Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2026 Mar 11;16:8746. doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-43499-4

Correction: Brain signal complexity tracks mind-wandering and visual perceptual learning

Louisa Krile 1,2, Ford Burles 1,2, Kuljeet Chohan 1, Maddie Kelly 1, Julia W Y Kam 1,2,#, Andrea B Protzner 1,2,3,✉,#
PMCID: PMC12979668  PMID: 41813807

Correction to: Scientific Reports 10.1038/s41598-025-23562-2, 13 November 2025

The original version of this Article contained errors in the legends of Figures 4 and 5.

Figure 4: "(a) Bar graph depicting the significance of associations between MSE and behaviour variables identified in the first LV as determined by permutation testing. Pre-training behaviour variables are represented by solid bars and post-training behaviour variables are represented by textured bars. Orange bars represent significant positive correlations, purple bars represent significant negative correlations, and grey bars represent non-significant correlations between MSE and behaviour variables. Our results indicate significant correlations between pre-training mind-wandering, post-training modal PTA (i.e., performance), and MSE. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.”

now reads:

"(a) Bar graph depicting the stable associations between MSE and behaviour variables identified in the first LV as determined by bootstrap testing. Pre-training behaviour variables are represented by solid bars and post-training behaviour variables are represented by textured bars. Orange bars represent stable positive correlations and purple bars represent stable negative correlations between MSE and behaviour variables. Grey bars do not contribute to the LV. Our results indicate an association between pre-training mind-wandering, post-training modal PTA (i.e., performance), and MSE. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.”

Figure 5: “(a) Bar graph depicting the significance of associations between MSE and behaviour variables identified in the second LV as determined by permutation testing. Pre-training behaviour variables are represented by solid bars and post-training behaviour variables are represented by textured bars. Orange bars represent significant positive correlations and grey bars represent non-significant correlations between MSE and behaviour variables. Our results indicate significant correlations between pre- and post-training N1amplitudes, post-training P3 amplitudes, post-training mind-wandering, and MSE. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.”

now reads:

“(a) Bar graph depicting the stable associations between MSE and behaviour variables identified in the second LV as determined by bootstrap testing. Pre-training behaviour variables are represented by solid bars and post-training behaviour variables are represented by textured bars. Orange bars represent stable positive correlations between MSE and behaviour variables. Grey bars do not contribute to the LV. Our results indicate an association between pre- and post-training N1 amplitudes, post-training P3 amplitudes, post-training mind-wandering, and MSE. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.”

The original Article has been corrected.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES