Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 1994 Winter;27(4):575–583. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-575

Assessing influential dimensions of reinforcers on choice in students with serious emotional disturbance.

N A Neef 1, D Shade 1, M S Miller 1
PMCID: PMC1297844  PMID: 7844054

Abstract

We examined how reinforcer rate, quality, delay, and response effort combined to influence the choices of 6 youths with learning and behavior difficulties, and the viability of an assessment methodology derived from matching theory for determining differential responsiveness to those reinforcer and response dimensions. The students were given two concurrent sets of math problems that were equal on two dimensions but competed on two other dimensions (e.g., one set yielded higher rate and lower quality reinforcement than the other). Competing dimensions were counterbalanced across the six conditions of the initial assessment phase, permitting assessment of each dimension on time allocation. The conditions resulting in the most and least time allocated to one problem set alternative relative to the other were then replicated. Time allocated to each of the problems within sets was differentially affected by the reinforcer and/or response dimensions, with allocation patterns varying across students. The results are discussed in the context of implications for the design of treatments and extrapolations from basic research on matching and behavioral economics.

Full text

PDF
575

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baum W. M. On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jul;22(1):231–242. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cooper L. J., Wacker D. P., Sasso G. M., Reimers T. M., Donn L. K. Using parents as therapists to evaluate appropriate behavior of their children: application to a tertiary diagnostic clinic. J Appl Behav Anal. 1990 Fall;23(3):285–296. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fuqua R. W. Comments on the applied relevance of the matching law. J Appl Behav Anal. 1984 Fall;17(3):381–386. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1984.17-381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HERRNSTEIN R. J. Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4:267–272. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Herrnstein R. J. On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):243–266. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mace F. C., Neef N. A. Limited matching on concurrent-schedule reinforcement of academic behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Winter;27(4):585–596. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Neef N. A. Effects of reinforcer rate and reinforcer quality on time allocation: Extensions of matching theory to educational settings. J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Fall;25(3):691–699. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Neef N. A., Mace F. C., Shade D. Impulsivity in students with serious emotional disturbance: the interactive effects of reinforcer rate, delay, and quality. J Appl Behav Anal. 1993 Spring;26(1):37–52. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Shull R. L. The collateral effects of behavioral interventions: Applied implications from JEAB, January 1993. J Appl Behav Anal. 1993 Fall;26(3):409–415. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES