Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

Research Square logoLink to Research Square
[Preprint]. 2026 Mar 6:rs.3.rs-7861443. [Version 1] doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7861443/v1

Intraductal digestive enzyme accumulation drives lethal hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis and enables therapeutic intervention

Baoan Ji 1, Jiale Wang 2, Yang Liu 3, Lingxiang Wang 4, bin wang, Jianhua Wan 5, Gordon He 6, Yasmin Jahan-mihan 7, Audrey Li 8, Yuxi Wang 9, Donfeng Feng 10, Jie Hu 11, Justin Clark 12, Muhammad Faheem 13, Oliver Wang 14, Zhu Zhu 15, Guangping Tu 16, Xiao Yu 17, Richard Waldron 18, Aurelia Lugea, Stephen Pandol, Brandy Edenfield 19, lizhi zhang 20, Ying Wang, Yan Bi
PMCID: PMC12980378  PMID: 41836514

Abstract

Background:

Hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis (HNP) is a highly lethal form of pancreatitis that lacks mechanism-based therapy. Intra-acinar enzyme activation is fundamental to pancreatitis initiation, yet it does not explain why only a subset of episodes progress to catastrophic hemorrhagic necrosis.

Objective:

To identify determinants of progression to lethal HNP and test a mechanism-based preventive intervention.

Design:

Using humanized trypsinogen mouse models and secretagogue regimens, we compared high-dose cerulein with low/moderate-dose cerulein and bombesin. We quantified pancreatic protease activity, performed blinded histopathologic scoring, assessed hemorrhage/vascular disruption, and evaluated enzyme localization and ductal injury by PRSS1 immunostaining. De-identified human pancreatic histology from HNP were examined. We tested a repurposed strategy using clinically approved agents for other indications: secretin to stimulate ductal fluid secretion and isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN) to promote ductal outflow via sphincter of Oddi relaxation.

Results:

High-dose cerulein induced robust intrapancreatic protease activation but predominantly caused edematous pancreatitis. Paradoxically, bombesin and low/moderate-dose cerulein elicited lower total pancreatic protease activity yet produced severe, frequently lethal HNP with vascular disruption and lobular ischemic necrosis. HNP was associated with intraductal enzyme accumulation and ductal injury. Secretin or ISMN alone showed limited protection, whereas combined secretin+ISMN prevented hemorrhagic necrotizing injury.

Conclusion:

Pancreatitis severity is determined not only by the magnitude of enzyme activation but also by where enzyme activity is exerted, implicating intraductal enzyme accumulation as a mechanistic determinant and therapeutic target in HNP. Coordinated enhancement of ductal secretion and outflow with clinically approved agents prevents HNP in vivo, supporting a translatable prevention strategy.

INTRODUCTION

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common, potentially life-threatening inflammatory disorder and a leading cause of gastrointestinal hospitalization worldwide. In the United States, AP accounts for roughly 275,000 hospital admissions annually and more than $2.5 billion in direct inpatient costs1, 2, 3. Although most cases are mild and self-limiting, approximately 20% of patients develop severe disease with pancreatic necrosis, hemorrhage, and/or multiorgan failure1, 2, 3. Hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis is among the most lethal presentations, with reported mortality approaching 30–40% despite modern intensive care. Yet management remains largely supportive, and no disease-modifying therapy has reliably prevented progression from early injury to hemorrhagic necrosis4, 5. This persistent therapeutic gap reflects an incomplete understanding of the mechanisms that determine pancreatitis subtype and severity.

The prevailing paradigm centers on inappropriate intra-acinar activation of digestive enzymes, particularly trypsinogen, as the initiating event6, 7. Decades of experimental work have reinforced this framework and shaped commonly used animal models, most notably supraphysiologic cerulean stimulation8. However, cerulein hyperstimulation predominantly produces edematous pancreatitis and does not recapitulate the hemorrhagic necrotizing phenotype observed in a subset of patients8, 9. Moreover, the intra-acinar activation paradigm does not explain why only a fraction of patients progress to vascular destruction, hemorrhage, and lobular necrosis. Early-stage human pancreatic tissue is rarely available, and by the time surgical or autopsy samples are obtained, widespread necrosis obscures initiating events10, 11, 12. As a result, the determinants that drive progression to hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis remain poorly defined, hindering targeted therapeutic development.

In a recent effort to model human hereditary pancreatitis, we generated humanized PRSS1R122H-PRSS2 mice using a bacterial artificial chromosome together with a control line expressing wild-type human PRSS1 and PRSS2 (PRSS1-PRSS2). Homozygous PRSS1R122H-PRSS2 mice develop spontaneous pancreatitis by 21 days of age, whereas heterozygous mice lack spontaneous disease but are markedly sensitized to secretagogue-induced injury. Notably, a single low dose of cerulein (2.5 μg/kg) is sufficient to trigger pancreatitis in heterozygous PRSS1R122H-PRSS2 mice compared with PRSS1-PRSS2 controls13. Cerulein acts through the cholecystokinin (CCK) receptor on acinar cells to induce trypsinogen activation and proinflammatory signaling14, 15, 16. Because bombesin receptors are functional in both human and murine acinar cells17, 18, yet bombesin elicits measurable trypsinogen activation without causing pancreatitis in wild-type rodents19, 20, we asked whether PRSS1R122H-PRSS2 mice are similarly sensitized to bombesin and whether bombesin elicits a distinct pancreatitis phenotype compared with cerulein.

In this study, we found that bombesin elicited only modest trypsin activation yet unexpectedly induced severe, lethal hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis (HNP). Interestingly, low-dose cerulein paradoxically resulted in severe HNP, whereas high-dose cerulein produced only edematous pancreatitis. Further analyses indicated that pancreatitis severity is determined not solely by the magnitude of enzyme activation, but by the compartment in which enzymatic activity acts on. Specifically, intraductal accumulation of digestive enzymes triggers lethal HNP. Guided by this duct-centered mechanism, we showed that pharmacologic reduction of intraductal enzyme burden with two repurposed, FDA-approved agents prevents progression to HNP in vivo, providing a readily translatable strategy to avert this devastating complication.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals

Generation and characterization of PRSS1-PRSS2 and PRSS1R122H-PRSS2 transgenic mice have been described previously13. C57BL/6J mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratory or bred in-house from the same foundation stock. Sample sizes are detailed in the figure legends. Unless otherwise specified, data represent pooled results from three independent experiments, each including 5-10 mice per pancreatitis group and 2-5 mice per saline control group. All mice were 10-20 weeks old and sex- and age-matched across experimental groups. All animal procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the Mayo Clinic.

Human tissue specimens

Human pancreatic tissue samples with histologically confirmed hemorrhagic-necrotizing pancreatitis were obtained under an Institutional Review Board (IRB)–approved protocol at Mayo Clinic. All procedures complied with institutional and national ethical guidelines. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) using standard histopathological methods and independently reviewed by board-certified pathologists. Patient identifiers were removed prior to analysis. Representative images were selected from cases showing extensive parenchymal necrosis and intralobular hemorrhage for comparison with experimental mouse models.

Secretagogue-induced pancreatitis models

Cerulein (CCKS-001A; CPC Scientific) and bombesin (Bomb-001A; CPC Scientific) were prepared in sterile 0.9% saline at 200 μg/mL. To induce acute or chronic pancreatitis, mice received intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections of cerulein or bombesin (100 μg/kg) at 1-hour intervals for a total of eight doses. For cerulein titration studies, a single i.p. injection was administered at the indicated dose. Mice were euthanized by CO2 inhalation at prespecified time points. In acute models, tissues were harvested 24 h after the final injection; for progression and chronic models, mice were collected at defined intervals following the first injection. The pancreas and other organs were processed for histological and biochemical analyses. All experimental mice were maintained on a C57BL/6J background.

Experimental therapeutic studies

Acute hemorrhagic–necrotizing pancreatitis was induced by intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of bombesin (100 μg/kg) given as three injections at 1-h intervals. Following the final bombesin injection, mice were randomized to one of four treatment groups: (i) NS (sterile 0.9% saline, i.p.); (ii) secretin (Sct; 0.2 μg/kg; CPC Scientific, SECT-002A; i.p.); (iii) isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN; 20 mg/kg; TargetMol; i.p.); or (iv) secretin plus ISMN (Sct 0.2 μg/kg + ISMN 20 mg/kg; i.p.). Treatments were administered as a single i.p. injection at 30 min after the final bombesin dose. Group allocation was performed using random assignment; investigators were blinded to treatment during outcome assessment where feasible. All other materials and methods are described in detail in the Supplementary Material.

RESULTS

Bombesin induces lethal hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis in humanized PRSS1 R122H-PRSS2 mice.

To test whether distinct secretagogue stimuli drive divergent pancreatitis phenotypes, C57BL/6J mice and heterozygous PRSS1R122H-PRSS2 mice were treated with either cerulein or bombesin using eight hourly high-dose injections (100 μg/kg), and pancreatic injury was assessed 24 hours after the initial dose (Supplementary Fig. 1A). Cerulein produced mild edematous pancreatitis in C57BL/6J mice and a more pronounced edematous response with clear ascites in PRSS1R122H-PRSS2 mice (Fig. 1A). In contrast, bombesin caused no detectable edema in C57BL/6J mice but strikingly triggered a hemorrhagic necrotizing phenotype with large volumes of bloody ascites in PRSS1R122H-PRSS2 mice (Fig. 1A).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrates ~50% mortality in bombesin-treated mice and no mortality in high-dose cerulein-treated mice during the observation period.

Bombesin elicits lethal hemorrhagic-necrotizing pancreatitis in humanized PRSS1R122H-PRSS2 mice.

(A) Gross pancreas and ascites 24 h after induction with high dose of cerulein or bombesin, illustrating distinct pancreatitis phenotypes (n = 9 per group).

(B) Representative H&E images. In wild-type (WT) C57BL/6J mice, cerulein induces mild interstitial edema, whereas bombesin does not elicit pancreatitis. In heterozygous PRSS1R122H-PRSS2 mice, cerulein causes marked edematous pancreatitis, while bombesin produces severe hemorrhagic-necrotizing pancreatitis characterized by lobular necrosis and intralobular hemorrhage. (n = 9 per group). Scale bar, 200 μm.

(C) Quantification of acinar necrosis after high-dose cerulein or bombesin. Mean ± s.d. (n = 6 per group). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test; P < 0.01 (**).

(D) Representative CD31 (endothelial) and α-SMA (vascular smooth muscle) immunostaining demonstrating preserved vascular integrity after cerulein and disrupted vascular architecture following bombesin treatment (n = 5 per group). Scale bar, 200 μm.

(E) Human cases of hemorrhagic-necrotizing pancreatitis show similar histopathology, including red blood cell extravasation and lobular ischemic coagulative necrosis.

To contextualize these gross findings, pancreatic water content and serum amylase were quantified. Cerulein modestly increased both parameters in C57BL/6J mice, whereas bombesin had minimal effect. In PRSS1R122H-PRSS2 mice, cerulein and bombesin produced comparably elevated edema and serum amylase relative to wild-type (WT) controls (Supplementary Fig. 1B, C), indicating that conventional injury indices do not explain the profound phenotype divergence.

Histological analysis further separated these responses. Cerulein induced edema, inflammatory infiltration, and scattered acinar necrosis that were more pronounced in PRSS1R122H-PRSS2 mice than in C57BL/6J mice. In sharp contrast, bombesin provoked extensive intralobular hemorrhage, vascular disruption, and lobular ischemic necrosis exclusively in PRSS1R122H-PRSS2 mice while causing no detectable acinar injury in C57BL/6J mice (Fig. 1B). Morphometric quantification confirmed substantially greater lobular necrosis after bombesin than after cerulein in PRSS1R122H-PRSS2 mice (Fig. 1C).

Because vascular injury defined the bombesin phenotype, vascular integrity was examined directly. Bombesin treatment resulted in loss of CD31-positive endothelial continuity and disruption of α–smooth muscle actin–positive vascular smooth muscle layers, whereas vascular architecture remained intact after cerulein (Fig. 1D). To assess whether this phenotype recapitulates human disease, we examined human pancreatitis tissues obtained at autopsy. The histological features of bombesin-treated PRSS1R122H-PRSS2 pancreata exhibited with red blood cell extravasation, loss of vascular integrity, and lobular ischemic coagulative necrosis with minimal inflammatory infiltrates, closely resembled human hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis (Fig. 1E). Areas of lobular necrosis without inflammatory infiltration indicated complete interruption of the local blood supply (Fig. 1E). In human severe acute pancreatitis, mortality rates can reach up to 40%10. Strikingly, no mortality was observed following high-dose cerulein treatment, whereas approximately 50% mortality occurred in bombesin-treated mice (Fig. 1F).

Additional histological features of bombesin-induced pancreatitis, assessed by focused hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining, revealed intrapancreatic thrombosis and regions of lobular necrosis accompanied by intense inflammatory infiltration, consistent with impaired but incompletely abolished perfusion (Supplementary Fig. 2A, B). The same H&E analysis demonstrated structural damage to pancreatic islets following bombesin treatment (Supplementary Fig. 2C). Cleaved caspase-3 staining localized predominantly to the islet surface after bombesin, with minimal staining in acinar cells. In contrast, cerulein-induced pancreatitis exhibited the opposite pattern, with prominent acinar cleaved caspase-3 staining and relative sparing of islets (Supplementary Fig. 2D). Consistent with endocrine involvement, bombesin-treated mice showed a trend toward elevated fasting blood glucose and impaired intraperitoneal glucose tolerance (Supplementary Fig. 2E, F).

Total intrapancreatic protease activity is uncoupled from pancreatitis severity.

Inappropriate intra-acinar trypsinogen activation is widely viewed as an initiating event in acute pancreatitis and is often assumed to scale with disease severity21, 22. Consistent with this paradigm, cerulein induced significantly higher total intrapancreatic protease activity, including trypsin and chymotrypsin, than bombesin in both C57BL/6J and heterozygous PRSS1R122H-PRSS2 mice (Fig. 2A, B). Paradoxically, despite lower total protease activity, bombesin produced markedly more severe injury in PRSS1R122H-PRSS2 mice, as defined by the hemorrhagic necrotizing phenotype as shown in Fig. 1.

To quantify this dissociation, pancreatitis severity was assessed by blinded semi-quantitative scoring of whole pancreatic sections, including hemorrhage, edema, acinar cell death, and inflammatory cell infiltration. These analyses showed that histologic severity did not track with total intrapancreatic protease activity (Fig. 2C–F). Notably, edema, acinar cell death, and inflammatory infiltration scores were comparable between cerulein- and bombesin-treated PRSS1R122H-PRSS2 mice despite substantial differences in total trypsin and chymotrypsin activity.

To further define inflammatory patterns associated with these divergent injury programs, immune cell infiltration was examined by CD11b and F4/80 staining. Cerulein-induced inflammation was concentrated in interlobular regions, whereas bombesin-induced pancreatitis showed pronounced regional heterogeneity, with areas of intense inflammatory infiltration interspersed with regions showing reduced or absent CD11b and F4/80 immunoreactivity (Supplementary Fig. 3). Loss of detectable extracellular epitopes on infiltrating immune cells is consistent with proteolytic cleavage by leaked digestive enzymes. Together, these findings indicate that severity and subtype cannot be inferred from total protease activity alone.

Chronic sequelae of bombesin-induced hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis in PRSS1 R122H-PRSS2 mice.

Bombesin-induced pancreatitis severity increased in a dose-dependent manner in PRSS1R122H-PRSS2 mice, as demonstrated by escalating hemorrhage, acinar necrosis, edema, and ascites formation with increasing numbers of bombesin injections (Supplementary Fig. 4A-F). Having established this graded acute injury response, we next examined the long-term consequences of bombesin-induced hemorrhagic pancreatitis.

By day 21 after injury, bombesin-treated PRSS1R122H-PRSS2 mice developed striking chronic pancreatic abnormalities that were not observed following cerulein-induced pancreatitis. Gross examination revealed pancreatic cyst formation and amylase-rich ascites (Fig. 3A-C). Bombesin-treated mice also exhibited significant body weight loss and markedly reduced pancreatic mass (Fig. 3D, E), indicating extensive and largely irreversible pancreatic injury. Histological analysis confirmed cystic remodeling, widespread loss of acinar tissue, and disruption of pancreatic ductal architecture (Fig. 3F).

Notably, the combination of pancreatic duct disruption and enzyme-rich ascites closely resembles disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome, a recognized complication affecting approximately 30–50% of patients with necrotizing pancreatitis23, 24. These findings indicate that bombesin-induced hemorrhagic pancreatitis in PRSS1R122H-PRSS2 mice progresses to a chronic disease state that captures key structural and functional sequelae observed in severe human pancreatitis.

Bombesin-induced hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis is not PRSS1 R122H mutation-specific and is modulated by trypsin gene dosage.

The bombesin-induced hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis phenotype was initially identified in PRSS1R122H-PRSS2 mice. To determine whether this phenotype depends on the PRSS1R122H mutation, we examined a complementary transgenic mouse line expressing wild-type human PRSS1 and PRSS2 (PRSS1–PRSS2 mice). Bombesin administration using the same stimulation regimen induced pathological features indistinguishable from those observed in PRSS1R122H-PRSS2 mice, demonstrating that the hemorrhagic necrotizing phenotype is not dependent on the PRSS1R122H mutation (Fig. 4A-H). The phenotype was stronger in homozygous mice than in heterozygous and correlated with trypsin expression and activity levels (Fig. 4A-H), suggesting trypsin activity still plays a critical role in the initiation of HNP.

Enzyme accumulation within the pancreatic duct is a defining feature of hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis.

Given that bombesin induces lower total intrapancreatic trypsin activity than high-dose cerulein which produces only edematous pancreatitis, the development of severe hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis following bombesin stimulation is paradoxical. To determine whether this difference reflects direct acinar cell injury, freshly isolated primary pancreatic acinar cells were exposed to cerulein or bombesin in vitro. High-dose cerulein induced overt acinar cell damage, characterized by membrane blebbing and ethidium bromide uptake, whereas bombesin and low-dose of cerulein did not cause detectable acinar cell injury (Fig. 5A). These findings indicate that bombesin-induced pancreatitis is not initiated by direct acinar cell cytotoxicity of bombesin receptor activation.

Figure 5. Pancreatic ductal enzymes accumulation in PRSS1R122H-PRSS2.

Figure 5

(A) Primary pancreatic acinar cells from PRSS1R122H-PRSS2 mice were stimulated with saline (control), cerulein, or bombesin as indicated concentrations. Ethidium bromide (EB) was included to monitor membrane permeability. High-dose cerulein triggered membrane blebbing and ethidium bromide (EB; red) uptake, indicating loss of plasma-membrane integrity. In contrast, low-dose cerulein and bombesin caused no detectable cellular injury (Representative images from 3 independent experiments).

(B) Schematic showing acinar responses: cerulein elicits biphasic amylase secretion curve, whereas bombesin sustains secretion even at high dose. Mean ± s.d. (representative from 3 independent experiments).

(C) Representative histology showing ductal and vascular injury after high-dose bombesin, but not after high-dose cerulein administered using the same protocol (100 μg/kg, 8 × hourly injections) (n = 10 per group). Scale bars, 200 μm.

(D) PRSS1 immunostaining shows marked intraductal enzyme accumulation and epithelial lining positivity after high-dose bombesin, but not cerulein. Representative images from five independent samples. Scale bars, 200 μm.

The enzyme secretion of pancreatic acinar cells in response secretagogues was in a stimulus- and concentration-dependent manner25, 26, 27. Low concentrations of cholecystokinin (CCK) or its analog cerulein stimulate enzyme secretion, whereas supraphysiologic concentrations suppress secretion despite continued intracellular enzyme activation. In contrast, bombesin activates distinct intracellular signaling pathways and preserves the secretion-associated cytoskeletal architecture, thereby failing to induce high-dose secretory inhibition (Fig. 5B). Based on these differences, we hypothesized that bombesin-induced enzyme activation occurs in the setting of preserved secretion, resulting in the delivery of activated digestive enzymes into the pancreatic ductal compartment.

Consistent with this hypothesis, histological analysis revealed prominent ductal dilation, disruption, and obstruction accompanied by adjacent vascular injury in bombesin-treated mice, whereas ductal architecture remained largely intact following high-dose cerulein stimulation (Fig. 5C). Notably, this combined pattern of ductal and vascular injury closely mirrors that observed in human hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis28, as illustrated in representative human pancreatic pathology images curated by the Japanese Society of Pathology (https://pathology.or.jp/corepicturesEN/11/c04/04.html). To directly assess ductal enzyme accumulation, immunohistochemical staining for PRSS1 was performed at the examined time point. No detectable PRSS1 immunoreactivity was observed in ducts from cerulein treated mice, whereas ducts from bombesin treated mice contained abundant PRSS1 positive material within the ductal lumen and along the ductal epithelial lining (Fig. 5D), supporting intraductal accumulation of trypsinogen and its association with ductal injury. Together, these findings identify accumulation of activated digestive enzymes within the ductal compartment, as a key mechanistic feature distinguishing hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis from edematous disease.

Low-dose cerulein paradoxically triggers severe hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis through a duct-centered mechanism, whereas high-dose cerulein causes edematous disease.

Based on the dose-dependent effects of cerulein on secretion (Fig. 5B), we reasoned that cerulein administered at doses that preserve enzyme secretion would recapitulate the bombesin-induced hemorrhagic pancreatitis phenotype. To test this hypothesis, PRSS1R122H-PRSS2 mice received a single intraperitoneal injection of cerulein across a wide dose range from 2.5 to 100 μg/kg (Supplementary Fig. 5A). Indeed, cerulein induced a dose dependent hemorrhagic phenotype, with maximal hemorrhage observed at doses of 10 to 15 μg/kg, and paradoxically hemorrhage diminished with higher doses of cerulein at 50 to 100 μg/kg (Fig. 6A). At hemorrhage inducing doses (10 to 15 μg/kg), pancreatic histology closely resembled that observed following bombesin stimulation and was characterized by prominent ductal dilation, ductal disruption, and adjacent vascular injury (Fig. 6B). Notably, under these conditions, the severity of hemorrhagic injury was uncoupled from total intrapancreatic trypsin activity, which did not scale with hemorrhage severity across doses (Fig. 6C and Supplementary Fig. 5D, E). Pancreatic edema and serum amylase levels increased with doses and plateaued above approximately 20 μg/kg, suggesting that these parameters do not necessarily correlate with pancreatitis severity (Supplementary Fig. 5B and C). At the lowest cerulein dose tested of 2.5 μg/kg, mice developed only mild edematous pancreatitis without hemorrhage (Fig. 6A, B), indicating that a threshold level of secretagogue induced trypsin activity is required to initiate hemorrhagic necrotizing injury. This threshold requirement likely explains why bombesin fails to induce pancreatitis in wild type mice but provokes severe hemorrhagic disease in transgenic mice expressing human PRSS1 and PRSS2.

Time course analysis further supported a duct centered mechanism. By day 7 following lower dose cerulein stimulation at hemorrhage inducing doses, pancreatic ducts were dilated and filled with debris, closely resembling the changes observed in bombesin treated mice (Fig. 6D, right panel). In contrast, mice receiving high dose cerulein showed no evidence of intraductal debris at the same time point (Fig. 6D, left panel). By day 21, abundant intraductal protein plugs with amorphous calcification had formed in lower dose cerulein treated mice, closely mimicking features of severe pancreatitis in human (Fig. 6E). Together, these findings show that the development of hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis requires both sufficient trypsin activity and preserved enzyme secretion that leads to digestive enzyme accumulation within the pancreatic ductal compartment, and that hemorrhagic severity is not determined by total intrapancreatic protease activity alone.

Pharmacologic flush-out of ductal enzyme accumulation prevents hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis.

Guided by the duct centered mechanism identified above, we postulated that reducing intraductal digestive enzyme burden could prevent progression to hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis. To model a therapeutic intervention, treatment was initiated 2.5 h after bombesin challenge, a time point at which ductal alterations and early pancreatic injury are detectable (Supplementary Fig. 6A). Secretin is a peptide hormone that stimulates pancreatic ductal epithelial cells to secrete bicarbonate rich fluid and is routinely used in pancreatic function testing and enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography29, 30. We hypothesized that secretin induced ductal fluid secretion might mitigate intraductal enzyme accumulation. However, when administered alone at 2.5 h after bombesin challenge, secretin did not confer protection and instead modestly exacerbated hemorrhagic injury, likely reflecting increased intraductal pressure in the setting of impaired pancreatic outflow (Fig. 7A-G). We next reasoned that effective ductal flush-out would require not only enhanced fluid secretion but also relaxation of the sphincter of Oddi, the muscular valve regulating pancreatic outflow into the duodenum. Accordingly, we administered the nitric oxide donor isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN), which relaxes the sphincter of Oddi31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36. Although ISMN alone conferred no protection, its combination with secretin completely prevented the development of hemorrhagic pancreatitis (Fig. 7B-G). Collectively, these findings support the duct-centered mechanism and identify a potentially translatable therapeutic strategy, as both agents are FDA approved and amenable to rapid clinical evaluation. A schematic overview of the proposed mechanism and therapeutic concept is provided (Graphical abstract).

DISCUSSION

In this study, we identify intraductal digestive enzyme accumulation as a key determinant of severe hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis. Retention of active proteases within the pancreatic ductal system leads to ductal disruption, parenchymal necrosis, and hemorrhagic injury. This duct-initiated mechanism explains pathological features of fulminant pancreatitis that are inadequately captured by existing experimental models and reframes disease severity from one driven primarily by intracellular acinar activation to one in which failure of ductal clearance plays a decisive role. These findings further suggest that reducing intraductal enzyme burden through pharmacologic ductal flush-out can attenuate disease progression, highlighting the pancreatic duct as a previously underappreciated translational target.

Most experimental models of acute pancreatitis emphasize acinar cell–centric mechanisms, particularly inappropriate intracellular digestive enzyme activation8, 9. Hyperstimulation models such as cerulein-induced pancreatitis produce robust acinar stress, inflammation, and edema and can induce necrosis at sufficient intensity, yet injury remains largely driven by intracellular acinar responses37. Likewise, the choline-deficient, ethionine-supplemented diet model induces severe pancreatic injury through systemic metabolic stress and acinar toxicity without addressing ductal clearance failure38, 39. In contrast, bile acid–based or retrograde infusion models rely on nonphysiologic chemical injury and artificial delivery routes that obscure endogenous disease processes40, 41, 42. The duct-driven hemorrhagic pancreatitis described here differs fundamentally by arising from failure of physiological enzyme clearance, resulting in intraductal protease accumulation, ductal disruption, and secondary vascular injury, a distinction that likely explains why existing models incompletely reproduce the hemorrhagic phenotype seen in severe human disease.

These findings indicate that the pancreatic duct is not merely a passive conduit for exocrine output but can determine disease trajectory when luminal clearance fails43, 44, 45. Mechanistically, our data support a two-requirement model for hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis: a threshold level of protease activity is required to initiate catastrophic injury, and secretion must remain sufficiently intact to deliver enzymes into the ductal system, enabling intraductal accumulation. This framework reconciles divergent phenotypes across stimulation paradigms. Supraphysiologic cerulein suppresses secretion despite robust intracellular activation, limiting ductal enzyme delivery26, 46, 47, 48, whereas bombesin and moderate-dose cerulein preserve secretion and favor ductal exposure to activated or activatable proteases27, 49, 50. Once proteases accumulate intraductally, enzymatic activity becomes spatially concentrated within a confined compartment, promoting focal ductal disruption and enzyme escape into the interstitium. Protease dissemination near the periductal microvasculature provides a mechanistic link to vascular barrier failure and hemorrhage. Accordingly, bulk pancreatic protease activity is an incomplete surrogate for disease severity because it does not capture where enzymatic activity is exerted.

These mechanistic insights identify ductal washout as a tractable therapeutic axis while indicating that enhancing secretion alone is insufficient when pancreatic outflow is impaired. In a clinically relevant intervention paradigm initiated 2.5 hours after bombesin challenge, when early ductal alterations are detectable but before overt hemorrhage, secretin failed to confer protection and modestly exacerbated hemorrhagic injury, likely by increasing intraductal pressure in the setting of impaired drainage51, 52, 53. This observation implies that effective enzyme washout requires both enhanced secretion and restoration of downstream outflow, specifically relaxation of the sphincter of Oddi36, 54, 55, 56. Although the nitric oxide donor isosorbide mononitrate was ineffective as monotherapy, its combination with secretin completely prevented hemorrhagic pancreatitis. Together, these findings support a mechanism-based strategy in which coordinated enhancement of secretion and ductal drainage reduces intraductal protease burden, preserves ductal integrity, and prevents secondary vascular injury. Because both agents are FDA approved for established clinical indications, near-term translational evaluation of this approach is feasible.

The chronic sequelae following duct-driven hemorrhagic injury extend the implications of intraductal protease retention beyond the acute phase. By day 21 after bombesin challenge, mice exhibited profound pancreatic remodeling characterized by loss of acinar tissue, reduced pancreatic mass, cyst formation, and amylase-rich ascites, indicating persistent leakage of enzyme-containing fluid from a disrupted ductal system. Sustained architectural distortion of the ductal compartment and intraductal protein plugs with amorphous calcification were observed, consistent with ongoing stasis and obstruction. This constellation closely resembles disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome57, 58, 59, a frequent and therapeutically challenging complication of necrotizing pancreatitis, suggesting that early ductal injury can initiate a self-reinforcing cycle of impaired drainage, continued enzyme leakage, and progressive remodeling.

In summary, our study establishes intraductal digestive enzyme accumulation and impaired ductal clearance as defining mechanisms that drive hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis. By distinguishing duct-driven hemorrhagic injury from acinar-centric pancreatitis programs, these findings explain why bulk pancreatic protease activity does not reliably predict severity and identify the ductal compartment as a decisive site of pathogenic enzyme action. The ability to prevent catastrophic hemorrhagic disease by co-optimizing ductal secretion and pancreatic outflow supports a translatable therapeutic principle centered on restoring ductal clearance and motivates future efforts to develop clinical measures of ductal patency and drainage to enable timely intervention in this high-risk pancreatitis subtype.

Supplementary Material

This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.

Acknowledgments:

Graphical abstract was created using BioRender (BioRender.com).

Funding:

This work was supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), National Institutes of Health (NIH), grants R01DK117910 (B.J.) and R01DK139207 (Y.B.); the National Cancer Institute (NCI), NIH, grant CA255068 (B.J.); U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) awards W81XWH-15-1-0257 (B.J.), W81XWH-19-1-0081 (B.J.), and HT9425-24-1-0609 (B.J. and Y.B.); and an American Pancreatic Association (APA) 2022 Young Investigator in Pancreatology Grant (J.W., Jiale Wang).

Footnotes

Participant Consent Statement: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB #24-008719; Study Title: “Histology Evaluation of Acute Pancreatitis”). The human histological specimens analyzed in this study were obtained from a deceased patient. In accordance with IRB determination and applicable regulations, the requirement for informed consent was waived.

Competing interests:

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics statement

All animal procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Mayo Clinic and were performed in accordance with institutional guidelines. Human pancreatic tissue specimens were obtained under a Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved protocol (24-008719). All samples were de-identified prior to analysis, and all procedures complied with institutional and applicable ethical guidelines.

Contributor Information

Baoan Ji, Mayo Clinic.

Jiale Wang, Mayo Clinic.

Yang Liu, Mayo Clinic.

Lingxiang Wang, Mayo Clinic.

Jianhua Wan, Mayo Clinic.

Gordon He, Mayo Clinic.

Yasmin Jahan-mihan, Mayo Clinic.

Audrey Li, Mayo Clinic.

Yuxi Wang, Mayo Clinic.

Donfeng Feng, Mayo Clinic.

Jie Hu, Mayo Clinic.

Justin Clark, Mayo Clinic.

Muhammad Faheem, Mayo Clinic.

Oliver Wang, Mayo Clinic.

Zhu Zhu, Mayo Clinic.

Guangping Tu, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University.

Xiao Yu, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University.

Richard Waldron, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center.

Brandy Edenfield, Mayo Clinic.

lizhi zhang, Mayo Clinic.

References

  • 1.Mederos MA, Reber HA, Girgis MD. Acute Pancreatitis: A Review. JAMA 325, 382–390 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Peery AF, Crockett SD, Murphy CC. Burden and cost of gastrointestinal, liver, and pancreatic diseases in the United States: update 2018 (vol 156, pg 254, 2019). Gastroenterology 156, 1936–1936 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Iannuzzi JP, et al. Global Incidence of Acute Pancreatitis Is Increasing Over Time: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gastroenterology 162, 122–134 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Boxhoorn L, et al. Acute pancreatitis. Lancet 396, 726–734 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tenner S, et al. American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines: Management of Acute Pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 119, 419–437 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lee PJ, Papachristou GI. New insights into acute pancreatitis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 16, 479–496 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mayerle J, Sendler M, Hegyi E, Beyer G, Lerch MM, Sahin-Toth M. Genetics, Cell Biology, and Pathophysiology of Pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 156, 1951–1968 e1951 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lerch MM, Gorelick FS. Models of acute and chronic pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 144, 1180–1193 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.han X, Wang F, Bi Y, Ji B. Animal models of gastrointestinal and liver diseases. Animal models of acute and chronic pancreatitis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 311, G343–355 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Forsmark CE, Vege SS, Wilcox CM. Acute Pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 375, 1972–1981 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gill JR. Pancreatitis: A Forensic Perspective. Acad Forensic Pathol 6, 237–248 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gorelick FS, Lerch MM. Do Animal Models of Acute Pancreatitis Reproduce Human Disease? Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol 4, 251–262 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wang J, Wan J, Wang L, Pandol SJ, Bi Y, Ji B. Wild-Type Human PRSS2 and PRSS1(R122H) Cooperatively Initiate Spontaneous Hereditary Pancreatitis in Transgenic Mice. Gastroenterology 163, 313–315 e314 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lampel M, Kern HF. Acute interstitial pancreatitis in the rat induced by excessive doses of a pancreatic secretagogue. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol 373, 97–117 (1977). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Niederau C, Ferrell LD, Grendell JH. Caerulein-induced acute necrotizing pancreatitis in mice: protective effects of proglumide, benzotript, and secretin. Gastroenterology 88, 1192–1204 (1985). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Niederau C, Liddle RA, Ferrell LD, Grendell JH. Beneficial effects of cholecystokinin-receptor blockade and inhibition of proteolytic enzyme activity in experimental acute hemorrhagic pancreatitis in mice. Evidence for cholecystokinin as a major factor in the development of acute pancreatitis. J Clin Invest 78, 1056–1063 (1986). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jensen RT, Moody T, Pert C, Rivier JE, Gardner JD. Interaction of bombesin and litorin with specific membrane receptors on pancreatic acinar cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 75, 6139–6143 (1978). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hampton LL, et al. Loss of bombesin-induced feeding suppression in gastrin-releasing peptide receptor-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95, 3188–3192 (1998). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wisner JR Jr., Ozawa S, Renner IG. Pancreatic exocrine function in unconscious rats treated with submaximal, maximal, and supramaximal doses of bombesin tetradecapeptide. Pancreas 4, 83–89 (1989). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Grady T, Dabrowski A, Williams JA, Logsdon CD. Stress-activated protein kinase activation is the earliest direct correlate to the induction of secretagogue-induced pancreatitis in rats. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 227, 1–7 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hegyi E, Sahin-Toth M. Genetic Risk in Chronic Pancreatitis: The Trypsin-Dependent Pathway. Dig Dis Sci 62, 1692–1701 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Geisz-Fremy A. Pathologically relevant trypsinogen activation in pancreatitis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 330, G87–G97 (2026). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Vanek P, Urban O, Trikudanathan G, Freeman ML. Disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis. Surg Open Sci 11, 19–25 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Maatman TK, et al. Disconnected Pancreatic Duct Syndrome: Spectrum of Operative Management. J Surg Res 247, 297–303 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Schafer C, Ross SE, Bragado MJ, Groblewski GE, Ernst SA, Williams JA. A role for the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase/Hsp 27 pathway in cholecystokinin-induced changes in the actin cytoskeleton in rat pancreatic acini. J Biol Chem 273, 24173–24180 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gaisano HY, et al. Supramaximal cholecystokinin displaces Munc18c from the pancreatic acinar basal surface, redirecting apical exocytosis to the basal membrane. J Clin Invest 108, 1597–1611 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Grady T, Mah'Moud M, Otani T, Rhee S, Lerch MM, Gorelick FS. Zymogen proteolysis within the pancreatic acinar cell is associated with cellular injury. Am J Physiol 275, G1010–1017 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Phat VN, Guerrieri MT, Alexandre JH, Camilleri JP. Early histological changes in acute necrotizing hemorrhagic pancreatitis. A retrospective pathological study of 20 total pancreatectomy specimens. Pathol Res Pract 178, 273–279 (1984). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Williams JA. Secretin. Pancreapedia: The Exocrine Pancreas Knowledge Base, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sherman S, et al. Administration of Secretin (RG1068) Increases the Sensitivity of Detection of Duct Abnormalities by Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Patients With Pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 147, 646-+ (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ibuki Y, et al. [Effects of isosorbide dinitrate on Oddi's sphincter]. Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi 89, 2078 (1992). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kaufman HS, Shermak MA, May CA, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD. Nitric oxide inhibits resting sphincter of Oddi activity. Am J Surg 165, 74–80 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Slivka A, et al. Inhibition of sphincter of Oddi function by the nitric oxide carrier S-nitroso-N-acetylcysteine in rabbits and humans. J Clin Invest 94, 1792–1798 (1994). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Luman W, Pryde A, Heading RC, Palmer KR. Topical glyceryl trinitrate relaxes the sphincter of Oddi. Gut 40, 541–543 (1997). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Staritz M, Poralla T, Ewe K, Meyer zum Buschenfelde KH. Effect of glyceryl trinitrate on the sphincter of Oddi motility and baseline pressure. Gut 26, 194–197 (1985). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Frank CD, Adler DG. Post-ERCP pancreatitis and its prevention. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 3, 680–688 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Saluja A, Dudeja V, Dawra R, Sah RP. Early Intra-Acinar Events in Pathogenesis of Pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 156, 1979–1993 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lombardi B, Estes LW, Longnecker DS. Acute hemorrhagic pancreatitis (massive necrosis) with fat necrosis induced in mice by DL-ethionine fed with a choline-deficient diet. Am J Pathol 79, 465–480 (1975). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Rao KN, Tuma J, Lombardi B. Acute hemorrhagic pancreatic necrosis in mice. Intraparenchymal activation of zymogens, and other enzyme changes in pancreas and serum. Gastroenterology 70, 720–726 (1976). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Aho HJ, Koskensalo SM, Nevalainen TJ. Experimental pancreatitis in the rat. Sodium taurocholate-induced acute haemorrhagic pancreatitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 15, 411–416 (1980). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Laukkarinen JM, Van Acker GJ, Weiss ER, Steer ML, Perides G. A mouse model of acute biliary pancreatitis induced by retrograde pancreatic duct infusion of Na-taurocholate. Gut 56, 1590–1598 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Perides G, van Acker GJ, Laukkarinen JM, Steer ML. Experimental acute biliary pancreatitis induced by retrograde infusion of bile acids into the mouse pancreatic duct. Nat Protoc 5, 335–341 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Schneider A, et al. Combined bicarbonate conductance-impairing variants in CFTR and SPINK1 variants are associated with chronic pancreatitis in patients without cystic fibrosis. Gastroenterology 140, 162–171 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Pallagi P, et al. Trypsin reduces pancreatic ductal bicarbonate secretion by inhibiting CFTR Cl(−) channels and luminal anion exchangers. Gastroenterology 141, 2228–2239 e2226 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hegyi P, Pandol S, Venglovecz V, Rakonczay Z Jr. The acinar-ductal tango in the pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis. Gut 60, 544–552 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.O'Konski MS, Pandol SJ. Effects of caerulein on the apical cytoskeleton of the pancreatic acinar cell. J Clin Invest 86, 1649–1657 (1990). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Pandol SJ, Schoeffield MS. 1,2-Diacylglycerol, protein kinase C, and pancreatic enzyme secretion. J Biol Chem 261, 4438–4444 (1986). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Messenger SW, et al. Vesicle associated membrane protein 8 (VAMP8)-mediated zymogen granule exocytosis is dependent on endosomal trafficking via the constitutive-like secretory pathway. J Biol Chem 289, 28040–28053 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Otani T, et al. Effects of pancreatic duct ligation on pancreatic response to bombesin. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 290, G633–639 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Pandol SJ, Saluja AK, Imrie CW, Banks PA. Acute pancreatitis: bench to the bedside. Gastroenterology 132, 1127–1151 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wen L, Javed TA, Yimlamai D, Mukherjee A, Xiao X, Husain SZ. Transient High Pressure in Pancreatic Ducts Promotes Inflammation and Alters Tight Junctions via Calcineurin Signaling in Mice. Gastroenterology 155, 1250–1263 e1255 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Romac JM, Shahid RA, Swain SM, Vigna SR, Liddle RA. Piezo1 is a mechanically activated ion channel and mediates pressure induced pancreatitis. Nat Commun 9, 1715 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Swain SM, et al. TRPV4 channel opening mediates pressure-induced pancreatitis initiated by Piezo1 activation. J Clin Invest 130, 2527–2541 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Chen JW, Thomas A, Woods CM, Schloithe AC, Toouli J, Saccone GT. Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction produces acute pancreatitis in the possum. Gut 47, 539–545 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Cote GA, et al. Similar efficacies of biliary, with or without pancreatic, sphincterotomy in treatment of idiopathic recurrent acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 143, 1502–1509 e1501 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Miyatani H, Mashima H, Sekine M, Matsumoto S. Post-ERCP biliary complications in patients with biliary type sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Sci Rep 8, 9951 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Thiruvengadam NR, et al. Disconnected Pancreatic Duct Syndrome: Pancreatitis of the Disconnected Pancreas and Its Role in the Development of Diabetes Mellitus. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 13, e00457 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.van Dijk SM, et al. Treatment of disrupted and disconnected pancreatic duct in necrotizing pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pancreatology 19, 905–915 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wilcox CM, et al. Management of the Disconnected Pancreatic Duct in Pancreatic Necrosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 23, 1878–1887 e1873 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Mosztbacher D, Demcsak A, Sahin-Toth M. Measuring digestive protease activation in the mouse pancreas. Pancreatology 20, 288–292 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Geisz A, Sahin-Toth M. A preclinical model of chronic pancreatitis driven by trypsinogen autoactivation. Nat Commun 9, 5033 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Schmidt J, et al. A better model of acute pancreatitis for evaluating therapy. Ann Surg 215, 44–56 (1992). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Williams JA. Isolation of rodent pancreatic acinar cells and acini by collagenase digestion. Pancreapedia: The Exocrine Pancreas Knowledge Base, (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Williams JA, Korc M, Dormer RL. Action of secretagogues on a new preparation of functionally intact, isolated pancreatic acini. Am J Physiol 235, 517–524 (1978). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Wan J, et al. Pancreas-specific CHRM3 activation causes pancreatitis in mice. JCI Insight 6, (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Research Square are provided here courtesy of American Journal Experts

RESOURCES