Skip to main content
Case Reports in Otolaryngology logoLink to Case Reports in Otolaryngology
. 2026 Mar 10;2026:7811132. doi: 10.1155/crot/7811132

Partial Recovery of Anosmia Since Childhood With Acquired Parosmia: Mechanistic Insights and Therapeutic Implications—A Case Report

Eishaan Kamta Bhargava 1,2, Shubin Li 1, Yling Mai 1, Susanne Weise 1, Antje Hähner 1, Thomas Hummel 1,✉
Editor: Rong-San Jiang
PMCID: PMC12976452  PMID: 41822178

Abstract

Background

Isolated congenital anosmia (ICA) traditionally represents an irreversible sensory disorder affecting 1 in 5,000–10,000 individuals. This case demonstrates rare partial olfactory recovery in childhood‐onset anosmia following corticosteroid therapy, providing novel insights into olfactory neuroplasticity and therapeutic potential.

Case Presentation

A 32‐year‐old woman with lifelong anosmia, diagnosed with ICA at age 20 using Sniffin’ Sticks testing (2013), experienced first olfactory perceptions in 2014 following one week of oral corticosteroids and nine months of topical mometasone. MRI (2021) revealed barely visible olfactory bulbs, narrow olfactory clefts, minor ethmoid sinus inflammation, but normal‐depth olfactory sulci and typical skull base morphology. Recent psychophysical testing (2025) demonstrated orthonasal hyposmia (TDI score 24) and retronasal hyposmia (11/20). Electrophysiological assessment detected preserved olfactory event–related potentials to hydrogen sulfide and phenyl ethyl alcohol, confirming functional neural circuitry. Recovery was complicated by parosmia, with foods like garlic, eggs and meat perceived as intensely unpleasant and faecal‐smelling, leading to dietary modifications and preference for low‐odour foods. Patient reported childhood social difficulties related to anosmia, with ongoing evolution of olfactory function over the past decade. Current treatment includes tapered systemic and topical corticosteroids, intranasal vitamin A drops (10,000 IU/day) and olfactory training, with recent improvements including tolerance of previously aversive foods.

Conclusions

This case challenges the irreversibility paradigm of childhood‐onset anosmia and demonstrates that olfactory recovery is possible even after decades, potentially mediated by anti‐inflammatory effects and neurogenic plasticity. The emergence of parosmia during recovery reflects maladaptive neuroplasticity during olfactory regeneration. Combined corticosteroid therapy, vitamin A supplementation and olfactory training may offer therapeutic hope for similar patients, warranting further investigation of inflammatory modulation and neuroregenerative approaches in congenital olfactory disorders.

Keywords: corticosteroids, neurogenesis, olfactory bulb, olfactory dysfunction, olfactory epithelium, olfactory pathways, smell disorders


Key Points

  • •

    Partial olfactory function recovery is possible in anosmia since childhood.

  • •

    Parosmia may emerge during recovery, reflecting maladaptive olfactory neuroplasticity.

  • •

    Anti‐inflammatory and neuroregenerative therapies offer hope for functional rehabilitation.

  • •

    Preserved olfactory circuitry can exist despite hypoplastic olfactory bulbs on MRI.

1. Introduction

Anosmia since birth is a rare, traditionally irreversible disorder, affecting an estimated 1 in 5000 to 1 in 10000 individuals [1]. We present a case of anosmia since childhood with partial olfactory recovery and parosmia following corticosteroid therapy. This case offers insights into olfactory neurogenesis, the role of inflammatory processes in perpetuating olfactory dysfunction and the potential for neuroregeneration even after decades of sensory loss.

2. Methods

This clinical experience is reported in line with CARE guidelines on clinical case reporting [2, 3]. Informed consent was obtained from the patient, and the report was deemed exempt from ethical committee review due to the anonymised nature of the case report.

3. Case Presentation

A 32‐year‐old woman reported lifelong anosmia, diagnosed as isolated congenital anosmia (ICA) at age 20 years following psychophysical testing for smell using Sniffin’ Sticks in 2013 (detailed threshold, discrimination and identification subscores were not available). In 2014, at age 21, she was prescribed a course of systemic corticosteroids followed by topical mometasone therapy. While the specific clinical indication, dosing and delivery technique for this treatment were not documented in available records, the patient reported consistent use and noted that approximately 3‐4 weeks after initiating treatment, she experienced her first conscious olfactory perceptions. An MRI in 2021 (Figure 1) revealed barely visible olfactory bulbs (OBs) consistent with ICA [4]. There were minor inflammatory changes in the ethmoid sinuses and narrow olfactory clefts, suggesting a mixed aetiology of developmental olfactory system anomaly with superimposed inflammatory changes. The skull base morphology on MRI was typical of normosmic people with fully developed OBs [5]. Olfactory sulci were of normal depth. Recent psychophysical testing (2025) showed orthonasal (Sniffin’ Sticks TDI score 24; T = 1, D = 10, and I = 13), and retronasal hyposmia (11/20). Gustatory testing and nasal endoscopy were normal.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

MRI scan with hypoplastic olfactory bulbs, normal depth olfactory clefts and minor inflammatory changes in the ethmoid sinuses. Note: S: olfactory sulcus; E: ethmoid sinuses; M: maxillary sinuses; NS: nasal septum; C: olfactory clefts; V: vessels; red rectangle: typical location of the olfactory bulbs, although they are not visible in this case.

Electrophysiological assessment was carried out using the electrobulbogram (EBG) methodology [6], with olfactory event–related potentials (OERPs) recorded via EEG electrodes positioned at the nasal bridge. Testing detected OERPs to hydrogen sulfide and phenyl ethyl alcohol (Figure 2), with characteristic high‐frequency gamma‐band responses (> 70 Hz) within 100–200 milliseconds post‐stimulus onset, indicating preserved olfactory neural circuitry. The patient was advised to try tapered systemic plus topical corticosteroids, vitamin A‐containing nasal drops (10000 IU/d) and olfactory training.

FIGURE 2.

Time‐frequency analysis graphic depicting detectable OERPs recorded from the electrobulbogram (EBG) to phenyl ethyl alcohol (a) and hydrogen sulfide (b). Note: The plots display frequency (10–100 Hz) over a 1 s time window following stimulus onset. Red ellipses highlight time‐frequency clusters of interest. Both stimuli elicited distinct high‐frequency responses in the gamma band (> 70 Hz), with additional low‐frequency activity.

graphic file with name CROT-2026-7811132-g003.jpg

(a)

graphic file with name CROT-2026-7811132-g001.jpg

(b)

3.1. Patient‐Reported Experiences

The patient described childhood social exclusion due to anosmia, with difficulty relating to social cues involving smell, and reliance on food texture for dietary choices. After initial systemic and topical corticosteroid therapy, she experienced a ‘blurry,’ fragmented emergence of smell complicated by parosmia. Foods like garlic, eggs and meat became intensely unpleasant, described as faecal in odour, shaping her aversion to complex or heavily spiced cuisines and preference for foods with lower odour intensity, like Japanese rice–based dishes.

Despite a decade of gradual recovery, her olfactory function is still evolving. She is only now beginning to appreciate the nuances and associations of different scents and flavours. Since starting the intranasal treatment with vitamin A‐containing nasal drops and olfactory training outlined above, she has come to appreciate and love the scent and flavour of tarragon and is now able to tolerate filet mignon. Negative associations with newly discovered strong smells such as sweat and sewage continue to predominate her olfactory recovery journey. She describes her experience as predominantly negative, mostly due to the sudden change in her sensory experience, but remains hopeful for improvement.

4. Discussion

The coexistence of ICA hallmarks (hypoplastic OBs and lifelong anosmia) with inflammatory imaging features (ethmoid sinus mucosal changes and narrow olfactory clefts) and a response to corticosteroids suggests a possible mixed pathophysiology combining developmental and acquired components, with chronic low‐grade inflammatory component potentially suppressing function of residual sensory elements. Such inflammatory changes may also lead to a hypoplastic OB, so her anosmia into early adulthood may have been inflammatory. The presence of normal‐depth olfactory sulci on MRI [1] and regular morphology of the skull base [5], in conjunction with the objective evidence of functional olfactory circuitry on electrophysiological assessment, may indicate normal olfactory system development at birth, despite poorly developed OBs. This aligns with recent population‐based data demonstrating that preserved olfactory function can exist without anatomically defined OBs on imaging, with Weiss et al. identifying approximately 0.6% of individuals in a large neuroimaging database who demonstrated normal olfactory psychophysical performance and typical piriform cortex fMRI activation despite the complete absence of structurally defined OBs [7].

4.1. Mechanistic Insights

  • 1.

    Steroid‐induced neurogenic priming: Recent evidence supports adult human olfactory neurogenesis [8], with neurogenic niches in olfactory epithelium. Corticosteroid therapy may suppress subclinical inflammation, enabling dormant progenitors to differentiate.

  • 2.

    Maladaptive plasticity and parosmia: Parosmia is common in early recovery from postviral or posttraumatic anosmia, often triggered by foods containing thiols, pyrazines and disulfides [9]. Incomplete characterization of odorants with predominant detection of these compounds at concentrations below normal detection thresholds [9] may underlie some distortions during olfactory neuron regeneration. This, alongside a sudden shift in sensory experience without gradual learnt social and emotional responses to odours [10], may explain the patient’s aversion to certain foods. The specific characterization of parosmic sensations as ‘faecal’ despite lifelong anosmia represents a fascinating phenomenon. This may be due to a combination of semantic characterisation of novel sensations following acquisition of conceptual knowledge of odour descriptors through language and social observation without direct olfactory experience, innate aversive responses to thiols and sulphur compounds (a major faecal odour component) and affective mapping of descriptors based on emotional valence (intense displeasure) rather than true olfactory similarity.

  • 3.

    Anti‐inflammatory effects of corticosteroids: Even after decades of anosmia, systemic corticosteroids followed by topical application may restore some olfactory function.

4.2. Therapeutic Implications

  • 1.

    Inflammatory modulation: Systemic and topical corticosteroids in anosmic patients with detectable OBs and normal olfactory sulci may promote neurogeneration through reduction of mucosal oedema in the olfactory cleft, lowering inflammatory cytokines that may suppress neurogenesis and creating a microenvironment permissive for olfactory neuronal maturation.

  • 2.

    Enhanced recovery protocols: Retinoic acid has been implicated in olfactory neuron differentiation; intranasal Vitamin A combined with olfactory training may improve olfactory function [11].

  • 3.

    Dietary modulation of parosmia: Understanding molecular triggers [9] may guide dietary interventions to alleviate negative experiences and improve recovery.

To our knowledge, only one other case has reported olfactory recovery in presumed ICA [10]. The key similarities and differences to our case are outlined in Table 1. The superior functional trajectory in our case may reflect therapeutic benefit of anti‐inflammatory intervention, active rehabilitation and extended neuroplastic adaptation.

TABLE 1.

Comparison of olfactory recovery cases in lifelong anosmia.

Feature Current case Pellegrino et al. [10]
Demographics and presentation
Age at diagnosis (years) 20 13
Age at recovery onset (years) 21 24
Sex Female Female
Family history Negative Negative
  
Baseline olfactory function
Initial diagnosis Functional anosmia Functional anosmia
Baseline TDI score Not documented Unable to detect 12 test odours
Retronasal function at baseline Not assessed Not assessed
  
Neuroimaging findings
Olfactory bulbs Barely visible bilaterally Absent bilaterally
Olfactory sulcus depth Normal bilaterally Flattened on left; clear but flattened on right
Skull base morphology Normal Not mentioned
Additional findings Minor ethmoid sinus inflammation; narrow olfactory clefts None reported
  
Recovery characteristics
Trigger/intervention Systemic + topical corticosteroids Spontaneous (no specific intervention)
Onset timing 3‐4 weeks after steroid initiation Gradual over months starting age 24
Recovery pattern Faint initial perceptions, gradual intensification with parosmia Fragmented emergence with phantosmia
  
Postrecovery olfactory function
Evaluation timepoint 11 years postrecovery (2025) 1–3 years postrecovery
Orthonasal TDI score 24 (hyposmia) 12 (functional anosmia)
Threshold (T) 1 1
Discrimination (D) 10 5
‐ Identification (I) 13 6
Retronasal function (score/total) 11/20 (hyposmia) 15/20, later 12/19
Subjective odour detection Multiple odours; evolving repertoire 16/32 test odours (50%)
  
Electrophysiological assessment
OERP/EBG to H2S Present Present
OERP/EBG to PEA Present Present
Interpretation Preserved functional circuitry Intact olfactory system despite absent bulbs
  
Qualitative distortions
Type Parosmia Phantosmia (lingering odours)
Descriptors ‘Faecal;’ intensely unpleasant ‘Cannot switch off;’ stressful
Trigger foods Garlic, eggs, meat Trigeminal‐component odours
Impact Dietary modifications; food aversions Disturbing; ‘annoyance’
  
Patient experience
Hedonic valence Predominantly negative initially; improving Disturbing; negative
Social/emotional impact Childhood social difficulties; ongoing challenges improving Stress from persistent sensations
Recovery trajectory Gradual improvement over 11 years with training Evolution ongoing at time of report
  
Current treatment
Active interventions Tapered systemic corticosteroids followed by topical corticosteroids; intranasal vitamin A (10,000 IU/day); olfactory training None reported
Treatment response Improved tolerance; some foods now enjoyable (e.g., tarragon and filet mignon) Not applicable
  
Proposed mechanisms
Primary hypothesis Anti‐inflammatory + neurogenic plasticity Hormonal influences on delayed neurogenesis
Supporting evidence Response to steroids; inflammatory imaging findings; normal olfactory sulci Spontaneous onset; age‐related factors

5. Conclusions

This case challenges the traditional view that anosmia since childhood is an irreversible condition and demonstrates that it may exist on a spectrum influenced by inflammatory and neurogenic plasticity. While corticosteroids and olfactory training are the mainstay of treatment, dietary modulation to cope with unpleasant odorous sensations and emerging therapies such as intranasal vitamin A may offer hope for improved outcomes.

Potential areas of future research with a personalised medicine focus may be olfactory cleft cytokine profiling to predict therapeutic response and investigating the genetic basis of parosmia susceptibility.

Author Contributions

Eishaan Kamta Bhargava: substantial contributions to conception, design, drafting and critical revision and final approval of submitted manuscript; Shubin Li, Yling Mai, and Susanne Weise: substantial contributions to conception, data acquisition, critical revision and final approval of submitted manuscript; Antje Hähner and Thomas Hummel: substantial contributions to conception, critical revision and final approval of submitted manuscript.

Funding

No sources of funding to disclose.

Disclosure

All authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Ethics Statement

Informed consent was obtained from the patient (available on request), and the report was deemed exempt from ethical committee review due to the anonymised nature of the case report.

Conflicts of Interest

Since 2023, Thomas Hummel collaborates with the following companies: Sony, Tokyo, Japan; Smell and Taste Lab, Geneva, Switzerland; Takasago, Paris, France; Cyrano, Delray Beach, FL, USA; Cynexo, Trieste, Italy; Sentosphere, Paris, France; NOAR, Sao Paulo, Brazil; Burghart, Holm, Germany; Rhino Therapeutics, Boston, MA, USA. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Bhargava, Eishaan Kamta , Li, Shubin , Mai, Yling , Weise, Susanne , Hähner, Antje , Hummel, Thomas , Partial Recovery of Anosmia Since Childhood With Acquired Parosmia: Mechanistic Insights and Therapeutic Implications—A Case Report, Case Reports in Otolaryngology, 2026, 7811132, 6 pages, 2026. 10.1155/crot/7811132

Academic Editor: Rong‐San Jiang

Contributor Information

Thomas Hummel, Email: thomas.hummel@tu-dresden.de.

Rong-San Jiang, Email: rsjiang@vghtc.gov.tw.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

References

  • 1. Croy I., Negoias S., Novakova L., Landis B. N., and Hummel T., Learning About the Functions of the Olfactory System From People Without a Sense of Smell, PLoS One. (2012) 7, no. 3, 10.1371/journal.pone.0033365, 2-s2.0-84858680274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Gagnier J. J., Kienle G., Altman D. G., Moher D., Sox H., and Riley D., The CARE Guidelines: Consensus-Based Clinical Case Reporting Guideline Development, Global Advances in Health and Medicine. (2013) 2, no. 5, 38–43, 10.7453/gahmj.2013.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Riley D. S., Barber M. S., Kienle G. S. et al., CARE Guidelines for Case Reports: Explanation and Elaboration Document, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. (2017) 89, 218–235, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.04.026, 2-s2.0-85020746212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Abolmaali N. D., Hietschold V., Vogl T. J., Hüttenbrink K. B., and Hummel T., MR Evaluation in Patients With Isolated Anosmia Since Birth or Early Childhood, American Journal of Neuroradiology. (2002) 23, no. 1, 157–164. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Yan X., Benkhatar H., Chao Y. T., Georgiopoulos C., and Hummel T., Anterior Skull Base Abnormalities in Congenital Anosmia, Journal for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Its Related Specialties. (2024) 86, no. 1, 1–12, 10.1159/000532077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Iravani B., Arshamian A., Ohla K., Wilson D. A., and Lundström J. N., Non-Invasive Recording From the Human Olfactory Bulb, Nature Communications. (2020) 11, no. 1, 10.1038/s41467-020-14520-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Weiss T., Soroka T., Gorodisky L. et al., Human Olfaction Without Apparent Olfactory Bulbs, Neuron. (2020) 105, no. 1, 35–45.e5, 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.10.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Durante M. A., Kurtenbach S., Sargi Z. B. et al., Single Cell Analysis of Olfactory Neurogenesis and Differentiation in Adult Humans, Nature Neuroscience. (2020) 23, no. 3, 323–326, 10.1038/s41593-020-0587-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Parker J. K., Kelly C. E., and Gane S. B., Insights Into the Molecular Triggers of Parosmia Based on Gas Chromatography Olfactometry, Communication and Medicine. (2022) 2, no. 1, 10.1038/s43856-022-00112-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Pellegrino R., Mignot C., Georgiopoulos C., Haehner A., and Hummel T., Consequences of Gaining Olfactory Function After Lifelong Anosmia, Neurocase. (2021) 27, no. 3, 238–242, 10.1080/13554794.2021.1921221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Hummel T., Whitcroft K. L., Rueter G., and Haehner A., Intranasal Vitamin A is Beneficial in Post-Infectious Olfactory Loss, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. (2017) 274, no. 7, 2819–2825, 10.1007/s00405-017-4576-x, 2-s2.0-85018855847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.


Articles from Case Reports in Otolaryngology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES