Skip to main content
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science logoLink to Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
. 2026 Mar 9;67(3):16. doi: 10.1167/iovs.67.3.16

Pro-Homeostatic Effects of Estrogen on Intraocular Pressure and the Trabecular Meshwork

Hannah A Youngblood 1,2, Jingwen Cai 2, Jason Sun 2, Ola A Elsayed 2, Hongfang Yu 2, Sylvia B Smith 2,3, Hongyan Xu 4, Louis R Pasquale 5, W Daniel Stamer 6, Yutao Liu 2,3,7,8,
PMCID: PMC12988677  PMID: 41800843

Abstract

Purpose

Elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) results from the dysregulation of aqueous humor outflow through the mechanoresponsive trabecular meshwork (TM). Evidence suggests that low estrogen (E2) and high TGFβ2 levels are risk factors for elevated IOP and primary open-angle glaucoma. We sought to examine whether E2 signaling is involved in TM regulation of IOP homeostasis.

Methods

IOP and central cornea thickness were measured in male and female Esr1/ mice and wild-type littermate controls from 3 to 12 months of age. Primary human TM cells (n = 10, 6 females and 4 males) were treated with TGFβ2 and/or E2 in the presence/absence of cyclic mechanical stretch (CMS) for 24 hours. Expression differences of 17 TGFβ2-responsive genes were assayed by quantitative RT-PCR.

Results

Higher IOP was observed in Esr1/ females compared to wild-type females (P < 0.05). Treatment with TGFβ2 and/or E2 significantly affected the expression of 10 genes (BMP1, CCN2, FST, GREM1, LAMC1, NFATC1, SERPINE1, SMAD2, SMAD3, and VCAN), with CMS exacerbating the effects of TGFβ2. The addition of E2 ameliorated the effects of TGFβ2 on two genes (NFATC1 and SMAD2) under static conditions and five genes (BMP1, FST, LAMC1, NFATC1, and SMAD2) under CMS.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that estrogen signaling promotes homeostatic TM regulation of IOP.

Keywords: glaucoma, intraocular pressure, aqueous humor outflow, trabecular meshwork, estrogen signaling


Glaucoma is characterized by the loss of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and optic nerve cupping.1 The only treatable risk factor for the main subtype, primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), is elevated intraocular pressure (IOP).2,3 IOP is maintained by the production and outflow of aqueous humor (AH).4,5 The predominant AH outflow pathway—the conventional pathway—comprises the trabecular meshwork (TM) and Schlemm's canal.68 The TM is the predominant regulator of AH outflow and IOP.9 IOP alterations are thought to be sensed by the TM cells as changes in mechanical stretch, allowing the TM cells to act as a homeostat for IOP.1012 In POAG, TM fibrosis, extracellular matrix (ECM) accumulation, and reduced outflow facility may lead to IOP dysregulation.9,10,1215

Among many pathways regulating IOP homeostasis, estrogen signaling may affect IOP regulation and glaucoma risk. First, we previously identified that many genes involved in hormone signaling and metabolism were responsive to cyclical mechanical stretch (CMS) of TM cells16 and that β-estradiol (E2) regulates several IOP-associated genes through ESR1.17 Second, the onset of menopause, a low estrogen state, increases IOP and glaucoma risk.1821 Third, an overall shorter fertility duration, hallmarked by late menarche or early menopause/ovariectomy, increases glaucoma risk.19,22,23 Fourth, hormone replacement therapy (HRT) among menopausal women decreases their IOP and glaucoma risk as compared to those without HRT.21,2430 Fifth, IOP is lower during hyperestrogenic phases of the menstrual cycle and pregnancy.18,3136 Sixth, genetic studies have identified associations between sequence variants in the estrogen signaling pathway and elevated IOP and glaucoma risk.3740 Seventh, aromatase knockout mice without the ability to convert testosterone to E2 had elevated IOP and RGC cell loss in female homozygous mice by 12 weeks of age.41 Eighth, estrogen receptors and metabolizing enzymes are expressed in multiple ocular tissues with neuroprotective effects.21,27,4246 These lines of evidence strongly support the role of estrogen receptor signaling in IOP regulation and in protection against POAG risk. However, the ability of E2 to counteract glaucomatous TM changes has not been explored.

We hypothesized that estrogen signaling regulates POAG- and IOP-related genes, promoting proper TM cell function, increasing AH outflow, and reducing IOP and POAG risk. Therefore, this project sought (1) to ascertain the effects of estrogen signaling loss in murine eyes and (2) to characterize the transcriptional effects of E2 on human TM (HTM) cells. Humans and mice have three estrogen receptors: estrogen receptor 1 (Esr1), estrogen receptor 2 (Esr2), and G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 (Gper1).47,48 Previously, we found that Esr1 regulates several IOP-associated genes.17 For this reason, we sought to determine the effects of Esr1 loss on ocular parameters related to glaucoma using Esr1 knockout mice.

We also explored whether estrogen treatment would restore normal TM processes in a cell culture model treated with TGFβ2. Exogenous overexpression of TGFβ2 may induce ocular hypertension (OHT) in mice and decrease outflow facility in perfused human, primate, and porcine anterior segments.4960 The observed IOP changes result from TGFβ2-induced TM changes, including altered ECM production and turnover, increased actin stress fiber formation and subsequent increased contractility, increased phagocytosis, reduced TM cell survivability, and an overall fibrotic stiffening of TM tissue.14,6166 TGFβ2 induces the expression of several ECM-related genes and proteins, including but not limited to those in Table 1.14,59,60,67 Therefore, this study assessed the ability of E2 to ameliorate glaucomatous changes induced by TGFβ2 treatment of HTM cells. Furthermore, HTM cell treatments were conducted with and without CMS to replicate what TM cells regularly experience as AH exits through the tissue.1012,14,6870

Table 1.

Genes and Proteins Responding to TGFβ2 in the Trabecular Meshwork

Name(s) Observed Changes Supporting Literature
α−Smooth muscle actin (αSMA, ACTA2) Increased gene and protein expression 65 , 108 , 115 123
β-Actin (F-actin, ACTB) Increased protein expression; formation of stress fibers and cross-linked actin networks (CLANs) 65 , 101 , 116 120 , 124 , 125
Bone morphogenetic protein 1 (BMP1) Increased gene expression; increased protein secretion and activity 126
Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF, CCN2) Increased gene and protein expression 120 , 127 134
CD44 Increased protein expression 135
Collagen type I α 1 chain (COL1A1) Increased gene and protein expression 65 , 101 , 108 , 118 121 , 136
Follistatin (FST) Increased gene and protein expression; increased protein secretion 137
Gremlin (GREM1) Increased gene and protein expression 138
Laminin Increased protein expression 115 , 139 , 140
Lysyl oxidase (LOX) Increased gene and protein expression; increased protein activity 134 , 141
Nuclear factor of activated T cells 1 (NFATC1/NFAT2/NFATc) Hypothetical activation (Personal correspondence with Donna Peters)
Plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1, SERPINE1) Increased gene and protein expression 60 , 101 , 108 , 127 , 128 , 131 , 142 144
SMAD2 Decreased gene expression; phosphorylation and nuclear localization of protein; increased protein activity 108 , 116 , 117 , 120 , 125 , 133 , 136 , 145
SMAD3 Decreased gene expression; phosphorylation and nuclear localization of protein; increased protein activity 108 , 116 , 117 , 120 , 130 , 133 , 136 , 145 , 146
Transglutaminase (TGM2) Increased gene and protein expression; increased protein expression 98 , 130
Thrombospondin 1 (TSP1, THBS1) Increased gene and protein expression 60 , 127 , 129
Tenascin C (TNC) Increased protein expression in response to constitutively active RhoA, a downstream target of TGFβ2 115
Versican (VCAN) Increased mRNA expression; differential expression of mRNA splice variants 147 , 148

Methods

Animals

All animal husbandry and experiments were conducted in accordance with the ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Vision and Ophthalmic Research, and the protocol was approved by the Augusta University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).

Heterozygote breeding pairs of B6N(Cg)-Esr1tm4.2Ksk/J obtained from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME, USA) were used to establish an Esr1/ colony. Exon 3 of the Esr1 gene has been deleted in these mice, leading to a truncated transcript with a premature stop codon.71 Mice were genotyped by PCR using primers (Supplementary Table S1) and the protocol established by the Jackson Laboratory. Measurements were conducted on both homozygous and heterozygous knockout mice. Wild-type littermates were used as controls.

Intraocular Pressure

IOP was assessed by applanation tonometry with an iCare TONOLAB tonometer (Colonial Medical Supply, Franconia, NH, USA). Mice were anesthetized before IOP measurements by placing them in an isoflurane chamber for 1 to 3 minutes until their breathing had slowed. Three measurements per eye were taken between 8:30 AM and 1 PM. The measurements for both eyes were averaged, so the data reported show the average for each individual mouse, where n = number of mice/group. IOP was assessed weekly or biweekly in Esr1/ mice and wild-type littermate control mice from 13 to 52 weeks of age (Supplementary Fig. S1). IOP measurements over 4 weeks were averaged to obtain a monthly mean (Supplementary Table S2). The experimenter was not masked to the genotype.

Tissue Histology

Following euthanasia by CO2 or isoflurane, eyes were immediately placed in Davidson's fixative or JB-4 fixatives. After >24 hours, the eyes in Davidson's fixative were moved to 70% EtOH. The eyes were then either embedded in JB-4 resin or taken to the Augusta University Electron Microscopy and Histology Core (RRID:SCR_026810) for paraffin embedding, sectioning, and hematoxylin and eosin staining. Sections were imaged with an ECHO Revolve 4K Hybrid Fluorescence Microscope (Echo, San Diego, CA, USA).

Optical Coherence Tomography

Iridocorneal angle and central corneal thickness (CCT) were assessed bilaterally by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) using a Bioptigen Envisu-R2200 System (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) in the Visual Function Assessment core at Augusta University (RRID:SCR_027277). Assessments were performed at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of age. Mice were anesthetized with 100 mg/mL ketamine (NDC code 11695-0703-1; Covetrus, Portland, ME, USA) and 30 mg/cc xylazine (NDC code 59399-110-20) 10 µL/g. A rectangular scan of each eye was used to assess the openness of the iridocorneal angle. Iridocorneal angles were considered open if the angle was open for the majority of its circumference (i.e., angles with one or two small, isolated synechiae were not considered closed). Mice with consistently closed angles were excluded from IOP analyses. Corneal damage was assessed from a radial scan. Eyes with consistent damage (i.e., unresolved pits, ulcers, etc., within the pupillary axis that affected CCT measurements) were excluded (Supplementary Table S3). CCT was measured manually from the radial scan using the caliper function available on the Bioptigen software. When available, CCT values from the left and right eyes were averaged. The value from the undamaged cornea was used for mice with one damaged cornea. The experimenter was not masked to the genotype.

Cell Culture

Independent strains (n = 10) of primary HTM cells were derived, cultured, and validated from postmortem human cornea rims (n = 10 donors) acquired from the Eye Clinic at Augusta University Medical Center and the Eye Physicians and Surgeons of Augusta–The Eye Guys after corneal transplantation according to the established protocol in the consensus recommendations for TM cell isolation, characterization, and culture.72 The study was approved by the Augusta University Institutional Review Board, and the human tissue experiments complied with the guidelines of the ARVO Best Practices for Using Human Eye Tissue in Research (November 2021). Cells were obtained from male and female donors without glaucoma from different ages (Supplementary Table S4). When sex information was not available, cells were genotyped for SRY, a gene present only on the Y chromosome, using primers F-TCGAACTCTGGCACCTTTCA and R-TTCATGGGTCGCTTCACTCT (Supplementary Table S5). The presence of a 243-bp product indicated a male donor, and the absence indicated a female donor. After growing in regular TM media (i.e., low glucose [1 g/L] Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium [DMEM], 10%–20% fetal bovine serum [FBS], 1% penicillin/streptomycin, or 1% antibiotic/antimycotic), HTM cells (second to fourth passages) were cultured for >24 hours in estrogen-free media (i.e., phenol red–free DMEM) with 10% charcoal-stripped FBS before the treatment with 50 µM E2 (Cayman Chemical Company, Ann Arbor, MI) and/or 10 ng/mL TGFβ2 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) for 24 hours. The following groups were included: media-only control, DMSO vehicle control, 50 µM E2 only, 10 ng/mL TGFβ2 only, and 50 µM E2 with 10 ng/mL TGFβ2. For each cell strain (n = 9–10), treatments were performed simultaneously on cells cultured on standard plastic 6-well culture plates (stiffness: ∼1000 kPa) or on collagen I–coated BioFlex 6-well culture plates (stiffness: 930 kPa) subjected to CMS (15%, 1 cycle/s, 24 hours) on a Flexcell FX-6000T Tension System (Flexcell International Corporation, Burlington, NC, USA).

Quantitative Real-Time PCR

After 24 hours of treatment, total RNA was extracted using a miRNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) for a quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). An Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer and a High Sensitivity RNA 2000 Pico kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) were used to assess RNA quality and concentration, requiring a RNA Integrity Number (RIN) ≥5.8 for inclusion. RNA (100 ng) was converted to cDNA using a High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). Transcriptional differences of a panel of 17 TGFβ2-responsive genes (Table 2) were assessed by qRT-PCR using a StepOnePlus System (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) with a 10-µL reaction using iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) and 10 µM primers (Supplementary Table S5).

Table 2.

TGFβ2/Estradiol Treatment and Alteration of the Expression of Known TGFβ2-Responsive Genes

P Value
Gene Full Model Static Stretch Male Female
ACTA2 1.0E-03 4.5E-04 3.4E-02
BMP1 2.2E-07 4.1E-09 1.4E-10 1.7E-02 9.2E-05
CCN2 2.2E-02 1.9E-07 7.6E-06
CD44 1.2E-04 3.6E-03
COL1A1 1.9E-03
FST 4.9E-02 1.0E-02 5.2E-03 4.6E-02
GREM1 1.2E-10 9.4E-06 2.5E-09 1.6E-04 1.9E-06
LAMC1 1.4E-02 4.5E-02 4.4E-07
LOX
NFATC1 3.7E-04 8.6E-06 2.1E-06 2.0E-02 4.4E-02
SERPINE1 2.1E-06 7.5E-11 7.9E-06 3.0E-04 1.3E-03
SMAD2 2.2E-03 5.9E-04 7.5E-05 3.8E-02
SMAD3 1.0E-11 2.9E-11 3.1E-09 1.1E-02 2.4E-12
TGM2 2.0E-06
THBS1 3.6E-02 4.3E-05 1.8E-05
TNC 4.4E-02
VCAN 6.4E-03 8.3E-05 3.1E-05

A panel of TGFβ2-responsive genes was assayed for the significant impacts of treatment. Data were analyzed by a linear mixed-effects model using treatment, stretch, and/or sex as cofactors. The full model included all samples and all factors. Data were also stratified to examine the impacts of treatment under static and stretch conditions separately, as well as in female and male cells. P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.

Statistical Analysis

For all IOP data, a mixed-effects analysis, an alternative to two-way repeated-measures ANOVA, was performed using either genotype × age or sex × age as factors with Tukey multiple comparison correction. A mixed-effects analysis, an alternative to two-way repeated-measures ANOVA, was used for all OCT data using genotype × age as factors with Tukey multiple comparison correction. For qRT-PCR, the transcriptional effects of treatment, stretch, and/or sex of the cell donor were tested using a linear mixed-effects model based on gene Ct relative to ACTB Ct, with treatment, stretch, and sex as covariates as specified in R.4.4.1 with the lme4 package. For post hoc testing, the ΔΔCt method was used to calculate fold change (2ΔΔCt), normalized to ACTB. A repeated-measures ANOVA was employed on 2ΔΔCt values using Tukey multiple comparison correction. All qRT-PCR comparisons were made to media-only controls. In all cases, differences were considered significant if P ≤ 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA), version 10.1.1.

Results

Intraocular Pressure Elevation in Female Esr1/ Mice

IOP was measured in female and male Esr1/ mice from 3 to 12 months of age (Supplementary Table S2). Female Esr1/ IOP trended higher than that of their wild-type littermates throughout their lifetime, with a larger separation between the two becoming more evident with advancing age (Fig. 1A). This difference was significant at 6 and 11 months of age (6-month-old Esr1+/+ 10.4 mm Hg, n = 21 vs. Esr1/ 11.2 mm Hg, n = 5, P = 0.028, 95% confidence interval [CI], −1.55 to −0.09; 11-month-old Esr1+/+ 9.9 mm Hg, n = 14 vs. Esr1/ 11.7 mm Hg, n = 3, P = 0.017, 95% CI, −3.19 to −0.43). Assessment of the iridocorneal angle did not show genotype-biased angle closure to obstruct the outflow (Fig. 1C). The IOP of female heterozygous Esr1+/− mice was similar to that of their wild-type littermates (Fig. 1A). Age was a significant factor (P < 0.0001), with female wild-type and Esr1+/− IOP decreasing with age. These time-dependent decreases were not observed for female Esr1/. Age was also a significant factor (P = 0.00020) for male mice, with wild-type males having significantly different IOP at 5 versus 12 months of age (11.4 mm Hg, n = 11 vs. 10.0 mm Hg, n = 11 P = 0.046, 95% CI, 0.03–2.70). However, no significant genotype-based difference (P > 0.05) was noted between male mice at any time point (n = 3–28) (Fig. 1B).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Intraocular pressure was influenced by Esr1 genotype and sex. (A, B) IOP was assessed in female and male mice from 3 to 12 months of age. IOP was significantly different between female wild-type and Esr1/ mice at 6 and 11 months of age. (A) Mixed-effects analysis as an alternative to two-way repeated-measures ANOVA, n = 3–28 group size/month; 6 months, *P ≤ 0.05, n = 21 and 5, 95% CI, −1.55 to −0.09; 11 months, *P ≤ 0.05, n = 14 and 3, 95% CI, −3.19 to −0.43. (B) Mixed-effects analysis as an alternative to two-way repeated-measures ANOVA, P > 0.05, n = 2–28 group size/month (sample size was insufficient for statistical analysis for 12-month-old Esr1/). (C) The openness of the angle of female Esr1+/+ and Esr1/ was assessed by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) histology and OCT. Whole-globe H&E images were from paraffin-embedded eyes (n = 5); angle H&E images were from JB-4–embedded eyes (n = 8), and all eyes (n = 30–38) were examined by OCT. AS, anterior segment; CB, ciliary body; CC, collector channel; ONH, optic nerve head; SC, Schlemm's canal. (DF) There were significant sex differences in IOP in wild-type mice at 6 months and in Esr1+/− mice at 7 and 8 months but not in Esr1/ mice. (D) Mixed-effects analysis as an alternative to two-way repeated-measures ANOVA, n = 12–28 group size/month; 6 months, *P ≤ 0.05, n = 21 and 27, 95% CI, 0.03–1.28. (E) Mixed-effects analysis as an alternative to two-way repeated-measures ANOVA, n = 3–20 group size/month; 7 months, *P ≤ 0.05, n = 11 and 18, 95% CI, 0.17–1.65; 8 months, *P ≤ 0.05, n = 11, 95% CI, 0.069–1.57. (F) Mixed-effects analysis as an alternative to two-way repeated-measures ANOVA, P > 0.05, n = 2–17 group size/month (sample size was insufficient for statistical analysis for 12-month-old Esr1/). (G, H) CCT was also assessed in female and male mice. (G) Mixed-effects analysis as an alternative to two-way repeated-measures ANOVA, P > 0.05, n = 3–25 group size/month. (H) Mixed-effects analysis as an alternative to two-way repeated-measures ANOVA, n = 5–26 group size/month; 6 months, *P ≤ 0.05, n = 24 and 12, 95% CI, −20.94 to −1.02. All data in Figure 1 are mean ± SEM. Only significant comparisons to wild-type or between sexes are shown.

For wild-type mice, the IOP of male mice trended higher than that of females, with male IOP becoming significantly higher than female IOP at 6 months of age (11.0 mm Hg, n = 27 vs. 10.4 mm Hg, n = 21, P = 0.041, 95% CI, 0.03–1.28) (Fig. 1D). Age was again a significant factor (P < 0.0001). Similarly, Esr1+/− male IOP trended higher than that of female mice with significant differences at 7 and 8 months of age (7-month-old male 11.0 mm Hg, n = 18 vs. female 10.1 mm Hg, n = 11, P = 0.018, 95% CI, 0.17–1.65; 8-month-old male 11.2 mm Hg, n = 11 vs. female 10.4 mm Hg, n = 11, P = 0.034, 95% CI, 0.07–1.57) (Fig. 1E). Age was a significant factor (P < 0.0001), with the interaction between sex and age also being significant (P = 0.0040). Unlike wild-type and Esr1+/− mice, female Esr1/ IOP trended higher than Esr1/ males after 8 months of age, although this difference never reached significance (Fig. 1F).

Because IOP measurements may be affected by CCT,3,4,6,7376 CCT was examined before and after the ages at which significant IOP differences were observed between female wild-type and Esr1/ mice. Multiple comparison testing did not show significant differences (P > 0.05) between different genotypes of female mice (Fig. 1G, Supplementary Table S3). Interestingly, male wild-type mice had a thinner CCT than male Esr1/ mice at 6 months of age (Esr1+/+ 87.6 ± 2.9 µm, n = 24; Esr1/ 98.5 ± 2.9 µm, n = 12; P = 0.028, 95% CI, −20.94 to −1.02) (Fig. 1H, Supplementary Table S3). However, this difference was not observed at other ages. Six-month-old wild-type males also had significantly thinner CCT than 9-month-old wild-type males (6 months 87.6 ± 2.9 µm, n = 24; 9 months 94.9 ± 2.6 µm, n = 19; P = 0.005, 95% CI, −18.33 to −3.67), suggesting that the significant CCT difference between wild-type and Esr1/ males may be due to outliers in the 6-month-old wild-type male cohort.

Transcriptional Response of Human Trabecular Meshwork Cells to In Vitro Estradiol and TGFβ2 Treatment

HTM cells (n = 10, 6 females and 4 males) were treated under both static and mechanical stretch conditions for 24 hours in the following groups: media-only control, DMSO vehicle control, 10 ng/mL TGFβ2 only, 50 µM E2 only, and 10 ng/mL TGFβ2 with 50 µM E2. qRT-PCR was used to examine whether E2 could mitigate the effects of TGFβ2 on a panel of 17 TGFβ2-responsive genes (Table 2).

Using a linear mixed-effects model with treatment, stretch conditions, and cell donor sex as covariates (i.e., full model), 10 genes (i.e., BMP1, CCN2, FST, GREM1, LAMC1, NFATC1, SERPINE1, SMAD2, SMAD3, and VCAN) were significantly altered (P 0.05) by one or more treatments (Table 2). Data were also stratified by static and stretch conditions as well as by donor sex to analyze the effects of treatment within each of those subpopulations separately. Fifteen genes (i.e., ACTA2, BMP1, CCN2, CD44, COL1A1, FST, GREM1, LAMC1, NFATC1, SERPINE1, SMAD2, SMAD3, TGM2, THBS1, and TNC) and 13 genes (i.e., ACTA2, BMP1, CCN2, CD44, FST, GREM1, LAMC1, NFATC1, SERPINE1, SMAD2, SMAD3, THBS1, and VCAN) were significantly altered (P 0.05) by treatment under static and stretch conditions, respectively (Table 2). Treatment significantly altered (P 0.05) eight genes (i.e., ACTA2, BMP1, GREM1, NFATC1, SERPINE1, SMAD3, THBS1, and VCAN) in female TM cells and seven genes (i.e., BMP1, FST, GREM1, NFATC1, SERPINE1, SMAD2, and SMAD3) in male cells (Table 2).

To distinguish the effects of the different treatments on the 10 genes identified by the full model, the expression data were analyzed by repeated-measures ANOVA, analyzing static and stretch conditions separately. Under static conditions, E2 significantly upregulated the expression of eight of the genes identified by the full model (i.e., BMP1, P = 0.0091; CCN2, P = 0.0030; FST, P = 0.044; GREM1, P = 0.0013; LAMC1, P = 0.0056; SERPINE1, P < 0.0001; SMAD2, P = 0.013; and SMAD3, P = 0.010) while TGFβ2 significantly downregulated three of the genes (i.e., NFATC1, P = 0.0005; SMAD2, P = 0.028; and SMAD3, P < 0.0001) (Fig. 2). The addition of E2 with TGFβ2 returned NFATC1 and SMAD2 to nonsignificance (P > 0.05) (Fig. 2Fig. 3). However, SMAD3 and CCN2 remained significantly downregulated (P < 0.0001) and upregulated (P = 0.026) relative to the media-only control, respectively.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Transcriptional response of human trabecular meshwork cells to in vitro estradiol and TGFβ2 treatment. The expression differences of the 10 genes identified by a linear mixed-effects model as being significantly impacted by treatment relative to media-only control were examined by repeated-measures ANOVA, n = 9−10, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. E2, estradiol; FC, fold-change.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Estradiol ameliorated TGFβ2 effects on human trabecular meshwork transcription under static conditions. Under static conditions, the addition of E2 with TGFβ2 ameliorated the effects of TGFβ2 on NFATC1 and SMAD2. Repeated-measures ANOVA, n = 9−10, *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001.

Under stretch conditions, E2 significantly upregulated BMP1 (P = 0.030) (Fig. 2) while TGFβ2 significantly upregulated SERPINE1 (P = 0.037) and downregulated seven genes (i.e., BMP1, P = 0.0019; FST, P = 0.014; GREM1, P = 0.00020; LAMC1, P = 0.030; NFATC1, P = 0.018; SMAD2, P = 0.0067; and SMAD3, P < 0.0001). The addition of E2 with TGFβ2 returned FST, LAMC1, NFATC1, and SMAD2 to nonsignificance (P > 0.05) (Fig. 2Fig. 4). Furthermore, the direction of expression change for BMP1 was reversed from downregulation in the TGFβ2-only treatment (P = 0.0019) to upregulation with the addition of E2 (P = 0.046) (Fig. 2Fig. 4). However, GREM1, SMAD3, and SERPINE1 remained significant (P = 0.017, 0.026, and 0.030, respectively) although the addition of E2 with TGFβ2 decreased the degree of significance for GREM1 and SMAD3.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Estradiol ameliorated TGFβ2 effects on human trabecular meshwork transcription under stretch conditions. Under stretch conditions, the addition of E2 with TGFβ2 reversed the effects of TGFβ2 on BMP1 and ameliorated its effects on FST, LAMC1, NFATC1, and SMAD2. Repeated-measures ANOVA, n = 9−10, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

Interacting Effects of Mechanical Stretch and TGFβ2/Estradiol in Human Trabecular Meshwork Cells

The effects of stretch/substrate on the 17 TGFβ2-responsive genes were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model with treatment, stretch, and donor sex as covariates. From this analysis, nine genes (i.e., BMP1, CCN2, CD44, FST, GREM1, LAMC1, NFATC1, SMAD2, and SMAD3) were significantly impacted (P 0.05) by stretch/substrate (Table 3). Data were also stratified by sex to determine the effects of stretch on male and female cells separately. Stretch/substrate significantly impacted (P 0.05) 12 genes (i.e., BMP1, CCN2, CD44, COL1A1, FST, GREM1, LAMC1, NFATC1, SMAD2, SMAD3, THBS1, and VCAN) in male cells and 11 of the same genes in female cells (i.e., BMP1, CCN2, CD44, COL1A1, FST, GREM1, LAMC1, NFATC1, SMAD2, SMAD3, and THBS1) (Table 3).

Table 3.

Mechanical Stretch and Expression of Known TGFβ2-Responsive Genes

P Value
Gene Full Model Male Female
BMP1 1.1E-15 1.0E-05 9.6E-11
CCN2 9.3E-07 1.1E-03 2.1E-04
CD44 2.5E-10 7.3E-06 2.1E-05
COL1A1 1.1E-02 1.8E-04
FST 9.05E-07 5.5E-08 2.6E-02
GREM1 8.8E-12 3.7E-05 3.4E-08
LAMC1 7.0E-05 7.7E-03 4.5E-03
NFATC1 6.3E-11 4.1E-03 1.5E-08
SMAD2 2.5E-06 7.2E-06 3.6E-02
SMAD3 3.0E-12 3.1E-05 1.1E-09
THBS1 2.9E-03 3.5E-13
VCAN 3.7E-03

A panel of TGFβ2-responsive genes was assayed for the significant impacts of stretch/substrate. Data were analyzed by a linear mixed-effects model using treatment, stretch, and/or sex as cofactors. The full model included all samples and all factors. Data were also stratified to examine the impacts of stretch/substrate in female and male cells separately. P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.

Furthermore, examining the effects of treatment separately under static and stretch conditions showed that the treatment with more significant effects (P ≤ 0.05) changed in response to the mechanical environment. Among the 17 genes of interest, more genes were significantly (P ≤ 0.05) altered by E2 under static conditions and by TGFβ2 under stretch conditions (Fig. 2Fig. 5A).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Mechanical stretch, but not sex, influenced transcriptional effects of TGFβ2 and estradiol. (A) Genes from the 17-gene panel significantly impacted by either TGFβ2 or E2 treatment under static and stretch conditions are shown. (B) Genes from the 17-gene panel significantly impacted by treatment in either male or female HTM cells are shown.

Sex-Biased Transcriptional Response of Known TGFβ2-Responsive Genes

The HTM cells used for treatment had been derived from six female and four male donors (Supplementary Table S4). The effects of sex on the 17 TGFβ2-responsive genes were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model with treatment, stretch, and donor sex as covariates. Only two genes (i.e., CD44, P = 0.039; SMAD3, P = 0.038) were significantly impacted by sex differences under the full model (Table 4). Data were also stratified to examine the effects of sex under static and stretch conditions separately. Only SMAD2 (P = 0.0029) was significantly affected by sex differences under static conditions, while three genes (i.e., CD44, P = 0.037; SMAD3, P = 0.045; THBS1, P = 0.048) were significantly affected by sex under stretch conditions. Furthermore, stretch impacted almost all the same genes in male and female cells (Table 4). Moreover, approximately the same number of genes were affected by treatment in male and female HTM cells (Table 4Fig. 5B).

Table 4.

Sex and the Expression of Known TGFβ2-Responsive Genes

P Value
Gene Full Model Static Stretch
CD44 3.9E-02 3.7E-02
SMAD2 2.9E-03
SMAD3 3.8E-02 4.5E-02
THBS1 4.8E-02

A panel of TGFβ2-responsive genes was assayed for the significant impacts of the sex of the cell donor. Data were analyzed by a linear mixed-effects model using treatment, stretch, and/or sex as cofactors. The full model included all samples and all factors. Data were also stratified to examine the impacts of sex differences under static and stretch conditions separately. P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.

Transcriptional Response of TGFβ Receptors to Estradiol Treatment

TGFBR1 expression was not significantly changed by E2 or TGFβ2 (Fig. 6). However, E2 significantly upregulated TGFBR2 (P = 0.017) under static conditions. On the other hand, TGFβ2 significantly downregulated (P < 0.0001) TGFBR2 under stretch conditions. The addition of E2 ameliorated this downregulation. Although TGFβ2 did not significantly alter the expression of TGFBR3 under static conditions, TGFβ2 significantly upregulated (P < 0.0001) TGFBR3 under stretch conditions. The addition of E2 did not mitigate this upregulation.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

TGFβ2/estradiol treatment affected the expression of TGFβ receptors. TGFBR1 was not significantly affected by E2, TGFβ2, or combined treatment under static or stretch conditions. TGFBR2 was significantly upregulated by E2 under static conditions and downregulated by TGFβ2 under stretch conditions. TGFBR3 was significantly downregulated by TGFβ2 under stretch conditions, even when combined with E2. Repeated-measures ANOVA, n = 9−10, *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ****P ≤ 0.0001.

Discussion

Previously, we showed that hormone signaling–related genes are responsive to CMS in TM cells16 and that ESR1 is a key upstream regulator of IOP-associated genes.17 In the current study, we show that loss of Esr1 elevates IOP in female mice at later ages. Furthermore, E2 may counteract the transcriptional effects of TGFβ2 in HTM cells in a CMS-influenced manner.

Effects of Estrogen Signaling Loss on Glaucoma-Related Ocular Parameters

Female Esr1/ mice had significantly higher IOP by ∼1 mm Hg than their wild-type littermates at 6 and 11 months of age, confirming the role of estrogen signaling in IOP regulation.20,21,25 While differences were not significant at all ages, Esr1/ IOP levels consistently trended higher than those of wild-type. Although 1 mm Hg is not large, POAG risks can increase by 15% with as little as a 1-mm Hg increase in baseline human IOP.37,77,78 The observed significant but modest IOP elevation due to Esr1 loss is consistent with the IOP changes (1.5–3 mm Hg) from the aromatase knockout mice and human-based studies during pregnancy, menopause, and estrogen supplementation.41,7982 Furthermore, POAG is a lifelong disease influenced by genetic and environmental factors, whose effects on the disease process are magnified with advanced aging.83,84 IOP elevation did not become significant until later ages, supporting the accumulative effect of chronic estrogen deprivation on IOP and POAG.82 Furthermore, only one estrogen receptor was examined. Potentially, the signaling pathways of the other estrogen receptors may also affect IOP.79

Wild-type and Esr1/ male IOP were not significantly different at any age, perhaps due to intrinsically low estrogen signaling levels in males. Because estrogen levels differ between males and females, and several studies have reported that males have a higher risk of glaucoma than females until menopause,8588 the IOPs of male and female mice were compared. The IOPs of wild-type and Esr1+/− males were significantly higher than those of females by ∼1 mm Hg at 6 and 7 to 8 months, respectively, with male IOP consistently trending higher even when not significant. This phenomenon was not observed in Esr1/ mice, with female IOP trending higher than male Esr1/ mice for most of their lifetime. These data suggest a role for ESR1 signaling in female IOP regulation that may explain previously observed sex-biased glaucoma risk.8588

Although CCT may affect IOP measurements, and estrogen-containing hormone replacement therapy affects CCT,26,76 the IOP increase observed in female Esr1/ mice did not appear to be mediated by estrogen-induced CCT changes. Therefore, the observed IOP elevation was not artifactual under the assumptions of rebound tonometry but may be due to the loss of estrogen signaling in AH outflow. Potential impacts on AH outflow require further study.

Mitigation of TGFβ2 Transcriptional Effects in Human Trabecular Meshwork Cells by Estradiol Treatment

Because female Esr1/ IOP was higher than that of wild-type females, we hypothesized that E2 plays a role in TM regulation of IOP homeostasis. We found that treating TM cells with E2 ameliorates TGFβ2-induced effects on genes previously shown to be TGFβ2-responsive. Several are involved in POAG-associated processes, such as ECM and cell adhesions,8992 suggesting that E2 plays a protective role in regulating these IOP- and POAG-related genes.

Interestingly, the TGFβ2-responsive genes in our qRT-PCR panel showed more pronounced TGFβ2 effects under CMS, suggesting that high IOP-induced increases in CMS may exacerbate TGFβ2’s impact through a positive feedback loop. In previous studies, CMS of TM cells has affected TGFβ signaling,93 TGFβ-relevant microRNAs, and the expression of long noncoding RNAs with sequence similarity to TGFβ receptor 2 and TGFβ receptor-associated protein 1.16 CMS induces HTM expression of another TGFβ family member, TGFβ1, leading to subsequent changes in ECM gene expression.94 Furthermore, CMS upregulated IL-6 expression in a TGFβ1-dependent manner.95 Together, this suggests an interaction between TGFβ signaling and mechanical stretch, whereby mechanical stretch could increase the effects of TGFβ signaling by increasing TGFβ1 expression. Moreover, IL-6, which is upregulated in TM cells by both TGFβ1 and CMS, can increase TGFβ1 promoter activity,96 suggesting a positive feedback mechanism for TGFβ signaling and CMS. Importantly, those findings pertained to TGFβ1, not TGFβ2, and the crosstalk between TGFβ2 and CMS in TM cells warrants further study. However, TGFβ2 and CMS affect many of the same genes and proteins,97102 potentially allowing for a double-dose effect.

While CMS alone could interact with TGFβ2 signaling, it is worth noting that our static treatments were conducted on plates with hard plastic bottoms (∼1000 kPa), whereas stretch treatments were conducted on plates with stretchable membrane bottoms (930 kPa). Substrate composition and stiffness are known to affect TM cell expression.103107 Interestingly, substrate stiffness and TGFβ2 signaling interact with softer substrates, reducing some effects of TGFβ2 and amplifying others.108,109 As a result, it is possible that the differences in culturing substrates could account for a portion of TGFβ2 effects being exacerbated under stretch conditions.

Surprisingly, response to treatment varied little between sexes, although we did not probe for individual treatments; rather, we examined the effects of treatment overall. The effects of mechanical stretch also had little difference between the sexes, and very few genes were significantly impacted by sex differences. This was surprising because previous studies have shown that higher titers of TGFβ2-loaded adenovirus 5 are required to induce sustained OHT in males than in females, suggesting that TM responsiveness to TGFβ2 differs between the sexes.110,111 However, Sugali et al.111 made this TGFβ2-induced OHT comparison between 3- and 5-month-old male mice and previously published data on 5- to 8-month-old mice.110 This is especially important because Sugali et al.111 observed that males had a larger IOP response to Ad5-TGFβ2 at 5 months than at 3 months, suggesting that age also affects the TGFβ2 response. Age was also an important factor for our mouse studies. Therefore, the apparent lack of sex differences in HTM cell response to treatment and mechanical stretch may be influenced by the older age of our female cell donors. Of our six female donors, age information was available for only four with ages of 18, 44, 54, and 56 years (Supplementary Table S4). Two of these were older than the average age at menopause in the United States (i.e., 52 years).112 Hormone changes associated with menopause could cause these cells to respond more similarly to male HTM, thereby confounding analysis of sex differences. However, no information on menopausal status, estrogen levels, or HRT use was available for the donors in this study, and due to the low sample size of cells with donor age information, we could not explore age as a factor.

Limitations

Although our study identifies a role for estrogen signaling in IOP regulation, it also has some limitations. First, the cell study had some limitations: cells were from nonglaucomatous donors, with incomplete demographic data in some cases, and most cells were from Caucasian donors, limiting the applicability of these results to other ethnicities with a higher risk and differing genetic basis of POAG.4,113 Second, our cell study was limited by a single, relatively short treatment time and higher E2 concentrations than physiological levels in the AH.17,114 Third, our cell culture experiments focused primarily on transcriptional studies with little information on translational or posttranslational changes. Although TGFβ2 has a range of transcriptional effects, several of the genes we examined in our TGFβ2-responsive gene panel are known to change their protein levels in response to TGFβ2. This could help explain why some of the genes in the panel did not show significant responses to TGFβ2 treatment. Fourth, the stretched TM cells were cultured on plates with stretchable membrane bottoms, whereas the statically treated TM cells were cultured on plates with hard plastic bottoms. Despite their similar stiffnesses (930 vs. 1000 kPa), substrate composition and stiffness could affect TM cell biology.103107 Fifth, our Esr1/ mouse model is not a tissue-specific knockout. Sixth, AH inflow and outflow dynamics with or without estrogen stimulation could be examined in the future. Despite these limitations, we have presented several lines of evidence suggesting the role of Esr1 signaling in IOP regulation and E2’s anti-TGFβ2 effect on TM cells.

Conclusions

For the first time, we have identified that loss of Esr1 elevates IOP in female mice and that 17β-estradiol ameliorates the transcriptional effects of TGFβ2 in HTM cells. Although the detailed mechanism remains to be elucidated, these results suggest that estrogen signaling plays a role in preserving IOP homeostasis by exerting antifibrotic effects on the TM. Importantly, because of its apparent antifibrotic activity in the TM, estrogen signaling could serve as a therapeutic target for POAG in both males and females.

Supplementary Material

Supplement 1
iovs-67-3-16_s001.pdf (250.2KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the donors for their ocular samples. This study would not be feasible without these precious samples.

Supported by The Glaucoma Foundation (LRP); the Glaucoma Research Foundation; the BrightFocus Foundation; National Institutes of Health grants R01EY023242, R21EY028671, R01EY022359, R01EY022359, R21EY033961, R01EY032960, R01EY032559, R01EY028608, P30EY005722, R01EY023287, R21NS057506, F31EY031973, F32EY036268, and P30EY031631; and an unrestricted challenge grant from Research to Prevent Blindness (LRP). Financial support from Fight for Sight is gratefully acknowledged.

Parts of this manuscript were presented at the 2022 ARVO Annual Meeting by Hannah A. Youngblood, at the 2022 ISER/BrightFocus Glaucoma Symposium by Hannah A. Youngblood, and at the 2023 ARVO Annual Meeting by Yutao Liu and Tarab Ajjan.

Disclosure: H.A. Youngblood, None; J. Cai, None; J. Sun, None; O.A. Elsayed, None; H. Yu, None; S.B. Smith, None; H. Xu, None; L.R. Pasquale, None; W.D. Stamer, None; Y. Liu, None

References

  • 1. Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, Cheng CY. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014; 121: 2081–2090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Weinreb RN, Aung T, Medeiros FA. The pathophysiology and treatment of glaucoma: a review. JAMA. 2014; 311: 1901–1911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Jonas JB, Aung T, Bourne RR, Bron AM, Ritch R, Panda-Jonas S. Glaucoma. Lancet. 2017; 390: 2183–2193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Liu Y, Allingham RR. Major review: molecular genetics of primary open-angle glaucoma. Exp Eye Res. 2017; 160: 62–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Stamer WD, Acott TS. Current understanding of conventional outflow dysfunction in glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012; 23: 135–143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Kotecha A, White E, Schlottmann PG, Garway-Heath DF. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers. Ophthalmology. 2010; 117: 730–737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Goel M, Picciani RG, Lee RK, Bhattacharya SK. Aqueous humor dynamics: a review. Open Ophthalmol J. 2010; 4: 52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Bill A. Editorial: the drainage of aqueous humor. Invest Ophthalmol. 1975; 14: 1–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Stamer WD. The cell and molecular biology of glaucoma: mechanisms in the conventional outflow pathway. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53: 2470–2472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Acott TS, Kelley MJ, Keller KE, et al.. Intraocular pressure homeostasis: maintaining balance in a high-pressure environment. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2014; 30: 94–101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Hirt J, Liton PB. Autophagy and mechanotransduction in outflow pathway cells. Exp Eye Res. 2017; 158: 146–153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Acott TS, Vranka JA, Keller KE, Raghunathan V, Kelley MJ. Normal and glaucomatous outflow regulation. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2021; 82: 100897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Tamm ER, Fuchshofer R. What increases outflow resistance in primary open-angle glaucoma? Surv Ophthalmol. 2007; 52(suppl 2): S101–S104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Stamer WD, Clark AF. The many faces of the trabecular meshwork cell. Exp Eye Res. 2017; 158: 112–123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Zhang X, Ognibene CM, Clark AF, Yorio T. Dexamethasone inhibition of trabecular meshwork cell phagocytosis and its modulation by glucocorticoid receptor beta. Exp Eye Res. 2007; 84: 275–284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Youngblood H, Cai J, Drewry MD, et al.. Expression of mRNAs, miRNAs, and lncRNAs in human trabecular meshwork cells upon mechanical stretch. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020; 61: 2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Youngblood HA, Parker E, Cai J, et al.. Identification of estrogen signaling in a prioritization study of intraocular pressure-associated genes. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22: 10288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Qureshi IA. Intraocular pressure: association with menstrual cycle, pregnancy and menopause in apparently healthy women. Chin J Physiol. 1995; 38: 229–234. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Hulsman CA, Westendorp IC, Ramrattan RS, et al.. Is open-angle glaucoma associated with early menopause? The Rotterdam Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2001; 154: 138–144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Vajaranant TS, Pasquale LR. Estrogen deficiency accelerates aging of the optic nerve. Menopause. 2012; 19: 942–947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Patel P, Harris A, Toris C, et al.. Effects of sex hormones on ocular blood flow and intraocular pressure in primary open-angle glaucoma: a review. J Glaucoma. 2018; 27: 1037–1041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Harris A, Harris M, Biller J, et al.. Aging affects the retrobulbar circulation differently in women and men. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000; 118: 1076–1080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Vajaranant TS, Grossardt BR, Maki PM, et al.. Risk of glaucoma after early bilateral oophorectomy. Menopause. 2014; 21: 391–398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Sator MO, Joura EA, Frigo P, et al.. Hormone replacement therapy and intraocular pressure. Maturitas. 1997; 28: 55–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Sator MO, Akramian J, Joura EA, et al.. Reduction of intraocular pressure in a glaucoma patient undergoing hormone replacement therapy. Maturitas. 1998; 29: 93–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Sorrentino C, Affinito P, Mattace Raso F, et al.. Effect of hormone replacement therapy on postmenopausal ocular function [in Italian]. Minerva Ginecol. 1998; 50: 19–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Lang Y, Lang N, Ben-Ami M, Garzozi H. The effects of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on the human eye. Harefuah. 2002; 141: 287–291, 313, 312. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Altintas O, Caglar Y, Yuksel N, Demirci A, Karabas L. The effects of menopause and hormone replacement therapy on quality and quantity of tear, intraocular pressure and ocular blood flow. Ophthalmologica. 2004; 218: 120–129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Uncu G, Avci R, Uncu Y, Kaymaz C, Develioğlu OJGE. The effects of different hormone replacement therapy regimens on tear function, intraocular pressure and lens opacity. 2006; 22: 501–505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Wojtowiec A, Wojtowiec P, Misiuk-Hojto M. The role of estrogen in the development of glacomatous optic neuropathy. Klin Oczna. 2016; 117: 275–277. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Phillips CI, Gore SM. Ocular hypotensive effect of late pregnancy with and without high blood pressure. Br J Ophthalmol. 1985; 69: 117–119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Green K, Phillips CI, Cheeks L, Slagle T. Aqueous humor flow rate and intraocular pressure during and after pregnancy. Ophthalmic Res. 1988; 20: 353–357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Weinreb RN, Lu A, Beeson C. Maternal corneal thickness during pregnancy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1988; 105: 258–260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Qureshi IA, Xi XR, Wu XD. Intraocular pressure trends in pregnancy and in the third trimester hypertensive patients. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1996; 75: 816–819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Yucel I, Akar ME, Dora B, Akar Y, Taskin O, Ozer HO. Effect of the menstrual cycle on standard achromatic and blue-on-yellow visual field analysis of women with migraine. Can J Ophthalmol. 2005; 40: 51–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Bahadir Kilavuzoglu AE, Cosar CB, Bildirici I, Cetin O, Ozbasli E. Estrogen- and progesterone-induced variation in corneal parameters according to hormonal status. Eye Contact Lens. 2018; 44(suppl 1): S179–S184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. de Voogd S, Wolfs RC, Jansonius NM, et al.. Estrogen receptors alpha and beta and the risk of open-angle glaucoma: the Rotterdam Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008; 126: 110–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Mabuchi F, Sakurada Y, Kashiwagi K, Yamagata Z, Iijima H, Tsukahara S. Estrogen receptor beta gene polymorphism and intraocular pressure elevation in female patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010; 149: 826–830.e821–822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Pasquale LR, Loomis SJ, Weinreb RN, et al.. Estrogen pathway polymorphisms in relation to primary open angle glaucoma: an analysis accounting for gender from the United States. Mol Vis. 2013; 19: 1471–1481. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Kosior-Jarecka E, Sagan M, Wróbel-Dudzińska D, et al.. Estrogen receptor gene polymorphisms and their influence on clinical status of Caucasian patients with primary open angle glaucoma. Ophthalmic Genet. 2019; 40: 323–328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Chen X, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Kam WR, Pasquale LR, Sullivan DA. Impact of aromatase absence on murine intraocular pressure and retinal ganglion cells. Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 3280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Ogueta SB, Schwartz SD, Yamashita CK, Farber DB. Estrogen receptor in the human eye: influence of gender and age on gene expression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999; 40: 1906–1911. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Suzuki T, Kinoshita Y, Tachibana M, et al.. Expression of sex steroid hormone receptors in human cornea. Curr Eye Res. 2001; 22: 28–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Rocha EM, Wickham LA, da Silveira LA, et al.. Identification of androgen receptor protein and 5alpha-reductase mRNA in human ocular tissues. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000; 84: 76–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Munaut C, Lambert V, Noel A, et al.. Presence of oestrogen receptor type beta in human retina. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001; 85: 877–882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Deschênes MC, Descovich D, Moreau M, et al.. Postmenopausal hormone therapy increases retinal blood flow and protects the retinal nerve fiber layer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010; 51: 2587–2600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Björnström L, Sjöberg M. Mechanisms of estrogen receptor signaling: convergence of genomic and nongenomic actions on target genes. Mol Endocrinol. 2005; 19: 833–842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Fuentes N, Silveyra P. Estrogen receptor signaling mechanisms. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol. 2019; 116: 135–170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Tripathi RC, Li J, Chan WF, Tripathi BJ. Aqueous humor in glaucomatous eyes contains an increased level of TGF-beta 2. Exp Eye Res. 1994; 59: 723–727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Inatani M, Tanihara H, Katsuta H, Honjo M, Kido N, Honda Y. Transforming growth factor-beta 2 levels in aqueous humor of glaucomatous eyes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2001; 239: 109–113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Picht G, Welge-Luessen U, Grehn F, Lütjen-Drecoll E. Transforming growth factor beta 2 levels in the aqueous humor in different types of glaucoma and the relation to filtering bleb development. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2001; 239: 199–207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Ochiai Y, Ochiai H. Higher concentration of transforming growth factor-beta in aqueous humor of glaucomatous eyes and diabetic eyes. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2002; 46: 249–253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Ozcan AA, Ozdemir N, Canataroglu A. The aqueous levels of TGF-beta2 in patients with glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol. 2004; 25: 19–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Gottanka J, Chan D, Eichhorn M, Lütjen-Drecoll E, Ethier CR. Effects of TGF-beta2 in perfused human eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004; 45: 153–158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Bhattacharya SK, Gabelt BT, Ruiz J, Picciani R, Kaufman PL. Cochlin expression in anterior segment organ culture models after TGFbeta2 treatment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009; 50: 551–559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Kasetti RB, Maddineni P, Kodati B, Nagarajan B, Yacoub S. Astragaloside IV attenuates ocular hypertension in a mouse model of TGFβ2 induced primary open angle glaucoma. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22: 12508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Shepard AR, Millar JC, Pang IH, Jacobson N, Wang WH, Clark AF. Adenoviral gene transfer of active human transforming growth factor-{beta}2 elevates intraocular pressure and reduces outflow facility in rodent eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010; 51: 2067–2076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. McDowell CM, Tebow HE, Wordinger RJ, Clark AF. Smad3 is necessary for transforming growth factor-beta2 induced ocular hypertension in mice. Exp Eye Res. 2013; 116: 419–423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Lütjen-Drecoll E. Morphological changes in glaucomatous eyes and the role of TGFbeta2 for the pathogenesis of the disease. Exp Eye Res. 2005; 81: 1–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Fleenor DL, Shepard AR, Hellberg PE, Jacobson N, Pang IH, Clark AF. TGFbeta2-induced changes in human trabecular meshwork: implications for intraocular pressure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006; 47: 226–234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Cao H, Mok A, Miskie B, Hegele RA. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms of the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 5 (PCSK5) gene. J Hum Genet. 2001; 46: 730–732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Cao Y, Wei H, Pfaffl MW, Da B. Effect of transforming growth factor beta 2 on phagocytosis in cultured bovine trabecular meshwork cells. Ophthalmologe. 2003; 100: 535–538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Fuchshofer R, Tamm ER. The role of TGF-β in the pathogenesis of primary open-angle glaucoma. Cell Tissue Res. 2012; 347: 279–290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Tamm ER, Braunger BM, Fuchshofer R. Intraocular pressure and the mechanisms involved in resistance of the aqueous humor flow in the trabecular meshwork outflow pathways. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2015; 134: 301–314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Kalouche G, Beguier F, Bakria M, et al.. Activation of prostaglandin FP and EP2 receptors differently modulates myofibroblast transition in a model of adult primary human trabecular meshwork cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016; 57: 1816–1825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Wang J, Harris A, Prendes MA, et al.. Targeting transforming growth factor-beta signaling in primary open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2017; 26: 390–395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Agarwal R, Agarwal P. Future target molecules in antiglaucoma therapy: TGF-beta may have a role to play. Ophthalmic Res. 2010; 43: 1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Johnstone MA. The aqueous outflow system as a mechanical pump: evidence from examination of tissue and aqueous movement in human and non-human primates. J Glaucoma. 2004; 13: 421–438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Johnstone M, Martin E, Jamil A. Pulsatile flow into the aqueous veins: manifestations in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Exp Eye Res. 2011; 92: 318–327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Li P, Reif R, Zhi Z, et al.. Phase-sensitive optical coherence tomography characterization of pulse-induced trabecular meshwork displacement in ex vivo nonhuman primate eyes. J Biomed Opt. 2012; 17: 076026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Hewitt SC, Kissling GE, Fieselman KE, Jayes FL, Gerrish KE, Korach KS. Biological and biochemical consequences of global deletion of exon 3 from the ER alpha gene. Faseb J. 2010; 24: 4660–4667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Keller KE, Bhattacharya SK, Borras T, et al.. Consensus recommendations for trabecular meshwork cell isolation, characterization and culture. Exp Eye Res. 2018; 171: 164–173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Herndon LW, Weizer JS, Stinnett SS. Central corneal thickness as a risk factor for advanced glaucoma damage. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004; 122: 17–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Lee SS, Mackey DA. Glaucoma—risk factors and current challenges in the diagnosis of a leading cause of visual impairment. Maturitas. 2022; 163: 15–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, et al.. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002; 120: 714–720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. American Academy of Ophthalmology. Intraocular pressure and aqueous humor dynamics. In: Jick S, Beardsley T, Brasington C.. Basic and Clinical Science Course, Section 02: Fundamentals and Principles of Ophthalmology. 2019-2020. American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2019: 13–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Nemesure B, Honkanen R, Hennis A, Wu S, Leske MC; Group BES. Incident open-angle glaucoma and intraocular pressure. Ophthalmology. 2007; 114: 1810–1815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Khawaja AP, Cooke Bailey JN, Wareham NJ, et al.. Genome-wide analyses identify 68 new loci associated with intraocular pressure and improve risk prediction for primary open-angle glaucoma. Nat Genet. 2018; 50: 778–782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Youngblood H, Schoenlein PV, Pasquale LR, Stamer WD, Liu Y. Estrogen dysregulation, intraocular pressure, and glaucoma risk. Exp Eye Res. 2023; 237: 109725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Feola AJ, Sherwood JM, Pardue MT, Overby DR, Ethier CR. Age and menopause effects on ocular compliance and aqueous outflow. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020; 61: 16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Ebeigbe JA, Ebeigbe PN, Ighoroje AD. Intraocular pressure in pregnant and non-pregnant Nigerian women. Afr J Reprod Health. 2011; 15: 20–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Dewundara SS, Wiggs JL, Sullivan DA, Pasquale LR. Is estrogen a therapeutic target for glaucoma? Semin Ophthalmol. 2016; 31: 140–146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Han X, Gharahkhani P, Hamel AR, et al.. Large-scale multitrait genome-wide association analyses identify hundreds of glaucoma risk loci. Nat Genet. 2023; 55: 1116–1125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Kim J, Kang JH, Wiggs JL, et al.. Does age modify the relation between genetic predisposition to glaucoma and various glaucoma traits in the UK Biobank? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2025; 66: 57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Paterson GD, Miller SJ. Hormonal influence in simple glaucoma. A preliminary report. Br J Ophthalmol. 1963; 47: 129–137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Rudnicka AR, Mt-Isa S, Owen CG, Cook DG, Ashby D. Variations in primary open-angle glaucoma prevalence by age, gender, and race: a Bayesian meta-analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006; 47: 4254–4261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Doshi V, Ying-Lai M, Azen SP, Varma R. Sociodemographic, family history, and lifestyle risk factors for open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. The Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2008; 115: 639–647.e632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Budenz DL, Barton K, Whiteside-de Vos J, et al.. Prevalence of glaucoma in an urban West African population: the Tema Eye Survey. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013; 131: 651–658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Tumminia SJ, Mitton KP, Arora J, Zelenka P, Epstein DL, Russell P. Mechanical stretch alters the actin cytoskeletal network and signal transduction in human trabecular meshwork cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998; 39: 1361–1371. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Liton PB, Gonzalez P. Stress response of the trabecular meshwork. J Glaucoma. 2008; 17: 378–385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. WuDunn D. Mechanobiology of trabecular meshwork cells. Exp Eye Res. 2009; 88: 718–723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Lakk M, Križaj D. TRPV4-Rho signaling drives cytoskeletal and focal adhesion remodeling in trabecular meshwork cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2021; 320: C1013–C1030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Bu Q, Zhu H, Cao G, et al.. Targeting mechanics-induced trabecular meshwork dysfunction through YAP-TGFβ ameliorates high myopia-induced ocular hypertension. Exp Eye Res. 2024; 241: 109853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Liton PB, Liu X, Challa P, Epstein DL, Gonzalez P. Induction of TGF-beta1 in the trabecular meshwork under cyclic mechanical stress. J Cell Physiol. 2005; 205: 364–371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Liton PB, Luna C, Bodman M, Hong A, Epstein DL, Gonzalez P. Induction of IL-6 expression by mechanical stress in the trabecular meshwork. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005; 337: 1229–1236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Liton PB, Li G, Luna C, Gonzalez P, Epstein DL. Cross-talk between TGF-beta1 and IL-6 in human trabecular meshwork cells. Mol Vis. 2009; 15: 326–334. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Okada Y, Matsuo T, Ohtsuki H. Bovine trabecular cells produce TIMP-1 and MMP-2 in response to mechanical stretching. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1998; 42: 90–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Welge-Lüssen U, May CA, Lütjen-Drecoll E. Induction of tissue transglutaminase in the trabecular meshwork by TGF-beta1 and TGF-beta2. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000; 41: 2229–2238. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Chudgar SM, Deng P, Maddala R, Epstein DL, Rao PV. Regulation of connective tissue growth factor expression in the aqueous humor outflow pathway. Mol Vis. 2006; 12: 1117–1126. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Keller KE, Kelley MJ, Acott TS. Extracellular matrix gene alternative splicing by trabecular meshwork cells in response to mechanical stretching. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007; 48: 1164–1172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Han H, Kampik D, Grehn F, Schlunck G. TGF-β2-induced invadosomes in human trabecular meshwork cells. PLoS One. 2013; 8: e70595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Muralidharan AR, Maddala R, Skiba NP, Rao PV. Growth differentiation factor-15-induced contractile activity and extracellular matrix production in human trabecular meshwork cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016; 57: 6482–6495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Schlunck G, Han H, Wecker T, Kampik D, Meyer-ter-Vehn T, Grehn F. Substrate rigidity modulates cell matrix interactions and protein expression in human trabecular meshwork cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008; 49: 262–269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Raghunathan VK, Morgan JT, Dreier B, et al.. Role of substratum stiffness in modulating genes associated with extracellular matrix and mechanotransducers YAP and TAZ. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013; 54: 378–386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Thomasy SM, Morgan JT, Wood JA, Murphy CJ, Russell P. Substratum stiffness and latrunculin B modulate the gene expression of the mechanotransducers YAP and TAZ in human trabecular meshwork cells. Exp Eye Res. 2013; 113: 66–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Tie J, Chen D, Guo J, et al.. Transcriptome-wide study of the response of human trabecular meshwork cells to the substrate stiffness increase. J Cell Biochem. 2020; 121: 3112–3123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Dhamodaran K, Baidouri H, Nartey A, et al.. Endogenous expression of Notch pathway molecules in human trabecular meshwork cells. Exp Eye Res. 2022; 216: 108935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Han H, Wecker T, Grehn F, Schlunck G. Elasticity-dependent modulation of TGF-β responses in human trabecular meshwork cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52: 2889–2896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Li H, Henty-Ridilla JL, Bernstein AM, Ganapathy PS, Herberg S. TGFβ2 regulates human trabecular meshwork cell contractility via ERK and ROCK pathways with distinct signaling crosstalk dependent on the culture substrate. Curr Eye Res. 2022; 47: 1165–1178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Hernandez H, Roberts AL, McDowell CM. Nuclear factor-kappa beta signaling is required for transforming growth factor beta-2 induced ocular hypertension. Exp Eye Res. 2020; 191: 107920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Sugali CK, Rayana NP, Dai J, Peng M, Mao W. Age and sex affect TGFβ2-induced ocular hypertension in C57BL/6J mice. Exp Eye Res. 2022; 219: 109055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Reynolds RF, Obermeyer CM. Age at natural menopause in Spain and the United States: results from the DAMES project. Am J Hum Biol. 2005; 17: 331–340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Youngblood H, Hauser MA, Liu Y. Update on the genetics of primary open-angle glaucoma. Exp Eye Res. 2019; 188: 107795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Iqbal Z, Midgley JM, Watson DG. Determination of oestrone, 17alpha- and 17beta-oestradiol in bovine aqueous humor using gas chromatography-negative ion chemical ionization mass spectrometry. Arch Pharm Res. 1997; 20: 247–252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Pattabiraman PP, Rao PV. Mechanistic basis of Rho GTPase-induced extracellular matrix synthesis in trabecular meshwork cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2010; 298: C749–C763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Wecker T, Han H, Börner J, Grehn F, Schlunck G. Effects of TGF-β2 on cadherins and β-catenin in human trabecular meshwork cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013; 54: 6456–6462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Inoue-Mochita M, Inoue T, Kojima S, et al.. Interleukin-6-mediated trans-signaling inhibits transforming growth factor-β signaling in trabecular meshwork cells. J Biol Chem. 2018; 293: 10975–10984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Igarashi N, Honjo M, Aihara M. mTOR inhibitors potentially reduce TGF-β2-induced fibrogenic changes in trabecular meshwork cells. Sci Rep. 2021; 11: 14111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Nakamura N, Yamagishi R, Honjo M, Igarashi N, Shimizu S, Aihara M. Effects of topical TGF-β1, TGF-β2, ATX, and LPA on IOP elevation and regulation of the conventional aqueous humor outflow pathway. Mol Vis. 2021; 27: 61–77. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Rao VR, Stubbs EB Jr. TGF-β2 promotes oxidative stress in human trabecular meshwork cells by selectively enhancing NADPH oxidase 4 expression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2021; 62: 4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Watanabe M, Ida Y, Ohguro H, Ota C, Hikage F. Establishment of appropriate glaucoma models using dexamethasone or TGFβ2 treated three-dimension (3D) cultured human trabecular meshwork (HTM) cells. Sci Rep. 2021; 11: 19369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Watanabe M, Ida Y, Ohguro H, Ota C, Hikage F. Diverse effects of pan-ROCK and ROCK2 inhibitors on 2 D and 3D cultured human trabecular meshwork (HTM) cells treated with TGFβ2. Sci Rep. 2021; 11: 15286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Buffault J, Brignole-Baudouin F, Reboussin É, et al.. The dual effect of rho-kinase inhibition on trabecular meshwork cells cytoskeleton and extracellular matrix in an in vitro model of glaucoma. J Clin Med. 2022; 11: 1001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. O'Reilly S, Pollock N, Currie L, Paraoan L, Clark AF, Grierson I. Inducers of cross-linked actin networks in trabecular meshwork cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52: 7316–7324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Inoue-Mochita M, Inoue T, Fujimoto T, et al.. p38 MAP kinase inhibitor suppresses transforming growth factor-β2-induced type 1 collagen production in trabecular meshwork cells. PLoS One. 2015; 10: e0120774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Tovar-Vidales T, Fitzgerald AM, Clark AF, Wordinger RJ. Transforming growth factor-β2 induces expression of biologically active bone morphogenetic protein-1 in human trabecular meshwork cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013; 54: 4741–4748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Fuchshofer R, Yu AH, Welge-Lüssen U, Tamm ER. Bone morphogenetic protein-7 is an antagonist of transforming growth factor-beta2 in human trabecular meshwork cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007; 48: 715–726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Junglas B, Yu AH, Welge-Lüssen U, Tamm ER, Fuchshofer R. Connective tissue growth factor induces extracellular matrix deposition in human trabecular meshwork cells. Exp Eye Res. 2009; 88: 1065–1075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Bollinger KE, Crabb JS, Yuan X, Putliwala T, Clark AF, Crabb JW. Quantitative proteomics: TGFβ₂ signaling in trabecular meshwork cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52: 8287–8294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Tovar-Vidales T, Clark AF, Wordinger RJ. Transforming growth factor-beta2 utilizes the canonical Smad-signaling pathway to regulate tissue transglutaminase expression in human trabecular meshwork cells. Exp Eye Res. 2011; 93: 442–451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Swaminathan SS, Oh DJ, Kang MH, Shepard AR, Pang IH, Rhee DJ. TGF-β2-mediated ocular hypertension is attenuated in SPARC-null mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014; 55: 4084–4097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Vranka JA, Kelley MJ, Acott TS, Keller KE. Extracellular matrix in the trabecular meshwork: intraocular pressure regulation and dysregulation in glaucoma. Exp Eye Res. 2015; 133: 112–125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Rao VR, Lautz JD, Kaja S, Foecking EM, Lukács E, Stubbs EB Jr. Mitochondrial-targeted antioxidants attenuate TGF-β2 signaling in human trabecular meshwork cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019; 60: 3613–3624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Yemanyi F, Vranka J, Raghunathan VK. Glucocorticoid-induced cell-derived matrix modulates transforming growth factor β2 signaling in human trabecular meshwork cells. Sci Rep. 2020; 10: 15641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Dillinger AE, Guter M, Froemel F, et al.. Intracameral delivery of layer-by-layer coated siRNA nanoparticles for glaucoma therapy. Small. 2018; 14: e1803239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Fujimoto T, Inoue-Mochita M, Iraha S, Tanihara H, Inoue T. Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) inhibits transforming growth factor-beta 2-induced increases in aqueous humor outflow resistance. J Biol Chem. 2021; 297: 101070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Fitzgerald AM, Benz C, Clark AF, Wordinger RJ. The effects of transforming growth factor-β2 on the expression of follistatin and activin A in normal and glaucomatous human trabecular meshwork cells and tissues. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53: 7358–7369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Sethi A, Jain A, Zode GS, Wordinger RJ, Clark AF. Role of TGFbeta/Smad signaling in gremlin induction of human trabecular meshwork extracellular matrix proteins. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52: 5251–5259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Fan Y, Guo L, Wei J, Chen J, Sun H, Guo T. Effects of salidroside on trabecular meshwork cell extracellular matrix expression and mouse intraocular pressure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019; 60: 2072–2082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Fan Y, Wei J, Guo L, et al.. Osthole reduces mouse IOP associated with ameliorating extracellular matrix expression of trabecular meshwork cell. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020; 61: 38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Sethi A, Mao W, Wordinger RJ, Clark AF. Transforming growth factor-beta induces extracellular matrix protein cross-linking lysyl oxidase (LOX) genes in human trabecular meshwork cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52: 5240–5250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Fuchshofer R, Welge-Lussen U, Lütjen-Drecoll E. The effect of TGF-beta2 on human trabecular meshwork extracellular proteolytic system. Exp Eye Res. 2003; 77: 757–765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143. Bachmann B, Birke M, Kook D, Eichhorn M, Lütjen-Drecoll E. Ultrastructural and biochemical evaluation of the porcine anterior chamber perfusion model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006; 47: 2011–2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Mody AA, Wordinger RJ, Clark AF. Role of ID proteins in BMP4 inhibition of profibrotic effects of TGF-β2 in human TM cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017; 58: 849–859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Razali N, Agarwal R, Agarwal P, Froemming GRA, Tripathy M, Ismail NM. IOP lowering effect of topical trans-resveratrol involves adenosine receptors and TGF-β2 signaling pathways. Eur J Pharmacol. 2018; 838: 1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146. Kang MH, Oh DJ, Kang JH, Rhee DJ. Regulation of SPARC by transforming growth factor β2 in human trabecular meshwork. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013; 54: 2523–2532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147. Zhao X, Ramsey KE, Stephan DA, Russell P. Gene and protein expression changes in human trabecular meshwork cells treated with transforming growth factor-beta. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004; 45: 4023–4034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148. Zhao X, Russell P. Versican splice variants in human trabecular meshwork and ciliary muscle. Mol Vis. 2005; 11: 603–608. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement 1
iovs-67-3-16_s001.pdf (250.2KB, pdf)

Articles from Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science are provided here courtesy of Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology

RESOURCES