Abstract
Imposed postfeedback delays promote discrimination training; the present experiments determined whether they also improve performance in programmed instruction. In two experiments, college students completed 45 sets of Holland and Skinner's (1961) programmed text on behavior analysis in a computerized format in a three-component multiple schedule. In Experiment 1, the conditions were (a) no delay between questions, (b) a 10-s delay after each question (noncontingent delay), and (c) a 10-s delay after each question answered incorrectly (contingent delay). Noncontingent delay produced better performance than no delay and contingent delay. To determine whether performance increased in the noncontingent delay condition because subjects studied the material during delay periods, Experiment 2 tested three conditions: (a) no delay between questions, (b) a 10-s delay after each question (noncontingent delay), and (c) a 10-s delay after each question with the screen blank during the delay period. Noncontingent delay produced better performance than no delay, but there was no difference in performance between no delay and noncontingent delay with blank screen. Hence, noncontingent delay improved performance because students used delay periods to study. Furthermore, subjects preferred noncontingent delay to the other conditions, and session time increased only slightly.
Keywords: computer-based instruction, programmed instruction, multiple schedule, delay, college students
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- BOURNE L. E., Jr, BUNDERSON C. V. Effects of delay of informative feedback and length of postfeedback interval on concept identification. J Exp Psychol. 1963 Jan;65:1–5. doi: 10.1037/h0046994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BOURNE L. E., Jr Effects of delay of information feedback and task complexity on the identification of concepts. J Exp Psychol. 1957 Sep;54(3):201–207. doi: 10.1037/h0044684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BOURNE L. E., Jr, GUY D. E., DODD D. H., JUSTESEN D. R. CONCEPT IDENTIFICATION: THE EFFECTS OF VARYING LENGTH AND INFORMATIONAL COMPONENTS OF THE INTERTRIAL INTERVAL. J Exp Psychol. 1965 Jun;69:624–629. doi: 10.1037/h0022018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HOLLAND J. G., PORTER D. The influence of repetition of incorrectly answered items in a teching-machine program. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Oct;4:305–307. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HOLLAND J. G. Teaching machines: an application of principles from the laboratory. J Exp Anal Behav. 1960 Oct;3:275–287. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1960.3-275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harris L. M., Tramontana J. Discrimination learning of retarded children as a function of positive reinforcement and response cost. Am J Ment Defic. 1973 Sep;78(2):216–219. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kemp F. D., Holland J. G. Blackout ratio and overt responses in programmed instruction: resolution of disparate results. J Educ Psychol. 1966 Apr;57(2):109–114. doi: 10.1037/h0023070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Salmoni A. W., Schmidt R. A., Walter C. B. Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal. Psychol Bull. 1984 May;95(3):355–386. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tudor R. M., Bostow D. E. Computer-programmed instruction: The relation of required interaction to practical application. J Appl Behav Anal. 1991 Summer;24(2):361–368. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1991.24-361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wolf M. M. Social validity: the case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. J Appl Behav Anal. 1978 Summer;11(2):203–214. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1978.11-203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]