Skip to main content
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine logoLink to Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
. 1997 Nov;90(11):604–609. doi: 10.1177/014107689709001104

Qualitative medical sociology: what are its crowning achievements?

J A Chard 1, R J Lilford 1, B V Court 1
PMCID: PMC1296669  PMID: 9496271

Abstract

Doctors and epidemiologists seldom read or cite qualitative medical sociology; it is little published in medical journals. A large number of articles bewail this lack and provide arguments explaining and justifying the subject. Any examples used in such articles are selected ad hoc. We made a systematic search for the literature and used citation analysis to select the world's top 100 articles. We analysed this trawl and provide resumés of a selection from the 'classics'. Mental health and the organization of medicine are the themes within medical sociology with highest impact. Much highly cited work consists of historical and theoretical analysis done 'at the desk' rather than observation or interview 'in the field'. Citation rates, even for the most famous works in medical sociology, are a small fraction of those for high impact biomedical research.

Full text

PDF
604

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Boulton M., Fitzpatrick R., Swinburn C. Qualitative research in health care: II. A structured review and evaluation of studies. J Eval Clin Pract. 1996 Aug;2(3):171–179. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.1996.tb00041.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kleinman A., Eisenberg L., Good B. Culture, illness, and care: clinical lessons from anthropologic and cross-cultural research. Ann Intern Med. 1978 Feb;88(2):251–258. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-88-2-251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Mays N., Pope C. Rigour and qualitative research. BMJ. 1995 Jul 8;311(6997):109–112. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6997.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Pearlin L. I. The sociological study of stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1989 Sep;30(3):241–256. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Rosenhan D. L. On being sane in insane places. Science. 1973 Jan 19;179(4070):250–258. doi: 10.1126/science.179.4070.250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Seglen P. O. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ. 1997 Feb 15;314(7079):498–502. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7079.497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Skelton J., Lilford R., Edwards S. Thoughts for humble servants of science. Lancet. 1997 Jan 11;349(9045):139–140. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)60931-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Verbrugge L. M. Gender and health: an update on hypotheses and evidence. J Health Soc Behav. 1985 Sep;26(3):156–182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine are provided here courtesy of Royal Society of Medicine Press

RESOURCES