Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2026 Feb 17;16:9389. doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-39436-0

Predictive modeling for physicochemical properties of Inline graphic-lactam antibiotics through eigenvalue based topological indices and non linear regression techniques

A Yuvaraj 1,#, G Kalaimurugan 1,#, R Thamizhmaran 1,#, M Mubeen Tajudeen 2,✉,#, Rodrigo Colnago Contreras 3,#
PMCID: PMC13002995  PMID: 41703180

Abstract

In this work, a quantitative structure property relationship analysis is performed for selected Inline graphic-lactam antibiotics using eigenvalue based spectral descriptors derived from molecular graph representations. Molecular structures are modeled as graphs, and spectral indices obtained from adjacency, Laplacian, signless Laplacian, and distance matrices are employed to encode global topological characteristics. Non linear regression models, including quadratic, logarithmic, and power forms, are used to investigate relationships between spectral descriptors and physicochemical properties such as boiling point, molar volume, molar refractivity, polar surface area, and surface tension. The results indicate that several spectral descriptors exhibit meaningful correlations with properties primarily governed by molecular size and connectivity. Among the considered models, quadratic regression generally shows marginally improved performance, reflected by higher coefficients of determination and lower prediction errors. In contrast, properties strongly influenced by electronic and surface specific effects display weaker correlations, highlighting the intrinsic limitations of purely graph based descriptors. Overall, the findings demonstrate the applicability of spectral graph descriptors as interpretable tools for QSPR modeling of Inline graphic-lactam antibiotics and provide a basis for further studies involving larger datasets and complementary descriptor classes.

Keywords: Inline graphic-lactam antibiotics, Eigenvalues based topological indices, Non linear regression, QSPR modeling

Subject terms: Chemistry, Mathematics and computing

Introduction

Inline graphic-lactam antibiotics constitute one of the most widely used and clinically important classes of antibacterial agents. Their antibacterial activity arises from the presence of the four membered Inline graphic-lactam ring, which binds to penicillin binding proteins (PBPs) and inhibits the synthesis of peptidoglycan in bacterial cell walls, ultimately leading to bacterial cell lysis. Owing to their broad spectrum efficacy, structural versatility, and comparatively low toxicity, Inline graphic-lactam antibiotics continue to play a central role in the treatment of bacterial infections18.

The Inline graphic-lactam family comprises several therapeutically significant subclasses, including penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems, and Inline graphic-lactamase inhibitors. Despite their long standing clinical success, extensive and prolonged use of Inline graphic-lactam antibiotics has contributed to the emergence of antibiotic resistant bacterial strains. This growing resistance challenge highlights the need for systematic approaches to understand and predict the physicochemical behavior of Inline graphic-lactam compounds. In this context, computational modeling techniques offer valuable complementary tools for analyzing molecular properties and supporting drug development and optimization efforts11.

Quantitative structure property relationship (QSPR) modeling provides a well-established computational framework for correlating molecular structure with experimentally measurable physicochemical properties using numerical descriptors. Within chemical graph theory, molecular structures are represented as graphs in which atoms correspond to vertices and chemical bonds correspond to edges. This representation enables the construction of topological descriptors that encode essential structural features such as molecular size, connectivity, branching, and cyclicity. Such descriptors have been extensively applied in QSPR studies to model physicochemical, pharmacokinetic, and biological properties of chemical compounds11,29,32.

From a chemical perspective, graph associated matrices provide complementary representations of molecular structure at different levels of connectivity and organization. The adjacency matrix captures direct bonding relationships between atoms and reflects local connectivity patterns within a molecule. The Laplacian and signless Laplacian matrices incorporate both adjacency information and vertex degrees, thereby encoding the interplay between local bonding environments and global molecular structure. In contrast, the distance matrix records shortest path distances between all pairs of atoms and reflects global molecular size and shape. Spectral descriptors derived from these matrices are therefore sensitive to variations in molecular topology and structural organization12,21,22,26,27.

Eigenvalue based spectral descriptors obtained from graph associated matrices have received increasing attention as alternatives to traditional degree based or distance based topological indices. By incorporating information from the entire molecular graph, spectral descriptors capture both local and global structural characteristics and are particularly responsive to subtle changes in molecular architecture. This enhanced sensitivity makes spectral indices especially suitable for modeling structurally complex drug molecules, where small structural modifications can lead to pronounced changes in physicochemical properties19,20.

In the present study, seven Inline graphic-lactam antibiotics are selected to represent structurally diverse and clinically relevant members of this drug class, namely Amoxicillin, Oxacillin, Cefuroxime, Meropenem, Imipenem, Ertapenem, and Clavulanic acid. These compounds differ in molecular size, side chain complexity, and substitution patterns, allowing an assessment of how eigenvalue based spectral descriptors respond to structural diversity within a chemically coherent group. Reliable experimental physicochemical property data are available for all selected antibiotics, ensuring consistency and comparability in QSPR modeling (Fig. 1)18.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Molecular Structure of Inline graphic-lactam antibiotics.

Motivated by these considerations, this work focuses on the systematic application of eigenvalue based spectral descriptors derived from adjacency, Laplacian, signless Laplacian, and distance matrices for QSPR analysis of Inline graphic-lactam antibiotics. Interpretable non linear regression models are employed to investigate relationships between molecular topology and key physicochemical properties. By integrating spectral graph theory with QSPR modeling, the study provides insight into the capability of eigenvalue based descriptors to capture structure property relationships in Inline graphic-lactam antibiotics.

Eigenvalue based topological indices

In quantitative structure property relationship (QSPR) modeling, molecular structures are commonly represented using graph theoretic concepts, which enable structural information to be encoded into mathematically well defined numerical descriptors. In this section, we describe the construction of eigenvalue based spectral topological indices employed in the present study.

Let Inline graphic be a simple and connected molecular graph associated with a chemical compound, where the vertex set V(G) represents atoms and the edge set E(G) represents covalent bonds. Let Inline graphic and Inline graphic denote the number of vertices and edges of G, respectively10. This graph representation forms the basis for the spectral descriptors used in the QSPR analysis.

The structural characteristics of the molecular graph G are captured using graph-associated matrices. The adjacency matrix Inline graphic is defined by

graphic file with name d33e377.gif

Let D(G) denote the diagonal degree matrix whose diagonal entries correspond to the degrees of the vertices. The Laplacian matrix is defined as Inline graphic, while the signless Laplacian matrix is defined as Inline graphic. In addition, the distance matrix Inline graphic is defined such that Inline graphic denotes the length of the shortest path between vertices Inline graphic and Inline graphic in G.

From a chemical perspective, the adjacency matrix reflects local bonding relationships between atoms, the Laplacian and signless Laplacian matrices encode both bonding patterns and vertex connectivity, and the distance matrix captures global molecular size and topological spread. Spectral descriptors derived from these matrices are therefore sensitive to variations in molecular topology and overall structural organization21,24,26,27.

Eigenvalue based spectral descriptors

Let Inline graphic denote the eigenvalues of the adjacency matrix A(G), Inline graphic the eigenvalues of the Laplacian matrix L(G), Inline graphic the eigenvalues of the signless Laplacian matrix Q(G), and Inline graphic the eigenvalues of the distance matrix Inline graphic. These eigenvalue spectra encode both local and global structural information of the molecular graph. The eigenvalue based spectral descriptors considered in this study are derived from the spectra of graph associated matrices and include indices related to graph energy, Estrada type measures, and Laplacian spectral properties13,21,22,26,27. The descriptors are defined as follows.

  1. Adjacency Energy (AE)9:
    graphic file with name d33e502.gif
  2. Adjacency Spectral Radius (ASR)30:
    graphic file with name d33e515.gif
  3. Adjacency Estrada Index (AEI)7:
    graphic file with name d33e528.gif
  4. Laplacian Energy (LE)17:
    graphic file with name d33e541.gif
  5. Laplacian Estrada Index (LEI)36,37:
    graphic file with name d33e557.gif
  6. Algebraic Connectivity (AC)14:
    graphic file with name d33e570.gif
  7. Signless Laplacian Energy (SLE)1,15:
    graphic file with name d33e586.gif
  8. Signless Laplacian Estrada Index (SLEI)8,16,25:
    graphic file with name d33e605.gif
  9. Distance Energy (DE)22:
    graphic file with name d33e618.gif

Illustrative calculation

To illustrate the computation of eigenvalue-based spectral descriptors, the molecular structure of Amoxicillin is considered as a representative example. The chemical structure is converted into a molecular graph by representing atoms as vertices and covalent bonds as edges. A schematic representation of the corresponding molecular graph is shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Molecular graph representation of Amoxicillin, where vertices represent atoms and edges represent covalent bonds.

Based on this graph representation, the adjacency matrix A(G) is constructed as

graphic file with name d33e636.gif

where Inline graphic if vertices Inline graphic and Inline graphic are adjacent, and Inline graphic otherwise. Similar procedures are followed to construct the Laplacian, signless Laplacian, and distance matrices.

The eigenvalues of each graph associated matrix are computed numerically using standard linear algebra algorithms. If Inline graphic denote the eigenvalues of the adjacency matrix, the corresponding adjacency energy is calculated as

graphic file with name d33e670.gif

Analogous procedures are used to compute the remaining spectral descriptors. These descriptors are subsequently employed as molecular variables in the QSPR regression models.

Methodology

This section describes the computational and statistical procedures employed to establish quantitative structure property relationship (QSPR) models for the selected Inline graphic-lactam antibiotics. The methodology consists of molecular graph construction, computation of eigenvalue based spectral descriptors, and subsequent non linear regression analysis.

Experimental physicochemical property data for the selected Inline graphic-lactam antibiotics were obtained from the ChemSpider database maintained by the Royal Society of Chemistry18. The considered properties include boiling point, molar volume, molar refractivity, polar surface area, polarizability, and surface tension, which are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Physical properties of selected Inline graphic-lactam antibiotics.

Drug BP E FP MR PSA P ST MV
(K) (kJ/mol) (K) (ÅInline graphic) (mN/m) (cmInline graphic/mol)
Amoxicillin 743.2 113.7 403.3 91.5 158 36.3 85.3 236.2
Oxacillin 686.8 105.8 369.2 101.3 138 40.2 77.3 268.5
Cefuroxime 731.7 112.1 396.3 96.7 204 38.3 78.1 241.0
Meropenem 627.4 106.4 333.2 96.8 135 38.4 68.4 268.9
Imipenem 530.2 92.7 274.5 72.7 139 28.8 71.0 183.9
Ertapenem 813.9 124.0 446.0 118.3 182 46.9 84.9 306.2
Clavulanic acid 545.8 94.8 283.9 43.6 87 17.3 82.3 120.3

For each antibiotic, the molecular structure was represented as a simple and connected molecular graph by associating atoms with vertices and covalent bonds with edges. Based on this graph representation, the adjacency, Laplacian, signless Laplacian, and distance matrices were constructed. Eigenvalues of these matrices were computed using standard numerical linear algebra routines implemented in the Python programming environment. The resulting eigenvalue spectra were used to evaluate all spectral descriptors defined in Section "Eigenvalue based topological indices", which are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2.

Graph spectral indices of selected Inline graphic-lactam antibiotics.

Drug AE ASR AEI LE LEI AC SLE SLEI DE
Amoxicillin 31.4464 2.6956 66.2831 40.5900 1039.0585 0.0363 40.8145 1045.2213 266.1190
Oxacillin 36.1719 2.6966 74.9673 44.5195 1155.0329 0.0318 45.2811 1164.1761 308.5235
Cefuroxime 38.0704 2.7025 77.7268 47.0116 1156.4233 0.0320 46.9429 1158.2981 355.6795
Meropenem 32.6042 2.7098 68.6695 41.9118 1029.9828 0.0395 42.2136 1038.3276 273.8790
Imipenem 25.1031 2.6768 52.2732 31.4014 748.7542 0.0609 31.4899 753.6672 185.6230
Ertapenem 41.9261 2.7098 86.5756 52.0314 1231.2364 0.0208 52.3792 1239.5810 448.0094
Clavulanic acid 17.7780 2.6180 38.1042 22.8945 572.4953 0.1659 23.0140 577.3645 92.8351

The computed spectral descriptors served as independent variables in the QSPR models, while the experimental physicochemical properties served as dependent variables. To examine non linear relationships between spectral descriptors and physicochemical properties, three regression models were considered quadratic, logarithmic, and power regression. These models were selected to capture non linear trends commonly observed in QSPR studies involving spectral and topological descriptors.

The quadratic regression model is expressed as

graphic file with name d33e1140.gif 1

the logarithmic regression model is given by

graphic file with name d33e1145.gif 2

and the power regression model is defined as

graphic file with name d33e1150.gif 3

where T denotes the physicochemical property, X represents the spectral descriptor, and R, Inline graphic, and Inline graphic are regression constants.

All regression analyses and statistical evaluations were carried out using SPSS software. For each regression model, the correlation coefficient (R), coefficient of determination (Inline graphic), F-statistic, and corresponding p-values were computed to assess the strength, goodness of fit, and statistical significance of the structure property relationships33,34.

The predictive accuracy of the regression models was quantified using the root mean square error (RMSE), defined as

graphic file with name d33e1194.gif 4

where Inline graphic and Inline graphic denote the experimental and predicted values of the physicochemical property, respectively, and n denotes the number of data points. The same statistical measures were applied consistently across all regression models to enable direct comparison of their performance.

Results

This section presents the numerical outcomes of the non linear QSPR analysis performed using eigenvalue based spectral descriptors for the selected Inline graphic-lactam antibiotics. Regression results obtained from quadratic, logarithmic, and power models are reported using statistical performance metrics and graphical comparisons.

The regression coefficients and statistical indicators corresponding to the quadratic, logarithmic, and power regression models are summarized in Tables 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11. These tables report the correlation coefficient (R), coefficient of determination (Inline graphic), root mean square error (RMSE), F-statistic, and p-values for each spectral descriptor and physicochemical property. For most properties, all three regression models yield statistically significant correlations between spectral descriptors and experimental data.

Table 3.

Quadratic regression model between eigenvalue-based topological indices and physical properties of Inline graphic-lactam antibiotics.

Phy. Pro. Regression Equation Inline graphic SE F-statistic P-value
BP Inline graphic 0.9128 38.1909 20.9411 0.0076
E Inline graphic 0.8992 4.2432 17.8549 0.0101
FP Inline graphic 0.9127 23.1065 20.9125 0.0076
MR Inline graphic 0.9795 4.2053 95.8913 0.0004
PSA Inline graphic 0.7446 23.2359 5.8309 0.0652
P Inline graphic 0.9793 1.6747 95.0274 0.0004
ST Inline graphic 0.5039 5.6870 2.0319 0.2461
MV Inline graphic 0.9332 19.6239 27.9774 0.0045

Table 4.

Quadratic correlation coefficients between eigenvalue-based topological indices and physical properties of Inline graphic-lactam antibiotics.

Index BP E FP MR PSA P ST MV
AE 0.8903 0.8861 0.8902 0.9811 0.8425 0.9808 0.5667 0.9556
ASR 0.7534 0.8231 0.7532 0.9544 0.7722 0.9543 0.2919 0.9596
AEI 0.8973 0.8983 0.8971 0.9849 0.8298 0.9847 0.5680 0.9627
LE 0.9071 0.9146 0.9070 0.9845 0.8360 0.9842 0.5710 0.9628
LEI 0.9153 0.8904 0.9153 0.9705 0.8004 0.9706 0.6030 0.9530
AC 0.9554 0.9483 0.9553 0.9897 0.8220 0.9896 0.7099 0.9658
SLE 0.9050 0.9109 0.9049 0.9861 0.8248 0.9859 0.5704 0.9660
SLEI 0.9139 0.8899 0.9138 0.9715 0.7959 0.9716 0.6009 0.9548
DE 0.8963 0.9073 0.8962 0.9821 0.8629 0.9817 0.5639 0.9521

Table 5.

Root mean square error (RMSE) values of quadratic regression model between eigenvalue-based topological indices and physical properties of Inline graphic-lactam antibiotics.

Index BP E FP MR PSA P ST MV
AE 44.5167 4.6846 26.9258 4.2950 18.7222 1.7155 5.0292 16.9186
ASR 64.2856 5.7394 38.8841 6.6343 22.0809 2.6342 5.8380 16.1464
AEI 43.1508 4.4396 26.1007 3.8459 19.3939 1.5354 5.0239 15.5437
LE 41.1511 4.0859 24.8940 3.9051 19.0687 1.5591 5.0110 15.5238
LEI 39.3688 4.5991 23.8099 5.3587 20.8326 2.1239 4.8693 17.4001
AC 28.8697 3.2076 17.4669 3.1789 19.7929 1.2660 4.2990 14.8851
SLE 41.5888 4.1696 25.1576 3.6898 19.6515 1.4719 5.0133 14.8343
SLEI 39.7001 4.6100 24.0101 5.2702 21.0408 2.0881 4.8790 17.0705
DE 43.3537 4.2482 26.2233 4.1820 17.5647 1.6760 5.0411 17.5523

Table 6.

Logarithmic regression model between eigenvalue-based topological indices and physical properties of Inline graphic-lactam antibiotics.

Phy. Pro. Regression Equation Inline graphic SE F-statistic P-value
BP Inline graphic 0.7345 59.6150 13.8302 0.0137
E Inline graphic 0.7123 6.4140 12.3798 0.0169
FP Inline graphic 0.7344 36.0477 13.8286 0.0197
MR Inline graphic 0.9771 3.9825 213.3004 0.0000
PSA Inline graphic 0.9698 4.5709 160.7184 0.0000
P Inline graphic 0.9766 1.5942 209.1768 0.0000
ST Inline graphic 0.0323 7.1047 0.1668 0.6998
MV Inline graphic 0.9342 17.4276 71.0182 0.0004

Table 7.

Logarithmic correlation coefficients between eigenvalue-based topological indices and physical properties of Inline graphic-lactam antibiotics.

Index BP E FP MR PSA P ST MV
AE 0.8422 0.8281 0.8422 0.9826 0.8434 0.9823 0.0613 0.9559
ASR 0.6824 0.6980 0.6824 0.9414 0.7718 0.9412 0.1797 0.9316
AEI 0.8484 0.8373 0.8484 0.9863 0.8316 0.9861 0.0680 0.9633
LE 0.8516 0.8440 0.8516 0.9856 0.8362 0.9854 0.0673 0.9633
LEI 0.8570 0.8341 0.8570 0.9724 0.8030 0.9724 0.0924 0.9543
AC 0.8324 0.8224 0.8324 0.9885 0.8258 0.9882 0.0724 0.9600
SLE 0.8504 0.8419 0.8504 0.9872 0.8264 0.9870 0.0671 0.9665
SLEI 0.8564 0.8340 0.8564 0.9733 0.7989 0.9733 0.0918 0.9560
DE 0.8415 0.8352 0.8415 0.9848 0.8622 0.9844 0.0646 0.9534

Table 8.

Root mean square error (RMSE) values of logarithmic regression model between eigenvalue-based topological indices and physical properties of Inline graphic-lactam antibiotics and clavulanic acid.

Index BP E FP MR PSA P ST MV
AE 52.7179 5.6662 31.8787 4.1326 18.6717 1.6527 6.0925 16.8709
ASR 71.4694 7.2369 43.2165 7.5016 22.0994 2.9801 6.0046 20.8785
AEI 51.7555 5.5251 31.29712 3.6639 19.30112 1.4646 6.0898 15.4125
LE 51.2495 5.4208 30.9918 3.7592 19.0615 1.5022 6.0901 15.4165
LEI 50.3839 5.5752 30.4658 5.1902 20.7122 2.0576 6.0778 17.1632
AC 54.1805 5.7492 32.7595 3.3658 19.5985 1.3473 6.0880 16.0865
SLE 51.4348 5.4540 31.1035 3.5466 19.5688 1.4160 6.0902 14.7290
SLEI 50.4797 5.5765 30.5238 5.1070 20.9039 2.0239 6.0782 16.8346
DE 52.8194 5.5583 31.9400 3.8631 17.6052 1.5526 6.0912 17.3231

Table 9.

Power regression model between eigenvalue-based topological indices and physical properties of Inline graphic-lactam antibiotics.

Phy. Pro. Regression Equation Inline graphic SE F-statistic P-value
BP Inline graphic 0.7598 0.0865 15.9644 0.0104
E Inline graphic 0.7337 0.0584 13.4174 0.0145
FP Inline graphic 0.7630 0.0975 16.2406 0.0100
MR Inline graphic 0.9768 0.0426 352.0576 0.0000
PSA Inline graphic 0.7434 0.1286 21.9413 0.0054
P Inline graphic 0.9764 0.0429 347.1154 0.0000
ST Inline graphic 0.0327 0.0924 0.1804 0.6886
MV Inline graphic 0.9232 0.0758 98.9532 0.0002

Table 10.

Power correlation coefficients between eigenvalue-based topological indices and physical properties of Inline graphic-lactam antibiotics.

Index BP E FP MR PSA P ST MV
AE 0.8587 0.8395 0.8607 0.9716 0.8422 0.9713 0.0626 0.9444
ASR 0.6945 0.7090 0.6960 0.9531 0.7667 0.9529 0.1811 0.9512
AEI 0.8650 0.8490 0.8669 0.9775 0.8288 0.9772 0.0694 0.9544
LE 0.8692 0.8566 0.8713 0.9787 0.8361 0.9784 0.0687 0.9561
LEI 0.8717 0.8430 0.8735 0.9676 0.8005 0.9676 0.0941 0.9491
AC 0.8571 0.8398 0.8602 0.9883 0.8207 0.9881 0.0743 0.9609
SLE 0.8676 0.8541 0.8697 0.9812 0.8243 0.9810 0.0685 0.9606
SLEI 0.8710 0.8429 0.8728 0.9688 0.7954 0.9689 0.0934 0.9515
DE 0.8620 0.8501 0.8643 0.9742 0.8622 0.9737 0.0662 0.9426

Table 11.

Root mean square error (RMSE) values of power regression model between eigenvalue-based topological indices and physical properties of Inline graphic-lactam antibiotics.

Index BP E FP MR PSA P ST MV
AE 50.3110 5.5033 30.2574 5.4299 18.7687 2.1646 6.0968 19.1034
ASR 70.5779 7.1403 42.6272 6.7527 22.3601 2.6823 6.0081 17.8849
AEI 49.27589 5.3515 29.6255 4.8524 19.4868 1.9336 6.0941 17.3378
LE 48.5894 5.2287 29.1964 4.6956 19.0959 1.8722 6.0944 16.9717
LEI 48.1176 5.4450 28.9328 5.6800 20.8756 2.2514 6.0817 18.1686
AC 50.7840 5.5093 30.4690 3.4704 19.8941 1.3863 6.0920 15.9638
SLE 48.8461 5.2688 29.3562 4.4203 19.7135 1.7611 6.0945 16.0876
SLEI 48.2422 5.4472 29.0103 5.5702 21.1121 2.2070 6.0821 17.7497
DE 49.8638 5.3391 29.9503 5.2095 17.6295 2.0822 6.0954 19.4127

Predicted physicochemical property values obtained from the regression models are presented in Tables 12,13,14. These tables provide a numerical comparison between experimental and predicted values for the considered properties.

Table 12.

Predicted values of physical properties using the quadratic regression model for Inline graphic-lactam antibiotics.

Compound BP E FP MR PSA P ST MV
(K) (kJ/mol) (K) (ÅInline graphic) (mN/m) (cmInline graphic/mol)
Amoxicillin 685.70 108.78 368.50 95.99 151.03 38.06 77.21 241.43
Oxacillin 721.19 112.46 389.96 101.31 162.13 40.17 79.06 263.53
Cefuroxime 719.18 112.25 388.74 101.01 172.71 40.05 78.96 271.21
Meropenem 661.86 106.31 354.09 92.38 153.17 36.61 75.99 248.60
Imipenem 530.73 92.72 274.81 71.49 125.82 28.33 69.66 186.21
Ertapenem 814.60 122.15 446.43 115.00 188.05 45.60 84.04 294.53
Clavulanic acid 545.72 94.81 283.85 43.68 90.03 17.33 82.35 119.45

Table 13.

Predicted values of physical properties using the logarithmic regression model for Inline graphic-lactam antibiotics.

Compound BP E FP MR PSA P ST MV
(K) (kJ/mol) (K) (ÅInline graphic) (mN/m) (cmInline graphic/mol)
Amoxicillin 693.81 108.52 373.40 95.30 91.50 37.79 77.87 241.43
Oxacillin 727.99 111.55 394.07 100.08 98.28 39.68 77.83 263.53
Cefuroxime 728.38 113.34 394.31 99.80 104.82 39.57 77.62 271.21
Meropenem 690.97 109.57 371.68 92.27 92.81 36.59 77.35 248.60
Imipenem 587.95 100.09 309.40 76.95 74.94 30.51 78.55 186.21
Ertapenem 748.63 116.67 406.55 115.10 115.42 45.63 77.35 294.53
Clavulanic acid 501.24 89.73 256.97 41.38 43.11 16.41 80.71 119.45

Table 14.

Predicted values of physical properties using the power regression model for Inline graphic-lactam antibiotics.

Compound BP E FP MR PSA P ST MV
(K) (kJ/mol) (K) (ÅInline graphic) (mN/m) (cmInline graphic/mol)
Amoxicillin 687.77 108.07 369.26 93.27 148.85 36.98 77.61 243.45
Oxacillin 725.42 111.22 392.33 99.62 159.75 39.49 77.57 259.02
Cefuroxime 725.86 113.12 392.59 99.23 170.98 39.34 77.34 258.07
Meropenem 684.74 109.15 367.42 89.47 150.92 35.48 77.07 234.07
Imipenem 583.16 99.77 306.10 72.47 125.32 28.74 78.33 191.91
Ertapenem 749.14 116.76 406.94 122.47 190.91 48.55 77.07 314.70
Clavulanic acid 509.43 90.42 262.51 44.43 90.01 17.62 80.65 121.01

The corresponding predicted versus experimental plots for the regression models are presented in Figures 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16. The graphical trends observed in these figures are consistent with the numerical values reported in Tables 12,13,14.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Visual plot of correlation on quadratic and logarithmic for properties of Inline graphic-lactum antibiotics.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Visual plot of correlation on power for properties of Inline graphic-lactum antibiotics.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Quadratic regression plots on boiling point and enthalpy.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Quadratic regression plots on flash point and molar refractivity.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Quadratic regression plots on polar surface area and polarizability.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Quadratic regression plots on surface tension and molar volume.

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Logarithmic regression plots on boiling point and enthalpy.

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

Logarithmic regression plots on flash point and molar refractivity.

Fig. 11.

Fig. 11

Logarithmic regression plots on polar surface area and polarizability.

Fig. 12.

Fig. 12

Logarithmic regression plots on surface tension and molar volume.

Fig. 13.

Fig. 13

Power regression plots on boiling point and enthalpy.

Fig. 14.

Fig. 14

Power regression plots on flash point and molar refractivity.

Fig. 15.

Fig. 15

Power regression plots on polar surface area and polarizability.

Fig. 16.

Fig. 16

Power regression plots on surface tension and molar volume.

Discussion

The results presented in Section “Results” demonstrate that eigenvalue based spectral descriptors capture meaningful structure property relationships for the selected Inline graphic-lactam antibiotics. The observed trends are interpreted below in terms of descriptor behavior, regression model characteristics, and chemical considerations.

Across the examined regression models, quadratic, logarithmic, and power forms exhibit comparable predictive behavior. The slightly improved performance observed for quadratic regression suggests that eigenvalue based spectral descriptors encode non linear dependencies that are more effectively captured by polynomial relationships. Recent QSPR investigations have also explored machine learning frameworks, including neural networks and ensemble methods, to enhance predictive accuracy for drug related physicochemical properties however, such approaches typically require larger datasets and often sacrifice interpretability compared to regression based spectral descriptor models2–6,23,28,31,35.

An examination of descriptor specific behavior indicates that algebraic connectivity, signless Laplacian energy, and distance energy frequently emerge as influential predictors. These descriptors reflect complementary aspects of molecular topology, including global connectivity, degree distribution, and molecular size, which are known to influence physicochemical properties within structurally diverse Inline graphic-lactam antibiotics.

The predicted versus experimental plots shown in Figures 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16 provide visual support for the numerical regression results. Properties such as boiling point, molar volume, and molar refractivity exhibit close agreement between predicted and experimental values, whereas increased dispersion is observed for polar surface area and surface tension.

The reduced predictive performance observed for polar surface area and surface tension can be attributed to their dependence on electronic distribution, hydrogen bonding, and intermolecular interactions, which are not explicitly encoded in purely topological descriptors. This behavior reflects an intrinsic limitation of graph based representations rather than a limitation of the regression methodology.

Overall, the discussion highlights the suitability of eigenvalue based spectral descriptors for modeling physicochemical properties governed primarily by molecular size, connectivity, and global structural organization in Inline graphic-lactam antibiotics.

Conclusion

In this work, a quantitative structure property relationship (QSPR) analysis was conducted for selected Inline graphic-lactam antibiotics using eigenvalue based spectral descriptors derived from molecular graph representations. Spectral indices obtained from adjacency, Laplacian, signless Laplacian, and distance matrices were combined with non linear regression models to examine relationships between molecular topology and key physicochemical properties. The analysis demonstrates that eigenvalue based spectral descriptors provide meaningful correlations with several physicochemical properties of Inline graphic-lactam antibiotics, particularly those governed by molecular size, connectivity, and global structural organization. Among the considered regression forms, quadratic models consistently exhibit slightly improved predictive performance compared to logarithmic and power models, indicating their suitability for capturing non linear structure property relationships encoded by spectral descriptors. These observations highlight both the strengths and limitations of eigenvalue based spectral descriptors within the context of QSPR modeling. Overall, the findings confirm the applicability of spectral graph descriptors as interpretable and mathematically grounded tools for modeling physicochemical properties of Inline graphic-lactam antibiotics. The study provides a structured basis for future investigations incorporating larger datasets and complementary descriptor classes to further enhance predictive performance.

Acknowledgements

The first author gratefully acknowledges the supervisor and co-authors for their support and valuable collaboration throughout this research work.

Author contributions

All authors contributed equally.

Funding

No funding was available for this study.

Data availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are cited at relevant places within the text as references.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

A. Yuvaraj, G. Kalaimurugan, R. Thamizhmaran, M. Mubeen Tajudeen, and R. Colnago Contreras contributed equally to this work.

References

  • 1.Abreu, N., Cardoso, D. M., Gutman, I. & Martins, E. A. Bounds for the signless Laplacian energy. Linear algebra and its applications435(10), 2365–2374. 10.1016/j.laa.2010.10.021 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Abubakar, M. S., Ejima, O., Sanusi, R. A., Ibrahim, A. H. & Aremu, K. O. Predicting antibacterial drugs properties using graph topological indices and machine learning. IEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3503760 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ahmed, W., et al. A deep dive into machine learning: The roles of neural networks and random forests in QSPR analysis. BioNanoScience,15(1), 89 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12668-024-01710-8
  • 4.Ahmed, W. et al. Computational approaches in drug chemistry leveraging python powered QSPR study of antimalaria compounds by using artificial neural networks. Scientific Reports15(1), 19307. 10.1038/s41598-025-01594-y (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ahmed, W., et al. Harnessing Topological Descriptors: A Comparative Analysis of Artificial Neural Networks and Random Forest for Predicting Anti-Alzheimer Drug Properties. Nano, 2550085. 10.1142/S1793292025500857 (2025).
  • 6.Ahmed, W., et al. Exploring the role of topological descriptors to predict physicochemical properties of anti-HIV drugs by using supervised machine learning algorithms. BMC chemistry, 18(1), 167 (2024). 10.1186/s13065-024-01266-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 7.Ashrafi, A.R. Experimental results on the energy and Estrada index of HCC [4p, 8] nanotubes. Optoelectronics and Advanced Materials-Rapid Communications, 4(January 2010), 48-49 (2010)
  • 8.Ayyaswamy, S. K., Balachandran, S., Venkatakrishnan, Y. B. & Gutman, I. Signless laplacian Estrada index. MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem66(3), 785–794 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Balakrishnan, R. The energy of a graph. Linear Algebra and its Applications387, 287–295. 10.1016/j.laa.2004.02.038 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bondy, J. A. & Murty, U. S. R. Graph theory with applications Vol. 290 (Macmillan, 1976). [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bueso-Bordils, J. I. et al. Molecular topology for the discovery of new broad-spectrum antibacterial drugs. Biomolecules10(9), 1343. 10.3390/biom10091343 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Estrada, E. Characterization of 3D molecular structure. Chemical Physics Letters319(5–6), 713–718. 10.1016/S0009-2614(00)00158-5 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Fan, Y. Z. & Yang, D. The signless Laplacian spectral radius of graphs with given number of pendant vertices. Graphs and Combinatorics25(3), 291–298. 10.1007/s00373-009-0840-1 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fiedler, M. Algebraic connectivity of graphs. Czechoslovak mathematical journal,23(2), 298-305. 10.21136/CMJ.1973.101168(1973).
  • 15.Ganie, H. A., Chat, B. A. & Pirzada, S. Signless Laplacian energy of a graph and energy of a line graph. Linear Algebra and its Applications544, 306–324. 10.1016/j.laa.2018.01.021 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gholami, A., On maximum signless Laplacian Estrada index of graphs with given parameters II. 10.26493/1855-3974.838.8fd
  • 17.Gutman, I. & Zhou, B. Laplacian energy of a graph. Linear Algebra and its applications414(1), 29–37. 10.1016/j.laa.2005.09.008 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hall, L. M., Hall, L. H. & Kier, L. B. QSAR modeling of -lactam binding to human serum proteins. Journal of computer-aided molecular design17(2), 103–118. 10.1023/A:1025309604656 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hayat, S. & Khan, S. Quality testing of spectrum-based valency descriptors for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with applications. Journal of Molecular Structure1228, 129789. 10.1016/j.molstruc.2020.129789 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hayat, S., Imran, M. & Liu, J. B. An efficient computational technique for degree and distance based topological descriptors with applications. IEEE Access7, 32276–32296. 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2900500 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hayat, S., Khan, A., Yousafzai, F., Imran, M. & Rehman, M.U. On spectrum related topological descriptors of carbon nanocones. Optoelectronics and advanced materials-rapid communications, 9(May-June 2015), 798-802 (2015).
  • 22.Indulal, G., Gutman, I. & Vijayakumar, A. On distance energy of graphs. MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem60(2), 461–472 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kirana, B., Shanmukha, M.C. & Usha, A. A QSPR analysis and curvilinear regression models for various degree-based topological indices: Quinolone antibiotics. Heliyon, 10(12), (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 24.Liu, H., Lu, M. & Tian, F. On the Laplacian spectral radius of a graph. Linear algebra and its applications376, 135–141. 10.1016/j.laa.2003.06.007 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nasiri, R., Ellahi, H.R., Fath-Tabar, G.H. & Gholami, A. On maximum signless Laplacian Estrada index of graphs with given parameters II. arXiv:1410.0229 (2014).
  • 26.Pattabiraman, K. & Danesh, P. Spectrum-Based Topological Indices and Their QSPR Studies of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry124(18), e27472. 10.1002/qua.27472 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rauf, A., Naeem, M. & Hanif, A. Quantitative structure-properties relationship analysis of Eigen-value-based indices using COVID-19 drugs structure. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry123(4), e27030. 10.1002/qua.27030 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ravi, V., Siddiqui, M. K., Chidambaram, N. & Desikan, K. On topological descriptors and curvilinear regression analysis of antiviral drugs used in COVID-19 treatment. Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds42(10), 6932–6945. 10.1080/10406638.2021.1993941 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shanmukha, M. C., Usha, A., Kulli, V. R. & Shilpa, K. C. Chemical applicability and curvilinear regression models of vertex-degree-based topological index: Elliptic Sombor index. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry124(9), e27376 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Stevanović, D. Spectral radius of graphs. In Combinatorial Matrix Theory 83–130 (Springer International Publishing, 2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Thamizhmaran, R. et al. Utilizing neighborhood topological indices for QSPR analysis of clinically approved immunosuppressive drugs in heart transplant therapy. Computational Biology and Chemistry117, 108414. 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2025.108414 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Todeschini, R. & Consonni, V. Molecular descriptors for chemoinformatics: volume I: alphabetical listing/volume II: appendices, references. (John Wiley and Sons, 2009).
  • 33.Vapnik, V. The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer science business media. (2013).
  • 34.Zaid, M.A. Correlation and regression analysis textbook. The Statistical, Economic and Social Research and Training Centre for Islamic Countries (SESRIC), Diplomatic Site, 6450 (2015).
  • 35.Zaman, S., Ahmed, W., Siddiqui, M. K., Mumtaz, A. & Kosar, Z. Role of eccentricity based topological descriptors to predict anti-HIV drugs attributes with supervised machine learning algorithms. Computers in Biology and Medicine190, 110101. 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110101 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhang, H. & Wang, Y. On the maximum Laplacian Estrada index of graphs. Linear Algebra and its Applications492, 68–77. 10.1016/j.laa.2015.11.005 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhu, B. X. On the Laplacian Estrada index of graphs. MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem66(3), 769–776 (2011). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are cited at relevant places within the text as references.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES