Abstract
Study Objectives
To evaluate whether telemedicine-delivered myofunctional therapy (MT) produces measurable structural changes in the upper airway (UA) of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).
Methods
This prospective, nonrandomized, blinded study included 60 adults with moderate-to-severe OSA, assigned to three groups: moderate OSA + MT (n = 19), severe OSA + MT + CPAP (n = 20), and OSA + CPAP without MT (control, n = 18). MT consisted of daily oropharyngeal exercises for 3 months, monitored through telemedicine. Pre- and postintervention assessments included sleep studies, submental ultrasound (interarterial distance, tongue thickness, and tongue volume), Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI) scores, and drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE; VOTE classification). Ultrasound measurements were performed by a single blinded examiner.
Results
After 3 months, the moderate OSA + MT group showed significant reductions in tongue volume (−8 cm³; P = .002), tongue thickness (−4 mm; P <.001), and interarterial distance (−5 mm; P < .001). In the severe OSA + MT + CPAP group, tongue volume (−12 cm³; P < .001) and interarterial distance (−7 mm; P < .001) decreased, while tongue thickness remained unchanged. No significant changes occurred in controls. Absence of tongue collapse during DISE increased from 15% to 80% in moderate OSA + MT (P = .039) and from 15% to 55% in severe OSA + MT + CPAP (P = .109).
Conclusions
Telemedicine-based MT promotes measurable UA remodeling. Submental ultrasound provides a practical, noninvasive monitoring tool, supporting MT as a scalable, patient-centered strategy to enhance structural and functional outcomes in OSA management.
Brief Summary
This prospective study explored whether myofunctional therapy (MT), delivered through a telemedicine platform, could lead to measurable changes in the upper airway of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Sixty adults were followed for three months with submental ultrasound and drug-induced sleep endoscopy. Patients with moderate OSA who performed MT showed clear reductions in tongue size and airway width, while no significant changes occurred in CPAP-only controls. These results suggest that telemedicine-based MT can expand upper airway structures, particularly in moderate OSA, and may help guide individualized treatment strategies.
Current Knowledge/Study Rationale:
Myofunctional therapy has been reported to improve symptoms of OSA, but its structural effects on the upper airway and the role of telemedicine-based delivery remain poorly documented.
Study Impact:
This study provides evidence that MT can induce measurable airway remodeling, especially in moderate OSA. Submental ultrasound proved useful for monitoring these changes, supporting the use of telemedicine MT as a scalable, patient-centered approach to individualized OSA management.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44470-025-00008-0.
Keywords: Myofunctional therapy, Obstructive sleep apnea, Ultrasound, Telemedicine, Upper airway remodeling
Introduction
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a highly prevalent disorder associated with significant cardiovascular, metabolic, and neurocognitive morbidity [1]. Anatomical factors, particularly those involving the tongue and oropharyngeal soft tissues, play a central role in upper airway (UA) collapsibility [2]. Recent imaging studies have shown that increased tongue volume, often due to fatty infiltration, is independently associated with OSA severity and may represent a modifiable therapeutic target [3, 4].
Myofunctional therapy (MT), a structured program of oropharyngeal exercises, may improve muscle strength [5, 6] and reduce OSA severity in some patients [7]. However, whether MT is accompanied by measurable structural remodeling of the UA remains controversial [8–10]. Some studies have suggested that the UA dilator muscles, particularly those targeted by MT, may lose neuromotor inputs during sleep, the period when airway collapse occurs, thereby raising questions about the clinical relevance of daytime oropharyngeal muscle training [11, 12]. In addition, although substantial changes are detectable in the upper airway of patients with OSA [13–15], expert consensus reports highlight the current lack of objective evidence linking MT to sustained anatomical modifications [11].
Current treatments, such as continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), effectively splint the airway open during sleep, but it remains unclear whether CPAP therapy induces long-term anatomical change [16]. Submental ultrasound has emerged as a practical, noninvasive tool for quantifying tongue volume, thickness, and the interarterial distance between the lingual arteries [17–20]. Compared with magnetic resonance imaging [21], ultrasound is more portable, repeatable, and suitable for serial measurements, which makes it an attractive option for tracking potential anatomical changes during MT [21].
Drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) provides a complementary dynamic assessment of airway collapse patterns and allows investigation of the relationships between structural measurements and functional improvements [22–25]. To our knowledge, no prospective study has combined submental ultrasound and DISE to evaluate the anatomical and functional changes in patients undergoing MT, particularly when clinical management is delivered via a telemedicine-based platform.
To address some of these issues, the current study examined whether telemedicine-delivered MT could promote measurable structural changes in the tongue and UA, as assessed by submental ultrasound and DISE, in patients with moderate-to-severe OSA while comparing these changes with a control group of patients receiving CPAP without MT.
Materials and methods
Study design and registration
We conducted a prospective, nonrandomized clinical study to evaluate the effects of telemedicine-delivered MT on UA anatomy in patients with OSA. The study protocol was registered prospectively at ISRCTN (ISRCTN92645461) and has been previously published [21]. The ISRCTN registry initially described the primary outcome as “tongue fat” to facilitate public understanding and dissemination, as requested by the registry administrators. However, direct quantification of intramuscular fat by submental ultrasound is technically limited. Therefore, the present study used tongue volume [4], a validated and reproducible ultrasound-derived surrogate that reflects structural remodeling of the tongue and indirectly captures potential changes in fat infiltration. The conceptual aim and hypothesis of the registered protocol, evaluating whether myofunctional therapy induces anatomical changes in the tongue related to upper airway patency, remained unchanged.
Ethical approval was obtained from the Provincial Research Ethics Committee of Málaga, Spain (AWGAP-2023-2). All participants provided written informed consent before enrollment.
Participants
Sixty adults aged 18–75 years with a diagnosis of moderate-to-severe OSA, confirmed by overnight polygraphy according to American Academy of Sleep Medicine criteria, were recruited consecutively between April 2023 and May 2025 from the Sleep Disorders Clinics at Hospital Quirónsalud Marbella (Marbella, Malaga) and Hospital Quirónsalud Campo de Gibraltar. (Palmones, Cadiz) Spain.
Inclusion criteria
Age 18–75 years.
Diagnosis of moderate or severe OSA (apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) ≥15 events/h).
For CPAP users: stable use ≥4 h/night on ≥70% of nights.
Body mass index (BMI) < 30 kg/m².
Ability to follow the protocol and provide informed consent.
All participants in the MT intervention groups exhibited habitual oral breathing, which was considered a clinical indication for therapy. This characteristic was absent in the CPAP-only control group.
Exclusion criteria
Previous oropharyngeal surgery affecting the tongue or airway anatomy.
Neurological or muscular disorders affecting swallowing or speech.
Severe cardiovascular instability.
Active neoplastic disease.
Previous or ongoing oropharyngeal muscle rehabilitation or oral appliance therapy.
Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) dysfunction or severe ankyloglossia.
Inability to use a smartphone or access telemedicine tools.
Weight variation > 5 kg during the study period.
All anatomical evaluations were conducted by an otolaryngologist who was blinded to the subject group assignment to minimize assessment bias and to allow the isolation of MT-related effects.
Interventions
Study groups
Participants were allocated into three groups as follows.
Moderate OSA + MT group: moderate OSA (AHI 15–30 events/h) treated exclusively with MT for 3 months.
Severe OSA + MT + CPAP group: severe OSA (AHI > 30 events/h) receiving stable CPAP plus MT.
Control group (CPAP only): moderate-to-severe OSA with stable and adherent use of CPAP ≥3 months before enrollment but no MT.
Sample size justification
The sample size was calculated to detect a clinically relevant difference in UA anatomy (primary outcome: lingual thickness and area measured by submental ultrasound) between the MT and control groups using an analysis of covariance model in which the posttreatment values were adjusted for the baseline with a two-sided α of 0.05 and 80% power. Based on pilot data (effect size ≈ 0.5, correlation between baseline and postintervention values r ≈.60) 18 participants per group were required. Allowing for a 10–15% dropout rate, the final target was 60 participants (i.e., 20 subjects per group).
Myofunctional therapy
MT comprised a standardized set of isotonic and isometric oropharyngeal exercises targeting the tongue, soft palate, and pharyngeal walls that aimed to strengthen upper airway (UA) muscles and improve nasal breathing. Patients performed MT by interacting with a plug-in connected to a smartphone screen [23]. The AirwayGym® app provides a series of daily exercises—including both isometric (tension) and isotonic (contraction) movements—designed to be performed conveniently in any setting. It offers the additional advantage of providing immediate feedback, allowing patients to monitor their progress and resolve difficulties with the assistance of a therapist.
Before each exercise, an animated demonstration and video provide step-by-step instructions. After each exercise, patients receive visual, acoustic, and tactile feedback as a score indicating performance quality. The tactile feedback is generated through a patented plug-in device connected to the smartphone: correct performance is recognized only when the oropharyngeal muscle exerts stable and adequate pressure on the screen sensor, triggering a vibrotactile signal confirming the exercise. A chat function is also available, allowing direct contact with the supervising therapist. This app complies with EU data protection regulations (2002/58/EC and 2016/679).
Exercises were performed for 20 min per day, 5–7 days per week, for 3 months, following instructional videos and supervised via the AirwayGym®telemedicine platform, which has been previously validated for OSA treatment [23, 26–33]. Weekly online reviews ensured correct execution and adherence (Fig. 1, panel a).
Fig. 1.
Multimodal assessment of telemedicine-delivered myofunctional therapy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). (A) Tongue proprioceptive training exercise performed with the Airway Gym® smartphone plug-in. (B) Submental ultrasound assessment of tongue volume, showing probe placement and representative image. (C) Coronal and sagittal ultrasound views with tongue boundaries outlined for volume calculation. (D) Submental ultrasound measurement of the interarterial distance, with calipers placed between the lingual arteries (arrows)
Although all participants completed the same nine standardized exercises, the emphasis on specific tasks was individualized according to the findings from the IOPI and DISE. Patients presenting with low tongue pressure and lingual collapse on DISE were instructed to focus on genioglossus-strengthening exercises, whereas those with velopharyngeal collapse or reduced buccinator pressure were guided to reinforce perioral and soft-palate exercises. The AirwayGym® app measures the accuracy of each exercise and provides targeted feedback. Exercises can be adjusted to address the specific levels and patterns of upper airway collapse identified during drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE). This approach was informed by our previous studies demonstrating correlations between IOPI measurements and DISE collapse patterns [34].
Assessments
Evaluations were conducted at baseline and at 3 months by the same team of blinded examiners.
Otorhinolaryngological examination
A complete otorhinolaryngological assessment was performed at baseline and at 3 months follow-up, and included anterior rhinoscopy, oropharyngeal inspection, and flexible nasopharyngolaryngoscopy. Tonsil size and tongue position were graded according to the Friedman staging [35], and nasal patency was assessed for septal deviation and turbinate hypertrophy. The presence of oral breathing, pathological lingual frenulum, TMJ dysfunction, or other structural abnormalities that could influence UA collapsibility was recorded. Neck circumference and craniofacial features were also noted. All examinations were conducted by board-certified otolaryngologists blinded to the treatment allocation.
Submental ultrasound measures
The submental ultrasound technique is a noninvasive imaging method used to assess anatomical features of the tongue and adjacent vascular structures. It is particularly useful for evaluating the tongue volume (expressed as cm3; Fig. 1 panel b), tongue thickness (mm; Fig. 1 panel c), and the position of and distance between the lingual arteries (Fig. 1 panel d. The patient was placed in a supine position with the head extended slightly backward to provide optimal access to the submental region. The mouth remained closed, and the tongue was in a natural resting position. Submental ultrasound examinations were performed using the SonoSite 180 Plus system (SonoSite Inc., Bothell, WA, USA) with a linear L38/10–5 MHz transducer. The same machine was used for all measurements throughout the study to ensure consistency. A high-frequency linear array transducer (typically 7–15 MHz) was used in the coronal and sagittal submental approaches [21]. Gel was applied to the submental area to ensure good acoustic coupling. The transducer was positioned transversely under the chin (in the submental region), perpendicular to the sagittal plane, and then rotated or angled as necessary to obtain optimal images of the tongue.
To ensure reliability, all ultrasound examinations were conducted by the same experienced otolaryngologist, who was blinded to group allocation. In a random subset of 10 participants, repeated measurements demonstrated high intra-rater reproducibility, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) > 0.85 for tongue volume, tongue thickness, and interarterial distance. These findings are consistent with prior validation studies confirming the repeatability of submental ultrasound in patients with OSA [17, 19].
Visualization of lingual arteries
Using color Doppler mode, the bilateral lingual arteries were identified in their course through the tongue. The inter-arterial distance (distance between the left and right lingual arteries) was measured at the level of their maximal visibility, typically near the midportion of the tongue.
Tongue thickness measurement
In this study, tongue thickness was measured consistently at the midline, as this approach has been validated as the most reproducible and standardized reference point for submental ultrasound assessment in OSA. Using a single measurement site for all participants minimized variability and ensured comparability across groups.
Tongue volume Estimation
Multiple cross-sectional images were acquired along the anterior–posterior axis of the tongue. The height, width, and thickness of the tongue were taken into account in different measurements to estimate the volume of the tongue using the ultrasound software to estimate the area. Once all the measurements have been saved, the result will appear on the screen: Tongue volume was calculated using the built-in measurement software of the SonoSite 180 Plus ultrasound system (SonoSite Inc., Bothell, WA, USA). The device automatically estimates volume based on three orthogonal two-dimensional measurements—height, length, and thickness—using a geometric ellipsoid model integrated into the manufacturer’s software. All participants were examined using the same ultrasound system and measurement protocol to ensure methodological consistency and reproducibility. As a result, all tongue volume data were derived using a single standardized technique, without inter-method variability.
Tongue strength measurement
The Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI) was used to measure maximal tongue pressure through a combined elevation–protrusion movement against the anterior palatal rugae, reflecting global tongue strength [36–38]. In individuals with a flat hard palate, the maxillary papilla lies at the same height as the tongue tip, naturally inducing a slight anterior component during elevation. This dual movement engages both genioglossus and intrinsic muscles, offering a comprehensive assessment of tongue strength [37, 38]. The IOPI is a validated device that measures tongue and lip strength by recording the maximum pressure exerted against an air-filled bulb. It provides objective, reproducible data about orofacial muscle performance that are helpful for monitoring functional changes during therapy [36, 37].
Sleep study
Overnigt polygraphy was performed for each participant using a type III sleep study device (SOMNOtouch™, SOMNOmedics GmbH, Randersacker, Germany). During polygraphy, the following parameters were evaluated for this study: mean oxygen saturation and lowest oxygen saturation, time of sleep spent with blood oxygen saturation < 90%, and the AHI. The AHI was defined as the total number of apnea and hypopnea events per hour of sleep recorded in an overnight sleep study. Apnea was defined as ≥90% decrease in airflow for at least 10 s and hypopnea as a reduction in respiratory signals for ≥10 s associated with a minimum of 3% oxygen desaturation [39].
For participants in the CPAP groups, follow-up polygraphy was performed after a washout period of at least 48 h without CPAP use to minimize residual effects of prior therapy, as AHI values have been reported to fluctuate immediately after CPAP withdrawal before stabilizing. All patients had stable CPAP adherence (≥ 4 h/night on ≥ 70% of nights) for at least 3 months prior to enrollment, with an average therapeutic pressure of 10.8 ± 2.1 cm H₂O in the severe OSA + MT + CPAP group and 10.4 ± 2.3 cm H₂O in controls.
Drug-induced sleep endoscopy
DISE was used with a standardized protocol involving target-controlled propofol infusion and video recording. The velum, oropharynx, tongue base, and epiglottis (VOTE) classification was performed by two independent blinded otolaryngologists, and their interrater agreement was assessed by calculating Cohen’s kappa [40, 41].
Adherence monitoring
Adherence was automatically recorded by the AirwayGym®platform, which tracked both the number and duration of daily exercise sessions. Satisfactory adherence was defined as completing ≥ 80% of the prescribed sessions (20 min/day, 5–7 days/week for 3 months). Participants who failed to meet this criterion were considered nonadherent and excluded from analysis. The mean adherence rates were 92% in the moderate OSA + MT group, 97% in the severe OSA + MT + CPAP group, and 86% CPAP compliance in the control group.
Endpoints
The primary endpoint was the change in tongue volume (cm3) from the baseline to 3 months. Secondary endpoints included the changes in tongue thickness, lingual artery distance, and DISE tongue base collapse classification.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed by the Department of Statistics at the University of Málaga, Spain, using IBM SPSS Statistics (v. 31; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range), and the distribution was assessed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Between-group differences were analyzed using analysis of variance or the Kruskal–Wallis test. Within-group changes were analyzed using the paired t-test or the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Categorical variables were compared using chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. Significance was set at P <.05.
Results
Participants and follow-up
Sixty adults with moderate-to-severe OSA were enrolled and allocated to three groups: moderate OSA treated with MT only (n = 20), severe OSA treated with MT plus CPAP (n = 20), and a control group on stable CPAP not using MT (n = 20). Three participants did not complete the 3-month follow-up: one in the moderate OSA + MT group withdrew due to weight change > 5 kg during the study; BMI values remained stable across all groups, and no significant pre- vs. post-treatment differences were observed. One control participant relocated; and another control participant developed temporomandibular joint dysfunction. No losses occurred in the severe OSA + MT + CPAP group. Thus, the final cohort completing the protocol comprised 19 participants in the moderate OSA + MT group, 20 subjects in the severe OSA + MT + CPAP group, and 18 controls (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.
CONSORT flow diagram of the study. Sixty adults with moderate-to-severe OSA were allocated to three groups: control (CPAP only, n = 20), moderate OSA treated with myofunctional therapy (MT) alone (n = 20), and severe OSA treated with MT plus continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP; n = 20). Baseline blinded assessments included submental ultrasound, drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE), and clinical examination. After 3 months of telemedicine-delivered MT, follow-up assessments were repeated. Losses to follow-up were as follows: n = 2 in the control group, n = 1 in the moderate OSA + MT group, and n = 0 in the severe OSA + MT + CPAP group. Final sample sizes were n = 18 in the control group, n = 19 in the moderate OSA + MT group, and n = 20 in the severe OSA + MT + CPAP group
Baseline characteristics
Baseline characteristics are presented in Table 1. Participants were predominantly middle-aged men. The sex distribution did not differ significantly between groups (P =.235). As expected, the Friedman tonsil and tongue position grades showed significant between-group differences (both P <.001); the severe OSA + MT + CPAP group had a higher percentage of patients with a grade 3 classification.
Table 1.
Baseline data
| Variable | Moderate OSA + MT (n = 19) | Severe OSA + MT + CPAP (n = 20) | Control (CPAP only) (n = 18) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demographics | ||||
| Age, years | 51.35±14.07 | 51.05±10.78 | 40.94±10.86 | 0.15 |
| Male sex, n (%) | 13 (68) | 18 (90) | 15 (83) | 0.235 |
| Female sex, n (%) | 6 (31) | 2 (10) | 3 (16) | 0.17 |
| Anthropometrics | ||||
| BMI, kg/m² | 27.66 ± 1.96 | 29.80 ± 3.50 | 23.09 ± 3.46 | 0.78 |
| Neck circumference, cm | 39.71 ± 2.10 | 40.06 ± 2.23 | 36.77 ± 3.19 | 0.82 |
| Friedman staging | ||||
| Tonsil grade 1, n (%) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 3 (15) | < 0.001 |
| Tonsil grade 2, n (%) | 11 (55) | 0 (0) | 6 (30) | < 0.001 |
| Tonsil grade 3, n (%) | 9 (45) | 20 (100) | 11 (55) | < 0.001 |
| Tongue position grade 1, n (%) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 2 (10) | < 0.001 |
| Tongue position grade 2, n (%) | 8 (40) | 0 (0) | 6 (30) | < 0.001 |
| Tongue position grade 3, n (%) | 12 (60) | 20 (100) | 12 (60) | < 0.001 |
| Functional measures | ||||
| IOPI lips, kPa | 20.4 ± 4.50 | 16.05 ± 4.98 | 23.6 ± 4.38 | < 0.001 |
| IOPI tongue, kPa | 44.35 ± 9.0 | 35.5±10.68 | 54.75±7.93 | < 0.001 |
| Mean therapeutic CPAP level, cm H₂O | - | 10.8 ± 2.1 | 10.4 ± 2.3 | 0.44 |
| Duration of CPAP use, year | - | 3.4 ± 1.2 | 3.1 ± 1.4 | 0.53 |
| Submental ultrasound baseline parameters | ||||
| Tongue volume (cm3) | 85 ± 5.3 | 93 ± 5.5 | 83 ± 6.5 | < 0.001 |
| Tongue thickness (mm) | 41 ± 3.5 | 47 ± 3.6 | 40.3 ± 5.7 | < 0.001 |
| Inter-arterial distance (mm) | 31 ± 4.0 | 36 ± 4.1 | 32.3 ± 3.8 | 0.006 |
BMI body mass index; CPAP continuous positive airway pressure; IOPI tongue maximal tongue pressure (genioglossus strength and intrinsic muscles); IOPI lips maximal lip pressure; MT myofunctional therapy; OSA obstructive sleep apnea. “–” indicates not applicable (patients not treated with CPAP). No significant changes in BMI were observed at 3 months. One participant was excluded due to a weight variation >5 kg P values obtained using independent-sample t test for continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables. Baseline submental ultrasound parameters (tongue volume, thickness, and inter-arterial distance) were compared across groups using one-way ANOVA; non-parametric tests were applied when distributional assumptions were not met
Baseline BMI (P =.78) and neck circumference (P =.82) did not differ significantly between groups, but baseline IOPI scores differed significantly between groups (P <.001): lip pressure was highest in the controls (23.6 ± 4.38 kPa), intermediate in the moderate OSA + MT group (20.4 ± 4.5 kPa), and lowest in the severe OSA + MT + CPAP group (16.05 ± 4.98 kPa. Tongue pressure followed a similar pattern (P <.001) and was lowest in the severe OSA + MT + CPAP group (35.5 ± 10.68 kPa) compared with the moderate OSA + MT (44.35 ± 9.5 kPa) and control (54.75 ± 7.93 kPa) groups.
As per study design, AHI was significantly higher in the severe OSA + MT + CPAP group (38.85 ± 5.98 events/h) than in the other two groups — moderate OSA + MT: 22.8 ± 3.61 events/h; CPAP-only controls: 22.6 ± 3.61 events/h — (both P <.001 vs. severe).
Changes in submental ultrasound parameters (Fig. 3)
Fig. 3.

Changes in submental ultrasound parameters after 3 months of intervention. Connected lines represent individual patient trajectories from baseline to follow-up. Black dots with error bars indicate group means ± standard error. (A) Tongue volume, (B) tongue thickness, and (C) interarterial distance. Red asterisks denote statistically significant within-group differences compared to baseline (*P <.05). Significant reductions were observed in the moderate OSA + MT group for all three parameters, and in the severe OSA + MT + CPAP group for tongue volume and interarterial distance. No significant changes occurred in the CPAP-only control group
After 3 months, the moderate OSA + MT group showed significant reductions in tongue volume, tongue thickness, and interarterial distance compared with baseline, while the severe OSA + MT + CPAP group showed reductions in tongue volume and interarterial distance but no significant change in tongue thickness. No significant changes emerged in the control group (Table 2). Between-group analyses confirmed greater improvements in both MT intervention groups than in controls for tongue volume and interarterial distance (all P <.01).
Table 2.
Changes in submental ultrasound parameters after 3 months
| Parameter | Group | Pre (mean ± SD) | Post (mean ± SD) | Δ (absolute) | % Change | 95% CI for Δ | P value ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tongue volume, cm3 | Moderate OSA + MT (n = 19) | 85 ± 5.31 | 77 ± 8.23 | –8 | –9% | −11.18 to − 5 | 0.002 |
| Severe OSA + MT + CPAP (n = 20) | 93 ± 5.45 | 81 ± 8.45 | –12 | –13% | −15.10 to − 8.90 | < 0.001 | |
| Control (CPAP only) (n = 18) | 82.9±6.46 | 82.43±6.20 | NS | — | — | NS | |
| Tongue thickness, mm | Moderate OSA + MT (n = 19) | 41 ± 3.48 | 37 ± 3.18 | –4 | –10% | −5.27 to − 2.73 | < 0.001 |
| Severe OSA + MT + CPAP (n = 20) | 47 ± 3.55 | 46 ± 3.13 | –1 | –2% | −2.24 to 0.24 | 0.08 | |
| Control (CPAP only) (n = 18) | 40.27±5.65 | 40.28±4.93 | NS | — | — | NS | |
| Interarterial distance, mm | Moderate OSA + MT (n = 19) | 31 ± 4.05 | 26 ± 4.05 | –5 | –16% | −6.27 to − 3.73 | < 0.001 |
| Severe OSA + MT + CPAP (n = 20) | 36 ± 4.06 | 29 ± 4.02 | –7 | –19% | −8.24 to − 5.76 | < 0.001 | |
| Control (CPAP only) (n = 18) | 32.26±3.84 | 32.1±3.80 | NS | — | — | NS |
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) unless otherwise indicated. = the absolute change from the baseline
BMI body mass index; CI confidence interval; CPAP continuous positive airway pressure; MT myofunctional therapy; NS not significant; OSA obstructive sleep apnea
Changes in DISE
DISE video recordings at baseline and at follow-up were reviewed independently by two board-certified otolaryngologists who were unaware of the treatment group allocation and clinical data. Their interrater agreement for VOTE scoring (κ = 0.82) was substantial.
In the moderate OSA + MT group, the percentage of patients without tongue base collapse (T0) increased significantly from 15% at the baseline to 80% after the intervention (P =.039). In the severe OSA + MT + CPAP group, T0 increased from 15% to 55%, a change that approached but did not reach statistical significance (P =.109). No significant differences were observed in the control group (P =.20) (Table 3).
Table 3.
Changes in VOTE classification for tongue base collapse on DISE
| Group | Baseline T0, n (%) | Baseline T1 + T2, n (%) | Post T0, n (%) | Post T1/T2, n (%) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moderate OSA + MT (n = 19) | 3 (15.8) | 16 (84.2) | 15 (78.9) | 4 (21.1) | 0.039 |
| Severe OSA + MT + CPAP (n = 20) | 3 (15.0) | 17 (85.0) | 11 (55.0) | 9 (45.0) | 0.109 |
| Control (CPAP only) (n = 18) | 4 (22.2) | 14 (77.8) | 5 (27.8) | 13 (72.2) | 0.200 |
T0 no tongue base collapse; T1/T2 partial or complete collapse; CPAP continuous positive airway pressure; DISE drug-induced sleep endoscopy; MT myofunctional therapy; OSA obstructive sleep apnea. P values obtained using one-way ANOVA; nonparametric tests applied when distributional assumptions were not met
Changes in IOPI scores
After 3 months, both intervention groups showed significant improvements in tongue and lip strength assessed by the IOPI; no changes were observed in the controls (Table 4). In the moderate OSA + MT group, both tongue and lip pressures increased significantly after 3 months. Similar improvements were also observed in the severe OSA + MT + CPAP group, while no significant changes occurred in the controls (Table 4).
Table 4.
Changes in IOPI measurements after 3 months
| Parameter | Group | Pre (mean ± SD) | Post (mean ± SD) | Δ (absolute) | 95% CI for Δ | P value( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tongue pressure, kPa | Moderate OSA + MT (n = 19) | 44.35 ± 9.50 | 54.98 ± 1.57 | + 10.63 | 5.72 to 15.53 | 0.002 |
| Severe OSA + MT + CPAP (n = 20) | 35.5 ± 10.68 | 50.42 ± 1.64 | + 14.92 | 9.93 to 19.91 | < 0.001 | |
| Control (CPAP only) (n = 18) | 53.77 ± 7.93 | 54.16 ± 7.95 | NS | –0.84 to 0.066 | 0.08 | |
| Lip pressure, kPa | Moderate OSA + MT (n = 19) | 20.4 ± 4.50 | 33.08 ± 1.34 | + 12.68 | 10.57 to 14.79 | < 0.001 |
| Severe OSA + MT + CPAP (n = 20) | 16.05 ± 4.98 | 31.29 ± 5.91 | + 15.24 | 12.58 to 17.89 | < 0.001 | |
| Control (CPAP only) (n = 18) | 23.36 ± 4.38 | 23.74 ± 4.72 | NS | –1.15 to 0.42 | 0.30 |
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) unless otherwise indicated. Δ = the absolute change from the baseline
CI confidence interval; CPAP continuous positive airway pressure; IOPI tongue maximal tongue pressure (combined elevation–protrusion effort reflecting genioglossus and intrinsic muscle strength)); IOPI lips maximal lip pressure; MT myofunctional therapy; NS not significant; OSA obstructive sleep apnea. P values obtained using one-way ANOVA; nonparametric tests applied when appropriate
Changes in the apnea–hypopnea index
At 3 months, both MT intervention groups exhibited significant reductions in the AHI compared to baseline, whereas no significant changes occurred in the control group (Table 5).
Table 5.
Changes in apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) after 3 months
| Group | Pre (mean ± SD) | Post (mean ± SD) | Δ (absolute) | 95% CI for Δ | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AHI, events/h | |||||
| Moderate OSA + MT (n = 19) | 22.8 ± 3.61 | 16.02 ± 4.53 | –6.78 | –9.50 to − 4.11 | 0.002 |
| Severe OSA + MT + CPAP (n = 20) | 40.9 ± 5.98 | 29.81 ± 9.51 | –11.09 | –16.75 to − 5.42 | 0.0016 |
| Control (CPAP only) (n = 18) | 22.6 ± 3.61 | 20.65 ± 3.32 | NS | –4.53 to 0.42 | 0.071 |
| ODI, events/h | |||||
| Moderate OSA + MT | 21 ± 7 | 14 ± 6 | –7 | –10.5 to − 3.5 | 0.01 |
| Severe OSA + MT + CPAP | 35 ± 8 | 24 ± 9 | –11 | –16.2 to − 5.8 | 0.001 |
| Control | 20 ± 6 | 19 ± 6 | NS | - | NS |
| SpO₂ nadir, % | |||||
| Moderate OSA + MT | 82 ± 4 | 86 ± 3 | + 4 | 2.0 to 6.0 | 0.01 |
| Severe OSA + MT + CPAP | 79 ± 5 | 84 ± 4 | + 5 | 2.0 to 8.0 | 0.02 |
| Control | 83 ± 4 | 82 ± 5 | NS | - | NS |
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) unless otherwise indicated. Δ = the absolute change from the baseline
AHI apnea–hypopnea index; CI confidence interval; CPAP continuous positive airway pressure; MT myofunctional therapy; NS not significant; SD standard deviation; OSA obstructive sleep apnea. P values obtained using one-way ANOVA; nonparametric tests applied when appropriate
Both MT intervention groups exhibited significant improvements in ODI and SpO₂ nadir compared to baseline, whereas no changes occurred in controls. Supplementary Table S1 shows that MT led to reductions in both apneas and hypopneas, with a proportionally greater decrease in hypopneas in the moderate OSA group and in apneas in the severe OSA + CPAP group. A responder analysis revealed that > 50% reduction in AHI was achieved in 53% of moderate OSA + MT participants and 60% of severe OSA + MT + CPAP participants, with 37% and 30% respectively also reaching a post-treatment AHI < 10.
Discussion
This study provides, for the first time, objective evidence that telemedicine-delivered MT can induce measurable structural changes in the upper airway of patients with OSA. Submental ultrasound [17, 19] revealed significant reductions in tongue volume, along with a decreased distance between the lingual arteries even after only 3 months of treatment. Interestingly, tongue thickness did not change significantly in the severe OSA group, whereas other ultrasound parameters improved. These anatomical changes were accompanied by measurable gains in tongue strength [28] and improvements in DISE parameters [23–25] as well as in the magnitude of respiratory disturbance during sleep, as illustrated by the AHI. In addition to the reduction in AHI, MT also led to significant improvements in other polygraph-derived parameters. Both intervention groups showed increases in SpO₂ nadir and decreases in ODI compared to baseline, whereas no significant changes occurred in controls (Table 5). Analysis of respiratory events (Supplementary Table S1) revealed reductions in both apneas and hypopneas, with a proportionally greater decrease in hypopneas among moderate OSA patients and in apneas among those with severe OSA on CPAP. A responder analysis further demonstrated that > 50% reduction in AHI was achieved in 53% of moderate OSA + MT participants and 60% of severe OSA + MT + CPAP participants, with 37% and 30% respectively also meeting the combined criterion of > 50% reduction and a post-treatment AHI < 10. Exploratory correlations showed that reductions in tongue volume and increases in IOPI tongue pressure were significantly associated with reductions in AHI, supporting the hypothesis that structural and functional remodeling of the upper airway underlies the observed clinical improvements.
As previously documented in a separate study [28], the AHI decreased significantly after 3 months of MT in both intervention groups and further supported by recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses, myofunctional therapy significantly reduces AHI in patients with OSA [42–44]; These findings suggest that MT can positively influence OSA severity beyond subjective symptom relief [42], likely by improving oropharyngeal muscle tone and reducing UA collapsibility. In contrast, no significant changes in the AHI were observed in the control group, which suggests that the effect of the AHI was attributable to the MT intervention rather than spontaneous night-to-night variability or CPAP alone [45]. Previous studies of MT have primarily focused on functional outcomes, such as reduction in the AHI [41] or improvements in daytime symptoms [46], without objectively demonstrating anatomical remodeling. Current findings fill this important gap and confirm that targeted oropharyngeal exercises can modify both the function and anatomical substrate that contributes to UA collapse.
The clinical implications of these results are potentially far reaching. Our finding that MT can alter UA anatomy supports its role as a viable adjunctive therapy for OSA, particularly in patients with moderate disease or those with poor CPAP adherence [47], or, although not tested here, when surgical intervention is not indicated. By addressing the structural factors that contribute to pharyngeal collapsibility, MT may improve airway stability during sleep and reduce the severity of respiratory disturbance [4].
There has been ongoing debate regarding whether daytime training can counteract the nocturnal reduction in upper airway dilator muscle tone [8]. Previous reports have emphasized the limited structural evidence supporting the use of MT [48]. The present study contributes to this discussion by providing reproducible imaging data that demonstrate structural remodeling following objectively assessed MT.
The telemedicine format of the intervention deserves comment as well. We believe that continued interactions between the patient and the treatment team are an essential factor in the success of this intervention program. Allowing patients to complete their daily exercises at home without an imposed rigid schedule reduced the barriers to adherence compared with traditional face-to-face programs [49]. Remote monitoring ensured that progress could be tracked, and prompt feedback was given if adherence declined [50]. Rather than replacing the therapeutic relationship, this approach appeared to strengthen it, as patients reported feeling more supported and clinicians were able to make timely adjustments to the exercise plan [51].
In addition to ultrasound, we used objective functional measures, including the IOPI [52], to quantify tongue strength. These tools provide reproducible data on neuromuscular performance and can also serve as indirect indicators of MT adherence. Measurable gains were observed only in patients who trained consistently [53]. In our previous work, improvements in these measures correlated with better clinical outcomes, namely reductions in AHI, decreased daytime sleepiness, and improvements in sleep-related quality of life, thereby enabling a valuable complement to imaging for monitoring the effectiveness of MT [54].
The mechanisms underlying the observed anatomical changes are likely multifactorial [55]. Repeated isotonic and isometric activation of the oropharyngeal muscles may increase the baseline muscle tone and promote hypertrophy of the targeted muscle fibers, particularly in the genioglossus and intrinsic tongue musculature. Improved neuromuscular coordination may also enhance the capacity to maintain airway patency during sleep [56]. Prior imaging studies have shown that targeted training and weight loss can reduce intramuscular fat infiltration within the tongue, which is strongly associated with airway collapsibility [4, 57]. Although we did not measure fat content directly, the reductions in tongue volume and thickness observed here are consistent with such possible decrease in fat tissue infiltration in the tongue. Mouth breathing may modulate both the baseline anatomy and the functional response to myofunctional therapy [6]. This pattern is associated with lower tongue posture, diminished oropharyngeal tone, and greater airway collapsibility [36, 37]. The improvement of nasal breathing and tongue position through targeted exercises may therefore have contributed to the structural and functional gains observed after MT [33].
In our cohort, the severe OSA group exhibited a greater reduction in the AHI despite showing smaller changes in submental ultrasound measurements. In contradistinction, the moderate OSA group achieved more pronounced anatomical remodeling but a smaller decrease in the AHI. These differences may reflect distinct mechanisms for the response to MT according to the baseline disease severity. In moderate OSA, improvements could be primarily driven by structural remodeling of the UA and increased muscle tone, as evidenced by significant ultrasound changes and gains in the IOPI score. Conversely, functional adaptations in severe OSA, such as improved neuromuscular coordination, altered pharyngeal dilator recruitment, and reduced collapsibility during sleep as documented on DISE, may play a more important role, even when structural changes are less pronounced. These patterns underscore the multifactorial nature of the effects of MT and suggest that anatomical and functional endpoints should be considered jointly when evaluating MT therapy outcomes.
One participant discontinued MT because of the onset of TMJ discomfort, despite having undergone a negative TMJ evaluation before therapy initiation. Although preintervention screening can reduce this risk, this isolated incident highlights the potential for TMJ symptoms to emerge during therapy, possibly related to changes in oral posture and increased muscular activity. For this reason, ongoing monitoring of TMJ status is advisable throughout MT protocols, and collaboration with maxillofacial specialists should be considered when symptoms arise.
A methodological strength of this study is the complementary use of two independent assessment modalities. Although submental ultrasound provides a noninvasive and repeatable method to quantify tongue volume, thickness, and interarterial distance, it remains partially operator dependent and subject to measurement variability [16]. To mitigate this limitation, we incorporated DISE for the objective dynamic evaluation of UA collapse. All DISE procedures were recorded, anonymized, and reviewed blindly by two independent expert otolaryngologists, who achieved optimal interrater agreement [43, 58]. This dual approach strengthens the validity of our anatomical findings and also ensures that the changes observed in airway structure are corroborated by real-time functional assessment during induced sleep, thereby reducing the potential bias associated with any single measurement technique. Of course, overnight polygraphy at the beginning and upon completion of the trial further reinforce the validity of the findings.
Limitations
One of the limitations of this study is the reliance on submental ultrasound for anatomical assessment because operator-dependent variability can affect reproducibility. We minimized this potential issue by using the same experienced examiner for all measurements and blinding the scorer to group allocation. The inclusion of a control group of moderate to severe OSA patients on stable CPAP therapy who were assessed under identical conditions also helped mitigate the potential for measurement bias.
A second limitation is the nonrandomized study design, which leaves open the possibility of selection bias despite similar baseline characteristics among the three groups. Another limitation concerns the relatively short follow-up period of 3 months, which does not allow us to draw conclusions about the long-term stability of the observed changes or to establish whether further improvements are possible. Thus, longer interventions and future studies including discontinuation of MT with longitudinal monitoring of functional and structural changes are warranted.
The cohort included predominantly patients with a low average BMI (26.97 kg/m²), and no morbidly obese patients were evaluated. Consequently, our findings may not be fully generalizable to patients with OSA and obesity, whose tongue fat content and airway collapsibility may substantially differ and therefore respond differently to MT. We also did not quantify lingual fat content directly, which could have helped clarify whether fat reduction contributed to the decrease in tongue volume.
Moreover, we did not systematically re-titrate CPAP pressure requirements after the intervention. Therefore, we cannot determine whether the observed improvements in airway anatomy and function translated into lower CPAP pressure needs. Future studies including CPAP retitration after MT would help clarify whether MT reduces therapeutic pressure requirements by decreasing upper airway collapsibility.
Lastly, we did not apply formal corrections for multiple comparisons. Given the exploratory and hypothesis-generating nature of this study and the relatively small sample size, we prioritized sensitivity to potential treatment effects. However, this increases the risk of type I error, and therefore the findings should be interpreted with caution and confirmed in larger randomized trials.
Conclusions
Telemedicine-delivered MT over a period of 3 months resulted in measurable UA remodeling in patients with OSA, as shown by the significant reductions in tongue volume and thickness, improved tongue strength, and favorable changes in tongue base collapse on DISE, particularly in those with moderate disease, as further illustrated by improvements in nocturnal respiratory disturbance. These findings provide objective structural and functional evidence that support MT as a noninvasive adjunctive treatment of non-obese or overweight OSA patients. Integrating ultrasound and DISE with functional measures enables comprehensive monitoring, and the telemedicine format enhances patient accessibility and adherence. Larger, long-term randomized trials are needed to confirm the durability and clinical impact of telemedicine-delivered MT.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to Dr. Blas Rodríguez, Head of the Anesthesiology Department at Quirónsalud Marbella, for his valuable support and collaboration throughout this study. We also thank nurses Vanesa Corchado and Elisa Rodríguez for their assistance and dedication during patient care and data collection.
Abbreviations
- AHI
Apnea–hypopnea index
- BMI
Body mass index
- CI
Confidence interval
- CPAP
Continuous positive airway pressure
- DISE
Drug-induced sleep endoscopy
- IOPI
Iowa Oral Performance Instrument
- MT
Myofunctional therapy
- OSA
Obstructive sleep apnea
- TMJ
Temporomandibular joint
- T0
Percentage of patients without tongue base collapse
- UA
Upper airway
- VOTE
Velum, oropharynx, tongue base, and epiglottis
Author contributions
C.R.A. and C.O.R.: data analysis, manuscript drafting, critical revision. L.R.A.: screening, data collection and analysis, manuscript drafting. J.M.I.: critical revision. G.P. and P.B.: study conception, screening, bias assessment, drafting, critical revision. D.G.: screening, critical revision. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This study did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Declarations
Consent for publication
Written informed consent for publication of anonymized data and images was obtained from all participants included in this study.
Ethical approval and consent for participation
The study was approved by the Provincial Research Ethics Committee of Málaga, Spain (approval code: AWGAP-2023-2). All procedures were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committees and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to their inclusion in the study.
Competing interests
C.O.R. is the creator of the Airway Gym® mobile application. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Clinical trial registration
How muscle exercise affects the amount of fat in the tongue of patients with obstructive sleep apnea, using ultrasound to measure the changes. ISRCTN (ISRCTN92645461); 10.1186/ISRCTN92645461.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Change history
1/29/2026
A Correction to this paper has been published: 10.1007/s44470-026-00053-3
References
- 1.Al Lawati NM, Patel SR, Ayas NT. Epidemiology, risk factors, and consequences of obstructive sleep apnea and short sleep duration. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2009;51(4):285–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zinchuk AV, Gentry MJ, Concato J, Yaggi HK. Phenotypes in obstructive sleep apnea: a definition, examples and evolution of approaches. Sleep Med Rev. 2017;35:113–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chiffer RC, Schwab RJ, Keenan BT, Borek RC, Thaler ER. Volumetric MRI analysis pre- and post-transoral robotic surgery for obstructive sleep apnea. Laryngoscope. 2015;125(8):1988–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kim AM, Keenan BT, Jackson N, Chan EL, Staley B, Poptani H, et al. Tongue fat and its relationship to obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep. 2014;37(10):1639–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Suzuki H, Yoshimiura M, Iwata Y, Oguchi S, Kawara M, Chow CM. Lip muscle training improves obstructive sleep apnea and objective sleep: a case report. Sleep Sci. 2017;10(3):128–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Carrasco-Llatas M, O’Connor-Reina C, Calvo-Henriquez C. The role of myofunctional therapy in treating sleep-disordered breathing: a state-of-the-art review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(14). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 7.Guimarães KC, Drager LF, Genta PR, Marcondes BF, Lorenzi-Filho G. Effects of oropharyngeal exercises on patients with moderate obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;179(10):962–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Poncin W, Correvon N, Tam J, Borel JC, Berger M, Liistro G, et al. The effect of tongue elevation muscle training in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a randomised controlled trial. J Oral Rehabil. 2022;49(11):1049–59. 10.1111/joor.13369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Maghsoudipour M, Nokes B, Bosompra NO, Jen R, Li Y, Moore S, DeYoung PN, Fine J, Edwards BA, Gilbertson D, Owens R, Morgan T, Malhotra A. A pilot randomized controlled trial of effect of genioglossus muscle strengthening on obstructive sleep apnea outcomes. J Clin Med. 2021;10(19):4554. 10.3390/jcm10194554 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 10.Rueda JR, Mugueta-Aguinaga I, Vilaró J, Rueda-Etxebarria M. Myofunctional therapy (oropharyngeal exercises) for obstructive sleep apnoea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;3;11(11):CD013449.doi:10.1002/14651858.CD013449.pub2.PMID:33141943;PMCID:PMC8094400 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 11.Mehra R, Schwab R, Kimoff RJ, Shah N, Gottlieb DJ, Patel SR, et al. The role of neuromuscular function in sleep apnea pathogenesis and management: a consensus of experts. Front Sleep. 2023. 10.3389/frsle.2023.1087196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Schwartz AR, O’Donnell CP, Baron J, Schubert N, Alam D, Samadi SD, et al. The hypotonic upper airway in obstructive sleep apnea: role of structures and neuromuscular activity. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;157(4 Pt 1):1051–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Boyd JH, Petrof BJ, Hamid Q, Fraser R, Kimoff RJ. Upper airway muscle inflammation and denervation changes in obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;170(5):541–6. 10.1164/rccm.200308-1100OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kimoff RJ, Hamid Q, Divangahi M, Hussain S, Bao W, Naor N, et al. Increased upper airway cytokines and oxidative stress in severe obstructive sleep apnoea. Eur Respir J. 2011;38(1):89–97. 10.1183/09031936.00048610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Shah F, Stål P. Myopathy of the upper airway in snoring and obstructive sleep apnea. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2022;7(2):636–45. 10.1002/lio2.782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Park P, Kim J, Song YJ, Lim JH, Cho SW, Won TB, et al. Influencing factors on CPAP adherence and anatomic characteristics of upper airway in OSA subjects. Medicine Baltimore. 2017;96(51):e8818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Liao L-J, Cho T-Y, Cheng P-W, Wang C-T, Lo W-C, Huang T-W. Submental ultrasonography in diagnosing severe obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. J Med Ultrason. 2016;24(3):107–11. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chien CY, Chen JW, Chang CH, Huang CC. Tracking dynamic tongue motion in ultrasound images for obstructive sleep apnea. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2017;43(12):2791–805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bilici S, Engin A, Ozgur Y, Ozgur Onerci C, Ahmet Gorkem Y, Aytul Hande Y. Submental ultrasonographic parameters among patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;156(3):559–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Volner K, Chao S, Camacho M. Dynamic sleep MRI in obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022;279(2):595–607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Rodriguez Alcala C, Rodriguez Alcala L, Ignacio Garcia JM, Plaza G, Baptista P, Lujan G, et al. Use of ultrasound to verify the impact of telemedicine myofunctional therapy on sleep apnea syndrome: study protocol proposal. Life. 2024. 10.3390/life14020197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.De Vito A, Carrasco Llatas M, Ravesloot MJ, Kotecha B, De Vries N, Hamans E, et al. European position paper on drug-induced sleep endoscopy: 2017 update. Clin Otolaryngol. 2018;43(6):1541–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.O’Connor Reina C, Plaza Mayor G, Ignacio-Garcia JM, Baptista Jardin P, Garcia-Iriarte MT, Casado-Morente JC. Floppy closing door epiglottis treated successfully with an Mhealth application based on myofunctional therapy: a case report. Case Rep Otolaryngol. 2019;2019:1–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.O’Connor-Reina C, Garcia JMI, Baptista P, Garcia-Iriarte MT, Alba CC, Perona M, et al. Non-acid reflux and sleep apnea: the importance of drug induced sleep endoscopy. Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery. 2021;50(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 25.Valderrama-Penagos JX, Rodríguez Alcalá L, Plaza G, Baptista P, Garcia Iriarte MT, Correa EJ, et al. Ankyloglossia in children, a cause of obstructive sleep apnoea: case report of paediatric ankyloglossia and sleep apnoea: DISE resolves the mystery. Children. 2024;11(2):218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.O’Connor-Reina C, Ignacio Garcia JM, Rodriguez Ruiz E, Morillo Dominguez MDC, Ignacio Barrios V, Baptista Jardin P, et al. Myofunctional therapy app for severe apnea–hypopnea sleep obstructive syndrome: pilot randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8(11):e23123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Duarte-Díaz A, Álvarez-Pérez, Y., Santos-Álvarez, A., Toledo-Chávarri, A., Valcárcel-Nazco, C., Herrera-Ramos, E., Hernández-Yumar, A., Pinto Robayna, B., Rivero-Santana, A., Ramos-García, V., Capafons Sosa, J. I., Ramallo-Fariña, Y., Pérez Rodríguez, A., Melle Hernández, N., Llamas-Ramos, I., Mediano San Andrés, O., Díaz Pérez, D., López Fernández, D., & Perestelo-Pérez, L. Terapia miofuncional (ejercicios orofaríngeos) para la apnea obstructiva del sueño. Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicio de Evaluación del Servicio Canario de la Salud. Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo; 2024.
- 28.O’Connor-Reina C, Ignacio Garcia JM, Rodriguez Alcala L, Rodríguez Ruiz E, Garcia Iriarte MT, Casado Morente JCC, et al. Improving adherence to myofunctional therapy in the treatment of sleep-disordered breathing. J Clin Med. 2021;10(24):5772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.O′Connor Reina C, Iriarte MTG, Morente JCC, Mayor GP, Jardin PB, Gonzalez EAV. Apnea bye, first app to treat sleep disorder breathing. Sleep Med. 2017;40:e243. [Google Scholar]
- 30.O’Connor Reina C, Plaza G, Ignacio-Garcia JM, Baptista Jardin P, Garcia-Iriarte MT, Casado-Morente JC, et al. New mHealth application software based on myofunctional therapy applied to sleep-disordered breathing in non-compliant subjects. Sleep Science and Practice. 2020. 10.1186/s41606-019-0040-8. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Garcia Iriarte MT, Alcala LR, Baptista P, Plaza G, O’Connor-Garcia C, O’Connor-Reina C. Myofunctional therapy for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: a narrative review. Pan Arab J Rhinol. 2023;13(1):47–55. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Schneider E, Shilo S, Ungar OJ. Validated mobile applications in otolaryngology head and neck surgery for patient and physicians: a systematic literature review. Am J Otolaryngol. 2024;45(4):104287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Rodríguez-Alcalá L, Martínez JML, Baptista P, Ríos Fernández R, Javier Gómez F, Parejo Santaella J, et al. Sensorimotor tongue evaluation and rehabilitation in patients with sleep-disordered breathing: a novel approach. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2021;48(12):1363–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.O’Connor-Reina C, Plaza G, Garcia-Iriarte MT, Ignacio-Garcia JM, Baptista P, Casado-Morente JC, et al. Tongue peak pressure: a tool to aid in the identification of obstruction sites in patients with obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome. Sleep Breath. 2020;24(1):281–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Friedman M, Tanyeri H, La Rosa M, Landsberg R, Vaidyanathan K, Pieri S, et al. Clinical predictors of obstructive sleep apnea. Laryngoscope. 1999;109(12):1901–7. 10.1097/00005537-199912000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.O’Connor-Reina C, Rodriguez‐Alcala L, Ignacio JM, Baptista P, Garcia‐Iriarte MT, Plaza G. Assessment of muscular weakness in severe sleep apnea patients: a prospective study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023;169(3):716–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Borrmann PF, O’Connor-Reina C, Ignacio JM, Rodriguez Ruiz E, Rodriguez Alcala L, Dzembrovsky F, et al. Muscular assessment in patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: protocol for a case-control study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2021;10(8):e30500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Solomon NP, Clark HM, Makashay MJ, Newman LA. Characteristics of orofacial muscles in healthy adults and individuals with oropharyngeal dysphagia. Dysphagia. 2000;15(3):166–77. 10.1007/s004550010015. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Pevernagie DA, Gnidovec-Strazisar B, Grote L, Heinzer R, McNicholas WT, Penzel T, et al. On the rise and fall of the apnea − hypopnea index: a historical review and critical appraisal. J Sleep Res. 2020. 10.1111/jsr.13066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kezirian EJ, Hohenhorst W, de Vries N. Drug-induced sleep endoscopy: the VOTE classification. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;268(8):1233–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Carrasco-Llatas M, Zerpa-Zerpa V. Response to reliability of drug-induced sedation endoscopy: a methodological issue. Sleep Breath. 2017;21(3):779–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Camacho M, Certal V, Abdullatif J, Zaghi S, Ruoff CM, Capasso R, et al. Myofunctional therapy to treat obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep. 2015;38(5):669–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Saba ES, Kim H, Huynh P, Jiang N. Orofacial myofunctional therapy for obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Laryngoscope. 2024;134(1):480–95. 10.1002/lary.30823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Xu Y, Yang R, Yu M, Gao X. Efficacy of myofunctional therapy for obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2025;25(3):102137. 10.1016/j.jebdp.2025.102137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.O’Connor-Reina C, Ignacio Garcia JM, Rodriguez Ruiz E, Morillo Dominguez MDC, Ignacio Barrios V, Baptista Jardin P, et al. Myofunctional therapy app for severe apnea–hypopnea sleep obstructive syndrome: pilot randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8(11):e23123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.de Felicio C, Dias F, Trawitzki L. Obstructive sleep apnea: focus on myofunctional therapy. Nature and Science of Sleep. 2018. 10.2147/NSS.S141132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Diaféria G, Santos-Silva R, Truksinas E, Haddad FLM, Santos R, Bommarito S, et al. Myofunctional therapy improves adherence to continuous positive airway pressure treatment. Sleep Breath. 2017;21(2):387–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kezirian EJ, Simmons M, Schwab RJ, Cistulli P, Li KK, Weaver EM, et al. Making sense of the noise: toward rational treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;202(11):1503–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Collado-Mateo D, Lavín-Pérez AM, Peñacoba C, Del Coso J, Leyton-Román M, Luque-Casado A, et al. Key factors associated with adherence to physical exercise in patients with chronic diseases and older adults: an umbrella review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. 10.3390/ijerph18042023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Thomas EE, Taylor ML, Banbury A, Snoswell CL, Haydon HM, Gallegos Rejas VM, et al. Factors influencing the effectiveness of remote patient monitoring interventions: a realist review. BMJ Open. 2021;11(8):e051844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Krist AH, Tong ST, Aycock RA, Longo DR. Engaging patients in decision-making and behavior change to promote prevention. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;240:284–302. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Clark HM, Solomon NP. Age and sex differences in orofacial strength. Dysphagia. 2012;27(1):2–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Adams V, Mathisen B, Baines S, Lazarus C, Callister R. A systematic review and meta-analysis of measurements of tongue and hand strength and endurance using the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI). Dysphagia. 2013;28(3):350–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Poncin W, Correvon N, Tam J, Borel JC, Berger M, Liistro G, et al. The effect of tongue elevation muscle training in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a randomised controlled trial. J Oral Rehabil. 2022. 10.1111/joor.13369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Schwab RJ, Pasirstein M, Pierson R, Mackley A, Hachadoorian R, Arens R, et al. Identification of upper airway anatomic risk factors for obstructive sleep apnea with volumetric magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;168(5):522–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Camacho M, Guilleminault C, Wei JM, Song SA, Noller MW, Reckley LK, et al. Oropharyngeal and tongue exercises (myofunctional therapy) for snoring: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;275(4):849–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Wang SH, Keenan BT, Wiemken A, Zang Y, Staley B, Sarwer DB, et al. Effect of weight loss on upper airway anatomy and the apnea-hypopnea index. The importance of tongue fat. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;201(6):718–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Carrasco-Llatas M, Zerpa-Zerpa V, Dalmau-Galofre J. Reliability of drug-induced sedation endoscopy: interobserver agreement. Sleep Breath. 2017;21(1):173–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


