Skip to main content
Neuro-Oncology logoLink to Neuro-Oncology
. 2025 Oct 17;28(2):334–352. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noaf236

T cell immunity in glioma and potential implications for immunotherapy: A systematic review

Rosa Luning 1, Pim J French 2, Wouter J F Vanbilloen 3,4, Lisa Dobber 5, Levi Van Hijfte 6, Raoull Hoogendijk 7, Martin J van den Bent 8, Reno Debets 9, Marjolein Geurts 10,11,✉
PMCID: PMC12979052  PMID: 41105161

Abstract

Background

T cell-based immunotherapies have had limited success in glioma thus far. Here, we evaluate the literature on abundance, spatial distribution and phenotypical characteristics of T cells in the tumor micro-environment (TME) of IDH-mutant and IDH-wildtype glioma, with the aim to understand how these measures relate to immunotherapy resistance and to aid the development of immunotherapies for glioma.

Methods

Medline, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched up to May 6, 2025. Out of 4303 articles screened, 85 studies examining T cell immunity in human glioma were selected. We collected information about tumor subtype, grade, methods, T cell abundance, spatial distribution, phenotypes and prognostic significance.

Results

T cells are present in the glioma TME, but densities are heterogeneous and generally low, especially in IDH-mutant glioma. T cell abundance increases with higher WHO grade and upon recurrence. T cells cluster around blood vessels, especially in IDH-mutant glioma. Glioma-infiltrating T cells largely display a late-differentiated phenotype (CD45RA-CCR7-C62L-), expressing markers that signify sustained antigen activation and exhaustion (PD-1, CTLA-4, TIM-3, LAG-3, CD39, and TIGIT). This phenotype coincides with decreased anti-tumor cytotoxicity and is spatially enriched in the myeloid-rich, hypoxic tumor core. Prognostic significance remains controversial.

Conclusions

T cells in glioma are scarce, generally fully differentiated and functionally inert. Understanding and reinvigorating the deficient T cell response will be essential for successful immunotherapies. Future research should incorporate functional and spatial immune profiling to optimize and personalize immunotherapeutic strategies for glioma patients.


Key Points.

  • Glioma T cells are scarce, generally fully differentiated and functionally inert.

  • Future research should include functional and spatial immune profiling to optimize immunotherapeutic strategies for individual glioma patients.

Importance of the Study

Adult diffuse glioma remains notoriously difficult to treat. While immunotherapies represent a promising avenue of research, most T cell-based immunotherapies, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), have been unsuccessful in glioma thus far. Here, we systematically evaluate the literature on phenotypes, densities and spatial distribution of T cells in the tumor micro-environment (TME) of adult diffuse glioma, with the aim to understand current immunotherapy resistance and to guide future research. We find that T cells in glioma are scarce, spatially restricted, and display typical characteristics of exhaustion and reduced functional performance. We discuss underlying mechanisms, therapeutic implications and strategies to overcome these barriers, and highlight currently unanswered questions in the field. Moving forward, studies integrating transcriptomic, functional and spatial immune profiling, providing high-resolution insights into the composition and relevance of distinct immune-niches in glioma, will be essential to guide the optimization and personalization of immunotherapeutic strategies.

Adult diffuse gliomas are the most common primary malignant tumors of the central nervous system (CNS).1 The 2021 WHO classification integrates histological and molecular parameters, with an important role for the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation, present in oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant (mt) and 1p/19q co-deleted and astrocytoma, IDHmt, but by definition absent in glioblastoma IDH-wildtype (wt).2 Standard of care consists of maximal safe resection combined with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. While IDHmt glioma patients have a significantly better median survival time compared to those with IDHwt glioblastomas, all gliomas invariably recur, and there is an ardent need for new therapeutic approaches in both groups.1

Immunotherapies harness the capacity of the host’s immune system to attack cancer cells, and have shifted the treatment standard for several advanced-stage solid and hematological malignancies.3,4 T cells play an executive role in many immunotherapies because they are responsible for recognition and cytotoxic destruction of tumor cells.3 The human T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire is enormously diverse, with 1 × 1015 distinct potential TCRs, allowing for the recognition of virtually any possible antigen including tumor neo-antigens.5,6 T cells originate from hematopoietic stem cells in the bone marrow and mature in the thymus. To become activated, naive T cells require the presentation of their cognate antigen by antigen-presenting cells (APCs) along with costimulatory signals and pro-inflammatory cytokines, generally in the secondary lymphoid organs. Consequently, they undergo clonal expansion, traffic to affected target tissues and differentiate into effector cells upon encounter with their cognate antigen.7 Immunotherapies that employ T cells to achieve tumor-directed immunogenicity include checkpoint inhibition, adoptive T cell transfer, bispecific T cell engagers, oncolytic viruses and cancer vaccines.3 Especially monoclonal antibodies blocking the checkpoint molecules PD-1 and CTLA-4, as well as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells, have generated dramatic and sometimes durable responses in several cancer types and are now widely embedded into clinical practice.

T cell-based immunotherapies have gained interest for glioma as well, but at least 2 important factors complicate the development of immunotherapies for glioma. Firstly, their location in the CNS, and secondly, the immunosuppressive properties of the glioma tumor micro-environment (TME). The CNS is structurally protected from pathogens and toxins by the blood-brain barrier (BBB), and was long thought to be an immunoprivileged site with very little to no infiltrating immune cells. However, it is now appreciated that the CNS is under tightly regulated immune surveillance.6 There is drainage of CNS antigens through the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and a meningeal lymphatic network onto the deep cervical lymph nodes, where APCs can prime and activate T cells.8 Activated T cells enter the CSF through leptomeningeal vessels in the subarachnoid space and the choroid plexus, and dynamic gradients of chemotactic cues including cytokines, chemoattractants, integrins and matrix metalloproteinases can induce and facilitate migration of effector lymphocytes across the BBB, allowing T cells to survey the brain and spinal cord.9

However, the glioma TME remains a T cell-poor environment compared to other solid tumors. Their location in the CNS is not the only cause, as brain metastases of other solid tumors do show marked T cell infiltration and can respond to treatment with checkpoint inhibitors.10,11 In particular glioblastomas employ several tactics to drive their TME towards a highly immunosuppressive state.11-14 Factors that influence immune evasion in glioma include a low mutational burden with limited neoantigens, the presence of immunosuppressive myeloid cells, the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10 and TGF-β, and the production of indolamine 2,3 dioxygenases and arginase, which influence tryptophan metabolism and negatively affect T cell activity.15–17 Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), including bone marrow-derived macrophages and tissue-resident microglia, dominate the glioma TME and may comprise up to 50% of the tumor mass.18,19 TAMs are generally considered pro-tumorigenic and suppress T cell responses in glioma.19 Furthermore, T cell sequestration in the bone marrow,20 therapy-induced systemic lymphopenia,21 and the prescription of immunosuppressive medication such as dexamethasone to reduce cerebral edema22 are factors that likely reduce T cell presence in glioma.

Clinical trials with checkpoint inhibitors have generally failed to show clinical benefit in glioma patients, as summarized elsewhere.23,24 However, most of these trials have focused on the evaluation of classical efficacy endpoints and did not perform assessments of immunogenicity or appropriate target engagement in the TME.17 Therefore, a better understanding of the immune micro-environment of gliomas is needed to fully understand why these trials failed. Furthermore, the first results of CAR-T cell therapies in glioma patients show signals of activity,25–27 and future trials with CAR-T products are likely to benefit from a better understanding of what holds back T cell immunity in these tumors.

Aim and Research Question

In this study, we aim to systematically review the literature on abundance as well as spatial and phenotypical characteristics of T cells in the TME of adult diffuse glioma. A better understanding of T cell immunity in glioma might allow for the selection of patient subsets with a better response to certain immunotherapies, or might provide a rationale for combination therapies. Ultimately, this can aid decisions about whether and how to proceed with the development of immunotherapies for glioma.

Methods

This review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement.28

Literature Search

A systematic literature search was conducted in Medline, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to retrieve all eligible articles published up to to May 6, 2025. The search terms glioma and T lymphocytes as well as synonyms were used. Complete search strings are reported in Supplement 1.

Eligibility Criteria

Only studies using human adult glioma samples were considered eligible, since extrapolating findings from preclinical glioma models remains challenging due to significant differences in tumor biology and the immune micro-environment between preclinical models and human gliomas. Given their established role in clinical management, studies with patients who received standard therapies such as radiotherapy or chemotherapy were included; however, in order to focus on the endogenous T cell landscape, we excluded studies analysing samples obtained after specific immunotherapeutic interventions, which might reflect treatment-induced alterations rather than baseline immune architecture. Publications had to be available in the English language, and reviews and studies with less than 5 patients were excluded to reduce sampling error. Finally, bio-informatic analyses using public datasets like TCGA were excluded to prevent duplication.

Study Selection and Data Extraction

Eligibility assessment was performed by 3 independent reviewers (R.L., W.V., and L.D.) by sequentially screening titles, abstracts and full-text articles using Rayyan.ai. Doubts regarding in- or exclusion were resolved through discussion. Where available, the following information was extracted from each study: sample size, tumor subtypes, grade, methods, and most important findings on T cell abundance, phenotypes, spatial distribution, and prognostic significance. From articles combining human data with in vitro studies, animal studies or analyses of public datasets, only human data was extracted. All extracted data are summarized in Table 1, and full extracted data can be found in Supplement 2.

Table 1.

Summary of data extracted from the 85 included studies

Author Glioma subtype, grade & IDH status (if known) Used WHO classification (if known) Methods Main findings on T cell abundance, spatial distribution, phenotypes & prognosis
Abdelfattah29 1 O2, 1 A2, 16 GBM 2021 scRNA seq Majority of T cells are CD8+ in all samples; increased T cell infiltration at recurrence
Alban30 6 GBM (of which 1 IDHmt) 2016 CyTOF mass cytometry More CD4+ T cells compared to CD8+ T cells across tumor grade; significantly increased amounts of double-positive and CD8+ T cells at recurrence
Asioli31 30 GBM 2021 IHC More CD4+ than CD8+ T cells; of the 25 CD3 positive cases, 10 showed an exclusively perivascular distribution, 14 both perivascular and intratumoral, and 1 case had an exclusively intratumoral distribution
Bartkowiak32 32 GBM 2021 Mass cytometry Lymphocytes in lateral ventricle-contracting GBM bear a hyperactivated/exhausted phenotype correlating with worse prognosis
Batchu33 1 A2, 7 GBM 2021 Spatial & scRNA seq Prominent spatial overlap amongst TAM signatures and a T cell exhaustion gene signature
Belghali 34 5 LGG (not specified), 19 GBM 2007 Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Significantly more T cells in GBM compared to LGG; mostly localized in the perivascular space; CD3 inversely correlates with survival
Benotmane35 9 GBM 2021 Spatial TCR seq Clonal T cell expansion was observed in 6 out of 9 samples
Berghoff36 43 LGG (15 A2, 7A3, 8 O2, 9 O3, 4 IDHwt LGG) & 131 GBM (of which 117 IDHwt) 2016 IHC Significantly higher CD3+ T cell and PD1+ T cell infiltration in GBM compared to LGG; more prominent TIL infiltration and higher PD-L1 expression in IDHwt compared to IDHmt gliomas
Chen37 59 gr II or III, 84 gr IV gliomas (not specified) 2016 IHC, flow cytometry (FCM) CCR5+CD38+HLA-DR+CD8+ T cells infiltrate the glioma TME
Davidson38 42 GBM, 10 LGG; 38 IDHwt, 13 IDHmt, 1 unknown 2016 FCM/FACS, mass cytometry, RNA seq Tumor-infiltrating PD-1+ T cells represent a chronically activated, exhausted effector T cell population (CD45RO+ CD27- IL-7R-HLA-DR+ CD38+ TIM-3+ LAG-3+ CTLA-4+)
Dejaegher39 10 LGG, 15 GBM (not further specified) 2016 FCM PD1 is upregulated on TILS compared to peripheral T cells; no differences in PD1 expression between LGG vs GBM or primary vs recurrent tumors
Dejaegher40 93 GBM 2007 IHC, FCM, DNA methylation arrays The mesenchymal subclass of GBM has the highest amount of infiltrating CD3+ T cells
Diaz41 4 LGG (1 O2, 2A2, 1 GA2), 11 GBM (IDH status not known) Multiplex IF (mIF); EM Highly proliferative gliomas show higher T cell infiltration into the tumor parenchyma; CD4+ T cells are abundant in perivascular areas
Dinevska42 98 LGG (22 A1, 42 A2, 34 A3), 28 GBM 2021 mIF T cell infiltration increases with tumor grade. FOXP3 Tregs are rare, comprising <0.5% of T cells. Most T cells localize to the perivascular niche
Dobersalske43 39 GBM (30 IDHwt, 9 IDH status not known) 2007 FCM, mIF, scRNA seq Tumor-reactive CD8+ clonotypes can be found in the cranial bone of glioblastoma patients
Friebel11 1A3, 1A4, 1O3, 19 GBM; 14 BrMs 2021 CyTOF mass cytometry T cell infiltration is increased in brain mets compared to gliomas. No significant differences in frequencies of specific T cell subsets (CD4+, CD8+ and γδ-T cells) were found between IDHmt, IDHwt glioma and brain mets
Fu44 5 A, 10 O, all IDHmt, grade not mentioned 2016 CyTOF mass cytometry The proportions of PD-1+ or TIM-3+ exhausted CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were substantially higher in TILs compared to peripheral T cells
Fu45 10 A (of which 1 IDHwt), 4 O (of which 1 IDHwt) 2016 CyTOF mass cytometry The proportions of TIM-3+ CD4+ and PD1+ CD8+ T cells were substantially higher in TILs compared to peripheral T cells; CD8+ TILs show reduced ability to secrete IFNγ, TNFβ, T-bet and granzyme B
Fu46 16 GBM (of which 5 IDHmt) 2016 CyTOF mass cytometry Both exhausted T cell (PD1, TIM-3 or LAG-3+) and regulatory T (Treg) cell percentages were significantly higher in TILs than in peripheral T cells
Gastearena47 76 GBM 2021 IHC Perivascular lymphocyte cuffs were observed in 12 out of 76 samples (16%), while most slides showed areas of infiltrating lymphocytes. Higher CD8 values correlated with a worse OS
Gershon48 22 LGG (of which 3 IDHwt), 4 A4, 59 GBM, 10 BrMs 2016 FCM A composite parameter combining the frequencies of 4 tumoral lymphocytes separates the survival curves of GBM patients with a median difference of 10 months
Gupta49 10 LGG (not further specified), 8 GBM 2021 scRNA seq, FCM Increased T cell infiltration at recurrence, independent of IDH-status
Heimberger50 77 LGG (19 A3, 3A2, 21 O2, 16 O3, 13 OA3, 5 OA2, 6 gliosarcoma), 58 GBM 2007 IHC, FCM CD4+ and CD8+ T cell infiltration increases with tumor grade; no significant difference in FOXP3+ Tregs between primary and recurrent tumors
Hijfte51 137 IDHmt astrocytoma 2021 mIF, bulk RNA seq, spatial RNA seq Perivascular T cell confinement in IDHmt astrocytomas associates with gemistocytic tumor cell—TAM networks that mimic glial scarring mechanisms
Huff52 26 GBM 2021 FCM, RNA seq There is a large population of CD8+CD28− T cells in GBM patients (blood + tumor) that is functionally and phenotypically distinct from exhausted T cells
Innocenti53 59 GBM (of which 56 IDHwt) 2016 IHC (on TMA’s) The number of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells is higher in GBM tissue compared to normal appearing brain tissue. CD4+ cells were inversely related to OS
Jacobs54 12 LGG (of which 6 gr II, 6 gr III), 31 GBM, 20 BrMs 2007 IHC, FCM Treg accumulation positively correlates with WHO grade. Tregs are mainly localized in the perivascular space, in close proximity to other lymphocytes
Kaffes55 56 GBM 2007 IHC, IF Mesenchymal tumors show markedly increased levels of TILs compared to other subtypes
Karimi12 120 GBM, 19 A4, 46 BrMs 2021 Imaging mass cytometry (IMC) Certain spatial cellular neighborhoods with elevated numbers of CD4+ T cells were associated with improved survival
Kikuchi56 33 IDHwt, 22 IDHmt, grade not mentioned RNA seq Higher immune infiltration in IDHwt gliomas. Exhausted CD4+ and CD8+ T cell states were more abundant in IDHwt gliomas. Tumor-specific T cells are present, but do not correlate with clinical prognosis
Kim57 18 LGG (9 O3, 9 A3), 46 GBM 2016 FCM Considerable heterogeneity between samples. T cells were more frequent in GBM compared to LGG. CD8+ T cells were more frequent than CD4+ T cells in all subgroups
Kim58 8 LGG (4 A3, 4 O3), 26 GBM 2016 FCM, RNA seq The numbers of CD3+, CD4+, CD8+ T cells and FOXP3+ Tregs were significantly higher in the tumor core compared to the peripheral regions. A hypoxia signature positively correlated with the enrichment of severely exhausted CD8+ T cells, M2 TAMs and Treg cells in the tumor core
Klemm13 FCM: 5 LGG, 2 GBM, 16BrMs. RNAseq: 7 LGG, 17 GBM, 17 BrMs 2016 FCM/FACS, RNA seq, IF, ELISA Gliomas contain an abundance of TAMs, whereas T cells were much fewer, particularly in IDHmt tumors. Tregs were rare in gliomas
Kmiecik59 65 GBM 2007 IHC, FCM Great heterogeneity in abundance and spatial localization. Increased CD3+ T cell infiltration was associated with prolonged survival
Knudsen60 23 GBM IF No significant differences in the fraction of CD3+T-lymphocytes nor the distribution of CD3+/CD8+ cytotoxic- andCD3+/FOXP3+-regulatory T-lymphocytes in primary vs recurrent tumours
Kollis61 30 GBM IF, FCM, scRNA seq T-cell subsets expressing CCR2, CCR5, CXCR3, CXCR4, CXCR6, CD49a, and CD49d are enriched in glioblastoma tumours compared to matched peripheral blood samples
Koshkaki62 9 GBM (of which 1 IDHmt) 2016 IHC Expression of PD-1, PD-L1, TIGIT, IDO, and FOXP3 was higher in the tumor core compared to infiltration zone, along with an increase in CD163+ TAMs
Kumar63 22 PXA, 29 LGG (all IDHmt astrocytoma grade II or III), 30 GBM (all IDHwt) 2016 mIF, spatial RNA seq PXAs harbored a significantly higher mean percentage of CD3+ T cells as compared with IDHmt astrocytoma and IDHwt GBM
La Manna64 20 GBM 2016 FACS/FCM, IF The CD8+CD103+ CD69+ TRM subset was significantly more abundant in GBM samples than in control (meningioma) samples
Lee65 32 GBM 2021 FCM An increased frequency of precursor exhausted T cells (CD8+KLRG1−PD-1+CXCR5+TCF1+TIM3−) was found in male vs female tumor samples
Liu66 22 LGG, 31 HGG (unspecified) 2007 IHC, FCM Tim‑3 expression was increased ∼4‑fold on the CD4+ TILs and ∼2‑fold on the CD8+ TILs as compared to PBMCs from glioma patients
Lohr67 28 LGG (13 WHO II, 15 WHO III), 65 WHO IV GBM 2007 mIF, FCM T cell infiltration increases with WHO grade; no difference between primary and recurrent tumors; effector T cell infiltration positively impacts survival
Luce68 32 LGG (A2 or A3), 60 GBM 2007 IHC (on TMA’s) Increased expression of PD-L1 in GBM compared to LGG
Maddison69 13 GBM 2021 IHC Low T cell density. Perivascular T cells are common in both primary and recurrent tumors. CD8+ TILs increased significantly in recurrent tumors
Magri70 63 GBM (57 IDHwt, 6 IDH unknown) FCM, mIF Increased frequency of CD8+ T cells both in central and marginal areas of recurrent tumors. Steady high frequency of PD-1 expression among TILs
Makarevic71 130 IDHmt LGG (59 gr II, 71 gr III), 13 IDHwt GBM 2016 mIF Higher T cell infiltration in IDHwt compared to IDHmt tumors. Tregs are rare and comparable across glioma groups. Increased CD3+ infiltration in recurrent tumors, especially after treatment with radiotherapy alone
Marinari72
  • RNAseq: 19 (16 gr IV, 3 gr III; 2 IDHmt, 17 IDHwt)

  • FCM: 39 (14 gr II, 8 gr III, 17 gr IV; 20 IDHmt, 15 IDHwt, 4 unknown)

2016 RNA seq, FCM Significant enrichment of CD8+ and CD4+ T cells and NK cells in patients with a poor prognosis
Martinez-Lage73 98 GBM (96 IDHwt, 2 IDHmt) 2016 IHC Great heterogeneity among and within samples. Highest lymphocyte infiltration in mesenchymal GBMs compared to other subgroups. The percentage of CD3+ and CD8+ T cells did not correlate with patient survival
Marx74 35 GBM (29 IDHwt, 6 IDH status unknown) FCM, IHC TEM comprised the dominant T cell subpopulation both in intratumoral CD4+ and CD8+ T cells
Mathewson75 15 LGG (3 O2, 2 O3, 4A3, 5 A4, 16 GBM (all IDHwt) 2016 scRNA seq TCR repertoire analysis revealed the presence of highly expanded clonotypes in each patient. Clonal CD8 T cells had higher expression of cytotoxicity genes (GZMB and NKG7) and NK receptors (KLRB1 and KLRD1) than non-clonal cells in GBM. A large fraction (>90%) of GBM-infiltrating CD8 T cells and most CD4 T cells were CD161-positive
Mauldin76 77 GBM 2021 mIF Median numbers of CD8, CD4, and CD20 infiltrates were 26.9, 6.0, and 10.6 cells/mm2 of tissue, respectively. No correlation between total densities of infiltrating CD4, CD8, and CD20 and survival
Mazzaschi77 GBM; 53 IDHwt, 3 IDHmt, 1 unknown 2016 IHC IDHmt tumors were characterized by a significantly higher density of perivascular TILs compared to wildtype tumors
Mitsdoerffer78
  • RNAseg: 9 GBM

  • FCM: 4 GBM

2021 RNA seq, FCM While CD4+ T cells were found in association with the wall of brain vessels and in necrotic areas, CD8+ T cells were largely located either perivascularly or scattered in the tumor bed. GBM-associated CD8+ T cells showed a partially exhausted phenotype with TIM3 (but not PD1) differentially expressed in GBM. Th17 cell signatures are markedly enriched in GBM TILs
Mohme79 40 GBM (all IDHwt) 2016 FCM, cytokine assays, TCR sequencing TILs were largely comprised of differentiated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, a mixture of TTM and TEM in the CD8+ compartment and a majority of TTM in the CD4+ compartment. High expression of PD-1, and CD39, and HLA-DR was found in rGBM (vs primary GBM). PD-1 was the most prominently expressed marker on TILs, both for CD8+ and CD4+ cells
Mu80 15 DA, 14 DA recurred as GBM, 15 GBM. 22/44 were IDHwt (not mentioned which) 2007 RNA seq, IHC, mIF More perivascular than intratumoral TILs in primary and recurrent tumors; in primary tumors, two-thirds of the TILs were in the perivascular niche. Perivascular T cells were enriched at recurrence
Musca81 19 GBM, 20 BrMs, IDH status unknown FCM Significantly more tumor-infiltrating T cells in brain mets compared to glioma; high levels of exhaustion markers, irrespective of the tumor’s origin
Najem82 2 LGG (1 A2 IDHmt, 1 A2 IDHwt), 8 GBM IDHwt, 10 BrMs scRNA seq, mIF T cells were much less frequent across tumors relative to myeloid-derived lineages. In GBM, T cells were mostly found in perivascular regions and showed strong nuclear p-STAT3 expression
Noorani83 59 GBM 2021 IHC There are functional interactions between anti-inflammatory TAMs and CD4+/CD8+ T cells in all regions. Suppression of T cells via PD-L1 may be present in the leading edge and may be driven by anti-inflammatory TAMs
Ou84 75 LGG, 50 GBM (mix of IDHwt and IDHmt, not further specified) IHC Increased infiltration of CD8+ T cells in recurrent gliomas, especially in GBM
Perrin85 16 grade 3 or 4 astrocytoma (no IDH status known) RNA seq (CDR-3 analysis & sequencing of amplified TCR transcripts) CDR-3 analysis revealed multiple T cell oligoclonal expansions in all astrocytomas. Unique T cell clones were present in different adjacent areas of a given tumor, but never detected in the blood. Expanded clones were almost exclusively confined to the CD8+ subset
Pimenta86 51 GBM (if which 50 IDHwt) 2016 FCM No significant differences in the different immune cell subsets were observed between primary and recurrent tumors
Ran87 9 GBM 2021 scRNA seq T cell subpopulations in glioma tissues exhibited higher exhaustion signature scores compared to PBMCs
Ravi88 8 GBM 2021 scRNA seq, spatial RNA seq CD8+ T cells revealed a stronger probability for tumor-associated exhaustion compared to the CD4+ population. Tumor regions enriched for mesenchymal-like (MES-like), and astrocytic-like (AC-like) transcriptional signatures were colocalized with CD8+ T exhausted clusters and CD4 Th17-like clusters. HMOX1+ myeloid cells were spatially correlated with T cell exhaustion and the mesenchymal state of glioblastoma
Romagnoli89 45 GBM 2021 FCM CD8+CD103+ TRM cells abundantly infiltrate GBM, and low frequency of these cells expressing PD1, TIM3, or both correlates with better OS
Sayour90 39 GBM IHC No significant difference in absolute cell counts of CD4+, CD8+, and FOXP3+ cells between primary and recurrent GBMs. Recurrent tumors showed a significant decrease in proportion of CD4+ T cells. Individual lymphocyte populations did not correlate with clinical outcomes
Schaettler91 1 O3, 18 GBM (of which 3 IDHmt), 11 BrMs Whole exome, RNA and TCR seq The T cell fraction among all cells was significantly higher within the BrMs compared to glioma, whereas the TCR repertoires within GBM had a higher degree of clonality. There is increased spatial heterogeneity of neoantigens within GBM compared to BrMs. The intratumoral TCR repertoire was significantly more similar between spatially distinct regions of BrMs than gliomas, which often harbored locally expanded T cell clones
Schmassman92 3 GBM, 2 A4 2021 scRNA seq, FCM Tumor CD8+ T cells displayed features of tissue-resident memory T cells and were characterized by an exhaustion phenotype
Scholl93 7 IDHmt LGG (grade/subtype not mentioned), 9 A4, 12 GBM 2021 FCM, RNA seq Increase in all ectoenzymes (CD38, CD39, CD73) in each lymphoid subset analyzed in the TME when compared to peripheral blood
Shen94 7 LGG (5 A3, 2 O3), 13 GBM 2016 FCM LAG3, BTLA, VISTA, TIM-3 and CTLA-4 were detected in various degrees on CD3+ T cells in the HGG microenvironment
Simonds95 19 GBM CyTOF mass cytometry Nearly all subsets of T cells, plus NK cells, were decreased in the GBM TIME compared to RCC and sarcoma primary tumors
Soltani96 5 GBM, all IDHwt 2016 IHC, IF, qPCR Highly variable numbers of CD3+ cells in GBM (ranging from 9 to 600 cells/mm2)
Tamma97 30 GBM 2021 IHC Both CD4+ and CD8+ cells in the tumor zone significantly increased compared to the surrounding normal appearing brain area; the increase of CD4+ cells was about ten times greater than that observed in CD8+ cells
Tamura98 10 GBM (all IDHwt) 2016 IHC Most T cells (both CD4 and CD8) were observed in the perivascular area. FOXP3+ cells were mainly observed in the perivascular area. The tumor core had more PD-1+CD8+ T cells compared to the infiltration zone
Tang99 41 IDHmt, 46 IDHwt (grade and subtype not mentioned) IHC CD3+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, neutrophils and macrophages were significantly less abundant in IDHmt glioma compared to IDHwt glioma
Wang100 21 GBM 2021 mIF, FCM PD-1 was expressed in about 46% of CD4+ T and 38% of CD8+ T cells in GBM tissue. CD8+ T cells were more abundant in patients with a better prognosis (survival > 14 months)
Wang101 15 HGG (unspecified; either A4 or GBM) 2021 scRNA seq, V(D)J seq, spatial RNA seq CD8+GZMK+ TILs comprised the most clonally expanded T cells, and localize near vasculature and CD163+ MHCII+ myeloid cells
Wang102 26 GBM 2021 Histopathology, IF, scRNA seq Within the peritumoral brain zone, the proportion of T cells in the high cerebral blood flow interface was higher than in the lower cerebral blood flow interface (10.08% vs. 3.30%)
Weenink103
  • FCM: 12 LGG (gr II), 8 HGG

  • IF: 28 LGG (gr II), 28 HGG

2016 FCM, IF, WES & RNA seq, qPCR LGG have lower numbers of intra-tumoral CD8 T cells compared to HGG. In LGG, T cells were predominantly located perivascularly. LGG and HGG harbor an equally diverse TCR-Vβ repertoire
Wischniewski104 26 GBM (of which 2 IDHmt). 4 O, all IDHmt. 6 A, of which 1 IDHwt (grade not mentioned). 48 BrM Bulk and scRNA seq, FCM, mIF, TCR profiling >90% of TILs were CD45RO+, indicating a conserved broad activation and differentiation program in brain TILs independent of the underlying disease. CD8+ TILs in gliomas had a high abundance of C1 which contained early active and effector memory CD8+ T cells
Woroniecka105 FCM: 21 GBM TCR analysis: 5 GBM FCM & TCR analysis PD-1, LAG-3, TIGIT, and CD39 were highly expressed on patient CD8+ TILs. PD-1 was especially prominent, being found on up to 96% of tumor infiltrating CD8+ T cells
Xu106
  • FCM: 2 A3, 7 GBM

  • IHC: 3 A3, 16 GBM

FACS/FCM, IHC, functional assays Robust CD39 expression was observed in CD4+ TILs, with a prevalence of 61.8 + 19.3% relative to the 8.0 + 5.7% from peripheral CD4+ T cells
Yang107 108 GBM IHC Tumors from long-term survivors were more likely than those from short-term survivors to have intermediate or extensive T cell infiltrates
Yang108 28 pilocytic astrocytoma, 63 GBM 2007 IHC Significantly more glioblastomas had intermediate or extensive perivascular CD8+ T cells compared to intratumoral CD8+ T cells
Zhang109 23 A3, 14 A4, 35 GBM IHC The IDH mutation was significantly associated with reduced numbers of tumor-infiltrating CD4+, CD8+ and FOXP3+ T cells. D-2HG significantly inhibited the migration of both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells
Zhao li110 24 GBM FACS/FCM Compared to healthy controls, GBM patients had significantly more CD4+ FOXP3- IL-10+ Tr1 cells in peripheral blood. The Tr1 frequency was further elevated in the tumor. By surface marker expression, the Tr1 cells were enriched in the antigen-experienced effector/memory cell compartment

This table includes a summary of information on glioma subtype, grade, IDH status, used WHO classification, methods and main findings on T cell abundance, spatial distribution, phenotypes and prognosis for each study included in the review. A more detailed overview of all extracted data can be found in Supplement 2.

Abbreviations: A2, grade 2 astrocytoma; A3, grade 3 astrocytoma; A4, grade 4 astrocytoma; BrMs, brain metastases; CyTOF, cytometry by time of flight; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorting; FCM, flow cytometry; GBM, glioblastoma; HGG, high grade glioma; IDH, isocitrate dehydrogenase; IF, immunofluorescence; IHC, immunohistochemistry; LGG, low grade glioma; mIF, multiplex immunofluorescence; O2, grade 2 oligodendroglioma; O3, grade 3 oligodendroglioma; PBMCs, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; qPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction; scRNAseq, single-cell RNA sequencing; TAM, tumor-associated macrophage; TCR, T cell receptor; TILs, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes; TMA, tissue micro-array; WES, whole exome sequencing.

Risk of Bias

The risk of bias in individual studies was assessed by 1 reviewer (R.L.) according to the updated Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool111 and was visualised using Robvis.112 Risk of bias was deemed intermediate in most studies; eleven articles were deemed high risk, mostly due to bias in reporting of the results (Supplement 3 and 4).

Search Results

A total of 4303 records were screened on title and abstract after removing duplicates. Four thousand one hundred sixty-six articles were excluded at the title-abstract level. One hundred thirty-four articles were screened on full text, and finally 85 articles were selected for review (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

PRISMA flowchart describing the systematic approach to identification, screening and inclusion of studies in this review.

Results

The 85 studies included in this review were published between 1999 and 2025. Due to changes in the WHO classification of CNS tumors during this period, patient populations might not be directly comparable among studies. Therefore, we have included subtype, WHO grade, WHO classification used, and IDH-mutation status (if reported) in Table 1. Out of 85 studies, only two articles focus solely on IDHmt glioma and 18 articles focus solely on IDHwt glioblastoma. The remaining articles include, and sometimes pool, both IDHwt and IDHmt gliomas in their analyses.

T Cells Are Present in the Glioma TME, but Abundance is Highly Variable and Lower than in Brain Metastases

Thirty-three included studies report quantitative data on T cell abundance in glioma. Despite different reporting methods, which impede direct comparisons, several observations can be made. First, T cells are present in the glioma TME. Four studies report a percentage of CD3+ T cells within the total amount of cells in the glioma TME, and find that CD3+ T cells comprise roughly 2% of all cells in 10 gliomas of different grades,82 <2% of total cells in glioblastoma,12 2.1% of all DAPI+ cells in glioblastoma,63 or “generally less than 5%” of total cells in glioblastoma.73 Two studies report the percentage of T cells among all isolated tumor-infiltrating immune cells, and find that T cells comprise 11%32 or 13%11 of immune cells in heterogeneous groups of glioma patients. Mazzaschi and colleagues report a median of 37 total CD3+ tumor-infiltating lymphocytes (TILs)/mm2 in glioblastoma,77 and Weenink et al. report that nearly all WHO 2016 grade II glioma samples have T cell counts < 40 cells/mm2.103 Kim et al. find 262 696 T cells per gram for glioblastoma, 151 000 for WHO III astrocytoma, and 142 606 for WHO III oligodendroglioma.57 Several studies mention that T cell numbers are increased in glioma when compared to adjacent normal-appearing brain tissue.53,55,78,97,98 For instance, Tamura et al. report a mean of 10 CD8+ T cells and 15 CD4+ T cells per 3 high-powered fields (HPF) in the tumor core of IDHwt glioblastomas, compared to 0.5 and 0 in adjacent normal-appearing brain, respectively.98

Even though T cells are detected in the glioma TME, they are considerably less abundant in glioma compared to brain metastases of other cancers. Six studies report significantly lower quantities of T cells in both IDHmt and IDHwt glioma compared to brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, breast cancer and renal cell carcinoma.11–13,81,91,95 Friebel et al. observe that T cells comprise 13% of all intratumoral immune cells in glioma, compared to 50% in brain metastases of melanoma and NSCLC. Contrastingly, the glioma TME contains a much higher fraction of TAMs and monocytes (80%) compared to brain metastases (40%).11 Furthermore, T cell abundance in glioma is highly heterogeneous, both between and within tumors, as mentioned in 9 of the included articles.12,29,57,59,67,71,73,77,91,96 Mazzaschi et al. report a wide range of 9-360 CD3+cells/mm2 of glioblastoma tissue,77 and Soltani et al. find a range of 9-600 CD3+ T cells/mm2 of glioblastoma tissue.96

In short, T cells are present in the glioma TME, although numbers are low compared to brain metastases. T cell densities are heterogeneous, both between regions and between tumors.

Determinants of T Cell Abundance Include IDH-Status, WHO Grade and Tumor Recurrence

T cell infiltration is significantly lower in IDHmt gliomas compared to IDHwt glioblastomas, as mentioned in 10 articles.11,13,33,36,40,56,57,71,99,109 Accumulation of the oncometabolite D-2-hydroxyglutarate (D-2HG) in IDHmt glioma drives TAMs toward an immunosuppressive state through a complex re-orchestration of tryptophan metabolism,16 decreasing pro-inflammatory cytokines and inhibiting proliferation and migration of both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Furthermore, D-2HG suppresses T cell activity by modulating the transcription factor NFAT and the complement system.109 Besides IDH-status, 5 studies have investigated the association between WHO grade and T cell density, and find that T cell density significantly increases with higher WHO grade.42,50,57,67,103 Grade 4 gliomas have a 5-fold higher T cell density/mm2 than grade 2 gliomas.103 Within IDHwt glioblastomas, 3 different transcriptome-based subtypes have been described; proneural, classical and mesenchymal, of which the mesenchymal subtype is considered most aggressive, most dedifferentiated and most inflammatory.113 Accordingly, 3 studies find that the mesenchymal subtype is associated with increased amounts of both myeloid cells and T cells.40,55,73 Whereas non-CNS tumors with a mismatch-repair deficiency (MMRd) often show increased immune infiltration, likely due to increased neo-antigen burden,114 a landmark study by Touat et al. showed no significant difference in T cell infiltration between MMR-deficient and MMR-proficient gliomas.115 Differences in T cell abundance between primary and recurrent glioma are reported in 9 studies.29,46,49,69–71,79,80,86 Three studies report increased CD3+ T cell presence at recurrence, both in IDHmt and IDHwt glioma.29,49,71 In a dataset of 78 primary and 66 recurrent IDHmt gliomas, Makarevic et al. report a 2-fold increase in CD3+ T cells at recurrence. In their study, treatment with radiotherapy alone was associated with increased T cell infiltration compared to chemotherapy alone or combined chemoradiotherapy.71 Others specifically report an increase in CD8+, but not CD4+ T cells in recurrent glioblastoma,69,70,79 or an increase of perivascular T cells in recurrent IDHmt and IDHwt glioma.80 The final 2 studies do not find significant differences between primary and recurrent tumors.46,86 The effect of corticosteroid treatment on T cell density is mentioned in 3 studies. Whereas 2 studies report no correlation between CD3+ TIL density and dexamethasone treatment,36,76 in the third study, where 18/31 patients did not receive dexamethasone before surgery, dexamethasone use was associated with a 4-fold reduction in CD3+ TIL density.75

In short, T cell abundance is higher in IDHwt glioblastomas compared to IDHmt gliomas, and increases with WHO grade and recurrence, whereas dexamethasone therapy likely reduces T cell presence. At present, there is no compelling evidence for increased T cell abundance in MMRd gliomas.

Tumor-Specific TILs Are Present in the Glioma TME, but Are Spatially Restricted

Several immunotherapies, including checkpoint inhibitors, require the presence of tumor-specific T cells for active tumor targeting. Seven articles report on such potentially tumor-reactive T cells (pTRTs) in glioma. Already in 1999, Perrin et al. looked into TCR-clonality in astrocytoma by determining the length of the TCR-β chain complementarity-determining region (CDR-)3 as a proxy for TCR variability.85 In all 16 samples, they detected several oligoclonal enrichments among CD8+ TILs in different tumor areas, but not in autologous PBMCs, suggesting local expansion of T cells expressing the same TCR-β chain.85 Reconstructing TCR sequences from single-cell RNA-reads confirms the presence of clonally expanded T cells in the majority of IDHmt and IDHwt gliomas.75 Interestingly, clonally expanded CD8+ T cells had higher expression of cytotoxicity genes and NK-receptors,75 pointing to the expansion of tumor-specific effector CD8+ T cells. Clonal diversity in the TCR-Vβ repertoire does not differ substantially between low-grade and high-grade glioma.103 Schaettler et al. find that in 6 out of 22 glioblastoma patients, a dominant T cell clone was present that comprised >12% of the total T cell repertoire in a certain region. The most highly expanded intratumoral T cell clones could also be detected in the peripheral blood, but at substantially reduced frequencies (<1%).91 Furthermore, T cell clones accounting for >5% of the clonal space were enriched in recurrent compared to primary glioblastoma.79 Stable and homogeneously expressed neo-antigens as potential targets for T cell responses are not well established in glioma.78 Accordingly, in contrast to brain metastases, where the TCR repertoire was relatively similar between spatially distinct regions, clonal expansion in glioblastoma is highly local and highly heterogeneous, corresponding to the genomic and transcriptional heterogeneity in glioblastoma.35,91

In short, there is evidence for heterogeneous and locally confined oligoclonal T-cell expansion in the glioma TME, suggesting the presence of potentially tumor-reactive effector cells.

T Cell Subsets Are Not Evenly Present: Tregs Are Enriched in the Tumor Core

The ratio between CD4+ and CD8+ T cells among glioma-infiltrating T cells is debated. Four studies report a predominance of CD8+ T cells,29,42,57,69 whereas four others report a predominance of CD4+ T cells,30,32,78,97 and 2 describe no significant differences.11,74 This may partly be due to different study designs; some studies include both primary and recurrent tumors,69 both IDHwt and IDHmt gliomas,29,42,57 and both low- and high-grade gliomas,29,42 whereas these factors might all influence CD4/CD8 ratio.103 Furthermore, CD4/CD8-ratio can be confounded by age.116 Tregs can promote tolerance and suppress anti-tumor T cell responses through upregulated expression of T cell inhibitory receptors, such as CTLA4 and TIGIT, and secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines such as TGF-β and IL10, which can inhibit T cell activation, proliferation and migration.67,117 Treg frequencies in glioma are relatively low; Tregs make up only a few percent of all lymphocytes in all of the reviewed articles.12,13,37,42,59,67,86 However, whereas one group finds that the proportion of Tregs does not differ between circulating T cells and glioblastoma-infiltrating T cells,79 three other groups find a more prominent population of Tregs in the TME compared to peripheral blood.11,45,110 Spatially, multiple groups report that Tregs are enriched in hypoxic core regions in mostly IDHwt glioblastomas.57,58,98 Regarding other specific CD4+ T cell subsets (Th1, Th2, Th17, Th17.1) not much is known yet, although a preferential commitment to the Th17-lineage has been suggested, which might contribute to the suppression of a sufficient Th1- and cytotoxic T cell antitumor response.78 Combining single-cell RNA sequencing and multicolor flow cytometry, Kollis et al. have examined profiles of chemokine receptor expression within both CD8+ and CD4+ T cells in glioblastoma. Within CD8+ TILs, expression of CCR2, CCR5, CXCR3, CXCR4, and CXCR6 was enriched compared to peripheral blood T cells; within CD4+ TILs, these were CCR2, CCR5, CXCR3, and CXCR6, both highlighting a potential role for these chemokine receptor axes in T cell-homing to the glioma TME.61 Elevated CCR5-expression on glioma TILs was confirmed by Chen et al.37

Recently, more innate-like T cell subsets have been described in glioma as well, such as γδ-T cells, natural killer-T cells and Malt-like T cells.49 Of these, especially γδ-T cells have gained interest within the area of cancer immunotherapy.118 In contrast to αβ-T cells, γδ-T cells are able to exert antitumor cytotoxicity independent of neoantigen burden and conventional MHC-dependent antigen presentation, making them theoretically suitable for the treatment of MHC-deficient tumors such as gliomas. Whereas their role in antitumor immunity has not been fully elucidated yet, γδ-T cells have been associated with favourable outcomes in most tumor types.118 Six articles out of the 85 articles included in our review mention γδ-T cells in glioma.11,34,48,49,64,78 Although they can be detected in most samples, frequencies of γδ-T cells are generally at least 10-fold lower than those of CD8+ or CD4+ T cells.11,48 La Manna et al report an average frequency of γδ-T cells of 1.7% of the CD45+ leukocyte population,64 and Belghali et al report heterogeneous immunohistochemical staining patterns for γδ1-T cells with a median of 3.5 positive cells per HPF, and report that does not correlate with age, glioma subtype or prognosis.34 The functional significance of such innate-like T cell subsets in human glioma has not been investigated to date, and remains incompletely understood.

In short, published results show distinct presence of CD4 and CD8 T cells as well as Tregs in glioma. While Treg frequencies are low, they are enriched in hypoxic regions in the tumor core. More inconventional, innate-like T cell subsets such as γδ-T cells are present, but remain underexplored in glioma.

Glioma TILs Display a Late-Differentiated, Tissue-Resident Memory Phenotype

T cells in the parenchyma of post-mortem brain donors display a late-differentiated phenotype compared to circulating T cells.119 Smolders et al. show that these T cells largely match a transcriptional phenotype of tissue-resident memory T cells (TRM s), expressing CD103 and CD69 along with inhibitory receptors CTLA-4 and PD-1.120 TRM cells reside within peripheral tissues after previous antigen exposure, patrolling the local environment to perform a ‘sensing-and-alarm’ function upon re-exposure.121 Similarly, glioma-infiltrating T cells are more often antigen-experienced and display a further differentiated phenotype compared to circulating T cells.92,104 Four studies find that effector memory T cells (TEM, defined either as CD45RO+CD62L-, CD45RA-CD62L-, or CD45RA-CCR7-CD28-) and/or transitional memory T cells (TTM, CD45RA-CCR7-CD28+) make up the dominant T cell subpopulations in the glioma TME, both within CD4+ and CD8+ subsets.74,78,79,105 Moreover, glioma-infiltrating T cells predominantly have a phenotypic and transcriptomic profile consistent with TRM cells, including expression of CD49a, CD103, CD69, CXCR3, CXCR6, CCR5, HOBIT, and BLIMP1 and reduced expression of TBET and EOMES.64,89,92

In short, T cells in the glioma TME largely display a late-differentiated, tissue-resident phenotype, which may reflect their earlier encounter with antigen and their capacity to enter the brain parenchyma upon chemotactic cues.

Different Spatial Distribution Patterns: glioma TILS Accumulate in the Perivascular Space, Especially in IDHmt Glioma

Sixteen studies mention spatial distribution patterns of glioma TILS. Of these, 3 studies investigate regional differences between the tumor core and infiltration zone, and find that T cells densities are consistently higher in the tumor core compared to the infiltration zone.36,58,62 Eleven articles describe that T cells can be found both in the tumor parenchyma and in the perivascular space.34,41,42,47,62,63,69,77,78,103,108 Five studies report a preference for the perivascular space compared to the parenchyma, both for CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.34,42,78,80,98 In a cohort of primary astrocytomas and glioblastomas, two-thirds of the TILs were found in the perivascular space and only one-third infiltrated the tumor parenchyma.80 Two other studies find that specifically CD4+ T cells accumulate in the perivascular space, whereas CD8+ T cells tend to infiltrate further.41,80 Accordingly, only a small fraction of FOXP3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) infiltrates deep into the tumor parenchyma, and most Tregs are retained in the perivascular space.54 Looking at differences between tumor types, 2 studies find that perivascular T cell-containment occurs more frequently in IDHmt glioma compared to IDHwt glioblastoma.77,103 T cell density in IDHmt astrocytomas is highest near blood vessels, and declines with increasing distance from vasculature.42 Van Hijfte et al. recently elucidated a cellular network between gemistocytic tumor cells and reactive TAMs which co-occurs with perivascular retainment of T cells in IDHmt astrocytoma. They observe a process reminiscent of glial scarring, mediated by tumor-TAM interactions through the expression of receptor-ligand pairs such as SPP1/CD44 and IL-1β/IL1R1, which might contribute to immune evasion in IDHmt glioma.51

Thus, perivascular clustering of T cells is a recurring observation, especially in IDHmt glioma. While it is tempting to speculate that this phenomenon may represent early attempts at tertiary lymphoid structure (TLS) formation, the perivascular lymphocyte aggregates observed in IDHmt glioma cannot be formally classified as TLS’s due to the lack of typical CD4+ T cell and B cell organization.51 However, this hypothesis merits further study, as TLSs have been associated with improved immunotherapy response in other cancers.122 Interestingly, Hotchkiss et al suggest that perivascular accumulation of T cells might support antigen presentation and T cell activation in glioblastoma; in their study, glioblastoma samples that were more permissive to successful TIL expansion seemed to contain more structured perivascular T cell aggregates.123 This is a hypothesis that will need further testing.

In short, spatial T cell phenotypic patterns are observed in glioma, and while certain T cells do infiltrate the tumor parenchyma, others are retained in the perivascular space. In IDHmt glioma, perivascular T cell retainment seems to be mediated through tumor-TAM interactions in a process reminiscent of glial scarring.

Glioma TILs Display Typical Characteristics of Exhaustion, Especially in the Hypoxic Tumor Core

Woroniecka et al. extensively profiled glioblastoma TILs, and were among the first to describe a tumor-imposed T cell-exhaustion phenotype characterized by the sequential co-expression of immune checkpoints molecules including PD-1, TIM-3, LAG-3, CTLA-4, TIGIT, and CD39 along with transcriptional programs that imply decreased cytotoxic functionality and closely resemble classical virus-induced exhaustion.105 PD-1 expression alone is not enough to characterize T cells as “bona fide” exhausted, as PD-1 single-positive TILs were able to produce similar amounts of IFNγ and TNFα compared to PD-1-negative TILs, whereas those expressing multiple immune checkpoints (PD-1, TIM-3, and LAG-3) lost their ability to produce IFNγ, TNFα, and IL-2 upon TCR triggering, signifying a more profound state of exhaustion.105 Furthermore, glioma TILs often lack expression of Ki-67 and Granzyme B, suggesting limited proliferative capacity and effector function.32 Seven studies confirm that PD-1 is expressed on the majority of glioma TILs;38,39,45,70,74,79,98 8 separate studies find that a substantial proportion of glioma TILS co-express multiple immune checkpoints, consistent with T cell exhaustion.11,32,38,45,46,66,79,94 For example, Davidson et al. show that PD1+ TILs often co-express CTLA-4, TIM-3, LAG-3, CD38, and HLA-DR.38 Spatially, the tumor core seems more immunosuppresive than the infiltration zone. The relative number of CD8+ of T-cells expressing PD-1, CTLA-4, TIGIT, 4–1BB, and OX40, a phenotype that makes T cells functionally inert, is significantly higher in the tumor core compared to infiltration zone.58 Hypoxia is often proposed as a driving factor,62 along with increased TAM density contributing to T cell exhaustion.11,62,88 Spatial transcriptomic analyses show a prominent overlap between neighborhoods with higher expression of suppressive TAM-signatures and T cell exhaustion signatures.33 Ravi et al. find that cellular neighbourhoods enriched for mesenchymal-like transcriptional signatures are enriched in CD163+ HMOX1+ TAM subsets that correlate with exhausted T cell clusters in glioblastoma. They show that both astrocytes and TAMs contribute to an immunosuppressive micro-environment through STAT-3-driven release of IL-10, which is crucial in the shift from T cell activation to exhaustion.88 Several factors involved in driving T cell exhaustion in glioma, including hypoxia, nutrient deprivation, tumor-TAM interactions, and the release of immunosuppressive cytokines including IL-10 and TGF-β are also elegantly reviewed elsewhere.124

Interestingly, Dobersalske et al. recently discovered accumulations of T cells in the cranial bone adjacent to the tumor site in glioblastoma patients.43 These aggregates contain mainly activated effector-type T cells that share clonotypes with intratumoral T cells, suggesting that they possess the same tumor reactivity. Notably, cranial bone-derived T cells retained proliferative capacity, show increased MHC-dependent tumor reactivity and are markedly less exhausted than tumor-infiltrating T cells, supporting the notion that tumor-derived cues drive T cell exhaustion.43

In short, T cells in the glioma TME often bear an exhausted phenotype, characterized by the expression of multiple immune checkpoint molecules and decreased cytotoxicity, especially in the hypoxic and TAM-high tumor core.

Prognostic Impact of Glioma TILs Remains Controversial

Abundance of CD8+ TILs is a recognized prognostic factor in several cancers,125 yet the clinical relevance of T cell abundance in glioma is strongly debated. Prognostic significance of T cell abundance in glioma is mentioned in 24 studies. Some find that higher CD3+ or CD8+ T cell numbers are associated with a better prognosis;59,64,67,107 conversely, others find that CD3+ T cell abundance correlates with a worse prognosis,34,40,57,72 or that CD4+ or CD8+ T cell abundance correlates with a worse prognosis.47,53 In some studies, the presence of CD3+ T cells does not significantly influence prognosis,73,76,77,80 nor does infiltration by Tregs.50,58,67 Others find that specific subsets relate to outcome; for instance, the presence of central memory T cells correlates with better overall survival,11 PD-1+CTLA-4+CD8+ T cells in core regions are associated with decreased progression-free survival,58 CD8+ TRM cells positively correlate with survival,64 or Ki-67-high CD8+ T cells positively correlate with overall survival.76 Perivascularly localized CD4+ T cells and FOXP3+ Tregs were associated with shorter progression-free survival in one study, although there was no association with overall survival,80 while an increased proportion of CD4+ Tregs within total TILs was associated with reduced survival in another study.90 Furthermore, recent mass cytometry and spatial transcriptomics efforts have revealed that spatial relationships between immune cell subsets might be more important than absolute numbers. Karimi et al. find that neighbourhoods enriched in MPO+ or M1 macrophages and neighbourhoods enriched in CD4+ T cells correlated with improved survival in glioblastoma.12

Thus, while there is some suggestion that antigen-experienced T cell subsets may associate with outcome, there is little consensus. Contributing factors to these discrepancies across studies include differences in patient demographics (including tumor subtype, grade, and prior treatments), significant inter- and intratumoral heterogeneity, different methods of TIL analysis and inconsistent definitions of T cell subsets between studies. Furthermore, most studies are retrospective with small sample sizes, and often do not take the spatial context into account. Without carefully stratifying for these factors, comparison across studies remains difficult.

Discussion

In this review, we systematically evaluated the abundance, phenotypic characteristics and spatial organization of T cells in glioma, integrating recent advances from spatial and single-cell profiling studies. We confirm and refine the understanding that gliomas are generally T cell-poor tumors, and that T cell abundance is higher in IDHwt gliomas compared to IDHmt gliomas, increases with higher WHO grade, and increases at recurrence. Paradoxically, increased T cell abundance does not directly correspond with improved outcomes, highlighting the importance of T cell functionality and spatial localization for an effective antitumor immune response. Indeed, glioma TILs largely display a late-differentiated phenotype (CD45RA-CCR7-C62L-), with markers for tissue residency (CD103, CD96) and co-expression of markers that signify profound T cell exhaustion (PD-1, CTLA-4, TIM-3, LAG-3, CD39, and TIGIT), coinciding with transcriptional programs pointing to decreased cytotoxic functionality. Furthermore, spatial constraints to T cell immunity in glioma are increasingly recognized. Clonally expanded T cell populations can be detected in glioma, but are more spatially restricted compared to brain metastases, corresponding to glioma-intrinsic genetic and transcriptional heterogeneity. Additionally, the cellular interactions within immunosuppressive niches in the glioma TME are beginning to be unraveled. For instance, tumor-TAM interactions contribute to T cell dysfunction in the hypoxic tumor core of glioblastomas through secretion of IL-10 and TGF-β, shifting the balance from T cell activation towards T cell exhaustion,88 and by promoting T cell exclusion in the perivascular space in IDHmt gliomas in a process reminiscent of glial scarring.51 A more granular understanding of such mechanisms will pave the way for better patient selection and rational combination therapies.

A major limitation for this review is the inclusion of retrospective studies with highly variable study designs. Differences in selected patient populations, tumor regions, methods of analysis and reporting methods hamper drawing fair comparisons between studies. The relatively low incidence of glioma and high costs of advanced techniques lead to small sample sizes, increasing the risk of selection bias, especially considering the heterogeneity of glioma samples.

Present barriers to successful immunotherapies for glioma patients include tumor-intrinsic heterogeneity, low neo-antigen burden, MHC class 1 downregulation, T cell scarcity, spatial restrictions, functional T cell deficits and strong tumor-driven immunosuppression. Several combinatorial immunotherapy strategies are now under investigation to overcome these barriers. Since T cell abundance positively correlates with response to checkpoint inhibitors in advanced melanoma and NSCLC,126 as well as in brain metastases of solid tumors,127 strategies that combine checkpoint inhibitors with treatments that increase T cell recruitment to the TME are of interest. Besides minimizing corticosteroid use, radiotherapy, laser interstitial thermal therapy, oncolytic virotherapy or vaccination therapies might promote T cell recruitment to the TME by increasing available neo-antigens, disrupting the BBB and/or stimulating the inflammatory cascade;128,129 however, concrete evidence for efficacy in glioma is currently lacking. Combination therapies that simultaneously target Tregs or the immunosuppressive TAMs are also of interest to enhance numbers and/or activity of glioma TILs.130,131 In order to mobilize potentially tumor-reactive T cells that are confined to the perivascular space51 or the cranial bone of glioblastoma patients,43 therapies that enhance T cell chemotaxis and entry into the brain parenchyma might be employed and are being tested preclinically. 132,133 Furthermore, since D-2HG accumulation likely plays a role in T cell exclusion in IDHmt tumors, treatment with the recently approved IDH-inhibitor vorasidenib might sensitize IDHmt tumors to immunotherapies, and the combination of vorasidenib and pembrolizumab is now under investigation in NCT05484622.

Whether the exhausted phenotype of glioma TILS reflects irreversible dysfunction or a reversible adaptation to the immunosuppressive TME currently remains an open question. In an attempt to reverse T cell exhaustion profiles, therapies that simultaneously target multiple checkpoints are being tested in clinical trials, such anti-PD1 combined with anti-CTLA4, anti-LAG3, anti-TIM3, or anti-TIGIT,134 and may be used in addition to those that enhance numbers of TILs. Locoregional administration of immunotherapies is another valuable strategy to bypass some of the present barriers. Intratumoral administration of checkpoint inhibitors135 as well as local administration of oncolytic viruses136 are being evaluated clinically. Furthermore, adoptive T cell therapies based on the ex-vivo expansion and locoregional infusion of naturally occurring or genetically engineered autologous tumor-specific T cells are rapidly gaining international momentum, and could potentially circumvent both tumor-driven T cell exclusion and T cell exhaustion. The first clinical trials using CAR-T cell products targeting EGFRvIII or IL13Rα2 describe rapid but transient radiological responses in glioma.25–27 In the largest CAR-T cell trial to date, tumors with higher CD3+ T cell infiltrates showed a better response to CAR-T therapy, suggesting that CAR-T cell therapies would benefit from co-treatments or additional engineering of T cells to counteract the immunosuppressive microenvironment.26 Major efforts are being made to enhance the persistence and potency of CAR-T cell products,137 and will be critical to realizing their full potential as the field progresses.

Conclusions and Future Perspectives

Despite disappointing trial outcomes to date, recent advances in spatial and single-cell techniques provide high-resolution insights into the glioma TME and are now rapidly expanding our understanding of the composition of distinct immune niches and their therapeutic relevance, offering new perspectives on immunotherapy for glioma patients. In order to move the field of glioma immunotherapy forward, we strongly support a framework that integrates transcriptomic, functional and spatial immune profiling into the design of early-phase immunotherapy trials. This includes prospective tissue acquisition, preferentially from both pre- and post-treatment tissue samples, in order to assess factors such as T cell abundance, clonality, activation/exhaustion states and spatial organization within the TME and relate these factors to clinical outcomes. This approach will be essential to verify that the intended therapeutic effect of a treatment is achieved in the TME and to correlate immune changes with therapeutic response, and will improve our understanding of the factors that currently hold back efficient antitumor immune responses in glioma. The value of study designs that incorporate serial tissue sampling and multimodal functional and/or spatial profiling is increasingly recognized,138 and similar approaches have been successfully embedded into more recent immunotherapy studies.139–141 For instance, Skadborg and colleagues showed that systemically administered nivolumab can reach and bind to glioblastoma TILS and causes significant changes in markers for T cell activation and proliferation, but also causes a strong upregulation of negative checkpoint inhibition molecules TIGIT, LAG-3, TIM3, and CTLA-4 that might mitigate its clinical efficacy.140 Furthermore, Hotchkiss et al. show that it is feasible to adapt a spatially resolved, multimodal profiling approach into a prospective clinical trial platform, which they employ to identify genomic and spatial factors that determine TIL expandability in glioblastoma.123 Such studies, where prospective tissue acquisition and functional and spatial immune profiling are incorporated into a clinical trial setting in a standardized way, may provide answers to some of the burning questions that currently remain unanswered and will guide the optimization of rational, biomarker-informed combination therapies, ultimately paving the way toward more effective, individualized immunotherapies for glioma patients.

Supplementary Material

noaf236_Supplementary_Data

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Maarten Engel, Wichor Bramer and Christa Niehot from the Erasmus MC Medical Library for their help in developing and updating the search strategies. The Graphical Abstract was created using BioRender and can be accessed through the following link: https://app.biorender.com/illustrations/6839a854e1ad9dfbf5bf4b9d (P. French, 2025).

Contributor Information

Rosa Luning, Department of Neurology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (R.L., P.J.F. W.J.F.V., L.D., R.H., M.J.v.d.B., M.G.).

Pim J French, Department of Neurology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (R.L., P.J.F. W.J.F.V., L.D., R.H., M.J.v.d.B., M.G.).

Wouter J F Vanbilloen, Department of Neurology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (R.L., P.J.F. W.J.F.V., L.D., R.H., M.J.v.d.B., M.G.); Department of Neurology, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

Lisa Dobber, Department of Neurology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (R.L., P.J.F. W.J.F.V., L.D., R.H., M.J.v.d.B., M.G.).

Levi Van Hijfte, Department of Neurosurgery, University Clinic Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.

Raoull Hoogendijk, Department of Neurology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (R.L., P.J.F. W.J.F.V., L.D., R.H., M.J.v.d.B., M.G.).

Martin J van den Bent, Department of Neurology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (R.L., P.J.F. W.J.F.V., L.D., R.H., M.J.v.d.B., M.G.).

Reno Debets, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology, Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Marjolein Geurts, Department of Neurology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (R.L., P.J.F. W.J.F.V., L.D., R.H., M.J.v.d.B., M.G.); Department of Medical Oncology, ­Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The ­Netherlands.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available online at Neuro-Oncology (https://academic.oup.com/neuro-oncology).

Funding

None.

Conflict of interest statement.

M.G. received honoraria from ­Servier and a research grant from Evgen Pharm. R.D. has received research support from MSD and Bayer, personal fees from ­Bluebird Bio, Genticel, other support from Pan Cancer T outside the submitted work (all paid to the Erasmus MC Cancer Institute), as well as European patent application no’s 21152822.9, 24192717.7 and 25163944.9 (pending to Erasmus MC). All other authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: R.L., P.J.F., R.D., and M.G. Eligibility assessment: R.L., W.V., and L.D. Writing (initial): R.L. Review & editing: all co-authors.

Data Availability

No new data were generated or analyzed in support of this research.

Ethics Statements

This study is a systematic review of previously published literature and does not involve any original data collection involving human or animal participants. Therefore, ethical approval and informed consent were not required.

References

  • 1. van den Bent MJ, Geurts M, French PJ, et al.  Primary brain tumours in adults. Lancet. 2023;402:1564–1579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P, et al.  The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the Central nervous system: a summary. Neuro Oncol. 2021;23:1231–1251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Waldman AD, Fritz JM, Lenardo MJ.  A guide to cancer immunotherapy: from T cell basic science to clinical practice. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020;20:651–668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Decker WK, da Silva RF, Sanabria MH, et al.  Cancer immunotherapy: historical perspective of a clinical revolution and emerging preclinical animal models. Front Immunol. 2017;8:829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Nikolich-Zugich J, Slifka MK, Messaoudi I.  The many important facets of T-cell repertoire diversity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004;4:123–132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Dunn GP, Okada H.  Principles of immunology and its nuances in the Central nervous system. Neuro Oncol.  2015;17 Suppl 7:vii3–vii8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Murphy K, Weaver C.  Janeway’s immunobiology. Garland Science; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Carson MJ, Doose JM, Melchior B, Schmid CD, Ploix CC.  CNS immune privilege: hiding in plain sight. Immunol Rev. 2006;213:48–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Perng P, Lim M.  Immunosuppressive mechanisms of malignant gliomas: parallels at Non-CNS sites. Front Oncol. 2015;5:153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Goldberg SB, Gettinger SN, Mahajan A, et al.  Pembrolizumab for patients with melanoma or non-small-cell lung cancer and untreated brain metastases: early analysis of a non-randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:976–983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Friebel E, Kapolou K, Unger S, et al.  Single-Cell mapping of human brain cancer reveals tumor-specific instruction of tissue-invading leukocytes. Cell. 2020;181:1626–1642.e20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Karimi E, Yu MW, Maritan SM, et al.  Single-cell spatial immune landscapes of primary and metastatic brain tumours. Nature. 2023;614:555–563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Klemm F, Maas RR, Bowman RL, et al.  Interrogation of the microenvironmental landscape in brain tumors reveals disease-specific alterations of immune cells. Cell. 2020;181:1643–1660.e17. e1617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Broekman ML, Maas SLN, Abels ER, Mempel TR, Krichevsky AM, Breakefield XO.  Multidimensional communication in the microenvirons of glioblastoma. Nat Rev Neurol. 2018;14:482–495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Jackson CM, Choi J, Lim M.  Mechanisms of immunotherapy resistance: lessons from glioblastoma. Nat Immunol. 2019;20:1100–1109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Friedrich M, Sankowski R, Bunse L, et al.  Tryptophan metabolism drives dynamic immunosuppressive myeloid states in IDH-mutant gliomas. Nat Cancer. 2021;2:723–740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Wen PY, Weller M, Lee EQ, et al.  Glioblastoma in adults: a society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) and european society of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) consensus review on current management and future directions. Neuro Oncol. 2020;22:1073–1113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Reardon DA, Wucherpfennig K, Chiocca EA.  Immunotherapy for glioblastoma: on the sidelines or in the game?  Discov Med. 2017;24:201–208. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Quail DF, Joyce JA.  The microenvironmental landscape of brain tumors. Cancer Cell. 2017;31:326–341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Chongsathidkiet P, Jackson C, Koyama S, et al.  Sequestration of T cells in bone marrow in the setting of glioblastoma and other intracranial tumors. Nat Med. 2018;24:1459–1468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Grossman SA, Ye X, Lesser G, et al. ; NABTT CNS Consortium. Immunosuppression in patients with high-grade gliomas treated with radiation and temozolomide. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:5473–5480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Swildens KX, Sillevis Smitt PAE, van den Bent MJ, French PJ, Geurts M.  The effect of dexamethasone on the microenvironment and efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors in glioblastoma: a systematic review. Neurooncol Adv. 2022;4:vdac087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Weenink B, French PJ, Sillevis Smitt PAE, Debets R, Geurts M.  Immunotherapy in glioblastoma: current shortcomings and future perspectives. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12:751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Gallus M, Kwok D, Lakshmanachetty S, Yamamichi A, Okada H.  Immunotherapy approaches in isocitrate-dehydrogenase-mutant low-grade glioma. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15:3726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Bagley SJ, Logun M, Fraietta JA, et al.  Intrathecal bivalent CAR T cells targeting EGFR and IL13Ralpha2 in recurrent glioblastoma: phase 1 trial interim results. Nat Med. 2024;30:1320–1329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Brown CE, Hibbard JC, Alizadeh D, et al.  Locoregional delivery of IL-13Ralpha2-targeting CAR-T cells in recurrent high-grade glioma: a phase 1 trial. Nat Med. 2024;30:1001–1012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Choi BD, Gerstner ER, Frigault MJ, et al.  Intraventricular CARv3-TEAM-E T cells in recurrent glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2024;390:1290–1298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al.  The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ . 2021;372:n71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Abdelfattah N, Kumar P, Wang C, et al.  Single-cell analysis of human glioma and immune cells identifies S100A4 as an immunotherapy target. Nat Commun. 2022;13:767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Alban TJ, Alvarado AG, Sorensen MD, et al.  Global immune fingerprinting in glioblastoma patient peripheral blood reveals immune-suppression signatures associated with prognosis. JCI Insight. 2018;3:e122264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Asioli S, Gatto L, Vardy U, et al.  Immunophenotypic profile of adult glioblastoma IDH-Wildtype microenvironment: a cohort study. Cancers (Basel). 2024;16:3859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Bartkowiak T, Lima SM, Hayes MJ, et al.  An immunosuppressed microenvironment distinguishes lateral ventricle-contacting glioblastomas. JCI Insight. 2023;8:e160652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Batchu S, Hanafy KA, Redjal N, Godil SS, Thomas AJ.  Single-cell analysis reveals diversity of tumor-associated macrophages and their interactions with T lymphocytes in glioblastoma. Sci Rep. 2023;13:20874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Belghali MY, Admou B, Brahimi M, Khouchani M, Ba-M’hamed S.  Immune tumoral microenvironment in gliomas: focus on CD3+ T cells, Vdelta1+ T cells, and microglia/macrophages. Immunol Res. 2022;70:224–239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Benotmane JK, Kueckelhaus J, Will P, et al.  High-sensitive spatially resolved T cell receptor sequencing with SPTCR-seq. Nat Commun. 2023;14:7432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Berghoff AS, Kiesel B, Widhalm G, et al.  Correlation of immune phenotype with IDH mutation in diffuse glioma. Neuro Oncol. 2017;19:1460–1468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Chen PY, Wu CY, Fang JH, et al.  Functional change of effector Tumor-Infiltrating CCR5+CD38+HLA-DR+CD8+ T cells in glioma microenvironment. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Davidson TB, Lee A, Hsu M, Sedighim S, Orpilla J.  Expression of PD-1 by T cells in malignant glioma patients reflects exhaustion and activation. Clinical Cancer. 2019;25:1913–1922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Dejaegher J, Verschuere T, Vercalsteren E, et al.  Characterization of PD-1 upregulation on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in human and murine gliomas and preclinical therapeutic blockade. Int J Cancer. 2017;141:1891–1900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Dejaegher J, Solie L, Hunin Z, et al.  DNA methylation based glioblastoma subclassification is related to tumoral T-cell infiltration and patient survival. Neuro Oncol. 2021;23:240–250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Diaz LR, Saavedra-Lopez E, Romarate L, et al.  Imbalance of immunological synapse-kinapse states reflects tumor escape to immunity in glioblastoma. JCI Insight. 2018;3: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Dinevska M, Widodo SS, Furst L, et al.  Cell signaling activation and extracellular matrix remodeling underpin glioma tumor microenvironment heterogeneity and organization. Cell Oncol (Dordr). 2023;46:589–602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Dobersalske C, Rauschenbach L, Hua Y, et al.  Cranioencephalic functional lymphoid units in glioblastoma. Nat Med. 2024;30:2947–2956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Fu W, Wang W, Li H, et al.  CyTOF analysis reveals a distinct immunosuppressive microenvironment in IDH mutant anaplastic gliomas. Front Oncol. 2020;10:560211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Fu W, Wang W, Li H, et al.  High dimensional mass cytometry analysis reveals characteristics of the immunosuppressive microenvironment in diffuse astrocytomas. Front Oncol. 2020;10:78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Fu W, Wang W, Li H, et al.  Single-Cell atlas reveals complexity of the immunosuppressive microenvironment of initial and recurrent glioblastoma. Front Immunol. 2020;11:835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Gastearena MAI, Lopez-Janeiro A, Aznarez AL, Arana-Iniguez I, Guillen-Grima F.  A quantitative digital analysis of tissue immune components reveals an immunosuppressive and anergic immune response with relevant prognostic significance in glioblastoma. Biomedicines. 2022;10:1753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Gershon R, Polevikov A, Karepov Y, et al.  Frequencies of 4 tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes potently predict survival in glioblastoma, an immune desert. Neuro Oncol. 2024;26:473–487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Gupta P, Dang M, Oberai S, et al. Immune landscape of isocitrate dehydrogenase-stratified primary and recurrent human gliomas. 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 50. Heimberger AB, Abou-Ghazal M, Reina-Ortiz C, et al.  Incidence and prognostic impact of FoxP3(+) regulatory T cells in human gliomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:5166–5172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. van Hijfte L, Geurts M, de Heer I, et al.  Gemistocytic tumor cells programmed for glial scarring characterize T cell confinement in IDH-mutant astrocytoma. Nat Commun. 2025;16:1156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Huff WX, Bam M, Shireman JM, et al.  Aging- and Tumor-Mediated increase in CD8+CD28- T cells might impose a strong barrier to success of immunotherapy in glioblastoma. Immunohorizons. 2021;5:395–409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Innocenti L, Ortenzi V, Scarpitta R, et al.  The prognostic impact of gender, therapeutic strategies, molecular background, and Tumor-Infiltrating lymphocytes in glioblastoma: a still unsolved jigsaw. Genes (Basel). 2023;14:501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Jacobs JF, Idema AJ, Bol KF, et al.  Regulatory T cells and the PD-L1/PD-1 pathway mediate immune suppression in malignant human brain tumors. Neuro Oncol. 2009;11:394–402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Kaffes I, Szulzewsky F, Chen Z, et al.  Human mesenchymal glioblastomas are characterized by an increased immune cell presence compared to proneural and classical tumors. Oncoimmunology. 2019;8:e1655360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Kikuchi M, Takami H, Kobayashi Y, et al.  Dissecting the immunological microenvironment of glioma based on IDH status: implications for immunotherapy. Cells. 2025;14:1035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Kim AR, Choi KS, Kim MS, et al.  Absolute quantification of tumor-infiltrating immune cells in high-grade glioma identifies prognostic and radiomics values. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2021;70:1995–2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Kim AR, Choi SJ, Park J, et al.  Spatial immune heterogeneity of hypoxia-induced exhausted features in high-grade glioma. Oncoimmunology. 2022;11:2026019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Kmiecik J, Poli A, Brons NH, et al.  Elevated CD3+ and CD8+ tumor-infiltrating immune cells correlate with prolonged survival in glioblastoma patients despite integrated immunosuppressive mechanisms in the tumor microenvironment and at the systemic level. J Neuroimmunol. 2013;264:71–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Knudsen AM, Ewald JD, Pedersen V, Haupt-Jorgensen M, Hansen EVR, Kristensen BW.  Characterisation of the tumour microenvironment in primary and recurrent glioblastomas. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2024;50:e13012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Kollis PM, Ebert LM, Toubia J, Bastow CR. Characterising distinct migratory profiles of infiltrating T-cell subsets in human glioblastoma: frontiersin.org; 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 62. Rahimi Koshkaki H, Minasi S, Ugolini A, et al.  Immunohistochemical characterization of immune infiltrate in tumor microenvironment of glioblastoma. J Pers Med. 2020;10: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Kumar A, Mohamed E, Tong S, et al.  CXCL14 promotes a robust brain tumor-associated immune response in glioma. Clin Cancer Res. 2022;28:2898–2910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. La Manna MP, Di Liberto D, Lo Pizzo M, et al.  The abundance of Tumor-Infiltrating CD8(+) tissue resident memory T lymphocytes correlates with patient survival in glioblastoma. Biomedicines. 2022;10:2454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Lee J, Nicosia M, Hong ES, et al.  Sex-Biased T-cell exhaustion drives differential immune responses in glioblastoma. Cancer Discov. 2023;13:2090–2105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Liu Z, Han H, He X, et al.  Expression of the galectin-9-tim-3 pathway in glioma tissues is associated with the clinical manifestations of glioma. Oncol Lett. 2016;11:1829–1834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Lohr J, Ratliff T, Huppertz A, Ge Y, et al.  Effector T-cell infiltration positively impacts survival of glioblastoma patients and is impaired by tumor-derived TGF-β. Clinical Cancer. 2011:17;4296–4308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Luce A, Abate M, Scognamiglio G, et al.  Immune cell infiltration and inflammatory landscape in primary brain tumours. J Transl Med. 2024;22:521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Maddison K, Graves MC, Bowden NA, et al.  Low tumour-infiltrating lymphocyte density in primary and recurrent glioblastoma. Oncotarget. 2021;12:2177–2187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Magri S, Musca B, Bonaudo C, et al.  Sustained accumulation of Blood-Derived macrophages in the immune microenvironment of patients with recurrent glioblastoma after therapy. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13:6178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Makarevic A, Rapp C, Dettling S, et al.  Increased Radiation-Associated T-Cell infiltration in recurrent IDH-Mutant glioma. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:7801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Marinari E, Allard M, Gustave R, et al.  Inflammation and lymphocyte infiltration are associated with shorter survival in patients with high-grade glioma. Oncoimmunology. 2020;9:1779990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Martinez-Lage M, Lynch TM, Bi Y, et al.  Immune landscapes associated with different glioblastoma molecular subtypes. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2019;7:203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Marx S, Wilken F, Miebach L, et al.  Immunophenotyping of circulating and intratumoral myeloid and T cells in glioblastoma patients. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14:5751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Mathewson ND, Ashenberg O, Tirosh I, Gritsch S. Inhibitory CD161 receptor identified in glioma-infiltrating T cells by single-cell analysis: cell.com; 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 76. Mauldin IS, Jo J, Wages NA, et al.  Proliferating CD8(+) T cell infiltrates are associated with improved survival in glioblastoma. Cells. 2021;10:3378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Mazzaschi G, Olivari A, Pavarani A, et al.  Integrated MRI–immune–genomic features enclose a risk stratification model in patients affected by glioblastoma. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14:3249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Mitsdoerffer M, Aly L, Barz M, et al.  The glioblastoma multiforme tumor site promotes the commitment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes to the TH17 lineage in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2022;119:e2206208119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Mohme M, Schliffke S, Maire CL, et al.  Immunophenotyping of newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma defines distinct immune exhaustion profiles in peripheral and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24:4187–4200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Mu L, Yang C, Gao Q, et al.  CD4+ and perivascular Foxp3+ T cells in glioma correlate with angiogenesis and tumor progression. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Musca B, Russo MG, Tushe A, et al.  The immune cell landscape of glioblastoma patients highlights a myeloid-enriched and immune suppressed microenvironment compared to metastatic brain tumors. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1236824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Najem H, Ott M, Kassab C, et al.  Central nervous system immune interactome is a function of cancer lineage, tumor microenvironment, and STAT3 expression. JCI Insight. 2022;7: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Noorani I, Sidlauskas K, Pellow S, et al.  Clinical impact of anti-inflammatory microglia and macrophage phenotypes at glioblastoma margins. Brain Commun. 2023;5:fcad176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Ou A, Hu W, Jiang P, et al.  Alterations in intratumoral and peripheral immune status in recurrent gliomas and their prognostic implications for patients underwent reoperation. Int Immunopharmacol. 2024;140:112797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Perrin G, Schnuriger V, Quiquerez AL, et al.  Astrocytoma infiltrating lymphocytes include major T cell clonal expansions confined to the CD8 subset. Int Immunol. 1999;11:1337–1350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Gonzalez-Tablas Pimenta M, Otero A, Arandia Guzman DA, et al.  Tumor cell and immune cell profiles in primary human glioblastoma: Impact on patient outcome. Brain Pathol. 2021;31:365–380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Ran X, Zheng J, Chen L, et al.  Single-Cell transcriptomics reveals the heterogeneity of the immune landscape of IDH-Wild-Type High-Grade gliomas. Cancer Immunol Res. 2024;12:232–246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Ravi VM, Neidert N, Will P, et al.  T-cell dysfunction in the glioblastoma microenvironment is mediated by myeloid cells releasing interleukin-10. Nat Commun. 2022;13:925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Romagnoli G, D’Alessandris QG, Capone I, et al.  CD8+CD103+PD1+TIM3+ T cells in glioblastoma microenvironment correlate with prognosis. Immunology. 2024;171:198–211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Sayour EJ, McLendon P, McLendon R, et al.  Increased proportion of FoxP3+ regulatory T cells in tumor infiltrating lymphocytes is associated with tumor recurrence and reduced survival in patients with glioblastoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2015;64:419–427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Schaettler MO, Richters MM, Wang AZ, et al.  Characterization of the genomic and immunologic diversity of malignant brain tumors through multisector analysis. Cancer Discov. 2022;12:154–171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Schmassmann P, Roux J, Dettling S, et al. Single-cell characterization of human GBM reveals regional differences in tumor-infiltrating leukocyte activation. 2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 93. Scholl JN, Weber AF, Dias CK, et al.  Characterization of purinergic signaling in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes from lower- and high-grade gliomas. Purinergic Signal. 2024;20:47–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Shen S, Wu Q, Liu J, et al.  Analysis of human glioma-associated co-inhibitory immune checkpoints in glioma microenvironment and peripheral blood. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2021;35:20587384211056505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Simonds EF, Lu ED, Badillo O, et al.  Deep immune profiling reveals targetable mechanisms of immune evasion in immune checkpoint inhibitor-refractory glioblastoma. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9:e002181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Soltani A, Kajtar B, Abdelwahab E, et al.  Is an immunosuppressive microenvironment a characteristic of both intra- and extraparenchymal Central nervous tumors?  Pathophysiology. 2021;28:34–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Tamma R, Ingravallo G, Annese T, d‘Amati A, Lorusso L, Ribatti D.  Tumor microenvironment and microvascular density in human glioblastoma. Cells. 2022;12:11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Tamura R, Ohara K, Sasaki H, et al.  Difference in immunosuppressive cells between peritumoral area and tumor core in glioblastoma. World Neurosurg.  2018;120:e601–e610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Tang F, Wang DW, Xi C, et al.  Local and systemic effects of IDH mutations on primary glioma patients. Immunology. 2023;169:503–514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Wang L, He Z, Fan S, et al.  Quantitative analysis of immune cells within the tumor microenvironment of glioblastoma and their relevance for prognosis. Int Immunopharmacol. 2024;142:113109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Wang AZ, Mashimo BL, Schaettler MO, et al.  Glioblastoma-Infiltrating CD8+ T cells are predominantly a clonally expanded GZMK+ effector population. Cancer Discov. 2024;14:1106–1131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Wang F, Dong J, Xu Y, et al.  Turning attention to tumor-host interface and focus on the peritumoral heterogeneity of glioblastoma. Nat Commun. 2024;15:10885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Weenink B, Draaisma K, Ooi HZ, Kros JM. Low-grade glioma harbors few CD8 T cells, which is accompanied by decreased expression of chemo-attractants, not immunogenic antigens: nature.com; 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 104. Wischnewski V, Maas RR, Aruffo PG, et al.  Phenotypic diversity of T cells in human primary and metastatic brain tumors revealed by multiomic interrogation. Nat Cancer. 2023;4:908–924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Woroniecka K, Chongsathidkiet P, Rhodin K, et al.  T-Cell exhaustion signatures vary with tumor type and are severe in glioblastoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24:4175–4186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Xu S, Shao QQ, Sun JT, et al.  Synergy between the ectoenzymes CD39 and CD73 contributes to adenosinergic immunosuppression in human malignant gliomas. Neuro Oncol. 2013;15:1160–1172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Yang I, Tihan T, Han SJ, et al.  CD8+ T-cell infiltrate in newly diagnosed glioblastoma is associated with long-term survival. J Clin. 2010;17:1381–1385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Yang I, Han SJ, Sughrue ME, Tihan T, Parsa AT.  Immune cell infiltrate differences in pilocytic astrocytoma and glioblastoma: evidence of distinct immunological microenvironments that reflect tumor biology. J Neurosurg. 2011;115:505–511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Zhang L, Sorensen MD, Kristensen BW, Reifenberger G, McIntyre TM, Lin F.  D-2-Hydroxyglutarate is an intercellular mediator in IDH-Mutant gliomas inhibiting complement and T cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24:5381–5391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Li Z, Liu X, Guo R, Wang P.  CD4(+)Foxp3(-) type 1 regulatory T cells in glioblastoma multiforme suppress T cell responses through multiple pathways and are regulated by tumor-associated macrophages. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2016;81:1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Sterne JAC, Savovic J, Page MJ, et al.  RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ . 2019;366:l4898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. McGuinness LA, Higgins JPT.  Risk-of-bias VISualization (robvis): an R package and shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-bias assessments. Res Synth Methods. 2021;12:55–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Verhaak RG, Hoadley KA, Purdom E, et al. ; Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Integrated genomic analysis identifies clinically relevant subtypes of glioblastoma characterized by abnormalities in PDGFRA, IDH1, EGFR, and NF1. Cancer Cell. 2010;17:98–110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Gubin MM, Schreiber RD.  CANCER. The odds of immunotherapy success. Science. 2015;350:158–159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Touat M, Li YY, Boynton AN, et al.  Mechanisms and therapeutic implications of hypermutation in gliomas. Nature. 2020;580:517–523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Smolders J, van Luijn MM, Hsiao CC, Hamann J.  T-cell surveillance of the human brain in health and multiple sclerosis. Semin Immunopathol. 2022;44:855–867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Woroniecka KI, Rhodin KE, Chongsathidkiet P, Keith KA, Fecci PE.  T-cell dysfunction in glioblastoma: applying a new framework. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24:3792–3802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Mensurado S, Blanco-Dominguez R, Silva-Santos B.  The emerging roles of gammadelta T cells in cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2023;20:178–191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Smolders J, Remmerswaal EB, Schuurman KG, et al.  Characteristics of differentiated CD8(+) and CD4 (+) T cells present in the human brain. Acta Neuropathol. 2013;126:525–535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Smolders J, Heutinck KM, Fransen NL, et al.  Tissue-resident memory T cells populate the human brain. Nat Commun. 2018;9:4593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Rosato PC, Wijeyesinghe S, Stolley JM, Masopust D.  Integrating resident memory into T cell differentiation models. Curr Opin Immunol. 2020;63:35–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Schumacher TN, Thommen DS.  Tertiary lymphoid structures in cancer. Science. 2022;375:eabf9419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Hotchkiss KM, Zhang K, Corcoran AM, et al. A Spatial Multi-Omic Framework Identifies Gliomas Permissive to TIL Expansion. 2025.
  • 124. Watowich MB, Gilbert MR, Larion M.  T cell exhaustion in malignant gliomas. Trends Cancer. 2023;9:270–292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Oliveira G, Wu CJ.  Dynamics and specificities of T cells in cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2023;23:295–316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Pilard C, Ancion M, Delvenne P, Jerusalem G, Hubert P, Herfs M.  Cancer immunotherapy: it’s time to better predict patients’ response. Br J Cancer. 2021;125:927–938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Berghoff AS, Fuchs E, Ricken G, et al.  Density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes correlates with extent of brain edema and overall survival time in patients with brain metastases. Oncoimmunology. 2016;5:e1057388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Ling AL, Solomon IH, Landivar AM, et al.  Clinical trial links oncolytic immunoactivation to survival in glioblastoma. Nature. 2023;623:157–166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Hwang H, Huang J, Khaddour K, et al.  Prolonged response of recurrent IDH-wild-type glioblastoma to laser interstitial thermal therapy with pembrolizumab. CNS Oncol. 2022;11:CNS81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Ding AS, Routkevitch D, Jackson C, Lim M.  Targeting myeloid cells in combination treatments for glioma and other tumors. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Amoozgar Z, Kloepper J, Ren J, et al.  Targeting treg cells with GITR activation alleviates resistance to immunotherapy in murine glioblastomas. Nat Commun. 2021;12:2582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Singh K, Hotchkiss KM, Patel KK, et al.  Enhancing T cell chemotaxis and infiltration in glioblastoma. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13:5367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Ma W, Wang Y, Zhang R, et al.  Targeting PAK4 to reprogram the vascular microenvironment and improve CAR-T immunotherapy for glioblastoma. Nat Cancer. 2021;2:83–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Liu Y, Zhou F, Ali H, Lathia JD, Chen P.  Immunotherapy for glioblastoma: current state, challenges, and future perspectives. Cell Mol Immunol. 2024;21:1354–1375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Duerinck J, Lescrauwaet L, Dirven I, et al.  Intracranial administration of anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 immune checkpoint-blocking monoclonal antibodies in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma. Neuro Oncol. 2024;26:2208–2221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Nassiri F, Patil V, Yefet LS, et al.  Oncolytic DNX-2401 virotherapy plus pembrolizumab in recurrent glioblastoma: a phase 1/2 trial. Nat Med. 2023;29:1370–1378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Montoya M, Gallus M, Phyu S, Haegelin J, de Groot J, Okada H.  A roadmap of CAR-T-Cell therapy in glioblastoma: challenges and future perspectives. Cells. 2024;13:726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Singh K, Hotchkiss KM, Parney IF, et al.  Correcting the drug development paradigm for glioblastoma requires serial tissue sampling. Nat Med. 2023;29:2402–2405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Hotchkiss KM, Zhang K, Corcoran AM, et al. A spatial multi-omic framework identifies gliomas permissive to TIL expansion. bioRxiv. 2025.
  • 140. Skadborg SK, Maarup S, Draghi A, et al.  Nivolumab reaches brain lesions in patients with recurrent glioblastoma and induces T-cell activity and upregulation of checkpoint pathways. Cancer Immunol Res. 2024;12:1202–1220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Long GV, Shklovskaya E, Satgunaseelan L, et al.  Neoadjuvant triplet immune checkpoint blockade in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Nat Med. 2025;31:1557–1566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

noaf236_Supplementary_Data

Data Availability Statement

No new data were generated or analyzed in support of this research.


Articles from Neuro-Oncology are provided here courtesy of Society for Neuro-Oncology and Oxford University Press

RESOURCES