Skip to main content
Journal of Medical Biochemistry logoLink to Journal of Medical Biochemistry
. 2026 Jan 6;44(9):1928-1934. doi: 10.5937/jomb0-59665

Predictive value of biochemical markers CRP, WBC, and total cholesterol for postoperative dry eye syndrome following phacoemulsification cataract surgery

Prediktivna vrednost biohemijskih markera CRP, WBC i ukupnog holesterola za postoperativni sindrom suvog oka nakon fakoemulzifikacije katarakte

Yenan Wang 1, Xizhe Wang 1, Zhen Li 1, Huiqing Yang 1, Xuxiang Zhang 1
PMCID: PMC12967177  PMID: 41799717

Abstract

Background

Dry eye syndrome is a common complication following phacoemulsification cataract surgery, potentially influenced by systemic biochemical factors. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive efficiency of three routinely measured biochemical markers - C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell count (WBC), and total cholesterol (TC) - in identifying patients at risk for postoperative dry eye syndrome.

Methods

A total of 87 patients undergoing phacoemulsification between January 2024 and February 2025 were enrolled and categorized into dry eye (n=49) and non-dry eye (n=38) groups. Blood samples were collected preoperatively to assess CRP, WBC, and TC levels using standard laboratory protocols. Baseline characteristics were compared, and multivariate logistic regression was conducted to identify independent risk factors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to determine the predictive performance of each marker and their combination.

Results

Patients in the dry eye group exhibited significantly elevated CRP, WBC, and TC levels compared to the non-dry eye group (P<0.001 for all). Multivariate analysis identified CRP (O R = 12.679), WBC (O R = 3.216), and TC (OR= 1.258) as independent predictors. The area under the ROC curve (a Uc ) values for CRP WBC, and TC were 0.791, 0.770, and 0.757, respectively, while the combined model yielded an AUC of 0.936, indicating superior diagnostic performance (P< 0.01).

Conclusions

CRP, WBC, and TC levels are clinically accessible biochemical parameters that hold significant predictive value for dry eye syndrome following cataract surgery.Combined detection enhances prognostic accuracy andmay guide early intervention strategies to reduce postoperative complications.

Keywords: C-reactive protein, white blood cell count, total cholesterol, biochemical markers, cataract surgery, dry eye syndrome, predictive diagnostics

Introduction

Cataract ranks among the leading causes of blindness worldwide. Clinically, phacoemulsification is the primary treatment modality, characterized by small incisions, rapid recovery, and high safety. However, postoperative complications remain a significant factor affecting patients' visual quality and overall quality of life. Among these complications, dry eye syndrome is particularly common, with a short-term incidence ranging from 30% to 60% and a long-term incidence still reaching 10% to 30% [1] [2]. Dry eye syndrome not only causes ocular surface discomfort and reduced visual quality but may also delay corneal healing, increase the risk of infection, and severely impact surgical outcomes [3].

C-reactive protein (CRP) is a sensitive marker of systemic inflammation and a common acute-phase reactant. White blood cell count (WBC) reflects immune defense and infection status, while total cholesterol (TC) is closely associated with lipid metabolism and vascular endothelial function [4] [5] [6]. Previous studies have shown that elevated levels of CRP and WBC are associated with chronic inflammation of the ocular surface, and abnormal TC levels may contribute to the development of dry eye syndrome by affecting meibomian gland lipid secretion [7]. However, the predictive value of combined CRP WBC, and TC levels for postoperative dry eye syndrome following phacoemulsification remains unclear. Based on the above, this study aims to explore the predictive efficacy of combined detection of CRP, WBC, and TC by observing their dynamic changes after surgery, providing a theoretical basis for early identification of high-risk patients and the development of individualized intervention strategies.

Materials and methods

General information

A total of 87 patients who underwent phacoemulsification at our hospital between January 2024 and February 2025 were included. Inclusion criteria: (1) age >18 years; (2) diagnosis of cataract according to the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria [1], confirmed by slit-lamp examination, fundus examination, and ocular ultrasound, with all patients having Grade III lens nuclear hardness; (3) eligibility for phacoemulsification surgery with no contraindications; (4) no prior diagnosis of dry eye syndrome; (5) no autoimmune diseases, and no medications affecting CRP WBC, or TC levels within the past three months. Exclusion criteria: (1) concurrent serious ocular diseases such as uveitis or glaucoma, or a history of previous ocular surgery; (2) use of anti-inflammatory or immunomodulatory drugs within the past three months; (3) pregnant or lactating women; (4) mental disorders.

Based on the development of dry eye syndrome postoperatively, patients were divided into a dry eye group (n = 49) and a non-dry eye group (n = 38). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants and their families before the study.

Methods

Baseline data, including age, sex, and medical history, were obtained from the hospital's electronic medical records. Levels of CRP WBC, and TC were measured using standardized procedures. After an overnight fast and adequate rest, 5 mL of venous blood was collected from each patient. For CRP and WBC testing, EDTA anticoagulant tubes were used; for TC testing, plain serum tubes were used. CRP and TC were measured using Automatic Biochemical Analyzer with enzymatic colorimetric assay kits. WBC counts were analyzed using the impedance and flow cytometry technology. All samples were processed within 2 hours after collection. The laboratory participated in external quality assessment programs and implemented strict internal quality control using commercial control materials. Daily calibration and routine maintenance were conducted in accordance with the manufacturers' guidelines to ensure the precision and accuracy of all measurements.

Observation indicators

(1) Comparison of baseline characteristics between the dry eye and non-dry eye groups.

(2) Comparison of CRP WBC, and TC levels between the two groups.

(3) Multivariate logistic regression analysis of factors influencing the development of dry eye syndrome post-phacoemulsification.

(4) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) calculations to evaluate the predictive value of CRP, WBC, and TC for postoperative dry eye syndrome.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using Statistic Package for Social Science (SPSS) 27.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Measurement data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (x̄ ± s), and independent samples t-tests were used for between-group comparisons. Categorical data were expressed as numbers and percentages (n (%)), and compared using the chi-square (χ2) test. ROC curves were plotted to assess the predictive value of CRP WBC, and TC. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to identify risk factors for postoperative dry eye syndrome. A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Comparison of baseline characteristics between the two groups

The dry eye group had significantly higher age, longer surgical duration, and a greater proportion of patients with a history of diabetes compared to the non-dry eye group (all P < 0.01). No statistically significant differences were observed in other baseline variables (P > 0.05). See Table 1.

Table 1. Comparison of baseline data between the two groups of patients (x̄±s), n (%).

Factor Dry Eye Group (n = 49) Non-Dry Eye Group (n = 38) t (χ2) / P
Age (years, x̄±s) 62.06 ± 8.68 57.68 ± 8.65 12.178 / <0.001
Male (n, %) 34 (69.39%) 25 (65.79%) 0.127 / 0.722
BMI (kg/m2, x̄±s) 24.18 ± 2.46 24.29 ± 2.34 -0.204 / 0.839
Smoking history (n, %) 11 (22.45%) 10 (26.32%) 0.175 / 0.676
Alcohol consumption (n, %) 10 (20.41%) 9 (23.68%) 0.135 / 0.714
Hypertension history (n, %) 13 (26.53%) 12 (31.58%) 0.266 / 0.606
Diabetes history (n, %) 32 (65.31%) 10 (26.32%) 13.030 / <0.001
Duration of surgery (min, x̄±s) 11.94 ± 1.75 9.89 ± 1.35 5.954 / <0.001

Comparison of CRP, WBC, and TC levels between the two groups

The levels of CRP WBC, and TC in the dry eye group were significantly higher than those in the non-dry eye group (all P < 0.001). See Table 2.

Table 2. Comparison of CRP WBC, and TC levels between the two groups (x̄±s).

Group CRP (mg/L) WBC (X10 /L ) TC (mmol/L)
Dry Eye Group (n = 49) 18.45 ± 1.11 6.90 ± 2.68 6.94 ± 2.38
Non-Dry Eye Group (n = 38) 10.50 ± 5.99 3.53 ± 1.50 4.40 ± 2.46
t/P 5.535 / <0.001 4.921 / <0.001 4.883 / <0.001

Multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors for dry eye syndrome after phacoemulsification

Dry eye syndrome after phacoemulsification was set as the dependent variable, and variables with P < 0.05 in univariate analysis were included as independent variables. The assignment of variables is shown in Table 3.

Table 3. Variable assignment table.

Factor Variable Assignment
Age X1 Entered as original value
History of diabetes X2 Yes = 1, No = 0
Duration of surgery X3 Entered as original value
CRP X4 Entered as original value
WBC X5 Entered as original value
TC X6 Entered as original value
Postoperative dry eye syndrome<br>after phacoemulsification Y Yes = 1, No = 0

Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age, history of diabetes, duration of surgery, CRP, WBC, and TC were all risk factors for postoperative dry eye syndrome (OR = 4.021, 2.362, 2.613, 12.679, 3.216, 1.258; 95% CI = 1.033-15.698). See Table 4 and Figure 1.

Table 4. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors for dry eye syndrome after phacoemulsification.

Variable β S.E. Wald P OR 95% CI
Age 1.649 0.457 3.608 <0.001 4.021 3.275-6.962
History of diabetes 2.109 0.506 4.168 0.006 2.362 1.252-5.641
Duration of surgery 0.960 0.205 22.011 <0.001 2.613 1.749-3.902
CRP 1.336 0.418 3.196 <0.001 12.679 4.567-15.698
WBC 1.862 0.463 4.022 <0.001 3.216 1.037-6.264
TC 2.175 0.527 4.127 <0.001 1.258 1.033-1.987

Figure 1. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors for dry eye syndrome after phacoemulsification.

Figure 1

Predictive Value of CRP, WBC, and TC levels for postoperative dry eye syndrome after phacoemulsification

ROC curve analysis showed that CRP, WBC, and TC levels had relatively high predictive value for dry eye syndrome after phacoemulsification (AUC: 0.791, 0.770, and 0.757, respectively). The combined detection model yielded a significantly higher AUC (0.936) than any single indicator (all P < 0.05). See Table 5 and Figure 2.

Table 5. Predictive value of CRP WBC, and TC levels for postoperative dry eye syndrome after phacoemulsification.

Indicator AUC S.E. 95%CI Sensitivity Specificity Cut-off Value
CRP 0.791 0.051 0.690~0.870 77.55 78.95 >10
WBC 0.770 0.056 0.667~0.853 75.51 76.32 >9
TC 0.757 0.054 0.653~0.843 77.55 76.32 >5
Combined Model 0.936 0.029 0.863~0.977 91.84 92.11 -
Z/PCombined Detection/CRP 2.979/0.003 - - - - -
Z/PCombined Detection/W BC 2.761/0.006 - - - - -
Z/PCombined DetectionAC 2.746/0.006 - - - - -

Figure 2. Predictive value of CRP WBC, and TC levels for postoperative dry eye syndrome after phacoemulsification.

Figure 2

Discussion

The surgical incision in phacoemulsification can damage corneal nerves and reduce corneal sensitivity, thereby decreasing reflex tear secretion and blink frequency. A reduced blink rate not only impairs meibomian gland lipid secretion and accelerates tear evaporation, but also induces inflammatory responses and disrupts ocular surface structure. These multiple factors contribute to a vicious cycle of excessive tear evaporation, ultimately leading to dry eye syndrome [8] [9].

In this study, data showed that patients who developed dry eye syndrome postoperatively had significantly higher age, longer surgical duration, elevated CRP, WBC, and TC levels, as well as a higher proportion of diabetes history compared with those without dry eye. Multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed these factors as independent risk factors for postoperative dry eye syndrome. Nur Faizah H et al. [10] reported a higher incidence of dry eye syndrome after phacoemulsification in cataract patients with diabetes. Bu Li et al. [11] suggested that elevated levels of inflammatory markers such as CRP in diabetic cataract patients may increase the risk of postoperative complications, including dry eye syndrome, supporting the rationale of the present study.

The underlying mechanisms may be as follows: With increasing age, lacrimal gland function declines, leading to decreased tear secretion and weakened repair capacity, thereby increasing dry eye risk [12]. Longer surgical duration prolongs ocular surface exposure, exacerbates corneal epithelial damage, and accumulates thermal injury due to phacoemulsification energy, compromising corneal nerves and tear film stability [13]. Chronic hyperglycemia induces corneal nerve degeneration and endothelial dysfunction, inhibits tear secretion, delays corneal epithelial healing, and further raises dry eye risk [14]. Elevated CRP and WBC levels indicate systemic inflammation, where inflammatory mediators can activate immune cells on the ocular surface, damaging corneal and conjunctival epithelial cells, impairing tear secretion, and aggravating tear film inflammation [15]. Hypercholesterolemia disrupts lipid metabolism and interferes with meibomian gland lipid secretion and composition. Abnormal lipid layers in the tear film accelerate tear evaporation and contribute to dry eye development [16].

Our results demonstrate that CRF, WBC, and TC each have a good predictive value for dry eye syndrome following phacoemulsification, with combined detection outperforming individual indicators. The likely reason is that CRP, as a sensitive marker of inflammation, reflects systemic inflammatory cascade activation and the upregulation of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), which promotes immune cell infiltration, damaging ocular surface tissues and disrupting tear film homeostasis. WBC count reflects immune defense status; increased neutrophils can release proteases and reactive oxygen species that harm corneal epithelial and goblet cells, affecting both tear secretion and tear film stability [17] [18]. Abnormal TC levels, linked to lipid metabolism disorders, may alter meibomian gland lipid composition, reducing tear film lipid layer fluidity and stability, thus accelerating tear evaporation [19].

The advantage of combined detection lies in the complementary nature of each biomarker: CRP identifies inflammatory activity, WBC quantifies immune response intensity, and TC reveals lipid metabolism abnormalities. This multi-parameter approach enables earlier detection of inflammation, assessment of immune-mediated tissue damage, and evaluation of tear film structure abnormalities, providing more precise identification of high-risk patients and a multidimensional basis for clinical early intervention.

This study is limited by its single-center design and relatively small sample size, which may affect the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, only short-term postoperative outcomes were evaluated, with no data on long-term follow-up. Future research should include larger, multicenter cohorts to enhance the robustness and applicability of the results. Extending the follow-up period will also provide a more comprehensive understanding of the temporal evolution and underlying mechanisms involved.

In conclusion, age, surgical duration, CRP, WBC, TC levels, and history of diabetes may all influence the development of postoperative dry eye syndrome after phacoemulsification. Among them, CRP, WBC, and TC demonstrate predictive value, with combined detection offering superior performance over single indicators. These factors may serve as a basis for early clinical prevention.

Dodatak

Conflict of interest statement

All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in this work.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest: The authors stated that they have no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

References

  • 1.Bhandari S, Chew E Y. Cataract surgery and the risk of progression of macular degeneration. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2023;34(1):27. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wang X, Zhang Z, Ge Y Q, Wu X, Ma Y C. The effect of calcium dobesilate combined with hypoglycemic drugs in the treatment of cataract NPDR and its effect on fundus microcirculation and blood ICAM-1, MCP-1 and MIF levels. J Med Biochem. 2023;42(4):591. doi: 10.5937/jomb0-37338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chen N, Zhang J S, Zhang T X, Fan B L, Ning Y. The effect of sodium hyaluronate on tear film stability in patients with dry eye syndrome after cataract surgery. Graef Arch Clin Exp. 2023;261(4):1011. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05880-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Plebani M. Why C-reactive protein is one of the most requested tests in clinical laboratories? Clin Chem Lab Med. 2023;61(9):1540. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2023-0086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tsuda K. A link between white blood cell count and blood pressure levels. Hypertens Res. 2024;47(2):537. doi: 10.1038/s41440-023-01528-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Perais J, Agarwal R, Evans J R, Loveman E, Colquitt J L, Owens D, et al Prognostic factors for the development and progression of proliferative diabetic retinopathy in people with diabetic retinopathy. Cochrane Db Syst Rev. 2023;2(2):CD013775. doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd013775.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Go J A, Mamalis C A, Khandelwal S S. Cataract Surgery Considerations for Diabetic Patients. Curr Diabetes Rep. 2021;21(12):67. doi: 10.1007/s11892-021-01418-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ta H, McCann P, Xiao M, Lien T, Abbott K, Gregory D G, et al Dry eye post-cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bmc Ophthalmol. 2025;25(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03841-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhao X, Jia Q, Fu J. Effectiveness of rb-bFGF Eye Drops for Post-Cataract Surgery Dry Eye and Observation of Changes in Tear Secretion and Corneal Damage in Patients. Altern Ther Health M. 2023;29(8):489. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nur F H, Mohd F Y, Siti Z M, Wan-Hazabbah W H. Evaluation of dry eye pre and post phacoemulsification in diabetic patients. Med J Malaysia. 2025;80(3):298. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lee B J, Afshari N A. Advances in drug therapy and delivery for cataract treatment. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2023;34(1):3. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jody N, Santana M, Rudell J. Pediatric cataract surgery: considerations and updates in diagnosis and management. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2023;34(1):58. doi: 10.1097/icu.0000000000000918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Li J L, Zhao J, Guo Z F, Xiao C, Liu X. Efficacy of recombinant human epidermal growth factor plus sodium hyaluronate eye drops in diabetic dry eye post-cataract surgery. World J Diabetes. 2024;15(6):1234. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v15.i6.1234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Moshirfar M, Ziari M, Ronquillo Y C. Cataract surgery considerations in patients with prior history of keratoconus and ectasia. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2023;34(1):41. doi: 10.1097/icu.0000000000000908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mishra D, Kashyap A, Srivastav T, Yadav A, Pandey S, Majhi M M, et al Enzymatic and biochemical properties of lens in age-related cataract versus diabetic cataract: A narrative review. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023;71(6):2379. doi: 10.4103/ijo.ijo_1784_22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Donthineni P R, Deshmukh R, Ramamurthy C, Sangwan V S, Mehta J S, Basu S. Management of cataract in dry eye disease: Preferred practice pattern guidelines. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023;71(4):1364. doi: 10.4103/ijo.ijo_2807_22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Świerczyńska M, Tronina A, Smędowski A. Understanding cataract development in axial myopia: The contribution of oxidative stress and related pathways. Redox Biol. 2025;80:103495. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2025.103495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hsu A Y, Kuo H T, Lin C J, Hsia N Y, Kuo S C, Wei C C, et al Cataract Development Among Pediatric Patients With Uveitis. Jama Netw Open. 2024;7(7):e2419366. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.19366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Shah Y S, Garg A K, Ramulu P Y. The effect of cataract surgery on lowering intraocular pressure. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2025;36(1):46. doi: 10.1097/icu.0000000000001112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Biochemistry are provided here courtesy of Society of Medical Biochemists of Serbia

RESOURCES