Skip to main content
PMC home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1998 Dec;75(6):3057–3063. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77746-X

Salt-dependent DNA superhelix diameter studied by small angle neutron scattering measurements and Monte Carlo simulations.

M Hammermann 1, N Brun 1, K V Klenin 1, R May 1, K Tóth 1, J Langowski 1
PMCID: PMC1299976  PMID: 9826625

Abstract

Using small angle neutron scattering we have measured the static form factor of two different superhelical DNAs, p1868 (1868 bp) and pUC18 (2686 bp), in dilute aqueous solution at salt concentrations between 0 and 1.5 M Na+ in 10 mM Tris at 0% and 100% D2O. For both DNA molecules, the theoretical static form factor was also calculated from an ensemble of Monte Carlo configurations generated by a previously described model. Simulated and measured form factors of both DNAs showed the same behavior between 10 and 100 mM salt concentration: An undulation in the scattering curve at a momentum transfer q = 0.5 nm-1 present at lower concentration disappears above 100 mM. The position of the undulation corresponds to a distance of approximately 10-20 nm. This indicated a change in the DNA superhelix diameter, as the undulation is not present in the scattering curve of the relaxed DNA. From the measured scattering curves of superhelical DNA we estimated the superhelix diameter as a function of Na+ concentration by a quantitative comparison with the scattering curve of relaxed DNA. The ratio of the scattering curves of superhelical and relaxed DNA is very similar to the form factor of a pair of point scatterers. We concluded that the distance of this pair corresponds to the interstrand separation in the superhelix. The computed superhelix diameter of 16.0 +/- 0.9 nm at 10 mM decreased to 9.0 +/- 0.7 nm at 100 mM salt concentration. Measured and simulated scattering curves agreed almost quantitatively, therefore we also calculated the superhelix diameter from the simulated conformations. It decreased from 18.0 +/- 1.5 nm at 10 mM to 9.4 +/- 1.5 nm at 100 mM salt concentration. This value did not significantly change to lower values at higher Na+ concentration, in agreement with results obtained by electron microscopy, scanning force microscopy imaging in aqueous solution, and recent MC simulations, but in contrast to the observation of a lateral collapse of the DNA superhelix as indicated by cryo-electron microscopy studies.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (98.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adrian M., ten Heggeler-Bordier B., Wahli W., Stasiak A. Z., Stasiak A., Dubochet J. Direct visualization of supercoiled DNA molecules in solution. EMBO J. 1990 Dec;9(13):4551–4554. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07907.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bednar J., Furrer P., Stasiak A., Dubochet J., Egelman E. H., Bates A. D. The twist, writhe and overall shape of supercoiled DNA change during counterion-induced transition from a loosely to a tightly interwound superhelix. Possible implications for DNA structure in vivo. J Mol Biol. 1994 Jan 21;235(3):825–847. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boles T. C., White J. H., Cozzarelli N. R. Structure of plectonemically supercoiled DNA. J Mol Biol. 1990 Jun 20;213(4):931–951. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80272-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brady G. W., Satkowski M., Foos D., Benham C. J. Environmental influences on DNA superhelicity. The effect of ionic strength on superhelix conformation in solution. J Mol Biol. 1987 May 5;195(1):185–191. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90335-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gebe J. A., Allison S. A., Clendenning J. B., Schurr J. M. Monte Carlo simulations of supercoiling free energies for unknotted and trefoil knotted DNAs. Biophys J. 1995 Feb;68(2):619–633. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80223-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gebe J. A., Delrow J. J., Heath P. J., Fujimoto B. S., Stewart D. W., Schurr J. M. Effects of Na+ and Mg2+ on the structures of supercoiled DNAs: comparison of simulations with experiments. J Mol Biol. 1996 Sep 20;262(2):105–128. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Grassian V., Brady G. W., Benham C. J. X-ray conformational study of the DNA duplex in solution. Biopolymers. 1983 Jun;22(6):1523–1543. doi: 10.1002/bip.360220608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hagerman P. J. Flexibility of DNA. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1988;17:265–286. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.17.060188.001405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hammermann M., Steinmaier C., Merlitz H., Kapp U., Waldeck W., Chirico G., Langowski J. Salt effects on the structure and internal dynamics of superhelical DNAs studied by light scattering and Brownian dynamics. Biophys J. 1997 Nov;73(5):2674–2687. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78296-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kapp U., Langowski J. Preparation of DNA topoisomers by RP-18 high-performance liquid chromatography. Anal Biochem. 1992 Nov 1;206(2):293–299. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(92)90369-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Klenin K. V., Frank-Kamenetskii M. D., Langowski J. Modulation of intramolecular interactions in superhelical DNA by curved sequences: a Monte Carlo simulation study. Biophys J. 1995 Jan;68(1):81–88. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80161-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Klenin K. V., Vologodskii A. V., Anshelevich V. V., Dykhne A. M., Frank-Kamenetskii M. D. Computer simulation of DNA supercoiling. J Mol Biol. 1991 Feb 5;217(3):413–419. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90745-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Klenin K., Merlitz H., Langowski J. A Brownian dynamics program for the simulation of linear and circular DNA and other wormlike chain polyelectrolytes. Biophys J. 1998 Feb;74(2 Pt 1):780–788. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)74003-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kremer W., Klenin K., Diekmann S., Langowski J. DNA curvature influences the internal motions of supercoiled DNA. EMBO J. 1993 Nov;12(11):4407–4412. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb06125.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Langowski J., Giesen U. Configurational and dynamic properties of different length superhelical DNAs measured by dynamic light scattering. Biophys Chem. 1989 Sep 15;34(1):9–18. doi: 10.1016/0301-4622(89)80036-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Langowski J., Giesen U., Lehmann C. Dynamics of superhelical DNA studied by photon correlation spectroscopy. Biophys Chem. 1986 Dec 15;25(2):191–200. doi: 10.1016/0301-4622(86)87010-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Langowski J. Salt effects on internal motions of superhelical and linear pUC8 DNA. Dynamic light scattering studies. Biophys Chem. 1987 Sep;27(3):263–271. doi: 10.1016/0301-4622(87)80066-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Merlitz H., Rippe K., Klenin K. V., Langowski J. Looping dynamics of linear DNA molecules and the effect of DNA curvature: a study by Brownian dynamics simulation. Biophys J. 1998 Feb;74(2 Pt 1):773–779. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)74002-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rippe K., Guthold M., von Hippel P. H., Bustamante C. Transcriptional activation via DNA-looping: visualization of intermediates in the activation pathway of E. coli RNA polymerase x sigma 54 holoenzyme by scanning force microscopy. J Mol Biol. 1997 Jul 11;270(2):125–138. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rippe K., Mücke N., Langowski J. Superhelix dimensions of a 1868 base pair plasmid determined by scanning force microscopy in air and in aqueous solution. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 May 1;25(9):1736–1744. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.9.1736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rybenkov V. V., Vologodskii A. V., Cozzarelli N. R. The effect of ionic conditions on the conformations of supercoiled DNA. I. Sedimentation analysis. J Mol Biol. 1997 Mar 28;267(2):299–311. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Schellman J. A. Electrical double layer, zeta potential, and electrophoretic charge of double-stranded DNA. Biopolymers. 1977 Jul;16(7):1415–1434. doi: 10.1002/bip.1977.360160704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Stigter D. Interactions of highly charged colloidal cylinders with applications to double-stranded. Biopolymers. 1977 Jul;16(7):1435–1448. doi: 10.1002/bip.1977.360160705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Vologodskii A. V., Levene S. D., Klenin K. V., Frank-Kamenetskii M., Cozzarelli N. R. Conformational and thermodynamic properties of supercoiled DNA. J Mol Biol. 1992 Oct 20;227(4):1224–1243. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90533-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES