Abstract
Nuclear medicine has undergone remarkable advances in recent decades. Among these, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) has become a key imaging modality, enabling metabolic assessment of tissues and precise anatomical correlation, thereby improving diagnostic accuracy.
We present the case of a 64-year-old woman with fever, pain, and a deteriorated general condition, initially suspected of having a hip prosthesis infection. FDG-PET/CT imaging played a pivotal role in suggesting the diagnosis of spondylodiscitis. We also discuss the relevance of this modality, its broad range of current clinical applications, and its specific utility in diagnosing and managing spinal infections.
Keywords: 18f fdg-pet/ct, clinical case report, nuclear medicine imaging, spinal instrumentation surgery, spondylodiscitis
Introduction
Nuclear medicine imaging has become an essential tool in modern medical practice. Among these techniques, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) employs a radiotracer to delineate metabolic activity across different body regions [1]. The radiotracer used, fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), is a glucose analog that accumulates in tissues with increased cellular metabolism, such as those affected by oncologic, infectious, or inflammatory processes [2].
The first study using FDG was published in 1976 [3], demonstrating physiologic uptake in organs such as the brain, heart, and urinary bladder [4,5]. Since then, the technique has evolved and now has extensive clinical applications, including metastatic disease assessment, fever of unknown origin, and autoimmune or vasculitic processes [6]. FDG offers high sensitivity, high-resolution imaging, and minimal adverse effects [7].
Spondylodiscitis, an infectious process involving the intervertebral disc and adjacent vertebral endplates [8], can result from hematogenous spread or direct inoculation, often as a postoperative complication. It is a diagnostic challenge because it presents with nonspecific, slowly progressive symptoms such as back pain, often without fever or marked laboratory abnormalities. Diagnosis is further complicated by delayed or inconclusive imaging findings and frequent confounders such as degenerative changes, malignancy, or postoperative alterations. The most common pathogens are Staphylococcus aureus, Gram-negative bacilli, and streptococci, though Brucella and Mycobacterium tuberculosis have also been reported [9,10].
While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the gold standard for diagnosis, FDG-PET/CT is particularly useful when MRI findings are inconclusive due to metallic artifacts, postoperative changes, or difficulty differentiating degenerative from infectious processes. Additionally, PET/CT allows whole-body assessment, facilitating detection of multifocal infection and alternative infectious foci [11]. Our objective with this case report is to demonstrate its use in a case with the aforementioned limitations and show its impact on clinical decision-making.
Case presentation
A 64-year-old woman with a medical history of cervical cancer, lumbar arthrodesis with parallel rods from L2 to S1 (2021), and total right hip replacement following a fracture (2022) presented to the emergency department with joint pain, fever, functional limitation, and general malaise. Laboratory tests revealed elevated C-reactive protein and thrombocytosis, without leukocytosis.
An acute prosthetic joint infection was initially suspected, and empirical vancomycin therapy was initiated, with partial clinical improvement. Hip arthrocentesis yielded negative aerobic and anaerobic cultures. An MRI was performed at the referring institution and was described in the referral documentation as showing nonspecific postoperative and degenerative changes, without definitive signs of infection. As our institution functions as a regional reference center for diagnostic imaging, we did not have direct access to the MRI images or the full report, which precluded their inclusion in this case report.
Due to persistently elevated inflammatory markers and uncertainty about the infectious focus, FDG-PET/CT was performed to distinguish between a delayed prosthetic joint infection and a spinal implant-related process. The scan (Figure 1) revealed retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy in the interaortocaval and retroaortic regions, which was interpreted as most likely reactive in accordance with the other findings (SUVmax: 4.9). Partial fusion changes were noted at L4-L5, with L4-over-L5 spondylolisthesis, likely inflammatory (SUVmax: 4.4). Intense hypermetabolism was observed at the inferior endplate of L5 and the superior endplate of S1, with associated sclerotic and erosive changes and extension into the anterior soft tissues. These findings are suggestive of spondylodiscitis at the L5-S1 level, with extension into the adjacent soft tissues and probable associated osteomyelitis.
Figure 1. (a) Sagittal CT of the lumbosacral spine showing partial L4–L5 fusion (red arrowhead), and sclerotic/erosive changes at L5–S1 (blue arrowhead). (b) Sagittal 18F-FDG PET/CT showing intense hypermetabolism corresponding to the L5-S1 CT changes (yellow arrowhead), extending into the anterior soft tissues.
Increased peri-prosthetic FDG uptake surrounding the right hip replacement (Figure 2) was interpreted as inflammatory rather than infectious in nature (SUVmax: 4.2). No validated SUV cutoff exists to reliably distinguish infection from inflammation; therefore, interpretation was based on uptake pattern, distribution, and correlation with CT findings and clinical context, which in this case favored an inflammatory process. The complete report was communicated to the treating team for further management planning.
Figure 2. (a) Axial CT of the pelvis showing the right hip prosthesis (green arrowheads). (b) Axial 18F-FDG PET showing increased uptake around the prosthesis (orange arrowheads), consistent with inflammatory rather than infectious activity.
Discussion
Given the patient’s symptoms, an initial diagnosis of prosthetic hip infection was reasonable. However, subsequent imaging clarified that the pathology was spinal in origin. This presentation, fever, malaise, and elevated inflammatory markers, is typical of spondylodiscitis, although its nonspecificity often delays diagnosis [12].
Imaging is essential to confirm the diagnosis. MRI remains the first-line modality for its high sensitivity and specificity, yet its role in follow-up is limited, and results may be inconclusive in some cases, like metal instrumentation or multifocal infection [13]. FDG-PET/CT provides superior differentiation between degenerative and infectious/inflammatory processes and is valuable for monitoring disease progression [14,15].
Treatment typically begins with aggressive intravenous antibiotic therapy [16]. Surgical intervention may be warranted in cases of neurological compromise, abscess formation, or significant structural damage [17]. Minimally invasive or endoscopic approaches have also shown promising results [18].
Despite its diagnostic utility, FDG-PET/CT remains underutilized in many regions, particularly in Latin America [19]. Beyond bacterial infections, this modality can detect inflammatory activity associated with viral or mycobacterial infections [20]. The development of cost-effective systems may help expand its accessibility in resource-limited settings.
Conclusions
Spondylodiscitis poses a considerable diagnostic challenge due to its nonspecific clinical presentation. MRI remains the first-line imaging modality for suspected spondylodiscitis. In cases like this one, where conventional imaging is limited by extensive spinal instrumentation and confounded by potential distractors such as a hip prosthesis, FDG-PET/CT proves to be an invaluable diagnostic tool. Its value extends beyond spinal infections, as it is also highly effective in evaluating prosthetic and other musculoskeletal infections.
The unique ability of FDG-PET/CT to differentiate active infection, assess disease extent, and monitor treatment response underscores its expanding role in precision medicine. Expanding access to this technology should be an important technological advancement priority, particularly in developing healthcare systems that strive for better precision in testing.
Disclosures
Human subjects: Informed consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study.
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:
Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.
Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.
Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Author Contributions
Concept and design: Ernesto Balmaceda Araya, Valeria Armani Arce, Akira Osawa Pivovarov, David Gutierrez Albenda, Álvaro Montoya Porras
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Ernesto Balmaceda Araya, Valeria Armani Arce, Akira Osawa Pivovarov, David Gutierrez Albenda, Álvaro Montoya Porras
Drafting of the manuscript: Ernesto Balmaceda Araya, Valeria Armani Arce, Akira Osawa Pivovarov, David Gutierrez Albenda, Álvaro Montoya Porras
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Ernesto Balmaceda Araya, Valeria Armani Arce, Akira Osawa Pivovarov, David Gutierrez Albenda, Álvaro Montoya Porras
Supervision: David Gutierrez Albenda
References
- 1.The basic principles of FDG-PET/CT imaging. Basu S, Hess S, Nielsen Braad PE, Olsen BB, Inglev S, Høilund-Carlsen PF. PET Clin. 2014;9:355-70, v. doi: 10.1016/j.cpet.2014.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.FDG PET scans in cancer care. Litt HK, Kwon DH, Velazquez AI. JAMA Oncol. 2023;9:1304. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.0265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Historic images in nuclear medicine: 1976: the first issue of clinical nuclear medicine and the first human FDG study. Hess S, Høilund-Carlsen PF, Alavi A. Clin Nucl Med. 2014;39:701–703. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000000487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Assessing the performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in bladder cancer: a narrative review of current evidence. Bacchiani M, Salamone V, Massaro E, et al. Cancers (Basel) 2023;15:2951. doi: 10.3390/cancers15112951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Thorax: normal and benign pathologic patterns in FDG-PET/CT imaging. Wachsmann JW, Gerbaudo VH. PET Clin. 2014;9:147–168. doi: 10.1016/j.cpet.2013.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Retrospective study on clinical value and optimal use of [(18)F] FDG PET/CT for inflammation of unknown origin in Japanese patients. Kobayashi T, Miyamori D, Ito M. Sci Rep. 2024;14:28197. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79794-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.FDG-PET/CT in infectious and inflammatory diseases. Hess S, Hansson SH, Pedersen KT, Basu S, Høilund-Carlsen PF. PET Clin. 2014;9:497-519, vi-vii. doi: 10.1016/j.cpet.2014.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Spondylodiscitis (Article in Spanish) Emilie S, Zeller V, Fautrel B, Aubry A. EMC - Tratado de Medicina. 2016;20:1–10. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pathology of the spine: nontuberculous infectious spondylodiscitis (Article in Spanish) Couderc M, Tournadre A, Soubrier M, Dubost J-J. EMC - Aparato Locomotor. 2022;55:1–15. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Brucella spondylodiscitis. Sade R, Polat G, Ogul H, Kantarci M. Med Clin (Barc) 2017;149:234. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2016.10.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Role and applications of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the assessment of osteoarticular infection and inflammation - part I (Article in Spanish) Noriega-Álvarez E, Rodríguez Alfonso B, Rosales Castillo JJ, et al. Revista Española de Medicina Nuclear e Imagen Molecular. 2025;44:500073. doi: 10.1016/j.remnie.2024.500073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Spondylodiscitis: a diagnostic challenge. Altabás MA, Altabás MJ. Visual J Emerg Med. 2023;33:101824. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Imaging of spondylodiscitis: an update. Raghavan M, Palestro CJ. Semin Nucl Med. 2023;53:152–166. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2022.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Role of nuclear medicine in the diagnosis of musculoskeletal infection: a review. Noriega-Álvarez E, Domínguez Gadea L, Orduña Diez MP, Peiró Valgañón V, Sanz Viedma S, García Jiménez R. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed) 2019;38:397–407. doi: 10.1016/j.remn.2019.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.A comparison of the diagnostic value of MRI and (18)F-FDG-PET/CT in suspected spondylodiscitis. Smids C, Kouijzer IJ, Vos FJ, et al. Infection. 2017;45:41–49. doi: 10.1007/s15010-016-0914-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Outcomes of treatment for hematogenous Staphylococcus aureus vertebral osteomyelitis in the MRSA ERA. Livorsi DJ, Daver NG, Atmar RL, Shelburne SA, White AC Jr, Musher DM. J Infect. 2008;57:128–131. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2008.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Role of surgery in spontaneous spondylodiscitis: experience in 83 consecutive patients (Article in Spanish) Martín-Alonso J, Delgado-López PD, Castilla-Díez JM, et al. Neurocirugia (Engl Ed) 2018;29:64–78. doi: 10.1016/j.neucir.2017.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Endoscopic treatment of spondylodiscitis: systematic review. Abreu PG, Lourenço JA, Romero C, et al. Eur Spine J. 2022;31:1765–1774. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07142-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Should the nuclear medicine community continue to underestimate the potential of 18F-FDG-PET/CT with present generation scanners for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection? Kwee TC, Basu S, Alavi A. Nucl Med Commun. 2015;36:756–757. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Preclinical research highlighting contemporary targeting mechanisms of radiolabelled compounds for PET based infection imaging. Kleynhans J, Sathekge MM, Ebenhan T. Semin Nucl Med. 2023;53:630–643. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


