Introduction
Lung ultrasound (LUS) is an increasingly used tool in daily clinical practice, due to its ease of use, portability (allowing bedside examination), repeatability, absence of ionizing radiation and good correlation with traditional radiologic findings. During the acute phase of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, LUS proved to be a valuable diagnostic and monitoring modality. Since then, several studies have confirmed its utility in monitoring medium- and long-term pulmonary sequelae. We present the clinical cases of two patients hospitalised for bilateral COVID-19 pneumonia in 2020, followed after discharge at the Pulmonology Unit of the Pisa University Hospital and re-evaluated five years later as part of the project “Very-long-term COVID-19 respiratory outcomes: clinical and molecular profiling of patients in different phases of the pandemic” (Progetti di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale-PRIN, bando 2022, Prot. 2022FJK39Z, Pisa University).
Case report
An 82-year-old man with no comorbidities was admitted in April 2020 for bilateral COVID-19 pneumonia and treated with oxygen and antiviral therapy. After discharge, he entered in a structured follow-up program including pulmonary function tests (PFTs), and single-breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO), LUS, and chest computer tomography (CT) at 3, 12, and 24 months. At the 3-month evaluation, the patient was asymptomatic with normal PFTs and DLCO. Concurrent LUS showed resolution of consolidations, a few isolated vertical artifacts, and minimal pleural irregularities, consistent with chest CT findings. At the 5-year follow-up, 59 months after acute COVID-19 pneumonia), clinical, PFTs and DLCO evaluation remained normal, and the absence of pathological ultrasound findings confirmed complete recovery, in agreement with a last chest CT (performed at 50 months after acute COVID-19 pneumonia for unrelated reasons). A 75-year-old man with myelofibrosis, hospitalized for bone marrow transplantation in February 2020 contracted SARS-CoV-2 infection, which led to bilateral pneumonia requiring oxygen therapy and infusion of hyperimmune plasma. Follow-up evaluations at 3, 12, and 24 months showed, with persistent dyspnoea, restrictive ventilatory pattern, progressive DLCO decline, and incomplete radiological resolution. LUS at 3 months revealed numerous vertical artifacts, diffuse pleural line abnormalities, without signs of consolidation or pleural effusion. These persistent abnormalities led to referral to the interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) clinic. In February 2024, a multidisciplinary diagnosis of post-COVID fibrosing ILD was made. Antifibrotic therapy with nintedanib was started but about 1 month later discontinued due to intolerance. At the latest reassessment in March 2025, 58 months after acute COVID-19 pneumonia), both clinical, functional and LUS evaluations confirmed a persistent interstitial pattern, mainly involving both posterior mid-basal pulmonary regions, in agreement with chest CT findings and ongoing symptoms.
Conclusions
In both cases, LUS proved to be a reliable, reproducible, and radiologically consistent tool for monitoring post-COVID-19 pulmonary evolution. In the first case, it confirmed full resolution of the acute lung injury; in the second case, it contributed to the early identification of post-infectious fibrosing ILD, confirmed by chest CT and multidisciplinary discussion. LUS remains a valuable, accessible and promising imaging modality in the follow-up of ILDs, including post-COVID-19 Integrating lung ultrasound (LUS) into structured monitoring programs may enhance early detection and long-term disease management, especially in vulnerable or high-risk populations. Nonetheless, further prospective studies are required to more accurately determine its sensitivity, specificity, and potential limitations in this setting.