Abstract
The electrochemical CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR) is one of the key chemical transformations promoting the transition from fossil fuel-based energy systems to renewable systems. Copper (Cu)-based materials uniquely catalyze the production of multicarbon (C2 +) products from CO2. Yet, copper operational instability limits long-term performance. Herein, we investigate the impact of the chemical nature of the initial Cu surface, particularly oxidation state and carbonate formation, on the structural and operational stability of Cu catalysts along with the reconstruction kinetics of the catalyst. We combine state-of-the-art well-defined catalysts with quasi-operando electrochemical liquid-phase transmission electron microscopy (ec-LPTEM) along with electrochemical characterization to learn about underlying differences. We demonstrate that catalysts with higher initial oxide content undergo faster structural reconstruction and suffer from faster operational deactivation. Interestingly, we find that Cu carbonates further exacerbate structural instability while also suppressing the CO2RR activity. Our results highlight the critical role of oxides and carbonates in dictating the reconstruction pathways and durability of Cu under CO2RR conditions, offering insights into tuning the Cu-based catalyst design for enhanced CO2RR stability and efficiency.


Introduction
The electrochemical CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR) into valuable chemical feedstocks is a promising lever to move from fossil to renewable energy while closing the carbon loop. , Cu-based materials remain the most promising catalysts to convert CO2 into C2+ products, including ethylene, ethanol, and acetate. − Efforts have been primarily devoted to catalyst design and cell engineering to overcome the intrinsic lack of selectivity of Cu catalysts, leading to near unity faradaic efficiency for some of the major products at industrially relevant currents. The overarching hurdle is now the long-term operation stability of CO2RR, which the structural reconstruction of Cu-based catalysts substantially contributes to along with electrochemical reactor failure (e.g., flooding). ,−
Different processes are involved in the reconstruction of Cu catalysts during CO2RR. ,− First, the Cu surface oxidizes, when starting with metallic surfaces, and dissolves in contact with the aqueous electrolyte at open circuit potential, releasing Cu ions. , Then, the oxide reduces and the Cu ions are electrodeposited during the cathodic ramp to operational potential, triggering the first phase of structural reconstruction. − Finally, transient carbonyl intermediates drive the second phase of copper reconstruction through surface diffusion and dissolution-redeposition cycles during operational CO2RR. ,,, These processes are intrinsic to Cu catalysts for CO2RR and, thus, are expected to be independent of the electrochemical reactor used. Yet, discrepancy exists in the literature regarding the operational stability of Cu electrodes, with time scales ranging from less than 1 h to hundreds of hours. −
While often generically referred to as “Cu electrodes”, the chemical nature of the initial Cu catalyst surface might vary. Indeed, metallic Cu, Cu oxides, and Cu exposed to preconditioning treatments (e.g., exposure to open-circuit potential, air oxidation during electrode preparation) are used across the literature. ,− In addition, carbonates have been recently suggested to contribute to copper surface diffusion and associated with reactor failure. , The discrepancies in stability of Cu electrodes across the literature suggest that the chemical nature of the initial copper surface might influence reconstruction kinetics and pathways and, thus, operational stability. The impact of the copper oxide on selectivity has been studied. , However, studies addressing the impact of the chemical nature of the initial surface on copper reconstruction and stability have been limited so far. ,
Here, we combine well-defined Cu catalysts with quasi-operando electrochemical liquid-phase transmission electron microscopy (ec-LPTEM) along with electrocatalytic performance and electrochemical descriptors to correlate the initial Cu surface composition to the structural and operational stability of Cu catalysts during the CO2RR. We demonstrate that oxide-rich catalysts undergo faster structural reconstruction and suffer from faster operational deactivation compared to metallic-rich catalysts. Interestingly, we find that Cu carbonates form at open-circuit potential and upon air exposure and further exacerbate the structural instability while suppressing the CO2RR activity, thus providing additional insight into the critical role of carbonates for Cu catalyst deactivation.
Results and Discussion
Tuning and Characterizing the Initial Surface Composition of Copper Catalysts
We employed well-defined Cu-based nanocrystals (NCs) as our catalytic platform. We compare metallic Cu cubic NCs, Cu oxide (Cu2O) cubic NCs, and pretreated Cu cubic NCs. We choose exposure to open-circuit potential (OCP) and air exposure as pretreatments; we refer to these samples as CuOCP and Cuair NCs, respectively.
Metallic Cu cubic NCs have been critical for elucidating facet-dependent selectivity, , for enabling active site engineering, , and for investigating structural degradation during CO2RR , while being compatible with industrially relevant conditions. , Cu2O cubic NCs have been widely used to prove the impact of oxides on selectivity. , All Cu electrodes eventually undergo exposure to air and open-circuit potential, which motivated us to select these pretreatments. We choose long exposure times for both OCP (15 h) and air (1 week) to mimic day on/day off intermittent operation and an eventual sample handling during shipping/storage, respectively, along with aiming at maximizing the effect of these pretreatments on the sample composition (Figure S1).
We thoroughly characterized the samples by combining different techniques (Figure ). High-angle annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF STEM) shows that all catalysts are cubic and have similar size (Figure a,e,i,m). More interestingly, the images provide information on the presence and uniformity of surface oxide layers for Cu, CuOCP, and Cuair NCs. The Cu NCs have a lower contrast patchy shell on their surface (Figure a–d). High-resolution (HR)STEM imaging identifies lattice fringes corresponding to Cu2O {111} planes (Figure b). The Cu2O NCs match what is expected for these materials, which is fully crystalline Cu2O (Figure e–h). The CuOCP NCs and Cuair NCs both possess a uniform Cu2O surface layer (Figure i–l,m–p, respectively). The oxide layer is thinner for the CuOCP (≈1.5 nm) than for the Cuair NCs (≈2.5 nm) based on HRSTEM (Figure j,n). Selected area electron diffraction (SAED) (Figure q) and electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) (Figure r) of all samples confirm the oxide identification made via HRSTEM.
1.
Characterization of Cu catalysts with tunable surface composition. (a–p) HAADF STEM and HRSTEM image along with 3D schematic representation of Cu (a–d), Cu2O (e–h), CuOCP (i–j), and Cuair (m–p) NCs. Scale bars, 50 nm, 10 nm, and 5 Å for HAADF STEM, inset, and HRSTEM images, respectively. (q) SAED radial profile of all studied samples along with references. (r) EEL spectra of the Cu L3,2 edge for all studied samples. (s) Surface copper speciation retrieved from X-ray Auger electron spectroscopy (XAES) (left axis) along with the oxide thickness measured from the HRSTEM (b,j,n) (right axis).
Complementary to electron microscopy, Cu LMM X-ray Auger electron spectroscopy (XAES) provides insight into the surface composition (≈5 nm) of the different catalytic systems (Figure s and Figure S2). The Cu NCs are predominately metallic with 75% Cu(0), 12% Cu(I) (Cu2O), and 13% Cu(II) (CuO/Cu(OH)2). Cu2O NCs are composed of 60% Cu(I) and 40% Cu(II), which is in line with previous studies. , The CuOCP NCs consist of 40% Cu(0) and show a higher fraction of oxide compared with the metallic Cu NCs (Cu(I) 15% and Cu(II) oxide 20%). Interestingly, a significant contribution of Cu carbonates (i.e., CuCO3 and Cu2CO3OH) emerges (c.a. 25%) for this sample. The Cuair NCs have only traces left of metallic Cu (less than 1%) and consist of Cu oxide (Cu(I) oxide 15% and Cu(II) oxide 35%) and Cu carbonate (c.a. 50%). Studies on Cu atmospheric corrosion report on the formation of Cu carbonate. , The data reported explicitely correlate the formation of Cu carbonate and CO2RR conditioning. Specifically, the formation of Cu carbonate depends on the presence of CO2 and on the time of exposure to air (Figure S3).
Catalytic Performance for CO2RR
Next, we evaluated the impact of the initial surface composition of the Cu catalysts on the catalytic performance for the CO2RR (Figure and Table S1 and Figure S4). We focused on −1.1 V vs RHE as one representative potential comparable with previous studies. − ,−
2.
CO2RR performance and long-term operational stability. (a) Total FEs for all gaseous products (that is, H2, CO, CH4, and C2H4) and the main liquid products (that is, HCOO–, acetate, ethylene glycol, C2H5OH, and 1-propanol) at −1.1 V vs RHE for 1h. (b–e) Evolution of the FEs for all gaseous products (that is, H2, CO, CH4, and C2H4) during 10 h of CO2RR for Cu (b), Cu2O (c), CuOCP (d), and Cuair (e) NCs. The data are the average of three independent experiments, and the error bars are the calculated standard deviation.
First, we comment on the faradaic efficiency (FE) of each sample, which was calculated based on the first hour of operation (Figure a). The Cu and Cu2O NCs are mostly selective for ethylene with around 30% faradaic efficiency (FE). The results are in line with previous studies. − ,, Interestingly, the FE for methane of CuOCP NCs is nearly double compared to Cu NCs (from around 10% to 20%) while the FE of ethylene drops to 20%. Finally, Cuair NCs are mostly selective for hydrogen with an FE above 60%.
Second, differences between the catalysts become more pronounced when looking at the FE over the 10 h CO2RR (Figure b–e, Table S1 and Figure S4). The product distribution of the Cu NCs remains mostly stable compared with the other samples (Figure b). A slight decay in ethylene FE occurs starting at around 6 h, matching our previous results. The Cu2O NCs show signs of earlier CO2RR deactivation (Figure c); here, ethylene FE decreases after 2–3 h. This observation is consistent with previous studies. ,, Interestingly, the Cu NCs oxidized to match the surface composition of Cu2O NCs also show an earlier sign of CO2RR deactivation (Figure S5). This observation strengthens the connection between the higher oxide content and accelerated CO2RR deactivation. A more pronounced HER increase at the expense of the CO2RR occurs for CuOCP (Figure d). This faster loss in ethylene selectivity for CuOCP compared to Cu2O and CuH2O2 indicates that the Cu speciation strongly influences the catalyst deactivation rates, where the presence of Cu carbonate seems to accelerate those effects. Cuair remains almost inactive for CO2RR over the 10 h with more than 60% hydrogen FE (Figure e).
Altogether, these observations indicate a clear difference in the stability of the product distribution of the investigated systems, which was herein compared under the same conditions for the first time. We observed comparable, if not poorer, C2+ selectivity between Cu and the oxide-rich catalysts. Our data highlight that oxide-derived catalysts do not necessarily enhance C2+ selectivity but rather greatly impact the operational stability of the catalyst (Supplementary Note 1). All the oxide-rich catalysts undergo faster operational deactivation for ethylene selectivity compared to the metallic-rich catalyst while high content of surface carbonates generate a HER-active Cu catalyst.
Quasi-Operando Liquid-Phase TEM Monitoring Catalyst Restructuring
We chose electrochemical liquid-phase transmission electron microscopy (ec-LPTEM) to follow the eventual restructuring of the NCs triggered by the different surface composition. ec-LPTEM has been demonstrated to provide valuable insight into Cu catalyst reconstruction during the initial stages of CO2RR. ,,,,, While ec-LPTEM operates on a short-time scale, the structural changes monitored by this technique have been essential to better understand CO2RR catalyst behavior on longer time scales. ,,,,, In contrast, insights gained from post-mortem TEM have been less useful because of the structural and compositional Cu changes occurring upon exposure to OCP. ,,−
We monitored the morphological and structural changes during the potential ramp from OCP to −0.8 V vs RHE by linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) (i.e., start-up) and subsequent chronoamperometry (CA) at −0.8 V vs RHE for 5 min via synchronized image sequences, particle analysis data, and selected area electron diffraction (SAED) (Figure ) along with performing several control experiments, including the exclusion of beam effects (Figures S6–S12).
3.
Quasi-operando liquid-phase TEM monitoring catalyst restructuring at CO2RR conditions. (a,c,e,g) Relative area loss of Cu (a, red), Cu2O (c, green), CuOCP (e, blue), and Cuair (g, yellow). (b,d,f,h) Time-lapse images of Cu (b), Cu2O (d), CuOCP (f), and Cuair (h) NCs during LSV-CA. Arrows of corresponding color indicate redeposited particles in panels (b,d,f). Arrows in panel (h) indicate hollowing events of primary Cu NCs. Scale bar: 100 nm. In panel (h), insets depict hollowing of one single NC. Scale bar, 20 nm. (i) Average area of redeposited particles and the onset time of redeposition for all samples. (j) In situ SAED of NCs before and after LSV-CA measurement.
The Cu NCs experience a progressive decrease in the projected area during the LSV, which continues during the CA up to 250 s before stabilizing at a total relative area loss of around 15% (Figure a). The synchronized image sequence shows that the formation of secondary particles (at ca. 70s) accompanies the size decrease of the Cu NCs (Figure b, Figures S6 and S7). The behavior of the Cu NCs agrees with previous ex situ observations on the same NCs. The size decrease and formation of the secondary particles is indicative of the dissolution-redeposition process driving Cu reconstruction. ,,
The Cu2O NCs undergo a more pronounced and steeper decrease in the projected area during LSV compared with the Cu NCs. The change continues during the first 30 s of CA before stabilizing at a total area loss of around 30% (Figure b). Concomitantly, an earlier formation onset of secondary particles (at ca. 10 s) and significant sintering of the Cu2O NCs occurs (Figure c,d and Figure S8). These observations are in line with previous ex situ and in situ results on the same NCs. ,
The CuOCP NCs exhibit a similar behavior to the Cu NCs, although with most change occurring during LSV and less change occurring during CA with fewer secondary particles forming (Figure e,f and Figure S9).
The Cuair NCs differ significantly in their restructuring behavior from the rest of the samples with their unique facet-selective core etching (hollowing) and a shell (edge and corner) remaining intact while secondary particles still form (Figure g,h).
Plotting the average area of redeposited secondary particles together with the onset time of their observation indicates a faster and more drastic reconstruction occurring for the Cu2O NCs among all samples and a larger extent of reconstruction for the CuOCP/Cuair compared to the Cu NCs (Figure i).
Complementary, in situ SAED of the samples confirms that all the Cu catalysts consist of mostly a metallic phase after LSV-CA (Figure j).
Strikingly, stabilizing the Cu surface by means of an inert oxide shell (here amorphous ZrOx) following our previous studies results in no change in the ec-LPTEM (Figure S10–S12), which confirm the importance of redox surface changes in the Cu stability during CO2RR. ,,
Overall, the quasi-operando electron microscopy evidence different kinetics among the CO2RR active Cu samples (i.e., Cu, Cu2O, and CuOCP) while a different mechanism emerges for the Cuair, which is HER-active.
Electrochemical Characterization Monitoring Catalyst Active Area and Selectivity
Additionally, we examined in more depth the partial current densities, the electrochemically active surface area (ECSA), and the selectivity trends from the benchtop measurements (Figure ).
4.

Electrochemical characterization monitoring catalyst active area and selectivity. (a) CO2 partial current density normalized by the geometric area as a function of time. (b) ECSAs from Pb-UPD of the different catalysts before CO2RR and after 1 and 10 h of CO2RR 5 min at −1.1 V vs RHE in CO2RR conditions were applied on Cu2O prior Pb-UPD for “before”. (c) Relative change in selectivity for H2, CO and C2H4 between 1 and 10 h.
The change in the CO2 partial current density normalized by the geometric surface area (JCO2‑geo) as a function of time reflects the evolution of the total number of CO2RR active sites during the 10 h electrolysis (Figure a). The data indicate that Cu2O and CuOCP NCs undergo the most drastic change. Indeed, the JCO2‑geo values of the Cu NCs remain stable. On the contrary, the JCO2‑geo of the Cu2O NCs and CuOCP NCs decreases over time, with a final loss of 20 and 45%, respectively. CuOCP NCs deactivate faster than the Cu2O NCs. The Cuair NCs remain overall inactive for the CO2RR during the 10 h. The total current density also decreases for the Cu2O NCs and CuOCP NCs without any catalyst detachment being observed (Figure S13). Additionally, the JCO2‑geo of surface-oxidized Cu NCs, which possess similar Cu(0) content of CuOCP NCs yet no carbonate (Figure S5), decreases similarly to Cu2O NCs (Figure S14), which points to carbonates playing a key role in deactivation kinetics.
The observed evolution over time in current density, while knowing that all catalysts reconstruct, indicate that the number of active sites and/or their selectivity (e.g., more sites that are less active or active for different products) must change for all.
We used ECSA to qualitatively examine the change in the total number of active sites, whether CO2RR or HER-active sites (Figure b and Figure S15). The ECSA of the Cu NCs continuously increases from before the CO2RR to 10 h after CO2RR. The ECSA of the Cu2O NCs increases from before to 1 h to reach the same value of the Cu NCs. The ECSA of CuOCP and Cuair NCs only slightly fluctuates around a value that is lower compared to the Cu NCs and Cu2O NCs. Pb-UPD confirms the slower transformation of the Cu NCs from low-coordinated atoms (i.e., defects, corners (111), and edges (110)) to more stable coordination geometry (100) compared to the Cu2O NCs (Figure S16,17).
Then, we looked at the relative change in selectivity for hydrogen, CO, and ethylene between 1 and 10 h of the CO2RR (Figure c). In addition to hydrogen and ethylene, we chose CO because of its role as key intermediate in the CO2RR mechanism and in driving copper reconstruction via Cu-CO intermediate formation. ,,,,, The ethylene remains constant for Cu NCs while it decreases for Cu2O and CuOCP NCs. Hydrogen increases for Cu2O and CuOCP NCs. The CO selectivity increases only for Cu NCs. Cuair does not undergo major change.
Discussion
The evolution of the catalytic performance and the catalyst restructuring indicate a clear difference between the Cu, Cu2O, CuOCP, and Cuair catalysts, which possess a different initial surface composition. The presence of oxides and carbonates correlates with faster operational CO2RR deactivation and structural changes to the extreme point of having a catalyst not active at all for CO2RR (i.e., Cuair). Interestingly, previous studies in flow cells and MEA also point at a higher stability of metal Cu compared to Cu oxide-derived catalysts. ,,,,,
Figure provides a summary of the findings. The catalysts with higher initial oxide content (i.e., Cu2O followed by CuOCP) undergo faster and/or more drastic structural changes compared to catalysts with higher initial metallic content (i.e., Cu NCs). The metal-rich Cu exhibits a more stable CO2RR and, particularly, C2+ selectivity compared to oxide-rich Cu. Eventually, CO selectivity increases for the metal-rich Cu while hydrogen selectivity increases for oxide-rich Cu. Remarkably, the CO2RR deactivation effect becomes even more pronounced in the presence of Cu carbonates and HER dominates along with a uniquely different reconstruction pathway (i.e., Cuair NCs).
5.

Schematic representation summarizing the impact of the initial Cu catalyst composition on catalyst reconstruction and the CO2RR selectivity.
Metallic Cu dominates in all catalysts at cathodic potential, corroborated here by the quasi-operando ec-LPTEM and in agreement with previous studies. ,,,,, The data suggest that the initial surface Cu composition impacts the reconstruction kinetics and the type of generated active sites responsible for selectivity.
Studies evidence that the greater the initial oxide content on copper is, the more the formation of grain boundaries, defects, and undercoordinated atoms during CO2RR is favored. ,,,,,,− A few studies indicate that these low-coordinated sites interact more weakly with CO. We suggest that the oxide-rich Cu transforms more rapidly into these low-coordinated sites, shifting the selectivity from the CO2RR to the HER-active sites. The observation of continuously increasing CO selectivity for the metal-rich Cu might indicate that different low-coordinated active sites are generated from the slower reconstruction or that the slow generation of the same weakly CO-interacting low-coordinated active sites enables the CO detection. HER might then still take over at longer operation time than those studied in this work.
A few reports hint at poor CO2RR activity associated with Cu carbonates. , Postelectrolysis Cu oxide cubes formed at OCP in carbonate electrolyte showed irreversible structural transformation and suppressed C2+ selectivity compared to the initial Cu spheres, hinting at a possible detrimental role of Cu carbonate. One study demonstrated that Cu carbonate is a poor CO2RR catalyst compared to Cu oxide-derived catalysts. Complementary in situ surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) indicates persistence of the Cu-carbonate signal during the CO2RR (Figure S18andTable S2). Thus, we suggest that the Cu carbonate might render the surface inaccessible for CO2RR or that the reduction of Cu carbonates generates active sites with poor binding affinity for CO2RR intermediates binding affinity.
As for the observed hollowing for the carbonate-rich Cu, competing reconstruction mechanisms might occur in the absence of significant CO2RR activity, which are different than the CO-driven reconstruction. In particular, cathodic corrosion has been previously identified to drive reconstruction of HER-active catalysts and has been recently suggested to cause hollowing of Cu cubes, although not yet connected to carbonate presence and HER activity. − One alternative or contributing pathway might involve continuous reduction–oxidation cycles of surface Cu wherein the reduction is voltage-driven while the reoxidation is caused by OH* radicals generated from oxygen transfer between H2O and HCO3 –. This cycle might ultimately lead to the dissolution of the internal metallic copper of carbonate-derived Cu NCs through hollowing.
Conclusions
In conclusion, this study clarifies how the initial copper surface composition critically dictates structural catalyst evolution and operational stability during the CO2RR. Our results underscore that greater initial oxide content triggers faster reconstruction and CO2RR performance degradation. Interestingly, the formation of Cu carbonates emerges as particularly detrimental, potentially persisting under cathodic conditions and promoting irreversible surface changes promoting HER and new reconstruction pathways. These findings might help to explain previously conflicting literature and emphasize the importance of precise control over surface composition and preconditioning in designing robust Cu catalysts. The comparison of Cu catalysts with different initial copper surface composition under the same conditions also raises an interesting question on the differences in their product selectivity, which might open up follow up studies.
Overall, this work inspires future strategies that consider both chemical and structural factors in catalyst preparation to achieve selective and durable CO2RR performance across various reactor platforms.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This publication was created as part of NCCR Catalysis (grant number 225147), a National Centre of Competence in Research funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation. The Interdisciplinary Center for Electron Microscopy (CIME) is acknowledged for TEM microscopy. P.A. thanks Jennifer Calderon Mora for discussions on the electrochemical results and help for setting the SERS measurement.
Experimental data are openly available in Zenodo at https://zenodo.org/uploads/18235845
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.5c21287.
Supplementary methods; additional experimental considerations; supplementary notes; additional TEM, XPS, Pb-UPD, and CO2RR (PDF)
+.
Petru P. Albertini and Saltanat Toleukhanova contributed equally.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
References
- De Luna P., Hahn C., Higgins D., Jaffer S. A., Jaramillo T. F., Sargent E. H.. What Would It Take for Renewably Powered Electrosynthesis to Displace Petrochemical Processes? Science. 2019;364(6438):eaav3506. doi: 10.1126/science.aav3506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nitopi S., Bertheussen E., Scott S. B., Liu X., Engstfeld A. K., Horch S., Seger B., Stephens I. E. L., Chan K., Hahn C., No̷rskov J. K., Jaramillo T. F., Chorkendorff I.. Progress and Perspectives of Electrochemical CO2 Reduction on Copper in Aqueous Electrolyte. Chem. Rev. 2019;119(12):7610–7672. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kuhl K. P., Cave E. R., Abram D. N., Jaramillo T. F.. New Insights into the Electrochemical Reduction of Carbon Dioxide on Metallic Copper Surfaces. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012;5(5):7050–7059. doi: 10.1039/c2ee21234j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Birdja Y. Y., Pérez-Gallent E., Figueiredo M. C., Göttle A. J., Calle-Vallejo F., Koper M. T. M.. Advances and Challenges in Understanding the Electrocatalytic Conversion of Carbon Dioxide to Fuels. Nat. Energy. 2019;4:732–745. doi: 10.1038/s41560-019-0450-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Stephens I. E. L., Chan K., Bagger A., Boettcher S. W., Bonin J., Boutin E., Buckley A. K., Buonsanti R., Cave E. R., Chang X., Chee S. W., da Silva A. H. M., de Luna P., Einsle O., Endrődi B., Escudero-Escribano M., Ferreira de Araujo J. V., Figueiredo M. C., Hahn C., Hansen K. U., Haussener S., Hunegnaw S., Huo Z., Hwang Y. J., Janáky C., Jayathilake B. S., Jiao F., Jovanov Z. P., Karimi P., Koper M. T. M., Kuhl K. P., Lee W. H., Liang Z., Liu X., Ma S., Ma M., Oh H. S., Robert M., Cuenya B. R., Rossmeisl J., Roy C., Ryan M. P., Sargent E. H., Sebastián-Pascual P., Seger B., Steier L., Strasser P., Varela A. S., Vos R. E., Wang X., Xu B., Yadegari H., Zhou Y.. 2022 Roadmap on Low Temperature Electrochemical CO2 Reduction. JPhys. Energy. 2022;4(4):042003. doi: 10.1088/2515-7655/ac7823. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Guo S., Wang J., Zhang H., Iloeje C. O., Liu D. J.. Direct Electrochemical Reduction of CO2 to C2+ Chemicals: Catalysts, Microenvironments, and Mechanistic Understanding. ACS Energy Lett. 2025;10(1):600–619. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.4c03186. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kok J., Albertini P. P., Leemans J., Buonsanti R., Burdyny T.. Overcoming Copper Stability Challenges in CO2 Electrolysis. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2025;10:550. doi: 10.1038/s41578-025-00815-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chen S., Farzinpour F., Kornienko N.. Dynamic Active Sites behind Cu-Based Electrocatalysts: Original or Restructuring-Induced Catalytic Activity. Chem. 2025;11(8):102575. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2025.102575. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Garg S., Xu Q., Moss A. B., Mirolo M., Deng W., Chorkendorff I., Drnec J., Seger B.. How Alkali Cations Affect Salt Precipitation and CO2 Electrolysis Performance in Membrane Electrode Assembly Electrolyzers. Energy Environ. Sci. 2023;16(4):1631–1643. doi: 10.1039/D2EE03725D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Raaijman S. J., Arulmozhi N., Koper M. T. M. M.. Morphological Stability of Copper Surfaces under Reducing Conditions. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2021;13(41):48730–48744. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c13989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vavra J., Ramona G. P. L., Dattila F., Kormányos A., Priamushko T., Albertini P. P., Loiudice A., Cherevko S., Lopéz N., Buonsanti R.. Solution-Based Cu+ Transient Species Mediate the Reconstruction of Copper Electrocatalysts for CO2 Reduction. Nat. Catal. 2024;7(1):89–97. doi: 10.1038/s41929-023-01070-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Amirbeigiarab R., Tian J., Herzog A., Qiu C., Bergmann A., Roldan Cuenya B., Magnussen O. M.. Atomic-Scale Surface Restructuring of Copper Electrodes under CO2 Electroreduction Conditions. Nat. Catal. 2023;6(9):837–846. doi: 10.1038/s41929-023-01009-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Vavra J., Shen T. H., Stoian D., Tileli V., Buonsanti R.. Real-Time Monitoring Reveals Dissolution/Redeposition Mechanism in Copper Nanocatalysts during the Initial Stages of the CO2 Reduction Reaction. Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 2021;60(3):1347–1354. doi: 10.1002/anie.202011137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang Y., Louisia S., Yu S., Jin J., Roh I., Chen C., Fonseca Guzman M. V., Feijóo J., Chen P. C., Wang H., Pollock C. J., Huang X., Shao Y. T., Wang C., Muller D. A., Abruña H. D., Yang P.. Operando Studies Reveal Active Cu Nanograins for CO2 Electroreduction. Nature. 2023;614(7947):262–269. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05540-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee S. H., Lin J. C., Farmand M., Landers A. T., Feaster J. T., Avile J. E., Beeman J. W., Ye Y., Yano J., Mehta A., Davis R. C., Jaramillo T. F., Hahn C., Drisdell W. S.. Oxidation State and Surface Reconstruction of Cu under CO 2 Reduction Conditions from In Situ X-Ray Characterization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021;143:2022. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c10017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Popović S., Nazrulla M. A., Šket P., Kamal K. M., Likozar B., Suhadolnik L., Pavko L., Surca A. K., Bele M., Hodnik N.. Electrochemically-Grown Chloride-Free Cu2O Nanocubes Favorably Electroreduce CO2 to Methane: The Interplay of Appropriate Electrochemical Protocol. Electrochim. Acta. 2022;436:141458. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2022.141458. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Q., Song Z., Sun X., Liu Y., Wan J., Betzler S. B., Zheng Q., Shangguan J., Bustillo K. C., Ercius P., Narang P., Huang Y., Zheng H.. Atomic Dynamics of Electrified Solid–Liquid Interfaces in Liquid-Cell TEM. Nature. 2024;630(8017):643–647. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07479-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang Y., Feijóo J., Figueras-Valls M., Chen C., Shi C., Fonseca Guzman M. V., Murhabazi Maombi Y., Liu S., Jain P., Briega-Martos V., Peng Z., Shan Y., Lee G., Rebarchik M., Xu L., Pollock C. J., Jin J., Soland N. E., Wang C., Salmeron M. B., Chen Z., Han Y., Mavrikakis M., Yang P.. Operando Probing Dynamic Migration of Copper Carbonyl during Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Nat. Catal. 2025;8(6):579–594. doi: 10.1038/s41929-025-01359-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Scholten F., Nguyen K. L. C., Bruce J. P., Heyde M., Roldan Cuenya B.. Identifying Structure–Selectivity Correlations in the Electrochemical Reduction of CO2: A Comparison of Well-Ordered Atomically Clean and Chemically Etched Copper Single-Crystal Surfaces. Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 2021;60(35):19169–19175. doi: 10.1002/anie.202103102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Velasco-Vélez J. J., Jones T., Gao D., Carbonio E., Arrigo R., Hsu C. J., Huang Y. C., Dong C. L., Chen J. M., Lee J. F., Strasser P., Roldan Cuenya B., Schlögl R., Knop-Gericke A., Chuang C. H.. The Role of the Copper Oxidation State in the Electrocatalytic Reduction of CO 2 into Valuable Hydrocarbons. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019;7(1):1485–1492. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b05106. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chen Z., Ye Y., Jiang K.. Metal–Metal Oxide Hybrid Catalysts for Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction Reaction. Chem. Phys. Rev. 2024;5(4):041302. doi: 10.1063/5.0223542. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bernasconi F., Plainpan N., Mirolo M., Wang Q., Zeng P., Battaglia C., Senocrate A.. Operando Observation of (Bi)Carbonate Precipitation during Electrochemical CO2 Reduction in Strongly Acidic Electrolytes. ACS Catal. 2024;14(11):8232–8237. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.4c01884. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Takamatsu D., Fukatani N., Yoneyama A., Hirano T., Hirai K., Yabuuchi S., Watanabe K., Kamiya K., Nakanishi S.. Dynamic Relocation of Copper Catalysts in Gas Diffusion Electrodes during CO2 Electroreduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025;147:24103. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5c07944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arán-Ais R. M., Scholten F., Kunze S., Rizo R., Roldan Cuenya B.. The Role of in Situ Generated Morphological Motifs and Cu(i) Species in C2+ Product Selectivity during CO2 Pulsed Electroreduction. Nat. Energy. 2020;5(4):317–325. doi: 10.1038/s41560-020-0594-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Timoshenko J., Bergmann A., Rettenmaier C., Herzog A., Arán-Ais R. M., Jeon H. S., Haase F. T., Hejral U., Grosse P., Kühl S., Davis E. M., Tian J., Magnussen O., Roldan Cuenya B.. Steering the Structure and Selectivity of CO2 Electroreduction Catalysts by Potential Pulses. Nat. Catal. 2022;5(4):259–267. doi: 10.1038/s41929-022-00760-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Loiudice A., Lobaccaro P., Kamali E. A., Thao T., Huang B. H., Ager J. W., Buonsanti R.. Tailoring Copper Nanocrystals towards C2 Products in Electrochemical CO2 Reduction. Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 2016;55(19):5789–5792. doi: 10.1002/anie.201601582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Iyengar P., Kolb M. J., Pankhurst J. R., Calle-Vallejo F., Buonsanti R.. Elucidating the Facet-Dependent Selectivity for CO2Electroreduction to Ethanol of Cu-Ag Tandem Catalysts. ACS Catal. 2021;11(8):4456–4463. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.1c00420. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang M., Nikolaou V., Loiudice A., Sharp I. D., Llobet A., Buonsanti R.. Tandem Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction with Fe-Porphyrins and Cu Nanocubes Enhances Ethylene Production. Chem. Sci. 2022;13(43):12673. doi: 10.1039/d2sc04794b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Albertini P. P., Calderon Mora J., Guskova M., Rodlamul P., Hicks N., Leemans J., Loiudice A., Buonsanti R.. Active Sites under Electronic Effect Are More Sensitive to Microenvironment in CO2 Electroreduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025;147:25517. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5c05697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang J., Hörmann N., Oveisi E., Loiudice A., De Gregorio G. L., Andreussi O., Marzari N., Buonsanti R.. Potential-Induced Nanoclustering of Metallic Catalysts during Electrochemical CO2 Reduction. Nat. Commun. 2018;9(1):3117. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05544-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De Gregorio G. L., Burdyny T., Loiudice A., Iyengar P., Smith W. A., Buonsanti R.. Facet-Dependent Selectivity of Cu Catalysts in Electrochemical CO2 Reduction at Commercially Viable Current Densities. ACS Catal. 2020;10(9):4854–4862. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.0c00297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Larrazábal G. O., Okatenko V., Chorkendorff I., Buonsanti R., Seger B.. Investigation of Ethylene and Propylene Production from CO2Reduction over Copper Nanocubes in an MEA-Type Electrolyzer. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2022;14(6):7779–7787. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c18856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grosse P., Gao D., Scholten F., Sinev I., Mistry H., Roldan Cuenya B.. Dynamic Changes in the Structure, Chemical State and Catalytic Selectivity of Cu Nanocubes during CO2 Electroreduction: Size and Support Effects. Angew. Chem. 2018;130(21):6300–6305. doi: 10.1002/ange.201802083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grosse P., Yoon A., Rettenmaier C., Herzog A., Chee S. W., Roldan Cuenya B.. Dynamic Transformation of Cubic Copper Catalysts during CO2 Electroreduction and Its Impact on Catalytic Selectivity. Nat. Commun. 2021;12(1):6736. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26743-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhan C., Dattila F., Rettenmaier C., Bergmann A., Kühl S., García-Muelas R., López N., Cuenya B. R.. Revealing the CO Coverage-Driven C-C Coupling Mechanism for Electrochemical CO2Reduction on Cu2O Nanocubesvia OperandoRaman Spectroscopy. ACS Catal. 2021;11(13):7694–7701. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.1c01478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- González S., Pérez M., Barrera M., González Elipe A. R., Souto R. M.. Mechanism of Copper Passivation in Aqueous Sodium Carbonate-Bicarbonate Solution Derived from Combined X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopic and Electrochemical Data. J. Phys. Chem. B. 1998;102(28):5483–5489. doi: 10.1021/jp981069k. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Leygraf, C. ; Wallinder, I. O. ; Tidblad, J. ; Graedel, T. . Atmospheric Corrosion; John Wiley & Sons, 2024; pp 337–347. 10.1002/9781118762134.app9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Toleukhanova S., Shen T. H., Chang C., Swathilakshmi S., Bottinelli Montandon T., Tileli V.. Graphene Electrode for Studying CO2 Electroreduction Nanocatalysts under Realistic Conditions in Microcells. Adv. Mater. 2024;36(16):1–10. doi: 10.1002/adma.202311133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lum Y., Ager J. W.. Stability of Residual Oxides in Oxide-Derived Copper Catalysts for Electrochemical CO2 Reduction Investigated with 18O Labeling. Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 2018;57(2):551–554. doi: 10.1002/anie.201710590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim D., Kley C. S., Li Y., Yang P.. Copper Nanoparticle Ensembles for Selective Electroreduction of CO2 to C2–C3 Products. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2017;114(40):10560–10565. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1711493114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li Y., Kim D., Louisia S., Xie C., Kong Q., Yu S., Lin T., Aloni S., Fakra S. C., Yang P.. Electrochemically Scrambled Nanocrystals Are Catalytically Active for CO2-to-Multicarbons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2020;117(17):9194–9201. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1918602117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Albertini P. P., Newton M. A., Wang M., Segura Lecina O., Green P. B., Stoian D. C., Oveisi E., Loiudice A., Buonsanti R.. Hybrid Oxide Coatings Generate Stable Cu Catalysts for CO2 Electroreduction. Nat. Mater. 2024;23(5):680–687. doi: 10.1038/s41563-024-01819-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leemans J., Calderon Mora J., Albertini P. P., Kumar K., Boulanger C., Buonsanti R.. The Chemical Nature of the Oxide Directs the Stability and Reactivity of Copper|Oxide Interfaces in the Electrochemical CO2 Reduction Reaction. Chem. Mater. 2025;37:3343. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5c00135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Osowiecki W. T., Nussbaum J. J., Kamat G. A., Katsoukis G., Ledendecker M., Frei H., Bell A. T., Alivisatos A. P.. Factors and Dynamics of Cu Nanocrystal Reconstruction under CO2 Reduction. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2019;2(11):7744–7749. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.9b01714. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- He J., Huang A., Johnson N. J. J., Dettelbach K. E., Weekes D. M., Cao Y., Berlinguette C. P.. Stabilizing Copper for CO 2 Reduction in Low-Grade Electrolyte. Inorg. Chem. 2018;57(23):14624–14631. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b02311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kok J., de Ruiter J., van der Stam W., Burdyny T.. Interrogation of Oxidative Pulsed Methods for the Stabilization of Copper Electrodes for CO2 Electrolysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024;146(28):19509–19520. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c06284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Möller T., Scholten F., Thanh T. N., Sinev I., Timoshenko J., Wang X., Jovanov Z., Gliech M., Roldan Cuenya B., Varela A. S., Strasser P.. Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction on CuOx Nanocubes: Tracking the Evolution of Chemical State, Geometric Structure, and Catalytic Selectivity Using Operando Spectroscopy. Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 2020;59(41):17974–17983. doi: 10.1002/anie.202007136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jung H., Lee S. Y., Lee C. W., Cho M. K., Won D. H., Kim C., Oh H. S., Min B. K., Hwang Y. J.. Electrochemical Fragmentation of Cu 2 O Nanoparticles Enhancing Selective C-C Coupling from CO 2 Reduction Reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019;141(11):4624–4633. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b11237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lei Q., Zhu H., Song K., Wei N., Liu L., Zhang D., Yin J., Dong X., Yao K., Wang N., Li X., Davaasuren B., Wang J., Han Y.. Investigating the Origin of Enhanced C2+Selectivity in Oxide-/Hydroxide-Derived Copper Electrodes during CO2Electroreduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142(9):4213–4222. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b11790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tomc B., Bele M., Plut M., Kostelec M., Popovic S., Nazrulla M. A., Martin S., Elbataioui A., Rafailovic L. D., Ruiz-zepeda F., Rebeka A., Pissolitto Y. B., Trivinho-strixino F., Jerzy W., Suhadolnik L., Hodnik N.. Recognizing the Universality of Copper Reconstruction Via Dissolution – Redeposition at the Onset of CO 2 Reduction. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2025;16:9553–9560. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5c01974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cheng D., Nguyen K. L. C., Sumaria V., Wei Z., Zhang Z., Gee W., Li Y., Morales-Guio C. G., Heyde M., Roldan Cuenya B., Alexandrova A. N., Sautet P.. Structure Sensitivity and Catalyst Restructuring for CO2 Electro-Reduction on Copper. Nat. Commun. 2025;16(1):4064. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59267-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gao D., Sinev I., Scholten F., Arán-Ais R. M., Divins N. J., Kvashnina K., Timoshenko J., Roldan Cuenya B.. Selective CO 2 Electroreduction to Ethylene and Multicarbon Alcohols via Electrolyte-Driven Nanostructuring. Angew. Chem. 2019;131(47):17203–17209. doi: 10.1002/ange.201910155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu S., Li Y., Wang D., Xi S., Xu H., Wang Y., Li X., Zang W., Liu W., Su M., Yan K., Nielander A. C., Wong A. B., Lu J., Jaramillo T. F., Wang L., Canepa P., He Q.. Alkali Cation-Induced Cathodic Corrosion in Cu Electrocatalysts. Nat. Commun. 2024;15(1):5080. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-49492-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hersbach T. J. P., Garcia-Esparza A. T., Hanselman S., Paredes Mellone O. A., Hoogenboom T., McCrum I. T., Anastasiadou D., Feaster J. T., Jaramillo T. F., Vinson J., Kroll T., Garcia A. C., Krtil P., Sokaras D., Koper M. T. M.. Platinum Hydride Formation during Cathodic Corrosion in Aqueous Solutions. Nat. Mater. 2025;24(4):574–580. doi: 10.1038/s41563-024-02080-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hersbach T. J. P., Ye C., Garcia A. C., Koper M. T. M.. Tailoring the Electrocatalytic Activity and Selectivity of Pt(111) through Cathodic Corrosion. ACS Catal. 2020;10(24):15104–15113. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.0c04016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mu S., Lu H., Wu Q., Li L., Zhao R., Long C., Cui C.. Hydroxyl Radicals Dominate Reoxidation of Oxide-Derived Cu in Electrochemical CO2 Reduction. Nat. Commun. 2022;13(1):1–8. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31498-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Experimental data are openly available in Zenodo at https://zenodo.org/uploads/18235845



