Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1999 Apr;76(4):1734–1743. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77335-2

Hydrophobic hydration of amphipathic peptides.

Y K Cheng 1, W S Sheu 1, P J Rossky 1
PMCID: PMC1300152  PMID: 10096874

Abstract

Biomolecular surfaces and interfaces are commonly found with apolar character. The hydrophobic effect thus plays a crucial role in processes involving association with biomolecular surfaces in the cellular environment. By computer simulation, we compared the hydrogen bonding structures and energetics of the proximal hydration shells of the monomer and dimer from a recent study of an extrinsic membrane peptide, melittin. The two peptides were studied in their amphipathic alpha-helical forms, which possess extended hydrophobic surfaces characterized by different topography. The topography of the peptide-water interface was found to be critical in determining the enthalpic nature of hydrophobic hydration. This topographical dependence has far-reaching implications in the regulation of bioactivities in the presence of amphipathicity. This result also engenders reconsideration of the validity of using free energy parameters that depend solely on the chemical nature of constituent moieties in characterizing hydrophobic hydration of proteins and biomolecules in general.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (983.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Altenbach C., Froncisz W., Hyde J. S., Hubbell W. L. Conformation of spin-labeled melittin at membrane surfaces investigated by pulse saturation recovery and continuous wave power saturation electron paramagnetic resonance. Biophys J. 1989 Dec;56(6):1183–1191. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(89)82765-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bernstein F. C., Koetzle T. F., Williams G. J., Meyer E. F., Jr, Brice M. D., Rodgers J. R., Kennard O., Shimanouchi T., Tasumi M. The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J Mol Biol. 1977 May 25;112(3):535–542. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(77)80200-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Braig K., Otwinowski Z., Hegde R., Boisvert D. C., Joachimiak A., Horwich A. L., Sigler P. B. The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 A. Nature. 1994 Oct 13;371(6498):578–586. doi: 10.1038/371578a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cheng Y. K., Rossky P. J. Surface topography dependence of biomolecular hydrophobic hydration. Nature. 1998 Apr 16;392(6677):696–699. doi: 10.1038/33653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dempsey C. E., Butler G. S. Helical structure and orientation of melittin in dispersed phospholipid membranes from amide exchange analysis in situ. Biochemistry. 1992 Dec 8;31(48):11973–11977. doi: 10.1021/bi00163a003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dempsey C. E. The actions of melittin on membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1990 May 7;1031(2):143–161. doi: 10.1016/0304-4157(90)90006-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Eisenberg D., McLachlan A. D. Solvation energy in protein folding and binding. Nature. 1986 Jan 16;319(6050):199–203. doi: 10.1038/319199a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Frey S., Tamm L. K. Orientation of melittin in phospholipid bilayers. A polarized attenuated total reflection infrared study. Biophys J. 1991 Oct;60(4):922–930. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82126-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ishiguro R., Matsumoto M., Takahashi S. Interaction of fusogenic synthetic peptide with phospholipid bilayers: orientation of the peptide alpha-helix and binding isotherm. Biochemistry. 1996 Apr 16;35(15):4976–4983. doi: 10.1021/bi952547+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kaiser E. T., Kézdy F. J. Amphiphilic secondary structure: design of peptide hormones. Science. 1984 Jan 20;223(4633):249–255. doi: 10.1126/science.6322295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lee B., Richards F. M. The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. J Mol Biol. 1971 Feb 14;55(3):379–400. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(71)90324-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lijnzaad P., Argos P. Hydrophobic patches on protein subunit interfaces: characteristics and prediction. Proteins. 1997 Jul;28(3):333–343. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lijnzaad P., Berendsen H. J., Argos P. Hydrophobic patches on the surfaces of protein structures. Proteins. 1996 Jul;25(3):389–397. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(199607)25:3<389::AID-PROT10>3.0.CO;2-E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Matsuzaki K., Murase O., Fujii N., Miyajima K. Translocation of a channel-forming antimicrobial peptide, magainin 2, across lipid bilayers by forming a pore. Biochemistry. 1995 May 16;34(19):6521–6526. doi: 10.1021/bi00019a033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mouritsen O. G., Bloom M. Models of lipid-protein interactions in membranes. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1993;22:145–171. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.22.060193.001045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nicholls A., Sharp K. A., Honig B. Protein folding and association: insights from the interfacial and thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons. Proteins. 1991;11(4):281–296. doi: 10.1002/prot.340110407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ohki S., Marcus E., Sukumaran D. K., Arnold K. Interaction of melittin with lipid membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1994 Sep 14;1194(2):223–232. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(94)90303-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Okada A., Wakamatsu K., Miyazawa T., Higashijima T. Vesicle-bound conformation of melittin: transferred nuclear Overhauser enhancement analysis in the presence of perdeuterated phosphatidylcholine vesicles. Biochemistry. 1994 Aug 16;33(32):9438–9446. doi: 10.1021/bi00198a009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pérez-Payá E., Houghten R. A., Blondelle S. E. The role of amphipathicity in the folding, self-association and biological activity of multiple subunit small proteins. J Biol Chem. 1995 Jan 20;270(3):1048–1056. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.3.1048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Spolar R. S., Record M. T., Jr Coupling of local folding to site-specific binding of proteins to DNA. Science. 1994 Feb 11;263(5148):777–784. doi: 10.1126/science.8303294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Stowell M. H., Rees D. C. Structure and stability of membrane proteins. Adv Protein Chem. 1995;46:279–311. doi: 10.1016/s0065-3233(08)60338-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Terwilliger T. C., Eisenberg D. The structure of melittin. I. Structure determination and partial refinement. J Biol Chem. 1982 Jun 10;257(11):6010–6015. doi: 10.2210/pdb1mlt/pdb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Tsai C. J., Lin S. L., Wolfson H. J., Nussinov R. Studies of protein-protein interfaces: a statistical analysis of the hydrophobic effect. Protein Sci. 1997 Jan;6(1):53–64. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560060106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tytler E. M., Anantharamaiah G. M., Walker D. E., Mishra V. K., Palgunachari M. N., Segrest J. P. Molecular basis for prokaryotic specificity of magainin-induced lysis. Biochemistry. 1995 Apr 4;34(13):4393–4401. doi: 10.1021/bi00013a031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wilcox W., Eisenberg D. Thermodynamics of melittin tetramerization determined by circular dichroism and implications for protein folding. Protein Sci. 1992 May;1(5):641–653. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560010510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Yuan P., Fisher P. J., Prendergast F. G., Kemple M. D. Structure and dynamics of melittin in lysomyristoyl phosphatidylcholine micelles determined by nuclear magnetic resonance. Biophys J. 1996 May;70(5):2223–2238. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79788-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. von Heijne G. Membrane proteins: from sequence to structure. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1994;23:167–192. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.23.060194.001123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES