Skip to main content
European Heart Journal Open logoLink to European Heart Journal Open
. 2026 Feb 19;6(2):oeag030. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeag030

Trends and future projections of cancer prevalence in patients with cardiovascular admissions

Guia Ferrari Ardicini 1,2, Andrija Matetic 3,4, Evangelos Kontopantelis 5,6, Alaide Chieffo 7,8, Carmen Maria Moldovan 9, Zahra Raisi-Estabragh 10, Elad Asher 11, Christian Mallen 12, Mamas A Mamas 13,14,15,✉,2
Editor: Magnus Bäck
PMCID: PMC12989293  PMID: 41847688

Abstract

Aims

Patients with cancer have an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) events, although there is limited data on future trends in cancer prevalence amongst patients with an acute cardiovascular admission. The aim of this study was to evaluate trends in cancer prevalence among CV admissions with an attempt to predict future cancer and CV co-morbidity over the next 20 years.

Methods and results

The analysis included all hospital admissions with a primary CV diagnosis from the US National Inpatient Sample (NIS), from 2016 to 2020. The sample was stratified by specific CV admission and by cancer status and type. The chi-square and the Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to compare categorical and continuous data, respectively, across the years. A Poisson regression model was used to predict the prevalence of overall and specific cancer types through 2040, based on the 5-year baseline period. Among 4.79 million CV admissions from 2016 to 2020, there was a significant increase in cancer prevalence from 4.8% to 5.4% (P < 0.001). This upward trend was observed across all CV diagnoses. Predictive modelling estimates that cancer prevalence in CV inpatients will increase from a 4.8% baseline in 2016 to 11.9% by 2040, with the most pronounced rate of growth seen in liver (IRR 1.069; P < 0.001), breast (IRR 1.056; P < 0.001), and renal cancer (IRR 1.055; P < 0.001). Nevertheless, haematological and lung cancers show the highest prevalence, both at baseline and in 2040.

Conclusion

The prevalence of cancer among patients hospitalized with CV disease is predicted to increase 2.48-fold by 2040. This trend highlights the importance of integrated cardio-oncology and multidisciplinary care models.

Keywords: Cancer, Cardiovascular admissions, Trends

Graphical Abstract

Graphical Abstract.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Introduction

The overlap between cardiovascular (CV) disease and cancer poses a significant challenge to healthcare systems globally. CV disease and cancer are leading drivers of mortality worldwide,1 with a strong bidirectional relationship. Both CV disease and cancer potentially increase the risk of each other through shared risk factors, chronic disease burden, and common pathophysiological pathways.2 With innovative therapeutic options available, mortality in patients diagnosed with cancer has declined, yielding an increased number of cancer survivors,3 who are at increased risk of CV morbidity and mortality. Among cancer survivors, CV disease is the major cause of non-cancer death4 with CV mortality overtaking cancer mortality in the longer term.5

How this growing burden of CV disease in patients with cancer will evolve over the next few decades is unclear. Whilst the prevalence of cancer in patients with a primary CV diagnosis has been estimated to be in the order of ∼4.5%, with haematological malignancy and lung cancer being the most prevalent,6,7 there is a significant literature gap on their future projections. Understanding cancer prevalence and its trends among patients with CVD is therefore essential for proper healthcare planning, education and policy development.

Therefore, this study aimed to determine the baseline prevalence of cancer and its specific types in patients with acute cardiovascular admissions. Importantly, this analysis aimed to determine the future predictions and trends in cancer prevalences within this patient population over the next 20 years. Finally, we aimed to determine the association of cancer prevalence, patient characteristics and future trends across different specific cardiovascular admission causes.

Methods

Ethical and reporting considerations

This study was conducted using publicly available data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, which is de-identified and anonymized, ensuring compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). This provides exemption from approval by institutional boards or ethics committees. Moreover, the manuscript adheres to the Strengthening The Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines for reporting observational studies (see Supplementary material online, Table S1).

Setting, participants and data sources

The NIS database was developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) under the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP).8 It generates nationally representative estimates of inpatient utilization, access, charges, quality, and outcomes in the United States (US).8 The NIS contains anonymized discharge data from more than seven million hospitalizations yearly, representing the largest publicly available all-payer inpatient database in the US.

The analysis included all adult cases (≥18 years) with any primary cardiovascular (CV) admission, between January 2016 and December 2020, defined using the International Classification of Diseases—10th Edition (ICD-10) [Supplementary material online, Table S1]. The CV admissions were further categorized to focus on the most clinically relevant diagnoses that can be reliably ascertained from clinical coding systems into acute coronary syndrome (ACS), heart failure (HF), atrial fibrillation/flutter, other arrhythmias, hypertension and its complications (excluding heart failure), pulmonary embolism (PE), ischaemic stroke, haemorrhagic stroke, valve disorders, and other CV causes. Furthermore, the study sample was stratified by cancer status and further categorized by primary cancer site (based on ICD-10 codes): Breast cancer, colorectal cancer, renal/urinary cancer, liver cancer, haematological cancer, lung/bronchus cancer, prostate and male genital cancer, pancreatic cancer, female genital cancer, skin cancer, and gastroesophageal cancer. Cancer cases were also stratified by metastatic status. It should be noted that the NIS does not contain clinical information to differentiate active cancer from cancer in remission. In this study, cancer status was defined using ICD-10 C-codes, which reflect current or recent malignancy. Z-codes (personal history of malignancy) were not included.

Analyses were weighted by the discharge weights provided, following HCUP recommendations.8 The analysis was performed after exclusion of cases due to missing data, which accounted for 0.38% (n = 18 268) [Figure 1].

Figure 1.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Flow diagram.

Variables—study outcomes

First, this study aimed to determine the baseline prevalence of overall and specific cancers in patients with a CV admission. Second, the analysis included an assessment of demographic and clinical characteristics of cancer patients across the study period. Finally, using the baseline 5-year period, we aimed to establish future projections in the prevalence of all cause cancer and specific cancer types among different CV admissions over the next 20 years.

Statistical analysis

The statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS, version 29; IBM Corp, Armonk, NY) and Stata (version MP17, StataCorp, College Station, TX). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient demographic and clinical characteristics. Data were expressed as frequencies and percentages for categorical data and median (interquartile range) for continuous data. The Chi-squared test was used to compare categorical data across the years, whilst the Kruskal–Wallis test was used to compare continuous data. The Mantel–Haenszel test was used to assess linear temporal trends in the prevalence of cancer among CV admissions and in the prevalence of specific CV admissions between 2016 and 2020.

To estimate the future burden of cancer among patients hospitalized with a primary CV diagnosis, a predictive model was created. The models were based on data from 2016 to 2020. Predictions were made up to the year 2040. Different cancer subtypes were analysed separately, allowing independent estimation of trajectories for each malignancy. For each cancer group, a Poisson regression model was fitted with calendar year as a continuous predictor. Moreover, an exposure offset was incorporated into each model, to ensure relative incidence rates over time, instead of raw counts. Goodness-of-fit of the model was evaluated through the log-likelihood and pseudo R2, and standard errors were derived with the delta method. The projections were summarized using model-based incidence rate ratios (IRR) to describe relative temporal trends, along with 95% confidence intervals, using the delta method, which provides valid uncertainty quantification under standard maximum-likelihood theory. Statistical significance was defined by a P-value of <0.05.

Results

Baseline patient characteristics of cancer patients with a primary CV admission

The median age of the cohort ranged from 72 years in 2016 (IQR: 64, 81) to 73 years in 2020 (IQR: 64, 81), and there were fewer female patients within the cohort (44.0% in 2016 and 43.3% in 2020). Most patients had Caucasian ethnicity (75.7% in 2016 and 75.1% in 2020) [Table 1].

Table 1.

Baseline patient characteristics of patients with cancer undergoing cardiovascular admissions across study period

Characteristics Years P-value
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Primary CV admissions with cancer 44 063 46 732 48 530 51 579 45 512 <0.001
Age (years), median (IQR) 72 (64, 81) 73 (64, 81) 73 (64, 81) 73 (65, 81) 73 (64, 81) <0.001
Female sex, % 44.0 43.7 43.7 43.1 43.3 0.03
Weekend admission, % 20.9 21.2 21.7 21.6 20.6 <0.001
Primary expected payer, % <0.001
 Medicare 72.0 72.9 73.2 73.1 71.7
 Medicaid 6.8 6.8 6.5 6.6 6.8
 Private Insurance 17.9 17.2 16.9 16.7 17.5
 Self-pay 1.3 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.4
 No charge 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
 Other 2.0 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.6
Race, % <0.001
 White 75.7 75.1 74.6 74.7 75.1
 Black 13.9 14.1 14.2 14.3 14.2
 Hispanic 5.8 6.0 6.5 6.1 5.9
 Other 4.6 4.8 4.7 4.9 4.8
Median Household Income (percentile), % <0.001
 0–25th 27.7 26.9 26.0 27.3 26.6
 26th–50th 25.1 26.4 27.1 24.7 27.2
 51st–75th 24.7 24.3 24.7 25.5 23.8
 76th–100th 22.5 22.4 22.1 22.5 22.4
Homelessness, % 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 <0.001
Cardiogenic shock, % 1.5 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.3 <0.001
Cardiac arrest, % 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.8 0.305
Do-not-resuscitate, % 16.9 18.0 18.8 19.0 20.0 <0.001
Comorbidities, %
 Chronic pulmonary disease 25.7 25.9 26.2 26.5 25.5 0.002
 Chronic pancreatitis 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.017
 Peptic ulcer disease 1.0 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.1 0.140
 Inflammatory bowel disease 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.023
 Weight loss 9.7 11.2 13.1 13.5 13.3 <0.001
 HIV status 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.801
 Neurologic disorders 6.6 6.9 5.8 5.8 6.0 <0.001
 Psychoses 1.7 1.6 0.7 0.6 0.7 <0.001
Atrial fibrillation/flutter 35.9 36.3 37.2 37.3 35.9 <0.001
Dyslipidaemia 45.7 46.8 48.4 50.6 52.5 <0.001
Smoking 10.4 10.2 10.4 10.5 10.6 0.345
Previous stroke 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.6 8.9 <0.001
Previous AMI, PCI or CABG 21.0 20.9 20.9 20.9 20.0 <0.001
Anaemias 37.6 37.6 37.7 37.6 38.4 0.040
Fluid and electrolyte disorders 32.9 33.8 35.6 36.3 39.6 <0.001
Hypertension 74.0 76.2 77.2 78.5 78.8 <0.001
Peripheral artery disease 11.0 11.5 10.6 10.9 11.3 <0.001
Diabetes mellitus 18.2 13.0 12.2 11.6 11.0 <0.001
Coagulopathy 12.5 12.9 12.6 12.5 14.1 <0.001
Depression 10.9 11.0 11.3 11.5 11.7 <0.001
Dementia 5.7 5.9 5.6 5.5 5.8 0.060
Liver disease 4.0 4.3 4.5 4.8 5.2 <0.001
Chronic renal failure 27.4 28.6 29.6 31.1 31.2 <0.001
Valvular disease 3.2 3.0 2.7 2.8 2.7 <0.001
Alcohol or drug abuse 3.6 3.9 4.0 4.2 4.6 <0.001
Obesity 12.1 13.1 13.5 13.7 15.2 <0.001
Hypothyroidism 15.7 15.6 16.2 16.4 17.2 <0.001
Bed size of hospital, % <0.001
 Small 18.0 17.1 18.2 19.1 19.5
 Medium 28.2 28.3 28.4 28.3 27.1
 Large 53.9 54.6 53.4 52.5 53.4
Location/teaching status of hospital, % <0.001
 Metropolitan non-teaching 21.0 22.3 20.3 17.6 17.4
 Metropolitan teaching 70.1 69.6 71.8 74.6 74.9
 Non-metropolitan hospital 8.1 8.2 7.9 7.7 7.7
Hospitalization-related factors, median (IQR)
 Length of stay (days) 4 (2, 7) 4 (2, 7) 4 (2, 7) 4 (2, 7) 4 (2, 7) 0.171
 Total charges (USD) 36 508 (19,603, 72,130) 38 550 (20,765, 76,048) 41 030 (22,103, 81,139) 43 754 (23,687, 86,778) 47 900 (25,801, 95,408) <0.001

All analyses were weighted using the provided discharge weights as recommended by HCUP. The variables ‘HOSP_NIS’ and ‘NIS_Stratum’ were used for clustering and stratification of the data, respectively.

Abbreviations: CV—Cardiovscular; AIDS—Acquired Immuno-deficiency Syndrome; IQR—Interquartile Range; USD—United States Dollar.

Most patients had prevalent hypertension, with a statistically significant increase from 74.0% in 2016 to 78.8% in 2020 (P < 0.001). Dyslipidaemia was the second most prevalent, with a rise from 45.7% in 2016 to 52.5% in 2020 (P < 0.001). Prevalence of anaemias was also high, with a significant variation in frequency across the study period (37.6% in 2016 to 38.4% in 2020; P = 0.040). Atrial fibrillation/flutter remained relatively constant over time, with a prevalence of 35.9% in 2016, reaching a peak of 37.3% in 2019, and then going back to 35.9% in 2020 (P < 0.001). Chronic renal failure increased from 27.4% in 2016 to 31.2% in 2020 (P < 0.001), although some comorbidities, such as diabetes, exhibited a downward trend in prevalence over time (18.2% in 2016 and 11.0% in 2020; P < 0.001) [Table 1].

Distribution of specific cardiovascular admissions in the sample

Considering the total study population (both patients with cancer and without cancer), the most prevalent CV admission across the study period was HF, with a significant increase from 2016 (22.8%) to 2020 (26.0%), followed by ACS (17.2% in 2016, 15.8% in 2020) and ischaemic stroke (10.6% in 2016, 11.9% in 2020). Less frequent were atrial fibrillation/flutter (9.7% in 2016, 7.0% in 2020), other arrhythmias (4.3% in 2016, 4.4% in 2020), hypertension and complications (4.5% in 2016, 4.8% in 2020), PE (3.9% in 2016, 4.2% in 2020), haemorrhagic stroke (2.7% in 2016, 3.3% in 2020) and valve disorders (2.7% in 2016, 3.3% in 2020). ACS and atrial fibrillation/flutter both showed a decreasing trend across the 5-year period [Supplementary material online, Table S4 and Figure 2].

Figure 2.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Distribution of main cardiovascular admission causes across the study period.

The prevalence of cancer among patients with acute cardiovascular admissions (2016–2020)

The study included 4 793 050 patients hospitalized with a primary CV diagnosis, between 2016 and 2020. The prevalence of cancer increased significantly from 4.8% in 2016 to 5.4% in 2020 (P < 0.001) [Table 2 and Figure 3A]. Among patients admitted with an acute CV event, 1.4% had metastatic cancer in 2016, increasing to 1.7% in 2020 (P < 0.001) [Table 2, Figure 3A and Supplementary material online, Table S2]. In relative terms, the proportion of metastatic cases among all cancers increased from 31.1% in 2016 to 32.1% in 2020 [Supplementary material online, Table S3].

Table 2.

Prevalence of cancer in patients undergoing cardiovascular admissions across study period

Prevalence Years P-valuea
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Overall Cancer, % 4.8 (n = 44 063) 5.0 (n = 46 732) 5.1 (n = 48 530) 5.3 (n = 51 579) 5.4 (n = 45 512) <0.001
Metastatic cancer, % 1.4 (n = 13 710) 1.5 (n = 14 817) 1.5 (n = 15 189) 1.6 (n = 16 230) 1.7 (n = 14 616) <0.001
Specific cancer type, %
Breast cancer 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 <0.001
Colorectal cancer 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 <0.001
Renal cancer 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 <0.001
Liver cancer 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 <0.001
Haematological cancer 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 <0.001
Lung and bronchus cancer 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 <0.001
Prostate and male genital cancer 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 <0.001
Pancreatic cancer 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 <0.001
Female genital cancer 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.008
Skin cancer 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 <0.001
Gastroesophageal cancer 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 <0.001
Secondary unspecified 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 <0.001
Other cancer 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 <0.001

aMantel–Haenszel test for trend.

All analyses were weighted using the provided discharge weights as recommended by HCUP. The variables ‘HOSP_NIS’ and ‘NIS_Stratum’ were used for clustering and stratification of the data, respectively.

Figure 3.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

( A ) Prevalence of overall cancer and metastatic cancer in patients undergoing cardiovascular admissions across the study period. (B) Prevalence of specific cancer in patients undergoing cardiovascular admissions across the study period. *Cancer subtypes with equal prevalence trajectories are represented by a single line.

In general, most cancer types showed a statistically significant linear increase in prevalence across the duration of the study (P < 0.001), although the magnitude of change in prevalence and corresponding clinical significance varied across cancer types [Table 2 and Figure 3B]. Trends in both relative and absolute proportions of metastatic and non-metastatic cancers across cancer types are also reported [Supplementary material online, Tables S2 and S3]. Haematological cancer was the most prevalent across all years, ranging from 1.2% in 2016 to 1.4% in 2020.

Lung cancer was the second most prevalent, growing from 0.8% in 2016 to 0.9% in 2020. Prevalence of metastatic disease among lung cancer patients increased significantly from 0.3% in 2016 to 0.4% in 2020, with a relative proportion spanning from 39.1% in 2016 to 41.4% in 2020 (P = 0.023) [Supplementary material online, Tables S2 and S3].

Regarding breast cancer, its prevalence rose from 0.3% in 2016 to 0.4% in 2020. Trends in the prevalence of breast cancer patients with metastatic disease showed non-significant variations across the study period [Supplementary material online, Tables S2 and S3].

Even though the prevalence of colorectal cancer was substantial among patients undergoing CV admission, it remained stable over the study period, with a rate of 0.3%, while there was no significant change in colorectal cancer’s metastatic disease burden [Supplementary material online, Tables S2 and S3].

A growth in prostate/male genital cancer was observed, from 0.5% in 2016 to 0.6% in 2040, with metastatic cancer cases rising from 0.1% in 2016 to 0.2% in 2020, and their relative proportions growing from 29.2% in 2016 to 31.4% in 2020 (P = 0.108) [Supplementary material online, Tables S2 and S3].

Renal/urinary tract cancer showed a modest growth in prevalence from 0.3% in 2016 to 0.4% in 2020. Burden of metastatic cancer was steady at 0.1% during the study period, with a statistically non-significant increase in relative proportion from 25.9% in 2016 to 26.4% in 2020 (P = 0.828) [Supplementary material online, Tables S2 and S3].

The prevalence of pancreatic and female genital cancers remained stable between 2016 and 2020, both at approximately 0.2%. Prevalence of metastatic cancer among pancreatic cancer patients was 0.1% across the 5-years period, and a larger share of pancreatic cancer cases were metastatic compared to non-metastatic, ranging from 58.7% in 2016 to 60.9% in 2020 (P = 0.094). Metastatic burden among female genital cancer patients was also steady at 0.1%, with a significant increase in relative proportions, from 37.8% in 2016 to 42.5% in 2020 (P = 0.023) [Supplementary material online, Tables S2 and S3].

Liver, skin, and gastroesophageal cancers not only were less prevalent but also showed less notable temporal changes across the study period. Among these, the most relevant change in prevalence of metastatic disease can be observed for skin cancer, whose burden was constant at <0.1% in absolute terms, with a steady rise in prevalence of metastatic cases compared to non-metastatic cases, from 20.8% in 2016 to 26.5% in 2020 (P = 0.001) [Supplementary material online, Tables S2 and S3].

Prevalence of cancer across specific cardiovascular admissions

The analysis of overall and specific cancer prevalence by CV admission type, as detailed below, is based on data reported in Table 3, Figure 4A and B and Supplementary material online, Figures S3–S15.

Table 3.

Prevalence of cancer based on specific cardiovascular admission causes across study period

Prevalence Years P-value
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Overall cancer, % ACS 3.0 3.1 3 3.2 3.3 <0.001
Heart failure 4.3 4.4 4.6 4.8 4.9 <0.001
Atrial fibrillation/flutter 5.1 5.3 5.2 5.5 5.9 <0.001
Other arrhythmias 3.7 4.1 4.1 4.4 4.5 <0.001
Hypertension and complications (excluding heart failure) 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.7 2.8 <0.001
Pulmonary embolism 14.7 15.1 15.5 16.1 15.5 <0.001
Ischemic stroke 4.2 4.3 4.6 4.8 5.1 <0.001
Haemorrhagic stroke 5.7 6.2 6.2 6.6 6.8 <0.001
Valve disorders 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.8 4.0 <0.001
Other cardiovascular causes 5.1 5.3 5.5 5.8 5.8 <0.001
Metastatic cancer, % ACS 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.020
Heart failure 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.2 <0.001
Atrial fibrillation/flutter 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.7 0.001
Other arrhythmias 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 0.002
Hypertension and complications (excluding heart failure) 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.001
Pulmonary embolism 7.3 7.5 7.8 8.2 7.8 <0.001
Ischemic stroke 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.9 2.0 <0.001
Haemorrhagic stroke 2.5 2.8 2.8 3.0 3.1 <0.001
Valve disorders 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.008
Other cardiovascular causes 1.6 1.8 1.9 1.9 2.0 <0.001
Specific cancer type, %
Breast cancer ACS 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.213
Heart failure 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 <0.001
Atrial fibrillation/flutter 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.181
Other arrhythmias 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 <0.001
Hypertension and complications 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.376
Pulmonary embolism 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.3 0.865
Ischaemic stroke 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 <0.001
Haemorrhagic stroke 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.234
Valve disorders 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.012
Other cardiovascular causes 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 <0.001
Colorectal cancer ACS 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.002
Heart failure 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 <0.001
Atrial fibrillation/flutter 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.042
Other arrhythmias 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.275
Hypertension and complications 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.934
Pulmonary embolism 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 0.671
Ischaemic stroke 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.005
Haemorrhagic stroke 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.248
Valve disorders 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.154
Other Cardiovascular causes 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.887
Renal cancer ACS 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.050
Heart failure 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 <0.001
Atrial Fibrillation/flutter 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.002
Other arrhythmias 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.001
Hypertension and complications 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.777
Pulmonary embolism 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.310
Ischaemic stroke 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.122
Haemorrhagic stroke 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.232
Valve disorders 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.036
Other cardiovascular causes 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 <0.001
Liver cancer ACS 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.536
Heart failure 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 <0.001
Atrial fibrillation/flutter 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.154
Other arrhythmias 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.508
Hypertension and complications 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.736
Pulmonary embolism 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.219
Ischaemic stroke 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.001
Haemorrhagic stroke 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.995
Valve disorders 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.819
Other cardiovascular causes 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.015
Haematological cancer ACS 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.249
Heart failure 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.7 0.003
Atrial fibrillation/flutter 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.6 0.017
Other arrhythmias 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.3 0.037
Hypertension and complications 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.584
Pulmonary embolism 1.8 1.9 1.9 2.0 1.9 0.095
Ischaemic stroke 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.007
Haemorrhagic stroke 1.3 1.5 1.3 1.5 1.6 0.004
Valve disorders 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.5 0.035
Other cardiovascular causes 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 <0.001
Lung cancer ACS 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.540
Heart failure 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 <0.001
Atrial fibrillation/flutter 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 0.062
Other arrhythmias 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.605
Hypertension and complications 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.167
Pulmonary embolism 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.6 3.4 0.462
Ischaemic stroke 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 1.0 <0.001
Haemorrhagic stroke 0.8 1.0 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.323
Valve disorders 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.046
Other cardiovascular causes 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.009
Prostate and male genital cancer ACS 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 <0.001
Heart failure 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.137
Atrial fibrillation/flutter 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.009
Other arrhythmias 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.029
Hypertension and complications 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.030
Pulmonary embolism 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.184
Ischaemic stroke 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.050
Haemorrhagic stroke 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.018
Valve disorders 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.160
Other cardiovascular causes 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 <0.001
Pancreatic cancer ACS 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.903
Heart failure 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.205
Atrial fibrillation/flutter 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.796
Other arrhythmias 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.668
Hypertension and complications <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 0.1 0.140
Pulmonary embolism 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.016
Ischaemic stroke 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 <0.001
Haemorrhagic stroke 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.409
Valve disorders <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 0.166
Other cardiovascular causes 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.021
Female genital cancer ACS 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.756
Heart failure 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.194
Atrial fibrillation/flutter 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.062
Other arrhythmias 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.725
Hypertension and complications 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.259
Pulmonary embolism 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.1 0.711
Ischaemic stroke 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.468
Haemorrhagic stroke 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.544
Valve disorders 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.616
Other cardiovascular causes 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.428
Skin cancer ACS 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.873
Heart failure 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.243
Atrial fibrillation/flutter 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.017
Other arrhythmias 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.113
Hypertension and complications 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.079
Pulmonary embolism 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.007
Ischaemic stroke 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.063
Haemorrhagic stroke 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.071
Valve disorders 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.786
Other cardiovascular causes 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.113
Gastroesophageal cancer ACS 0.1 0.1 <0.1 0.1 0.1 0.495
Heart failure 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.908
Atrial fibrillation/flutter 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.321
Other arrhythmias 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.023
Hypertension and complications <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.720
Pulmonary embolism 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.028
Ischaemic stroke 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.006
Haemorrhagic stroke 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 0.1 0.192
Valve disorders <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.465
Other cardiovascular causes 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.649
Secondary unspecified ACS 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.006
Heart failure 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 <0.001
Atrial fibrillation/flutter 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5 <0.001
Other arrhythmias 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.071
Hypertension and complications 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.036
Pulmonary embolism 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.1 2.0 <0.001
Ischaemic stroke 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 <0.001
Haemorrhagic stroke 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.1 0.001
Valve disorders 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.062
Other cardiovascular causes 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 <0.001
Other cancer ACS 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.090
Heart failure 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 <0.001
Atrial fibrillation/flutter 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.349
Other arrhythmias 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.020
Hypertension and complications 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.854
Pulmonary embolism 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.121
Ischaemic stroke 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.043
Haemorrhagic stroke 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.686
Valve disorders <0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.003
Other cardiovascular causes 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 <0.001

All analyses were weighted using the provided discharge weights as recommended by HCUP. The variables ‘HOSP_NIS’ and ‘NIS_Stratum’ were used for clustering and stratification of the data, respectively.

Abbreviations: AIDS, Acquired Immuno-deficiency Syndrome; IQR, interquartile range; USD, United States Dollar.

Figure 4.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Prevalence of overall and metastatic cancer based on specific cardiovascular admission causes across study period.

Overall cancer

In general, the prevalence of overall cancer showed significant variations between 2016 and 2020 for all CV admissions analysed (P < 0.001), and its prevalence increased across all CV admission types. Likewise, the proportion of cancers with metastatic disease was observed to increase across all CV admissions from 2016 to 2020 (P < 0.05). Overall, cancer was most prevalent in patients with PE, significantly increasing from 14.7% in 2016 to 15.5% in 2020. Cancer was also very prevalent in patients presenting with haemorrhagic stroke, with a steady increase from 5.7% in 2016 to 6.8% in 2020. Atrial Fibrillation/flutter was the third most common CV admission in cancer patients; in this case, the rate of cancer patients increased from 5.1% in 2016 to 5.9% in 2020. Similarly, cancer prevalence also showed an increasing trend in other cardiovascular admissions, both in overall and metastatic cases, as shown in Table 3 and Figure 4A and B.

Similar prevalence analysis was also performed for each cancer type among specific cardiovascular admissions across the study period [Table 3 and Supplementary material online, Figures S3–S15]. Haematological cancer was the most common across all CV admissions, except for PE, for which lung cancer showed the highest prevalence. Moreover, haematological cancer showed the most significant increase in prevalence in patients hospitalized for HF, atrial fibrillation/flutter, ischemic and haemorrhagic stroke, and valve disorders. Lung cancer showed a notable increase in frequency in patients with HF, ischaemic stroke, and valve disorders. Other relevant findings are shown in Table 3 and Supplementary material online, Figures S3–S15.

Future projections through 2040

When looking at the trends in the following 20 years, until 2040, the prevalence of cancer in CV admissions is expected to nearly triple by 2040, starting from a rate of 4.8% in 2016 and reaching an estimated 11.9% in 2040 (2.48-fold increase from baseline) [Supplementary material online, Table S5 and Figure 5]. The modelled projections show consistent linear increases across all major cancer types [Supplementary material online, Table S5, Supplementary material online, Tables S6A-D, and Figure 6A–C, Supplementary material online, Figures S1A-F and S2A-G]. While haematological and lung cancers are expected to remain the cancers with the highest total burden, other malignancies show faster growth trajectories, with bigger relative growth. Liver cancer showed the steepest annual increase in prevalence, from 0.1% in 2016 to 0.6% in 2040 (IRR 1.069, 95% CI 1.049–1.089; P < 0.001) [Supplementary material online, Figure S1D], followed by breast cancer, which is expected to increase from 0.3% in 2016 to 1.3% in 2040 (IRR 1.056, 95% CI 1.045–1.068; P < 0.001) [Supplementary material online, Figure S1A], and renal cancer, which showed a future increasing trend from 0.3% in 2016 to 1.1% in 2040 (IRR 1.055, 95% CI 1.043–1.067; P < 0.001) [Supplementary material online, Figure S1C]. Pancreatic and colorectal cancers are also expected to more than double in prevalence, with the former that is expected to rise from 0.2% in 2016 to 0.5% in 2040 (IRR 1.049, 95% CI 1.032–1.066; P < 0.001) [Supplementary material online, Figure S2B], while the latter is projected to rise from 0.3% in 2016 to 0.7% in 2040 (IRR 1.044, 95% CI 1.031–1.056; P < 0.001) [Supplementary material online, Figure S1B]. Skin cancer shows similar trends, tripling from a rate of 0.1% in 2016 to 0.3% in 2040 (IRR 1.038, 95% CI 1.019–1.057; P < 0.001) [Supplementary material online, Figure S2D]. Prostate and male genital cancer are predicted to show a quite linear and constant increase across the years, from 0.5% in 2016 to 1.3% in 2040 (IRR 1.042, 95% CI 1.033–1.052; P < 0.001) [Supplementary material online, Figure S2A]. Similarly, haematological cancer is projected to rise from 1.2% in 2016 to 2.6% in 2040 (IRR 1.032, 95% CI 1.026–1.037; P < 0.001) [Supplementary material online, Figure S1E]. Lung and bronchus cancer is projected to double from 0.8% in 2016 to 1.6% in 2040 (IRR 1.028, 95% CI 1.021–1.035; P < 0.001) [Supplementary material online, Figure S1F]. Comparable findings are evident in case of gastroesophageal cancer, with a growth rate ranging from 0.1% in 2016, expected to rise to 0.2% in 2040 (IRR 1.038, 95% CI 1.017–1.060; P < 0.001) [Supplementary material online, Figure S2E]. Female genital cancer has a less relevant rate of increase until 2040, increasing from 0.2% in 2016 to 0.3% in 2040 (IRR 1.017, 95% CI 1.015–1.032; P = 0.031) [Supplementary material online, Figure S2C]. In terms of absolute changes, haematological cancer is expected to remain the most common across the years and is predicted to show the highest absolute increase (+1.4% absolute increase), followed by breast cancer (+1.0% absolute increase) and lung and bronchus cancer (+0.8% absolute increase). These represent the cancers with a highest total burden.

Figure 5.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Prediction of cancer prevalence in patients undergoing cardiovascular admissions—until 2040. The solid line represents baseline data, while the dotted line represents projected data.

Figure 6.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Prediction of prevalence of specific cancers in patients undergoing cardiovascular admissions—until 2040. (A) Breast, colorectal, renal, and liver cancer; (B) Haematological, lung, prostate and male genital, pancreatic, and female genital cancer; (C) Skin, gastroesophageal, secondary unspecified, and other cancers.

Discussion

This nationwide analysis of US hospitalized patients with primary CV diagnosis and co-existing cancer adds important data on contemporary status and future projections of cancer in this high-risk population. The study revealed a steady rise in cancer prevalence in the period from 2016 to 2020. Consistently, the present projections indicate a continuous increase in the cancer prevalence among CV inpatients, meaning that by 2040, roughly one out of eight patients admitted for a CV condition may also carry a diagnosis of concurrent cancer. Importantly, the magnitude of these projections should be interpreted with caution and viewed as exploratory and illustrative of potential population-level trajectories. These findings emphasize a growing co-existence of cancer and CV disease. This is in line with the improvement in both CVD and cancer treatment, leading to prolonged survival in both cohorts, and with the presence of a rising ageing population on a global scale,9 which greatly contributes to the growing prevalence of multimorbidity,10 and represents a major risk factor for many CV and cancer pathologies.11,12 Consistent with the population-level trends observed in our study, Global Burden of Disease (GBD) forecasts indicate that the absolute (crude) burden of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) attributable to CVD and cancer has increased from 1990 to 2021, and is projected to rise further by 2050, largely driven by population ageing and growth. In contrast, age-standardized DALY rates attributable to these conditions have declined and are expected to keep decreasing by 2050, which is reflective of improved preventive and treatment measures.13

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first national analysis of future cancer projections in patients admitted with an acute CV event. Among the few published studies on this topic, Okura et al. analysed a local Japanese cancer registry and estimated a 23.4% increase in cancer patients with co-existing CV disease by 2039, with a growth rate (1.23) outpacing the cancer-only population (1.18). Atrial fibrillation was predicted to be the most common CV comorbidity, with a more pronounced growth in females, though absolute numbers remained higher in males.14

Several mechanisms may explain the rising cancer prevalence among patients with CV disease. First, a shared risk hypothesis suggests that increasing rates of common risk factors and comorbidities contribute to both cancer and CVD. These include smoking, obesity, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, metabolic syndrome, sedentary lifestyle, and poor diet. Obesity and diabetes are strongly linked to several cancer types and are well-established drivers of CVD, including coronary artery disease, stroke, and HF.15 The World Obesity Atlas (2025) projects that about three billion adults will be overweight by 2030, with 1.1 billion classified as obese and more prevalent among women (643 million).16 The prevalence of diabetes is also predicted to rise to 43% and affect approximately 1 in 8 adults worldwide (∼853 million) by 2050.17 Smoking is causally implicated in the pathogenesis of several cancers, especially lung cancer, whose risk is 15- to 30-fold higher in smokers,18 and is also linked to an elevated risk of CVD.19 While smoking rates are projected to decline by 25.9% in males and 30.0% in females by 2050, total numbers will remain substantial.20 According to GBD forecasts, high systolic blood pressure, dietary risks and air pollution are projected to be the leading risk factors driving the shared burden of CVD and cancer in 2050.13 Inflammation underlies many of these risks, promoting both tumorigenesis and atherogenesis. Chronic inflammation supports tumour growth by encouraging cellular transformation, reactive oxygen, tissue damage, and angiogenesis dysfunction.21 Pro-inflammatory cytokines like IL-6, TNF-α and IL-1β activate pathways that promote tumour proliferation, angiogenesis, and apoptosis resistance.22 Similarly, inflammation promotes atherogenesis through immune cell recruitment, endothelial dysfunction, and atherosclerosis, promoting plaque growth and disruption.23

Second, increased survival with better treatment modalities, as well as the rising issue of cardiotoxicity could greatly contribute to increased prevalence. It is well established that many cancer drugs are associated with an increased risk of CV disease, such as left ventricular dysfunction, HF, hypertension, myocardial ischaemia, and rhythm abnormalities.24 A US-based study predicts an increase in the proportion of cancer survivors, from an estimated 18.1 million in 2022 to 26 million by 2040.25 Notably, recent studies confirm there is an overall ∼42% higher risk of CVD in cancer survivors than people without cancer, and that survivors of breast, lung, and haematological cancers experience some of the highest rates of CV adverse events.26 Observational studies confirm that cancer survivors are at increased risk of hospitalization (HR 1.11) and/or death from CVD (HR 1.31) compared to individuals without a history of cancer, especially survivors of lung cancer, multiple myeloma, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma and breast cancer.27 Another study highlighted a 55% higher risk of mortality from CVD in cancer survivors compared to the general population.4

Third, another important factor contributing to the increasing prevalence of cancer in the general population, and consequently among those with CV admissions, is the continuous trend towards population ageing. This demographic shift is expected to significantly raise cancer incidence in the next decades. This is supported by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), which estimated a projected rise of new cancer cases from 19.3 million in 2020 to 28.4 million in 2040, which corresponds to a 47% increase.28 Even more recent estimates suggest an increase to over 35 million annual cases by 2050, corresponding to a 77% increase from the 20 million cases in 2022.29 Projections suggest that breast, prostate, lung, and colorectal cancers will remain the most frequent, with female breast cancer predicted to rise by about 52% by 2050 due to demographic changes.30 These trends align with our findings, as higher cancer prevalence will be associated with increasing CV complications.

When looking at the specific cancers, liver, breast, renal, and pancreatic cancer showed the highest relative increase in prevalence. This trend is supported by epidemiological projections indicating a significant rise in both liver and pancreatic cancers worldwide by 2040. In particular, liver cancer, which was the one with the overall steepest relative projected increase in patients with CV admissions, is expected to surge dramatically in the general population, with a predicted 55% increase in incidence from 2020 to 2040.31

In terms of absolute increase and prevalence, haematological, breast, prostate, and lung cancers are predicted to remain the most common until 2040. Haematological cancer was the most prevalent among patients admitted with CVD. It was especially frequent in patients with PE, HF, and atrial fibrillation, likely due to shared pathogenesis and treatment-related cardiotoxicity.32 Breast cancer also had one of the highest predicted absolute and relative rise in prevalence among CV admissions, possibly related to cardiotoxic effects of therapies like anthracyclines and HER2-targeted agents, known to cause left ventricular dysfunction and HF, particularly when combined with anthracyclines.33 In addition, radiation therapy to the thorax can also affect the heart, increasing the risk of CV complications.34 Lung cancer also demonstrated a significant projected absolute rise and prevalence, remaining the most frequent malignancy among patients with PE, which is consistent with the literature.35 Among cardiotoxic treatments, immune checkpoint inhibitors have been linked to CV adverse events including myocarditis, pericardial diseases, and arrhythmias,36 while targeted therapies such as EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, used to treat non-small-cell lung cancer, have been associated with systolic dysfunction and HF.37

It is important to keep in mind that our projections were derived using a Poisson Regression approach that models observed temporal trends in cancer prevalence among patients with cardiovascular disease, without explicitly incorporating individual-level determinants. This approach is well-suited for prediction when trends are stable and show no statistical evidence of non-linearity, as observed in our data. Accordingly, the projections reflect extrapolations of observed temporal trends rather than assumptions regarding future changes in the underlying determinants of cancer and CVD prevalence. Nonetheless, future deviations from the projected trends may occur if such determinants evolve over time. Such changes may include improvements in cancer prevention and early detection, improved treatments, reduced exposure to cardiotoxic agents, or advances in CV management leading to modified hospitalization patterns. Conversely, population ageing, increasing multimorbidity, and increased exposure to risk factors could accelerate the predicted trends. In this context, public health plays a fundamental role in trying to counterbalance this increase by implementing broader primary and secondary prevention strategies. Although our analysis does not evaluate clinical interventions directly, the observed and projected trends provide context for healthcare systems to anticipate a growing need for integrated care models that incorporate CV prevention into oncology pathways and survivorship care.

Managing such a fragile and growing cohort highlights the relevance of enhanced clinical education. International guidelines increasingly endorse the integrated management of these patients. European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines on cardio-oncology (2022) already suggest a multidisciplinary approach to patients developing CV complications from cancer therapy.38 The American Heart Association (AHA) has introduced the concept of cardio-oncology rehabilitation (CORE), which focuses on strategies to identify cancer patients or survivors at risk of CVD and to prevent or cope with such adverse events. These strategies, which adapt cardiac rehab principles to cancer patients, include counseling on exercise training and on CV risk factors management (weight, blood pressure, lipid profile, weight loss, diabetes mellitus, tobacco cessation).39 ESC and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines advocate for baseline CV risk stratification, using tools like the HFA-ICOS risk assessment and cardiac tests (e.g. electrocardiogram, biomarkers, and imaging) before starting potentially cardiotoxic treatments. This enables the identification of at-risk patients and to tailor primary or secondary preventive measures according to pre-existing CVD, individual risk of CV toxicity, and type of cancer therapy.40 In addition, these findings may help raise awareness of the potential usefulness of cancer screening programmes in patients with CVD.

Beyond clinical practice guidelines, national and international policy initiatives may play an important role in supporting the development of cardio-oncology care frameworks. Among emerging ones, at the national level, in the US the National Cancer Institute (NCI) in partnership with the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), has established a joint cardio-oncology research initiative, which aims to advance research in cancer treatment-related cardiotoxicity and to promote collaboration between cardiologists and oncologists. Their collaboration has led to several studies, e.g. a NCI/NHLBI-supported research identified ways to mitigate cardiotoxicity, including the use of beta-blockers and dexrazoxane.41 Moreover, in the UKa dedicated cardio-oncology clinic opened in 2011 at the Royal Brompton Hospital. Between February 2011 and February 2016, it managed 535 patients experiencing cancer treatment-related cardiotoxicity, with 128 presenting with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD). Following cardiac optimization, LVEF improved from 45% to 53% (P < 0.001) and the percentage of patients considered eligible to continue cancer therapy rose to 88%.42 Therefore, results are promising and encourage the implementation of such clinics on a broader scale.

Finally, although this analysis is based on US inpatient administrative data, its findings may have relevance beyond the US context and require cautious interpretation when applied to European healthcare contexts. Europe bears one fifth of the global cancer cases (22.4%) and cancer deaths (20.4%), despite accounting for less than 10% of the global population,28 reflecting an ageing population and an improving cancer survival rate. These demographic trends, coupled with the increasing prevalence of shared CV and cancer risk factors, suggest that the observed population-level increase in cancer diagnoses among CV hospitalizations may also be directionally relevant to European settings. However, important structural differences between USA and European healthcare systems limit the direct extrapolation of absolute prevalence estimates, since European systems are largely publicly funded, with universal coverage, different hospitalization thresholds, and distinct reimbursement and coding practices that may influence admission patterns and diagnostic recording.43,44 Nevertheless, the broader implications remain highly relevant for Europe and other non-US countries.

Limitations

Several limitations are present in this study, mainly related to the use of administrative data and ICD-10 coding. This includes potential for inaccuracy and inconsistency in diagnostic coding. The structure of ICD-10 coding may lead to grouping of distinct clinical entities under single categories, thereby limiting the interpretability of results within certain CV and cancer diagnoses. Moreover, the NIS does not provide detailed anthropometric, lifestyle or clinical data, such as cancer stage, cancer treatment exposure, or timing of cancer diagnosis relative to hospitalization. Cancer diagnoses are therefore not stratified by the status of the disease during CV admission, so whether the disease is active, in remission, or currently undergoing treatment. As a result, potential mechanisms linking cancer and CVD, such as cardiotoxicity of oncologic therapies, cannot be assessed, and the present analysis remains descriptive at the population-level. Furthermore, the NIS records anonymized discharge-level data, which does not allow identification of repeated hospitalizations for the same individual over time. Consequently, patients with chronic CV conditions requiring frequent admissions, such as heart failure or atrial fibrillation, may contribute to multiple records, potentially inflating prevalence estimates. This limitation may also influence long-term projections, and its magnitude cannot be fully quantified. Importantly, this study focused only on inpatients, so it is not possible to extrapolate these findings to the overall population of patients with CV conditions. Projections were derived using a Poisson model, which, although appropriate for our aims, does not account for changes in the characteristics of the population of interest and does not model linear or non-linear associations between demographic or epidemiological factors and the outcomes of interest, at person-level. The projected trends were not externally validated using independent datasets, as such analysis is not feasible within the NIS framework. The long-term extrapolations are based on a five-year observation window, which also warrants careful interpretation of projected trends. However, extending the analysis to earlier periods with different coding structures or temporal dynamics may introduce additional bias and was therefore not pursued. Additionally, as this analysis is based on aggregate administrative data, these trends reflect population-level patterns, individual-level association or causal relationships between CVD and cancer cannot be directly inferred (ecological fallacy). Finally, as these results are based on US data, they may not be easily generalizable to countries with different healthcare systems and differing cancer and CVD epidemiology. Additionally, future temporal changes in coding practices, diagnostic sensitivity, and admission thresholds may influence the predicted trends. Finally, the structure and coding system of the NIS dataset may further limit reproducibility of these findings in non-US settings. Validation of these trends in international administrative datasets would be valuable to assess generalizability. Despite these limitations, this study leverages a very large dataset, offering novel insights and a broad overview of the relationship at population-level between CV disease and cancer.

Conclusion

This study provides new insights into future trends in the prevalence of cancer diagnoses among CV hospitalizations, forecasting a significant increase from 2016 to 2040. Specifically, the proportion of CV hospitalizations with a concurrent cancer diagnosis is projected to increase approximately from 1 in 21 in 2016 to 1 in 8 by 2040. This prediction is relevant for healthcare planning, policies, and further granular research, in the developing field of cardio-oncology.

Supplementary Material

oeag030_Supplementary_Data

Contributor Information

Guia Ferrari Ardicini, Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Centre for Prognosis Research, Keele University, Keele ST5 5BG, UK; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132 Milan, Italy.

Andrija Matetic, Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Centre for Prognosis Research, Keele University, Keele ST5 5BG, UK; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Split, Spinciceva 1, 21000 Split, Croatia.

Evangelos Kontopantelis, Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Science, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; Division of Family Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Drive, 119228 Singapore, Singapore.

Alaide Chieffo, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132 Milan, Italy; Interventional Cardiology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy.

Carmen Maria Moldovan, The 3rd Department of Cardiology, University of Athens, Sotiria Hospital, Mesogeion Avenue 152, 11527 Athens, Greece.

Zahra Raisi-Estabragh, Centre for Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, NIHR Barts Biomedical Research Centre, Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.

Elad Asher, Jesselson Heart Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, The Eisenberg R&D Authority, and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 12 Bayit Street, Jerusalem 91031, Israel.

Christian Mallen, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK.

Mamas A Mamas, Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Centre for Prognosis Research, Keele University, Keele ST5 5BG, UK; Royal Stoke University Hospital, Newcastle Road, Stoke-on-Trent ST4 6QG, UK; National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham B15 2TQ, UK.

Data availability

The data underlying this article were provided by HCUP under license and cannot be shared publicly. Researchers may access the NIS dataset directly from https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov upon fulfilling the data use agreement requirements.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at European Heart Journal Open online.

Author contributions

Guia Ferrari Ardicini (Conceptualization [supporting]; Data curation [lead]; Formal analysis [lead]; Investigation [lead]; Methodology [lead]; Software [lead]; Visualization [lead]; Writing—original draft [lead]; Writing—review & editing [lead]), Andrija Matetic (Conceptualization [lead]; Data curation [lead]; Formal analysis [supporting]; Investigation [supporting]; Methodology [supporting]; Project administration [supporting]; Resources [equal]; Software [supporting]; Supervision [equal]; Validation [equal]; Visualization [supporting]; Writing—review & editing [equal]), Evangelos Kontopantelis (Data curation [equal]; Formal analysis [lead]; Methodology [equal]; Validation [equal]; Writing—review & editing [equal]), Alaide Chieffo (Validation [equal]; Writing—review & editing [equal]), Carmen Maria Moldovan (Validation [equal]; Writing—review & editing [equal]), Zahra Raisi-Estabragh (Validation [equal]; Writing—review & editing [equal]), Elad Asher (Validation [equal]; Writing—review & editing [equal]), Christian Mallen (Validation [equal]; Writing—review & editing [equal]), and Mamas A. Mamas (Conceptualization [lead]; Methodology [supporting]; Project administration [lead]; Resources [lead]; Supervision [lead]; Validation [lead]; Writing—review & editing [lead])

Funding

Evagelos Kontopantelis is part-funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) in Emergency and Acute Care (NIHR205301) and the British Heart Foundation (BHF) (RE/24/130017).

References

  • 1. Roth  GA, Abate  D, Abate  KH, Abay  SM, Abbafati  C, Abbasi  N, Abbastabar  H, Abd-Allah  F, Abdela  J, Abdelalim  A, Abdollahpour  I, Abdulkader  RS, Abebe  HT, Abebe  M, Abebe  Z, Abejie  AN, Abera  SF, Abil  OZ, Abraha  HN, Abrham  AR, Abu-Raddad  LJ, Accrombessi  MMK, Acharya  D, Adamu  AA, Adebayo  OM, Adedoyin  RA, Adekanmbi  V, Adetokunboh  OO, Adhena  BM, Adib  MG, Admasie  A, Afshin  A, Agarwal  G, Agesa  KM, Agrawal  A, Agrawal  S, Ahmadi  A, Ahmadi  M, Ahmed  MB, Ahmed  S, Aichour  AN, Aichour  I, Aichour  MTE, Akbari  ME, Akinyemi  RO, Akseer  N, Al-Aly  Z, Al-Eyadhy  A, Al-Raddadi  RM, Alahdab  F, Alam  K, Alam  T, Alebel  A, Alene  KA, Alijanzadeh  M, Alizadeh-Navaei  R, Aljunid  SM, Alkerwi  A, Alla  F, Allebeck  P, Alonso  J, Altirkawi  K, Alvis-Guzman  N, Amare  AT, Aminde  LN, Amini  E, Ammar  W, Amoako  YA, Anber  NH, Andrei  CL, Androudi  S, Animut  MD, Anjomshoa  M, Ansari  H, Ansha  MG, Antonio  CAT, Anwari  P, Aremu  O, Ärnlöv  J, Arora  A, Arora  M, Artaman  A, Aryal  KK, Asayesh  H, Asfaw  ET, Ataro  Z, Atique  S, Atre  SR, Ausloos  M, Avokpaho  EFGA, Awasthi  A, Quintanilla  BPA, Ayele  Y, Ayer  R, Azzopardi  PS, Babazadeh  A, Bacha  U, Badali  H, Badawi  A, Bali  AG, Ballesteros  KE, Banach  M, Banerjee  K, Bannick  MS, Banoub  JAM, Barboza  MA, Barker-Collo  SL, Bärnighausen  TW, Barquera  S, Barrero  LH, Bassat  Q, Basu  S, Baune  BT, Baynes  HW, Bazargan-Hejazi  S, Bedi  N, Beghi  E, Behzadifar  M, Behzadifar  M, Béjot  Y, Bekele  BB, Belachew  AB, Belay  E, Belay  YA, Bell  ML, Bello  AK, Bennett  DA, Bensenor  IM, Berman  AE, Bernabe  E, Bernstein  RS, Bertolacci  GJ, Beuran  M, Beyranvand  T, Bhalla  A, Bhattarai  S, Bhaumik  S, Bhutta  ZA, Biadgo  B, Biehl  MH, Bijani  A, Bikbov  B, Bilano  V, Bililign  N, Bin Sayeed  MS, Bisanzio  D, Biswas  T, Blacker  BF, Basara  BB, Borschmann  R, Bosetti  C, Bozorgmeh  K, Brady  OJ, Brant  LC, Brayne  C, Brazinova  A, Breitborde  NJK, Brenner  H, Briant  PS, Britton  G, Brugha  T, Busse  R, Butt  ZA, Callender  CSKH, Campos-Nonato  IR, Campuzano Rincon  JC, Cano  J, Car  M, Cárdenas  R, Carreras  G, Carrero  JJ, Carter  A, Carvalho  F, Castañeda-Orjuela  CA, Castillo Rivas  J, Castle  CD, Castro  C, Castro  F, Catalá-López  F, Cerin  E, Chaiah  Y, Chang  J-C, Charlson  FJ, Chaturvedi  P, Chiang  PP-C, Chimed-Ochir  O, Chisumpa  VH, Chitheer  A, Chowdhury  R, Christensen  H, Christopher  DJ, Chung  S-C, Cicuttini  FM, Ciobanu  LG, Cirillo  M, Cohen  AJ, Cooper  LT, Cortesi  PA, Cortinovis  M, Cousin  E, Cowie  BC, Criqui  MH, Cromwell  EA, Crowe  CS, Crump  JA, Cunningham  M, Daba  AK, Dadi  AF, Dandona  L, Dandona  R, Dang  AK, Dargan  PI, Daryani  A, Das  SK, Gupta  RD, Neves  JD, Dasa  TT, Dash  AP, Davis  AC, Davis Weaver  N, Davitoiu  DV, Davletov  K, De La Hoz  FP, De Neve  J-W, Degefa  MG, Degenhardt  L, Degfie  TT, Deiparine  S, Demoz  GT, Demtsu  BB, Denova-Gutiérrez  E, Deribe  K, Dervenis  N, Des Jarlais  DC, Dessie  GA, Dey  S, Dharmaratne  SD, Dicker  D, Dinberu  MT, Ding  EL, Dirac  MA, Djalalinia  S, Dokova  K, Doku  DT, Donnelly  CA, Dorsey  ER, Doshi  PP, Douwes-Schultz  D, Doyle  KE, Driscoll  TR, Dubey  M, Dubljanin  E, Duken  EE, Duncan  BB, Duraes  AR, Ebrahimi  H, Ebrahimpour  S, Edessa  D, Edvardsson  D, Eggen  AE, El Bcheraoui  C, El Sayed Zaki  M, El-Khatib  Z, Elkout  H, Ellingsen  CL, Endres  M, Endries  AY, Er  B, Erskine  HE, Eshrati  B, Eskandarieh  S, Esmaeili  R, Esteghamati  A, Fakhar  M, Fakhim  H, Faramarzi  M, Fareed  M, Farhadi  F, Farinha  CSE, Faro  A, Farvid  MS, Farzadfar  F, Farzaei  MH, Feigin  VL, Feigl  AB, Fentahun  N, Fereshtehnejad  S-M, Fernandes  E, Fernandes  JC, Ferrari  AJ, Feyissa  GT, Filip  I, Finegold  S, Fischer  F, Fitzmaurice  C, Foigt  NA, Foreman  KJ, Fornari  C, Frank  TD, Fukumoto  T, Fuller  JE, Fullman  N, Fürst  T, Furtado  JM, Futran  ND, Gallus  S, Garcia-Basteiro  AL, Garcia-Gordillo  MA, Gardner  WM, Gebre  AK, Gebrehiwot  TT, Gebremedhin  AT, Gebremichael  B, Gebremichael  TG, Gelano  TF, Geleijnse  JM, Genova-Maleras  R, Geramo  YCD, Gething  PW, Gezae  KE, Ghadami  MR, Ghadimi  R, Ghasemi Falavarjani  K, Ghasemi-Kasman  M, Ghimire  M, Gibney  KB, Gill  PS, Gill  TK, Gillum  RF, Ginawi  IA, Giroud  M, Giussani  G, Goenka  S, Goldberg  EM, Goli  S, Gómez-Dantés  H, Gona  PN, Gopalani  SV, Gorman  TM, Goto  A, Goulart  AC, Gnedovskaya  EV, Grada  A, Grosso  G, Gugnani  HC, Guimaraes  ALS, Guo  Y, Gupta  PC, Gupta  R, Gupta  R, Gupta  T, Gutiérrez  RA, Gyawali  B, Haagsma  JA, Hafezi-Nejad  N, Hagos  TB, Hailegiyorgis  TT, Hailu  GB, Haj-Mirzaian  A, Haj-Mirzaian  A, Hamadeh  RR, Hamidi  S, Handal  AJ, Hankey  GJ, Harb  HL, Harikrishnan  S, Haro  JM, Hasan  M, Hassankhani  H, Hassen  HY, Havmoeller  R, Hay  RJ, Hay  SI, He  Y, Hedayatizadeh-Omran  A, Hegazy  MI, Heibati  B, Heidari  M, Hendrie  D, Henok  A, Henry  NJ, Herteliu  C, Heydarpour  F, Heydarpour  P, Heydarpour  S, Hibstu  DT, Hoek  HW, Hole  MK, Homaie Rad  E, Hoogar  P, Hosgood  HD, Hosseini  SM, Hosseinzadeh  M, Hostiuc  M, Hostiuc  S, Hotez  PJ, Hoy  DG, Hsiao  T, Hu  G, Huang  JJ, Husseini  A, Hussen  MM, Hutfless  S, Idrisov  B, Ilesanmi  OS, Iqbal  U, Irvani  SSN, Irvine  CMS, Islam  N, Islam  SMS, Islami  F, Jacobsen  KH, Jahangiry  L, Jahanmehr  N, Jain  SK, Jakovljevic  M, Jalu  MT, James  SL, Javanbakht  M, Jayatilleke  AU, Jeemon  P, Jenkins  KJ, Jha  RP, Jha  V, Johnson  CO, Johnson  SC, Jonas  JB, Joshi  A, Jozwiak  JJ, Jungari  SB, Jürisson  M, Kabir  Z, Kadel  R, Kahsay  A, Kalani  R, Karami  M, Karami Matin  B, Karch  A, Karema  C, Karimi-Sari  H, Kasaeian  A, Kassa  DH, Kassa  GM, Kassa  TD, Kassebaum  NJ, Katikireddi  SV, Kaul  A, Kazemi  Z, Karyani  AK, Kazi  DS, Kefale  AT, Keiyoro  PN, Kemp  GR, Kengne  AP, Keren  A, Kesavachandran  CN, Khader  YS, Khafaei  B, Khafaie  MA, Khajavi  A, Khalid  N, Khalil  IA, Khan  EA, Khan  MS, Khan  MA, Khang  Y-H, Khater  MM, Khoja  AT, Khosravi  A, Khosravi  MH, Khubchandani  J, Kiadaliri  AA, Kibret  GD, Kidanemariam  ZT, Kiirithio  DN, Kim  D, Kim  Y-E, Kim  YJ, Kimokoti  RW, Kinfu  Y, Kisa  A, Kissimova-Skarbek  K, Kivimäki  M, Knudsen  AKS, Kocarnik  JM, Kochhar  S, Kokubo  Y, Kolola  T, Kopec  JA, Koul  PA, Koyanagi  A, Kravchenko  MA, Krishan  K, Kuate Defo  B, Kucuk Bicer  B, Kumar  GA, Kumar  M, Kumar  P, Kutz  MJ, Kuzin  I, Kyu  HH, Lad  DP, Lad  SD, Lafranconi  A, Lal  DK, Lalloo  R, Lallukka  T, Lam  JO, Lami  FH, Lansingh  VC, Lansky  S, Larson  HJ, Latifi  A, Lau  KM-M, Lazarus  JV, Lebedev  G, Lee  PH, Leigh  J, Leili  M, Leshargie  CT, Li  S, Li  Y, Liang  J, Lim  L-L, Lim  SS, Limenih  MA, Linn  S, Liu  S, Liu  Y, Lodha  R, Lonsdale  C, Lopez  AD, Lorkowski  S, Lotufo  PA, Lozano  R, Lunevicius  R, Ma  S, Macarayan  ERK, Mackay  MT, MacLachlan  JH, Maddison  ER, Madotto  F, Magdy Abd El Razek  H, Magdy Abd El Razek  M, Maghavani  DP, Majdan  M, Majdzadeh  R, Majeed  A, Malekzadeh  R, Malta  DC, Manda  A-L, Mandarano-Filho  LG, Manguerra  H, Mansournia  MA, Mapoma  CC, Marami  D, Maravilla  JC, Marcenes  W, Marczak  L, Marks  A, Marks  GB, Martinez  G, Martins-Melo  FR, Martopullo  I, März  W, Marzan  MB, Masci  JR, Massenburg  BB, Mathur  MR, Mathur  P, Matzopoulos  R, Maulik  PK, Mazidi  M, McAlinden  C, McGrath  JJ, McKee  M, McMahon  BJ, Mehata  S, Mehndiratta  MM, Mehrotra  R, Mehta  KM, Mehta  V, Mekonnen  TC, Melese  A, Melku  M, Memiah  PTN, Memish  ZA, Mendoza  W, Mengistu  DT, Mengistu  G, Mensah  GA, Mereta  ST, Meretoja  A, Meretoja  TJ, Mestrovic  T, Mezgebe  HB, Miazgowski  B, Miazgowski  T, Millear  AI, Miller  TR, Miller-Petrie  MK, Mini  GK, Mirabi  P, Mirarefin  M, Mirica  A, Mirrakhimov  EM, Misganaw  AT, Mitiku  H, Moazen  B, Mohammad  KA, Mohammadi  M, Mohammadifard  N, Mohammed  MA, Mohammed  S, Mohan  V, Mokdad  AH, Molokhia  M, Monasta  L, Moradi  G, Moradi-Lakeh  M, Moradinazar  M, Moraga  P, Morawska  L, Moreno Velásquez  I, Morgado-Da-Costa  J, Morrison  SD, Moschos  MM, Mouodi  S, Mousavi  SM, Muchie  KF, Mueller  UO, Mukhopadhyay  S, Muller  K, Mumford  JE, Musa  J, Musa  KI, Mustafa  G, Muthupandian  S, Nachega  JB, Nagel  G, Naheed  A, Nahvijou  A, Naik  G, Nair  S, Najafi  F, Naldi  L, Nam  HS, Nangia  V, Nansseu  JR, Nascimento  BR, Natarajan  G, Neamati  N, Negoi  I, Negoi  RI, Neupane  S, Newton  CRJ, Ngalesoni  FN, Ngunjiri  JW, Nguyen  AQ, Nguyen  G, Nguyen  HT, Nguyen  HT, Nguyen  LH, Nguyen  M, Nguyen  TH, Nichols  E, Ningrum  DNA, Nirayo  YL, Nixon  MR, Nolutshungu  N, Nomura  S, Norheim  OF, Noroozi  M, Norrving  B, Noubiap  JJ, Nouri  HR, Nourollahpour Shiadeh  M, Nowroozi  MR, Nyasulu  PS, Odell  CM, Ofori-Asenso  R, Ogbo  FA, Oh  I-H, Oladimeji  O, Olagunju  AT, Olivares  PR, Olsen  HE, Olusanya  BO, Olusanya  JO, Ong  KL, Ong  SKS, Oren  E, Orpana  HM, Ortiz  A, Ortiz  JR, Otstavnov  SS, Øverland  S, Owolabi  MO, Özdemir  R, P A  M, Pacella  R, Pakhale  S, Pakhare  AP, Pakpour  AH, Pana  A, Panda-Jonas  S, Pandian  JD, Parisi  A, Park  E-K, Parry  CDH, Parsian  H, Patel  S, Pati  S, Patton  GC, Paturi  VR, Paulson  KR, Pereira  A, Pereira  DM, Perico  N, Pesudovs  K, Petzold  M, Phillips  MR, Piel  FB, Pigott  DM, Pillay  JD, Pirsaheb  M, Pishgar  F, Polinder  S, Postma  MJ, Pourshams  A, Poustchi  H, Pujar  A, Prakash  S, Prasad  N, Purcell  CA, Qorbani  M, Quintana  H, Quistberg  DA, Rade  KW, Radfar  A, Rafay  A, Rafiei  A, Rahim  F, Rahimi  K, Rahimi-Movaghar  A, Rahman  M, Rahman  MHU, Rahman  MA, Rai  RK, Rajsic  S, Ram  U, Ranabhat  CL, Ranjan  P, Rao  PC, Rawaf  DL, Rawaf  S, Razo-García  C, Reddy  KS, Reiner  RC, Reitsma  MB, Remuzzi  G, Renzaho  AMN, Resnikoff  S, Rezaei  S, Rezaeian  S, Rezai  MS, Riahi  SM, Ribeiro  ALP, Rios-Blancas  MJ, Roba  KT, Roberts  NLS, Robinson  SR, Roever  L, Ronfani  L, Roshandel  G, Rostami  A, Rothenbacher  D, Roy  A, Rubagotti  E, Sachdev  PS, Saddik  B, Sadeghi  E, Safari  H, Safdarian  M, Safi  S, Safiri  S, Sagar  R, Sahebkar  A, Sahraian  MA, Salam  N, Salama  JS, Salamati  P, Saldanha  RDF, Saleem  Z, Salimi  Y, Salvi  SS, Salz  I, Sambala  EZ, Samy  AM, Sanabria  J, Sanchez-Niño  MD, Santomauro  DF, Santos  IS, Santos  JV, Milicevic  MMS, Sao Jose  BP, Sarker  AR, Sarmiento-Suárez  R, Sarrafzadegan  N, Sartorius  B, Sarvi  S, Sathian  B, Satpathy  M, Sawant  AR, Sawhney  M, Saxena  S, Sayyah  M, Schaeffner  E, Schmidt  MI, Schneider  IJC, Schöttker  B, Schutte  AE, Schwebel  DC, Schwendicke  F, Scott  JG, Sekerija  M, Sepanlou  SG, Serván-Mori  E, Seyedmousavi  S, Shabaninejad  H, Shackelford  KA, Shafieesabet  A, Shahbazi  M, Shaheen  AA, Shaikh  MA, Shams-Beyranvand  M, Shamsi  M, Shamsizadeh  M, Sharafi  K, Sharif  M, Sharif-Alhoseini  M, Sharma  R, She  J, Sheikh  A, Shi  P, Shiferaw  MS, Shigematsu  M, Shiri  R, Shirkoohi  R, Shiue  I, Shokraneh  F, Shrime  MG, Si  S, Siabani  S, Siddiqi  TJ, Sigfusdottir  ID, Sigurvinsdottir  R, Silberberg  DH, Silva  DAS, Silva  JP, Silva  NTD, Silveira  DGA, Singh  JA, Singh  NP, Singh  PK, Singh  V, Sinha  DN, Sliwa  K, Smith  M, Sobaih  BH, Sobhani  S, Sobngwi  E, Soneji  SS, Soofi  M, Sorensen  RJD, Soriano  JB, Soyiri  IN, Sposato  LA, Sreeramareddy  CT, Srinivasan  V, Stanaway  JD, Starodubov  VI, Stathopoulou  V, Stein  DJ, Steiner  C, Stewart  LG, Stokes  MA, Subart  ML, Sudaryanto  A, Sufiyan  MB, Sur  PJ, Sutradhar  I, Sykes  BL, Sylaja  PN, Sylte  DO, Szoeke  CEI, Tabarés-Seisdedos  R, Tabuchi  T, Tadakamadla  SK, Takahashi  K, Tandon  N, Tassew  SG, Taveira  N, Tehrani-Banihashemi  A, Tekalign  TG, Tekle  MG, Temsah  M-H, Temsah  O, Terkawi  AS, Teshale  MY, Tessema  B, Tessema  GA, Thankappan  KR, Thirunavukkarasu  S, Thomas  N, Thrift  AG, Thurston  GD, Tilahun  B, To  QG, Tobe-Gai  R, Tonelli  M, Topor-Madry  R, Torre  AE, Tortajada-Girbés  M, Touvier  M, Tovani-Palone  MR, Tran  BX, Tran  KB, Tripathi  S, Troeger  CE, Truelsen  TC, Truong  NT, Tsadik  AG, Tsoi  D, Tudor Car  L, Tuzcu  EM, Tyrovolas  S, Ukwaja  KN, Ullah  I, Undurraga  EA, Updike  RL, Usman  MS, Uthman  OA, Uzun  SB, Vaduganathan  M, Vaezi  A, Vaidya  G, Valdez  PR, Varavikova  E, Vasankari  TJ, Venketasubramanian  N, Villafaina  S, Violante  FS, Vladimirov  SK, Vlassov  V, Vollset  SE, Vos  T, Wagner  GR, Wagnew  FS, Waheed  Y, Wallin  MT, Walson  JL, Wang  Y, Wang  Y-P, Wassie  MM, Weiderpass  E, Weintraub  RG, Weldegebreal  F, Weldegwergs  KG, Werdecker  A, Werkneh  AA, West  TE, Westerman  R, Whiteford  HA, Widecka  J, Wilner  LB, Wilson  S, Winkler  AS, Wiysonge  CS, Wolfe  CDA, Wu  S, Wu  Y-C, Wyper  GMA, Xavier  D, Xu  G, Yadgir  S, Yadollahpour  A, Yahyazadeh Jabbari  SH, Yakob  B, Yan  LL, Yano  Y, Yaseri  M, Yasin  YJ, Yentür  GK, Yeshaneh  A, Yimer  EM, Yip  P, Yirsaw  BD, Yisma  E, Yonemoto  N, Yonga  G, Yoon  S-J, Yotebieng  M, Younis  MZ, Yousefifard  M, Yu  C, Zadnik  V, Zaidi  Z, Zaman  SB, Zamani  M, Zare  Z, Zeleke  AJ, Zenebe  ZM, Zhang  AL, Zhang  K, Zhou  M, Zodpey  S, Zuhlke  LJ, Naghavi  M, Murray  CJL. Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet  2018;392:1736–1788. 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32203-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Wilcox  NS, Amit  U, Reibel  JB, Berlin  E, Howell  K, Ky  B. Cardiovascular disease and cancer: shared risk factors and mechanisms. Nat Rev Cardiol  2024;21:617–631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Kort  EJ, Paneth  N, Woude  GFV. The decline in US cancer mortality in people born since 1925. Cancer Res  2009;69:6500–6505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Ng  HS, Meng  R, Marin  TS, Damarell  RA, Buckley  E, Selvanayagam  JB, Koczwara  B. Cardiovascular mortality in people with cancer compared to the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Med  2024;13:e70057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Wang  Z, Fan  Z, Yang  L, Liu  L, Sheng  C, Song  F, Huang  Y, Chen  K. Higher risk of cardiovascular mortality than cancer mortality among long-term cancer survivors. Front Cardiovasc Med  2023;10:1014400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Kobo  O, Raisi-Estabragh  Z, Gevaert  S, Rana  JS, Van Spall  HGC, Roguin  A, Petersen  SE, Ky  B, Mamas  MA. Impact of cancer diagnosis on distribution and trends of cardiovascular hospitalizations in the USA between 2004 and 2017. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes  2022;8:787–797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Matetic  A, Mohamed  M, Miller  RJH, Kolman  L, Lopez-Mattei  J, Cheung  WY, Brenner  DR, Van Spall  HGC, Graham  M, Bianco  C, Mamas  MA. Impact of cancer diagnosis on causes and outcomes of 5.9 million US patients with cardiovascular admissions. Int J Cardiol  2021;341:76–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) . HCUP-US NIS overview. https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/ (January 2025).
  • 9. World Health Organization (WHO) . Ageing and health. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health (January 2025).
  • 10. Salive  ME. Multimorbidity in older adults. Epidemiol Rev  2013;35:75–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Montégut  L, López-Otín  C, Kroemer  G. Aging and cancer. Mol Cancer  2024;23:106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Lakatta  EG, Levy  D. Arterial and cardiac aging: major shareholders in cardiovascular disease enterprises: part I: aging arteries: a “set up” for vascular disease. Circulation  2003;107:139–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Koo  CY, Chong  B, Jayabaskaran  J, Nagarajan  S, Jauhari  SM, Chen  Y, Tan  LL, Mehta  A, Khan  MS, Muthiah  M, Hausenloy  D, Richards  AM, Ko  DT, Mallen  CD, Secemsky  EA, Chan  MY, Thavendiranathan  P, Chew  NWS, Mamas  MA. Global trends and forecast of cardiovascular diseases, cancer, and shared risk factors: insights from the GBD 2021. J Am Heart Assoc  2025;14:e043629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Okura  Y, Takayama  T, Ozaki  K, Tanaka  H, Kikuchi  A, Saito  T, Tanigawa  T, Takii  Y, Seki  H, Takenouchi  T, Chou  T, Sato  N, Tanabe  N, Minamino  T. Future projection of cancer patients with cardiovascular disease in Japan by the year 2039: a pilot study. Int J Clin Oncol  2019;24:983–994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Kachur  S, Lavie  CJ, de Schutter  A, Milani  RV, Ventura  HO. Obesity and cardiovascular diseases. Minerva Med  2017;108:212–228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. World Obesity Federation . World Obesity Atlas 2025. London: World Obesity Federation; 2025. https://data.worldobesity.org/publications/world-obesity-atlas-2025-v6.pdf (April 2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 17. International Diabetes Federation (IDF) . IDF Diabetes Atlas. 11th ed. Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation (IDF); 2025. https://diabetesatlas.org/media/uploads/sites/3/2025/04/IDF_Atlas_11th_Edition_2025-1.pdf (April 2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) . Lung cancer risk factors. https://www.cdc.gov/lung-cancer/risk-factors/index.html (March 2025).
  • 19. Münzel  T, Hahad  O, Kuntic  M, Keaney  JF, Deanfield  JE, Daiber  A. Effects of tobacco cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and waterpipe smoking on endothelial function and clinical outcomes. Eur Heart J  2020;41:4057–4070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) . Global Burden of Disease Study 2021 (GBD 2021). Smoking Mortality and Prevalence Forecasts 2022–2050. Seattle, United States of America: Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME); 2024. https://ghdx.healthdata.org/record/ihme-data/gbd-2021-smoking-mortality-prevalence-forecasts-2022-2050 (April 2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Coussens  LM, Werb  Z. Inflammation and cancer. Nature  2002;420:860–867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Grivennikov  SI, Greten  FR, Karin  M. Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cell  2010;140:883–899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Ross  R. Atherosclerosis—an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med  1999;340:115–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Perpinia  AS, Kadoglou  N, Vardaka  M, Gkortzolidis  G, Karavidas  A, Marinakis  T, Papachrysostomou  C, Makaronis  P, Vlachou  C, Mantzourani  M, Farmakis  D, Konstantopoulos  K. Pharmaceutical prevention and management of cardiotoxicity in hematological malignancies. Pharmaceuticals (Basel)  2022;15:1007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Tonorezos  E, Devasia  T, Mariotto  AB, Mollica  MA, Gallicchio  L, Green  P, Doose  M, Brick  R, Streck  B, Reed  C, de Moor  JS. Prevalence of cancer survivors in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst  2024;116:1784–1790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Florido  R, Daya  NR, Ndumele  CE, Koton  S, Russell  SD, Prizment  A, Blumenthal  RS, Matsushita  K, Mok  Y, Felix  AS, Coresh  J, Joshu  CE, Platz  EA, Selvin  E. Cardiovascular disease risk among cancer survivors. J Am Coll Cardiol  2022;80:22–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Tawfiq  E, Pylypchuk  R, Elwood  JM, McKeage  M, Wells  S, Selak  V. Risk of cardiovascular disease in cancer survivors: a cohort study of 446,384 New Zealand primary care patients. Cancer Med  2023;12:20081–20093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Sung  H, Ferlay  J, Siegel  RL, Laversanne  M, Soerjomataram  I, Jemal  A, Bray  F. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin  2021;71:209–249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)World Health Organization (WHO) . Global cancer burden growing, amidst mounting need for services. https://www.who.int/news/item/01-02-2024-global-cancer-burden-growing--amidst-mounting-need-for-services/ (January 2025).
  • 30. Weir  HK, Thompson  TD, Stewart  SL, White  MC. Cancer incidence projections in the United States between 2015 and 2050. Prev Chronic Dis  2021;18:E59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Rumgay  H, Arnold  M, Ferlay  J, Lesi  O, Cabasag  CJ, Vignat  J, Laversanne  M, McGlynn  KA, Soerjomataram  I. Global burden of primary liver cancer in 2020 and predictions to 2040. J Hepatol  2022;77:1598–1606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Burns  SS, Kapur  R. Putative mechanisms underlying cardiovascular disease associated with clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential. Stem Cell Reports  2020;15:292–306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Zheng  H, Mahmood  SS, Khalique  OK, Zhan  H. Trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity: when and how much should we worry?  JCO Oncol Pract  2024;20:1055–1063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Ritter  A, Quartermaine  C, Pierre-Charles  J, Balasubramanian  S, Raeisi-Giglou  P, Addison  D, Miller  E. Cardiotoxicity of anti-cancer radiation therapy: a focus on heart failure. Curr Heart Fail Rep  2023;20:44–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Sørensen  HT, Mellemkjaer  L, Olsen  JH, Baron  JA. Prognosis of cancers associated with venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med  2000;343:1846–1850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Chitturi  KR, Xu  J, Araujo-Gutierrez  R, Bhimaraj  A, Guha  A, Hussain  I, Kassi  M, Bernicker  EH, Trachtenberg  BH. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related adverse cardiovascular events in patients with lung cancer. JACC CardioOncol  2019;1:182–192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Franquiz  MJ, Waliany  S, Xu  AY, Hnatiuk  A, Wu  SM, Cheng  P, Wakelee  HA, Neal  J, Witteles  R, Zhu  H. Osimertinib-associated cardiomyopathy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a case series. JACC CardioOncol  2023;5:839–841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Jacobs  LA, Shulman  LN. Cardio-oncology care delivery for all patients with cancer within academic and community settings. JACC CardioOncol  2024;6:470–472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Gilchrist  SC, Barac  A, Ades  PA, Alfano  CM, Franklin  BA, Jones  LW, La Gerche  A, Ligibel  JA, Lopez  G, Madan  K, Oeffinger  KC, Salamone  J, Scott  JM, Squires  RW, Thomas  RJ, Treat-Jacobson  DJ, Wright  JS. Cardio-oncology rehabilitation to manage cardiovascular outcomes in cancer patients and survivors: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation  2019;139:e997–e1012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Lyon  AR, López-Fernández  T, Couch  LS, Asteggiano  R, Aznar  MC, Bergler-Klein  J, Boriani  G, Cardinale  D, Cordoba  R, Cosyns  B, Cutter  DJ, de Azambuja  E, de Boer  RA, Dent  SF, Farmakis  D, Gevaert  SA, Gorog  DA, Herrmann  J, Lenihan  D, Moslehi  J, Moura  B, Salinger  SS, Stephens  R, Suter  TM, Szmit  S, Tamargo  J, Thavendiranathan  P, Tocchetti  CG, van der Meer  P, van der Pal  HJH, Lancellotti  P, Thuny  F, Abdelhamid  M, Aboyans  V, Aleman  B, Alexandre  J, Barac  A, Borger  MA, Casado-Arroyo  R, Cautela  J, Čelutkienė  J, Cikes  M, Cohen-Solal  A, Dhiman  K, Ederhy  S, Edvardsen  T, Fauchier  L, Fradley  M, Grapsa  J, Halvorsen  S, Heuser  M, Humbert  M, Jaarsma  T, Kahan  T, Konradi  A, Koskinas  KC, Kotecha  D, Ky  B, Landmesser  U, Lewis  BS, Linhart  A, Lip  GYH, Løchen  M-L, Malaczynska-Rajpold  K, Metra  M, Mindham  R, Moonen  M, Neilan  TG, Nielsen  JC, Petronio  A-S, Prescott  E, Rakisheva  A, Salem  J-E, Savarese  G, Sitges  M, Berg  Jt, Touyz  RM, Tycinska  A, Wilhelm  M, Zamorano  JL, Laredj  N, Zelveian  P, Rainer  PP, Samadov  F, Andrushchuk  U, Gerber  BL, Selimović  M, Kinova  E, Samardzic  J, Economides  E, Pudil  R, Nielsen  KM, Kafafy  TA, Vettus  R, Tuohinen  S, Ederhy  S, Pagava  Z, Rassaf  T, Briasoulis  A, Czuriga  D, Andersen  KK, Smyth  Y, Iakobishvili  Z, Parrini  I, Rakisheva  A, Pruthi  EP, Mirrakhimov  E, Kalejs  O, Skouri  H, Benlamin  H, Žaliaduonytė  D, Iovino  A, Moore  AM, Bursacovschi  D, Benyass  A, Manintveld  O, Bosevski  M, Gulati  G, Leszek  P, Fiuza  M, Jurcut  R, Vasyuk  Y, Foscoli  M, Simic  D, Slanina  M, Lipar  L, Martin-Garcia  A, Hübbert  L, Kurmann  R, Alayed  A, Abid  L, Zorkun  C, Nesukay  E, Manisty  C, Srojidinova  N, Baigent  C, Abdelhamid  M, Aboyans  V, Antoniou  S, Arbelo  E, Asteggiano  R, Baumbach  A, Borger  MA, Čelutkienė  J, Cikes  M, Collet  J-P, Falk  V, Fauchier  L, Gale  CP, Halvorsen  S, Iung  B, Jaarsma  T, Konradi  A, Koskinas  KC, Kotecha  D, Landmesser  U, Lewis  BS, Linhart  A, Løchen  M-L, Mindham  R, Nielsen  JC, Petersen  SE, Prescott  E, Rakisheva  A, Sitges  M, Touyz  RM. 2022 ESC guidelines on cardio-oncology developed in collaboration with the European Hematology Association (EHA), the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ESTRO) and the International Cardio-Oncology Society (IC-OS). Eur Heart J  2022;43:4229–4361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Adhikari  BB, Shi  S, Dimond  EP, Shelburne  N, Desvigne-Nickens  P, Minasian  LM. Spectrum of National Institutes of Health-Funded Research in Cardio-Oncology: a basic, clinical, and observational science perspective. Heart Fail Clin  2022;18:515–528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Pareek  N, Cevallos  J, Moliner  P, Shah  M, Tan  LL, Chambers  V, Baksi  AJ, Khattar  RS, Sharma  R, Rosen  SD, Lyon  AR. Activity and outcomes of a cardio-oncology service in the United Kingdom-a five-year experience. Eur J Heart Fail  2018;20:1721–1731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) . Health at a Glance 2025: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2025. [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Busse  R, Geissler  A, Aaviksoo  A, Cots  F, Hakkinen  U, Kobel  C, Mateus  C, Or  Z, O'Reilly  J, Serden  L, Street  A, Tan  SS, Quentin  W. Diagnosis related groups in Europe: moving towards transparency, efficiency, and quality in hospitals?  BMJ  2013;346:f3197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

oeag030_Supplementary_Data

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying this article were provided by HCUP under license and cannot be shared publicly. Researchers may access the NIS dataset directly from https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov upon fulfilling the data use agreement requirements.


Articles from European Heart Journal Open are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology

RESOURCES