Skip to main content
PMC home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1998 May;74(5):2272–2277. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77936-6

Spatial sensing of stimulus gradients can be superior to temporal sensing for free-swimming bacteria.

D B Dusenbery 1
PMCID: PMC1299570  PMID: 9591654

Abstract

Predictions of the minimal size an organism must have to swim along stimulus gradients were used to compare the relative advantages of sensory systems employing spatial (simultaneous) and temporal (sequential) gradient detection mechanisms for small free-swimming bacteria, leading to the following conclusions: 1) there are environmental conditions where spatial detection mechanisms can function for smaller organisms than can temporal mechanisms, 2) temporal mechanisms are superior (have a smaller size limit) for the difficult conditions of low concentration and shallow gradients, but 3) observed bacterial chemotaxis occurs mostly under conditions where spatial mechanisms have a smaller size limit, and 4) relevant conditions in the natural environment favor temporal mechanisms in some cases and spatial mechanisms in others. Thus, sensory ecology considerations do not preclude free-swimming bacteria from employing spatial detection mechanisms, as has been thought, and microbiologists should be on the lookout for them. If spatial mechanisms do not occur, the explanation should be sought elsewhere.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (55.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adler J. Chemoreceptors in bacteria. Science. 1969 Dec 26;166(3913):1588–1597. doi: 10.1126/science.166.3913.1588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adler J. Chemotaxis in bacteria. Annu Rev Biochem. 1975;44:341–356. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.44.070175.002013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berg H. C., Purcell E. M. Physics of chemoreception. Biophys J. 1977 Nov;20(2):193–219. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(77)85544-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Berg H. C., Turner L. Cells of Escherichia coli swim either end forward. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jan 17;92(2):477–479. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.2.477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Block S. M., Segall J. E., Berg H. C. Impulse responses in bacterial chemotaxis. Cell. 1982 Nov;31(1):215–226. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90421-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Canfield D. E., Jorgensen B. B., Fossing H., Glud R., Gundersen J., Ramsing N. B., Thamdrup B., Hansen J. W., Nielsen L. P., Hall P. O. Pathways of organic carbon oxidation in three continental margin sediments. Mar Geol. 1993;113:27–40. doi: 10.1016/0025-3227(93)90147-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dahlquist F. W., Elwell R. A., Lovely P. S. Studies of bacterial chemotaxis in defined concentration gradients. A model for chemotaxis toward L-serine. J Supramol Struct. 1976;4(3):329–342. doi: 10.1002/jss.400040304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. DeLisi C., Marchetti F., Del Grosso G. A theory of measurement error and its implications for spatial and temporal gradient sensing during chemotaxis. Cell Biophys. 1982 Jun-Sep;4(2-3):211–229. doi: 10.1007/BF02918313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dusenbery D. B. Minimum size limit for useful locomotion by free-swimming microbes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Sep 30;94(20):10949–10954. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.20.10949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hazelbauer G. L. The bacterial chemosensory system. Can J Microbiol. 1988 Apr;34(4):466–474. doi: 10.1139/m88-080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Häder D. P. Photosensory behavior in procaryotes. Microbiol Rev. 1987 Mar;51(1):1–21. doi: 10.1128/mr.51.1.1-21.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Macnab R. M. Bacterial motility and chemotaxis: the molecular biology of a behavioral system. CRC Crit Rev Biochem. 1978;5(4):291–341. doi: 10.3109/10409237809177145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Macnab R. M., Koshland D. E., Jr The gradient-sensing mechanism in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Sep;69(9):2509–2512. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.9.2509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Maddock J. R., Shapiro L. Polar location of the chemoreceptor complex in the Escherichia coli cell. Science. 1993 Mar 19;259(5102):1717–1723. doi: 10.1126/science.8456299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Manson M. D. Bacterial motility and chemotaxis. Adv Microb Physiol. 1992;33:277–346. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2911(08)60219-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mitchell J. G., Pearson L., Dillon S., Kantalis K. Natural assemblages of marine bacteria exhibiting high-speed motility and large accelerations. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 Dec;61(12):4436–4440. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.12.4436-4440.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Segall J. E., Block S. M., Berg H. C. Temporal comparisons in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Dec;83(23):8987–8991. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.23.8987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES