Abstract
Carbonyl oxides, or Criegee intermediates (CIs), are key species formed during the ozonolysis of alkenes and are an important atmospheric oxidant. However, direct measurements of CI gas-phase rate constants for many atmospherically relevant reactions are still unknown. Herein, we present various approaches for developing structure–activity relationships (SARs) to predict the reactivity of the simplest CI (formaldehyde oxide; CH2OO) with a range of carbonyls that are significant primary emission components as well as secondary products of hydrocarbon oxidation in the atmosphere. Approaches include the application of Hammett analysis, frontier molecular orbital (FMO) theory, and global electrophilicity indices to develop SARs. By combining these parameters with available kinetic data, we establish substituent-based predictive models that extend to carbonyl species and CIs lacking measured rate constants that can enhance the predictive representation of CI chemistry in atmospheric models. Of the different approaches, Hammett constants yield the best correlations overall, however, low-cost quantum chemical calculations of orbital energies offer a practical alternative for systems lacking experimental substituent parameters. Finally, we extend this framework to explore the influence of substitution on the CI and the corresponding cycloaddition kinetics.
Keywords: carbonyl oxides, Hammett analysis, frontier molecular orbital theory, electrophilicity index, ozonolysis, isoprene, gas-phase kinetics


1. Introduction
Although the existence of Criegee intermediates (CIs, carbonyl oxides, R1R2COO) had been postulated since the 1930s, there were no means of directly measuring the gas-phase kinetics of these highly reactive intermediates until 2012, when it was discovered that photolysis of diiodomethane (CH2I2) in the presence of O2 yields a significant amount of the simplest CI, formaldehyde oxide (CH2OO), that can be used for direct kinetic studies. , This result was a major breakthrough, as accurate rate constants are required to characterize the impact of CIs on oxidation processes in the atmosphere and in combustion. These initial experimental measurements have been followed by an extensive body of work characterizing the spectroscopy and reactivity of CH2OO and larger CIs (R1R2COO, where R1 and R2 are alkyl or vinyl groups), − providing an important means of benchmarking theoretical methods needed to model their reactions in the atmosphere.
Ozonolysis reactions are prominent low-temperature oxidation processes and are a major chemical sink of unsaturated hydrocarbons in the atmosphere. , Ozone (O3) reacts with alkenes via a 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition across the double bond to form cyclic 1,2,3-trioxolanes, or primary ozonides (POZs), which decompose to form a carbonyl compound and a CI. As a coproduct of ozonolysis, carbonyls also act as important Criegee scavengers, reacting via an analogous 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition across the carbonyl double bond and leading to the formation of a cyclic 1,2,4-trioxolane species, or secondary ozonide (SOZ). , Reactions of CIs with carbonyls have been the focus of many recent direct experimental kinetics − and computational ,, studies.
1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reactions occur where an electron-rich 1,3-dipole (in this case, the CI) initiates bond formation via interaction with an electron-deficient dipolarophile (here, the carbonyl). The overall reactivity of this class of reaction has long been known to depend strongly on substituent effects, as argued by Sustmann in his discussion of Diels–Alder reactions. , The impact of different carbonyl substituents on reactivity toward CIs can be understood using concepts from frontier molecular orbital (FMO) theory. , Substituent electronic properties (electron-withdrawing vs electron-donating) inductively affect the electron density of the carbonyl, respectively lowering or raising the FMO energies. The result is stabilization or destabilization of the cycloaddition transition state, which consequently increases or decreases the corresponding rate constant. For instance, the room-temperature bimolecular rate constant for the reaction of CH2OO with hexafluoroacetone ((CF3)2CO) is ∼100 times larger than that for the reaction with acetone ((CH3)2CO), , as the strongly electron-withdrawing trifluoromethyl (CF3) groups significantly lower the energies of the FMOs, while the electron-donating methyl (CH3) groups increase them. In lieu of orbital energies, which are typically obtained from ab initio calculations, the electron-withdrawing or donating character of substituents on the carbonyls can be quantified using Hammett substituent constants. , Hansch et al. organized the Hammett parameter coefficients for over 200 substituents that have several different electronic and steric properties.
Here, we provide an analysis of the kinetics of 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reactions CIs with a range of carbonyl species. A sizable experimental data set now exists for reactions involving CH2OO, although there are almost no equivalent measurements for other CIs, where substituent effects are expected to play a similar role. As an alternative, the reactions of larger (substituted) CIs with SO2, which also proceed via a cycloaddition mechanism, will be used as a proxy. Following on from our previous work, ,,− , we propose various structure–activity relationships (SARs) based on Hammett substituent constants and applications of FMO theory to quantify the carbonyl substituent effect on reactivity with CH2OO. The SARs provide a semiempirical means of estimating rate constants for CH2OO + R1R2CO reactions without explicit applications of reaction rate theories that rely on accurate ab initio characterization of transition states geometries and properties. Precise quantification of thermochemical properties from ab initio calculations requires an accurate treatment of the electronic structure along with careful evaluation of the molecular partition functions that go beyond the rigid rotor harmonic oscillator (RRHO) model, by including hindered rotors or improved treatment of anharmonicity, as well as taking into account tunneling contributions. The convenient, low computational cost predictive SARs developed here can be used to estimate rate constants for reactions of CH2OO with carbonyls, as well as the analogous reactions of larger CIs, which have received far less attention experimentally.
2. Methods
Electronic structure calculations of the unimolecular reaction intermediates and energies involved were performed with the Gaussian and GAMESS packages. , Initial geometry optimizations were carried out with the B3LYP/cc-pVDZ method and thermodynamic quantities were further refined with the CBS-QB3 compound method, which has been shown to provide reliable thermochemistry involving the main group elements at modest computational cost. Frequency analysis confirmed the transition states and minimum structures. In addition, the energies of the frontier molecular orbitals were obtained from the B3LYP/cc-pVDZ calculations. Previous work has shown the orbital energies calculated at a similar level of theory to provide linear correlation with molecular properties such as ionization potential, electron affinity, and excitation energy. This level of theory also can be reasonably scaled to larger systems.
3. Results
3.1. Overview of Reactions and Substituent Effects
Carbonyls are key oxidation products of hydrocarbons in the atmosphere and also contribute to primary emissions, making their atmospheric fate a subject of significant interest. The dominant removal pathways for most carbonyls are reaction with OH radicals and direct photolysis initiated by the presence of the n-π* transition in the carbonyl chromophore. − In addition, wet and dry deposition contribute for some water-soluble species. Aldehydes possess an abstractable hydrogen atom, making OH oxidation the primary atmospheric sink though photolysis is also significant. Aliphatic ketones such as acetone lack this abstractable hydrogen and are instead removed primarily by photolysis. α,β-Dicarbonyls such as biacetyl and pyruvic acid exhibit enhanced near-UV absorption and are dominated by photolysis. , Enals and enones react readily with OH radicals due to addition across the conjugated CC double bond, making this the dominant atmospheric sink for these species. ,
Reaction with CIs represents an additional potential sink for atmospheric carbonyls. Bimolecular rate constants have been measured for the reactions of the simplest CI (CH2OO) with a range of organic carbonyl species (aldehydes, ,,,,− ,, ketones, ,,,,,, hydroxyketones, dicarbonyls, , enones and enals, , and keto acids , ), denoted in general as R1R2CO. The weighted average room-temperature (295–300 K) rate constants, listed in Table , span 2 orders of magnitude (from approximately 0.3 to 30 × 10–12 cm3 s–1) and clearly demonstrate that the identities of the carbonyl substituents affect the reactivity of R1R2CO toward CH2OO. Taking formaldehyde (HCHO), acetaldehyde (MeCHO), and acetone (CH3COCH3, dMK) as examples, each successive replacement of H with CH3 results in an approximately 3-fold decrease in the magnitude of the rate constant, such that k HCHO > k MeCHO > k dMK.
1. Experimental Room-Temperature Rate Constants for Reactions of CH2OO with Carbonyls (R1R2CO) .
| class | species (abbreviation) | k exp/10–12 cm3 s–1 | R1 | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| aldehydes | formaldehyde (HCHO) , | 3.90 ± 0.20 | H | H |
| acetaldehyde (MeCHO) ,,,, | 1.24 ± 0.05 | H | CH3 | |
| propanal (EtCHO) , | 3.27 ± 0.25 | H | CH2CH3 | |
| n-butanal (nPrCHO) , | 2.65 ± 0.27 | H | CH2CH2CH3 | |
| isobutanal (iPrCHO) , | 2.33 ± 0.38 | H | CH(CH3)2 | |
| ketones | acetone (dMK) ,,,,, | 0.45 ± 0.01 | CH3 | CH3 |
| methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) | 0.64 ± 0.02 | CH3 | CH2CH3 | |
| hexafluoroacetone (HFA) | 30.6 ± 2.7 | CF3 | CF3 | |
| hydroxyketones | hydroxyacetone (AcOH) | 1.09 ± 0.15 | CH3 | CH2OH |
| 4-hydroxy-2-butanone (4H2B) | 1.11 ± 0.26 | CH3 | CH2CH2OH | |
| enals, enones | acrolein (ACR) | 1.63 ± 0.19 | H | CHCH2 |
| methacrolein (MACR) | 0.44 ± 0.10 | H | C(CH3)CH2 | |
| methyl vinyl ketone (MVK) | 0.50 ± 0.04 | CH3 | CHCH2 | |
| α -dicarbonyls | biacetyl (BiAc) , | 11.0 ± 0.9 | CH3 | CH3CO |
| acetylpropionyl (AcPr) | 10.9 ± 1.3 | CH3 | CH3CH2CO | |
| CH3CH2CO | CH3CO | |||
| keto-acid | pyruvic acid (PyrA) , | 19.6 ± 1.0 | CH3 | COOH |
| OH | CH3CO | |||
| enolone | acetylacetone (AcAc) | 0.80 ± 0.07 | CH3 | CHCH(OH)CH3 |
Values are weighted averages of reported measurements, with 1σ uncertainties.
In contrast to CH2OO, rate constants for the analogous reactions of other CIs (R1R2COO, where R1, R2 are alkyl or vinyl groups) with organic carbonyls have not been reported. In lieu of those experimental measurements on substituted CIs with organic carbonyls, we will discuss instead the related reactions between CIs and sulfur dioxide (SO2), which also proceed via a 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition mechanism and have been the subject of numerous kinetics studies. Experimental room-temperature rate constants for the R1R2COO + SO2 reactions are compiled in Table and show that the reactivity is also affected by the identity of the CI substituents. ,,,− In going from CH2OO to anti-CH3CHOO to (CH3)2COO, successive replacement of each H with CH3 results in a steady increase in the magnitude of the rate constant.
2. Experimental Room-Temperature Rate Constants for Reactions of Aliphatic Criegee Intermediates (R1R2COO) with SO2 .
| species | k exp/10–12 cm3 s–1 | R1 | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| formaldehyde oxide (CH2OO) ,,,,− ,− | 37.7 ± 0.3 | H | H |
| acetaldehyde oxide (syn-CH3CHOO) ,,,, | 25.0 ± 1.4 | H | CH3 |
| acetaldehyde oxide (anti-CH3CHOO) ,, | 101 ± 8 | H | CH3 |
| acetone oxide ((CH3)2COO) , | 135 ± 4 | CH3 | CH3 |
Values are weighted averages of reported measurements, with 1σ uncertainties.
Criegee intermediates react with organic carbonyls via 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reactions to form cyclic 1,2,4-trioxolanes, commonly referred to as secondary ozonides (SOZs). This pathway is illustrated schematically in Figure for reaction of CH2OO with a representative asymmetric carbonyl, acetaldehyde (R1 = H, R2 = CH3). The reactions proceed by formation of a near coplanar entrance-channel van der Waals complex (vdW) that then passes over the cycloaddition transition state (TS) resulting in SOZ formation. The relative energetics are shown in terms of the changes in the zero-point corrected electronic energies (ΔE) at 0 K and the free energies (ΔG) at 298 K. In terms of ΔE, the vdW complex and the TS are both lower in energy than the separated reactants. However, the entropic contribution to the free energy moves ΔG of both the entrance channel complex and the transition state structure above the reactants. In general, the cycloaddition TS is the highest point on the free energy surface and represents the rate determining step in the overall reaction mechanism. SOZ formation is exothermic by approximately 40–50 kcal mol–1, and the energized product can undergo a range of further isomerization and decomposition reactions. It should be noted that for carbonyls with very low barriers to SOZ formation, the rate can be controlled by so-called “outer” complexes and transition states that occur at larger reactant separations. In the present work, our analysis focuses on the shorter range “inner” vdW complexes and TSs.
1.

CBS-QB3 zero-point corrected energy ΔE (blue, 0 K) and free energy ΔG (red, 298 K) profiles for reaction of CH2OO with acetaldehyde to form a secondary ozonide (SOZ). Geometries of the entrance channel complexes (vdW), transition states (TSs), and SOZ products for the E and Z pathways described in the text are both shown, although energy differences are small.
Before proceeding, we briefly discuss some stereochemical aspects of the 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition mechanism. The CIs that will be discussed belong to the Cs point group and the carbonyl moiety of the coreactant is also planar. Ab initio calculations have shown that, in general, the reactions proceed via near coplanar entrance channel complexes (see Figure ), in which the CI and carbonyl species are separated by ∼2.5 Å. Closing the distance to ∼2.2 Å leads to a reactant-like early TS that is typically lower in energy than the reactants. Reaction can occur act at either face (obverse or reverse) of the CO group. For asymmetric carbonyl compounds (i.e., R1 ≠ R2), the CI can adopt two distinct orientations, which we classify as E and Z according to whether the central O atom of the CI is displaced toward the side of the lower or higher priority carbonyl substituent, respectively. These two conformers are shown in Figure . Substituent priority follows organic chemistry conventions (H < CH3 < CH2OH < CH3O etc.). Reaction at either face of the carbonyl leads to stereoisomeric TSs and SOZs that have identical energies. The E and Z reaction pathways proceed via TSs with slightly different energies and lead to different ring puckering conformers of the SOZ products.
Qualitatively, the substituent effects can be understood from consideration of the frontier molecular orbitals, as originally proposed by Sustmann to describe the symmetry-allowed orbital interactions of Diels–Alder cycloaddition reactions. , The substituents are classified as electron-donating groups (EDGs) and electron-withdrawing groups (EWGs). A molecular orbital (MO) diagram for the reaction between CH2OO and formaldehyde (R1 = R2 = H) is shown in Figure . The orbital interactions are labeled based on loose symmetry considerations. The occupied nonbonding (n pC–pO ) orbital on CH2OO and the unoccupied π* orbital of HCHO are loosely symmetric about a center of inversion, and they interact to form the molecular orbitals labeled S and S*. The antisymmetric orbitals are the occupied π orbital on HCHO and the unoccupied π* orbital of CH2OO, which interact to form the molecular orbitals labeled A and A*. The nonbonding orbitals localized on heteroatoms are neglected. In general, the S-interaction involves a smaller orbital energy gap and is likely to be more significant in controlling reactivity (see Section below).
2.

Molecular orbital diagram for the 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction between CH2OO (left) and formaldehyde (right). The “symmetric” orbitals interact to form the molecular orbitals (S, S*) (connected by black solid lines), and the “antisymmetric” orbitals form the molecular orbitals (A, A*) (connected by gray dotted lines). The effects on the orbital energies of the CI or the carbonyl of replacing H atoms with electron-donating groups (EDGs) or electron-withdrawing groups (EWGs) are indicated with arrows.
Substituent groups raise or lower the FMO energies of the CI and the carbonyl relative to their values in CH2OO and HCHO. The effect on reactivity can be understood qualitatively by considering the dominant (smaller orbital energy gap) S-interaction. Substituents that are more electron-withdrawing than H lower the frontier molecular orbital energies, while substituents that are more electron-donating raise them. As can be seen in Figure , electron-withdrawing substituents on the carbonyl decrease the S-interaction orbital energy gap, stabilizing the transition state, and increasing reactivity. Electron-withdrawing substituents on the CI serve to increase the S-interaction orbital energy gap, which leads to a decrease in reactivity. Electron-donating substituents have the opposite effects. On the CI they are activating, while on the carbonyl they are deactivating.
3.2. Thermodynamic Energy Relationships
The reactivity of 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reactions can be characterized in terms of thermodynamic energy correlations as discussed by Ess and Houk, who explored the reactivity of a range of 1,3-dipoles including oxides, imines, and ylides. , In that work, it was shown that the Marcus-type relationship for electron transfer reactions holds for some 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reactions but not others. However, in general, lower TS energies are associated with more exothermic reactions.
We have used the composite CBS-QB3 method to characterize the transition states and SOZ products for all but one of the CH2OO + R1R2CO reactions listed in Table . The sole exception is the CH2OO + HFA reaction, for which no TS could be located at the B3LYP/6–311G(2d,d,p) level of theory used to optimize geometries within the CBS-QB3 method. Calculations were performed for both E and Z pathways for asymmetric carbonyls. Harmonic frequencies are used to estimate vibrational zero-point energies and evaluate thermal contributions to the enthalpy and free energy at 298 K using RRHO partition functions for all modes. The resulting zero-point corrected energies (ΔE TS; ΔE SOZ) at 0 K and free energies (ΔG TS; ΔG SOZ) at 298 K of the TSs and SOZs relative to the reactants are compiled in Table . For asymmetric carbonyls, the values reported in Table are the average of the E and Z conformer energies. The E pathway TSs are, on average, lower in energy for the unsaturated carbonyls by −0.4 kcal mol–1, but are, on average, higher for the conjugated carbonyls by +0.8 kcal mol–1. A full tabulation of the CBS-QB3 energies, enthalpies, and free energies, including the SOZ products, for each conformer can be found in the Supporting Information.
3. Zero-point Corrected Energies (ΔE at 0 K) and Free Energies (ΔG at 298 K) of the 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition Transition States and SOZ Products for CH2OO + R1R2CO Reactions .
| species | ΔE TS | ΔG TS | ΔE SOZ | ΔG SOZ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCHO | –6.67 | +3.64 | –51.43 | –40.20 |
| MeCHO | –6.23 | +5.24 | –50.62 | –38.12 |
| EtCHO | –7.00 | +4.74 | –51.50 | –38.64 |
| nPrCHO | –7.23 | +4.53 | –51.27 | –38.45 |
| iPrCHO | –6.92 | +5.02 | –50.96 | –38.02 |
| dMK | –6.07 | +5.51 | –50.30 | –37.55 |
| MEK | –5.46 | +5.88 | –48.66 | –35.74 |
| HFA | –57.62 | –44.29 | ||
| AcOH | –5.92 | +6.77 | –48.22 | –34.87 |
| 4H2B | –6.24 | +5.99 | –49.40 | –36.00 |
| ACR | –5.28 | +6.17 | –47.28 | –34.99 |
| MACR | –5.54 | +6.12 | –47.02 | –34.48 |
| MVK | –6.58 | +5.54 | –47.98 | –34.99 |
| BiAc | –8.79 | +3.41 | –49.94 | –36.97 |
| AcPr (ac) | –8.63 | +4.35 | –49.73 | –36.02 |
| AcPr (pr) | –8.86 | +3.85 | –50.03 | –36.61 |
| PyrA (keto) | –7.70 | +4.71 | –47.58 | –34.39 |
| PyrA (acid) | –7.55 | +4.79 | –41.44 | –28.55 |
| AcAc (enol) | –2.56 | +9.97 | –38.33 | –24.88 |
All values (kcal mol–1) were calculated at the CBS-QB3 level. For asymmetric carbonyls, the values are averages over the E and Z pathways.
For all reactions, ΔE TS < 0 and the cycloaddition transition states are submerged with respect to the reactants, as shown for CH2OO + MeCHO in Figure . Values of ΔE TS range from approximately −2 to −9 kcal mol–1. The entropic contribution to the free energy at 298 K moves the ΔG TS values above the separated reactants, leading to reaction barriers of +3 to +7 kcal mol–1. The reaction of the dominant enolone tautomer of acetylacetone (AcAc) has an unusually high free energy barrier of approximately +10 kcal mol–1. ΔG TS is the maximum energy point on all free energy surfaces and therefore is rate limiting, according to the two-step model outlined in Reactions and below. Passage over the barrier results in SOZ formation, for which the overall free energy changes range from ΔG SOZ ≈ −25 kcal mol–1 (CH2OO + AcAc) to −45 kcal mol–1 (CH2OO + HFA).
Figure shows the relationship between the free energies of the transition states ΔG TS and the SOZ products ΔG SOZ calculated at the CBS-QB3 level of theory for each reaction studied here. The values used are the average of those obtained for the E and Z pathways. The reactions fall into groups corresponding to (a) reactions involving saturated carbonyls (aliphatic aldehydes and ketones, hydroxyketones) and (b) reactions involving carbonyls with conjugated π systems (enones and enals, α-dicarbonyls, and the keto-acid PyrA). Both groups show a linear relationship between ΔG TS and ΔG SOZ, although there are two obvious outliers, highlighted in Figure . The first corresponds to reaction of PyrA at the acid CO and the second to reaction of AcAc, both of which were omitted from the linear fit. Cycloaddition at the carboxylic acid group of PyrA is unique among the carbonyl species studied, as it is the only case where the carbonyl is directly bonded to an electron-withdrawing oxygen heteroatom. This structural difference impacts both the thermochemistry and the SAR approach described in Section . As a result, we focus exclusively on the ketone carbonyl group of PyrA and reactions at the carboxylic acid group are not included in the SAR correlations discussed below. AcAc exists predominantly in its enol form, which introduces two additional reactive sites beyond the carbonyl: the CC double bond and the enolic −OH group. Reaction at the former site exhibits a comparable free energy barrier to carbonyl cycloaddition at the CBS-QB3 level and can contribute to the overall reactivity, as discussed further in Section below.
3.

Plot of CBS-QB3 transition state free energies at 298 K (ΔG TS) vs overall free energies (ΔG SOZ) for CH2OO + R1R2CO reactions. Saturated carbonyls (aliphatic aldehydes, ketones, and hydroxyketones) are shown as circles and conjugated carbonyls (α-dicarbonyls, enals and enones, keto-acids, and enolones) are shown as triangles. The color scale is used to represent the experimental room-temperature rate constants. Linear fits to the saturated and conjugated data are shown as solid and dashed lines, respectively, with the shaded area representing 1σ confidence interval.
The linear fit for the saturated carbonyls gives a slope of 0.53 ± 0.05, near the value expected for a Marcus-type reaction , while the slope for the conjugated species is steeper with a value of 0.88 ± 0.26. Using the former relationship, the free energy of the TS for the CH2OO + HFA reaction, also highlighted in Figure , is estimated to be ΔG TS = +1.6 kcal mol–1. Though the correlations between the calculated ΔG TS and ΔG SOZ values hold, the relationship to bimolecular rate constant is more opaque. The color scale used for the data points in Figure represents the experimental values of log10(k exp), however no obvious trends are apparent in the data for reactions of either saturated or conjugated carbonyls that would allow rate constants to be estimated based on, for example, the reaction exothermicity.
3.3. Transition State Theory
A canonical transition state theory (CTST) treatment can be applied to the reaction scheme shown in Figure , involving a two-step model for the overall reaction rate which is written in general as
| R1 |
| R2 |
If it is assumed that equilibrium is established for vdW complex formation (i.e., vdW complex decomposition is faster than conversion to the SOZ), then the overall rate constant for the reaction can be expressed as
| 1 |
where K eq is the equilibrium constant for vdW complex formation and k SOZ is the rate of passage over the cycloaddition TS. Combining the statistical mechanical expressions for K eq and the TST expression for k SOZ leads to the Eyring equation for the overall temperature-dependent rate constant:
| 2 |
where κ is the tunneling coefficient (assumed here to be unity); k B is the Boltzmann constant; T is temperature; h is the Planck constant; R is the gas constant; p° is standard pressure (1 bar); and ΔG TS is the standard free energy of the TS relative to the reactants. The factor k B /hp° evaluates to 2.88 × 10–12 cm3 s–1 K–2. Application of CTST to calculate thermal rate constants requires only ΔG TS which is available from the ab initio calculations, or from the relationships shown in Figure , if only ΔG SOZ is available.
Figure shows how the CTST thermal rate constant at 298 K varies as a function of ΔG TS, calculated using eq . The experimentally measured rate constants are also plotted against the CBS-QB3 ΔG TS values, which are averaged over the E and Z addition pathways for clarity. All the experimental data, except for the AcAc reaction, lie below the CTST line. However, as noted above, AcAc reacts faster than expected due to an additional competitive pathway involving analogous 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition at the CC bond, which is calculated to have a similar barrier height at the CBS-QB3 level.
4.

Plot of experimental room-temperature rate constants vs calculated transition state free energies (ΔG TS) calculated at the CBS-QB3 level. Saturated carbonyls (aliphatic aldehydes, ketones, and hydroxyketones) are shown as circles and conjugated carbonyls (α-dicarbonyls, enals and enones, keto-acids, and enolones) are shown as triangles. The variation in the TST rate constant with ΔG TS, calculated at 298 K, is shown in red.
Most experimental rate constants are at least an order of magnitude smaller than the CTST prediction. The largest discrepancy is found for the HCHO reaction, arguably the simplest to treat computationally, for which the observed rate constant is 140 times smaller than the CTST prediction. The systematic overprediction of rate constants suggests a systematic underestimation of the CBS-QB3 free energies of activation, ΔG TS. Comparison of CBS-QB3 calculated activation free energies (ΔG TS) with those derived from experimental rate constants gives a consistent average offset of +1.75 kcal mol–1. Application of this uniform correction brings the CTST predictions into good agreement with experimental values, as shown in Figure S1 of the Supporting Information.
With the exponential sensitivity of rate constants to the transition state barrier height, even minor errors in the computed transition state free energy can result in substantial discrepancies in predicted kinetics. To enhance the accuracy of theoretical rate constants, refinement of transition state energies is needed. High-level correlation methods such as CCSD(T)/CBS and CCSDT(Q)/CBS offer improved electronic structure accuracy, but are very computationally expensive for larger systems and can still introduce errors of approximately 0.4–1.0 kcal mol–1 in 0 K heats of formation. This degree of accuracy in ΔG TS values produces rate constants that vary by factors of 2–6. Furthermore, a more rigorous (and laborious) treatment of the rotational and vibrational partition functions beyond the conventional rigid rotor-harmonic oscillator (RRHO) approximation such as hindered rotor models may be necessary to improve the reliability of room-temperature rate constant calculations. It is, however, not obvious when such effort is required if computation is to be used to predict a rate constant. As noted above, the largest discrepancy between the TST rate constant calculated using CBS-QB3 free energies is for the comparatively simple and computationally most tractable CH2OO + HCHO reaction. Experimental rate constants for reactions involving larger carbonyl species with methyl or larger alkyl substituents, reactions for which hindered rotor treatments may have been anticipated, are much better reproduced by TST using simple RRHO partition functions, likely due to cancellation of errors.
3.4. SARs for CH2OO + R1R2CO Reactions
Obtaining accurate TST rate constants is challenging, particularly as molecular size increases, and high-level ab initio calculations of electronic energies and sophisticated treatments to determine molecular partition functions are required. Here, we describe alternative strategies to estimate CI + R1R2CO reactivity through structure–activity relationships (SARs) that are capable of reliably predicting rate constants without requiring high-level ab initio calculations. The SARs presented in this work are based on empirical correlations with experimental rate constants and do not rely on TST predictions for parametrization. The SARs are based on the model for 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reactions described by Sustmann, , in which the electron-donating or electron-withdrawing characters of the substituents determine reactivity through their influence on the energies of the frontier molecular orbitals, as illustrated in Figure .
The general form of the SARs is presented in eq :
| 3 |
where λ is a quantifiable property that characterizes the electron-donating or withdrawing character of the substituents or their effect on the substituted carbonyl. We focus on two alternative approaches: Hammett constants, which have been tabulated for a broad range of substituents, and the frontier molecular orbital energies, which are readily obtained from low-cost DFT calculations.
The SARs presented here focus on room-temperature rate constants which are further assumed to represent high-pressure limit values. Previous experimental studies have demonstrated that the high-pressure limit for 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reactions of carbonyls with Criegee intermediates is reached at relatively low pressures (∼20–30 Torr of air) indicating negligible pressure dependence under tropospheric conditions. ,, Temperature-dependent measurements for CH2OO reactions with carbonyls have generally shown weak negative temperature dependences with comparable activation energies (−E a/R ≈ 1000 K). ,, Therefore, the room-temperature SARs described below could be extended to other atmospherically relevant temperatures, although with increased uncertainty.
3.4.1. Hammett Substituent Constants
Hammett constants were originally developed to quantify the impact of meta and para substituents on the pK a of meta and para substituted benzoic acids, although they have found applicability in the study of a broad range of organic reactions. The Hammett relationship is defined in eq :
| 4 |
where K X and K H are acid dissociation constants for the substituted and the unsubstituted species (X = H), respectively. , For aromatic systems, the substituent constants depend on the location of substitution, and are identified as σm and σp. The sensitivity of a particular reaction to the substituent effect is captured by the factor ρ in eq , where ρ = 1 for the benzoic acid dissociation equilibrium. Following the discussion in Hansch et al., the substituent electronic effects can be split into a field/inductive component characterized with the σI constant, and a resonance component, characterized with the σR constant.
While the standard meta and para position Hammett constants (σm and σp) work well in many cases, there are known situations in which further parametrization is required. To a first approximation, negative values indicate an EDG (σ < 0; deactivating on the carbonyl) and positive values indicate an EWG (σ > 0; activating on the carbonyl). However, other substituent effects can also influence reactivity. For instance, steric effects can play a large role, as is the case for ortho substituents in the benzoic acid reaction series and Taft parameters have been developed to describe the steric influence of a given substituent.
In comparing gas- and aqueous-phase acidities of benzoic acid, the ΔΔG(gas) is approximately an order of magnitude larger than the corresponding ΔΔG(aq). However, Hammett substituent constants still perform reasonably well even in describing gas-phase reactions, , and the use of tabulated Hammett constants could provide a method to predict rate constants for CH2OO + R1R2CO reactions and insight into the expected reactivity of a given carbonyl. Equation can be modified by replacing the acid dissociation equilibrium constants with the bimolecular reaction rate constants and rearranged to yield eq
| 5 |
which has the same form as the general linear SAR eq .
Previously, for more limited data sets, we have shown that the rate constants for CH2OO + R1R2CO reactions correlate with the sum of the para position Hammett constants (∑σp) for the carbonyl substituents. Here we extend the analysis to include the relationship between the experimental rate constants and the meta, para, field/inductive, and resonance substituent constants. Although, the meta and para designations used in traditional Hammett analysis are specific to aromatic systems and do not apply here, as all substituents are bonded directly to the carbonyl. Furthermore, the field/inductive and resonance substituent constants are employed here as descriptors of the electron-donating or electron-withdrawing character of each substituent, without implying a direct physical interpretation specific to aromatic systems for which they were originally developed.
In the analysis, we continue to assume that the electronic effects of the substituent constants are additive, i.e., the variables in eq are λ = ∑ σ i = σ i,R1 + σ i,R2 where i indicates the meta, para, field/inductive, or resonance constants. Table compiles the ∑σ i values for each carbonyl species, using data from Hansch et al. Figure shows semilog plots of k exp against ∑σm, ∑σp, ∑σI, and ∑σR. The values of a and b obtained from unweighted linear fits of the data to eq , along with the associated statistical parameters, are shown in Table . The fit parameter a corresponds to log10 k HCHO while b represents the reaction sensitivity (ρ). The quality of the linear correlation as measured by Pearson’s r and R 2 values follows the order: ∑σI < ∑σm < ∑σp < ∑σR.
4. Empirical Total Hammett Substituent Constant ρσtotal for a Given Carbonyl along with the Corresponding Sums of σm, σp, σI, and σR (meta, para, Field/Inductive, and Resonance, Respectively) Hammett Substituent Constants .
| species | ρσtotal | ∑σm | ∑σp | ∑σI | ∑σR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCHO | 0 | 0 | 0 | +0.07 | –0.07 |
| MeCHO | –0.50 | –0.07 | –0.17 | +0.04 | –0.21 |
| EtCHO | –0.08 | –0.07 | –0.15 | +0.03 | –0.18 |
| nPrCHO | –0.17 | –0.06 | –0.13 | +0.04 | –0.17 |
| iPrCHO | –0.22 | –0.04 | –0.15 | +0.07 | –0.22 |
| dMK | –1.01 | –0.14 | –0.34 | +0.02 | –0.36 |
| MEK | –0.79 | –0.14 | –0.32 | +0.01 | –0.33 |
| HFA | +0.89 | +0.86 | +1.08 | +0.77 | +0.31 |
| AcOH | –0.55 | –0.07 | –0.17 | +0.04 | –0.21 |
| 4H2B | –0.55 | –0.19 | –0.34 | –0.05 | –0.29 |
| ACR | –0.38 | +0.06 | –0.04 | +0.16 | –0.20 |
| MACR | –0.95 | +0.09 | +0.05 | +0.16 | –0.11 |
| MVK | –0.89 | –0.01 | –0.21 | +0.13 | –0.34 |
| BiAc | +0.45 | +0.31 | +0.33 | +0.34 | –0.01 |
| AcPr (ac) | +0.52 | +0.31 | +0.35 | +0.35 | –0.04 |
| AcPr (pr) | +0.31 | +0.31 | +0.33 | +0.02 | |
| PyrA (keto) | +0.70 | +0.30 | +0.28 | +0.35 | –0.07 |
| PyrA (acid) | +0.50 | +0.18 | +0.66 | –0.53 | |
| AcAc | –0.69 |
See Table for substituents.
5.
Semilog plots of k exp for CH2OO + R1R2CO reactions vs the sum of the (a) meta, (b) para, (c) field/inductive, and (d) resonance Hammett constants for substituents R1 and R2. Unweighted linear fits to the data are also shown with shaded areas representing 1σ confidence intervals.
5. Parameters Obtained from Unweighted Linear Fits of log10(k exp/10–12 cm3 s–1) vs Hammett Substituent Constant Sums (∑σm, ∑σp, ∑σI, and ∑σR), Frontier Molecular Orbital Energy Gaps (ΔE A, ΔE S), and Global Electrophilicity Index (GEI) Calculated at The B3LYP/cc-pVDZ Level for CH2OO + R1R2CO Reactions .
| variable | intercept, a | gradient, b | Pearson’s r | R 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ∑σm | 0.24 ± 0.10 | 1.80 ± 0.37 | 0.79 | 0.63 |
| ∑σp | 0.37 ± 0.09 | 1.36 ± 0.25 | 0.82 | 0.64 |
| ∑σI | –0.02 ± 0.13 | 2.24 ± 0.50 | 0.77 | 0.59 |
| ∑σR | 0.84 ± 0.12 | 3.02 ± 0.52 | 0.84 | 0.71 |
| ΔE A | –4.36 ± 1.42 | 0.61 ± 0.18 | 0.65 | 0.42 |
| ΔE S | 3.01 ± 0.75 | –0.49 ± 0.14 | –0.68 | 0.46 |
| GEI | –0.81 ± 0.29 | 0.37 ± 0.09 | 0.73 | 0.54 |
Values are shown with 1σ statistical uncertainties.
As can be seen in Figure , the presence of electron-withdrawing substituents (σ > 0) on the carbonyl is associated with larger rate constants, while the presence of electron-donating substituents (σ < 0) is associated with smaller rate constants. The observed slopes (b = ρ > 1) indicate a greater sensitivity to substituent effects in these gas-phase reactions compared to that observed in the aqueous benzoic acid ionization equilibrium.
Alternatively, it is possible to develop a specific ρσ scale for the CH2OO + R1R2CO 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reactions, where the unsubstituted carbonyl is represented by formaldehyde (R1 = R2 = H). The Hammett relationship can be written as eq :
| 6 |
Using the experimental rate constant for the reaction of CH2OO with formaldehyde (k HCHO = 3.9 × 10–12 cm3 s–1) the values of ρσtotal can be calculated using eq for each the reactions listed in Table . The resulting values of ρσtotal values are compiled in Table .
This scheme allows the calculation of σX for specific substituents with σX,H defined as zero and with the reaction sensitivity (ρ) set to 1. For instance, the rate constant for an aldehyde will directly give the σX for the non-hydrogen substituent. For symmetric carbonyls such as HFA, the substituent constant for CF3 is simply σX,CF3 = σtotal,HFA/2. For methyl, we have used the average values of σX,CH3 = −0.50 from σtotal,MeCHO and σtotal,dMK/2. However, both approaches give a nearly identical value for σX,CH3 . We use this value for subsequent calculations of σX in Table . For instance, σX,CH2OH is calculated from σtotal,AcOH – σX,CH3 . We employ average values for ethyl (derived from EtCHO and MEK) and vinyl (derived from ACR and MVK) using this methodology. A plot showing the application of the empirical substituent constants back to the known carbonyls is included as Figure S1 in the Supporting Information.
6. Empirical Hammett Substituent Constants σX for Various Substituents Based on Measured Rate Constants (ρσtotal) Assuming ρ = 1 .
| substituent | σX |
|---|---|
| C(CH3)CH2 | –0.95 |
| CH3 | –0.50 |
| CHCH2 | –0.38 |
| CH(CH3)2 | –0.22 |
| CH2CH3 | –0.18 |
| CH2CH2CH3 | –0.17 |
| CH2OH | –0.06 |
| CH2CH2OH | –0.05 |
| H | 0 |
| CF3 | 0.45 |
| C(O)CH3 | 0.95, |
The substituents are ordered from most electron donating to most electron withdrawing.
Average from MeCHO and dMK.
ACR and MVK.
PrH and MEK.
BiAc.
3.4.2. Taft Analysis
We employed Taft analysis to investigate substituent effects on the measured rate constants for the cycloaddition of CH2OO to carbonyl compounds. Unlike the Hammett approach, Taft analysis explicitly accounts for the influence of steric effects in addition to polar (electron-donating or -withdrawing) contributions. It should be noted that Taft substituent constants are derived from a different reference reaction system (acid- or base-catalyzed ester hydrolysis) than the conventional Hammett parameters. In general, Taft relationships are expressed by eq :
| 7 |
where σ* and E S represent the polar and steric substituent constants, respectively, and the coefficients ρ* and δ quantify the relative sensitivities of the reaction series to these electronic and steric contributions. In contrast to traditional Hammett parameters, Taft constants are referenced (k 0) to the methyl group, for which both σ* and E S are defined as zero. In this work, available σ* and E S values were compiled from two sources, , however, Taft parameters were not available for all the carbonyls presented in Table . The specific values adopted here are included in the Supporting Information in Table S2.
Using these substituent constants, we performed a two-parameter least-squares fit and obtained values of ρ* = 0.36 and δ = 0.17. These results indicate that the cycloaddition is more sensitive to polar effects than to steric influences. Using these fitted parameters, we constructed a correlation of log10(k exp) versus ρ*σ* + δE S, as shown in Figure . Overall, a good correlation is obtained for the subset of carbonyl species evaluated here, with an R 2 value of 0.85. Therefore, the SAR derived from the Taft analysis above can be used to predict CH2OO + carbonyl rate constants and provides a better R 2 value than the Hammett approaches described above. However, the applicability of this approach is more limited by availability of σ* and E S values and it lacks some of the generality offered by the other SAR approaches presented.
6.

Taft analysis for CH2OO + R1R2CO reactions with available σ* and E S parameters. Two-parameter least-squares fit are shown with 1σ confidence intervals (red) and obtained values of ρ* = 0.36 and δ = 0.17 (R 2 = 0.85).
3.4.3. Frontier Molecular Orbital Theory
Figure illustrates the frontier molecular orbitals (FMOs) that govern the reactivity of CIs with carbonyls. The FMO energies were computed using routine B3LYP/cc-pVDZ calculations, a method that is both reliable and readily scalable to larger molecular systems. The interaction can be defined in terms of the magnitudes of the energy gaps ΔE A and ΔE S, defined as in eqs and :
| 8 |
| 9 |
For a given CI, the FMO energies are unchanged and the energy gaps are determined by the identity of the R1 and R2 substituents on the carbonyl. Although both A and S orbital interactions contribute to the energy of the cycloaddition transition state, ΔE S < ΔE A for all of the CH2OO + R1R2CO reactions listed in Table , so reactivity is primarily controlled by ΔE S. Semilog plots of k exp versus ΔE A and ΔE S, evaluated at the B3LYP/cc-pVDZ level, are shown in Figure a,b, respectively, along with unweighted linear fits to the general SAR eq . The values of a and b, along with the associated statistical parameters, are collected in Table .
7.

Semilog plots of k exp for CH2OO + R1R2CO reactions vs frontier molecular orbital energy gaps (a) ΔE A and (b) ΔE S, and (c) the global electrophilicity index, GEI. Unweighted linear fits to the data are also shown with shaded areas representing 1σ confidence intervals.
As expected, log10(k exp) correlates positively with ΔE A and negatively with ΔE S, consistent with the stabilizing effect of smaller ΔE S gaps on the transition-state energy. Larger experimental rate constants are observed for carbonyls bearing electron-withdrawing substituents, which lower the LUMO energy of R1R2CO, thereby decreasing ΔE S and increasing ΔE A (see Figure ). The fits to ΔE S display slightly higher correlation coefficients than those for ΔE A, indicating the symmetric interaction exerts the greater control over the observed reactivity.
A similar approach to quantify the electrophilic character of the carbonyls is the global electrophilicity index (GEI). GEI is particularly useful for comparing the reactivity of electrophiles across a series of molecules in reactions where electron transfer is important, such as cycloaddition reactions. , The GEI is related to the chemical potential (μ) and hardness (η) as defined in eq :
| 10 |
The chemical potential and hardness of a given R1R2CO molecule can be calculated from the energies of the HOMO (the nonbonding n O orbital) and LUMO (the π* antibonding orbital) molecule using eqs and :
| 11 |
| 12 |
Figure c shows a semilog plot of k exp versus GEI, evaluated using B3LYP/cc-pVDZ calculations.
The correlation is again linear, indicating that the GEI provides a useful single-parameter descriptor of reactivity for the CH2OO + R1R2CO reactions. The GEI-based SAR performs slightly better than those based on ΔE A or ΔE S, with larger absolute values of Pearson’s r and higher R 2 coefficients. Overall, correlations using Hammett substituent constants still yield somewhat stronger agreement with experimental rate constants. However, SARs constructed from low-cost DFT calculations such as GEI offer advantages in generality as this approach does not depend on tabulated substituent parameters and can be readily extended to a broader range of molecular structures, as will be discussed in more detail below.
3.4.4. Extension to CI + SO2 Reactions
The Sustmann model for 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reactions implies that electron-donating and electron-withdrawing substituents on the CI (R1R2COO) will also influence reactivity toward carbonyls. As noted earlier and shown in Figure , the effects are reversed: electron-donating substituents on the CI are now activating, while electron-withdrawing substituents are deactivating, In the absence of experimental rate constants for reactions of Cn CIs (n = 1–3 i.e., R1, R2 = H or CH3, giving the CIs CH2OO, anti-CH3CHOO, syn-CH3CHOO, and (CH3)2COO) with a common organic carbonyl, we use the Cn + SO2 reactions, which also proceed via a 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition mechanism, as proxies. The experimental rate constants are summarized in Table . Plots of log10(k exp) against the various Hammett substituent constant sums, the orbital energy gaps, and GEI are shown in Figures S2 and S3 in Supporting Information, while linear fit parameters are compiled in Table S4. The syn and anti conformers of CH3CHOO show marked isomer-specific reactivity toward SO2. ,, The use of Hammett substituent constant sums explicitly does not distinguish between syn-CH3CHOO and anti-CH3CHOO and the energies of the frontier molecular orbitals are almost identical. Consequently, for all variables used, the rate constant for the syn-CH3CHOO + SO2 reaction deviates significantly from the trend and it was omitted from the linear fits to eq . However, fits including syn-CH3CHOO can be found in the Supporting Information (Figure S5). The practical significance of this deviation from the SAR models is limited as unimolecular decomposition is likely a far more significant process than reaction for syn-CH3CHOO. Further experimental results could provide more insight. Overall, the ΔE S relationship provides the strongest (negative) correlation as quantified by the Pearson’s r and R 2 values.
4. Discussion
4.1. CH2OO + Aldehydes, Ketones, and Hydroxyketones
The aldehydes (HCHO, MeCHO, EtCHO, nPrCHO, and iPrCHO) deviate from the SAR predictions, generally reacting faster than predicted from all substituent Hammett substituent constant sums, FMO, and GEI. One possible explanation is steric accessibility: the CO in these aldehydes is more easily approached by CH2OO than in ketones bearing two non-hydrogen substituents. However, even within this aldehyde subset, steric effects do not follow the expected trend. For example, iPrCHO reacts faster than MeCHO despite its bulkier isopropyl group. This is likely due to the reactive geometry involving CH2OO approaching in a planar orientation above or below the carbonyl which minimizes steric hindrance. As a result, the steric effects are less important than the electron-withdrawing or donating effect.
For aliphatic ketones (dMK and MEK), the presence of two electron-donating substituents results in smaller rate constants, consistent with Hammett substituent constant SAR predictions. The ethyl group has a slightly less negative σp than methyl, in agreement with experimental measurements showing MEK reacting faster than dMK. However, the experimental rate constants are slightly lower than the Hammett SAR predictions. The carbonyl π* orbital energies for the two ketones are nearly identical, and orbital energy gaps and GEI SARs predict near equivalent rates.
The introduction of a hydroxyl group in the hydroxyketones (AcOH and 4H2B) makes the substituent moderately more electron withdrawing, leading to an increased rate constant. Both compounds are well described by the SAR approaches. Finally, HFA exhibits the largest measured rate constant of any carbonyl studied, consistent with the presence of two strongly electron-withdrawing −CF3 substituents that substantially lower the LUMO energy and enhance the electrophilic character of the carbonyl center. The experimental rate constant is also in good agreement with both Hammett- and FMO-based predictions.
From an atmospheric perspective, aliphatic aldehydes generally react more rapidly with OH radicals through hydrogen abstraction at the aldehydic position. However, trifluoroacetaldehyde (TFA), as discussed further below, exhibits a slower reaction with OH, but has a comparatively large rate constant for reaction with CH2OO. Consequently, reaction with stabilized CIs may constitute a significant atmospheric removal pathway for TFA, although its presence in the atmosphere has not been established. TFA could possibly be produced from the atmospheric oxidation of fluoroolefins or degradation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), but its abundance and role in atmospheric chemistry is not well documented. Finally, the aliphatic ketones and hydroxyketones generally exhibit smaller rate constants for reaction with CH2OO, and their atmospheric removal is expected to be dominated by reactions with OH radicals and by direct photolysis as detailed below.
4.2. CH2OO + α, β-Unsaturated Carbonyls
Conjugation of the carbonyl leads to pronounced substituent effects that deviate more strongly from the SAR predictions. For MACR and MVK, conjugation with the π-electron-donating vinylic group results in a slower reaction than expected, whereas for BiAc, AcPr, and PyrA, conjugation with π-electron-withdrawing groups accelerates the reaction. In particular, the rates for MACR and MVK are substantially slower than predicted by Hammett correlations or FMO theory and fall below the linear fits. It should be noted, however, that these measurements were conducted at relatively low pressure (∼4 Torr, He) and may not represent the high-pressure limit. , Further experiments to characterize the pressure dependence of these reactions would provide insight into the reactivity of MACR and MVK. The α-dicarbonyl compounds exhibit comparatively large rate constants for reaction with CH2OO, with k > 10–11 cm3 s–1. The atmospheric reactions of CH2OO with α-dicarbonyls are discussed further below with a focus on glyoxal and methylglyoxal.
4.3. Application of SARs to CI Reactions with Atmospherically Relevant Carbonyls
4.3.1. Reactions of CH2OO
Estimates of room-temperature rate constants based on the Hammett resonance constants and GEI SARs for reactions of CH2OO with a selection of unstudied atmospherically relevant carbonyls are presented in Table along with the corresponding error estimate for each model. The Hammett resonance constants and GEI provided the best statistical fit to the experimental data (highest R 2 values) and were therefore used for rate constant estimations. Other SAR predictions for these carbonyls are included in the Supporting Information (Table S3). Where possible, the rate constants based on the empirical Hammett constants compiled in Table are also included.
7. Predicted Room-Temperature Bimolecular Rate Constants (k/10–12 cm3 s–1) for CH2OO Reactions with Selected Carbonyls Based on Various SARs .
| species (abbreviation) | ∑σR | GEI | ∑σX |
|---|---|---|---|
| trifluoroacetaldehyde (TFA) | 16.3 ± 2.2 | 5.9 ± 2.8 | 10.9 ± 0.2 |
| diethyl ketone (dEK) | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.3 | 1.69 ± 0.05 |
| methyl isopropyl ketone (MiPrK) | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.3 | 0.74 ± 0.04 |
| glycolaldehyde (Glyc) | 4.3 ± 0.5 | 1.8 ± 0.7 | 3.44 ± 0.07 |
| glyoxal (Gly) | 10.6 ± 1.3 | 34.2 ± 21.7 | |
| methylglyoxal (MGly; ald) | 17.4 ± 2.4 | 15.2 ± 8.6 | 34.7 ± 0.7 |
| MGly (keto) | 3.9 ± 0.5 | ||
| crotonaldehyde (Cro) | 1.5 ± 0.3 | 3.0 ± 1.3 |
Uncertainties are 1σ based on the statistical uncertainties in the linear SAR fits. The GEI method does not distinguish between the aldehyde and ketone carbonyl groups for MGly and yields a single predicted rate constant.
The test set covers aldehydes, ketones, hydroxycarbonyls, α-dicarbonyls, and enals: Specifically: trifluoroacetaldehyde (CF3CHO, TFA), methyl isopropyl ketone (CH3COCH(CH3)2, MiPrK), diethylketone ((C2H5)2CO, dEK), glyoxal (CHOCHO, Gly) and methylglyoxal (CH3COCHO, MGly), glycolaldehyde (HOCH2CHO, Glyc), and crotonaldehyde (CH3CHCHCHO, Cro). Collectively, these compounds represent important classes of carbonyls found in the atmosphere that span a wide range of electronic environments and substituent effects.
Trifluoroacetaldehyde (or fluoral, CF3CHO, TFA) is an oxidation product of hydrofluoroolefin refrigerants. TFA reacts with OH with a reported rate constant of ∼6 × 10–13 cm3 s–1. Using the empirical Hammett constants (σX), the OH radical rate constant is more than an order of magnitude smaller than the SAR-predicted rate constant for the corresponding CI reaction (Table ), suggesting that CIs may serve as an important atmospheric sink for TFA. Based on estimated ambient concentrations where [OH] exceeds [CH2OO] by approximately 2 orders of magnitude, the ratio k CI[CH2OO]/k OH[OH] ≈ 0.2 indicates that the reaction with CIs can represent a competitive loss pathway. However, due to the slow reaction with OH, direct photolysis and reaction with HO2 have been estimated to be major loss channels of TFA, as well as wet and dry deposition.
We have also provided estimates for the rate constants for the aliphatic ketones MiPrK and dEK. As expected, these compounds are predicted to exhibit relatively small rate constants on the order of ∼10–13 cm3 s–1. Their low reactivity toward CH2OO suggests that reactions with OH radicals and direct photolysis , will dominate their removal under typical atmospheric conditions.
The α-dicarbonyls are particularly significant because of their abundance as secondary oxidation products of isoprene and aromatic hydrocarbons, as well as their central role in aqueous-phase chemistry and secondary organic aerosol formation. Accurate estimation of their gas-phase reactivity is therefore critical for understanding their atmospheric lifetime and partitioning. , In addition, measurements on BiAc, AcPr, and PyrA demonstrate that α,β-dicarbonyls react rapidly with CH2OO. For Gly, the two carbonyls are equivalent and the rate constant for reaction with CH2OO is estimated to range from ∼13–44 × 10–12 cm3 s–1. In comparison, the measured rate constant for reaction of glyoxal with OH radical is ∼9 × 10–12 cm3 s–1. Given that the tropospheric OH radical concentration is estimated to be approximately 2 orders of magnitude larger than that of CIs, reaction with OH is expected to represent the dominant atmospheric sink. However, reaction with CI could make some contribution to glyoxal loss rates especially under conditions of elevated CI concentrations. The reactivity of MGly is expected to be dominated by attack at the aldehyde carbonyl, which is predicted to be faster than reaction at the ketone carbonyl. Based on the SAR approaches, the rate constant for CI addition at the aldehyde site is estimated to fall in the range of 17–35 × 10–12 cm3 s–1 For comparison, the measured rate constant for OH radical reaction with MGly is ∼13 × 10–12 cm3 s–1. These similar magnitudes suggest that, under conditions of elevated CI concentrations such as regions with high biogenic alkene emissions or during nighttime periods when OH concentrations are lower, reaction with stabilized CIs could represent a non-negligible atmospheric sink for methylglyoxal.
Finally, Table also includes estimates for two additional aldehydes, Glyc and Cro. These aldehydes are predicted to have similar rate constants with values of ∼10–12 cm3 s–1. For comparison, atmospheric glycolaldehyde is primarily removed through OH radical reaction and wet deposition due to its high water solubility. In the gas phase, Glyc reacts with OH radical with an estimated rate constant of ∼1 × 10–11 cm3 s–1 which is approximately an order of magnitude larger than its estimated rate constant for reaction with CH2OO. The major atmospheric sink for crotonaldehyde is reaction with OH radical (k ∼ 2 × 10–11 cm3 s–1) with a minor contribution from direct photolysis. Given these relative rate constants, the reaction of CH2OO with either glycolaldehyde or crotonaldehyde is expected to represent only a minor atmospheric loss process.
4.3.2. Reactions of Substituted CIs
While this work focuses primarily on reactions of formaldehyde oxide (CH2OO) with carbonyls, for which the most extensive kinetic data are available, many other important stabilized Criegee intermediates exist in the atmosphere. However, we can provide valuable perspective in the application of these SAR approaches to the available kinetic data for other SCIs. The major atmospheric source of CIs is ozonolysis of isoprene (CH2C(CH3)CHCH2), , which is outlined in Scheme . Ozone addition at either of the two CC bonds in isoprene produces formaldehyde oxide (CH2OO) along with two unsaturated CIs: methylvinylketone oxide (MVKO) and methacrolein oxide (MACRO). − Due to the presence of syn and anti conformers for the asymmetric intermediates, isoprene ozonolysis yields five distinct stabilized Criegee intermediates (SCIs): CH2OO, syn-MVKO, anti-MVKO, syn-MACRO, and anti-MACRO. ,, In addition to these conjugated CIs produced from isoprene, we will discuss the aliphatic CIs acetaldehyde oxide (CH3CHOO) and acetone oxide ((CH3)2COO). For asymmetric CIs where R1 ≠ R2, the syn and anti isomers exhibit different reactivity and unimolecular decomposition kinetics. There has been previous work on substituent effects in the unimolecular pathways and for the reaction with H2O and (H2O)2 with substituted CIs. In contrast, the CI + H2O reaction involves nucleophilic addition of water to the carbonyl oxide. Because of these mechanistic differences, the substituent effects that govern reactivity are expected to differ between the two reaction types.
1. Reactions and Products for Ozonolysis of Isoprene Yielding Three Different Stabilized Criegee Intermediates: Formaldehyde Oxide (CH2OO), Methylvinylketone Oxide (MVKO), and Methacrolein Oxide (MACRO).
While likely less accurate than the Hammett-based approaches, the FMO energy gap SARs are most generally applicable as they rely on readily calculable properties of both the CI and the carbonyl. Using B3LYP/cc-pVDZ orbital energies and the ΔE S SAR, we have estimated the room-temperature rate constants for the reactions of the CIs anti-CH3CHO, (CH3)2COO, MACRO, and MVKO with a subset of the organic carbonyls. For the conjugated CIs MVKO and MACRO, four distinct isomers/conformers (the conjugated π system may be cis or trans about the α C–C bond and the orientation of the terminal O atom is syn or anti as in CH3CHOO). The relative stabilities of the conformers vary by a few kcal mol–1, but the frontier molecular orbital energies are very similar- average ΔE S values are used in the SAR calculation.
The estimated room-temperature rate constants for reactions of the four CIs with HCHO, dMK, HFA, and BiAc are compiled in Table , where propagation of the statistical uncertainties in the SAR fits suggest overall uncertainties of around a factor of 2. As has been observed for the Cn + SO2 reactions, sequential substitution of H by CH3 increases the predicted rate constant for a given carbonyl. Conjugation in the α,β-unsaturated CIs lowers their reactivity slightly relative to their aliphatic analogs. Predicted MACRO rate constants are around 10% smaller than those for anti-CH3CHOO, and MVKO rate constants are similarly smaller than those for (CH3)2COO. However, based on the predicted rate constants, reactions with carbonyls are less likely to compete significantly with alternative pathways such as unimolecular decomposition as an atmospheric sink for these larger CIs.
8. Predicted Room-Temperature Bimolecular Rate Constants (k/10–12 cm3 s–1) for a Selection of CI + R1R2CO Reactions Using the ΔE S SAR .
| R1R2CO | anti-CH3CHOO | (CH3)2COO | MVKO | MACRO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCHO | 3.7 | 4.9 | 4.4 | 3.3 |
| dMK | 1.5 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 1.3 |
| HFA | 25.5 | 33.2 | 29.8 | 22.4 |
| BiAc | 14.2 | 18.4 | 16.5 | 12.4 |
1σ accuracy estimated within factor of two.
4.3.3. Expected Accuracy of SARs
The uncertainties reported in Table reflect statistical fitting uncertainties and do not account for potential systematic errors in the underlying computational methods or experimental rate constant measurements. As discussed in Section of the Results, CBS-QB3 systematically underestimates activation free energies by approximately 1.75 kcal mol–1. However, this offset is consistent across the data set, and the SARs are based on relative trends rather than absolute barrier heights. Overall, we estimate the SARs for CH2OO predict rate constants to within a factor of 2–3 for saturated aldehydes and ketones. Larger uncertainties should be expected for carbonyls with competitive reaction pathways, such as α,β-unsaturated carbonyls or carboxylic acids. For substituted CIs, there is limited data available to limited experimental data are available for validation. Propagation of statistical uncertainties indicate accuracy on the order of a factor of 2 (Table ), but these predictions should be considered more tentative pending further experimental validation.
5. Conclusions
Hammett analysis and FMO theory have been used to construct SARs that are based on correlations with experimental rate constants. The reaction between CH2OO and HCHO was used as a baseline case to explain how substituent effects of EWGs and EDGs on the carbonyl can influence the rate of the reaction. An inverse correlation was found between the π* orbital energy of the carbonyls and the bimolecular rate constants for the reaction with CH2OO. The strong linear correlation provides a SAR to predict rate constants for the reactions of CH2OO with carbonyls. While Hammett constants provide the best correlation, low-cost quantum chemical calculations of orbital energies offer a practical alternative for predicting rate constants, especially for molecules lacking experimental or tabulated substituent parameters. Further exploration of steric effects beyond the Taft analysis presented here could enhance the SARs for carbonyls with bulkier substituents.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This material is based upon work supported in part by the National Science Foundation under grant no. ECS-1905364. A.W.H. acknowledges support from Trinity University startup funds, the Research Corporation for Science Advancement (Award ID No: CS-CSA-2025-046), and the Welch Foundation (W-0031).
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.5c00398.
CBS-QB3 zero-point corrected energies (ΔE at 0 K) and free energies (ΔG at 298 K) of the transition states for 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reactions of CH2OO with various carbonyls; Taft substituent constants; predicted room-temperature bimolecular rate constants (k/10–12 cm3 s–1) for CH2OO reactions with selected carbonyls based on various SARs; analysis of a uniform +1.75 kcal/mol correction to ΔG TS of CBS-QB3 TST results; empirical Hammett constants applied back to model set; Cn + SO2 Hammett substituent constants and FMO energy gaps, GEI; and additional fits including syn-CH3CHOO (PDF)
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
References
- Criegee R.. Mechanism of Ozonolysis. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1975;14(11):745–752. doi: 10.1002/anie.197507451. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Marston G.. An Elusive Intermediate Gets Caught. Science. 2012;335(6065):178–179. doi: 10.1126/science.1217165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eskola A. J., Wojcik-Pastuszka D., Ratajczak E., Timonen R. S.. Kinetics of the reactions of CH2Br and CH2I radicals with molecular oxygen at atmospheric temperatures. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2006;8(12):1416–1424. doi: 10.1039/b516291b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Welz O., Savee J. D., Osborn D. L.. et al. Direct Kinetic Measurements of Criegee Intermediate (CH2OO) Formed by Reaction of CH2I with O2 . Science. 2012;335(6065):204–207. doi: 10.1126/science.1213229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Osborn D. L., Taatjes C. A.. The physical chemistry of Criegee intermediates in the gas phase. Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2015;34(3):309–360. doi: 10.1080/0144235X.2015.1055676. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Taatjes C. A.. Criegee Intermediates: What Direct Production and Detection Can Teach Us About Reactions of Carbonyl Oxides. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2017;68(1):183–207. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physchem-052516-050739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cabezas C., Nakajima M., Endo Y.. Criegee intermediates meet rotational spectroscopy. Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2020;39(3):351–384. doi: 10.1080/0144235X.2020.1782651. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cox R. A., Ammann M., Crowley J. N.. et al. Evaluated kinetic and photochemical data for atmospheric chemistry: Volume VII – Criegee intermediates. Atmos Chem. Phys. 2020;20(21):13497–13519. doi: 10.5194/acp-20-13497-2020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chhantyal-Pun R., Khan M. A. H., Taatjes C. A., Percival C. J., Orr-Ewing A. J., Shallcross D. E.. Criegee intermediates: production, detection and reactivity. Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2020;39(3):385–424. doi: 10.1080/0144235X.2020.1792104. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Stephenson T. A., Lester M. I.. Unimolecular decay dynamics of Criegee intermediates: Energy-resolved rates, thermal rates, and their atmospheric impact. Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2020;39(1):1–33. doi: 10.1080/0144235X.2020.1688530. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Khan M A. H, Percival C. J., Caravan R. L., Taatjes C. A., Shallcross D. E.. Criegee intermediates and their impacts on the troposphere. Environ. Sci: Processes Impacts. 2018;20(3):437–453. doi: 10.1039/C7EM00585G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taatjes C. A., Shallcross D. E., Percival C. J.. Research frontiers in the chemistry of Criegee intermediates and tropospheric ozonolysis. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014;16(5):1704–1718. doi: 10.1039/c3cp52842a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Medvedko S., Wagner J. P.. From Criegee to Breslow: How π-Donors Steer the Route of Olefin Ozonolysis. Chemistry – A . European Journal. 2024;30(29):e202400026. doi: 10.1002/chem.202400026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jalan A., Allen J. W., Green W. H.. Chemically activated formation of organic acids in reactions of the Criegee intermediate with aldehydes and ketones. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013;15(39):16841–16852. doi: 10.1039/c3cp52598h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wei W.-M, Yang X., Zheng R.-H., Qin Y.-d., Wu Y.-K., Yang F.. Theoretical studies on the reactions of the simplest Criegee intermediate CH2OO with CH3CHO. Comput. Theor. Chem. 2015;1074:142–149. doi: 10.1016/j.comptc.2015.10.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Taatjes C. A., Welz O., Eskola A. J.. et al. Direct measurement of Criegee intermediate (CH2OO) reactions with acetone, acetaldehyde, and hexafluoroacetone. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012;14(30):10391–10400. doi: 10.1039/c2cp40294g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stone D., Blitz M., Daubney L., Howes N. U. M., Seakins P.. Kinetics of CH2OO reactions with SO2, NO2, NO, H2O and CH3CHO as a function of pressure. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014;16(3):1139–1149. doi: 10.1039/C3CP54391A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berndt T., Kaethner R., Voigtländer J.. et al. Kinetics of the unimolecular reaction of CH2OO and the bimolecular reactions with the water monomer, acetaldehyde and acetone under atmospheric conditions. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015;17(30):19862–19873. doi: 10.1039/C5CP02224J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Elsamra R. M. I., Jalan A., Buras Z. J., Middaugh J. E., Green W. H.. Temperature- and Pressure-Dependent Kinetics of CH2OO + CH3COCH3 and CH2OO + CH3CHO: Direct Measurements and Theoretical Analysis. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 2016;48(8):474–488. doi: 10.1002/kin.21007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Eskola A. J., Döntgen M., Rotavera B.. et al. Direct kinetics study of CH2OO + methyl vinyl ketone and CH2OO + methacrolein reactions and an upper limit determination for CH2OO + CO reaction. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018;20(29):19373–19381. doi: 10.1039/C8CP03606C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chhantyal-Pun R., Rotavera B., McGillen M. R.. et al. Criegee Intermediate Reactions with Carboxylic Acids: A Potential Source of Secondary Organic Aerosol in the Atmosphere. ACS Earth Space Chem. 2018;2(8):833–842. doi: 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.8b00069. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chhantyal-Pun R., Khan M. A. H., Martin R.. et al. Direct Kinetic and Atmospheric Modeling Studies of Criegee Intermediate Reactions with Acetone. ACS Earth Space Chem. 2019;3(10):2363–2371. doi: 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00213. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Y., Zhou X., Chen Y.. et al. Temperature- and pressure-dependent rate coefficient measurement for the reaction of CH2OO with CH3CH2CHO. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2020;22(44):25869–25875. doi: 10.1039/D0CP04316H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cornwell Z. A., Harrison A. W., Murray C.. Kinetics of the Reactions of CH2OO with Acetone, α-Diketones, and β-Diketones. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2021;125(39):8557–8571. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.1c05280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cornwell Z. A., Enders J. J., Harrison A. W., Murray C.. Temperature-Dependent Kinetics of the Reactions of CH2OO with Acetone, Biacetyl, and Acetylacetone. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 2023;55(3):154–166. doi: 10.1002/kin.21625. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Luo P. L., Chen I. Y., Khan M. A. H., Shallcross D. E.. Direct gas-phase formation of formic acid through reaction of Criegee intermediates with formaldehyde. Commun. Chem. 2023;6(1):1. doi: 10.1038/s42004-023-00933-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu S., Chen Y., Jiang H.. et al. Kinetics for the reaction of Criegee intermediate CH2OO with n-butyraldehyde and its atmospheric implications. Atmos. Environ. 2023;311:120012. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jiang H., Liu Y., Xiao C., Yang X., Dong W.. Reaction Kinetics of CH2OO and syn-CH3CHOO Criegee Intermediates with Acetaldehyde. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2024;128(25):4956–4965. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.4c01374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Debnath A., Rajakumar B.. Experimental and theoretical study of Criegee intermediate (CH2OO) reactions with n-butyraldehyde and isobutyraldehyde: kinetics, implications and atmospheric fate. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2024;26(8):6872–6884. doi: 10.1039/D3CP05482A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cornwell Z. A., Enders J. J., Harrison A. W., Murray C.. Temperature-Dependent Kinetics of the Reactions of the Criegee Intermediate CH2OO with Hydroxyketones. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2024;128(10):1880–1891. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.4c00156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Enders J. J., Cornwell Z. A., Harrison A. W., Murray C.. Temperature-Dependent Kinetics of the Reactions of the Criegee Intermediate CH2OO with Aliphatic Aldehydes. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2024;128(37):7879–7888. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.4c04990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Enders J. J., Harrison A. W., Murray C.. Temperature-Dependent Kinetics of the Reaction of the Criegee Intermediate CH2OO with Pyruvic Acid. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2025;129(33):7641–7652. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.5c03374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Durán R., Barrales-Martínez C., Solorza J., Alzate-Morales J.. Computational Study of the 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition between Criegee Intermediates and Linalool: Atmospheric Implications. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2025;129(4):1099–1115. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.4c06728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sustmann R.. A simple model for substituent effects in cycloaddition reactions. I. 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions. Tetrahedron Lett. 1971;12(29):2717–2720. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4039(01)96961-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sustmann R.. A simple model for substituent effects in cycloaddition reactions. II. The diels-alder reaction. Tetrahedron Lett. 1971;12(29):2721–2724. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4039(01)96962-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Houk K. N.. Frontier molecular orbital theory of cycloaddition reactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 1975;8(11):361–369. doi: 10.1021/ar50095a001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Fukui K.. Role of Frontier Orbitals in Chemical Reactions. Science. 1982;218(4574):747–754. doi: 10.1126/science.218.4574.747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Y., Bayes K. D., Sander S. P.. Measuring Rate Constants for Reactions of the Simplest Criegee Intermediate (CH2OO) by Monitoring the OH Radical. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2014;118(4):741–747. doi: 10.1021/jp407058b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hammett L. P.. The Effect of Structure upon the Reactions of Organic Compounds. Benzene Derivatives. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1937;59(1):96–103. doi: 10.1021/ja01280a022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hansch C., Leo A., Taft R. W.. A survey of Hammett substituent constants and resonance and field parameters. Chem. Rev. 1991;91(2):165–195. doi: 10.1021/cr00002a004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cornwell, Z. A. The Kinetics of Reactions of Criegee Intermediates with Functionalized Ketones; University of California: Irvine, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Aroeira G. J. R., Abbott A. S., Elliott S. N., Turney J. M., Schaefer H. F.. The addition of methanol to Criegee intermediates. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019;21(32):17760–17771. doi: 10.1039/C9CP03480C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frisch, M. J. ; Trucks, G. W. ; Schlegel, H. B. ; Scuseria, G. E. ; Robb, M. A. ; Cheeseman, J. R. ; Scalmani, G. ; Barone, V. ; Petersson, G. A. ; Nakatsuji, H. ; Li, X. ; Caricato, M. ; Marenich, A. V. ; Bloino, J. ; Janesko, B. G. ; Gomperts, R. ; Mennucci, B. ; Hratchian, H. P. ; Ortiz, J. V. ; Izmaylov, A. F. ; Sonnenberg, J. L. ; Williams-Young, D. ; Ding, F. ; Lipparini, F. ; Egidi, F. ; Goings, J. ; Peng, B. ; Petrone, A. ; Henderson, T. ; Ranasinghe, D. ; Zakrzewski, V. G. ; Gao, J. ; Rega, N. ; Zheng, G. ; Liang, W. ; Hada, M. ; Ehara, M. ; Toyota, K. ; Fukuda, R. ; Hasegawa, J. ; Ishida, M. ; Nakajima, T. ; Honda, Y. ; Kitao, O. ; Nakai, H. ; Vreven, T. ; Throssell, K. ; Montgomery, Jr., J. A. ; Peralta, J. E. ; Ogliaro, F. ; Bearpark, M. J. ; Heyd, J. J. ; Brothers, E. N. ; Kudin, K. N. ; Staroverov, V. N. ; Keith, T. A. ; Kobayashi, R. ; Normand, J. ; Raghavachari, K. ; Rendell, A. P. ; Burant, J. C. ; Iyengar, S. S. ; Tomasi, J. ; Cossi, M. ; Millam, J. M. ; Klene, M. ; Adamo, C. ; Cammi, R. ; Ochterski, J. W. ; Martin, R. L. ; Morokuma, K. ; Farkas, O. ; Foresman, J. B. ; Fox, D. J. . Gaussian 16, Revision B.01; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford CT, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Gordon, M. S. ; Schmidt, M. W. . Advances in electronic structure theory: GAMESS a decade later. In: Dykstra, C. E. ; Frenking, G ; Kim, K. S. ; Scuseria, G. E. , eds. Theory and Applications of Computational Chemistry, the First Forty Years. Chapter 41; Elsevier; 2005: 1167–1189. [Google Scholar]
- Barca G. M. J., Bertoni C., Carrington L.. et al. Recent developments in the general atomic and molecular electronic structure system. J. Chem. Phys. 2020;152(15):154102. doi: 10.1063/5.0005188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Montgomery J. A., Frisch M. J., Ochterski J. W., Petersson G. A.. A complete basis set model chemistry. VI. Use of density functional geometries and frequencies. J. Chem. Phys. 1999;110(6):2822–2827. doi: 10.1063/1.477924. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Simmie J. M., Somers K. P.. Benchmarking Compound Methods (CBS-QB3, CBS-APNO, G3, G4, W1BD) against the Active Thermochemical Tables: A Litmus Test for Cost-Effective Molecular Formation Enthalpies. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2015;119(28):7235–7246. doi: 10.1021/jp511403a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhan C. G., Nichols J. A., Dixon D. A.. Ionization Potential, Electron Affinity, Electronegativity, Hardness, and Electron Excitation Energy: Molecular Properties from Density Functional Theory Orbital Energies. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2003;107(20):4184–4195. doi: 10.1021/jp0225774. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lary D. J., Shallcross D. E.. Central role of carbonyl compounds in atmospheric chemistry. J. Geophys Res. 2000;105(D15):19771–19778. doi: 10.1029/1999JD901184. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Rowell K. N., Kable S. H., Jordan M. J. T.. An assessment of the tropospherically accessible photo-initiated ground state chemistry of organic carbonyls. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 2022;22(2):929–949. doi: 10.5194/acp-22-929-2022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Q., Gao Y., Huang W., Ling Z., Wang Z., Wang X.. Carbonyl compounds in the atmosphere: A review of abundance, source and their contributions to O3 and SOA formation. Atmospheric Research. 2022;274:106184. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2022.106184. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Matsunaga S. N., Guenther A. B., Izawa Y., Wiedinmyer C., Greenberg J. P., Kawamura K.. Importance of wet precipitation as a removal and transport process for atmospheric water soluble carbonyls. Atmos. Environ. 2007;41(4):790–796. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.08.054. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jiménez E., Lanza B., Martínez E., Albaladejo J.. Daytime tropospheric loss of hexanal and trans-2-hexenal: OH kinetics and UV photolysis. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2007;7(6):1565–1574. doi: 10.5194/acp-7-1565-2007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Singh H. B., O’Hara D., Herlth D.. et al. Acetone in the atmosphere: Distribution, sources, and sinks. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 1994;99(D1):1805–1819. doi: 10.1029/93JD00764. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Reed Harris A. E., Doussin J. F., Carpenter B. K., Vaida V.. Gas-Phase Photolysis of Pyruvic Acid: The Effect of Pressure on Reaction Rates and Products. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2016;120(51):10123–10133. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.6b09058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rinaman J. E., Murray C.. Primary and Secondary Dissociation Pathways in the UV Photochemistry of α-Dicarbonyls. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2025;129(13):3040–3051. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.5c00715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Magneron I., Thévenet R., Mellouki A., Le Bras G., Moortgat G. K., Wirtz K.. A Study of the Photolysis and OH-initiated Oxidation of Acrolein and trans-Crotonaldehyde. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2002;106(11):2526–2537. doi: 10.1021/jp013413a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Praske E., Crounse J. D., Bates K. H., Kurtén T., Kjaergaard H. G., Wennberg P. O.. Atmospheric Fate of Methyl Vinyl Ketone: Peroxy Radical Reactions with NO and HO2. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2015;119(19):4562–4572. doi: 10.1021/jp5107058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu S., Chen Y., Jiang H.. et al. Reaction between Criegee Intermediate CH2OO and Isobutyraldehyde: Kinetics and Atmospheric Implications. ChemistrySelect. 2023;8(47):e202303129. doi: 10.1002/slct.202303129. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Debnath A., Rajakumar B.. Investigation of kinetics and mechanistic insights of the reaction of criegee intermediate (CH2OO) with methyl-ethyl ketone (MEK) under tropospherically relevant conditions. Chemosphere. 2023;312:137217. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou X., Chen Y., Liu Y., Li X., Dong W., Yang X.. Kinetics of CH2OO and syn-CH3CHOO reaction with acrolein. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2021;23(23):13276–13283. doi: 10.1039/D1CP00492A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taatjes C. A., Welz O., Eskola A. J.. et al. Direct Measurements of Conformer-Dependent Reactivity of the Criegee Intermediate CH3CHOO. Science. 2013;340(6129):177–180. doi: 10.1126/science.1234689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sheps L.. Absolute Ultraviolet Absorption Spectrum of a Criegee Intermediate CH2OO. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2013;4(24):4201–4205. doi: 10.1021/jz402191w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sheps L., Scully A. M., Au K.. UV absorption probing of the conformer-dependent reactivity of a Criegee intermediate CH3CHOO. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014;16(48):26701–26706. doi: 10.1039/C4CP04408H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith M. C., Ting W. L., Chang C. H., Takahashi K., Boering K. A., Lin J. J. M.. UV absorption spectrum of the C2 Criegee intermediate CH3CHOO. J. Chem. Phys. 2014;141(7):074302. doi: 10.1063/1.4892582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chhantyal-Pun R., Davey A., Shallcross D. E., Percival C. J., Orr-Ewing A. J.. A kinetic study of the CH2OO Criegee intermediate self-reaction, reaction with SO2 and unimolecular reaction using cavity ring-down spectroscopy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015;17(5):3617–3626. doi: 10.1039/C4CP04198D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang H. L., Chao W., Lin J. J. M.. Kinetics of a Criegee intermediate that would survive high humidity and may oxidize atmospheric SO2 . Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 2015;112(35):10857–10862. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1513149112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Y., Liu F., Liu S., Dai D., Dong W., Yang X.. A kinetic study of the CH2OO Criegee intermediate reaction with SO2, (H2O)2, CH2I2 and I atoms using OH laser induced fluorescence. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017;19(31):20786–20794. doi: 10.1039/C7CP04336H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chhantyal-Pun R., Welz O., Savee J. D.. et al. Direct Measurements of Unimolecular and Bimolecular Reaction Kinetics of the Criegee Intermediate (CH3)2COO. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2017;121(1):4–15. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.6b07810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Howes N. U. M., Mir Z. S., Blitz M. A.. et al. Kinetic studies of C1 and C2 Criegee intermediates with SO2 using laser flash photolysis coupled with photoionization mass spectrometry and time resolved UV absorption spectroscopy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018;20(34):22218–22227. doi: 10.1039/C8CP03115K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qiu J., Tonokura K.. Detection of the simplest Criegee intermediate CH2OO in the ν4 band using a continuous wave quantum cascade laser and its kinetics with SO2 and NO2. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2019;737:100019. doi: 10.1016/j.cpletx.2019.100019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Onel L., Lade R., Mortiboy J.. et al. Kinetics of the gas phase reaction of the Criegee intermediate CH2OO with SO2 as a function of temperature. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2021;23(35):19415–19423. doi: 10.1039/D1CP02932K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lade R. E., Onel L., Blitz M. A., Seakins P. W., Stone D.. Kinetics of the Gas-Phase Reactions of syn- and anti-CH3CHOO Criegee Intermediate Conformers with SO2 as a Function of Temperature and Pressure. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2024;128(14):2815–2824. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.4c00199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang P. B., Truhlar D. G., Xia Y., Long B.. Temperature-dependent kinetics of the atmospheric reaction between CH2OO and acetone. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2022;24(21):13066–13073. doi: 10.1039/D2CP01118B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Favre, H. A. ; Powell, W. H. . Nomenclature of Organic Chemistry; The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Ess D. H., Jones G. O., Houk K. N.. Conceptual, Qualitative, and Quantitative Theories of 1,3-Dipolar and Diels–Alder Cycloadditions Used in Synthesis. Adv. Synth Catal. 2006;348(16–17):2337–2361. doi: 10.1002/adsc.200600431. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ess D. H., Houk K. N.. Theory of 1,3-Dipolar Cycloadditions: Distortion/Interaction and Frontier Molecular Orbital Models. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130(31):10187–10198. doi: 10.1021/ja800009z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith C. D., Karton A.. Kinetics and Thermodynamics of Reactions Involving Criegee Intermediates: An Assessment of Density Functional Theory and Ab Initio Methods Through Comparison with CCSDT(Q)/CBS Data. J. Comput. Chem. 2020;41(4):328–339. doi: 10.1002/jcc.26106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Santiago C. B., Milo A., Sigman M. S.. Developing a Modern Approach To Account for Steric Effects in Hammett-Type Correlations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016;138(40):13424–13430. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b08799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Modern Physical Organic Chemistry. https://link.springer.com/book/9781891389313. Accessed July 17, 2023.
- Taft R. W. Jr. Polar and Steric Substituent Constants for Aliphatic and o-Benzoate Groups from Rates of Esterification and Hydrolysis of Esters1. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1952;74(12):3120–3128. doi: 10.1021/ja01132a049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- MacPhee J. A., Panaye A., Dubois J. E.. Steric effectsI: A critical examination of the taft steric parameterEs. Definition of a revised, broader and homogeneous scale. Extension to highly congested alkyl groups. Tetrahedron. 1978;34(24):3553–3562. doi: 10.1016/0040-4020(78)88431-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kanerva L. T., Euranto E. K.. Taft σ* constants, particularly for halogen-substituted alkyl groups, and their utility in mechanistic studies. J. Chem. Soc, Perkin Trans 2. 1987;(4):441–444. doi: 10.1039/P29870000441. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Parr R. G., Szentpály L. V., Liu S.. Electrophilicity Index. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999;121(9):1922–1924. doi: 10.1021/ja983494x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Pérez P., Domingo L. R., José Aurell M., Contreras R.. Quantitative characterization of the global electrophilicity pattern of some reagents involved in 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reactions. Tetrahedron. 2003;59(17):3117–3125. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4020(03)00374-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sharma P., Kumar A., Sahu V.. Theoretical Evaluation of Global and Local Electrophilicity Patterns to Characterize Hetero-Diels–Alder Cycloaddition of Three-Membered 2H-Azirine Ring System. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2010;114(2):1032–1038. doi: 10.1021/jp9088222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pérez-Peña M. P., Fisher J. A., Hansen C., Kable S. H.. Assessing the atmospheric fate of trifluoroacetaldehyde (CF3CHO) and its potential as a new source of fluoroform (HFC-23) using the AtChem2 box model. Environ. Sci: Atmos. 2023;3(12):1767–1777. doi: 10.1039/D3EA00120B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sun C., Jia P., Zhang S.. Temperature- and Pressure-Dependent Kinetics of CH2 OO + Methacrolein and CH2 OO + Methyl Vinyl Ketone Reactions: A Theoretical Study. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2026;130(4):890–901. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.5c06491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Long B., Xia Y., Truhlar D. G.. Quantitative Kinetics of HO2 Reactions with Aldehydes in the Atmosphere: High-Order Dynamic Correlation, Anharmonicity, and Falloff Effects Are All Important. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022;144(43):19910–19920. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c07994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nielsen O. J., Andersen M. P. S., Franklin J.. Comment on “Assessing the atmospheric fate of trifluoroacetaldehyde (CF3CHO) and its potential as a new source of fluoroform (HFC-23) using the AtChem2 box model” by Pérez-Peña et al., Environ. Sci.: Atmos., 2023, 3, 1767–1777, DOI: 10.1039/D3EA00120B. Environ. Sci.: Atmos. 2025;5(4):530–534. doi: 10.1039/D4EA00123K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Romero M. T. B., Blitz M. A., Heard D. E.. et al. Photolysis of methylethyl, diethyl and methylvinyl ketones and their role in the atmospheric HOx budget. Faraday Discuss. 2005;130(0):73–88. doi: 10.1039/B419160A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rowell K. N., Kable S. H., Jordan M. J. T.. An assessment of the tropospherically accessible photo-initiated ground state chemistry of organic carbonyls. Atmos Chem. Phys. 2022;22(2):929–949. doi: 10.5194/acp-22-929-2022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ervens B., Volkamer R.. Glyoxal processing by aerosol multiphase chemistry: towards a kinetic modeling framework of secondary organic aerosol formation in aqueous particles. Atmos Chem. Phys. 2010;10(17):8219–8244. doi: 10.5194/acp-10-8219-2010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- De Haan, D. O. Aqueous Aerosol Processing of Glyoxal and Methylglyoxal: Recent Measurements of Uptake Coefficients, SOA Production, and Brown Carbon Formation. In: Multiphase Environmental Chemistry in the Atmosphere. ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society, 2018, 1299, 149–167. [Google Scholar]
- Feierabend K. J., Zhu L., Talukdar R. K., Burkholder J. B.. Rate Coefficients for the OH + HC(O)C(O)H (Glyoxal) Reaction between 210 and 390 K. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2008;112(1):73–82. doi: 10.1021/jp0768571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tyndall G. S., Staffelbach T. A., Orlando J. J., Calvert J. G.. Rate coefficients for the reactions of OH radicals with Methylglyoxal and Acetaldehyde. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 1995;27(10):1009–1020. doi: 10.1002/kin.550271006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bacher C., Tyndall G. S., Orlando J. J.. The Atmospheric Chemistry of Glycolaldehyde. J. Atmos Chem. 2001;39(2):171–189. doi: 10.1023/A:1010689706869. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Newland M. J., Rickard A. R., Vereecken L., Muñoz A., Ródenas M., Bloss W. J.. Atmospheric isoprene ozonolysis: impacts of stabilised Criegee intermediate reactions with SO2, H2O and dimethyl sulfide. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 2015;15(16):9521–9536. doi: 10.5194/acp-15-9521-2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nguyen T. B., Tyndall G. S., Crounse J. D.. et al. Atmospheric fates of Criegee intermediates in the ozonolysis of isoprene. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016;18(15):10241–10254. doi: 10.1039/C6CP00053C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aschmann S. M., Atkinson R.. Formation Yields of Methyl Vinyl Ketone and Methacrolein from the Gas-Phase Reaction of O3 with Isoprene. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1994;28(8):1539–1542. doi: 10.1021/es00057a025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wennberg P. O., Bates K. H., Crounse J. D.. et al. Gas-Phase Reactions of Isoprene and Its Major Oxidation Products. Chem. Rev. 2018;118(7):3337–3390. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang D., Lei W., Zhang R.. Mechanism of OH formation from ozonolysis of isoprene: kinetics and product yields. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2002;358(3):171–179. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2614(02)00260-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Vereecken L., Novelli A., Taraborrelli D.. Unimolecular decay strongly limits the atmospheric impact of Criegee intermediates. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017;19(47):31599–31612. doi: 10.1039/C7CP05541B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Caravan R. L., Vansco M. F., Au K.. et al. Direct kinetic measurements and theoretical predictions of an isoprene-derived Criegee intermediate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2020;117(18):9733–9740. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1916711117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


