Skip to main content
Sexual Medicine logoLink to Sexual Medicine
. 2026 Mar 23;14(2):qfag013. doi: 10.1093/sexmed/qfag013

Using artificial intelligence to predict sexual health outcomes in endometriosis: a decision tree model algorithm

Alexandre Vallée 1,✉, Anis Feki 2, Jean-Marc Ayoubi 3,4
PMCID: PMC13006972  PMID: 41877766

Abstract

Background

Endometriosis profoundly impairs sexual function through complex interactions between pain, hormonal disturbances, psychological distress, and sociodemographic factors.

Aim

To develop and validate a decision tree–based model identifying key predictors of sexual dysfunction in women with endometriosis.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional online survey among 1586 women with endometriosis recruited through social media in France between November 2023 and January 2024. Participants completed sociodemographic and clinical questionnaires and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), with sexual dysfunction defined as FSFI < 26.55. The predictors included pain characteristics, menstrual symptoms, digestive symptoms, infertility, BMI, lifestyle factors, and treatment history. A classification and regression tree model was trained on 70% of the sample and validated on the remaining 30%. Model performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. Subgroups at high or low risk of sexual dysfunction were identified through terminal nodes (rules) of the decision tree.

Outcomes

The primary outcome was classification into sexual dysfunction versus normal sexual function.

Results

Of the 1586 respondents, 1358 (86%) met the criteria for sexual dysfunction. The decision tree demonstrated strong discrimination in the training dataset (AUC = 0.96; sensitivity = 98%; specificity = 82%) and acceptable performance in the validation dataset (AUC = 0.79; sensitivity = 72%; specificity = 77%). Chronic pelvic pain, dyspareunia, worsening pain over time, heavy menstrual bleeding, infertility, BMI, digestive symptoms, education level, and treatment history were identified as major determinants. Several terminal nodes showed a 100% probability of sexual dysfunction, most notably women with severe menstrual cramps, heavy menstrual bleeding, no treatment, normal weight or obesity, infertility, or pronounced digestive symptoms. Conversely, women with no dyspareunia, no urinary or bowel pain, high education, and overweight exhibited a 0% probability of dysfunction.

Clinical Implications

AI-driven decision trees can support early identification of high-risk profiles and guide individualized management strategies to improve sexual health in women with endometriosis.

Strengths and Limitations

Strengths include a large sample, comprehensive symptom profiling, and transparent model interpretability. Limitations include reliance on self-reported diagnosis, potential selection bias inherent to online recruitment, lack of geographic and clinical verification data, and the cross-sectional nature of the analysis, preventing causal inference.

Conclusion

A decision tree–based model accurately identified key predictors of sexual dysfunction in endometriosis, supporting its potential for personalized risk stratification and clinical decision support.

Keywords: endometriosis, FSFI, sexual dysfunction, decision tree model, artificial intelligence, machine learning, pain, dyspareunia, infertility, BMI

Introduction

Endometriosis is defined as a disease characterized by the presence of endometrium-like epithelium and/or stroma outside the endometrium and myometrium, usually associated with an inflammatory process.1–3 It is considered a chronic inflammatory condition, defined as the presence of endometrium-like tissue outside the uterus.4 The establishment and growth of such ectopic tissue are estrogen-dependent,5 explaining why the disease predominantly affects women of reproductive age. However, its clinical consequences and management may persist well into the postmenopausal period.6 The inflammatory and estrogen-dependent nature of endometriosis contributes to progressive lesion development, central sensitization, and persistent pain, thereby explaining the chronic and often progressive course of the disease.7,8

Common symptoms include intense menstrual pain (dysmenorrhea), pain during intercourse (dyspareunia), abdominal and pelvic discomfort that may extend to the lower back, as well as pain during urination and gynecological assessments.9–11

The exact prevalence of endometriosis is unknown but estimates range from 2% to 10% in the general female population and up to 50% among infertile women.12,13 Thus, it is estimated that currently at least 190 million women and adolescent girls worldwide are affected by the disease during reproductive age, although some women may suffer beyond menopause.14,15 While not all women with endometriosis are symptomatic, endometriosis-associated pain and infertility are the clinical hallmarks of the disease affecting not only women with endometriosis, but also their partners and families. An impact of endometriosis, and particularly pain symptoms, has been shown on quality of life, but also on a range of activities and life domains, including physical functioning, everyday activities and social life, education and work, sex, intimacy and intimate partnerships, and mental health and emotional well-being.16 Moreover, it is diagnosed in nearly half of the patients experiencing chronic pelvic pain syndrome.17 However, because some individuals remain asymptomatic, the true prevalence is difficult to determine, posing challenges to precise epidemiological evaluation.18,19

In assessing sexual function, the Female Sexual Functioning Index (FSFI), a comprehensive 19-item questionnaire where higher scores denote better sexual function, has been employed.20 According to findings by Shi et al., women diagnosed with endometriosis exhibited significantly lower FSFI scores in comparison to their healthy counterparts, indicating impaired sexual well-being.21 Beyond physical symptoms, endometriosis can impact various dimensions of a woman’s life, including sexual relationships, often resulting in increased relational stress.22 Evidence suggests that the symptoms of endometriosis can disrupt intimate and sexual partnerships.23,24 The aspect of sexuality, which encompasses both psychosocial and physiological dimensions, plays a crucial role in not only a woman’s physical health but also her psychological state and interpersonal connections.

With the emergence of personalized, predictive, and preventive medicine, there is an increasing need to identify the determinants that negatively affect QoL in individuals with endometriosis. Gaining deeper insight into these factors can facilitate the development of targeted interventions aimed at enhancing patient outcomes and overall well-being. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly through decision tree models, present promising opportunities for refining analyses related to endometriosis.25–28 However, to date, no decision tree models have been employed to explore sexual function among women with endometriosis. Consequently, the objective of this study was to construct a decision tree–based model to assess sexual function by incorporating various factors associated with endometriosis.

Methods

Study design and participants

We designed and conducted a cross-sectional survey using survey software developed by our hospital.29 The survey was completed anonymously to encourage honest and unbiased responses.

The study link was disseminated via social media (Instagram), where participants were asked to forward this link to others they know. All the registrants were free to accept or decline the invitation, with no monetary reward received in return. Participants were also informed that they could withdraw at any time. Following internationally accepted ethical codes, respondents were duly informed of the purpose of the survey and were reminded of their participation rights before proceeding to take the survey. A research protocol was conducted to obtain approval from an ethical committee. The distribution of the questionnaire occurred between November 2023 and January 2024 in France on social media (Instagram). We closed the survey link after the workshop ended.

Questionnaire and measuring instruments

The questionnaire was divided into the following sections:

Sociodemographic questions (couple status, age, educational level, children).

Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg)/height2 (m2) and initially classified according to WHO criteria as underweight (<18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5-24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25.0-29.9 kg/m2), and obesity (≥30 kg/m2). For descriptive analyses and decision tree modeling, and due to the number of participants, categories were grouped into normal BMI (<25 kg/m2, including underweight and normal weight; only 89 participants showed BMI < 18.5 kg/m2), overweight BMI (25.0-29.9 kg/m2), and obesity BMI (≥30 kg/m2). Obesity subclasses (class I-III) were not analyzed separately due to limited sample sizes in extreme categories.

Questions related to the disease (diagnosis, symptoms, treatment, age of diagnosis, etc.)

Symptoms of endometriosis were defined as follows: pain during sexual intercourse (dyspareunia); heavy menstrual bleeding; infertility, defined as a disease characterized by the failure to establish a clinical pregnancy after 12 months of regular and unprotected sexual intercourse30; pain during urination (dysuria), particularly during menstruation; pain during bowel movements, particularly during menstruation (dyschezia); other digestive symptoms such as diarrhea, constipation, or nausea; worsening pain over time; excessive menstrual cramps or chronic pelvic pain; and medical and surgical treatment for endometriosis.

Heavy menstrual bleeding was defined as menstrual bleeding lasting more than 7 days, requiring frequent change of sanitary protection (eg, soaking one or more pads or tampons per hour for several consecutive hours), nighttime changes, or the presence of large blood clots, in accordance with American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists / National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (ACOG/NICE) criteria.

Female Sexual Function Index questionnaire: The FSFI contains 19 items and collects data on 6 domains of sexual function: desire, arousal, vaginal lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain. For each domain except the pain domain, the item scores range from 0 to 5. Higher item scores indicate better function. Items in the pain domain are coded by a descending scale. To obtain the total FSFI score, the item scores within each domain are added and then multiplied by a correction factor. The resulting scores within each of the 6 domains are added to obtain a total FSFI score. Higher scores reflect better sexual function.20 An FSFI total score under 26.55 was considered to be the optimal cut score for differentiating women with sexual dysfunction from women without sexual dysfunction.31

Statistical analysis

Characteristics of the study population were described using mean ± standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables. Categorical variables were described as numbers and proportions. Comparisons between groups were performed using the Mann-Whitney test or Student t-test for continuous variables. Pearson’s χ2 test was performed for categorical variables. The statistical analyses were performed using SAS software (version 9.4; SAS Institute, Carry, NC). A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Decision tree model

The target or outcome variable consisted of two classes: one class for the sexual dysfunction and the second for good sexual functioning. Data mining detects unknown patterns or prediction rules. One of the different methods of data mining is the decision tree. The decision tree model is a nonparametric methodology that performs tree-based classification modeling.32,33 The main purpose of this methodology is to provide a predictive tool for the target variable regardless of the predictors. Decision tree models are composed of three types of nodes: root node, internal node, and end node.34 This methodology performs splitting criteria to break a node to form a tree. The internal variables of the model represent a tree structure in which a decision is performed on each branch according to the data features. Splitting criteria provide a rate for each predictive variable. Variables that have the best rate of splitting criteria are selected as staying in the algorithm. In the decision tree, the first variable or root node is the main important determinant, and then the other variables could be classified in order of importance.32 The root node is the variable that can divide the whole population with the highest information gain.

The classification and regression tree (CART) is a decision tree algorithm.35 CART is made by splitting subsets of data using all the predictor variables. By this procedure, all the root nodes are created repeatedly. The CART algorithm creates a binary division of the tree and prunes the tree on the cost complexity. The CART algorithm uses the Gini impurity index to select the best variable.

The Gini impurity measures the probability of misclassifying a randomly chosen element. It is defined as:

graphic file with name DmEquation1.gif

where Inline graphic is the number of classes and Inline graphic is the proportion of samples in the node that belong to class Inline graphic.

For a split into left (Inline graphic) and right (Inline graphic) child nodes, the weighted Gini impurity is:

graphic file with name DmEquation2.gif

where Inline graphic and Inline graphic are the Gini impurities of the left and right child nodes; Inline graphic and Inline graphic are the number of samples in the left and right child nodes, respectively; andInline graphic is the total number of samples in the parent node. The best split is chosen by minimizing the weighted Gini index.

Gini gain:

graphic file with name DmEquation3.gif

where Inline graphic is the Gini impurity before splitting and Inline graphicis the weighted impurity after splitting. A larger Inline graphic indicates a better split.

All the variables were entered in the decision tree model regardless their significance.

Due to the small number of participants with classes of obesity, obesity subclasses were not modeled separately in the decision tree analysis to preserve model stability and avoid unreliable terminal nodes.

The model was trained on a testing population (70% of the overall population) and validated on a validation population (30% of the overall population).

Results

A total of 1586 women with endometriosis responded to the online questionnaire, and among them, 759 (48%) have children, 1247 (79%) were in couples, and 410 (26%) declared smoking tobacco. Their overall mean FSFI level was 17 (SD: 9) and BMI was 26 (SD: 6). When considering the dichotomization of our study population according to good sexual function or not, we observed significant differences for age (P = .042), being in a couple, (P < .001), and pain during urination during periods (P < .001) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Characteristics of the study population according to sexual function status.

Variable Sexual dysfunction (N = 1358) n/mean %/SD No sexual dysfunction (N = 228) n/mean %/SD P-value
Age (years) .042
18-25 209 15.39% 28 12.28%
26-30 266 19.59% 56 24.56%
31-35 279 20.54% 48 21.05%
36-40 289 21.28% 46 20.18%
41-45 204 15.02% 22 9.65%
>45 111 8.17% 28 12.28%
Surgical treatment of endometriosis 204 15.02% 35 15.35% .898
Education level .172
High 331 24.41% 56 24.56%
Moderate 246 18.14% 53 23.25%
Low 779 57.45% 119 52.19%
Children 641 47.41% 118 51.75% .225
In a couple 1037 76.36% 210 92.11% <.001
Current smoking 351 25.92% 59 26.34% .896
Heavy menstrual bleeding 871 64.14% 141 61.84% .506
Infertility 433 31.89% 65 28.51% .306
Pain during urination during menstruation 688 50.66% 88 38.60% <.001
Pain during bowel movements during menstruation 905 66.64% 139 60.96% .097
Other digestive symptoms (diarrhea, constipation, nausea) 1202 88.51% 203 89.04% .817
Worsening pain over time 990 72.90% 166 72.81% .976
Severe menstrual cramps 877 64.58% 142 62.28% .504
BMI category .965
Obesity (≥30 kg/m2) 312 23.11% 52 22.81%
Class III (≥40 kg/m2) 21 1.56% 2 0.88%
Class II (35-39.9 kg/m2) 88 6.52% 12 5.26%
Class I (30-34.9 kg/m2) 203 15.04% 38 16.67%
Overweight (25-29.9 kg/m2) 346 25.63% 57 25.00%
Normal weight (<25 kg/m2) 692 51.26% 119 52.19%
BMI (kg/m 2 ) 26.0 5.79 25.6 5.62 .287
Medical treatment for endometriosis 589 43.50% 90 39.47% .254
FSFI total score 14.7 8.41 28.5 1.32 <.001
FSFI domains
Desire 4.25 2.01 7.50 1.56 <.001
Arousal 6.78 5.56 17.1 2.07 <.001
Vaginal lubrication 7.71 6.37 17.5 2.55 <.001
Orgasm 5.46 4.63 13.4 1.68 <.001
Satisfaction 6.85 4.66 12.0 1.49 <.001
Pain 7.22 4.54 8.67 1.72 <.001

Figure 1 shows the different items of the FSFI score according to the two groups.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Distribution of Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) total score and domain scores in women with and without sexual dysfunction (FSFI < 26.55 [no sexual dysfunction] vs ≥26.55 [sexual dysfunction]).

A decision tree model was performed on the testing population (70% of the overall population, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.96, sensitivity = 98%, and specificity = 82%) and validated on the validation population (30% of the overall population, AUC = 0.79, sensitivity = 72%, and specificity = 77%) (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC) of the decision tree model for the testing phase (red line, AUC = 0.96) and for the validation phase (blue line, AUC = 0.79).

The decision tree model identified 23 main subgroups of women who consistently exhibited either marked deterioration or no impairment in sexual functioning, based on their clinical and sociodemographic profiles (Table 2).

Table 2.

Rules created by the decision tree model, final number of participants by rule with the probability of sexual dysfunction associated with each rule and then, the different steps of each rule.

Rules Final number Probability of sexual dysfunction (%) All steps of the rule
Rule 1 N = 5 0 If, in couple, no pain during urination during periods, age < 46 years, pain, particularly excessive menstrual cramps felt, no heavy menstrual bleeding, other digestive issues (diarrhea, constipation, nausea), no treatment of endometriosis, high education
Rule 2 N = 8 88 If, in couple, no pain during urination during periods, age < 46 years, pain, particularly excessive menstrual cramps felt, no heavy menstrual bleeding, other digestive issues (diarrhea, constipation, nausea), treatment against endometriosis, pain during bowel movements during periods
Rule 3 N = 7 100 If, in couple, no pain during urination during periods, age < 46 years, pain, particularly excessive menstrual cramps felt, no heavy menstrual bleeding, no other digestive issues (diarrhea, constipation, nausea)
Rule 4 N = 5 20 If, in couple, no pain during urination during periods, age < 36 years, no pain, particularly excessive menstrual cramps felt, no heavy menstrual bleeding, no other digestive issues (diarrhea, constipation, nausea), no tobacco smoking, pain during bowel movements during periods
Rule 5 N = 5 0 If, in couple, no pain during urination during periods, age > 46 years, no pain, particularly excessive menstrual cramps felt, no heavy menstrual bleeding, no other digestive issues (diarrhea, constipation, nausea), age > 46 years, worsening pain over time
Rule 6 N = 5 0 If, in couple, no pain during urination during periods, age < 46 years, pain, particularly excessive menstrual cramps felt, heavy menstrual bleeding, no infertility, obesity or overweight, low education, treatment against endometriosis, having children
Rule 7 N = 8 12 If, in couple, no pain during urination during periods, age < 36 years, no pain, particularly excessive menstrual cramps felt, heavy menstrual bleeding, no pain during bowel movements during periods, other digestive issues (diarrhea, constipation, nausea)
Rule 8 N = 5 100 If, in couple, no pain during urination during periods, age < 46 years, pain, particularly excessive menstrual cramps felt, heavy menstrual bleeding, no infertility, overweight, low education, no treatment against endometriosis
Rule 9 N = 16 100 If, in couple, no pain during urination during periods, age < 46 years, pain, particularly excessive menstrual cramps felt, heavy menstrual bleeding, no infertility, normal weight, moderate or low education, no treatment against endometriosis
Rule 10 N = 18 100 If, in couple, no pain during urination during periods, age < 46 years, pain, particularly excessive menstrual cramps felt, heavy menstrual bleeding, infertility, obesity or overweight
Rule 11 N = 7 16 If, in couple, no pain during urination during periods, tobacco smoking, treatment against endometriosis, age < 40 years, not having children, high education
Rule 12 N = 12 100 If, in couple, no pain during urination during periods, no pain, particularly excessive menstrual cramps felt, no heavy menstrual bleeding, other digestive issues (diarrhea, constipation, nausea), high or moderate education, no tobacco smoking, no pain during bowel movements during periods, age > 36 years
Rule 13 N = 41 100 If, in couple, no pain during urination during periods, no pain, particularly excessive menstrual cramps felt, no heavy menstrual bleeding, other digestive issues (diarrhea, constipation, nausea), low education
Rule 14 N = 12 100 If, in couple, no pain during urination during periods, age > 40 years, surgical treatment of endometriosis, overweight or normal weight
Rule 15 N = 5 0 If, in couple, no pain during urination during periods, tobacco smoking, pain during bowel movements during periods, treatment against endometriosis, age < 40 years, having children
Rule 16 N = 11 88 If, in couple, no pain during urination during periods, tobacco smoking, pain during bowel movements during periods, treatment against endometriosis, age < 40 years, not having children, high education
Rule 17 N = 8 0 If, in couple, pain during urination during periods, no tobacco smoking, other digestive issues (diarrhea, constipation, nausea), no surgical treatment of endometriosis, age < 40 years, worsening pain over time, low education, no infertility, heavy menstrual bleeding, having children
Rule 18 N = 16 100 If, in couple, pain during urination during periods, tobacco smoking, pain during bowel movements during periods, no treatment against endometriosis, worsening pain over time, having children, obesity or overweight
Rule 19 N = 9 100 If, in couple, pain during urination during periods, no tobacco smoking, age < 40 years, other digestive issues (diarrhea, constipation, nausea), no surgical treatment of endometriosis, worsening pain over time, infertility
Rule 20 N = 21 100 If, in couple, pain during urination during periods, no tobacco smoking, age < 40 years, other digestive issues (diarrhea, constipation, nausea), no surgical treatment of endometriosis, worsening pain over time, high education, no treatment against endometriosis, heavy menstrual bleeding, not having children
Rule 21 N = 16 100 If, not in couple, age < 36 years, other digestive issues (diarrhea, constipation, nausea), worsening pain over time, no tobacco smoking, treatment against endometriosis, overweight or normal weight, heavy menstrual bleeding
Rule 22 N = 25 100 If, not in couple, age < 36 years, other digestive issues (diarrhea, constipation, nausea), worsening pain over time, no tobacco smoking, no treatment against endometriosis, moderate or low education
Rule 23 N = 33 100 If, not in couple, age < 36 years, other digestive issues (diarrhea, constipation, nausea), worsening pain over time, tobacco smoking

Women with painful menstrual cramps, heavy menstrual bleeding, and no infertility, combined with normal weight, moderate/low education, and no treatment for endometriosis, exhibited 100% sexual dysfunction (rules 9 and 10). Those with pain during urination and bowel movements, worsening pain over time, and obesity also showed 100% probability of sexual dysfunction (rule 18). Women who underwent surgical treatment of endometriosis, had normal weight or were overweight, and were over 40 years old had a 100% probability of sexual dysfunction (rule 14). Patients with digestive issues (diarrhea, constipation, nausea), worsening pain over time, and tobacco use showed 100% sexual dysfunction, especially if they were not in a couple and under 36 years old (rules 21, 22, and 23). Women in a couple who had digestive symptoms, no surgical treatment of endometriosis, high education, and worsening pain over time also had 100% probability of sexual dysfunction (rule 20).

It should be noted that terminal nodes with extreme probabilities (eg, 100%) reflect specific multivariable combinations of predictors identified by the CART algorithm and do not imply causal effects of any single variable, including surgical treatment. In particular, surgical history appeared in different terminal nodes depending on the surrounding clinical context (age, pain severity, digestive symptoms, education level), highlighting interaction effects rather than isolated associations.

Women who were in a couple, had no pain during urination or bowel movements, no severe menstrual cramps, and high education showed 0% probability of sexual dysfunction (rules 1 and 5). Those with no worsening pain over time, not overweight, no heavy menstrual bleeding, and who had received endometriosis treatment also had 0% sexual dysfunction (rule 6). Being in a couple appeared to be a protective factor, as women not in a couple and experiencing digestive symptoms and worsening pain over time had 100% sexual dysfunction (rules 21 and 22). Women who were in a couple, had pain during bowel movements, but were younger than 40 and had high education showed an 88% probability of sexual dysfunction (rule 16). Women with menstrual cramps, heavy menstrual bleeding, overweight, and low education had an 88% probability of sexual dysfunction (rule 8) (Table 2).

Discussion

Interest of AI application

The use of decision tree models to examine factors affecting sexual function in women with endometriosis offers a novel and valuable approach to addressing this complex issue. Traditional statistical analyses often fall short in capturing the multifactorial nature of sexual dysfunction, which involves interactions between clinical symptoms, psychological distress, and sociodemographic influences. In contrast, decision trees provide a transparent, data-driven method that identifies the most relevant predictors and organizes them in a structured hierarchy.36 By systematically analyzing these variables, decision trees can detect intricate relationships that may not be evident through conventional methods. This ability to model nonlinear and interdependent factors makes them particularly well suited for evaluating sexual dysfunction in endometriosis, a condition known for its heterogeneous presentation. Additionally, decision pathways generated by AI models offer clinicians practical insights that can improve the individualization of therapeutic approaches.37,38 The integration of machine learning into sexual health assessments could significantly enhance the ability to predict, prevent, and manage sexual dysfunction in affected patients.39

A major strength of decision tree modeling is its capacity to uncover complex interactions between diverse factors such as dyspareunia, infertility, BMI, emotional distress, and relationship dynamics. Unlike traditional linear models, which assume predictor independence, decision trees can identify nuanced subgroups of patients with varying degrees of sexual dysfunction. For instance, the model may highlight an unexpected link between overweight, severe menstrual cramps, and psychological distress, where increased awareness of symptoms contributes to greater sexual impairment.40 These findings illustrate how AI can reveal previously unrecognized risk factors, paving the way for more effective interventions.

From a clinical perspective, leveraging decision tree models allows for a targeted and stratified approach to managing sexual dysfunction in endometriosis patients. By ranking risk factors according to their influence on sexual health, healthcare providers can prioritize interventions for women at the highest risk. For example, if the model identifies severe pelvic pain and infertility as leading contributors, personalized strategies such as pelvic floor rehabilitation, hormonal management, and psychosexual therapy can be recommended. Additionally, the visual representation of patient profiles created by decision trees simplifies shared decision-making,41 ensuring that both patients and clinicians can better understand individualized treatment options. Moreover, incorporating AI-driven models into digital health platforms could enable real-time patient monitoring, enhancing the precision and adaptability of treatment plans.

Ultimately, integrating AI-based decision tree models into endometriosis research provides a powerful tool for decoding the complexities of sexual dysfunction. By utilizing advanced data-driven methodologies, researchers and clinicians can gain deeper insights into the underlying mechanisms, enhance the early detection of high-risk groups, and implement tailored therapeutic strategies. This approach holds great potential to improve the overall management of sexual health in women with endometriosis, offering more effective, individualized, and proactive interventions.

Determinants of sexual dysfunction in women with endometriosis

Endometriosis is a complex gynecological condition with a profound impact on multiple aspects of quality of life, particularly sexual function. The decision tree model in this study provided a data-driven approach to identifying key clinical, psychological, and sociodemographic predictors of sexual dysfunction in women with endometriosis. The results revealed that pain progression,42 menstrual disorders,43 infertility,44 digestive symptoms,45 and treatment history were critical determinants influencing sexual well-being.

Pain as a central determinant of sexual dysfunction

Chronic pelvic pain, particularly worsening pain over time and pain during urination or bowel movements, emerged as a strong predictor of impaired sexual function.46 This finding aligns with previous research suggesting that persistent pain leads to avoidance behaviors, fear of intercourse (anticipatory pain anxiety), and reduced sexual desire.47 The neuropathic nature of endometriosis-related pain can cause central sensitization, leading to heightened pain perception and further impairing sexual activity.48

Furthermore, pain during intercourse (dyspareunia), a hallmark symptom of deep infiltrating endometriosis, can lead to psychosexual distress, reduced arousal, and relationship strain.49 Women with dyspareunia and worsening pain over time had a high probability of sexual dysfunction, emphasizing the need for early pain management strategies through multimodal approaches, including pharmacological, surgical, and psychological interventions.50,51

Menstrual disorders and hormonal influence on sexual function

Heavy menstrual bleeding was another key factor contributing to sexual dysfunction.52 In this study, women experiencing heavy menstrual bleeding and painful cramps were significantly more likely to report worse FSFI scores. Excessive menstrual bleeding may lead to fatigue, anemia, and reduced libido, while severe menstrual cramps (dysmenorrhea) further exacerbate pain-related sexual avoidance.53

From a hormonal perspective, estrogen dominance in endometriosis is known to increase inflammation, pain severity, and menstrual abnormalities, further impacting sexual health.54 Hormonal treatments, including progestins, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues, and combined oral contraceptives, play a critical role in reducing symptoms and improving sexual function.55 However, some treatments, such as GnRH analogues, may have adverse effects on libido due to estrogen suppression, highlighting the importance of personalized treatment strategies.56

Infertility as a psychological burden affecting sexual well-being

Infertility is a well-documented source of psychological distress in women with endometriosis57 and was identified as a major predictor of poor sexual function in this study. Women with infertility and obesity or overweight had a high probability of sexual dysfunction, underscoring the emotional toll associated with reproductive concerns.58

The bidirectional relationship between infertility and sexual dysfunction is well established.59,60 Women facing infertility often experience decreased sexual spontaneity, increased performance pressure, and emotional distress, all of which negatively affect sexual desire and satisfaction.61,62 Psychological interventions, including counseling and cognitive behavioral therapy, may be beneficial in helping couples navigate intimacy challenges associated with infertility.63

Digestive symptoms and their impact on sexual function

Endometriosis frequently affects the gastrointestinal tract, leading to symptoms such as constipation, diarrhea, bloating, and nausea, which significantly impact comfort and confidence during sexual activity.64,65 The decision tree model revealed that women with digestive symptoms combined with worsening pain over time exhibited a high probability of sexual dysfunction.

The presence of rectovaginal or bowel-infiltrating endometriosis may lead to pain during defecation (dyschezia), bloating, and increased pelvic pressure, further worsening sexual function.66 Additionally, gut dysbiosis and increased inflammation have been implicated in endometriosis pathophysiology, suggesting that gut-targeted therapies, including dietary modifications and probiotics, may play a role in symptom management.67

Body mass index and sexual dysfunction

Body mass index emerged as a significant factor influencing sexual function, with obesity and the combined category of underweight/normal weight (BMI < 25 kg/m2) associated with poorer FSFI scores. However, underweight participants were few and were grouped with normal-weight women for analytical purposes. Therefore, no conclusion can be drawn regarding differences between underweight and normal-weight participants specifically.68 Future studies with larger samples of underweight women are needed to explore whether distinct associations exist between low-BMI phenotypes and sexual function in endometriosis. Women with obesity and infertility had a high probability of sexual dysfunction, likely due to systemic inflammation, altered hormonal metabolism, and increased pain perception.69 Conversely, normal weight was associated with poor sexual function in the absence of infertility, possibly due to hormonal imbalances, reduced estrogen levels, and decreased sexual desire. These findings highlight the need for individualized lifestyle interventions, including weight management strategies, to optimize sexual health outcomes.

Treatment history and its dual impact on sexual function

Treatment history emerged as an important component of several decision tree pathways. Women who did not receive treatment for endometriosis were more likely to experience sexual dysfunction, suggesting that inadequate symptom control may contribute to persistent sexual impairment. Conversely, some women who had undergone surgical treatment, particularly those over 40 years of age, also exhibited high probabilities of sexual dysfunction. This may be explained by postsurgical complications, persistent pain, adhesions, and decreased ovarian function after surgical treatment of endometriosis.70,71 Surgical interventions, while effective in symptom relief, should be carefully considered in the context of long-term sexual function outcomes.

Importantly, in the CART model, surgical history appeared downstream of symptom-related variables such as pain severity, digestive symptoms, and pain progression, suggesting that surgery is selected by the algorithm after clinical severity markers rather than acting as a primary determinant of sexual outcomes. Interpretation of surgical treatment within the decision tree framework requires caution.72,73 Although surgery is clinically recognized as an effective option to reduce pain and improve quality of life and sexual function in selected patients with endometriosis,1,4,74 CART models do not estimate causal effects and do not assign intrinsic importance to individual variables in isolation, but rather identify multivariable profiles associated with homogeneous outcomes.72,75,76

Therefore, the observation that both women who underwent surgery and women who did not undergo surgery appear in terminal nodes with a 100% probability of sexual dysfunction likely reflects different clinical trajectories rather than contradictory effects of surgery itself. Surgical history in this model may serve as a proxy for disease severity, symptom burden, and prior treatment exposure, consistent with the well-described phenomenon of confounding by indication in observational research.77–79

Moreover, the cross-sectional design and data-driven modeling strategy do not allow temporal or causal inference regarding treatment effects.80 Future studies using longitudinal designs or stratified modeling approaches according to surgical status may better disentangle the independent role of surgery from disease severity and symptom progression.

Sociodemographic conditions and sexual dysfunction

Being in a couple was generally associated with better sexual function,81 possibly due to partner support, emotional security, and shared coping strategies. However, women who were not in a couple and experienced worsening pain over time had a high probability of sexual dysfunction, highlighting the psychosocial vulnerability of single women with endometriosis.16 Higher education appeared to be a protective factor, as women with moderate to high education levels had a lower probability of sexual dysfunction. This may be attributed to better health literacy, access to medical care, and proactive disease management strategies.82 Smoking was associated with higher rates of sexual dysfunction, potentially due to vascular impairment, increased inflammation, and worsened pelvic pain symptoms.83 These findings reinforce the importance of smoking cessation programs in endometriosis care.

Limitations

This study presents several limitations. Firstly, the sample is not fully representative of French women with endometriosis. The questionnaire was intentionally designed to be simple and accessible, which may have limited our ability to assess certain lifestyle habits in detail. Ethical constraints under French regulations also restricted us from collecting specific personal information, such as participants’ locations. This limitation made direct comparisons with other geographically detailed studies more challenging. These limitations may impact the generalizability of our findings. No confirmatory medical examinations, such as laparoscopic surgery or imaging studies, were required to verify the diagnosis. This introduces the possibility that only women with more severe symptoms or those who had previously received a formal medical diagnosis participated in the study, potentially leading to a selection bias. Additionally, as an Internet-based study, there is a potential for selection bias. Although obesity subclasses (classes I-III) may be clinically relevant, the small number of participants with class III obesity prevented reliable stratified modeling in the decision tree framework. Consequently, obesity severity could not be explored in detail. Given the cross-sectional design, causality between variables cannot be established. In addition, the cross-sectional CART framework does not allow causal interpretation of treatment effects, and the role of surgery may be confounded by disease severity and indication for intervention.

Conclusion

This study applied a decision tree model to identify key clinical, psychological, and sociodemographic determinants of sexual dysfunction in women with endometriosis. Our findings highlight the complex and multifaceted nature of sexual health impairments in this population, emphasizing the interplay of pain severity, menstrual disorders, infertility, BMI, digestive symptoms, and treatment history. The model successfully categorized women into high- and low-risk groups, demonstrating strong predictive accuracy and providing clinically relevant insights for individualized patient management.

Chronic pelvic pain, particularly dyspareunia, worsening pain over time, and pain during urination or bowel movements emerged as major contributors to poor sexual function, reinforcing the need for comprehensive pain management strategies. Additionally, heavy menstrual bleeding, hormonal imbalances, and infertility-related distress were significant factors negatively impacting sexual well-being. The influence of lifestyle factors such as BMI, smoking, and relationship status further underscores the importance of a multidimensional approach to care. The decision tree methodology proved valuable in uncovering nonlinear relationships and hidden patterns that conventional statistical models might overlook. This underscores its potential as a decision-support tool for healthcare providers, allowing for personalized interventions based on patient-specific risk profiles. Integrating AI-driven predictive models into clinical practice could enhance early identification of vulnerable patients, optimize treatment selection, and improve overall sexual health outcomes in women with endometriosis.

Future research should focus on external validation of this model in diverse populations, exploring its application in longitudinal studies and digital health platforms. The incorporation of machine learning algorithms into gynecological and sexual health assessments represents a promising step toward precision medicine, facilitating more effective and patient-centered care strategies.

Contributor Information

Alexandre Vallée, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Foch Hospital, Suresnes 92150, France.

Anis Feki, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Fribourg, 1708 Fribourg, Switzerland.

Jean-Marc Ayoubi, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Foch Hospital, Suresnes 92150 France; Medical School, University of Versailles, Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ), 78180 Versailles, France.

Author contributions

A.V.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing—original draft. J.M.A.: Writing—original draft. A.F.: Writing—original draft. The authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest for this research.

Ethical approval and patient consent

The study was approved by the Foch IRB: IRB00012437 (approval number: 23-07-05) on July 18, 2023. Nonopposed consent was obtained from all the participants.

References

  • 1. Becker  CM, Bokor  A, Heikinheimo  O, et al.  ESHRE guideline: endometriosis. Hum Reprod Open. 2022;2022(2):hoac009. 10.1093/hropen/hoac009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. International Working Group of AAGL, ESGE, ESHRE and WES, Tomassetti  C, et al.  An international terminology for endometriosis, 2021. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2021;13:295–304. 10.52054/FVVO.13.4.036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. International working group of AAGL, ESGE, ESHRE and WES, Tomassetti  C, et al.  An international terminology for endometriosis, 2021. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021;28:1849–1859. 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.08.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Kennedy  S, Bergqvist  A, Chapron  C, et al.  ESHRE guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2005;20:2698–2704. 10.1093/humrep/dei135 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Kitawaki  J, Kado  N, Ishihara  H, Koshiba  H, Kitaoka  Y, Honjo  H. Endometriosis: the pathophysiology as an estrogen-dependent disease. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2002;83:149–155. 10.1016/s0960-0760(02)00260-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Vallée  A, Carbonnel  M, Ceccaldi  P-F, Feki  A, Ayoubi  J-M. Postmenopausal endometriosis: a challenging condition beyond menopause. Menopause N Y N. 2024;31:447–456. 10.1097/GME.0000000000002338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Vallée  A, Lecarpentier  Y. Curcumin and endometriosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:21. 10.3390/ijms21072440 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Vallée  A, Vallée  J-N, Le Blanche  A, Lecarpentier  Y. PPARγ agonists: emergent therapy in endometriosis. Pharm Basel Switz. 2021;14:543. 10.3390/ph14060543 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Burney  RO, Giudice  LC. Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:511–519. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Vallée  A, Ceccaldi  P-F, Carbonnel  M, Feki  A, Ayoubi  J-M. Pollution and endometriosis: a deep dive into the environmental impacts on women’s health. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2023;131:401–414. 10.1111/1471-0528.17687 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Parazzini  F, Esposito  G, Tozzi  L, Noli  S, Bianchi  S. Epidemiology of endometriosis and its comorbidities. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;209:3–7. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.04.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Eskenazi  B, Warner  ML. Epidemiology of endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 1997;24:235–258. 10.1016/s0889-8545(05)70302-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Meuleman  C, Vandenabeele  B, Fieuws  S, Spiessens  C, Timmerman  D, D’Hooghe  T. High prevalence of endometriosis in infertile women with normal ovulation and normospermic partners. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:68–74. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.04.056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Gemmell  LC, Webster  KE, Kirtley  S, Vincent  K, Zondervan  KT, Becker  CM. The management of menopause in women with a history of endometriosis: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23:481–500. 10.1093/humupd/dmx011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Zondervan  KT, Becker  CM, Missmer  SA. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1244–1256. 10.1056/NEJMra1810764 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Culley  L, Law  C, Hudson  N, et al.  The social and psychological impact of endometriosis on women’s lives: a critical narrative review. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19:625–639. 10.1093/humupd/dmt027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Macer  ML, Taylor  HS. Endometriosis and infertility: a review of the pathogenesis and treatment of endometriosis-associated infertility. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 2012;39:535–549. 10.1016/j.ogc.2012.10.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Giudice  LC. Clinical practice. Endometriosis N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2389–2398. 10.1056/NEJMcp1000274 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Soliman  AM, Coyne  KS, Zaiser  E, Castelli-Haley  J, Fuldeore  MJ. The burden of endometriosis symptoms on health-related quality of life in women in the United States: a cross-sectional study. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;38:238–248. 10.1080/0167482X.2017.1289512 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Rosen  R, Brown  C, Heiman  J, et al.  The female sexual function index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther. 2000;26:191–208. 10.1080/009262300278597 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Shi  C, Xu  H, Zhang  T, Gao  Y. Endometriosis decreases female sexual function and increases pain severity: a meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023;307:195–204. 10.1007/s00404-022-06478-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Di Donato  N, Montanari  G, Benfenati  A, et al.  Do women with endometriosis have to worry about sex?  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;179:69–74. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.05.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Facchin  F, Buggio  L, Vercellini  P, Frassineti  A, Beltrami  S, Saita  E. Quality of intimate relationships, dyadic coping, and psychological health in women with endometriosis: results from an online survey. J Psychosom Res. 2021;146:110502. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110502 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Troìa  L, Luisi  S. Sexual function and quality of life in women with endometriosis. Minerva Obstet Gynecol. 2022;74:203–221. 10.23736/S2724-606X.22.05033-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Goldstein  A, Cohen  S. Self-report symptom-based endometriosis prediction using machine learning. Sci Rep. 2023;13:5499. 10.1038/s41598-023-32761-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Liu  J, Ma  Y, Jiang  W, Xie  P. Research progress on correlative prediction factors and prediction models of endometriosis associated ovarian carcinoma. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024;103:e40131. 10.1097/MD.0000000000040131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Rodríguez  Y, Grasso  E, Tessari  L, et al.  Management of patients with endometriosis and infertility: laparoscopic treatment and spontaneous pregnancy rate. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2024;28:392–398. 10.5935/1518-0557.20240018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Sivajohan  B, Elgendi  M, Menon  C, Allaire  C, Yong  P, Bedaiwy  MA. Clinical use of artificial intelligence in endometriosis: a scoping review. NPJ Digit Med. 2022;5:109–117. 10.1038/s41746-022-00638-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Vallée  A, Arutkin  M, Ceccaldi  P-F, Ayoubi  J-M. Quality of life identification by unsupervised cluster analysis: a new approach to modelling the burden of endometriosis. PLoS One. 2025;20:e0317178. 10.1371/journal.pone.0317178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Vander Borght  M, Wyns  C. Fertility and infertility: definition and epidemiology. Clin Biochem. 2018;62:2–10. 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.03.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Wiegel  M, Meston  C, Rosen  R. The female sexual function index (FSFI): cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores. J Sex Marital Ther. 2005;31:1–20. 10.1080/00926230590475206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Vallée  A. Arterial stiffness nomogram identification by cluster analysis: a new approach of vascular phenotype modeling. J Clin Hypertens Greenwich Conn. 2022;24:1415–1426. 10.1111/jch.14571 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Vallée  R, Vallée  J-N, Guillevin  C, et al.  Machine learning decision tree models for multiclass classification of common malignant brain tumors using perfusion and spectroscopy MRI data. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1089998. 10.3389/fonc.2023.1089998 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Shi G. Chapter 5, decision trees. In: G  Shi, ed. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery for Geoscientists. Elsevier; 2014. 10.1016/B978-0-12-410437-2.00005-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Lewis  RJ. An introduction to classification and regression tree (CART) analysis. n.d.;14, 2000.
  • 36. Song  Y, Lu  Y. Decision tree methods: applications for classification and prediction. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2015;27:130–135. 10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.215044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Alowais  SA, Alghamdi  SS, Alsuhebany  N, et al.  Revolutionizing healthcare: the role of artificial intelligence in clinical practice. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23:689. 10.1186/s12909-023-04698-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Giordano  C, Brennan  M, Mohamed  B, Rashidi  P, Modave  F, Tighe  P. Accessing artificial intelligence for clinical decision-making. Front Digit Health. 2021;3:645232. 10.3389/fdgth.2021.645232 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Gibbs  J, Solomon  D, Jackson  L, Mullick  S, Burns  F, Shahmanesh  M. Measuring and evaluating sexual health in the era of digital health: challenges and opportunities. Sex Health. 2022;19:336–345. 10.1071/SH22068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Venkatasubramaniam  A, Wolfson  J, Mitchell  N, Barnes  T, JaKa  M, French  S. Decision trees in epidemiological research. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2017;14:11. 10.1186/s12982-017-0064-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Podgorelec  V, Kokol  P, Stiglic  B, Rozman  I. Decision trees: an overview and their use in medicine. J Med Syst. 2002;26:445–463. 10.1023/A:1016409317640 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Flegge  LG, Barr  A, Craner  JR. Sexual functioning among adults with chronic pain: prevalence and association with pain-related outcomes. Pain Med Malden Mass. 2023;24:197–206. 10.1093/pm/pnac117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Gollapudi  M, Thomas  A, Yogarajah  A, et al.  Understanding the interplay between premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) and female sexual dysfunction (FSD). Cureus. 2024;16(6):e62788. 10.7759/cureus.62788 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Starc  A, Trampuš  M, Pavan Jukić  D, Rotim  C, Jukić  T, Polona  MA. Infertility and sexual dysfunctions: a systematic literature review. Acta Clin Croat. 2019;58:508–515. 10.20471/acc.2019.58.03.15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Bedell  A, Friedlander  A. Management of sexual dysfunction in gastrointestinal disorders. Gastroenterol Clin N Am. 2022;51:815–828. 10.1016/j.gtc.2022.06.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Pluchino  N, Wenger  J-M, Petignat  P, et al.  Sexual function in endometriosis patients and their partners: effect of the disease and consequences of treatment. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;22:762–774. 10.1093/humupd/dmw031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Brauer  M, Lakeman  M, van Lunsen  R, Laan  E. Predictors of task-persistent and fear-avoiding behaviors in women with sexual pain disorders. J Sex Med. 2014;11:3051–3063. 10.1111/jsm.12697 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Karp  BI, Stratton  P. Endometriosis-associated chronic pelvic pain. Med. 2023;4:143–146. 10.1016/j.medj.2023.02.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Privitera  G, O’Brien  K, Misajon  R, Lin  C-Y. Endometriosis symptomatology, dyspareunia, and sexual distress are related to avoidance of sex and negative impacts on the sex lives of women with endometriosis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20:3362. 10.3390/ijerph20043362 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Yang  X, Xu  X, Lin  L, et al.  Sexual function in patients with endometriosis: a prospective case–control study in China. J Int Med Res. 2021;49:03000605211004388. 10.1177/03000605211004388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Del Forno  S, Raspollini  A, Doglioli  M, et al.  Painful sexual intercourse, quality of life and sexual function in patients with endometriosis: not just deep dyspareunia. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024;310:2091–2100. 10.1007/s00404-024-07643-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Laughlin-Tommaso  SK, Borah  BJ, Stewart  EA. The effect of menses on standardized assessment of sexual dysfunction among women with uterine fibroids: a cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:435–439. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.04.029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Nelson  AL, Ritchie  JJ. Severe anemia from heavy menstrual bleeding requires heightened attention. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213:97.e1–97.e6. 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.04.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Chantalat  E, Valera  M-C, Vaysse  C, et al.  Estrogen receptors and endometriosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:2815. 10.3390/ijms21082815 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Saleh  FL, Taylor  HS. Clinical applications of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues: a broad impact on reproductive medicine. FS Rep. 2023;4:83–87. 10.1016/j.xfre.2023.01.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Resta  C, Moustogiannis  A, Chatzinikita  E, et al.  Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)/GnRH receptors and their role in the treatment of endometriosis. Cureus. 2023;15:38136. 10.7759/cureus.38136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Mori  LP, Zaia  V, Montagna  E, Vilarino  FL, Barbosa  CP. Endometriosis in infertile women: an observational and comparative study of quality of life, anxiety, and depression. BMC Womens Health. 2024;24:251. 10.1186/s12905-024-03080-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Zheng  L, Yang  L, Guo  Z, Yao  N, Zhang  S, Pu  P. Obesity and its impact on female reproductive health: unraveling the connections. Front Endocrinol. 2024;14:1326546. 10.3389/fendo.2023.1326546 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Wischmann  TH. Sexual disorders in infertile couples. J Sex Med. 2010;7:1868–1876. 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01717.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Mendonça  CR d, Arruda  JT, Noll  M, de Campoli  PM, do Amaral  WN. Sexual dysfunction in infertile women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;215:153–163. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.06.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Oddens  BJ, den Tonkelaar  I, Nieuwenhuyse  H. Psychosocial experiences in women facing fertility problems—a comparative survey. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:255–261. 10.1093/humrep/14.1.255 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Assaysh-Öberg  S, Borneskog  C, Ternström  E. Women’s experience of infertility & treatment – a silent grief and failed care and support. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2023;37:100879. 10.1016/j.srhc.2023.100879 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Faramarzi  M, Pasha  H, Esmailzadeh  S, Kheirkhah  F, Heidary  S, Afshar  Z. The effect of the cognitive behavioral therapy and pharmacotherapy on infertility stress: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Fertil Steril. 2013;7:199–206. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Ek  M, Roth  B, Ekström  P, Valentin  L, Bengtsson  M, Ohlsson  B. Gastrointestinal symptoms among endometriosis patients—a case-cohort study. BMC Womens Health. 2015;15:59. 10.1186/s12905-015-0213-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Villa  NAC, Benetti-Pinto  CL, Yela  DA. Does bowel function impacts on quality of life and sexual function in women with deep infiltrating endometriosis according kind of treatment?  Arq Gastroenterol. 2023;60:257–263. 10.1590/S0004-2803.202302023-47 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Moawad  NS, Caplin  A. Diagnosis, management, and long-term outcomes of rectovaginal endometriosis. Int J Women's Health. 2013;5:753–763. 10.2147/IJWH.S37846 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Qin  R, Tian  G, Liu  J, Cao  L. The gut microbiota and endometriosis: from pathogenesis to diagnosis and treatment. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:1069557. 10.3389/fcimb.2022.1069557 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Rao  SR, Sy-Cherng  LW, Hafizz  AMHA, Mamat @ Yusof  MN, Shafiee  MN. Sexual functioning and marital satisfaction among endometriosis patients in Malaysia: a cross-sectional study. Front Psychol. 2023;14:14. 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1224995 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Ferrero  S, Anserini  P, Remorgida  V, Ragni  N. Body mass index in endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;121:94–98. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.11.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Cervantes  GV, Ribeiro  PAAG, Tomasi  MC, Farah  D, Ribeiro  HSAA. Sexual function of patients with deep endometriosis after surgical treatment: a systematic review. Rev Bras Ginecol E Obstet Rev Fed Bras Soc Ginecol E Obstet. 2023;45:e729–e744. 10.1055/s-0043-1772596 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Perricos  A, Gstoettner  M, Iklil  S, et al.  How does surgery influence female sexuality in patients with endometriosis compared to those with other benign gynecological conditions?  BMC Med. 2024;22:508. 10.1186/s12916-024-03733-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen RA, Stone CJ. Classification and Regression Trees. Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2017. 10.1201/9781315139470 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Pearl J. Causality: models, reasoning, and inference, Cambridge University Press; 2009..   10.1017/CBO9780511803161 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Perricos  A, Wenzl  R. Recent advances in endometriosis pathophysiology and pharmacological treatment. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25:6575. 10.3390/ijms25126575 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. The Elements of Statistical Learning. Springer; 2009. 10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Shmueli  G. To explain or to predict?  Stat Sci. 2010;25:25. 10.1214/10-STS330 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Kyriacou  DN, Lewis  RJ. Confounding by indication in clinical research. JAMA. 2016;316:1818–1819. 10.1001/jama.2016.16435 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Bosco  JLF, Silliman  RA, Thwin  SS, et al.  A most stubborn bias: no adjustment method fully resolves confounding by indication in observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:64–74. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Psaty  BM, Koepsell  TD, Lin  D, et al.  Assessment and control for confounding by indication in observational studies. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999;47:749–754. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb01603.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Grimes  DA, Schulz  KF. Bias and causal associations in observational research. Lancet Lond Engl. 2002;359:248–252. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07451-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Yeoh  SH, Razali  R, Sidi  H, et al.  The relationship between sexual functioning among couples undergoing infertility treatment: a pair of perfect gloves. Compr Psychiatry. 2014;55:S1–S6. 10.1016/j.comppsych.2012.09.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Matloobi  M, Amini  L, Shahali  S, et al.  Effect of sex education on sexual function and sexual quality of life in women with endometriosis: a quasi-experimental study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022;159:702–710. 10.1002/ijgo.14254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Choi  J, Shin  DW, Lee  S, et al.  Dose-response relationship between cigarette smoking and female sexual dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2015;58:302–308. 10.5468/ogs.2015.58.4.302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Sexual Medicine are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES