ABSTRACT
Relaxor ferroelectrics featuring highly dynamic polar nanoregions hold significant potential for pulse‐power dielectric capacitor applications. Nevertheless, achieving an optimal polarization‐field response that combines low hysteresis, delayed polarization saturation, and high maximum polarization remains a critical challenge toward superior comprehensive energy storage performance. Herein, we propose an effective strategy of engineering quasi‐antipolar nanoclusters in relaxor ferroelectrics via a high‐entropy composition design to optimize polarization behavior. By intentionally incorporating aliovalent ions with different ferroelectric activities into antiferroelectric NaNbO3, local antiparallel‐like polarization configurations were constructed within a high‐entropy relaxor matrix of Na0.73Ba0.1Bi0.11Li0.06Nb0.73Ti0.22Fe0.05O3 (NBBLNTF). These quasi‐antipolar nanoclusters not only weaken the coupling among polar nanoregions but also exhibit distinct transition behaviors under high electric fields toward a ferroelectric state. Consequently, a polarization‐field loop with low hysteresis, high linearity, and large maximum polarization is achieved, yielding an ultrahigh recoverable energy density Wrec of 18.3 J·cm−3 with a high efficiency η of 91.5% and an outstanding energy storage strength Wrec/E of 0.25 J/(kV·mm−5) in NBBLNTF multilayer ceramic capacitors, together with excellent thermal and frequency stability. These results offer a feasible strategy for developing next‐generation high‐performance dielectrics with exceptional energy storage properties.
Keywords: antiferroelectric, energy storage, in situ structural evolution, multilayer ceramic capacitors, relaxor ferroelectrics
Quasi‐antipolar nanoclusters are engineered in lead‐free NaNbO3‐based high‐entropy relaxors that weaken polar nanoregion coupling and induce distinct ferroelectric transition under high fields to enable desirable polarization response. This breakthrough system achieves ultrahigh recoverable‐energy‐density (≈18.3 J cm−3), efficiency (≈91.5%), and breakthrough energy‐storage‐strength (0.25 J/(kV·mm−5)), supporting superior energy‐storage in eco‐friendly multilayer ceramic capacitors.

1. Introduction
Dielectric energy‐storage capacitors play a vital role in modern electronic and electrical power systems, particularly for pulse‐power applications such as medical defibrillators, hybrid electric vehicles, and advanced weapons systems, where rapid charge/discharge cycles are essential [1, 2, 3, 4]. Among various types of dielectric capacitors, ceramic‐based capacitors, especially multilayer ceramic capacitors (MLCCs), stand out due to their compact size, fast switching speed, excellent thermal stability, and high reliability, making them commercially indispensable [5, 6]. Dielectric ceramics used for energy storage primarily include linear dielectrics, ferroelectrics (FEs), relaxor FEs, and antiferroelectrics (AFEs), each exhibiting distinct polarization‐electric field (P‐E) responses that directly govern their energy storage performance [7].
Among these dielectric families, AFEs have attracted considerable interest for energy storage owing to their characteristic field‐induced AFE‐to‐FE phase transition, which yields a large maximum polarization (Pmax ) and thus a high theoretical energy storage density (Wrec ) [8, 9]. However, this first‐order phase transition is invariably accompanied by substantial hysteresis, leading to low energy‐storage efficiency (η). In contrast, relaxor FEs typically exhibit slim P‐E loops with minimal hysteresis as a result of their highly dynamic polar nanoregions (PNRs), which give rise to high η [10, 11, 12]. Nonetheless, their relatively low Pmax and premature polarization saturation generally limit the achievable Wrec . Recent research has sought to overcome the trade‐off between Wrec and η in relaxor FEs through various strategies, including constructing multi‐phase coexistence, exploiting superparaelectric states, or designing supercritical relaxors [2, 13, 14, 15, 16]. Despite these advances, many studies have overlooked the importance of the energy storage strength (Wrec /E), a critical metric defined as the recoverable energy density per unit electric field [17]. A high Wrec /E value is essential for achieving superior energy‐storage performance under relatively low applied fields, which in turn enhances device reliability and facilitates miniaturization [18, 19]. Therefore, an ideal energy‐storage feature necessitates the simultaneous optimization of Wrec , η, and Wrec /E, which fundamentally stems from an optimal P‐E response featuring high maximum polarization, low hysteresis, and delayed polarization saturation (as illustrated schematically in Figure S1).
Recently, several attempts have been made to combine the advantages of AFEs and relaxor FEs by constructing local‐scale coexistence of AFE domains and PNRs [20, 21]. However, the resulting energy‐storage feature often remains a compromise between Wrec and η. This limitation arises because harnessing the high polarization of AFEs necessitates an AFE‐to‐FE phase transition, whose intrinsic hysteresis inevitably degrades η. Moreover, these systems mostly require extremely high electric fields to achieve promising performance, failing to address the challenge of low Wrec /E [22]. In this work, we propose a novel strategy to optimize the P‐E response for advanced energy storage by engineering quasi‐antipolar nanoclusters (QA‐NCs) within a high‐entropy relaxor FE matrix, as illustrated in Figure 1. Unlike conventional AFE domains (Figure 1a), these QA‐NCs are composed of PNRs with large polarization orientation differences (>90°), yet not perfectly antiparallel (Figure 1b). This pronounced polarization mismatch promotes local stability, akin to geometric frustration, which effectively weakens the correlations among surrounding PNRs. Furthermore, the electric‐field‐induced transition of QA‐NCs toward a ferroelectric state differs from that of typical PNRs, requiring higher driving fields and thereby contributing to delayed polarization saturation. This results in a special free energy landscape with a flattened, multi‐well profile and low energy barriers for the short‐range ordered PNRs rotation and QA‐NCs to FE transitions (Figure 1c). Therefore, the optimized nonlinear P‐E response is realized. Regarding polarization hysteresis, the extremely small PNRs in high‐entropy relaxor FEs exhibit high polarization responsiveness to electric fields, while the energy barrier for the transition of QA‐NCs to a FE state is lower than that of conventional AFE nanodomains, thus avoiding a significant increase in hysteresis. As a result, extremely low polarization hysteresis can be achieved. Additionally, the polymorphic nanodomain structure contributes to a high Pmax . To realize this strategy, we conducted a high‐entropy composition design of intentionally incorporating aliovalent ions with different FE activities and tolerance factors (τ) into the A and B sites of AFE/FE‐tunable NaNbO3 (NN) matrix. As the configurational entropy increases, the compositional disorder is significantly enhanced. Meanwhile, the local chemical heterogeneity, where some species tend to stabilize FE order while others favor AFE order, is anticipated to facilitate the formation of such quasi‐antipolar configurations. The designed Na0.73Ba0.1Bi0.11Li0.06Nb0.73Ti0.22Fe0.05O3 (NBBLNTF) high‐entropy (≈1.58R) relaxor ceramic demonstrates a Wrec of 18.3 J·cm−3 and η of 91.5%, with an efficient Wrec /ΔE of 0.25 J/(kV·mm5) in its prototype MLCC device, validating the feasibility of the proposed quasi‐antipolar nanocluster engineering strategy.
FIGURE 1.

Schematic diagram for engineering QA‐NCs strategy within a high‐entropy relaxor FE matrix for a high‐performance energy storage dielectric capacitor. By incorporating aliovalent ions with different τ and high FE activities (spontaneous polarization, Ps ), QA‐NCs were constructed in relaxor ferroelectrics, thereby achieving a nonlinear P‐E response with large Pmax and high breakdown strength EB in NBBLNTF MLCC.
2. Results and Discussion
The X‐ray diffraction (XRD) pattern (Figure S2a) confirms the pure perovskite structure of the NBBLNTF ceramic. The NN ceramic exhibits an antiferroelectric orthorhombic phase with two distinct splitting peaks (002)O/(200)O and the presence of (11 3/4) and (21 3/4) superlattice diffraction peaks (Figure 2a; Figure S2b). Following multielement substitution, the NBBLNTF ceramic demonstrates a pseudocubic average structure as confirmed by the split diffraction lines merging, which is typical in relaxor materials. The local structure changes are analyzed by Raman spectroscopy in Figure 2b. Distinct multi‐peak features below 300 cm−1, characteristic of the AFE orthorhombic P phase, can be observed in pure NN [23]. NBBLNTF ceramic shows the obvious broadened Raman peaks, indicating increased structural disorder attributed to the break of the long‐range ordering by the local chemical heterogeneity in the high entropy ceramic [24, 25]. Figure 2c presents the temperature‐dependent dielectric spectra collected during the heating process. Pure NN ceramic obtains a maximum permittivity (εm ) near 370 °C with a sharp dielectric anomaly. After the configurational entropy modulation of aliovalent ions incorporated, the high entropy NBBLNTF ceramic with an entropy value of 1.58R exhibits a significantly enhanced relaxor behavior with the flattened permittivity‐temperature response, as indicated by the enhanced relaxation degree (ΔTrelaxor = Tm,1 MHz −Tm,1 kHz ) and diffuseness degree (γ) (Figure S3). A large relaxor degree would contribute to the exceptional energy storage performance, as the presence of high‐dynamic PNRs exhibits a rapid polarization response to an external electric field, resulting in an improvement in efficiency. Additionally, the dielectric properties demonstrate excellent temperature stability, with the capacitance variation rate (ΔC/C) remaining within ±15% across a broad temperature range from −100°C to 157°C (Figure S4), which is beneficial for the stability of energy storage performance. Figure 2d displays the polarization versus electric field (P‐E) hysteresis loops of NN and NBBLNTF ceramic measured from low electric field to breakdown using a bipolar triangular external field at 10 Hz. Consistent with the significantly enhanced relaxation degree, a greatly slimmed loop with significantly reduced hysteresis loss, i.e., from typical FE features of NN ceramic with a large Pr ≈32 µC·cm−2 to a near‐zero Pr ≈0.43 µC·cm−2 is shown in NBBLNTF ceramic. Meanwhile, the tested electric field is greatly enhanced in NBBLNTF ceramic. The Weibull distribution fitting reveals that the statistical breakdown strength Eb values increase from 16 kV·mm−1 in pure NN to 51 kV·mm−1 in NBBLNTF ceramic. Eb serves as a critical parameter determining dielectric energy storage performance. This improvement stems from the superior electrical insulation, characterized by increased resistance and higher activation energy Ea due to grain refinement, which effectively suppresses the leakage current. (Figure S5). Consequently, a substantial enhancement in energy storage performance with Wrec of 8.8 J cm−3 and η of 91.7% (nearly 59‐fold in Wrec , and 16‐fold in η) is achieved in NBBLNTF ceramic, benefiting from the markedly elevated Eb value and optimized polarization behavior, as shown in Figure 2e.
FIGURE 2.

Phase structure, capacitance, microstructure, and piezoelectric response of NN and NBBLNTF ceramics. (a) Enlarged XRD patterns. (b) Raman spectra. (c) Temperature‐dependent dielectric constant εr and loss tanδ. (d) P‐E loops at the maximum applied electric field with a test frequency of 10 Hz. (e) Comparison of the breakdown strength Eb , energy density Wrec , and efficiency η. Out‐of‐plane PFM amplitude images at various electric fields of (f) NN, and (g) NBBLNTF ceramic.
The domain response to the applied electric fields after multielement substitution is detected utilizing in situ piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM). The polarization behavior can be evaluated by the variation of amplitude magnitude under different electric fields, as presented in Figure 2f,g. The NN ceramic exhibits amplitude responsiveness under a driving electric field (≈5 V), whereas pronounced responsiveness can be observed under a low driving electric field (≈2 V) in NBBLNTF ceramic, demonstrating the dominance of highly dynamic PNRs in NBBLNTF ceramic. With increasing driving field strength, the orientation of FE domains or PNRs toward the electric field direction brings progressive domain growth and augmentation in amplitude values in both samples. The domains are completely switched to the electric field direction at a relatively lower driving field of ≈25 V in NN ceramic (as illustrated in the comparison of amplitude and phase images in Figure S6). By comparison, the NBBLNTF ceramic exhibits a delayed polarization saturation as evidenced by a persistent trend of increasing polarization response until the driving electric field elevates to 50 V. This delayed saturation behavior facilitates a smoother polarization reversal process, effectively mitigating hysteresis losses and thereby enhancing energy storage performance. And a completely reversible process can be observed in Figure 2g4 as the electric field returns to 2 V. This reversible field‐induced polarization behavior is conducive to the near‐zero Pr value and ensures the achievement of large Wrec and η.
Aberration‐corrected scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) and the high‐angle annular dark‐field (HAADF) STEM images were utilized to further investigate the local structural features of the NBBLNTF ceramic. Figure 3a exhibits the typical perovskite‐type atomic column arrangement along [001]c zone axis, and the corresponding atomic‐resolution energy‐dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) mapping in Figure 3b reveals the uniform distributions of foreign atoms at both A‐ and B‐sites. The polarization distributions (including orientation and magnitude) can be identified by analyzing the displacement of B‐site atoms with respect to the four nearest neighboring A‐site atoms. As evidenced by the contour map and the statistical analysis in Figure 3c, NBBLNTF ceramic obtains highly disordered polarization orientation with polarization angle ranges from −180° to 180° along the [001]c direction, suggesting the foreign atoms with significantly different ionic radii and ferroelectric activity effectively induce local structural distortion and hinder the formation of long‐range FE orders in the high‐entropy matrix [8]. Those multi‐symmetrical short‐range orders can reduce polarization anisotropy and enhance local random fields, contributing to the observed low‐hysteresis P‐E loop. Notably, the polarization orientation contour map reveals distinct local polarization configurations exhibiting pronounced angular disparities, as demarcated by the white dashed boxes in Figure 3c. The detailed distributions of polarization vectors within the specified regions (e.g., region I, II, and III) are presented in Figure 3d. Evidently, these emergent regions originate from the composition of PNRs with large polarization orientation differences (>90°), yet not perfectly antiparallel, giving rise to localized clusters that manifest distinct antipolar characteristics. Consequently, through aliovalent ions incorporation, the NBBLNTF ceramic achieves a unique combination of polarization configurations featuring quasi‐antipolar nanoclusters (QA‐NCs) embedded within a high‐entropy relaxor FE matrix.
FIGURE 3.

Local polarization configuration of NBBLNTF ceramic. (a) Atomic‐resolution HAADF‐STEM image of atomic structure taken with the [001]c zone axis, and (b) the corresponding EDS maps for individual Na, Nb, Ba, Ti, Bi, Fe, and O elements, (c) 2D contour of polarization orientation along [001]c with the statistical distributions of calculated polarization angles. (d) Magnified images with the corresponding atomic displacement vector of selected areas from (c). (e) 2D contour of polarization amplitude along [001]c with the statistical distributions of calculated polarization displacement.
The characteristics of the combined polarization configuration, particularly for those formed QA‐NCs, can be further investigated through the polarization amplitude distribution in Figure 3e. The QA‐NCs, outlined by white dashed boxes, exhibit significantly weak magnitudes compared to the surrounding regions that sustain strong polar fluctuations, thus breaking the FE long‐range order to form FE PNRs with sizes of 1–2 nm and resulting in a gradient polarization distribution in the NBBLNTF ceramic. Those extremely small PNRs with multiple orientations could reduce polarization anisotropy and weaken coupling between each other, thereby exhibiting high polarization responsiveness and reducing hysteresis loss [26]. And the distribution of these weak polar QA‐NCs is very analogous to the paraelectric phases in conventional RFEs, which can reduce internal stress and hinder polarization rotation under applied electric fields, thereby contributing to delayed polarization saturation [27, 28]. As the applied electric field increases, QA‐NCs would undergo a transition to polar clusters and then align along the electric field direction, thereby facilitating further enhancement of polarization intensity (as the persistently increased polarization response in PFM tests). More importantly, this transition would not cause a significant increase in hysteresis, owing to the lower transition energy barrier of QA‐NCs than that of conventional AFE nanodomains, which have a complete antiparallel arrangement. Meanwhile, these activated polar clusters can quickly recover to their initial state upon removing the electric field, further contributing to reducing hysteresis. The polarization response of NBBLNTF ceramic is compared with 0.73NN‐0.27BaTiO3 (NN‐0.27BT), 0.73NN‐0.27BiFeO3 (NN‐0.27BF), and 0.73NN‐0.27Bi0.5Li0.5TiO3 (NN‐0.27BLT) RFE ceramics at 20 kV/mm (Figure S7). Obviously, NBBLNTF ceramic exhibits superior energy storage potential based on a quasi‐linear P‐E loop with superior polarization. Therefore, the composited QA‐NCs facilitate the attainment of enhanced polarization response along with minimal hysteresis, providing a crucial structural foundation for further optimization of energy storage performance.
To further verify the potential of the energy storage performance optimization strategies, the NBBLNTF prototype MLCC device was fabricated employing a traditional tape casting technique. The MLCC has five layers of dielectric, and each layer has a thickness of ≈9 µm. As shown in Figure 4a, high‐quality samples with dense dielectric layers and continuous electrode layers are obtained. The EDS results (Figure 4b; Figure S8) exhibit a clear boundary between the dielectric and electrode layer, without element diffusion. Benefiting from the reduced thickness of the dielectric layer, the breakdown field strength was further enhanced, reaching 82 kV/mm (Figure S9). The NBBLNTF MLCC exhibits a near‐linear polarization response analogous to the bulk ceramic, as shown in Figure 4c. Attributed to the enhanced ferroelectric activity and the engineering of QA‐NCs, Pm increases gradually to 62.7 µC·cm−2 with increasing electric field, and remains a near‐zero Pr at the maximum electric field. Consequently, NBBLNTF MLCC achieves an outstanding energy storage performance with a giant Wrec of 18.3 J·cm−3 and a high η of 91.5% (Figure 4d). As summarized in Figure 4e,f, the ultrahigh Wrec obtained in our work demonstrates a marked superiority over previously reported dielectric systems, especially with an external electric field below 90 kV·mm−1, showcasing the optimal overall energy storage performance among RFE ceramics, encompassing both lead‐based and lead‐free systems [6, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62]. Moreover, Figure 4g compares the energy storage strength Wrec/E as a function of E between the NBBLNTF MLCC and the latest lead‐free energy storage ceramics (representative systems are tabulated in Table S1). NBBLNTF MLCC shows a superior high value of Wrec/E = 0.25 J/(kV·mm−5), indicating its capability to achieve high energy storage density under relatively low electric fields. This remarkable characteristic holds significant implications for energy storage applications, while simultaneously validating the superiority of the proposed optimization strategy for improving energy storage performance in RFEs.
FIGURE 4.

Microstructures and energy storage performance of the NBBLNTFO MLCC (a) Digital image of the MLCC and cross‐sectional SEM image with (b) corresponding element distribution. (c) P‐E loops up to breakdown. (d) The corresponding energy storage performance as a function of the electric field. (e) Comparisons of Wrec between NBBLNTF MLCC and other reported NN‐based lead‐free bulk ceramics with electric fields < 90 kV·mm−1. Comparison of (f) Wrec and η, (g) energy storage strength Wrec/E of NBBLNTF MLCC with other energy storage relaxor systems.
From a practical application perspective, the temperature and frequency stability of the NBBLNTF MLCC was further considered to evaluate the application potential. Figure 5a exhibits the P‐E loops of NBBLNTF MLCC as a function of temperature under an electric field of 50 kV·mm−1. Slim loops with small hysteresis are obtained with increasing temperature, and the temperature‐insensitive large Wrec of 11.6 ± 0.5 J·cm−3 (ΔWrec <5%) and a large η of 90 ± 4% (η <10%) can be maintained over a wide temperature range from 25 °C to 180 °C. The excellent thermal stability should be attributed to the temperature‐insensitive dielectric properties and phase structure, as shown in Figures S4 and S10. Regarding frequency stability, the frequency‐dependent P‐E loop measured from 2 to 240 Hz under 50 kV·mm−1 shows a significant frequency‐independent energy storage performance with a large Wrec of 11.8 ± 0.2 J·cm−3 (ΔWrec <5%) and a large η of 92 ± 2% (Δη ≈8%). The charge/discharge performance characteristics were also tested as an important metric for assessing the energy storage application potential. Figure 5e presents the overdamped discharge at different temperatures with a 200 Ω load resistor. The MLCC exhibits a high discharge energy density WD of 10.2 ± 0.2 J·cm−3 in the range of 25 °C to 100 °C and a fast discharge rate t0.9 of 258 ns. Besides, the NBBLNTF MLCC obtains an excellent cycle reliability with only a slight decline in discharge energy density WD by ≈3.5% after 104 charge‐discharge cycles (Figure 5f). These results reveal good charging‐discharging performance of NBBLNTF MLCC and make it a promising candidate for pulsed‐power applications.
FIGURE 5.

Stability and charge/discharge properties of the NBBLNTF MLCC. (a) P‐E loops and (b) Wrec and η as a function of temperature at 50 kV·mm−1. (c) P‐E loops and (d) Wrec and η as a function of frequency at 50 kV·mm−1. (e) Thermal stability and (f) fatigue test of (a) P‐E loops and (b) Wrec and η as a function of temperature at 50 kV·mm−1.
3. Conclusion
In conclusion, we have successfully optimized the polarization‐field response of NN‐based lead‐free relaxor FEs by introducing QA‐NCs via a high‐entropy composition design. The resulting heterogeneous nanostructure, comprising QA‐NCs embedded within a matrix of polar nanoregions, contributes to a desirable P‐E loop characterized by an extremely low hysteresis, highly delayed polarization saturation, and a large Pmax in NBBLNTF ceramics. The fabricated NBBLNTF MLCC delivers outstanding overall energy storage performance, including an ultrahigh Wrec of 18.3 J·cm−3, a high η of 91.5%, and a superior Wrec /E of 0.25 J/(kV·mm)−5, along with excellent thermal (25‐180 °C) and frequency (2–240 Hz) stability. The combined merits not only underscore the promising application potential of NBBLNTF‐based devices in advanced pulsed‐power electronics but also demonstrate a feasible and effective approach to developing high‐performance energy‐storage dielectrics.
4. Experimental Section
4.1. Material Synthesis
NaNbO3, and Na0.73Ba0.1Bi0.11Li0.06Nb0.73Ti0.22Fe0.05O3ceramics (abbreviated as NN and NBBLNTF) were fabricated by the tape‐casting method using analytical pure raw materials of Na2CO3, Nb2O5, BaCO3, Bi2O3, Li2CO3, TiO2, and Fe2O3 (>99.0%, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd). The stoichiometrically weighted powders were subjected to ball milling for 8 h and then calcined at 850 °C for 6 h. The calcined powder was ball‐milled for 12 h to obtain fine NN and NBBLNTF powders for casting. The powders were mixed with a dispersant and ethyl acetate/ethanol solvent for 24 h, and then added organic binder, plasticizer, and ball mill were added for 12 h to obtain homogenous slurries. The prepared uniform slurry was cast by a laboratory tape casting machine (CAM‐L252, KEKO, Slovenia) on a poly‐(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) substrate. The prepared green films were cut, stacked, isothermally pressured, and then cut into 1 cm × 1 cm patches, finally sintering at 1180–1220 °C for 2 h after removing the organic components. The NBBLNTF MLCC was prepared by the same green films. The 70Ag/30Pd electrode paste was screen‐printed by a printing machine using a customized mask. The printed layers were alternately stacked with blank diaphragms stacked at both ends as the protective layer, followed by isothermal pressure. After cutting and sintering, silver electrode paste was applied to both ends.
4.2. X‐Ray Diffraction
Phase structure was detected using a powder X‐ray diffraction (XRD) diffractometer with a Cu Kα with λ = 1.5406 Å (XRD, PANalytical X‐Pert PRO MPD, Panalytical, Netherlands).
4.3. Scanning Electron Microscopy
The microstructure and element distribution of ceramics and MLCC samples were examined using a scanning electron microscope (SEM EM‐30AX Plus, Coxem, Korea).
4.4. Piezoresponse Force Microscopy
The microscopic domain configuration under different electric fields was analyzed by piezoelectric response force microscopy (MFP‐3D, Asylum Research, USA) connected with a high voltage amplifier on polished and annealed surfaces of the ceramic samples.
4.5. Raman Spectra
In situ Raman spectra were acquired on well‐polished samples using a confocal microscope system (LabRam HR Evolution, HORIBA JOBIN YVON, Longjumeau Cedex, France) with a heating stage (HFS600E‐PB2, Linkam Scientific Instruments, UK).
4.6. Transmission Electron Microscopy
High‐angle annular dark‐field STEM (HAADF‐STEM) images were recorded on a probe‐corrected Hitachi HF5000. Specimens were prepared in a Gatan PIPS II by mechanical thinning followed by Ar⁺ ion milling.
4.7. Dielectric Measurements
The temperature‐, frequency‐ dependent dielectric properties, and the impedance data were measured by an LCR meter (KEYSIGHT E4990A, Keysight Technologies, USA) with a high‐temperature resistance furnace.
4.8. Energy Storage Properties
The ferroelectric properties were assessed based on the P‐E loops obtained from the ferroelectric testing platform (TF Analyzer 2000E, aixACCT Systems GmbH, Germany) integrated with a high‐temperature stage (HFS600E‐PB2, Tongguo Technology, China). The pulsed charge‐discharge current was determined using an RLC circuit (CFD‐003, Tongguo Technology, China). The energy storage properties were measured on bulk ceramic samples with a thickness of 50‐60 µm, and gold electrodes with an area of ≈0.8 mm2. The active area between the opposite electrodes was ≈3 mm2. The dielectric layers of sintered MLCCs have a thickness of ≈9 µm, and the active area between the opposite electrodes was ≈3 mm2.
4.9. Breakdown Strength
The dielectric breakdown measurements were carried out on a voltage‐withstand test device (BDJC‐50KV, Beiguangjingyi Instrument Equipment Co. Ltd., Beijing, China).
4.10. Leakage Current
DC leakage characteristics were evaluated using a high‐resistance measurement system (6517B, Keithley, USA) coupled with a temperature‐controlled sample stage (HCT1801, Tongguo Technology).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Supporting information
Supporting File: advs73550‐sup‐0001‐SuppMat.docx.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (2308085QE140), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFB3807403), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52302131, 52302136), the Key Research and Development Program of Anhui Province (202304a05020044), the Anhui Province Technology Innovation Tackling Plan Project (202423i08050005, 202423i08050040), Opening Project of Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Low Temperature Co‐fired Materials (HNLC2025A02), and the Opening Project of State Key Laboratory of Advanced Ceramics (SKL202404SIC).
Contributor Information
Aiwen Xie, Email: xieaiwen@ahpu.edu.cn.
Tengfei Hu, Email: hutengfei@mail.sic.ac.cn.
Ruzhong Zuo, Email: zuoruzhong@ahpu.edu.cn.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
- 1. Yang L., Kong X., Li F., et al., “Perovskite Lead‐Free Dielectrics for Energy Storage Applications,” Progress in Materials Science 102 (2019), 72–108. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Pan H., Lan S., Xu S., et al., “Ultrahigh Energy Storage In Superparaelectric Relaxor Ferroelectrics,” Science 374 (2021): 100–104, 10.1126/science.abi7687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Yan F., Qian J., Wang S., and Zhai J., “Progress And Outlook On Lead‐Free Ceramics For Energy Storage Applications,” Nano Energy 123 (2024): 109394, 10.1016/j.nanoen.2024.109394. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Cao W., Sun T., Luo H., et al., “A Strategy of Enhancing Polarization to Achieve Excellent Energy Storage Performance in Simple Bi0.5K0.5TiO3‐Based Relaxors,” Angewandte Chemie 137 (2025): 202500516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Feng M., Feng Y., Zhang T., et al., “Recent Advances in Multilayer‐Structure Dielectrics for Energy Storage Application,” Advanced Science 8 (2021): 2102221, 10.1002/advs.202102221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Zhao P., Cai Z., Chen L., et al., “Ultra‐High Energy Storage Performance In Lead‐Free Multilayer Ceramic Capacitors Via A Multiscale Optimization Strategy,” Energy & Environmental Science 13 (2020): 4882–4890, 10.1039/D0EE03094E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Zhang H., Wei T., Zhang Q., et al., “A review on the development of Lead‐Free Ferroelectric Energy‐Storage Ceramics and Multilayer Capacitors,” Journal of Materials Chemistry C 8 (2020): 16648–16667, 10.1039/D0TC04381H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Ge G., Qian J., Xu K., et al., “Excellent Energy Storage Performance of Polymorphic Modulated Antiferroelectric Lead Zirconate Ceramic,” Advanced Materials 37 (2025): 2505731, 10.1002/adma.202505731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Qi H., Zuo R., Xie A., et al., “Ultrahigh Energy‐Storage Density in NaNbO 3 ‐Based Lead‐Free Relaxor Antiferroelectric Ceramics With Nanoscale Domains,” Advanced Functional Materials 29 (2019): 1903877, 10.1002/adfm.201903877. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Dong X., Fu Z., Wang Z., Lv X., and Wu J., “Engineering Relaxors By Embedding Ultra‐Weak Polar Regions For Superior Energy Storage,” Nature Communications 16 (2025): 5657, 10.1038/s41467-025-61406-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Chen L., Zhang Y., Qi H., et al., “Ultrahigh Capacitive Energy Storage in Lead‐Free Relaxors via Localizing Distortion,” ACS Nano 19 (2025): 17738–17745, 10.1021/acsnano.5c02357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Ma Q., Chen L., Yu H., et al., “Excellent Energy‐Storage Performance in Lead‐Free Capacitors With Highly Dynamic Polarization Heterogeneous Nanoregions,” Small 19 (2023): 2303768, 10.1002/smll.202303768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Chen L., Wang N., Zhang Z., et al., “Local Diverse Polarization Optimized Comprehensive Energy‐Storage Performance in Lead‐Free Superparaelectrics,” Advanced Materials 34 (2022): 2205787, 10.1002/adma.202205787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Fu J., Xie A., Zuo R., et al., “A Highly Polarizable Concentrated Dipole Glass For Ultrahigh Energy Storage,” Nature Communications 15 (2024): 7338, 10.1038/s41467-024-51766-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Xie A., Fu J., Zuo R., et al., “Supercritical Relaxor Nanograined Ferroelectrics for Ultrahigh‐Energy‐Storage Capacitors,” Advanced Materials 34 (2022): 2204356, 10.1002/adma.202204356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Shu L., Shi X., Zhang X., et al., “Partitioning Polar‐Slush Strategy In Relaxors Leads To Large Energy‐Storage Capability,” Science 385 (2024): 204–209, 10.1126/science.adn8721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Cao W., Wu Y., Yang X., et al., “Breaking polarization‐breakdown strength paradox for ultrahigh energy storage density in NBT‐based ceramics,” Nature Communications 16 (2025): 6228, 10.1038/s41467-025-61030-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Wu G., Zhou L., Zhang X., Bian S., Ran H., and Yu C., “A Touchable Pulsed Air Plasma Plume Driven by DC Power Supply,” IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science 38 (2010): 3404–3408, 10.1109/TPS.2010.2082571. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Dang S., Peng Z., Zhang X., et al., “Enhanced Energy Storage Performance Of Bifeo3‐Batio3 Based Ceramics Under Moderate Electric Fields Via Multiple Synergistic Design,” Chemical Engineering Journal 512 (2025): 162494, 10.1016/j.cej.2025.162494. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Yang B., Liu Y., Jiang R.‐J., et al., “Enhanced Energy Storage In Antiferroelectrics Via Antipolar Frustration,” Nature 637 (2025): 1104–1110, 10.1038/s41586-024-08505-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Wang S., Xu K., Ge G., et al., “Nanoplex‐Driven Energy Storage In Relaxor Antiferroelectrics,” Energy & Environmental Science 18 (2025): 7481–7489, 10.1039/D5EE02541A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Zhang M., Lan S., Yang B., et al., “Ultrahigh energy storage in high‐entropy ceramic capacitors with polymorphic relaxor phase,” Science 384 (2024): 185–189, 10.1126/science.adl2931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Shen Z., Wang X., Kuok M., and Tang S., “Raman Scattering Investigations Of The Antiferroelectric‐Ferroelectric Phase Transition of NaNbO3,” Journal of Raman Spectroscopy 29 (1998): 379–384, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4555(199805)29:5<379::AID-JRS249>3.0.CO;2-F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Xie A., Li Z., Wu X., et al., “Superior Capacitive Energy Storage of NaNbO 3 ‐Based MLCCs Enabled by Heterogeneous Short‐Range Ferroic Orders,” Advanced Functional Materials (2025): 16297, 10.1002/adfm.202516297. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Wu J., Zhu J., Zhang T., et al., “Nano‐Micro Engineering Modulating High‐Entropy Multilayer Ceramic Capacitor for High‐Performance Energy Storage,” Advanced Functional Materials (2025): 14008, 10.1002/adfm.202514008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Zhao C., Wu H., Li F., et al., “Practical High Piezoelectricity in Barium Titanate Ceramics Utilizing Multiphase Convergence With Broad Structural Flexibility,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 140 (2018): 15252–15260, 10.1021/jacs.8b07844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Novikov S. and Vannikov A., “Cluster Structure in the Distribution of the Electrostatic Potential in a Lattice of Randomly Oriented Dipoles,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry 99 (1995): 14573–14576, 10.1021/j100040a001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Zhou Y., Zhang T., Chen L., et al., “Design of antiferroelectric Polarization Configuration For Ultrahigh Capacitive Energy Storage Via Increasing Entropy,” Nature Communications 16 (2025): 805, 10.1038/s41467-025-56194-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Chen F., Chen M., Zhang J., et al., “Polar Vortices in Relaxor Ferroelectric Ceramics for High‐Efficiency Capacitive Energy Storage,” ACS Nano 19 (2025): 1809–1818, 10.1021/acsnano.4c16672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Li Y., Liu Y., Tang M., et al., “Energy storage performance of BaTiO3‐based relaxor ferroelectric ceramics prepared through a two‐step process,” Chemical Engineering Journal 419 (2021): 129673, 10.1016/j.cej.2021.129673. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Kang R., Wang Z., Zhao Y., et al., “Enhanced Energy Storage Performance Of Bi0.5k0.5tio3‐Based Ceramics Via Composition Modulation,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds 935 (2023): 167999, 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.167999. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Niu Z., Zheng P., Xiao Y., et al., “Bi0·5K0·5TiO3‐Based Lead‐Free Relaxor Ferroelectric With High Energy Storage Performances Via The Grain Size And Bandgap Engineering,” Materials Today Chemistry 24 (2022): 100898, 10.1016/j.mtchem.2022.100898. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Wang C., Cao W., Liang C., et al., “Ultrahigh Energy‐Storage Density of BaTiO 3 ‐Based Ceramics via the Interfacial Polarization Strategy,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 15 (2023): 42774–42783, 10.1021/acsami.3c08168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Long C., Zhou W., Song H., et al., “Simultaneously realizing ultrahigh energy storage density and efficiency in BaTiO3‐based dielectric ceramics by creating highly dynamic polar nanoregions and intrinsic conduction,” Acta Materialia 256 (2023): 119135, 10.1016/j.actamat.2023.119135. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Kong X., Yang L., Meng F., et al., “High‐entropy Engineered BaTiO3‐Based Ceramic Capacitors With Greatly Enhanced High‐Temperature Energy Storage Performance,” Nature Communications 16 (2025): 885, 10.1038/s41467-025-56195-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Zhou Z., Pan Z., Hu J., et al., “Engineering Nanocluster And Pyrochlore Phase in BiFeO3‐Based Ceramics For Electrostatic Energy Storage,” Composites Part B: Engineering 287 (2024): 111829, 10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111829. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Li Y., Tang M.‐Y., Zhang Z.‐G., et al., “BaTiO 3 ‐Based Ceramics With High Energy Storage Density,” Rare Metals 42 (2023): 1261–1273, 10.1007/s12598-022-02175-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Cui T., Yu A., Zhang Y., et al., “Energy Storage Performance of BiFeO 3 –SrTiO 3 –BaTiO 3 Relaxor Ferroelectric Ceramics,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society 105 (2022): 6252–6261, 10.1111/jace.18589. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Zhang J., Pu Y., Hao Y., et al., “Novel ternary BiFeO3‐based perovskite‐pyrochlore composite ceramics for enhanced energy‐storage performance,” Chemical Engineering Journal 516 (2025): 164008, 10.1016/j.cej.2025.164008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Zhu W., Shen Z.‐Y., Deng W., et al., “A Review: (Bi,Na)TiO3 (BNT)‐Based Energy Storage Ceramics,” Journal of Materiomics 10 (2024): 86–123, 10.1016/j.jmat.2023.05.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Duan X., Wang J., Chai Q., et al., “Achieving High Energy Storage Density Under Moderate Electric Field in K0.5Na0.5NbO3 Ceramics Via Multiple Synergistic Optimization Strategies,” Journal of Power Sources 649 (2025): 237453, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2025.237453. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Li Q., Ji S., Wang D., et al., “Simultaneously enhanced Energy Storage Density And Efficiency In Novel Bifeo3‐Based Lead‐Free Ceramic Capacitors,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society 41 (2021): 387–393, 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.08.032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Kang F., Zhang L., Yang W., et al., “Achieving Ultrahigh Energy Storage Performance In Bifeo3‐Batio3 Based Lead Free Relaxors Via A Composition Optimization Strategy,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society 42 (2022): 6958–6967. [Google Scholar]
- 44. Zheng L., Niu Z., Zheng P., et al., “Simultaneously Achieving High Energy Storage Performance And Remarkable Thermal Stability in Bi0.5K0.5TiO3‐Based Ceramics,” Materials Today Energy 28 (2022): 101078, 10.1016/j.mtener.2022.101078. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Xing J., Huang Y., Xu Q., et al., “Realizing High Comprehensive Energy Storage and Ultrahigh Hardness in Lead‐Free Ceramics,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 13 (2021): 28472–28483, 10.1021/acsami.1c05153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Hou L., Li C., Wang X., Wang X., Wang T., and Huan Y., “Superior energy storage efficiency through tailoring relaxor behavior and band energy gap in KNN‐based ferroelectric ceramic capacitors,” Journal of Advanced Dielectrics 13 (2023): 2242001, 10.1142/S2010135X22420012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Sun Z., Zhao S., Wang T., et al., “Achieving High Overall Energy Storage Performance of KNN‐Based Transparent Ceramics By Ingenious Multiscale Designing,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A 12 (2024): 16735–16747, 10.1039/D4TA02425G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Wang X., Huan Y., Zhao P., et al., “Optimizing the Grain Size And Grain Boundary Morphology of (K,Na)NbO3‐Based Ceramics: Paving The Way For Ultrahigh Energy Storage Capacitors,” Journal of Materiomics 7 (2021): 780–789, 10.1016/j.jmat.2020.12.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Li D., Zhou D., Wang D., Zhao W., Guo Y., and Shi Z., “Improved Energy Storage Properties Achieved in (K, Na)NbO 3 ‐Based Relaxor Ferroelectric Ceramics via a Combinatorial Optimization Strategy,” Advanced Functional Materials 32 (2022): 2111776, 10.1002/adfm.202111776. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Zhang M., Yang H., Lin Y., Yuan Q., and Du H., “Significant Increase in Comprehensive Energy Storage Performance of Potassium Sodium Niobate‐Based Ceramics Via Synergistic Optimization Strategy,” Energy Storage Materials 45 (2022): 861–868, 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.12.037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Zhao R., Wang K., Li W., et al., “High Recoverable Energy Storage Density And Efficiency Achieved In Doped Nanbo3 Ceramics Via Composition Design Strategy For Pulsed Power Capacitor,” Chemical Engineering Journal 495 (2024): 153421, 10.1016/j.cej.2024.153421. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Dong X., Li X., Chen H., et al., “Realizing Enhanced Energy Storage And Hardness Performances in 0.90NaNbO3−0.10Bi(Zn0.5Sn0.5)O3 Ceramics,” Journal of Advanced Ceramics 11 (2022): 729–741, 10.1007/s40145-022-0566-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Wei K., Duan J., Fan X., et al., “Achieving Ultrahigh Energy Storage Performance for NaNbO3‐Based Lead‐Free Antiferroelectric Ceramics via the Coupling of the Stable Antiferroelectric R Phase and Nanodomain Engineering,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 15 (2023): 48354–48364, 10.1021/acsami.3c09630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Zhang L., Chen Z., Luo G., Ai F., and Luo N., “NaNbO3‐Based Short‐Range Antiferroelectric Ceramics With Ultrahigh Energy Storage Performance,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society 43 (2023): 6077–6083, 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.07.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Xu M., Zhang X., Zeng D., et al., “Optimize Energy Storage Performance of NaNbO3 Ceramics By Multivariable Control Strategy,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society 44 (2024): 6460–6469, 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2024.04.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Lv Z., Lu T., Liu Z., et al., “NaNbO 3 ‐Based Multilayer Ceramic Capacitors With Ultrahigh Energy Storage Performance,” Advanced Energy Materials 14 (2024): 2304291, 10.1002/aenm.202304291. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Qian J., Yu Z., Ge G., et al., “Topological Vortex Domain Engineering for High Dielectric Energy Storage Performance,” Advanced Energy Materials 14 (2024): 2303409, 10.1002/aenm.202303409. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Zeng X., Lin J., Chen Y., et al., “Superior Energy Storage Capability and Fluorescence Negative Thermal Expansion of NaNbO 3 ‐Based Transparent Ceramics by Synergistic Optimization,” Small 20 (2024): 2309992, 10.1002/smll.202309992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Shi W., Zhang L., Jing R., et al., “Moderate Fields, Maximum Potential: Achieving High Records With Temperature‐Stable Energy Storage in Lead‐Free BNT‐Based Ceramics,” Nano‐Micro Letters 16 (2024): 91, 10.1007/s40820-023-01290-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Zhong B., Zuo C., Yang C., et al., “Bifunctional Europium Doped Srtio3 Ceramics With Energy Storage And Photoluminescence,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds 901 (2022): 163556. [Google Scholar]
- 61. Wu C., Pu Y., Lu X., et al., “Constructing Novel SrTiO3‐Based Composite Ceramics With High Energy Storage Performance Under Moderate Electric Field,” Journal of Power Sources 604 (2024): 234475, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.234475. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Liu L., Liu Y., Hao J., et al., “Multi‐Scale Collaborative Optimization of SrTiO3‐Based Energy Storage Ceramics With High Performance And Excellent Stability,” Nano Energy 109 (2023): 108275, 10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.108275. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supporting File: advs73550‐sup‐0001‐SuppMat.docx.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
