Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Mar 10.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Med Chem. 2022 Oct 14;244:114840. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2022.114840

From dopamine 4 to sigma 1: Synthesis, SAR and biological characterization of a piperidine scaffold of σ1 modulators

Kirsten T Tolentino a,1, Viktoriya Mashinson a,1, Manish K Sharma b, Yashpal S Chhonker b, Daryl J Murry b, Corey R Hopkins a,c,*
PMCID: PMC12969314  NIHMSID: NIHMS2147546  PMID: 36283180

Abstract

The sigma 1 receptor is a multifunctional receptor with wide distribution in the nervous system and its function has been implicated with a number of neurological disorders including dementia and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other neurodegenerative disorders. In addition, modulators of σ1 have been advanced into clinical trials for the treatment of pain. Starting from our previously disclosed piperidine scaffold, we have identified a class of potent sigma 1 modulators. This work highlights the key SAR components that lead to the divergence in D4 and σ1 activity. In addition, we further profile lead compounds in a panel of off-target receptors, in vitro and in vivo pharmacokinetic studies. This has culminated in the discovery of multiple σ1 receptor modulators with properties that will allow for study in animal models.

Keywords: Dopamine 4 receptor, Sigma 1 receptor, Selectivity, Modulators, SAR

1. Introduction

The dopamine receptors (DR) were first characterized in the 1980s as members of the Class A G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) super-family [14]. They were later subdivided into five subtypes, D1–5; which are further subdivided into two families of distinct receptor types (D1-like and D2-like) [4,5]. The dopamine receptors garnered much attention due to the dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia and much of the work centered on the D2 and D3 receptors, specifically due to the activity of the typical and atypical antipsychotics [611]. In addition, the dopamine 4 receptor subtype garnered quite a bit of interest in the early 1990s as a potential therapeutic target for schizophrenia, as it was shown the atypical antipsychotic clozapine was more active at D4 compared to the other dopamine receptor subtypes [12,13]. One of the first compounds that progressed into clinical trials for the treatment of schizophrenia was L745,870, 1; however, the compound failed to show efficacy, although it was well tolerated (Fig. 1) [14,15]. In addition to 1, other D4 antagonists that were progressed to clinical trials failed to show any efficacy. After these failures, many of the D4 receptor antagonists and modulators were sidelined in favor of the other subtypes. Recently there have been several reports linking D4 to addiction [16], Parkinson’s disease (PD) [17], and cancer [18,19], and as such, there has been a resurging interest in D4 antagonists [20].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Reported D4 antagonists.

l-DOPA is the hallmark therapeutic treatment for PD; however, chronic treatment with l-DOPA can lead to the development of abnormal involuntary movements (dyskinesia). These l-DOPA-induced dyskinesias (PD-LIDs) can lead to significant loss of quality of life. D4 receptors are present in the basal ganglia, and it has been postulated that treatment with D4 antagonists can lead to a reduction in PD-LIDs. Again, 1 was the lead compound, and it was reported to have activity in rodent and non-human primate models of l-DOPA induced dyskinesias [21,22]. However, 1 failed to improve rotarod performance, suggesting that it would have a narrow therapeutic window for PD-LIDs. Our laboratory reported the discovery of morpholine and 4,4-difluoropiperidine scaffolds, 2 and 3 [23,24], and showed that 2 was active in an in vivo mouse model of PD-LIDs and was devoid of the rotarod issue associated with 1 [25].

During this, and subsequent SAR work, we performed selectivity studies using the Psychoactive Drug Screening Program (PDSP) to gauge the relative selectivity of these tool compounds against a wide panel of CNS receptors [26]. We noticed a common off-target receptor, sigma 1, that was consistently active when tested against our compounds. Most of our original compounds maintained high potency against the D4 receptor (Ki < 10 nM) and had modest selectivity against σ1 (~10-fold) (Table 1). However, we did notice a distinct change in the selectivity profile with only a modest change to the compound. The 5-indole southern analog, 4, was potent at D4 (Ki = 3.3 nM) and ~13-fold selective versus σ1; however, moving to the 5-benzimidazole moiety reversed this selectivity (5, σ1, Ki = 18 nM vs. D4, Ki = 426 nM). This was the first time in this morpholine scaffold that we saw this switch, and we wanted to further investigate the σ1 activity in our newly reported piperidine D4 scaffolds [27].

Table 1.

Dopamine 4 and sigma 1 receptor binding values of previously disclosed compounds.

Cmpd Structure σ1 LEb/LLEb/MPO D4
Ki (nM); pKia Ki (nM); pKia
1 graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0001.jpg 101;
7.00
0.43
3.49
4.9
0.6;
9.26
2 graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0002.jpg 41;
7.39
0.43
4.00
4.7
5.0;
8.30
3 graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0003.jpg 52;
7.28
0.38
1.60
2.5
3.5;
8.45
4 graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0004.jpg 44;
7.36
0.43
3.86
4.8
3.3;
8.48
5 graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0005.jpg 18;
7.74
0.42
4.77
5.4
426;
6.37
a

Ki values determined by competitive inhibition of [3H]N-methylspiperone (D4R) or [3H] Pentazocine (S1R) binding in membranes harvested from HEK293 cells. All Ki are run in triplicate.

b

Ligand efficiency (LE) and ligand-lipophilicity (LLE) measurements based on the σ1 receptor.

The sigma (σ) receptors were identified in the 1970s as opioid receptors but were later accepted as a separate and distinct family of receptors, which is comprised of two subtypes, the sigma 1 (σ1) and sigma 2 (σ2) receptors [28,29]. Although the structural and functional aspects of the sigma receptors are not fully elucidated, the σ1 receptor has recently been implicated in a variety of CNS disorders and cancer, including Parkinson’s disease [30,31], pain [3234], Alzheimer’s disease [30,31,35], depression [36], and addiction [37,38]. Much of the information regarding the σ1 receptor and its role in pain modulation is due to the use of σ1 knockout (KO) [3941] experiments and σ1 antagonists, showing its effects of analgesia without the known side effects of opioids (constipation and tolerance). Recently, σ1 receptor antagonists have been advanced to clinical trials for pain [42,43]. The X-ray crystallographic structures of the human σ1 receptor in complex with known modulators have been recently published, and this has paved the way for additional SAR studies [44]. The X-ray crystallographic work also showed a common SAR motif that overlapped with our knowledge of the D4 receptor pharmacophore work. We were able to dock our compounds using the Schrödinger Drug Discovery Suite (Maestro, Release 2022–3) and generate poses using Glide [45,46]. Both receptors have scaffolds with basic nitrogens (e.g., piperidine, morpholine, pyrazole) that make key interactions (σ1: Glu172; D4: Asp115) with additional aromatic or benzylic groups participating in π-π stacking (Fig. 2) [47,48]. Due to this overlap, and the availability of both the σ1 and D4 structural information, we embarked on an effort to characterize a set of 3- and 4-hydroxypiperidine compounds [27] as potent σ1 modulators and detail where the SAR diverges with respect to D4.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Docking studies of 5 in the (A) D4 receptor (5WIU) and (B) s1 receptor (5HK1).

2. Chemistry

The synthesis of the 3- and 4-oxypiperidine scaffolds is shown in Scheme 1. Starting with the commercially available tert-butyl (S)-3-hydroxy or 4-hydroxypiperidine-1-carboxylates, 6 or 7, which were alkylated with NaH and the respective BnBr to form the benzyl ethers, followed by deprotection to yield the amines 8 or 9. Next, the final targets, 1023, were realized by either direct N-alkylation (Cs2CO3 and BnBr), reductive amination protocols (Et3N, ArCHO, NaHB(OAc)3), or polymer-supported reductive amination (ArCHO, PS-NaBH3CN, AcOH, CH2Cl2) [27].

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1.

Synthesis of 3- and 4-hydroxypiperidine analogs.

aReagents and conditions: a) NaH, DMF, BnBr; b) 4 N HCl, dioxane; c) Cs2CO3, DMF, BnBr; d) ArCHO, Et3N, CH2Cl2, NaHB(OAc)3; e) CH2Cl2, ArCHO, AcOH, PS-NaBH3CN, μW, 110 °C, 10 min.

In addition to the piperidine scaffolds, we had wanted to explore other alternative scaffolds that may introduce new chemical matter into the D4 realm. For this, we thought the commercially available diazaspiro [4.4]nonanes or diazaspiro[4.5]decanes might be of interest. These racemic spirocyclic compounds, 24 or 25, were synthesized in a similar fashion to the piperidine analogs (Scheme 2). The phenyl acetamides, 22, were synthesized by direct N-alkylation of the requisite spirocyclic amines, 20, with the chloroacetamides, 21, under basic conditions (Et3N, NaI, THF), followed by N-Boc deprotection (4 N HCl, dioxane) to yield 22. The heteroaryl southern analogs, 25, were made via reductive amination (R2CHO, Et3N, DCE, NaBH(OAc)3) followed by deprotection to yield 23. Both 23 and 24 were alkylated with the 3,4-difluorobenzyl bromide (iPr2EtN, DCE or Cs2CO3, CH3CN) to yield the desired final targets 24 or 25 [27].

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2.

Synthesis of spirocyclic analogs.

aReagents and conditions: a) Et3N, NaI, THF; b) 4 N HCl, dioxane; c) R2CHO, Et3N, DCE, NaBH(OAc)3; d) iPr2EtN, DCE; e) Cs2CO3, CH3CN, 3,4-difluorobenzyl bromide.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Evaluation of pharmacological activity

Recently, we have disclosed a series of 3- and 4-hydroxypiperidine compounds, that had moderate D4 activity [27]; however, over the course of the selectivity screening, we noticed that the divergence in D4/σ1 activity was exemplified even more dramatically with the benzimidazole (10a, σ1, Ki = 8.3 nM; D4, Ki = 4,280 nM vs. 5, σ1, Ki = 18 nM; D4, Ki = 426 nM) in this series compared to the morpholine scaffold (Table 2). This trend continued with the additional 5-benzimidazole derivatives 10b (σ1, Ki = 3.1 nM; D4, Ki = 1,158 nM) and 10c (σ1, Ki = 27 nM; D4, Ki = 1,803 nM). To confirm the activity against the sigma 1 receptor, we had 10a and 10b run at Eurofins in their cell-based assay utilizing Jurkat cells. The Ki values were confirmed in this assay (10a, Ki = 12 nM; 10b, Ki = 3.9 nM). The trifluoromethylbenzyl compound, 10c, had a diminished selectivity but that was due to a slight loss of σ1 activity. Adding a methyl group to the benzimidazole nitrogen resulted in compounds that retained the σ1 activity (11a-c); however, the D4 activity was better for 11a and 11c and slightly worse for 11b. Moving the nitrogen from the benzimidazole into the indazole moiety led to more potent compounds against both σ1 and D4, 12a-c (e.g., 12a, σ1, Ki = 1.8 nM; D4, Ki = 1,730 nM); which resulted in excellent selectivity (σ1:D4 > 950). The 4-chloro-3-fluoro indazole analog, 12b, is the most potent σ1 modulator identified in this study (Ki = 0.7 nM) with an excellent selectivity profile (σ1:D4 = 828). The NH-indazole analogs, 12a-c, have excellent ligand efficiency (LE > 0.45) [49], ligand-lipophilicity efficiency (LLE >5)50, and the CNS multiparameter optimization (CNS MPO) scores (>4.6)51, 52, all measures of drug-like molecules. The LE parameter is an estimate of efficiency of binding, the LLE parameter estimates lipophilicity efficiency and the CNS MPO is a scoring set that utilizes a set of six physicochemical properties to predict CNS-like compounds. Adding a methyl to the nitrogen of the indazole produced a similar pattern as the methylated benzimidazole, similar potency against σ1, but more D4 activity (13a-c). We compared these compounds with the morpholine scaffold, and the selectivity for σ1 over D4 was completely lost in this scaffold (13d-e), with the thiazole analog, 13e, losing significant activity against both receptors compared to the 3, 4-difluorophenyl, 13d. Moving to the (S)-3-oxopiperidine with the N-methyl-5-indazole produced compounds with varying σ1 activity. The 2-pyridine, 13f, lost activity against σ1 (Kι = 1,283 nM), which was analogous to the thiazole, 13e. However, the 2-methylphenyl, 13g, regained the activity against σ1 (Ki = 37 nM) and was significantly less active against D4 (65% inhibition at 10 μM), maintaining high selectivity.

Table 2.

Dopamine 4 and sigma 1 receptor binding values of piperidine-based scaffold.

Cmpd Structure σ1 LEb/LLEb/MPO D4
Ki (nM); pKia Ki (nM); pKia
5 graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0006.jpg 18;
7.74
0.42
4.77
5.4
426;
6.37
10a graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0007.jpg 8.3;
8.08
0.44
4.91
5.4
4,280;
5.37
10b graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0008.jpg 3.1;
8.51
0.46
4.88
4.8
1,158;
5.94
10c graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0009.jpg 27;
7.57
0.38
3.81
4.7
1,803;
5.74
11a graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0010.jpg 11;
7.95
0.41
4.55
4.8
1,400;
5.85
11b graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0011.jpg 31;
7.51
0.39
3.65
4.3
48%;
ND
11c graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0012.jpg 12;
7.91
0.38
3.92
4.0
640;
6.19
12a graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0013.jpg 1.8;
8.74
0.48
5.75
5.4
1,730;
5.76
12b graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0014.jpg 0.7;
9.15
0.47
5.11
4.9
580;
6.24
12c graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0015.jpg 1.2;
8.92
0.46
5.71
4.6
860;
6.07
13a graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0016.jpg 1.8;
8.74
0.45
5.41
5.2
276;
6.56
13b graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0017.jpg 1.3;
8.89
0.46
5.10
4.3
170;
6.77
13c graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0018.jpg 1.7;
8.76
0.42
4.83
4.1
201;
6.70
13d graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0019.jpg 23;
7.65
0.40
4.52
5.3
28;
7.55
13e graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0020.jpg 1,326;
5.88
0.33
3.56
4.9
557;
6.25
13f graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0021.jpg 1,283;
5.89
0.32
3.39
5.9
23%;
ND
13g graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0022.jpg 37;
7.66
0.40
3.42
4.2
65%;
ND
a

Ki values determined by competitive inhibition of [3H]N-methylspiperone (D4R) or [3H] Pentazocine (S1R) binding in membranes harvested from HEK293 cells. All Ki are run in triplicate.

b

Ligand efficiency (LE) and ligand-lipophilicity (LLE) measurements based on the σ1 receptor.

Next, we expanded the SAR for the southern portion of the molecule to include additional heteroaryl 5,6- and 6,5-moieties (Table 3). The 6-chloro-2-indole analogs (14a-e) all lost selectivity for the σ1 receptor versus D4 predominantly due to increased D4 activity (e.g., 14a, σ1, Ki =8.1 nM; D4, Ki = 149 nM); however, reduced σ1 activity was also to blame for some compounds (e.g., 14d, σ1, Ki = 52 nM; D4, Ki = 319 nM); although the 2-pyridine, 14d, did retain activity compared to 13f, above. As was seen above, the morpholine analog, 14e, reversed the selectivity and was more active against D4 (14e, σ1, Ki = 388 nM; D4, Ki = 169 nM). Moving to the imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine southern portion also continued the above trend that showed a diminished σ1:D4 selectivity compared to the previously shown 5-benzimidazole and 5-indazole compounds (Table 1). Specifically, the 3-imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine analogs, 15a-e, showed a loss of σ1 activity, which led to the diminished selectivity (σ1:D4, 1–5); with the exception of 15d, which lost all activity against D4 (40% inhibition of D4 at 10 μM). The 3-methyl-1-imidazo [1,5-a]pyridine analogs, 16a-c, were also less selective, and had more significant D4 activity, with selectivity ratios of 9–12 (σ1:D4). However, the activity against σ1 could be regained by moving to the 2-imidazo [1,2-a]pyridine compounds (17a-c) on the 4-oxypiperidine scaffold. Thus, these compounds have excellent binding against σ1 (Ki = 2.3–5.2 nM); however, they also do have D4 activity (Ki = 134–338 nM), leading to better selectivities compared to the imidazo[1,5-a]pyridines. In addition, these three compounds retain excellent LE (>0.45) [49], LLE (>5.4) [50], and CNS MPO (>5) scores [51,52]. The northern 2-pyridine substituents lost activity, which was seen previously as well (17d-e). When this southern fragment was included on the 3-oxopiperidine scaffold, nearly all the activity was lost – at both the σ1 and D4 receptor, with the notable exception of 17g (σ1, Ki = 34.7 nM; D4, Ki = 646 nM). Similar to what we’ve seen, the thiazole substituted morpholine scaffold, 17j, lost activity while the aryl substituted morpholine retained the D4 activity while not being active against σ1, 17k (σ1, Ki = 1,093 nM; D4, Ki = 91 nM). Lastly, we evaluated a series of N-arylacetamides on the southern portion of the molecule (18a-d). These compounds also lost potency on σ1 while retaining activity against D4, which again eroded the selectivity seen in other compounds (e.g., 18a, σ1, Ki = 131 nM; D4, Ki = 299 nM).

Table 3.

Additional Dopamine 4 and sigma 1 receptor binding values of piperidine-based scaffold.

Cmpd Structure σ1 LEb/LLEb/MPO D4
Ki (nM); pKia Ki (nM); pKia
14a graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0023.jpg 8.1;
8.09
0.42
3.58
3.4
149;
6.83
14b graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0024.jpg 29;
7.54
0.39
2.57
2.9
323;
6.49
14c graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0025.jpg 14;
7.84
0.38
2.74
2.8
211;
6.68
14d graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0026.jpg 52;
7.28
0.39
3.60
4.8
319;
6.50
14e graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0027.jpg 388;
6.41
0.36
2.91
4.7
169;
6.77
15a graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0028.jpg 143;
6.84
0.37
4.44
5.4
215;
6.67
15b graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0029.jpg 31;
7.25
0.35
3.25
5.1
158;
6.80
15c graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0030.jpg 175;
6.76
0.34
3.77
4.9
208;
6.68
15d graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0031.jpg 55;
7.26
0.35
3.26
4.2
40%;
NA
15e graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0032.jpg 15%;
NA
NA
NA
6.0
19%;
NA
16a graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0033.jpg 40;
7.40
0.38
4.87
5.4
478;
6.32
16b graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0034.jpg 12;
7.94
0.41
4.95
5.0
96;
7.02
16c graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0035.jpg 35;
7.46
0.36
4.34
4.8
309;
6.52
17a graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0036.jpg 5.2;
8.29
0.45
5.54
5.2
338;
6.47
17b graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0037.jpg 2.3;
8.65
0.47
5.78
5.1
134;
6.87
17c graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0038.jpg 3.5;
8.46
0.42
5.11
4.6
175;
6.76
17d graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0039.jpg 180;
6.74
0.32
4.27
6.0
320;
6.49
17e graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0040.jpg 170;
6.77
0.34
4.50
6.0
2,290;
5.64
17f graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0041.jpg 490;
6.31
0.37
3.47
5.0
1,210;
5.92
17g graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0042.jpg 35;
7.46
0.36
3.10
3.9
646;
6.19
17h graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0043.jpg 39%;
NA
NA
NA
6.0
23%;
NA
17i graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0044.jpg 503;
6.30
0.35
2.87
4.7
60%;
NA
17j graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0045.jpg 6%;
NA
NA
NA
6.0
1,559;
5.80
17k graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0046.jpg 1,093;
5.96
0.32
3.41
5.7
91;
7.04
18a graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0047.jpg 131;
6.88
0.34
2.69
3.9
299;
6.52
18b graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0048.jpg 358;
6.45
0.30
1.7
3.4
1,156;
5.94
18c graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0049.jpg 97;
7.01
0.5
2.36
3.5
441;
6.36
18d graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0050.jpg 81;
7.09
0.35
3.36
4.4
121;
6.92
a

Ki values determined by competitive inhibition of [3H]N-methylspiperone (D4R) or [3H] Pentazocine (S1R) binding in membranes harvested from HEK293 cells. All Ki are run in triplicate.

b

Ligand efficiency (LE) and ligand-lipophilicity (LLE) measurements based on the σ1 receptor.

Utilizing the (S)-3-oxopiperidine scaffold, we had evaluated several southern benzyl substituents, and although they did possess D4 activity, they were not as potent as the morpholine scaffold. We were pleased to see that these compounds did, however, possess significant binding activity against σ1 (Table 4). The initial compound, 19a, showed single-digit nanomolar activity with good selectivity against D4 (σ1, Ki = 2.4 nM; D4, Ki = 135 nM). During the course of the D4 project we knew that the activity primarily resides in the (S)-enantiomer, and this was also confirmed in this study (e.g., 19a vs. 19b, D4, Ki = 135 nM vs. 1,054 nM, respectively). The slight reduction of activity was also seen against the σ1 receptor (19a vs. 19b, σ1, Ki = 2.4 vs. 8.8 nM), although the loss was not quite as dramatic as in the D4 receptor (3.7 vs. 8-fold), and 19b still retained significant activity. Further study is warranted to fully understand the enantiopreference in the sigma 1 receptor binding. Nearly all of the compounds in this series that were tested showed excellent binding against the σ1 receptor (Ki’s = 2.4–45 nM); with some compounds, such as 19h, being fully selective against D4 (46% inhibition at 10 μM). Although these compounds were potent σ1 binders and had good selectivity against D4, they did suffer from poor CNS MPO (~3)51, 52 and LLE (~3)50, which was primarily due to the higher cLogP and cLogD values of these lipophilic analogs.

Table 4.

3-Oxypiperidine analogs.

Cmpd Structure σ1 LEb/LLEb/MPO D4
Ki (nM); pKia Ki (nM); pKia
19a graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0051.jpg 2.4;
8.63
0.46
3.93
3.2
135;
6.87
19b graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0052.jpg 8.8;
8.06
0.42
3.11
3.2
1,054;
5.98
19c graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0053.jpg 4.3;
8.37
0.47
4.19
3.6
206;
6.69
19d graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0054.jpg 8.7;
8.06
0.45
3.50
3.3
343;
6.46
19e graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0055.jpg 5.5;
8.26
0.46
3.70
3.3
241;
6.62
19f graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0056.jpg 14;
7.86
0.46
3.43
4.2
1,014;
5.99
19g graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0057.jpg 19;
7.73
0.47
3.02
3.1
33%;
NA
19h graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0058.jpg 5.2;
8.28
0.46
3.72
3.3
46%;
NA
19i graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0059.jpg 6.5;
8.19
0.48
2.96
2.7
165;
6.78
19j graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0060.jpg 45;
7.43
0.45
2.72
3.1
29%;
NA
a

Ki values determined by competitive inhibition of [3H]N-methylspiperone (D4R) or [3H] Pentazocine (S1R) binding in membranes harvested from HEK293 cells. All Ki are run in triplicate.

b

Ligand efficiency (LE) and ligand-lipophilicity (LLE) measurements based on the σ1 receptor.

A variety of spirocyclic scaffold analogs were tested with the 3,4-difluorobenzyl derivative as the common northern moiety and various southern substituents (Table 5). All of the compounds tested were inactive against the D4 receptor (or significantly reduced in activity), with the exception of 25b, the 6-chloro-1H-indol-2-yl)methyl)-1,7-diazaspiro[4.4]nonane derivative (D4, Ki = 268 nM). However, these compounds all possessed significant σ1 receptor binding. The spirocyclic compounds imparted improved binding with the N-phenylacetamide derivatives (e.g., 24b vs. 18a, σ1, Ki = 14.2 nM vs. 131 nM). Coupling the improved σ1 binding and the loss of D4 binding, these compounds exhibited a much-improved selectivity profile. Unfortunately, these compounds suffered from poor LLE and CNS MPO scores that are attributed to several factors: the presence of a H-bond donor, higher MW, and higher cLogP’s. Moving from the acetamides to the 2-imidazo [1,2-a]pyridine produced a potent σ1 binder with selectivity over D4 of 65 (25a, σ1, Ki = 3.6 nM; D4, Ki = 337 nM). Introducing this southern group also improved the drug-like properties (LLE = 5.54 and MPO = 5.2). The 6-chloro-2-indole group also brought the σ1 binding activity (25b, σ1, Ki = 5.5 nM; 25c, σ1, Ki = 7.1 nM) into the single-digit nanomolar range and had varying D4 receptor activity (25b, D4, Ki = 268 nM; 25c, D4, Ki = 39% inhibition at 10 μM); however, due to the presence of the H-bond donor and higher cLogP values, the drug-like properties were worse than for 25a.

Table 5.

Spirocyclic analogs.

Cmpd Structure σ1 LEb/LLEb/MPO D4
Ki (nM); pKia Ki (nM); pKia
24a graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0061.jpg 83;
7.08
0.46
3.93
3.2
4%;
NA
24b graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0062.jpg 14;
7.85
0.42
3.11
3.2
1,704;
5.77
24c graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0063.jpg 19;
7.72
0.47
4.19
3.6
23%;
NA
24d graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0064.jpg 27;
7.57
0.45
3.50
3.3
25%;
NA
24e graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0065.jpg 16;
7.79
0.46
3.70
3.3
14%;
NA
24f graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0066.jpg 11;
7.97
0.46
3.43
4.2
11%;
NA
25a graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0067.jpg 3.6;
8.45
0.47
3.02
3.1
−0.7%;
NA
25b graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0068.jpg 5.5;
8.27
0.46
3.72
3.3
268;
6.57
25c graphic file with name nihms-2147546-t0069.jpg 7.1;
8.15
0.48
2.96
2.7
39%;
NA
a

Ki values determined by competitive inhibition of [3H]N-methylspiperone (D4R) or [3H] Pentazocine (S1R) binding in membranes harvested from HEK293 cells. All Ki are run in triplicate.

b

Ligand efficiency (LE) and ligand-lipophilicity (LLE) measurements based on the σ1 receptor.

3.2. Off-target selectivity and functional activity

Our initial selectivity filter was for the σ1 and D4 receptors, but we wanted to expand this to the other members of those receptor families (i.e., σ2, D1,2–5), and those results are shown in Table 6. The selectivity versus the σ2 receptor was significantly reduced compared to the D4 receptor; this was expected as the σ1:σ2 selectivity has been difficult to obtain for previously published scaffolds [26]. The selectivity ranged from ~1.4 (18d) to a high of 31 (19g), with most compounds in the 3–6 range. Two compounds with the highest selectivity (19f,g) were from the (S)-3-oxopiperidine scaffold with the substituted benzyl moieties on the southern portion; these compounds were also selective against the dopamine receptor family (>74-fold). Another highly selective compound was 10a (σ1:σ2 = 20) which was the initial benzimidazole compound and had high selectivity against the dopamine family (>490). The only spirocycle with high selectivity versus the dopamine family was 25a, although the σ2 selectivity was less (6-fold). In addition to selectivity versus the sigma and dopamine receptor families, we evaluated 10a, 19f, 19g, and 25a against the Psychoactive Drug Screening Panel (PDSP) at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill [26]. This panel consists of 45 receptors and transporters that are important in the CNS (Supplemental Table S2). Compound 10a was selective against the panel with only SERT (Ki = 163 nM, selectivity = 20) and α2C (Ki = 853 nM, selectivity = 103) having activity under 1 μM. Both 19f and 19g were highly selective with only DAT showing any activity (both >300-fold selective); although the activity was weak (19f, DAT Ki = 4, 087 nM, selectivity = 300; 19g, DAT Ki = 8,815 nM, selectivity = 473). Finally, 25a was also selective against the panel, with only α2A (Ki = 697 nM, selectivity = 194) having activity under 1 μM.

Table 6.

Selectivity versus sigma 2 and dopamine 1–5 receptors.

Cmpd σ1 D4 σ2 D1 D2 D3 D5
Ki (nM)
10a 8.3 4,280 166 >10,000 4,079 >10,000
10b 3.1 1,517 70 >10,000
10c 27 1,803 73 >10,000 948 >10,000
13a 1.8 276 10 >10,000
13g 37 1,663 239 >10,000
18a 131 81 299 >10,000 2,463 >10,000
18d 81 121 123 >10,000
19a 2.4 135 123 >10,000
19b 8.8 1,054 206 >10,000
19f 14 1,014 248 >10,000
19g 19 >10,000 574 >10,000
19h 5.2 >10,000 40 >10,000
19i 6.5 165 76 >10,000
24a 83 >10,000 121 >10,000
24b 14 1,704 43 >10,000
24e 16 >10,000 47 >10,000 512 >10,000
24f 11 >10,000 45 >10,000 376 >10,000
25a 3.6 >10,000 23 >10,000
25b 5.4 268 23 2,373 >10,000 118 >10,000
25c 7.1 >10,000 30 1,527 >10,000 345 >10,000
a

Ki values determined by competitive inhibition of [3H]N-methylspiperone (D2R, D3R, D4R), [3H]SCH23390 (D1R, D5R), [3H] Pentazocine (S1R) or [3H] DTG (S2R) binding in membranes harvested from HEK293 cells. All Ki are run in triplicate.

3.3. In vitro PK evaluation

Having identified several compounds that were potent σ1 binders, we profiled select compounds in in vitro DMPK assays to assess their human and mouse liver microsomal intrinsic clearance and plasma protein binding (Table 7) [53,54]. In human liver microsomes, there were a number of stable compounds (10a, 11b, 17a; CLINT < 20 mL/min/kg) and others that displayed low clearance (12b, 14a; CLINT < 30 mL/min/kg). However, there was a species difference seen in these compounds, with some displaying moderate stability in mouse liver microsomes (MLM) (CLINT < 90 mL/min/kg), except for 11b, which was stable in MLM (CLINT < 20 mL/min/kg). The benzyl southern substituted compounds (19) and the spirocyclic compounds (24, 25) all displayed high clearance in both species. From a metabolite identification study (unpublished results), the compounds showed oxidation as the primary metabolism product. Using equilibrium dialysis, the plasma protein binding of the selected compounds was determined in human and mouse plasma. Most of the compounds tested showed moderate free fraction in both human and mouse (%fu > 3%); however, there were some notable exceptions in the human protein binding (see Table 7). A few compounds showed a high free fraction in mouse plasma (10a, 11b, 17a, 25a; %fu >30%); however, this was not due to plasma instability.

Table 7.

In vitro PK parameters of selected compounds.

Cmpd Intrinsic clearance (mL/min/kg)a,d Plasma protein binding (% fu)b,d
hCLINT hCLHEP mCLINT mCLHEP hPPB mPPB
10a <20 <10 93.9 46.0 22.9 40.1
10b 48.3 14.2 90.4 45.1 7.7 17.1
11b <20 <10 <20 <16 13.0 75.0
12b 26.8 11.5 72.0 40.0 7.0 6.5
13a 32.8 12.5 103.7 48.2 3.6 16.6
13b 42.7 13.7 85.3 43.8 0.9 5.2
13c 63.3 15.3 85.2 43.8 1.0 5.7
13g 334.1 19.0 545.1 77.3 4.3 8.8
14a 23.5 10.8 83.2 43.3 <0.3 0.4
16b 130.1 17.4 198.7 62.0 8.3 9.0
17a <20 <10 158.3 57.4 6.2 42.8
17b 44.1 13.8 96.8 46.7 1.8 22.4
17c 69.3 15.6 149.8 56.3 2.2 8.8
17k 42.1 13.6 320.8 70.3 2.4 14.3
18a 144.7 17.6 287.1 68.6 0.3 1.5
18d 49.5 14.3 306.2 69.6 0.5 c
19a 963.8 19.7 >2,400 86.8 0.6 1.2
19b 673.9 19.5 960.8 82.4 c 1.0
19e 1,127.9 19.7 1,187.7 83.7 1.3 2.5
19f 842.2 19.6 484.6 76.0 1.2 2.4
19g 1,401.5 19.8 >2,400 86.8 0.3 1.4
24f 602.1 19.5 855.3 81.5 0.02 c
25a 223.2 18.4 695.5 79.8 2.7 30.2
a

Predicted hepatic clearance based on intrinsic clearance in mouse and human liver microsomes using the well-stirred organ CL model (binding terms excluded).

b

fu = fraction unbound.

c

Unstable in plasma.

d

In vitro DMPK studies performed at Q2 Solutions, Indianapolis, IN.

3.4. In vivo pharmacokinetic study

Based on the totality of the properties of the evaluated compounds, we chose to progress 10a and 10b into a discrete mouse in vivo PK study (IP dosing, 5 mg/kg) (Table 8). The study was done in order to determine the plasma and brain concentrations over a 24 h time period. Both 10a and 10b displayed good plasma half-life (t1/2 = 2.1 h and 3.7 h, respectively) and each had significantly longer half-life in brain (t1/2 = 9.1 h and 6.9 h, respectively). In addition, each compound had total plasma and brain concentrations significantly higher than the σ1 Ki, and the compounds showed excellent brain penetration. This brain penetration can be seen in both the high Kp (10a, 2.8 and 10b, 4.9) and Kp,uu (10a, 1.6 and 10b, 2.4) at 1 h; and due to the longer brain t1/2 even higher or equivalent Kp (10a, 6.4 and 10b, 4.9) and Kp,uu (10a, 3.7 and 10b, 2.4) at 5 h. The free plasma and brain concentrations that are greater than the Ki’s are maintained over a 10 h time span, making these compounds good in vivo probes. Overall, 10a and 10b show the appropriate properties (Ki < 10 nM; >20-fold selectivity vs. a panel of receptors; high Kp,uu) to be used as σ1 in vivo tool compounds to probe the mechanistic role of σ1 in a variety of CNS disorders.

Table 8.

In vivo mouse PK.

PK Parametersa,b 10a 10b
Plasma Brain Plasma Brain
T1/2 (h) 2.14 ± 0.5 9.11 ± 0.29 3.68 ± 0.98 6.88 ± 2.32
MRT (h) 2.12 ± 0.21 8.43 ± 0.91 4.54 ± 0.21 8.3 ± 1.9
Tmax (h) 0.28 ± 0.19 0.56 ± 0.42 0.67 ± 0.29 1.67 ± 1.15
Cmax (ng/mL or ng/g) 527 ± 52 860 ± 38 401 ± 45 1893 ± 313
AUCinf (h*ng/mL or h*ng/g) 952 ± 163 4561 ± 965 2225 ± 331 13871 ± 532
B:P Kpc Kp,uud,e Kpc Kp,uud,e
1 h 2.78 1.59 4.94 2.43
5 h 6.44 3.68 4.88 2.40
a

PK studies performed at Pharmaron, Inc. (Louisville, KY).

b

IP dosing (5 mg/kg); Formulation (10%DMSO/10% Cremphor EL/30% PEG400/50% water); PK parameters were estimated by non-compartmental model using WinNonlin 8.3.

c

Kp is the ratio of total brain concentration to total plasma concentration.

d

Kp,uu is the ration of the free brain concentration to free plasma concentration. eBased on fu (mPPB) = 0.358; fu (mBHB) = 0.205.

e

Based on fu (mPPB) = 0.189; fu (mBHB) = 0.093.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we have identified a series of oxopiperidine compounds as new σ1 modulators. This work highlights the divergence in the SAR between the D4 and σ1 receptors. Starting with a scaffold with modest selectivity for the σ1 receptor, our SAR efforts identified compounds with high selectivity against the dopamine receptors (D1–5), and modest selective against the sigma 2 receptor and against a panel of important CNS receptors. Our compound SAR and design generally follow the pharmacophore outlined in previous studies [55,56]. In vitro PK studies have identified compounds that have high human liver microsome stability; however, these compounds also show species differentiation with moderate-low stability in mice and rats. Lastly, selected compounds have high brain penetration when assessed in a discrete mouse PK assay. Coupling the in vivo PK study with the high σ1 binding and excellent selectivity make these compounds ideal probe compounds. Further studies aimed at improving clearance, determining functional activity and in vivo animal studies are on-going and will be reported in due course.

5. Experimental procedures

5.1. Chemistry

5.1.1. General experimental methods

All 1H & 13C NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker AV-400 (500 MHz) instrument. Chemical shifts are reported in ppm relative to residual solvent peaks as an internal standard set to δ1H 3.31 or δ13C 49.0 (CD3OD) or δ1H 2.50 or δ13C 39.5 ((CD3)2SO) or δ1H 7.26 or δ13C 77.2 (CDCl3). Data are reported as follows: chemical shift, multiplicity (br = broad, s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, q = quartet, m = multiplet), coupling constant (Hz), and integration. Low resolution mass spectra were obtained on an Agilent 1260 LCMS with electrospray ionization, with a gradient of 5–95% MeCN in 0.1% formic acid water over 4 min. Analytical thin layer chromatography was performed on LuxPlate silica gel 60 F254 plates. Visualization was accomplished with UV light, and/or the use of ninhydrin, anisaldehyde and ceric ammonium molybdate solutions followed by charring on a hotplate. Chromatography on silica gel was performed using Silica Gel 60 Å (230–400 mesh) from Sorbent Technologies. Solvents for extraction, washing and chromatography were HPLC grade. All reagents were purchased from Aldrich Chemical Co. (or similar) and were used without purification. All reagents and solvents were commercial grade and purified prior to use when necessary.

Final compounds were purified on a Gilson preparative reversed-phase HPLC system comprised of a 322 aqueous pump with solvent-selection valve, 334 organic pump, GX-271 liquid hander, two column switching valves, and a 159 UV detector. UV wavelength for fraction collection was user-defined, with absorbance at 254 nm always monitored. Column: Phenomenex Axia-packed Luna C18, 50 × 21.2 mm, 5 μm. For Acidic Method: Mobile phase: CH3CN in H2O (0.1% formic acid). Gradient conditions: 2.0 min equilibration, followed by user-defined gradient (starting organic percentage, ending organic percentage, duration, typically 15 min), hold at 95% CH3CN in H2O (0.1% TFA) for 2 min, 20 mL/min, 23 °C. Final compounds were confirmed to be >95% purity based on HPLC and measured at 215 and 254 nm.

There were no unexpected or unusually high safety hazards encountered for the synthesis of these compounds.

5.1.1.1. General synthetic procedure
5.1.1.1.1. General procedure A.

To tert-butyl (S)-3-hydroxypiperidine-1-carboxylate, 6, (1 eq) in DMF (10 mL) was slowly added sodium hydride (3 eq) at rt and stirred for 1h then the benzyl bromide (1 eq) was added and the reaction was stirred at 60 °C for 48 h. The reaction was quenched with distilled water (100 mL), extracted with ethyl acetate (30 mL × 3), combined organic phases washed with brine (20 mL), dried with magnesium sulfate, concentrated in vacuo, and purified by normal phase chromatography (0–100% hexane/ethyl acetate).

HCl in dioxane was added dropwise at rt and the reaction was stirred overnight at 60 °C, concentrated in vacuo, and taken to the next step without further purification. Compound 8 (1 eq) was dissolved in DMF (10 mL) in a 30 mL glass vial, then Cs2CO3 (2.5 eq) was added followed by benzyl bromide (1.4 eq). The reaction was heated in a microwave at 120 °C for 1 h then quenched with distilled water (100 mL), extracted with ethyl acetate (30 mL × 3), washed with brine (20 mL), dried over MgSO4 and then concentrated in vacuo. The final compound was purified by normal phase chromatography (0–100% hexane/ethyl acetate) and (0–100% DCM/MeOH) to yield the desired compounds.

5.1.1.1.2. General procedure B.

General Procedure B. To the piperidine hydrogen chloride, 8 or 9, (1 eq) in anhydrous DCE (4 mL) was added Et3N (2 eq) dropwise at rt and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 h then 1-methyl-1H-indazole-5-carbaldehyde (0.9 eq) in anhydrous DCE (5 mL) was added followed by a slow addition of sodium triacetoxyborohydride (2 eq). The reaction was stirred at rt under argon for 72 h then quenched with saturated Na2CO3 (40 mL), extracted with ethyl acetate (20 mL × 3), washed with brine (15 mL), dried with magnesium sulfate, concentrated in vacuo, and purified via normal phase (0–100% DCM/MeOH) and reverse phase chromatography (0–100% ACN/water) to yield the desired compounds.

5.1.1.1.3. General Procedure C.

A microwave vial containing piperidine starting material, 9, (1 eq), aldehyde (1 eq), polymer supported sodium cyanoborohydride (2 eq), acetic acid (20 mL), and dichloromethane (500 mL) was reacted for 10 min at 110 °C. The reaction was quenched with saturated sodium bicarbonate solution and product was extracted with dichloromethane. Product was purified on flash chromatography 0–15% MeOH (0.01% TEA):CH2Cl2 and reverse-phase chromatography 0–100% water:CH3CN to yield the desired compounds.

5.1.1.1.4. (S)-4-((1H-benzo[d]imidazole-5-yl)methyl)-2-((3,4-difluorophenoxy)methyl)morpholine (5).

Prepared using General Procedure outlined in Ref. 23. Yield = 15.6 mg (50%, red oil). LCMS: RT = 1.649 min, ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 360.15 for C19H20F2N3O2, found 360.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.30 (s, 1H), 8.12 (s, 1H), 7.67 (s, 1H), 7.63 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.30 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.03 (q, J = 9.3 Hz, 1H), 6.71 (ddd, J = 11.8, 6.5, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 6.61–6.53 (m, 1H), 3.94 (dd, J = 9.6, 5.2 Hz, 3H), 3.87 (dd, J = 9.7, 4.2 Hz, 1H), 3.83–3.71 (m, 3H), 2.96 (d, J = 11.1 Hz, 1H), 2.82 (d, J = 11.4 Hz, 1H), 2.35 (t, J = 11.2 Hz, 1H), 2.21 (t, J = 10.4 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 155.0, 151.4, 149.4, 146.2, 144.2, 140.9, 132.3, 124.4, 117.1, 116.0, 115.3, 109.9, 104.3, 73.9, 70.1, 66.8, 63.5, 55.0, 52.9, 40.9.

*Additional carbon peaks due to C–F coupling peaks however, these are overlapping with other aromatic peaks.

5.1.1.1.5. 5-((4-((3,4-difluorobenzyl)oxy)piperidin-1-yl)methyl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole (10a).

Prepared using General Procedure B. Yield = 18.5 mg (15%, yellow oil). LCMS: RT = 1.968 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 358.17 for C20H22F2N3O, found 358.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.08 (s, 1H), 7.71 (s, 1H), 7.58 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.28 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.17–7.05 (m, 2H), 7.01 (d, J = 3.8 Hz, 1H), 4.45 (d, J = 9.7 Hz, 2H), 3.84 (s, 2H), 3.53 (s, 1H), 2.90 (t, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 2.57 (s, 2H), 2.13–2.02 (m, 2H), 1.80 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 151.3, 150.9, 149.5, 148.9, 141.9, 135.4, 124.9, 123.2, 123.2, 117.2, 116.3, 71.6, 68.9, 62.4, 49.3, 29.0.

5.1.1.1.6. 5-((4-((4-chloro-3-fluorobenzyl)oxy)piperidin-1-yl)methyl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole (10b).

Prepared using General Procedure C. Yield: 16.2 mg (21%, yellow oil). LCMS: RT = 1.866 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 374.14 for C20H22ClFN3O, found 374.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.07 (s, 2H), 7.68 (s, 2H), 7.58 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.37–7.29 (m, 2H), 7.27 (d, J = 10.4 Hz, 3H), 7.12 (d, J = 9.8 Hz, 2H), 7.02 (t, J = 10.8 Hz, 2H), 5.29 (s, 1H), 4.51–4.40 (m, 4H), 3.79 (s, 4H), 3.50 (s, 2H), 2.95–2.80 (m, 4H), 2.48 (s, 4H), 2.12–1.94 (m, 5H), 1.77 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H).13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 159.1, 157.1, 141.8, 139.5, 139.5, 130.5, 124.8, 123.4, 123.4, 120.0, 119.9, 115.5, 115.3, 72.2, 68.8, 62.5, 49.5, 29.3.

5.1.1.1.7. 5-((4-((3-(trifluoromethyl)benzyl)oxy)piperidin-1-yl) methyl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole (10c).

Prepared using General Procedure B. Yield = 28.6 mg (21%, yellow oil). LCMS: RT = 2.083 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 390.18 for C21H23F3N3O, found 390.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.10 (s, 1H), 7.74 (s, 1H), 7.60–7.54 (m, 2H), 7.52 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.48 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.43 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.27 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 4.55 (d, J = 16.4 Hz, 2H), 3.88 (s, 2H), 3.57 (s, 1H), 2.95 (t, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 2.65 (d, J = 14.2 Hz, 2H), 2.09 (s, 2H), 1.95–1.69 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 142.2, 139.3, 130.9, 130.7, 130.6, 129.0, 125.2, 124.9, 124.5, 124.0, 123.0, 117.7, 115.9, 71.4, 69.5, 62.3, 49.2, 28.8.

5.1.1.1.8. 5-((4-((3,4-difluorobenzyl)oxy)piperidin-1-yl)methyl)-1-methyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazole (11a).

Prepared using General Procedure C. Yield = 10.0 mg (9%, orange oil). LCMS: RT = 2.176 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 372.19 for C21H24F2N3O, found 372.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.86 (s, 1H), 7.70 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.49 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.38 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.33 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.11 (dd, J = 9.9, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 7.03–6.99 (m, 1H), 4.47 (s, 2H), 3.84 (s, 3H), 3.80 (s, 2H), 3.49 (s, 1H), 2.85 (s, 2H), 2.04 (s, 2H), 1.77 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 159.1, 157.1, 144.0, 143.7, 139.9, 130.5, 125.0, 123.4, 121.4, 119.8, 115.4, 115.3, 109.5, 74.4, 68.6, 62.8, 50.1, 31.1, 29.7.

5.1.1.1.9. 5-((4-((4-chloro-3-fluorobenzyl)oxy)piperidin-1-yl)methyl)-1-methyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazole (11b).

Prepared using General Procedure C. Yield = 17.2 mg (14%, orange oil). LCMS: RT = 2.252 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 388.16 for C21H24ClFN3O, found 388.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.85 (s, 1H), 7.70 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.41 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.35 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.16–7.06 (m, 2H), 7.01 (ddt, J = 6.9, 4.6, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 4.45 (s, 2H), 3.83 (s, 3H), 3.72 (s, 2H), 3.45 (s, 1H), 2.87–2.77 (m, 2H), 2.32 (s, 2H), 1.98 (s, 2H), 1.77–1.66 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 151.3, 150.6, 149.3, 148.7, 143.8, 136.0, 134.1, 124.7, 123.1, 121.1, 117.1, 116.3, 109.3, 74.1, 68.6, 62.9, 50.4, 31.1, 30.7.

5.1.1.1.10. 1-Methyl-5-((4-((3-(trifluoromethyl)benzyl)oxy)piperidin-1-yl)methyl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole (11c).

Prepared using General Procedure C. Yield = 13.4 mg (11%, orange oil). LCMS: RT = 2.291 min; m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 404.19 for C22H25F3N3O, found 404.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.85 (s, 1H), 7.70 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.58 (s, 1H), 7.51 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 7.43 (dd, J = 14.6, 7.1 Hz, 2H), 7.36 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 4.56 (s, 2H), 3.83 (s, 3H), 3.73 (s, 2H), 3.48 (s, 1H), 2.88–2.79 (m, 2H), 2.33 (s, 2H), 1.78–1.67 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 143.9, 143.8, 139.9, 134.1, 130.8, 130.6, 128.8, 125.2, 124.8, 124.3, 124.0, 123.1, 121.1, 109.3, 74.5, 69.1, 63.0, 50.5, 31.1, 30.7, 29.7.

5.1.1.1.11. 5-((4-((3,4-difluorobenzyl)oxy)piperidin-1-yl)methyl)-1H-indazole (12a).

Prepared using General Procedure C. Yield = 13.8 mg (18%, yellow oil). LCMS: RT = 2.169 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 358.17 for C20H22F2N3O, found 358.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.01 (s, 1H), 7.70 (s, 1H), 7.48–7.40 (m, 2H), 7.21–7.04 (m, 2H), 7.01 (ddt, J = 8.3, 3.9, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 4.46 (s, 2H), 3.76 (s, 2H), 3.51 (s, 1H), 2.92–2.77 (m, 2H), 2.47 (s, 2H), 2.04 (d, J = 10.7 Hz, 2H), 1.79 (dd, J = 13.2, 7.8 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 151.3, 150.7, 149.4, 148.7, 139.8, 135.8, 134.7, 128.8, 123.3, 123.1, 121.8, 117.1, 116.3, 109.9, 73.4, 68.7, 62.7, 50.1, 30.2.

5.1.1.1.12. 5-((4-((4-chloro-3-fluorobenzyl)oxy)piperidin-1-yl) methyl)-1H-indazole (12b).

Prepared using General Procedure C. Yield = 17.1 mg (22%, yellow oil). LCMS: RT = 2.261 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 374.14 for C20H22ClFN3O, found 374.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.03 (s, 1H), 7.68 (s, 1H), 7.43 (s, 2H), 7.33 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.14 (dd, J = 9.8, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 7.03 (dd, J = 8.2, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 4.48 (s, 2H), 3.69 (s, 2H), 3.48 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H), 2.81 (q, J = 6.3, 5.1 Hz, 2H), 2.33 (s, 2H), 1.74 (qd, J = 11.4, 9.4, 5.2 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 159.1, 157.1, 140.0, 139.7, 134.8, 130.4, 128.7, 123.4, 123.3, 121.3, 119.7, 115.5, 115.3, 109.7, 74.3, 68.5, 62.8, 50.5, 30.7.

5.1.1.1.13. 5-((4-((3-(trifluoromethyl)benzyl)oxy)piperidin-1-yl) methyl)-1H-indazole (12c).

Prepared using General Procedure C. Yield = 17.8 mg (24%, yellow oil). LCMS: RT = 2.322 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 390.18 for C21H23F3N3O, found 390.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.02 (s, 1H), 7.69 (s, 1H), 7.59 (s, 1H), 7.52 (t, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.45 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H), 4.57 (s, 2H), 3.72 (s, 2H), 3.51 (dt, J = 8.2, 4.4 Hz, 1H), 2.85 (ddd, J = 11.5, 6.9, 3.5 Hz, 2H), 2.39 (s, 2H), 2.03 (t, J = 10.0 Hz, 2H), 1.79 (td, J = 9.0, 8.4, 4.1 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 139.9, 139.7, 134.7, 130.9, 130.6, 128.8, 128.8, 125.2, 124.3, 124.0, 123.3, 123.1, 121.5, 109.8, 74.0, 69.2, 62.8, 50.4, 30.5.

5.1.1.1.14. 5-((4-((3,4-difluorobenzyl)oxy)piperidin-1-yl)methyl)-1-methyl-1H-indazole (13a).

Prepared using General Procedure B. Yield = 32.9 mg (28%, yellow oil). LCMS: RT = 1.919 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 372.19 for C21H24F2N3O, found 372.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.95 (d, J = 0.9 Hz, 1H), 7.63 (s, 1H), 7.43 (dd, J = 8.6, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.37 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.19 (ddd, J = 11.1, 7.7, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 7.12 (dt, J = 10.2, 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.04 (ddt, J = 8.2, 3.8, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 4.49 (s, 2H), 4.08 (s, 3H), 3.63 (s, 2H), 3.44 (tt, J = 8.6, 3.9 Hz, 1H), 2.79 (dt, J = 10.6, 4.5 Hz, 2H), 2.21 (t, J = 10.8 Hz, 2H), 1.94 (dd, J = 12.4, 5.1 Hz, 2H), 1.70 (dtd, J = 12.8, 9.0, 3.6 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 151.3, 150.6, 149.4, 148.7, 139.5, 136.1, 132.5, 130.6, 128.1, 124.0, 123.1, 121.1, 117.0, 116.3, 108.7, 74.9, 68.5, 63.0, 50.9, 35.6, 31.2.

5.1.1.1.15. 5-((4-((4-chloro-3-fluorobenzyl)oxy)piperidin-1-yl) methyl)-1-methyl-1H-indazole (13b).

Prepared using General Procedure C. Yield = 24.9 mg (8%, yellow oil). LCMS: RT = 2.115 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 388.16 for C21H24ClFN3O, found 388.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.62 (s, 1H), 7.94 (s, 3H), 7.65 (s, 3H), 7.44 (dd, J = 8.6, 0.7 Hz, 3H), 7.38–7.30 (m, 6H), 7.12 (dd, J = 9.8, 1.3 Hz, 3H), 7.03 (t, J = 9.7 Hz, 3H), 4.47 (s, 6H), 4.06 (s, 9H), 3.76 (s, 6H), 3.49 (s, 3H), 2.89–2.75 (m, 6H), 2.44 (s, 5H), 2.03–1.92 (m, 6H), 1.82–1.67 (m, 6H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 159.1, 157.1, 139.9, 139.6, 132.6, 130.4, 128.3, 124.0, 123.3, 121.8, 119.7, 115.3, 108.9, 73.9, 68.5, 62.6, 50.1, 35.6, 30.4.

5.1.1.1.16. 1-Methyl-5-((4-((3-(trifluoromethyl)benzyl)oxy)piperidin-1-yl)methyl)-1H-indazole (13c).

Prepared using General Procedure B. Yield = 27.6 mg (22%, yellow oil). LCMS: RT = 2.169 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 404.19 for C22H25F3N3O, found 404.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.93 (s, 1H), 7.61 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 7.52 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.43 (dd, J = 16.0, 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.35 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 4.57 (s, 2H), 4.06 (s, 3H), 3.61 (s, 2H), 3.49–3.41 (m, 1H), 2.85–2.71 (m, 2H), 2.20 (s, 2H), 1.94 (d, J = 10.2 Hz, 2H), 1.71 (ddd, J = 17.2, 10.9, 3.4 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 140.0, 139.5, 132.6, 130.8, 130.6, 128.8, 128.2, 125.2, 124.2, 124.0, 123.0, 121.3, 108.8, 74.8, 69.1, 62.9, 50.7, 35.6, 30.9.

5.1.1.1.17. (S)-2-((3,4-Difluorophenoxy)methyl)-4-((1-methyl-1H-indazol-5-yl)methyl)morpholine (13d).

Prepared following the procedure outlined in Ref. 23. Yield = 10.4 mg (32%, pink oil). LCMS: RT = 2.012 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 374.17 for C20H22F2N3O2, found 374.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.94 (s, 1H), 7.63 (s, 1H), 7.39 (dd, J = 27.5, 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.03 (q, J = 9.4 Hz, 1H), 6.71 (ddd, J = 11.9, 6.5, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 6.62–6.53 (m, 1H), 4.07 (s, 3H), 3.98–3.82 (m, 4H), 3.74 (td, J = 11.3, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 3.67–3.59 (m, 2H), 2.84 (d, J = 11.2 Hz, 1H), 2.71 (d, J = 11.3 Hz, 1H), 2.26 (td, J = 11.4, 3.2 Hz, 1H), 2.13–2.01 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 154.9, 151.3, 149.3, 146.2, 144.3, 139.6, 132.6, 128.1, 124.0, 117.2, 109.9, 109.0, 104.4, 73.7, 69.9, 66.3, 63.2, 55.2, 52.7, 35.6.

5.1.1.1.18. (S)-4-((1-methyl-1H-indazol-5-yl)methyl)-2-(((4-methylthiazol-2-yl)oxy)methyl)morpholine (13e).

Prepared following the procedure outlined in Ref. 23. Yield = 23.9 mg (29%, white solid). LCMS: RT = 2.008 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 359.15 for C18H23N4O2S, found 359.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.93 (s, 1H), 7.62 (s, 1H), 7.41 (dd, J = 8.7, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.35 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 6.20 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 4.37 (d, J = 4.9 Hz, 2H), 4.06 (s, 3H), 4.01–3.94 (m, 1H), 3.91 (ddd, J = 11.4, 3.4, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 3.79–3.70 (m, 1H), 3.65 (s, 2H), 2.86–2.68 (m, 2H), 2.27 (td, J = 11.3, 3.3 Hz, 1H), 2.22 (s, 3H), 2.12 (t, J = 10.7 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.4, 151.4, 150.8, 149.4, 148.8, 137.0, 135.6, 134.7, 127.2, 125.4, 123.2, 119.7, 117.2, 116.3, 73.6, 68.9, 62.1, 51.6, 31.6, 14.3.

5.1.1.1.19. (S)-1-methyl-5-((3-((6-methylpyridin-2-yl)methoxy)piperidin-1-yl)methyl)-1H-indazole (13f).

Prepared using general Procedure B. Yield = 23.3 mg (14%, viscous orange oil). LCMS: RT = 1.645 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 351.22 for C21H27N4O, found 351.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.92 (s, 1H), 7.61 (s, 1H), 7.53 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.41 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.34 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.22 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.00 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 4.63–4.56 (m, 2H), 4.06 (s, 3H), 3.73–3.66 (m, 2H), 3.64–3.58 (m, 1H), 3.02 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 2.73 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H), 2.50 (s, 3H), 2.17–2.11 (m, 2H), 2.05–1.99 (m, 1H), 1.80–1.74 (m, 1H), 1.58 (dd, J = 24.5, 11.0 Hz, 1H), 1.37 (dd, J = 23.3, 13.9 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 157.7, 157.3, 139.8, 137.1, 132.9, 128.7, 124.3, 124.0, 123.4, 122.2, 118.6, 109.4, 72.9, 71.6, 61.4, 55.2, 51.9, 35.6, 29.1, 24.1, 20.8.

5.1.1.1.20. (S)-1-methyl-5-((3-((2-methylbenzyl)oxy)piperidin-1-yl) methyl)-1H-indazole (13g).

Prepared using General Procedure B. Yield = 54.2 mg (32%, viscous orange oil). LCMS: RT = 2.295 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 350.22 for C22H28N3O, found 350.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.96 (s, 1H), 7.64 (s, 1H), 7.43 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.36 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.30 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 7.18 (dt, J = 13.0, 6.3 Hz, 3H), 4.53 (q, J = 11.5 Hz, 2H), 4.09 (s, 3H), 3.70 (q, J = 13.0 Hz, 2H), 3.62–3.55 (m, 1H), 3.07 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 2.76 (d, J = 10.6 Hz, 1H), 2.32 (s, 3H), 2.15–2.02 (m, 3H), 1.77 (dd, J = 9.8, 3.6 Hz, 1H), 1.59 (dd, J = 24.1, 11.9 Hz, 1H), 1.34 (td, J = 12.5, 3.9 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 139.2, 136.4, 136.3, 132.3, 130.2, 129.9, 128.3, 127.9, 127.5, 125.5, 123.8, 120.9, 108.4, 74.4, 68.6, 63.0, 57.9, 53.1, 35.3, 30.3, 23.1, 18.6.

5.1.1.1.21. 6-chloro-2-((4-((3,4-difluorobenzyl)oxy)piperidin-1-yl) methyl)-1H-indole (14a).

Prepared using General Procedure B. Yield = 16.8 mg (20%, brown oil). LCMS: RT = 2.337 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 391.14 for C21H22ClF2N2O, found 391.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.65 (s, 1H), 7.48–7.38 (m, 2H), 7.19–7.07 (m, 2H), 7.04 (td, J = 7.4, 6.3, 1.8 Hz, 2H), 6.40 (s, 1H), 4.46 (s, 2H), 3.96 (s, 2H), 3.64 (s, 1H), 2.97–2.85 (m, 2H), 2.73 (s, 2H), 2.13–2.03 (m, 2H), 1.89 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 151.4, 150.7, 149.4, 148.7, 136.5, 135.9, 127.4, 126.9, 123.1, 121.0, 120.3, 117.1, 116.3, 110.8, 101.6, 74.2, 68.7, 55.6, 51.0, 31.0.

5.1.1.1.22. 6-chloro-2-((4-((4-chloro-3-fluorobenzyl)oxy)piperidin-1-yl)methyl)-1H-indole (14b).

Prepared using General Procedure B. Yield = 44.0 mg (39%, brown oil). LCMS: RT = 2.510 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 407.11 for C21H22Cl2FN2O, found 407.0. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.18 (s, 1H), 7.44 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.37–7.31 (m, 3H), 7.15 (dd, J = 9.8, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 7.04 (dt, J = 8.3, 2.1 Hz, 3H), 6.33 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 4.48 (s, 3H), 3.70 (s, 3H), 3.49 (dp, J = 8.1, 3.7 Hz, 1H), 2.79 (ddd, J = 11.3, 6.8, 3.4 Hz, 3H), 2.35 (d, J = 10.6 Hz, 2H), 1.96 (ddt, J = 13.8, 7.1, 3.5 Hz, 3H), 1.73 (dtd, J = 12.4, 8.3, 3.5 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 170.0, 159.1, 157.1, 139.9, 136.7, 135.5, 130.5, 127.5, 126.8, 123.4, 121.0, 120.3, 119.8, 115.4, 110.9, 102.1, 73.8, 68.6, 55.4, 50.6, 30.6.

5.1.1.1.23. 6-chloro-2-((4-((3-(trifluoromethyl)benzyl)oxy)piperidin-1-yl)methyl)-1H-indole (14c).

Prepared using General Procedure B. Yield = 20.6 mg (25%, yellow oil). LCMS: RT = 2.564 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 423.15 for C22H23ClF3N2O, found 423.0. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.74 (s, 1H), 7.63 (s, 1H), 7.56 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 7.48 (dd, J = 15.2, 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.35 (s, 1H), 7.07 (dd, J = 8.4, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 6.34 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 4.61 (s, 2H), 3.68 (s, 2H), 3.52 (tt, J = 8.2, 3.8 Hz, 1H), 2.81 (dt, J = 11.0, 4.7 Hz, 2H), 2.29 (t, J = 10.6 Hz, 2H), 1.99 (ddd, J = 13.4, 6.7, 3.6 Hz, 2H), 1.75 (dtd, J = 12.6, 8.7, 3.6 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 139.9, 136.5, 130.6, 128.9, 127.4, 126.9, 125.3, 124.3, 124.0, 123.1, 120.9, 120.3, 110.8, 101.6, 74.5, 69.2, 55.6, 51.0, 31.1.

5.1.1.1.24. (S)-6-chloro-2-((3-((6-methylpyridin-2-yl)methoxy)piperidin-1-yl)methyl)-1H-indole (14d).

Prepared using General Procedure B. Yield = 12.0 mg (9%, viscous brown oil). LCMS: RT = 2.509 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 370.17 for C21H25ClN3O, found 370.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.47 (s, 1H), 7.54 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.46–7.41 (m, 2H), 7.17 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.07–7.00 (m, 2H), 6.41 (s, 1H), 4.58 (q, J = 12.5 Hz, 2H), 4.14 (dd, J = 32.9, 13.5 Hz, 2H), 3.84 (dt, J = 10.7, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 3.04 (d, J = 12.4 Hz, 1H), 2.94 (s, 1H), 2.73 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 2.51 (s, 3H), 2.05–1.91 (m, 2H), 1.77 (ddd, J = 12.1, 9.0, 4.9 Hz, 1H), 1.67 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 157.7, 156.2, 137.8, 128.9, 127.2, 125.8, 122.8, 121.3, 120.8, 119.2, 112.1, 106.0, 71.4, 71.3, 54.0, 53.6, 51.9, 27.8, 23.6, 18.9.

5.1.1.1.25. (S)-4-((6-chloro-1H-indol-2-yl)methyl)-2-(((4-methylthiazol-2-yl)oxy)methyl)morpholine (14e).

Prepared following the procedure outlined in Ref. 23. Yield = 49.6 mg (56%, yellow solid). LCMS: RT = 2.231 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 378.10 for C18H21ClN3O2S, found 378.0. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.90 (s, 1H), 7.46 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.36–7.33 (m, 1H), 7.07 (dd, J = 8.4, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.37 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 6.23 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 1H), 4.41 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 2H), 4.01–3.92 (m, 2H), 3.75 (td, J = 11.4, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 3.70 (s, 2H), 2.85 (dt, J = 11.5, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 2.75–2.69 (m, 1H), 2.32 (td, J = 11.4, 3.4 Hz, 1H), 2.25 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 3H), 2.18 (t, J = 10.7 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.6, 146.6, 136.7, 135.0, 127.6, 126.8, 121.1, 120.5, 110.9, 105.4, 102.4, 73.4, 71.7, 66.4, 55.8, 54.5, 52.7, 17.7.

5.1.1.1.26. 3-((4-((3,4-difluorobenzyl)oxy)piperidin-1-yl)methyl)imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine (15a).

Prepared using General Procedure B. Yield = 24.0 mg (31%, brown oil). LCMS: RT = 2.036 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 358.17 for C20H22F2N3O, found 358.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.22 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 7.40 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 7.33 (s, 1H), 7.15 (ddd, J = 10.4, 7.7, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 7.09 (dt, J = 10.2, 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.01 (ddd, J = 8.5, 4.1, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 6.70 (dd, J = 9.2, 6.3 Hz, 1H), 6.58–6.50 (m, 1H), 4.45 (s, 2H), 3.94 (s, 2H), 3.42 (tt, J = 8.5, 4.0 Hz, 1H), 2.73 (dt, J = 10.8, 4.6 Hz, 2H), 2.27–2.19 (m, 2H), 1.90 (dt, J = 12.5, 4.0 Hz, 2H), 1.63 (dtd, J = 13.0, 9.2, 3.6 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 151.3, 150.6, 149.3, 148.7, 136.0, 135.1, 131.4, 123.1, 122.5, 118.6, 118.4, 118.2, 117.0, 116.3, 112.0, 74.6, 68.6, 55.2, 51.0, 31.2.

5.1.1.1.27. 3-((4-((4-chloro-3-fluorobenzyl)oxy)piperidin-1-yl) methyl)imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine (15b).

Prepared using General Procedure B. Yield = 12.6 mg (16%, brown oil). LCMS: RT = 2.316 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 374.14 for C20H22ClFN3O, found 374.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.24 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 7.41 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 7.34 (q, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.16–7.10 (m, 1H), 7.03 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 6.75–6.67 (m, 1H), 6.55 (q, J = 6.7 Hz, 1H), 4.48 (s, 2H), 3.96 (s, 2H), 3.50–3.37 (m, 1H), 2.80–2.69 (m, 2H), 2.25 (s, 2H), 1.90 (t, J = 16.5 Hz, 2H), 1.65 (dt, J = 13.8, 6.2 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 159.1, 157.1, 140.1, 131.4, 130.4, 123.4, 122.5, 119.7, 118.6, 118.5, 118.2, 115.4, 112.0, 75.2, 68.5, 55.2, 50.9, 31.1.

5.1.1.1.28. 3-((4-((3-(trifluoromethyl)benzyl)oxy)piperidin-1-yl) methyl)imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine (15c).

