Skip to main content
PMC home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1998 Oct;75(4):1679–1688. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77610-6

Analysis of synaptic transmission in the neuromuscular junction using a continuum finite element model.

J L Smart 1, J A McCammon 1
PMCID: PMC1299840  PMID: 9746510

Abstract

There is a steadily growing body of experimental data describing the diffusion of acetylcholine in the neuromuscular junction and the subsequent miniature endplate currents produced at the postsynaptic membrane. To gain further insights into the structural features governing synaptic transmission, we have performed calculations using a simplified finite element model of the neuromuscular junction. The diffusing acetylcholine molecules are modeled as a continuum, whose spatial and temporal distribution is governed by the force-free diffusion equation. The finite element method was adopted because of its flexibility in modeling irregular geometries and complex boundary conditions. The resulting simulations are shown to be in accord with experiment and other simulations.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (123.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Agmon N., Edelstein A. L. Collective binding properties of receptor arrays. Biophys J. 1997 Apr;72(4):1582–1594. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78805-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Almers W., Tse F. W. Transmitter release from synapses: does a preassembled fusion pore initiate exocytosis? Neuron. 1990 Jun;4(6):813–818. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(90)90134-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bartol T. M., Jr, Land B. R., Salpeter E. E., Salpeter M. M. Monte Carlo simulation of miniature endplate current generation in the vertebrate neuromuscular junction. Biophys J. 1991 Jun;59(6):1290–1307. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82344-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bennett M. R., Farnell L., Gibson W. G., Lavidis N. A. Synaptic transmission at visualized sympathetic boutons: stochastic interaction between acetylcholine and its receptors. Biophys J. 1997 Apr;72(4):1595–1606. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78806-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bruns D., Jahn R. Real-time measurement of transmitter release from single synaptic vesicles. Nature. 1995 Sep 7;377(6544):62–65. doi: 10.1038/377062a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dionne V. E., Leibowitz M. D. Acetylcholine receptor kinetics. A description from single-channel currents at snake neuromuscular junctions. Biophys J. 1982 Sep;39(3):253–261. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(82)84515-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dwyer T. M. The rising phase of the miniature endplate current at the frog neuromuscular junction. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1981 Aug 6;646(1):51–60. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(81)90271-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Edmonds B., Gibb A. J., Colquhoun D. Mechanisms of activation of muscle nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and the time course of endplate currents. Annu Rev Physiol. 1995;57:469–493. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.57.030195.002345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fertuck H. C., Salpeter M. M. Quantitation of junctional and extrajunctional acetylcholine receptors by electron microscope autoradiography after 125I-alpha-bungarotoxin binding at mouse neuromuscular junctions. J Cell Biol. 1976 Apr;69(1):144–158. doi: 10.1083/jcb.69.1.144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Friboulet A., Thomas D. Reaction-diffusion coupling in a structured system: application to the quantitative simulation of endplate currents. J Theor Biol. 1993 Feb 21;160(4):441–455. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1993.1029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hartzell H. C., Kuffler S. W., Yoshikami D. Post-synaptic potentiation: interaction between quanta of acetylcholine at the skeletal neuromuscular synapse. J Physiol. 1975 Oct;251(2):427–463. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Katz B., Miledi R. Estimates of quantal content during 'chemical potentiation' of transmitter release. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1979 Aug 31;205(1160):369–378. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1979.0070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Katz B., Miledi R. The binding of acetylcholine to receptors and its removal from the synaptic cleft. J Physiol. 1973 Jun;231(3):549–574. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Katz B., Miledi R. The statistical nature of the acetycholine potential and its molecular components. J Physiol. 1972 Aug;224(3):665–699. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Khanin R., Parnas H., Segel L. Diffusion cannot govern the discharge of neurotransmitter in fast synapses. Biophys J. 1994 Sep;67(3):966–972. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80562-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kleinle J., Vogt K., Lüscher H. R., Müller L., Senn W., Wyler K., Streit J. Transmitter concentration profiles in the synaptic cleft: an analytical model of release and diffusion. Biophys J. 1996 Nov;71(5):2413–2426. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79435-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Land B. R., Harris W. V., Salpeter E. E., Salpeter M. M. Diffusion and binding constants for acetylcholine derived from the falling phase of miniature endplate currents. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Mar;81(5):1594–1598. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.5.1594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Land B. R., Salpeter E. E., Salpeter M. M. Acetylcholine receptor site density affects the rising phase of miniature endplate currents. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Jun;77(6):3736–3740. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.6.3736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Land B. R., Salpeter E. E., Salpeter M. M. Kinetic parameters for acetylcholine interaction in intact neuromuscular junction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Nov;78(11):7200–7204. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.11.7200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Madsen B. W., Edeson R. O., Lam H. S., Milne R. K. Numerical simulation of miniature endplate currents. Neurosci Lett. 1984 Jul 13;48(1):67–74. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(84)90290-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Magleby K. L., Terrar D. A. Factors affecting the time course of decay of end-plate currents: a possible cooperative action of acetylcholine on receptors at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1975 Jan;244(2):467–495. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Matthews-Bellinger J., Salpeter M. M. Distribution of acetylcholine receptors at frog neuromuscular junctions with a discussion of some physiological implications. J Physiol. 1978 Jun;279:197–213. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Miledi R., Molenaar P. C., Polak R. L. Free and bound acetylcholine in frog muscle. J Physiol. 1982 Dec;333:189–199. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Radić Z., Gibney G., Kawamoto S., MacPhee-Quigley K., Bongiorno C., Taylor P. Expression of recombinant acetylcholinesterase in a baculovirus system: kinetic properties of glutamate 199 mutants. Biochemistry. 1992 Oct 13;31(40):9760–9767. doi: 10.1021/bi00155a032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Salpeter M. M., Plattner H., Rogers A. W. Quantitative assay of esterases in end plates of mouse diaphragm by electron microscope autoradiography. J Histochem Cytochem. 1972 Dec;20(12):1059–1068. doi: 10.1177/20.12.1059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Salpeter M. M., Rogers A. W., Kasprzak H., McHenry F. A. Acetylcholinesterase in the fast extraocular muscle of the mouse by light and electron microscope autoradiography. J Cell Biol. 1978 Jul;78(1):274–285. doi: 10.1083/jcb.78.1.274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Stiles J. R., Van Helden D., Bartol T. M., Jr, Salpeter E. E., Salpeter M. M. Miniature endplate current rise times less than 100 microseconds from improved dual recordings can be modeled with passive acetylcholine diffusion from a synaptic vesicle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jun 11;93(12):5747–5752. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.12.5747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wathey J. C., Nass M. M., Lester H. A. Numerical reconstruction of the quantal event at nicotinic synapses. Biophys J. 1979 Jul;27(1):145–164. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(79)85208-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES