
Siming Zheng 2023 [52] - 2230 - 4977 526 - - - - - 8290 64 - - Sinus rhythm without any ST-segment changes - [52]
Wang, Chen 2023 [53] - 0.363 - 22,536 748.9 - 1156 - - - - 71 CTA: localized noncalcified plaque in the middle of the left anterior descending artery and mild stenosis of the lumen - Amplitude of wave 5 caused by low-frequency re-frequency electrical stimulation on bilateral facial nerves attenuated 5% −10% Sinus rhythm with prolongation of QTc interval VT storms, VF [53]
Xin Liu 2023 [54] - - 5574 - 96.7 - - - - - 111.9 68 CAG (-) - - Sinus rhythm with segment elevating in multiple leads VT, VF [54]
Yue Hu 2023 [55] 0.303 - - - - - - - - - - 68 CTA: no evidence of ACS CMR(-) - Sinus rhythm without any ST segment changes - [55]
BHTCM 2023 - 5.7 - 2513.8 92.6 278.5 946.6 190.8 349.3 48.27 - 58 - - - Accelerated junctional escape rhythm with ST-segment elevating in multiple leads with NSVT VT, VE -

TNT Cardiac Troponin T, TNI Cardiac Troponin I, hsTNI Hypersensitive Troponin I, CK Creatine Kinase, CKMB Creatine Kinase isoenzyme MB, MB Myoglobin, LDH Lactate Dehydrogenase, ALT Aspartate Transaminase, AST Aspartate Transaminase, BNP Brain Natriuretic Peptide, LVEF Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction, CAG Coronary Angiography, CTA Computed Coronary Tomography Angiography, CMR Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, ECG Electrocardiogram, CRBBB Complete Right Bundle Branch, FEPB Frequent Ventricular Premature Beat, ISV Interventricular Septum, CLBBB complete left bundle branch, VT Ventricular Tachycardia, BVT Bidirectional Ventricular Tachycardia, NSVT Nonsustained Ventricular Tachycardia, VF Ventricular Fibrillation, ACS Acute Coronary Syndrome, VE Ventricular Escape

Treatment and Prognosis

As listed in Table 6, all included 23 cases quit sintilimab treatment after the occurrence if adverse reactions. And methylprednisolone therapy was given by injection or oral administration in 1 to 14 days after symptom occured. The injection dose ranged from 60 mg/d to 1000 mg/d, and the oral dose was 40 mg/d. Immunoglobulin injection therapy was given to nine cases with 20–30 mg/ day; temporary pacemaker was implanted in four cases; plasma exchange therapy was performed for two cases. Cardiac death occurred in five cases with malignant arrhythmia and peritoneal infection occurred in one case, with a mortality rate of 26.09% (Table 7). Among 17 cases of improvement, four cases were reported still survive in two months after discharged, and one case reported tumor progressed in two months after discharged.

Table 7.

Treatment and prognosis of cases with sintilimab-related autoautoimmune myocarditis

Nomber Diagnosis Systems involved initiation time Steroids Immunoglobulin Other drugs Other treatments Prognosis Reference
Peipei Rong 2021 [31] ICIs-related autoautoimmune myocarditis Circulatory system - Methylprednisolone for injection (500 mg/d, gradually decreasing the dose) - - - Improvement [31]
Bo Xu 2021 [32]

ICIs-related autoimmune myocarditis

Immune myositis, myasthenia

Immune liver injury

Circulatory system

Moter system

Digestive system

8 Methylprednisolone for injection(80 mg/d, gradually decreasing the dose) -

Magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate,

Adenosine cyclophosphate

- Improvement [31]
Ling Wu 2022 [33] ICIs-related autoimmune myocarditis Circulatory system - Methylprednisolone for injection(1 g/d, gradually decreasing the dose)

Immunoglobulin

(20 mg/d)

- Improvement [33]
Fenfen Xu 2022 [34]

Immune myositis

ICIs-related autoimmune myocarditis

Circulatory system

Moter system

3 Methylprednisolone for injection(240 mg/d for 5 days, gradually decreasing the dose) - - Temporary pacemaker Improvement [34]
Huiping Zhou 2022 [35] ICIs-related autoimmune myocarditis Circulatory system 8 Methylprednisolone for injection(160 mg/d, gradually decreasing the dose) - - - Improvement [35]
Min Chen 2023 [36]

ICIs-related autoimmune myocarditis

myasthenia

Circulatory system

Moter system

6 Methylprednisolone for injection(60 mg/d, gradually decreasing the dose) - - - Improvement [36]
Ningfu Li 2023 [37] ICIs-related autoimmune myocarditis Circulatory system 3 Methylprednisolone for injection(500 mg/d for 4 days, gradually decreasing the dose)

Immunoglobulin

(20 mg/d)

Trimetazidine,

Coenzyme Q10,

Sacubitril valsartan sodium

- Cardiac death [37, 38]
Bin Liu 2023 [39] ICIs-related autoimmune myocarditis Circulatory system 3 Methylprednisolone for injection(120 mg/d, gradually decreasing the dose) - - - Improvement [39]
Shuangyan Zhang 2023 [40]

ICIs-related autoimmune myocarditis

Immune myositis

Circulatory system + Moter system 5 Methylprednisolone for injection (500 mg/d, gradually decreasing the dose) Improvement [40]
Yu Zhang 2023 [41]

ICIs-related autoimmune myocarditis

Immune myositis, myasthenia

Circulatory system

Moter system

1 Methylprednisolone for oral(40 mg/d, gradually decreasing the dose) - - - Improvement [41]
Qian Xing 2020 [42]

ICIs-related autoimmune myocarditis

Immune myositis

Circulatory system

Moter system

- Methylprednisolone for injection(500 mg/d, gradually decreasing the dose)

Immunoglobulin

(25 g/d)

Pyridostigmine Bromide120g Qid

Temporary pacemaker,

Plasmapheresis

Improvement [42, 43]
Huanhuan Bi 2021 [44] ICIs-related autoimmune myocarditis Circulatory system -

Methylprednisolone for injection

(80 mg/d for 1 days、60 mg/d for 3 days、40 mg/d for 5 days)

Methylprednisolone for oral

(16 mg/d for 15 days、8 mg/d for 45 days)

- - - Improvement [44, 45]
Yukai Chen 2021 [46]

ICIs-related autoimmune myocarditis

Immune myositis、myasthenia

Immune liver injury

Circulatory system

Moter system

Digestive system

5

Methylprednisolone for injection(480 mg/d for 5 days)

Methylprednisolone for oral

(40 mg/d for 28 days)

- - - Dead of abdominal infection [46]
Zixuan Yang 2021 [47] ICIs-related autoimmune myocarditis

Circulatory system

Moter system

6 Methylprednisolone for injection(2 mg/kg/d for 5 days, gradually decreasing the dose)

Immunoglobulin

(20 g/d for 5 days)

Pyridostigmine Bromide 180 mg/d - Improvement [47]
Beibei Yin 2022 [48]

ICIs-related autoimmune myocarditis

Immune myositis、myasthenia

Circulatory system

Moter system

- Methylprednisolone for injection(500 mg/d for 5 days, gradually decreasing the dose)

Immunoglobulin

(0.4 g/kg/d for 5 days)

Tacrolimus(3 mg/d) - Improvement [49]
Shiwei Liu 2022 [49] ICIs-related autoimmune myocarditis Circulatory system 1 Methylprednisolone for injection(100 mg/d for 3 days, gradually decreasing the dose)

Immunoglobulin

(30 mg for 1 days)

Coenzyme Q10 - Cardiac death [49]
Yi, Tang 2022 [50] ICIs-related autoimmune myocarditis Circulatory system - Methylprednisolone for injection(200 mg/d, gradually decreasing the dose) Immunoglobulin - Temporary pacemaker, Cardiac death [50]
Yunling Lin 2022 [51] ICIs-related autoimmune myocarditis Circulatory system - Methylprednisolone for injection(2 mg/kg/d for 7 days, gradually decreasing the dose)

Immunoglobulin

(0.4 g/kg/d for 7 days)

- - Improvement [51]
Siming Zheng 2023 [52] ICIs-related autoimmune myocarditis Circulatory system 3

Methylprednisolone for injection(15 mg/d)

after CAG ruling out ACS

(120 mg/d, gradually decreasing the dose)

-

Aspirin

Atorvastatin

- Improvement [52]
Wang, Chen 2023 [53]

ICIs-related autoimmune myocarditis

myasthenia

Circulatory system

Moter system

3 Methylprednisolone for injection(120 mg/d, gradually decreasing the dose) - -

Cardioversion

Plasmapheresis

Cardiac death [53]
Xin Liu 2023 [54] ICIs-related autoimmune myocarditis Circulatory system 14 Methylprednisolone for injection(120 mg/d, gradually decreasing the dose)

Immunoglobulin

(20 g for 7 days)

- IABP Improvement [54]
Yue Hu 2023 [55] ICIs-related autoimmune myocarditis Circulatory system - Methylprednisolone for injection(1 mg/kg/d for 3 days, gradually decreasing the dose) - - - Improvement [55]
BHTCM 2023 ICIs-related autoimmune myocarditis

Circulatory system

Moter system

4 Methylprednisolone for injection(80 mg/d for 3 days) - - Temporary pacemaker Cardiac death -

ICIs Immune Checkpoint inhibitors, CAG Coronary Angiography, ACS Acute Coronary Syndrome, IABP Intra-aortic balloon pump

Discussion

Characterized by sudden onset and rapid progression, Sintilimab-related autoimmune myocarditis is similar with AMI in the affected popularity and clinical manifestations, which brings significant difficulties to differentiate the two. However, the therapeutic principles of them are quite different. Therefore, differential diagnosis of the tow rapidly and accurately is of great value. Sintilimab-related autoimmune myocarditis has a preponderance of elderly males, which may be related to the characteristics of the primary disease treated by sintilimab (such as non-small cell lung cancer, etc.) [56]. AMI frequently occurs at midlife and beyond, and the mortality rate of men is higher than that of women [56, 57]. Obviously, there is an overlap between sintilimab-related autoimmune myocarditis and AMI in susceptible popularity. The common clinical manifestations of autoimmune myocarditis are mostly non-specific symptoms similar to AMI, such as chest tightness and shortness of breath, palpitations, etc. Some patients even only present elevated cardiac biomarkers such as Tn without obvious symptoms. Elevated cardiac biomarkers only indicates the myocardial damage and is not satisfactory in the specific diagnosis of autoimmune myocarditis [58, 59]. The history of sintilimab therapy is the key to the identification of sintilimab-related autoimmune myocarditis. However, the scattered onset time brings more difficulty to the diagnosis and differential diagnosis. Moreover, there may be interaction between sintilimab-related autoimmune myocarditis and AMI. Studies have shown that people with AMI risk factors such as heart disease and diabetes may increase the risk of myocarditis, while hypercoagulability induced by tumors may promote coronary thrombosis [18], and ICIs may also accelerate atherosclerosis and plaque rupture [60]. These dilemmas make the differential diagnosis of the two even more difficult.