Prepared using General Procedure B. Yield: 20.7 mg (28%, brown oil). LCMS: RT = 2.328 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 390.18 for C21H23F3N3O, found 390.0. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.24 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 7.59 (s, 1H), 7.51 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 7.46–7.39 (m, 2H), 7.34 (s, 1H), 6.70 (dd, J = 9.1, 6.3 Hz, 1H), 6.54 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 4.56 (s, 2H), 3.95 (s, 2H), 3.45 (tt, J = 8.5, 3.9 Hz, 1H), 2.75 (dt, J = 10.6, 4.5 Hz, 2H), 2.25 (t, J = 10.9 Hz, 2H), 1.94 (dt, J = 13.8, 4.0 Hz, 2H), 1.66 (dtd, J = 13.1, 9.3, 3.6 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 139.9, 135.1, 131.4, 130.8, 130.6, 128.8, 124.3, 124.0, 122.5, 118.6, 118.4, 118.2, 112.0, 74.8, 69.1, 55.2, 51.0, 31.2.

5.1.1.1.29. (S)-3-((3-((3-(trifluoromethoxy)benzyl)oxy)piperidin-1-yl)methyl)imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine (15d).

Prepared using General Procedure B. Yield = 36.7 mg (19%, brown viscous oil). LCMS: RT = 2.558 min; ESI-MS: m/z = 406.1 [M + H]+, calc’d 406.17 for C21H23F3N3O2, found 406.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.20 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 7.41 (d, J = 10.2 Hz, 1H), 7.35 (s, 1H), 7.31 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.18 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.15 (s, 1H), 7.09 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.69 (ddd, J = 9.1, 6.4, 0.7 Hz, 1H), 6.51–6.46 (m, 1H), 4.50–4.43 (m, 2H), 4.01–3.94 (m, 2H), 3.49 (ddd, J = 12.2, 8.2, 3.7 Hz, 1H), 2.87 (d, J = 9.7 Hz, 1H), 2.60–2.53 (m, 1H), 2.21 (dd, J = 17.5, 7.8 Hz, 2H), 1.93 (dd, J = 11.7, 3.8 Hz, 1H), 1.76 (ddd, J = 12.2, 8.2, 3.9 Hz, 1H), 1.53–1.44 (m, 1H), 1.39 (td, J = 12.4, 3.7 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 149.3, 141.3, 135.1, 131.3, 129.5, 125.4, 122.4, 121.4, 119.6, 119.4, 118.5, 118.3, 118.1, 111.9, 74.5, 69.2, 57.6, 55.4, 53.2, 30.0, 22.9.

5.1.1.1.30. (S)-3-((3-((6-methylpyridin-2-yl)methoxy)piperidin-1-yl) methyl)imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine (15e).

Prepared using General Procedure B. Yield = 150.8 mg (30%, brown viscous oil). LCMS: RT = 1.480 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 337.20 for C20H25N4O, found 337.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.22 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 7.54 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.41 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 7.34 (s, 1H), 7.23 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.01 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.73–6.66 (m, 1H), 6.49 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 1H), 4.59 (q, J = 13.4 Hz, 2H), 3.98 (s, 2H), 3.58–3.51 (m, 1H), 2.94 (d, J = 9.9 Hz, 1H), 2.58 (d, J = 11.0 Hz, 1H), 2.51 (s, 3H), 2.26–2.14 (m, 2H), 1.99 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 1.75 (d, J = 13.1 Hz, 1H), 1.49 (dd, J = 23.8, 10.6 Hz, 1H), 1.40 (dd, J = 21.1, 10.1 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 158.4, 157.4, 136.7, 135.0, 131.3, 122.5, 121.7, 118.4, 118.4, 118.1, 118.0, 111.9, 74.9, 71.3, 57.9, 55.4, 53.2, 30.1, 24.3, 23.0.

5.1.1.1.31. 1-((4-((3,4-difluorobenzyl)oxy)piperidin-1-yl)methyl)-3-methylimidazo[1,5-a]pyridine (16a).

Prepared using General Procedure B. Yield = 37.0 mg (45%, red oil). LCMS: RT = 2.038 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 372.19 for C21H24F2N3O, found 372.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.62 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 7.58 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 7.09 (ddt, J = 13.2, 10.2, 5.1 Hz, 2H), 6.98 (ddd, J = 8.5, 4.2, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 6.69 (dd, J = 9.2, 6.3 Hz, 1H), 6.58–6.53 (m, 1H), 4.42 (s, 2H), 3.98 (s, 2H), 3.49 (s, 1H), 2.97 (ddd, J = 11.9, 7.9, 3.4 Hz, 2H), 2.61 (s, 5H), 2.12–2.00 (m, 2H), 1.86–1.75 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 151.3, 150.6, 149.3, 148.7, 135.8, 134.5, 129.5, 123.1, 120.7, 118.3, 118.0, 117.1, 116.2, 112.5, 68.6, 54.2, 49.5, 29.7, 12.5.

5.1.1.1.32. 1-((4-((4-chloro-3-fluorobenzyl)oxy)piperidin-1-yl) methyl)-3-methylimidazo[1,5-a]pyridine (16b).

Prepared using General Procedure B. Yield = 44.5 mg (37%, red oil). LCMS: RT = 2.326 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 388.16 for C21H24ClFN3O, found 388.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.59 (t, J = 6.2 Hz, 1H), 7.52 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 7.31–7.24 (m, 1H), 7.06 (d, J = 9.7 Hz, 1H), 6.97 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.65 (dd, J = 9.2, 6.3 Hz, 1H), 6.52 (q, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 4.41 (d, J =7.0 Hz, 2H), 3.91 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 3.45 (s, 1H), 3.43–3.36 (m, 1H), 2.91 (ddt, J = 13.8, 9.7, 4.9 Hz, 2H), 2.57 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H), 2.51 (s, 2H), 2.01 (ddd, J = 13.2, 8.7, 4.3 Hz, 2H), 1.81–1.71 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 159.0, 157.0, 139.9, 134.4, 130.4, 129.3, 123.3, 120.7, 119.6, 119.5, 118.2, 117.9, 117.9, 115.3, 112.5, 73.2, 68.5, 54.2, 49.7, 29.9, 12.4.

5.1.1.1.33. 3-methyl-1-((4-((3-(trifluoromethyl)benzyl)oxy)piperidin-1-yl)methyl)imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine (16c).

Prepared using General Procedure B. Yield = 34.4 mg (44%, red oil). LCMS: RT = 2.364 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 404.19 for C22H25F3N3O, found 404.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.61 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.58 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 7.54 (s, 1H), 7.49 (dd, J = 14.8, 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.42 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.69 (dd, J = 9.2, 6.3 Hz, 1H), 6.58–6.52 (m, 1H), 4.53 (s, 2H), 3.97 (s, 2H), 3.52 (s, 1H), 2.97 (ddd, J = 11.7, 7.8, 3.5 Hz, 2H), 2.60 (s, 3H), 2.58–2.37 (m, 1H), 2.13–2.03 (m, 2H), 1.87–1.77 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 139.8, 134.5, 130.8, 130.5, 128.8, 125.2, 124.3, 123.9, 123.0, 120.7, 118.2, 118.0, 112.5, 72.8, 69.1, 54.3, 49.7, 29.9, 12.5.

5.1.1.1.34. 2-((4-((3,4-difluorobenzyl)oxy)piperidin-1-yl)methyl)imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine (17a).

Prepared using General Procedure B. Yield = 47.0 mg (60%, brown oil). LCMS: RT = 1.890 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 358.17 for C20H22F2N3O, found 358.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.06 (dt, J = 6.8, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.59–7.48 (m, 2H), 7.19–7.05 (m, 3H), 7.01 (ddd, J = 8.2, 4.0, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 6.74 (td, J = 6.8, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 4.45 (s, 2H), 3.75 (s, 2H), 3.44 (tt, J = 8.3, 3.8 Hz, 1H), 2.96–2.84 (m, 2H), 2.35 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 2H), 1.96 (ddd, J = 13.6, 6.5, 3.4 Hz, 2H), 1.73 (dtd, J = 12.7, 8.8, 3.6 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 151.3, 150.6, 149.3, 148.6, 145.0, 143.3, 136.1, 125.5, 124.3, 123.1, 117.4, 117.0, 116.2, 112.2, 111.3, 74.3, 68.5, 56.4, 51.0, 30.9.

5.1.1.1.35. 2-((4-((4-chloro-3-fluorobenzyl)oxy)piperidin-1-yl) methyl)imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine (17b).

Prepared using General Procedure B. Yield = 28.6 mg (37.4%, red oil). LCMS: RT = 2.019 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 374.14 for C20H22ClFN3O, found 374.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.05 (dd, J = 6.8, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.58 (s, 1H), 7.53 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 7.31 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.16–7.09 (m, 2H), 7.01 (dd, J = 8.3, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 6.74 (td, J = 6.7, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 4.47 (s, 2H), 3.77 (s, 2H), 3.45 (dq, J = 8.4, 3.9 Hz, 1H), 2.93 (ddd, J = 11.2, 6.4, 3.7 Hz, 2H), 2.40 (s, 2H), 1.97 (ddt, J = 13.7, 7.0, 3.6 Hz, 2H), 1.75 (ddd, J = 12.7, 8.4, 3.7 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 159.1, 157.1, 145.1, 140.0, 130.4, 125.6, 124.4, 123.4, 119.7, 117.5, 115.4, 115.3, 112.3, 73.9, 68.5, 56.2, 50.7, 30.5.

5.1.1.1.36. 2-((4-((3-(trifluoromethyl)benzyl)oxy)piperidin-1-yl) methyl)imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine (17c).

Prepared using General Procedure B. Yield = 36.0 mg (48%, red oil). LCMS: RT = 2.063 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 390.18 for C21H23F3N3O, found 390.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.05 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 1H), 7.58 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 2H), 7.52 (dd, J = 16.2, 8.4 Hz, 3H), 7.42 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.12 (ddd, J = 8.9, 6.8, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 6.73 (td, J = 6.8, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 4.55 (s, 2H), 3.77 (s, 2H), 3.47 (tt, J = 8.1, 3.7 Hz, 1H), 2.97–2.89 (m, 2H), 2.40 (d, J = 11.2 Hz, 2H), 1.99 (ddd, J = 13.0, 6.9, 3.6 Hz, 2H), 1.76 (dtd, J = 12.6, 8.6, 3.6 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 145.0, 142.6, 140.0, 130.8, 130.6, 128.8, 125.6, 125.2, 124.4, 124.2, 124.0, 123.1, 117.4, 112.3, 111.6, 74.1, 69.1, 56.2, 50.7, 30.6.

5.1.1.1.37. 2-((4-((6-methylpyridin-2-yl)methoxy)piperidin-1-yl) methyl)imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine (17d).

Prepared using general Procedure B. Yield = 75.3 mg (19%, viscous pink oil). LCMS: RT = 0.695 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 337.20 for C20H25N4O, found 337.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.07 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 1H), 7.66–7.50 (m, 3H), 7.30 (s, 1H), 7.17–7.11 (m, 1H), 7.03 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.76 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 1H), 4.63 (s, 2H), 3.75 (s, 2H), 3.55–3.47 (m, 1H), 2.98–2.89 (m, 2H), 2.53 (s, 3H), 2.35 (s, 2H), 2.00 (dd, J = 13.7, 3.0 Hz, 2H), 1.82–1.74 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 158.6, 157.5, 144.9, 143.8, 136.8, 125.4, 124.2, 121.7, 118.0, 117.4, 112.0, 111.0, 74.9, 70.8, 56.5, 51.2, 31.1, 24.3.

5.1.1.1.38. 2-((4-(pyridin-3-ylmethoxy)piperidin-1-yl)methyl)imidazo [1,2-a]pyridine (17e).

Prepared using general Procedure B. Yield = 28.8 mg (8%, viscous pink oil). LCMS: RT = 0.393 min; m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 323.19 for C19H23N4O, found 323.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.55 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H), 8.50 (dd, J = 4.8, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 8.05 (dt, J = 6.8, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.66 (dt, J = 7.8, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 7.57–7.50 (m, 2H), 7.24 (dd, J = 8.0, 5.1 Hz, 1H), 7.11 (ddd, J = 9.0, 6.7, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.72 (td, J = 6.8, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 4.53 (s, 2H), 3.71 (s, 2H), 3.46–3.40 (m, 1H), 2.93–2.85 (m, 2H), 2.30 (s, 2H), 1.95 (dd, J = 13.1, 3.3 Hz, 2H), 1.75–1.68 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 149.0, 148.9, 145.0, 144.0, 135.2, 134.3, 125.4, 124.1, 123.3, 117.4, 112.0, 110.9, 74.8, 67.2, 56.5, 51.2, 31.1.

5.1.1.1.39. (S)-2-((3-((3-fluorobenzyl)oxy)piperidin-1-yl)methyl)imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine (17f).

Prepared using general Procedure B. Yield = 87.0 mg (21%, viscous pink oil). LCMS: RT = 2.016 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 340.18 for C20H23FN3O, found 340.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.05 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 7.55 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 7.51 (s, 1H), 7.25 (dt, J = 13.7, 7.0 Hz, 1H), 7.16–7.10 (m, 1H), 7.05 (t, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 6.96–6.88 (m, 1H), 6.74 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 1H), 4.57–4.47 (m, 2H), 3.77 (s, 2H), 3.62–3.53 (m, 1H), 3.11 (d, J = 9.4 Hz, 1H), 2.84 (d, J = 11.0 Hz, 1H), 2.15 (dd, J = 21.8, 11.6 Hz, 2H), 1.99 (dd, J = 12.2, 3.8 Hz, 1H), 1.79–1.72 (m, 1H), 1.58 (td, J = 15.0, 3.6 Hz, 1H), 1.30 (ddd, J = 22.0, 12.2, 4.2 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 163.9, 161.9, 145.0, 143.5, 141.6, 129.7, 125.4, 124.2, 122.8, 117.5, 114.2, 112.1, 111.0, 74.6, 69.6, 58.1, 56.6, 53.5, 30.2, 23.1.

5.1.1.1.40. (S)-2-((3-((3-(trifluoromethoxy)benzyl)oxy)piperidin-1-yl)methyl)imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine (17g).

Prepared using General Procedure B. Yield = 39.6 mg (23%, viscous dark red oil). LCMS: RT = 2.689 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 406.17 for C21H23F3N3O2, found 406.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.05 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 7.55 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 7.53 (s, 1H), 7.30 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.21 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.18 (s, 1H), 7.13 (ddd, J = 9.0, 6.7, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.08 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 6.74 (td, J = 6.8, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 4.58–4.51 (m, 2H), 3.84–3.78 (m, 2H), 3.63–3.56 (m, 1H), 3.15 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 2.88 (d, J = 11.2 Hz, 1H), 2.21 (dt, J = 19.1, 10.4 Hz, 2H), 2.02–1.96 (m, 1H), 1.76 (ddd, J = 11.5, 7.6, 3.8 Hz, 1H), 1.65–1.56 (m, 1H), 1.31 (ddd, J = 22.0, 12.2, 4.3 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 149.3, 145.0, 143.3, 141.4, 129.6, 125.5, 125.4, 124.2, 121.5, 119.7, 119.4, 117.4, 112.1, 111.1, 74.6, 69.5, 57.8, 56.4, 53.4, 30.3, 23.1.

5.1.1.1.41. (S)-2-((3-((6-methylpyridin-2-yl)methoxy)piperidin-1-yl) methyl)imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine (17h).

Prepared using General Procedure B. Yield = 18.3 mg (12%, viscous orange oil). LCMS: RT = 1.361 min; ESI-MS: m/z = 335.1 [M – H]+, calc’d 335.19 for C20H23N4O, found 335.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.07 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 7.60 (s, 1H), 7.55 (dd, J = 13.0, 5.4 Hz, 2H), 7.24 (s, 1H), 7.17–7.11 (m, 1H), 7.00 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.76 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 1H), 4.66–4.59 (m, 2H), 3.86 (s, 2H), 3.71–3.65 (m, 1H), 3.21 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 2.91 (d, J = 10.5 Hz, 1H), 2.50 (s, 3H), 2.27 (d, J = 9.8 Hz, 2H), 2.08–2.01 (m, 1H), 1.80 (dd, J = 9.7, 3.9 Hz, 1H), 1.65 (dd, J = 23.9, 11.5 Hz, 1H), 1.42–1.32 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 158.2, 157.5, 144.9, 142.9, 136.8, 125.5, 124.3, 121.8, 118.3, 117.5, 112.1, 111.3, 74.6, 71.3, 57.7, 56.5, 53.4, 29.9, 24.2, 22.7.

5.1.1.1.42. (S)-2-((3-((2-methylbenzyl)oxy)piperidin-1-yl)methyl) imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine (17i).

Prepared using General Procedure B. Yield = 64.6 mg (37%, viscous orange oil). LCMS: RT = 2.213 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 336.21 for C21H26N3O, found 336.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.03 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 7.54 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 7.48 (s, 1H), 7.28 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.17–7.09 (m, 4H), 6.78–6.67 (m, 1H), 4.52 (q, J = 11.6 Hz, 2H), 3.82–3.72 (m, 2H), 3.63–3.55 (m, 1H), 3.14 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 2.85 (d, J = 11.1 Hz, 1H), 2.29 (s, 3H), 2.17–2.08 (m, 2H), 2.01 (dd, J = 12.2, 3.4 Hz, 1H), 1.78–1.71 (m, 1H), 1.63–1.54 (m, 1H), 1.28 (ddd, J = 22.3, 12.3, 4.3 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 144.7, 143.3, 136.3, 136.3, 129.9, 128.3, 127.4, 125.5, 125.3, 124.0, 117.1, 111.8, 110.8, 74.4, 68.7, 58.1, 56.4, 53.1, 30.0, 23.0, 18.6.

5.1.1.1.43. (S)-4-(imidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-2-ylmethyl)-2-(((4-methylthiazol-2-yl)oxy)methyl)morpholine (17j).

Prepared following the procedure outlined in Ref. 23. Yield = 29.5 mg (37%, red oil). LCMS: RT = 1.907 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 345.14 for C17H21N4O2S, found 345.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.10–8.07 (m, 1H), 7.60 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 7.57 (s, 1H), 7.18 (ddd, J = 8.9, 6.8, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 6.80 (td, J = 6.8, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.20 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 1H), 4.38 (d, J = 4.9 Hz, 2H), 4.03 (dtd, J = 10.1, 4.9, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 3.94 (ddd, J = 11.5, 3.5, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 3.85–3.76 (m, 3H), 2.99 (dt, J = 11.3, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 2.89 (dq, J = 11.5, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 2.42 (td, J = 11.5, 3.4 Hz, 1H), 2.29–2.22 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.9, 146.9, 145.3, 142.2, 125.9, 125.2, 117.6, 112.9, 111.8, 105.5, 73.6, 72.2, 66.7, 56.5, 54.7, 53.0, 17.9.

5.1.1.1.44. (S)-2-((3,4-difluorophenoxy)methyl)-4-(imidazo[1,2-a] pyridin-2-ylmethyl)morpholine (17k).

Prepared following the procedure outlined in Ref. 23. Yield = 6.0 mg (19%, pink oil). LCMS: RT = 1.923 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 360.15 for C19H20F2N3O2, found 360.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.07 (dd, J = 6.8, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.58 (s, 1H), 7.58–7.55 (m, 1H), 7.16 (ddd, J = 9.1, 6.7, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.02 (q, J = 9.3 Hz, 1H), 6.77 (td, J = 6.8, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.71 (ddd, J = 12.0, 6.5, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 6.58 (dtd, J = 9.1, 3.2, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 4.02 (dtd, J = 10.4, 5.0, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 3.97–3.90 (m, 2H), 3.90–3.75 (m, 4H), 3.02 (dt, J = 11.3, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 2.89 (dd, J = 11.6, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 2.41 (td, J = 11.5, 3.4 Hz, 1H), 2.26 (t, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 155.0, 150.4, 146.1, 145.2, 144.2, 142.3, 125.6, 124.6, 117.5, 117.1, 112.4, 111.5, 109.9, 104.4, 73.7, 70.0, 66.6, 56.6, 55.0, 52.9.

*Additional carbon peaks due to C–F coupling peaks however, these are overlapping with other aromatic peaks.

5.1.1.1.45. N-(3-chloro-2-methylphenyl)-2-(4-((3,4-difluorobenzyl) oxy)piperidin-1-yl)acetamide (18a).

Prepared following the procedure outlined in Ref. 27. Yield = 43.8 mg (46.5%, pale yellow solid). LCMS: RT = 2.219 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 409.15 for C21H24ClF2N2O2, found 409.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.41 (s, 1H), 8.04 (d, J = 4.6 Hz, 1H), 7.22–7.00 (m, 5H), 4.50 (s, 2H), 3.50 (s, 1H), 3.20 (d, J = 24.6 Hz, 2H), 2.91 (s, 2H), 2.46 (s, 2H), 2.34 (s, 3H), 2.00 (s, 2H), 1.75 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.4, 151.1, 149.1, 137.0, 135.6, 134.7, 127.2, 125.4, 123.2, 119.7, 117.2, 117.1, 116.4, 116.3, 73.6, 68.9, 62.1, 51.6, 31.6, 14.3.

5.1.1.1.46. N-(3-chloro-2-methylphenyl)-2-(4-((3-(trifluoromethyl) benzyl)oxy)piperidin-1-yl)acetamide (18b).

Prepared following the procedure outlined in Ref. 27. Yield = 33.8 mg (33.3%, yellow oil). LCMS: RT = 2.334 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 441.16 for C22H25ClF3N2O2, found 441.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.42 (s, 1H), 8.05 (s, 1H), 7.62 (s, 1H), 7.55 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 7.47 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.19–7.08 (m, 2H), 4.61 (s, 2H), 3.53 (s, 1H), 3.18 (s, 2H), 2.92 (s, 2H), 2.48 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.35 (s, 3H), 2.03 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 2H), 1.78 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.4, 139.6, 137.0, 134.7, 131.0, 130.6, 128.9, 127.2, 125.4, 124.5, 124.1, 123.1, 119.8, 73.8, 69.4, 62.1, 51.6, 31.7, 14.3.

5.1.1.1.47. N-(3-chloro-2-methylphenyl)-2-(4-((4-chloro-3-fluorobenzyl)oxy)piperidin-1-yl)acetamide (18c).

Prepared following the procedure outlined in Ref. 27. Yield = 37.2 mg (37.9%, yellow oil). LCMS: RT = 2.301 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 425.12 for C21H24Cl2FN2O2, found 425.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.41 (s, 1H), 8.04 (d, J = 5.3 Hz, 1H), 7.36 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.19–7.10 (m, 3H), 7.06 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 4.51 (s, 2H), 3.50 (s, 1H), 3.17 (s, 2H), 2.86 (d, J = 43.0 Hz, 2H), 2.48 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 2H), 2.35 (d, J = 9.7 Hz, 3H), 2.06–1.92 (m, 2H), 1.76 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 159.1, 157.1, 139.7, 137.0, 134.7, 130.5, 127.2, 125.4, 123.5, 123.4, 119.9, 115.5, 115.3, 73.7, 68.8, 62.1, 51.6, 31.6, 14.3.

5.1.1.1.48. 2-(4-((3,4-difluorobenzyl)oxy)piperidin-1-yl)-N-(4-fluoro-3-methylphenyl)acetamide (18d).

Prepared following the procedure outlined in Ref. 27. Yield = 57.1 mg (58.5%, white solid). LCMS: RT = 2.301 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 393.18 for C21H24ClF3N2O2, found 393.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.12 (s, 1H), 7.39 (dd, J = 6.8, 2.7 Hz, 1H), 7.33 (ddd, J = 8.7, 4.4, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 7.17 (ddd, J = 10.3, 7.6, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 7.11 (dt, J = 10.2, 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.03 (ddt, J = 8.2, 3.7, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 6.94 (t, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 4.48 (s, 2H), 3.48 (tt, J = 8.2, 3.9 Hz, 1H), 3.11 (s, 2H), 2.85 (dt, J = 10.7, 4.6 Hz, 2H), 2.42 (ddd, J = 12.0, 9.2, 3.1 Hz, 2H), 2.25 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 3H), 2.03–1.93 (m, 2H), 1.74 (dtd, J = 12.6, 8.8, 3.6 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.3, 158.8, 156.9, 151.3, 150.7, 149.4, 148.7, 135.8, 133.4, 125.4, 123.2, 122.5, 118.4, 117.1, 116.3, 115.2, 73.6, 61.9, 53.5, 51.5, 31.5, 14.6.

5.1.1.1.49. (S)-3-((4-fluoro-3-methylbenzyl)oxy)-1-(3-fluoro-4-methoxybenzyl)piperidine (19a).

Prepared using General Procedure A. Yield = 166.4 mg (31%, viscous yellow oil). LCMS: RT = 2.403 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 362.19 for C21H26F2NO2, found 362.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.15 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.09 (d, J = 10.9 Hz, 2H), 7.00 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.95 (t, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 6.90 (t, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 4.46 (q, J = 11.6 Hz, 2H), 3.90 (s, 3H), 3.58–3.49 (m, 1H), 3.47 (s, 2H), 2.96 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H), 2.68 (d, J = 10.7 Hz, 1H), 2.27 (s, 3H), 2.06–1.95 (m, 3H), 1.75 (dd, J = 9.8, 3.7 Hz, 1H), 1.54 (dd, J = 24.0, 11.9 Hz, 1H), 1.30 (td, J = 12.4, 3.9 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 161.7, 159.8, 153.2, 151.3, 146.6, 134.2, 130.8, 126.6, 124.6, 116.7, 114.7, 113.0, 74.5, 69.8, 62.1, 57.9, 56.3, 53.3, 30.4, 23.3, 14.5.

5.1.1.1.50. (R)-3-((4-fluoro-3-methylbenzyl)oxy)-1-(3-fluoro-4-methoxybenzyl)piperidine (19b).

Prepared using General Procedure A. Yield = 14.0 mg (11%, viscous yellow oil). LCMS: RT = 2.525 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 362.19 for C21H26F2NO2, found 362.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.12 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.07 (dt, J = 5.5, 3.3 Hz, 2H), 6.97 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.96–6.91 (m, 1H), 6.88 (t, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 4.44 (q, J = 11.5 Hz, 2H), 3.88 (s, 3H), 3.49 (td, J = 9.1, 4.3 Hz, 1H), 3.45 (s, 2H), 2.93 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 2.66 (d, J = 10.9 Hz, 1H), 2.25 (s, 3H), 2.04–1.92 (m, 3H), 1.76–1.70 (m, 1H), 1.58–1.47 (m, 1H), 1.28 (ddd, J = 22.1, 12.2, 4.2 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 161.7, 159.8, 153.2, 151.3, 146.6, 134.1, 130.9, 126.6, 124.6, 116.7, 114.7, 112.9, 74.5, 69.8, 62.1, 58.0, 56.3, 53.3, 30.4, 23.3, 14.5.

5.1.1.1.51. (S)-1-(3-fluoro-4-methoxybenzyl)-3-((3-fluorobenzyl)oxy) piperidine (19c).

Prepared using General Procedure A. Yield = 65.1 mg (43%, viscous yellow oil). LCMS: RT = 2.152 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 348.18 for C20H24F2NO2, found 348.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.27 (dd, J = 13.8, 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.06 (t, J = 9.8 Hz, 3H), 6.98 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 6.94 (td, J = 8.6, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.88 (t, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 4.52 (q, J = 12.3 Hz, 2H), 3.87 (s, 3H), 3.50 (td, J = 9.0, 4.4 Hz, 1H), 3.46 (d, J = 13.9 Hz, 2H), 2.92 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 2.64 (d, J = 11.0 Hz, 1H), 2.00 (d, J = 13.3 Hz, 3H), 1.74 (ddt, J = 11.4, 7.7, 4.0 Hz, 1H), 1.56–1.46 (m, 1H), 1.31 (ddd, J = 16.2, 12.3, 4.2 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 163.8, 161.9, 153.2, 151.2, 146.5, 141.6, 131.3, 129.7, 124.5, 122.7, 116.5, 114.1, 112.9, 74.7, 69.5, 62.0, 57.9, 56.2, 53.2, 30.3, 23.2.

5.1.1.1.52. (S)-1-(3-fluoro-4-methoxybenzyl)-3-((2-methylbenzyl) oxy)piperidine (19d).

Prepared using general Procedure A. Yield = 63.0 mg (41%, viscous yellow oil). LCMS: RT = 2.173 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 344.20 for C21H27FNO2, found 344.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.34–7.29 (m, 1H), 7.22–7.14 (m, 3H), 7.09 (dd, J = 12.2, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.99 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 6.90 (t, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 4.53 (q, J = 11.6 Hz, 2H), 3.89 (s, 3H), 3.56–3.50 (m, 1H), 3.46 (q, J = 13.2 Hz, 2H), 2.98 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 2.67 (d, J = 11.0 Hz, 1H), 2.34 (s, 3H), 2.07–1.97 (m, 3H), 1.75 (ddt, J = 11.1, 7.4, 3.9 Hz, 1H), 1.58–1.49 (m, 1H), 1.31 (ddd, J = 21.6, 12.0, 3.9 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.2, 151.2, 146.5, 136.5, 131.4, 130.1, 128.5, 127.6, 125.7, 124.5, 116.5, 112.9, 74.5, 68.8, 62.1, 58.0, 56.0, 53.2, 30.3, 23.3, 18.7.

5.1.1.1.53. (S)-1-(3-fluoro-4-methoxybenzyl)-3-((4-methylbenzyl) oxy)piperidine (19e).

Prepared using General Procedure A. Yield = 20.6 mg (8%, orange viscous yellow oil). LCMS: RT = 2.230 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 344.20 for C21H27FNO2, found 344.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.20 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 7.13 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 7.07 (dd, J = 12.2, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.98 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 6.89 (t, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 4.49 (q, J = 11.7 Hz, 2H), 3.88 (s, 3H), 3.52–3.47 (m, 1H), 3.46 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 2.95 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 2.65 (d, J = 11.0 Hz, 1H), 2.33 (s, 3H), 1.98 (dd, J = 17.7, 8.8 Hz, 3H), 1.73 (ddt, J = 11.2, 7.6, 3.9 Hz, 1H), 1.55–1.46 (m, 1H), 1.28 (qd, J = 12.3, 4.2 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.2, 151.3, 146.5, 137.1, 135.7, 129.0, 127.7, 124.6, 116.6, 112.9, 74.2, 70.2, 62.1, 58.1, 56.3, 53.2, 30.4, 23.3, 21.1.

5.1.1.1.54. (S)-4-((3-((4-methylbenzyl)oxy)piperidin-1-yl)methyl) benzonitrile (19f).

Prepared using General Procedure A. Yield = 10.6 mg (7%, viscous orange oil). LCMS: RT = 2.361 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 321.20 for C21H25N2O, found 321.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.60 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.43 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.19 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 7.13 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 4.49 (q, J = 11.7 Hz, 2H), 3.56 (s, 2H), 3.53–3.47 (m, 1H), 2.90 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 2.62 (d, J = 9.9 Hz, 1H), 2.34 (s, 3H), 2.03 (dt, J = 17.1, 5.9 Hz, 3H), 1.78–1.72 (m, 1H), 1.52 (dd, J = 23.4, 11.7 Hz, 1H), 1.31 (ddd, J = 15.9, 12.5, 4.2 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 137.2, 135.6, 131.9, 129.4, 129.0, 127.6, 119.0, 110.8, 74.0, 70.2, 62.5, 58.2, 53.5, 30.2, 23.1, 21.1.

5.1.1.1.55. (S)-1-(3-fluorobenzyl)-3-((4-methylbenzyl)oxy)piperidine (19g).

Prepared using General Procedure A. Yield = 26.2 mg (25%, viscous orange oil). LCMS: RT = 2.266 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 314.19 for C20H25FNO, found 314.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.30–7.27 (m, 1H), 7.22 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 7.15 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 7.08 (t, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 6.99–6.94 (m, 1H), 4.52 (q, J = 11.7 Hz, 2H), 3.59–3.50 (m, 3H), 2.99 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 2.69 (d, J = 10.9 Hz, 1H), 2.36 (s, 3H), 2.04 (dd, J = 15.5, 11.4 Hz, 3H), 1.79–1.72 (m, 1H), 1.55 (tt, J = 15.1, 3.8 Hz, 1H), 1.35–1.27 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 163.8, 161.9, 137.1, 135.7, 129.5, 129.0, 127.7, 124.5, 115.7, 113.9, 74.1, 70.2, 62.4, 58.1, 53.3, 30.4, 23.2, 21.1.

5.1.1.1.56. (S)-3-((3-fluoro-4-methoxybenzyl)oxy)-1-(3-methylbenzyl)piperidine (19h).

Prepared using General Procedure A. Yield = 4.1 mg (3%, viscous yellow oil). LCMS: RT = 2.218 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 344.20 for C21H27FNO2, found 344.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.22 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.15 (s, 1H), 7.10 (dd, J = 16.4, 9.2 Hz, 3H), 7.02 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 6.91 (t, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 4.51–4.42 (m, 2H), 3.89 (s, 3H), 3.53 (q, J = 12.3 Hz, 3H), 2.99 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 2.71 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 2.37 (s, 3H), 2.04 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 3H), 1.76 (d, J = 13.1 Hz, 1H), 1.56 (d, J = 10.7 Hz, 1H), 1.34–1.26 (m, 1H).13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.3, 151.4, 148.0, 137.8, 132.0, 129.9, 128.0, 127.8, 126.3, 123.3, 115.5, 113.2, 74.3, 69.4, 63.1, 57.9, 56.3, 53.3, 30.4, 23.2, 21.4.

5.1.1.1.57. (S)-3-((4-fluoro-3-methylbenzyl)oxy)-1-(4-methylbenzyl) piperidine (19i).

Prepared using General Procedure A. Yield = 20.7 mg (8%, viscous yellow oil). LCMS: RT = 2.555 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 328.21 for C21H27FNO, found 328.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.19 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 7.13 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 3H), 7.08 (ddd, J = 7.3, 4.9, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 6.96–6.91 (m, 1H), 4.45 (q, J = 11.6 Hz, 2H), 3.55–3.48 (m, 3H), 2.99 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 2.69 (d, J = 11.0 Hz, 1H), 2.35 (s, 3H), 2.26 (d, J = 1.7 Hz, 3H), 1.99 (dd, J = 17.4, 10.3 Hz, 3H), 1.73 (qd, J = 7.6, 4.0 Hz, 1H), 1.58–1.48 (m, 1H), 1.32–1.23 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 161.6, 159.8, 136.6, 134.9, 134.2, 130.9, 129.1, 128.8, 126.6, 124.6, 114.7, 74.5, 69.8, 62.9, 58.0, 53.3, 30.5, 23.3, 21.1, 14.5.

5.1.1.1.58. (S)-3-((3-fluorobenzyl)oxy)-1-(2-methylbenzyl)piperidine (19j).

Prepared using General Procedure A. Yield = 59.6 mg (35%, viscous orange oil). LCMS: RT = 2.181 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 314.19 for C20H25FNO, found 314.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.28 (dt, J = 14.1, 7.3 Hz, 2H), 7.21–7.13 (m, 3H), 7.07 (t, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.00–6.91 (m, 1H), 4.55–4.48 (m, 2H), 3.52 (dd, J = 8.8, 4.4 Hz, 1H), 3.48 (d, J = 14.1 Hz, 2H), 3.00 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 2.70 (d, J = 10.9 Hz, 1H), 2.37 (s, 3H), 2.05 (dd, J = 20.3, 10.8 Hz, 3H), 1.78–1.71 (m, 1H), 1.52 (dd, J = 24.5, 11.6 Hz, 1H), 1.39–1.28 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 163.9, 161.9, 141.7, 137.3, 136.6, 130.2, 129.7, 129.6, 126.9, 125.4, 122.7, 114.2, 114.1, 74.9, 69.4, 60.8, 58.0, 53.3, 30.6, 23.4, 19.2.

5.1.1.1.59. General Procedure D.

To spirocycle, 20, starting material (1.0 eq.) in THF (2 mL) was added the substituted 2-chloro-N-phenylacetamide, 21, (1.0 eq.), Et3N (2.0 eq.), and NaI (5 mg). The reaction was stirred overnight at room temperature. The reaction was then quenched with saturated sodium bicarbonate solution and product was extracted into ethyl acetate. The product was purified by flash chromatography 0–65% EtOAc:hexanes.

5.1.1.1.60. General Procedure E.

To the spirocycle, 20, (1.1 eq.) in dichloroethane (2 mL) was added 4 Å molecular sieves, aldehyde (1.0 eq.) and Et3N (2.0 eq.). The reaction was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. Next, sodium triacetoxyborohydride (2.0 eq.) was added and the reaction was stirred overnight at room temperature. The reaction was quenched with saturated sodium bicarbonate solution and product was extracted in dichloromethane. Product was purified on flash chromatography 0–10% MeOH (0.01% Et3N):DCM and reverse-phase chromatography 0–100% water:ACN when necessary. Boc deprotection was done using 4 N HCl in dioxane. The reaction was stirred for 2 h before it was concentrated in vacuo.

5.1.1.1.61. General Procedure F.

To a vial with deprotected intermediate spirocycle, 22 or 23, (1.1 eq.) in dichloroethane was slowly added 3,4-difluorobenzyl bromide (1 eq) and iPr2EtN (2 eq.). The reaction was stirred for 20 h at room temperature. The reaction was quenched with water and the product was extracted with dichloromethane. The DCM layers were collected and washed with brine and dried with sodium sulfate. The product was purified with flash chromatography 0–10% MeOH:DCM.

5.1.1.1.62. General Procedure G.

To a vial with deprotected intermediate spirocycle, 22 or 23, (1 eq.) in acetonitrile at 0 °C was slowly added cesium carbonate (2 eq.). The mixture was stirred for 1 h and allowed to warm to room temperature. The vial was cooled in an ice bath before adding the substituted benzyl bromide (1.1 eq.). The reaction was allowed to come to room temperature and was stirred for 20 h. The reaction was quenched with water and the product was extracted with EtOAc. The EtOAc layers were collected and washed with brine and dried with sodium sulfate. The product was purified with flash chromatography 0–15% EtOAc:hexanes.

5.1.1.1.63. N-(3-chloro-2-methylphenyl)-2-(1-(3,4-difluorobenzyl)-1,8-diazaspiro[4.5]decan-8-yl)acetamide (24a).

Using General Procedure D and F, N-(3-chloro-2-methylphenyl)-2-(1,8-diazaspiro[4.5]decan-8-yl)acetamide (50.0 mg; 0.156 mmol), 3,4-difluorobenzyl bromide (18.1 μL; 0.141 mmol), DIPEA (49.1 μL, 0.282 mmol) were reacted. Yield = 56.6 mg (44.7%, white solid). LCMS: RT = 1.890 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 448.20 for C24H29ClF2N3O, found 448.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.43 (s, 1H), 8.01 (dd, J = 7.0, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 7.23–7.00 (m, 5H), 3.59 (s, 2H), 3.18 (s, 2H), 3.00–2.92 (m, 2H), 2.64 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 2.45 (td, J = 12.1, 2.4 Hz, 2H), 2.34 (s, 3H), 1.77 (d, J = 13.9 Hz, 6H), 1.49 (d, J = 12.6 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.5, 151.3, 149.3, 137.9, 137.0, 134.7, 127.3, 125.7, 125.4, 123.8, 119.9, 116.9, 62.1, 60.7, 52.5, 51.2, 50.6, 34.2, 32.7, 31.6, 22.7, 20.9, 14.4.

5.1.1.1.64. N-(3-chloro-2-methylphenyl)-2-(1-(3,4-difluorobenzyl)-1,7-diazaspiro[4.4]nonan-7-yl)acetamide (24b).

Using General Procedure D and F, N-(3-chloro-2-methylphenyl)-2-(1,7-diazaspiro[4.4]nonan-7-yl)acetamide (50.0 mg; 0.163 mmol), 3,4-difluorobenzyl bromide (18.9 μL; 0.148 mmol), DIPEA (51.5 μL, 0.296 mmol) were reacted. Yield = 30.8 mg (40.8%, yellow oil). LCMS: RT = 2.199 min; ESI-MS: m/ z [M + H]+, calc’d 434.18 for C23H27ClF2N3O, found 434.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.15 (s, 1H), 8.00 (dd, J = 7.4, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.20 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 7.19–7.12 (m, 2H), 7.12–7.01 (m, 2H), 3.81–3.70 (m, 1H), 3.70–3.63 (m, 1H), 3.41–3.25 (m, 2H), 3.07–2.99 (m, 1H), 2.93 (td, J = 8.7, 4.7 Hz, 1H), 2.81–2.72 (m, 1H), 2.62 (dd, J = 14.7, 9.0 Hz, 2H), 2.30 (s, 3H), 2.15 (dq, J = 14.7, 7.8, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 1.98 (qd, J = 12.2, 11.7, 5.4 Hz, 2H), 1.83–1.76 (m, 3H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.4, 151.4, 151.3, 149.5, 149.4, 136.9, 134.7, 127.2, 125.6, 123.8, 120.3, 117.1, 116.9, 70.7, 61.4, 59.9, 54.6, 52.5, 51.2, 40.2, 32.4, 20.9, 14.3.

5.1.1.1.65. N-(3-chloro-2-methylphenyl)-2-(7-(3,4-difluorobenzyl)-2,7-diazaspiro[4.5]decan-2-yl)acetamide (24c).

Using General Procedure D and F, N-(3-chloro-2-methylphenyl)-2-(2,7-diazaspiro[4.5]decan-2-yl)acetamide (50.0 mg; 0.156 mmol), 3,4-difluorobenzyl bromide (18.1 μL; 0.141 mmol), DIPEA (49.1 μL, 0.282 mmol) were reacted. Yield = 52.9 mg (54.4%, pale yellow oil). LCMS: RT = 1.852 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 448.20 for C24H29ClF2N3O, found 448.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.24 (s, 1H), 8.03 (dd, J = 6.8, 2.6 Hz, 1H), 7.20–7.13 (m, 3H), 7.08–6.99 (m, 2H), 3.81–3.74 (m, 1H), 3.69–3.62 (m, 1H), 3.42 (q, J = 13.6 Hz, 2H), 3.29 (q, J = 16.6 Hz, 2H), 2.86–2.76 (m, 2H), 2.71 (q, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 2.53 (d, J = 9.4 Hz, 1H), 2.18 (s, 3H), 1.80–1.72 (m, 1H), 1.66 (ddd, J = 13.8, 8.5, 5.9 Hz, 2H), 1.61–1.51 (m, 2H), 1.51–1.42 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.7, 151.3, 150.4, 149.3, 148.4, 137.0, 136.1, 134.6, 127.2, 125.3, 124.3, 119.9, 117.2, 116.9, 65.2, 64.0, 62.0, 59.5, 54.1, 53.9, 42.6, 36.6, 36.2, 23.4, 14.0.

5.1.1.1.66. 2-(1-(3,4-difluorobenzyl)-1,8-diazaspiro[4.5]decan-8-yl)-N-(4-fluoro-3-methylphenyl)acetamide (24d).

Using General Procedure D and F, N-(4-fluoro-3-methylphenyl)-2-(1,8-diazaspiro[4.5]decan-8-yl) acetamide (61.7 mg; 0.202 mmol), 3,4-difluorobenzyl bromide (23.5 μL; 0.183 mmol), DIPEA (63.7 μL, 0.366 mmol) were reacted. Yield = 10.2 mg (12.9%, pale yellow oil). LCMS: RT = 2.121 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 432.23 for C24H29F3N3O, found 432.2. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.06 (s, 1H), 7.41 (dd, J = 6.7, 2.7 Hz, 1H), 7.31 (ddd, J = 8.8, 4.4, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 7.21 (s, 1H), 6.95 (t, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 3.64 (s, 2H), 3.14 (s, 2H), 2.93 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 2H), 2.65 (s, 2H), 2.40 (t, J = 12.0 Hz, 2H), 2.26 (d, J = 1.9 Hz, 3H), 1.78 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.4, 158.9, 157.0, 151.4, 149.4, 138.0, 133.3, 125.4, 123.8, 122.7, 118.6, 116.9, 115.2, 62.1, 60.8, 52.4, 51.4, 50.6, 34.1, 32.5, 31.7, 22.7, 20.9, 14.7.

5.1.1.1.67. 2-(1-(3,4-difluorobenzyl)-1,7-diazaspiro[4.4]nonan-7-yl)-N-(4-fluoro-3-methylphenyl)acetamide (24e).

Using General Procedure D and F, N-(4-fluoro-3-methylphenyl)-2-(1,7-diazaspiro[4.4]nonan-7-yl) acetamide (62.5 mg; 0.214 mmol), 3,4-difluorobenzyl bromide (25.0 μL; 0.195 mmol), DIPEA (67.9 μL, 0.390 mmol) were reacted. Yield = 18.1 mg (22.2%, yellow oil). LCMS: RT = 2.340 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 418.21 for C23H27F3N3O, found 418.2. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.93 (s, 1H), 7.29 (td, J = 8.4, 3.2 Hz, 2H), 7.21 (d, J = 9.8 Hz, 1H), 7.12–7.01 (m, 2H), 6.92 (t, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 3.73 (q, J = 12.8 Hz, 2H), 3.31 (d, J = 16.4 Hz, 1H), 3.19 (d, J = 16.4 Hz, 1H), 3.02 (s, 1H), 2.87 (s, 1H), 2.69 (q, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 2.57 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.45 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 2.22 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 3H), 2.18–2.07 (m, 1H), 2.02–1.90 (m, 2H), 1.86–1.71 (m, 3H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.3, 158.9, 156.9, 151.4, 149.4, 137.1, 133.3, 125.5, 123.7, 122.3, 118.2, 117.0, 115.2, 70.9, 61.4, 59.7, 54.3, 52.6, 51.2, 40.0, 32.7, 21.0, 14.6.

5.1.1.1.68. 2-(7-(3,4-difluorobenzyl)-2,7-diazaspiro[4.5]decan-2-yl)-N-(4-fluoro-3-methylphenyl)acetamide (24f).

Using General Procedure D and F, N-(4-fluoro-3-methylphenyl)-2-(2,7-diazaspiro[4.5]decan-2-yl) acetamide (55.2 mg; 0.181 mmol), 3,4-difluorobenzyl bromide (21.0 μL; 0.164 mmol), DIPEA (57.1 μL, 0.328 mmol) were reacted. Yield = 20.8 mg (24.7%, clear oil). LCMS: RT = 2.194 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 432.23 for C24H29F3N3O, found 432.2. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.97 (s, 1H), 7.36 (dd, J = 6.8, 2.7 Hz, 1H), 7.23 (dt, J = 7.8, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 7.19–7.12 (m, 1H), 7.09–7.00 (m, 2H), 6.95 (t, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 3.44 (q, J = 13.6 Hz, 2H), 3.26 (t, J = 13.0 Hz, 2H), 2.89–2.62 (m, 3H), 2.49 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H), 2.35 (d, J = 34.9 Hz, 2H), 2.26 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 3H), 2.23–2.09 (m, 1H), 1.70–1.60 (m, 2H), 1.60–1.50 (m, 2H), 1.50–1.40 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.5, 158.9, 156.9, 150.8, 148.8, 136.1, 133.3, 125.4, 124.2, 122.4, 118.3, 117.3, 116.8, 115.2, 64.9, 63.9, 62.1, 59.3, 53.9, 53.7, 42.6, 36.4, 36.2, 23.4, 14.6.

5.1.1.1.69. 1-(3,4-difluorobenzyl)-7-(imidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-2-ylmethyl)-1,7-diazaspiro[4.4]nonane (25a).

Using General Procedure E and F, 7-(imidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-2-ylmethyl)-1,7-diazaspiro[4.4]nonane (74.3 mg; 0.289 mmol), 3,4-difluorobenzyl bromide (40.6 μL; 0.318 mmol), DIPEA (100.6 μL, 0.578 mmol) were reacted. Yield = 20.2 mg (18.3%, yellow oil). LCMS: RT = 2.749 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 383.20 for C22H25F2N4, found 383.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.14–8.09 (m, 1H), 7.97 (s, 1H), 7.52 (dd, J = 9.1, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.20 (ddd, J = 9.1, 6.7, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.11 (ddd, J = 11.4, 7.7, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.06–6.96 (m, 2H), 6.81 (td, J = 6.8, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 4.21 (q, J = 13.5 Hz, 2H), 3.81 (d, J = 13.8 Hz, 1H), 3.59 (d, J = 13.7 Hz, 1H), 3.40–3.30 (m, 2H), 3.12 (q, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 2.99 (d, J = 11.6 Hz, 1H), 2.63 (ddd, J = 9.6, 7.9, 5.9 Hz, 1H), 2.51 (dt, J = 9.5, 7.1 Hz, 1H), 2.25 (dt, J = 13.3, 8.7 Hz, 1H), 2.10–2.01 (m, 1H), 1.96 (dt, J = 12.6, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 1.82 (ddd, J = 13.3, 6.9, 3.9 Hz, 1H), 1.79–1.72 (m, 2H), 1.41 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 150.8, 148.7, 145.1, 138.0, 136.4, 126.1, 125.5, 123.9, 117.4, 117.0, 116.8, 113.7, 113.0, 70.6, 58.4, 53.1, 52.7, 52.1, 51.3, 46.0, 39.7, 20.9.

5.1.1.1.70. 7-((6-chloro-1H-indol-2-yl)methyl)-1-(3,4-difluorobenzyl)-1,7-diazaspiro[4.4]nonane (25b).

Using General Procedure E and G, 7-((6-chloro-1H-indol-2-yl)methyl)-1,7-diazaspiro[4.4]nonane (83.8 mg; 0.215 mmol), 3,4-difluorobenzyl bromide (30.3 μL; 0.237 mmol), Cs2CO3 (140.3 mg, 0.431 mmol) were reacted. Yield = 11.6 mg (12.9%, yellow oil). LCMS: RT = 2.564 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 416.17 for C23H25ClF2N3, found 416.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 11.54 (s, 1H), 8.48 (s, 1H), 7.49–7.44 (m, 2H), 7.14–7.09 (m, 1H), 7.06 (ddd, J = 8.2, 5.8, 3.9 Hz, 2H), 7.01–6.95 (m, 1H), 6.46 (s, 1H), 4.27 (s, 2H), 3.73 (d, J = 13.6 Hz, 1H), 3.56 (d, J = 13.6 Hz, 1H), 3.32 (ddd, J = 11.8, 8.3, 4.3 Hz, 1H), 3.18 (dt, J = 17.6, 11.3 Hz, 2H), 2.95 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1H), 2.70–2.62 (m, 1H), 2.52 (ddd, J = 9.5, 8.3, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 2.34–2.26 (m, 1H), 2.04 (qdd, J = 12.5, 8.5, 6.6 Hz, 2H), 1.91–1.76 (m, 3H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.1, 151.0, 148.9, 138.0, 135.9, 128.9, 128.8, 125.8, 123.8, 121.3, 120.9, 117.0, 112.1, 104.9, 70.2, 57.8, 52.9, 52.7, 51.7, 51.2, 40.0, 30.3, 20.9.

5.1.1.1.71. 2-((6-chloro-1H-indol-2-yl)methyl)-7-(3,4-difluorobenzyl)-2,7-diazaspiro[4.5]decane (25c).

Using General Procedure E and G, 2-((6-chloro-1H-indol-2-yl)methyl)-2,7-diazaspiro[4.5]decane (93.4 mg; 0.232 mmol), 3,4-difluorobenzyl bromide (32.6 μL; 0.255 mmol), Cs2CO3 (151.2 mg, 0.464 mmol) were reacted. Yield = 17.8 mg (17.9%, pale yellow oil). LCMS: RT = 2.246 min; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+, calc’d 430.19 for C24H27ClF2N3, found 430.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 11.73 (s, 1H), 8.48 (s, 1H), 7.53–7.46 (m, 2H), 7.15–7.06 (m, 3H), 6.99 (ddd, J = 8.3, 4.0, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 6.45 (s, 1H), 4.30–4.19 (m, 2H), 3.44 (s, 2H), 3.25 (s, 1H), 3.14 (s, 2H), 2.98 (d, J = 11.9 Hz, 1H), 2.21 (s, 2H), 2.02 (s, 1H), 1.92 (dt, J = 13.6, 7.7 Hz, 1H), 1.64 (dd, J = 9.8, 5.4 Hz, 2H), 1.57–1.43 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.2, 150.9, 148.9, 138.0, 135.3, 128.9, 128.5, 125.7, 124.6, 121.1, 117.5, 117.0, 112.2, 104.8, 62.3, 61.7, 61.4, 53.2, 52.4, 52.2, 42.5, 35.2, 34.5, 23.1.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental

Acknowledgments

This work was generously supported by a grant from the US National Institutes of Health (NINDS: R01NS119266) to C.R.H. The authors would like to thank Q2 Solutions (Indianapolis, IN USA) and Pharmaron, Inc. (Louisville, KY) for the in vitro and in vivo DMPK experiments.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Corey R. Hopkins reports financial support was provided by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. Corey R. Hopkins reports a relationship with National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke that includes: funding grants.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2022.114840.

Data availability

Data will be made available on request.

References

  • [1].Jaber M, Robinson SW, Missale C, Caron MG, Dopamine receptors and brain function, Neuropharmacology 35 (1996) 1503–1519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Ye N, Neumeyer JL, Baldessarini RJ, Zhen X, Zhang A, Update 1 of: recent progress in development of dopamine receptor subtype-selective agents: potential therapeutics for neurological and psychiatric disorders, Chem. Rev 113 (2013) PR123–PR178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Girault J-A, Greengard P, The neurobiology of dopamine signaling, Arch. Neurol 61 (2004) 641–644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Zhou Q-Y, Grandy DK, Thambi L, Kushner JA, Van Tol HHM, Cone R, Pribnow D, Salon J, Bunzow JR, Civelli O, Cloning and expression of human and rat D1 dopamine receptors, Nature 347 (1990) 76–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Grandy DK, Marchionni MA, Makam H, Stofko RE, Alfano M, Frothingham L, Fischer JB, Burke-Howe KJ, Bunzow JR, Server AC, Civelli O, Cloning of the cDNA and gene for a human D2 dopamine receptor, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 86 (1989) 9762–9766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Brisch R, Saniotis A, Wolf R, Bielau H, Bernstein H-G, Steiner J, Bogerts B, Braun K, Jankowski Z, Kumaratilake J, Henneberg M, Gos T, The role of dopamine in schizophrenia from a neurobiological and evolutionary perspective: old fashioned, but still in vogue, Front. Psychiatr 5 (2014) 47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Carlsson A, Lindqvist M, Effect of chlorpromazine or haloperidol on formation of 3-methoxytryramine and normetanephrine in mouse brain, Acta Pharmacol. Toxicol 20 (1963) 140–144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Horn AS, Snyder SH, Chlorpromazine and dopamine: conformational similarities that correlate with the antischizophrenic activity of phenothiazine drugs, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 68 (1971) 2325–2328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Hökfelt T, Ljungdahl A, Fuxe K, Johansson O, Dopamine nerve terminals in the rat limbic cortex: aspects of the dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia, Science 184 (1974) 177–179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Iversen SD, Iversen LL, Dopamine: 50 years in perspective, Trends Neurosci 30 (2007) 188–193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Madras BK, History of the discovery of the antipsychotic dopamine d2 receptor: a basis for the dopamine hypothesis in schizophrenia, J. Hist. Neurosci 22 (2013) 62–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Sharma A, Kramer ML, Wick PF, Liu D, Chari S, Shim S, Tan W, Ouellette D, Nagata M, DuRand CJ, Kotb M, Deth RC, D4 dopamine receptor-mediated phospholipid methylation and its implication for mental illnesses such as schizophrenia, Mol. Psychiatr 4 (1999) 235–246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Tarazi FI, Baldessarini RJ, Dopamine D4 receptors: significance for molecular psychiatry at the millennium, Mol. Psychiatr 4 (1999) 529–538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Bristow LJ, Kramer MS, Kulagowski J, Patel S, Ragan CI, Seabrook GR, Schizophrenia and L-745,870, a novel dopamine D4 receptor antagonist, Trends Pharmacol. Sci 18 (1997) 186–188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Bristow LJ, Collinson N, Cook GP, Curtis N, Freedman SB, Kulagowski JJ, Leeson PD, Patel S, Ragan CI, Ridgill M, Saywell KL, Tricklebank MDL, 745,870, a subtype selective dopamine D4 receptor antagonist, does not exhibit a neurleptic-like profile in rodent behavioral tests, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Therapeut 283 (1997) 1256–1263. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Di Ciano P, Grandy DK, Le Foll B, Dopamine D4 receptors in psychostimulant addiction, Adv. Pharmacol 69 (2014) 301–321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Huot P, Johnston TH, Koprich JB, Fox SH, Brotchie JM, The pharmacology of L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson’s disease, Pharmacol. Rev 65 (2013) 171–222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Dolma S, Selvadurai HJ, Lan X, Lee L, Kushida M, Voisin V, Whetstone H, So M, Aviv T, Park N, Zhu X, Xu C, Head R, Rowland KJ, Bernstein M, Clarke ID, Bader G, Harrington L, Brumell JH, Tyers M, Dirks PB, Inhibition of dopamine receptor D4 impedes autophagic flux, proliferation, and survival of glioblastoma stem cells, Cancer Cell 29 (2016) 859–873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Sachlos E, Risueño RM, Laronde S, Shapovalova Z, Lee J-H, Russell J, Malig M, McNicol JD, Fiebig-Comyn A, Graham M, Levadoux-Martin M, Lee JB, Giacomelli AO, Hassell JA, Fischer-Russell D, Trus MR, Foley R, Leber B, Xenocostas A, Brown ED, Collins TJ, Bhatia M, Identification of drugs including a dopamine receptor antagonist that selectively target cancer stem cells, Cell 149 (2012) 1284–1297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Lindsley CW, Hopkins CR, Return of D4 dopamine receptor antagonists in drug discovery, J. Med. Chem 60 (2017) 7233–7243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Huot P, Johnston TH, Koprich JB, Aman A, Fox SH, Brotchie JML, 745,870 Reduces L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia in the 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine-lesioned macaque model of Parkinson’s disease, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Therapeut 342 (2012) 576–585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Huot P, Johnston TH, Koprich JB, Espinosa MC, Reyes MG, Fox SH, Brotchie JML, 745,870 reduces the expression of abnormal involuntary movements in the 6-OHDA-lesioned rat, Behav. Pharmacol 26 (2015) 101–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Witt JO, McCollum AL, Hurtado MA, Huseman ED, Jeffries DE, Temple KJ, Plumley HC, Blobaum AL, Lindsley CW, Hopkins CR, Synthesis and characterization of a series of chiral alkoxymethyl morpholine analogs as dopamine receptor 4 (D4R) antagonists, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett 26 (2016) 2481–2488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Jeffries DE, Witt JO, McCollum AL, Temple KJ, Hurtado MA, Harp JM, Blobaum AL, Lindsley CW, Hopkins CR, Discovery, characterization and biological evaluation of a novel (R)-4,4-difluoropiperidine scaffold as dopamine receptor 4 (D4R) antagonists, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett 26 (2016) 5757–5764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Sebastianutto I, Maslava N, Hopkins CR, Cenci MA, Validation of an improved scale for rating L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia in the mouse and effects of specific dopamine receptor antagonists, Neurobiol. Dis 96 (2016) 156–170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Besnard J, Ruda GF, Setola V, Abecassis K, Rodriguez RM, Huang XP, Norval S, Sassano MF, Shin AI, Webster LA, Simeons FR, Sojanovsky L, Prat A, Seidah NG, Constam DB, Bickerton GR, Read KD, Wetsel WC, Gilbert IH, Roth BL, Hopkins AL, Automated design of ligands to polypharmacological profiles, Nature 492 (2012) 215–220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Tolentino KT, Mashinson V, Vadukoot AK, Hopkins CR, Discovery and characterization of benzyloxy piperidine based dopamine 4 receptor antagonists, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett 61 (2022), 128615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Hanner M, Moebius FF, Flandorfer A, Knaus H-G, Striessnig J, Kampner E, Glossman H, Purification, molecular cloning, and expression of the mammalian sigma1 binding site, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 93 (1996) 8072–8077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Schmidt HR, Kruse AC, The molecular function of σ receptors: past, present, and future, Trends Pharmacol. Sci 40 (2019) 636–654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Ryskamp DA, Korban S, Zhemkov V, Kraskovskaya N, Bezprozvanny I, Neuronal sigma-1 receptors: signaling functions and protective roles in neurodegenerative diseases, Front. Neurosci 13 (2019) 862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Ye N, Qin W, Tian S, Xu Q, Wold EA, Zhou J, Zhen X-C, Small molecules selectively targeting sigma-1 receptor for the treatment of neurological diseases, J. Med. Chem 63 (2020) 15187–15217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Bravo-Caparrós I, Perazzoli G, Yeste S, Cikes D, Baeyens JM, Cobos EJ, Nieto FR, Sigma-1 receptor inhibition reduces neuropathic pain induced by partial sciatic nerve transection in mice by opioid-dependent and -independent mechanisms, Front. Pharmacol 10 (2019) 613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Obeng S, Hiranita T, León F, McMahon LR, McCurdy CR, Novel approaches, drug candidates, and targets in pain drug discovery, J. Med. Chem 64 (2021) 6523–6548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Merlos M, Romero LO, Zamanillo D, Plata-Salamán C, Vela JM, Sigma-1 receptor and pain, Handb. Exp. Pharmacol 244 (2017) 131–161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Nguyen L, Lucke-Wold BP, Mookerjee SA, Cavendish JZ, Robson MJ, Scandinaro AL, Matsumoto RR, Role of sigma-1 receptors in neurodegenerative diseases, J. Pharmacol. Sci 127 (2015) 17–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Sałaciak K, Pytka K, Revisiting the sigma-1 receptor as a biological target to treat affective and cognitive disorders, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev 132 (2022) 1114–1136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Katz JL, Hiranita T, Kopajtic TA, Rice KC, Mesangeau C, Narayanan S, Abdelazeem AH, McCurdy CR, Blockade of cocaine or σ receptor agonist self-administration by subtype-selective σ receptor antagonist, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Therapeut 358 (2016) 109–124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Aguinaga D, Casanovas M, Rivas-Santisteban R, Reyes-Resina I, Navarro G, Franco R, The sigma-1 receptor as key common factor in cocaine and food-seeking behaviors, J. Mol. Endocrinol 63 (2019) R81–R92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Castany S, Gris G, Vela JM, Verdú E, Boadas-Vaello P, Critical role of sigma-1 receptors in central neuropathic pain-related behaviours after mild spinal cord injury in mice, Sci. Rep 8 (2018) 3873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Ruiz-Cantero MC, Gonzalez-Cano R, Tejada MA, Santos-Caballero M, Perazzoli G, Nieto FR, Cobos EJ, Sigma-1 receptor: a drug target for the modulation of neuroimmune and neuroglial interactions during chronic pain, Pharmacol. Res 163 (2021), 105339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Sabino V, Cottone P, Parylak SL, Steardo L, Zorilla EP, Sigma-1 receptor knockout mice display a depressive-like phenotype, Behav. Brain Res 198 (2009) 472–476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Peng Y, Zhang Q, Welsh WJ, Novel sigma 1 receptor antagonists as potential therapeutics for pain management, J. Med. Chem 64 (2021) 890–904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Díaz JL, García M, Torrens A, Caamaño AM, Enjo J, Sicre C, Lorente A, Port A, Montero A, Yeste S, Álvarez I, Martín M, Maldonado R, de la Puente B, Vidal-Torres A, Cendán CM, Vela JM, Almansa C, EST64454: a highly soluble σ1 receptor antagonist clinical candidate for pain management, J. Med. Chem 63 (2020) 14979–14988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Schmidt HR, Zheng S, Gurpinar E, Koehl A, Manglik A, Kruse AC, Crystal structure of the human ?1 receptor, Nature 532 (2016) 527–530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Friesner RA, Banks JL, Murphy RB, Halgren TA, Klicic JJ, Mainz DT, Repasky MP, Knoll EH, Shelley M, Perry JK, Shaw DE, Francis P, Shenkin PS, Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy, J. Med. Chem 47 (2004) 1739–1749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Halgren TA, Murphy RB, Friesner RA, Beard HS, Frye LL, Pollard WT, Banks JL, Glide: a new approach for rapide, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening, J. Med. Chem 47 (2004) 1750–1759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Fallica AN, Pittalá V, Modica MN, Salerno L, Romeo G, Marrazzo A, Helal MA, Intagliata S, Recent advances in the development of sigma receptor ligands as cytotoxic agents: a medicinal chemistry perspective, J. Med. Chem 64 (2021) 7926–7962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Wang S, Wacker D, Levit A, Che T, Betz RM, McCorvy JD, Venkatakrishnan AJ, Huang X-P, Dror RO, Shoichet BK, Roth BL, D4 dopamine receptor high-resolution structures enable the discovery of selective agonists, Science 358 (2017) 381–386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Hopkins AL, Groom CR, Alex A, Ligand efficiency: a useful metric for lead selection, Drug Discov. Today 9 (2004) 430–431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Leeson PD, S B, The influence of drug-like concepts on decision-making in medicinal chemistry, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov 6 (2007) 881–890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Wager TT, Chandrasekaran RY, Hou X, Troutman MD, Verhoest PR, Villalobos A, Will Y, Defining desirable central nervous system drug space through the alignment of molecular properties, in vitro ADME, and safety attributes, ACS Chem. Neurosci 1 (2010) 420–434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [52].Wager TT, Hou X, Verhoest PR, Villalobos A, Moving beyond rules: the development of a central nervous system multiparameter optimization (CNS MPO) approach to enable alignment of druglike properties, ACS Chem. Neurosci 1 (2010) 435–449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [53].Obach RS, Prediction of human clearance of twenty-nine drugs from hepatic microsomal intrinsic clearance data: an examination of in vitro half-life approach and nonspecific binding to microsomes, Drug Metab. Dispos 27 (1999) 1350–1359. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [54].Chang G, Steyn SJ, Umland JP, Scott DO, Strategic use of plasma and microsome binding to exploit in vitro clearance in early drug discovery, ACS Med. Chem. Lett 1 (2010) 50–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [55].Zampieri D, Mamolo MG, Laurini E, Florio C, Zanette C, Fermeglia M, Posocco P, Paneni MS, Pricl S, Vio L, Synthesis, biological evaluation, and three-dimensional in silico pharmacophore model for σ1 receptor ligands based on a series of substituted benzo[d]oxazol-2(3H)-one derivative, J. Med. Chem 52 (2009) 5380–5393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [56].Gilligan PJ, Cain GA, Christos TE, Cook L, Drummond S, Johnson AL, Kergaye AA, McElroy JF, Rohrbach KW, Schmidt WK, Tam SW, Novel piperidine σ receptor ligands as potential antipsychotic drugs, J. Med. Chem 35 (1992) 4344–4361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

RESOURCES