Skip to main content
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology logoLink to Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
. 2026 Feb 25;14:1775975. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2026.1775975

Efficacy of the combination of umbilical fat and venous blood on limb salvage

Erhan Hafiz 1,*,†
PMCID: PMC12975975  PMID: 41822465

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of combined umbilical adipose tissue and venous blood–derived stromal vascular fraction (SVF) on limb perfusion, pain and functional recovery in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI).

Methods

A total of 20 patients aged between 36 and 82 years (mean age: 60.3 ± 11.2 years) were included in the study. Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI), pain scores and pain-free walking distance were evaluated before treatment and at follow-up at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.

Results

At 12 months, ABI increased significantly, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) decreased, while pain-free walking distance improved at 9 and 12 months compared to baseline. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) showed a non-significant rise (54.6%–55.2%, p = 0.072), while renal function improved modestly (creatinine 1.12 → 1.09 mg/dL, eGFR 78 → 80.5 mL/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.034). Angiography revealed enhanced vessel visualization and collateral formation.

Conclusions

Combined Autologous conditioned plasma (ACP) and adipose-derived SVF injections effectively improved limb perfusion, pain, lesion severity and functional outcomes in CLTI patients, suggesting a promising therapeutic approach for peripheral arterial disease (PAD).

Keywords: autologous conditioned plasma, chronic limb-threatening ischemia, limb salvage, stromal vascular fraction, umblical fat

Introduction

Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) represents the advanced stage of peripheral arterial disease (PAD), characterized by multilevel arterial occlusions and insufficient blood flow to sustain tissue viability. Clinically, it presents with rest pain, non-healing ulcers, or gangrene and affects <20% of PAD patients, corresponding to approximately 1.28% of adults over 40 years, with nearly two million cases annually in the United States alone (Eid et al., 2021; Bekwelem and Hirsch, 2017; Beckman et al., 2021). If untreated, CLTI often progresses to amputation, leading to functional decline, reduced quality of life and high healthcare costs (Teraa et al., 2016). Despite advancements in revascularization techniques, amputation rates remain high, with 1-year mortality exceeding 40% in many cases (Teraa et al., 2016). Certain populations, including rural, socioeconomically disadvantaged and racial or ethnic minority groups, are disproportionately affected (Minc et al., 2021).

Traditional management relies on endovascular therapy and surgical bypass; however, innovative approaches such as autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) have emerged (Levin et al., 2020). ASCT has demonstrated clinical benefits across multiple diseases, including hematologic malignancies, autoimmune conditions and metabolic disorders, while also showing promise in the treatment of CLTI (Kamber et al., 2015; Cook et al., 2011; Cook et al., 2016; Lepik et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2015; Zahid et al., 2017; Li et al., 2014; Xie et al., 2018; Bura et al., 2014).

Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) are of particular interest due to their abundance, accessibility, differentiation potential and reparative effects, including promotion of angiogenesis and modulation of inflammation (Zhang et al., 2020). Venous blood provides an additional source of hematopoietic and immune cells with regenerative potential and its minimally invasive collection enhances clinical applicability (Zhao et al., 2017; Lawall et al., 2010).

This study investigates the therapeutic potential of combining adipose tissue-derived stem cells with venous blood-derived components for patients with CLTI, aiming to assess their synergistic effects on tissue healing and limb salvage.

Methods

This prospective interventional case series evaluated the efficacy of combined adipose tissue and venous blood in patients with critical limb-threatening peripheral artery disease (PAD) who lacked revascularization options. Twenty patients were enrolled after providing written informed consent.

Patient selection

Twenty patients aged ≥18 years with CLTI were enrolled in accordance with the Global Vascular Guidelines. Inclusion criteria comprised an ABI ≤0.4 or transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO2) ≤30 mmHg, accompanied by non-healing ischemic ulcers or gangrene. Patients with multilevel tibial occlusions confirmed by angiography and deemed unsuitable for surgical or endovascular revascularization were eligible. Exclusion criteria included systemic infection, severe cardiac dysfunction (EF <30%), dialysis-dependent renal failure, malignancy, coagulation disorders and ongoing immunosuppressive therapy. A pragmatic sample size of 20 patients, consistent with prior pilot studies on cell-based therapies, was chosen to evaluate safety and feasibility rather than statistical efficacy.

Inclusion criteria

Patients aged ≥18 years were included if they had CLTI, defined by an ABI ≤0.4 and/or non-healing ischemic ulcers or gangrene. Angiographic evidence of multilevel occlusions or severe stenosis in at least two major lower limb arteries (anterior tibial, posterior tibial, or peroneal) was required. Patients were eligible when revascularization via endovascular or surgical approaches was deemed unfeasible. This population typically presents with chronic ulcers, infection, or gangrene, often necessitating major limb amputation in the absence of alternative therapies, underscoring the need for innovative interventions.

Intervention and preparation ACP–SVF preparation

Autologous stromal vascular fraction (SVF) was prepared from abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue combined with autologous conditioned plasma (ACP) obtained from peripheral venous blood, using ARTHREX ACP and fat transfer kits.

Venous blood collection and ACP preparation

Autologous conditioned plasma (ACP) was prepared from peripheral venous blood using a standardized protocol. A total of 30 mL of venous blood was obtained from each patient under sterile conditions, with 15 mL collected into each ACP syringe (Arthrex ACP® Double Syringe System, Arthrex Inc., Naples, FL, United States of America). Sodium citrate (1 mL) was added to each syringe as an anticoagulant to prevent premature coagulation. The samples were then centrifuged according to the manufacturer’s protocol using a dedicated centrifuge at 1,500 rpm for 5 min at room temperature. Following centrifugation, the plasma fraction enriched with platelets and plasma-derived bioactive factors was separated from the erythrocyte layer using the built-in double-syringe system and collected via a three-way stopcock. The resulting ACP was visually inspected to ensure absence of red blood cell contamination. The ACP obtained from both syringes was pooled and maintained under sterile conditions until immediate combination with the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) for intramuscular administration. No exogenous activation agents were added and ACP was used fresh in all patients.

Adipose tissue harvesting and stromal vascular fraction (SVF) isolation

Stromal vascular fraction (SVF) was obtained from autologous abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue using a standardized mechanical processing protocol. All procedures were performed under sterile conditions. The periumbilical region was disinfected and local anesthesia was administered approximately 2 cm below the umbilicus. A tumescent solution consisting of 0.5 mg adrenaline, 10 mL bupivacaine and 100 mL normal saline was infiltrated into the subcutaneous tissue. After a waiting period of approximately 10 min, adipose tissue was aspirated using gentle negative pressure through a blunt cannula to minimize cellular damage. A total volume of 30 mL of adipose tissue was collected from each patient. The harvested adipose tissue was processed mechanically without enzymatic digestion. Mechanical emulsification was performed by sequential passage of the lipoaspirate through cannulas of decreasing diameters (2.4 mm, 1.4 mm and 1.2 mm) to disrupt adipose clusters and release the stromal vascular fraction. The emulsified fat was then centrifuged according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Program B). Following centrifugation, the upper oil (triglyceride) layer was discarded and the intermediate aqueous layer containing cellular components was collected. The material was subsequently filtered and centrifuged a second time to further purify the SVF.

The final SVF pellet was resuspended and combined with ACP to obtain a homogeneous injectable suspension. The preparation was used immediately for intramuscular administration without further manipulation or cryopreservation.

Final preparation and application

The final SVF suspension was combined with ACP to obtain a homogeneous injectable product. The prepared solution was administered as a single-session treatment via multiple intramuscular injections into the ischemic lower limb. Injections were performed under sterile conditions and targeted the major muscle groups of the affected limb, including the gastrocnemius, soleus, tibialis anterior and peroneal muscles, depending on the anatomical distribution of ischemia. The injection sites were distributed along the calf and distal lower limb, with particular emphasis on regions adjacent to ischemic ulcers or areas supplied by occluded tibial vessels. The total injection volume was evenly divided among multiple injection points to ensure homogeneous local distribution and to enhance cell retention within ischemic tissues. No additional imaging guidance was used during administration. All patients received a single combined SVF–ACP administration and no repeat dosing was performed during the follow-up period.

Because the SVF–ACP product was prepared as a point-of-care formulation for immediate administration, no formal product characterization (total nucleated cell yield, viability testing, or flow-cytometric immunophenotyping) was performed. Concomitant antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies were maintained unchanged in all patients according to standard clinical practice for chronic limb-threatening ischemia. No temporary suspension or modification of antiaggregation or anticoagulation therapy was performed prior to the procedure in order to avoid thrombotic risk in this high-risk population. Patients were not stratified according to antiplatelet regimen.

Data collection and evaluation

Collecting demographic and clinical data

Each patient’s background, including demographic details, medical history and condition prior to treatment, was thoroughly documented. Following the procedure, regular clinical follow-ups were conducted to track progress and gather essential data for evaluation.

Assessing functional improvements assessment of functional recovery

Identification of critical limb-compromised PAD, in which blood flow to the lower extremities is severely reduced, was primarily defined by the ABI. An ABI of 0.4 or less indicated severe PAD, while non-healing ulcers reflected inadequate tissue perfusion.

Pain levels were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), allowing comparison of pain intensity before and after treatment. Pain-free walking distance was measured using a six-minute walking test, reflecting changes in mobility and quality of life.

Cardiac and renal function monitoring

Cardiac and renal functions were systematically assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-intervention. Cardiac evaluation included echocardiographic measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), resting heart rate monitoring and electrocardiography (ECG). Renal assessment comprised serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN). All values were compared with baseline to evaluate intervention-related changes.

Statistical analyses

Data were analyzed using SPSS version 21.0. Descriptive statistics, including mean, standard deviation and percentages, were calculated. Normality was assessed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Shapiro–Wilk tests. Paired-samples t-tests were used to compare continuous variables before and after the procedure, while chi-square tests evaluated categorical variables. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 20 patients were enrolled, including 13 men (65%) and seven women (35%), with a mean age of 58.6 ± 12.3 years. Eight patients (40%) were smokers. Comorbidities included diabetes mellitus (DM) in 14 patients (70%), hyperlipidemia (HPL) in 10 (50%), hypertension (HT) in 6 (30%), coronary artery disease (CAD) in 6 (30%) and chronic renal failure (CRF) in 2 (10%) (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of the patients.

Age (Min.-Max/Ort. ± ss) 35–85/58.61 ± 12.33
Gender – n (%)
 Female 7 (35)
 Male 13 (65)
Smoking-n (%)
 No 12 (60)
 Yes 8 (40)
HPL-n (%)
 No 10 (50)
 Yes 10 (50)
DM-n (%)
 No 6 (30)
 Yes 14 (70)
HT-n (%)
 No 14 (70)
 Yes 6 (30)
CRF-n (%)
 No 18 (90)
 Yes 2 (10)
CAD-n (%)
 No 18 (90)
 Yes 2 (10)

Min, Minimum; Max, Maximum; HPL, hyperlipidemia; DM, diabetes mellitus; HT, hypertension; CRF, chronic renal failure; CAD, coronary artery disease.

When patients’ ABI, VAS and pain-free walking values before and after surgery were examined, the ABI, value at 12 months postoperatively was found to have increased significantly compared with preoperative values, while the VAS, score decreased significantly.

In addition, pain-free walking distance at 9 and 12 months postoperatively increased significantly compared with both preoperative values and those measured at 3 months post-surgery (Table 2).

TABLE 2.

Comparison of ABI, VAS and pain free walking distance.

Time ABI VAS Pain free walking distance (m)
Preop 0.40 ± 0.05a 6.32 ± 0.95a 35.0 ± 12.11a
3rd month 0.43 ± 0.06 6.29 ± 0.90 38.0 ± 9.08b
6th month 0.45 ± 0.06 6.15 ± 0.83 43.2 ± 5.45
9th month 0.47 ± 0.07 5.89 ± 0.87 50.25 ± 4.76
12th month 0.50 ± 0.06a 5.21 ± 0.46a 55.12 ± 4.47a,b
p 0.032 0.048 0.036

The letters “a” and “b” denote statistically significant differences. Groups with the same letter differ significantly from each other. “Preop” refers to the preoperative period, while “3rd month,” “6th month,” “9th month,” and “12th month” indicate 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the operation, respectively.

Systemic effects were less pronounced. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increased slightly from 54.6% to 55.2% at 12 months, without reaching statistical significance (p = 0.072). Serum creatinine decreased marginally from 1.12 to 1.09 mg/dL, while the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) increased to 80.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 at 12 months (p = 0.034). Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels demonstrated only minimal change, decreasing from 17.3 to 17.0 mg/dL (Table 3).

TABLE 3.

Comparison of cardiac and renal parameters.

Time LVEF (%) Creatinine (mg/dL) eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) BUN (mg/dL)
Preop 54.60 ± 6.3 1.12 ± 0.23 78.5 ± 12.4a 17.3 ± 3.8a
3rd month 54.70 ± 6.1 1.11 ± 0.21 78.8 ± 12.0 17.3 ± 3.6b
6th month 54.90 ± 6.0 1.11 ± 0.20 79.2 ± 11.8 17.2 ± 3.5
9th month 55.10 ± 5.9 1.10 ± 0.20 79.8 ± 11.7 17.1 ± 3.5
12th month 55.20 ± 5.7 1.09 ± 0.19 80.5 ± 11.5a 17.0 ± 3.3a,b
p 0.072 0.074 0.034 0.036

The letters “a” and “b” denote statistically significant differences. Groups with the same letter differ significantly from each other. “Preop” refers to the preoperative period, while “3rd month,” “6th month,” “9th month,” and “12th month” indicate 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the operation, respectively.

Angiographic evaluation at 3 months demonstrated improved vessel visualization and collateral circulation (Figure 1), supporting the potential of adipose tissue- and venous blood–derived stromal vascular fraction to enhance revascularization in critical limb ischemia.

FIGURE 1.

Panel A presents a clinical photograph of a lower leg with extensive black necrotic tissue covering a significant portion of the distal area, surrounded by erythematous, swollen skin suggestive of severe soft tissue involvement. The discoloration and tissue destruction indicate advanced necrosis. Panel B shows the same lower leg following treatment. The black necrotic tissue has largely been removed, revealing a large open wound bed with yellowish fibrinous tissue and visible areas of red granulation tissue. Surrounding inflammation appears reduced compared to Panel A, indicating progression toward wound healing.

(A) Preoperative and (B) Postoperative limb image 3 months later.

During the 12-month follow-up period, one patient required a minor amputation involving two toes, while no major limb amputations were performed in the study cohort.

Discussion

This study presents a novel approach combining adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) from periumbilical fat with autologous venous blood products for the treatment of CLTI. Unlike platelet-rich plasma (PRP) or bone marrow–derived mononuclear cell protocols, this method leverages both the regenerative capacity of ASCs and the trophic support of venous blood–derived factors. Our findings suggest improvements in vascular perfusion, lesion healing, functional outcomes and selected systemic parameters, highlighting the therapeutic potential of this strategy in ischemic vascular disease.

The significant increase in ABI values indicates enhanced microvascular perfusion and arterial remodeling. These effects are consistent with prior evidence demonstrating that ASCs secrete angiogenic factors such as VEGF, FGF-2, PDGF and HGF, thereby promoting endothelial proliferation and vessel formation (Lawall et al., 2010; Zhuang et al., 2019; Lozano et al., 2022). Venous blood products likely contributed to vessel stabilization through mediators such as PDGF-BB and TGF-β1. Variability in patient responses may reflect differences in diabetes duration, metabolic control and chronic inflammation, all of which influence angiogenic capacity (Yousefifard et al., 2020).

Symptomatic improvements, including reduced ischemic pain and increased pain-free walking distance, suggest benefits extending beyond hemodynamic changes. ASCs exert immunomodulatory effects by downregulating pro-inflammatory cytokines and enhancing anti-inflammatory mediators, while venous blood products may further support endothelial function and limit local inflammation.

Although changes in LVEF were modest and did not reach statistical significance, renal function demonstrated favorable trends, including improved eGFR and reduced creatinine levels. These findings are consistent with experimental data showing mesenchymal stem cell–mediated protection against ischemia-induced nephropathy (Fisher et al., 2015; Kukharchuk et al., 2024). Mechanistically, the observed effects likely arise from paracrine signaling, immunomodulation, extracellular vesicle–mediated transfer of regulatory molecules and modulation of the TGF-β pathway (Conte et al., 2019).

Recent advances in regenerative therapies for chronic limb-threatening ischemia have highlighted the importance of rigorous cellular characterization and controlled study designs. In this context, Kukharchuk et al. (2024) reported a comprehensive preclinical and randomized clinical investigation evaluating fetal progenitor cells (FPCs) for the treatment of chronic limb ischemia (Kukharchuk et al., 2024). Their study demonstrated significant improvements in wound healing, pain reduction, ankle–brachial index and prevention of major amputations, supported by detailed cellular phenotyping and long-term follow-up (Kukharchuk et al., 2024). Compared with this methodologically robust approach, the present study represents an early-stage, pragmatic clinical experience using mechanically processed autologous stromal vascular fraction combined with autologous conditioned plasma as a point-of-care therapy. While our approach lacks extensive cellular characterization and randomization, it offers a feasible and ethically accessible strategy for no-option chronic limb-threatening ischemia patients. Together, these studies illustrate complementary pathways in regenerative angiogenesis, ranging from highly standardized cell products to real-world autologous formulations that may inform future controlled trials.

Limitations of this study include the small sample size, lack of randomization and use of a single-dose protocol. Future studies should investigate repeated dosing strategies, optimized delivery routes, standardized characterization of ASCs and venous blood components and the incorporation of biomaterial carriers to enhance cell retention. Long-term follow-up assessing amputation-free survival, ulcer healing and recurrent ischemia is necessary to confirm the durability and clinical applicability of this approach.

An additional limitation is the lack of SVF product characterization (total viable cell yield, viability and immunophenotyping such as CD34+ progenitor frequency and mesenchymal/hematopoietic subsets), which limits biological standardization and cross-study comparability. In addition, the potential influence of ongoing antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy on the biological activity of autologous conditioned plasma was not specifically evaluated, which represents an additional limitation of the present exploratory study. Future studies should incorporate standardized cell quantification and flow-cytometric profiling to improve reproducibility.

Amputation-related outcomes were not predefined as primary endpoints in this exploratory case series. Although no major amputations occurred, one patient required a minor toe amputation during follow-up, underscoring the need for larger, controlled studies evaluating amputation-free survival as a primary outcome.

Although the administration protocol was standardized within this study, further multicenter studies are required to optimize injection sites, dosing strategies and repetition intervals to establish a universally applicable protocol.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the combined use of adipose-derived stem cells and autologous venous blood products represents a promising and biologically rational therapeutic strategy for patients with critical limb ischemia. By synergistically enhancing angiogenesis, modulating inflammation and supporting tissue repair, this approach demonstrated improvements in perfusion, functional outcomes and selected systemic parameters. Although preliminary, these findings provide a strong rationale for larger, randomized and longitudinal studies to further define the clinical efficacy, optimal treatment protocols and long-term benefits of this regenerative modality in ischemic vascular disease.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.

Footnotes

Edited by: Bruce Alan Bunnell, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, United States

Reviewed by: Ranjit Ranbhor, Odin Pharmaceuticals LLC, United States

Giovanni Mastrangelo, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Hospital, Italy

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Gaziantep University, Turkey. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

EH: Methodology, Resources, Data curation, Project administration, Visualization, Investigation, Validation, Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Software, Writing – review and editing, Formal Analysis.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  1. Beckman J. A., Schneider P. A., Conte M. S. (2021). Advances in revascularization for peripheral artery disease: revascularization in PAD. Circulation Res. 128 (12), 1885–1912. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bekwelem W., Hirsch A. T. (2017). Epidemiology of peripheral arterry disease. Peripher. Artery Dis. 1–35. 10.1002/9781118775998.ch1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bura A., Planat-Benard V., Bourin P., Silvestre J. S., Gross F., Grolleau J. L., et al. (2014). Phase I trial: the use of autologous cultured adipose-derived stroma/stem cells to treat patients with non-revascularizable critical limb ischemia. Cytotherapy 16 (2), 245–257. 10.1016/j.jcyt.2013.11.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Conte M. S., Bradbury A. W., Kolh P., White J. V., Dick F., Fitridge R., et al. (2019). Global vascular guidelines on the management of chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovascular Surg. 58 (1), S1–S109. 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.05.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cook G., Liakopoulou E., Pearce R., Cavet J., Morgan G. J., Kirkland K., et al. (2011). Factors influencing the outcome of a second autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in relapsed multiple myeloma: a study from the British society of blood and marrow transplantation registry. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 17 (11), 1638–1645. 10.1016/j.bbmt.2011.04.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cook G., Ashcroft A. J., Cairns D. A., Williams C. D., Brown J. M., Cavenagh J. D., et al. (2016). The effect of salvage autologous stem-cell transplantation on overall survival in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (final results from BSBMT/UKMF Myeloma X Relapse [intensive]): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 3 (7), e340–e351. 10.1016/S2352-3026(16)30049-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Eid M. A., Mehta K. S., Goodney P. P. (2021). Epidemiology of peripheral artery disease. Seminars Vasc. Surg. 34, 38–46. 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2021.02.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fisher S. A., Doree C., Mathur A., Martin-Rendon E. (2015). Meta-analysis of cell therapy trials for patients with heart failure. Circulation Res. 116 (8), 1361–1377. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.304386 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kamber C., Zimmerli S., Suter-Riniker F., Mueller B. U., Taleghani B. M., Betticher D., et al. (2015). Varicella zoster virus reactivation after autologous SCT is a frequent event and associated with favorable outcome in myeloma patients. Bone Marrow Transplantation 50 (4), 573–578. 10.1038/bmt.2014.290 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kukharchuk O., Bopardikar A., Anand Baskaran P. P., Kukharchuk A., Kulkarni R., Ranbhor R. (2024). Fetal progenitor cells for treatment of chronic limb ischemia. Am. J. Stem Cells 13 (3), 169–190. 10.62347/MZKI8393 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lawall H., Bramlage P., Amann B. (2010). Stem cell and progenitor cell therapy in peripheral artery disease. Thrombosis Haemostasis 103 (04), 696–709. 10.1160/TH09-10-0688 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lepik K. V., Mikhailova N. B., Moiseev I. S., Kondakova E. V., Tsvetkova L. A., Zalyalov Y. R., et al. (2019). Nivolumab for the treatment of relapsed and refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma after ASCT and in ASCT-Naïve patients. Leukemia Lymphoma 60 (9), 2316–2319. 10.1080/10428194.2019.1573368 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Levin S. R., Arinze N., Siracuse J. J. (2020). Lower extremity critical limb ischemia: a review of clinical features and management. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 30 (3), 125–130. 10.1016/j.tcm.2019.04.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Li J., Shen K. N., Huang W. R., Li L. H., Chen H., Chen W. M., et al. (2014). Autologous stem cell transplant can overcome poor prognosis in patients with multiple myeloma with extramedullary plasmacytoma. Leukemia Lymphoma 55 (7), 1687–1690. 10.3109/10428194.2013.853296 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lozano Navarro L. V., Chen X., Giratá Viviescas L. T., Ardila-Roa A. K., Luna-Gonzalez M. L., Sossa C. L., et al. (2022). Mesenchymal stem cells for critical limb ischemia: their function, mechanism, and therapeutic potential. Stem Cell Res. Therapy 13 (1), 345. 10.1186/s13287-022-03043-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Minc S. D., Budi S., Thibault D., Misra R., Armstrong D. G., Smith G. S., et al. (2021). Opportunities for diabetes and peripheral artery disease-related lower limb amputation prevention in an Appalachian state: a longitudinal analysis. Prev. Med. Rep. 23, 101505. 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101505 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Teraa M., Conte M. S., Moll F. L., Verhaar M. C. (2016). Critical limb ischemia: current trends and future directions. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 5 (2), e002938. 10.1161/JAHA.115.002938 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wang Z. X., Cao J. X., Li D., Zhang X. Y., Liu J. L., Li J. L., et al. (2015). Clinical efficacy of autologous stem cell transplantation for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis. Cytotherapy 17 (7), 956–968. 10.1016/j.jcyt.2015.02.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Xie B., Luo H., Zhang Y., Wang Q., Zhou C., Xu D. (2018). Autologous stem cell therapy in critical limb ischemia: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Stem Cells Int. 2018 (1), 7528464. 10.1155/2018/7528464 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Yousefifard M., Shamseddin J., Babahajian A., Sarveazad A. (2020). Efficacy of adipose derived stem cells on functional and neurological improvement following ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Neurol. 20 (1), 294. 10.1186/s12883-020-01865-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zahid U., Akbar F., Amaraneni A., Husnain M., Chan O., Riaz I. B., et al. (2017). A review of autologous stem cell transplantation in lymphoma. Curr. Hematol. Malignancy Rep. 12, 217–226. 10.1007/s11899-017-0382-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Zhang J., Liu Y., Chen Y., Yuan L., Liu H., Wang J., et al. (2020). Adipose‐derived stem cells: current applications and future directions in the regeneration of multiple tissues. Stem Cells Int. 2020 (1), 8810813. 10.1155/2020/8810813 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhao L., Johnson T., Liu D. (2017). Therapeutic angiogenesis of adipose-derived stem cells for ischemic diseases. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 8 (1), 125. 10.1186/s13287-017-0578-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhuang Q., Ma R., Yin Y., Lan T., Yu M., Ming Y. (2019). Mesenchymal stem cells in renal fibrosis: the flame of cytotherapy. Stem Cells Int. 2019 (1), 8387350. 10.1155/2019/8387350 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.


Articles from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES