Skip to main content
PMC home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1998 Apr;74(4):1744–1753. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77885-3

The effect of protein relaxation on charge-charge interactions and dielectric constants of proteins.

Y Y Sham 1, I Muegge 1, A Warshel 1
PMCID: PMC1299519  PMID: 9545037

Abstract

The effect of the reorganization of the protein polar groups on charge-charge interaction and the corresponding effective dielectric constant (epsilon(eff)) is examined by the semimicroscopic version of the Protein Dipole Langevin Dipoles (PDLD/S) method within the framework of the Linear Response Approximation (LRA). This is done by evaluating the interactions between ionized residues in the reaction center of Rhodobacter sphaeroides, while taking into account the protein reorganization energy. It is found that an explicit consideration of the protein relaxation leads to a significant increase in epsilon(eff) and that semimicroscopic models that do not take this relaxation into account force one to use a large value for the so-called "protein dielectric constant," epsilon(p), of the Poisson-Boltzmann model or for the corresponding epsilon(in) in the PDLD/S model. An additional increase in epsilon(eff) is expected from the reorganization of ionized residues and from changes in the degree of water penetration. This finding provides further support for the idea that epsilon(in) (or epsilon(p)) represents contributions that are not considered explicitly. The present study also provides a systematic illustration of the nature of epsilon(eff), supporting our previously reported view that charge-charge interactions correspond to a large value of this "dielectric constant," even in protein interiors. It is also pointed out that epsilon(eff) for the interaction between ionizable groups in proteins is very different from the effective dielectric constant, epsilon'(eff), that determines the free energy of ion pairs in proteins (epsilon'(eff) reflects the effect of preoriented protein dipoles). Finally, the problems associated with the search for a general epsilon(in) are discussed. It is clarified that the epsilon(in) that reproduces the effect of protein relaxation on charge-charge interaction is not equal to the epsilon(in) that reproduces the corresponding effect upon formation of individual charges. This reflects fundamental inconsistencies in attempts to cast microscopic concepts in a macroscopic model. Thus one should either use a large epsilon(in) for charge-charge interactions and a small epsilon(in) for charge-dipole interactions or consider the protein relaxation microscopically.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (137.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beroza P., Fredkin D. R., Okamura M. Y., Feher G. Electrostatic calculations of amino acid titration and electron transfer, Q-AQB-->QAQ-B, in the reaction center. Biophys J. 1995 Jun;68(6):2233–2250. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80406-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cutler R. L., Davies A. M., Creighton S., Warshel A., Moore G. R., Smith M., Mauk A. G. Role of arginine-38 in regulation of the cytochrome c oxidation-reduction equilibrium. Biochemistry. 1989 Apr 18;28(8):3188–3197. doi: 10.1021/bi00434a012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Del Buono G. S., Figueirido F. E., Levy R. M. Intrinsic pKas of ionizable residues in proteins: an explicit solvent calculation for lysozyme. Proteins. 1994 Sep;20(1):85–97. doi: 10.1002/prot.340200109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ermler U., Fritzsch G., Buchanan S. K., Michel H. Structure of the photosynthetic reaction centre from Rhodobacter sphaeroides at 2.65 A resolution: cofactors and protein-cofactor interactions. Structure. 1994 Oct 15;2(10):925–936. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(94)00094-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gilson M. K. Theory of electrostatic interactions in macromolecules. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1995 Apr;5(2):216–223. doi: 10.1016/0959-440x(95)80079-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hwang J. K., Warshel A. Why ion pair reversal by protein engineering is unlikely to succeed. Nature. 1988 Jul 21;334(6179):270–272. doi: 10.1038/334270a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lancaster C. R., Michel H., Honig B., Gunner M. R. Calculated coupling of electron and proton transfer in the photosynthetic reaction center of Rhodopseudomonas viridis. Biophys J. 1996 Jun;70(6):2469–2492. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79820-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Langen R., Brayer G. D., Berghuis A. M., McLendon G., Sherman F., Warshel A. Effect of the Asn52----Ile mutation on the redox potential of yeast cytochrome c. Theory and experiment. J Mol Biol. 1992 Apr 5;224(3):589–600. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90546-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lee F. S., Chu Z. T., Bolger M. B., Warshel A. Calculations of antibody-antigen interactions: microscopic and semi-microscopic evaluation of the free energies of binding of phosphorylcholine analogs to McPC603. Protein Eng. 1992 Apr;5(3):215–228. doi: 10.1093/protein/5.3.215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Matthew J. B. Electrostatic effects in proteins. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1985;14:387–417. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.14.060185.002131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Muegge I., Schweins T., Langen R., Warshel A. Electrostatic control of GTP and GDP binding in the oncoprotein p21ras. Structure. 1996 Apr 15;4(4):475–489. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(96)00052-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nakamura H. Roles of electrostatic interaction in proteins. Q Rev Biophys. 1996 Feb;29(1):1–90. doi: 10.1017/s0033583500005746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Perutz M. F. Electrostatic effects in proteins. Science. 1978 Sep 29;201(4362):1187–1191. doi: 10.1126/science.694508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rees D. C. Experimental evaluation of the effective dielectric constant of proteins. J Mol Biol. 1980 Aug 15;141(3):323–326. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(80)90184-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Russell S. T., Warshel A. Calculations of electrostatic energies in proteins. The energetics of ionized groups in bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. J Mol Biol. 1985 Sep 20;185(2):389–404. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90411-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sharp K. A., Honig B. Electrostatic interactions in macromolecules: theory and applications. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1990;19:301–332. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.19.060190.001505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Warshel A., Aqvist J. Electrostatic energy and macromolecular function. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1991;20:267–298. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.20.060191.001411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Warshel A. Calculations of enzymatic reactions: calculations of pKa, proton transfer reactions, and general acid catalysis reactions in enzymes. Biochemistry. 1981 May 26;20(11):3167–3177. doi: 10.1021/bi00514a028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Warshel A. Conversion of light energy to electrostatic energy in the proton pump of Halobacterium halobium. Photochem Photobiol. 1979 Aug;30(2):285–290. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1979.tb07148.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Warshel A. Energetics of enzyme catalysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Nov;75(11):5250–5254. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.11.5250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Warshel A., Levitt M. Theoretical studies of enzymic reactions: dielectric, electrostatic and steric stabilization of the carbonium ion in the reaction of lysozyme. J Mol Biol. 1976 May 15;103(2):227–249. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(76)90311-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Warshel A., Russell S. T. Calculations of electrostatic interactions in biological systems and in solutions. Q Rev Biophys. 1984 Aug;17(3):283–422. doi: 10.1017/s0033583500005333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Warshel A., Russell S. T., Churg A. K. Macroscopic models for studies of electrostatic interactions in proteins: limitations and applicability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Aug;81(15):4785–4789. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.15.4785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Warwicker J., Watson H. C. Calculation of the electric potential in the active site cleft due to alpha-helix dipoles. J Mol Biol. 1982 Jun 5;157(4):671–679. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90505-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Yang A. S., Gunner M. R., Sampogna R., Sharp K., Honig B. On the calculation of pKas in proteins. Proteins. 1993 Mar;15(3):252–265. doi: 10.1002/prot.340150304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES