Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Jun 13.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Densitom. 2026 Feb 17;29(2):101684. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2026.101684

Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry Leg Length in Youth

Jack S Dooley 1, Lance C Liu 1, Bonny Donzella 2, Donald R Dengel 1, Megan R Gunnar 2, Brie M Reid 3
PMCID: PMC12973448  NIHMSID: NIHMS2150001  PMID: 41771211

Abstract

Introduction:

Leg length has been found to be a predictor of the risk cardiovascular disease, metabolic disease and type 2 diabetes. Traditional measures of leg-length are conducted by subtracting seated leg length from standing height. We examined whether dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) may provide another accurate method to determine leg length. The data were obtained from a study of adolescents. The aims were to examine the relationship between DXA-derived leg length (DXA-LL) and traditionally derived leg length (T-LL) and determine whether the two types of measures yielded similar associations with measures of cardiometabolic health and bone density.

Methods:

140 adolescents either conceived and reared in their birth families in the United States (BR birth reared, n = 74, 39 female) or internationally adopted prior to age 5 from orphanage-like institutions (PI previously institutionalized, n = 66, 44 female) had their leg length measured using traditional methods and then using whole body DXA scan. DXA-LL was determined using custom regions of interest.

Results:

DXA-LL and T-LL measures were nearly perfectly correlated (r (138) =0.96, p<0.001). However, DXA-LL estimates were less than T-LL estimates (77.75±6.04 vs 78.96±6.00cm, p<0.001). The BR group had longer DXA-LL than the PI group (80.67 cm, 74.84 cm) after controlling for age and sex. Controlling for age and sex, longer leg length using DXA-LL was associated with lower glucose, cholesterol, triglycerides, and HDL, and denser bone density. Similar results were obtained with T-LL.

Conclusion:

DXA-LL is an accurate and reliable leg length measurement tool.

Keywords: dual X-ray absorptiometry, leg length, children, adolescents, bone mineral density, heart rate variability

INTRODUCTION

Leg length development in children and adolescents is an area of interest due to its bearing on growth trajectory into adulthood1, and its association with childhood nutritional status and the development of cardiometabolic health2–8. It has been used as a proxy for growth in childhood because of the proportionally rapid growth of the legs as compared to the trunk or head1–8. Individual differences in leg length rates may reflect the sufficiency of nutritional resources and social resources available in childhood to support healthy growth and development2–8. Consistent with the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) hypothesis9, physical and social resources early in life may lay the groundwork for health across the lifespan9–11. Supporting this, shorter leg lengths in adolescence have been correlated with risk cardiovascular disease (CVD)3, 11–13, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)14–16, behavioral disorders15, and all-cause mortality3–4, 8, 16–22. While the DoHAD hypothesis focuses on the first few years of life, in most of the populations studied, nutritional and social adversity has existed throughout the child’s life. Determining whether threats to growth at any one point in development matter, or the cumulative impact is what is associated with greater cardiovascular risk, is made difficult. To understand the implications of early life nutritional and social deprivation we identified a population of adolescents whose nutritional and social adversity was largely confined to the earliest years of life and compared them to a population of youth who had experienced little to no deprivation during development.

Studies of leg length have traditionally involved subtracting seated height measure from standing height9, 14, 23–25. Recently, dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has been used to measure limb length23–25. This method has the advantage of also providing information on body composition and bone health (e.g., bone mineral density (BMD))23–27 However; to integrate the literature emerging using DXA-derived leg length (DXA-LL) with the older literature, it is necessary to determine the degree of agreement between the two types of measures.

Data using traditional leg length (T-LL) and DXA-LL was obtained to compare adolescents and young adults who had been adopted internationally from institutional care (previously institutionalized, PI) with similar-aged youth who were conceived and raised in birth families (birth reared, BR) of similar economic and educational levels as the families adopting internationally. This selection strategy was intended to broaden the distribution of leg length to include shorter leg lengths, as the nutritional and social deprivation in institutional care typically results in growth delays. Institutional care for is a complex and extensively researched form of childhood adversity6, often involving inadequate provision of basic needs (e.g., nutrition, cognitive stimulation, absence of stable attachment6, 28). Institutional settings also increase risk of disease, intestinal parasites, and stress, all of which can result in micronutrient deficiencies and height stunting3–6, 28–30. For PI adoptees in the United States, most of their infancy is typically spent institutional care, with their deprivation ending with adoption into well-resourced families mostly before age three6. After adoption, PI youth experience rapid catch-up growth and early onset puberty38, though typically fail to achieve similar height as their BR peers4. Previous work has shown children adopted from such orphanage-like institutions have a higher likelihood of experiencing stunted growth and developing CVD and T2DM3–6. However, no studies have examined leg length differences because of early institutional care and how that may be associated with cardiometabolic health by adolescence and early adulthood.

The goals of the study were to examine: (1) the relations between T-LL and DXA-LL; (2) leg-length differences between PI and BR youth; and (3) the relation between DXA-LL and cardiometabolic markers, hear rate variability (HRV) metrics, and measures of body composition, most notably BMD. The sample size was too small to examine whether leg-length was more highly associated with cardiometabolic measures for the PI youth than BR youth.

METHODS

Subjects and Recruitment

The parent study involved a sample of 179 children and adolescents (102 females, 76 males). The current study sample included 140 children and adolescents, composed of 66 PI (44 female, 22 male) and 74 BR (39 female, 35 male). The difference in sample size was due to deciding to measure leg-length part way through data collection, and thus only then including T-LL along with coding the DXA data for leg length. Recruitment of the PI group was conducted using the Minnesota International Adoption Project Registry which consisted of a pool of families who had adopted children internationally. BR youth in the eligible age were randomly selected from the available registry pool. At screening, parents answered brief questions to place their child into early/middle/late pubertal development, and recruitment continued until we had enrolled a balance of males and females across ages and pubertal development. Despite efforts, the registry under-represents minoritized populations and lower income households. While minoritized populations and lower income households are currently under-represented in the registry, the resultant sample of BR is otherwise well matched for family composition, socioeconomic status, and parent race/ethnicity demographics, if not child race/ethnicity demographics. The inclusion criteria were children and adolescents between the ages of 12–21 years, and for adoptees, who had been adopted internationally into a Minnesotan family before the age of 5 years old (M=15.12 months). Exclusion criteria included a gestational age of less than 37 weeks, and the presence of congenital and/or chromosomal disorders (cerebral palsy, Turner syndrome, Downs syndrome, fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS), intellectual disabilities, Fragile X). This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki of 1975 and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities (protocol STUDY00009969, approved on 6 September 2020). Written assent (participants under 18) and consent (participants 18 year and older and guardians of youth under 18 years) was obtained.

Measurement and Protocol

Participants visited the University of Minnesota Center of Pediatric Obesity Medicine for laboratory-based anthropometric and clinical assessments at Time 1 and returned two years later (Time 2) to repeat the measurements. For this study, anthropometric and clinical data were taken from a participant’s most recent visit that included both T- LL and DXA-LL.

Weight and height were obtained using a digital scale (Scale-Tronix 5002, Welch Allyn), and wall-mounted stadiometer (Model S100, Ayrton Corporation, Prior Lake, MN, United States of America), respectively. Standing height was measured by standing against the wall. Seated height was measured as participants sat on a 50-centimeter (cm) box pushed directly against the wall stadiometer. T-LL was determined by subtracting the seated height from standing height. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as body weight in kilograms (kg) divided by height in meters squared (m2)31. Pubertal stage was determined through self-reporting of Tanner stage using previously explained methodologies32.

Body composition was measured in the supine position with legs internally rotated using standard DXA procedures (iDXA; General Electric Medical Systems, Madison, WI) with enCore™ software (platform version, 16.0, General Electric Medical Systems). DXA provided measures of lean mass, fat mass, and BMD. DXA-LL was measured by creating a custom region of interest (ROI) by drawing a line vertically from the pubic symphysis to the calcaneus. BMD was also determined in the ROI as well as each leg. The Shapiro-Wilk test and density plots showed DXA-LL was not normally distributed (W = 0.98, p = 0.04). However, for the purpose of analysis, DXA-LL was not transformed.

Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were obtained once after ten minutes of rest in the supine position using a SphygmoCor XCEL system (AtCor Medical, Sydney, Australia). Pulse wave velocity (PWV) assessments were conducted using a SphygmoCor XCEL system (AtCor Medical, Sydney, Australia) to determine measures of arterial health. Following blood pressure measures, HRV was recorded in the supine position using a 3-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) (SphygmoCor MM3 AtCor Medical, Sydney, Australia) for five minutes.

Fasting blood samples were drawn by a trained phlebotomist for analysis of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), glucose, insulin, and triglycerides. Homeostatic model of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated by taking fasting insulin (mU/L) times fasting glucose (mg/dL)/40529. All blood measurements were analyzed at the University of Minnesota Fairview Hospital, a CLIA-certified laboratory.

Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using RStudio (version 4.0.1) and SPSS (28.0.0.0 190). Normality was determined via density plot visualization and the Shapiro-Wilk Normality Test. We used Steiger’s test of correlational matrixes comparisons48 and paired t-tests to examine the difference between DXA-LL and T-LL. Coefficient of variation percentage (CV%) was used to assessed reliability, while Bland–Altman plots evaluated agreement between leg length measurement methods. Simple correlations compared DXA-LL and T-LL values for significant differences. To increase the range of values for cardiometabolic analysis, PI and BR youth were combined. Hierarchical linear regression models examined associations between DXA-LL and cardiometabolic risk factors, arterial stiffness, HRV, and BMD, adjusting for age and sex.

RESULTS

Demographic characteristics of participants are provided in Table 1. The PI youth were slightly older than the BR youth and of a broader racial distribution.

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics between Previously Institutionalized and Birth Reared subjects. Categorical variables presented as frequency (% within columns).

Total (n=140) Previously Institutionalized (n=66) Birth Reared (n=74) p-value
Age (years) 17.2 ± 2.3 18.1 ± 2.4 16.4 ± 1.9 <0.01
Tanner Stage, n(%) 0.06
I 0(0%) 0 (0%) 0(0%)
II-IV 93 (77%) 49 (80%) 44 (73%)
V 28 (23%) 12 (20%) 16(27%)
Median Family Income 100–150K 100–150K 100–155K 0.68
Ethnicity/Race, n(%) <0.01
Asian 33(19%) 31(38%) 2(6%)
Black 11(10%) 10(22%) 1(2%)
Indigenous to the Americas 12(7%) 11(19%) 1(0%)
More than one race 13(11%) 5(9%) 8(12%)
White 70(53%) 9(12%) 61(80%)

Traditional and DXA-derived Leg Length

T-LL and DXA-LL differed significantly (p <0.001), though the two measurement types were highly correlated (r (138) = 0.96, p<0.001). A Bland-Altman analysis showed agreement between the two measurement techniques (Bias = −1.23+0.165, limits of agreement = −4.47 – 2.01; Figure 1). DXA-LL was found to be an accurate and reliable measurement, with a CV% of 7.8 while T-LL had a CV% of 7.6.

Figure 1:

Figure 1:

Bland-Altman plot of Traditional and DXA-derived Leg Length Measures

Difference determined via DXA-LL – T-LL.

Group Differences in Leg Length using DXA-LL

Controlling for age and sex, the PI youth had shorter legs than the BR youth (p <0.001). BR leg lengths ranged from 71.0 to 95.0 cm, while PI ranged from 66.5 to 84.3 cm. 24% percent of PI leg lengths fell below the shortest BR leg length, and 30% of BR leg lengths exceeded the longest PI leg length. Combining groups widened the overall range of leg lengths.

Relations between DXA-LL and Cardiometabolic Measures (see Table 2)

Table 2.

Regression of cardiometabolic variables of interest on DXA-leg length after controlling for age and sex

Independent Variables of Interest β T p-value
Glucose Regulation
Glucose (mg/dL) −0.24 −2.29 0.02 *
Insulin (mg/dL) −0.178 −1.61 0.11
HOMA-IR −0.19 −1.73 0.09
Lipid Measures
Total Cholesterol (mg/dL) −0.29 −2.12 0.04 *
Triglyceride (mg/dL) −0.23 −2.08 0.04 *
HDL (mg/dL) −0.23 −2.15 0.03 *
LDL (mg/dL) −0.17 −1.48 0.14
Cardiovascular health
Heart Rate (bpm) 0.35 0.33 0.74
RMSSD (ms) −0.06 −0.59 0.56
LF:HF 0.001 0.01 0.99
PWV (m/s) 0.13 1.30 0.19
Blood Pressure
SBP (mmHg) 0.06 0.55 0.58
DBP (mmHg) 0.05 0.47 0.64
Bone Mineral Density
Leg BMD (g/cm2) 0.39 4.22 <0.01 *
*

Indicates p-value ≤0.05

Abbreviations: milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL), high density lipoprotein (HDL), low density lipoprotein (LDL), beats per minute (bpm), root mean squared standard deviation of N-N intervals (RMSSD), milliseconds (ms), low frequency: high frequency ratio, pulse wave velocity (PWV), meters per second (m/s), systolic blood pressure (SBP), millimeters of Mercury (mmHg), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), bone mineral density (BMD), grams per centimeter squared (g/cm2)

**

It should be noted that age was significantly and positively correlated with PWV (ms), HOMA-IR and Leg BMD

Total cholesterol, triglyceride, HDL, and glucose were significantly associated with DXA-LL (p = 0.02–0.04). There were no associations between any metrics of HRV or PWV and DXA-LL (p>0.05). SBP and DBP were not associated with DXA-LL (p = 0.58–0.64).

Relations Between DXA-LL and Bone Density

Lower body BMD was significantly associated with DXA-leg length (p<0.01; Table 2).

DISCUSSION

There was a significant difference between traditionally derived and DXA-LL in terms of the absolute length of leg. Although DXA-LL and T-LL differed by ~2 cm, similarly to prior work24, the methods agreed closely, achieving our first aim. Our findings support prior work showing limb measurements can be reproduced from DXA scans26.

Nevertheless, the leg length measures share predictive utility. Previous studies report associations between T-LL and cardiac health. In this study, we found that DXA-LL was also associated with cardiometabolic markers. In addition, it was associated with BMD as is T-LL. Notably there are some significant advantages to the use of DXA-LL measures. Specifically, there are studies that have collected DXA data to assess body composition but have not included T-LL that can now be re-analyzed to assess leg-length.

The second aim was to examine group differences between BR and PI youth in leg-length. The results showed BR subjects to have longer legs than their PI counterparts. This was expected as PI youth consistently exhibit shorter height-for-age4, 6. Future studies should assess whether leg length or torso length drives group height differences. This would help focus attention on nutritional and social deprivation experiences in childhood as a function of early institutional care.

Our third aim was to examine associations between DXA measured leg length and markers of cardiometabolic health, HRV, arterial function, and BMD. Prior studies have used DXA-LL to determine the practicality of these measures22. Research has also examined adolescent limb length as a proxy for growth stunting4–5. Similarly, BR/PI differences have also been reported for SBP and HDL4–6. Unlike earlier reports5, we found no association between DXA-LL and HOMA-IR, possibly due to lifestyle differences between BR and PI subjects. Thus, the relationships among leg length, insulin sensitivity, and T2DM risk shown previously16–17 were not replicated here. Still, DXA-LL was associated with cholesterol and HDL, echoing studies that connect normal growth with CVD risk in youth12.

To our knowledge, no previous studies have associated HRV to leg length directly but have associated it with CVD and T2DM, separately28, 35–39. Our study found no significant relationships between various metrics of HRV and DXA-LL. These findings were contrary to prior research28, 35–39 which found significant relationships with several HRV measures CVD/T2DM outcomes. These differences could be due to the specifics of study populations, with prior work focusing solely on white patients with Type 1 Diabetes35 and adults. These studies have also included participants who experienced significant adversity throughout childhood, rather than adversity limited to the first years of life35–39.

This was also the first study to compare measures of arterial stiffness and leg length. Prior studies report an inverse link between adult height and CVD3, but our findings do not align. A possible explanation is age confounding, as arterial stiffness increases with age; however, we included age as a covariate, and it remained strongly correlated with arterial stiffness (Table 2, footnote). Additionally, previous research found connections between psychological and socioeconomic stressors and increased risk for CVD,4–5, 29, 40 which may play a role in the lack of concordance in our findings.

To our knowledge, no previous studies have examined the relation between leg length and bone health measurements. Regional BMD has a strong association with DXA-leg length, suggesting that as children and adolescents continue to grow, the bone composition measurements continue to improve.

Strengths of this study include DXA-based bone composition measures, standardized leg-length assessment, and evaluation of vascular structure and function. A limitation is the difference in ethnicities between the PI and BR subjects. However, because the primary aim of this study was to determine difference in measurement techniques, each subject is compared to themselves and act as their own control. Another limitation is the reliance on HOMA-IR for insulin resistance: while reliable33, it is not the gold standard, which may explain discrepancies with prior findings on insulin resistance and T2DM4–6. Nevertheless, euglycemic clamp studies in large pediatric would be prohibitively expensive and time-consuming.

This study suggests that DXA-LL may be utilized accurately and reliably in place of traditional-leg length measurements. This study found minor associations between DXA-LL and cardiometabolic and bone composition markers in BR and PI youth. Future research is needed to clarify how these associations change with age and maturation.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Funding for this project was possible through an NIH grant (R01HL149709) as awarded to Dr. Megan GXXXX. We thank the families who made this research possible. Thanks, are also due to the recruiting and collection team and the clinical team at the Clinical and Translational Science Institute of the University of Minnesota. We are grateful to the Cytokine Reference Laboratory at the University of Minnesota, as well as to M Health Fairview for their assistance with assays.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Tanner JM Growth at Adolescence: With a General Consideration of the Effects of Heredity and Environmental Factors upon Growth and Maturation from Birth to Maturity. (Blackwell Science Publication, 1962). [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gunnell D Associations of height, leg length, and lung function with cardiovascular risk factors in the Midspan Family Study. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 57, 141–146 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schooling CM et al. Are height and leg length universal markers of childhood conditions? The Guangzhou Biobank cohort study. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 62, 607–614 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Reid BM et al. Early growth faltering in post-institutionalized youth and later anthropometric and pubertal development. Pediatr Res 82, 278–284 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Reid BM et al. Early Life Adversity with Height Stunting Is Associated with Cardiometabolic Risk in Adolescents Independent of Body Mass Index. The Journal of Pediatrics 202, 143–149 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gunnar MR & Reid BM Early Deprivation Revisited: Contemporary Studies of the Impact on Young Children of Institutional Care. Annu. Rev. Dev. Psychol 1, 93–118 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Shirley MK et al. Implications of leg length for metabolic health and fitness. Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health 10, 316–324 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sönmez G & Erdal YS The effect of different socio-economic and working conditions on body size and proportions: A case study on adults from Samsun, Turkey. J. Biosoc. Sci 1–20 (2022) doi: 10.1017/S0021932022000232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Silveira PP, Portella AK, Goldani MZ & Barbieri MA Developmental origins of health and disease (DOHaD). J Pediatr (Rio J) 83, 494–504 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Barker D, Eriksson J, Forsén T & Osmond C Fetal origins of adult disease: strength of effects and biological basis. International Journal of Epidemiology 31, 1235–1239 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Davey Smith G Leg length, insulin resistance, and coronary heart disease risk: The Caerphilly Study. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 55, 867–872 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Whitley E, Martin RM, Davey Smith G, Holly JMP & Gunnell D The association of childhood height, leg length and other measures of skeletal growth with adult cardiovascular disease: the Boyd–Orr cohort. J Epidemiol Community Health 66, 18–23 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lawlor DA, Ebrahim S & Davey Smith G The association between components of adult height and Type II diabetes and insulin resistance: British Women’s Heart and Health Study. Diabetologia 45, 1097–106 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Weitzman S, Wang C-H, Pankow JS, Schmidt MI & Brancati FL Are measures of height and leg length related to incident diabetes mellitus? The ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities) study. Acta Diabetol 47, 237–42 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Johnston LW et al. Short leg length, a marker of early childhood deprivation, is associated with metabolic disorders underlying type 2 diabetes: the PROMISE cohort study. Diabetes Care 36, 3599–606 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Asao K et al. Short stature and the risk of adiposity, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes in middle age: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III), 1988–1994. Diabetes Care 29, 1632–7 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pliakas T & McCarthy HD Association of leg length with overweight and obesity in children aged 5–15 years: A cross-sectional study. Annals of Human Biology 37, 10–22 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Datta Banik S Inter-relationships between percentage body fat, relative subischial leg length and body mass index among adolescents and adults from the Limbu community of Darjeeling, West Bengal. J. Biosoc. Sci 54, 124–134 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dangour AD, Schilg S, Hulse JA & Cole TJ Sitting height and subischial leg length centile curves for boys and girls from Southeast England. Annals of Human Biology 29, 290–305 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Danquah I et al. Early-life factors are associated with waist circumference and type 2 diabetes among Ghanaian adults: The RODAM Study. Sci. rep 9, 10848 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hawkes CP, Mostoufi-Moab S, McCormack SE, Grimberg A & Zemel BS Leg length and sitting height reference data and charts for children in the United States. Data in Brief 32, 106131 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Han T, Hooper J, Morrison C & Lean M Skeletal proportions and metabolic disorders in adults. Eur J Clin Nutr 51, 804–809 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Weidauer L, Wey H, Slater H, Moyer-Mileur L & Specker B Estimation of length or height in infants and young children using ulnar and lower leg length with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry validation. Dev Med Child Neurol 56, 995–1000 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Capaldi N et al. Feasibility of Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Based Images for Measurement of Height, Sitting Height, and Leg Length in Children. Journal of Clinical Densitometry 23, 472–481 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Crabtree NJ et al. Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Interpretation and Reporting in Children and Adolescents: The Revised 2013 ISCD Pediatric Official Positions. Journal of Clinical Densitometry 17, 225–242 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Shih R, Wang Z, Heo M, Wang W & Heymsfield SB Lower limb skeletal muscle mass: development of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry prediction model. Journal of Applied Physiology 89, 1380–1386 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wasserman H, O’Donnell JM & Gordon CM Use of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in pediatric patients. Bone 104, 84–90 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Reid BM et al. Does rapid rebound height growth come at a neurocognitive cost for previously institutionalized youth? Child Psychology Psychiatry 63, 1434–1444 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Urbina EM, Kimball TR, Khoury PR, Daniels SR & Dolan LM Increased arterial stiffness is found in adolescents with obesity or obesity-related type 2 diabetes mellitus. Journal of Hypertension 28, 1692–1698 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Keys A, Fidanza F, Karvonen MJ, Kimura N & Taylor HL Indices of relative weight and obesity. International Journal of Epidemiology 43, 655–665 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wei R, Ogden CL, Parsons VL, Freedman DS & Hales CM A method for calculating BMI z-scores and percentiles above the 95 th percentile of the CDC growth charts. Annals of Human Biology 47, 514–521 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Morris NM, & Udry RJ (1980). Validation of a self-administered instrument to assess stage of adolescent development. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 9, 271080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Matthews DR et al. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and fl-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia 28, 412–419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Steiger JH Test for Comparing Elements of a Correlational Matrix. Psychological Bulletin 87, 245–251 (1980). [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Jaiswal M et al. Reduced Heart Rate Variability Is Associated With Increased Arterial Stiffness in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 36, 2351–2358 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bourdon JL et al. Resting Heart Rate Variability (HRV) in Adolescents and Young Adults from a Genetically-Informed Perspective. Behav Genet 48, 386–396 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Osborne MT et al. Disentangling the Links Between Psychosocial Stress and Cardiovascular Disease. Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging 13, e010931 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Armstrong KR, Cote AT, Devlin AM & Harris KC Childhood Obesity, Arterial Stiffness, and Prevalence and Treatment of Hypertension. Curr Treat Options Cardio Med 16, 339 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Blacher J, Asmar R, Djane S, London GM & Safar ME Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity as a Marker of Cardiovascular Risk in Hypertensive Patients. Hypertension 33, 1111–1117 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Johnson AE, Bruce J, Tarullo AR & Gunnar MR Growth delay as an index of allostatic load in young children: Predictions to disinhibited social approach and diurnal cortisol activity. Dev Psychopathology 23, 859–871 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES