Abstract
Ribosome profiling has revealed thousands of noncanonical translation events across mammalian genomes, yet functional characterization has overwhelmingly focused on proliferative fitness in cancer cell lines. Here, we present a comprehensive survey of noncanonical translation in the mouse immune system and its functional consequences in macrophages. By performing a unified Ribo-seq meta-analysis across 20 public mouse leukocyte datasets - spanning macrophages, dendritic cells, neutrophils, B cells, and T cells - we define a compendium of 22,276 noncanonical coding sequences (CDSs), including upstream ORFs (uORFs), downstream ORFs, and ORFs on noncoding RNAs and pseudogenes (ncORFs). Proteogenomic integration with reanalyzed mass spectrometry data prioritizes a high-confidence subset with detectable protein products, including pseudogene-encoded and lncRNA-encoded zinc finger proteins. To move beyond cataloging, we carried out two orthogonal CRISPR screens in immortalized bone marrow-derived macrophages: a fitness screen identifying noncanonical CDSs required for macrophage viability, and a TLR1/TLR2-NFκB reporter screen uncovering CDSs that modulate innate immune signaling. These screens nominate uORFs, several conserved between mouse and human, that exert phenotypic effects on par with their cognate coding sequences. We unexpectedly discovered a family of endogenous retroviral envelope-derived proteins translated in adult myeloid cells. Among these, SYNIR is a full-length syncytin-like membrane glycoprotein that positively regulates NFκB-responsive transcription, while SEMR is a secreted protein with structural homology to the feline leukemia virus accessory protein FeLIX that drives broad transcriptional remodeling of macrophage gene programs upon knockout. Updated single-cell RNA-seq annotations and an interactive UCSC Genome Browser session integrating Ribo-seq, proteomics, and CRISPR screen data are provided as community resources. Together, these findings expand the functional landscape of noncanonical translation in immunity and establish endogenous retroviral proteins as previously unrecognized regulators of macrophage biology.
Introduction
Over the past decade, ribosome profiling (Ribo-seq) has revealed that translation occurs at thousands of sites beyond canonical coding sequences. In mRNAs this includes translation of upstream open reading frames (uORFs) in the 5’ untranslated region (UTR), internal ORFs (iORFs) nested in the coding sequence (CDS), and downstream ORFs (dORFs) in the 3’ UTR. Beyond annotated coding genes, translation of ORFs embedded at loci annotated as pseudogenes and noncoding RNAs (ncORFs) has also been repeatedly documented1–4. In this report we will refer to the subset of ORFs, which are predicted to be translated, as noncanonical coding sequenes (nCDSs). These nCDSs give rise to a “dark proteome”5 whose scope continues to expand with improved detection methods and deeper sequencing coverage, challenging classical definitions of coding potential and raising fundamental questions about which translated sequences carry biological function.
Early genome annotation efforts relied heavily on sequence length and evolutionary conservation, establishing a 100-codon threshold that systematically excluded short ORFs from reference gene sets6. As a consequence, there may be thousands of unannotated small proteins and regulatory peptides, arising from misclassified “noncoding” transcripts. Computational rescoring of genomic sequences, combined with advances in Ribo-seq and mass spectrometry-based proteomics, has since identified hundreds of translated nCDSs with important phenotypic effects, including defined roles in inflammation7–9, skeletal muscle activity10,11, and cell differentiation12. These discoveries have motivated efforts to catalog noncanonical translation events and to integrate them into updated genome annotations13.
Despite progress in cataloging nCDSs2,14–16, functional characterization has lagged substantially behind discovery. The vast majority of Ribo-seq-detected translation events remain uncharacterized with respect to biological activity. Moreover, many small, nCDS translation products are likely to be unstable, degrading shortly after production, and not act as functional effectors17,18. Recent efforts have been made to ascribe biological function to some of the tens of thousands of predicted nCDSs with multiple high-throughput perturbation studies linking these ORFs to phenotypes. However, these screens have predominantly tested essentiality in proliferating cancer cell lines and stem cells19–23, probing nCDS importance in a relatively narrow context. A notable exception is a targeted Perturb-seq experiment in K562s which provided a rich readout of altered gene programming following nCDS knockout, albeit at reduced throughput compared to pooled screens19. Thus, while the laudable goal of identifying cancer driving noncanonical translation events has helped contextualize some of these nCDSs, the field has not witnessed similar efforts to apply high throughput screens in other biological contexts.
Immune cells represent a particularly compelling context in which to explore noncanonical translation24. Leukocytes must rapidly adapt their proteomes in response to inflammatory cues, pathogen encounter, and tissue damage. This plasticity is regulated in part at the translational level, with global reprogramming of ribosome occupancy occurring within hours of immune activation25,26. uORFs have emerged as key regulatory elements in this context, modulating translation of downstream CDSs for cytokines, transcription factors, and stress-response genes27–33. Moreover, a subset of long noncoding RNAs and pseudogenes are induced in inflammatory contexts34,35, and the translational potential of these loci remains largely unexplored.
A related underexplored dimension of noncanonical translation concerns endogenous retroviruses (ERVs), remnants of ancient retroviral integrations that comprise roughly 8–10% of mammalian genomes36,37. Most ERV sequences have degenerated beyond coding capacity, but a subset retains intact ORFs that can be transcribed and translated38. The best-characterized examples are the syncytins, envelope-derived (Env) genes that have been co-opted for placental development and trophoblast fusion across placental mammalian lineages39,40. Whether additional ERV ORFs are translated outside the placenta, and whether they contribute to immune function, remain open questions.
Addressing these gaps requires an integrative approach that combines detection of translation events and high-throughput functional assays. Here, we present a unified Ribo-seq meta-analysis of all public mouse leukocyte datasets available at the outset of this study to define a comprehensive catalog of nCDSs translated in the immune system. We merge computational translation predictions from two complementary callers with a custom transcriptome annotation and highlight hits with confident proteomics support. We then carry out two orthogonal CRISPR screens in immortalized bone marrow derived macrophages (iBMDMs) - an essentiality screen for fitness effects and a TLR1/TLR2-NFκB reporter screen for inflammatory signaling - to identify nCDs with measurable biological activity. This strategy nominates translated uORFs and ncORFs that modulate macrophage viability and innate immune activation, including several conserved between mouse and human. Finally, we characterize a family of translated Env proteins expressed in myeloid cells, including a syncytin-like membrane protein that tunes NFκB-responsive transcription and a secreted Env fragment with structural homology to the feline leukemia virus accessory (FeLIX) protein. Together, these findings expand the functional landscape of noncanonical translation in immunity and establish resources - including updated single-cell annotations and an interactive genome browser - for continued exploration of the noncanonical ORFeome.
Results
A unified leukocyte Ribo-seq meta-analysis defines a noncanonical ORF compendium
We analyzed 20 publicly available Ribo-seq datasets spanning mouse leukocyte lineages (neutrophils41, macrophages7,42–45, B cells46–49, CD449–54 and CD8 T cells55, and dendritic cells56–58) and kidney tissue59 treated with the inflammatory ligand lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (Fig. 1A,B). After preprocessing to remove contaminating reads (Supplementary Fig. 1A, Methods), the majority of retained reads mapped in-frame to annotated coding sequence (CDS) P-sites, supporting expected ribosome occupancy (Supplementary Fig. 1B,C).
Figure 1. Integrated Ribo-seq and proteomics pipeline across immune cells.

(A) Overview of the noncanonical CDS (nCDS) discovery pipeline. Ribo-seq reads were aligned with STAR to a custom transcriptome constructed from GENCODE vM31, RefSeq lncRNAs, and a Nanopore de novo assembly. Translation events were inferred independently using RiboTISH and PRICE. The predicted nCDS peptides were merged with Gencode protein annotations to generate a custom spectral search database for MS-GF+ and ms2Rescore analysis of publicly available proteomics datasets.
(B) Publicly available Ribo-seq datasets analyzed in this study.
(C) Publicly available mass spectrometry datasets.
(D) Shared predictions between RiboTISH- and PRICE-derived nCDSs at each tool's Benjamini Hochberg adjusted p-value < 0.01 cut-off.
(E) Representative nCDS categories identified by the pipeline. Canonical CDS entries and their N-terminal extensions were not considered in subsequent analysis.
(F) Composition of the aggregated nCDS catalog across all datasets.
(G) Reidentification of previously documented nCDSs.
CDS: coding sequence
UTR: untranslated region
lncRNA: long noncoding RNA
uORF: upstream open reading frame
iORF: internal open reading frame
dORF: downstream open reading frame
ncORF: noncoding RNA open reading frame
We generated a custom transcriptome that merges GENCODE vM31, RefSeq lncRNAs, and a de novo Nanopore direct RNA assembly60, to enable comprehensive translation discovery (Fig. 1A). Translation events were inferred independently using two complementary callers - RiboTISH61 and PRICE62 (Fig. 1A; Tables S1,S2) - and predicted protein sequences were merged with GENCODE proteins to generate a tailored spectral search database for peptide spectra matching (Fig. 1A,C, Methods). Aggregating predictions across all datasets yielded a catalog of 22,276 nCDSs spanning uORFs, iORFs, dORFs, and ncORFs, while excluding annotated CDS and N-terminal extensions from the noncanonical set (Fig. 1E,F, Table S3). UORFs made up the largest fraction of nCDS calls, consistent with previous reports19,22,63 and unsurprising given their position upstream of canonical CDSs and preferential access to the pre-initiation complex (Fig. 1F). At matched confidence thresholds (adjusted p-value [padj] < 0.01), PRICE proved more sensitive, identifying a larger number of ORFs and reidentifying 10 out of 10 previously identified nCDSs compared to 8 out of 10 reindentifications with RiboTISH (Fig. 1D,G, Table S4).
Consistent with expectations for noncanonical translation, predicted nCDSs were predominantly short, with many below the historical 100-codon cut-off used in earlier coding sequence annotation6 (Supplementary Fig. 2A). In silico localization predictions with DeepLoc64 further suggested that proteins encoded by predicted nCDSs differ from canonical proteomes, including an increased propensity for mitochondrial localization and reduced propensity for membrane embedding, consistent with prior nCDSs predictions18(Supplementary Fig. 2B, Tables S5–7).
Proteogenomic evidence strongly supports translation of pseudogenes and lncRNA-encoded zinc finger proteins
To determine which Ribo-seq-inferred translation events yield detectable protein products, we reanalyzed public mass spectrometry datasets with our predicted nCDS peptide database using MS-GF+65 for initial search and MS2Rescore66 to recalculate assignments (Fig 1A; Tables S10,S11). High confidence peptide spectrum matches (PSMs) were reported (q-value < 0.01; posterior error probability < 0.1) and we highlighted nCDSs supported by either robust total peptide-spectrum matches (PSMs; ≥5) or multiple unique PSMs (≥2) and visualized their expression across immune lineages using uniformly processed, batch-corrected gene abundance estimates (Fig. 2A; Table S12) (Methods).
Figure 2. Proteomics supports translation of select noncanonical loci.

(A) Heatmap of nCDS with either a minimum of 5 total peptide spectra matches (PSMs) or 2 unique PSMs. Gene expression is uniformly processed and batch corrected with Limma to calculate comparable counts per million (CPM). Final expression for a given cell type is the mean of experimental replicates.
(B) PSMs of unique nCDSs found in macrophage cell lysate mass spectrometry dataset IPX0001245000 which includes macrophages from many tissues. The density cloud represents 10,000 randomly selected PSMs that mapped to protein coding genes. All displayed PSMs are significant at q-value < 0.01, posterior error probability < 0.1 cut-offs.
(C,D) Uniquely mapped bulk RNA and Ribo-seq at ENSMUSG00000121501 (or Gvin-ps7) and Gm12250, interferon induced pseudogenes with strong evidence of transcription and translation.
PSM: peptide spectra match
CPM: counts per million
CDS: coding sequence
Among the most strongly supported examples were interferon-induced loci annotated as pseudogenes, including ENSMUSG000000121501 (Gvin-ps7) and Gm12250. Despite their pseudogene annotation, these loci exhibit uniquely mapped bulk RNA and robust Ribo-seq signal across their dominant ORFs, alongside proteomic evidence of translation in macrophages (Fig. 2B–D). We also identified a cluster on chromosome 13 in which multiple transcripts annotated as long noncoding RNAs neighbor the protein-coding zinc finger gene Zfp825. Once again, these loci showed convergent evidence of translation: uniquely mapped Nanopore reads, bulk RNA and Ribo-seq coverage, unique PSMs, and predicted KRAB/zinc finger domains consistent with ZFP-like proteins (Supplementary Fig. 3A–E). Together, these cases argue that a subset of “noncoding” or “pseudogene” annotations reflect genuine protein synthesis, supported by orthogonal readouts spanning transcription, ribosome occupancy, and peptide detection.
While proteomic support provides especially compelling evidence for translation, we emphasize that shotgun mass spectrometry remains biased toward abundant, stable proteins and is expected to miss many translated products - particularly small, lowly translated, and unstable proteins. In line with this limitation, while our pipeline reidentified multiple previously published translated ORFs with Ribo-seq (Fig 1G, Table S4), we did not identify confident PSMs that matched the predicted proteins from any of these 10 nCDS. Thus, proteogenomic integration serves primarily to prioritize a subset of translation events, rather than to define the full scope of biologically meaningful noncanonical translation.
A pooled macrophage essentiality screen identifies ORFs that contribute to cellular fitness
To functionally prioritize nCDSs, we designed a targeted CRISPR library against candidates with evidence of transcription and Ribo-seq translation in macrophages (Table S13) using the CRISPRware guide RNA library design package67. We targeted 2,165 uORFs and 63 dORFs across 984 protein-coding genes and 1,093 ncORFs across 400 ncRNAs and pseudogenes. Each ORF was targeted by at least 4 independent guide RNAs (gRNAs). In some cases, ORFs overlapped due to out-of-frame translation and gRNAs, could not be uniquely associated with a single target; in these cases the co-targeted ORF IDs were concatenated, e.g. Emsy uORF1:Emsy uORF2, and treated as a single targeted unit (Fig. 3C). For genes harboring targeted uORFs, we additionally included gRNAs against the cognate downstream CDS to enable paired comparisons at shared loci (Methods). GRNAs were cloned into lentivirus and transduced at low multiplicity of infection into our previously published immortalized bone marrow-derived macrophage lines, which constitutively express Cas9 and carry an NFκB-GFP reporter cassette68 (Fig. 3A, 4A). Following selection and outgrowth in three distinct clonal lines, we quantified changes in guide abundance and inferred gene-level effects on cellular fitness using MAGeCK-MLE69.
Figure 3. Dropout screen against nCDSs with predicted translation in bone marrow derived macrophages (BMDMs).

(A) CRISPRware designed a gRNA library against nCDSs on transcripts expressed in BMDMs (>0.1 TPM). Each ORF was targeted with at least 4 guide RNAs. Where uORFs were targeted, the canonical coding sequence (CDS) was also included. After pooled transduction into immortalized CRISPR-Cas9 BMDMs, cells were selected with puromycin for seven days, and genomic DNA was taken 14 days subsequent to selection.
(B) MAGeCK-MLE dropout results for nCDS and canonical CDS hits from the pooled CRISPR dropout screen. ORFs with padj < 0.05 and Wald-p-value < 0.05 were considered significant hits. To enhance visualization, beta scores < −1.5 were capped at −1.5 and Wald p-values < 1E-6 were set to 1E-6. Full values are available in the associated table.
(C) Comparison of CDS and uORF effects identifies genes where disrupting the upstream ORF and/or the canonical CDS contributes to fitness.
(D,E) NCDS loci illustrating gRNA dropout (mean from triplicates), Ribo-seq support, ORF structure, and conservation with human sequence. Mouse Ribo-seq is combined from all studies (Figure 1). Human THP-1 Ribo-seq was mapped to Hg38 and lifted to mouse Mm39. (D) Kat6a both uORF and cognate CDS passed our threshold for significance. (E) For Zdhhc5 the uORF passed our significance threshold (padj = 2.3E-10, Wald p-value = 9E-3) but the cognate CDS did not (Wald p-value > 0.05).
TPM: Transcript per million
iBMDM: immortalized bone marrow derived macrophages
MOI: multiplicity of infection
Figure 4. TLR1/2-NF-κB sorting screen results.

(A) Activation of the Tlr1/Tlr2-NFkB inflammatory cascade induces GFP production in NFkB-GFP immortalized bone marrow derived macrophage (iBMDM) line. Cells were sorted into GFP high (top 20%) and GFP low (bottom 20%) buckets by GFP expression after stimulation with Pam3CSK4. Guide RNA and gene level z-score were calculated with MAUDE (Mean Alterations Using Discrete Expression). Negative z-scores indicate positive regulators of NFkB signaling, positive z-scores indicate negative regulators.
(B) The MAUDE calculated z-scores of known positive and negative regulators of Tlr1/Tlr2-NFkB signaling cascade.
(C) ORFs are considered hits if the direction of the effect is the same for all replicates, the absolute values of the combined z-score are > 2.5 and the padj. < 0.05. nCDS combined z-scores across triplicates calculated with Stouffer’s method. Z-scores are log transformed to improve visualization.
(D) The results of targeting nCDS across both screens. The majority of significant hits are screen-specific. To enhance visualization, beta scores < −2 were capped at −2 and z-scores beyond +/−10 were capped at −10 and 10. Full values are available in the associated table. (E,F) NCDS loci illustrating gRNA combined z-score and dropout (Stouffer’s mean from triplicates), Ribo-seq support, ORF structure and conservation with human ORF where applicable. Mouse Ribo-seq is combined from all studies (Figure 1). Ranges are raw signal counts. (E) Tirap uORF 4 is grouped with negative regulators of NFkB (mean z-score > 2.6, padj < 3.2E-2) while Tirap primary coding sequence (mean z-score < −5.3, padj < 1.8E-6) is grouped with positive regulators. Tirap uORF 3 is highly translated, but does not show a consistent effect across replicates. Signal track is log-transformed to improve visualization.
(F) Ints3 uORF was a significant hit in both screens (dropout: Wald p-value < 0.02, padj. < 5E-4 ; sorting: mean z-score > 7.8, padj < 9.3E-14) as a growth suppressor and negative NFkB regulator, while Ints3 was not a significant hit in either screen.
Encouragingly, an inspection of the top gene hits included common essential genes such as Polrmt and Rpl27(depmap.org)70 as well as genes that have demonstrated essentiality specifically in macrophages: Spi171, Bach172, Ikbkb73, and Zeb274. On the other hand, pro-apoptotic Bcl2l1175 and tumor suppressor Rbm4776 genes were significantly enriched targets (Fig. 3B). To minimize false positives, we defined confident hits using dual criteria (permutation padj. < 0.05 and Wald p-value < 0.05), a threshold that proved sufficiently stringent to exclude genes with described effects on viability, such as the pro-apoptotic factor Bbc3, from the high-confidence set (Fig. 4B; Tables S14,S15). Two previously reported noncanonical ORFs, Dleu2 ncORF3 and Ppp1r15a uORF1 (Fig. 1F, Table S4), were recovered as significant dropout hits (Fig. 4B), nominating a potential role in macrophage viability in addition to previously ascribed functions12,33.
Next we leveraged the paired design to compare uORF-targeting gRNAs with gRNAs against cognate CDS regions: in 19 loci, disruption of either the uORF or the CDS significantly impaired viability, whereas in 8 loci, uORF targeting produced a significant dropout phenotype in the absence of a significant CDS effect (Fig. 3C). We examined four representative uORF hits - Emsy uORF 1, Kat6a uORF 2, Zdhhc5 uORF 2, and Brd2 uORF 4 - and observed consistent negative log fold changes across their targeting guides, consistent with contribution to macrophage fitness (Fig. 3E,F; Supp. Fig. 4A,B). Each of these uORFs is conserved in the orthologous human gene, suggesting selective constraint on the translated element. In three of the cases, published Ribo-seq reads from the human monocytic THP-1 line, when lifted to mouse genome build mm39 coordinates (Methods), recapitulated the ribosome occupancy patterns observed at the corresponding mouse uORFs (Fig. 3E,F; Supp. Fig. 4A), supporting conserved translation across species and strengthening the case that these uORFs are important elements in myeloid biology broadly.
A TLR1/TLR2-NFκB sorting screen reveals noncanonical ORFs that tune innate immune signaling
The same transduced cells were used for an orthogonal screen that directly reads out NFκB pathway activity. At day 14, we stimulated cells with Pam3CSK4, a proinflammatory bacterial lipopeptide ligand that binds the TLR1/TLR2 heterodimer, triggering canonical NFκB activation and inducing GFP expression via an NFκB-GFP expression element68,77. We then performed fluorescence-activated cell sorting to isolate GFP-high and GFP-low populations and sequenced gRNAs in each bin, enabling inference of nCDS and CDS elements that influence this signaling pathway (Fig. 4A).
We analyzed each replicate independently using MAUDE78 to estimate a z-score for each targeted element, then filtered candidate hits to require directional consistency across replicates (all z-scores either positive or negative for a given ORF), after which replicate-level information was aggregated (Methods). We defined significant NFκB modulators as those with |z-score| > 2.5 and padj < 0.05 (Fig. 4C; Tables S16-S18). Many top-scoring hits corresponded to established regulators of TLR-NFκB signaling, supporting assay fidelity (Fig. 4B). Importantly, the thresholds remained conservative enough to exclude several likely pathway components that did not meet significance, including Nfkb2 (z-score = 2.21, padj = 0.068), Traf1 (z-score = −2.19, padj = 0.069), and Irak3 (z-score = −2.05, padj = 0.080), indicating that the reported set reflects stringent filtering (Table S18).
To assess whether generalized dropout phenotypes could present as NFκB regulators, we compared effect profiles between the fitness and sorting screens. Overall, the two hit sets were notably independent, indicating that most NFκB modulators were not simply genes required for growth in culture, and conversely that viability hits did not significantly bias GFP output (Fig. 4D). An exception was a short, 14-codon uORF in Ints3, which emerged as a strong hit in both assays despite the absence of a corresponding phenotype for the cognate Ints3-CDS, suggesting a locus where a small translated element may exert disproportionate regulatory impact (Fig. 4F). Conversely, analysis of Irak1 uORF1, our top nCDS hit in the sorting screen, highlighted an important caution for interpreting short-ORF perturbations: the highly active gRNAs substantially overlapped the embedded microRNA mir-718, emphasizing the need to consider local genomic context and to integrate multiple lines of evidence when attributing phenotypes to a given ORF (Sup. Fig. 4A).
Finally, we highlight two instructive uORF patterns that illustrate how nCDS elements can diverge from their cognate CDSs: a conserved uORF in the transcription factor Nrf1 gene produced a stronger effect on NFκB-GFP output (z = −5.1, padj < 4×10−6) than the Nrf1 CDS (z = −3.2, padj < 9×10−3) (Sup. Fig. 4B), and Tirap uORF4 (z = 2.7) exhibited an effect in the opposite direction of its cognate CDS (z = −5.3). Although Tirap uORF3 showed strong evidence of translation in Ribo-seq, its replicate effects were not directionally consistent and it was therefore excluded from the final hit set, reflecting the conservative filtering used to prioritize robust regulators (Fig. 4E). Together these examples demonstrate that uORFs can exert measurable impact on a critical signaling pathway, with evidence that they sometimes exhibit effects as profound, or in opposite directions, to their cognate coding sequence.
A syncytin-like envelope protein - SYNIR - positively regulates NFκB-responsive transcription
One sorting-screen hit was a 596-codon nCDS on an uncharacterized long noncoding RNA identified as ENSMUSG00000120992 (or D17H6S56E-5) (z-score = −2.8, padj = 0.024). In addition to being a sorting screen hit, translation of this lncRNA was supported by multiple independent lines of evidence: strong Ribo-seq signal across the ORF, robust transcription in macrophages, and 14 unique peptide-spectrum matches that map to the predicted protein sequence (Fig. 2A, 5A).
Figure 5. Synir (ENSMUSG00000120992 ncORF 3) encodes a retrovirus-derived membrane-bound protein with homology to Syncytin-1 and modulates NF-κB signaling in bone marrow derived macrophages (BMDMs).

(A) Synir genomic locus with Ribo-seq, BMDM RNA-seq, peptide spectra matches, and predicted protein domains.
(B) Reference UMAP of leukocyte single-cell RNA-seq colored by cell type for context in panels (C-H).
(C,D) Expression of Synir (596 codon ORF) (ENSMUSG00000120992/D17H6S56E-5) and AI506816 (645 codon ORF) which are translated to produce a transmembrane protein with classic retroviral envelope signatures.
(E) Expression of B230354K17Rik which harbors a translated 493 codon ORF with homology to Friend virus susceptibility protein 1 - a protein thought to arise from retroviral gag protein endogenization.
(F,G) Expression of Brip1os (282 codon ORF) and D430020J02Rik (226 codon ORF) which encode truncated viral proteins with N-terminal signal peptides, but lack the transmembrane viral protein domain.
(H) Expression of Syncytin A, a fusogenic protein derived from retroviral envelope endogenization with expression restricted to placental trophoblasts.
(I) Shared domains and features between SYNIR protein and human Syncytin-1. Signal peptide predicted by Signal6P and DeepTMHMM. Transmembrane domain predicted with DeepTMHMM. Furin cleavage site predicted with ProP. Other domains predicted by Interproscan.
(J) Syncytins are membrane bound proteins with the SU and TM domains secured by a disulfide bond following cleavage at the furin site. Once membrane bound, the proteins form homotrimeric structures.
(K) Gene expression changes following CRISPR Cas9 KO with 3 unique gRNAs. Significant differentially expressed genes (n): padj < 0.01, |log2(FC)| > 1.
(L) Gene expression changes following CRISPR Cas9 KO with 3 unique gRNAs and stimulated for 6 hours with LPS. Significant differentially expressed genes (n): padj < 0.01, |log2(FC)| > 1. Enlarged colored dots highlight genes to broad pathways found in literature search.
CPM: counts per million
ISD: immunosuppressive domain.
HR1: heptad repeat 1 domain
HR2: heptad repeat 2 domain
LPS: lipopolysaccharide
We examined predicted protein domains and discovered protein architecture consistent with a retrovirus-derived envelope protein, including a signal peptide, an extracellular surface unit (SU), and a transmembrane domain (TM) (Fig. 5A). Together, these features suggested that the encoded protein is a full-length, membrane-spanning envelope-like (Env) protein. To place this gene in context, we performed a BLASTP79 search against mouse and human proteins and identified human Syncytin-1 as the closest characterized homolog (e-value < 5e−10). Syncytins are endogenized retroviral genes that are required for formation of the placenta39,40,80. Given the structural similarity to Syncytin-1 and the regulation of NFκB signaling, we renamed this protein SYNIR (SYNcytin-like Immune Regulator), used hereafter. A closer inspection of SYNIR uncovered remarkable conservation of hallmark features with Syncytin-1. These included canonical cysteine motifs consistent with disulfide-stabilized SU/TM organization, a predicted furin cleavage site that would separate SU and TM, and motifs indicating a homotrimeric interface and an immunosuppressive domain (ISD) (Fig. 5I,J). These shared structural and functional signatures support a model in which SYNIR represents a retrovirus-derived Env protein that has been retained and repurposed in the mouse genome. We next tested whether SYNIR functionally contributes to inflammatory signaling, consistent with its negative z-score in the TLR1/TLR2-NFκB sorting screen (Fig. 4C). We disrupted the SYNIR ORF using three independent gRNAs in our Cas9 iBMDM line and performed RNA-seq at baseline and following stimulation with the inflammatory ligand LPS (Tables S19, S20). In untreated cells, SYNIR knockout induced a focused transcriptional response (27 differentially expressed genes; padj < 0.01, |log2FC| > 1; Fig. 5K). Notably, three dysregulated genes - Ccr5, Amotl2, and Sult1a1 - have reported connections to retroviral infection raising the possibility that SYNIR may influence susceptibility of host to viral infection81–83.
Following 6 h LPS treatment, SYNIR disruption again altered the transcriptional state (23 differentially expressed genes; padj < 0.01, |log2FC| > 1; Fig. 5L). Two genes induced in the knockout, Slpi84 and Mturn85, encode proteins reported to negatively regulate NFκB pathway activity, and their upregulation in SYNIR-deficient macrophages is consistent with the sorting screen result, indicating SYNIR behaves as a positive regulator of the pathway (Fig. 4C). Notably, the sorting screen stimulus (Pam3CSK4; TLR1/TLR2) and the validation stimulus (LPS; TLR4) are distinct upstream inputs, suggesting SYNIR influences NFκB signaling at a point of convergence rather than in a TLR receptor-restricted manner. In addition to the direct regulators of NFκB, six of the differentially expressed genes have been linked to alterations in M1-proinflammatory or M2-antinflammatory macrophage polarization programs, and these could further modulate the NFκB pathway. Collectively, these data establish SYNIR as a translated, retrovirus-derived Env protein and demonstrate that SYNIR supports NFκB-responsive transcription in macrophages.
Updated scRNA-seq references expand the landscape of envelope-like translated loci across immune and tissue contexts
The identification of SYNIR as a protein of retroviral origin encouraged us to search for additional Env translation events. Across the aggregated Ribo-seq predictions, we identified four lncRNA loci with ORFs whose predicted proteins exhibit Env features: ENSMUSG00000120992 (SYNIR), D430020J02Rik, Brip1os, and AI506816. One additional Env gene, Gm33887, was previously predicted in the RefSeq proteome database (it is annotated as a lncRNA in Gencode, and our pipeline did not identify it as translated). Because envelope-derived genes are typically discussed in the context of placental formation and fetal development86, we sought a broad and unbiased view of expression across tissues and immune lineages. We therefore reanalyzed Tabula Muris87 and Tabula Senis88 single-cell RNA-seq references using an updated gene annotation that includes lncRNAs, expanding quantification well beyond the protein-coding gene set used in the initial releases (Methods). This reanalysis provides a practical resource for interpreting lncRNA specificity across adult tissues at three ages (3-,18-, and 24-months; >110,000 total cells post-filtering) beyond the present investigation (Data Availability).
In these updated scRNA-seq embeddings, the Env lncRNA loci showed distinct and nonredundant expression patterns across immune subsets and tissue contexts (Fig. 5B–F; Supp. Fig. 6A–F), in contrast with Syncytin-A, which demonstrated virtually no transcription in these non-placental cells (Fig. 5G). Across genes, we observed marked differences in both the magnitude of expression and the cell types in which expression concentrates, supporting a diversified landscape of envelope-derived loci with lineage- and tissue-biased expression in adult mice (Fig. 5C; Supp. Fig. 6A–F).
Long-read Nanopore sequencing resolves unannotated retroviral Env gene models and isoforms
Our custom transcriptome incorporated a de novo Nanopore direct RNA assembly from BMDMs60, enabling us to identify genes and isoforms that are difficult to resolve with short reads alone. Within this long-read-informed annotation, we identified additional Env ORFs that were absent in Gencode. Three loci emerged as high-confidence Env genes (Supp. Fig. 6A–D). First, XLOC000481 corresponds to a novel Ctse isoform defined by an alternative second exon that is strongly represented in long-read data relative to canonical Ctse isoforms (Supp. Fig. 6A). A Sashimi plot of short-read junction spanning reads corroborated this isoform structure and relative usage (Supp. Fig. 6B). Second, XLOC012421 is an unannotated, highly transcribed gene antisense to Cnbd2 (Supp. Fig. 6C). Third, XLOC008059 is an extended second exon model of the annotated lncRNA Gm62403 (Supp. Fig. 6D). Unlike the annotated Env genes above, these three loci exhibit extreme sequence similarity exemplified by an absence of uniquely targeting CRISPR guides. We observed only low Ribo-seq signals at the loci and RiboTISH, but not PRICE, identified the Env ORFs at these loci as translation events. We attribute this to the challenges associated with uniquely mapping ~30-nt, single-end Ribo-seq reads to repeated genomic elements. This limitation is overcome with long reads, but we are only able to confidently report on transcriptional, not translational, activity at these loci - a reminder of the limits of current approaches.
An additional retroviral-derived gag-like protein has been discovered on the B230354K17Rik lncRNA.
A final notable novel retroviral-related hit with convincing proteomics support was the 493 codon ORF on lncRNA B230354K17Rik (Supp. Fig. 8A). The encoded protein is predicted to have a Friend virus susceptibility domain, homologous to the protein encoded on Fv1, a gene that is known to control infection by Friend leukemia virus and which is derived from an endogenized gag gene89. We predicted a structure with Alphafold 390 and found that it produced a high confidence globular domain and a lower confidence extended alpha helix with the two connected by disordered linkers (Supp. Fig. 8B). We performed a FoldSeek91 structure search on the globular domain and identified Fv1 and an uncharacterized globular protein, 2410002F23Rik as closely related hits. We again looked at global expression and observed that both B230354K17Rik and 2410002F23Rik were widely expressed (Supp. Fig. 9A–D). As retroviruses typically exhibit strong preference for infecting specific cell types, this wider expression may indicate functions that diverge from a purely anti-viral, defensive role.
Brip1os encodes a secreted envelope-like protein with FeLIX homology and broad paracrine transcriptional impact.
Among the Env candidates, D430020J02Rik and Brip1os were notable outliers in predicted protein length: both encoded proteins less than 300 amino acids long, less than half the length of classical Env proteins. Domain prediction shows that these proteins preserve an N-terminal signal peptide and SU-like envelope domain, but lack a transmembrane segment, consistent with secreted, rather than membrane-bound, proteins (Fig. 6A). Mirroring our approach with SYNIR we used BLASTP to search for homologs, but did not find characterized proteins in mouse or human. Next, we used Alphafold to predict structures and found that both produced high-confidence β-sandwich-like architectures. We used Foldseek to search structural databases and identified an ortholog in FeLIX, a previously described feline retrovirus-derived accessory protein with documented roles in modulating the ability of feline leukemia virus to infect host cells92,93 (Fig. 6B).
Figure 6. Brip1os encodes a retrovirus-derived secreted protein, SEMR, in bone marrow derived macrophages (BMDMs) with immunomodulatory function and homology with FeLIX protein.

(A,B) Predicted domains and AlphaFold structure prediction of Feline Leukemia virus accessory protein (FeLIX), SEMR (Brip1os ncORF7), and D430020J02Rik ncORF 1. Foldseek search reveals close structural homology between the three proteins.
(C) Brip1os genomic locus with Ribo-seq, BMDM RNA-seq, peptide spectra matches, and predicted protein domains.
(D) Unique peptide-spectrum matches (PSMs) from macrophage secretome datasets. PSMs uniquely mapping to the SEMR protein sequence are labelled.
(E) Volcano plot of CRISPR–Cas9 knockout of Brip1os ncORF7 in BMDMs treated with LPS for six hours induces broad transcriptional remodeling.
(F) Number of significant gene changes in immune and metabolic Reactome pathways after SEMR loss.
Significant genes (n): padj < 0.01, |log2(FC)| > 1.
LPS: lipopolysaccharide
Brip1os, in particular, emerged as an attractive candidate for functional follow-up because of its widespread and consistent expression across tissues (Fig. 5C; Supp. Fig. 5B), and as the most prominent nCDSs hit in macrophage secretome proteomics datasets (Fig. 6D). We asked whether the Brip1os encoded protein has a measurable regulatory impact in cultured macrophages. Using three independent gRNAs, we disrupted the Brip1os ncORF7 in iBMDMs and performed RNA-seq at baseline and after 6 hours of LPS stimulation. KO induced extensive transcriptional remodeling in both conditions (Fig. 6E,F; Supp. Fig. 8A,B; Tables S21,S22), with hundreds to thousands of differentially expressed genes (padj < 0.01, |log2FC| > 1). The genes most prominently affected span core macrophage programs, including metabolic and hypoxia-linked regulators (e.g., Hif1a, Bach1), inflammatory and NFκB-associated transcriptional circuitry (e.g., Nfkb1, Junb, Rel), lineage determinants (e.g., Zeb1, Zeb2), and broad chromatin and transcriptional regulators (e.g., Ctcf, Kmt2a) (Fig. 6E; Supp. Fig. 8A). Pathway-level analysis highlighted enrichment of Reactome94 pathways related to metabolism and immune activity (Fig. 6F; Supp. Fig. 8B). Based on this protein’s secretion, derivation from a retroviral envelope protein, and impact on cellular metabolism, we name this protein SEMR (Secreted Envelope-like Metabolic Regulator). Notably, despite the profound changes in this targeted KO experiment, SEMR was not a significant hit in either screen. This observation, along with the overwhelming evidence that the SEMR protein is secreted, implies that it functions as a paracrine signaler, and identifying its requisite receptor(s) presents an intriguing future opportunity.
An interactive genome browser resource enables rapid community interrogation of noncanonical ORFs and functional evidence
A core theme throughout this study is that confident interpretation of noncanonical translation requires synthesis of multiple orthogonal signals: Ribo-seq evidence, peptide-spectrum support, transcription, protein domain predictions, conservation, and evidence from CRISPR screens. To make these layers directly interrogable by the community, we created an interactive public UCSC Genome Browser95,96 session that aggregates the processed data into a navigable format (Fig. 7A–E).
Figure 7. Interactive and customizable public Genome Browser session for further inquiry.

(A) Example of the Leukocyte ORF Genome Browser session at the Brip1os locus. The session includes (from top to bottom) guide RNA effect sizes, mouse and human Ribo-seq, protein domain predictions, peptide spectra matches, nCDS predictions, Gencode gene annotations, bulk RNA-seq and cross-species conservation
(B) Guide RNA effect sizes for both dropout and sorting screen can be displayed as means or per replicate.
(C) Ribo-seq tracks can be set to show mouse (aggregate leukocyte) and human (THP1) signal tracks from elongation inhibition experiments (cycloheximide) as well as signal from translation initiation inhibition experiments (lactimidomycin or harringtonine).
(D) Proteomics tracks include domain predictions from SignalP (secreted peptides), DeepTMHMM (secreted peptides and transmembrane proteins), Interproscan (protein domain database aggregator) and peptide spectra matches from comparison
(E) NCDS prediction tracks include merged PRICE and RiboTISH calls as well as per-tool tracks and configurable display of transcriptome sources.
The session is built on the current mouse reference genome (mm39) and is designed so that any locus can be queried via standard gene-name or chromosome coordinate search. The browser view integrates, in a single place, gRNA effect sizes from both essentiality and sorting screens (with options to view replicate-level or mean-level tracks), aggregate mouse leukocyte Ribo-seq tracks, including separate entries for elongation (cycloheximide treated) and initiation (harringtonine and lactimidomycin). Human THP-1 Ribo-seq tracks mapped to hg38 and lifted to mm39, proteomics evidence including peptide-spectrum matches, and protein feature predictions such as secretion signals and transmembrane domains from Signal6P97, DeepTMHMM98, protein family domains from Interproscan/Pfam99,100 and intrinsically disordered regions from MobiDB-lite3101 (Supp. Fig. 7A–D). By lowering the barrier to locus-level evaluation, this resource is intended to accelerate hypothesis generation and prioritization for follow-up studies on the many additional translated ORFs uncovered in this work but not yet functionally characterized. Hosting on the highly reliable UCSC Genome Browser ensures that this work will remain a stable and accessible long-term resource.
Discussion
Here we present a unified Ribo-seq meta-analysis across mouse leukocyte lineages and implement dual orthogonal CRISPR screens - one measuring cellular fitness, the other NFκB activity - to identify noncanonical coding sequences (nCDSs) with measurable biological activity in macrophages. This strategy nominates uORFs and ncORFs that modulate viability and innate immune signaling, and unexpectedly uncovers multiple retrovirus-derived envelope proteins expressed and translated outside the placenta, including SYNIR, a membrane protein that tunes NFκB-responsive transcription and SEMR, a secreted protein with broad paracrine impact on macrophage gene programs.
Expanding the functional landscape of noncanonical translation beyond proliferative fitness
The finding that uORFs can exert phenotypic effects on NFκB signaling that are on par with, or opposite to, their cognate coding sequences has important implications. Classical models of uORF function emphasize translational repression of the downstream CDS, wherein uORF translation attenuates main-ORF output by sequestering ribosomes and/or triggering nonsense-mediated decay. In most cases, we observed the opposite with CDS and uORF KO, resulting in directionally consistent phenotypic impact (Fig. 3C,D,E ; Supp. Fig 4A,B; Supp. Fig. 5A,B). In these cases, it is possible that gRNAs targeting the 5’ UTR reduce gene transcription, thereby reproducing the phenotype of disrupting the CDS directly. However, the added evidence of cross-species conservation of the uORFs argues that these are bona fide coding sequences producing peptides with independent phenotypic effects. On the other hand, we present two examples which are not conserved in the human genome, Irak1 uORF1 (Supp. Fig. 5A) and Tirap uORF4 (Fig. 4E). Irak1 uORF1 was the most significant noncanonical ORF hit in the sorting screen, but substantially overlaps mir-718, a microRNA known to reduce NFkB signaling102. However, the gRNAs targeting the Irak1 uORF1 and mir-718 are consistent with targeting a positive regulator of NFκB signaling, complicating interpretation and leaving open the possibility that the uORF itself is an important player in this pathway. Finally, Tirap uORF4 is grouped with the negative regulators, in contrast with the Tirap CDS, perhaps indicating that disruption of the uORF releases a brake on downstream CDS translation. Whether the peptides encoded by these uORFs act in cis (e.g., by modulating co-translational folding or localization of the nascent main-ORF protein) or in trans (e.g., by interacting with cellular machinery independent of the main ORF) remains an open question that warrants targeted biochemical follow-up.
Retrovirus-derived proteins as an underexplored class of effector proteins
Perhaps the most unexpected finding of this study is the identification of widespread transcription and translation of envelope-derived proteins in adult mouse cells. Endogenous retroviruses comprise roughly 8–10% of mammalian genomes, but only a handful of their coding remnants have been functionally characterized, most notably the syncytins, which are required for placental development39,40,80. Our data implicate ERV-Envs as important genes in adult cells and tissues indicating expanded roles beyond their canonical placental and fetal expression.
SYNIR (ENSMUSG00000120992) emerged from the NFκB sorting screen as a translated lncRNA encoding a 596-amino acid protein with all the hallmarks of a full-length envelope glycoprotein (Fig. 5I). Its closest characterized homolog is human Syncytin-1, a fusogenic protein with expression restricted to placental and fetal tissue. SYNIR, on the other hand, is highly expressed in adult myeloid, lymphoid, mammary gland, and large intestine tissue (Supp. Fig. 5I). CRISPR KO of SYNIR altered both baseline and LPS-induced transcription, with upregulation of known NFκB pathway inhibitors (Slpi, Mturn) upon knockout. This result was consistent with the sorting-screen linking SYNIR with positive regulation of NFκB activity. While we were able to confirm SYNIR as a screen hit, the main goal of this project, we are intrigued by the fusogenic potential of this syncytin homolog (Fig. 5I). The hallmark of syncytin cell fusion is the generation of multinucleated cells - an important part of placental maturation. Notably, macrophages are also known to form multinucleated cells with pathological function: osteoclasts, Langhans giant cells, and foreign body giant cells103. The idea that SYNIR (or other Env proteins reported herein) contributes to this phenomenon is intriguing, but support for this possibility is tempered by expression of this gene in HSCs, B cells, and other cell types without documented multinuclear cell formation. Still, we see this as an exciting opportunity for future study.
Notably, the most up- and down-regulated genes in SYNIR knockout: Ccr5 and Sut1a1, respectively, are orthologs to proteins linked to HIV infection in humans. Ccr5, a well-established co-receptor for HIV, is downregulated, while Sut1a1, the human ortholog of which facilitates HIV reverse transcription82, is upregulated. This gives us reason to believe that SYNIR is involved in retroviral entry and replication. Furthermore, this observation resonates with a broader theme in ERV biology: that endogenized viral genes can be co-opted to modulate host susceptibility to exogenous retroviruses. Other germane examples of this phenomenon include Fv1, a gag-derived gene that encodes Friend virus susceptibility protein 1, and which is closely related to an nCDS we identified on the lncRNA B230354K17Rik (Supp. Fig. 8); and Feline leukemia virus susceptibility protein (FeLIX), a secreted Env fragment, which, as its name indicates, is known to module leukemia virus infection in felines, and which is a structural ortholog of another of our documented Env proteins, SEMR.
Because FeLIX has only been studied in the context of modulating feline leukemia virus infection, we were surprised to find that knockout of SEMR induced striking transcriptional changes affecting hundreds of genes - including master regulators of inflammation (Nfkb1, Rel, Junb), hypoxia (Hif1a, Bach1), and lineage identity (Zeb1, Zeb2) (Fig. 6E). This impressive KO response demonstrates that SEMR is not narrowly involved in modulating viral infection as we had hypothesized. Furthermore, as retroviruses exhibited strong cell-specific tropism, Brip1os’s near ubiquitous transcription (Supp. Fig. 6E) is inconsistent with targeted restriction of retrovirus infection. This exciting finding demonstrates that ERV proteins can act beyond retroviral infection modulation and influence critical pathways.
Based on the evidence compiled in this report, SEMR is likely involved in paracrine signaling: in a pooled screen, secreted factors are diluted across the culture, masking signaling effects, and consistent with SEMR not being identified as an essentiality hit. The detection of SEMR as the most prominent nCDS protein in macrophage secretome proteomics and its predicted signal peptides supports a role in extracellular signaling. Identification of the cognate receptor(s) for SEMR is a priority for future work and may reveal new axes of immune regulation.
Considerations for interpreting CRISPR screens targeting noncanonical ORFs
Several features of nCDSs complicate loss-of-function interpretation. First, many translated elements are short, often below 100 codons, leaving limited sequence space for gRNA targeting. GRNA tiling will not always be able to distinguish nCDS-specific effects from regulatory DNA perturbation. The Irak1 uORF1 case illustrates this challenge: the top-scoring gRNAs also disrupted mir-718, confounding attribution of the phenotype. Second, overlapping nCDS predictions can preclude assignment of a phenotype to a single translation product. In many cases, our pipeline identified multiple overlapping uORFs at a single locus, and gRNAs could not be uniquely assigned. In both of these challenging cases, careful consideration of local genomic context can resolve issues of interpretation. To facilitate this process, we organized our findings visually as a UCSC Genome Browser session (Resource availability) that aggregates Ribo-seq, RNA-seq, proteomics, gRNA effect size, and more into a navigable interface.
Limitations and future directions
Several limitations of the present study warrant consideration. First coverage across immune lineages is uneven: macrophages and CD4 T cells dominate the catalog, with fewer datasets representing other cell types. Second, our proteogenomic integration relies on shotgun mass spectrometry, which is biased toward abundant, stable proteins. Many translated products - particularly small, lowly expressed, or rapidly degraded peptides - likely evade detection. The absence of PSMs for 10 previously validated nCDSs in our reanalysis underscores this limitation (Fig. 1G). Third, the mechanistic basis for most hits remains unknown. For uORFs, distinguishing peptide-mediated effects from translational-regulatory effects will require targeted biochemical and genetic dissection.
Resource availability
A central goal of this study was to lower barriers to community engagement with noncanonical translation data. The interactive UCSC Genome Browser session we provide integrates gRNA effect sizes, Ribo-seq tracks, proteomics evidence, and protein feature predictions in a single navigable interface. By making these data layers directly accessible, we hope to accelerate hypothesis generation and follow-up studies on the thousands of translated ORFs identified here but not yet functionally characterized. https://genome.ucsc.edu/s/emalekos/Leukocyte_ORF_paper
The updated single-cell RNA-seq annotations, incorporating lncRNAs absent from original Tabula Muris releases, further extend the utility of this work for the broader research community. https://github.com/ericmalekos/scRNAseq
Code associated with this manuscript is available at
Conclusions
This study demonstrates that noncanonical translation in immune cells extends well beyond leaky scanning or transcriptional noise: a subset of translated uORFs and ncORFs carries measurable biological activity in macrophage viability and inflammatory signaling. The discovery of retrovirus-derived envelope proteins expressed and translated in myeloid cells, including a syncytin-like membrane protein that modulates NFκB and a secreted FeLIX-like factor with paracrine transcriptional impact, expands the known repertoire of endogenized viral genes with host regulatory function. Together with the community resources released here, these findings establish a foundation for continued exploration of the noncanonical ORFeome in immunity and beyond.
Methods
Custom gene annotation
Comprehensive gene annotation v31 was downloaded from Gencode104. NCBI RefSeq gene annotation ncbiRefSeq.2020–10-27105 was downloaded, and transcripts with transcript_biotype “lnc_RNA” were extracted. We previously generated a long-read de novo BMDM transcriptome assembly60. These three files: Gencode vM31, NCBI Refseq lncRNAs, and BMDM long-read genes were merged with Another GFF Analysis Toolkit’s agat_sp_merge_annotations utility106.
Mouse Ribo-seq data
GEO datasets were retrieved and FASTQ files were assessed with FastQC and MultiQC107. Adapters were removed with TrimGalore!108. Mouse tRNA and rRNA sequences were downloaded from GtRNAdb109 and RNACentral110, respectively, and a bowtie2111 index was generated. Trimmed reads were mapped to the t/rRNA index with ‘--very-fast-local’ flag, and unmapped reads were retained. Retained reads were mapped to mouse genome assembly mm39 with STAR112 with splice sites defined in the custom transcriptome and the following arguments: --outFilterMultimapNmax 1, --outSAMattributes All, --outFilterMismatchNmax 3, --alignEndsType EndToEnd, --outFilterIntronMotifs RemoveNoncanonicalUnannotated --twopassMode None. Alignments to chrM and nonstandard chromosomes were discarded, and alignments that overlapped Gencode vM31 snoRNAs were filtered out with bedtools113 intersect -v -s -f 0.33.
Aggregate signal tracks were formed by separately merging elongating alignments (cycloheximide-treated) and initiating alignments (lactimidomycin/harringtonine-treated) across datasets with bamtools merge. Alignments were converted to Bigwig with the deepTools bamCoverage and split by strand. The Ribo-seq signal was not normalized.
Human Ribo-seq data
THP-1 Ribo-seq FASTQ files from GSE208041114 were downloaded and processed as above, with reads mapping to human r/t/snoRNAs discarded. Remaining reads were mapped to the hg38 human reference genome. Alignments were lifted to mm39 coordinates with the liftover utility and mm39.hg38.chain file provided by the UCSC Genome Browser95,96 (https://hgdownload.soe.ucsc.edu/downloads.html).
ORF calling
Biological replicates within GEO datasets were merged and filtered for alignments in the 27–32 nucleotide length range. RiboTISH61’s QC module was run on each library and manually examined for 3-nucleotide periodicity for each set of read lengths. CDSs were called using a hierarchical strategy with both RiboTISH and PRICE62 at three levels: (1) replicate-level merging within individual experiments, (2) experiment-level merging within each GEO dataset, and (3) global merging across all datasets. This hierarchical approach maximized sensitivity while maintaining specificity by calling CDSs at multiple scales of evidence.
RiboTISH was run with --alt --longest to identify the longest statistically significant CDS with any near-cognate start codon. PRICE was run with default settings, and Benjamini-Hochberg correction was applied to generate adjusted p-values (padj). NCDSs from both tools were retained if they reached padj < 0.01 in at least one hierarchical test and encoded peptides >10 amino acids. ORFs sharing start or stop codons with Gencode protein-coding genes were excluded to focus on truly novel translation events.
The final nCDS set was generated by merging PRICE and RiboTISH calls, consolidating entries that (1) shared a stop codon and (2) where one amino acid sequence was a complete subsequence of the other, retaining the longer variant.
Annotating novel ORFs
Amino acid sequences from the final set of novel nCDSs were annotated for functional domains with SignalP697(signal peptides), DeepTMHMM98 (signal peptides and transmembrane domains), MobiDB-lite3101 (intrinsically disordered regions), and InterProScan5/Pfam99,100 (protein families) with default settings. Localization predictions were determined using DeepLoc264.
Proteomics data
Database construction:
Cell-type-specific proteome databases were generated for macrophages, B cells, and T cells by combining nCDSs with Gencode vM31 proteins from transcripts expressed (TPM > 0) in the following RNA-seq datasets:
For immunopeptidomics117 analysis of the mouse tissue atlas, a pan-tissue database containing all Gencode proteins plus all nCDSs was used. MaxQuant common contaminant sequences were appended to all databases.
Peptide assignment:
Mass spectrometry data from,
Were searched against cell-type-matched databases using MS-GF+65 with a reverse-decoy database for false discovery estimation. Carbamidomethylation of cysteine was set as a fixed modification and methionine oxidation as a variable modification. For TMT-labeled dataset PXD029155, TMT (+229.16) was included as a static modification on N-termini and lysines.
Rescoring and filtering:
MS2Rescore 2.066 was used to rescore MS-GF+65 output with ms2pip126 and percolator127. Trained models were selected based on fragmentation method: “HCD2019” for HCD datasets, “Immuno-HCD” for immunopeptidomics HCD, “TMT” for TMT-labeled samples, and “CID” for all other acquisition types. PSMs matching Gencode proteins were excluded, and retained PSMs matched at least one nCDSs. NCDS PSMs with q-value < 0.01 and posterior error probability < 0.1 were considered high-confidence hits.
short read RNA-seq
RNA expression for cell-type comparison (Figure 2A) was quantified with Salmon128 (--validateMappings --seqBias --gcBias) against Gencode vM31 using datasets GSE60927, GSE210222, GSE88987, GSE120762, PRJNA482293, GSE141745. Transcript-level quantifications were aggregated to gene-level counts with tximport129, log-transformed, and batch-corrected using limma's removeBatchEffect function130.
RNA-seq visualization tracks
For locus-level visualization (e.g., Figure 2C,D), paired-end RNA-seq reads from GSE94671 (100 bp), GSE195678 (101 bp), GSE201870 (150 bp), GSE210419 (150 bp), and GSE120762 (76 bp) were aligned with STAR112, with multimapping reads discarded (--outFilterMultimapNmax 1 --twopassMode Basic). Alignments were converted to CPM-normalized BigWig tracks with deepTools131 bamCoverage.
Long read RNA-seq
We previously published Nanopore direct RNA data from wild-type C57BL/6 BMDMs (untreated and 6-hour LPS) that were basecalled and aligned to mouse build mm1060. We lifted the alignments to mm39 with the liftover utility and mm10.mm39.chain file provided by the UCSC Genome Browser95,96 (https://hgdownload.soe.ucsc.edu/downloads.html) for visualization.
sgRNA Library design
In order to generate a gRNA library specific to nCDSs relevant to macrophage biology we used the utilities and workflow from the CRISPRware67 software package. Novel ORFs were filtered to include only those on RNAs expressed at >0.1 TPM in BMDM-specific RNA-seq datasets (GSE60930, GSE81250, GSE89184, GSE99787, GSE120762) and called at the individual condition level (i.e., before merging across conditions) in at least one macrophage Ribo-seq dataset, ensuring high-confidence ribosome engagement in macrophages. GTFs were generated for both PRICE and RiboTISH ORFs, and candidate gRNAs with cut sites (−4 bp from PAM) intersecting these ORFs were enumerated. GRNAs were filtered to exclude those with MIT specificity score132 <50, Ruleset2 cleavage efficiency133 <30, or which overlap with annotated CDS regions. Up to 10 gRNAs were selected per nCDS, prioritizing guides targeting the 5' half of nCDSs >200 bp, the 5’ 75th percentile of nCDSs 100–200 bp, or any position for nCDSs <100 bp to balance expected phenotypic impact with guide availability for short sequences. When >10 suitable guides were available, those with highest specificity scores were selected. For nCDSs with overlapping translated regions (arising from alternative transcripts or frameshifts), gRNAs were assigned to combined “ORF-units” for analysis.
Controls:
Up to 8 sgRNAs targeting non-nCDS regions of each lncRNA were included to distinguish ORF-specific effects from transcript-level regulation. For each targeted uORF, the cognate downstream CDS was also targeted with 6 sgRNAs. Positive controls we included 100 essential genes from our previous genome-wide screen68 and 236 NFκB pathway regulators (138 from our prior NFκB-GFP sorting screen and 98 from GO terms134 GO:0007250, GO:0038061, GO:0004704, and GO:0046696). Protein-coding gene gRNAs were designed using CRISPick133,135. The 1,500 non-targeting sgRNAs with the lowest measured dropout from our prior screen served as negative controls.
Selected gRNA sequences were 20 nucleotides in length, and the 5’-nucleotide was replaced with “G” to enhance transcription. The final library consisted of 39,748 gRNAs.
Lentiviral transduction and selection
The gRNA library was synthesized as an oligonucleotide pool by Twist Bioscience and cloned into a lentiviral vector containing puromycin resistance and BFP reporter cassettes as previously described68,135. HEK293T cells were transfected with library plasmid and packaging vectors, and the supernatant was harvested at 72 hours. Three distinct clonal lines of NFkB-GFP+, Cas9+ immortalized bone marrow-derived macrophages were infected with lentivirus at MOI < 0.3 at day −10. After three days (day −7), lentiviral media was replaced with DMEM +10% FBS media and 10 ug/ml puromycin. After seven days of puromycin selection, each clonal line showed >90% BFP positive cells by flow cytometry, and day 0 samples were collected and stored in freezing media (90% FBS, 10% DMSO).
Essentiality screen
For 14 days post-selection, cells were split every ~3 days to maintain confluency between 60–70% while ensuring >2000X gRNA library coverage. On day 14, cells from each clonal line were collected at >1000X and stored in freezing media.
Sorting CRISPR screen
At day 14, cells from each clonal line were treated with 200 ng/mL Pam3CSK4. After 24 hours, cells were transferred to FACS buffer to prepare for sorting on a BD FACSAria II as previously described68. In brief, GFP was excited using a 488-nm laser and detected using a 525/50-nm filter. For each clonal line, the top 20% and bottom 20% of cells were collected as GFP-high and GFP-low samples, with >100X coverage maintained in each sorted sample.
Screen sequencing and analysis
Genomic DNA was collected from cell pellet and PCR amplified as previously described68,136. Libraries were sequenced, 23-nucleotide single-end, on an Illumina NextSeq 2000 sequencer operated by the UCSC Paleogenomics Lab.
Sequenced reads were matched to gRNAs with MAGeCK69 count with the arguments (--trim-5 1 --sgrna-len 19). In cases where gRNAs targeted overlapping nCDS regions, arising from alternative transcripts or out-of-frame translation, gRNAs were matched to “ORF-units”, e.g. Emsy uORF1:Emsy uORF2. nCDS-loci with less than 4 gRNAs were filtered out and Mageck MLE was used to test for essentiality hits between the day 0 and day 14 samples (--control-sgrna negctrl_ids.txt --norm-method control --permutation-round 10 --remove-outliers --sgrna-efficiency gRNA_scores.tsv), where negctrl_ids.txt is the list of 1,500 negative control gRNAs and gRNA_scores.tsv is the DeepHF137 cleavage efficiency prediction for each gRNA.
The gRNA counts from the high and low GFP sorting experiments were normalized with DESeq2138 calculated size factors adjustment, and processed in MAUDE78 as clonal replicates with output reported by the geneLevelStats() function. This resulted in three dataframes, one for each clonal replicate, with z-scores assigned to each nCDS-loci and canonical CDS. The three dataframes were then filtered to a final combined set which removed entries that were not directionally consistent across all three datasets, reducing the number of tested nCDS-loci from 4,891 to 1,434. In this filtered set, replicate aggregated p-values and z-scores were calculated with Stouffer’s method and new padj values were assigned using the Benjamini-Hochberg correction.
novel ORF conservation
NCDS nucleotide sequences were BLATed139 against the human genome hg38 build on the UCSC Genome Browser. In cases where an nCDS was identified on the orthologous human gene, the translated sequences were aligned and visualized in the Jalview application141.
CRISPR KO Experiments
Three gRNAs were chosen to target SYNIR and SEMR ORFs.
Three SYNIR gRNAs: 1- TGGAGTCTTGATCCCGTCTG, 2- GGGTGAACTGAACTGTAATG, 3-TATGCACAGAAGTATGACTC
SEMR gRNAs: 1- GAAACTAAGATACAGTACCA, 2- AACGTGGCAGGTGATATCAG, 3-ACCAGCCACGCAACCTAACG
And three non-targeting gRNAs were used as negative controls. Complementary oligos were ordered from IDT, reconstituted and ligated into pU6 expression vector. The vector also contained a puromycin resistance cassette and mCherry reporter. Lentivirus was prepared as described above and iBMDM samples were each infected with a single gRNA. Infected cells were puromycin-selected for 7 days when the mCherry population reach >90%. Each gRNA-iBMDM line was treated with 200ng/ml LPS for 6 h and samples were collected for RNA processing.
RNA sequencing
Total RNA was isolated from cells using TRIzol reagent (SigmaAldrich, T9424) and Direct-zol RNA Miniprep Plus kit (Zymo Research, R2072), following manufacturer’s instructions. RNA samples were sent to Novogene for 150×150 bp stranded library preparation and were sequenced on a NovaSeq X Plus sequencer.
Differential gene expression
Reads were quantified with Salmon128 (--validateMappings --gcBias --seqBias) against Gencode vM31. Transcript-level abundance estimates were summarized to gene level using tximport with length-scaled TPM counts (countsFromAbundance = “lengthScaledTPM”). Differential expression was performed with DESeq2138 using default parameters and a two-factor design comparing samples with targeting- and non-targeting-gRNAs. Genes were considered significantly differentially expressed at adjusted p-value < 0.01 and |log₂(fold-change)| > 1. Volcano plots were generated in R using ggplot2.
Tabula muris/senis scRNASeq reprocessing
To expand the scope of genes available for interrogation in these single-cell atlases, we reprocessed 158,420 cells with reads sequenced with the SMART-Seq2140 protocol - a sensitive, full transcript sequencing approach, not restricted to the 3’ end originally published in the Tabula Muris87 and Tabula Senis88 projects. For quantifying expression, we used Salmon128 with (--validateMappings --gcBias --seqBias) against Gencode annotation vM38. We filtered out cells with fewer than 500 unique genes or less than 50,000 total gene counts, leaving ~110,000 cells with roughly equal distribution across mouse ages 3-, 18-, and 24-month. Cell annotations, including cell ontology ids, tissue of origin, mouse of origin, etc. were matched from the original publications, and the cell annotation approach is described therein. Gene counts were normalized as ln(1 + counts per million). For clustering, 3000 high-variance genes were selected with the scran142 package and used to generate 50 principal components at separately at distinct mouse ages and globally, yielding four Rdata object, 3-,18-,24-months, and all ages combined. For each age and for the global set UMAPs were generated with scater143 with n_neighbors 30 and min_dist 0.5. Full pipeline description and scripts are available in the GitHub repo (Data Availability).
Envelope protein structure homology search
The Alphafold 390 web browser interface was used to predict structures for SEMR B230354K17Rik ncORF8, and D430020J02Rik ncORF1 proteins. For SEMR and D430020J02Rik ncORF1, the predicted signal peptide was not included in the prediction, as this would be cleaved to generate a functional protein. For B230354K17Rik ncORF8, one subdomain was folded with high confidence, while the rest of the protein was predicted at low confidence. The high-confidence structure predictions were searched against the AFDB50 database with FoldSeek91.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Guide RNA vector cloning, lentivirus production, pooled infection, and subsequent NGS library preparation, as well as targeted CRISPR knockout experiments in SYNIR and SEMR, were performed by UCSC CRISPR Core Director Dr. Alice Devigne. Sorting by GFP intensity was performed by the UCSC Institute for the Biology of Stem Cells Flow Cytometry Core Manager, Dr. Bari Nazario. The authors would like to thank Prof. Angela Brooks for advice and guidance on the project.
S.C. is supported by R35GM137801 from NIGMS, and E.M. is supported by F31AI179201 from NIAID.
References
- 1.Ingolia N.T., Ghaemmaghami S., Newman J.R.S., and Weissman J.S. (2009). Genome-wide analysis in vivo of translation with nucleotide resolution using ribosome profiling. Science 324, 218–223. 10.1126/science.1168978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ingolia N.T., Lareau L.F., and Weissman J.S. (2011). Ribosome Profiling of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells Reveals the Complexity and Dynamics of Mammalian Proteomes. Cell 147, 789–802. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ingolia N.T. (2016). Ribosome Footprint Profiling of Translation throughout the Genome. Cell 165, 22–33. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ji Z., Song R., Regev A., and Struhl K. (2015). Many lncRNAs, 5’UTRs, and pseudogenes are translated and some are likely to express functional proteins. eLife 4, e08890. 10.7554/eLife.08890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wright B.W., Yi Z., Weissman J.S., and Chen J. (2022). The dark proteome: translation from noncanonical open reading frames. Trends Cell Biol. 32, 243–258. 10.1016/j.tcb.2021.10.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Frith M.C., Forrest A.R., Nourbakhsh E., Pang K.C., Kai C., Kawai J., Carninci P., Hayashizaki Y., Bailey T.L., and Grimmond S.M. (2006). The Abundance of Short Proteins in the Mammalian Proteome. PLOS Genet. 2, e52. 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jackson R., Kroehling L., Khitun A., Bailis W., Jarret A., York A.G., Khan O.M., Brewer J.R., Skadow M.H., Duizer C., et al. (2018). The Translation of Non-Canonical Open Reading Frames Controls Mucosal Immunity. Nature 564, 434–438. 10.1038/s41586-018-0794-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Halasz H., Malekos E., Covarrubias S., Yitiz S., Montano C., Sudek L., Katzman S., Liu S.J., Horlbeck M.A., Namvar L., et al. (2024). CRISPRi screens identify the lncRNA, LOUP , as a multifunctional locus regulating macrophage differentiation and inflammatory signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 121, e2322524121. 10.1073/pnas.2322524121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Long Noncoding RNA U90926 Is Induced in Activated Macrophages, Is Protective in Endotoxic Shock, and Encodes a Novel Secreted Protein | The Journal of Immunology | Oxford Academic https://academic.oup.com/jimmunol/article-abstract/210/6/807/7930452?redirectedFrom=full ext&login=false. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 10.Anderson D.M., Anderson K.M., Chang C.-L., Makarewich C.A., Nelson B.R., McAnally J.R., Kasaragod P., Shelton J.M., Liou J., Bassel-Duby R., et al. (2015). A Micropeptide Encoded by a Putative Long Noncoding RNA Regulates Muscle Performance. Cell 160, 595–606. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nelson B.R., Makarewich C.A., Anderson D.M., Winders B.R., Troupes C.D., Wu F., Reese A.L., McAnally J.R., Chen X., Kavalali E.T., et al. (2016). A peptide encoded by a transcript annotated as long noncoding RNA enhances SERCA activity in muscle. Science 351, 271–275. 10.1126/science.aad4076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tang S., Zhang J., Lou F., Zhou H., Cai X., Wang Z., Sun L., Sun Y., Li X., Fan L., et al. (2024). A lncRNA Dleu2-encoded peptide relieves autoimmunity by facilitating Smad3-mediated Treg induction. EMBO Rep. 25, 1208–1232. 10.1038/s44319-024-00070-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mudge J.M., Ruiz-Orera J., Prensner J.R., Brunet M.A., Calvet F., Jungreis I., Gonzalez J.M., Magrane M., Martinez T.F., Schulz J.F., et al. (2022). Standardized annotation of translated open reading frames. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 994–999. 10.1038/s41587-022-01369-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hahnfeld J.M., Schwengers O., Jelonek L., Diedrich S., Cemič F., and Goesmann A. (2025). sORFdb – a database for sORFs, small proteins, and small protein families in bacteria. BMC Genomics 26, 110. 10.1186/s12864-025-11301-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Li Y., Zhou H., Chen X., Zheng Y., Kang Q., Hao D., Zhang L., Song T., Luo H., Hao Y., et al. (2021). SmProt: A Reliable Repository with Comprehensive Annotation of Small Proteins Identified from Ribosome Profiling. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 19, 602–610. 10.1016/j.gpb.2021.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Leblanc S., Yala F., Provencher N., Lucier J.-F., Levesque M., Lapointe X., Jacques J.-F., Fournier I., Salzet M., Ouangraoua A., et al. (2024). OpenProt 2.0 builds a path to the functional characterization of alternative proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, D522–D528. 10.1093/nar/gkad1050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kesner J.S., Chen Z., Shi P., Aparicio A.O., Murphy M.R., Guo Y., Trehan A., Lipponen J.E., Recinos Y., Myeku N., et al. (2023). Noncoding translation mitigation. Nature 617, 395–402. 10.1038/s41586-023-05946-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yang H., Li Q., Stroup E.K., Wang S., and Ji Z. (2024). Widespread stable noncanonical peptides identified by integrated analyses of ribosome profiling and ORF features. Nat. Commun. 15, 1932. 10.1038/s41467-024-46240-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chen J., Brunner A.-D., Cogan J.Z., Nuñez J.K., Fields A.P., Adamson B., Itzhak D.N., Li J.Y., Mann M., Leonetti M.D., et al. (2020). Pervasive functional translation of noncanonical human open reading frames. Science 367, 1140–1146. 10.1126/science.aay0262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Prensner J.R., Enache O.M., Luria V., Krug K., Clauser K.R., Dempster J.M., Karger A., Wang L., Stumbraite K., Wang V.M., et al. (2021). Noncanonical open reading frames encode functional proteins essential for cancer cell survival. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 697–704. 10.1038/s41587-020-00806-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zheng C., Wei Y., Zhang P., Xu L., Zhang Z., Lin K., Hou J., Lv X., Ding Y., Chiu Y., et al. (2023). CRISPR/Cas9 screen uncovers functional translation of cryptic lncRNA-encoded open reading frames in human cancer. J. Clin. Invest. 133. 10.1172/JCI159940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hofman D.A., Ruiz-Orera J., Yannuzzi I., Murugesan R., Brown A., Clauser K.R., Condurat A.L., Dinter J.T. van, Engels S.A.G., Goodale A., et al. (2024). Translation of non-canonical open reading frames as a cancer cell survival mechanism in childhood medulloblastoma. Mol. Cell 84, 261–276.e18. 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Schlesinger D., Dirks C., Navarro C., Lafranchi L., Spinner A., Raja G.L., Tong G.M.-S., Eirich J., Martinez T.F., and Elsässer S.J. (2025). A large-scale sORF screen identifies putative microproteins involved in cancer cell fitness. iScience 28. 10.1016/j.isci.2025.111884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Malekos E., and Carpenter S. (2022). Short open reading frame genes in innate immunity: from discovery to characterization. Trends Immunol. 43, 741–756. 10.1016/j.it.2022.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Piccirillo C.A., Bjur E., Topisirovic I., Sonenberg N., and Larsson O. (2014). Translational control of immune responses: from transcripts to translatomes. Nat. Immunol. 15, 503–511. 10.1038/ni.2891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Su X., Yu Y., Zhong Y., Giannopoulou E.G., Hu X., Liu H., Cross J.R., Rätsch G., Rice C.M., and Ivashkiv L.B. (2015). Interferon-γ regulates cellular metabolism and mRNA translation to potentiate macrophage activation. Nat. Immunol. 16, 838–849. 10.1038/ni.3205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Vattem K.M., and Wek R.C. (2004). Reinitiation involving upstream ORFs regulates ATF4 mRNA translation in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101, 11269–11274. 10.1073/pnas.0400541101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ivanov I.P., Loughran G., and Atkins J.F. (2008). uORFs with unusual translational start codons autoregulate expression of eukaryotic ornithine decarboxylase homologs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 10079–10084. 10.1073/pnas.0801590105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Watatani Y., Ichikawa K., Nakanishi N., Fujimoto M., Takeda H., Kimura N., Hirose H., Takahashi S., and Takahashi Y. (2008). Stress-induced Translation of ATF5 mRNA Is Regulated by the 5′-Untranslated Region *. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 2543–2553. 10.1074/jbc.M707781200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Barbosa C., Peixeiro I., and Romão L. (2013). Gene Expression Regulation by Upstream Open Reading Frames and Human Disease. PLOS Genet. 9, e1003529. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Young S.K., Willy J.A., Wu C., Sachs M.S., and Wek R.C. (2015). Ribosome Reinitiation Directs Gene-specific Translation and Regulates the Integrated Stress Response *. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 28257–28271. 10.1074/jbc.M115.693184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Young S.K., and Wek R.C. (2016). Upstream Open Reading Frames Differentially Regulate Gene-specific Translation in the Integrated Stress Response *. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 16927–16935. 10.1074/jbc.R116.733899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kidwell A., Yadav S.P.S., Maier B., Zollman A., Ni K., Halim A., Janosevic D., Myslinski J., Syed F., Zeng L., et al. (2023). Translation Rescue by Targeting Ppp1r15a through Its Upstream Open Reading Frame in Sepsis-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in a Murine Model. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 34, 220. 10.1681/ASN.2022060644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lilue J., Doran A.G., Fiddes I.T., Abrudan M., Armstrong J., Bennett R., Chow W., Collins J., Collins S., Czechanski A., et al. (2018). Sixteen diverse laboratory mouse reference genomes define strain-specific haplotypes and novel functional loci. Nat. Genet. 50, 1574–1583. 10.1038/s41588-018-0223-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Robinson E.K., Covarrubias S., and Carpenter S. (2020). The how and why of lncRNA function: An innate immune perspective. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gene Regul. Mech. 1863, 194419. 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2019.194419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium, Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Center for Genome Research:, Lander E.S., Linton L.M., Birren B., Nusbaum C., Zody M.C., Baldwin J., Devon K., Dewar K., et al. (2001). Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409, 860–921. 10.1038/35057062. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium (2002). Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature 420, 520–562. 10.1038/nature01262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kassiotis G., and Stoye J.P. (2016). Immune responses to endogenous retroelements: taking the bad with the good. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 16, 207–219. 10.1038/nri.2016.27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Mi S., Lee X., Li X., Veldman G.M., Finnerty H., Racie L., LaVallie E., Tang X.-Y., Edouard P., Howes S., et al. (2000). Syncytin is a captive retroviral envelope protein involved in human placental morphogenesis. Nature 403, 785–789. 10.1038/35001608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Dupressoir A., Vernochet C., Bawa O., Harper F., Pierron G., Opolon P., and Heidmann T. (2009). Syncytin-A knockout mice demonstrate the critical role in placentation of a fusogenic, endogenous retrovirus-derived, envelope gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106, 12127–12132. 10.1073/pnas.0902925106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Guo H., Ingolia N.T., Weissman J.S., and Bartel D.P. (2010). Mammalian microRNAs predominantly act to decrease target mRNA levels. Nature 466, 835–840. 10.1038/nature09267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sako H., and Suzuki K. (2016). Genome-wide Analysis of Acute Inflammatory and Anti-Inflammatory Responses in RAW264 Cells Suggests cis-Elements Associated with Translational Regulation. J. Data Min. Genomics Proteomics 07. 10.4172/2153-0602.1000191. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Tiedje C., Diaz-Muñoz M.D., Trulley P., Ahlfors H., Laaß K., Blackshear P.J., Turner M., and Gaestel M. (2016). The RNA-binding protein TTP is a global post-transcriptional regulator of feedback control in inflammation. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 7418–7440. 10.1093/nar/gkw474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Barry K.C., Ingolia N.T., and Vance R.E. (2017). Global analysis of gene expression reveals mRNA superinduction is required for the inducible immune response to a bacterial pathogen. eLife 6, e22707. 10.7554/eLife.22707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zhang X., Chen X., Liu Q., Zhang S., and Hu W. (2017). Translation repression via modulation of the cytoplasmic poly(A)-binding protein in the inflammatory response. eLife 6, e27786. 10.7554/eLife.27786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Eichhorn S.W., Guo H., McGeary S.E., Rodriguez-Mias R.A., Shin C., Baek D., Hsu S., Ghoshal K., Villén J., and Bartel D.P. (2014). mRNA Destabilization Is the Dominant Effect of Mammalian MicroRNAs by the Time Substantial Repression Ensues. Mol. Cell 56, 104–115. 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.08.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Diaz-Muñoz M.D., Bell S.E., Fairfax K., Monzon-Casanova E., Cunningham A.F., Gonzalez-Porta M., Andrews S.R., Bunik V.I., Zarnack K., Curk T., et al. (2015). The RNA-binding protein HuR is essential for the B cell antibody response. Nat. Immunol. 16, 415–425. 10.1038/ni.3115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Jin H.Y., Oda H., Chen P., Yang C., Zhou X., Kang S.G., Valentine E., Kefauver J.M., Liao L., Zhang Y., et al. (2017). Differential Sensitivity of Target Genes to Translational Repression by miR-17~92. PLOS Genet. 13, e1006623. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Hu F., Lu J., Matheson L.S., Díaz-Muñoz M.D., Saveliev A., Xu J., and Turner M. (2021). ORFLine: a bioinformatic pipeline to prioritize small open reading frames identifies candidate secreted small proteins from lymphocytes. Bioinformatics 37, 3152–3159. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Davari K., Lichti J., Gallus C., Greulich F., Uhlenhaut N.H., Heinig M., Friedel C.C., and Glasmacher E. (2017). Rapid Genome-wide Recruitment of RNA Polymerase II Drives Transcription, Splicing, and Translation Events during T Cell Responses. Cell Rep. 19, 643–654. 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.03.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Moore M.J., Blachere N.E., Fak J.J., Park C.Y., Sawicka K., Parveen S., Zucker-Scharff I., Moltedo B., Rudensky A.Y., and Darnell R.B. (2018). ZFP36 RNA-binding proteins restrain T cell activation and anti-viral immunity. eLife 7, e33057. 10.7554/eLife.33057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Li H.-B., Tong J., Zhu S., Batista P.J., Duffy E.E., Zhao J., Bailis W., Cao G., Kroehling L., Chen Y., et al. (2017). m6A mRNA methylation controls T cell homeostasis by targeting the IL-7/STAT5/SOCS pathways. Nature 548, 338–342. 10.1038/nature23450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Myers D.R., Norlin E., Vercoulen Y., and Roose J.P. (2019). Active Tonic mTORC1 Signals Shape Baseline Translation in Naive T Cells. Cell Rep. 27, 1858–1874.e6. 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.04.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Matheson L.S., Petkau G., Sáenz-Narciso B., D’Angeli V., McHugh J., Newman R., Munford H., West J., Chakraborty K., Roberts J., et al. (2022). Multiomics analysis couples mRNA turnover and translational control of glutamine metabolism to the differentiation of the activated CD4+ T cell. Sci. Rep. 12, 19657. 10.1038/s41598-022-24132-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Salloum D., Singh K., Davidson N.R., Cao L., Kuo D., Sanghvi V.R., Jiang M., Lafoz M.T., Viale A., Ratsch G., et al. (2022). A Rapid Translational Immune Response Program in CD8 Memory T Lymphocytes. J. Immunol. Author Choice 209, 1189–1199. 10.4049/jimmunol.2100537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Jovanovic M., Rooney M.S., Mertins P., Przybylski D., Chevrier N., Satija R., Rodriguez E.H., Fields A.P., Schwartz S., Raychowdhury R., et al. (2015). Dynamic profiling of the protein life cycle in response to pathogens. Science 347, 1259038. 10.1126/science.1259038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Fields A.P., Rodriguez E.H., Jovanovic M., Stern-Ginossar N., Haas B.J., Mertins P., Raychowdhury R., Hacohen N., Carr S.A., Ingolia N.T., et al. (2015). A Regression-Based Analysis of Ribosome-Profiling Data Reveals a Conserved Complexity to Mammalian Translation. Mol. Cell 60, 816–827. 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.11.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Wang H., Hu X., Huang M., Liu J., Gu Y., Ma L., Zhou Q., and Cao X. (2019). Mettl3-mediated mRNA m(6)A methylation promotes dendritic cell activation. Nat. Commun. 10, 1898. 10.1038/s41467-019-09903-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Hato T., Maier B., Syed F., Myslinski J., Zollman A., Plotkin Z., Eadon M.T., and Dagher P.C. (2019). Bacterial sepsis triggers an antiviral response that causes translation shutdown. J. Clin. Invest. 129, 296–309. 10.1172/JCI123284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Robinson E.K., Jagannatha P., Covarrubias S., Cattle M., Smaliy V., Safavi R., Shapleigh B., Abu-Shumays R., Jain M., Cloonan S.M., et al. (2021). Inflammation drives alternative first exon usage to regulate immune genes including a novel iron-regulated isoform of Aim2. eLife 10, e69431. 10.7554/eLife.69431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Zhang P., He D., Xu Y., Hou J., Pan B.-F., Wang Y., Liu T., Davis C.M., Ehli E.A., Tan L., et al. (2017). Genome-wide identification and differential analysis of translational initiation. Nat. Commun. 8, 1749. 10.1038/s41467-017-01981-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Erhard F., Halenius A., Zimmermann C., L’Hernault A., Kowalewski D.J., Weekes M.P., Stevanovic S., Zimmer R., and Dölken L. (2018). Improved Ribo-seq enables identification of cryptic translation events. Nat. Methods 15, 363–366. 10.1038/nmeth.4631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Chothani S.P., Adami E., Widjaja A.A., Langley S.R., Viswanathan S., Pua C.J., Zhihao N.T., Harmston N., D’Agostino G., Whiffin N., et al. (2022). A high-resolution map of human RNA translation. Mol. Cell 82, 2885–2899.e8. 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.06.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Thumuluri V., Almagro Armenteros J.J., Johansen A.R., Nielsen H., and Winther O. (2022). DeepLoc 2.0: multi-label subcellular localization prediction using protein language models. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, W228–W234. 10.1093/nar/gkac278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Kim S., and Pevzner P.A. (2014). MS-GF+ makes progress towards a universal database search tool for proteomics. Nat. Commun. 5, 5277. 10.1038/ncomms6277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Buur L.M., Declercq A., Strobl M., Bouwmeester R., Degroeve S., Martens L., Dorfer V., and Gabriels R. (2024). MS2Rescore 3.0 Is a Modular, Flexible, and User-Friendly Platform to Boost Peptide Identifications, as Showcased with MS Amanda 3.0. J. Proteome Res. 23, 3200–3207. 10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Malekos E., Montano C., and Carpenter S. (2025). CRISPRware: a software package for contextual gRNA library design. BMC Genomics 26, 607. 10.1186/s12864-025-11775-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Covarrubias S., Vollmers A.C., Capili A., Boettcher M., Shulkin A., Correa M.R., Halasz H., Robinson E.K., O’Briain L., Vollmers C., et al. (2020). High-Throughput CRISPR Screening Identifies Genes Involved in Macrophage Viability and Inflammatory Pathways. Cell Rep. 33. 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Li W., Xu H., Xiao T., Cong L., Love M.I., Zhang F., Irizarry R.A., Liu J.S., Brown M., and Liu X.S. (2014). MAGeCK enables robust identification of essential genes from genome-scale CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screens. Genome Biol. 15, 554. 10.1186/s13059-014-0554-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Arafeh R., Shibue T., Dempster J.M., Hahn W.C., and Vazquez F. (2025). The present and future of the Cancer Dependency Map. Nat. Rev. Cancer 25, 59–73. 10.1038/s41568-024-00763-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Klemsz M.J., McKercher S.R., Celada A., Beveren C.V., and Maki R.A. (1990). The macrophage and B cell-specific transcription factor PU.1 is related to the ets oncogene. Cell 61, 113–124. 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90219-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Namgaladze D., Fuhrmann D.C., and Brüne B. (2022). Interplay of Nrf2 and BACH1 in inducing ferroportin expression and enhancing resistance of human macrophages towards ferroptosis. Cell Death Discov. 8, 327. 10.1038/s41420-022-01117-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Nataraj N.M., Sillas R.G., Herrmann B.I., Shin S., and Brodsky I.E. (2024). Blockade of IKK signaling induces RIPK1-independent apoptosis in human macrophages. PLOS Pathog. 20, e1012469. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1012469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Scott C.L., T’Jonck W., Martens L., Todorov H., Sichien D., Soen B., Bonnardel J., Prijck S.D., Vandamme N., Cannoodt R., et al. (2018). The Transcription Factor ZEB2 Is Required to Maintain the Tissue-Specific Identities of Macrophages. Immunity 49, 312–325.e5. 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.07.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Vogler M., Braun Y., Smith V.M., Westhoff M.-A., Pereira R.S., Pieper N.M., Anders M., Callens M., Vervliet T., Abbas M., et al. (2025). The BCL2 family: from apoptosis mechanisms to new advances in targeted therapy. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 10, 91. 10.1038/s41392-025-02176-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Vanharanta S., Marney C.B., Shu W., Valiente M., Zou Y., Mele A., Darnell R.B., and Massagué J. (2014). Loss of the multifunctional RNA-binding protein RBM47 as a source of selectable metastatic traits in breast cancer. eLife 3, e02734. 10.7554/eLife.02734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Covarrubias S., Robinson E.K., Shapleigh B., Vollmers A., Katzman S., Hanley N., Fong N., McManus M.T., and Carpenter S. (2017). CRISPR/Cas-based screening of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in macrophages with an NF-κB reporter. J. Biol. Chem. 292, 20911–20920. 10.1074/jbc.M117.799155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.de Boer C.G., Ray J.P., Hacohen N., and Regev A. (2020). MAUDE: inferring expression changes in sorting-based CRISPR screens. Genome Biol. 21, 134. 10.1186/s13059-020-02046-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Altschul S. (1997). Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 3389–3402. 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Dupressoir A., Marceau G., Vernochet C., Bénit L., Kanellopoulos C., Sapin V., and Heidmann T. (2005). Syncytin-A and syncytin-B, two fusogenic placenta-specific murine envelope genes of retroviral origin conserved in Muridae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102, 725–730. 10.1073/pnas.0406509102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Mercenne G., Alam S.L., Arii J., Lalonde M.S., and Sundquist W.I. (2015). Angiomotin functions in HIV-1 assembly and budding. eLife 4, e03778. 10.7554/eLife.03778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Swann J., Murry J., and Young J.A.T. (2016). Cytosolic sulfotransferase 1A1 regulates HIV-1 minus-strand DNA elongation in primary human monocyte-derived macrophages. Virol. J. 13, 30. 10.1186/s12985-016-0491-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.OBrien S.J. (2024). Legacy of a magic gene—CCR5-Δ32: From discovery to clinical benefit in a generation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 121, e2321907121. 10.1073/pnas.2321907121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Taggart C.C., Cryan S.-A., Weldon S., Gibbons A., Greene C.M., Kelly E., Low T.B., O’Neill S.J., and McElvaney N.G. (2005). Secretory leucoprotease inhibitor binds to NF-κB binding sites in monocytes and inhibits p65 binding. J. Exp. Med. 202, 1659–1668. 10.1084/jem.20050768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Zhou J., Zhou Q., Zhang T., and Fan J. (2021). C7ORF41 Regulates Inflammation by Inhibiting NF-κB Signaling Pathway. BioMed Res. Int. 2021, 7413605. 10.1155/2021/7413605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Haig D. (2012). Retroviruses and the Placenta. Curr. Biol. 22, R609–R613. 10.1016/j.cub.2012.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Schaum N., Karkanias J., Neff N.F., May A.P., Quake S.R., Wyss-Coray T., Darmanis S., Batson J., Botvinnik O., Chen M.B., et al. (2018). Single-cell transcriptomics of 20 mouse organs creates a Tabula Muris. Nature 562, 367–372. 10.1038/s41586-018-0590-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Almanzar N., Antony J., Baghel A.S., Bakerman I., Bansal I., Barres B.A., Beachy P.A., Berdnik D., Bilen B., Brownfield D., et al. (2020). A single-cell transcriptomic atlas characterizes ageing tissues in the mouse. Nature 583, 590–595. 10.1038/s41586-020-2496-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Best S., Tissier P.L., Towers G., and Stoye J.P. (1996). Positional cloning of the mouse retrovirus restriction gene Fvl. Nature 382, 826–829. 10.1038/382826a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Abramson J., Adler J., Dunger J., Evans R., Green T., Pritzel A., Ronneberger O., Willmore L., Ballard A.J., Bambrick J., et al. (2024). Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature 630, 493–500. 10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.van Kempen M., Kim S.S., Tumescheit C., Mirdita M., Lee J., Gilchrist C.L.M., Söding J., and Steinegger M. (2024). Fast and accurate protein structure search with Foldseek. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 243–246. 10.1038/s41587-023-01773-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Anderson M.M., Lauring A.S., Burns C.C., and Overbaugh J. (2000). Identification of a Cellular Cofactor Required for Infection by Feline Leukemia Virus. Science 287, 1828–1830. 10.1126/science.287.5459.1828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Hussain N., Thickett K.R., Na H., Leung C., and Tailor C.S. (2011). Feline Leukemia Virus Infection Requires a Post-Receptor Binding Envelope-Dependent Cellular Component. J. Virol. 85, 12529–12536. 10.1128/jvi.00822-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Croft D., O’Kelly G., Wu G., Haw R., Gillespie M., Matthews L., Caudy M., Garapati P., Gopinath G., Jassal B., et al. (2011). Reactome: a database of reactions, pathways and biological processes. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, D691–D697. 10.1093/nar/gkq1018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Kent W.J., Sugnet C.W., Furey T.S., Roskin K.M., Pringle T.H., Zahler A.M., and Haussler D. (2002). The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res. 12, 996–1006. 10.1101/gr.229102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Perez G., Barber G.P., Benet-Pages A., Casper J., Clawson H., Diekhans M., Fischer C., Gonzalez J.N., Hinrichs A.S., Lee C.M., et al. (2025). The UCSC Genome Browser database: 2025 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, D1243–D1249. 10.1093/nar/gkae974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Teufel F., Almagro Armenteros J.J., Johansen A.R., Gíslason M.H., Pihl S.I., Tsirigos K.D., Winther O., Brunak S., von Heijne G., and Nielsen H. (2022). SignalP 6.0 predicts all five types of signal peptides using protein language models. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 1023–1025. 10.1038/s41587-021-01156-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Hallgren J., Tsirigos K.D., Pedersen M.D., Almagro Armenteros J.J., Marcatili P., Nielsen H., Krogh A., and Winther O. (2022). DeepTMHMM predicts alpha and beta transmembrane proteins using deep neural networks (Bioinformatics) 10.1101/2022.04.08.487609. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Blum M., Andreeva A., Florentino L.C., Chuguransky S.R., Grego T., Hobbs E., Pinto B.L., Orr A., Paysan-Lafosse T., Ponamareva I., et al. (2025). InterPro: the protein sequence classification resource in 2025. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, D444–D456. 10.1093/nar/gkae1082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Paysan-Lafosse T., Andreeva A., Blum M., Chuguransky S.R., Grego T., Pinto B.L., Salazar G.A., Bileschi M.L., Llinares-López F., Meng-Papaxanthos L., et al. (2025). The Pfam protein families database: embracing AI/ML. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, D523–D534. 10.1093/nar/gkae997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Necci M., Piovesan D., Clementel D., Dosztányi Z., and Tosatto S.C.E. (2021). MobiDB-lite 3.0: fast consensus annotation of intrinsic disorder flavors in proteins. Bioinformatics 36, 5533–5534. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa1045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Kalantari P., Harandi O.F., Agarwal S., Rus F., Kurt-Jones E.A., Fitzgerald K.A., Caffrey D.R., and Golenbock D.T. (2017). miR-718 represses proinflammatory cytokine production through targeting phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN). J. Biol. Chem. 292, 5634–5644. 10.1074/jbc.M116.749325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Ahmadzadeh K., Vanoppen M., Rose C.D., Matthys P., and Wouters C.H. (2022). Multinucleated Giant Cells: Current Insights in Phenotype, Biological Activities, and Mechanism of Formation. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 10. 10.3389/fcell.2022.873226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Mudge J.M., Carbonell-Sala S., Diekhans M., Martinez J.G., Hunt T., Jungreis I., Loveland J.E., Arnan C., Barnes I., Bennett R., et al. (2025). GENCODE 2025: reference gene annotation for human and mouse. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, D966–D975. 10.1093/nar/gkae1078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Goldfarb T., Kodali V.K., Pujar S., Brover V., Robbertse B., Farrell C.M., Oh D.-H., Astashyn A., Ermolaeva O., Haddad D., et al. (2025). NCBI RefSeq: reference sequence standards through 25 years of curation and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, D243–D257. 10.1093/nar/gkae1038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Dainat J., Cannoodt R., Soares A., Ruano D.G., Hereñú D., Murray D.K.D., Davis E., Ugrin I., Crouch K., Soler L., et al. (2026). NBISweden/AGAT: AGAT v1.6.1. (Zenodo). 10.5281/zenodo.18230424 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18230424. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Ewels P., Magnusson M., Lundin S., and Käller M. (2016). MultiQC: summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report. Bioinformatics 32, 3047–3048. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Martin M. (2011). Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet.journal 17, 10–12. 10.14806/ej.17.1.200. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Chan P.P., and Lowe T.M. (2009). GtRNAdb: a database of transfer RNA genes detected in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D93–D97. 10.1093/nar/gkn787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.The RNAcentral Consortium (2019). RNAcentral: a hub of information for non-coding RNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D221–D229. 10.1093/nar/gky1034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Langmead B., and Salzberg S.L. (2012). Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359. 10.1038/nmeth.1923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Dobin A., Davis C.A., Schlesinger F., Drenkow J., Zaleski C., Jha S., Batut P., Chaisson M., and Gingeras T.R. (2013). STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Quinlan A.R., and Hall I.M. (2010). BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841–842. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Ansari S.A., Dantoft W., Ruiz-Orera J., Syed A.P., Blachut S., Heesch S. van, Hübner N., and Uhlenhaut N.H. (2022). Integrative analysis of macrophage ribo-Seq and RNA-Seq data define glucocorticoid receptor regulated inflammatory response genes into distinct regulatory classes. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 20, 5622–5638. 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.09.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Chong C., Müller M., Pak H., Harnett D., Huber F., Grun D., Leleu M., Auger A., Arnaud M., Stevenson B.J., et al. (2020). Integrated proteogenomic deep sequencing and analytics accurately identify non-canonical peptides in tumor immunopeptidomes. Nat. Commun. 11, 1293. 10.1038/s41467-020-14968-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Kazachenka A., Bertozzi T.M., Sjoberg-Herrera M.K., Walker N., Gardner J., Gunning R., Pahita E., Adams S., Adams D., and Ferguson-Smith A.C. (2018). Identification, Characterization, and Heritability of Murine Metastable Epialleles: Implications for Non-genetic Inheritance. Cell 175, 1259–1271.e13. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.09.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Schuster H., Shao W., Weiss T., Pedrioli P.G.A., Roth P., Weller M., Campbell D.S., Deutsch E.W., Moritz R.L., Planz O., et al. (2018). A tissue-based draft map of the murine MHC class I immunopeptidome. Sci. Data 5, 180157. 10.1038/sdata.2018.157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Qie J., Liu Y., Wang Y., Zhang F., Qin Z., Tian S., Liu M., Li K., Shi W., Song L., et al. (2022). Integrated proteomic and transcriptomic landscape of macrophages in mouse tissues. Nat. Commun. 13, 7389. 10.1038/s41467-022-35095-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Ma J., Chen T., Wu S., Yang C., Bai M., Shu K., Li K., Zhang G., Jin Z., He F., et al. (2019). iProX: an integrated proteome resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D1211–D1217. 10.1093/nar/gky869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Quantitative analysis of competitive cytokine signaling predicts tissue thresholds for the propagation of macrophage activation | Science Signaling https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scisignal.aaf3998?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 121.Chalise U., Daseke M.J., Kalusche W.J., Konfrst S.R., Rodriguez-Paar J.R., Flynn E.R., Cook L.M., Becirovic-Agic M., and Lindsey M.L. (2022). Macrophages secrete murinoglobulin-1 and galectin-3 to regulate neutrophil degranulation after myocardial infarction†. Mol. Omics 18, 186–195. 10.1039/D1MO00519G. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Leslie J., Macia M.G., Luli S., Worrell J.C., Reilly W.J., Paish H.L., Knox A., Barksby B.S., Gee L.M., Zaki M.Y.W., et al. (2020). c-Rel orchestrates energy-dependent epithelial and macrophage reprogramming in fibrosis. Nat. Metab. 2, 1350–1367. 10.1038/s42255-020-00306-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Perez-Riverol Y., Csordas A., Bai J., Bernal-Llinares M., Hewapathirana S., Kundu D.J., Inuganti A., Griss J., Mayer G., Eisenacher M., et al. (2019). The PRIDE database and related tools and resources in 2019: improving support for quantification data. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D442–D450. 10.1093/nar/gky1106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Williams N.C., Ryan D.G., Costa A.S.H., Mills E.L., Jedrychowski M.P., Cloonan S.M., Frezza C., and O’Neill L.A. (2022). Signaling metabolite L-2-hydroxyglutarate activates the transcription factor HIF-1α in lipopolysaccharide-activated macrophages. J. Biol. Chem. 298, 101501. 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.101501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Erady C., Boxall A., Puntambekar S., Suhas Jagannathan N., Chauhan R., Chong D., Meena N., Kulkarni A., Kasabe B., Prathivadi Bhayankaram K., et al. (2021). Pan-cancer analysis of transcripts encoding novel open-reading frames (nORFs) and their potential biological functions. Npj Genomic Med. 6, 4. 10.1038/s41525-020-00167-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Degroeve S., and Martens L. (2013). MS2PIP: a tool for MS/MS peak intensity prediction. Bioinformatics 29, 3199–3203. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Käll L., Canterbury J.D., Weston J., Noble W.S., and MacCoss M.J. (2007). Semi-supervised learning for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics datasets. Nat. Methods 4, 923–925. 10.1038/nmeth1113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Patro R., Duggal G., Love M.I., Irizarry R.A., and Kingsford C. (2017). Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat. Methods 14, 417–419. 10.1038/nmeth.4197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Soneson C., Love M.I., and Robinson M.D. (2016). Differential analyses for RNA-seq: transcript-level estimates improve gene-level inferences. Preprint at F1000Research, https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.7563.2 10.12688/f1000research.7563.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Ritchie M.E., Phipson B., Wu D., Hu Y., Law C.W., Shi W., and Smyth G.K. (2015). limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e47. 10.1093/nar/gkv007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Ramírez F., Dündar F., Diehl S., Grüning B.A., and Manke T. (2014). deepTools: a flexible platform for exploring deep-sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, W187–W191. 10.1093/nar/gku365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Hsu P.D., Scott D.A., Weinstein J.A., Ran F.A., Konermann S., Agarwala V., Li Y., Fine E.J., Wu X., Shalem O., et al. (2013). DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 827–832. 10.1038/nbt.2647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Doench J.G., Fusi N., Sullender M., Hegde M., Vaimberg E.W., Donovan K.F., Smith I., Tothova Z., Wilen C., Orchard R., et al. (2016). Optimized sgRNA design to maximize activity and minimize off-target effects of CRISPR-Cas9. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 184–191. 10.1038/nbt.3437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Ashburner M., Ball C.A., Blake J.A., Botstein D., Butler H., Cherry J.M., Davis A.P., Dolinski K., Dwight S.S., Eppig J.T., et al. (2000). Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet. 25, 25–29. 10.1038/75556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Sanson K.R., Hanna R.E., Hegde M., Donovan K.F., Strand C., Sullender M.E., Vaimberg E.W., Goodale A., Root D.E., Piccioni F., et al. (2018). Optimized libraries for CRISPR-Cas9 genetic screens with multiple modalities. Nat. Commun. 9, 5416. 10.1038/s41467-018-07901-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Boettcher M., Tian R., Blau J.A., Markegard E., Wagner R.T., Wu D., Mo X., Biton A., Zaitlen N., Fu H., et al. (2018). Dual gene activation and knockout screen reveals directional dependencies in genetic networks. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 170–178. 10.1038/nbt.4062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Wang D., Zhang C., Wang B., Li B., Wang Q., Liu D., Wang H., Zhou Y., Shi L., Lan F., et al. (2019). Optimized CRISPR guide RNA design for two high-fidelity Cas9 variants by deep learning. Nat. Commun. 10, 4284. 10.1038/s41467-019-12281-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Love M.I., Huber W., and Anders S. (2014). Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550. 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Kent W.J. (2002). BLAT—The BLAST-Like Alignment Tool. Genome Res. 12, 656–664. 10.1101/gr.229202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Picelli S., Faridani O.R., Björklund Å.K., Winberg G., Sagasser S., and Sandberg R. (2014). Full-length RNA-seq from single cells using Smart-seq2. Nat. Protoc. 9, 171–181. 10.1038/nprot.2014.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Waterhouse A.M., Procter J.B., Martin D.M.A., Clamp M., and Barton G.J. (2009). Jalview Version 2—a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics 25, 1189–1191. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Lun A.T.L., McCarthy D.J., and Marioni J.C. (2016). A step-by-step workflow for low-level analysis of single-cell RNA-seq data with Bioconductor. F1000Research 5, 2122. 10.12688/f1000research.9501.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.McCarthy D.J., Campbell K.R., Lun A.T.L., and Wills Q.F. (2017). Scater: pre-processing, quality control, normalization and visualization of single-cell RNA-seq data in R. Bioinformatics 33, 1179–1186. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
