Skip to main content
PMC home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1998 May;74(5):2531–2544. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77961-5

A topological approach to nucleosome structure and dynamics: the linking number paradox and other issues.

A Prunell 1
PMCID: PMC1299595  PMID: 9591679

Abstract

The linking number paradox of DNA in chromatin (two negative crossings around the octamer, associated with a unit linking number reduction), which is 21 years old this year, has come of age. After stirring much debate in the past, the initially hypothetical explanation of the paradox by DNA overtwisting on the nucleosome surface is now presented as a hard fact in recent textbooks. The first part of this article presents a historical perspective of the problem and details the numerous attempts to measure DNA local periodicity, which in one remarkable example sowed the seeds for the discovery of DNA bending. The second part is devoted to the DNA minicircle system, which has been developed in the author's laboratory as an alternative to the local-periodicity-measurement approach. It offers a simple proposal: a unit linking number reduction associated with a single crossing. This conclusion is contrasted with the latest high-resolution crystallographic data of the nucleosome in the third part of the article, and the fourth part examines the available evidence supporting an extension of these results to nucleosomes in chromatin. The last part addresses another basic question pertaining to nucleosome dynamics, the conformational flexibility of the histone tetramer.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (369.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baer B. W., Rhodes D. Eukaryotic RNA polymerase II binds to nucleosome cores from transcribed genes. Nature. 1983 Feb 10;301(5900):482–488. doi: 10.1038/301482a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bauer W. R., Crick F. H., White J. H. Supercoiled DNA. Sci Am. 1980 Jul;243(1):100–113. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baxevanis A. D., Godfrey J. E., Moudrianakis E. N. Associative behavior of the histone (H3-H4)2 tetramer: dependence on ionic environment. Biochemistry. 1991 Sep 10;30(36):8817–8823. doi: 10.1021/bi00100a013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bednar J., Horowitz R. A., Dubochet J., Woodcock C. L. Chromatin conformation and salt-induced compaction: three-dimensional structural information from cryoelectron microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1995 Dec;131(6 Pt 1):1365–1376. doi: 10.1083/jcb.131.6.1365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bina M. Periodicity of dinucleotides in nucleosomes derived from simian virus 40 chromatin. J Mol Biol. 1994 Jan 7;235(1):198–208. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(05)80026-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bordas J., Perez-Grau L., Koch M. H., Vega M. C., Nave C. The superstructure of chromatin and its condensation mechanism. II. Theoretical analysis of the X-ray scattering patterns and model calculations. Eur Biophys J. 1986;13(3):175–185. doi: 10.1007/BF00542561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Camerini-Otero R. D., Felsenfeld G. Histone H3 disulfide dimers and nucleosome structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Dec;74(12):5519–5523. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.12.5519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Coury J. E., McFail-Isom L., Williams L. D., Bottomley L. A. A novel assay for drug-DNA binding mode, affinity, and exclusion number: scanning force microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Oct 29;93(22):12283–12286. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.22.12283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Crick F. H. Linking numbers and nucleosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Aug;73(8):2639–2643. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.8.2639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Daban J. R., Cantor C. R. Role of histone pairs H2A,H2B and H3,H4 in the self-assembly of nucleosome core particles. J Mol Biol. 1982 Apr 25;156(4):771–789. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90141-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dimitrov S. I., Apostolova T. M., Makarov V. L., Pashev I. G. Chromatin superstructure. A study with an immobilized trypsin. FEBS Lett. 1986 May 12;200(2):322–326. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(86)81161-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dong F., van Holde K. E. Nucleosome positioning is determined by the (H3-H4)2 tetramer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Dec 1;88(23):10596–10600. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.23.10596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Drew H. R., Calladine C. R. Sequence-specific positioning of core histones on an 860 base-pair DNA. Experiment and theory. J Mol Biol. 1987 May 5;195(1):143–173. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90333-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Drew H. R., McCall M. J. Structural analysis of a reconstituted DNA containing three histone octamers and histone H5. J Mol Biol. 1987 Oct 5;197(3):485–511. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90560-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Drew H. R., Travers A. A. DNA bending and its relation to nucleosome positioning. J Mol Biol. 1985 Dec 20;186(4):773–790. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90396-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Duband-Goulet I., Carot V., Ulyanov A. V., Douc-Rasy S., Prunell A. Chromatin reconstitution on small DNA rings. IV. DNA supercoiling and nucleosome sequence preference. J Mol Biol. 1992 Apr 20;224(4):981–1001. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90464-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Eickbush T. H., Moudrianakis E. N. The histone core complex: an octamer assembled by two sets of protein-protein interactions. Biochemistry. 1978 Nov 14;17(23):4955–4964. doi: 10.1021/bi00616a016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Finch J. T., Lutter L. C., Rhodes D., Brown R. S., Rushton B., Levitt M., Klug A. Structure of nucleosome core particles of chromatin. Nature. 1977 Sep 1;269(5623):29–36. doi: 10.1038/269029a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Flaus A., Luger K., Tan S., Richmond T. J. Mapping nucleosome position at single base-pair resolution by using site-directed hydroxyl radicals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Feb 20;93(4):1370–1375. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.4.1370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fuller F. B. The writhing number of a space curve. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Apr;68(4):815–819. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.4.815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Furrer P., Bednar J., Dubochet J., Hamiche A., Prunell A. DNA at the entry-exit of the nucleosome observed by cryoelectron microscopy. J Struct Biol. 1995 May-Jun;114(3):177–183. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.1995.1017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gale J. M., Nissen K. A., Smerdon M. J. UV-induced formation of pyrimidine dimers in nucleosome core DNA is strongly modulated with a period of 10.3 bases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Oct;84(19):6644–6648. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.19.6644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gale J. M., Smerdon M. J. Photofootprint of nucleosome core DNA in intact chromatin having different structural states. J Mol Biol. 1988 Dec 20;204(4):949–958. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90054-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Germond J. E., Hirt B., Oudet P., Gross-Bellark M., Chambon P. Folding of the DNA double helix in chromatin-like structures from simian virus 40. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 May;72(5):1843–1847. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.5.1843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Goulet I., Zivanovic Y., Prunell A. Helical repeat of DNA in solution. The V curve method. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Apr 10;15(7):2803–2821. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.7.2803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Goulet I., Zivanovic Y., Prunell A., Revet B. Chromatin reconstitution on small DNA rings. I. J Mol Biol. 1988 Mar 20;200(2):253–266. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90238-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Graziano V., Gerchman S. E., Schneider D. K., Ramakrishnan V. Histone H1 is located in the interior of the chromatin 30-nm filament. Nature. 1994 Mar 24;368(6469):351–354. doi: 10.1038/368351a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hamiche A., Carot V., Alilat M., De Lucia F., O'Donohue M. F., Revet B., Prunell A. Interaction of the histone (H3-H4)2 tetramer of the nucleosome with positively supercoiled DNA minicircles: Potential flipping of the protein from a left- to a right-handed superhelical form. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jul 23;93(15):7588–7593. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.15.7588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hamiche A., Prunell A. Chromatin reconstitution on small DNA rings. V. DNA thermal flexibility of single nucleosomes. J Mol Biol. 1992 Nov 20;228(2):327–337. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90821-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hamiche A., Schultz P., Ramakrishnan V., Oudet P., Prunell A. Linker histone-dependent DNA structure in linear mononucleosomes. J Mol Biol. 1996 Mar 22;257(1):30–42. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hayes J. J., Clark D. J., Wolffe A. P. Histone contributions to the structure of DNA in the nucleosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Aug 1;88(15):6829–6833. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.15.6829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hayes J. J., Tullius T. D., Wolffe A. P. The structure of DNA in a nucleosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Oct;87(19):7405–7409. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.19.7405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Horowitz D. S., Wang J. C. Torsional rigidity of DNA and length dependence of the free energy of DNA supercoiling. J Mol Biol. 1984 Feb 15;173(1):75–91. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90404-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Horowitz R. A., Agard D. A., Sedat J. W., Woodcock C. L. The three-dimensional architecture of chromatin in situ: electron tomography reveals fibers composed of a continuously variable zig-zag nucleosomal ribbon. J Cell Biol. 1994 Apr;125(1):1–10. doi: 10.1083/jcb.125.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ioshikhes I., Bolshoy A., Derenshteyn K., Borodovsky M., Trifonov E. N. Nucleosome DNA sequence pattern revealed by multiple alignment of experimentally mapped sequences. J Mol Biol. 1996 Sep 20;262(2):129–139. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Jackson S., Brooks W., Jackson V. Dynamics of the interactions of histones H2A,H2B and H3,H4 with torsionally stressed DNA. Biochemistry. 1994 May 10;33(18):5392–5403. doi: 10.1021/bi00184a006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Jackson V. In vivo studies on the dynamics of histone-DNA interaction: evidence for nucleosome dissolution during replication and transcription and a low level of dissolution independent of both. Biochemistry. 1990 Jan 23;29(3):719–731. doi: 10.1021/bi00455a019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Jackson V. Influence of positive stress on nucleosome assembly. Biochemistry. 1993 Jun 8;32(22):5901–5912. doi: 10.1021/bi00073a024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Jackson V. Preferential binding of histones H3 and H4 to highly positively coiled DNA. Biochemistry. 1995 Aug 22;34(33):10607–10619. doi: 10.1021/bi00033a036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Klug A., Lutter L. C. The helical periodicity of DNA on the nucleosome. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981 Sep 11;9(17):4267–4283. doi: 10.1093/nar/9.17.4267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Levitt M. How many base-pairs per turn does DNA have in solution and in chromatin? Some theoretical calculations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Feb;75(2):640–644. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.2.640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Liu L. F., Wang J. C. Supercoiling of the DNA template during transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Oct;84(20):7024–7027. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.20.7024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Louters L., Chalkley R. Exchange of histones H1, H2A, and H2B in vivo. Biochemistry. 1985 Jun 18;24(13):3080–3085. doi: 10.1021/bi00334a002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lowman H., Bina M. Correlation between dinucleotide periodicities and nucleosome positioning on mouse satellite DNA. Biopolymers. 1990;30(9-10):861–876. doi: 10.1002/bip.360300902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Luger K., Mäder A. W., Richmond R. K., Sargent D. F., Richmond T. J. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution. Nature. 1997 Sep 18;389(6648):251–260. doi: 10.1038/38444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Lutter L. C. Precise location of DNase I cutting sites in the nucleosome core determined by high resolution gel electrophoresis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979 Jan;6(1):41–56. doi: 10.1093/nar/6.1.41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Makarov V. L., Dimitrov S. I., Tsaneva I. R., Pashev I. G. The role of histone H1 and non-structured domains of core histones in maintaining the orientation of nucleosomes within the chromatin fiber. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1984 Aug 16;122(3):1021–1027. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(84)91193-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Marini J. C., Levene S. D., Crothers D. M., Englund P. T. Bent helical structure in kinetoplast DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Dec;79(24):7664–7668. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.24.7664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Morse R. H., Cantor C. R. Effect of trypsinization and histone H5 addition on DNA twist and topology in reconstituted minichromosomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986 Apr 25;14(8):3293–3310. doi: 10.1093/nar/14.8.3293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Morse R. H., Cantor C. R. Nucleosome core particles suppress the thermal untwisting of core DNA and adjacent linker DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Jul;82(14):4653–4657. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.14.4653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Morse R. H., Simpson R. T. DNA in the nucleosome. Cell. 1988 Jul 29;54(3):285–287. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90190-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Noll M. Internal structure of the chromatin subunit. Nucleic Acids Res. 1974 Nov;1(11):1573–1578. doi: 10.1093/nar/1.11.1573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Noll M., Zimmer S., Engel A., Dubochet J. Self-assembly of single and closely spaced nucleosome core particles. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980 Jan 11;8(1):21–42. doi: 10.1093/nar/8.1.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Norton V. G., Imai B. S., Yau P., Bradbury E. M. Histone acetylation reduces nucleosome core particle linking number change. Cell. 1989 May 5;57(3):449–457. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90920-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Pehrson J. R. Probing the conformation of nucleosome linker DNA in situ with pyrimidine dimer formation. J Biol Chem. 1995 Sep 22;270(38):22440–22444. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Prunell A., Kornberg R. D., Lutter L., Klug A., Levitt M., Crick F. H. Periodicity of deoxyribonuclease I digestion of chromatin. Science. 1979 May 25;204(4395):855–858. doi: 10.1126/science.441739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Prunell A. Periodicity of exonuclease III digestion of chromatin and the pitch of deoxyribonucleic acid on the nucleosome. Biochemistry. 1983 Oct 11;22(21):4887–4894. doi: 10.1021/bi00290a004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Read C. M., Baldwin J. P., Crane-Robinson C. Structure of subnucleosomal particles. Tetrameric (H3/H4)2 146 base pair DNA and hexameric (H3/H4)2(H2A/H2B)1 146 base pair DNA complexes. Biochemistry. 1985 Jul 30;24(16):4435–4450. doi: 10.1021/bi00337a027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Rhodes D. Chromatin structure. The nucleosome core all wrapped up. Nature. 1997 Sep 18;389(6648):231–233. doi: 10.1038/38386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Rhodes D., Klug A. Sequence-dependent helical periodicity of DNA. Nature. 1981 Jul 23;292(5821):378–380. doi: 10.1038/292378a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Richmond T. J., Finch J. T., Rushton B., Rhodes D., Klug A. Structure of the nucleosome core particle at 7 A resolution. Nature. 1984 Oct 11;311(5986):532–537. doi: 10.1038/311532a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Richmond T. J., Rechsteiner T., Luger K. Studies of nucleosome structure. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1993;58:265–272. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1993.058.01.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Saragosti S., Moyne G., Yaniv M. Absence of nucleosomes in a fraction of SV40 chromatin between the origin of replication and the region coding for the late leader RNA. Cell. 1980 May;20(1):65–73. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90235-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Shore D., Baldwin R. L. Energetics of DNA twisting. II. Topoisomer analysis. J Mol Biol. 1983 Nov 15;170(4):983–1007. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(83)80199-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Shrader T. E., Crothers D. M. Effects of DNA sequence and histone-histone interactions on nucleosome placement. J Mol Biol. 1990 Nov 5;216(1):69–84. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80061-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Shure M., Vinograd J. The number of superhelical turns in native virion SV40 DNA and minicol DNA determined by the band counting method. Cell. 1976 Jun;8(2):215–226. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(76)90005-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Simpson R. T., Thoma F., Brubaker J. M. Chromatin reconstituted from tandemly repeated cloned DNA fragments and core histones: a model system for study of higher order structure. Cell. 1985 Oct;42(3):799–808. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90276-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Sogo J. M., Stahl H., Koller T., Knippers R. Structure of replicating simian virus 40 minichromosomes. The replication fork, core histone segregation and terminal structures. J Mol Biol. 1986 May 5;189(1):189–204. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90390-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Stein A. DNA wrapping in nucleosomes. The linking number problem re-examined. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980 Oct 24;8(20):4803–4820. doi: 10.1093/nar/8.20.4803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Struck M. M., Klug A., Richmond T. J. Comparison of X-ray structures of the nucleosome core particle in two different hydration states. J Mol Biol. 1992 Mar 5;224(1):253–264. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90588-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. The helical repeat of nucleosome-wrapped DNA. Cell. 1989 Jan 13;56(1):9–11. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90977-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Thoma F., Koller T., Klug A. Involvement of histone H1 in the organization of the nucleosome and of the salt-dependent superstructures of chromatin. J Cell Biol. 1979 Nov;83(2 Pt 1):403–427. doi: 10.1083/jcb.83.2.403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Trifonov E. N. Curved DNA. CRC Crit Rev Biochem. 1985;19(2):89–106. doi: 10.3109/10409238509082540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Trifonov E. N., Sussman J. L. The pitch of chromatin DNA is reflected in its nucleotide sequence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Jul;77(7):3816–3820. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.7.3816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Ulanovsky L. E., Trifonov E. N. Superhelicity of nucleosomal DNA changes its double-helical repeat. Cell Biophys. 1983 Dec;5(4):281–283. doi: 10.1007/BF02788626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Vinograd J., Lebowitz J., Radloff R., Watson R., Laipis P. The twisted circular form of polyoma viral DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1965 May;53(5):1104–1111. doi: 10.1073/pnas.53.5.1104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Wang B. C., Rose J., Arents G., Moudrianakis E. N. The octameric histone core of the nucleosome. Structural issues resolved. J Mol Biol. 1994 Feb 11;236(1):179–188. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Wang J. C. Helical repeat of DNA in solution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Jan;76(1):200–203. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.1.200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Wang J. C. The path of DNA in the nucleosome. Cell. 1982 Jul;29(3):724–726. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90433-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. White J. H., Cozzarelli N. R., Bauer W. R. Helical repeat and linking number of surface-wrapped DNA. Science. 1988 Jul 15;241(4863):323–327. doi: 10.1126/science.3388041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Williams S. P., Athey B. D., Muglia L. J., Schappe R. S., Gough A. H., Langmore J. P. Chromatin fibers are left-handed double helices with diameter and mass per unit length that depend on linker length. Biophys J. 1986 Jan;49(1):233–248. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(86)83637-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Woodcock C. L., Grigoryev S. A., Horowitz R. A., Whitaker N. A chromatin folding model that incorporates linker variability generates fibers resembling the native structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Oct 1;90(19):9021–9025. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.19.9021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Worcel A., Strogatz S., Riley D. Structure of chromatin and the linking number of DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Mar;78(3):1461–1465. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.3.1461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Zhang P., Tobias I., Olson W. K. Computer simulation of protein-induced structural changes in closed circular DNA. J Mol Biol. 1994 Sep 23;242(3):271–290. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Zivanovic Y., Duband-Goulet I., Schultz P., Stofer E., Oudet P., Prunell A. Chromatin reconstitution on small DNA rings. III. Histone H5 dependence of DNA supercoiling in the nucleosome. J Mol Biol. 1990 Jul 20;214(2):479–495. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(90)90195-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Zivanovic Y., Goulet I., Revet B., Le Bret M., Prunell A. Chromatin reconstitution on small DNA rings. II. DNA supercoiling on the nucleosome. J Mol Biol. 1988 Mar 20;200(2):267–290. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90239-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Zivanovic Y., Goulet I., Revet B., Le Bret M., Prunell A. Chromatin reconstitution on small DNA rings. II. DNA supercoiling on the nucleosome. J Mol Biol. 1988 Mar 20;200(2):267–290. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90239-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Zlatanova J., Leuba S. H., Yang G., Bustamante C., van Holde K. Linker DNA accessibility in chromatin fibers of different conformations: a reevaluation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jun 7;91(12):5277–5280. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.12.5277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. van Holde K., Zlatanova J. What determines the folding of the chromatin fiber? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Oct 1;93(20):10548–10555. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.20.10548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES