Skip to main content
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1998 Oct;75(4):2038–2049. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77646-5

Local measurements of viscoelastic parameters of adherent cell surfaces by magnetic bead microrheometry.

A R Bausch 1, F Ziemann 1, A A Boulbitch 1, K Jacobson 1, E Sackmann 1
PMCID: PMC1299876  PMID: 9746546

Abstract

A magnetic bead microrheometer has been designed which allows the generation of forces up to 10(4) pN on 4.5 micron paramagnetic beads. It is applied to measure local viscoelastic properties of the surface of adhering fibroblasts. Creep response and relaxation curves evoked by tangential force pulses of 500-2500 pN (and approximately 1 s duration) on the magnetic beads fixed to the integrin receptors of the cell membrane are recorded by particle tracking. Linear three-phasic creep responses consisting of an elastic deflection, a stress relaxation, and a viscous flow are established. The viscoelastic response curves are analyzed in terms of a series arrangement of a dashpot and a Voigt body, which allows characterization of the viscoelastic behavior of the adhering cell surface in terms of three parameters: an effective elastic constant, a viscosity, and a relaxation time. The displacement field generated by the local tangential forces on the cell surface is visualized by observing the induced motion of assemblies of nonmagnetic colloidal probes fixed to the membrane. It is found that the displacement field decays rapidly with the distance from the magnetic bead. A cutoff radius of Rc approximately 7 micron of the screened elastic field is established. Partial penetration of the shear field into the cytoplasm is established by observing the induced deflection of intracellular compartments. The cell membrane was modeled as a thin elastic plate of shear modulus mu * coupled to a viscoelastic layer, which is fixed to a solid support on the opposite side; the former accounts for the membrane/actin cortex, and the latter for the contribution of the cytoskeleton to the deformation of the cell envelope. It is characterized by the coupling constant chi characterizing the elasticity of the cytoskeleton. The coupling constant chi and the surface shear modulus mu * are obtained from the measured displacements of the magnetic and nonmagnetic beads. By analyzing the experimental data in terms of this model a surface shear modulus of mu * approximately 2 . 10(-3) Pa m to 4 . 10(-3) Pa m is found. By assuming an approximate plate thickness of 0.1 micron one estimates an average bulk shear modulus of mu approximately (2 / 4) . 10(-4) Pa, which is in reasonable agreement with data obtained by atomic force microscopy. The viscosity of the dashpot is related to the apparent viscosity of the cytoplasm, which is obtained by assuming that the top membrane is coupled to the bottom (fixed) membrane by a viscous medium. By application of the theory of diffusion of membrane proteins in supported membranes we find a coefficient of friction of bc approximately 2 . 10(9) Pa s/m corresponding to a cytoplasmic viscosity of 2 . 10(3) Pa s.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (410.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chicurel M. E., Singer R. H., Meyer C. J., Ingber D. E. Integrin binding and mechanical tension induce movement of mRNA and ribosomes to focal adhesions. Nature. 1998 Apr 16;392(6677):730–733. doi: 10.1038/33719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Choquet D., Felsenfeld D. P., Sheetz M. P. Extracellular matrix rigidity causes strengthening of integrin-cytoskeleton linkages. Cell. 1997 Jan 10;88(1):39–48. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81856-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Forgacs G. Biological specificity and measurable physical properties of cell surface receptors and their possible role in signal transduction through the cytoskeleton. Biochem Cell Biol. 1995 Jul-Aug;73(7-8):317–326. doi: 10.1139/o95-040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hofmann U. G., Rotsch C., Parak W. J., Radmacher M. Investigating the cytoskeleton of chicken cardiocytes with the atomic force microscope. J Struct Biol. 1997 Jul;119(2):84–91. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.1997.3868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ingber D. E. Tensegrity: the architectural basis of cellular mechanotransduction. Annu Rev Physiol. 1997;59:575–599. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.59.1.575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Miyamoto S., Akiyama S. K., Yamada K. M. Synergistic roles for receptor occupancy and aggregation in integrin transmembrane function. Science. 1995 Feb 10;267(5199):883–885. doi: 10.1126/science.7846531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pasternak C., Wong S., Elson E. L. Mechanical function of dystrophin in muscle cells. J Cell Biol. 1995 Feb;128(3):355–361. doi: 10.1083/jcb.128.3.355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Radmacher M., Fritz M., Kacher C. M., Cleveland J. P., Hansma P. K. Measuring the viscoelastic properties of human platelets with the atomic force microscope. Biophys J. 1996 Jan;70(1):556–567. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79602-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sato M., Wong T. Z., Brown D. T., Allen R. D. Rheological properties of living cytoplasm: a preliminary investigation of squid axoplasm (Loligo pealei). Cell Motil. 1984;4(1):7–23. doi: 10.1002/cm.970040103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Schmidt F. G., Ziemann F., Sackmann E. Shear field mapping in actin networks by using magnetic tweezers. Eur Biophys J. 1996;24(5):348–353. doi: 10.1007/BF00180376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Simson R., Wallraff E., Faix J., Niewöhner J., Gerisch G., Sackmann E. Membrane bending modulus and adhesion energy of wild-type and mutant cells of Dictyostelium lacking talin or cortexillins. Biophys J. 1998 Jan;74(1):514–522. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77808-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Tsai M. A., Frank R. S., Waugh R. E. Passive mechanical behavior of human neutrophils: effect of cytochalasin B. Biophys J. 1994 Jun;66(6):2166–2172. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)81012-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Valberg P. A., Butler J. P. Magnetic particle motions within living cells. Physical theory and techniques. Biophys J. 1987 Oct;52(4):537–550. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(87)83243-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Valberg P. A., Feldman H. A. Magnetic particle motions within living cells. Measurement of cytoplasmic viscosity and motile activity. Biophys J. 1987 Oct;52(4):551–561. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(87)83244-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wang N., Butler J. P., Ingber D. E. Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton. Science. 1993 May 21;260(5111):1124–1127. doi: 10.1126/science.7684161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhelev D. V., Needham D., Hochmuth R. M. Role of the membrane cortex in neutrophil deformation in small pipets. Biophys J. 1994 Aug;67(2):696–705. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80529-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ziemann F., Rädler J., Sackmann E. Local measurements of viscoelastic moduli of entangled actin networks using an oscillating magnetic bead micro-rheometer. Biophys J. 1994 Jun;66(6):2210–2216. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)81017-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES