Skip to main content
PMC home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1998 Jun;74(6):3023–3030. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)78010-5

Structural features that modulate the transmembrane migration of a hydrophobic peptide in lipid vesicles.

S Jayasinghe 1, M Barranger-Mathys 1, J F Ellena 1, C Franklin 1, D S Cafiso 1
PMCID: PMC1299644  PMID: 9635757

Abstract

Two approaches employing nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) were used to investigate the transmembrane migration rate of the C-terminal end of native alamethicin and a more hydrophobic analog called L1. Native alamethicin exhibits a very slow transmembrane migration rate when bound to phosphatidylcholine vesicles, which is no greater than 1 x 10(-4) min(-1). This rate is much slower than expected, based on the hydrophobic partition energies of the amino acid side chains and the backbone of the exposed C-terminal end of alamethicin. The alamethicin analog L1 exhibits crossing rates that are at least 1000 times faster than that of native alamethicin. A comparison of the equilibrium positions of these two peptides shows that L1 sits approximately 3-4 A deeper in the membrane than does native alamethicin (Barranger-Mathys and Cafiso. 1996. Biochemistry. 35:489). The slow rate of alamethicin crossing can be explained if the peptide helix is irregular at its C-terminus and hydrogen bonded to solvent or lipid. We postulate that L1 does not experience as large a barrier to transport because its C-terminus is already buried within the membrane interface. This difference is most easily explained by conformational differences between L1 and alamethicin rather than differences in hydrophobicity. The results obtained here demonstrate that side-chain hydrophobicity alone cannot account for the energy barriers to peptide and protein transport across membranes.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (132.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Archer S. J., Ellena J. F., Cafiso D. S. Dynamics and aggregation of the peptide ion channel alamethicin. Measurements using spin-labeled peptides. Biophys J. 1991 Aug;60(2):389–398. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82064-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barranger-Mathys M., Cafiso D. S. Membrane structure of voltage-gated channel forming peptides by site-directed spin-labeling. Biochemistry. 1996 Jan 16;35(2):498–505. doi: 10.1021/bi951985d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ben-Tal N., Ben-Shaul A., Nicholls A., Honig B. Free-energy determinants of alpha-helix insertion into lipid bilayers. Biophys J. 1996 Apr;70(4):1803–1812. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79744-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cafiso D. S. Alamethicin: a peptide model for voltage gating and protein-membrane interactions. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1994;23:141–165. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.23.060194.001041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cafiso D. S., Hubbell W. L. EPR determination of membrane potentials. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1981;10:217–244. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.10.060181.001245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cafiso D. S., Hubbell W. L. Estimation of transmembrane pH gradients from phase equilibria of spin-labeled amines. Biochemistry. 1978 Sep 5;17(18):3871–3877. doi: 10.1021/bi00611a030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cafiso D. S., Hubbell W. L. Transmembrane electrical currents of spin-labeled hydrophobic ions. Biophys J. 1982 Sep;39(3):263–272. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(82)84516-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Castle J. D., Hubbell W. L. Estimation of membrane surface potential and charge density from the phase equilibrium of a paramagnetic amphiphile. Biochemistry. 1976 Nov 2;15(22):4818–4831. doi: 10.1021/bi00667a011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ellena J. F., Archer S. J., Dominey R. N., Hill B. D., Cafiso D. S. Localizing the nitroxide group of fatty acid and voltage-sensitive spin-labels in phospholipid bilayers. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1988 May 9;940(1):63–70. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(88)90008-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Engelman D. M., Steitz T. A., Goldman A. Identifying nonpolar transbilayer helices in amino acid sequences of membrane proteins. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1986;15:321–353. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.15.060186.001541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Franklin J. C., Ellena J. F., Jayasinghe S., Kelsh L. P., Cafiso D. S. Structure of micelle-associated alamethicin from 1H NMR. Evidence for conformational heterogeneity in a voltage-gated peptide. Biochemistry. 1994 Apr 5;33(13):4036–4045. doi: 10.1021/bi00179a032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hall J. E., Vodyanoy I., Balasubramanian T. M., Marshall G. R. Alamethicin. A rich model for channel behavior. Biophys J. 1984 Jan;45(1):233–247. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(84)84151-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. He K., Ludtke S. J., Heller W. T., Huang H. W. Mechanism of alamethicin insertion into lipid bilayers. Biophys J. 1996 Nov;71(5):2669–2679. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79458-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Huang C., Mason J. T. Geometric packing constraints in egg phosphatidylcholine vesicles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Jan;75(1):308–310. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.1.308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Huang H. W., Wu Y. Lipid-alamethicin interactions influence alamethicin orientation. Biophys J. 1991 Nov;60(5):1079–1087. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82144-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Keller S. L., Bezrukov S. M., Gruner S. M., Tate M. W., Vodyanoy I., Parsegian V. A. Probability of alamethicin conductance states varies with nonlamellar tendency of bilayer phospholipids. Biophys J. 1993 Jul;65(1):23–27. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81040-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Keller S. L., Gruner S. M., Gawrisch K. Small concentrations of alamethicin induce a cubic phase in bulk phosphatidylethanolamine mixtures. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1996 Jan 31;1278(2):241–246. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(95)00229-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kelsh L. P., Ellena J. F., Cafiso D. S. Determination of the molecular dynamics of alamethicin using 13C NMR: implications for the mechanism of gating of a voltage-dependent channel. Biochemistry. 1992 Jun 9;31(22):5136–5144. doi: 10.1021/bi00137a007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Latorre R., Alvarez O. Voltage-dependent channels in planar lipid bilayer membranes. Physiol Rev. 1981 Jan;61(1):77–150. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1981.61.1.77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Maduke M., Roise D. Import of a mitochondrial presequence into protein-free phospholipid vesicles. Science. 1993 Apr 16;260(5106):364–367. doi: 10.1126/science.8385804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Marassi F. M., Shivers R. R., Macdonald P. M. Resolving the two monolayers of a lipid bilayer in giant unilamellar vesicles using deuterium nuclear magnetic resonance. Biochemistry. 1993 Sep 28;32(38):9936–9943. doi: 10.1021/bi00089a009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mathew M. K., Balaram P. Alamethicin and related membrane channel forming polypeptides. Mol Cell Biochem. 1983;50(1):47–64. doi: 10.1007/BF00225279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Matsuzaki K., Murase O., Fujii N., Miyajima K. Translocation of a channel-forming antimicrobial peptide, magainin 2, across lipid bilayers by forming a pore. Biochemistry. 1995 May 16;34(19):6521–6526. doi: 10.1021/bi00019a033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Molle G., Duclohier H., Dugast J. Y., Spach G. Design and conformation of non-Aib synthetic peptides enjoying alamethicin-like ionophore activity. Biopolymers. 1989 Jan;28(1):273–283. doi: 10.1002/bip.360280128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Perkins W. R., Cafiso D. S. Characterization of H+/OH- currents in phospholipid vesicles. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 1987 Oct;19(5):443–455. doi: 10.1007/BF00770029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rizzo V., Stankowski S., Schwarz G. Alamethicin incorporation in lipid bilayers: a thermodynamic study. Biochemistry. 1987 May 19;26(10):2751–2759. doi: 10.1021/bi00384a015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sansom M. S. Alamethicin and related peptaibols--model ion channels. Eur Biophys J. 1993;22(2):105–124. doi: 10.1007/BF00196915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Schwarz G., Stankowski S., Rizzo V. Thermodynamic analysis of incorporation and aggregation in a membrane: application to the pore-forming peptide alamethicin. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1986 Sep 25;861(1):141–151. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(86)90573-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Stankowski S., Schwarz G. Lipid dependence of peptide-membrane interactions. Bilayer affinity and aggregation of the peptide alamethicin. FEBS Lett. 1989 Jul 3;250(2):556–560. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(89)80795-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Vodyanoy I., Hall J. E., Balasubramanian T. M. Alamethicin-induced current-voltage curve asymmetry in lipid bilayers. Biophys J. 1983 Apr;42(1):71–82. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(83)84370-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Woolley G. A., Wallace B. A. Model ion channels: gramicidin and alamethicin. J Membr Biol. 1992 Aug;129(2):109–136. doi: 10.1007/BF00219508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Xu Z. C., Cafiso D. S. Phospholipid packing and conformation in small vesicles revealed by two-dimensional 1H nuclear magnetic resonance cross-relaxation spectroscopy. Biophys J. 1986 Mar;49(3):779–783. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(86)83705-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. de Kroon A. I., Killian J. A., de Gier J., de Kruijff B. The membrane interaction of amphiphilic model peptides affects phosphatidylserine headgroup and acyl chain order and dynamics. Application of the "phospholipid headgroup electrometer" concept to phosphatidylserine. Biochemistry. 1991 Jan 29;30(4):1155–1162. doi: 10.1021/bi00218a038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES