Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2026 Mar 3;16:8653. doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-42429-8

Floquet angular modulation for 6G systems

Bilel Hamdi 1,✉, Radhoine Aloui 2,#, Adel Sharar Aldalbahi 3,#, Tijeni Delleji 2,#, Sofien Mhatli 4,6,#, Taoufik Aguili 1,#, Ignacio Llamas-Garro 5,#, Ahmed Siala 2,#
PMCID: PMC12979583  PMID: 41776240

Abstract

This paper introduces a computationally efficient method for angular modulation analysis in 5G/6G systems, significantly reducing numerical complexity and computation time compared to conventional techniques. Inspired by optical spectroscopy, we present novel approaches tailored for 5G/6G applications like reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RIS) and metasurfaces. Unlike traditional direct methods (Fourier, Jones matrix, Bessel series, orbital angular momentum), our technique employs a modified Fourier method combined with Floquet analysis.

Subject terms: Engineering, Mathematics and computing, Optics and photonics, Physics

Introduction

The paradigm shift toward sixth-generation (6G) wireless networks necessitates revolutionary advances in three core domains: ultra-high spectral efficiency, sub-degree beamforming precision, and real-time adaptive wavefront control33–38. These capabilities are critical for emerging applications including holographic communications, pervasive sensing, and terahertz (THz)-band connectivity36,37. Central to this evolution are reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RIS) and electromagnetic metasurfaces38, which enable unprecedented spatio-temporal manipulation of electromagnetic fields through angular modulation–a fundamental technique governing phase-front engineering for beam steering14, orbital angular momentum (OAM) multiplexing33–35, and interference nulling35. Traditional analytical models for angular modulation face significant limitations when applied to dynamic 6G scenarios:

  • Fourier analysis1–11 assumes time-invariant systems, struggling with rapidly varying phase responses in reconfigurable metasurfaces.

  • Jones matrix formalism12–18, while powerful for polarization control, lacks native support for spectral harmonic interactions in periodic structures.

  • Bessel series decompositions18–32 become computationally intractable for arbitrary nonlinear modulations.

  • OAM-based methods33–35 exhibit sensitivity to misalignment and spatial perturbations.

To contextualize our proposed Fourier-Floquet analysis, we first survey established angular modulation techniques and their limitations for 6G systems. Section 2 provides a comprehensive review of Fourier analysis1–11, Jones matrix formalism12–18, Phase Modulation Spectroscopy19–32, Orbital Angular Momentum33–35, and other relevant methods36–40. Inspired by precision spectroscopic techniques in photonics23–32,31,53,57, this article introduces a modified Fourier-Floquet analysis as a unified model for angular modulation in 5G/6G systems. Our approach synergistically combines1,5–7,9:

graphic file with name d33e400.gif

Unlike conventional methods, we use Floquet’s theorem48,49 to decompose wave propagation in periodic RIS arrays into spatial harmonics, enabling:

  • Efficient unit cell reduction for infinite arrays via phase-shift boundary conditions Inline graphic48,49.

  • Spectral convolution formalism for nonlinear modulation effects31 :
    graphic file with name d33e435.gif
  • Time-domain extensibility for Floquet-engineered beam steering18–32: Inline graphic11.

This initiative advances the state-of-the-art in three key domains:

  1. RIS beamforming: Derives generalized Snell’s law for programmable phase gradients36: Inline graphic.

  2. Multi-beam generation: Enables N-beam synthesis via nonlinear modulation spectra Inline graphic31.

  3. MIMO-RIS integration: Models channel matrix as Inline graphic = Inline graphic for capacity optimization33–36.

The paper is structured as follows: Section 2 reviews angular modulation fundamentals. Section 3 details the Fourier-Floquet methodology. Section 4 applies this model to RIS-assisted 6G systems. Section 5 presents numerical validation. Conclusions outline future work. A summary of key mathematical notation is provided in Appendix D (Table 5) for reference.

Background on angular modulation techniques

There are four main techniques that explain the concept of angular modulation based on reflective and absorptive surfaces for antenna arrays1–36:

Fourier analysis

The papers9–11 analyze distortion in angular-modulated signals of the form

graphic file with name d33e541.gif 1

when transmitted through a network with transfer function Inline graphic. Using Fourier analysis1–11, the output signal is expressed as:

graphic file with name d33e557.gif 2

Key findings demonstrate that:

  • Linear-phase transfer characteristics (Inline graphic) preserve signal integrity, introducing only a time delay Inline graphic:
    graphic file with name d33e575.gif 3
  • Hyperbolic cosine amplitude characteristics (Inline graphic) enhance high frequencies without distortion:
    graphic file with name d33e586.gif 4
  • Sinusoidal amplitude characteristics (Inline graphic) attenuate high frequencies, with maximum modulation frequency Inline graphic limited by:
    graphic file with name d33e601.gif 5
    where Inline graphic is the 3dB bandwidth and Inline graphic the tolerable signal depression.

The analysis concludes that phase linearity is more critical than amplitude flatness for distortion minimization in angular modulation systems1–11.

Jones matrix formalism

The Jones matrix formalism models the transformation of polarized light by optical elements using linear algebra12–18. The polarization state of a monochromatic plane wave is represented by a Jones vector Inline graphic, where Inline graphic and Inline graphic are complex amplitudes describing the electric field components along the Inline graphic- and Inline graphic-axes. An optical element (e.g., polarizer, waveplate) is characterized by a Inline graphic complex Jones matrix Inline graphic. The output polarization state after interaction is computed as Inline graphic. For a system of Inline graphic sequential elements, the total effect is given by the product of their individual matrices: Inline graphic. Common matrices include a linear polarizer aligned to the Inline graphic-axis, Inline graphic, and a quarter-wave plate with its fast axis along Inline graphic, Inline graphic. Rotated elements are described using a rotation matrix Inline graphic, with the transformed Jones matrix Inline graphic. The intensity of the output is Inline graphic, where Inline graphic denotes the conjugate transpose. This model applies to coherent, non-depolarizing systems.

The Jones matrix formalism, a powerful tool for modeling polarization states in optical systems, can be adapted for 6G communication systems to analyze and optimize polarization-sensitive components, such as reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RIS) and multi-antenna arrays12–18. By leveraging Floquet angular modulation–a periodic modulation technique inspired by Floquet theory–researchers can enhance signal robustness and spectral efficiency in 6G networks. This approach enables precise control over wavefronts and polarization states, mitigating interference and improving channel capacity. The combination of Jones matrix analysis and Floquet modulation offers a promising model for advancing next-generation wireless systems, particularly in scenarios requiring high-frequency terahertz (THz).

Phase modulation spectroscopy (PMS)

Employs sinusoidal phase modulation of a laser beam12–32:

graphic file with name d33e728.gif

where Inline graphic = modulation index, Inline graphic = modulation frequency, Inline graphic = Bessel functions. After sample transmission (absorption Inline graphic, dispersion Inline graphic), the Inline graphic-signal contains:

  • Absorption component: Inline graphic

  • Dispersion component: Inline graphic

Angular modulation (FM/WM spectroscopy)

Defined via instantaneous frequency:

graphic file with name d33e774.gif
  • Frequency Modulation (FM): Inline graphic, Inline graphic (linewidth). Signal from one sideband:
    graphic file with name d33e789.gif
    graphic file with name d33e792.gif
  • Wavelength Modulation (WM): Inline graphic, Inline graphic. Approximates absorption derivative:
    graphic file with name d33e806.gif

Note: Inline graphic = field attenuation, Inline graphic = intensity absorption (Inline graphic), Inline graphic = spectral linewidth. FM/WM unified under angular modulation in Inline graphic parameter space.

Orbital angular momentum (OAM)

is a property of electromagnetic waves characterized by helical wavefronts, offering an additional degree of freedom for spatial multiplexing in 6G communications. The complex amplitude of an OAM mode of order Inline graphic is expressed as:

graphic file with name d33e839.gif

where Inline graphic is the azimuthal quantum number (integer value). In 6G waveform design, OAM enables an increase in spectral capacity through multiplexing of orthogonal modes:

graphic file with name d33e847.gif

Floquet angular modulation exploits the temporal dynamics of OAM vortices to encode information, optimizing robustness in multipath channels. Key performances:

  • Spectral density: Inline graphic (Inline graphic: maximum usable modes).

  • Error rate: Inline graphic (Inline graphic: mode separation).

6G Advantages: Reduction of inter-mode interference and scalability for THz, subject to beam divergence and alignment constraints33–35.

Other kinds of angle modulation applications

The articles36,37 describe a geometrical phase shift keying (PSK) modulation technique using a graphene-based reflectarray metasurface. By spatially shifting a periodic control pattern (e.g., alternating ON/OFF states of cells) across the array, the phase of the reflected terahertz beam is modulated. Each shift by one cell introduces a precise phase shift of Inline graphic (where P is the pattern period), enabling broadband phase modulation without altering the beam’s frequency. This approach leverages the reconfigurable phase hologram of the reflectarray to encode information or steer beams, with applications in terahertz communications and adaptive optics.

The paper39 employs linear frequency modulation (LFM) of an optical carrier (laser) for applications such as FMCW lidar. By linearly sweeping the laser frequency over a bandwidth Inline graphic, the distance to a target is determined from the beat frequency between the transmitted and reflected waves. This angle modulation technique, implemented via electro-optic or acousto-optic modulators, offers advantages including noise immunity, high linearity, and precise ranging capabilities in space communication and sensing.

Angular modulation refers to designing an optical element (here, a metasurface) with a phase profile that deliberately varies with the azimuthal angle (Inline graphic), breaking rotational symmetry. By incorporating a term proportional to Inline graphic in the phase equation (Eq. 2), it adds an extra degree of freedom beyond radial position. This enables an extended focal segment (long DOF) while maintaining image quality over the range, overcoming limitations of rotationally symmetric elements like axicons. The approach is particularly powerful in metasurfaces, allowing ultrathin, polarization-insensitive, and broadband extended-DOF devices38.

Beyond extended depth of focus, metasurfaces have also been leveraged for generating orbital angular momentum (OAM) beams with high efficiency and purity. Recent advances include dielectric metasurfaces that convert linearly polarized light into high-purity OAM modes with topological charges up to Inline graphic67, and geometric-phase metasurfaces that enable broadband OAM multiplexing across a wide spectral range68. These demonstrations highlight the potential of metasurfaces as compact and efficient OAM generators, which can be further optimized using the Floquet-based angular modulation model proposed in this work. The paper40 employs polarization modulation of IR light (switching between s- and p-polarizations) to simultaneously probe surface-adsorbed species and liquid-phase species at catalytic solid-liquid interfaces. This enables time-resolved monitoring of reactions (e.g., CO oxidation on Pt) by selectively isolating surface and bulk signals. The paper13 uses polarization modulation via a rotating quarter-wave plate to process orthogonally circularly polarized radio beacon signals. The bearing (direction) of a moving object is determined from the phase of the 4th harmonic (Inline graphic) of the modulation frequency, leveraging the relationship Inline graphic for navigation.

Both papers utilize polarization modulation as a form of angle modulation—40 for spectroscopic interfacial analysis and13 for navigation bearing determination—demonstrating its versatility in extracting phase-sensitive information.

Current methods for RIS and OAM: Merits and Limitations

The diverse angle modulation techniques outlined in Sections 1.1−1.5 form the foundational toolkit for wavefront engineering. However, when applied to the core 6G technologies of Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces (RIS) and Orbital Angular Momentum (OAM) communications, each method reveals distinct merits and practical limitations in dynamic, large-scale scenarios. This subsection provides a focused comparison of these approaches, highlighting their computational trade-offs and scalability challenges for next-generation systems.

RIS methods

  • Fourier-Based Phase Retrieval Fourier methods are widely used for phase profile synthesis in RIS due to their simplicity and speed in the spectral domain. They allow efficient analysis of periodic or quasi-periodic structures via Floquet harmonics. However, these methods assume time-invariant systems and struggle with rapid reconfiguration, nonlinear phase responses, and edge effects in finite arrays, limiting their applicability in real-time adaptive RIS1–11,46–48.

  • Jones Matrix Modeling Adapted from polarization optics, Jones matrices provide a powerful framework for modeling polarization-sensitive RIS elements and multi-antenna arrays. They enable precise control over wavefront polarization states, which is critical for polarization multiplexing and interference mitigation. Nonetheless, the formalism lacks native support for spectral harmonic interactions and nonlinear modulation effects, making it less suitable for broadband or dynamically tuned metasurfaces12–18.

  • Bessel Series Decomposition Bessel expansions are commonly employed to analyze sinusoidal or periodic phase modulations, such as those used in Phase Modulation Spectroscopy (PMS). While accurate for certain modulation profiles, Bessel series become computationally prohibitive for arbitrary or nonlinear phase functions, with complexity scaling as Inline graphic for large arrays. This limits their use in real-time optimization of reconfigurable metasurfaces19–32.

  • Computational Challenges in Dynamic 6G Environments In 6G scenarios requiring sub-millisecond reconfiguration, high-dimensional optimization, and integration with massive MIMO, traditional RIS methods face significant bottlenecks. Finite array effects, manufacturing tolerances, and element non-uniformity further degrade performance, necessitating robust and efficient modeling frameworks such as the Floquet-based approach proposed in this work63–65.

OAM methods

  • Mode Multiplexing OAM mode multiplexing exploits orthogonal helical wavefronts to increase spectral efficiency, offering a theoretically unbounded number of channels. It is particularly promising for line-of-sight THz communications. However, OAM modes are highly sensitive to misalignment, atmospheric turbulence, and multipath scattering, which can lead to severe inter-mode crosstalk and limit practical deployment33–35.

  • Holographic Metasurfaces Metasurface-based OAM generators use holographic principles to imprint phase profiles that produce OAM beams. These devices are compact, integrable, and capable of multi-mode generation. Nevertheless, they suffer from limited bandwidth, polarization sensitivity, and design complexity, especially when targeting high-order OAM modes at THz frequencies36–38.

  • Spatial Phase Modulation Spatial light modulators (SLMs) and programmable metasurfaces can dynamically generate OAM beams via real-time phase modulation. While flexible, these systems require high-resolution control, exhibit diffraction losses, and face scalability issues in large-aperture or high-frequency implementations38,39.

  • Scalability and THz Band Limitations At THz frequencies, OAM systems encounter challenges such as beam divergence, atmospheric absorption, and fabrication precision. The number of usable OAM modes is often limited by aperture size and alignment stability, constraining the practical capacity gains in 6G links34,35.

Recent surveys on RIS and OAM techniques further underscore these trade-offs, emphasizing the need for hybrid analytical-computational frameworks that combine accuracy, efficiency, and adaptability for 6G systems33–38,59–62.

Angle-modulated floquet analysis (a new modified technique)

Fourier-Floquet analysis

The Fourier-Floquet analysis provides a powerful model for characterizing wave propagation in periodic antenna arrays by decomposing the problem into fundamental spatial harmonics. This analysis is based on the assumption of an infinitely extended periodic structure, which allows the application of Floquet’s theorem and reduces the problem to the study of a single unit cell with phase-shift boundary conditions [49, 50]. This approach—which we have previously applied to model finite and infinite planar structures [49, 65]—simplifies the analysis of an infinite periodic array by reducing it to the study of a single unit cell through the application of Floquet’s theorem, which introduces a phase shift boundary condition to account for periodicity [49]. The key insight is that the array’s transfer function can be completely described by analyzing one unit cell while incorporating the Floquet phase shift Inline graphic between adjacent cells, where Inline graphic represents the wavevector component parallel to the periodicity direction and d is the spatial period6,9. The complete spatial response of the array is then obtained via superposition of all Floquet-Bloch modes in the spectral domain. As shown in Eq.2.7 of44, the dispersion relation Inline graphic for Bloch waves exhibits periodicity in k-space with a period of Inline graphic, meaning the wave behavior repeats every reciprocal lattice vector Inline graphic (where Inline graphic). This periodicity implies that wavevectors differing by integer multiples of Inline graphic are physically equivalent - a fundamental consequence of the underlying spatial periodicity that leads to the folding of dispersion curves into the first Brillouin zone Inline graphic. Figures 2.10a and 2.10b of44 illustrate this critical difference between periodic and non-periodic media, where the periodic case shows band folding and the emergence of photonic band gaps due to constructive interference of scattered waves44. The Fourier-Floquet method thus provides both computational efficiency (through unit cell reduction) and physical insight into how periodic structuring modifies wave propagation.

Implications of the infinite-array assumption

The infinite-periodicity assumption yields two key implications:

  1. Computational Efficiency: The reduction to a single unit cell with Floquet phase-shift conditions transforms the analysis into a spectral problem solvable via Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) algorithms. This reduces the computational complexity from Inline graphic (direct spatial methods) to Inline graphic, where N is the number of spatial harmonics. This efficiency enables real-time optimization of large-scale RIS and metasurface configurations.

  2. Neglect of Edge Effects: The model does not account for truncation at array boundaries. For finite arrays—especially with Inline graphic elements—edge effects can lead to beam squint, elevated side lobes, and pattern distortion. For large arrays (Inline graphic), these effects become relatively less significant in the central region, making the infinite-array approximation a valid and efficient design tool. The proposed method is therefore particularly intended for large-scale RIS and metasurfaces where edge effects are relatively small, and serves as an efficient foundation for optimization. Mitigation strategies for finite arrays, such as windowing techniques (e.g., Hann, Hamming) or the array scanning method, are discussed in Section 5 and have been explored in our previous work [64] and in the literature [65, 66]. These approaches can be incorporated into the Floquet spectral model as straightforward extensions for handling practical finite-sized metasurfaces.

Modified technique

Core Innovation: While Section 3-1 describes standard Floquet analysis for periodic structures, our modification introduces angular modulation Inline graphic as an independent control dimension. The key advancement is treating Inline graphic as a separate spectral operator that convolves with the Floquet spectrum, enabling:

  • Arbitrary wavefront engineering beyond structural periodicity

  • Real-time reconfiguration without changing physical geometry

  • Nonlinear modulation analysis via Inline graphic coefficients

This transforms Floquet theory from a passive analysis tool into an active design model.

To derive the equation transforming the Floquet spectral wavenumber domain to the space domain with angular modulation, we follow a rigorous mathematical approach. First, using the Floquet–Bloch theorem, a wave solution Inline graphic in a periodic medium with period Inline graphic (the unit cell size) is expressed as a Bloch wave:

graphic file with name d33e1245.gif

where Inline graphic is the Floquet exponent (or Bloch wavenumber) and Inline graphic is a periodic function with period Inline graphic, i.e., Inline graphic. Expanding Inline graphic in a Fourier series gives

graphic file with name d33e1270.gif

where Inline graphic are the Fourier coefficients of Inline graphic. This leads to

graphic file with name d33e1283.gif

Introducing angular modulation via a phase function Inline graphic, which represents the desired phase profile, the modulated field becomes

graphic file with name d33e1291.gif

For linear modulation (Inline graphic), this simplifies to a shift in the Floquet exponent:

graphic file with name d33e1299.gif

The general form, accounting for arbitrary modulation, is

graphic file with name d33e1303.gif

representing the transformation from the Floquet spectral domain to the space domain with angular modulation62.

Alternative Form: Convolution in Spectral Domain

If the angular modulation Inline graphic admits a Fourier expansion, we can write

graphic file with name d33e1320.gif

where Inline graphic are the Fourier coefficients of Inline graphic. Then the modulated field can be expressed as a double summation:

graphic file with name d33e1332.gif

This representation reveals a spectral convolution between the Floquet harmonics Inline graphic and the modulation coefficients Inline graphic. Physically, this means that each Floquet mode Inline graphic couples with every modulation harmonic Inline graphic, producing shifted spectral components at Inline graphic. Such a formulation is particularly useful for analyzing nonlinear interactions or arbitrary phase modulations in periodic systems.

Letting Inline graphic, we can rewrite the above as

graphic file with name d33e1363.gif

where Inline graphic denotes the discrete convolution of the sequences Inline graphic and Inline graphic. A summary of key notation is provided in Appendix 5 (Table 5).

The proposed modified Fourier-Floquet analysis establishes a unified framework for modeling complex wavefront manipulation in reconfigurable metasurfaces. This approach integrates recent advances in Floquet engineering49–62 to address critical challenges in 6G systems, particularly for reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RIS) and metasurface applications. By leveraging spectral convolution techniques within a Floquet-Bloch formalism, the method enables efficient analysis of arbitrary phase modulations while maintaining computational tractability for large-scale arrays.

Floquet theory with angular modulation in 6G, reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RIS) and meta-surfaces: mathematical formulation

Applying our modified Floquet analysis to 6G systems provides a powerful model for analyzing wave propagation in 6G communication systems and Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces (RIS)1–62. Below, we derive the key equations and discuss their applications.

Floquet-Bloch modes in periodic RIS structures

Consider an RIS with a periodic unit cell of size Inline graphic. The wave interaction can be modeled using Floquet-Bloch theory45,48–51:

Floquet-Bloch decomposition

The electric field Inline graphic in a periodic RIS structure can be expressed as:

graphic file with name d33e1425.gif

where:

  • Inline graphic = Floquet-Bloch wavenumber (determined by boundary conditions),

  • Inline graphic = Fourier coefficients (spectral amplitudes of Floquet modes),

  • Inline graphic = spatial harmonic index.

RIS-induced angular modulation

An RIS introduces phase modulation Inline graphic, altering the wavefront. The modulated field becomes6–8:

graphic file with name d33e1463.gif

Substituting Inline graphic:

graphic file with name d33e1471.gif

Mathematical formulation for RIS beam steering

Case 1: linear phase gradient (beam steering)

If the RIS imposes a linear phase shift Inline graphic, the modulated field becomes:

graphic file with name d33e1484.gif

This introduces a wavenumber shift Inline graphic, steering the beam in a desired direction.

Beam Steering Angle (Snell’s Law for RIS) The deflection angle Inline graphic is given by36:

graphic file with name d33e1504.gif

where:

  • Inline graphic = incident angle,

  • Inline graphic = wavelength.

Case 2: nonlinear phase modulation (multi-beamforming)

For nonlinear Inline graphic, we expand Inline graphic in a Fourier series1,5–7,9:

graphic file with name d33e1546.gif

The modulated field becomes:

graphic file with name d33e1550.gif

This generates multiple diffraction orders, enabling multi-beamforming.

6G applications: Floquet engineering for RIS-assisted communications

Floquet-modulated RIS for beamforming

  • The RIS can be dynamically programmed to introduce time-varying Inline graphic, enabling Floquet-engineered beam steering.

  • The time-modulated phase can be written as:
    graphic file with name d33e1571.gif
    where Inline graphic is the modulation frequency.
  • The resulting field is:
    graphic file with name d33e1582.gif
    where Inline graphic is the Bessel function of the first kind. This generates sidebands at frequencies Inline graphic, useful for joint communication and sensing (JCAS)11,18–32.

Floquet theory for RIS-assisted massive MIMO33–36

  • In massive MIMO, RIS can be modeled as a Floquet-periodic boundary.

  • The channel matrix Inline graphic between a transmitter (Tx) and receiver (Rx) via RIS is:
    graphic file with name d33e1627.gif
    where Inline graphic represents the Floquet channel modes.
  • Optimizing Inline graphic maximizes the effective rank of Inline graphic, enhancing MIMO capacity.

Channel loss model for realistic signal evaluation

In practical 6G deployments, channel loss is a critical factor that must be accounted for in the design and analysis of RIS-assisted systems. The channel loss model encompasses frequency-dependent attenuation, angular spreading, and other propagation effects. To integrate channel loss into our Floquet analysis, we extend the Floquet-MIMO channel matrix by introducing a path-loss term Inline graphic that depends on the angle of departure/arrival Inline graphic and the frequency Inline graphic.

The channel matrix with path loss is expressed as:

graphic file with name d33e1665.gif

where:

  • Inline graphic is the Floquet channel mode for the Inline graphic-th spatial harmonic,

  • Inline graphic is the angle associated with the Inline graphic-th Floquet mode,

  • Inline graphic is the path loss for the Inline graphic-th mode, which can be decomposed into a distance-dependent loss and an angular-dependent factor.

The path loss term Inline graphic can be modeled using existing standardized channel models, such as the 3GPP TR 38.901 model66, which provides a comprehensive framework for channel modeling in frequencies from 0.5 to 100 GHz and is being extended to THz bands. For example, the path loss in dB can be expressed as:

graphic file with name d33e1709.gif

where Inline graphic is the reference distance, Inline graphic is the link distance, Inline graphic is the path loss exponent, Inline graphic is the shadow fading term, and Inline graphic accounts for angular-dependent losses (e.g., due to beam misalignment or pattern distortion).

Integrating this loss model into the Floquet framework allows for a more realistic evaluation of the system performance. Specifically, the channel capacity with loss becomes:

graphic file with name d33e1736.gif

where Inline graphic is the transmit power and Inline graphic is the noise variance.

Our modified Floquet analysis, combined with the channel loss model, enables the joint optimization of the RIS phase profile and the transmitter/receiver beamforming to mitigate the impact of channel loss. For instance, by adjusting the angular modulation Inline graphic to steer beams away from directions with high path loss, the system can achieve better signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and, consequently, higher capacity.

Furthermore, the proposed method can be extended to incorporate other channel impairments, such as Doppler effects and time-varying fading, by making the path loss term time-dependent: Inline graphic. This extension is left for future work.

By integrating the channel loss model, our analysis provides a more comprehensive tool for the design and optimization of RIS and metasurfaces in realistic 6G propagation environments.

Overview of key equations

This approach is critical for 6G RIS design, smart environments, and ultra-massive MIMO systems. Future work could explore nonlinear Floquet effects for adaptive RIS optimization.

Numerical results

Results and discussions

Figure 1 establishes the foundation by depicting a periodic function Inline graphic, representing a unit cell’s response, alongside its Fourier coefficients Inline graphic, visualizing its spatial harmonic decomposition. Figure 2 shows the resulting original Floquet-Bloch wave u(x), constructed from these harmonics. Figure 3 contrasts linear and nonlinear angular modulation functions Inline graphic, illustrating phase profiles for beam steering and complex wavefront manipulation. Figure 4 demonstrates the linearly modulated field Inline graphic, showing the altered wave for beam steering. Figure 5 validates the core technique by comparing the nonlinearly modulated field from direct multiplication and the proposed spectral convolution method, showing close agreement. Figure 6 delves into the convolution process, showing the modulation spectrum Inline graphic and a 2D map of the spectral coupling Inline graphic. Finally, Fig. 7 quantifies the convolution result Inline graphic and provides a spectral comparison, confirming the accuracy of the modified Floquet analysis.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

(a) Periodic function Inline graphic - (b) fourier coefficients Inline graphic.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Original Floquet-Bloch wave u(x).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Angular modulation functions Inline graphic.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Linearly modulated field: Inline graphic.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Nonlinearly modulated field comparison.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

(a) Modulation spectrum Inline graphic - (b) Spectral convolution Inline graphic.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

(a) Convolution result Inline graphic - (b) Spectral comparison.

Comparative significance of the proposed method

The numerical results presented in Section 5 validate the mathematical correctness of the proposed modified Fourier-Floquet analysis. Beyond validation, the principal significance of this method lies in its substantial advantages over conventional techniques for angular modulation analysis in 6G systems, specifically in the context of RIS and metasurface optimization. These advantages are summarized below and quantitatively supported by the simulations.

  • Computational Efficiency and Scalability: The core advancement is the reduction of algorithmic complexity from Inline graphic (typical of Bessel series decomposition and dense matrix methods) to Inline graphic through spectral-domain convolution (see Figs. 5, 6 and Eq. 2.7). As demonstrated in Tables 3–4, this translates to a speed-up exceeding 128Inline graphic compared to the Bessel method for an array with Inline graphic elements (3.2 ms vs. 412 ms). This efficiency is paramount for real-time optimization of large-scale RIS, enabling dynamic reconfiguration and channel tracking previously infeasible with traditional Inline graphic methods.

  • Modeling Flexibility: Unlike Fourier analysis (limited to time-invariant systems) or Jones matrices (lacking spectral harmonic support), the proposed model natively models nonlinear and time-varying phase modulations Inline graphic. This is achieved via the convolution of the Floquet spectrum Inline graphic with arbitrary modulation coefficients Inline graphic (Fig. 6), facilitating the analysis of complex beamforming (multi-beam generation) and Floquet-engineered beam steering with sideband control (Section 3.3.1).

  • Accuracy and Robustness: The spectral convolution approach maintains high numerical precision. The relative error remains below Inline graphic (Table 3), and the normalized mean square error (NMSE) compared to a direct multiplication benchmark is below Inline graphic, confirming the method’s stability for high-fidelity beamforming prediction.

  • Practical Relevance for 6G: To underscore practical relevance, Fig. 8 compares the beamforming gain under a realistic multipath channel scenario (incorporating the loss model from Section 3.3.3) for the proposed Floquet method, a Bessel-series baseline, and an OAM-based beamformer. The proposed method maintains a 3–5 dB gain advantage across a 30Inline graphic scanning range, demonstrating its robustness in mitigating practical channel impairments like angular spread and path loss, which critically degrade the performance of alignment-sensitive methods like OAM.

These comparative advantages—unprecedented speed, flexibility, accuracy, and practical robustness—collectively position the modified Floquet analysis as a transformative tool for the design and real-time control of RIS and metasurfaces in dynamic 6G networks.

Table 3.

Computational performance of angular analysis methods.

Metric Floquet method Bessel method OAM/Jones
Time (N=256) 0.8 ms 24.6 ms >100 ms
Time (N=1024) 3.2 ms 412 ms >1.5 s
Relative error Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic
NMSE (vs. Direct) Inline graphic N/A N/A
Memory usage Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic

Table 4.

Computational performance comparison (Inline graphic).

Method Time (ms) Memory Error
Bessel decomposition Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic
OAM analysis Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic
Proposed Floquet Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Beamforming gain vs. scan angle under a realistic multipath channel model. Comparison of the proposed Floquet-optimized RIS, a conventional Bessel-series-based design, and an OAM beamformer. The Floquet method shows superior and consistent gain due to its ability to jointly optimize for the periodic structure and channel conditions.

Discussion on computational efficiency and design implications

The close agreement between the direct multiplication and spectral convolution methods in Fig. 5 validates the mathematical correctness of our approach. However, the key advantage lies in the computational strategy. The spectral convolution is more efficient because it replaces the computationally expensive Inline graphic double summation over all spatial and modulation harmonics with a simple multiplication in the Fourier domain, followed by an inverse transform—an Inline graphic operation. This is visually corroborated by Fig. 6, where the 2D convolution map Inline graphic illustrates the inherent coupling between Floquet and modulation harmonics; our method computes this interaction natively in the spectral domain where it is most efficient.

For a system designer, these results are transformative. The Inline graphic speed-up and reduced memory footprint demonstrated in Tables  3 and 4 mean that complex beamforming and multi-beam patterns for very large RIS (Inline graphic) can now be optimized in milliseconds, not seconds. This enables real-time, dynamic channel estimation and precoding in 6G systems, moving RIS from static configurators to adaptive components that can track user equipment and mitigate interference on the fly.

Computational complexity and time reduction

The modified Floquet technique offers significant computational efficiency compared to traditional methods (Bessel series decomposition, OAM). By leveraging the periodicity of RIS arrays via Floquet’s theorem, the analysis of an infinite unit-cell array reduces to a single unit cell with phase-shift boundary conditions (Inline graphic). This topological simplification decreases algorithmic complexity from Inline graphic to Inline graphic, where Inline graphic is the number of spatial harmonics46–48. The spectral convolution formalism

graphic file with name d33e2190.gif

models arbitrary nonlinear modulations without costly explicit decompositions (e.g., Bessel series). Numerical simulations confirm >60% computation speed-up for large RIS surfaces (Inline graphic), enabling real-time optimization in 6G systems.

Table 1 summarizes key simulation parameters and results validating the Floquet angular modulation technique. It confirms high precision (relative error Inline graphic) for beam angle prediction (Inline graphic) in a THz-band RIS array with Inline graphic mm and element spacing of Inline graphic.

Table 1.

Key mathematical formulations.

Concept Equation
Floquet-Bloch Field Inline graphic
RIS-Modulated Field Inline graphic
Beam Steering Law Inline graphic
Time-Modulated RIS Inline graphic
Floquet MIMO Channel Inline graphic
Channel Loss Model Inline graphic

Table 2 compares computational performance across angular modulation analysis methods. The Floquet technique significantly outperforms Bessel series decomposition and OAM/Jones matrix methods in speed (e.g., 3.2 ms vs. 412 ms for Inline graphic elements), memory efficiency (Inline graphic vs. Inline graphic), and accuracy (error Inline graphic). This highlights its suitability for real-time 6G optimization.

Table 2.

Simulation parameters and results.

Parameter Value Physical meaning
Wavelength (Inline graphic) 1 mm THz frequency
(300 GHz)
Element spacing Inline graphic mm Antenna array spacing
Beam angle (Inline graphic) 28.6Inline graphic Analytical prediction
Relative error Inline graphic Machine precision accuracy

The performance comparison in Table 3 demonstrates significant advantages of the proposed Floquet method over conventional approaches. The 128Inline graphic speed improvement over Bessel decomposition stems from replacing expensive series expansions with efficient spectral convolution operations. This computational efficiency enables real-time optimization of large-scale RIS configurations, which was previously infeasible with traditional methods.

The memory complexity reduction from Inline graphic to Inline graphic is particularly crucial for 6G applications, where array sizes scale to thousands of elements. This improvement allows the analysis of larger metasurfaces without exponential memory growth. Furthermore, the superior error performance (Inline graphic) confirms the numerical stability of our spectral approach, ensuring reliable beamforming predictions in practical deployments.

These computational benefits position the Floquet method as a viable solution for dynamic 6G environments requiring rapid reconfiguration and real-time adaptation.

Discussion on practical implementation constraints

Practical RIS deployments face implementation constraints that merit discussion:

Finite Array Effects: The infinite-array assumption, while computationally efficient, neglects edge effects inherent in finite-sized RIS. For arrays with Inline graphic elements, boundary truncation can lead to beam squint, increased side-lobe levels, and pattern distortion. These effects diminish as array size increases; for Inline graphic, the infinite-array model provides an accurate representation of the central array behavior. Thus, while the proposed method is optimized for large-scale RIS/metasurfaces where edge effects are minimal, it can be extended to finite arrays through straightforward corrections. To address finite-array limitations in practice, windowing techniques (e.g., Hann, Hamming) or the array scanning method can be applied to taper the aperture and suppress side lobes63–65. In our previous work63, we have demonstrated how these methods can be integrated with Floquet spectral analysis to maintain computational efficiency while accounting for finite-array effects. Such corrections ensure the model remains applicable to realistic, finite-sized metasurfaces without sacrificing the computational advantages of the infinite-array formulation.

Manufacturing Imperfections: Fabrication tolerances in metasurface unit cells introduce phase errors Inline graphic. Our preliminary analysis shows the method maintains robustness for Inline graphic, with graceful degradation up to Inline graphic. Beyond this, calibration procedures would be necessary.

Element Non-uniformity: Spatial variations in resonant frequency (Inline graphic typical) slightly perturb the Floquet spectrum but can be compensated by updating the Inline graphic coefficients in the convolution model.

These considerations highlight the model’s practical limitations while underscoring its value as a foundation for real-world RIS optimization.

Conclusion

The proposed method achieves a significant reduction in numerical complexity and computation time, enabling real-time optimization for large-scale RIS and metasurface configurations. The significance of this method is demonstrated through a comprehensive comparison with current state-of-the-art techniques. As validated numerically, it offers a computational speed-up of over two orders of magnitude compared to Bessel-series decomposition (128Inline graphic for Inline graphic), reduces memory complexity from Inline graphic to Inline graphic, and maintains exceptional accuracy (error Inline graphic). Crucially, it uniquely combines the modeling flexibility to handle nonlinear and time-varying modulations—a key requirement for dynamic 6G environments—with the computational efficiency necessary for real-time operation. This addresses the core limitations of Fourier (static assumption), Jones matrix (limited spectral support), and OAM-based (alignment sensitivity) methods discussed in Section 1.6. The model serves as an efficient foundation for optimization of large-scale RIS and metasurfaces where edge effects are relatively small, with finite-size corrections being straightforward extensions. The modified Fourier-Floquet approach provides a more flexible and accurate model for analyzing angular modulation in RIS and metasurfaces compared to traditional methods. It enables better modeling of dynamic, nonlinear, and spatially varying phase responses, making it highly suitable for 5G/6G beamforming, OAM communications, meta-surfaces and intelligent reflecting surfaces.

Future work will extend the proposed Floquet analysis to address practical constraints of finite-sized arrays and element non-uniformity, optimize the computation of complex modulation spectra for real-time operation, and explore synergies with deep learning for inverse design and nonlinear Floquet effects.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Sys’Com laboratory at ENIT, Tunisia, and the Military Research Center, Ouina Military Base, Tayeb Mhiri, for their assistance. We are also deeply grateful to Professor Larbi Talbi from the Université du Québec en Outaouais (UQO)- Canada for his valuable insights and constructive discussions throughout the development of this research. This work was supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research, Vice Presidency for Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia [Grant No. KFU260126].

Appendix A: Explaining the Spatial Form of Angular Modulation Using Floquet Analysis: Final Form (Space Domain with Angular Modulation)

To derive the equation transforming the Floquet spectral wave number domain to the space domain with angular modulation, we proceed with mathematical rigor.

1. Floquet-Bloch Theorem for Periodic Systems

Consider a wave solution Inline graphic in a periodic medium with period Inline graphic. By Floquet’s theorem, the solution can be expressed as a Bloch wave:

graphic file with name d33e2621.gif

where: - Inline graphic is the Floquet exponent (or Bloch wave number), - Inline graphic is a periodic function with period Inline graphic, i.e., Inline graphic.

2. Fourier Series Expansion of the Periodic Function

Since Inline graphic is periodic, it can be expanded in a Fourier series:

graphic file with name d33e2650.gif

where: - Inline graphic are the Fourier coefficients, - Inline graphic is the harmonic index.

Substituting back into the Bloch wave:

graphic file with name d33e2664.gif

This represents the field in the space domain in terms of its Floquet spectral components.

3. Introducing Angular Modulation

Suppose the wave undergoes angular modulation, described by a phase function Inline graphic. The modulated field becomes:

graphic file with name d33e2676.gif

Substituting the previous expression:

graphic file with name d33e2680.gif
Case 1: Linear Angular Modulation (Simplest Case)

If Inline graphic (linear phase modulation), then:

graphic file with name d33e2691.gif

Here, the modulation simply shifts the Floquet exponent Inline graphic.

Case 2: General Angular Modulation

For arbitrary Inline graphic, the modulated field is:

graphic file with name d33e2707.gif

This is the general form of the transformation from the Floquet spectral domain to the space domain with angular modulation.

4. Alternative Form: Convolution in Spectral Domain

If Inline graphic has a Fourier expansion:

graphic file with name d33e2719.gif

then the modulated field becomes a double sum:

graphic file with name d33e2723.gif

which can be seen as a convolution in the spectral domain.

Summary

The general equation transforming the Floquet spectral domain to the space domain with angular modulation is:

graphic file with name d33e2731.gif

where: - Inline graphic are the Floquet spectral coefficients, - Inline graphic is the angular modulation, - Inline graphic is the Floquet wave number, - Inline graphic is the periodicity of the system.

Author contributions

B.H. and T.A. conceived the study and developed the theoretical framework. R.A. and T.D. conducted the numerical simulations and performed the formal analysis. S.M., I.L.-G., and A.S. analyzed the results. A.S.A. acquired funding. B.H. wrote the original draft. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript. T.A., A.S., and B.H. supervised the project. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research, Vice Presidency for Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia [Grant No. KFU260126].

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available within the article.

Declarations

Competing interests

Author Adel Sharar Aldalbah is affiliated with King Faisal University, which funded this work. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Radhoine Aloui, Adel Sharar Aldalbahi, Tijeni Delleji, SofienMhatli, Taoufik Aguili, Ignacio Llamas-Garro and Ahmed Siala.

References

  • 1.Li, J.-R., Shteynas, B. & Ketterle, W. Floquet heating in interacting atomic gases with an oscillating force. Phys. Rev. A100, 033406 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Xu, J. et al. Floquet Cavity Electromagnonics. Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 237201 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Xu, J. et al. Floquet Cavity Electromagnonics. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.14727 (2020) [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 4.Zhang, P. & Gu, Y. Periodically and quasi-periodically driven dynamics of Bose-Einstein condensates. SciPost Phys. (2020).
  • 5.Chen, Z., Murphree, J. D. & Bigelow, N. P. SU(2) geometric phase induced by a periodically driven Raman process in an ultracold dilute Bose gas. Phys. Rev. A (2019).
  • 6.Novicenko, V., Anisimovas, E. & Juzeliūnas, G. Floquet analysis of a quantum system with modulated periodic driving. Phys. Rev. A95, 023615 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bilitewski, T. & Cooper, N. Scattering theory for Floquet-Bloch states. Phys. Rev. A 91 (2014).
  • 8.Oka, T. & Kitamura, S. Floquet Engineering of Quantum Materials (Annu. Rev. Condens, Matter Phys, 2018).
  • 9.Gerlach, A. A. Distortion-Band-Pass Considerations in Angular Modulation. Proc. IRE38, 1203–1207 (1950). [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mazo, J. & Salz, J. Spectral properties of single-sideband angle modulation. IEEE Trans. Commun. Technol.16, 52–62 (1968). [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Abramson, N. Bandwidth and spectra of phase-and-frequency-modulated waves. IEEE Trans. Commun. Syst.11, 407–414 (1963). [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Logofatu, P. C. Phase-modulation scatterometry. Appl. Opt.41, 7187–7192 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gulko, V. L. & Mescheryakov, A. A. Modulation method for determining the bearing of a moving object from radio beacon signals orthogonally polarized in a circle. Russ. Phys. J.63, 625–630 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zeng, H. et al. A review of terahertz phase modulation from free space to guided wave integrated devices. Nanophotonics11, 415–437 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Halagacka, L. et al. Precise phase-modulation generalized ellipsometry of anisotropic samples. Phys. Status Solidi A205, 752–755 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Meng, Z. et al. Jones pupil metrology of lithographic projection lens and its optimal configuration in the presence of error sources. Opt. Express27, 4629–4647 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Postava, K. et al. Null ellipsometer with phase modulation. Opt. Express12, 6040–6045 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wang, C. et al. On the limits of low-numerical-aperture imaging scatterometry. Opt. Express28, 8445–8462 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Schenzle, A., DeVoe, R. G. & Brewer, R. G. Phase-modulation laser spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. A25, 2606–2621 (1982). [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hall, G. E. & North, S. W. Transient laser frequency modulation spectroscopy. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.51, 243–274 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Di Rosa, M. D. & Reiten, M. T. Computational expressions for signals in frequency-modulation spectroscopy. Appl. Opt.54, 5031–5036 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ben-Aroya, I., Kahanov, M. & Eisenstein, G. Multi-field frequency modulation spectroscopy. Opt. Express16, 6081–6097 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Supplee, J. M., Whittaker, E. A. & Lenth, W. Theoretical description of frequency modulation and wavelength modulation spectroscopy. Appl. Opt.33, 6294–6302 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Godone, A., Micalizio, S. & Levi, F. RF spectrum of a carrier with a random phase modulation of arbitrary slope. Metrologia45, 313 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Canillas, A., Pascual, E. & Drévillon, B. An IR phase-modulated ellipsometer using a Fourier transform spectrometer for in situ applications. Thin Solid Films234, 318–322 (1993). [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Farès, H. et al. From quantum physics to digital communication: Single sideband continuous phase modulation. C R Phys.19, 54–63 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Axelsson, S. R. J. Noise radar using random phase and frequency modulation. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.42, 2370–2384 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Garcia-Caurel, E. et al. Ultraviolet phase-modulated ellipsometer. Rev. Sci. Instrum.73, 4307–4312 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Logofatu, P. C. UV scatterometry. In Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XVII 208–214 (SPIE, 2003).
  • 30.Canillas, A., Pascual, E. & Drévillon, B. Phase-modulated ellipsometer using a Fourier transform infrared spectrometer for real time applications. Rev. Sci. Instrum.64, 2153–2159 (1993). [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kawanishi, T. Electro-Optic Modulation for Photonic Networks (Springer, 2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kauppinen, J. & Partanen, J. Fourier Transforms in Spectroscopy (Wiley, 2001). [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Affan, A. et al. Performance analysis of orbital angular momentum (OAM): A 6G waveform design. IEEE Commun. Lett.25, 3985–3989 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhang, H. et al. Orbital angular momentum (OAM) in wireless communication: Applications and challenges towards 6G. In 2023 14th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence 842–847 (IEEE, 2023).
  • 35.Zhu, Q. et al. Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface-Based Orbital Angular Momentum Communications Toward 6G. IEEE Commun. Stand. Mag.8, 54–61 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Tamagnone, M. et al. Graphene reflectarray metasurface for terahertz beam steering and phase modulation. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.02202 (2018)
  • 37.Cheng, J., Fan, F. & Chang, S. Recent progress on graphene-functionalized metasurfaces for tunable phase and polarization control. Nanomaterials9, 398 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhang, Z. et al. Metasurface lens with angular modulation for extended depth of focus imaging. Opt. Lett.45, 611–614 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Cao, C. et al. Linear frequency modulation with electronic-optics modulator. In Optoelectronic Materials and Devices II 876–884 (SPIE, 2007).
  • 40.Meier, D. M., Urakawa, A. & Baiker, A. Polarization-modulation infrared reflection-absorption spectroscopy affording time-resolved simultaneous detection of surface and liquid phase species at catalytic solid–liquid interfaces. Analyst134, 1779–1780 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gazanhes, C. et al. Quelques aspects de la dispersion ultrasonore. Doctoral dissertation, LMA (1997).
  • 42.Choi, J. H. & Itoh, T. Beam-scanning leaky-wave antennas. In Handbook of Antenna Technologies (eds Choi, J. H. & Itoh, T.) 1697–1735 (Springer, 2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Baccarelli, P. et al. A new Brillouin dispersion diagram for 1-D periodic printed structures. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech.55, 1484–1495 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Fonash, S. J. Introduction to Light Trapping in Solar Cell and Photo-detector Devices (Elsevier, 2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Drissi, K. E. K. et al. Angular modulation of dual-inverter fed open-end motor for electrical vehicle applications. IEEE Trans. Power Electron.31, 2980–2990 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Janpugdee, P. et al. An accelerated DFT-MoM for the analysis of large finite periodic antenna arrays. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.54, 279–283 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Janpugdee, P. et al. An accelerated DFT-MoM for the analysis of large finite periodic antenna arrays in grounded layered media. In IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society Symposium 2679–2682 (2004).
  • 48.Hamdi, B., Aguili, T. & Baudrand, H. Floquet modal analysis to modelize and study 2-D planar almost periodic structures in finite and infinite extent with coupled motifs. Prog. Electromagn. Res. B62, 63–86 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Barkeshli, K. & Khorasani, S. Periodic Structures. In Advanced Electromagnetics and Scattering Theory (Springer, 2015).
  • 50.Jha, S. N. & Craeye, C. Contour-FFT based spectral domain MBF analysis of large printed antenna arrays. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.62, 5752–5764 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Craeye, C. & González-Ovejero, D. A review on array mutual coupling analysis. Radio Sci.46, RS2012 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Salamon, T. et al. Quantum anomalous Hall phase in synthetic bilayers via twistronics without a twist. Phys. Rev. B102, 235126 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Sandholzer, K. Floquet Engineering of Ultracold Atoms in Optical Lattices (ETH Zurich, 2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Bahmani, S. & Askarpour, A. N. Anomalous Floquet topological phase in a lattice of LC resonators. Eur. Phys. J. B96, 81 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Guo, Z. et al. Anomalous broadband Floquet topological metasurface with pure site rings. Adv. Photonics Nexus2, 016006 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wintersperger, K. et al. Realization of an anomalous Floquet topological system with ultracold atoms. Nat. Phys.16, 1058–1063 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Zhang, Z. et al. Floquet topological physics in photonics. Opt. Mater. Express15, 828–889 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Wu, Y. et al. Applications of topological photonics in integrated photonic devices. Adv. Opt. Mater.5, 1700357 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Nagulu, A. et al. Chip-scale Floquet topological insulators for 5G wireless systems. Nat. Electron.5, 300–309 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Kumar, A. et al. Terahertz topological photonic integrated circuits for 6G and beyond: A Perspective. J. Appl. Phys.132, 140901 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kumar, A., Gupta, M. & Singh, R. Topological integrated circuits for 5G and 6G. Nat. Electron.5, 261–262 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 62.De Sabata, A., Matekovits, L. & Lipan, O. Band pattern of commensurate modulated periodic structures. IET Microw. Antennas Propag.11, 1303–1307 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Bilel, H. & Taoufik, A. Spectral Floquet-spatial modulations devoted to strongly coupled periodic arrays: metasurfaces, dense massive MIMO, reconfigurable-intelligent-surfaces (RIS), 5G and 6G uses. 2023 17th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), 1–5 (2023). doi: 10.23919/EuCAP57121.2023.10133810.
  • 64.Bilel, H. & Taoufik, A. Floquet spectral almost-periodic modulation of massive finite and infinite strongly coupled arrays: dense-massive-MIMO, intelligent-surfaces, 5G, and 6G applications. Electronics11, 36. 10.3390/electronics11010036 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Dardenne, X. & Craeye, C. Application of the array scanning method with windowing to the analysis of finite rectangular periodic structures. 2005 18th International Conference on Applied Electromagnetics and Communications 1–4 (2005). 10.1109/ICECOM.2005.205022.
  • 66.3GPP. Study on channel model for frequencies from 0.5 to 100 GHz (Release 16). 3GPP TR 38.901 V16.1.0, (2020).
  • 67.Chen, S., Li, Z., Zhang, Y., Cheng, H. & Tian, J. Phase Manipulation of Electromagnetic Waves with Metasurfaces and Its Applications in Nanophotonics. Advanced Photonics7, 056009 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Wang, S. et al. Arbitrary convolution operations on a spin-orbit hybrid metasurface platform. Nat. Nanotechnol.18, 564–570 (2023). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available within the article.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES