Skip to main content
PMC home page
Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society logoLink to Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society
. 1985;83:250–267.

Analytic approaches to the interpretation of automated threshold perimetric data for the diagnosis of early glaucoma.

A Sommer, C Duggan, C Auer, H Abbey
PMCID: PMC1298700  PMID: 3832529

Full text

PDF
250

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anctil J. L., Anderson D. R. Early foveal involvement and generalized depression of the visual field in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984 Mar;102(3):363–370. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1984.01040030281019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Armaly M. F. Selective perimetry for glaucomatous defects in ocular hypertension. Arch Ophthalmol. 1972 May;87(5):518–524. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1972.01000020520005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Atkin A., Bodis-Wollner I., Wolkstein M., Moss A., Podos S. M. Abnormalities of central contrast sensitivity in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1979 Aug;88(2):205–211. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(79)90467-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Batko K. A., Anctil J. L., Anderson D. R. Dethecting glaucomatous damage with the Friedmann analyzer compared with te Goldmann perimeter and evaluation of stereoscopic photographs of the optic disk. Am J Ophthalmol. 1983 Apr;95(4):435–447. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(83)90262-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bebie H., Fankhauser F., Spahr J. Static perimetry: accuracy and fluctuations. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1976 Jul;54(3):339–348. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1976.tb01263.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brechner R. J., Whalen W. R. Creation of the transformed Q statistic probability distribution to aid in the detection of abnormal computerized visual fields. Ophthalmic Surg. 1984 Oct;15(10):833–836. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Drance S. M., Berry V., Hughes A. Studies in the reproducibility of visual field areas in normal and glaucomatous subjects. Can J Ophthalmol. 1966 Jan;1(1):14–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Drance S. M., Wheeler C., Pattullo M. The use of static perimetry in the early detection of glaucoma. Can J Ophthalmol. 1967 Oct;2(4):249–258. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Flammer J., Drance S. M., Zulauf M. Differential light threshold. Short- and long-term fluctuation in patients with glaucoma, normal controls, and patients with suspected glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984 May;102(5):704–706. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1984.01040030560017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gloor B., Schmied U., Faessler A. Changes of glaucomatous field defects. Degree of accuracy of measurements with the automatic perimeter Octopus. Int Ophthalmol. 1980 Dec;3(1):5–10. doi: 10.1007/BF00136207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Greve E. L., Verduin W. M. Mass visual field investigation in 1834 persons with supposedly normal eyes. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 1972;183(4):286–293. doi: 10.1007/BF00496155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hart W. M., Jr, Becker B. The onset and evolution of glaucomatous visual field defects. Ophthalmology. 1982 Mar;89(3):268–279. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(82)34798-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Heijl A. Automatic perimetry in glaucoma visual field screening. A clinical study. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 1976 Jul 26;200(1):21–37. doi: 10.1007/BF00411430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Heijl A., Drance S. M. A clinical comparison of three computerized automatic perimeters in the detection of glaucoma defects. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981 May;99(5):832–836. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1981.03930010832008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Heijl A., Drance S. M., Douglas G. R. Automatic perimetry (COMPETER). Ability to detect early glaucomatous field defects. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980 Sep;98(9):1560–1563. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1980.01020040412002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Henson D. B., Dix S. M., Oborne A. C. Evaluation of the Friedmann Visual Field Analyser Mark II. Part 1. Results from a normal population. Br J Ophthalmol. 1984 Jul;68(7):458–462. doi: 10.1136/bjo.68.7.458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Holmin C., Krakau C. E. Variability of glaucomatous visual field defects in computerized perimetry. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 1979 Jun 15;210(4):235–250. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Johnson C. A., Keltner J. L., Balestrery F. G. Suprathreshold static perimetry in glaucoma and other optic nerve disease. Ophthalmology. 1979 Jul;86(7):1278–1286. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(79)35399-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Johnson C. A., Keltner J. L. Comparative evaluation of the Autofield-I, CFA-120, and Fieldmaster Model 101-PR automated perimeters. Ophthalmology. 1980 Aug;87(8):777–784. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(80)35162-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Keltner J. L. Comments on automated perimetry papers. Ophthalmology. 1979 Jul;86(7):1317–1319. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(79)35396-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lakowski R., Drance S. M., Goldthwaite D. Chromatic extrafoveal dark adaptation function in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Mod Probl Ophthalmol. 1976;17:304–310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Li S. G., Spaeth G. L., Scimeca H. A., Schatz N. J., Savino P. J. Clinical experiences with the use of an automated perimeter (Octopus) in the diagnosis and management of patients with glaucoma and neurologic diseases. Ophthalmology. 1979 Jul;86(7):1302–1316. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(79)35397-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mikelberg F. S., Drance S. M. The mode of progression of visual field defects in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1984 Oct 15;98(4):443–445. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(84)90128-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mills R. P. A comparison of Goldmann, Fieldmaster 200, and Dicon AP2000 perimeters used in a screening mode. Ophthalmology. 1984 Apr;91(4):347–354. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(84)34280-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Morin J. D. Changes in the visual fields in glaucoma: static and kinetic perimetry in 2,000 patients. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1979;77:622–642. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Parrish R. K., 2nd, Schiffman J., Anderson D. R. Static and kinetic visual field testing. Reproducibility in normal volunteers. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984 Oct;102(10):1497–1502. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1984.01040031217021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Portney G. L., Krohn M. A. The limitations of kinetic perimetry in early scotoma detection. Ophthalmology. 1978 Mar;85(3):287–293. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(78)35666-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Quigley H. A., Addicks E. M., Green W. R. Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma. III. Quantitative correlation of nerve fiber loss and visual field defect in glaucoma, ischemic neuropathy, papilledema, and toxic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982 Jan;100(1):135–146. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1982.01030030137016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Rock W. J., Drance S. M., Morgan R. W. Visual field screening in glaucoma. An evaluation of the Armaly technique for screening glaucomatous visual fields. Arch Ophthalmol. 1973 Apr;89(4):287–290. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1973.01000040289005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Schmied U. Automatic (Octopus) and manual (Goldmann) perimetry in glaucoma. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 1980;213(4):239–244. doi: 10.1007/BF00417545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sommer A., Quigley H. A., Robin A. L., Miller N. R., Katz J., Arkell S. Evaluation of nerve fiber layer assessment. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984 Dec;102(12):1766–1771. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1984.01040031430017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Werner E. B., Drance S. M. Early visual field disturbances in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1977 Jul;95(7):1173–1175. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1977.04450070071002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Werner E. B., Saheb N., Thomas D. Variability of static visual threshold responses in patients with elevated IOPs. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982 Oct;100(10):1627–1631. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1982.01030040605010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Wilensky J. T., Joondeph B. C. Variation in visual field measurements with an automated perimeter. Am J Ophthalmol. 1984 Mar;97(3):328–331. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(84)90631-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society are provided here courtesy of American Ophthalmological Society

RESOURCES