Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2026 Mar 11;9(3):e261311. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.1311

GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Use and Survival Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Brain Metastases

Kuan-Yu Chi 1, Yu Chang 2, Junmin Song 1, Chien-Min Chen 3,4,✉, Pang-Shuo Perng 2, Hong-Min Lin 5
PMCID: PMC12980253  PMID: 41811319

Abstract

This cohort study assesses the association between glucagon-like peptide–1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) use and survival in patients with type 2 diabetes and brain metastases.

Introduction

Brain metastases (BM) are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer.1 Comorbid type 2 diabetes (T2D) may worsen outcomes through metabolic and inflammatory pathways.2 Glucagon-like peptide–1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have transformed beyond antiglycemic control, with emerging preclinical evidence suggesting potential neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory effects.3 However, clinical evidence evaluating their association with BM remains limited. Thus, we aimed to assess the association between GLP-1 RA use and survival in this population.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study used the TriNetX Global Network, a federated database comprising 151 health care organizations around the world.4 (eAppendix 1 in Supplement 1) This research was approved by the National Cheng Kung University Hospital institutional review board. This report was prepared in accordance with the STROBE reporting guidelines for cohort studies, where applicable.

Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with cancer with BM and T2D between January 1, 2018, and January 1, 2024, were identified. The exposed cohort included patients prescribed GLP-1 RAs within 6 months before the first instance of T2D and BM diagnosis. The control cohort included those with no GLP-1 RA use over the same period. We excluded those with potential contraindications to GLP-1 RA use and those with lower socioeconomic status (eAppendix 2 in Supplement 1). One-to-one propensity score (PS) matching between 2 groups was performed using the greedy nearest-neighbor algorithm with a caliper width of 0.1 pooled SDs (Table). A standardized mean difference less than 0.10 indicated balanced covariates. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality up to 3 years from the study index date—namely, the first recorded date of BM. We also conducted subgroup analyses based on primary cancer sites, GLP-1 RA types, and comparison with other antidiabetic agents. We also set seizure events and pneumonia as falsification end points to examine study findings’ vulnerability to unmeasured confounders. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for the outcome. Statistical significance was defined as 2-tailed P < .05. All analyses were performed within the TriNetX Analytic Platform.

Table. Baseline Demographic and Clinical Characteristics Before and After Propensity Score Matchinga.

Characteristic Before propensity score matching After propensity score matching
Patients, No. (%) P value Patients, No. (%) SMD
GLP-1 RA (n = 866) No GLP-1 RA (n = 11 103) GLP-1 RA (n = 850) No GLP-1 RA (n = 850)
Age at index, mean (SD), y 64.3 (10.3) 67.7 (10.5) <.001 64.5 (10.2) 65.0 (10.4) 0.050
Sex
Male 393 (45.4) 5594 (50.4) .005 387 (45.5) 377 (44.4) 0.024
Female 471 (54.4) 5505 (49.6) .006 461 (54.2) 470 (55.3) 0.021
Race
Asian 47 (5.4) 731 (6.6) .18 46 (5.4) 43 (5.1) 0.016
Black or African American 120 (13.9) 1572 (14.2) .81 117 (13.8) 119 (14.0) 0.007
White 622 (71.8) 7319 (65.9) <.001 610 (71.8) 625 (73.5) 0.040
Otherb 32 (3.7) 358 (3.2) .45 32 (3.8) 32 (3.8) <0.001
Unknown 34 (3.9) 969 (8.7) <.001 34 (4.0) 25 (2.9) 0.058
Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino 54 (6.2) 608 (5.5) .35 52 (6.1) 54 (6.4) 0.010
Not Hispanic or Latino 658 (76.0) 7914 (71.3) .003 645 (75.9) 648 (76.2) 0.008
Unknown 154 (17.8) 2581 (23.2) <.001 153 (18.0) 148 (17.4) 0.015
Malignant entity
Lung cancer 315 (36.4) 4440 (40.0) .04 312 (36.7) 306 (36.0) 0.015
Breast cancer 145 (16.7) 1601 (14.4) .06 140 (16.5) 151 (17.8) 0.034
Melanoma 81 (9.4) 803 (7.2) .02 80 (9.4) 71 (8.4) 0.037
Colon cancer 27 (3.1) 389 (3.5) .55 27 (3.2) 22 (2.6) 0.035
Rectal cancer 12 (1.4) 149 (1.3) .91 12 (1.4) 13 (1.5) 0.010
Kidney cancer 66 (7.6) 617 (5.6) .01 63 (7.4) 56 (6.6) 0.032
Malignant neoplasm of larynx 10 (1.2) 51 (0.5) .006 10 (1.2) 10 (1.2) <0.001
Bone metastases 210 (24.2) 2679 (24.1) .94 205 (24.1) 203 (23.9) 0.006
Comorbidities
Essential hypertension 684 (79.0) 7776 (70.0) <.001 672 (79.1) 690 (81.2) 0.053
Heart failure 153 (17.7) 1529 (13.8) .001 150 (17.6) 156 (18.4) 0.018
Ischemic heart diseases 319 (36.8) 3298 (29.7) <.001 309 (36.4) 316 (37.2) 0.017
Atrial fibrillation and flutter 109 (12.6) 1415 (12.7) .89 106 (12.5) 102 (12.0) 0.014
Cerebrovascular diseases 257 (29.7) 2245 (20.2) <.001 245 (28.8) 205 (24.1) 0.107
Morbid obesity 210 (24.2) 1103 (9.9) <.001 199 (23.4) 204 (24.0) 0.014
Nicotine dependence 195 (22.5) 2587 (23.3) .60 192 (22.6) 188 (22.1) 0.011
Alcohol-related disorders 30 (3.5) 458 (4.1) .34 30 (3.5) 30 (3.5) <0.001
Chronic kidney disease 234 (27.0) 2283 (20.6) <.001 228 (26.8) 241 (28.4) 0.034
Other chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 192 (22.2) 2368 (21.3) .56 190 (22.4) 197 (23.2) 0.020
Procedures
SRS, multisource cobalt 60 based 24 (2.8) 158 (1.4) .002 24 (2.8) 16 (1.9) 0.062
SRS, linear accelerator based 29 (3.3) 180 (1.6) <.001 28 (3.3) 19 (2.2) 0.065
Stereotactic body radiation therapy 56 (6.5) 488 (4.4) .005 53 (6.2) 36 (4.2) 0.090
Craniectomy or craniotomy procedures 68 (7.9) 340 (3.1) <.001 62 (7.3) 51 (6.0) 0.052
Medications
Antineoplastic therapy 418 (48.3) 4747 (42.8) .002 411 (48.4) 405 (47.6) 0.014
Systemic corticosteroids 724 (83.6) 8033 (72.4) <.001 711 (83.6) 693 (81.5) 0.055
Sodium-glucose cotransporter–2 inhibitors 248 (28.6) 727 (6.5) <.001 236 (27.8) 229 (26.9) 0.018
Metformin 544 (62.8) 4352 (39.2) <.001 530 (62.4) 543 (63.9) 0.032
Sulfonylureas 262 (30.3) 1995 (18.0) <.001 258 (30.4) 257 (30.2) 0.003
Thiazolidinediones 83 (9.6) 382 (3.4) <.001 79 (9.3) 87 (10.2) 0.032
Insulin 664 (76.7) 5393 (48.6) <.001 648 (76.2) 659 (77.5) 0.031
Dipeptidyl peptidase–4 inhibitors 180 (20.8) 1188 (10.7) <.001 177 (20.8) 182 (21.4) 0.014
Laboratory values, mean (SD)
Hemoglobin A1c, % 7.9 (1.8) 7.0 (1.6) <.001 7.8 (1.8) 7.5 (1.7) 0.219
Body mass indexc 32.9 (7.4) 29.1 (6.8) <.001 32.9 (7.4) 32.7 (6.9) 0.031
Estimated glomerular filtration rate, mL/min/1.73 m2 74.4 (33.1) 77.8 (33.7) .007 74.4 (32.9) 75.7 (33.3) 0.039
Visit type
Emergency department 456 (52.7) 5104 (46.0) <.001 446 (52.5) 442 (52.0) 0.009
Inpatient encounter 518 (59.8) 5311 (47.8) <.001 505 (59.4) 481 (56.6) 0.057
Ambulatory 778 (89.8) 9713 (87.5) .04 763 (89.8) 776 (91.3) 0.052

Abbreviations: SMD, standardized mean difference; SRS, stereotactic radiosurgery.

SI conversion factor: To convert hemoglobin A1c to proportion of total hemoglobin, multiply by 0.01.

a

Propensity score matching was performed on the following variables: age at index, sex, race, ethnicity, cancer types, hydrocephalus, morbid obesity, smoking, alcohol use, chronic kidney disease, other chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, hypertension, atrial fibrillation or flutter, cerebrovascular diseases, ischemic heart diseases, radiation therapy, craniectomy or craniotomy, antineoplastic agents, sodium-glucose cotransporter–2 inhibitors, metformin, sulfonylureas, thiazolidinediones, insulin, dipeptidyl peptidase–4 inhibitors, hemoglobin A1c, body mass index, and estimated glomerular filtration rate.

b

Other race includes American Indian or Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and others.

c

Body mass index is calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared.

Results

Among a total of 19 234 patients with cancer, BM, and T2D, 866 GLP-1 RA users (semaglutide, 369 patients; dulaglutide, 379 patients; liraglutide, 147 patients; and tirzepatide, 95 patients), and 11 103 nonusers met eligibility criteria. After PS matching, 850 GLP-1 RA users were matched to nonusers, with well-balanced baseline characteristics (Table).

GLP-1 RA use was associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.54-0.72; P < .001) (Figure). The observed mortality benefit remains consistent across major cancer types and GLP-1 RA types, except for liraglutide, and in comparison with other antidiabetic therapy (Figure). Falsification end points were comparable between the 2 groups (Figure).

Figure. Forest Plot of Study Findings With Subgroup Analyses and Falsification End Points.

Figure.

DPP4 indicates dipeptidyl peptidase–4; GLP-1 RA, glucagon-like peptide–1 receptor agonist; HR, hazard ratio; NA, not applicable; SGLT2, sodium-glucose cotransporter–2; TZD, thiazolidinedione.

Discussion

The findings of this cohort study suggest that GLP-1 RA use was associated with significant reduction in all-cause mortality among patients with cancer with BM and T2D, with generally consistent association across subgroups. These results build upon existing evidence that GLP-1 receptor activation modulates pathways relevant to neuro-oncologic health, including attenuation of neuroinflammation, preservation of blood–brain barrier integrity, and reduction of oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction.5,6

Our study has several limitations. First, the retrospective design limits causal inference despite PS matching and comparable falsification end points. Second, the lack of individual-level data precluded dose-response analyses, detailed assessment of concomitant systemic and radiation therapies, and evaluation of cancer-specific mortality. Third, the restriction of 1:1 PS matching within TriNetX excluded substantial nonusers, limiting the generalizability of our findings to patients with sufficient covariate overlap. Fourth, participating health care organizations within TriNetX are mostly academic hospitals, also limiting the generalizability of our findings to nonacademic setting. GLP-1 RA was associated with significant reduction in all-cause mortality among patients with cancer with BM and T2D, warranting future prospective studies to further elucidate the effects of GLP-1 RA in cancer populations.

Supplement 1.

eAppendix 1. Data Source

eReferences

eAppendix 2. Diseases, Medications, and Outcome Definition

Supplement 2.

Data Sharing Statement

References

  • 1.Boire A, Brastianos PK, Garzia L, Valiente M. Brain metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2020;20(1):4-11. doi: 10.1038/s41568-019-0220-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Farmaki P, Damaskos C, Garmpis N, Garmpi A, Savvanis S, Diamantis E. Complications of the type 2 diabetes mellitus. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2020;16(4):249-251. doi: 10.2174/1573403X1604201229115531 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Diz-Chaves Y, Mastoor Z, Spuch C, González-Matías LC, Mallo F. Anti-inflammatory effects of GLP-1 receptor activation in the brain in neurodegenerative diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(17):9583. doi: 10.3390/ijms23179583 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Palchuk MB, London JW, Perez-Rey D, et al. A global federated real-world data and analytics platform for research. JAMIA Open. 2023;6(2):ooad035. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Salcedo I, Tweedie D, Li Y, Greig NH. Neuroprotective and neurotrophic actions of glucagon-like peptide-1: an emerging opportunity to treat neurodegenerative and cerebrovascular disorders. Br J Pharmacol. 2012;166(5):1586-1599. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.01971.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tseng YT, Tsai YH, Fülöp F, Chang FR, Lo YC. 2-Iodo-4′-methoxychalcone attenuates methylglyoxal-induced neurotoxicity by activation of GLP-1 receptor and enhancement of neurotrophic signal, antioxidant defense and glyoxalase pathway. Molecules. 2019;24(12):2249. doi: 10.3390/molecules24122249 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement 1.

eAppendix 1. Data Source

eReferences

eAppendix 2. Diseases, Medications, and Outcome Definition

Supplement 2.

Data Sharing Statement


Articles from JAMA Network Open are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES