Abstract
Structures of higher coordinate onium-boronium dications (X+BH3+ 1–4a and X+BH5+ 1–4d; X = NH3, PH3, H2O, and H2S) were calculated by using the ab initio method at the MP2/6-311+G** level. All of the dications 1–4a contain a four-coordinate boron atom with a three-center two-electron bond involving boron and two hydrogens. On the other hand, all the dications 1–4d contain a six-coordinate boron atom with two three-center two-electron bonds. The thermodynamics of the complexations of 1–4a and H2 to form 1–4d were computed. Deprotonations of 1–4d were found to be substantially endothermic.
Higher coordinate compounds involving a main group element are of both theoretical (1–4) and experimental (5) interest. Schmidbaur and coworkers have prepared a variety of higher coordinate boron (6), carbon (7, 8), nitrogen (9), oxygen (10), phosphorus (11), and sulfur (12) complexes with gold and determined their x-ray crystal structures. They have prepared trigonal bipyramidal (7) {[(C6H5)3PAu]5C}+ and octahedral (8) {[(C6H5)3PAu]6C}2+ complexes involving five- and six-coordinate carbon, respectively, representing the isolobal (5) analogs of CH5+ and CH62+. Lithiated five- and six-coordinate carbocations, CLi5+ and CLi62+, respectively, were also calculated to be stable minima (13–15).
We previously reported (16) computed structures of the four-coordinate boronium ion BH4+ and the six-coordinate boronium ion BH6+. The structure of BH4+ is planar with a three-center two-electron (3c-2e) bond (16). The structure of BH6+ contains two 3c-2e bonds (16). The structures of BH4+ and BH6+ were found to be isostructural with their isoelectronic carbon analogs CH42+ (17) and CH62+ (18, 19), respectively. DePuy et al. were able to prepare and observe the BH4+ and BH6+ ions experimentally in the gas phase by reacting BH2+ and H2 and BH4+ and H2, respectively (see Scheme S1; refs. 20 and 21).
Scheme 1.
Structures of BH4+ and BH6+.
Recently we reported (22) ab initio-calculated structures of protonated BXH2 and BX2H (BXH3+ and BX2H2+; X = F and Cl) as well as their dihydrogen complexes BXH5+ and BX2H4+. In continuation of our study we now have extended our investigations to the higher coordinate onium-boronium dications (X+BH3+ and X+BH5+; X = NH3, PH3, OH2, and SH2).‡
Results and Discussion
Calculations were carried out with the GAUSSIAN 98 program system (23). The geometry optimizations were performed at the MP2/6-311+G** level. Vibrational frequencies at the MP2/6-311+G**/MP2/6-311+G** level were used to characterize stationary points as minima (number of imaginary frequency = 0) and evaluate zero-point vibrational energies that were scaled by a factor of 0.96 (24). For improved energy, single-point energies at MP4(SDTQ)6-311+G** on MP2/6-311+G** optimized geometries were computed. Final energies were calculated at the MP4(SDTQ)/6-311+G**/MP2/6-311+G** + zero-point vibrational energy level. Thermodynamics of the selected complexation and protonation processes are given in Table 1. The calculated energies are given in Table 2. MP2/6-311+G** geometrical parameters and final energies will be discussed throughout unless stated otherwise.
Table 1.
Dissociation energy ΔE0 at 298 K for the selected processes
| Process | ΔE0†, kcal/mol |
|---|---|
| H3N+BH5+1d → H3N+BH3+1a + H2 | +23.9 |
| H3P+BH5+2d → H3P+BH3+2a + H2 | +26.2 |
| H2O+BH5+3d → H2O+BH3+3a + H2 | +21.0 |
| H2S+BH5+4d → H2S+BH3+4a + H2 | +23.0 |
| H3N+BH5+1d → H3N+BH5+1e + H+ | +18.3 |
| H3P+BH5+2d → H3P+BH5+2e + H+ | +29.0 |
| H2O+BH5+3d → H2O+BH5+3e + H+ | +7.9 |
| H2S+BH5+4d → H2S+BH5+4e + H+ | +17.7 |
At MP4(SDTQ)/6-311+G**/MP2/6-311+G** + zero-point vibrational energies level.
Table 2.
Total energies (arbitrary units), zero-point vibrational energies and relative energies (kcal/mol)
| MP2/6-311+G**// MP2/6-311+G** | ZPE† | MP4(SDTQ)/6-311+G**//MP2/6-311+G** | Rel. energy‡, kcal/mol | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| H3N+BH3+1a | 82.10296 | 40.7 | 82.13927 | 2.8 |
| H3N+BH21b | 82.10172 | 36.7 | 82.13731 | 0.0 |
| H2NBH21c | 81.80118 | 29.1 | 81.83471 | 182.3 |
| H3N+BH5+1d | 83.31232 | 53.7 | 83.35587 | 0.0 |
| H3N+BH41e | 83.27616 | 48.8 | 83.31895 | 18.3 |
| H3P+BH3+2a | 368.29369 | 34.2 | 368.34047 | 0.0 |
| H3P+BH22b | 368.26971 | 29.4 | 368.31531 | 11.0 |
| H2PBH22c | 367.95513 | 23.3 | 367.99940 | 203.1 |
| H3P+BH5+2d | 369.50727 | 46.8 | 369.56016 | 0.0 |
| H3P+BH42e | 369.45327 | 41.3 | 369.50513 | 29.0 |
| H2O+BH3+3a | 101.91317 | 32.4 | 101.94288 | 15.1 |
| H2O+BH23b | 101.93220 | 28.7 | 101.96102 | 0.0 |
| HOBH23c | 101.65843 | 21.6 | 101.68629 | 165.3 |
| H2O+BH5+3d | 103.11643 | 44.5 | 103.15340 | 0.0 |
| H2O+BH43e | 103.09736 | 40.0 | 103.13371 | 7.9 |
| H2S+BH3+4a | 424.49422 | 28.7 | 424.53832 | 1.2 |
| H2S+BH24b | 424.49084 | 24.3 | 424.53320 | 0.0 |
| HSBH24c | 424.21875 | 18.7 | 424.25812 | 167.0 |
| H2S+BH5+4d | 425.70157 | 40.9 | 425.75229 | 0.0 |
| H2S+BH44e | 425.66677 | 35.7 | 425.71583 | 17.7 |
Zero-point vibrational energies (ZPE) at MP2/6-311+G**//MP2/6-311+G** scaled by a factor of 0.96.
Relative energies at MP4(SDTQ)/6-311+G**//MP2/6-311+G** + ZPE level.
X+BH3+ Dications; X = NH3, PH3, H2O, and H2S.
The ammonium-boronium dication H3N+BH3+ 1a (Fig. 1) was found to be a minimum on the potential energy surface. The structure 1a can also be considered as ammonium-substituted BH4+. The structure is characterized with a four-coordinate boron atom having a 3c-2e bond involving boron and two hydrogens. In dication 1a the boronium ion (–BH3+) unit and the ammonium ion (–NH3+) unit are separated by a distance of 1.505 Å. The structures of phosphonium-boronium H3P+BH3+ 2a, oxonium-boronium H2O+BH3+ 3a, and sulfonium-boronium H2S+BH3+ 4a dications (Fig. 1) were also calculated and found to be minima on the potential energy surface. Similar to 1a, each of the 2–4a structures also contains a 3c-2e bond involving boron and two hydrogens.
Figure 1.
MP2/6-311+G** structures of 1–4.
Deprotonation energies of 1–4a were computed and are listed in Table 1. Deprotonation of 1a to give monocation H3N+BH2 1b was calculated to be slightly exothermic by 2.8 kcal/mol. The structure 1b can be considered as an ammonium-substituted borane. However, deprotonation of 2a to give H3P+BH2 2b was found to be endothermic by 11.0 kcal/mol. On the other hand, deprotonation of 3a and 4a were computed to be exothermic by 15.1 and 1.2 kcal/mol, respectively. We also calculated the deprotonation energies for 1–4b. Deprotonation of 1–4b into neutral 1–4c, however, were calculated to be highly endothermic (by 165–203 kcal/mol; see Table 2).
X+BH5+ Dications; X = NH5, PH3, H2O, and H2S.
Complexation of 1a with H2 leads to H3N+BH5+ 1d, which was found to be a stable minimum on the potential energy surface (Fig. 2). The structure 1a can be considered as an ammonium-substituted BH6+ (16). The ammonium-boronium dication 1d contains a six-coordinate boron with two 3c-2e bonds. In dication 1a the boronium ion (–BH5+) unit and the ammonium ion (–NH3+) unit are separated by a distance of 1.544 Å. The formation of 1d from complexation of 1a and H2 is an exothermic (by 23.9 kcal/mol) process (Table 1). In comparison, the formation of BH6+ from BH4+ and H2 was calculated to be exothermic by 17.7 kcal/mol (16). The calculated structure of the six-coordinate parent BH6+ was reported first by Rasul and Olah in 1997 (16). In the same year the ion was prepared by DePuy et al. in the gas phase by complexing BH4+ with H2 (20, 21). The structures of phosphonium-boronium H3P+BH5+ 2d, oxonium-boronium H2O+BH5+ 3d, and sulfonium-boronium H2S+BH5+ 4d dications (Fig. 2) were also calculated and found to be minima on the potential energy surface. Similar to 1d, each of the 2–4d structures also contains two 3c-2e bonds involving boron and two hydrogens. Formation of 2d, 3d, and 4d from complexations of 2a, 3a, and 4a, respectively, and H2 were also found to be exothermic (by 26.2, 21.0, and 23.0 kcal/mol) processes (Table 1).
Figure 2.
MP2/6-311+G** structures of 1–4d and 1–4e.
Deprotonation energies of dications 1–4d were calculated and are displayed in Table 1. Deprotonation of 1d to give monocation H3N+BH4 1e was found to be endothermic by 18.3 kcal/mol. The structure 1e contains a 3c-2e bond and can be considered an ammonium-substituted BH5. We previously calculated (25) the structure 1e at the MP2/6-31G** level. Thus deprotonation of 1d is a unfavorable process.
Deprotonation of 2d, 3d, and 4d to give 2e, 3e, and 4e were also computed to be endothermic by 29.0, 7.9, and 17.7 kcal/mol, respectively (Table 2).
As expected, the calculated deprotonation energies (ΔE0) of the dications X+BH3+ 1–4a and X+BH5+ 1–4d (Tables 1 and 2) indicate an increase in the stability of the dications toward deprotonation with the increase in the size of the X atoms. The instabilities of the small multicharged cations are due mainly to the charge–charge repulsion. A significant implication of the study of multicharged onium-boronium dications is the relationship of their bonding nature to carbon analogues, i.e., carbon superelectrophiles (26) involved in superacid media. Better stabilization of some of these dications by Schmidbaur-type auration (5) with (C6H5)3PAu, an isolobal analogue of H+, however, should be possible.
In conclusion, present ab initio calculations at the MP2/6-311+G** level indicate that the onium-boronium dications (X+BH3+ 1–4a and X+BH5+ 1–4d; X = NH3, PH3, H2O, and H2S) are stable minima. The optimized structures show that 1–4a all contain a four-coordinate boron atom having a 3c-2e bond involving boron and two hydrogens. Calculated structures show that 1–4d all contain a six-coordinate boron atom having two 3c-2e bonds. Thermodynamics of the complexations of 1–4a and H2 to form 1–4d were computed. Deprotonations of 1–4d to form 1–4e were found to be substantially endothermic.
Acknowledgments
Support of our work by the National Science Foundation is gratefully acknowledged.
Abbreviation
- 3c-2e
three-center two-electron
Footnotes
This is paper no. 59 in the series “Onium Ions.” Paper no. 58 is ref. 27.
References
- 1.Haberlen O D, Schmidbaur H, Rosch N. J Am Chem Soc. 1994;115:8241–8248. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gorling A, Rosch N, Ellis D E, Schmidbaur H. Inorg Chem. 1991;30:3986–3988. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Schreiner P R, Schaefer H F, Schleyer P v R. Advances in Gas Phase Ion Chemistry. London: JAI Press; 1996. p. 125. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Schreiner P R, Schaefer H F, Schleyer P v R. J Chem Phys. 1995;103:5565–5569. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Schmidbaur H. Chem Soc Rev. 1995;24:391–400. [Google Scholar]
- 6. Blumenthal, A., Beruda, H. & Schmidbaur, H. (1993) J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun., 1005–1006.
- 7.Scherbaum F, Grohmann A, Müller G, Schmidbaur H. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 1989;28:463–465. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Scherbaum F, Grohmann A, Huber B, Krüger C, Schmidbaur H. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 1988;27:1544–1546. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Grohmann A, Riede J, Schmidbaur H. Nature. 1990;345:140–142. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Schmidbaur H, Hofreiter S, Paul M. Nature. 1995;377:503–504. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Schmidbaur H, Beruda H, Zeller E. Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon Relat Elem. 1994;87:245–255. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zeller E, Beruda H, Schmidbaur H. Inorg Chem. 1993;32:3203–3204. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jemmis E D, Chandrasekhar J, Würthwein E-U, Schleyer P v R, Chinn J W, Landro F J, Lagow R J, Luke B, Pople J A. J Am Chem Soc. 1982;104:4275–4276. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Schleyer P v R, Tidor B, Jemmis E D, Chandrasekhar J, Würthwein E-U, Kos A J, Luke B T, Pople J A. J Am Chem Soc. 1983;105:484–488. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Reed A E, Weinhold F. J Am Chem Soc. 1985;107:1919–1921. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rasul G, Olah G A. Inorg Chem. 1997;36:1278–1281. doi: 10.1021/ic960843k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wong M W, Radom L. J Am Chem Soc. 1989;111:1155–1156. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lammertsma K, Olah G A, Barzaghi M, Simonetta M. J Am Chem Soc. 1982;104:6851–6852. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lammertsma K, Barzaghi M, Olah G A, Pople J A, Schleyer P v R, Simonetta M. J Am Chem Soc. 1983;105:5258–5263. [Google Scholar]
- 20.DePuy C H, Gareyev R, Hankin J, Davico G E. J Am Chem Soc. 1997;119:427–428. [Google Scholar]
- 21.DePuy C H, Gareyev R, Hankin J, Davico G E, Krempp M, Damrauer R. J Am Chem Soc. 1998;120:5086–5092. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rasul G, Olah G A. Inorg Chem. 2001;40:2453–2456. doi: 10.1021/ic000877z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Frisch M J, Trucks G W, Schlegel H B, Scuseria G E, Robb M A, Cheeseman J R, Zakrzewski V G, Montgomery J A, Stratmann R E, Burant J C, et al. GAUSSIAN 98. Pittsburgh: Gaussian; 1998. , Revision A. 5. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Foresman J B, Frisch A. Exploring Chemistry with Electronic Structure Methods. Pittsburgh: Gaussian; 1995. p. 64. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rasul G, Prakash G K S, Olah G A. Inorg Chem. 1999;38:44–47. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Olah G A. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 1993;32:767–788. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Laali K K, Rasul G, Prakash G K S, Olah G A. J Org Chem. 2002;67:2913–2918. doi: 10.1021/jo020084p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