Since the incidence of AMI is much higher than sintilimab-related autoimmune myocarditis [15, 56], the latter is easily misdiagnosed as AMI in clinical practice. Clarify the medical history of sintilimab therapy is essential in the diagnosis. As shown in Table 4, all patients with sintilimab therapy, whether in early (< 90 days after ICI therapy initiation) or in late (≥ 90 days after ICI therapy initiation) therapy period, should be alert to the possibility of autoimmune myocarditis when cardiac related symptoms such as chest tightness appearing. Myocarditis occurs in 17.39% cases after the third dose of treatment, and late adverse events is mainly revealed to be heart failure [56, 61]. Past history is helpful to identify autoimmune myocarditis. Comparing to patients with autoimmune myocarditis, patients with AMI are more likely to have cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, and smoking. Moreover, in addition to cardiovascular adverse reactions, the adverse reactions of sintilimab often involve multiple systems such as exercise and digestion [62]. As a result, a note of caution on autoimmune myocarditis should be added when patients show evidence other than cardiovascular system.

Exclusionary diagnosis is one of the important way to distinguish sintilimab-related autoimmune myocarditis from AMI, due to its poor specificity in symptoms, signs, laboratory tests and electrocardiogram [28]. CAG is the gold standard for diagnosing AMI [26], but CAG exclusion in the diagnosis of autoimmune myocarditis has disadvantages in clinical practice. First of all, patients may not withstand the invasive CAG examination due to their poor condition as a result of the long-term consuming of tumor. Secondly, patients with myocarditis may delay their seeking medical attention because of the non-specific symptoms, which may easily result in missing the emergency CAG owing to the misdiagnosis of AMI beyond the time window for emergency intervention. CTA is a non-invasive examination with high negative predictive value for coronary artery disease [63, 64]. However, coronary disease is easily overestimated in elderly patients by CTA, because of the significant affection coronary artery calcification make the assessment of coronary artery stenosis degree, which is very common in elderly patients [65]. Unfortunately, tumor is common in elderly population, which increases the risk of misdiagnosing autoimmune myocarditis as AMI due to false positive CTA result, especial without the basement image.

Myocardial biopsy is the gold standard for the diagnosis of autoimmune myocarditis [66–68], but not widely used in clinical practice especially in acute and critical myocarditis, owning to its invasiveness and risk of cardiac perforation. CMR is the gold standard for non-invasive diagnosis of myocarditis caused by traditional etiology [66, 69]. But studies have shown that its sensitivity in the diagnosis of ICI related myocarditis may decrease, especially in the early stage of the disease, where false negatives are prone to occur [70].

Some other features of autoimmune myocarditis are also helpful in clinical diagnosis. Cardiac biomarkers have been proved to be valuable in the early diagnosis of autoimmune myocarditis [58, 71, 72]. Tn often presents a continuous increasing before steroids therapy [58], which was significantly different from the of elevate-peak-fall like variation of Tn in AMI [73]. CK-MB/CK ratio usually decrease, and the multiple of CK-MB exceeding the normal upper limit is usually lower than that of CK, which is significantly different from the proportional rise of the two of AMI. And this may be related to the release of other isoenzymes of CK due to muscle injury caused by immune myositis, which is often been seen with sintilimab-related autoimmune myocarditis [74, 75]. Moreover, the elevating of Tn and CK can be a predicter of poor prognosis. Studies have shown that patients with autoimmune myocarditis who present a Tn of ≥ 1.5 ng/ml was associated with a fourfold increased risk of MACE [18] Hypersensitive troponin may have higher potential value in the diagnosis and prognosis prediction of autoimmune myocarditis [76, 77]. In addition, studies have shown that the elevating of AST, Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (ALT), LDH and other non-cardiac biomarkers can also play a certain reference value in auxiliary diagnosis and prognosis judgment [58]. Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) levels are of limited clinical value, which depends on whether the myocardial damage leads to heart failure. The electrocardiogram of patients with sintilimab-related autoimmune myocarditis often shows various types of arrhythmias, with or without ST-T changes, among which atrioventricular block and bundle branch block have certain value in diagnostic specificity [18]. New severe conduction block and ventricular rhythm may suggest poor prognosis, which presents in all four cases of cardiogenic death included in the study. It should be noted that, the measurement of the LVEF would not provide any utility in diagnosis or prognosis prediction, only 2 of the 23 patients reported significant decrease in LVEF. Studies have shown that LVEF were normal in 50% patients with autoimmune myocarditis, and in 38% patients with cardiac events [18].

Sintilimab is often used in combination with antineoplastic drugs such as chemotherapeutic drugs, anti-angiogenic drugs, and other ICIs, and multi-drug combination increases the risk of autoimmune myocarditis. Studies have shown that morbidity and mortality of autoimmune myocarditis were higher with combination sintilimab plus other ICIs [78, 79]. The combination of sintilimab plus anti-angiogenic drugs such as antilotinib may also aggravate myocardial damage [39]. In addition, some antineoplastic drugs may cause other cardiac adverse reactions. Anthracyclines may cause dose-dependent heart failure and irreversible myocardial damage due to its cardiotoxic [80, 81]. Hypertension is a common adverse reaction of anti-angiogenic drugs, with a clinical incidence of up to 56.2%. It has been reported that AMI and aortic dissection may occurred after hypertension onsets [82–84]. Therefore, for patients with combination therapy of sintilimab and other antineoplastic drugs, it is necessary to be especially vigilant with the autoimmune myocarditis caused by overlap syndrome, and attention should be paid in identifying the cardiac adverse reactions caused by different antineoplastic drugs.

Glucocorticoids are recommended as the first choice for ICIS-related myocarditis [28]. American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelinepoints out that, it is essential to use glucocorticoids early and adequately, which can improve the prognosis of autoimmune myocarditis [17]. However, among the 23 cases included in this study, the initiation time of the 5 cases whose outcomes reported cardiogenic death was 3–4 days, while the outcomes of the other 4 cases whose initiation time was more than 8 days were reported improved. This may be related to the different severity in myocarditis. Patients with insidious onset and mild involvement often delay their treatment due to inconspicuous symptoms, resulting in delayed initiation medication. On the contrary, although patients with sudden onset and severe involvement seek medical treatment in time due to distinct symptoms, they still die of the rapid progression of the disease after intensive treatment. Therefore, rapid and accurate diagnosis of autoimmune myocarditis, especially severe autoimmune myocarditis, and timely treatment are of great significance in clinical practice.

The mortality rate of sintilimab related autoimmune myocarditis is relatively high, with previous reports suggesting which ranges between 39.7% and 51% [85, 86]. And the main causes of death are malignant arrhythmias, including advanced atrioventricular bloc, ventricular escape, ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation. The mechanism of malignant arrhythmia is still unclear, which may be related to the damage of the cardiac conduction system caused by the autoimmune reaction induced by sintilimab [50]. In addition, the cachexia caused by the tumor may lead to electrolyte disturbance, which plays an important role in promoting malignant arrhythmia. Among the five patients with cardiogenic death, three patients developed heart failure after malignant arrhythmia, manifesting as increased BNP or NT-proBNP, and one patient showed a mild decrease in EF, which was consistent with previous studies [18]. This suggests that one of the causes of death in patients with autoimmune myocarditis may be heart failure with preserved EF or heart failure with mid-range EF. It is worth noting that infection may be a risk factor for death in patients with autoimmune myocarditis. Among the dead cases, one was caused by abdominal infection, and the other two cases were accompanied by respiratory infection. Therefore, clinical attention should be paid to adverse reactions such as infection after the application of glucocorticoids.

Limitation

First, most of the cases in this study were case reports, which leads to lacking of control group and pretty convincing statistical analysis. Besides, some data is not fully reported in literature. Meanwhile, the sample size is small (only 23) increasing the unreliable generalizability of the conclusions. In summary, larger sample size, more standardized retrospective studies are needed for further in-depth research.

Conclusion

In summary, sintilimab-related autoimmune myocarditis is prone to be misdiagnosis in clinical practice especially with AMI due to its lacking of specific manifestation. Patients with chest pain who have a history of sintilimab therapy or presenting other systemic manifestations should be alert to the possibility of autoimmune myocarditis. If condition permitting, CAG or coronary CTA should be performed as soon as possible to rule out AMI, CMR or even myocardial biopsy can be performed directly to confirm the diagnosis. Meanwhile, a note of caution should be added to elevating cardiac biomarkers and changes in electrocardiogram for the assistant of diagnosis, and a comprehensive judgment can made by referring to AST, ALT, and LDH.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

ALT

Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase

AMI

Acute Myocardial Infarction

AST

Aspartate Transaminase

BNP

Brain Natriuretic Peptide

CAG

Coronary Angiography

CK

Creatine Kinase

CKMB

Creatine Kinase isoenzyme MB

CMR

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

CTA

Computed Tomography Angiography

ECG

Electrocardiogram

ICIs

Immune Checkpoint inhibitors

LDH

Lactate Dehydrogenase

LVEF

Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Mb

Myoglobin

PD-1

Programmed cell death receptor-1

PDL-1

Programmed cell death receptor ligand-1

Tn

Cardiac Troponin

Authors’ Contributions

All authors participated in writing. Writing-review, language correction & editing were done by Liu Hongxu and Nian Jiayun.

Funding

This study was supported by the Beijing major difficult disease cooperation project of Chinese and Western medicine (NO. 2023BJSZDYNJBXTGG-011).

Data Availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

This study was approved by Ethics Committees of Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine and patient consent was obtained. The manuscript does not contain clinical studies or patient data.

Consent for Publication

The authors declare their agreement for publication.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.National Health Commission. China Health Statistical Yearbook 2022. Beijing: China Union Medical College Press; 2022; 202. p. 283–299. (in Chinese).
  • 2.Bohdan M, Kowalczys A, Mickiewicz A, Gruchała M, Lewicka E. Cancer Therapy-Related Cardiovascular Complications in Clinical Practice: Current Perspectives. J Clin Med. 2021;10:1647. 10.3390/jcm10081647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hoy SM. Sintilimab: First Global Approval. Drugs. 2019;79:341–6. 10.1007/s40265-019-1066-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhang L, Mai W, Jiang W, Geng Q. Sintilimab: A Promising Anti-Tumor PD-1 Antibody. Front Oncol. 2020;10:594558. 10.3389/fonc.2020.594558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sun P, Li Y, Li C, Ren K, Wang Y, Yang H, Jiang W, Zou L, Yang H, Zhou H, Li ZM. A phase II study of sintilimab, anlotinib, and pegaspargase sandwiched with radiotherapy as first-line therapy in patients with newly diagnosed, stage I-II extranodal natural-killer/T-cell lymphoma. Am J Hematol. 2023;98:1043–51. 10.1002/ajh.26922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lu S, Wu L, Jian H, Cheng Y, Wang Q, Fang J, Wang Z, Hu Y, Han L, Sun M, Miao L, Ding C, Cui J, Wang K, Li B, Li X, Ye F, Liu A, Pan Y, Cang S, He Y. Sintilimab plus chemotherapy for patients with EGFR-mutated non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer with disease progression after EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor therapy (ORIENT-31): second interim analysis from a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2023;11:624–36. 10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00135-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lu Z, Wang J, Shu Y, et al. Sintilimab versus placebo in combination with chemotherapy as first line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ORIENT-15): multicentre, randomised, double blind, phase 3 trial. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2022;377:e068714. 10.1136/bmj-2021-068714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Xu J, Jiang H, Pan Y, et al. Sintilimab Plus Chemotherapy for Unresectable Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: The ORIENT-16 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2023;330:2064–74. 10.1001/jama.2023.19918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ren Z, Xu J, Bai Y, et al. Sintilimab plus a bevacizumab biosimilar (IBI305) versus sorafenib in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (ORIENT-32): a randomised, open-label, phase 2–3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:977–90. 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00252-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chen G, Jin Y, Guan WL, Zhang RX, Xiao WW, Cai PQ, Liu M, Lin JZ, Wang FL, Li C, Quan TT, Xi SY, Zhang HZ, Pan ZZ, Wang F, Xu RH. Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade with sintilimab in mismatch-repair deficient, locally advanced rectal cancer: an open-label, single-centre phase 2 study. The lancet Gastroenterology hepatology. 2023;8:422–31. 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00439-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Li X, Li G, Chen D, Su L, Wang RP, Zhou Y. Case Report: sintilimab-induced Stevens-Johnson Syndrome in a patient with advanced lung adenocarcinoma. Front Oncol. 2023;13:912168. 10.3389/fonc.2023.912168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Qiu X, Ren B, Fang L, Dong Z. Anti-PD1 therapy-associated distal renal tubular acidosis: A case report. Exp Ther Med. 2023;26:385. 10.3892/etm.2023.12084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhang M, Wu R, Jia M, Sun S, Zhang L, Tang T. Sintilimab-induced erythema multiforme drug eruption in the treatment of sigmoid colon cancer: A case report and literature review. Medicine. 2023;102:e35659. 10.1097/MD.0000000000035659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Peng L, Yang D, Weng C. Sintilimab and Cardiovascular Toxicity. JAMA. 2024;331:1333–4. 10.1001/jama.2024.0673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Malaty MM, Amarasekera AT, Li C, Scherrer-Crosbie M, Tan TC. Incidence of immune checkpoint inhibitor mediated cardiovascular toxicity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Invest. 2022;52:e13831. 10.1111/eci.13831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Neilan, T. G., Rothenberg, M. L., Amiri-Kordestani, L., Sullivan, R. J., Steingart, R. M., Gregory, W., Hariharan, S., Hammad, T. A., Lindenfeld, J., Murphy, M. J., Moslehi, J. J., Checkpoint Inhibitor Safety Working Group. Myocarditis Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: An Expert Consensus on Data Gaps and a Call to Action. Oncologist. 2018;23:874–8. 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Brahmer JR, Lacchetti C, Schneider BJ, et al. Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2018;36:1714–68. 10.1200/JCO.2017.77.6385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mahmood SS, Fradley MG, Cohen JV, Nohria A, Reynolds KL, Heinzerling LM, Sullivan RJ, Damrongwatanasuk R, Chen CL, Gupta D, Kirchberger MC, Awadalla M, Hassan MZO, Moslehi JJ, Shah SP, Ganatra S, Thavendiranathan P, Lawrence DP, Groarke JD, Neilan TG. Myocarditis in Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:1755–64. 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Xie F, Xu M, Lu J, Mao L, Wang S. The role of exosomal PD-L1 in tumor progression and immunotherapy. Mol Cancer. 2019;18:146. 10.1186/s12943-019-1074-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Johnson DB, Balko JM, Compton ML, et al. Fulminant Myocarditis with Combination Immune Checkpoint Blockade. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(18):1749–55. 10.1056/NEJMoa1609214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Berner F, Bomze D, Diem S, et al. Association of Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Toxic Effects with Shared Cancer and Tissue Antigens in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5:1043–7. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ronen D, Bsoul A, Lotem M, Abedat S, Yarkoni M, Amir O, Asleh R. Exploring the Mechanisms Underlying the Cardiotoxic Effects of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapies. Vaccines. 2022;10:540. 10.3390/vaccines10040540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Liu Y, Chen Y, Zeng Z, Liu A. Research Progress of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-associated Myocarditis. Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2021;24(9):668–72 (In Chinese). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chen Y, Cheng L, Junbo GE. Advances in molecular mechanisms of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis. Chinese J Clin Med. 2022;29:260–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Grabie N, Lichtman AH, Padera R. T cell checkpoint regulators in the heart. Cardiovasc Res. 2019;115:869–77. 10.1093/cvr/cvz025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chinese Society of Cardiology of Chinese Medical Association, Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Cardiology. 2019 Chinese Society of Cardiology (CSC) guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with ST⁃segment elevation myocardial infarction. Chin J Cardiol. 2019;47:766–783. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 27.Thompson JA, Schneider BJ, Brahmer J, et al. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Management of Immunotherapy-Related Toxicities, Version 1.2020. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020;18:230–41. 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Society of Integrative Cardio-Oncology China Anti-Cancer Association, The Cardio-Oncology Group of the Chinese Society of Cardiovascular Diseases of Chinese Medical Association, Chinese College of Cardiovascular Physicians Specialized Committee on Cardio-Oncology Chinese Medical Docotor Association, et al. Chinese expert consensus on the surveillance and management of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related myocarditis (2020 version). Chin J Clin Oncol. 2020;47:1027–38.
  • 29.Chinese Society of Endocrinology, China Endocrinology and Metabolism Specialist Alliance. Principles for clinical application of glucocorticoids. Chin J Endocrinol Mtab. 2023;39:289–296.
  • 30.National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases. China Cardiovascular Health and Disease Report 2023 (coronary heart disease) [J]. J Cardiovasc Pulmonary Dis.2024,43(10):1015–1024.
  • 31.Rong P. A case analysis of immune checkpoint inhibitor myocarditis induced by Sindilimab in treating thymoma. Anhui Med Pharmaceutical J. 2021;25:1239–41. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Xu B, Jia T, Wu H, et al. A case of programmed death receptor-1 inhibitors for immune myositis caused by renal carcinoma myasthenia gravis. Henan Med Res. 2021;30:5760–2. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wu L, Wu X, Feng H, et al. Severe immune-related myocarditis induced by combination therapy with sintilimab and IBI310 in malignant melanoma: a case report and literature analysis. Chin J Cancer Biother. 2022;29:1013–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Xu F, Lai L, Tu J, et al. A case of immune-associated myositis and myocarditis after sintilimab treatment of liver cancer. J Wenzhou Med Univ. 2022;52:1014–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhou H, Tang Y, Chen Y, et al. Case Analysis and Pharmaceutical Care for a Case of Heart Failure and Respiratory Failure Caused by Immune-related Myocarditis Induced by Sintilimab. China Pharmacist. 2022;25:1036–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chen M, Zhang M, An W, et al. A case of Immune-associated myocarditis in a tumor patient with diabetes mellitus. Chin J Pharmacoepidemiol. 2023;32:471–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Li N, Li Z, Chen X, et al. Reason and treatment a patient with myocardial injury during sintilimab treatment of recurrent thymoma. Shandong Medical Journal. 2023;63:76–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Han B, Chen X, Wang Z, et al. Analysis of cases of cardiac biomarker abnormality caused by sintilimab. Chin J Clin Pharmacol. 2023;39:1043–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Liu B, Yang Y, Zhu Z, et al. A Case Report of Immune Associated Myocarditis Induced by Sintilimab. Labeled Immunoassays Clin Med. 2023;30:1617–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhang S, Song Y, He X, et al. PD-1 A case report of eyelid ptosis with immune - related myositis induced by PD -1 inhibitors treatment. Modern Oncol. 2022;30:4170–2. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhang Y, Li P, Zhang W, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitors related myocarditis, myasthenia gravis and myositis: a case report and literature review. Chin JFront Med Sci. 2023;15:69–74. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Xing Q, Zhang ZW, Lin QH, et al. Myositis-myasthenia gravis overlap syndrome complicated with myasthenia crisis and myocarditis associated with anti-programmed cell death-1 (sintilimab) therapy for lung adenocarcinoma. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8:250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Guo K, Zhu B, Wang F, et al. A case report of myositis and myasthenia gravis induced by PD-1 inhibitors treatmen. Shanghai Med Pharmaceutical J. 2020;41(03):56–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bi H, Ren D, Wang Q, Ding X, Wang H. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced myocarditis in lung cancer patients: a case report of sintilimab-induced myocarditis and a review of the literature. Ann Palliat Med. 2021;10:793–802. 10.21037/apm-20-2449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Liang S, Yang J, Lin Y, Li T, Zhao W, Zhao J, Dong C. Immune Myocarditis Overlapping With Myasthenia Gravis Due to Anti-PD-1 Treatment for a Chordoma Patient: A Case Report and Literature Review. Front Immunol. 2021;12:682262. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.682262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Chen Y, Jia Y, Liu Q, Shen Y, Zhu H, Dong X, Huang J, Lu J, Yin Q. Myocarditis related to immune checkpoint inhibitors treatment: two case reports and literature review. Ann Palliat Med. 2021;10:8512–7. 10.21037/apm-20-2620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Yang ZX, Chen X, Tang SQ, Zhang Q. Sintilimab-Induced Myocarditis Overlapping Myositis in a Patient With Metastatic Thymoma: A Case Report. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:797009. 10.3389/fcvm.2021.797009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Yin B, Xiao J, Wang X, Li X, Guan Y, Chen J, Han P, Li K, Wang J. Myocarditis and myositis/myasthenia gravis overlap syndrome induced by immune checkpoint inhibitor followed by esophageal hiatal hernia: A case report and review of the literature. Front Med. 2022;9:950801. 10.3389/fmed.2022.950801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Liu S, Ma G, Wang H, Yu G, Chen J, Song W. Severe cardiotoxicity in 2 patients with thymoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: A case report. Medicine. 2022;101:e31873. 10.1097/MD.0000000000031873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Tang Y, Zhang Y, Yang XY. Rare Case of Wide QRS Tachycardia After Sintilimab Treatment for Lung Cancer. Circulation. 2022;145:783–6. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.058936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lin Y, Yuan X, Chen L. Immune myocarditis related to sintilimab treatment in a patient with advanced lung adenocarcinoma: A case report. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:955527. 10.3389/fcvm.2022.955527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zheng S, Zhang H, Hu B, Zhou J, Wen L, Li M. A case of acute myocarditis induced by PD-1 inhibitor (sintilimab) in the treatment of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. Heliyon. 2023;9:e16874. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Wang C, Zhong B, He J, Liao X. Immune checkpoint inhibitor sintilimab-induced lethal myocarditis overlapping with myasthenia gravis in thymoma patient: A case report. Medicine. 2023;102:e33550. 10.1097/MD.0000000000033550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Liu X, Zeng Z, Cao J, Li X, Muhetaer M, Jin Z, Cai H, Lu Z. Sintilimab-Induced Myocarditis in a Patient with Gastric Cancer: A Case Report and Literature Review. Journal of cardiovascular development and disease. 2023;10:422. 10.3390/jcdd10100422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hu Y, Liu C, Jin S, Yi Z, Wang C, Pan X, Huang H. A case of subclinical immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis in non-small cell lung cancer. BMC Pulm Med. 2023;23:119. 10.1186/s12890-023-02417-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Rongshou ZHENG, Ru CHEN, Bingfeng HAN, et al. Analysis of malignant tumor prevalence in China in 2022. Chin J Oncol. 2024;46:221–31. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases. Interpretation of report on Cardiovascular of health and disease in China 2022. Chin J Carioovasc Med. 2023;28:297–312.
  • 58.Vasbinder A, Ismail A, Salem JE, Hayek SS. Role of Biomarkers in the Management of Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Myocarditis. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2023;25:959–67. 10.1007/s11886-023-01915-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Jeremias A, Gibson CM. Narrative review: alternative causes for elevated cardiac troponin levels when acute coronary syndromes are excluded. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:786–91. 10.7326/0003-4819-142-9-200505030-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Maria ATJ, Delmas C, Coustal C, Palassin P, Roubille F. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis and coronary artery disease: There may be more than meets the eye! Eur J Cancer (Oxford, England : 1990). 2022;177:194–6. 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.09.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Dolladille C, Ederhy S, Allouche S, Dupas Q, Gervais R, Madelaine J, Sassier M, Plane AF, Comoz F, Cohen AA, Thuny FR, Cautela J, Alexandre J. Late cardiac adverse events in patients with cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8: e000261. 10.1136/jitc-2019-000261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Lin X, Guan W, Li B, Deng H, Chen Y, Yang Y, Qiu G, Xie X, Zhou C. A case report and literature review on respiratory failure with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a life-threatening adverse event. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2023;45:780–7. 10.1080/08923973.2023.2228480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Serruys PW, Hara H, Garg S, Kawashima H, Nørgaard BL, Dweck MR, Bax JJ, Knuuti J, Nieman K, Leipsic JA, Mushtaq S, Andreini D, Onuma Y. Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Complete Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;78:713–36. 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.06.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Knuuti J, Ballo H, Juarez-Orozco LE, Saraste A, Kolh P, Rutjes AWS, Jüni P, Windecker S, Bax JJ, Wijns W. The performance of non-invasive tests to rule-in and rule-out significant coronary artery stenosis in patients with stable angina: a meta-analysis focused on post-test disease probability. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:3322–30. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Hecht HS. Coronary calcium, coronary CTA and intention to diagnose: Interpreting the uninterpretable. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2021;15:419–20. 10.1016/j.jcct.2021.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Caforio AL, Pankuweit S, Arbustini E, European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases, et al. Current state of knowledge on aetiology, diagnosis, management, and therapy of myocarditis: a position statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:2636–2648d. 10.1093/eurheartj/eht210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Kawai C, Matsumori A, Kawamura K. Myocardial biopsy. Annu Rev Med. 1980;31:139–57. 10.1146/annurev.me.31.020180.001035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Piperata A, Bottio T, Gerosa G. The importance of myocardial biopsy in the diagnosis of infectious myocarditis: it still plays a role. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:3280. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Eichhorn C, Greulich S, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Sznitman R, Kwong RY, Gräni C. Multiparametric Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Approach in Diagnosing, Monitoring, and Prognostication of Myocarditis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;15:1325–38. 10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Zhang L, Awadalla M, Mahmood SS, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(18):1733–43. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Shibata N, Kondo T, Okumura T, Imaizumi T, Dohi K, Izawa H, Ohte N, Amano T, Murohara T, CHANGE PUMP 2 investigators. Clinical Value of Troponin Levels to Cardiac Function and Prognosis in Patients with Fulminant Myocarditis. Int Heart J. 2024;65:218–29. 10.1536/ihj.23-589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Lippi G. Biomarkers: Novel troponin immunoassay for early ACS rule-out. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2016;13:9–10. 10.1038/nrcardio.2015.174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Katsioupa M, Kourampi I, Oikonomou E, Tsigkou V, Theofilis P, Charalambous G, Marinos G, Gialamas I, Zisimos K, Anastasiou A, Katsianos E, Kalogeras K, Katsarou O, Vavuranakis M, Siasos G, Tousoulis D. Novel Biomarkers and Their Role in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome. Life (Basel, Switzerland). 2023;13:1992. 10.3390/life13101992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Danese E, Montagnana M. An historical approach to the diagnostic biomarkers of acute coronary syndrome. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4:194. 10.21037/atm.2016.05.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.el Allaf M, Chapelle JP, el Allaf D, Adam A, Faymonville ME, Laurent P, Heusghem C. Differentiating muscle damage from myocardial injury by means of the serum creatine kinase (CK) isoenzyme MB mass measurement/total CK activity ratio. Clin Chem. 1986;32:291–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Waissengein B, Abu Ata B, Merimsky O, Shamai S, Wolf I, Arnold JH, Bar-On T, Banai S, Khoury S, Laufer-Perl M. The predictive value of high sensitivity troponin measurements in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Clin Res Cardiol.  2023;112:409–18. 10.1007/s00392-022-02118-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Rossi VA, Gawinecka J, Dimitriou F, von Eckardstein A, Dummer R, Ruschitzka F, Matter CM. Value of troponin T versus I in the diagnosis of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related myocarditis and myositis: rechallenge? ESC Heart Fail. 2023;10:2680–5. 10.1002/ehf2.14360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Moslehi JJ, Salem JE, Sosman JA, Lebrun-Vignes B, Johnson DB. Increased reporting of fatal immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis. Lancet (London, England). 2018;391:933. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30533-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Cone EB, Haeuser L, Reese SW, Marchese M, Nguyen DD, Nabi J, Chou WH, Noldus J, McKay RR, Kilbridge KL, Trinh QD. Immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy is associated with less cardiac toxicity than combination therapy. PLoS ONE. 2022;17:e0272022. 10.1371/journal.pone.0272022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Cardinale D, Iacopo F, Cipolla CM. Cardiotoxicity of Anthracyclines. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020;7:26. 10.3389/fcvm.2020.00026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Mattioli R, Ilari A, Colotti B, Mosca L, Fazi F, Colotti G. Doxorubicin and other anthracyclines in cancers: Activity, chemoresistance and its overcoming. Mol Aspects Med. 2023;93:101205. 10.1016/j.mam.2023.101205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Zhao S, Wang P, Yin F, Wu J, Wang Y, Li P, Zhang Y, Yang J, Guo X, Zhang D, Song P. Cardiovascular toxicity associated with the multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor anlotinib. Tumori. 2023;109:186–96. 10.1177/03008916221084362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Liu G, Chen T, Ding Z. Anlotinib-induced acute myocardial infarction: A case report and literature review. Exp Ther Med. 2020;20(4):3203–7. 10.3892/etm.2020.9041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Jiang B, Li J, Chen J, Xiang X, Xiong J, Deng J. Aortic dissection in a patient treated with anlotinib for metastatic lung squamous cell carcinoma. Thorac Cancer. 2020;11:461–4. 10.1111/1759-7714.13288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Wang DY, Salem JE, Cohen JV, Chandra S, Menzer C, Ye F, Zhao S, Das S, Beckermann KE, Ha L, Rathmell WK, Ancell KK, Balko JM, Bowman C, Davis EJ, Chism DD, Horn L, Long GV, Carlino MS, Lebrun-Vignes B, Johnson DB. Fatal Toxic Effects Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:1721–8. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.3923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Fan Q, Hu Y, Yang C, Zhao B. Myocarditis following the use of different immune checkpoint inhibitor regimens: A real-world analysis of post-marketing surveillance data. Int Immunopharmacol. 2019;76:105866. 10.1016/j.intimp.2019.105866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.


Articles from Biological Procedures Online are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES