Abstract
In this work, a quantitative structure property relationship analysis is performed for selected
-lactam antibiotics using eigenvalue based spectral descriptors derived from molecular graph representations. Molecular structures are modeled as graphs, and spectral indices obtained from adjacency, Laplacian, signless Laplacian, and distance matrices are employed to encode global topological characteristics. Non linear regression models, including quadratic, logarithmic, and power forms, are used to investigate relationships between spectral descriptors and physicochemical properties such as boiling point, molar volume, molar refractivity, polar surface area, and surface tension. The results indicate that several spectral descriptors exhibit meaningful correlations with properties primarily governed by molecular size and connectivity. Among the considered models, quadratic regression generally shows marginally improved performance, reflected by higher coefficients of determination and lower prediction errors. In contrast, properties strongly influenced by electronic and surface specific effects display weaker correlations, highlighting the intrinsic limitations of purely graph based descriptors. Overall, the findings demonstrate the applicability of spectral graph descriptors as interpretable tools for QSPR modeling of
-lactam antibiotics and provide a basis for further studies involving larger datasets and complementary descriptor classes.
Keywords:
-lactam antibiotics, Eigenvalues based topological indices, Non linear regression, QSPR modeling
Subject terms: Chemistry, Mathematics and computing
Introduction
-lactam antibiotics constitute one of the most widely used and clinically important classes of antibacterial agents. Their antibacterial activity arises from the presence of the four membered
-lactam ring, which binds to penicillin binding proteins (PBPs) and inhibits the synthesis of peptidoglycan in bacterial cell walls, ultimately leading to bacterial cell lysis. Owing to their broad spectrum efficacy, structural versatility, and comparatively low toxicity,
-lactam antibiotics continue to play a central role in the treatment of bacterial infections18.
The
-lactam family comprises several therapeutically significant subclasses, including penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems, and
-lactamase inhibitors. Despite their long standing clinical success, extensive and prolonged use of
-lactam antibiotics has contributed to the emergence of antibiotic resistant bacterial strains. This growing resistance challenge highlights the need for systematic approaches to understand and predict the physicochemical behavior of
-lactam compounds. In this context, computational modeling techniques offer valuable complementary tools for analyzing molecular properties and supporting drug development and optimization efforts11.
Quantitative structure property relationship (QSPR) modeling provides a well-established computational framework for correlating molecular structure with experimentally measurable physicochemical properties using numerical descriptors. Within chemical graph theory, molecular structures are represented as graphs in which atoms correspond to vertices and chemical bonds correspond to edges. This representation enables the construction of topological descriptors that encode essential structural features such as molecular size, connectivity, branching, and cyclicity. Such descriptors have been extensively applied in QSPR studies to model physicochemical, pharmacokinetic, and biological properties of chemical compounds11,29,32.
From a chemical perspective, graph associated matrices provide complementary representations of molecular structure at different levels of connectivity and organization. The adjacency matrix captures direct bonding relationships between atoms and reflects local connectivity patterns within a molecule. The Laplacian and signless Laplacian matrices incorporate both adjacency information and vertex degrees, thereby encoding the interplay between local bonding environments and global molecular structure. In contrast, the distance matrix records shortest path distances between all pairs of atoms and reflects global molecular size and shape. Spectral descriptors derived from these matrices are therefore sensitive to variations in molecular topology and structural organization12,21,22,26,27.
Eigenvalue based spectral descriptors obtained from graph associated matrices have received increasing attention as alternatives to traditional degree based or distance based topological indices. By incorporating information from the entire molecular graph, spectral descriptors capture both local and global structural characteristics and are particularly responsive to subtle changes in molecular architecture. This enhanced sensitivity makes spectral indices especially suitable for modeling structurally complex drug molecules, where small structural modifications can lead to pronounced changes in physicochemical properties19,20.
In the present study, seven
-lactam antibiotics are selected to represent structurally diverse and clinically relevant members of this drug class, namely Amoxicillin, Oxacillin, Cefuroxime, Meropenem, Imipenem, Ertapenem, and Clavulanic acid. These compounds differ in molecular size, side chain complexity, and substitution patterns, allowing an assessment of how eigenvalue based spectral descriptors respond to structural diversity within a chemically coherent group. Reliable experimental physicochemical property data are available for all selected antibiotics, ensuring consistency and comparability in QSPR modeling (Fig. 1)18.
Fig. 1.
Molecular Structure of
-lactam antibiotics.
Motivated by these considerations, this work focuses on the systematic application of eigenvalue based spectral descriptors derived from adjacency, Laplacian, signless Laplacian, and distance matrices for QSPR analysis of
-lactam antibiotics. Interpretable non linear regression models are employed to investigate relationships between molecular topology and key physicochemical properties. By integrating spectral graph theory with QSPR modeling, the study provides insight into the capability of eigenvalue based descriptors to capture structure property relationships in
-lactam antibiotics.
Eigenvalue based topological indices
In quantitative structure property relationship (QSPR) modeling, molecular structures are commonly represented using graph theoretic concepts, which enable structural information to be encoded into mathematically well defined numerical descriptors. In this section, we describe the construction of eigenvalue based spectral topological indices employed in the present study.
Let
be a simple and connected molecular graph associated with a chemical compound, where the vertex set V(G) represents atoms and the edge set E(G) represents covalent bonds. Let
and
denote the number of vertices and edges of G, respectively10. This graph representation forms the basis for the spectral descriptors used in the QSPR analysis.
The structural characteristics of the molecular graph G are captured using graph-associated matrices. The adjacency matrix
is defined by
![]() |
Let D(G) denote the diagonal degree matrix whose diagonal entries correspond to the degrees of the vertices. The Laplacian matrix is defined as
, while the signless Laplacian matrix is defined as
. In addition, the distance matrix
is defined such that
denotes the length of the shortest path between vertices
and
in G.
From a chemical perspective, the adjacency matrix reflects local bonding relationships between atoms, the Laplacian and signless Laplacian matrices encode both bonding patterns and vertex connectivity, and the distance matrix captures global molecular size and topological spread. Spectral descriptors derived from these matrices are therefore sensitive to variations in molecular topology and overall structural organization21,24,26,27.
Eigenvalue based spectral descriptors
Let
denote the eigenvalues of the adjacency matrix A(G),
the eigenvalues of the Laplacian matrix L(G),
the eigenvalues of the signless Laplacian matrix Q(G), and
the eigenvalues of the distance matrix
. These eigenvalue spectra encode both local and global structural information of the molecular graph. The eigenvalue based spectral descriptors considered in this study are derived from the spectra of graph associated matrices and include indices related to graph energy, Estrada type measures, and Laplacian spectral properties13,21,22,26,27. The descriptors are defined as follows.
Illustrative calculation
To illustrate the computation of eigenvalue-based spectral descriptors, the molecular structure of Amoxicillin is considered as a representative example. The chemical structure is converted into a molecular graph by representing atoms as vertices and covalent bonds as edges. A schematic representation of the corresponding molecular graph is shown in Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

Molecular graph representation of Amoxicillin, where vertices represent atoms and edges represent covalent bonds.
Based on this graph representation, the adjacency matrix A(G) is constructed as
![]() |
where
if vertices
and
are adjacent, and
otherwise. Similar procedures are followed to construct the Laplacian, signless Laplacian, and distance matrices.
The eigenvalues of each graph associated matrix are computed numerically using standard linear algebra algorithms. If
denote the eigenvalues of the adjacency matrix, the corresponding adjacency energy is calculated as
![]() |
Analogous procedures are used to compute the remaining spectral descriptors. These descriptors are subsequently employed as molecular variables in the QSPR regression models.
Methodology
This section describes the computational and statistical procedures employed to establish quantitative structure property relationship (QSPR) models for the selected
-lactam antibiotics. The methodology consists of molecular graph construction, computation of eigenvalue based spectral descriptors, and subsequent non linear regression analysis.
Experimental physicochemical property data for the selected
-lactam antibiotics were obtained from the ChemSpider database maintained by the Royal Society of Chemistry18. The considered properties include boiling point, molar volume, molar refractivity, polar surface area, polarizability, and surface tension, which are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.
Physical properties of selected
-lactam antibiotics.
| Drug | BP | E | FP | MR | PSA | P | ST | MV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (K) | (kJ/mol) | (K) | (Å ) |
(mN/m) | (cm /mol) |
|||
| Amoxicillin | 743.2 | 113.7 | 403.3 | 91.5 | 158 | 36.3 | 85.3 | 236.2 |
| Oxacillin | 686.8 | 105.8 | 369.2 | 101.3 | 138 | 40.2 | 77.3 | 268.5 |
| Cefuroxime | 731.7 | 112.1 | 396.3 | 96.7 | 204 | 38.3 | 78.1 | 241.0 |
| Meropenem | 627.4 | 106.4 | 333.2 | 96.8 | 135 | 38.4 | 68.4 | 268.9 |
| Imipenem | 530.2 | 92.7 | 274.5 | 72.7 | 139 | 28.8 | 71.0 | 183.9 |
| Ertapenem | 813.9 | 124.0 | 446.0 | 118.3 | 182 | 46.9 | 84.9 | 306.2 |
| Clavulanic acid | 545.8 | 94.8 | 283.9 | 43.6 | 87 | 17.3 | 82.3 | 120.3 |
For each antibiotic, the molecular structure was represented as a simple and connected molecular graph by associating atoms with vertices and covalent bonds with edges. Based on this graph representation, the adjacency, Laplacian, signless Laplacian, and distance matrices were constructed. Eigenvalues of these matrices were computed using standard numerical linear algebra routines implemented in the Python programming environment. The resulting eigenvalue spectra were used to evaluate all spectral descriptors defined in Section "Eigenvalue based topological indices", which are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2.
Graph spectral indices of selected
-lactam antibiotics.
| Drug | AE | ASR | AEI | LE | LEI | AC | SLE | SLEI | DE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amoxicillin | 31.4464 | 2.6956 | 66.2831 | 40.5900 | 1039.0585 | 0.0363 | 40.8145 | 1045.2213 | 266.1190 |
| Oxacillin | 36.1719 | 2.6966 | 74.9673 | 44.5195 | 1155.0329 | 0.0318 | 45.2811 | 1164.1761 | 308.5235 |
| Cefuroxime | 38.0704 | 2.7025 | 77.7268 | 47.0116 | 1156.4233 | 0.0320 | 46.9429 | 1158.2981 | 355.6795 |
| Meropenem | 32.6042 | 2.7098 | 68.6695 | 41.9118 | 1029.9828 | 0.0395 | 42.2136 | 1038.3276 | 273.8790 |
| Imipenem | 25.1031 | 2.6768 | 52.2732 | 31.4014 | 748.7542 | 0.0609 | 31.4899 | 753.6672 | 185.6230 |
| Ertapenem | 41.9261 | 2.7098 | 86.5756 | 52.0314 | 1231.2364 | 0.0208 | 52.3792 | 1239.5810 | 448.0094 |
| Clavulanic acid | 17.7780 | 2.6180 | 38.1042 | 22.8945 | 572.4953 | 0.1659 | 23.0140 | 577.3645 | 92.8351 |
The computed spectral descriptors served as independent variables in the QSPR models, while the experimental physicochemical properties served as dependent variables. To examine non linear relationships between spectral descriptors and physicochemical properties, three regression models were considered quadratic, logarithmic, and power regression. These models were selected to capture non linear trends commonly observed in QSPR studies involving spectral and topological descriptors.
The quadratic regression model is expressed as
![]() |
1 |
the logarithmic regression model is given by
![]() |
2 |
and the power regression model is defined as
![]() |
3 |
where T denotes the physicochemical property, X represents the spectral descriptor, and R,
, and
are regression constants.
All regression analyses and statistical evaluations were carried out using SPSS software. For each regression model, the correlation coefficient (R), coefficient of determination (
), F-statistic, and corresponding p-values were computed to assess the strength, goodness of fit, and statistical significance of the structure property relationships33,34.
The predictive accuracy of the regression models was quantified using the root mean square error (RMSE), defined as
![]() |
4 |
where
and
denote the experimental and predicted values of the physicochemical property, respectively, and n denotes the number of data points. The same statistical measures were applied consistently across all regression models to enable direct comparison of their performance.
Results
This section presents the numerical outcomes of the non linear QSPR analysis performed using eigenvalue based spectral descriptors for the selected
-lactam antibiotics. Regression results obtained from quadratic, logarithmic, and power models are reported using statistical performance metrics and graphical comparisons.
The regression coefficients and statistical indicators corresponding to the quadratic, logarithmic, and power regression models are summarized in Tables 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11. These tables report the correlation coefficient (R), coefficient of determination (
), root mean square error (RMSE), F-statistic, and p-values for each spectral descriptor and physicochemical property. For most properties, all three regression models yield statistically significant correlations between spectral descriptors and experimental data.
Table 3.
Quadratic regression model between eigenvalue-based topological indices and physical properties of
-lactam antibiotics.
| Phy. Pro. | Regression Equation | ![]() |
SE | F-statistic | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BP | ![]() |
0.9128 | 38.1909 | 20.9411 | 0.0076 |
| E | ![]() |
0.8992 | 4.2432 | 17.8549 | 0.0101 |
| FP | ![]() |
0.9127 | 23.1065 | 20.9125 | 0.0076 |
| MR | ![]() |
0.9795 | 4.2053 | 95.8913 | 0.0004 |
| PSA | ![]() |
0.7446 | 23.2359 | 5.8309 | 0.0652 |
| P | ![]() |
0.9793 | 1.6747 | 95.0274 | 0.0004 |
| ST | ![]() |
0.5039 | 5.6870 | 2.0319 | 0.2461 |
| MV | ![]() |
0.9332 | 19.6239 | 27.9774 | 0.0045 |
Table 4.
Quadratic correlation coefficients between eigenvalue-based topological indices and physical properties of
-lactam antibiotics.
| Index | BP | E | FP | MR | PSA | P | ST | MV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AE | 0.8903 | 0.8861 | 0.8902 | 0.9811 | 0.8425 | 0.9808 | 0.5667 | 0.9556 |
| ASR | 0.7534 | 0.8231 | 0.7532 | 0.9544 | 0.7722 | 0.9543 | 0.2919 | 0.9596 |
| AEI | 0.8973 | 0.8983 | 0.8971 | 0.9849 | 0.8298 | 0.9847 | 0.5680 | 0.9627 |
| LE | 0.9071 | 0.9146 | 0.9070 | 0.9845 | 0.8360 | 0.9842 | 0.5710 | 0.9628 |
| LEI | 0.9153 | 0.8904 | 0.9153 | 0.9705 | 0.8004 | 0.9706 | 0.6030 | 0.9530 |
| AC | 0.9554 | 0.9483 | 0.9553 | 0.9897 | 0.8220 | 0.9896 | 0.7099 | 0.9658 |
| SLE | 0.9050 | 0.9109 | 0.9049 | 0.9861 | 0.8248 | 0.9859 | 0.5704 | 0.9660 |
| SLEI | 0.9139 | 0.8899 | 0.9138 | 0.9715 | 0.7959 | 0.9716 | 0.6009 | 0.9548 |
| DE | 0.8963 | 0.9073 | 0.8962 | 0.9821 | 0.8629 | 0.9817 | 0.5639 | 0.9521 |
Table 5.
Root mean square error (RMSE) values of quadratic regression model between eigenvalue-based topological indices and physical properties of
-lactam antibiotics.
| Index | BP | E | FP | MR | PSA | P | ST | MV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AE | 44.5167 | 4.6846 | 26.9258 | 4.2950 | 18.7222 | 1.7155 | 5.0292 | 16.9186 |
| ASR | 64.2856 | 5.7394 | 38.8841 | 6.6343 | 22.0809 | 2.6342 | 5.8380 | 16.1464 |
| AEI | 43.1508 | 4.4396 | 26.1007 | 3.8459 | 19.3939 | 1.5354 | 5.0239 | 15.5437 |
| LE | 41.1511 | 4.0859 | 24.8940 | 3.9051 | 19.0687 | 1.5591 | 5.0110 | 15.5238 |
| LEI | 39.3688 | 4.5991 | 23.8099 | 5.3587 | 20.8326 | 2.1239 | 4.8693 | 17.4001 |
| AC | 28.8697 | 3.2076 | 17.4669 | 3.1789 | 19.7929 | 1.2660 | 4.2990 | 14.8851 |
| SLE | 41.5888 | 4.1696 | 25.1576 | 3.6898 | 19.6515 | 1.4719 | 5.0133 | 14.8343 |
| SLEI | 39.7001 | 4.6100 | 24.0101 | 5.2702 | 21.0408 | 2.0881 | 4.8790 | 17.0705 |
| DE | 43.3537 | 4.2482 | 26.2233 | 4.1820 | 17.5647 | 1.6760 | 5.0411 | 17.5523 |
Table 6.
Logarithmic regression model between eigenvalue-based topological indices and physical properties of
-lactam antibiotics.
| Phy. Pro. | Regression Equation |
|
SE | F-statistic | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BP |
|
0.7345 | 59.6150 | 13.8302 | 0.0137 |
| E |
|
0.7123 | 6.4140 | 12.3798 | 0.0169 |
| FP |
|
0.7344 | 36.0477 | 13.8286 | 0.0197 |
| MR |
|
0.9771 | 3.9825 | 213.3004 | 0.0000 |
| PSA |
|
0.9698 | 4.5709 | 160.7184 | 0.0000 |
| P |
|
0.9766 | 1.5942 | 209.1768 | 0.0000 |
| ST |
|
0.0323 | 7.1047 | 0.1668 | 0.6998 |
| MV |
|
0.9342 | 17.4276 | 71.0182 | 0.0004 |
Table 7.
Logarithmic correlation coefficients between eigenvalue-based topological indices and physical properties of
-lactam antibiotics.
| Index | BP | E | FP | MR | PSA | P | ST | MV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AE | 0.8422 | 0.8281 | 0.8422 | 0.9826 | 0.8434 | 0.9823 | 0.0613 | 0.9559 |
| ASR | 0.6824 | 0.6980 | 0.6824 | 0.9414 | 0.7718 | 0.9412 | 0.1797 | 0.9316 |
| AEI | 0.8484 | 0.8373 | 0.8484 | 0.9863 | 0.8316 | 0.9861 | 0.0680 | 0.9633 |
| LE | 0.8516 | 0.8440 | 0.8516 | 0.9856 | 0.8362 | 0.9854 | 0.0673 | 0.9633 |
| LEI | 0.8570 | 0.8341 | 0.8570 | 0.9724 | 0.8030 | 0.9724 | 0.0924 | 0.9543 |
| AC | 0.8324 | 0.8224 | 0.8324 | 0.9885 | 0.8258 | 0.9882 | 0.0724 | 0.9600 |
| SLE | 0.8504 | 0.8419 | 0.8504 | 0.9872 | 0.8264 | 0.9870 | 0.0671 | 0.9665 |
| SLEI | 0.8564 | 0.8340 | 0.8564 | 0.9733 | 0.7989 | 0.9733 | 0.0918 | 0.9560 |
| DE | 0.8415 | 0.8352 | 0.8415 | 0.9848 | 0.8622 | 0.9844 | 0.0646 | 0.9534 |
Table 8.
Root mean square error (RMSE) values of logarithmic regression model between eigenvalue-based topological indices and physical properties of
-lactam antibiotics and clavulanic acid.
| Index | BP | E | FP | MR | PSA | P | ST | MV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AE | 52.7179 | 5.6662 | 31.8787 | 4.1326 | 18.6717 | 1.6527 | 6.0925 | 16.8709 |
| ASR | 71.4694 | 7.2369 | 43.2165 | 7.5016 | 22.0994 | 2.9801 | 6.0046 | 20.8785 |
| AEI | 51.7555 | 5.5251 | 31.29712 | 3.6639 | 19.30112 | 1.4646 | 6.0898 | 15.4125 |
| LE | 51.2495 | 5.4208 | 30.9918 | 3.7592 | 19.0615 | 1.5022 | 6.0901 | 15.4165 |
| LEI | 50.3839 | 5.5752 | 30.4658 | 5.1902 | 20.7122 | 2.0576 | 6.0778 | 17.1632 |
| AC | 54.1805 | 5.7492 | 32.7595 | 3.3658 | 19.5985 | 1.3473 | 6.0880 | 16.0865 |
| SLE | 51.4348 | 5.4540 | 31.1035 | 3.5466 | 19.5688 | 1.4160 | 6.0902 | 14.7290 |
| SLEI | 50.4797 | 5.5765 | 30.5238 | 5.1070 | 20.9039 | 2.0239 | 6.0782 | 16.8346 |
| DE | 52.8194 | 5.5583 | 31.9400 | 3.8631 | 17.6052 | 1.5526 | 6.0912 | 17.3231 |
Table 9.
Power regression model between eigenvalue-based topological indices and physical properties of
-lactam antibiotics.
| Phy. Pro. | Regression Equation |
|
SE | F-statistic | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BP |
|
0.7598 | 0.0865 | 15.9644 | 0.0104 |
| E |
|
0.7337 | 0.0584 | 13.4174 | 0.0145 |
| FP |
|
0.7630 | 0.0975 | 16.2406 | 0.0100 |
| MR |
|
0.9768 | 0.0426 | 352.0576 | 0.0000 |
| PSA |
|
0.7434 | 0.1286 | 21.9413 | 0.0054 |
| P |
|
0.9764 | 0.0429 | 347.1154 | 0.0000 |
| ST |
|
0.0327 | 0.0924 | 0.1804 | 0.6886 |
| MV |
|
0.9232 | 0.0758 | 98.9532 | 0.0002 |
Table 10.
Power correlation coefficients between eigenvalue-based topological indices and physical properties of
-lactam antibiotics.
| Index | BP | E | FP | MR | PSA | P | ST | MV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AE | 0.8587 | 0.8395 | 0.8607 | 0.9716 | 0.8422 | 0.9713 | 0.0626 | 0.9444 |
| ASR | 0.6945 | 0.7090 | 0.6960 | 0.9531 | 0.7667 | 0.9529 | 0.1811 | 0.9512 |
| AEI | 0.8650 | 0.8490 | 0.8669 | 0.9775 | 0.8288 | 0.9772 | 0.0694 | 0.9544 |
| LE | 0.8692 | 0.8566 | 0.8713 | 0.9787 | 0.8361 | 0.9784 | 0.0687 | 0.9561 |
| LEI | 0.8717 | 0.8430 | 0.8735 | 0.9676 | 0.8005 | 0.9676 | 0.0941 | 0.9491 |
| AC | 0.8571 | 0.8398 | 0.8602 | 0.9883 | 0.8207 | 0.9881 | 0.0743 | 0.9609 |
| SLE | 0.8676 | 0.8541 | 0.8697 | 0.9812 | 0.8243 | 0.9810 | 0.0685 | 0.9606 |
| SLEI | 0.8710 | 0.8429 | 0.8728 | 0.9688 | 0.7954 | 0.9689 | 0.0934 | 0.9515 |
| DE | 0.8620 | 0.8501 | 0.8643 | 0.9742 | 0.8622 | 0.9737 | 0.0662 | 0.9426 |
Table 11.
Root mean square error (RMSE) values of power regression model between eigenvalue-based topological indices and physical properties of
-lactam antibiotics.
| Index | BP | E | FP | MR | PSA | P | ST | MV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AE | 50.3110 | 5.5033 | 30.2574 | 5.4299 | 18.7687 | 2.1646 | 6.0968 | 19.1034 |
| ASR | 70.5779 | 7.1403 | 42.6272 | 6.7527 | 22.3601 | 2.6823 | 6.0081 | 17.8849 |
| AEI | 49.27589 | 5.3515 | 29.6255 | 4.8524 | 19.4868 | 1.9336 | 6.0941 | 17.3378 |
| LE | 48.5894 | 5.2287 | 29.1964 | 4.6956 | 19.0959 | 1.8722 | 6.0944 | 16.9717 |
| LEI | 48.1176 | 5.4450 | 28.9328 | 5.6800 | 20.8756 | 2.2514 | 6.0817 | 18.1686 |
| AC | 50.7840 | 5.5093 | 30.4690 | 3.4704 | 19.8941 | 1.3863 | 6.0920 | 15.9638 |
| SLE | 48.8461 | 5.2688 | 29.3562 | 4.4203 | 19.7135 | 1.7611 | 6.0945 | 16.0876 |
| SLEI | 48.2422 | 5.4472 | 29.0103 | 5.5702 | 21.1121 | 2.2070 | 6.0821 | 17.7497 |
| DE | 49.8638 | 5.3391 | 29.9503 | 5.2095 | 17.6295 | 2.0822 | 6.0954 | 19.4127 |
Predicted physicochemical property values obtained from the regression models are presented in Tables 12,13,14. These tables provide a numerical comparison between experimental and predicted values for the considered properties.
Table 12.
Predicted values of physical properties using the quadratic regression model for
-lactam antibiotics.
| Compound | BP | E | FP | MR | PSA | P | ST | MV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (K) | (kJ/mol) | (K) | (Å ) |
(mN/m) | (cm /mol) |
|||
| Amoxicillin | 685.70 | 108.78 | 368.50 | 95.99 | 151.03 | 38.06 | 77.21 | 241.43 |
| Oxacillin | 721.19 | 112.46 | 389.96 | 101.31 | 162.13 | 40.17 | 79.06 | 263.53 |
| Cefuroxime | 719.18 | 112.25 | 388.74 | 101.01 | 172.71 | 40.05 | 78.96 | 271.21 |
| Meropenem | 661.86 | 106.31 | 354.09 | 92.38 | 153.17 | 36.61 | 75.99 | 248.60 |
| Imipenem | 530.73 | 92.72 | 274.81 | 71.49 | 125.82 | 28.33 | 69.66 | 186.21 |
| Ertapenem | 814.60 | 122.15 | 446.43 | 115.00 | 188.05 | 45.60 | 84.04 | 294.53 |
| Clavulanic acid | 545.72 | 94.81 | 283.85 | 43.68 | 90.03 | 17.33 | 82.35 | 119.45 |
Table 13.
Predicted values of physical properties using the logarithmic regression model for
-lactam antibiotics.
| Compound | BP | E | FP | MR | PSA | P | ST | MV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (K) | (kJ/mol) | (K) | (Å ) |
(mN/m) | (cm /mol) |
|||
| Amoxicillin | 693.81 | 108.52 | 373.40 | 95.30 | 91.50 | 37.79 | 77.87 | 241.43 |
| Oxacillin | 727.99 | 111.55 | 394.07 | 100.08 | 98.28 | 39.68 | 77.83 | 263.53 |
| Cefuroxime | 728.38 | 113.34 | 394.31 | 99.80 | 104.82 | 39.57 | 77.62 | 271.21 |
| Meropenem | 690.97 | 109.57 | 371.68 | 92.27 | 92.81 | 36.59 | 77.35 | 248.60 |
| Imipenem | 587.95 | 100.09 | 309.40 | 76.95 | 74.94 | 30.51 | 78.55 | 186.21 |
| Ertapenem | 748.63 | 116.67 | 406.55 | 115.10 | 115.42 | 45.63 | 77.35 | 294.53 |
| Clavulanic acid | 501.24 | 89.73 | 256.97 | 41.38 | 43.11 | 16.41 | 80.71 | 119.45 |
Table 14.
Predicted values of physical properties using the power regression model for
-lactam antibiotics.
| Compound | BP | E | FP | MR | PSA | P | ST | MV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (K) | (kJ/mol) | (K) | (Å ) |
(mN/m) | (cm /mol) |
|||
| Amoxicillin | 687.77 | 108.07 | 369.26 | 93.27 | 148.85 | 36.98 | 77.61 | 243.45 |
| Oxacillin | 725.42 | 111.22 | 392.33 | 99.62 | 159.75 | 39.49 | 77.57 | 259.02 |
| Cefuroxime | 725.86 | 113.12 | 392.59 | 99.23 | 170.98 | 39.34 | 77.34 | 258.07 |
| Meropenem | 684.74 | 109.15 | 367.42 | 89.47 | 150.92 | 35.48 | 77.07 | 234.07 |
| Imipenem | 583.16 | 99.77 | 306.10 | 72.47 | 125.32 | 28.74 | 78.33 | 191.91 |
| Ertapenem | 749.14 | 116.76 | 406.94 | 122.47 | 190.91 | 48.55 | 77.07 | 314.70 |
| Clavulanic acid | 509.43 | 90.42 | 262.51 | 44.43 | 90.01 | 17.62 | 80.65 | 121.01 |
The corresponding predicted versus experimental plots for the regression models are presented in Figures 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16. The graphical trends observed in these figures are consistent with the numerical values reported in Tables 12,13,14.
Fig. 3.
Visual plot of correlation on quadratic and logarithmic for properties of
-lactum antibiotics.
Fig. 4.

Visual plot of correlation on power for properties of
-lactum antibiotics.
Fig. 5.
Quadratic regression plots on boiling point and enthalpy.
Fig. 6.
Quadratic regression plots on flash point and molar refractivity.
Fig. 7.
Quadratic regression plots on polar surface area and polarizability.
Fig. 8.
Quadratic regression plots on surface tension and molar volume.
Fig. 9.
Logarithmic regression plots on boiling point and enthalpy.
Fig. 10.
Logarithmic regression plots on flash point and molar refractivity.
Fig. 11.
Logarithmic regression plots on polar surface area and polarizability.
Fig. 12.
Logarithmic regression plots on surface tension and molar volume.
Fig. 13.
Power regression plots on boiling point and enthalpy.
Fig. 14.
Power regression plots on flash point and molar refractivity.
Fig. 15.
Power regression plots on polar surface area and polarizability.
Fig. 16.
Power regression plots on surface tension and molar volume.
Discussion
The results presented in Section “Results” demonstrate that eigenvalue based spectral descriptors capture meaningful structure property relationships for the selected
-lactam antibiotics. The observed trends are interpreted below in terms of descriptor behavior, regression model characteristics, and chemical considerations.
Across the examined regression models, quadratic, logarithmic, and power forms exhibit comparable predictive behavior. The slightly improved performance observed for quadratic regression suggests that eigenvalue based spectral descriptors encode non linear dependencies that are more effectively captured by polynomial relationships. Recent QSPR investigations have also explored machine learning frameworks, including neural networks and ensemble methods, to enhance predictive accuracy for drug related physicochemical properties however, such approaches typically require larger datasets and often sacrifice interpretability compared to regression based spectral descriptor models2–6,23,28,31,35.
An examination of descriptor specific behavior indicates that algebraic connectivity, signless Laplacian energy, and distance energy frequently emerge as influential predictors. These descriptors reflect complementary aspects of molecular topology, including global connectivity, degree distribution, and molecular size, which are known to influence physicochemical properties within structurally diverse
-lactam antibiotics.
The predicted versus experimental plots shown in Figures 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16 provide visual support for the numerical regression results. Properties such as boiling point, molar volume, and molar refractivity exhibit close agreement between predicted and experimental values, whereas increased dispersion is observed for polar surface area and surface tension.
The reduced predictive performance observed for polar surface area and surface tension can be attributed to their dependence on electronic distribution, hydrogen bonding, and intermolecular interactions, which are not explicitly encoded in purely topological descriptors. This behavior reflects an intrinsic limitation of graph based representations rather than a limitation of the regression methodology.
Overall, the discussion highlights the suitability of eigenvalue based spectral descriptors for modeling physicochemical properties governed primarily by molecular size, connectivity, and global structural organization in
-lactam antibiotics.
Conclusion
In this work, a quantitative structure property relationship (QSPR) analysis was conducted for selected
-lactam antibiotics using eigenvalue based spectral descriptors derived from molecular graph representations. Spectral indices obtained from adjacency, Laplacian, signless Laplacian, and distance matrices were combined with non linear regression models to examine relationships between molecular topology and key physicochemical properties. The analysis demonstrates that eigenvalue based spectral descriptors provide meaningful correlations with several physicochemical properties of
-lactam antibiotics, particularly those governed by molecular size, connectivity, and global structural organization. Among the considered regression forms, quadratic models consistently exhibit slightly improved predictive performance compared to logarithmic and power models, indicating their suitability for capturing non linear structure property relationships encoded by spectral descriptors. These observations highlight both the strengths and limitations of eigenvalue based spectral descriptors within the context of QSPR modeling. Overall, the findings confirm the applicability of spectral graph descriptors as interpretable and mathematically grounded tools for modeling physicochemical properties of
-lactam antibiotics. The study provides a structured basis for future investigations incorporating larger datasets and complementary descriptor classes to further enhance predictive performance.
Acknowledgements
The first author gratefully acknowledges the supervisor and co-authors for their support and valuable collaboration throughout this research work.
Author contributions
All authors contributed equally.
Funding
No funding was available for this study.
Data availability
The data used to support the findings of this study are cited at relevant places within the text as references.
Declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
A. Yuvaraj, G. Kalaimurugan, R. Thamizhmaran, M. Mubeen Tajudeen, and R. Colnago Contreras contributed equally to this work.
References
- 1.Abreu, N., Cardoso, D. M., Gutman, I. & Martins, E. A. Bounds for the signless Laplacian energy. Linear algebra and its applications435(10), 2365–2374. 10.1016/j.laa.2010.10.021 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- 2.Abubakar, M. S., Ejima, O., Sanusi, R. A., Ibrahim, A. H. & Aremu, K. O. Predicting antibacterial drugs properties using graph topological indices and machine learning. IEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3503760 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ahmed, W., et al. A deep dive into machine learning: The roles of neural networks and random forests in QSPR analysis. BioNanoScience,15(1), 89 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12668-024-01710-8
- 4.Ahmed, W. et al. Computational approaches in drug chemistry leveraging python powered QSPR study of antimalaria compounds by using artificial neural networks. Scientific Reports15(1), 19307. 10.1038/s41598-025-01594-y (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ahmed, W., et al. Harnessing Topological Descriptors: A Comparative Analysis of Artificial Neural Networks and Random Forest for Predicting Anti-Alzheimer Drug Properties. Nano, 2550085. 10.1142/S1793292025500857 (2025).
- 6.Ahmed, W., et al. Exploring the role of topological descriptors to predict physicochemical properties of anti-HIV drugs by using supervised machine learning algorithms. BMC chemistry, 18(1), 167 (2024). 10.1186/s13065-024-01266-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 7.Ashrafi, A.R. Experimental results on the energy and Estrada index of HCC [4p, 8] nanotubes. Optoelectronics and Advanced Materials-Rapid Communications, 4(January 2010), 48-49 (2010)
- 8.Ayyaswamy, S. K., Balachandran, S., Venkatakrishnan, Y. B. & Gutman, I. Signless laplacian Estrada index. MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem66(3), 785–794 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- 9.Balakrishnan, R. The energy of a graph. Linear Algebra and its Applications387, 287–295. 10.1016/j.laa.2004.02.038 (2004). [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bondy, J. A. & Murty, U. S. R. Graph theory with applications Vol. 290 (Macmillan, 1976). [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bueso-Bordils, J. I. et al. Molecular topology for the discovery of new broad-spectrum antibacterial drugs. Biomolecules10(9), 1343. 10.3390/biom10091343 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Estrada, E. Characterization of 3D molecular structure. Chemical Physics Letters319(5–6), 713–718. 10.1016/S0009-2614(00)00158-5 (2000). [Google Scholar]
- 13.Fan, Y. Z. & Yang, D. The signless Laplacian spectral radius of graphs with given number of pendant vertices. Graphs and Combinatorics25(3), 291–298. 10.1007/s00373-009-0840-1 (2009). [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fiedler, M. Algebraic connectivity of graphs. Czechoslovak mathematical journal,23(2), 298-305. 10.21136/CMJ.1973.101168(1973).
- 15.Ganie, H. A., Chat, B. A. & Pirzada, S. Signless Laplacian energy of a graph and energy of a line graph. Linear Algebra and its Applications544, 306–324. 10.1016/j.laa.2018.01.021 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gholami, A., On maximum signless Laplacian Estrada index of graphs with given parameters II. 10.26493/1855-3974.838.8fd
- 17.Gutman, I. & Zhou, B. Laplacian energy of a graph. Linear Algebra and its applications414(1), 29–37. 10.1016/j.laa.2005.09.008 (2006). [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hall, L. M., Hall, L. H. & Kier, L. B. QSAR modeling of -lactam binding to human serum proteins. Journal of computer-aided molecular design17(2), 103–118. 10.1023/A:1025309604656 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hayat, S. & Khan, S. Quality testing of spectrum-based valency descriptors for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with applications. Journal of Molecular Structure1228, 129789. 10.1016/j.molstruc.2020.129789 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hayat, S., Imran, M. & Liu, J. B. An efficient computational technique for degree and distance based topological descriptors with applications. IEEE Access7, 32276–32296. 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2900500 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hayat, S., Khan, A., Yousafzai, F., Imran, M. & Rehman, M.U. On spectrum related topological descriptors of carbon nanocones. Optoelectronics and advanced materials-rapid communications, 9(May-June 2015), 798-802 (2015).
- 22.Indulal, G., Gutman, I. & Vijayakumar, A. On distance energy of graphs. MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem60(2), 461–472 (2008). [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kirana, B., Shanmukha, M.C. & Usha, A. A QSPR analysis and curvilinear regression models for various degree-based topological indices: Quinolone antibiotics. Heliyon, 10(12), (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 24.Liu, H., Lu, M. & Tian, F. On the Laplacian spectral radius of a graph. Linear algebra and its applications376, 135–141. 10.1016/j.laa.2003.06.007 (2004). [Google Scholar]
- 25.Nasiri, R., Ellahi, H.R., Fath-Tabar, G.H. & Gholami, A. On maximum signless Laplacian Estrada index of graphs with given parameters II. arXiv:1410.0229 (2014).
- 26.Pattabiraman, K. & Danesh, P. Spectrum-Based Topological Indices and Their QSPR Studies of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry124(18), e27472. 10.1002/qua.27472 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rauf, A., Naeem, M. & Hanif, A. Quantitative structure-properties relationship analysis of Eigen-value-based indices using COVID-19 drugs structure. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry123(4), e27030. 10.1002/qua.27030 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ravi, V., Siddiqui, M. K., Chidambaram, N. & Desikan, K. On topological descriptors and curvilinear regression analysis of antiviral drugs used in COVID-19 treatment. Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds42(10), 6932–6945. 10.1080/10406638.2021.1993941 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 29.Shanmukha, M. C., Usha, A., Kulli, V. R. & Shilpa, K. C. Chemical applicability and curvilinear regression models of vertex-degree-based topological index: Elliptic Sombor index. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry124(9), e27376 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 30.Stevanović, D. Spectral radius of graphs. In Combinatorial Matrix Theory 83–130 (Springer International Publishing, 2018). [Google Scholar]
- 31.Thamizhmaran, R. et al. Utilizing neighborhood topological indices for QSPR analysis of clinically approved immunosuppressive drugs in heart transplant therapy. Computational Biology and Chemistry117, 108414. 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2025.108414 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Todeschini, R. & Consonni, V. Molecular descriptors for chemoinformatics: volume I: alphabetical listing/volume II: appendices, references. (John Wiley and Sons, 2009).
- 33.Vapnik, V. The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer science business media. (2013).
- 34.Zaid, M.A. Correlation and regression analysis textbook. The Statistical, Economic and Social Research and Training Centre for Islamic Countries (SESRIC), Diplomatic Site, 6450 (2015).
- 35.Zaman, S., Ahmed, W., Siddiqui, M. K., Mumtaz, A. & Kosar, Z. Role of eccentricity based topological descriptors to predict anti-HIV drugs attributes with supervised machine learning algorithms. Computers in Biology and Medicine190, 110101. 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110101 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhang, H. & Wang, Y. On the maximum Laplacian Estrada index of graphs. Linear Algebra and its Applications492, 68–77. 10.1016/j.laa.2015.11.005 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zhu, B. X. On the Laplacian Estrada index of graphs. MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem66(3), 769–776 (2011). [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data used to support the findings of this study are cited at relevant places within the text as references.


































































