ABSTRACT
Introduction
Amyloid beta plaques and tau tangles are the primary hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Recently, passive anti‐Aβ immunotherapy for AD has markedly advanced, as supported by evidence from AD animal models and clinical trials. Whereas innate immunity significantly contributes to AD pathology, it does not fully represent the immune mechanisms linked to this condition. Therefore, focus should be directed toward adaptive immunity, encompassing both humoral and cellular immunity.
Methods
Relevant publications and clinical trial data up to February 2026 were systematically reviewed to summarize the mechanisms, therapeutic targets, safety profiles, and translational applications of CD8+ T cells in AD.
Results
Clinical and animal studies have particularly suggested a potential involvement of T cells in AD pathogenesis. T cells that infiltrate the central nervous system (CNS) exert both protective and detrimental effects on neural tissue in AD. Because autoreactive CD8+ T cells are generally expected to have cytotoxic effects on CNS cells, they have received less attention. Nevertheless, accumulating evidence suggests that CD8+ Treg cells are involved in various diseases.
Conclusion
However, the function of anti‐Aβ‐specific CD8+ T cells in Alzheimer's disease (AD) remains ambiguous. Many subsets of CD8+ T cells have been well‐studied in autoimmunity. We suggest that CD8+ T cell subsets identified in AD studies may constitute a promising area for future AD research.
Keywords: Alzheimer's disease, amyloid beta protein, animal models, autoantigens, CD8‐positive T‐lymphocytes, clinical trials, cognitive dysfunction, tau proteins
Emerging evidence highlights a previously underappreciated role of CD8+ T cells in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Beyond amyloid‐β and tau pathology, CD8+ T‐cell subsets infiltrate the central nervous system and exhibit functional heterogeneity. Cytotoxic effector CD8+ T cells may exacerbate neuroinflammation and neuronal injury, whereas regulatory or exhausted phenotypes may exert immunomodulatory effects. Findings from transgenic mouse models and clinical immune profiling of peripheral blood and cerebrospinal fluid demonstrate clonal expansion and antigen experience of CD8+ T cells. These translational insights suggest that targeting CD8+ T‐cell responses could represent a complementary immunotherapeutic strategy in AD.

Abbreviations
- Ach
acetylcholine
- AChE
acetylcholinesterase
- AChEI
acetylcholin‐esterase inhibitor
- AD
Alzheimer's disease
- AE
adverse effects
- APP
amyloid precursor protein
- ARIA
amyloid‐related imaging abnormalities
- ARIA‐E
amyloid‐related imaging abnormalities ‐Edema
- Aβ
beta amyloid protein
- BACE‐1
β‐site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme 1
- BBB
blood‐brain barrier
- FDA
Food and Drug Administration
- GSA‐3β
glycogen synthase kinase3β
- iGluRs
ionic receptors
- MCI
mild cognitive impairment
- ME
meningoencephalitis
- mGluRs
metabolic receptors
- MPT
mitochondrial permeability transition
- NbM
basal ganglia of memory
- NFTs
neuro‐cell tangles
- NMDAR
anti‐N‐methyl‐d‐aspartate receptor
- TEAEs
treatment‐related adverse reactions
- The membrane‐associated C99
comprising the terminal 99 amino acid residues of the carbon chain"
- VGLUT
vesicular glutamate transporter
1. Introduction
In Alzheimer's disease (AD), the presence of amyloid beta (Aβ) plaques and tau tangles [1, 2, 3] are major contributors to AD pathogenesis [4, 5, 6], with Aβ pathology representing the primary factor in the early stage [7, 8, 9. Specifically, AD is distinguished by the accumulation of the 40–42 amino acid peptide Aβ (Aβ40‐42) in amyloid plaques [10, 11, 12]. Thus, Aβ‐targeting immunotherapies are considered more important than those targeting tau [13, 14].
Recently, a marked progress has been made in passive anti‐Aβ immunotherapy for AD, supporting the role of immunological factors in AD pathology [1]. The antibodies used include lecanemab [Le qembi], donanemab [15, 16], and aducanumab [Aduhelm]) [17], among others [2]. However, in contrast to the current state of immunotherapies for neuro‐autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS), evidence supporting disease‐modifying and complete treatment effects of immunotherapies for AD remains lacking [7, 18, 19, 20].
Substantial evidence has supported the critical role of immunological factors in the pathology of AD, including innate immunity [1, 21, 22, 23], adaptive immunity [24], and particularly T cells, mostly including CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Among these, regulatory T cells (Tregs) have a protective role [25, 26, 27, 28].
2. Brief Progress on Anti‐Aβ Immunotherapies
The role of anti‐Aβ immunotherapies has been extensively examined in AD animal models, including Aβ‐precursor protein (APP) transgenic mice [9, 29, 30, 31, 32], as well as in clinical trials [9, 33, 34, 35, 36], in which reduced cerebral Aβ content was confirmed by positron‐emission tomography (Aβ‐PET) [9, 15]. Moreover, anti‐Aβ immunotherapies decrease tau species and glial fibrillary acidic protein in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or blood [15, 16, 37, 38, 39], reducing Aβ loading in the CSF and Aβ‐associated tauopathy and astrocytic activation in the brain [29].
3. Brief Progress on Immunity and AD
Given the clear importance of anti‐Aβ immunotherapies in AD, the relevant immune mechanisms should be clearly established. Essentially, immunity can be divided into innate immunity and adaptive immunity [1, 40, 41, 42, 43]. The local immune system, including the complement system, microglia, and astrocytes, played a role in these processes [23, 44, 45, 46], resulting in neuronal injury and death [47].
Collectively, although innate immunity plays a crucial role in AD pathology [48], it does not account for all immunological factors implicated in AD pathogenesis [49]. Therefore, the contribution of adaptive immunity, particularly the involvement of T cells, must also be examined to fully understand AD pathogenesis.
4. T Cells and AD
Adaptive immunity encompasses humoral immunity, mainly governed by B cells, and cellular immunity, influenced by T cells. Research suggests that T cells play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of AD [24]. Individuals with AD exhibit increased levels of CD4+ T helper (Th) cells, T regulatory cells (Tregs, particularly FoxP3+ CD4+ T cells), Th9 cells, and Th17 cells and decreased levels of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells in peripheral blood [50, 51, 52].
CNS‐infiltrating T cells may play a protective role for neurons in AD [24] by expressing neurotrophic factors, enhancing microglial phagocytic activity, and helping to reduce Aβ deposition [53]. However, some Aβ‐reactive T cells may also exacerbate AD progression through secretion of pro‐inflammatory cytokines, thus leading to sterile, chronic inflammation [53]. Moreover, in the APP/PS1 mouse model of AD, Th1‐derived interferon (IFN) γ was shown to impair cognitive function by promoting microglial stimulation and increasing Aβ aggregation. Treatment with an anti‐IFNγ antibody could alleviate disease progression in these mice, which supported the view that Th1 cells play a neurotoxic role in AD [54]. Furthermore, Aβ‐specific Th2 cells can inhibit cytokine production by glial cells, whereas Aβ‐specific Th1 cells exhibit the capability to stimulate the production of pro‐inflammatory cytokines [55]. Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity by microglial cells might also be an important factor contributing to AD pathology [53]. According to this body of evidence, we speculate that different stages of AD progression may be characterized by distinct profiles of T cell subpopulations and by opposing roles of immune cells [24].
Tregs can inhibit the release of reactive oxygen species (ROS) from microglia and prevent ROS‐induced neuronal damage [56]. In individuals with AD, peripheral blood exhibits increased levels of CD4+ T helper (Th) cells [57], T regulatory cells (Tregs), Th9 cells, and Th17 cells, whereas the number of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells is diminished [57]. A recent phase I clinical trial with a small cohort of PD patients has initiated an exploration of sargramostim, a recombinant human granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor that augments Treg‐mediated suppression [58].
Aβ1‐42 peptide injection into rat brains led to increased levels of IL‐17A, RORγt, and IL‐22; this was reversed by the anti‐inflammatory action of TGF‐β1 [59], indicating that Th17 cells and their related cytokines act in concert to enhance neuroinflammation and degeneration in AD.
Conversely, a number of studies have demonstrated that the activation of T cells may diminish symptoms of AD. Anti‐PD‐1 therapy improved cognitive deficits and Aβ plaque loading in the hippocampus and cortex of an AD mouse model [60, 61] (Baruch, Deczkowska et al. 2016). Effector T cells may suppress AD pathology by stimulating Aβ clearance by macrophages and microglia [62].
From a classic immunological view, the following evidence should be presented to confirm the role of T cells, as we have previously reported for MG, MS, uveitis, and type 1 diabetes [63, 64, 65, 66, 67] (i) they should be autoantigen‐specific (Aβ‐ or tau‐specific), (ii) the profile of cytokines secreted by T cells should be present, and (iii) adoptive transfer should induce or inhibit the disease. These have been addressed by some reports [68, 69, 70]; however, more evidence generated following this protocol is required in the future to unravel the precise mechanisms associated with T cells in AD (Figure 1).
Figure 1.

The relationship of T cells and the pathogenesis of AD. T cells could play and injury or protective role on neurons, depending on T cell subsets and their related cytokine, and local immune cells. AD, Alzheimer's disease.
4.1. Aβ‐Specific T Cells in AD
To date, the role of adaptive immune T cells in the development of AD remains unclear [71]. In peripheral tissues, T cells are stimulated by modified self‐peptide fragments of Aβ and tau (such as Aβ1‐42), which are displayed by antigen‐presenting cells like microglia and dendritic cells located within the brain parenchyma (Chaffey 2003, 2020). In AD, effector T cells modified self‐peptide fragments of Aβ and tau and induced self‐clonal expansion [28, 72], supported through evidence from the periphery and brain in patients with AD [50, 52, 62, 73], as well as from studies of mixed microglia‐astroglia cultures [74] and APP/PS1 mice [71]. Interestingly, in APP/PS1 mice, Aβ‐reactive Teff cells showed stable Th1 and Th17 profiles and enhanced memory impairment and systemic inflammation, which could be downregulated by Aβ‐reactive Tregs derived from peripheral blood and located in the brain [71].
In Table 1, we have compiled recent findings on autoreactive T cells in AD, encompassing both animal models and clinical investigations. Unfortunately, most studies were focused on CD4+ T cells, whereas only a few were focused on CD8+ T cells.
Table 1.
Studies of Aβ‐specific T cells in AD.
| References | Cells | Auto‐antigen | Animal models or patients | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Machhi et al. [71] | Aβ reactive Th1 and Th17 cells (CD4+ cells) | Aβ 15–30 peptide | APP/PS1 mice |
|
| Yang et al. [75] | Aβ reactive CD4+ Tregs(CD4+ cells) | Aβ 1–42 peptide | 3xTg‐AD mice |
|
| Yeapuri et al. [28] | TCRAβ‐Tregs(CD4+ CD25+ cells) | Aβ 15–30 peptide | APP/PS1 mice |
|
| Fisher et al. [76] | Aβ reactive Th1 cells (CD4+ cells) | Aβ 1–42 peptide | APP/PS1 mice, APPSwe/PS1dE9 Tg mice |
|
| Rosset et al. [77] | Aβ‐specific Tc1 cells (CD8+ T cell) | Aβ 33–41 peptide | APP/PS1 mice, B6 wild‐type mice |
|
| Eremenko et al. [78] | Aβ reactive Th1 cells (CD4+ cells) | Aβ 1–42 peptide | 5XFAD Tg mice, B6 wild‐type mice |
|
| Fisher et al. [79] | Aβ reactive Th1 cells (CD4+ cells) | Aβ 1–42 peptide |
Aβ PP‐Tg mice, AβPP/IFN‐ B6SJLF1 Tg mice. C57BL6 and SJL mice |
|
| Monsonego et al. [80] | Aβ reactive Th1 cells (CD4+ cells) | Aβ 1–40 and Aβ 1–42 synthetic peptides | B6 wild‐type mice |
|
| Zhao et al. [82] | Aβ reactive Th1 cells (Total T cells | Aβ 1–40 and Aβ 1–42 peptides | 3xTg‐AD, APP/PS1, C57BL/6 mice |
|
| Park et al. [83] | Aβ reactive Tregs (CD4+ CD25+ cells) | Aβ 1–42 peptide | 5xFAD mice |
|
| Saresella et al. [84] | PD1‐expressing Aβ reactive CD4+ T cells, | Aβ peptides: 1–40, 1–6, and 1–35 |
AD and MCI patients HC |
|
| Ethell et al. [85] | Aβ reactive T cells (Total T cells, | Aβ 1–42 peptide | F3 APP/PS1 mice, |
|
| Gate et al. [62] | CD3+CD8+CD45RA+T cells | Aβ1–40 and Aβ1–42 peptides |
AD and MCI patients HC |
|
Note: Aβ: amyloid beta, Th1: type 1 T helper, Th17: type 17 T helper, APP/PS1: mouse/human amyloid precursor protein and mutant human presenilin 1, Tregs: regulatory T cells, Teff: effector T cells, CNS: central nervous system. 3xTg‐AD mice: B6;129‐Tg (APPSwe, tauP301L)1Lfa Psen1tm1Mpm/Mmjax) mice, TCRAβ‐Tregs: Tregs expressing a transgenic TCRAβ, BDNF: brain‐derived neuro trophic factor, Aβ PP‐Tg mice: amyloid‐ protein precursor (AβPP)‐transgenic (Tg) mice, AβPP/IFN‐ B6SJLF1 Tg mice: Homozygous IFN‐Tg mice: crossed with AβPP‐Tg mice, TECs: Thymic epithelial cells, ESCs: embryonic stem cells, TEPs: thymic epithelial progenitors, CP: choroid plexus, APP: amyloid precursor protein. APP −/−: APP gene deleted, Ab: antibody, MCI: mild cognitive impairment, HC: healthy controls, F3 APP/PS1 mice:a cross between either heterozygous APPsw mice and heterozygous PS1mice or from a cross between APPsw + PS1 mice and non‐transgenic mice, TEMRA: T effector memory CD45RA+, TCR: T cell receptor, CSF: cerebrospinal fluid, EBV: Epstein–Barr virus. Aβ refers to amyloid beta; Th1 denotes type 1 T helper cells; Th17 indicates type 17 T helper cells; APP/PS1 signifies mouse and human amyloid precursor protein along with mutant human presenilin 1; Tregs represents regulatory T cells; Teff stands for effector T cells; and CNS corresponds to the central nervous system.3xTg‐AD mice: B6;129‐Tg (APPSwe, tauP301L)1Lfa Psen1tm1Mpm/Mmjax mice, TCRAβ‐Tregs: Tregs with a transgenic TCRAβ, BDNF: brain‐derived neurotrophic factor, AbPP‐Tg mice: amyloid‐beta precursor protein (AbPP)‐transgenic mice, AbPP/IFN‐B6SJLF1 Tg mice: Homozygous IFN‐transgenic mice crossed with AbPP‐Tg mice, TECs: thymic epithelial cells, ESCs: embryonic stem cells, TEPs: thymic epithelial progenitor cells, CP: choroid plexus, APP: amyloid precursor protein.“APP −/−: APP gene knockout, Ab: immunoglobulin, MCI: mild cognitive decline, HC: healthy subjects, F3 APP/PS1 mice: offspring from either heterozygous APPsw and heterozygous PS1 mice or from APPsw + PS1 mice crossed with non‐transgenic animals, TEMRA: T effector memory cells CD45RA+, TCR: T cell antigen receptor, CSF: cerebrospinal fluid, EBV: Epstein‐Barr virus.”
4.2. Aβ‐specific CD8+ T Cells in AD
The role of anti‐Aβ‐specific CD8+ T cells in AD remains unclear [87]. Nonetheless, CD8+ T cells remain significant; a clinical Aβ vaccine trial using AN1792 was unsuccessful owing to meningoencephalitis onset in several patients with AD, as verified by postmortem examination [88]. This adverse reaction may be associated with CD4+ and/or CD8+ T cells, alongside substantial macrophage infiltration and reduced amyloid deposition (Unger, Li et al. 2020, Piehl, van Olst et al. 2022) [68, 69, 89, 90].
To date, primary AD immunotherapy trials have utilized humanized anti‐Aβ monoclonal antibodies or vaccination strategies employing the N‐terminal region of Aβ to induce antibody production while circumventing Aβ‐specific T cell activation. Most AD immunotherapy trials have failed, suggesting that more attention should be given to the role of Aβ‐specific T cells in AD. Anti‐Aβ mAbs such as bapineuzumab [91, 92] and solanezumab [93] were ineffective in enhancing cognitive function in patients with AD.
The epitope of Aβ‐specific CD4+ T cells is known in patients with AD [94] and animal models. Epitopes derived from Aβ that stimulate CD4+ T cell responses have also been identified in various mouse genotypes and HLA class II transgenic mice [95, 96, 97, 98].
Immunization with the full Aβ1‐42 peptide could potentially activate both Aβ‐specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Given that autoreactive CD8+ T cells are anticipated to be cytotoxic toward central nervous system cells, they have been less emphasized in AD research. Nonetheless, CD8+ Tregs have been demonstrated to be involved in various diseases [99, 100, 101], including our previous study [102].
The CD8+ T cell epitope for the Aβ1‐42 peptide remains controversial. One study has reported the Aβ15‐30 peptide (KLVFFAEDVGSNKGA) in mice, as well as the Aβ15‐42 amino acid region in humans [103]. Another study in B6 mice suggested the Aβ33‐42 peptide. Nonetheless, an additional study in BALB/c mice demonstrated that Aβ12‐28 serves as the CD8+ T cell epitope. Consequently, the precise CD8+ T cell epitope of the Aβ1‐42 peptide remains undetermined. Different epitopes of the Aβ1‐42 peptide may be targeted in different mouse strains, such as Aβ1‐28 in BALB/c mice and Aβ1‐28 or 17‐40 in DRB0101 mice, which are transgenic for human MHC Class II molecules [97]. Please see Table 2.
Table 2.
Evidences of CD8 T cells in AD.
| Type | Reference | CD8 T cell source | Animal model or AD subtype | CD8 T subset | Major result | Institution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical studies | [62] | PBMCs, CSF | 97 healthy individuals, 31 patients with MCI, 28 patients with AD and 8 patients with PD | CD8 + T cell, TEM and TCM CD8 + T cells, CD8 + TEMRA cells | 1. Performed mass cytometry of PBMCs and discovered an immune signature of AD that consists of increased numbers of CD8 + TEMRA cells. 2. CD8 + TEMRA cells were negatively associated with cognition. 3. Single‐cell RNA sequencing revealed that TCR signalling was enhanced in these cells. 4. Clonally expanded CD8 + TEMRA cells in the CSF of AD patients. 5. By machine learning, cloning and peptide screens to demonstrate the specificity of clonally expanded TCRs in the CSF of AD patients to two separate EBV antigens. | Stanford University, University of California at San Francisco, University of California at San Diego, California, USA |
| Lu et al. 2021 | PBMCs, AD brain tissues | ImmPort database, A bulk sequencing dataset of AD brain tissues | CD8 + T cell, | 1. Eight clusters were identified, including memory CD4 T, NKT, NK, B, DC, CD8 Tcells, and platelets. 2. NK cells were significantly decreased in patients with AD, while CD4 T cells were increased. 3. NK and DC cells exhibited the highest IRG activity. GO and KEGG analyses of the scRNA and bulk sequencing data showed that the DEGs focused on the immune response. 4. Seventy common IRGs were found in both peripheral NK cells and the brain. 5. Seventeen TFs were associated with IRG expression, and the PPI network indicated that STAT3, IRF1, and REL were the hub TFs. | Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China, | |
| [50] | PBMCs | Healthy young and healthy elderly individuals, AD patient | CD8 + T cell, | 1. The distribution of peripheral T cell subsets in young and healthy old people is markedly different, characterized by decreased numbers of naive cells and increased numbers and clonal expansions of memory cells, predominantly in the CD8 + MHC class I‐restricted subset. 2. Dramatic alterations in naive and memory subsets of CD4+ cells in patients with mild AD, with greatly decreased percentages of naiıve cells, elevated memory cells, and increased proportions of CD4+ but not CD8+ cells lacking the important costimulatory receptor CD28. CD4+CD25high potentially T regulatory cells with a naive phenotype are also reduced in AD patients. | University of Tubingen, T ¨ ubingen, Germany; Medical University of Gdansk, Gda ´ nsk, Poland; Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada;; University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada | |
| [104] | Infiltrating T cells | Single‐nuclear RNA sequencing data of the middle temporal gyrus from 84 donors with AD (n = 42) or healthy control (n = 42) w | CD8 + T cell, | 1. Using recent large‐scale, high‐quality single‐nuclear sequencing datasets from over 84 AD and control cases, single‐nuclear RNAseq data from 800 lymphocyt were collected from 70 individuals to complete unbiased molecular profiling. 2. effector memory CD8 T cells are the major lymphocyte subclass enriched in the brain tissues of individuals with AD dementia. 3. disease‐enriched interactions involving CD8 T cells and multiple brain cell subclasses including two distinct microglial disease states that correlate, respectively, to beta‐amyloid and tau pathology. 4. beta‐amyloid‐associated microglia are a major hub of multicellular cross‐talk gained in disease, including interactions involving both vulnerable neuronal subtypes and CD8 T cells. 5. Amyloid‐response microglia are depleted in APOE4 carriers. Overall, these human‐based studies provide additional support for the potential relevance of effector memory CD8 T cells as a lymphocyte population of interest in AD dementia and provide new candidate interacting partners and drug targets for further functional study. | University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; | |
| [105] | Single‐cell ATAC‐seq RNA‐seq data | 29 AD patients and 26 age and sex‐matched Healthy controls | CD8 + T cell, | 1. Using single cell sequencing strategies, including assay for transposase‐accessible chromatin and RNA sequencing. it was shown that a striking amount of open chromatin in peripheral immune cells in AD. In CD8 T cells, and also shown a cis‐regulatory DNA element co‐accessible with the CXC motif chemokine receptor 3 gene promoter. 2. a novel AD‐specific RELA transcription factor binding site is adjacented to an open chromatin region in the nuclear factor kappa B subunit 2 gene. 3. apolipoprotein E genotype‐dependent epigenetic changes in monocytes. 4. differentially accessible chromatin regions in genes associated with sporadic AD risk. | Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA | |
| [69] | CSF | 45 healthy controls,14 patients with MCI or AD | CD8 T effector memory cells | 1. single cell RNA sequencing on CSF from 45 cognitively normal subjects ranging from 54–82 years old, it was shown that upregulation of lipid transport genes in monocytes with age. 2. compared this cohort to 14 cognitively impaired subjects, downregulation of lipid transport genes in monocytes occurred concomitantly with altered cytokine signaling to CD8 T cells in cognitively impaired subjects. 3. Clonal CD8 T effector memory cells upregulated CXCR6 in cognitively impaired subjects. The CXCR6 ligand, CXCL16, was elevated in CSF of cognitively impaired subjects, | Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. | |
| [106] | PBMCs, CSF | 8 AD patients and 4 age and sex‐matched Healthy controls | CD69 + CD103 + CD8 + T cells, |
The frequency of CD69+CD103+CD8 + T cells was strikingly higher in the CSF than in the peripheral blood (among memory fraction, 13.5% vs 0.11%, difference (mean [SE]): 13.4% [2.9]). This CD69+CD103+CD8 + T‐cell population was increased in the CSF from patients with chronic inflammatory diseases, including multiple sclerosis and with neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson disease and Alzheimer's disease compared with controls (11.5%, 13.0%, 8.1% vs 2.9%, respectively). By contrast, the frequency was not altered in acute inflammatory conditions in the CNS (4.0%). Single‐cell RNAseq analysis confirmed Trm signature in CD69+CD103+CD8 + T cells in the CSF, supporting their Trm‐like phenotype, which was not clear in controls. |
National Institute of Neuroscience, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira, Japan; Kyoto University; Kansai Medical University Medical Center, Moriguchi, Japan | |
| Animal Studies | Wang et al. 2024 | C57BL/6 J mice, APP/PS1 mice (B6. Cg‐Tg(APPswe, PSEN1Δ9) 85Dbo/J), 5xFAD mice (B6. CgTg; APPSwFILon, PSEN1* M146L* L286V), congenic JHT mice (B6.129P2‐Igh‐Jtm1Cgn/J), and 5xFAD‐BKO mice | CXCR6 + CD39 + CD73 + / − CD8 + TRM‐like cells | 1. By artificially blocking or augmenting CD8 + T cells in the brain of 5xFAD mice, it was shown that AD‐like pathology is promoted by pathogenic, proinflammatory cytokines and exhaustion markers expressing CXCR6 + CD39 + CD73 + /−CD8 + TRM‐like cells. 2. The CD8 + T cells appear to act by targeting disease associated microglia (DAM), and CD8 + T cells were shown that in tight complexes with microglia around Aβ plaques in the brain of mice and humans with AD. 3. These CD8 + T cells were induced by B cells in the periphery, further underscoring the pathogenic importance of the adaptive immunity in AD. 4. CD8 + T cells and B cells should be considered as therapeutic targets for control of AD, as their ablation at the onset of AD is sufficient to decrease CD8 + T cells in the brain and block the amyloidosis‐linked neurodegeneration |
Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Immunolgy, Baltimore, MD; National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, MD; University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA; The Leslie and Susan Gonda Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center, Israel; The Mina and Everard Goodman faculty of Life sciences, Israel; Bar‐Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Ludwig‐Maximilians‐Universität München, Munich, Germany; LMU Munich, Munich, Germany |
|
| [107] | PBMCs, Infiltrating T cells | 5×FAD mice | Infiltrating CD8 + T cells | 1. Using single‐cell RNA‐sequencing, it showed that infiltration of T cells into AD cultures led to induction of IFN = γand neuroinflammatory pathways in glial cells. 2. CXCL10 and its receptor, CXCR3 played a key role in regulating T cell infiltration and neuronal damage in AD cultures | Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Shriners Burns Hospital, Boston, MA, USA | |
| [108] | PBMCs, Infiltrating T cells | SAMP8 mice | Infiltrating CD8 + T cells | 1. With a dose‐dependent profile, salidroside ly attenuated cognitive impairment, reduced the accumulation of Aβ plaques and restored neuronal damage. 2. Salidroside also suppressed the infiltration of CD8 + T cells, oxidative stress, and inflammatory cytokines, and improved mitochondrial metabolism, iron metabolism, lipid metabolism, and redox in the SAMP8 mice brain. | Zhu Jiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China | |
| Zeng et al. 2025 | Database reanalysis | N/A | CD8 T cells |
1. ATP6V1D, ATP6V1G2, CLTB, and NSF were identified as biomarkers, exhibiting a positive correlation with each other and a downregulated expression in AD. 2. activated CD8 T cells and various dendritic cells (DCs) is associated with an inflammatory milieu in AD while also displaying a negative correlation with the biomarkers. |
Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China | |
| Kang et al. 2025 | Brain parenchymal, choroid plexus | 5xFAD mice | CD8+ resident memory T cells (TRM) |
1.11,587 single cells and found distinct differences in T cell and choroid plexus cell populations between 5xFAD mouse and littermate control were analyzed. 2. Subsequent sub‐clustering of T cells in the 5xFAD mouse revealed distinct subtypes, with CD8+ resident memory T cells (TRM) being the most prevalent T cell type. 3. an increase in T cell exhaustion markers, including Pdcd1, Ctla4, and Havcr2, with a particularly significant elevation of PD‐1 and TIM‐3 in CD8 + TRM in 5xFAD mouse. 4. Choroid plexus (ChP) epithelial cells showed altered gene expression patterns, with higher expression of MHC class I and Type I IFN‐stimulated genes in 5xFAD mouse compared to the control mouse, suggesting an association with clonal expansion of AD‐specific T cells in the brain. 5. Through single‐cell RNA sequencing (scRNA‐seq) analysis, it suggested that the potential role of resident memory CD8 + T cell and their possible interactions with ChP epithelial cells. |
Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, Republic of Korea; PB Immune Therapeutics Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea; Pusan National University, Yangsan, Republic of Korea | |
| [109] | Brain | Nur77GFP‐APP/PS1 mice, C57BL/6JTg, Tg(APPswe, PSEN1dE9) 85Dbo/Mmjax) mice, “wt” (Nur77GFP:C57BL/6‐Tg(Nr4a1‐EGFP/cre)820Khog/J mice). | CD8 T cells | 1. Using flow cytometry to characterize T cell populations and their activation mode in an AD mouse model. 2. By assessing GFP expression in C57BL/6JTg(Nr4a1‐EGFP/cre)820Khog; Tg(APPswe, PSEN1dE9)85Dbo/Mmjax mice, antigenia depended from antigen‐independent activation in CD4⁺, CD8⁺, and double‐negative T cells (DNTs). 3. This approach allows analysis of the full repertoire of antigen‐specifically activated T cells in a physiological immune system without prior knowledge of target antigens. 4. AD‐like amyloid pathology progression was monitored by monthly scoring until mice reached 2, 6, 10‐12 or 15‐18 months of age and Aβ‐quantification via thioflavine S staining. Antigen‐specific activation during AD development was assessed by comparing AD mice with wildtype littermates. 5. At 15–18 months, AD mice exhibited elevated numbers of activated, highly differentiated DNTs, along with increased antigen‐specific CD8⁺ and DNT cells relative to controls. | University Medicine, Greifswald, Germany | |
| [110] | Brain | 3xTg‐AD, and WT B6129SF2/J | brain CD8 + T cell, CD103–CD8 + T cells | 1. The brain CD8 + T cell compartment is dysregulated in AD patients and in the 3xTgAD mouse model, accumulating activated CD103–tissue‐resident memory T cells that produce large amounts of GrK. 2. These CD103–CD8 + T cells originate from the circulation and migrate into the brain using LFA‐1 integrin. Ablation of brain CD103–CD8 + T cells in 3xTg‐AD mice ameliorates cognitive decline and reduces neuropathology. 3. GrK induces neuronal dysfunction and tau hyperphosphorylation in human and mouse cells via PAR‐1, which is expressed at higher levels in the AD brain, revealing a key immune‐mediated neurotoxic axis. | University of Verona, Verona, Italy | |
| Zhang et al. 2024 | PBMCs | 58 AD patients, | CD8 T cells | 1. Plasma TNF α, IFN‐γ, IL‐33 levels increased in the APOE ε4 carriers but IL‐7 expression notably decreased. 2.A negative correlation was observed between plasma IL‐7 level and the hippocampal atrophy degree. 3. the expression of IL‐7R and CD28 also decreased in PBMCs of APOE ε4 carriers. 4. ScRNA‐seq data results indicated that the changes were mainly related to the CD4+ Tem (effector memory) and CD8+ Tem T cells. | The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China; The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China; The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China; Fudan University Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China | |
| [111] | P301S − / − , P301S + /−, and P301S + /+ mice | GZMK+CD8+T cells | 1. Using mice that express mutant human tau in neurons, it was shown that microglia slowed tauopathy development by controlling the spread of pTau in the central nervous system and blood. However, over time microglia converted into distressed antigen‐presenting cells, acquired neuronal transcripts and were targeted by resident, clonally expanded CD8 + T cells. 2. These cells did not express traditional effector molecules, such as IFNγ, TNF or granzymes a/b/c, but instead deposited granzyme K (GZMK) onto microglia and were regulated by immune checkpoint proteins (TIGIT, PD‐1), as blockade of TIGIT and PD‐1 enhanced disease progression. GZMK + CD8 + T cells also targeted microglia in pTau‐rich human brain lesions resulting from age, Alzheimer's disease or chronic traumatic encephalopathy. 3. Deletion of CD8 + T cells in mice promoted the emergence of distressed microglia containing neuronal transcripts, markedly enhanced pTau spread and accelerated neurological decline. |
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA; National Institute of Allergy & Infectious Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA; National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA; School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA |
Note: CD8 + T effector memory CD45RA+ (TEMRA) cells, Alzheimer's disease (AD), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), T cell receptor (TCR), major histocompatibility complex (MHC), peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), amyloid‐β (Aβ), CD3 + CD8 + CD27 − T effector memory CD45RA+ (TEMRA), T central memory (TCM), T effector memory (TEM) cells, Alzheimer's disease (AD), Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV), interferon‐γ (IFN = γ), the C‐X‐C motif chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10), C‐X‐C motif chemokine receptor 3 (CXCR3), ATP6V1D: ATPase H+ transporting V1 subunit D, risk gene orthologs vha‐10 (ATP6V1G2), carrot‐made LTB‐Syn antigen (cLTB‐Syn), synaptic vesicle cycling (SVC), SVC related genes (SVCRGs), Immunity‐related genes (IRGs), single‐cell RNA(scRNA), CD8+ resident memory T cells (TRM), protease‐activated receptor‐1 (PAR‐1), granzyme K (GrK), bulk RNA sequencing (RNA‐seq), single‐cell RNA sequencing (scRNA‐seq), tumor necrosis factor α(TNF α), interferon γ(IFN‐γ), interleukin (IL), apolipoprotein E (APOE), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), C‐X‐C Motif Chemokine Receptor 6 (CXCR6), C‐X‐C Motif Chemokine Ligand (CXCL16), phosphorylated tau (pTau), granzyme K (GZMK), phosphorylated tau (pTau).
4.3. The Role of Anti‐Aβ‐Specific CD8+ T Cells Versus CD4+ T Cells in AD
In 2023, Afsar et al. compared the role of anti‐Aβ‐specific CD8+ T cells versus CD4+ T cells in AD. They suggested that (1) in healthy controls, 90% of infiltrated cells are T cells, with a CD4:CD8 ratio of 3.5 [112]. However, the CD4/CD8 ratio was inverted below 1.00 (about 8% in the age range of 20–59 years and around 16% in the age range of 60–94 years [113]. A similar study [114] showed that, compared with CD8+ T cells in healthy controls, there were large changes in CD4+ in lower proportions of naïve cells, more late‐differentiated cells, and higher percentages of activated CD4+ CD25+ T cells without a Treg phenotype in AD patients [47]. It was shown that, compared with the healthy controls, patients with AD had a higher CD4+∕CD8+ ratio and a lower percentage of CD8+ T cells [115]. Moreover, an earlier report showed that the increasing CD4+∕CD8+ ratio was due to a decrease in CD8+ T cells in patients with AD [116]. Also, the percentage of CD4+ T cells increased in patients with AD [117]. Furthermore, T cell subsets had distinct patterns in different subtypes of patients with AD. For example, CD4+ T cells were increased in patients with mild or moderately severe AD [50, 118], whereas CD8+ T cells were decreased in those with severe AD [119]. Specifically, the increased apoptosis in peripheral lymphocytes of the patients was largely caused by CD4+ cells rather than CD8+ T cells [120]. CD8+ T cells were increased in healthy controls; however, they were increased in patients with AD [121].
5. Future Prospects
Many subsets of CD8+ T cells, such as Tc1, Tc2, Tc17, and CD8+ Tregs, have been well‐studied in autoimmunity [65, 122, 123, 124]. These subsets may be of interest in future AD research, given that CD8+ T cells are not cytotoxic T cells. The protocol used for evaluating CD4+ T cells in AD studies can also be followed to elucidate the roles of CD8+ T cells in this disease.
In fact, many reports on AD have focused more on the role of CD4+ T cells rather than on CD8+ T cells; however, the reason is still unclear. Some studies compared the roles of CD4+ versus CD8+ T cells depending on the severity of AD, as discussed in Section 4.3. Unfortunately, there is an ongoing debate [125, 126], for example, regarding the notable decrease in both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in patients with AD [127]. Therefore, the actual role of CD8+ T cells in patients with AD remains to be fully elucidated, which is our goal for future studies.
Author Contributions
Yong Peng received funding support and developed the research hypothesis. Yong Peng, Shun‐yu Yao, Si‐Liang Wu, Huan Yang, Xiuli Zhang, Sugimoto Kazuo, Jia Liu, Miao‐qiao Du, Lan‐xin Lin, and Xu‐hui Kang drafted the primary manuscript, which was the result of collaborative writing efforts by all authors.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors assert that the study was carried out in the absence of any commercial or financial ties that might be perceived as potential conflicts of interest.
AI Usage Declaration
The authors assert that this manuscript did not use AI in preparing the main text and figures.
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by the Scientific Research Project of the Hunan Provincial Health Commission, People's Republic of China (Grant No. C202303076574 to Y.P.), Key Plans of Hunan Administration Traditional Chinese Medicine, PR China (No. Grant No.2023039 to Y.P.), the University‐Hospital Joint Fund of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, PR China (Grant No.2022XYLH198 to Y.P.), the Fund for Creative Research Groups at the Affiliated First Hospital of Hunan Traditional Chinese Medical College, PR China (Grant No.2021B‐003 to YP), Fund for Research Chief of Clinical Department of Affiliated First Hospital of Hunan Traditional Chinese Medical College, PR China (To Y.P.), and the Technology Plan Project of Zhuzhou City, Hunan Province, PR China (Grant No.2021‐009 to Y.P.).
Data Availability Statement
The availability of our data is in our submission.
References
- 1. Jucker M. and Walker L. C., “Alzheimer's Disease: From Immunotherapy to Immunoprevention,” Cell 186 (2023): 4260–4270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Peng Y., Jin H., Xue Y., et al., “Current And Future Therapeutic Strategies For Alzheimer'S Disease: An Overview of Drug Development Bottlenecks,” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 15 (2023): 1206572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Peng Y., Yao S. Y., Chen Q., Jin H., Du M. Q., et al., “True or False? Alzheimer'S Disease is Type 3 Diabetes: Evidences From Bench to Bedside,” Ageing Research Reviews 102383 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Alves F., Kalinowski P., and Ayton S., “Accelerated Brain Volume Loss Caused by Anti‐β‐Amyloid Drugs: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Neurology 100 (2023a): e2114–e2124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Alves S. S., Servilha‐Menezes G., Rossi L., da Silva Junior R. M. P., and Garcia‐Cairasco N., “Evidence of Disturbed Insulin Signaling in Animal Models Of Alzheimer'S Disease,” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 152 (2023b): 105326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Greenberg S. M., Bacskai B. J., Hernandez‐Guillamon M., Pruzin J., Sperling R., and van Veluw S. J., “Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy and Alzheimer Disease ‐ One Peptide, Two Pathways,” Nature Reviews Neurology 16 (2020): 30–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. C. R. Jack, Jr. , Bennett D. A., Blennow K., et al., “Nia‐Aa Research Framework: Toward A Biological Definition of Alzheimer's Disease,” Alzheimer's & Dementia 14 (2018): 535–562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Long J. M. and Holtzman D. M., “Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies,” Cell 179 (2019): 312–339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Karran E. and De Strooper B., “The Amyloid Hypothesis in Alzheimer Disease: New Insights From New Therapeutics,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 21 (2022): 306–318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Gafson A. R., Barthélemy N. R., Bomont P., et al., “Neurofilaments: Neurobiological Foundations For Biomarker Applications,” Brain 143 (2020): 1975–1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Bacioglu M., Maia L. F., Preische O., et al., “Neurofilament Light Chain In Blood And Csf As Marker of Disease Progression in Mouse Models and in Neurodegenerative Diseases,” Neuron 91 (2016): 56–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Barkhof F. and Knopman D. S., “Brain Shrinkage in Anti‐β‐Amyloid Alzheimer Trials: Neurodegeneration Or Pseudoatrophy?,” Neurology 100 (2023): 941–942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Ji C. and Sigurdsson E. M., “Current Status of Clinical Trials on Tau Immunotherapies,” Drugs 81 (2021): 1135–1152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Imbimbo B., Balducci C., Ippati S., and Watling M., “Initial Failures of Anti‐Tau Antibodies in Alzheimer's Disease Are Reminiscent of the Amyloid‐β Story,” Neural Regeneration Research 18 (2023): 117–118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Sims J. R., Zimmer J. A., Evans C. D., et al., “Donanemab in Early Symptomatic Alzheimer Disease: The Trailblazer‐Alz 2 Randomized Clinical Trial,” Journal of the American Medical Association 330 (2023): 512–527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. van Dyck C. H., Swanson C. J., Aisen P., et al., “Lecanemab in Early Alzheimer's Disease,” New England Journal of Medicine 388 (2023): 9–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Budd Haeberlein S., Aisen P. S., Barkhof F., et al., “Two Randomized Phase 3 Studies of Aducanumab In Early Alzheimer's Disease,” Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease 9 (2022): 197–210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Selkoe D. J., “Preventing Alzheimer's Disease,” Science 337 (2012): 1488–1492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Jansen W. J., Ossenkoppele R., Knol D. L., et al., “Prevalence of Cerebral Amyloid Pathology in Persons Without Dementia: A Meta‐Analysis,” Journal of the American Medical Association 313 (2015): 1924–1938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. McDade E., Wang G., Gordon B. A., et al., “Longitudinal Cognitive and Biomarker Changes In Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Disease,” Neurology 91 (2018): e1295–e1306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Cunningham C. L., Martínez‐Cerdeño V., and Noctor S. C., “Microglia Regulate The Number of Neural Precursor Cells in The Developing Cerebral Cortex,” The Journal of neuroscience 33 (2013): 4216–4233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Davalos D., Grutzendler J., Yang G., et al., “Atp Mediates Rapid Microglial Response to Local Brain Injury In Vivo,” Nature Neuroscience 8 (2005): 752–758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Liddelow S. A., Guttenplan K. A., Clarke L. E., et al., “Neurotoxic Reactive Astrocytes Are Induced By Activated Microglia,” Nature 541 (2017): 481–487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Huang B., Zhenxin Y., Chen S., et al., “The Innate and Adaptive Immune Cells In Alzheimer's and Parkinson's Diseases,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2022 (2022): 1315248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Abbott V., Housden B. E., and Houldsworth A., “Could Immunotherapy and Regulatory T Cells Be Used Therapeutically to Slow the Progression Of Alzheimer's Disease?,” Brain communications 7 (2025): fcaf092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. De Sousa R. A. L. and Mendes B. F., “T‐Regulatory Cells and Extracellular Vesicles in Alzheimer's Disease: New Therapeutic Concepts And Hypotheses,” Brain Research 1850 (2025): 149393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Liston A., Dooley J., and Yshii L., “Brain‐Resident Regulatory T Cells And Their Role In Health And Disease,” Immunology Letters 248 (2022): 26–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Yeapuri P., Machhi J., Lu Y., et al., “Amyloid‐β Specific Regulatory T Cells Attenuate Alzheimer's Disease Pathobiology In App/Ps1 Mice,” Molecular Neurodegeneration 18 (2023): 97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Brody D. L. and Holtzman D. M., “Active and Passive Immunotherapy For Neurodegenerative Disorders,” Annual Review of Neuroscience 31 (2008): 175–193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Schenk D., Barbour R., Dunn W., et al., “Immunization with Amyloid‐β Attenuates Alzheimer‐Disease‐Like Pathology in the Pdapp Mouse,” Nature 400 (1999): 173–177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Zetterberg H. and Blennow K., “Biomarker Evidence For Uncoupling Of Amyloid Build‐Up And Toxicity In Alzheimer's Disease,” Alzheimer's & Dementia 9 (2013): 459–462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Rother C., Uhlmann R. E., Müller S. A., et al., “Experimental Evidence For Temporal Uncoupling of Brain Aβ Deposition and Neurodegenerative Sequelae,” Nature Communications 13 (2022): 7333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Hock C., Konietzko U., Streffer J. R., et al., “Antibodies against β‐Amyloid Slow Cognitive Decline in Alzheimer's Disease,” Neuron 38 (2003): 547–554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Nicoll J. A. R., Barton E., Boche D., et al., “Aβ Species Removal After Aβ42Immunization,” Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology 65 (2006): 1040–1048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Nicoll J. A. R., Buckland G. R., Harrison C. H., et al., “Persistent Neuropathological Effects 14 Years Following Amyloid‐β Immunization in Alzheimer's Disease,” Brain 142 (2019): 2113–2126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Villain N., Planche V., and Levy R., “High‐Clearance Anti‐Amyloid Immunotherapies in Alzheimer's Disease. Part 1: Meta‐Analysis and Review of Efficacy and Safety Data, And Medico‐Economical Aspects,” Revue Neurologique 178 (2022): 1011–1030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Mintun M. A., Lo A. C., Duggan Evans C., et al., “Donanemab in Early Alzheimer's Disease,” New England Journal of Medicine 384 (2021): 1691–1704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Salloway S., Farlow M., McDade E., et al., “A Trial of Gantenerumab or Solanezumab in Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer's Disease,” Nature Medicine 27 (2021): 1187–1196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Pontecorvo M. J., Lu M., Burnham S. C., et al., “Association of Donanemab Treatment With Exploratory Plasma Biomarkers in Early Symptomatic Alzheimer Disease: A Secondary Analysis Of The Trailblazer‐Alz Randomized Clinical Trial,” JAMA neurology 79 (2022): 1250–1259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Brown G. C. and Neher J. J., “Microglial Phagocytosis of Live Neurons,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 15 (2014): 209–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Marín‐Teva J. L., Dusart I., Colin C., Gervais A., van Rooijen N., and Mallat M., “Microglia Promote The Death of Developing Purkinje Cells,” Neuron 41 (2004): 535–547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Andersson P. B., Perry V. H., and Gordon S., “Intracerebral Injection of Proinflammatory Cytokines or Leukocyte Chemotaxins Induces Minimal Myelomonocytic Cell Recruitment to the Parenchyma of the Central Nervous System,” Journal of Experimental Medicine 176 (1992): 255–259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Shi Y. and Holtzman D. M., “Interplay Between Innate Immunity and Alzheimer Disease: Apoe And Trem2 In The Spotlight,” Nature Reviews Immunology 18 (2018): 759–772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Nimmerjahn A., Kirchhoff F., and Helmchen F., “Resting Microglial Cells Are Highly Dynamic Surveillants of Brain Parenchyma In Vivo,” Science 308 (2005): 1314–1318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Wu Y., Dissing‐Olesen L., MacVicar B. A., and Stevens B., “Microglia: Dynamic Mediators of Synapse Development and Plasticity,” Trends in Immunology 36 (2015): 605–613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Kettenmann H., Hanisch U. K., Noda M., and Verkhratsky A., “Physiology of Microglia,” Physiological Reviews 91 (2011): 461–553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Tan M. S., Tan L., Jiang T., Zhu X. C., Wang H. F., et al., “Amyloid‐β Induces Nlrp1‐Dependent Neuronal Pyroptosis In Models of Alzheimer's Disease,” Cell Death & Disease 5 (2014): e1382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Zenaro E., Pietronigro E., Bianca V. D., et al., “Neutrophils Promote Alzheimer's Disease‐Like Pathology and Cognitive Decline Via Lfa‐1 Integrin,” Nature Medicine 21 (2015): 880–886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Vom Berg J., Prokop S., Miller K. R., et al., “Inhibition of Il‐12/Il‐23 Signaling Reduces Alzheimer's Disease‐Like Pathology and Cognitive Decline,” Nature Medicine 18 (2012): 1812–1819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Larbi A., Pawelec G., Witkowski J. M., et al., “Dramatic Shifts in Circulating Cd4 But Not Cd8 T Cell Subsets in Mild Alzheimer's Disease,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 17 (2009): 91–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Town T., Tan J., Flavell R. A., and Mullan M., “T‐Cells in Alzheimer's Disease,” NeuroMolecular Medicine 7 (2005): 255–264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Saresella M., Calabrese E., Marventano I., et al., “Pd1 Negative and Pd1 Positive Cd4+ T Regulatory Cells in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 21 (2010): 927–938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Mietelska‐Porowska A. and Wojda U., “T Lymphocytes and Inflammatory Mediators in the Interplay Between Brain and Blood in Alzheimer's Disease: Potential Pools of New Biomarkers,” Journal of Immunology Research 2017 (2017): 1–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Browne T. C., McQuillan K., McManus R. M., O'Reilly J. A., Mills K. H. G., and Lynch M. A., “Ifn‐γ Production by Amyloid β‐Specific Th1 Cells Promotes Microglial Activation and Increases Plaque Burden in A Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease,” The Journal of Immunology 190 (2013): 2241–2251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Dorsey E. R., Constantinescu R., Thompson J. P., et al., “Projected Number of People With Parkinson Disease in the Most Populous Nations, 2005 Through 2030,” Neurology 68 (2007): 384–386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Reynolds A. D., Stone D. K., Mosley R. L., and Gendelman H. E., “Nitrated α‐Synuclein‐Induced Alterations in Microglial Immunity are Regulated by Cd4+ T Cell Subsets,” Journal of Immunology 182 (2009): 4137–4149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Reynolds A. D., Banerjee R., Liu J., Gendelman H. E., and Lee Mosley R., “Neuroprotective Activities of Cd4+Cd25+ Regulatory T Cells in an Animal Model of Parkinson'S Disease,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology 82 (2007): 1083–1094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Gendelman H. E., Zhang Y., Santamaria P., et al., “Evaluation of the Safety And Immunomodulatory Effects of Sargramostim in A Randomized, Double‐Blind Phase 1 Clinical Parkinson'S Disease Trial,” npj Parkinson's Disease 3 (2017): 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Chen J. H., Ke K. F., Lu J. H., Qiu Y. H., and Peng Y. P., “Protection of Tgf‐β1 Against Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration in Aβ1‐42‐Induced Alzheimer's Disease Model Rats,” PLoS One 10 (2015): e0116549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Wakselman S., Béchade C., Roumier A., Bernard D., Triller A., and Bessis A., “Developmental Neuronal Death in Hippocampus Requires the Microglial Cd11B Integrin And Dap12 Immunoreceptor,” Journal of neuroscience 28 (2008): 8138–8143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Baruch K., Deczkowska A., Rosenzweig N., et al., “Pd‐1 Immune Checkpoint Blockade Reduces Pathology and Improves Memory in Mouse Models of Alzheimer's Disease,” Nature Medicine 22 (2016): 135–137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Gate D., Saligrama N., Leventhal O., et al., “Clonally Expanded Cd8 T Cells Patrol the Cerebrospinal Fluid in Alzheimer's Disease,” Nature 577 (2020): 399–404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Peng Y., Yang H., Chen Q., Jin H., Xue Y.‐h, et al., “An Angel or A Devil? Current View on the Role of Cd8+ T Cells in the Pathogenesis of Myasthenia Gravis,” Journal of Translational Medicine 22 (2024a): 183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Peng Y., Zhu F. Z., Chen Z. X., et al., “Characterization of Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein (Mog)35‐55‐Specific Cd8+ T Cells in Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis,” Chinese Medical Journal 132 (2019): 2934–2940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Peng Y., Zhu F.‐Z., Deng X., et al., “Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis Inhibited by Huangqi Guizhi Wuwu Decoction Via Th2 Cytokine Enhancement,” World Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine 7 (2021): 467–476. [Google Scholar]
- 66. Peng Y. and Liu C.‐P., “Characterization of Proteolipid Protein‐Peptide‐Specific Cd(4)(+) T Cell of Experimental Allergic Encephalomyelitis in Biozzi Ab/H Mice,” Chinese Medical Journal 115 (2002): 521–524. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Shao H., Peng Y., Liao T., et al., “A Shared Epitope of the Interphotoreceptor Retinoid‐Binding Protein Recognized by the Cd4+ and Cd8+Autoreactive T Cells,” Journal of Immunology 175 (2005): 1851–1857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Unger M. S., Li E., Scharnagl L., et al., “Cd8(+) T‐Cells Infiltrate Alzheimer's Disease Brains and Regulate Neuronal‐ and Synapse‐Related Gene Expression in App‐Ps1 Transgenic Mice,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity 89 (2020): 67–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Piehl N., van Olst L., Ramakrishnan A., et al., “Cerebrospinal Fluid Immune Dysregulation During Healthy Brain Aging and Cognitive Impairment,” Cell 185 (2022): 5028–5039.e13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Panwar A., Rentsendorj A., Jhun M., et al., “Antigen‐Specific Age‐Related Memory Cd8 T Cells Induce and Track Alzheimer's‐Like Neurodegeneration,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121 (2024): e2401420121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Machhi J., Yeapuri P., Lu Y., et al., “Cd4+ Effector T Cells Accelerate Alzheimer's Disease in Mice,” Journal of Neuroinflammation 18 (2021): 272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Machhi J., Kevadiya B. D., Muhammad I. K., et al., “Harnessing Regulatory T Cell Neuroprotective Activities For Treatment of Neurodegenerative Disorders,” Molecular Neurodegeneration 15 (2020): 32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Oberstein T. J., Taha L., Spitzer P., et al., “Imbalance of Circulating T(H)17 and Regulatory T Cells in Alzheimer's Disease: A Case Control Study,” Frontiers in Immunology 9 (2018): 1213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. McQuillan K., Lynch M. A., and Mills K. H. G., “Activation of Mixed Glia by Aβ‐Specific Th1 and Th17 Cells and its Regulation by Th2 Cells,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity 24 (2010): 598–607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Yang H., Park S. Y., Baek H., et al., “Adoptive Therapy With Amyloid‐β Specific Regulatory T Cells Alleviates Alzheimer's Disease,” Theranostics 12 (2022): 7668–7680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Fisher Y., Strominger I., Biton S., Nemirovsky A., Baron R., and Monsonego A., “Th1 Polarization of T Cells Injected Into the Cerebrospinal Fluid Induces Brain Immunosurveillance,” Journal of Immunology 192 (2014): 92–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Rosset M. B., Lui G., Dansokho C., Chaigneau T., and Dorothée G., “Vaccine‐Induced Aβ‐Specific Cd8+ T Cells Do Not Trigger Autoimmune Neuroinflammation in A Murine Model of Alzheimer's Disease,” Journal of Neuroinflammation 12 (2015): 95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Eremenko E., Mittal K., Berner O., et al., “Bdnf‐Producing, Amyloid β‐Specific Cd4 T Cells as Targeted Drug‐Delivery Vehicles in Alzheimer's Disease,” EBioMedicine 43 (2019): 424–434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Fisher Y., Nemirovsky A., Baron R., and Monsonego A., “Dendritic Cells Regulate Amyloid‐β‐Specific T‐Cell Entry into the Brain: The Role of Perivascular Amyloid‐β,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 27 (2011): 99–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Monsonego A., Imitola J., Zota V., Oida T., and Weiner H. L., “Microglia‐Mediated Nitric Oxide Cytotoxicity of T Cells Following Amyloid β‐Peptide Presentation to Th1 Cells,” Journal of Immunology 171 (2003): 2216–2224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Kaushal V., Dye R., Pakavathkumar P., et al., “Neuronal Nlrp1 Inflammasome Activation of Caspase‐1 Coordinately Regulates Inflammatory Interleukin‐1‐Beta Production and Axonal Degeneration‐Associated Caspase‐6 Activation,” Cell Death & Differentiation 22 (2015): 1676–1686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Zhao J., Su M., Lin Y., Liu H., He Z., and Lai L., “Administration of Amyloid Precursor Protein Gene Deleted Mouse Esc‐Derived Thymic Epithelial Progenitors Attenuates Alzheimer's Pathology,” Frontiers in Immunology 11 (2020): 1781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Park S. Y., Yang J., Yang H., Cho I., Kim J. Y., and Bae H., “Therapeutic Effects of Aβ‐Specific Regulatory T Cells in Alzheimer's Disease: A Study in 5Xfad Mice,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25 (2024): 783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Saresella M., Calabrese E., Marventano I., et al., “A Potential Role For the Pd1/Pd‐L1 Pathway in the Neuroinflammation of Alzheimer's Disease,” Neurobiology of Aging 33 (2012): 624.e11–624.e22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Ethell D. W., Shippy D., Cao C., et al., “Aβ‐Specific T‐Cells Reverse Cognitive Decline and Synaptic Loss in Alzheimer's Mice,” Neurobiology of Disease 23 (2006): 351–361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Bjornevik K., Cortese M., Healy B. C., et al., “Longitudinal Analysis Reveals High Prevalence of Epstein‐Barr Virus Associated With Multiple Sclerosis,” Science 375 (2022): 296–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Gilman S., Koller M., Black R. S., et al., “Clinical Effects of Aβ Immunization (An1792) in Patients With Ad in an Interrupted Trial,” Neurology 64 (2005): 1553–1562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Orgogozo J. M., Gilman S., Dartigues J. F., et al., “Subacute Meningoencephalitis in A Subset Of Patients With Ad After Aβ42 Immunization,” Neurology 61 (2003): 46–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Nicoll J. A. R., Wilkinson D., Holmes C., Steart P., Markham H., and Weller R. O., “Neuropathology of Human Alzheimer Disease After Immunization With Amyloid‐β Peptide: A Case Report,” Nature Medicine 9 (2003): 448–452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Ferrer I., Rovira M. B., Guerra M. L. S., Rey M. J., and Costa‐Jussá F., “Neuropathology and Pathogenesis of Encephalitis Following Amyloid β Immunization in Alzheimer's Disease,” Brain Pathology 14 (2004): 11–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Laskowitz D. T. and Kolls B. J., “A Phase 2 Multiple Ascending Dose Trial of Bapineuzumab in Mild to Moderate Alzheimer Disease,” Neurology 74: 2026; author reply (2010): 26–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Rinne J. O., Brooks D. J., Rossor M. N., et al., “11C‐Pib Pet Assessment of Change in Fibrillar Amyloid‐β Load in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease Treated With Bapineuzumab: A Phase 2, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled, Ascending‐Dose Study,” Lancet. Neurology 9 (2010): 363–372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Farlow M. R., Andreasen N., Riviere M. E., et al., “Long‐Term Treatment With Active Aβ Immunotherapy With Cad106 in Mild Alzheimer's Disease,” Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 7 (2015): 23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Zota V., Nemirovsky A., Baron R., et al., “Hla‐Dr Alleles In Amyloid β‐Peptide Autoimmunity: A Highly Immunogenic Role For the Drb1*1501 Allele,” Journal of Immunology 183 (2009): 3522–3530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Das P., Chapoval S., Howard V., David C. S., and Golde T. E., “Immune Responses Against Aβ1–42 In Hla Class Ii Transgenic Mice: Implications For Aβ1–42 Immune‐Mediated Therapies,” Neurobiology of Aging 24 (2003): 969–976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Seabrook T., “Differences In The Immune Response to Long Term A? Vaccination in C57Bl/6 and B6D2F1 Mice,” Vaccine 22 (2004): 4075–4083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Kutzler M. A., Cao C., Bai Y., et al., “Mapping Of Immune Responses Following Wild‐Type and Mutant Abeta42 Plasmid or Peptide Vaccination in Different Mouse Haplotypes and Hla Class Ii Transgenic Mice,” Vaccine 24 (2006): 4630–4639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Toly‐Ndour C., Lui G., Manuel Nunes M., Bruley‐Rosset M., Aucouturier P., and Dorothée G., “Mhc‐Independent Genetic Factors Control The Magnitude of Cd4+ T Cell Responses to Amyloid‐β Peptide in Mice Through Regulatory T Cell‐Mediated Inhibition,” Journal of Immunology 187 (2011): 4492–4500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Liu C., Chikina M., Deshpande R., et al., “Treg Cells Promote the Srebp1‐Dependent Metabolic Fitness of Tumor‐Promoting Macrophages Via Repression Of Cd8(+) T Cell‐Derived Interferon‐γ,” Immunity 51 (2019): 381–397.e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Mishra S., Srinivasan S., Ma C., and Zhang N., “Cd8(+) Regulatory T Cell ‐ A Mystery to Be Revealed,” Frontiers in Immunology 12 (2021): 708874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Moreno Ayala M. A., Campbell T. F., Zhang C., et al., “Cxcr3 Expression in Regulatory T Cells Drives Interactions With Type I Dendritic Cells In Tumors to Restrict Cd8(+) T Cell Antitumor Immunity,” Immunity 56 (2023): 1613–1630.e5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Peng Y., Shao H., Ke Y., et al., “Minimally Activated Cd8 Autoreactive T Cells Specific For Irbp Express A High Level of Foxp3 and are Functionally Suppressive,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 48 (2007): 2178–2184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Monsonego A., Nemirovsky A., and Harpaz I., “Cd4 T Cells in Immunity and Immunotherapy of Alzheimer's Disease,” Immunology 139 (2013): 438–446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Yamakawa M. and Rexach J., “Cell States and Interactions of Cd8 T Cells and Disease‐Enriched Microglia in Human Brains With Alzheimer's Disease,” Biomedicines 12 (2024): 308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Ramakrishnan A., Piehl N., Simonton B., et al., “Epigenetic Dysregulation in Alzheimer's Disease Peripheral Immunity,” Neuron 112 (2024): 1235–1248.e5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Kimura K., Nishigori R., Hamatani M., Sawamura M., Ashida S., et al., “Resident Memory‐Like Cd8(+) T Cells are Involved in Chronic Inflammatory and Neurodegenerative Diseases in the Cns,” Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation (2024): 11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Jorfi M., Park J., Hall C. K., et al., “Infiltrating Cd8(+) T Cells Exacerbate Alzheimer's Disease Pathology in A 3D Human Neuroimmune Axis Model,” Nature Neuroscience 26 (2023): 1489–1504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Yang H., Park S. Y., Baek H., et al., “Adoptive Therapy With Amyloid‐β Specific Regulatory T Cells Alleviates Alzheimer's Disease,” Theranostics 12 (2022): 7668–7680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Gellrich J., Ruhnau J., Köslich L., Gross S., Flöel A., et al., “Antigen‐Specifically Activated Cd8+ And Double‐Negative T Cells Accumulate In The Brain Of Alzheimer's Disease Mice,” Aging and Disease (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Terrabuio E., Pietronigro E. C., Bani A., Della Bianca V., Laudanna C., et al., “Cd103(‐)Cd8(+) T Cells Promote Neurotoxic Inflammation in Alzheimer's Disease Via Granzyme K‐Par‐1 Signaling,” Nature Communications 16 (2025): 8372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Mason H. D., Latour Y. L., Boughter C. T., et al., “Granzyme K(+) Cd8 T Cells Slow Tauopathy Progression by Targeting Microglia,” Nature Immunology 26 (2025): 1152–1167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Wang J., Nan Y., Liu M., and Hu K., “The Role Of Cd4+ T Cells in the Immunotherapy of Brain Disease by Secreting Different Cytokines,” Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology 17 (2022): 409–422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Wikby A., Månsson I. A., Johansson B., Strindhall J., and Nilsson S. E., “The Immune Risk Profile is Associated With Age and Gender: Findings From Three Swedish Population Studies of Individuals 20–100 Years Of Age,” Biogerontology 9 (2008): 299–308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Pellicanò M., Larbi A., Goldeck D., et al., “Immune Profiling of Alzheimer Patients,” Journal of Neuroimmunology 242 (2012): 52–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Huang L. T., Zhang C. P., Wang Y. B., and Wang J. H., “Association of Peripheral Blood Cell Profile With Alzheimer's Disease: A Meta‐Analysis,” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 14 (2022b): 888946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Pirttilä T., Mattinen S., and Frey H., “The Decrease of Cd8‐Positive Lymphocytes in Alzheimer's Disease,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences 107 (1992): 160–165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Afsar A., Chen M., Xuan Z., and Zhang L., “A Glance Through the Effects of Cd4(+) T Cells, Cd8(+) T Cells, and Cytokines on Alzheimer's Disease,” Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal 21 (2023): 5662–5675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Huang B., Zhenxin Y., Chen S., Tan Z., Zong Z., et al., “The Innate and Adaptive Immune Cells in Alzheimer's and Parkinson'S Diseases,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2022 (2022a): 1315248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Schindowski K., Peters J., Gorriz C., et al., “Apoptosis of Cd4+ T and Natural Killer Cells In Alzheimer's Disease,” Pharmacopsychiatry 39 (2006): 220–228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Leuner K., Schulz K., Schütt T., et al., “Peripheral Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Alzheimer's Disease: Focus on Lymphocytes,” Molecular Neurobiology 46 (2012): 194–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Wang Y., Zhan D., and Wang L., “Ribosomal Proteins are Blood Biomarkers and Associated With Cd4+ T Cell Activation in Alzheimer's Disease: A Study Based on Machine Learning Strategies and Scrna‐Seq Data Validation,” American Journal of Translational Research 15 (2023): 2498–2514. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Peng Y., Deng X., Zeng Q., and Tang Y., “Tc17 Cells in Autoimmune Diseases,” Chinese Medical Journal 135 (2022): 2167–2177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Peng Y., Zhang X., Tang Y., He S., Rao G., et al., “Role of Autoreactive Tc17 Cells in the Pathogenesis of Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis,” Neuroprotection 2 (2024b): 49–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Peng Y., Zhu F. Z., Chen Z. X., et al., “Characterization of Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein (Mog)35–55‐Specific Cd8+ T Cells in Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis,” Chinese Medical Journal 132 (2019): 2934–2940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Richartz‐Salzburger E., Batra A., Stransky E., et al., “Altered Lymphocyte Distribution in Alzheimer's Disease,” Journal of Psychiatric Research 41 (2007): 174–178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Shalit F., Sredni B., Brodie C., Kott E., and Huberman M., “T Lymphocyte Subpopulations and Activation Markers Correlate With Severity of Alzheimer's Disease,” Clinical Immunology and Immunopathology 75 (1995): 246–250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Sh Y., Liu B., Zhang J., Zhou Y., Hu Z., and Zhang X., “Application of Artificial Intelligence Modeling Technology Based on Fluid Biopsy to Diagnose Alzheimer's Disease,” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 13 (2021): 768229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The availability of our data is in our submission.
