Abstract
Cortical layer 1 (L1) is a key site for integrating top-down and bottom-up information and is populated by inhibitory interneurons, including vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)-expressing cells. These interneurons regulate information flow across the cortical column by disinhibiting pyramidal neurons, yet the subthreshold ionic mechanisms that shape their excitability in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) remain poorly understood. Here, we characterize the electrophysiological properties of L1b VIP interneurons in mouse mPFC, focusing on the role of the hyperpolarization-activated cation current (Ih) and inward-rectifying potassium current (Kir). Using whole-cell recordings in acute slices, we find that L1b VIP interneurons exhibit constitutively active Ih and Kir conductances. Inhibition of Ih with ZD-7288 hyperpolarized the resting membrane potential (RMP), increased input resistance (Rin), and prolonged action potential (AP) duration without altering rheobase or firing frequency, while increasing EPSP-spike coupling probability. Blocking Kir with BaCl2 depolarized the RMP, increased Rin and membrane time constant, reduced rheobase, increased firing frequency, and similarly enhanced EPSP-spike probability and AP duration. Voltage-clamp experiments confirmed the presence of ZD-7288-sensitive Ih and BaCl2-sensitive Kir currents of small amplitude but operating on a high-resistance membrane, consistent with a strong impact on excitability. In contrast, neither Ih nor Kir inhibition affected the amplitude or frequency of spontaneous or miniature EPSCs, indicating that these currents do not measurably alter basal excitatory synaptic transmission. Immunofluorescence revealed weak somatic HCN1 and no detectable HCN2 expression in L1b VIP interneurons. Notably, Kir inhibition unmasked an Ih-dependent voltage sag during hyperpolarizing steps, suggesting that constitutive Kir activity normally masks Ih recruitment at subthreshold potentials. Together, these results indicate that Ih and Kir are active near RMP in L1b VIP interneurons and jointly regulate their passive properties, intrinsic excitability, and EPSP-spike coupling, therefore shaping how L1 VIP cells filter incoming signals and influence information flow within the prefrontal cortical column.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40659-026-00673-2.
Keywords: VIP interneuron, Kir, Ih, Excitability, Prefrontal cortex, Layer 1, Subthreshold currents
Introduction
Layer 1 (L1) of the neocortex is a critical site for the convergence of long-range cortical, thalamic, and neuromodulatory inputs [1]. In the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), this convergence is central for coordinating attention, working memory, and executive functions through the integration of top-down and bottom-up information streams [2]. Unlike deeper layers, L1 contains no excitatory somata and is composed exclusively of inhibitory interneurons, primarily LAMP5 and VIP cells [3], . LAMP5 neurogliaform cells are located in the upper part of L1 (L1a) and mediate widespread GABAergic inhibition of pyramidal apical dendrites [4–6]. Meanwhile VIP interneurons are located in the bottom part of L1 (L1b) and disinhibit pyramidal neurons by inhibiting Somatostatin (SST) and Parvalbumin (PV) expressing interneurons, therefore enhancing the impact of top-down signals [7–9]. This positions VIP interneurons as key modulators of cortical column excitability and state-dependent information routing.
VIP interneurons in L1 and at the L1-L2 border display two principal morphologies: a bipolar form with vertically oriented dendrites extending through Layers 1 and 2, and a multipolar form with horizontally ramified dendrites. Both morphological types are positioned to sample dense neuromodulatory inputs and long-range corticocortical projections [2, 10]. Their axons primarily target layers 2/3 and 5, enabling them to coordinate disinhibition across multiple layers. Although their anatomical organization in sensory cortices has been described [11–13], their intrinsic electrophysiological properties, particularly in mPFC L1b, remain poorly understood. Most functional studies focus on VIP cells in deeper layers, where they are characterized by high intrinsic excitability and robust disinhibition [14]. Yet the ionic mechanisms that shape their excitability in L1, a region dominated by distal and modulatory inputs, have received little attention.
Subthreshold ionic conductances are particularly relevant because they determine how neurons integrate synaptic inputs below spike threshold, influencing firing probability, temporal precision, and excitability dynamics [15–19]. Among these, the inward-rectifying potassium current (Kir) and the hyperpolarization-activated cation current Ih may play an especially important role in modulating the function of L1 interneurons, due to their strong filtering and gain-control capabilities [16, 20]. Inward rectifying potassium channels (Kir) stabilize the resting membrane potential, decrease membrane resistance and slow its responses to voltage changes while also promoting an influx of potassium at hyperpolarized membrane potentials, acting as one of the main filters for weak synaptic inputs [21, 22]. By contrast to Kir, the hyperpolarization-activated cation current Ih depolarizes the membrane, accelerates membrane responses, and promotes coincidence detection while contributing to resting potential instability through activity-dependent inactivation [23, 24]. Although Kir and Ih have been well characterized in pyramidal neurons, Parvalbumin-expressing and Somatostatin-expressing interneurons, the expression, strength, and functional consequences of these currents in VIP interneurons remain largely unknown, despite suggestive electrophysiological evidence of their presence in this interneuron [12, 25].
Understanding these mechanisms is particularly critical in L1, where VIP interneurons may act as gatekeepers of cortical disinhibition and, consequently, of top-down information flow. In contrast to LAMP5 neurogliaform cells, which are abundant and provide widespread inhibition [4–6, 26–28], L1 VIP interneurons constitute only ~ 10% of L1 cells and remain understudied despite their strategic position and powerful disinhibitory function. In the mPFC, VIP interneurons are located predominantly in the lower part of layer 1 (L1b) and at the interface between L1b and layer 2 [2, 3, 13, 29]. Their dendritic access to neuromodulatory and top-down signals, combined with axonal outputs to layers 2/3 and 5 [10], make them ideally suited to regulate the balance between contextual information and sensory input [7, 8, 30, 31]. Subthreshold currents such as Kir and Ih, by shaping resting membrane potential, input resistance, and EPSP-spike coupling, are therefore likely to be fundamental determinants of how VIP cells filter incoming signals and influence circuit computations.
However, the combinatorial operation of Kir and Ih in L1 VIP interneurons, and its impact on neuronal excitability and spike-timing, has not been systematically examined. Here we hypothesize that the balance of Ih and Kir conductances in VIP interneurons of mPFC L1b is a major determinant of their excitability and spike-timing, therefore shaping their disinhibitory influence across cortical layers. To test this hypothesis, we combined whole-cell patch-clamp recordings with immunofluorescence to characterize Kir and Ih in L1 VIP cells. We find that both conductances are constitutively active and strongly regulate passive membrane properties, synaptic integration, and firing precision. These results reveal that Kir and Ih fine-tune VIP interneuron excitability and suggest a modulatory role in the flow of top-down and bottom-up information through the cortical column with implications for sensory processing flexibility, network stability, and cognitive control.
Methods
Animals
Male mice between 30 and 90 days old were used for the study (median = 56). For experiments, we crossed homozygous STOCK Viptm1(cre)Zjh/J male mice with B6.Cg-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm9(CAG−tdTomato)Hze/J homozygous female mice. All mice were maintained in a 12-hour light-dark cycle, with the light cycle occurring between 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM. Animals had ad libitum access to water and food. All experiments were conducted following the animal protocol (N°: 193/2022) approved by the Ethical Committee of the Universidad de Santiago de Chile according to the rules and guidelines of the National Agency of Research and Development (ANID-Chile).
Electrophysiological recordings
Slice preparation: 300 μm acute brain slices were prepared from mice deeply anesthetized with isoflurane (3%) and intracardially perfused with ice-cold cutting solution containing: 125 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 5 MgCl2, 0.5 CaCl2, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 25 NaHCO3, 11 Glucose (pH 7.4). Following dissection, tissue blocks containing the prefrontal cortex were cut using a vibratome. Then, slices were transferred to a recording chamber with oxygenated ACSF containing: 125 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 1.3 MgCl2, 2.5 CaCl2, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 25 NaHCO3, 11 Glucose (pH 7.4, ~ 300 mOsm/kg). After 1 h recovery, the slices were transferred to a recording chamber mounted on a Zeiss Axio Examiner A1 DIC microscope. Slices were continuously perfused with oxygenated ACSF (2–3 mL/min) at 34 ± 2 °C.
Patch clamp: Whole-cell recordings were performed in layer 1 of the mPFC in tdTomato expressing VIP interneurons, using borosilicate glass pipettes (4 to 6 MΩ). For voltage and current clamp, the intracellular solution contained (in mM): 120 K-gluconate, 10 KCl, 8 NaCl, 10 HEPES, 0.5 EGTA, 4 Mg-ATP, 0.3 Na-GTP, pH 7.2 adjusted with KOH (~ 300 mOsm/kg). For voltage clamp recordings, pipette, and whole-cell capacitance were compensated, series resistance was continuously monitored and compensated by 80%; neurons were held at -80 mV. The voltage-step protocols consisted in voltage steps from − 130 to -50 mV with 10 mV steps from a holding potential of -80 mV, with a duration of 0.5 s and delivered somatically at 0.2 Hz. Liquid junction potential was 16.8 mV and was not subtracted (calculated according to the stationary Nernst-Planck equation using LJPcalc software (https://swharden.com/LJPcalc)).
The current-step protocols consisted of a series of somatic current steps from − 60 to 200 pA in steps of 20 pA with a duration of 1 s and delivered at 0.2 Hz at a holding current of 0. All current-clamp recordings were bridge-balanced and pipette capacitance neutralization was applied. Recordings were monitored continuously for changes in Rs using a pulse of 50 and − 50 pA at the end of each current step. Recording showing changes in Rs > 20% were discarded from the analysis. Voltage and current clamp recordings were performed using a Multiclamp 700 A (Molecular Devices, USA), digitized with a National Instruments PCIe-6323. The signal was low-pass filtered at 10 kHz and digitized at 50 kHz using WinWCP 5.8 (https://github.com/johndempster/WinWCPXE/releases/tag/V5.7.8).
Evoked EPSPs: To perform the extracellular stimulation protocol, a tungsten bipolar electrode (FHC) was positioned in layer 1 (L1) of the mPFC, approximately 200 μm from the soma of the recorded VIP interneuron. Stimuli were delivered every 3 s as 50 µs test pulses via an A365 stimulus isolator (WPI, USA). The stimulus intensity (range: 0.1-1.0 mA) was calibrated for each cell to elicit an action potential (AP) with a probability of 0.5 (determined over 20 traces). To isolate the excitatory component, all experiments were conducted in the presence of 50 µM picrotoxin unless otherwise noted. For voltage-clamp experiments isolating subthreshold Ih- and Kir-mediated currents, the solution was supplemented with 5 mM 4-AP, 5 mM TEA, and 0.5 µM TTX. Ih was inhibited using 20 µM ZD-7288 (Tocris, USA), and Kir was inhibited using 50 µM BaCl2 (Sigma-Aldrich, USA).
Tissue Immunofluorescence
Coronal brain slices containing the prefrontal cortex were prepared from mice aged 30 to 90 days. Briefly, male mice were deeply anesthetized with 3% isoflurane. Animals were intracardially perfused with 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.2) followed by freshly made 4% w/v formaldehyde dissolved in 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.4). All mice were euthanized by decapitation, and brains were quickly removed and placed in 4% w/v formaldehyde (Merck, Germany) for overnight incubation at 4 °C. The next day, brains were placed in a vibrating tissue slicer and sectioned using a sapphire blade to obtain 60 μm thick slices. Slices were obtained between the anteroposterior coordinates 1.54 to 2.46 mm from the bregma.
Antibodies
Monoclonal anti-HCN1 (N70/28, RRID: AB_2750810) and anti- HCN2 (N71/37, RRID: AB_2279449) antibodies were obtained from NeuroMab (United States). Polyclonal Anti-MAP2 (RRID: AB_776174) antibody was obtained from Abcam (United States). Secondary Alexa Fluor 488 Goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L) (A-11029), and Alexa Fluor 546 donkey anti-rabbit IgG (A-10040) were obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific (United States).
Immunofluorescence labeling
Tissue sections containing the prefrontal cortex were permeabilized in 0.3% Triton X- 100 (TX- 100) for 10 min and then blocked in 0.3% BSA, 0.09% TX-100 and 7% normal goat serum (NGS) in 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.4) for 2 h at room temperature (RT). Sections were then incubated with the primary antibody: HCN1 (1:50), HCN2 (1:100) or MAP2 (1:300) diluted in 1% BSA plus 0.3% TX-100 with gentle rocking for 24 h at 4 °C. For negative controls, tissue sections were incubated with blocking solution and without the primary antibody. Sections were washed in 0.1 M PBS for 30 min before incubation with the secondary antibody (1:500 dilution, 1.5 h at RT). After six, 5-minute washes with PBS, the sections were mounted on glass slides using Mowiol mounting media and covered with a 0.17 mm thick coverslip. Fluorescence was observed in an LSM 800 inverted confocal microscope (Zeiss, Germany). High magnification confocal images were acquired using a 40 × 1.1 N.A. water immersion objective, with a pinhole of 1 Airy unit for each channel, a scan zoom of 0.5, frame scan mode with averaging of 4, and a pixel time of 2.06 µs. All images were obtained at 8 -bit pixel depth at 1024 × 1024 resolution. Images were taken as a Z-stack at 1 μm intervals and analyzed as Z-projections using Fiji-ImageJ. Images were adjusted for overall brightness, contrast, and level using Fiji-ImageJ.
Data analysis
Electrophysiological data analysis data were analyzed using Clampfit 10.3 and Igor Pro 6.37 with the Neuromatic module [32]. Rheobase was defined as the minimal current injection required to elicit an action potential (AP). The slope of the EPSP was calculated from 10 to 90% of the maximal amplitude. For EPSP-spike probability, an AP was considered when the slope of the rising phase of the AP reached 50 mV/ms and if the event passed a threshold of -10 mV. EPSP-spike latency was calculated by subtracting the time of EPSP onset (determined via the method described by [32]) from the time of spike threshold. Sag amplitude was calculated as the maximal hyperpolarization of the membrane potential between the first 100 ms after the onset of the current step minus the average values of the steady state of the last 500 ms of the hyperpolarization pulse. Spike precision was quantified as the coefficient of variation (CV) of EPSP-spike latency across trials.
Statistical analysis Data are reported as the mean ± 95% confidence interval (C.I.), unless stated otherwise. Data normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Statistical significance to compare replicate means by row was evaluated using two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc tests. For multiple mean group analysis we used one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey’s post hoc test. For parametric data paired t-tests were used in most of the two group analyses. For non-parametric paired data, the Wilcoxon matched pair signed rank test was used. Statistical significance was considered at p < 0.05. All data analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 9.
Results
Localization and morphology of L1b VIP interneurons and lack of Ih/Kir effects on spontaneous synaptic transmission
VIP interneurons in layer 1 (L1) are key integrators of bottom-up and top-down signals, and their excitability state strongly influences how these inputs are filtered and routed through the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). Subthreshold currents such as Kir and Ih play an important role in setting the resting membrane potential and shaping intrinsic responsiveness, providing neurons with strong filtering and gain-control properties. Therefore, characterizing these conductances is essential for understanding the computational role of L1 VIP interneurons. To investigate these mechanisms, we first examined the distribution and morphology of VIP interneurons in the mPFC of VIPCre;Ai9 mice. Most labeled VIP somata were located in the lower subdivision of L1 (L1b), and no labeled somata were detected in the upper region (L1a) (Fig. 1Ai). Morphologically, VIP cells were predominantly bipolar, with vertically oriented processes extending across L1 and L2, and in several cases projecting into the upper L1 compartment (Fig. 1Aii).
We next evaluated the contribution of Ih and Kir channels to spontaneous excitatory synaptic activity. In current clamp recordings performed in the presence of 50 µM picrotoxin, Ih inhibition with 20 µM ZD-7288 did not alter sEPSP amplitude or frequency (Fig. 1B; Supplementary Table 1). Similarly, Kir inhibition with 50 µM BaCl2 produced no detectable change in sEPSP parameters (Fig. 1C). To assess whether Ih or Kir influence quantal synaptic release or postsynaptic glutamatergic receptor responsiveness, we measured miniature EPSCs (mEPSCs) in voltage clamp in the presence of TTX and picrotoxin. Neither ZD-7288 (Fig. 2A) nor BaCl2 (Fig. 2B) affected mEPSC amplitude or frequency. These results demonstrate that Ih and Kir do not measurably influence basal excitatory synaptic transmission onto L1b VIP interneurons.
Fig. 1.
Contribution of Kir and Ih channels to sEPSPs in layer 1 VIP interneurons of the mPFC. A (i) Fluorescence image of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) from VIPCre;Ai9 mice expressing tdTomato. (ii) Higher magnification of the area indicated in (i); arrows indicate tdTomato-positive VIP interneurons in layer 1b. (iii) Schematic representation of the recording site. B Left: Representative sEPSP traces recorded in control conditions, in the presence of 50 µM picrotoxin (PTX), and with 50 µM PTX + 20 µM ZD-7288. Right: Summary plots quantifying the effect on sEPSP amplitude and frequency (n = 4 cells/4 animals). C Left: Representative sEPSP traces recorded in control, 50 µM PTX, and 50 µM PTX + 50 µM BaCl2. Right: Summary plots showing the effect on sEPSP amplitude and frequency (n = 4 cells/4 animals). Scale bars: 100 μm (Ai), 20 μm (Aii)
Fig. 2.
Effect of Kir and Ih inhibition on mEPSCs in layer 1 VIP interneurons of the mPFC. A Left: Representative current traces of spontaneous EPSCs and mEPSCs recorded in the presence of 0.5 µM TTX, 0.5 µM TTX + 50 µM PTX, and 0.5 µM TTX + 50 µM PTX + 50 µM ZD-7288. Right: Summary graphs showing the amplitude and frequency of synaptic currents. B Left: Representative current traces of spontaneous EPSCs and mEPSCs in the presence of 0.5 µM TTX, 0.5 µM TTX + 50 µM PTX, and 0.5 µM TTX + 50 µM PTX + 50 µM BaCl2. Right: Summary graphs showing the amplitude and frequency of synaptic currents
Inhibition of Ih and Kir conductances increases EPSP-spike coupling in L1b VIP interneurons
To determine how Ih and Kir shape synaptic integration, we recorded EPSP-evoked spikes by stimulating excitatory afferents in L1b ~ 200 μm from the soma (Fig. 3A). Stimulation intensity was titrated for each neuron to achieve ~ 0.5 action-potential probability under control conditions, enabling detection of bidirectional changes in synaptic responsiveness. Inhibition of Ih with 5 or 20 µM ZD-7288 increased spike probability to 1.0 in all recorded cells (Fig. 3B, Supplementary Fig. 3). Likewise, inhibition of Kir with 50 µM BaCl2 increased spike probability to 1.0 (Fig. 3C). These effects persisted and were amplified when GABA-A receptors were blocked with picrotoxin (Fig. 3D, E), indicating that Ih and Kir strongly influence synaptic integration even when inhibitory conductances are pharmacologically suppressed.
Fig. 3.
Inhibition of Kir and Ih currents increases spike probability in VIP interneurons. A Schematic of the recording configuration showing the distance between the stimulating electrode and the recorded neuron (200 μm), along with the pharmacological treatment protocol. B Left: Effect of 20 µM ZD-7288 on the evoked EPSP and spike probability induced by synaptic stimulation. Right: Summary plot of spike probability over time, before and after 20 µM ZD-7288 treatment (n = 5 cells/5 animals; p < 0.001). C Left: Effect of 50 µM BaCl2 on the evoked EPSP and spike probability induced by synaptic stimulation. Right: Summary plot of spike probability over time, before and after 50 µM BaCl2 treatment (n = 6 cells/6 animals; p < 0.001). D Left: Representative traces in control, 50 µM PTX, and 50 µM PTX + 20 µM ZD-7288. Right: Spike probability over time before and after PTX and PTX + ZD-7288 application (n = 8 cells/6 animals). E Left: Representative traces in control, 50 µM PTX, and 50 µM PTX + 50 µM BaCl2. Right: Spike probability over time before and after PTX and PTX + BaCl2 application (n = 10 cells/6 animals). F Left: Representative trace illustrating the EPSP-spike latency measurement. Right: Quantification of EPSP-spike latency over time in the presence of PTX and PTX + ZD-7288. G Left: Representative trace of spike latency. Right: Quantification of EPSP-spike latency over time in the presence of PTX and PTX + BaCl2. Data are presented as mean ± 95% C.I
Moreover, we found that both ZD-7288 and BaCl2 increased the EPSP slope and decreased EPSP-spike latency (Fig. 3F, G; Supplementary Fig. 1), reflecting accelerated membrane depolarization toward threshold. Both drugs also reduced spike precision (increased latency variability), suggesting that Ih and Kir normally constrain the temporal window for EPSP-spike transformation. Together, these findings show that Ih and Kir exert potent control over EPSP integration and spike generation in L1b VIP interneurons, primarily by modifying subthreshold membrane properties rather than synaptic amplitude.
Ih and Kir differentially modulate intrinsic excitability of L1b VIP interneurons
We next assessed how Ih and Kir shape passive and active intrinsic properties. Blocking Ih with 20 µM ZD-7288 hyperpolarized the resting membrane potential (RMP) and increased input resistance, with no significant effect on membrane time constant or capacitance (Fig. 4A; Supplementary Table 1). Hyperpolarizing current injections revealed that 20 µM ZD-7288 abolished the characteristic voltage sag, as expected for Ih inhibition. Despite increased Rin, ZD-7288 produced no significant change in rheobase or firing frequency across the tested current range (Fig. 4A), similarly, these effects were also observed at 5 µM ZD-7288 (Supplementary Fig. 3, Supplementary Table 2), consistent with Ih playing its role in subthreshold integration.
Fig. 4.
Inhibition of Kir and Ih conductances enhances the intrinsic excitability of layer 1b VIP interneurons. A Left: Representative traces showing the voltage response to current injections of -60 pA, 20, 40 pA, and 80 pA in mPFC L1 VIP interneurons in the presence of 20 µM ZD-7288. Right: Summary plots showing the effect of 20 µM ZD-7288 on resting membrane potential (RMP), input resistance (Rin), AP frequency, and rheobase (n = 23 cells/18 animals). B Left: Representative traces showing the effect of ZD-7288 on the shape of the first action potential (AP) at rheobase. Right: Summary plots of the effect of ZD-7288 on AP amplitude, threshold, full width at half maximum (FWHM), rise time, and decay time (n = 23 cells/18 animals). C Left: Representative traces showing the effect of 50 µM BaCl2 on the voltage response evoked by − 60 pA, 20, 40 pA, and 60 pA current injections. Right: Effect of 50 µM BaCl2 on RMP, Rin, AP frequency, and rheobase (n = 22 cells/13 animals). D Left: Representative traces showing the effect of BaCl2 on AP shape. Right: Summary plots of the effect of BaCl2 on AP amplitude, threshold, FWHM, rise time, and decay time (n = 22 cells/13 animals). Data for AP firing frequency are shown as mean ± 95% C.I. Asterisks (*) indicate currents where p-values are statistically significant (p < 0.05). P-values are indicated above each graph
Action-potential waveform analysis showed that ZD-7288 hyperpolarized the AP threshold, increased AP amplitude, and prolonged AP duration by slowing both rise and decay kinetics (Fig. 4B; Supplementary Table 1), reflecting altered recruitment of voltage-gated Na+ and K+ channels at more hyperpolarized potentials. In contrast, blocking Kir with 50 µM BaCl2 depolarized the RMP, increased Rin, and prolonged the membrane time constant while leaving capacitance unchanged (Fig. 4C; Supplementary Table 1). Hyperpolarizing steps produced larger voltage deflections but also revealed an increase in sag amplitude, suggesting recruitment of Ih. Current-step protocols demonstrated that BaCl2 substantially decreased rheobase and increased firing frequency at moderate current injections (40–100 pA), although this facilitation plateaued at higher current amplitudes (Fig. 4E). As with Ih inhibition, BaCl2 hyperpolarized AP threshold, increased AP amplitude, and prolonged AP duration (Fig. 4D). Together, these findings indicate that Ih and Kir are both active at rest and jointly regulate passive properties and action-potential generation, but exert distinct influences on firing gain and excitability: Ih primarily shapes subthreshold responsiveness, whereas Kir sets the depolarization threshold for AP initiation and determines gain in the low-current regime.
Kir Inhibition unmasks an Ih-dependent voltage Sag in L1b VIP interneurons
Because BaCl2 increased Rin and hyperpolarization amplitude, we hypothesized that Kir inhibition enhances sag amplitude by increasing Ih recruitment. We quantified sag during a -60 pA current step before and after BaCl2, and again after BaCl2 + ZD-7288 (Fig. 5A). In 85% of neurons (11/13), BaCl2 significantly increased sag amplitude (Fig. 5B, C). Subsequent application of ZD-7288 abolished this enhanced sag, demonstrating that the BaCl2-induced sag is Ih-dependent. These results indicate that under baseline conditions constitutive Kir activity stabilizes the membrane potential in a range that limits Ih activation during modest hyperpolarizations, effectively masking sag. Removal of Kir shifts the operating point into a regime where Ih becomes strongly engaged, unmasking the sag response. This interaction suggests a dynamic balance between Kir and Ih in shaping subthreshold voltage trajectories.
Fig. 5.
Kir inhibition unmasks a ZD-7288-sensitive voltage sag. A Schematic representation of the recording area and the pharmacological treatment protocol. B (i) Representative traces showing the response to a -60 pA somatic current injection in control, 50 µM BaCl2, and 50 µM BaCl2 + 20 µM ZD-7288 conditions. The current injection protocol is shown above the traces. (ii) Higher magnification of the boxed area showing the effect of treatments on sag amplitude. C Summary plot quantifying the effect of BaCl2 and BaCl2 + ZD-7288 on sag amplitude (n = 11 cells/11 animals). P-values are shown above the graph
Voltage-clamp identification of Ih and Kir currents and HCN channel expression in L1b VIP interneurons
To directly measure subthreshold currents, we performed voltage-clamp recordings from − 130 to -50 mV using pharmacological isolation (Fig. 6). Under control conditions, L1b VIP interneurons displayed a small inward current with an apparent reversal around − 82 mV (uncorrected for the liquid junction potential; Fig. 6A). Application of ZD-7288 reduced inward current between − 130 and − 100 mV, yielding a ZD-sensitive component of ~-18 pA at -130 mV with an apparent reversal near − 76 mV (Fig. 6B), consistent with an Ih-like mixed cation current. Application of BaCl2 revealed a Ba2+-sensitive inwardly rectifying current of ~-30 pA at -130 mV with reversal around − 82 mV (Fig. 6C, D), consistent with Kir activation. Although these currents are small in amplitude, they operate on a high-resistance membrane, indicating that even tens of picoamps can substantially shape excitability. To determine the molecular identity of Ih channels, we performed immunofluorescence in VIPCre;Ai9 mice. VIP neurons were confined to L1b and exhibited predominantly bipolar morphology (Fig. 7). HCN1 immunoreactivity was weak and primarily somatic, and not all VIP neurons expressed detectable HCN1. No HCN2 signal was observed in L1b or L2/3 VIP interneurons (Supplementary Fig. 2). In line with previous reports, we identified HCN1-labeled distal dendrites originating from deep layers. This suggests that the low expression of HCN1 observed in VIP interneurons is cell-type specific rather than a general labeling deficit. Furthermore, HCN1 expression in the prefrontal cortex followed the classical gradient described by Lörincz et al. [33], with density increasing toward the distal dendrites in pyramidal neurons (Fig. 7, red arrows, Supplementary Fig. 4). These findings support the presence of a small somatic Ih conductance mediated mainly by HCN1, consistent with the modest Ih amplitude observed in voltage clamp.
Fig. 6.
Ih and Kir currents in mPFC L1 VIP interneurons. A Representative current traces measured using a voltage step protocol from − 130 to − 50 mV: (i) before, (ii) after ZD-7288 application, and (iii) the ZD-7288-sensitive difference current (Control - ZD-7288). B Quantification of (i) total current and (ii) ZD-7288-sensitive current (n = 6 cells/6 animals). C Representative current traces measured using a voltage step protocol from − 130 to -50 mV: (i) before, (ii) after BaCl2 application, and (iii) the BaCl2-sensitive difference current (Control - BaCl2). D Quantification of (i) total current and (ii) BaCl2-sensitive current (n = 6 cells/6 animals). Data are presented as mean ± 95% C.I. Arrows indicate the time point where measurements were taken. *p < 0.05
Fig. 7.
HCN1 expression in mPFC L1 VIP interneurons. Representative immunofluorescence images showing labeling for HCN1 (green), tdTomato (red), and the merged signal. Lines indicate layer boundaries. Inset shows a higher magnification view of the cells in the enclosed square. Scale bar = 50 μm. White arrow indicates neurons in layer 1; yellow arrow indicates VIP interneurons in layer 2; red arrows indicate HCN1 expression in dendrites coming from deep layers
Discussion
In this study, we show that the subthreshold currents Ih and Kir are constitutively active in L1b VIP interneurons of the medial prefrontal cortex and critically regulate their passive properties, intrinsic excitability, and EPSP-spike coupling. By combining whole-cell recordings, synaptic stimulation, voltage-clamp isolation of subthreshold currents, and immunofluorescence, we demonstrate that these two conductances jointly shape how VIP interneurons integrate synaptic inputs and determine their responsiveness to excitatory drive. Our findings position Ih and Kir as key regulators of signal filtering in layer 1, where VIP neurons function as important modulators of disinhibition and top-down information flow across cortical layers.
Ih conductance regulates subthreshold integration and EPSP-spike coupling
Our results demonstrate that Ih is active near the resting membrane potential of L1b VIP interneurons, where it acts as a depolarizing conductance that lowers input resistance and constrains EPSP-spike coupling. Pharmacological inhibition of Ih with ZD-7288 hyperpolarized the resting membrane potential, increased input resistance, abolished the voltage sag, and enhanced both the probability and temporal precision with which excitatory inputs triggered action potentials. These effects closely mirror those reported in CA1 pyramidal neurons, where Ih shapes dendritic depolarization, synaptic integration, and long-term plasticity [15, 23, 33], supporting a conserved role for Ih in regulating subthreshold excitability.
Notably, Ih inhibition did not alter spontaneous EPSP or miniature EPSC amplitude or frequency, indicating that Ih does not significantly influence presynaptic glutamate release or postsynaptic glutamate receptor responsiveness under basal conditions. Instead, its primary role appears to be the regulation of intrinsic membrane responsiveness, consistent with observations across multiple neuronal classes [15, 18, 19]. Voltage-clamp recordings revealed a small ZD-7288-sensitive inward current (~ − 18 pA at − 130 mV), and immunofluorescence analysis showed weak, predominantly somatic HCN1 expression with no detectable HCN2 signal in L1b VIP interneurons. These findings align with reports of relatively modest Ih amplitudes in interneurons [34, 35]. Despite its small magnitude, Ih exerted substantial functional effects, likely due to the high input resistance characteristic of L1 interneurons [13], which amplifies the voltage impact of small conductances.
Given the high input resistance of L1 VIP interneurons, even small Ih active near rest can produce millivolt-scale shifts in membrane potential (ΔV ≈ I × Rin), consistent with our observed changes in RMP and EPSP-spike coupling. In addition, weak somatic HCN1 immunoreactivity may underestimate functionally relevant channel pools in fine dendrites or other subcellular compartments. Importantly, the main intrinsic effects were replicated at 5 µM ZD-7288 (Supplementary Fig. 3), supporting the interpretation that they largely reflect Ih blockade rather than high-dose off-target actions.
The enhancement of EPSP-spike coupling following Ih inhibition can therefore be explained by an increase in input resistance, which promotes EPSP summation and facilitates recruitment of conductances such as NMDARs. The absence of changes in sEPSC and mEPSC properties further supports a predominantly postsynaptic mechanism. Although ZD-7288 has been reported to affect T-type Ca2+ and Na+ channels at higher concentrations [36, 37], our analyses focused on subthreshold membrane potentials where these channels are minimally active, supporting the interpretation that the observed effects primarily reflect Ih blockade. Nevertheless, because high concentrations of ZD-7288 can enhance presynaptic glutamate release in certain circuits [38, 39], subtle presynaptic contributions cannot be completely excluded.
Together, these data indicate that Ih functions as a stabilizing, depolarizing leak conductance in L1b VIP interneurons that narrows the temporal window for synaptic integration and limits spike probability. By doing so, Ih fine-tunes the gain and timing of excitatory input-output coupling in these cells, positioning it as a key regulator of excitability and temporal precision in layer 1 cortical microcircuits.
Kir conductance shapes resting potential, excitability, and the temporal integration window
Kir inhibition with BaCl2 produced effects opposite to those of Ih inhibition: depolarization of RMP, increased Rin and membrane time constant, reduced rheobase, and increased firing frequency for low to moderate current injections. These findings demonstrate that Kir channels normally provide a stabilizing conductance that constrains excitability, consistent with the canonical role of inwardly rectifying potassium channels [16, 21]. Voltage-clamp recordings revealed a Ba2+-sensitive inwardly rectifying current (~-30 pA at -130 mV), with characteristics similar to Kir2.x channels. Although scRNAseq datasets indicate that GIRK (Kir3.x) subunits are expressed in VIP interneurons [40–42], the presence of a constitutively active Ba2+-sensitive current suggests additional Kir family members may contribute. Similar interactions among HCN, Kir2.x, and K-leak channels have been described as key determinants of dendritic excitability in frontal cortex pyramidal neurons [21]. Kir inhibition enhanced EPSP-spike coupling and broadened EPSPs, consistent with increased Rin and prolonged membrane integration time. Prior studies showed that Kir inhibition increases EPSP amplitude and temporal summation in striatal and cortical neurons [21, 42]. Our data extend this principle to L1b VIP interneurons, showing that Kir channels exert tonic control over synaptic integration by limiting depolarization and narrowing the integration window.
Beyond shifting the resting membrane potential, Kir activation reduces VIP interneuron excitability through shunting inhibition. By increasing total membrane conductance, Kir channels decrease Rin, so identical EPSCs produce smaller voltage deflections (EPSPs), effectively filtering weak or subthreshold inputs even independent of any hyperpolarizing shift in membrane potential. This shunting mechanism is particularly relevant in VIP interneurons, where high basal Rin makes excitability highly sensitive to modest changes in ionic conductance.
Interplay between Ih and Kir establishes a dynamic balance governing voltage trajectories and spike timing
Our results indicate that Kir inhibition unmasks an Ih-dependent voltage sag. Under baseline conditions, hyperpolarizing current injections produced minimal sag, suggesting limited Ih recruitment. However, blocking Kir strongly increased sag amplitude, and subsequent ZD-7288 application abolished this effect. This indicates that Kir current shunts Ih current and stabilizes the membrane potential, effectively masking sag.
This interplay resembles observations in CA1 pyramidal neurons, where GIRK activation reduces Ih recruitment by preventing hyperpolarizing shifts in membrane potential [43]. Contrary, in L1b VIP interneurons, removing Kir reduces current shunting thus unmasking Ih current, increasing sag amplitude and altering voltage trajectories. We also found that blocking GABA-A receptors alone had little effect on spontaneous synaptic activity or RMP in L1b VIP interneurons, consistent with reports that L1 receives relatively sparse local inhibition [1, 13]. However, during evoked excitation, picrotoxin increased spike probability, and this effect was greatly amplified when Kir was inhibited, suggesting that Kir-mediated shunting normally masks the influence of feedforward inhibition. Removal of Kir thus increases membrane gain and enhances the impact of both excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs.
In this work, we utilized mice ranging from 1 to 3 months of age, a period spanning late adolescence to young adulthood. While previous literature suggests that Layer 1 interneuron markers are expressed as early as P14, it is critical to acknowledge that the prefrontal cortex (PFC) undergoes a protracted maturation process [44]. Sexual maturity in mice typically occurs around 6 weeks, and the refinement of PFC connectivity and synaptic pruning continues throughout the 1–3 month window [45, 46]. We did not observe clear age-related trends within this range, but the study was not powered to detect subtle developmental effects.
Together, these results show that Ih and Kir are active near the resting membrane potential of mPFC L1b VIP interneurons, where they jointly regulate the voltage range over which synaptic inputs are integrated. By shaping subthreshold filtering, intrinsic excitability, and EPSP-spike coupling, the interplay between these conductances establishes a dynamic balance that determines the timing, probability, and precision of spike generation. This coordinated regulation positions VIP interneurons as finely tunable modulators of disinhibition and information flow within the cortical column.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary Material 1: Figure 1. EPSP input/output curves of mPFC L1b VIP interneurons. Input/output (I/O) curves recorded from L1b VIP interneurons following stimulation in L1b, 200 µm from the soma. (A) Slope of the I/O relationship in the presence of 20 µM ZD-7288. (B) EPSP amplitude I/O relationship in the presence of 20 µM ZD-7288 (n = 5 cells/5 animals). (C) Slope of the I/O relationship in the presence of 50 µM BaCl2. (D) EPSP amplitude I/O relationship in the presence of 50 µM BaCl2 (n = 6 cells/6 animals).
Supplementary Material 2: Figure 2. (A) Representative immunofluorescence images showing labeling for HCN2, tdTomato, and the merged signal. (B) Representative immunofluorescence images showing the negative control for the primary antibody, tdTomato, and the merged signal. Lines indicate layer boundaries. Inset shows a higher magnification view of the cells in the enclosed square. Scale bar = 50 µm.
Supplementary Material 3: Figure 3. Effect of 5 µM ZD-7288 on layer 1 VIP interneurons in the mPFC. (A) (i) Representative voltage responses to somatic current injections of -60, 20, and 40 pA. Summary graphs show (ii) resting membrane potential, (iii) input resistance, (iv) sag, (v) action potential firing frequency, and (vi) rheobase. (vii) Representative voltage responses to the same current injections, with summary graphs of (viii) action potential threshold, (ix) amplitude, (x) full width at half maximum, (xi) rise time, and (xii) decay time (n = 3). (B) Representative traces illustrating the effects of 5 µM ZD-7288 on sEPSP amplitude and frequency (right panels) (n = 4). (C) Summary graphs showing the effects of 5 µM ZD-7288 on mEPSC amplitude and frequency. (D) Representative traces showing the effects of 5 µM ZD-7288 on eEPSPs under (i) control conditions, (ii) picrotoxin, and (iii) picrotoxin + 5 µM ZD-7288. (iv) Summary graph of spike probability in the presence of 5 µM ZD-7288 (n = 2).
Supplementary Material 4: Figure 4. HCN1 expression in the mPFC and hippocampal CA1 at P35. (A) Representative images of HCN1 (green) and MAP2 (red) immunolabeling in mPFC layers 1 and 2/3, highlighting HCN1 signal in dendritic processes (yellow arrows). (B) Representative images of HCN1 (green) and MAP2 (red) immunolabeling in the hippocampal CA1 region. Scale bar, 20 µm.
Supplementary Material 5: Table 1. Electrophysiological characteristics of VIP interneurons before and after 20 µM ZD-7288 and 50 µM BaCl2 treatment.
Supplementary Material 6: Table 2. Electrophysiological characteristics of VIP interneurons before and after 5 µM ZD-7288 treatment.
Acknowledgements
The authors also thank the Microscopy Core Facility at Universidad de Santiago de Chile, funded by Programa de Equipamiento Científico y Tecnológico (FONDEQUIP) EQM150069.
Author contributions
E.L-S and C.M. conceived the experiments and developed the analyses. C.M., D.R., C.C, P.L. and EL-S. performed the experiments and analyzed the data. E.L-S wrote the manuscript, and all authors edited the manuscript.
Funding
ANID FONDECYT Regular 1220680. ANID-Subdirección de Capital Humano/Doctorado Nacional 21202294 2020 to C.M. ANID-Subdirección de Capital Humano/Doctorado Nacional 21231679 2023 to P.L. Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Proyecto AYUDANTE_DICYT, Código 022543LS_Ayudante, Vicerrectoría de Investigación, Innovación y Creación.
Data availability
The data supporting this study’s findings are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All experiments were conducted according to animal protocols approved by the Ethics Committee of the Universidad de Santiago de Chile (N° 193/2022), according to the rules and guidelines of the National Research and Development Agency (ANID).
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Schuman B, Dellal S, Prönneke A, Machold R, Rudy B. Neocortical layer 1: an elegant solution to Top-Down and Bottom-Up integration. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2021;44:221–52. 10.1146/annurev-neuro-100520-012117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Anastasiades PG, Collins DP, Carter AG. Mediodorsal and ventromedial thalamus engage distinct L1 circuits in the prefrontal cortex. Neuron. 2021;109:314–e3304. 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.10.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Huang S, Wu SJ, Sansone G, Ibrahim LA, Fishell G. Layer 1 neocortex: gating and integrating multidimensional signals. Neuron. 2024;112:184–200. 10.1016/j.neuron.2023.09.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Aurélie B, Gaëlle M, Przemyslaw J, Yuqi L, Ole P, Audrey HY. Layer 1 NDNF interneurons form distinct subpopulations with opposite activation patterns during sleep in freely behaving mice. bioRxiv 2025.01.10.632405. 10.1101/2025.01.10.632405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 5.Cohen-Kashi Malina K, Tsivourakis E, Kushinsky D, Apelblat D, Shtiglitz S, Zohar E, et al. NDNF interneurons in layer 1 gain-modulate whole cortical columns according to an animal’s behavioral state. Neuron. 2021;109:2150–e21645. 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Furlanis E, Dai M, Leyva Garcia B, Tran T, Vergara J, Pereira A, et al. An enhancer-AAV toolbox to target and manipulate distinct interneuron subtypes. Neuron. 2025;113:1525–e154715. 10.1016/j.neuron.2025.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Batista-Brito R, Vinck M, Ferguson KA, Chang JT, Laubender D, Lur G, et al. Developmental dysfunction of VIP interneurons impairs cortical circuits. Neuron. 2017;95:884–e8959. 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.07.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cardin JA. Inhibitory interneurons regulate temporal precision and correlations in cortical circuits. Trends Neurosci. 2018;41:689–700. 10.1016/j.tins.2018.07.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Veit J, Hakim R, Jadi MP, Sejnowski TJ, Adesnik H. Cortical gamma band synchronization through somatostatin interneurons. Nat Neurosci. 2017;20:951–9. 10.1038/nn.4562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Georgiou C, Kehayas V, Lee KS, Brandalise F, Sahlender DA, Blanc J, et al. A subpopulation of cortical VIP-expressing interneurons with highly dynamic spines. Commun Biol. 2022;5:352. 10.1038/s42003-022-03278-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jackson J, Ayzenshtat I, Karnani MM, Yuste R. VIP + interneurons control neocortical activity across brain States. J Neurophysiol. 2016;115:3008–17. 10.1152/jn.01124.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Prönneke A, Scheuer B, Wagener RJ, Möck M, Witte M, Staiger JF. Characterizing VIP neurons in the barrel cortex of VIPcre/tdTomato mice reveals Layer-Specific differences. Cereb Cortex. 2015;25:4854–68. 10.1093/cercor/bhv202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Schuman B, Machold RP, Hashikawa Y, Fuzik J, Fishell GJ, Rudy B. Four unique interneuron populations reside in neocortical layer 1. J Neurosci. 2019;39:125–39. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1613-18.2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Posłuszny A. Updating the picture of layer 2/3 VIP-expressing interneuron function in the mouse cerebral cortex. Acta Neurobiol Exp. 2020;79:328–37. 10.21307/ane-2019-031. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gasselin C, Inglebert Y, Debanne D. Homeostatic regulation of h-conductance controls intrinsic excitability and stabilizes the threshold for synaptic modification in CA1 neurons. J Physiol. 2015;593:4855–69. 10.1113/jp271369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hibino H, Inanobe A, Furutani K, Murakami S, Findlay I, Kurachi Y. Inwardly rectifying potassium channels: their structure, function, and physiological roles. Physiol Rev. 2010;90:291–366. 10.1152/physrev.00021.2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Leao RM, Li S, Doiron B, Tzounopoulos T. Diverse levels of an inwardly rectifying potassium conductance generate heterogeneous neuronal behavior in a population of dorsal cochlear nucleus pyramidal neurons. J Neurophysiol. 2012;107:3008–19. 10.1152/jn.00660.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ratté S, Lankarany M, Rho Y-A, Patterson A, Prescott SA. Subthreshold membrane currents confer distinct tuning properties that enable neurons to encode the integral or derivative of their input. Front Cell Neurosci. 2015;8. 10.3389/fncel.2014.00452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 19.Wahl-Schott C, Biel M. HCN channels: structure, cellular regulation and physiological function. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009;66:470–94. 10.1007/s00018-008-8525-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Amarillo Y, Tissone AI, Mato G, Nadal MS. Inward rectifier potassium current IKir promotes intrinsic pacemaker activity of thalamocortical neurons. J Neurophysiol. 2018;119:2358–72. 10.1152/jn.00867.2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Day M, Carr DB, Ulrich S, Ilijic E, Tkatch T, Surmeier DJ. Dendritic excitability of mouse frontal cortex pyramidal neurons is shaped by the interaction among HCN, Kir2, and K leak channels. J Neurosci. 2005;25:8776–87. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2650-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pignatelli M, Ryan TJ, Roy DS, Lovett C, Smith LM, Muralidhar S, et al. Engram cell excitability state determines the efficacy of memory retrieval. Neuron. 2019;101:274–e2845. 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.11.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Campanac E, Daoudal G, Ankri N, Debanne D. Downregulation of dendritic I(h) in CA1 pyramidal neurons after LTP. J Neurosci. 2008;28:8635–43. 10.1523/jneurosci.1411-08.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Huang Z, Walker MC, Shah MM. Loss of dendritic HCN1 subunits enhances cortical excitability and epileptogenesis. J Neurosci. 2009;29:10979–88. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1531-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Athilingam JC, Ben-Shalom R, Keeshen CM, Sohal VS, Bender KJ. Serotonin enhances excitability and gamma frequency temporal integration in mouse prefrontal fast-spiking interneurons. eLife. 2017;6:e31991. 10.7554/eLife.31991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hartung J, Schroeder A, Péréz Vázquez RA, Poorthuis RB, Letzkus JJ. Layer 1 NDNF interneurons are specialized top-down master regulators of cortical circuits. Cell Rep. 2024;43:114212. 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Naumann LB, Hertäg L, Müller J, Letzkus JJ, Sprekeler H. Layer-specific control of inhibition by NDNF interneurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2025;122:e2408966122. 10.1073/pnas.2408966122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 28.Webster JF, Vroman R, Beerens S, Sakata S, Wozny C. Y <>Smith editor. 2021 NDNF is selectively expressed by neocortical, but not habenular neurogliaform cells. Eur J Neurosci 53 3561–75 10.1111/ejn.15237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cruikshank SJ, Ahmed OJ, Stevens TR, Patrick SL, Gonzalez AN, Elmaleh M, et al. Thalamic control of layer 1 circuits in prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci. 2012;32:17813–23. 10.1523/jneurosci.3231-12.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ayzenshtat I, Karnani MM, Jackson J, Yuste R. Cortical control of spatial resolution by VIP+ interneurons. J Neurosci. 2016;36:11498–509. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1920-16.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Krabbe S, Paradiso E, d’Aquin S, Bitterman Y, Courtin J, Xu C, et al. Adaptive disinhibitory gating by VIP interneurons permits associative learning. Nat Neurosci. 2019;22:1834–43. 10.1038/s41593-019-0508-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Rothman JS, Silver RA. NeuroMatic: an integrated open-source software toolkit for acquisition, analysis and simulation of electrophysiological data. Front Neuroinf. 2018;12:14. 10.3389/fninf.2018.00014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 33.Lörincz A, Notomi T, Tamás G, Shigemoto R, Nusser Z. Polarized and compartment-dependent distribution of HCN1 in pyramidal cell dendrites. Nat Neurosci. 2002;5:1185–93. 10.1038/nn962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Roth FC, Hu H. An axon-specific expression of HCN channels catalyzes fast action potential signaling in GABAergic interneurons. Nat Commun. 2020;11:2248. 10.1038/s41467-020-15791-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Seo H, Seol M-J, Lee K. Differential expression of hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channel subunits during hippocampal development in the mouse. Mol Brain. 2015;8:13. 10.1186/s13041-015-0103-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Felix R, Sandoval A, Sánchez D, Gómora JC, Vega-Beltrán JLDL, Treviño CL, et al. ZD7288 inhibits low-threshold Ca2+ channel activity and regulates sperm function. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;311:187–92. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.09.197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wu X, Liao L, Liu X, Luo F, Yang T, Li C. Is ZD7288 a selective blocker of hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channel currents? Channels. 2012;6:438–42. 10.4161/chan.22209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chevaleyre V, Castillo PE. Assessing the role of Ih channels in synaptic transmission and mossy fiber LTP. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2002;99:9538–43. 10.1073/pnas.142213199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 39.Huang Z, Li G, Aguado C, Lujan R, Shah MM. HCN1 channels reduce the rate of exocytosis from a subset of cortical synaptic terminals. Sci Rep. 2017;7:40257. 10.1038/srep40257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lüscher C, Slesinger PA. Emerging roles for G protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels in health and disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010;11:301–15. 10.1038/nrn2834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zhao Y, Ung PM-U, Zahoránszky-Kőhalmi G, Zakharov AV, Martinez NJ, Simeonov A, et al. Identification of a G-protein-independent activator of GIRK channels. Cell Rep. 2020;31:107770. 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Shen W, Tian X, Day M, Ulrich S, Tkatch T, Nathanson NM, et al. Cholinergic modulation of Kir2 channels selectively elevates dendritic excitability in striatopallidal neurons. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10:1458–66. 10.1038/nn1972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Takigawa T, Alzheimer C. Interplay between activation of GIRK current and deactivation of Ih modifies Temporal integration of excitatory input in CA1 pyramidal cells. J Neurophysiol. 2003;89:2238–44. 10.1152/jn.00957.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ma J, Yao X-H, Fu Y, Yu Y-C. Development of layer 1 neurons in the mouse neocortex. Cereb Cortex. 2014;24:2604–18. 10.1093/cercor/bht114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Chini M, Hanganu-Opatz IL. Prefrontal cortex development in health and disease: lessons from rodents and humans. Trends Neurosci. 2021;44:227–40. 10.1016/j.tins.2020.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Semple BD, Blomgren K, Gimlin K, Ferriero DM, Noble-Haeusslein LJ. Brain development in rodents and humans: identifying benchmarks of maturation and vulnerability to injury across species. Prog Neurobiol. 2013;106–107:1–16. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary Material 1: Figure 1. EPSP input/output curves of mPFC L1b VIP interneurons. Input/output (I/O) curves recorded from L1b VIP interneurons following stimulation in L1b, 200 µm from the soma. (A) Slope of the I/O relationship in the presence of 20 µM ZD-7288. (B) EPSP amplitude I/O relationship in the presence of 20 µM ZD-7288 (n = 5 cells/5 animals). (C) Slope of the I/O relationship in the presence of 50 µM BaCl2. (D) EPSP amplitude I/O relationship in the presence of 50 µM BaCl2 (n = 6 cells/6 animals).
Supplementary Material 2: Figure 2. (A) Representative immunofluorescence images showing labeling for HCN2, tdTomato, and the merged signal. (B) Representative immunofluorescence images showing the negative control for the primary antibody, tdTomato, and the merged signal. Lines indicate layer boundaries. Inset shows a higher magnification view of the cells in the enclosed square. Scale bar = 50 µm.
Supplementary Material 3: Figure 3. Effect of 5 µM ZD-7288 on layer 1 VIP interneurons in the mPFC. (A) (i) Representative voltage responses to somatic current injections of -60, 20, and 40 pA. Summary graphs show (ii) resting membrane potential, (iii) input resistance, (iv) sag, (v) action potential firing frequency, and (vi) rheobase. (vii) Representative voltage responses to the same current injections, with summary graphs of (viii) action potential threshold, (ix) amplitude, (x) full width at half maximum, (xi) rise time, and (xii) decay time (n = 3). (B) Representative traces illustrating the effects of 5 µM ZD-7288 on sEPSP amplitude and frequency (right panels) (n = 4). (C) Summary graphs showing the effects of 5 µM ZD-7288 on mEPSC amplitude and frequency. (D) Representative traces showing the effects of 5 µM ZD-7288 on eEPSPs under (i) control conditions, (ii) picrotoxin, and (iii) picrotoxin + 5 µM ZD-7288. (iv) Summary graph of spike probability in the presence of 5 µM ZD-7288 (n = 2).
Supplementary Material 4: Figure 4. HCN1 expression in the mPFC and hippocampal CA1 at P35. (A) Representative images of HCN1 (green) and MAP2 (red) immunolabeling in mPFC layers 1 and 2/3, highlighting HCN1 signal in dendritic processes (yellow arrows). (B) Representative images of HCN1 (green) and MAP2 (red) immunolabeling in the hippocampal CA1 region. Scale bar, 20 µm.
Supplementary Material 5: Table 1. Electrophysiological characteristics of VIP interneurons before and after 20 µM ZD-7288 and 50 µM BaCl2 treatment.
Supplementary Material 6: Table 2. Electrophysiological characteristics of VIP interneurons before and after 5 µM ZD-7288 treatment.
Data Availability Statement
The data supporting this study’s findings are available from the corresponding author upon request.







