Skip to main content
PMC home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1999 Dec;77(6):2968–2987. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77129-8

Different ionic selectivities for connexins 26 and 32 produce rectifying gap junction channels.

T M Suchyna 1, J M Nitsche 1, M Chilton 1, A L Harris 1, R D Veenstra 1, B J Nicholson 1
PMCID: PMC1300569  PMID: 10585920

Abstract

The functional diversity of gap junction intercellular channels arising from the large number of connexin isoforms is significantly increased by heterotypic interactions between members of this family. This is particularly evident in the rectifying behavior of Cx26/Cx32 heterotypic channels (. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 88:8410-8414). The channel properties responsible for producing the rectifying current observed for Cx26/Cx32 heterotypic gap junction channels were determined in transfected mouse neuroblastoma 2A (N2A) cells. Transfectants revealed maximum unitary conductances (gamma(j)) of 135 pS for Cx26 and 53 pS for Cx32 homotypic channels in 120 mM KCl. Anionic substitution of glutamate for Cl indicated that Cx26 channels favored cations by 2.6:1, whereas Cx32 channels were relatively nonselective with respect to charge. In Cx26/Cx32 heterotypic cell pairs, the macroscopic fast rectification of the current-voltage relationship was fully explained at the single-channel level by a rectifying gamma(j) that increased by a factor of 2.9 as the transjunctional voltage (V(j)) changed from -100 to +100 mV with the Cx26 cell as the positive pole. A model of electrodiffusion of ions through the gap junction pore based on Nernst-Planck equations for ion concentrations and the Poisson equation for the electrical potential within the junction is developed. Selectivity characteristics are ascribed to each hemichannel based on either pore features (treated as uniform along the length of the hemichannel) or entrance effects unique to each connexin. Both analytical GHK approximations and full numerical solutions predict rectifying characteristics for Cx32/Cx26 heterotypic channels, although not to the full extent seen empirically. The model predicts that asymmetries in the conductance/permeability properties of the hemichannels (also cast as Donnan potentials) will produce either an accumulation or a depletion of ions within the channel, depending on voltage polarity, that will result in rectification.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (342.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barrio L. C., Suchyna T., Bargiello T., Xu L. X., Roginski R. S., Bennett M. V., Nicholson B. J. Gap junctions formed by connexins 26 and 32 alone and in combination are differently affected by applied voltage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Oct 1;88(19):8410–8414. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.19.8410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beblo D. A., Veenstra R. D. Monovalent cation permeation through the connexin40 gap junction channel. Cs, Rb, K, Na, Li, TEA, TMA, TBA, and effects of anions Br, Cl, F, acetate, aspartate, glutamate, and NO3. J Gen Physiol. 1997 Apr;109(4):509–522. doi: 10.1085/jgp.109.4.509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bevans C. G., Kordel M., Rhee S. K., Harris A. L. Isoform composition of connexin channels determines selectivity among second messengers and uncharged molecules. J Biol Chem. 1998 Jan 30;273(5):2808–2816. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.5.2808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brink P. R., Cronin K., Banach K., Peterson E., Westphale E. M., Seul K. H., Ramanan S. V., Beyer E. C. Evidence for heteromeric gap junction channels formed from rat connexin43 and human connexin37. Am J Physiol. 1997 Oct;273(4 Pt 1):C1386–C1396. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1997.273.4.C1386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brink P. R., Dewey M. M. Evidence for fixed charge in the nexus. Nature. 1980 May 8;285(5760):101–102. doi: 10.1038/285101a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bruzzone R., White T. W., Paul D. L. Connections with connexins: the molecular basis of direct intercellular signaling. Eur J Biochem. 1996 May 15;238(1):1–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1996.0001q.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bukauskas F. F., Elfgang C., Willecke K., Weingart R. Heterotypic gap junction channels (connexin26-connexin32) violate the paradigm of unitary conductance. Pflugers Arch. 1995 Apr;429(6):870–872. doi: 10.1007/BF00374812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cao F., Eckert R., Elfgang C., Nitsche J. M., Snyder S. A., H-ulser D. F., Willecke K., Nicholson B. J. A quantitative analysis of connexin-specific permeability differences of gap junctions expressed in HeLa transfectants and Xenopus oocytes. J Cell Sci. 1998 Jan;111(Pt 1):31–43. doi: 10.1242/jcs.111.1.31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen D. P., Barcilon V., Eisenberg R. S. Constant fields and constant gradients in open ionic channels. Biophys J. 1992 May;61(5):1372–1393. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(92)81944-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen D. P., Eisenberg R. S. Flux, coupling, and selectivity in ionic channels of one conformation. Biophys J. 1993 Aug;65(2):727–746. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81099-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dahl E., Manthey D., Chen Y., Schwarz H. J., Chang Y. S., Lalley P. A., Nicholson B. J., Willecke K. Molecular cloning and functional expression of mouse connexin-30,a gap junction gene highly expressed in adult brain and skin. J Biol Chem. 1996 Jul 26;271(30):17903–17910. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.30.17903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dunlap K., Takeda K., Brehm P. Activation of a calcium-dependent photoprotein by chemical signalling through gap junctions. Nature. 1987 Jan 1;325(6099):60–62. doi: 10.1038/325060a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Eisenberg R. S. Computing the field in proteins and channels. J Membr Biol. 1996 Mar;150(1):1–25. doi: 10.1007/s002329900026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Elfgang C., Eckert R., Lichtenberg-Fraté H., Butterweck A., Traub O., Klein R. A., Hülser D. F., Willecke K. Specific permeability and selective formation of gap junction channels in connexin-transfected HeLa cells. J Cell Biol. 1995 May;129(3):805–817. doi: 10.1083/jcb.129.3.805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. FRANKENHAEUSER B. Sodium permeability in toad nerve and in squid nerve. J Physiol. 1960 Jun;152:159–166. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Falk M. M., Buehler L. K., Kumar N. M., Gilula N. B. Cell-free synthesis and assembly of connexins into functional gap junction membrane channels. EMBO J. 1997 May 15;16(10):2703–2716. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.10.2703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Flagg-Newton J. L., Dahl G., Loewenstein W. R. Cell junction and cyclic AMP: 1. Upregulation of junctional membrane permeability and junctional membrane particles by administration of cyclic nucleotide or phosphodiesterase inhibitor. J Membr Biol. 1981;63(1-2):105–121. doi: 10.1007/BF01969452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Fuhlbrigge R. C., Fine S. M., Unanue E. R., Chaplin D. D. Expression of membrane interleukin 1 by fibroblasts transfected with murine pro-interleukin 1 alpha cDNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Aug;85(15):5649–5653. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.15.5649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. HODGKIN A. L., KATZ B. The effect of sodium ions on the electrical activity of giant axon of the squid. J Physiol. 1949 Mar 1;108(1):37–77. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1949.sp004310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Harris A. L., Walter A., Paul D., Goodenough D. A., Zimmerberg J. Ion channels in single bilayers induced by rat connexin32. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 1992 Oct;15(3-4):269–280. doi: 10.1016/0169-328x(92)90118-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hennemann H., Suchyna T., Lichtenberg-Fraté H., Jungbluth S., Dahl E., Schwarz J., Nicholson B. J., Willecke K. Molecular cloning and functional expression of mouse connexin40, a second gap junction gene preferentially expressed in lung. J Cell Biol. 1992 Jun;117(6):1299–1310. doi: 10.1083/jcb.117.6.1299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Horan P. K., Melnicoff M. J., Jensen B. D., Slezak S. E. Fluorescent cell labeling for in vivo and in vitro cell tracking. Methods Cell Biol. 1990;33:469–490. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)60547-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Horn R. Run, don't hop, through the nearest calcium channel. Biophys J. 1998 Sep;75(3):1142–1143. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)74033-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jaslove S. W., Brink P. R. The mechanism of rectification at the electrotonic motor giant synapse of the crayfish. Nature. 1986 Sep 4;323(6083):63–65. doi: 10.1038/323063a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Jiang J. X., Goodenough D. A. Heteromeric connexons in lens gap junction channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Feb 6;93(3):1287–1291. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.3.1287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kumar N. M., Gilula N. B. The gap junction communication channel. Cell. 1996 Feb 9;84(3):381–388. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81282-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Levitt D. G. General continuum theory for multiion channel. II. Application to acetylcholine channel. Biophys J. 1991 Feb;59(2):278–288. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82221-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Makowski L., Caspar D. L., Phillips W. C., Goodenough D. A. Gap junction structures. V. Structural chemistry inferred from X-ray diffraction measurements on sucrose accessibility and trypsin susceptibility. J Mol Biol. 1984 Apr 15;174(3):449–481. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90331-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Moreno A. P., Eghbali B., Spray D. C. Connexin32 gap junction channels in stably transfected cells: unitary conductance. Biophys J. 1991 Nov;60(5):1254–1266. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82159-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Neveu M. J., Hully J. R., Babcock K. L., Hertzberg E. L., Nicholson B. J., Paul D. L., Pitot H. C. Multiple mechanisms are responsible for altered expression of gap junction genes during oncogenesis in rat liver. J Cell Sci. 1994 Jan;107(Pt 1):83–95. doi: 10.1242/jcs.107.1.83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Nicholson B., Dermietzel R., Teplow D., Traub O., Willecke K., Revel J. P. Two homologous protein components of hepatic gap junctions. Nature. 1987 Oct 22;329(6141):732–734. doi: 10.1038/329732a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Nonner W., Eisenberg B. Ion permeation and glutamate residues linked by Poisson-Nernst-Planck theory in L-type calcium channels. Biophys J. 1998 Sep;75(3):1287–1305. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)74048-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Paul D. L. Molecular cloning of cDNA for rat liver gap junction protein. J Cell Biol. 1986 Jul;103(1):123–134. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.1.123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Reed K. E., Westphale E. M., Larson D. M., Wang H. Z., Veenstra R. D., Beyer E. C. Molecular cloning and functional expression of human connexin37, an endothelial cell gap junction protein. J Clin Invest. 1993 Mar;91(3):997–1004. doi: 10.1172/JCI116321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Schwarzmann G., Wiegandt H., Rose B., Zimmerman A., Ben-Haim D., Loewenstein W. R. Diameter of the cell-to-cell junctional membrane channels as probed with neutral molecules. Science. 1981 Jul 31;213(4507):551–553. doi: 10.1126/science.7244653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Spray D. C., Harris A. L., Bennett M. V. Equilibrium properties of a voltage-dependent junctional conductance. J Gen Physiol. 1981 Jan;77(1):77–93. doi: 10.1085/jgp.77.1.77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Stauffer K. A. The gap junction proteins beta 1-connexin (connexin-32) and beta 2-connexin (connexin-26) can form heteromeric hemichannels. J Biol Chem. 1995 Mar 24;270(12):6768–6772. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Steinberg T. H., Civitelli R., Geist S. T., Robertson A. J., Hick E., Veenstra R. D., Wang H. Z., Warlow P. M., Westphale E. M., Laing J. G. Connexin43 and connexin45 form gap junctions with different molecular permeabilities in osteoblastic cells. EMBO J. 1994 Feb 15;13(4):744–750. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06316.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sáez J. C., Connor J. A., Spray D. C., Bennett M. V. Hepatocyte gap junctions are permeable to the second messenger, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate, and to calcium ions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Apr;86(8):2708–2712. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.8.2708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Traub O., Look J., Dermietzel R., Brümmer F., Hülser D., Willecke K. Comparative characterization of the 21-kD and 26-kD gap junction proteins in murine liver and cultured hepatocytes. J Cell Biol. 1989 Mar;108(3):1039–1051. doi: 10.1083/jcb.108.3.1039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Tsien R. W., Weingart R. Inotropic effect of cyclic AMP in calf ventricular muscle studied by a cut end method. J Physiol. 1976 Aug;260(1):117–141. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Veenstra R. D. Size and selectivity of gap junction channels formed from different connexins. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 1996 Aug;28(4):327–337. doi: 10.1007/BF02110109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Veenstra R. D., Wang H. Z., Beblo D. A., Chilton M. G., Harris A. L., Beyer E. C., Brink P. R. Selectivity of connexin-specific gap junctions does not correlate with channel conductance. Circ Res. 1995 Dec;77(6):1156–1165. doi: 10.1161/01.res.77.6.1156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Veenstra R. D., Wang H. Z., Beyer E. C., Ramanan S. V., Brink P. R. Connexin37 forms high conductance gap junction channels with subconductance state activity and selective dye and ionic permeabilities. Biophys J. 1994 Jun;66(6):1915–1928. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80985-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Verselis V. K., Ginter C. S., Bargiello T. A. Opposite voltage gating polarities of two closely related connexins. Nature. 1994 Mar 24;368(6469):348–351. doi: 10.1038/368348a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Verselis V., Brink P. R. The gap junction channel. Its aqueous nature as indicated by deuterium oxide effects. Biophys J. 1986 Nov;50(5):1003–1007. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(86)83542-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wang H. Z., Veenstra R. D. Monovalent ion selectivity sequences of the rat connexin43 gap junction channel. J Gen Physiol. 1997 Apr;109(4):491–507. doi: 10.1085/jgp.109.4.491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. White T. W., Bruzzone R., Goodenough D. A., Paul D. L. Mouse Cx50, a functional member of the connexin family of gap junction proteins, is the lens fiber protein MP70. Mol Biol Cell. 1992 Jul;3(7):711–720. doi: 10.1091/mbc.3.7.711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. White T. W., Paul D. L., Goodenough D. A., Bruzzone R. Functional analysis of selective interactions among rodent connexins. Mol Biol Cell. 1995 Apr;6(4):459–470. doi: 10.1091/mbc.6.4.459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Yeager M., Nicholson B. J. Structure of gap junction intercellular channels. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1996 Apr;6(2):183–192. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(96)80073-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhang J. T., Nicholson B. J. The topological structure of connexin 26 and its distribution compared to connexin 32 in hepatic gap junctions. J Membr Biol. 1994 Apr;139(1):15–29. doi: 10.1007/BF00232671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES