Skip to main content
Journal of Thoracic Disease logoLink to Journal of Thoracic Disease
. 2026 Feb 6;18(2):69. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2025-aw-2075

Inflammatory score, intrinsic capacity and the risk of new-onset chronic lung disease: a cohort study from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study

Xinyi Zhou 1, Zhuohan Liu 2, Jiaxin Liu 1, Hongyan Tao 1, Tianming Zhang 1,
PMCID: PMC12972829  PMID: 41816444

Abstract

Background

Chronic lung disease (CLD) presents a substantial health challenge among aging populations. Currently, the roles of intrinsic capacity (IC) and inflammatory score (IS) in the development of CLD remain to be fully elucidated. This study aimed to investigate the associations of IC and IS with the risk of CLD in older adults.

Methods

This study analyzed data from 5,425 participants aged 45 years and older without CLD at baseline, drawn from the nationally representative China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). Participants were followed from 2011 to 2015. Assessment of IC covered six domains according to standardized guidelines. An IS was derived by summing standardized C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cell (WBC) values from fasting samples. The associations of IC and IS with new-onset CLD were analyzed using generalized linear models (GLMs), adjusting for demographic, socioeconomic, and behavioral covariates.

Results

Among 5,425 participants (mean age 57.8 years; 49.9% women), 316 (5.8%) developed CLD during follow-up. An elevated IS was significantly associated with a higher risk of new-onset CLD, with participants in the highest quartile exhibiting 38% greater odds compared to the lowest quartile after full adjustment [odds ratio (OR) =1.38, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01–1.90]. Conversely, IC showed a strong protective effect, with each unit increase linked to a 20% reduction in CLD risk (OR =0.80, 95% CI: 0.73–0.88) in fully adjusted models. Dose-response analyses confirmed linear associations for both markers.

Conclusions

The results indicate that greater IC corresponds to a reduced likelihood of developing new-onset CLD, whereas elevated systemic inflammation is linked to an increased risk of new-onset CLD.

Keywords: Intrinsic capacity (IC), inflammatory score (IS), chronic lung disease (CLD), longitudinal study, China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS)


Highlight box.

Key findings

• The greater intrinsic capacity (IC) corresponds to a reduced likelihood of developing new-onset chronic lung disease (CLD), whereas elevated systemic inflammation is linked to an increased risk of new-onset CLD.

What is known and what is new?

• CLD is prevalent in aging populations, and systemic inflammation plays a role in its pathogenesis. IC has been proposed as a key indicator of healthy aging, but evidence linking IC to respiratory outcomes is limited.

• This study provides prospective evidence that IC is a strong protective factor against incident CLD, while systemic inflammation increases CLD risk. It is among the first studies to jointly examine IC and inflammation in relation to CLD development in a large population-based cohort.

What is the implication, and what should change now?

• Incorporating IC assessment and IS into routine evaluations may improve early identification of individuals at risk for CLD. Interventions aimed at maintaining functional capacity and reducing systemic inflammation may represent promising strategies for the prevention of CLD in aging populations.

Introduction

Chronic lung disease (CLD), primarily comprising chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma, represents a serious global health problem, characterized by persistent airflow obstruction and progressive loss of respiratory performance, with substantial heterogeneity in clinical phenotypes and disease progression (1). Globally, CLD-related deaths have increased by 18% over the past three decades, with the highest mortality and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) observed in low sociodemographic index (SDI) regions—notably Africa, the Middle East, Central and Southeast Asia, and South America. These disparities disproportionately affect low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) (2-4). In China, CLD imposes a significant dual health and economic burden, posing particular challenges for LMIC populations (5). The predominant risk factors for CLD include tobacco smoking, ambient and household air pollution, and occupational exposures (6-8).

Persistent systemic inflammation critically contributes to CLD pathogenesis and advancement through induction of tissue remodeling and rapid loss of function. Leukocytes, well-established markers of inflammation, also act as surrogate indicators of cardio-metabolic risk factors predictive of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Beyond their individual roles, combining leukocyte counts with C-reactive protein (CRP) into an inflammatory score (IS) provides a more robust measure of systemic inflammation. This composite approach reduces the influence of short-term biological variability and daily fluctuations that may affect single markers, thereby better reflecting cumulative inflammatory burden over time. The IS enables longitudinal assessment of cardio-metabolic health trajectories, offering dual clinical utility for both CVD risk stratification and therapeutic response evaluation (9). Concurrent elevations of fibrinogen (>14 µmol/L), white blood cell (WBC) count (>9×109/L), and CRP (>3 mg/L) have been linked to a 3.7-fold increased risk of frequent acute exacerbations within one year. Moreover, advanced cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome (stages 3–4) is strongly associated with elevated CLD risk, with high-sensitivity CRP (hsCRP) identified as a key mediator of this relationship (10). Elevated CRP levels are also significantly correlated with both absolute and relative declines in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) among COPD patients (11). Thus, the IS represents a valuable tool for quantifying systemic inflammation and predicting disease risk and clinical outcomes across diverse populations (9). Although this inflammation index has been validated primarily in CVD populations (12), its application in CLD remains largely unexplored.

Intrinsic capacity (IC), as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO), refers to the totality of an individual’s physical and psychological functions, has recently gained attention as an important factor influencing health trajectories in chronic diseases (13,14). The IC framework encompasses five domains: cognition, mobility, psychological well-being, vitality, and sensory function. In support of this framework, the WHO issued two key guidelines—Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) in 2017, and the Handbook: Person-centred Assessment and Pathways in Primary Care in 2019-offering recommendations for community-based interventions and clinical practice, respectively (15,16). Tracking IC trajectories in older adults may inform strategies to prevent, delay, or mitigate adverse health outcomes such as chronic disease progression, functional decline, disability, frailty, falls, and mortality. Longitudinal studies on IC can elucidate its temporal dynamics and determine whether continuous IC monitoring predicts these adverse outcomes (17). Prospective data from the UK Biobank identify the IC deficit score as a significant predictor of both functional decline and cardiovascular risk trajectories, highlighting its potential as a clinical screening tool for early preventive interventions (18). Furthermore, a meta-analysis has demonstrated that IC is negatively correlated with the risk of functional decline and mortality in the elderly population, these findings underscore the potential of IC as a hallmark metric of healthy ageing (19). Consequently, IC has been proposed as a biomarker for monitoring implementation progress and evaluating intervention effectiveness within the United Nations Decade of Healthy Ageing (20).

Although both IS and IC have been independently linked to respiratory health, their interplay in relation to the risk of new-onset CLD remains poorly understood. Elucidating their combined and interactive effects is essential for advancing our understanding of new-onset CLD pathophysiology and may offer novel opportunities for early detection and intervention. This study sought to explore the relationships of IS and IC with the risk of developing CLD, thereby filling an important gap in current respiratory and gerontological research. We present this article in accordance with the STROBE reporting checklist (available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-2025-aw-2075/rc).

Methods

The data utilized in this study were obtained from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), a comprehensive longitudinal survey that is nationally representative and focuses on individuals in China who are aged 45 years and older (21). CHARLS was designed to investigate the aging process in China and to support research on health, socioeconomic status, and retirement among adults. The present study utilized data from the 2011 baseline survey, which collected detailed information on demographics, health status, physical measurements, and other relevant variables, along with follow-up data from the 2015 wave (21,22). Venous blood biomarkers were obtained from biospecimen data collected in the CHARLS (23). CHARLS data are publicly available at http://charls.pku.edu.cn/en. The CHARLS study received approval from the Institutional Review Board of Peking University in 2008, under the identification number IRB00001052-11015, and all participants provided written informed consent. The current study complied with all relevant CHARLS protocols and ethical guidelines.

A total of 17,708 participants were recruited at baseline in 2011, and after applying exclusion criteria, 5,425 individuals were included in the final analysis. The flow of participant inclusion is presented in Figure 1. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Flowchart of study participants. CLD, chronic lung disease.

Assessment of CLD

CLD status was determined through structured interviews, during which participants were asked, “Have you been diagnosed with CLD by a doctor?”. A response of “yes” indicated a self-reported physician diagnosis of CLD, while a response of “no” indicated no such diagnosis. Participants reporting asthma were excluded. This standardized approach aligns with previously validated methods and facilitates reliable identification of self-reported CLD (24). IC and inflammation score were assessed at baseline before the onset of CLD, and only incident CLD cases occurring during follow-up were included in the analysis.

Assessment of IC

In accordance with WHO guidelines, IC assessment covered six dimensions: locomotion, vitality, hearing, vision, cognition, and psychological function, using standardized operational definitions (25-28). Each domain received a score of 1 for normal function or 0 for functional impairment, yielding a total IC score ranging from 0 to 6, where higher scores indicate superior capacity (29).

  1. Locomotion was evaluated using the five-times sit-to-stand test. Participants who completed five repetitions independently within 14 seconds were scored 1, while those requiring more than 14 seconds were scored 0 (26).

  2. Vitality was assessed by calculating the body mass index (BMI). Based on the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), individuals with BMI >18.5 kg/m2 received a score of 1, while those with BMI ≤18.5 kg/m2 were scored 0 (30).

  3. Hearing was evaluated via the question “What is your level of auditory function?”. Participants who responded “poor” were scored 0, participants indicating “good”, “very good”, “excellent”, or “fair” were given a score of 1.

  4. Vision was assessed based on responses to two questions: “How well do you see distant things?” and “How well do you see near things?”. Participants were scored 1 if both answers were “fair”, “good”, “very good”, or “excellent”. A response of “poor” to either question resulted in a score of 0.

  5. Cognition was assessed using the Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status (TICS), comprising memory and mental status components (31). (i) Memory was assessed using immediate and delayed recall of 10 unrelated words. A total of 20 points could be achieved. Mental status included correct orientation (5 points: day, month, year, day of week, and season), serial subtraction of 7 from 100 (5 points), and visuoconstruction ability assessed by replicating two overlapping pentagons (1 point), totaling 11 points. (ii) Participants were classified as having intact cognitive function (score =1) if both memory and mental status scores were above the threshold defined as one standard deviation (SD) below the mean; otherwise, a score of 0 was assigned.

  6. The psychological condition was evaluated using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). A score <12 was considered intact and scored 1; a score ≥12 indicated impairment and was scored 0 (32).

Assessment of IS

Blood samples from the venous system were obtained from the participants following a night of fasting at the initial assessment. Plasma concentrations of CRP were measured from frozen specimens using an immunoturbidimetric assay. Automated hematology analyzers in certified clinical laboratories were employed to determine WBC counts (21). For each biomarker, Z-scores were computed using the formula: Z-score = (X − M)/SD, where X denotes the individual measurement, M the cohort mean, and SD the standard deviation. An inflammation score was subsequently derived by summing the z-scores of CRP and WBC (9,33).

Assessment of covariates

A range of potential confounders was included in the analysis, encompassing sociodemographic, socioeconomic, and health-related behavioral factors. Sociodemographic variables consisted of age, gender, BMI, marital status (married vs. single), residential location (city/town vs. village), and education status (elementary school or below vs. middle school or above). Health-related behaviors included smoking status (smoker vs. non-smoker) and drinking status (drinker vs. non-drinker) (34-38).

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables following a normal distribution were presented as mean ± SD, while those with skewed distribution were presented as median and interquartile range (IQR). Categorical variables were expressed as counts and percentages. Baseline characteristics were compared between participants with and without new-onset CLD using the Chi-squared test for categorical variables and independent-sample t-tests for continuous variables, as appropriate. To evaluate inflammation index and IC as potential risk factors for new-onset CLD, regression analyses were subsequently performed.

To evaluate the associations of IS and IC with the risk of CLD, generalized linear models (GLMs) specifying a binomial distribution and logit link function were utilized. IS was analyzed both as a continuous variable (per IQR increment) and as a categorical variable based on quartiles (Q1–Q4). Three logistic regression models were sequentially constructed: crude model (Model 1), without any adjustments; Model 2 was adjusted for sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors including age, gender, marital status, educational attainment, and place of residence; and Model 3 was further adjusted for health-related behavioral factors and physical condition, including smoking status, drinking status, and BMI, to account for potential confounding effects. Results were reported as odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Restricted cubic spline (RCS) regression was applied to examine potential non-linear associations between IS, IC, and the risk of CLD. Non-linearity was evaluated using likelihood ratio tests that compared models with and without spline terms. To explore potential effect modification, multiplicative interaction terms [e.g., CLD × (interaction term)] were incorporated into the fully adjusted model. Stratified analyses were further performed to evaluate the consistency of associations across key subgroups (39). Statistical analyses were performed using R software (version 4.2; http://www.R-project.org), with RCS implemented via the “rms” package. All statistical tests were conducted as two-sided, with a significance level set at P<0.05.

Results

Baseline characteristics of the study population

Table 1 presents a summary of the initial demographic and clinical characteristics of participants, categorized according to the occurrence of incident CLD. A total of 5,425 individuals were involved, with a mean age of 57.8 years (SD: 8.5 years); 2,707 (49.9%) were women. During follow-up, 316 participants (5.8%) developed CLD. Participants who developed CLD were significantly older (59.3 vs. 57.7 years, p=0.001), had lower IC scores (4.5 vs. 4.9, P<0.001), and lower BMI (23.2 vs. 23.8 kg/m2, P=0.006) compared to those without CLD. The proportion of males was higher in the CLD group (59.81% vs. 49.50%, P<0.001), and a greater percentage were current smokers (50.95% vs. 40.05%, P<0.001).

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the study population with and without CLD.

Characteristic Without new-onset CLD With new-onset CLD P value
Age (years) 57.7±8.5 59.3±8.8 0.001
Gender <0.001
   Female 2,580 (50.50) 127 (40.19)
   Male 2,529 (49.50) 189 (59.81)
Marital status 0.58
   Married 4,616 (90.35) 282 (89.24)
   Single 493 (9.65) 34 (10.76)
Education status 0.07
   Elementary school or below 3,291 (64.42) 220 (69.62)
   Middle school or above 1,818 (35.58) 96 (30.38)
Residence status 0.71
   City/town 1,856 (36.33) 111 (35.13)
   Village 3,253 (63.67) 205 (64.87)
Smoking status <0.001
   Non-smoker 3,063 (59.95) 155 (49.05)
   Smoker 2,046 (40.05) 161 (50.95)
Drinking status 0.20
   Non-drinker 3,008 (58.88) 174 (55.06)
   Drinker 2,101 (41.12) 142 (44.94)
BMI (kg/m2) 23.8±3.8 23.2±3.7 0.006
Intrinsic capacity 4.9±1.1 4.5±1.3 <0.001
Inflammatory score −0.1±1.3 0.2±1.4 0.001
Quartiles of IS 0.009
   Q1 1,274 (24.94) 72 (22.78)
   Q2 1,292 (25.29) 63 (19.94)
   Q3 1,285 (25.15) 78 (24.68)
   Q4 1,258 (24.62) 103 (32.59)

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation or n (%). BMI, body mass index; CLD, chronic lung disease; IS, inflammatory score; Q, quartile.

Regarding inflammatory status, participants with CLD had significantly higher IS levels (mean: 0.2 vs. −0.1, P=0.001). When categorized into quartiles, the distribution also differed significantly between groups (P=0.009), with a higher proportion of individuals in the highest quartile (Q4) among those with CLD (32.6% vs. 24.6%). No significant differences were observed in marital status, drinking status, educational level, or residential location between the two groups (P>0.05).

Association between IS quartiles and the risk of new-onset CLD

The association between the IS quartiles and the risk of incident CLD is summarized in Table 2. When individuals were divided into quartiles, those in the uppermost quartile of IS (Q4) exhibited a markedly higher likelihood of experiencing newly diagnosed CLD in comparison to participants in the lowest quartile (Q1). In Model 1, the OR for new-onset CLD in Q4 was 1.45 (95% CI: 1.06–1.98; P for trend <0.05). This association remained robust after adjusting for age, gender, education, residence, marital status, and BMI in Model 2 (OR =1.42; 95% CI: 1.04–1.95; P for trend <0.05). In the Model 3, which further accounted for smoking and drinking status, the association persisted (OR =1.38; 95% CI: 1.01–1.90; P for trend <0.05). A significant linear trend was observed across IS quartiles (P for trend <0.05), indicating a dose-response relationship between systemic inflammation and CLD risk. Sensitivity analyses treating IS as a continuous variable yielded consistent results, further confirming an independent and positive association between elevated IS and increased risk of new-onset CLD across all models (Table S1).

Table 2. Association between IS quartiles and the risk of new-onset CLD.

Model Quartile of IS, OR (95% CI) P for trend*
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Model 1 1.00 (Ref) 0.86 (0.61–1.22) 1.07 (0.77–1.50) 1.45 (1.06–1.98)* <0.05
Model 2 1.00 (Ref) 0.85 (0.60–1.20) 1.07 (0.77–1.50) 1.42 (1.04–1.95)* <0.05
Model 3 1.00 (Ref) 0.84 (0.59–1.20) 1.06 (0.76–1.47) 1.38 (1.01–1.90)* <0.05

Model 1: crude model; Model 2: adjusted for age, gender, educational level, residence, marital status, BMI; Model 3: adjusted for age, gender, educational level, residence, marital status, BMI, smoking status, drinking status. *, P value for linear trend calculated from category median values (P<0.05). BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; CLD, chronic lung disease; IS, inflammatory score; OR, odds ratio; Q, quartile; Ref, reference.

Association between IC and risk of new-onset CLD

As shown in Table 3, Inversely correlated with the likelihood of developing new-onset CLD, IC demonstrated a significant association. In Model 1, each unit increase in IC was associated with a 20% reduction in the risk of CLD (OR =0.80; 95% CI: 0.73–0.87; P<0.001). After adjusting for age, gender, education, residence, marital status, and BMI (Model 2), the association remained significant and slightly stronger (OR =0.79; 95% CI: 0.72–0.87; P<0.001). This inverse relationship persisted in Model 3, which additionally accounted for smoking and drinking status (OR =0.80; 95% CI: 0.73–0.88; P<0.001). These findings indicate that greater IC is independently associated with a lower risk of developing new-onset CLD, regardless of sociodemographic factors, physical health status, and lifestyle behaviors.

Table 3. Association between the IC and new-onset CLD.

Model IC, OR (95% CI) P
Model 1 0.80 (0.73–0.87)* <0.001
Model 2 0.79 (0.72–0.87)* <0.001
Model 3 0.80 (0.73–0.88)* <0.001

Model 1: crude model; Model 2: adjusted for age, gender, educational level, residence, marital status, BMI; Model 3: adjusted for age, gender, educational level, residence, marital status, BMI, smoking status, drinking status. *, P value for linear trend calculated from category median values (P<0.05). BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; CLD, chronic lung disease; IC, intrinsic capacity; OR, odds ratio; Ref, reference.

Dose-response relationship between IS, IC and risk of new-onset CLD

RCS regression was employed to investigate the dose-response associations between IS, IC, and the risk of new-onset CLD. For IS, the overall association with new-onset CLD was statistically significant (Chi-squared =10.06, P=0.02). However, the non-linear component was not significant (Chi-squared =2.67, P=0.26), suggesting a primarily linear relationship (Figure 2A). For IC, a significant inverse association with new-onset CLD risk was observed (Chi-squared =20.26, P<0.001). Similarly, the test for non-linearity was not significant (Chi-squared =0.71, P=0.40), indicating a linear dose-response relationship (Figure 2B).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

RCS curves showing the association between (A) IS and the risk of incident new-onset CLD, and (B) IC and the risk of incident new-onset CLD. Models were adjusted for all covariates listed in the Methods section. CI, confidence interval; CLD, chronic lung disease; IC, intrinsic capacity; IS, inflammatory score; RCS, restricted cubic spline.

Subgroup analyses

Subgroup analyses revealed that the association between elevated IS (Q4 vs. Q1) and increased risk of new-onset CLD remained consistent across stratified populations (Figure 3A), with borderline significant interactions observed for marital status (P=0.054). In contrast, higher IC consistently exhibited a strong protective association with the risk of new-onset CLD across all examined subgroups (Figure 3B), with residential location significantly modifying this relationship (P=0.04). Notably, married individuals with high IS had a significantly elevated new-onset CLD risk (OR 1.40; 95% CI: 1.11–1.78), while no significant association was found among singles. The predicted probability curves further illustrated univariate interaction effects between IS levels and new-onset CLD risk with respect to marital status (Figure 4A). Specifically, the inverse association between IC and new-onset CLD risk was more evident among urban residents (OR =0.70; 95% CI: 0.59–0.83) than among their rural counterparts (OR =0.85; 95% CI: 0.76–0.96). The predicted probability curves further illustrated univariate interaction effects between IC levels and new-onset CLD risk with respect to urban-rural settings (Figure 4B).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Subgroup analysis. Subgroup analyses of the associations between (A) IS quartiles and the risk of incident new-onset CLD, and (B) IC and the risk of incident new-onset CLD. Models were adjusted for all covariates listed in the Methods section. BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; CLD, chronic lung disease; IC, intrinsic capacity; IS, inflammatory score; OR, odds ratio.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Logistic regression interaction. Logistic regression interaction analysis revealed distinct associations stratified by marital status and geographic location. A positive correlation was observed between IS and new-onset CLD risk among married individuals (A), whereas a negative correlation emerged between IC and new-onset CLD risk in urban settings compared to rural areas (B). Solid lines depict the predicted probability of new-onset CLD risk across IS quartiles and IC, with shaded areas representing 95% confidence intervals. Models were adjusted for all covariates listed in the Methods section. CLD, chronic lung disease; IC, intrinsic capacity; IS, inflammatory score.

Discussion

Our findings identified IS as a significant and independent risk factor for the development of CLD. Individuals in the uppermost quartile of IS exhibited a significantly elevated risk of CLD when contrasted with those in the lowest quartile, with the association persisting across all adjustment models. The linear trend observed in both categorical and continuous analyses supports a dose-response relationship, indicating that higher levels of low-grade systemic inflammation are associated with greater susceptibility to chronic respiratory conditions. Persistent inflammation has emerged as a central contributor to age-associated conditions, encompassing CLD like COPD, asthma, and pulmonary fibrosis (40,41). In COPD, for example, fluctuations in CRP levels correlate with airway inflammation and clinical outcomes during exacerbations (42). Moreover, COPD’s inflammatory profile involves diverse immune cells, including lymphocytes and neutrophils, which contribute to respiratory tissue damage (43). Collectively, these findings suggest that sustained systemic inflammatory burden promotes airway remodeling, immune dysregulation, and progressive lung function decline in chronic respiratory diseases (44,45).

CRP is widely recognized as a conventional biomarker for distinguishing infection-driven progression of acute exacerbations in COPD (AE-COPD) (46,47). A systematic review reported that individuals with COPD exhibit significantly elevated CRP levels, with an average increase of 1.86 mg/L compared to controls, a difference deemed clinically meaningful (48). Supporting this, Stolz et al. demonstrated markedly elevated CRP concentrations during AE-COPD episodes (49). Collectively, these findings underscore CRP’s role as a sensitive marker of systemic inflammation and disease activity in COPD. Beyond its diagnostic value, CRP serves as a marker of airway inflammation across various respiratory disorders. Being an acute-phase protein, elevated CRP indicates systemic inflammation and potentially (50), oxidative stress (51), and protease-antiprotease imbalance (52). In asthma, particularly among corticosteroid-treated patients, higher CRP levels have been associated with increased airway wall thickness and eosinophilic inflammation (53). While traditional asthma biomarkers primarily focus on eosinophilic inflammation, emerging evidence highlights a critical role for neutrophilic inflammation in acute exacerbations of asthma (AAE) (54,55), suggesting therapeutic implications for targeting neutrophilic inflammation in AAE management (56,57). These findings collectively emphasize CRP as a valuable indicator of systemic inflammation and disease progression in chronic airway conditions.

Blood leukocyte counts, especially eosinophil levels, serve as important biomarkers for COPD onset, classification, and exacerbation (58). Increased leukocyte counts are independently linked to reduced predicted forced vital capacity (FVC) and FEV1, as well as diminished quality of life in COPD patients (58). Observational and Mendelian randomization (MR) studies further suggest that increased neutrophil counts may causally contribute to lung function impairment (59). Specifically, elevated eosinophil counts have been identified as causal contributors to COPD onset, exacerbation, and lung function decline, underscoring their potential as therapeutic targets. Conversely, the increase in neutrophil levels seems to be a result of disease progression rather than a factor contributing to it, highlighting the need for eosinophil-focused treatment strategies (60). Given these associations with lung function, quality of life, exacerbation risk, and mortality, leukocyte count is a robust biomarker in COPD management (58).

Recent studies have also validated emerging inflammatory biomarkers, such as the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), as potential predictors of COPD risk (61-63). The CALLY index, which is a newly developed biomarker that combines serum albumin levels, lymphocyte counts, and CRP concentrations, has been found to be independently linked to a decreased likelihood of asthma-COPD overlap (ACO), highlighting its potential for clinical risk stratification (64,65). Furthermore, a higher inflammatory burden index (IBI) is significantly linked to increased mortality in chronic inflammatory airway disease (CIAD) patients; participants in the highest IBI quartile showed markedly increased risks of all-cause and respiratory disease-related mortality relative to those in the lowest quartile (66). In our study, we incorporated WBC counts and CRP levels, confirming their independent associations with the risk of new-onset CLD, thereby supporting their utility as inflammatory indicators in the early detection of respiratory diseases. We acknowledge that participants with acute infections at baseline may have had temporarily elevated inflammatory markers, which could affect the inflammation score. However, such cases are expected to be rare and are unlikely to materially influence the associations observed.

Our study provides compelling evidence that IC, a composite measure of physical and psychological reserves, is inversely associated with the risk of CLD. Across all models, higher IC scores were significantly linked to lower CLD risk, with each unit increase in IC corresponding to an approximate 20% reduction in risk, indicating that IC independently predicts disease susceptibility. The observed linear dose–response relationship further suggests that declines in IC may precede the onset of respiratory disease, positioning IC as a potential early marker of physiological vulnerability. Given that IC reflects the integrated functioning of cognitive, psychological, locomotor, sensory, and vitality domains, it may capture early physiological dysregulation not detectable by conventional clinical biomarkers (28). These findings reinforce the WHO’s emphasis on IC as a cornerstone of healthy aging and imply that routine assessment of IC could facilitate early identification of individuals at elevated risk of CLD before clinical symptoms manifest.

Patients with COPD often exhibit impaired lung function alongside cognitive deficits, particularly in memory performance (67). Emerging research suggests that reductions in lung function are linked to an elevated risk of dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), with middle-aged individuals suffering from lung disease showing a modestly elevated risk of cognitive decline later in life. Notably, restrictive lung impairment demonstrates a stronger association with cognitive decline than obstructive disease (68). However, the mechanisms by which cognitive abilities influence physical performance in COPD patients remain insufficiently understood. A recent scoping review suggests that cognitive impairment in COPD is more closely associated with deficits in balance, manual dexterity, and dual-task performance than with overall exercise capacity (69).

A MR study demonstrated a bidirectional causal relationship between typical walking pace (WP) and the risk of COPD, whereas reduced right-hand grip strength (HGS) showed a unidirectional association with increased COPD risk (70). The results indicate that WP could function as a predictive variable for COPD onset and as a simple, objective marker for disease prognosis (70). Complementing this, the five-repetition sit-to-stand test (5-STS) has been identified as an objective measure with good discriminative ability for predicting mortality in COPD patients (71-73). Sensory dysfunction has been shown to play a key role in chronic pulmonary disease risk. In middle-aged and older individuals, initial deficits in visual, auditory, or dual sensory function were associated with an increased likelihood of developing chronic pulmonary disease (P=0.042; HR =1.53, 95% CI: 1.02–2.31) (74), underscoring the need for continuous monitoring and timely intervention to manage chronic disease risk in aging populations. Psychological factors likewise influence respiratory health. Higher subjective well-being was associated with lower COPD risk, particularly among men, as shown in a study of 12,246 Europeans aged 50+ years where well-being measured by CASP-12 predicted reduced COPD incidence over 9 years (75). Depressive symptoms have complex associations with CLD. A study employing the CHARLS found that depressive symptoms were associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in individuals diagnosed with hypertension, diabetes, and arthritis. However, this relationship was not observed in participants suffering from CLD (76). In contrast, another prospective CHARLS analysis revealed a bidirectional association between elevated depressive symptoms and CLD incidence: baseline depression increased CLD risk by 68% [hazard ratio (HR) =1.68, 95% CI: 1.46–1.93], while baseline CLD status increased the risk of subsequent depressive symptoms by 17% (HR =1.17, 95% CI: 1.01–1.35) (77). These associations were consistent across most subgroups, although no significant biological or behavioral mediators were identified. This suggests that while depression may not increase mortality in CLD patients, it critically influences disease onset and progression, highlighting the importance of early psychological assessment and intervention. Obesity and body weight status are also implicated in respiratory disease risk. A recent MR study found that obesity increases the risk of most respiratory diseases, including asthma and chronic diseases of the tonsils and adenoids (78). Both individuals classified with low and high BMI exhibited an increased susceptibility to chronic inflammatory-associated disease (CIAD). Furthermore, within the cohort of CIAD patients, the association between all-cause mortality and BMI demonstrated a non-linear pattern, attaining its lowest point at a BMI of 32.4 kg/m2 (79). Consistent with these findings, underweight and severe obesity have been linked to reduced lung function, whereas mild obesity appears to exert a protective effect among individuals at risk of COPD and those with preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm) (80). These insights may inform the refinement of early screening and management strategies for COPD. Although BMI is included in the IC score, it was modeled separately in our regression analyses to account for its potential independent association with CLD.

Building on the established links between physical, cognitive, and psychological factors and CLD, IC, which refers to the combined physical and mental capacities of an individual, has emerged as a key indicator of healthy aging. Accumulating evidence suggests that higher levels of IC are inversely associated with functional decline and mortality risk among older adults (19). For instance, a longitudinal aging study in Beijing reported that lower IC was significantly associated with poorer physical performance, frailty, social vulnerability, chronic diseases, fractures, and falls (81). These findings underscore IC as a promising biomarker for identifying older adults at elevated risk of adverse outcomes, affirming its role in healthy aging assessment (18,19,82). Lower literacy, middle income, lack of social engagement, marital disruption (divorced, widowed, never married), smoking, low physical activity, rural residence, non-age-friendly family environments, and absence of health insurance were all associated with a higher likelihood of belonging to the low-decline IC trajectory (83). In parallel, a trajectory characterized by low IC with slow decline is associated with an increased risk of CVD, highlighting the importance of monitoring IC over time for early identification of older adults at elevated cardiovascular risk (84). These findings provide evidence for early identification of heterogeneous IC trajectories and support the implementation of stratified intervention strategies to preserve IC.

Determinants of IC trajectories include age, sex, education, ethnicity, number of chronic conditions, marital status, perceived financial adequacy, economic support, self-rated health, and inflammatory biomarkers such as IL-6, TNFR-1, and GDF-15. Adverse IC trajectory patterns are associated with increased risk of mortality, lower quality of life, disability, frailty, and falls (85). These findings underscore the multidimensional nature of IC and its value as an early marker for identifying older adults at elevated risk of multiple health outcomes. In subgroup analyses, the positive association between elevated IS and incident CLD was observed among married participants but not among singles. While intriguing, this finding should be interpreted with caution. Possible explanations include psychosocial stress associated with marital life or detection bias, whereby married individuals may be more likely to undergo medical evaluation due to spousal encouragement. Despite these advances, evidence linking IC specifically to CLD remains scarce. Our study addresses this gap by demonstrating the predictive value of IC for CLD risk, thereby expanding its application to the early identification of respiratory vulnerability. A deeper understanding of IC could facilitate novel strategies for CLD risk prediction and prevention. From a public health perspective, routine assessment of IC in older adults could serve as a preventive strategy to identify individuals at elevated risk of CLD and CVD before clinical symptoms manifest. Policymakers may consider integrating IC screening into primary care or community health programs to guide early interventions, such as targeted physical, cognitive, or lifestyle interventions, aimed at preserving IC and reducing the burden of chronic diseases in aging populations.

This research employs information derived from a substantial cohort that is representative of older adults across China on a national scale, enhancing the generalizability of our findings. IC was assessed across five WHO-defined domains, and IS was concurrently examined, offering a comprehensive perspective on biological and functional aging. Rigorous adjustment for demographic, lifestyle, and clinical variables strengthens the robustness of our results. Notably, we provide novel evidence linking IC decline to CLD, extending its utility as a predictive marker in respiratory health.

Nonetheless, several limitations merit consideration. First, the longitudinal design does not allow for definitive causal inference regarding IC, IS, and CLD. Second, certain components of IC and IS relied on self-reported or proxy measures, which may be susceptible to recall bias or measurement inaccuracies. Third, both IC and IS were measured only at baseline, preventing assessment of their time-varying effects on CLD risk, which may have led to residual bias. Fourth, the vitality domain of IC was assessed using BMI with a lower cutoff of 18.5 kg/m2, without consideration of upper thresholds for obesity, potentially overlooking the adverse impact of obesity on respiratory outcomes. Fifth, smoking was recorded categorically (smoker vs. non-smoker) without quantitative measures such as pack-years, which may limit precision in capturing dose-response relationships. Sixth, participants with overt acute infections at baseline were not specifically excluded, potentially causing transient elevations in inflammatory markers. Finally, comorbidities such as CVD and diabetes, which may influence both IS and CLD risk, were not adjusted for, and residual confounding by these conditions cannot be ruled out. Future prospective studies incorporating repeated measures of IC and IS, detailed comorbidity profiles, and more nuanced assessments of vitality and smoking exposure are warranted to validate our findings and elucidate temporal interactions among IC, IS, and respiratory outcomes.

Conclusions

In this cohort of older Chinese adults, which is representative on a national scale, we found that reductions in IC and elevated IS were independently linked to higher risk of CLD. These results underscore the potential utility of IC as a functional biomarker for early detection of individuals at risk of respiratory decline. Incorporating both IC and IS into geriatric assessments may provide novel strategies for prevention and risk stratification of CLD in aging populations.

Supplementary

The article’s supplementary files as

jtd-18-02-69-rc.pdf (85.9KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.21037/jtd-2025-aw-2075
jtd-18-02-69-coif.pdf (266.8KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.21037/jtd-2025-aw-2075
DOI: 10.21037/jtd-2025-aw-2075

Acknowledgments

None.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments.

Footnotes

Reporting Checklist: The authors have completed the STROBE reporting checklist. Available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-2025-aw-2075/rc

Funding: This work was supported by Cuiying Scientific and Technological Innovation Program of The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University (No.CY2024-LC-B03), Gansu Province Science and Technology Plan Project (Nos. 25JRRA607 and 25JRRA598), Zhongguancun Zhuoyi Chronic Disease Prevention and Control Technology Innovation Research Institute, and The National Health Commission’s Medical and Health Science and Technology Development Research Center’s Scientific Rese Project (No. WKZX2024HK0117).

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-2025-aw-2075/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  • 1.Sun C, Dai H, M J J van der Kleij R, et al. Digital Health Education for Chronic Lung Disease: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e53142. 10.2196/53142 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Prevalence and attributable health burden of chronic respiratory diseases, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Respir Med 2020;8:585-96. 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30105-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Li X, Cao X, Guo M, et al. Trends and risk factors of mortality and disability adjusted life years for chronic respiratory diseases from 1990 to 2017: systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. BMJ 2020;368:m234. 10.1136/bmj.m234 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Safiri S, Carson-Chahhoud K, Noori M, et al. Burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and its attributable risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. BMJ 2022;378:e069679. 10.1136/bmj-2021-069679 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sun C, Meijer E, Chavannes NH, et al. eHealth literacy in the general population: a cross-sectional study in China. BMC Public Health 2025;25:211. 10.1186/s12889-025-21389-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jin L, Fang S, Nan Y, et al. The effect of air pollutants on COPD-hospitalized patients in Lanzhou, China (2015-2019). Front Public Health 2024;12:1399662. 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1399662 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kasza KA, O'Connor RJ, Cummings KM, et al. Cigarette smoking and chronic disease in the United States, 2021-2023. Prev Med 2025;201:108378. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2025.108378 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lu W, Aarsand R, Schotte K, et al. Tobacco and COPD: presenting the World Health Organization (WHO) Tobacco Knowledge Summary. Respir Res 2024;25:338. 10.1186/s12931-024-02961-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mazidi M, Katsiki N, Mikhailidis DP, et al. Association of ideal cardiovascular health metrics with serum uric acid, inflammation and atherogenic index of plasma: A population-based survey. Atherosclerosis 2019;284:44-9. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.09.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yang B, Zhang H, Zhang X, et al. Association of advanced stages of Cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome with the risk of developing chronic lung disease: evidence from a nationwide prospective cohort study. Heart Lung 2025;74:230-7. 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2025.07.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wang J, Ställberg B, Hårdstedt M, et al. Lung Function Decline in COPD - Relations to Changes in Symptom Burden, Inflammation, and Comorbidities. COPD 2025;22:2525433. 10.1080/15412555.2025.2525433 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zhao HQ, Lv JL, Gao YZ, et al. Association between inflammatory score, healthy lifestyle, and cardiovascular disease: a national cohort study. Front Nutr 2025;12:1534458. 10.3389/fnut.2025.1534458 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Merchant RA, Chan YH, Aprahamian I, et al. Patterns of participation restriction among older adults at risk of falls and relationship with intrinsic capacity: A latent cluster analysis. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022;9:1023879. 10.3389/fmed.2022.1023879 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Beard JR, Officer A, de Carvalho IA, et al. The World report on ageing and health: a policy framework for healthy ageing. Lancet 2016;387:2145-54. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00516-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Michel JP, Graf C, Ecarnot F. Individual healthy aging indices, measurements and scores. Aging Clin Exp Res 2019;31:1719-25. 10.1007/s40520-019-01327-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zhou Y, Ma L. Intrinsic Capacity in Older Adults: Recent Advances. Aging Dis 2022;13:353-9. 10.14336/AD.2021.0818 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yu R, Lai D, Leung G, et al. Trajectories of Intrinsic Capacity: Determinants and Associations with Disability. J Nutr Health Aging 2023;27:174-81. 10.1007/s12603-023-1881-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ramírez-Vélez R, Iriarte-Fernández M, Santafé G, et al. Association of intrinsic capacity with incidence and mortality of cardiovascular disease: Prospective study in UK Biobank. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2023;14:2054-63. 10.1002/jcsm.13283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sánchez-Sánchez JL, Lu WH, Gallardo-Gómez D, et al. Association of intrinsic capacity with functional decline and mortality in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Lancet Healthy Longev 2024;5:e480-92. 10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00092-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Amuthavalli Thiyagarajan J, Mikton C, Harwood RH, et al. The UN Decade of healthy ageing: strengthening measurement for monitoring health and wellbeing of older people. Age Ageing 2022;51:afac147. 10.1093/ageing/afac147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhao Y, Hu Y, Smith JP, et al. Cohort profile: the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). Int J Epidemiol 2014;43:61-8. 10.1093/ije/dys203 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhao Y, Strauss J, Chen X, et al. China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study Wave 4 User’s Guide. National School of Development, Peking University; 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chen X, Crimmins E, Hu PP, et al. Venous Blood-Based Biomarkers in the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study: Rationale, Design, and Results From the 2015 Wave. Am J Epidemiol 2019;188:1871-7. 10.1093/aje/kwz170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wang H, Qiu H, Gu X, et al. The association between sarcopenia and incident chronic lung disease in the general population: A longitudinal study based on CHARLS data. Exp Gerontol 2023;180:112257. 10.1016/j.exger.2023.112257 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee. Integrated Care for Older People: Guidelines on Community-Level Interventions to Manage Declines in Intrinsic Capacity. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.World Health Organization. Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE): Guidance for Person-Centred Assessment and Pathways in Primary Care. World Health Organization; 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sum G, Lau LK, Jabbar KA, et al. The World Health Organization (WHO) Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) Framework: A Narrative Review on Its Adoption Worldwide and Lessons Learnt. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022;20:154. 10.3390/ijerph20010154 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.de Souto Barreto P, Gonzalez-Bautista E, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, et al. Real-life intrinsic capacity screening data from the ICOPE-Care program. Nat Aging 2024;4:1279-89. 10.1038/s43587-024-00684-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhou Y, Wang G, Li J, et al. Trajectory of intrinsic capacity among community-dwelling older adults in China: The China health and retirement longitudinal study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2024;124:105452. 10.1016/j.archger.2024.105452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Stratton RJ, Hackston A, Longmore D, et al. Malnutrition in hospital outpatients and inpatients: prevalence, concurrent validity and ease of use of the 'malnutrition universal screening tool' ('MUST') for adults. Br J Nutr 2004;92:799-808. 10.1079/bjn20041258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhao X, Zhou Y, Wei K, et al. Associations of sensory impairment and cognitive function in middle-aged and older Chinese population: The China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. J Glob Health 2021;11:08008. 10.7189/jogh.11.08008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Andresen EM, Malmgren JA, Carter WB, et al. Screening for depression in well older adults: evaluation of a short form of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale). Am J Prev Med 1994;10:77-84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chen Y, Ju H, Xie K, et al. Association of inflammatory score with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with metabolic syndrome: NHANES longitudinal cohort study. Front Immunol 2024;15:1410871. 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1410871 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Global, regional, and national burden of asthma and atopic dermatitis, 1990-2021, and projections to 2050: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Respir Med 2025;13:425-46. 10.1016/S2213-2600(25)00003-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Evans A, Farewell D, Demmler J, et al. Association of asthma severity and educational attainment at age 6-7 years in a birth cohort: population-based record-linkage study. Thorax 2021;76:116-25. 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-215422 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wan J, Zhang Q, Li C, et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for asthma among people aged 45 and older in China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pulm Med 2021;21:311. 10.1186/s12890-021-01664-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lan G, Xie M, Lan J, et al. Association and mediation between educational attainment and respiratory diseases: a Mendelian randomization study. Respir Res 2024;25:115. 10.1186/s12931-024-02722-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kong W, Zhang X, Gu H, et al. Association between BMI and asthma in adults over 45 years of age: analysis of Global Burden of Disease 2021, China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study, and National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data. EClinicalMedicine 2025;82:103163. 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hu Y, Yu J, Xu Z, et al. Association between metabolic score for insulin resistance and lower limb pain among the elderly: a cross-sectional study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2025;16:1530067. 10.3389/fendo.2025.1530067 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Franceschi C, Garagnani P, Parini P, et al. Inflammaging: a new immune-metabolic viewpoint for age-related diseases. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2018;14:576-90. 10.1038/s41574-018-0059-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Racanelli AC, Kikkers SA, Choi AMK, et al. Autophagy and inflammation in chronic respiratory disease. Autophagy 2018;14:221-32. 10.1080/15548627.2017.1389823 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Liang Y, Chang C, Zhu H, et al. Correlation between decrease of CRP and resolution of airway inflammatory response, improvement of health status, and clinical outcomes during severe acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Intern Emerg Med 2015;10:685-91. 10.1007/s11739-015-1228-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wang H, Anthony D, Selemidis S, et al. Resolving Viral-Induced Secondary Bacterial Infection in COPD: A Concise Review. Front Immunol 2018;9:2345. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02345 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Koenen RR. The prowess of platelets in immunity and inflammation. Thromb Haemost 2016;116:605-12. 10.1160/TH16-04-0300 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hao W, Li M, Zhang Y, et al. Severity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with 'exacerbator with emphysema phenotype' is associated with potential biomarkers. Postgrad Med J 2020;96:28-32. 10.1136/postgradmedj-2019-136599 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Polzin A, Pletz M, Erbes R, et al. Procalcitonin as a diagnostic tool in lower respiratory tract infections and tuberculosis. Eur Respir J 2003;21:939-43. 10.1183/09031936.03.00055103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Mohamed K, Abderabo M, Ramadan E, et al. Procalcitonin as a diagnostic marker in acute exacerbation of COPD. Egyptian Journal of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis 2012;61:301-5. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gan WQ, Man SF, Senthilselvan A, et al. Association between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and systemic inflammation: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Thorax 2004;59:574-80. 10.1136/thx.2003.019588 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Stolz D, Christ-Crain M, Morgenthaler NG, et al. Copeptin, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin as prognostic biomarkers in acute exacerbation of COPD. Chest 2007;131:1058-67. 10.1378/chest.06-2336 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Li L, Guo Z, Zhao Y, et al. The impact of oxidative stress on abnormal lipid metabolism-mediated disease development. Arch Biochem Biophys 2025;766:110348. 10.1016/j.abb.2025.110348 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Woo SD, Park HS, Yang EM, et al. 8-Iso-prostaglandin F2α as a biomarker of type 2 low airway inflammation and remodeling in adult asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2024;133:73-80.e2. 10.1016/j.anai.2024.04.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Brantly M, Stocks J, Lascano J, et al. Inhaled alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) restores lower respiratory tract protease-antiprotease homoeostasis and reduces inflammation in AAT-deficient individuals: a randomised phase 2 study. ERJ Open Res 2025;11:00537-2024. 10.1183/23120541.00537-2024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Hoshino M, Ohtawa J, Akitsu K. Increased C-reactive protein is associated with airway wall thickness in steroid-naive asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2014;113:37-41. 10.1016/j.anai.2014.04.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Porsbjerg CM, Townend J, Bergeron C, et al. Association between pre-biologic T2-biomarker combinations and response to biologics in patients with severe asthma. Front Immunol 2024;15:1361891. 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1361891 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Zeng X, Qing J, Li CM, et al. Blood transcriptomic signature in type-2 biomarker-low severe asthma and asthma control. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2023;152:876-86. 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.05.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Bleecker ER, Panettieri RA, Jr, Lugogo NL, et al. Dupilumab Efficacy in Patients with Type 2 Asthma with and without Elevated Blood Neutrophils. J Immunol Res 2023;2023:9943584. 10.1155/2023/9943584 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Chen Y, Sun J, Chen Y, et al. Machine learning-based model for acute asthma exacerbation detection using routine blood parameters. World Allergy Organ J 2025;18:101074. 10.1016/j.waojou.2025.101074 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Koo HK, Kang HK, Song P, et al. Systemic White Blood Cell Count as a Biomarker Associated with Severity of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul) 2017;80:304-10. 10.4046/trd.2017.80.3.304 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wu X, Wang C, Li H, et al. Circulating white blood cells and lung function impairment: the observational studies and Mendelian randomization analysis. Ann Med 2021;53:1118-28. 10.1080/07853890.2021.1948603 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Han Z, Hu H, Yang P, et al. White blood cell count and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A Mendelian Randomization study. Comput Biol Med 2022;151:106187. 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106187 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Cai C, Zeng W, Wang H, et al. Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) and Monocyte-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (MLR) as Biomarkers in Diagnosis Evaluation of Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Retrospective, Observational Study. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2024;19:933-43. 10.2147/COPD.S452444 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Xu Y, Yan Z, Li K, et al. The association between systemic immune-inflammation index and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in adults aged 40 years and above in the United States: a cross-sectional study based on the NHANES 2013-2020. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023;10:1270368. 10.3389/fmed.2023.1270368 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Guo R, Li J, Ma X, et al. The predictive value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev Respir Med 2020;14:929-36. 10.1080/17476348.2020.1776613 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Iida H, Tani M, Komeda K, et al. Superiority of CRP-albumin-lymphocyte index (CALLY index) as a non-invasive prognostic biomarker after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. HPB (Oxford) 2022;24:101-15. 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.06.414 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Fu S, Chen Z, Wu H. Association between CRP-Albumin-Lymphocyte (CALLY) index and Asthma-COPD overlap: analysis of NHANES 2015-2018 data. BMC Pulm Med 2025;25:257. 10.1186/s12890-025-03705-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Zhu N, Lin S, Wang L, et al. Elevated inflammatory burden index increases mortality in adults with chronic inflammatory airway diseases: a nationwide cohort study. BMC Pulm Med 2024;24:399. 10.1186/s12890-024-03211-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Lv Z, Chen Q, Jiang Y, et al. Abnormal Static and Dynamic Local-Neural Activity in COPD and Its Relationship With Pulmonary Function and Cognitive Impairments. Front Hum Neurosci 2020;14:580238. 10.3389/fnhum.2020.580238 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Lutsey PL, Chen N, Mirabelli MC, et al. Impaired Lung Function, Lung Disease, and Risk of Incident Dementia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019;199:1385-96. 10.1164/rccm.201807-1220OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Rassam P, Pazzianotto-Forti EM, Matsumura U, et al. Impact of cognitive capacity on physical performance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: A scoping review. Chron Respir Dis 2023;20:14799731231163874. 10.1177/14799731231163874 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Qiu P, Chen M, Lv S, et al. The association between walking pace and hand grip strength with the risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study. BMC Pulm Med 2023;23:450. 10.1186/s12890-023-02759-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Medina-Mirapeix F, Valera-Novella E, Morera-Balaguer J, et al. Prognostic value of the five-repetition sit-to-stand test for mortality in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2022;65:101598. 10.1016/j.rehab.2021.101598 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Bernabeu-Mora R, Valera-Novella E, Bernabeu-Serrano ET, et al. Five-Repetition Sit-to-Stand Test as Predictor of Mortality in High Risk COPD Patients. Arch Bronconeumol 2025;61:90-5. 10.1016/j.arbres.2024.07.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Bernabéu-Mora R, Oliveira-Sousa SL, Medina-Mirapeix F, et al. Identifying COPD patients with poor health status and low exercise tolerance through the five-repetition sit-to-stand test and modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Score. Eur J Intern Med 2024;125:51-6. 10.1016/j.ejim.2024.03.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Wang Y, Cheng F, Hou N, et al. Increased risk of chronic diseases and multimorbidity in middle-aged and elderly individuals with early vision, hearing, or dual sensory impairments: insights from prospective cohort studies and Mendelian randomization analysis. BMC Med 2025;23:118. 10.1186/s12916-025-03857-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Okely JA, Shaheen SO, Weiss A, et al. Wellbeing and chronic lung disease incidence: The Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe. PLoS One 2017;12:e0181320. 10.1371/journal.pone.0181320 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Zhu L, Wang Y, Li J, et al. Depressive symptoms and all-cause mortality among middle-aged and older people in China and associations with chronic diseases. Front Public Health 2024;12:1381273. 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1381273 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Zheng J, Li J, Pei T, et al. Depressive symptoms and chronic lung disease in middle-aged and older Chinese adults: Prospective bidirectional association and mediation analysis. J Affect Disord 2022;297:283-93. 10.1016/j.jad.2021.10.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Yang W, Yang Y, Guo Y, et al. Obesity and risk for respiratory diseases: a Mendelian randomization study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023;14:1197730. 10.3389/fendo.2023.1197730 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Liu S, Zhang H, Lan Z. Associations of obesity with chronic inflammatory airway diseases and mortality in adults: a population-based investigation. BMC Public Health 2024;24:1300. 10.1186/s12889-024-18782-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Tang X, Lei J, Li W, et al. The Relationship Between BMI and Lung Function in Populations with Different Characteristics: A Cross-Sectional Study Based on the Enjoying Breathing Program in China. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2022;17:2677-92. 10.2147/COPD.S378247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Pan Y, Li X, Zhang L, et al. Declined intrinsic capacity predicts long-term mortality in Chinese older adults: Beijing Longitudinal Study of Aging. Maturitas 2024;188:108082. 10.1016/j.maturitas.2024.108082 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Lu WH, Rolland Y, Guyonnet S, et al. Reference centiles for intrinsic capacity throughout adulthood and their association with clinical outcomes: a cross-sectional analysis from the INSPIRE-T cohort. Nat Aging 2023;3:1521-8. 10.1038/s43587-023-00522-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Zhang Y, Wu S, Xie F, et al. Association between social determinants of health and intrinsic capacity trajectories: A population-based longitudinal study. Maturitas 2026;204:108783. 10.1016/j.maturitas.2025.108783 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Guo Z, Chen Y, Koirala B, et al. Intrinsic capacity trajectories and cardiovascular disease incidence among Chinese older adults: a population-based prospective cohort study. BMC Geriatr 2025;25:269. 10.1186/s12877-025-05910-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Wang Y, Tang N, Shao M, et al. Transitions and trajectories in intrinsic capacity states over time: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr 2025;25:407. 10.1186/s12877-025-05938-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    The article’s supplementary files as

    jtd-18-02-69-rc.pdf (85.9KB, pdf)
    DOI: 10.21037/jtd-2025-aw-2075
    jtd-18-02-69-coif.pdf (266.8KB, pdf)
    DOI: 10.21037/jtd-2025-aw-2075
    DOI: 10.21037/jtd-2025-aw-2075

    Articles from Journal of Thoracic Disease are provided here courtesy of AME Publications

    RESOURCES