Abstract
The conversion of ornamental stone waste, rich in quartz and potassium feldspar, into precursors for LTA and SOD zeolite synthesis was investigated via alkaline activation at 850 °C, followed by hydrothermal crystallization without autoclaves. This approach promoted complete amorphization of the material, facilitating the breakdown of the original crystalline framework and the incorporation of sodium ions, which are essential for structural rearrangement during zeolite formation. LTA zeolite was obtained after 6 h of crystallization, reaching 99.94% crystallinity, and progressively transformed into the SOD phase over 48 h, achieving 87.56% crystallinity. This phase transition was closely related to variations in the Na2O/Al2O3 molar ratio and the conditions governing nucleation and crystal growth. Solid-state 29Si NMR analyses revealed local rearrangements in the aluminosilicate framework during the LTA → SOD transformation, highlighting the key role of Na+ redistribution in structural evolution. Complementary 27Al NMR confirmed the exclusive presence of tetrahedrally coordinated aluminum and the absence of Brønsted acid sites, indicating a basic character of the synthesized zeolites. These results demonstrate the technical and environmental feasibility of using ornamental stone waste as a raw material, providing a sustainable and economically competitive route to produce functional zeolites with potential applications in catalysis, adsorption, sensing, and gas separation technologies.


Introduction
The ornamental stone industry in Brazil is one of the most significant sectors of the national mining industry, standing out for its economic and social relevance. The country holds a leading global position in the production and export of ornamental stones, particularly granite and marble. Between January and November 2025, the Brazilian ornamental stone export market reached 1.14 billion U.S. dollars and 1.87 million tons, highlighting the sector’s importance to the national economy.
Ornamental stones, widely used in flooring, cladding, and countertops, can be primarily classified as granite, marble, and quartzite. Granite is composed of quartz, feldspar, and iron-bearing minerals; marble consists mainly of calcite and dolomite; while quartzite is essentially composed of quartz. During the processing of these stones, from quarry extraction to industrial cutting and polishing, solid and slurry wastes are generated due to the use of water for tool cooling and slab polishing, in addition to particulate residues resulting from sawing with diamond wire saws. ,
It is estimated that about 30% to 40% of the volume extracted from quarries is converted into waste, totaling between 690,000 and 920,000 tons per year. These residues contain metal contents such as Fe, Mg, Ca, Cu, Cr, Pb, and Cd, whose presence may alter the local ecosystem. Additionally, particles with sizes between 1 and 60 μm can block soil pores, compromising its permeability and fertility. Such environmental impacts may negatively affect human health and biodiversity.
Sludge wastes from ornamental stone processing, which are typically disposed of in landfills, can be effectively used as secondary raw materials to replace conventional aggregates (siliceous fillers) in self-compacting mortars, without increasing costs and contributing to the reduction of dependence on natural raw materials. Azevedo et al. reported that replacing conventional lime in the cement industry with industrial solid wastes, including those derived from ornamental rocks, could generate annual savings of approximately 250 million U.S. dollars for the sector. Other applications of these wastes include the manufacture of red-fired coatings, the production of soda-lime glass, the preparation of mortars, interlocking paving blocks, belitic cement, their incorporation into clay ceramics, the development of sustainable clay-based cosmetic mask formulations, and their use as sand substitutes in concrete, assisted by silane coupling agents.
An alternative for the utilization of ornamental rock waste, particularly granite, is the synthesis of zeolites, as these wastes are rich in aluminosilicates, which are key precursors for the formation of the material. Zeolites possess a microporous crystalline structure composed of aluminum and silicon oxide tetrahedra that share oxygen atoms at the vertices, creating interconnected polyhedra that form a three-dimensional network with porous channels ranging from 0.2 to 1.2 nm, occupied by cationic ions, mainly alkali and alkaline earth metals, which neutralize the negative charge of tetrahedral aluminum. , Synthetic zeolites allow the adjustment of chemical properties and the number of active sites, being preferred for specific applications, whereas natural zeolites are more suitable as molecular sieves. These materials are widely used in the adsorption of metal ions, , proteins and dyes, enzymatic immobilization, catalytic pyrolysis, antitumor remediation and biofuel synthesis.
Zeolite synthesis can be carried out using either pure chemical reagents or industrial wastes rich in silicon and aluminum oxides, providing economic and environmental benefits by promoting waste valorization and reducing the extraction of natural resources. Various types of zeolites have already been synthesized from silicoaluminous wastes, including Linde Type A (LTA) zeolites derived from glass and aluminum wastes coal fly ash, lithium leaching residues and rice husk combined with diatomite; GIS-type zeolites obtained from municipal solid waste incineration fly ash and kaolinite-rich construction and demolition wastes; and faujasite (FAU) zeolites synthesized from acid-treated waste glass powder and rice husk ash.
The hydrothermal method, also referred to as the solvothermal method, is the most extensively studied for zeolite synthesis. It involves the addition of aluminum and silicon precursors to an alkaline solution (pH > 8.5), followed by transfer to autoclaves at temperatures between 80 and 350 °C, promoting the growth of highly crystalline and single-phase crystals. However, the use of mineral wastes in this method presents limitations when they contain high amounts of thermally stable minerals, such as feldspars and quartz. An effective alternative is alkaline activation with NaOH, a procedure that promotes the breakdown of crystalline structures and the formation of soluble silicates in solution. This process increases the availability of silica and alumina in a reactively accessible form, which is crucial for the subsequent formation of zeolites during the hydrothermal step.
Among the benefits of alkaline activation are the improved dissolution of active components, reduced crystallization time, and lower consumption of additional reagents. However, alkaline activation also presents disadvantages, such as high energy consumption, since the activation temperature generally ranges between 600 and 1000 °C for 1.5 to 4 h.
In this study, ornamental rock wastes rich in quartz and potassium feldspar were used as precursors for zeolite synthesis, employing the hydrothermal method without autoclave assistance, following a pretreatment via alkaline activation. This approach allows the valorization of abundant waste from the ornamental rock industry, converting low-value materials into functional zeolites, while simultaneously overcoming limitations associated with the presence of thermally stable minerals.
Methodology
Treatment of Ornamental Rock Waste
The ornamental rock waste was obtained as a donation from an industry located in the municipality of Cachoeiro de Itapemirim, Espírito Santo, Brazil. This waste, composed of slabs with approximate dimensions of 45 × 30 × 5 cm, underwent a crushing process followed by grinding in a ring mill to produce a powdered form of the waste. The resulting powder was passed through a 75-μm mesh sieve, and the finest fraction was collected, stored, and designated as “OR.”
To obtain reactive aluminosilicates necessary for zeolite synthesis, the alkaline activation method described by Kong and Jiang was adopted with adaptations. In this procedure, the OR powder was mixed with solid NaOH in a mass ratio of 1:1.5 to break down the crystalline structure of OR and was calcined at 850 °C for 3 h, then cooled inside the furnace to 100 °C, after which it was removed and stored in a vacuum desiccator. The calcined material was dispersed in distilled water at a ratio of 1 g per 20 mL. The solid suspended in this solution was separated by filtration, washed with distilled water until reaching pH 9, and subjected to a drying process at 105 °C for 12 h.
The obtained solid was designated as “CR850-Na,” with 850 representing the calcination temperature. To evaluate the leaching of Si and Al species into the aqueous phase during the dissolution step of the calcined material, an aliquot of the aqueous phase was collected and designated as “LS-CM.” To assess the necessity of alkaline activation for obtaining amorphous material, the OR powder was also calcined under the same conditions as CR850-Na, but without the addition of NaOH. This sample was named “CR850.”
Zeolite Synthesis
For zeolite synthesis, adaptations were made from the works of Aliasmaeel et al., Su; Ma; Chuan and Huo et al. The CR850-Na precursor was homogenized at a ratio of 1 g per 10 mL of a 14 wt % NaOH solution. This mixture was stirred using a magnetic stirrer for 12 h at room temperature until a gel was formed, which was then subjected to a crystallization process in 50 mL autoclavable polyethylene bottles. Crystallization was carried out over 48 h at a constant temperature of 90 °C. During this period, samples were withdrawn after 6, 12, 24, and 48 h, and were designated as “Z-X,” where X represents the time at which the sample was collected.
Characterizations
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was conducted using a Setaram thermal analyzer, model LabSys Evo. Samples were heated in an alumina crucible at a rate of 10 °C min–1 from 30 °C to 1000 °C under an inert atmosphere (N2). X-ray diffraction (XRD) was performed using a Rigaku diffractometer, model Miniflex 600, employing Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å) at 40 kV and 20 mA. Measurements were carried out over a 2θ range of 5° to 60° with a step size of 0.02° and a scan rate of 2° 2θ min–1. Peak indexing was performed using the databases of the International Zeolite Association (IZA) and the Crystallography Open Database (COD). Crystallinity was calculated according to eq ,
| 1 |
where CZ(%) is the percentage crystallinity of the zeolitic phase, and A t and A z are, respectively, the total area of the diffractogram and the area of the diffraction peaks corresponding to the obtained zeolitic phase.
Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was performed using an Agilent Cary 630 spectrometer. Spectra were obtained with powdered samples, with measurements carried out using 100 scan repetitions and a resolution of 2 cm–1. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was conducted using a JEOL JSM6610LV microscope, with an acceleration voltage adjustable between 300 V and 30 kV, resolution ranging from 3.0 to 15 nm, using a tungsten filament, and magnification from 5× to 300,000×. An energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) detector from Bruker, model Xflash Detector 6|10, was coupled to the microscope, featuring an analysis area of 10 mm2 and an energy resolution of 121 eV for Mn Kα, 38 eV for C Kα, and 47 eV for F Kα (100,000 cps).
For inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) analysis, an Optima 7000DV instrument (PerkinElmer, USA) was used. Method calibration was performed by external standardization in 2% v/v nitric acid. The operational conditions were: radiofrequency power of 1300 W, plasma gas flow of 15 L min–1, nebulizer gas flow of 0.8 L min–1, auxiliary gas flow of 0.8 L min–1, and sample aspiration rate of 1.5 mL min–1. Method accuracy was evaluated through recovery assays for the elements Al, K, Na, and Si using 2 mg L–1 fortifications.
Solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiments were performed at room temperature using a Varian–Agilent 400 MHz spectrometer operating at a magnetic field of 9.4 T. The 27Al and 29Si resonance frequencies were 104.16 and 79.41 MHz, respectively. The 27Al NMR spectra were acquired using a 1 μs pulse, a repetition time of 1 s, and 800 accumulated transients, with a spectral width of 100 kHz and an acquisition time of 20.48 ms. The spectra were referenced to a 1.2 mol L–1 aqueous aluminum nitrate solution. The 29Si NMR spectra were recorded using a π/2 excitation pulse of 5.25 μs, a repetition time of 30 s, and an acquisition time of 32 ms.
Results and Discussion
Characterization of Ornamental Rock Waste and Zeolite Synthesis
The thermogravimetric analysis of OR (Figure ) revealed an atypical behavior, of a slight mass gain up to 500 °C, possibly associated with structural reorganizations. In addition, the material exhibits high thermal stability, a characteristic favorable for applications requiring resistance to heating, but which, on the other hand, suggests low reactivity for zeolite synthesis without additional chemical modifications.
1.

TGA analysis of ornamental rock waste.
The X-ray diffraction pattern of OR (Figure ) confirmed the predominant presence of quartz and potassium feldspars (albite and orthoclase), crystalline phases with high thermal stability, which justifies the thermal behavior observed in the TGA. After calcination at 850 °C (CR850), the crystalline pattern was preserved, demonstrating that heating under this condition did not promote amorphization or significant structural changes. In contrast, alkaline activation at the same temperature (CR850-Na) resulted in complete amorphization of the material, evidenced by the absence of crystalline peaks and the appearance of a diffuse halo around 2θ ≈ 30°. This behavior confirms that alkaline fusion with NaOH was effective in disrupting the crystalline network of silicates and feldspars, producing a highly reactive amorphous material, an essential condition for its use as a precursor in zeolite synthesis.
2.

XRD analysis of the ornamental rock waste and products after waste treatment.
SEM/EDS analyses (Figure ) showed that OR exhibited a relatively homogeneous distribution of silicon and aluminum within its crystalline matrix, consistent with the presence of quartz and feldspars identified by XRD. In contrast, CR850-Na displayed an irregular, fragmented, and porous morphology with vitreous regions, along with a homogeneous redistribution of the main elements throughout the material. The clear detection of sodium in CR850-Na confirms its incorporation during the alkaline activation process, resulting in a greater accessible surface area and increased chemical reactivity, which make this material a suitable precursor for zeolite synthesis.
3.

SEM/EDS analyses of the ornamental rock waste and products after waste treatment.
Kumar et al. reported the formation of amorphous precursors in the form of worm-like particles, with branched morphology, heterogeneous silica-rich composition, and metastable character, acting as nutrient reservoirs for nucleation and crystal growth. Thus, the characteristics of CR850-Na reinforce that this material may play an analogous role, functioning as a highly reactive intermediate phase, suitable for conversion into zeolitic structures under hydrothermal conditions.
The EDS analysis of CR850-Na (Figure A) revealed chemical changes compared to the original residue (OR). The OR exhibited a SiO2/Al2O3 mass ratio of 2.01, characteristic of silica-rich materials. After the steps of alkaline activation, dissolution, washing, and drying, this ratio decreased to 1.03, indicating the selective leaching of silicon and, consequently, the relative enrichment of aluminum in the solid matrix. The composition of the aqueous phase (LS-CM), resulting from the washing step of CR850-Na, was evaluated by ICP-OES (Figure B), confirming the leaching of silicon. The solution exhibited a silicon concentration approximately 15 times higher than that of aluminum, in addition to elevated sodium levels. This discrepancy explains the decrease in the SiO2/Al2O3 ratio in the residual solid, while also revealing the potential use of the liquid phase as an additional source of silicate precursors.
4.

EDS (A) and ICP-OES (B) analyses of the ornamental rock waste and products after waste treatment.
Sodium incorporation into the CR850-Na was observed, originating from the alkaline activation, which represents a strategic factor for zeolite synthesis. The presence of Na+ cations is essential not only because they actively participate in nucleation and crystal growth processes, but also because they play a direct role in stabilizing the aluminosilicate framework. These ions compensate for the negative charges introduced by the isomorphic substitution of Al3+ in the lattice, thereby reducing structural mobility and preventing dealumination processes.
Another relevant aspect is the influence of Na+ on acidity modulation: by occupying sites associated with Si–O–Al bridging oxygens, the cations decrease the density of Brønsted acid sites, making the structure more stable under severe reaction conditions while enhancing both thermal and hydrothermal stability of the zeolite. Thus, sodium incorporation into the precursor not only directs the formation of more stable crystalline nuclei but also provides decisive structural and chemical advantages for zeolite synthesis and performance.
Regarding the silicon-leached phase (LS-CM), it can also be employed for zeolite synthesis. Similar strategies have been reported in the literature, as described by Ndlovu et al., in which the enrichment of the aqueous phase with silicon was exploited for the synthesis of zeolites with high Si/Al ratios, such as MFI- and GIS-type zeolites. Therefore, both the aluminosilicate solid and the resulting aqueous phase can be synergistically utilized for zeolite synthesis, enhancing process efficiency and reducing waste generation.
The presence of Fe in CR850-Na is a relevant factor for interpreting the structural evolution during zeolite synthesis. Although systematic studies addressing the direct effect of metallic impurities on LTA and sodalite zeolites are still limited, recent evidence indicates that species such as Fe, Ca, and Mg can influence nucleation, crystal growth, and phase transformation processes, especially in systems derived from waste materials or under highly alkaline conditions. −
Fe3+ ions may partially substitute Al3+ in the aluminosilicate framework, forming Fe–O–Si/Al linkages, which alters the local structural order, the effective Si/Al ratio, and the crystallinity. Similarly, divalent cations can disturb the charge balance and promote the formation of secondary phases, reducing LTA purity and accelerating its transformation into sodalite, a structurally more compact and thermodynamically stable phase in highly alkaline media. ,
In the case of LTA zeolites, the Al content and its spatial distribution are crucial for maintaining the geometry of the supercages, and the presence of iron or other cations with variable coordination may introduce local distortions and reduce structural stability. In contrast, sodalite, whose structure is more compact and rigid, exhibits lower tolerance to cationic substitutions; thus, excess impurities tend to result in a higher amorphous fraction, smaller crystals, and a higher density of structural defects, with a direct impact on material quality and performance.
From a functional perspective, the incorporation of Fe and other cations may block pores, reduce ion-exchange capacity, and compromise the thermal and hydrothermal stability of the material, with effects being more pronounced for LTA than for sodalite. ,
Characterization of the Zeolites
FTIR analysis revealed that the precursor material for synthesis was rich in hydrated oxides, evidenced by the presence of vibrations corresponding to O–H bond stretching at 3364 cm–1 and bending of adsorbed water at 1641 cm–1 (Figure ). Furthermore, all generated products exhibited vibration signals related to aluminosilicates, with O–Si stretching at 981 cm–1 and Al–O stretching at 424 cm–1. It was observed that, after 12 h of crystallization, a band appeared at 555 cm–1, attributed to α-cage vibrations, characteristic of LTA-type zeolites. However, this band decreased in intensity after 24 h of crystallization, giving rise to bands at 657 cm–1, 698 cm–1, and 719 cm–1, which correspond to symmetric stretching modes of β-cages, characteristic of SOD-type zeolites, − suggesting a possible phase transformation during the crystallization process.
5.

FTIR analyses of the zeolites obtained at different crystallization times and of the starting materials.
The phase transition was confirmed by XRD analysis (Figure ) of samples collected at intervals of 6, 12, 24, and 48 h. It was observed that, after only 6 h of crystallization, LTA-type zeolite was formed as the sole phase, remaining so until 12 h. After 24 h, the coexistence of LTA and SOD phases was detected. Finally, after 48 h, SOD-type zeolite became the predominant phase, confirming the transition from LTA to SOD throughout the process.
6.

XRD analyses of the zeolites obtained at different crystallization times.
After 6 h of crystallization, the Z-6 sample corresponded to the LTA phase, as confirmed by the typical cubic morphology observed by SEM (Figure ). After 12 h (Z-12), although LTA still predominated, signs of surface irregularity suggested the onset of a restructuring process, possibly associated with partial crystal dissolution. At 24 h (Z-24), the coexistence of remaining cubic particles and spherical crystals characteristic of sodalite indicated a transition stage, in which LTA began to be consumed by the nucleation and growth of the SOD phase. This process was completed after 48 h (Z-48), when the cubic crystals had almost completely disappeared, giving way to interconnected spherical aggregates typical of sodalite.
7.
SEM analyses of the zeolites obtained at different crystallization times.
The results obtained in this study are consistent with the findings reported by Deng et al., who demonstrated that increasing the hydrothermal temperature and prolonging the crystallization time favor the transformation of LTA zeolite into SOD, achieving complete conversion under more severe conditions (160 °C for 12 h). According to these authors, the dominant mechanism involves partial dissolution of the LTA phase followed by recrystallization into SOD, characterizing an Ostwald ripening-type process. This mechanism adequately explains the morphological features observed in the present work, such as the progressive corrosion of the cubic LTA surfaces, the formation of structural defects, and the subsequent emergence of spherical particles attributed to the SOD phase.
In a complementary manner, Peng et al. showed that the presence of specific anions, such as sulfate and carbonate, can accelerate this transformation by modulating the dissolution kinetics of LTA and the nucleation of SOD. These authors also reported preferential SOD growth at the edges and structurally less stable regions of LTA crystals, which corroborates the observations of this study, in which the transformation occurred gradually, initiating from the surface degradation of the cubic particles.
However, the literature indicates that the LTA → SOD transformation does not occur in a unique or universal manner, being strongly dependent on chemical conditions and crystallization history. Ding et al. and Djozing et al. demonstrated that under high alkalinity and different thermal regimes, the transformation may proceed through distinct mechanisms, including solid–solid restructuring and hybrid dissolution–recrystallization processes. Additional microstructural evidence, such as the formation of internal nanoplates and the progressive rupture of the cubic LTA “shell” described in the Greer et al. study, further supports that the transformation is governed not only by thermodynamic factors but also by crystal growth rates, localized nucleation, and defect evolution.
Moreover, studies based on natural raw materials, such as clays, show that LTA frequently forms as an initial metastable phase, evolving into SOD or multiphase systems as hydrothermal conditions become more severe. From an applied perspective, Ritter et al. highlighted that the choice of reagents and the control of alkalinity, crystallization time, and temperature are decisive for the final zeolitic phase obtained, reinforcing the need for an integrated mechanistic analysis.
The evolution of the Na2O/Al2O3 ratio throughout the crystallization process (Figure ) provides additional evidence of the phase transformation from LTA to SOD. At 6 h (Z-6), the relatively low Na2O/Al2O3 value (0.60) is associated with the predominance of the highly crystalline LTA phase, consistent with a structure stabilized by a lower amount of compensating cations. Ritter et al. state that an increase in Na+ concentration favors the formation of sodalite zeolites. At 12 h (Z-12), the Na2O/Al2O3 ratio increased significantly to 1.37, coinciding with the reduction in LTA crystallinity and the onset of morphological irregularities, suggesting that the excess Na+ destabilized the structural units of LTA and favored SOD nucleation. This transitional behavior was confirmed at 24 h (Z-24), when the Na2O/Al2O3 ratio decreased to 0.84 and the coexistence of both phases was observed. Finally, at 48 h (Z-48), the ratio increased again (1.27), in agreement with the predominance of the SOD phase.
8.

EDS analyses of the zeolites obtained at different crystallization times, along with the percentage crystallinity of each phase formed.
These results indicate that the higher Na2O/Al2O3 ratio acted as a determining factor for the formation of the SOD phase at the expense of LTA, demonstrating that the redistribution of sodium over the crystallization time, associated with the temporal evolution of the system, constituted the main driving force for the phase transition. Additional factors, such as temperature, alkalinity, and the nature of the anions, may also play a modulatory role in the process.
It is noteworthy that, in the present work, the crystallization of the zeolitic structures was conducted in a system without hydrothermal reactors, which are traditionally employed in syntheses of this type. Despite this methodological difference, the observed behavior was remarkably like that described in the literature, with the progressive transformation of LTA into SOD following the same temporal and morphological trend. These findings demonstrate that phase conversion can be achieved under simpler experimental conditions, suggesting that the use of hydrothermal reactors, although widely applied, is not strictly necessary to enable the transformation of LTA into SOD.
The comparative thermal analysis of materials Z-6 (LTA) and Z-48 (SOD) (Figure ) reveals distinct behaviors related to thermal stability and mass loss processes. For both solids, an initial mass loss stage below 150 °C is observed, attributed to the removal of physically adsorbed water and water weakly retained within the channels and cavities of the zeolites. This process is accompanied by endothermic peaks in the DSC curve, typical of dehydration.
9.

Thermal analysis of the obtained LTA (Z-6) and SOD (Z-48) zeolites.
In the case of the LTA zeolite (Z-6), after the initial dehydration stage, the TG curve remains relatively stable up to approximately 700 °C, indicating higher thermal resistance. Small variations in the DTG curve within this temperature range may be associated with the gradual removal of more strongly coordinated or trapped water molecules within the structure. Above 700 °C, a slight mass loss begins, accompanied by changes in the DSC baseline, suggesting deeper structural transformations, possibly related to disordering and the onset of partial collapse of the crystalline framework.
In contrast, the SOD zeolite (Z-48) exhibits a distinct behavior, with more pronounced mass losses occurring in two main stages: the first, between 50 and 200 °C, related to initial dehydration, and a second, more pronounced stage between 200 and 400 °C, which may be associated with the release of strongly retained water molecules and the onset of structural rearrangements. The thermal stability of this material is lower than that of LTA, as evidenced by the continued mass loss throughout the heating range up to 900 °C. Furthermore, the DSC curve exhibits more pronounced variations, including exothermic events around 800 °C, suggesting recrystallization processes or phase transformation.
Thus, the comparison between the two materials shows that the LTA zeolite (Z-6) exhibits greater thermal stability, maintaining its structure relatively preserved up to higher temperatures, whereas the SOD zeolite (Z-48) demonstrates less stable behavior, with more intense mass loss events and evidence of structural transformation at intermediate and high temperatures.
The LTA zeolite (Z-6) exhibited a thermal behavior quite similar to that reported by Ritter et al., with dehydration events below 250 °C and high stability up to temperatures close to 700–800 °C, consistent with the profiles described for analogous materials synthesized under autoclave conditions. This result suggests that the absence of the autoclave-assisted crystallization step did not significantly compromise the thermal stability of LTA. In contrast, the SOD zeolite displayed more intense and continuous mass losses throughout heating, differing from the higher stability reported by the authors.
This difference may be related to the lower crystallinity or the higher degree of structural defects introduced by the employed synthesis route, factors that weaken the framework and anticipate thermal degradation. Therefore, while LTA maintained performance comparable to that described in the literature, SOD proved to be more sensitive to the absence of autoclave treatment, indicating that this condition differently affects the stability of the zeolitic phases formed.
The 29Si NMR spectra (Figure ) indicate that the synthesized zeolites exhibit a predominantly condensed aluminosilicate framework, with resonances concentrated in the characteristic range of Q4(nAl) sites (≈ −85 to −95 ppm), which is typical of low-Si/Al zeolites. In sample Z6, a strong and well-defined resonance at approximately −85 ppm is observed, accompanied by a broader secondary contribution near −92 ppm. This spectral pattern is characteristic of highly aluminated Q4 environments, predominantly Q4(3Al) and Q4(2Al) species, in agreement with the high crystallinity of the LTA phase identified by XRD and with the low Na2O/Al2O3 ratio determined by EDS.
10.

29Si NMR spectra of the obtained zeolites.
For Z12, the persistence of these resonances indicates that, despite the increase in Na+ content in the system, the local Si–O–Al connectivity remains largely preserved. This behavior is consistent with the partial reduction in LTA crystallinity observed by XRD and with the onset of morphological irregularities evidenced by SEM.
In sample Z24, the broadening of the resonance centered at −85 ppm, together with the emergence of a spectral contribution shifted toward less negative values around −83 ppm, reflects an increased heterogeneity of the Q4(nAl) environments. This evolution is directly associated with the coexistence of LTA and SOD phases identified by XRD and correlates with the redistribution of Na+ cations, as evidenced by the variation in the Na2O/Al2O3 ratio, characterizing an intermediate stage of structural reorganization.
Finally, in Z48, the attenuation of the contribution near −83 ppm and the reestablishment of a dominant resonance at −85 ppm indicate the stabilization of Q4(3Al) environments typical of sodalite, in full agreement with the predominance of the SOD phase observed by XRD. These results demonstrate that the LTA → SOD transformation is mainly governed by Na+ redistribution and local topological rearrangements of the aluminosilicate framework, as reported for low-silica zeolites. − Thus, the 29Si NMR data consistently corroborate the structural evolution inferred from XRD, EDS, and Na2O/Al2O3 analyses, reinforcing that the transition from LTA to SOD is predominantly controlled by local framework rearrangements induced by the redistribution of compensating cations.
The 27Al NMR analysis of the zeolites revealed only a signal around 58 ppm (Figure ), attributed to aluminum in tetrahedral coordination (AlO4), in which each aluminum atom is bonded to four silicon atoms via oxygen bridges. This result indicates a highly organized structure, without the presence of extraframework aluminum species in pentahedral or octahedral coordination, which could contribute to the material’s acidity.
11.
27Al NMR spectra of the obtained zeolites.
The structural organization of zeolites is closely associated with the Si/Al ratio. According to Xu et al., an increase in this ratio in LTA-type zeolites promotes the formation of different aluminum species, identified by 27Al NMR: hexacoordinated aluminum (signal between −7.5 and 1.3 ppm), distorted tetrahedral aluminum (46.0 to 31.0 ppm), and pentacoordinated aluminum (31.0 to 17.1 ppm). These signals reflect not only the degree of structural organization of the zeolite but are also related to the presence of acidity within the crystalline framework.
In the present study, the composition of the obtained zeolites, in the sodium form due to the presence of Na+ cations from the synthesis medium acting as charge balancers, indicates the absence of Brønsted acid sites, which arise when the compensating cations are H+. Furthermore, the lack of octahedrally coordinated aluminum species, which, after thermal treatment of hydrated zeolites, generate Lewis acid sites, also suggests the absence of Lewis acidity. Thus, both the SOD and LTA zeolites obtained in this work exhibit a basic character, making them promising for reactions involving the deprotonation of acidic hydrogens, acting as catalysts in organic processes.
LTA zeolites have demonstrated efficiency in the removal of hazardous inorganic and organic substances from water. Their production from waste materials and the short crystallization time can be strategies to reduce production costs. Moreover, the use of waste in the synthesis of new materials is a practice that deserves encouragement, as it aligns with the principles of sustainable chemistry. Finally, the additional benefit of being able to perform the synthesis without the need for hydrothermal reactors broadens the feasibility of using these materials on a large scale.
Conclusion
This study demonstrated that ornamental rock wastes rich in quartz and potassium feldspar can be efficiently converted into precursors for zeolite synthesis via alkaline activation, adding value to industrial residues and promoting a sustainable production route. Alkaline activation at 850 °C resulted in complete amorphization of the material, a reduction in the Si/Al ratio from 2.01 to 1.03, indicating selective silicon leaching, and sodium incorporation, which is essential for zeolite synthesis.
Nonautoclave-assisted hydrothermal crystallization enabled the initial formation of LTA zeolite (Z-6) with 99.94% crystallinity and characteristic cubic morphology in just 6 h, followed by a progressive transition to SOD zeolite (Z-48), reaching 87.56% crystallinity after 48 h. Sodium redistribution, evidenced by variations in the Na2O/Al2O3 ratio (0.60 in Z-6 → 1.37 in Z-12 → 0.84 in Z-24 → 1.27 in Z-48), was a key factor driving the phase transformation.
29Si and 27Al NMR analyses confirmed the structural evolution: 29Si revealed local rearrangements of the aluminosilicate framework associated with Na+ redistribution during the LTA → SOD transition, while 27Al showed the exclusive presence of tetrahedral aluminum (∼58 ppm), indicating the absence of extraframework species and Brønsted or Lewis acid sites, thus conferring a basic character to the zeolites. Thermal analyses revealed marked differences between the phases: LTA maintained stability up to ∼700 °C, whereas SOD exhibited more pronounced mass losses in two stages, along with structural changes and exothermic events near 800 °C.
Therefore, this work demonstrates that the synthesis of LTA and SOD zeolites from ornamental rock wastes is feasible without hydrothermal reactors, combining short crystallization times, waste valorization, and the production of materials with tunable structural and chemical properties, thereby expanding their potential for applications such as catalysts, adsorbents, sensors, and gas separation.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the Laboratório de Ultraestrutura Celular Carlos Alberto Redins (LUCCAR/UFES) for performing the SEM/EDS analyses, the Laboratório de Materiais Carbonosos (LMC/UFES) for the thermal analyses, and the characterization and NMR laboratories of the Núcleo de Competências em Química do Petróleo (LabPetro/UFES) for their support. The authors also thank the Espírito Santo Research Support Foundation (FAPES) for supporting the execution of this research.
The manuscript was written through the contributions of all authors. All authors have given their approval to the final version of the manuscript. Conceptualization: E.P.C. and A.G.B.; Methodology: E.P.C., A.G.B., D.G., and C.C.M.D.S.; Formal analysis and investigation: E.P.C., A.G.B., D.G., and C.C.M.D.S.; Writingoriginal draft preparation: E.P.C.; Writingreview and editing: E.P.C., A.G.B., D.G., and C.C.M.D.S.; Supervision: A.G.B. and V.L.J.
The Article Processing Charge for the publication of this research was funded by the Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES), Brazil (ROR identifier: 00x0ma614).
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
References
- Sindicato da Indústria de Rochas Ornamentais, Cal e Calcário do Espírito Santo. Relatório de Exportações de Rochas Ornamentais: Janeiro–Novembro 2025: SINDIROCHAS, Technical Report; SINDIROCHAS: Brazil, 2025. https://www.sindirochas.com/relatorio-exportacoes-rochas.php. (accessed 05 January 2026). [Google Scholar]
- Upadhyay, R. K. Non-Metallic Minerals and Their Deposits. In Geology and Mineral Resources; Springer Geology, Springer Nature Singapore: Singapore, 2025, pp. 563–652. 10.1007/978-981-96-0598-9_9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tazzini A., Gambino F., Casale M., Dino G. A.. Managing Marble Quarry Waste: Opportunities and Challenges for Circular Economy Implementation. Sustainability. 2024;16(7):3056. doi: 10.3390/su16073056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ribeiro F. R. C., Modolo R. C. E., Kulakowski M. P., Brehm F. A., Moraes C. A. M., Ferreira V. M., Mesquita E. F. T., De Azevedo A. R. G., Monteiro S. N.. Production of Belite Based Clinker from Ornamental Stone Processing Sludge and Calcium Carbonate Sludge with Lower CO2 Emissions. Materials. 2022;15(7):2352. doi: 10.3390/ma15072352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ramos J. C. R., Passalini P. G., Holanda J. N. F.. Utilization of Marble Waste as a Sustainable Replacement for Calcareous in the Manufacture of Red-Firing Wall Tiles. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023;377:131115. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131115. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Pereira G., Ribeiro F. R. C., De Lima C. J. F., Pacheco F., Brehm F. A., Modolo R. C. E.. Production of Adhesive Mortars with Ornamental Rock Processing Sludge and Calcium Carbonate Sludge. J. Build Rehabil. 2023;8(1):29. doi: 10.1007/s41024-023-00273-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ahmad Z., Khan S. M., Page S. E., Balzter H., Ullah A., Ali S., Jehangir S., Ejaz U., Afza R., Razzaq A., Mukhamezhanova A. S.. Environmental Sustainability and Resilience in a Polluted Ecosystem via Phytoremediation of Heavy Metals and Plant Physiological Adaptations. J. Clean. Prod. 2023;385:135733. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135733. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lozano-Lunar A., Tapia G. P., Fernández-Rodríguez J. M., Jiménez J. R., Merino-Lechuga A. M.. Use of Ornamental Rock Mining Waste as Secondary Raw Material for Sustainable Self-Compacting Mortar Production. J. Build. Eng. 2025;111:113305. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2025.113305. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- De Azevedo A. R. G., Costa A. M., Cecchin D., Pereira C. R., Marvila M. T., Adesina A.. Economic Potential Comparative of Reusing Different Industrial Solid Wastes in Cementitious Composites: A Case Study in Brazil. Environ. Dev. Sustainability. 2022;24(4):5938–5961. doi: 10.1007/s10668-021-01630-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gomes V. R., Babisk M. P., Vieira C. M. F., Sampaio J. A., Vidal F. W. H., Gadioli M. C. B.. Ornamental Stone Wastes as an Alternate Raw Material for Soda-Lime Glass Manufacturing. Mater. Lett. 2020;269:127579. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2020.127579. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Vianna Bahiense A., Alexandre J., De Castro Xavier G., De Azevedo A. R. G., Monteiro S. N.. Dosage of Interlocking Paving with Ornamental Rock Waste: An Experimental Design Approach, Particle Packing and Polluting Potential. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2021;15:e00596. doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00596. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- DilliBabu, S. P. ; Polisetty, L. K. ; Ramesh Kumar, A. ; Nithin Kumar, K. C. ; Arun Kumar, R. ; Raviteja Kanakala, V. ; Prabhu, V. . Characterization of Waste from the Ornamental Stone Processing for Incarnation in Clay Ceramics Mater. Today: Proc. 2023. 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.07.198 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Da Silva Cordeiro M. B., Nogueira H. C. N., De Sousa A. A. P., De Lucena Júnior J. R.. Transforming Waste into Beauty: Sustainable Clay Mask Formulations Using Ornamental Stone Processing Waste. Appl. Clay Sci. 2024;258:107498. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2024.107498. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Al-Jrajreh S. S., Al-Hamaiedeh H., Al-Kheetan M. J., Jweihan Y. S., Aljaafreh T.. Improvement of Ornamental Stone Wastes as Sand Replacement in Concrete Using Silane Coupling Agent. Results Eng. 2023;20:101580. doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101580. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hart A., Wood J.. Methodological Review of Zeolite Synthesis from Industrial Waste and Natural Clays and the Fabrication of Hierarchical Pore Structures. Next Mater. 2025;9:101113. doi: 10.1016/j.nxmate.2025.101113. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chen L., Xu B., Wang S., Ren S., Yang F., Zhang W., Lan Y., Chen C., Li J., Su Y.. Advancements in Synthesis Strategies and Environmental Application of FAU-Type Zeolite: Bibliometric-Driven Review. Green Energy Environ. 2025;11:36–61. doi: 10.1016/j.gee.2025.10.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Król M.. Natural vs. Synthetic Zeolites. Crystals. 2020;10(7):622. doi: 10.3390/cryst10070622. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kang, M.-C. ; Jun, G. ; Ryu, G. U. ; Pyo, S. . Sustainable Synthesis of Functional Zeolites from Waste OLED Powder for Heavy Metal Adsorption and Barium Immobilization J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2025. 10.1016/j.jiec.2025.11.020 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Fan J., Huang J., Chen T., Zheng X., Guo F., Yang M., Ma Q., Fu L., Min X., Huang Z.. Synthesis of Magnetic Zeolite 4A Using Thermally Reduced Red Mud and Metakaolin via Ultrafast Joule Heating for Heavy Metal Ion Removal from Industrial Wastewater. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2026;403:114019. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2025.114019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Li J., Chen H., Kang Z., Liu Y., Tu Y., Wang Q., Fan J.. A Combined Computational and Experimental Approach Predicts Thrombin Adsorption to Zeolites. Colloids Surf., B. 2023;221:113007. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2022.113007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sodha, V. ; Koshti, H. ; Gaur, R. ; Bandyopadhyay, R. ; Shahabuddin, S. . Investigation on the Adsorption of Cationic Dyes and Heavy Metal Ions on Zeolite HY from Aqueous Solution Mater. Today: Proc. 2024. 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.12.048 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Pedro K. C. N. R., Da Silva G. A. R., Da Silva M. A. P., Henriques C. A., Langone M. A. P.. Immobilization of Lipase on Zeolite, Silica, and Silica-Aluminas and Its Use in Hydrolysis, Esterification, and Transesterification Reactions. Catal. Today. 2025;447:115141. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2024.115141. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sukkasem T., Yoojaroen N., Truadnog Y., Prayutte P., Junpirom S., Sukjit E.. Converting Polystyrene Waste into Valuable Oils: High Performance of SUZ-4 Zeolite for Selective Oil Component Conversion in Catalytic Pyrolysis. Fuel. 2026;405:136456. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2025.136456. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Monteiro W. F., Diz F. M., Andrieu L., Morrone F. B., Ligabue R. A., Bernardo-Gusmão K., De Souza M. O., Schwanke A. J.. Waste to Health: Ag-LTA Zeolites Obtained by Green Synthesis from Diatom and Rice-Based Residues with Antitumoral Activity. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2020;307:110508. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2020.110508. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tarigan J. B., Chrisnayanti E., Sembiring P. H. N. T., Daus A., Sitepu E. K., Taufiq-Yap Y. H.. Synthesis and Characterization of CaO/Zeolite for Homogenizer-Intensified Room Temperature Biodiesel Production of High Free Fatty Acid Feedstock. Results Chem. 2025;18:102773. doi: 10.1016/j.rechem.2025.102773. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cao C., Xuan W., Yan S., Wang Q.. Zeolites Synthesized from Industrial and Agricultural Solid Waste and Their Applications: A Review. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023;11(5):110898. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2023.110898. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mouna S., Hajji S., Tounsi H.. Waste to Health: Green Synthesis of Zn Loaded LTA Zeolite Prepared from Waste Glass and Aluminum Scrap with High Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities. J. Clean. Prod. 2024;434:139946. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139946. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- García-Chirino J., Dáder Jiménez A., Van Der Bruggen B.. Hybrid Na-A Zeolite/Oxycut Residue Thin Film Composite Nanofiltration Membrane for Cr (III) Removal. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023;11(2):109351. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2023.109351. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lv Y., Ma B., Liu Y., Wang C., Chen Y.. Adsorption Behavior and Mechanism of Mixed Heavy Metal Ions by Zeolite Adsorbent Prepared from Lithium Leach Residue. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2022;329:111553. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2021.111553. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yang D., Kow K.-W., Meredith W., Peng Y., Wang L., Li X., Zhang G., Zhang J., Chen G., Li J., Wang X., Wang W., Mao Y., Xu M.. Green Synthesis of NaP1 Zeolite from MSWI Fly Ash and Silica-Rich Solid Waste with Superior Cu(II) Removal Efficiency. Chem. Eng. J. 2025;522:167475. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2025.167475. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cai L., Zheng Q., Wang Z., Tian Z., Yang D., Wei Z., Hou J.. Converting Building Waste Soil into GIS Zeolite to Remediate Cd-Polluted Soil. J. Hazard. Mater. 2025;496:139334. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.139334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sousa P. B. F., Bieseki L., Pergher S. B. C.. Seed-Assisted Crystallization in the Hydrothermal Synthesis of FAU Zeolite from Acid-Treated Residue Glass Powder. Materials. 2025;18(7):1393. doi: 10.3390/ma18071393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ray G., Haque I., Ahmed T., Hasan M. M., Salma M. M., Hossain M. K., Islam M. S., Alam M. A., Sharmin N., Akhtar U. S.. Synthesis of Carbon Capturing NaX Zeolite from Rice Husk Ash: Evaluation of Its Adsorption Properties. ACS Sustainable Resour. Manage. 2025;2(4):662–672. doi: 10.1021/acssusresmgt.5c00019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Khaleque A., Alam M. M., Hoque M., Mondal S., Haider J. B., Xu B., Johir M. A. H., Karmakar A. K., Zhou J. L., Ahmed M. B., Moni M. A.. Zeolite Synthesis from Low-Cost Materials and Environmental Applications: A Review. Environ. Adv. 2020;2:100019. doi: 10.1016/j.envadv.2020.100019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mohammadi P., Mirghaffari N., Razavi Z., Soleimani M.. Synthesis and Characterization of Zeolite X from Granite Stone Sludge. Next Mater. 2025;6:100466. doi: 10.1016/j.nxmate.2024.100466. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- El Bojaddayni I., Emin Küçük M., El Ouardi Y., Jilal I., El Barkany S., Moradi K., Repo E., Laatikainen K., Ouammou A.. A Review on Synthesis of Zeolites from Natural Clay Resources and Waste Ash: Recent Approaches and Progress. Miner. Eng. 2023;198:108086. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2023.108086. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kong D., Jiang R.. Preparation of NaA Zeolite from High Iron and Quartz Contents Coal Gangue by Acid LeachingAlkali Melting Activation and Hydrothermal Synthesis. Crystals. 2021;11(10):1198. doi: 10.3390/cryst11101198. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Alismaeel Z. T., Abbas A. S., Albayati T. M., Doyle A. M.. Biodiesel from Batch and Continuous Oleic Acid Esterification Using Zeolite Catalysts. Fuel. 2018;234:170–176. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.07.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Su S., Ma H., Chuan X.. Hydrothermal Decomposition of K-Feldspar in KOH–NaOH–H2O Medium. Hydrometallurgy. 2015;156:47–52. doi: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2015.05.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Huo Z., Xu X., Lü Z., Song J., He M., Li Z., Wang Q., Yan L.. Synthesis of Zeolite NaP with Controllable Morphologies. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2012;158:137–140. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2012.03.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar M., Li R., Rimer J. D.. Assembly and Evolution of Amorphous Precursors in Zeolite L Crystallization. Chem. Mater. 2016;28(6):1714–1727. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04569. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Deng C., Zhang J., Dong L., Huang M., Li B., Jin G., Gao J., Zhang F., Fan M., Zhang L.. et al. The Effect of Positioning Cations on Acidity and Stability of the Framework Structure of Y Zeolite. Sci. Rep. 2016;6(1):23382. doi: 10.1038/srep23382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ndlovu N. Z. N., Ameh A. E., Petrik L. F., Ojumu T. V.. Synthesis and Characterisation of Pure Phase ZSM-5 and Sodalite Zeolites from Coal Fly Ash. Mater. Today Commun. 2023;34:105436. doi: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.105436. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Campoverde J., Guaya D.. From Waste to Added-Value Product: Synthesis of Highly Crystalline LTA Zeolite from Ore Mining Tailings. Nanomaterials. 2023;13(8):1295. doi: 10.3390/nano13081295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tanirbergenova S., Tugelbayeva D., Zhylybayeva N., Aitugan A., Tazhu K., Moldazhanova G., Mansurov Z.. Effect of Acid Treatment on the Structure of Natural Zeolite from the Shankhanai Deposit. Processes. 2025;13(9):2896. doi: 10.3390/pr13092896. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- G V S. K., Matli C. S.. Synthesis and Characterisation of Pure Zeolite A from Fly Ash for Removal of Lead and Cadmium. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2025;105(9):1973–1995. doi: 10.1080/03067319.2024.2301928. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ahmed M. H. M., Muraza O., Yoshioka M., Yokoi T.. Effect of Multi-Step Desilication and Dealumination Treatments on the Performance of Hierarchical EU-1 Zeolite for Converting Methanol to Olefins. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2017;241:79–88. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2016.12.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hartmann M., Thommes M., Schwieger W.. Hierarchically-Ordered Zeolites: A Critical Assessment. Adv. Mater. Interfaces. 2021;8(4):2001841. doi: 10.1002/admi.202001841. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Klima K. M., Schollbach K., Brouwers H. J. H., Yu Q.. Enhancing the Thermal Performance of Class F Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer by Sodalite. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022;314:125574. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125574. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang P., Sun Q.. Synthesis and Characterisation of Zeolite LTA with Sheet Structure. Micro Nano Lett. 2020;15(7):433–436. doi: 10.1049/mnl.2019.0793. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sánchez-Hernández R., López-Delgado A., Padilla I., Galindo R., López-Andrés S.. One-Step Synthesis of NaP1, SOD and ANA from a Hazardous Aluminum Solid Waste. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2016;226:267–277. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2016.01.037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Peng H., Ding M., Vaughan J.. The Anion Effect on Zeolite Linde Type A to Sodalite Phase Transformation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018;57(31):10292–10302. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b02026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ding L., Yang H., Rahimi P., Omotoso O., Friesen W., Fairbridge C., Shi Y., Ng S.. Solid Transformation of Zeolite NaA to Sodalite. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2010;130(1–3):303–308. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2009.11.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Nzodom Djozing W., Valange S., Nikitenko S. I., Chave T.. Sonohydrothermal Synthesis of Zeolite A and Its Phase Transformation into Sodalite. Dalton Trans. 2024;53(39):16407–16421. doi: 10.1039/D4DT01943A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Greer H., Wheatley P. S., Ashbrook S. E., Morris R. E., Zhou W.. Early Stage Reversed Crystal Growth of Zeolite A and Its Phase Transformation to Sodalite. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131(49):17986–17992. doi: 10.1021/ja907475z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ritter M. T., Padilla I., Lobo-Recio M. Á., Romero M., López-Delgado A.. Waste Symbiosis through the Synthesis of Highly Crystalline LTA and SOD Zeolites. Materials. 2024;17(17):4310. doi: 10.3390/ma17174310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brouwer D. H.. Rapid Solid-State 29Si NMR Chemical Shift Refinements of Pure Silica Zeolite Frameworks with an Improved Structure-to-Shift Correlation. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2026;401:113914. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2025.113914. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Asselman K., Haouas M., Houlleberghs M., Radhakrishnan S., Wangermez W., Kirschhock C. E. A., Breynaert E.. Does Water Enable Porosity in Aluminosilicate Zeolites? Porous Frameworks versus Dense Minerals. Cryst. Growth Des. 2023;23(5):3338–3348. doi: 10.1021/acs.cgd.2c01476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao Q., Ling J., Wang J., Gao Y., Liu H., Zhang Z., Jiang J., Nakayama A., Li J., Muraoka K., Wu P., Xu L.. Organic-Free Synthesis of High-Silica Zeolite Y with Aluminophosphate as the Aluminum Carrier. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2025;64(10):e202420080. doi: 10.1002/anie.202420080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walkley B., Provis J. L.. Solid-State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy of Cements. Mater. Today Adv. 2019;1:100007. doi: 10.1016/j.mtadv.2019.100007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu H., Lu P., Fu G., Miao J., Zhao J., Ding R., Zhao L., Lang Z., Yang X., Valtchev V.. The Strong SDA/Framework Interactions and Acidity Study of High-Silica LTA-Type Zeolites. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2023;360:112724. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2023.112724. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ravi M., Sushkevich V. L., Van Bokhoven J. A.. Towards a Better Understanding of Lewis Acidic Aluminium in Zeolites. Nat. Mater. 2020;19(10):1047–1056. doi: 10.1038/s41563-020-0751-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Manique M. C., Lacerda L. V., Alves A. K., Bergmann C. P.. Biodiesel Production Using Coal Fly Ash-Derived Sodalite as a Heterogeneous Catalyst. Fuel. 2017;190:268–273. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.11.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Pan J., Wang B., Liu S., Liu S., Yan W.. Synthesis and Application of LTA Zeolite for the Removal of Inorganic and Organic Hazardous Substances from Water: A Review. Molecules. 2025;30(3):554. doi: 10.3390/molecules30030554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


