Skip to main content
PMC home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 2000 May;78(5):2349–2363. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76780-4

Tests of continuum theories as models of ion channels. I. Poisson-Boltzmann theory versus Brownian dynamics.

G Moy 1, B Corry 1, S Kuyucak 1, S H Chung 1
PMCID: PMC1300825  PMID: 10777732

Abstract

Continuum theories of electrolytes are widely used to describe physical processes in various biological systems. Although these are well-established theories in macroscopic situations, it is not clear from the outset that they should work in small systems whose dimensions are comparable to or smaller than the Debye length. Here, we test the validity of the mean-field approximation in Poisson-Boltzmann theory by comparing its predictions with those of Brownian dynamics simulations. For this purpose we use spherical and cylindrical boundaries and a catenary shape similar to that of the acetylcholine receptor channel. The interior region filled with electrolyte is assumed to have a high dielectric constant, and the exterior region representing protein a low one. Comparisons of the force on a test ion obtained with the two methods show that the shielding effect due to counterions is overestimated in Poisson-Boltzmann theory when the ion is within a Debye length of the boundary. As the ion gets closer to the boundary, the discrepancy in force grows rapidly. The implication for membrane channels, whose radii are typically smaller than the Debye length, is that Poisson-Boltzmann theory cannot be used to obtain reliable estimates of the electrostatic potential energy and force on an ion in the channel environment.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (184.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adcock C., Smith G. R., Sansom M. S. Electrostatics and the ion selectivity of ligand-gated channels. Biophys J. 1998 Sep;75(3):1211–1222. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)74040-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cai M., Jordan P. C. How does vestibule surface charge affect ion conduction and toxin binding in a sodium channel? Biophys J. 1990 Apr;57(4):883–891. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(90)82608-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cheng W., Wang C. X., Chen W. Z., Xu Y. W., Shi Y. Y. Investigating the dielectric effects of channel pore water on the electrostatic barriers of the permeation ion by the finite difference Poisson-Boltzmann method. Eur Biophys J. 1998;27(2):105–112. doi: 10.1007/s002490050116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chung S. H., Allen T. W., Hoyles M., Kuyucak S. Permeation of ions across the potassium channel: Brownian dynamics studies. Biophys J. 1999 Nov;77(5):2517–2533. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77087-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chung S. H., Hoyles M., Allen T., Kuyucak S. Study of ionic currents across a model membrane channel using Brownian dynamics. Biophys J. 1998 Aug;75(2):793–809. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77569-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cooper K., Jakobsson E., Wolynes P. The theory of ion transport through membrane channels. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1985;46(1):51–96. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(85)90012-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Corry B., Kuyucak S., Chung S. H. Tests of continuum theories as models of ion channels. II. Poisson-Nernst-Planck theory versus brownian dynamics. Biophys J. 2000 May;78(5):2364–2381. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76781-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dieckmann G. R., Lear J. D., Zhong Q., Klein M. L., DeGrado W. F., Sharp K. A. Exploration of the structural features defining the conduction properties of a synthetic ion channel. Biophys J. 1999 Feb;76(2):618–630. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77230-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Eisenberg R. S. Computing the field in proteins and channels. J Membr Biol. 1996 Mar;150(1):1–25. doi: 10.1007/s002329900026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Eisenberg R. S. From structure to function in open ionic channels. J Membr Biol. 1999 Sep 1;171(1):1–24. doi: 10.1007/s002329900554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Honig B., Nicholls A. Classical electrostatics in biology and chemistry. Science. 1995 May 26;268(5214):1144–1149. doi: 10.1126/science.7761829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hoyles M., Kuyucak S., Chung S. H. Energy barrier presented to ions by the vestibule of the biological membrane channel. Biophys J. 1996 Apr;70(4):1628–1642. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79726-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jayaram B., Sharp K. A., Honig B. The electrostatic potential of B-DNA. Biopolymers. 1989 May;28(5):975–993. doi: 10.1002/bip.360280506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jordan P. C., Bacquet R. J., McCammon J. A., Tran P. How electrolyte shielding influences the electrical potential in transmembrane ion channels. Biophys J. 1989 Jun;55(6):1041–1052. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(89)82903-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Klapper I., Hagstrom R., Fine R., Sharp K., Honig B. Focusing of electric fields in the active site of Cu-Zn superoxide dismutase: effects of ionic strength and amino-acid modification. Proteins. 1986 Sep;1(1):47–59. doi: 10.1002/prot.340010109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Levitt D. G. Interpretation of biological ion channel flux data--reaction-rate versus continuum theory. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1986;15:29–57. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.15.060186.000333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Levitt D. G. Modeling of ion channels. J Gen Physiol. 1999 Jun;113(6):789–794. doi: 10.1085/jgp.113.6.789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Levitt D. G. Strong electrolyte continuum theory solution for equilibrium profiles, diffusion limitation, and conductance in charged ion channels. Biophys J. 1985 Jul;48(1):19–31. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(85)83757-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Li S. C., Hoyles M., Kuyucak S., Chung S. H. Brownian dynamics study of ion transport in the vestibule of membrane channels. Biophys J. 1998 Jan;74(1):37–47. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77764-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. McCleskey E. W. Calcium channel permeation: A field in flux. J Gen Physiol. 1999 Jun;113(6):765–772. doi: 10.1085/jgp.113.6.765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Miller C. Ionic hopping defended. J Gen Physiol. 1999 Jun;113(6):783–787. doi: 10.1085/jgp.113.6.783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Nonner W., Chen D. P., Eisenberg B. Progress and prospects in permeation. J Gen Physiol. 1999 Jun;113(6):773–782. doi: 10.1085/jgp.113.6.773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rostovtseva T. K., Aguilella V. M., Vodyanoy I., Bezrukov S. M., Parsegian V. A. Membrane surface-charge titration probed by gramicidin A channel conductance. Biophys J. 1998 Oct;75(4):1783–1792. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77620-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Roux B. Influence of the membrane potential on the free energy of an intrinsic protein. Biophys J. 1997 Dec;73(6):2980–2989. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78327-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Roux B., Karplus M. Molecular dynamics simulations of the gramicidin channel. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1994;23:731–761. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.23.060194.003503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sankararamakrishnan R., Adcock C., Sansom M. S. The pore domain of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor: molecular modeling, pore dimensions, and electrostatics. Biophys J. 1996 Oct;71(4):1659–1671. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79370-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sansom M. S., Adcock C., Smith G. R. Modelling and simulation of ion channels: applications to the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. J Struct Biol. 1998;121(2):246–262. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.1997.3950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sharp K. A., Honig B. Electrostatic interactions in macromolecules: theory and applications. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1990;19:301–332. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.19.060190.001505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Smejtek P., Mense M., Word R., Wang S. Electrokinetic properties of the sarcoplasmic reticulum membrane obtained from reconstitution studies. J Membr Biol. 1999 Jan 15;167(2):151–163. doi: 10.1007/s002329900479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Toyoshima C., Unwin N. Ion channel of acetylcholine receptor reconstructed from images of postsynaptic membranes. Nature. 1988 Nov 17;336(6196):247–250. doi: 10.1038/336247a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES