Skip to main content
PMC home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 2000 Mar;78(3):1207–1215. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76678-1

Response kinetics of tethered Rhodobacter sphaeroides to changes in light intensity.

R M Berry 1, J P Armitage 1
PMCID: PMC1300723  PMID: 10692310

Abstract

Rhodobacter sphaeroides can swim toward a wide range of attractants (a process known as taxis), propelled by a single rotating flagellum. The reversals of motor direction that cause tumbles in Eschericia coli taxis are replaced by brief motor stops, and taxis is controlled by a complex sensory system with multiple homologues of the E. coli sensory proteins. We tethered photosynthetically grown cells of R. sphaeroides by their flagella and measured the response of the flagellar motor to changes in light intensity. The unstimulated bias (probability of not being stopped) was significantly larger than the bias of tethered E. coli but similar to the probability of not tumbling in swimming E. coli. Otherwise, the step and impulse responses were the same as those of tethered E. coli to chemical attractants. This indicates that the single motor and multiple sensory signaling pathways in R. sphaeroides generate the same swimming response as several motors and a single pathway in E. coli, and that the response of the single motor is directly observable in the swimming pattern. Photo-responses were larger in the presence of cyanide or the uncoupler carbonyl cyanide 4-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone (FCCP), consistent with the photo-response being detected via changes in the rate of electron transport.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (117.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Armitage J. P. Bacterial tactic responses. Adv Microb Physiol. 1999;41:229–289. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2911(08)60168-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Armitage J. P., Macnab R. M. Unidirectional, intermittent rotation of the flagellum of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. J Bacteriol. 1987 Feb;169(2):514–518. doi: 10.1128/jb.169.2.514-518.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Armitage J. P., Schmitt R. Bacterial chemotaxis: Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Sinorhizobium meliloti--variations on a theme? Microbiology. 1997 Dec;143(Pt 12):3671–3682. doi: 10.1099/00221287-143-12-3671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Berg H. C. A physicist looks at bacterial chemotaxis. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1988;53(Pt 1):1–9. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1988.053.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Berg H. C., Brown D. A. Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli analysed by three-dimensional tracking. Nature. 1972 Oct 27;239(5374):500–504. doi: 10.1038/239500a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Berg H. C., Purcell E. M. Physics of chemoreception. Biophys J. 1977 Nov;20(2):193–219. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(77)85544-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Berg H. C., Tedesco P. M. Transient response to chemotactic stimuli in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Aug;72(8):3235–3239. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.8.3235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Block S. M., Segall J. E., Berg H. C. Adaptation kinetics in bacterial chemotaxis. J Bacteriol. 1983 Apr;154(1):312–323. doi: 10.1128/jb.154.1.312-323.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Block S. M., Segall J. E., Berg H. C. Impulse responses in bacterial chemotaxis. Cell. 1982 Nov;31(1):215–226. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90421-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Brown D. A., Berg H. C. Temporal stimulation of chemotaxis in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Apr;71(4):1388–1392. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.4.1388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dusenbery D. B. Spatial sensing of stimulus gradients can be superior to temporal sensing for free-swimming bacteria. Biophys J. 1998 May;74(5):2272–2277. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77936-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gauden D. E., Armitage J. P. Electron transport-dependent taxis in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. J Bacteriol. 1995 Oct;177(20):5853–5859. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.20.5853-5859.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Grishanin R. N., Gauden D. E., Armitage J. P. Photoresponses in Rhodobacter sphaeroides: role of photosynthetic electron transport. J Bacteriol. 1997 Jan;179(1):24–30. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.1.24-30.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hamblin P. A., Maguire B. A., Grishanin R. N., Armitage J. P. Evidence for two chemosensory pathways in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Mol Microbiol. 1997 Dec;26(5):1083–1096. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.6502022.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Harrison D. M., Packer H. L., Armitage J. P. Swimming speed and chemokinetic response of Rhodobacter sphaeroides investigated by natural manipulation of the membrane potential. FEBS Lett. 1994 Jul 4;348(1):37–40. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(94)00572-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ingham C. J., Armitage J. P. Involvement of transport in Rhodobacter sphaeroides chemotaxis. J Bacteriol. 1987 Dec;169(12):5801–5807. doi: 10.1128/jb.169.12.5801-5807.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jeziore-Sassoon Y., Hamblin P. A., Bootle-Wilbraham C. A., Poole P. S., Armitage J. P. Metabolism is required for chemotaxis to sugars in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Microbiology. 1998 Jan;144(Pt 1):229–239. doi: 10.1099/00221287-144-1-229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Packer H. L., Armitage J. P. The chemokinetic and chemotactic behavior of Rhodobacter sphaeroides: two independent responses. J Bacteriol. 1994 Jan;176(1):206–212. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.1.206-212.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Packer H. L., Gauden D. E., Armitage J. P. The behavioural response of anaerobic Rhodobacter sphaeroides to temporal stimuli. Microbiology. 1996 Mar;142(Pt 3):593–599. doi: 10.1099/13500872-142-3-593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Poole P. S., Armitage J. P. Motility response of Rhodobacter sphaeroides to chemotactic stimulation. J Bacteriol. 1988 Dec;170(12):5673–5679. doi: 10.1128/jb.170.12.5673-5679.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Poole P. S., Armitage J. P. Role of metabolism in the chemotactic response of Rhodobacter sphaeroides to ammonia. J Bacteriol. 1989 May;171(5):2900–2902. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.5.2900-2902.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Poole P. S., Smith M. J., Armitage J. P. Chemotactic signalling in Rhodobacter sphaeroides requires metabolism of attractants. J Bacteriol. 1993 Jan;175(1):291–294. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.1.291-294.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Romagnoli S., Armitage J. P. Roles of chemosensory pathways in transient changes in swimming speed of Rhodobacter sphaeroides induced by changes in photosynthetic electron transport. J Bacteriol. 1999 Jan;181(1):34–39. doi: 10.1128/jb.181.1.34-39.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Scharf B. E., Fahrner K. A., Turner L., Berg H. C. Control of direction of flagellar rotation in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Jan 6;95(1):201–206. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.1.201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Segall J. E., Block S. M., Berg H. C. Temporal comparisons in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Dec;83(23):8987–8991. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.23.8987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Silverman M., Simon M. Flagellar rotation and the mechanism of bacterial motility. Nature. 1974 May 3;249(452):73–74. doi: 10.1038/249073a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Taylor B. L., Zhulin I. B. In search of higher energy: metabolism-dependent behaviour in bacteria. Mol Microbiol. 1998 May;28(4):683–690. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00835.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Turner L., Caplan S. R., Berg H. C. Temperature-induced switching of the bacterial flagellar motor. Biophys J. 1996 Oct;71(4):2227–2233. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79425-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES