Skip to main content
eLife logoLink to eLife
. 2026 Mar 23;14:RP108976. doi: 10.7554/eLife.108976

4-Aminoquinolines block heme iron reactivity and interfere with artemisinin action

Melissa Rosenthal 1, Daniel E Goldberg 1,2,✉
Editors: Dominique Soldati-Favre3, Dominique Soldati-Favre4
PMCID: PMC13008355  PMID: 41870038

Abstract

Artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) remain the mainstay of treatment for Plasmodium falciparum malaria, despite reports of ACT treatment failure. ACTs consist of an artemisinin and a longer-lived partner drug, which is often a quinoline. Given that heme is central to the mechanism of action of artemisinins and some quinolines, we hypothesized that these antimalarials would exhibit strong drug-drug interactions. Previous studies using standard 48 hr or 72 hr assays identified additive to mildly antagonistic interactions between artemisinins and quinolines. Here, we sought to re-evaluate these interactions using a pulsing assay that better mimics the short in vivo half-life of artemisinins. We found that chloroquine (CQ), piperaquine (PPQ), and amodiaquine substantially antagonize dihydroartemisinin (DHA), the active metabolite of artemisinins. CQ-DHA antagonism was notably exacerbated in CQ-resistant parasites, resulting in a superantagonistic phenotype in isobolograms. Further, we found that CQ co-treatment conferred artemisinin resistance to Kelch 13 wild-type parasites in the ring-stage survival assay. Using a small molecule probe (Ac-H-FluNox) to measure chemically reactive heme in live parasites, we determined that quinolines block artemisinin activation by rendering cytosolic heme inert. Finally, we probed beyond traditional ACTs, evaluating interactions of the proposed triple ACT, DHA-PPQ-mefloquine, as well as OZ439-quinoline combinations, which were all found to be antagonistic. Collectively, these in vitro data suggest that peroxide-quinolines may have liabilities as combination therapies.

Research organism: P. falciparum

Introduction

Malaria was responsible for an estimated 263 million cases and 597,000 deaths in 2023, the majority of which were caused by Plasmodium falciparum (World Health Organization, 2024). The World Health Organization recommends artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) for the treatment of P. falciparum malaria. ACTs are composed of a short-lived artemisinin derivative paired with a longer-lived partner drug. Depending on geographical resistance profiles, one of six combinations is recommended: dihydroartemisinin (DHA)+piperaquine (PPQ), artesunate (AS)+mefloquine (MFQ), AS+amodiaquine (ADQ), AS+pyronaridine (PYR), artemether (AM)+lumefantrine (LM), or AS+sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP). Three of these six partner drugs, PPQ, MFQ, and ADQ, possess quinoline groups. Importantly, heme is central to the mechanism of action of both artemisinins and quinolines (Wicht et al., 2020; Rosenthal and Ng, 2020).

Asexual blood-stage parasites are adept at thriving in an incredibly heme-rich environment. Parasites import up to 80% of host cell hemoglobin (Sigala et al., 2015), which is transported to a specialized lysosome-like organelle, termed the digestive vacuole. Here, hemoglobin is proteolytically processed into globin peptides and redox active heme (Fe2+-ferroprotoporphyrin IX), which is oxidized to hemin (Fe3+-ferroprotoporphyrin IX) (Matz, 2022). The majority of hemin is retained within the digestive vacuole where it is detoxified via sequestration into inert hemozoin crystals (Egan et al., 2002; Combrinck et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 1999). Hemin concentrations approach 0.5 M within the digestive vacuole (Francis et al., 1997). Blood-stage parasites also maintain a relatively high cytosolic heme concentration of approximately 1.6 μM (Abshire et al., 2017). While the source of this labile heme pool has not been experimentally determined, it is thought to originate from hemoglobin digestion.

The heme-rich environment of asexual blood stages has long been exploited for antimalarial intervention. The 4-aminoquinolines CQ and PPQ are thought to act primarily in the parasite digestive vacuole, where they inhibit hemozoin formation by binding heme/hemin and the growing face of hemozoin (Sullivan et al., 1996; Sullivan et al., 1998; Olafson et al., 2017; Olafson et al., 2015; Adams et al., 1996; Egan et al., 1997). It has been proposed that disruption of heme homeostasis and/or accumulation of toxic heme-quinoline complexes may contribute to parasite killing (de Villiers and Egan, 2021; Fitch, 2004; Kapishnikov et al., 2019). Resistance to 4-aminoquinolines is mediated by a collection of mutations in the CQ resistance transporter (PfCRT), which is located on the parasite digestive vacuole membrane (Fidock et al., 2000). Mutations in PfCRT are thought to mediate resistance by enabling drug efflux out of the digestive vacuole (Wicht et al., 2020; Kim et al., 2019; Papakrivos et al., 2012; Sanchez et al., 2005; Summers et al., 2014).

Heme is also central to the mechanism of action of artemisinins. Artemisinins contain a peroxide bridge that must be cleaved by heme for antimalarial activity (Cumming et al., 1997; Meshnick et al., 1996; Kaiser et al., 2007; Zhang and Gerhard, 2008; Meunier and Robert, 2010). Following activation, artemisinins nonspecifically alkylate adjacent molecules, causing widespread cellular damage to the parasite (Wang et al., 2015; Ismail et al., 2016b; Jourdan et al., 2019). Clinically, artemisinin resistance is primarily associated with mutations in Kelch 13 (K13) (Ariey et al., 2014; Ashley et al., 2014; Straimer et al., 2015), which are thought to reduce parasite hemoglobin uptake and digestion (Birnbaum et al., 2020; Siddiqui et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2019). Consequently, less heme is available to activate artemisinins.

ACTs remain the mainstay treatment for falciparum malaria. Widespread resistance to artemisinins in Southeast Asia and recent emergence of artemisinin resistance in Africa have posed great concern (World Health Organization, 2024; Ashley et al., 2014; Uwimana et al., 2020; Uwimana et al., 2021; Tumwebaze et al., 2022; Rosenthal et al., 2024a). Reduced artemisinin efficacy means that the partner drugs are responsible for clearing a larger parasite biomass, increasing the likelihood for resistance to emerge to partner drugs. Indeed, high treatment failure rates have been reported for AS-MFQ, DHA-PPQ, and AS-ADQ in Southeast Asia (Saunders et al., 2014; Spring et al., 2015; Leang et al., 2015; van der Pluijm et al., 2019; van der Pluijm et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2023; Amaratunga et al., 2016; Phyo et al., 2016a; Mairet-Khedim et al., 2021).

Given that heme is central to the mechanism of action of both quinolines and artemisinins, we hypothesized that these antimalarials would exhibit strong drug-drug interactions. Previously, several groups have assessed quinoline-artemisinin interactions using standard 48 hr or 72 hr assays and found that combinations were additive in CQ-sensitive parasites and additive to slightly antagonistic in CQ-resistant parasites (Davis et al., 2006; Fivelman et al., 1999; Ribbiso et al., 2021; Ansbro et al., 2020; Muangnoicharoen et al., 2009). However, standard 48 hr or 72 hr assays in which parasites are exposed to compounds for the entire assay duration do not well represent clinical drug exposure conditions and can mask not only resistance phenotypes, but also drug-drug interaction phenotypes (Duru et al., 2015; Witkowski et al., 2013; Stokes et al., 2019; Gligorijevic et al., 2008). We sought to re-evaluate quinoline-artemisinin interactions in multidrug-sensitive, CQ-resistant, artemisinin-resistant, and PPQ-resistant parasites using pulsing assays that better represent artemisinin kinetics. Our work identifies that CQ, PPQ, and ADQ antagonize DHA, the active metabolite of clinically used artemisinins, likely by rendering heme chemically inert and preventing DHA activation. In addition, we explore drug-drug interactions beyond traditional ACTs, investigating interactions of putative triple ACTs (TACTs), as well as ozonide-quinoline combinations that failed in clinical trials. Overall, the data presented here highlight the importance of detailed investigation of drug-drug interactions, particularly in drug-resistant parasites.

Results

CQ and DHA are superantagonistic in CQ-resistant parasites

 We began by evaluating CQ-DHA interactions in 3D7, a CQ-sensitive parasite, and Dd2, a CQ-resistant parasite (Table 1), using trophozoite-stage isobologram assays. Synchronized trophozoites were treated with fixed ratios of CQ and DHA for 4 hr, drugs were washed off, and then parasitemia was assessed 72 hr later. Given the short half-life of artemisinins (Witkowski et al., 2013), we believe that this pulsing format allows us to better assess the effect of ACT partner drugs on DHA activity compared to standard 48 hr or 72 hr assays. Fractional IC50 (FIC50) values were calculated from fixed ratios and then plotted on an XY graph to generate isobolograms. Isobolograms can be interpreted based on isobole shape and mean ΣFIC50 values as follows: points along the dotted line with a mean ΣFIC50 value close to 1 indicate additivity, points above the dotted line in a concave curve with a mean ΣFIC50 value >1.25 indicate antagonism, and points below the dotted line in a convex curve with a mean ΣFIC50 value <0.75 indicate synergy.

Table 1. Parasite strains used in this study.

Strains are annotated with their origin (isolate or edited), chloroquine resistance transporter (PfCRT) genotype, Kelch 13 (K13) genotype, and whether they are resistant to chloroquine (CQ), piperaquine (PPQ), or dihydroartemisinin (DHA). Wild-type (WT) K13 corresponds to the 3D7 genotype.

Parasite name Origin PfCRT genotype K13 genotype Resistance
74 75 76 97 220 271 326 343 356 371
3D7 Africa (1981) M N K H A Q N M I R WT –
Dd2 Indochina (1980) I E T H S E S M T I WT CQ
Dd2 PfCRTDd2 Edited (introns removed) I E T H S E S M T I WT CQ
Dd2 PfCRT3D7 Edited M N K H A Q N M I R WT –
Dd2 K13R539T Edited I E T H S E S M T I R539T CQ, DHA
Dd2 PfCRTM343L Edited I E T H S E S L T I WT CQ, PPQ
MRA-1284 (IPC_6261) Cambodia (2012) I E T Y S E S M T I C580Y DHA, PPQ

 We observed strong antagonism for CQ-DHA in 3D7 parasites (Figure 1a), with a mean ΣFIC50 value of 1.68. Antagonism was notably exacerbated in Dd2 parasites (Figure 1b), which had a mean ΣFIC50 value of 2.44. The magnitude of this value far surpasses conventional antagonism, and we termed this phenomenon ‘superantagonism’. Perhaps even more unexpected was the atypical shape of this isobole (Figure 1b), where points extended upward and peak ΣFIC50 values exceeded 4. In contrast, peak ΣFIC50 values for 3D7 reached only 2. The traditional isobole shape for 3D7 indicates a reciprocal relationship between CQ and DHA, whereas the atypical isobole shape of Dd2 suggests a one-sided relationship, whereby CQ is blocking DHA activity.

Figure 1. Chloroquine (CQ) and dihydroartemisinin (DHA) are superantagonistic in CQ-resistant parasites.

Shown are trophozoite-stage isobolograms for (a–e) CQ-DHA, (f–k) PPQ-DHA, and (l–q) MFQ DHA. The dotted line on each graph represents perfect additivity. 3D7, Dd2, Dd2 PfCRT3D7, Dd2 PfCRTDd2, Dd2 K13R539T, and Dd2 PfCRTM343L parasites are indicated in orange, gray, pink, blue, purple, and teal, respectively. Data from three independent replicates are indicated by different shading.

Figure 1—source data 1. Isobologram analysis.

Figure 1.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Chloroquine (CQ), dihydroartemisinin (DHA), piperaquine (PPQ), and mefloquine (MFQ) sensitivity of different parasites.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

Shown are mean (a) CQ, (b) DHA, (c) PPQ, and (d) MFQ trophozoite-stage IC50 values ± SEM obtained as part of at least three independent isobologram replicates (see Figure 1). For (b) DHA, IC50 values from CQ-DHA and PPQ-DHA isobolograms are shown. Statistical significance between Dd2 versus all other parasites was determined using a one-way ANOVA with a Dunnett’s test for multiple comparisons. ****p<0.0001; **p<0.01; *p<0.05; ns = not significant.
Figure 1—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Chloroquine (CQ), dihydroartemisinin (DHA), piperaquine (PPQ), and mefloquine (MFQ) IC50 values.

 Multiple groups have demonstrated that parasite genetics can influence drug-drug interactions (Ansbro et al., 2020; Rosenthal and Ng, 2021; Eastman et al., 2016). 3D7 and Dd2 parasites differ genetically at a number of drug resistance markers, including PfCRT which is responsible for mediating CQ resistance. To determine if PfCRT genotype was responsible for differences in CQ-DHA interactions between these parasite lines, we evaluated interactions in two Dd2 parasites that are isogenic except at PfCRT (Straimer et al., 2012; Ross et al., 2018): Dd2 PfCRT3D7, which is edited to have the 3D7 PfCRT genotype, and Dd2 PfCRTDd2, which maintains the Dd2 PfCRT genotype and was used as a cloning control (Table 1). Notably, superantagonism was lost in Dd2 PfCRT3D7 parasites, which phenocopied 3D7 parasites, and had a mean ΣFIC50 value of 1.85 and a conventional isobole shape (Figure 1c). In contrast, Dd2 PfCRTDd2 parasites displayed one-sided superantagonism with a mean ΣFIC50 value of 2.73 and peak ΣFIC50 values >4.5 (Figure 1d). These data suggest that PfCRT genotype is the main genetic determinant that dictates CQ-DHA interactions.

 Both 3D7 and Dd2 parasites are artemisinin sensitive, harboring a wild-type K13. To determine if resistance to artemisinins alters CQ-DHA interactions, we next evaluated CQ-DHA combinations in Dd2 parasites that are edited to have a K13R539T mutation (Straimer et al., 2015; Table 1). Dd2 K13R539T parasites, which also harbor a Dd2 PfCRT genotype, displayed a one-sided superantagonistic isobole that was reminiscent of both Dd2 and Dd2 PfCRTDd2 parasites (Figure 1e). This suggests that, unlike PfCRT genotype, K13 genotype appeared to have no impact on drug-drug interactions at the trophozoite stage.

PPQ and DHA are antagonistic

 Next, we sought to evaluate drug-drug interactions of DHA and the ACT partner drugs PPQ and MFQ. PPQ is believed to have a similar mechanism of action as CQ and both antimalarials are 4-aminoquinolines. Accordingly, we hypothesized that PPQ and DHA would also be antagonistic. In 3D7, Dd2, Dd2 PfCRT3D7, Dd2 PfCRTDd2, and Dd2 K13R539T trophozoites, we observed conventional antagonism for PPQ-DHA (Figure 1f–j) with mean ΣFIC50 values ranging from 1.55 to 1.71. To determine if, similar to CQ, PPQ-DHA interactions would be exacerbated in PPQ-resistant parasites, we also evaluated Dd2 PfCRTM343L, which harbors the Dd2 PfCRT plus an additional mutation at M343L (Ross et al., 2018; Table 1). The M343L mutation had no impact on PPQ-DHA interactions and Dd2 PfCRTM343L parasites displayed conventional antagonism with a mean ΣFIC50 value of 1.58 (Figure 1k). Note that while the PPQ IC50 of Dd2 PfCRTM343L is 2.5-fold higher than Dd2 (65 nM versus 25 nM; Figure 1—figure supplement 1), this shift is substantially smaller than the >1000-fold CQ IC50 shift that we and others (Gligorijevic et al., 2008) have observed in CQ-sensitive versus CQ-resistant parasites using the pulsing assay format (Figure 1—figure supplement 1).

 Next, we assessed interactions between MFQ and DHA (Figure 1l–q). Though MFQ contains a quinoline group, it is chemically classified as an aryl amino alcohol and is believed to have a heme-independent mechanism of action (Vanaerschot et al., 2017). Consistent with this, we observed additivity for MFQ-DHA in all six parasites tested with mean ΣFIC50 values ranging from 0.94 to 1.20. This additivity, along with the synergism that we previously reported for DHA-proteasome inhibitor combinations (Rosenthal and Ng, 2021), provides context for the antagonism and superantagonism that we observed for PPQ-DHA and CQ-DHA.

CQ combination treatment confers artemisinin resistance to K13WT parasites in ring-stage survival assays

Given our observation that CQ and PPQ antagonize DHA in trophozoite stages, we next sought to determine if these quinolines would promote survival in early ring stages where artemisinin resistance is classically observed. We performed DHA dose-response assays on early ring-stage parasites to determine both ring-stage survival assay (RSA) values and IC50 values (Figure 2a and Figure 2—figure supplement 1). The RSA is used to delineate artemisinin-sensitive versus resistant parasites, where survival >1% corresponds to resistance and <1% indicates sensitivity (Witkowski et al., 2013). Though DHA IC50 values cannot reliably differentiate artemisinin-sensitive versus resistant parasites (Witkowski et al., 2013), they can provide important insight into different factors that contribute to artemisinin susceptibility (Wang et al., 2016).

Figure 2. Chloroquine (CQ) co-treatment confers artemisinin resistance in K13WT parasites.

(a) Dihydroartemisinin (DHA) dose-response assays were performed on 0–3 hr post invasion (hpi) ring-stage parasites. Twofold serial dilutions of DHA were prepared in 96-well plates (DHA concentration represented by different shades of purple) starting at 1.4 μM so that both IC50 values and ring-stage survival assay (RSA) survival values at 700 nM DHA could be determined. To evaluate quinoline-DHA interactions in early ring stages, DHA titrations were prepared with fixed concentrations of 10 μM CQ or 200 nM piperaquine (PPQ). (b–d) Mean RSA survival values ± SEM (top panel) and mean DHA IC50 values ± SEM (bottom panel) are shown for (b) Dd2 PfCRT3D7, (c) Dd2, and (d) Dd2 K13R539T parasites. For the PPQ-resistant parasites (e) Dd2 PfCRTM343L and (f) MRA-1284, additional fixed PPQ concentrations of 500 nM and 10 μM were also tested. At least three independent replicates were performed for each experiment. For b bottom panel, a Student’s t-test was used to assess statistical differences between DHA alone versus DHA + PPQ. For all other graphs, statistical differences between DHA alone (-) and DHA + quinolines was assessed using a one-way ANOVA with a Dunnett’s test for multiple comparisons. ****p<0.0001; ***p<0.001; *p<0.05; ns = not significant.

Figure 2—source data 1. Ring-stage survival assay (RSA) dose-response assays.

Figure 2.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1. Early ring-stage dose-response curves.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1.

Dihydroartemisinin (DHA) dose-response assays on 0–3 hr post invasion (hpi) ring-stage (a) Dd2 PfCRT3D7, (b) Dd2, and (c) Dd2 K13R539T parasites were performed with DHA alone, or DHA with the addition of 10 μM chloroquine (CQ), or 200 nM piperaquine (PPQ). For the PPQ-resistant parasites (d) Dd2 PfCRTM343L and (e) MRA-1284, additional PPQ concentrations of 500 nM and 10 μM were also tested. Shown are dose-response curves with mean % inhibition ± SEM from at least three independent replicates.

In the absence of quinolines, the artemisinin-sensitive K13WT parasites, Dd2 PfCRT3D7 and Dd2, had RSA survival values ≤1%, while Dd2 K13R539T had an RSA survival of 12.63% (Figure 2b–d, top panel). Co-treatment with 10 μM CQ, a pharmacologically relevant concentration (Cabrera et al., 2009; Melo et al., 2022), significantly increased RSA survival, conferring artemisinin resistance to both Dd2 PfCRT3D7 and Dd2 parasites with mean RSA values of 2.66% and 4.49%, respectively (Figure 2b and c, top panel). RSA survival values were also increased in Dd2 K13R539T parasites to 18.39%, although this shift was not statistically significant (Figure 2d, top panel). When assessing DHA sensitivity by ring-stage IC50 values, CQ co-treatment also had a substantial rescuing effect in both Dd2 and Dd2 K13R539T parasites, resulting in a fourfold increase in DHA IC50 (Figure 2c and d, bottom panel). Note that while we were unable to determine a DHA IC50 value for CQ-sensitive Dd2 PfCRT3D7 parasites in the presence of 10 μM CQ, the dose-response curve was suggestive of antagonism (Figure 2—figure supplement 1a).

To determine if PPQ would have a similar rescuing effect, we performed these same assays in the presence of 200 nM PPQ. This concentration was chosen because it is sublethal for early rings in this short 3 hr pulse, pharmacologically relevant (Nguyen et al., 2009; Hoglund et al., 2017), and mimics the PPQ survival assay (PSA) that is used to delineate PPQ resistance (Duru et al., 2015). Co-treatment with 200 nM PPQ did not have a rescuing effect for Dd2 PfCRT3D7, Dd2, or Dd2 K13R539T parasites and resulted in mean RSA values that were either similar to or lower than the DHA-only control (Figure 2b–d). Note that in the absence of DHA, 200 nM PPQ inhibited parasite growth approximately 20%. However, co-treatment with 200 nM PPQ did not shift the IC50 values or DHA dose-response curves of these parasites (Figure 2b–d and Figure 2—figure supplement 1a–c), indicating that PPQ and DHA are also antagonistic in early ring stages.

We were curious if higher concentrations of PPQ might have a rescuing effect, particularly for PPQ-resistant parasites that are capable of surviving a higher PPQ dose. To this end, we assayed two PPQ-resistant parasites: Dd2 PfCRTM343L and MRA-1284 (IPC_6261), which is an artemisinin-resistant and PPQ-resistant clinical isolate that was collected in 2012 from Cambodia (Table 1). Dd2 PfCRTM343L and MRA-1284 have PPQ survival values (PSA) of 10% (Ross et al., 2018) and 40% (Nkhoma et al., 2021), respectively. While co-treatment with 10 μM CQ had a rescuing effect for Dd2 PfCRTM343L as assessed by RSA and IC50 values, neither 200 nM PPQ, 500 nM PPQ, nor 10 μM PPQ co-treatment rescued parasite survival (Figure 2e and Figure 2—figure supplement 1d). Similarly, 10 μM CQ co-treatment decreased MRA-1284 sensitivity to DHA as assessed by RSA and early ring IC50 values, while co-treatment with 200 nM PPQ or 500 nM PPQ had no effect on DHA sensitivity (Figure 2f). This phenotype is consistent with conventional antagonism. Interestingly, while co-treatment with 10 μM PPQ did not alter the RSA survival of MRA-1284, it did shift the dose-response curve to the left (Figure 2—figure supplement 1e). However, since 10 μM PPQ inhibited parasite growth approximately 60% on its own, we were unable to determine an IC50 value.

CQ and PPQ interfere with heme iron reactivity

 In total, we profiled three different quinoline-DHA interactions, which are summarized in Figure 3a. In solution, quinolines and heme form heme-quinoline complexes, wherein heme is present as a µ-oxo dimer (Kuter et al., 2016; Dorn et al., 1998; Leed et al., 2002). Though the exact stoichiometry of this interaction for each quinoline remains debated (Kuter et al., 2016; Dorn et al., 1998; Leed et al., 2002; Egan, 2006; Vippagunta et al., 2000), formation of such a complex could render quinoline-bound heme chemically inert (i.e. unable to activate artemisinins).

Figure 3. Chloroquine (CQ) and piperaquine (PPQ) antagonize dihydroartemisinin (DHA) activation by ‘inactivating’ heme.

(a) Shown are mean ΣFIC50 values calculated from the trophozoite-stage isobolograms in Figure 1. Values close to 1 (pink) indicate additivity. Values ranging from 1.25 to 2 (light blue) indicate classical antagonism. Values >2.25 (dark turquoise) indicate superantagonism. (b top panel) Heme (Fe2+-FPIX) cleaves the N-O bond of H-FluNox, mediating probe fluorescence. (b bottom panel) Heme cleaves the peroxide bridge of DHA, which generates a carbon-centered radical that can alkylate proximal biomolecules. (c) H-FluNox was incubated with increasing concentrations of heme in the presence or absence of 10 μM CQ, 150 nM PPQ, 10 μM PPQ, 150 nM MFQ, or 10 μM MFQ. Shown are mean relative fluorescence units (RFU) ± SD from at least three independent replicates performed in technical triplicate. (d and e) Dd2 trophozoites were treated with 10 μM CQ, 150 nM PPQ, 150 nM MFQ, or mock-treated for 5.5 hr. (f) Dd2 PfCRTDd2 and Dd2 PfCRT3D7 trophozoites were mock-treated or treated with 150 nM CQ or 10 μM CQ for 5.5 hr. (d–f) Parasites were then incubated with 10 μM Ac-H-FluNox (the cell-permeable analog of H-FluNox) to visualize and quantify ‘active’ heme. Shown are (d) representative images and (e and f) mean fluorescence intensity ± SD of at least 70 parasites from at least three independent drug treatments. Statistical significance was assessed using a one-way ANOVA with a Tukey's test for multiple comparisons. (g and h) Dd2 trophozoites were treated with 10 μM CQ, 25 nM DHA, 10 μM CQ + 25 nM DHA for 6 hr. Parasite lysates were subjected to western blot and probed with anti-K48-linked ubiquitin (K48-Ub) antibodies or anti-plasmepsin V (PMV) antibodies. Shown is a (g) representative blot and (h) quantification of relative K48-Ub intensity ± SEM from three independent replicates. Statistical significance between mock-treated and antimalarial-treated parasites was determined using a one-way ANOVA with a Tukey's test for multiple comparisons. ****p<0.0001; ***p<0.001; **p<0.01; ns = not significant. Scale bar = 5 μm.

Figure 3—source data 1. Mean sum FIC50 values used to generate the heat map.
Figure 3—source data 2. H-FluNox relative fluorescence units (RFU) with chloroquine (CQ), piperaquine (PPQ), and mefloquine (MFQ).
Figure 3—source data 3. Ac-H-FluNox parasite fluorescence with chloroquine (CQ), piperaquine (PPQ), and mefloquine (MFQ).
Figure 3—source data 4. Ac-H-FluNox fluorescence of Dd2 PfCRTDd2 and Dd2 PfCRT3D7 parasites.
Figure 3—source data 5. Uncropped, labeled western blots.
Figure 3—source data 6. Western blot raw images.
Figure 3—source data 7. Western blot quantifications.

Figure 3.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1. Effect of pH on H-FluNox and Ac-H-FluNox activity.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

(a) H-FluNox was incubated with increasing concentrations of heme at pH 7.5, 5.4, and 4. Shown are mean relative fluorescence units (RFU)± SD from two independent replicates performed in technical duplicate. (b) Dd2 trophozoites were treated with 10 μM chloroquine (CQ) or mock-treated for 5.5 hr. Parasites were then co-incubated with Ac-H-FluNox and 10 mM ammonium chloride to visualize free heme and alkalinize the digestive vacuole, respectively. Shown are two representative images per treatment condition. Note that exposure times were optimized for different treatment conditions to better visualize the digestive vacuole. Scale bar = 5 μm.
Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 1. H-FluNox pH titration relative fluorescence units (RFU).
Figure 3—figure supplement 2. Equimolar comparison of chloroquine (CQ), piperaquine (PPQ), and mefloquine (MFQ) on Ac-HFluNox fluorescence.

Figure 3—figure supplement 2.

Dd2 trophozoites were treated with 10 μM CQ, 10 μM PPQ, 10 μM MFQ, or mock-treated for 1 hr. Parasites were then incubated with Ac-H-FluNox to visualize and quantify ‘active’ heme. Shown are (a) representative images and (b) mean fluorescence intensity ± SD of at least 75 parasites from three independent drug treatments. Statistical significance was assessed using a one-way ANOVA with a Tukey’s test for multiple comparisons. Scale bar = 5 μm.
Figure 3—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Ac-H-FluNox fluorescence for 10 μM chloroquine (CQ), 10 μM piperaquine (PPQ), 10 μM mefloquine (MFQ) treatment.
Figure 3—figure supplement 3. Representative images of Dd2 PfCRTDd2 and Dd2 PfCRT3D7 Ac-H-FluNox fluorescence.

Figure 3—figure supplement 3.

Dd2 PfCRTDd2 and Dd2 PfCRT3D7 trophozoites were mock-treated or treated with 150 nM chloroquine (CQ) or 10 μM CQ for 5.5 hr. Parasites were then incubated with 10 μM Ac-H-FluNox (the cell-permeable analog of H-FluNox) to visualize and quantify ‘active’ heme. Shown are representative images relating to Figure 3f. Scale bar = 5 μm.

 To investigate this, we utilized a recently developed small molecule probe, H-FluNox, that is highly sensitive and specific for heme over hemin, heme-bound proteins, Fe2+, and other salts and metal ions (Kawai et al., 2022). H-FluNox is basally non-fluorescent, but upon cleavage of an N-O bond by the Fe2+ of heme, H-FluNox fluoresces (Kawai et al., 2022; Figure 3b, top panel). While not identical, this reaction is similar to artemisinin activation, which requires cleavage of artemisinin’s peroxide bond by the Fe2+ of heme (Meunier and Robert, 2010; Figure 3b, bottom panel). To determine if quinoline-heme complexes would react with H-FluNox, we began by assessing H-FluNox fluorescence in solution with 10 μM CQ, which is sub-lethal for CQ-resistant parasites and pharmacologically relevant (Cabrera et al., 2009; Melo et al., 2022). Relative to the untreated control, 10 μM CQ inhibited fluorescence approximately 50% in the presence of 250 nM heme (Figure 3c). This suggests that heme iron reactivity is impaired when heme is in complex with CQ. Next, we evaluated PPQ and MFQ at two different concentrations: 150 nM, which reflects a 5× trophozoite-stage IC50 concentration, and 10 μM to directly compare these quinolines with CQ. At 150 nM, both PPQ and MFQ inhibited fluorescence, albeit only 10% (Figure 3c). At 10 μM, MFQ inhibited fluorescence to a similar extent as CQ, while 10 μM PPQ only inhibited fluorescence 25% (Figure 3c). Note that 10 μM concentrations exceed maximum plasma concentrations of PPQ and MFQ, which have been reported to reach approximately 0.5–1 μM and 5 μM, respectively (Nguyen et al., 2009; Hoglund et al., 2017; Gutman et al., 2009).

 Next, we assessed fluorescence in live trophozoite-stage parasites using the cell-permeable analog of H-FluNox, Ac-H-FluNox (Kawai et al., 2022). In untreated Dd2 parasites, fluorescence was predominantly observed in the parasite cytoplasm (Figure 3d), and little signal was detected in red blood cells or the parasite digestive vacuole. This suggests that a significant portion of DHA could be activated in the parasite cytoplasm. Lack of signal in the digestive vacuole could be due to issues with permeability, the specificity of Ac-H-FluNox for heme over hemin (the predominant heme species in the digestive vacuole), or sensitivity of Ac-H-FluNox to a low pH environment. In solution, H-FluNox fluorescence was decreased approximately 60% at pH 5.4 (Figure 3—figure supplement 1a), which is the estimated pH of the digestive vacuole (Wiser, 2024). However, alkalinization of the digestive vacuole with ammonium chloride (Yayon et al., 1984) did not increase digestive vacuole fluorescence signal (Figure 3—figure supplement 1b), suggesting that low pH alone cannot explain this lack of labeling.

 Importantly, treatment of Dd2 trophozoites with 10 μM CQ nearly ablated Ac-H-FluNox fluorescent signal (Figure 3d and e). Treatment with 150 nM PPQ also significantly reduced fluorescence, though not to the same extent as 10 μM CQ (50% inhibition versus >92% inhibition) (Figure 3d and e). In contrast, parasites treated with 150 nM MFQ had similar fluorescence as untreated control parasites (Figure 3d and e). These assays with H-FluNox and Ac-H-FluNox correlate well with hemozoin inhibition assays in which CQ, PPQ, and MFQ inhibit hemozoin formation in solution (Dorn et al., 1998), but only CQ and PPQ inhibit hemozoin formation in parasites (Combrinck et al., 2013; Dhingra et al., 2017; Warhurst et al., 2007; Combrinck et al., 2015). To determine if concentration alone was responsible for the differences that we observed between CQ and the other quinolines, we also evaluated Ac-H-FluNox fluorescence following treatment with 10 μM PPQ or 10 μM MFQ. At this super-physiological and super-lethal concentration, an equimolar concentration of CQ still inhibited H-FluNox fluorescence to a greater extent than PPQ or MFQ (Figure 3—figure supplement 2). This suggests that something unique to the chemistry of CQ and/or the biology of the parasite is responsible for the differences that we observed.

 PfCRTDd2 is believed to mediate CQ resistance by pumping CQ out of the digestive vacuole (Wicht et al., 2020; Kim et al., 2019; Papakrivos et al., 2012; Sanchez et al., 2005; Summers et al., 2014), suggesting that cytoplasmic CQ concentrations may differ between PfCRTDd2 and PfCRT3D7 parasites treated with the same concentration of CQ. Given the substantial difference that we saw in the shape of CQ-DHA isobolograms between PfCRTDd2 and PfCRT3D7 parasites, we were curious if differences in PfCRT genotype would impact Ac-H-FluNox fluorescence. Accordingly, we treated Dd2 PfCRTDd2 and Dd2 PfCRT3D7 parasites with 150 nM CQ or 10 μM CQ and measured chemically ‘reactive’ heme using Ac-H-FluNox. In untreated Dd2 PfCRTDd2 versus Dd2 PfCRT3D7 parasites, we observed no difference in Ac-H-FluNox localization or fluorescence intensity (Figure 3f and Figure 3—figure supplement 3). Following treatment with 150 nM CQ, fluorescence was inhibited by 25% in Dd2 PfCRT3D7 and by 35% in Dd2 PfCRTDd2; however, this difference was not statistically significant (Figure 3f). Curiously, while 10 μM CQ treatment reduced mean fluorescence approximately 60% in Dd2 PfCRT3D7 parasites, it was not to the extent of Dd2 PfCRTDd2 parasites (80%) (Figure 3f). These data suggest that transport of CQ out of the digestive vacuole by PfCRTDd2 may contribute to superantagonism between CQ and DHA in CQ-resistant parasites.

CQ co-treatment rescues DHA-mediated protein damage

 Following activation by heme, DHA causes widespread protein damage in the parasite (Wang et al., 2015; Ismail et al., 2016b; Jourdan et al., 2019; Bridgford et al., 2018). Accordingly, we would expect that if CQ is antagonizing DHA activation, then CQ co-treatment should rescue DHA-mediated protein damage. To test this hypothesis, we treated Dd2 trophozoites with CQ, DHA, or CQ+DHA and probed for K48-linked ubiquitin, which is a marker of protein damage (Bridgford et al., 2018). Consistent with what has been previously reported (Rosenthal et al., 2024b), CQ treatment alone had no effect on K48-linked ubiquitin levels, while treatment with DHA resulted in a twofold increase in K48-linked ubiquitin (Figure 3g and h). Importantly, the addition of CQ to DHA had a rescuing effect, resulting in levels of K48-linked ubiquitin that were similar to the DMSO-treated control (Figure 3g and h). Collectively, these data suggest that CQ antagonizes DHA by rendering heme chemically inert, reducing DHA activation, and consequently, reducing DHA-mediated protein damage.

PPQ and MFQ do not harm treatment efficacy but strongly antagonize each other

 With the looming threat of widespread ACT treatment failure, several ideas have been proposed to delay the spread of ACT resistance by using currently available antimalarials. TACTs, which are composed of a traditional ACT plus an additional longer-lived partner drug, have gained the most traction. Early clinical trials indicate that DHA-PPQ-MFQ and AM-LM-ADQ show good safety and efficacy against artemisinin-sensitive and resistant parasites (van der Pluijm et al., 2020; Coulibaly et al., 2015; Peto et al., 2022; Mahamar et al., 2025). We were curious how the addition of a third antimalarial would influence drug interactions. Accordingly, we performed trophozoite-stage DHA dose-response assays on Dd2 parasites in the presence of a fixed, sub-lethal concentration of PPQ, MFQ, or PPQ+MFQ. Addition of 2 nM DHA was also included as a control to represent additivity. As assessed by DHA IC50 values, addition of 15 nM PPQ did not improve parasite killing, while addition of 15 nM MFQ resulted in a threefold decrease in IC50 compared to the DMSO control (Figure 4a and b). These phenotypes are consistent with antagonistic and additive relationships, respectively. Notably, the addition of PPQ+MFQ had no additional benefit compared to the addition of MFQ alone (Figure 4a and b).

Figure 4. Quinolines antagonize peroxides.

(a and b) Trophozoite-stage dihydroartemisinin (DHA) dose-response assays were performed with Dd2 parasites in the presence or absence of 15 nM piperaquine (PPQ), 15 nM mefloquine (MFQ), 15 nM PPQ+15 nM MFQ, or 2 nM DHA. Shown are (a) dose-response curves with mean % inhibition ± SEM and (b) mean IC50 values ± SEM from at least three independent replicates. Statistical significance was determined using a one-way ANOVA with a Tukey’s test for multiple comparisons. Trophozoite-stage isobolograms were performed on Dd2 parasites to determine drug-drug interactions of (c) PPQ-MFQ, (d) ADQ-DHA, (e) LM-DHA, (f) PPQ-OZ439, and (g) FQ OZ439 using the following fixed ratios: 1:0, 4:1, 2:1, 1:1, 1:2, 1:4, 0:1. Shown are fractional IC50 values from at least three independent replicates. Independent replicates are indicated in different shading and the diagonal dotted line on each plot indicates perfect additivity. (h and i) Dd2 parasites were mock-treated or treated with 10 μM chloroquine (CQ), 150 nM ADQ, 500 nM lumefantrine (LM), or 150 nM ferroquine (FQ) for 5.5 hr and free heme was then labeled in live parasites with Ac-H-FluNox. Shown are (h) representative images and (i) mean fluorescence intensity ± SD of at least 90 parasites from three independent drug treatments. Statistical significance was assessed using a one-way ANOVA with a Dunnett’s test for multiple comparisons. ****p<0.0001; ns = not significant. (j) Mean relative fluorescence of Ac-H-FluNox from drug treatments in Figure 3 and (i) was plotted against Dd2 mean ΣFIC50 values for the indicated combinations. Combinations with DHA are indicated in black. Combinations with OZ439 are indicated in blue. Scale bar = 5 μm.

Figure 4—source data 1. Dose response analyses for TACTs.
Figure 4—source data 2. Isobologram analyses.
Figure 4—source data 3. Ac-H-FluNox fluorescence for ADQ, FQ, and LM.
Figure 4—source data 4. Values for FIC50 and Ac-H-FluNox correlation.

Figure 4.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1. Additional mefloquine (MFQ) isobolograms.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1.

Trophozoite-stage isobolograms were performed on (a) Dd2 PfCRTM343L and (b) Dd2 parasites to determine drug-drug interactions of using the following fixed ratios: 1:0, 4:1, 2:1, 1:1, 1:2, 1:4, 0:1. Shown are fractional IC50 values from three independent replicates.
Figure 4—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Isobologram analysis.
Figure 4—figure supplement 2. Amodiaquine (ADQ), lumefantrine (LM), and ferroquine (FQ) IC50 values.

Figure 4—figure supplement 2.

Shown are mean Dd2 trophozoite-stage IC50 values ± SEM obtained as part of three independent isobologram replicates (see Figure 4d, e and g).
Figure 4—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Amodiaquine (ADQ), lumefantrine (LM), ferroquine (FQ), IC50 values.

 Following the initial 3-day TACT treatment regimen, long-lived partner drugs are responsible for clearing the remaining parasite burden. Accordingly, we sought to assess drug-drug interactions of PPQ-MFQ in the absence of DHA. Previously, it was reported that MFQ and PPQ were moderately antagonistic in 3D7 and K1 parasites using a standard 48 hr assay, with mean ΣFIC50 values of 1.31 and 1.28, respectively (Davis et al., 2006). Using our trophozoite-stage assay, we observed reciprocal superantagonism in both PPQ-sensitive Dd2 (Figure 4c) and PPQ-resistant Dd2 PfCRTM343L (Figure 4—figure supplement 1a), with mean ΣFIC50 values of 2.62 and 2.44, respectively. This phenotype appears to be unique to PPQ, as we observed only strong antagonism for CQ-MFQ with a mean ΣFIC50 of 1.72 (Figure 4—figure supplement 1b). Overall, these in vitro data suggest that based on drug-drug interactions, PPQ and MFQ may not be a strategic long-lived antimalarial pairing for TACTs.

Quinolines antagonize peroxides

To determine if the drug-drug interactions that we evaluated were specific to a subset of antimalarials or represented a broader phenotype, we next evaluated DHA interactions with the clinically used ACT partner drugs ADQ and LM. Structurally, ADQ is classified as a 4-aminoquinoline like PPQ and CQ, while LM is classified as an aryl amino alcohol like MFQ. However, unlike MFQ, LM lacks a quinoline group. We found that in Dd2 parasites, ADQ and DHA were antagonistic (Figure 4d) with a mean ΣFIC50 of 1.61, while LM and DHA were additive (Figure 4e) with a mean ΣFIC50 of 1.02.

To determine if 4-aminoquinolines antagonize other peroxide antimalarials, we next sought to assess interactions of two different OZ439-quinoline pairs that were previously evaluated in clinical trials. Similar to artemisinins, the synthetic ozonide, OZ439, requires activation via heme-mediated cleavage of a peroxide bond but has a significantly improved half-life of 46–62 hr (Phyo et al., 2016b). In phase II clinical trials, OZ439 showed good efficacy alone (Phyo et al., 2016b), but poor efficacy either in combination with PPQ (Macintyre et al., 2017) or the next-generation quinoline, ferroquine (FQ) (Adoke et al., 2021; Gansane et al., 2023). To assess drug-drug interactions, we performed trophozoite-stage isobolograms with OZ439-PPQ and OZ439-FQ in Dd2 parasites. The pulsing format was used to maintain consistency across experiments. Both PPQ-OZ439 (Figure 4f) and FQ-OZ439 (Figure 4g) were antagonistic with mean ΣFIC50 values of 1.42 and 1.52, respectively. These data suggest that antagonistic interactions are potentially one of several factors (Macintyre et al., 2017; Adoke et al., 2021; Gansane et al., 2023; Hamilton et al., 2019; Phuc et al., 2017) that may have contributed to the poor efficacy of these single-dose combination therapies.

Although the mechanism of action of ADQ and FQ is less well studied, both antimalarials appear to inhibit hemozoin formation. ADQ was shown to inhibit hemozoin formation in parasites using the heme fractionation assay (Combrinck et al., 2015). While in-parasite assays have not been performed with FQ, in vitro biochemical studies suggest that FQ may inhibit hemozoin formation even better than CQ (Biot et al., 2005). Accordingly, we were curious if ADQ and FQ treatment would ‘inactivate’ heme in parasites. Using the Ac-H-FluNox heme probe, we observed that relative to the untreated control, treatment with 150 nM ADQ or 150 nM FQ (approximately 5× IC50 concentrations; Figure 4—figure supplement 2) reduced Ac-H-FluNox fluorescent signal approximately 50% and 55%, respectively (Figure 4h and i). In contrast, treatment with an equipotent concentration of LM had no significant impact on Ac-H-FluNox signal relative to the untreated control (Figure 4h and i). Among the six partner drugs that were evaluated, we observed a clear inverse correlation between Ac-H-FluNox signal and mean ΣFIC50, with an R2 value of 0.84 (Figure 4j). These data strongly suggest that antimalarials that render heme inert also antagonize artemisinin and ozonide antimalarials, presumably by blocking endoperoxide activation.

Discussion

Combination therapies are widely believed to delay the emergence of drug resistance not only for malaria, but also bacterial infections, HIV, fungal infections, and cancer. However, to maximize the benefits of combination therapies, it is essential that drugs are strategically paired. At a minimum, combinations should enhance efficacy to reduce parasite biomass and reduce the potential for drug resistance to evolve. In vitro assessment of drug-drug interactions between two antimalarials with vastly different half-lives is challenging. We chose to use a short treatment pulse to mimic artemisinin exposure and gain an understanding of how quinolines impact artemisinin activity. While drug-drug interactions are undoubtedly much more complex in vivo, we believe this assay format better recapitulates clinical conditions compared to traditional 48 hr or 72 hr assays.

We found that CQ and PPQ are antagonistic with DHA as assessed in early ring and trophozoite stages across three different parasite backgrounds. Artemisinin resistance is thought to be mediated by reduced heme-mediated activation and/or enhanced parasite stress response. Accordingly, 4-aminoquinolines could antagonize DHA by either or both mechanism(s). Our work with Ac-H-FluNox suggests that 4-aminoquinolines antagonize DHA by rendering intra-parasitic heme chemically inert, thus blocking DHA activation. However, future work will be needed to assess the effect of 4-aminoquinolines on parasite stress responses.

To date, it remains debated where artemisinins are activated within the parasite. There are several lines of evidence that suggest that artemisinins can be activated in the parasite cytoplasm. First, immunofluorescence studies with an anti-AS antibody (Wang et al., 2010) and live-cell imaging with an artemisinin-based photoaffinity probe (Gao et al., 2024) revealed that artemisinins localize throughout the parasite cytoplasm. Second, numerous chemical proteomics studies utilizing artemisinin and ozonide-based click chemistry probes have identified a number of cytoplasmic proteins as targets of artemisinin and ozonides (Wang et al., 2015; Ismail et al., 2016b; Jourdan et al., 2019; Ismail et al., 2016a; Siddiqui et al., 2022). Given how quickly activated artemisinins react with adjacent molecules, it is unlikely that activated artemisinins could traverse the digestive vacuole or other organelle membranes before encountering a cytoplasmic target. Finally, immunofluorescence assays with antibodies specific for the alkylation signature of the ozonide OZ277 (Jourdan et al., 2016) revealed labeling throughout the parasite cytoplasm. Our data with Ac-H-FluNox also lend credence to this hypothesis. We observed Ac-H-FluNox fluorescence throughout the parasite cytoplasm, indicating that there is a substantial amount of heme in this location that is chemically competent to activate artemisinins. It is possible that technical limitations, such as issues with membrane permeability, limit Ac-H-FluNox fluorescence in the digestive vacuole. Nevertheless, these data collectively indicate that artemisinins can be activated in the parasite cytoplasm.

Previously, it has been reported that CQ treatment increases intracellular ‘free’ heme (Combrinck et al., 2013; Abshire et al., 2017; Famin and Ginsburg, 2003). However, the term ‘free’ heme is somewhat malleable. While the pyridine-heme fractionation assay (Combrinck et al., 2013; Combrinck et al., 2015), electron spectroscopic imaging with energy-loss spectroscopy (Combrinck et al., 2013), and heme biosensor (Abshire et al., 2017) can be used to detect and quantify heme species, they are unable to differentiate chemically ‘active’ heme from inert heme (i.e. quinoline bound or protein bound). In contrast, H-FluNox is highly specific for chemically ‘active’ heme (Kawai et al., 2022). One possibility to reconcile our data with previous reports is that CQ treatment increases non-hemozoin/hemoglobin heme, but that this heme is bound to CQ or other biomolecules, rendering it unable to activate Ac-H-FluNox or peroxides. It is important to note that the chemistry of artemisinin and Ac-H-FluNox activation is not identical, and these data with Ac-H-FluNox should be interpreted with caution. Nevertheless, we believe that Ac-H-FluNox is the best currently available proxy to assess artemisinin activation in live parasites.

CQ-DHA antagonism was notably exacerbated in CQ-resistant parasites. The concentrations used in isobolograms are chosen based on parasite IC50 values to individual compounds. While all parasites were exposed to similar DHA concentrations, CQ-resistant parasites were exposed to much higher CQ concentrations compared to their CQ-sensitive counterparts. This may explain in part why antagonism was intensified in CQ-resistant parasites. However, equimolar treatment with 10 µM CQ resulted in significantly lower Ac-H-FluNox signal in Dd2 PfCRTDd2 versus Dd2 PfCRT3D7 parasites (Figure 3f). These data could suggest that while the majority of CQ is sequestered in the digestive vacuole of Dd2 PfCRT3D7 parasites, PfCRTDd2 is able to transport more CQ out of the digestive vacuole, thus allowing more CQ to bind cytosolic heme in parasites harboring a PfCRTDd2. This duality of PfCRTDd2, simultaneously enhancing parasite survival to CQ while promoting cytoplasmic heme ‘inactivation’, may explain the unprecedented one-sided superantagonistic isobole that we observed.

Fortunately, we did not observe superantagonism with DHA-PPQ in PPQ-resistant parasites. With a modest threefold shift in PPQ IC50 between Dd2 and Dd2 PfCRTM343L parasites (25 nM versus 65 nM), it is perhaps unsurprising that no significant difference in DHA-PPQ isobolograms was observed between these two parasites. This is in contrast to the >1000-fold CQ IC50 shift that we and others (Gligorijevic et al., 2008) have observed between CQ-sensitive and CQ-resistant parasites using pulsing assays. Our studies with Ac-H-FluNox indicate that 150 nM PPQ is sufficient to render approximately 50% of available heme inert (Figure 3e). While these data suggest that PPQ blocks some DHA activation, it is likely that 150 nM PPQ is not sufficient to block all DHA activation. Since even PPQ-resistant parasites are at least partially susceptible to mid-nanomolar PPQ concentrations, the protective effect that PPQ has in neutralizing DHA is partially negated by PPQ-mediated killing. In contrast, CQ-resistant parasites are relatively unaffected by pulses with low micromolar CQ concentrations. Accordingly, CQ concentrations that are high enough to nearly block all DHA activation are insufficient to kill CQ-resistant parasites.

Relative to PPQ and MFQ, CQ appears to have the greatest ability to impair heme iron reactivity. We were surprised to observe that PPQ inhibited H-FluNox fluorescence only half as well as CQ in solution. This suggests that there may be important differences in how these 4-aminoquinolines bind heme. In Dd2 parasites, CQ also inhibited Ac-H-FluNox fluorescence to a greater extent than PPQ at 10 μM concentrations. Given that the ability of CQ to ‘inactivate’ heme in parasites is dependent on PfCRT genotype, it is possible that these results may differ in a PPQ-resistant parasite. In solution, equimolar concentrations of CQ and MFQ inhibited H-FluNox fluorescence to a similar extent, while MFQ had a minimal effect on Ac-H-FluNox fluorescence at even super-pharmacological concentrations. This was somewhat surprising given that MFQ is believed to act in the parasite cytoplasm (Sidhu et al., 2006; Rohrbach et al., 2006). It’s possible that differences in how MFQ binds to heme (Dorn et al., 1998), affinity of MFQ for other biomolecules (Wong et al., 2017), and/or modification of MFQ within the parasite could contribute to this discrepancy.

In the early 2000s, the rise of CQ resistance prompted a search for new combination therapies (Packard, 2014). Several clinical trials were conducted in West Africa to compare the efficacy of CQ versus CQ-AS. On day 28, two studies reported similar failure rates for CQ and CQ-AS (Sutherland et al., 2003; Kofoed et al., 2003). In a third study, cure rates were significantly higher for CQ-AS compared to CQ alone (Sirima et al., 2003). However, all three studies recommended against use of CQ-AS, due to poor treatment efficacy. Notably, AS-SP and AS-LM were reported to show >97% efficacy on West African populations during the same time period (von Seidlein et al., 2001; Mutabingwa et al., 2005). In contrast to superantagonism, in vitro conventional antagonism does not appear to correlate well with treatment failure. ACTs, including DHA-PPQ and AS-ADQ, are highly effective, provided that parasites remain sensitive to one or both ACT component(s). It has yet to be evaluated if antagonistic combinations have silent consequences that might discourage their clinical implementation. For example, since PPQ and ADQ appear to block artemisinin activation, it is possible that these combinations are acting more like pseudo-monotherapies than true combination therapies. This could have a number of downstream consequences, such as impacting the rate of drug resistance evolution. However, future work is needed to address these concerns.

With the absence of new antimalarials ready for clinical implementation, novel strategies with existing drugs have been proposed to overcome current problems with ACT treatment failures. One such strategy, TACTs, has gained the most traction. For traditional ACTs, the short 1 hr half-life of artemisinins means that long-lived partner drugs are essentially acting as monotherapies for most of the initial 3-day treatment regimen and a substantial period thereafter. In the case of artemisinin-resistant parasites, partner drugs must clear a significantly higher parasite biomass, which increases the likelihood for resistance to emerge. In theory, TACTs are designed to overcome this flaw, whereby two partner drugs with similar half-lives are used, ensuring that parasites are always exposed to at least two antimalarials (Nguyen et al., 2023; van der Pluijm et al., 2021). In clinical trials, DHA-PPQ-MFQ showed improved efficacy over DHA-PPQ in regions of high PPQ resistance (van der Pluijm et al., 2020). However, some have speculated that this was solely due to the application of MFQ to MFQ-sensitive parasites and that the TACT would be no more effective than DHA-MFQ (Wang et al., 2021). PPQ and MFQ were initially promoted as ideal partner drugs for TACTs as it was thought that either due to collateral sensitivity or fitness costs, dual PPQ and MFQ resistance was unlikely to occur (Amato et al., 2017; Witkowski et al., 2017). Use of edited isogenic lines suggests that PPQ resistance-conferring mutations in PfCRT have no effect on MFQ sensitivity, while increased MDR1 copy number, which underlies MFQ resistance, has no effect on PPQ sensitivity (Dhingra et al., 2017). Further, more recent genetic surveillance studies of Cambodian parasites cast doubt on the hypothesis that a DHA-PPQ-MFQ-resistant parasite would be unfit to spread clinically (Rossi et al., 2017). Previous reports using standard 48 hr or 72 hr assays indicated that PPQ and MFQ are modestly antagonistic (Davis et al., 2006; Ansbro et al., 2020). Interestingly, we observed a much more pronounced superantagonistic phenotype using a pulsing format. It is important to note that unlike artemisinins, PPQ and MFQ have half-lives of several weeks (Palmer et al., 1993; Rijken et al., 2011), raising the question of which assay format would be best suited to evaluate interactions of long-lived partner drugs. Nevertheless, given the interplay of existing PPQ resistance and PPQ-MFQ antagonism, MFQ and PPQ should, perhaps, be further scrutinized as potential partners for TACTs.

The synthetic ozonide, OZ439, was previously poised to replace artemisinins in combination therapies. While OZ439 is believed to have a mechanism of action similar to that of artemisinins, it has a notably improved 46–62 hr half-life (Phyo et al., 2016b) and was shown to be effective against artemisinin-resistant parasites (Walz et al., 2019; Baumgärtner et al., 2017; Straimer et al., 2017). While OZ439 showed good efficacy alone (Phyo et al., 2016b), high treatment failure as part of single-dose combination therapies ultimately resulted in a loss of interest in this antimalarial (Macintyre et al., 2017; Adoke et al., 2021; Gansane et al., 2023). However, our data suggest that unsuitable choices in partner drugs may be one of several factors, including poor drug exposure (Macintyre et al., 2017; Adoke et al., 2021; Gansane et al., 2023) and preexisting PPQ resistance (Hamilton et al., 2019; Phuc et al., 2017), that contributed to the poor therapeutic efficacy of these combinations. As assessed by Ac-H-FluNox, both PPQ and FQ appear to render heme inert, thus blocking OZ439 activation. Biochemical studies have predicted that due to its less basic behavior, FQ might have a lower propensity to accumulate in the parasite digestive vacuole compared to CQ (Biot et al., 2005). Greater accumulation of FQ in the parasite cytoplasm compared to other quinolines might explain the ability of FQ to greatly diminish Ac-H-FluNox signal even at nanomolar concentrations. Clinically, peak levels of FQ have been reported to reach approximately 0.5 μM (Supan et al., 2017), which could significantly impact OZ439 activation. However, unlike CQ, mid-nanomolar FQ concentrations are lethal for parasites, which may explain why we did not observe a superantagonistic phenotype for FQ-OZ439.

The antimalarials that we have are a precious resource, and it is only a matter of time before they fail. Our work clearly demonstrates the importance of detailed understanding of drug-drug interactions at the parasite level. While we believe the pulsing assay used in this study better mimics artemisinin pharmacokinetics compared to standard 72 hr assays, it is not suitable for high-throughput format. Recently, a high-throughput assay was developed to evaluate drug-drug and drug-drug-drug interactions in P. falciparum (Ansbro et al., 2020). Using this assay, the authors were able to evaluate interactions of 16 potential TACT combinations against 13 clinical isolates (Ansbro et al., 2020). Similar to our findings, the authors reported that interactions can be highly dependent on parasite genetics. This high-throughput assay will undoubtedly be an important first step in evaluating interactions of new combinations. Nevertheless, since this assay relies on a 72 hr format, additive interactions should be interpreted with caution, as this format can mask drug-drug interactions (Stokes et al., 2019). Accordingly, pulsing assays like the one used in this study will be an important step for investigating drug-drug interactions, prior to in vivo studies (Demarta-Gatsi et al., 2023).

Materials and methods

Reagents

All reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich unless otherwise indicated.

Parasite culture

Dd2 PfCRTDd2, Dd2PfCRT3D7, Dd2 PfCRTM343L, and Dd2 K13R539T were kindly provided by Dr. David Fidock (Columbia University) (Straimer et al., 2015; Ross et al., 2018). MRA-1284 was obtained through BEI Resources, NIAID, NIH: P. falciparum, Strain IPC_6261, MRA-1284, contributed by Dr. Didier Ménard. Parasites, which were confirmed Mycoplasma negative by sequencing and resistance testing, were propagated in human red blood cells obtained from St. Louis Children’s Hospital blood bank. Cultures were grown at 5% hematocrit in media containing RPMI1640 (Gibco) supplemented with 0.25% (wt/vol) Albumax (Gibco), 15 mg/L hypoxanthine, 110 mg/L sodium pyruvate, 1.19 g/L HEPES, 2.52 g/L sodium bicarbonate, 2 g/L glucose, and 10 mg/L gentamicin and were maintained in air-tight chambers filled with 5% O2/5% CO2/90% N2 at 37°C.

Trophozoite-stage dose-response assays and isobolograms

Trophozoite-stage assays were performed as previously described with minor modifications (Rosenthal and Ng, 2021). Briefly, parasites were synchronized to the trophozoite stage using two consecutive treatments with 5% sorbitol 10 hr apart, followed by culturing for an additional 14 hr. Trophozoite stages were seeded at 0.2% parasitemia and 1% hematocrit in round-bottom 96-well plates. Following a 4 hr incubation with antimalarials, infected red blood cells were washed a minimum of five times for plates containing OZ439 and four times for all other antimalarials. Plates were centrifuged, 190 μL of media was carefully removed, and 190 μL of fresh media was added. Following the last wash, cultures were transferred to a new flat-bottom 96-well plate. After 72 hr, parasitemia was assessed by flow cytometry. Cultures were resuspended, and 10 μL was transferred to a new 96-well plate containing 50 μL per well of 1× PBS with 1× SYBR Green I and 100 nM MitoTracker Deep Red. Following incubation at 37°C for 1 hr, plates were read on a BD FACSCanto with a BD HTS automated plate reader and analyzed with BD FACSDiva Software version 8. Approximately 10,000 events were analyzed per well. GraphPad version 10 was used to calculate IC50 values by nonlinear regression.

For dose-response assays with fixed concentrations of partner drugs, a 96-well plate was prepared containing twofold serial dilutions of DHA media at 100 μL per well. A bulk intermediate culture of parasites was prepared at 2% hematocrit. Partner drugs were added to this intermediate culture at 2× concentrations. After mixing, 100 μL of the intermediate culture was added to the 96-well plate containing DHA serial dilutions, for a final hematocrit of 1% and a 1× fixed partner drug concentration.

For isobolograms, the following fixed ratios were prepared as starting concentrations: 1:0, 4:1, 2:1, 1:1, 1:2, 1:4, 0:1. The starting concentration of each drug alone (1:0 and 0:1 ratios) represents an approximate 16× IC50 concentration. Trophozoite stages were exposed to twofold dilutions of these ratios. Fractional IC50 (FIC50) values were calculated as follows:

FIC50= IC50 of drugs in combinationIC50 of individual drug

FIC50 values were plotted on an XY graph. Mean ΣFIC50 values were calculated by averaging the sums of FIC50 values from 4:1, 2:1, 1:1, 1:2, and 1:4 ratios. Trophozoite-stage IC50 values for Figure 1—figure supplement 1 and Figure 4—figure supplement 2 were obtained from 1:0 or 0:1 ratios. A one-way ANOVA with a Tukey’s or Dunnett’s multiple comparison test was used to assess statistical significance for IC50 values.

RSAs and early ring-stage dose-response assays

0–3 hr post invasion (hpi) rings were obtained as previously described (Hasan et al., 2023). Briefly, schizonts were enriched using MACS LD magnet columns (Miltenyi Biotec). Schizont-enriched cultures were diluted to 2% hematocrit in 3–4 mL of media and incubated for 3 hr with shaking. A 5% sorbitol treatment was then used to remove remaining mature parasites. Early ring stages were seeded at 1% parasitemia and 1% hematocrit in round-bottom 96-well plates. Twofold serial dilutions were prepared starting at 1400 nM DHA, so that both IC50 values and RSA values could be obtained. After incubation for 3 hr, antimalarials were washed out, and parasitemia was assessed 72 hr later by flow cytometry as described in the previous section. GraphPad Prism version 10 was used to calculate IC50 values by nonlinear regression. RSA survival was obtained by dividing the parasitemia of cultures treated with 700 nM DHA by the untreated control. A one-way ANOVA with a Dunnett’s multiple comparison test was used to determine statistical significance for IC50 values and RSA survival values.

Detection of free heme in vitro

H-FluNox was kindly provided by Dr. Tasuku Hirayama (Gifu Pharmaceutical University, Lab of Pharmaceutical & Medicinal Chemistry). Reactions were carried out in a buffer containing 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.4) and 100 μM reduced glutathione. Glutathione was used to convert hemin into heme. Hemin was made up in reaction buffer, and twofold serial dilutions were performed to obtain a range of heme concentrations starting at 500 nM. H-FluNox was used at a final concentration of 500 nM. Reactions were performed in black-walled clear-bottom 96-well plates. Following incubation with H-FluNox and indicated antimalarials at room temperature for 30 min, fluorescence was read at 485/535 nm ex/em using an EnVision Multimode Plate Reader.

Detection of free heme in live parasites

Ac-H-FluNox was kindly provided by Dr. Tasuku Hirayama (Gifu Pharmaceutical University, Lab of Pharmaceutical & Medicinal Chemistry). Parasites were synchronized to the trophozoite stage as described above. Cultures were then treated with the indicated compound for the indicated time. Media was removed, and parasite cultures were resuspended and incubated in 1× PBS containing 10 μM Ac-H-FluNox for 30 min at 37°C. Ac-H-FluNox is the cell-permeable analog of H-FluNox and is converted to H-FluNox in cells (Kawai et al., 2022). Following incubation, cultures were washed with 1× PBS and then imaged using a 63× objective on a Zeiss Imager M2 Plus Widefield fluorescence microscope with AxioVision 4.8 software. Except for Figure 3—figure supplement 1b, a fixed exposure of 350 ms was used to capture H-FluNox fluorescence at 470/509 nm ex/em. Exposure for Figure 3—figure supplement 1b was adjusted for each condition so that DV staining could be optimally visualized. For quantification in Figures 3e, f, 4i, Figure 3—figure supplement 2, at least 10 fields were captured per treatment condition and then mean fluorescence intensity of parasite minus background was quantified with ImageJ. Statistical significance of ≥70 parasites from at least three independent drug treatments was assessed using a one-way ANOVA.

Western blot

Parasite drug treatment, protein harvest, sample preparation, SDS-PAGE, and wet transfer were performed as previously described (Rosenthal et al., 2024b). Blots were blocked with 3% BSA in TBS-T and incubated overnight with primary antibodies used at 1:1000 in 1× TBS-T. Anti K48-linked ubiquitin was obtained from Cell Signaling Technologies (catalog number: D9D5, rabbit). Anti-PMV was obtained from Banerjee et al., 2002. Blots were incubated for 1 hr at room temperature with IRDye-conjugated goat secondary antibodies (LI-COR) at 1:10,000 dilutions. Blots were imaged using a Bio-Rad imager with Image Lab Touch Software and then quantified with ImageJ. Significant differences between control and antimalarial-treated parasites were determined using a one-way ANOVA with a Dunnett’s multiple comparison test.

Acknowledgements

Funding for this work was provided by T32AI007172 and F32AI188627 (to MRR). We thank David Fidock (Columbia University) and Miles Siegel (LGENIA) for helpful discussion.

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Contributor Information

Daniel E Goldberg, Email: dgoldberg@wustl.edu.

Dominique Soldati-Favre, University of Geneva, Switzerland.

Dominique Soldati-Favre, University of Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding Information

This paper was supported by the following grants:

  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases F32 AI188627 to Melissa Rosenthal.

  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases T32AI007172 to Melissa Rosenthal.

Additional information

Competing interests

No competing interests declared.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.

Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Writing – review and editing.

Additional files

MDAR checklist

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files; source data files have been provided.

References

  1. Abshire JR, Rowlands CJ, Ganesan SM, So PTC, Niles JC. Quantification of labile heme in live malaria parasites using a genetically encoded biosensor. PNAS. 2017;114:E2068–E2076. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1615195114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams PA, Berman PA, Egan TJ, Marsh PJ, Silver J. The iron environment in heme and heme-antimalarial complexes of pharmacological interest. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry. 1996;63:69–77. doi: 10.1016/0162-0134(95)00212-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Adoke Y, Zoleko-Manego R, Ouoba S, Tiono AB, Kaguthi G, Bonzela JE, Duong TT, Nahum A, Bouyou-Akotet M, Ogutu B, Ouedraogo A, Macintyre F, Jessel A, Laurijssens B, Cherkaoui-Rbati MH, Cantalloube C, Marrast AC, Bejuit R, White D, Wells TNC, Wartha F, Leroy D, Kibuuka A, Mombo-Ngoma G, Ouattara D, Mugenya I, Phuc BQ, Bohissou F, Mawili-Mboumba DP, Olewe F, Soulama I, Tinto H, FALCI Study Group A randomized, double-blind, phase 2b study to investigate the efficacy, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of a single-dose regimen of ferroquine with artefenomel in adults and children with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Malaria Journal. 2021;20:222. doi: 10.1186/s12936-021-03749-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Amaratunga C, Lim P, Suon S, Sreng S, Mao S, Sopha C, Sam B, Dek D, Try V, Amato R, Blessborn D, Song L, Tullo GS, Fay MP, Anderson JM, Tarning J, Fairhurst RM. Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Cambodia: a multisite prospective cohort study. The Lancet. Infectious Diseases. 2016;16:357–365. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00487-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Amato R, Lim P, Miotto O, Amaratunga C, Dek D, Pearson RD, Almagro-Garcia J, Neal AT, Sreng S, Suon S, Drury E, Jyothi D, Stalker J, Kwiatkowski DP, Fairhurst RM. Genetic markers associated with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine failure in Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Cambodia: a genotype-phenotype association study. The Lancet. Infectious Diseases. 2017;17:164–173. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30409-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ansbro MR, Itkin Z, Chen L, Zahoranszky-Kohalmi G, Amaratunga C, Miotto O, Peryea T, Hobbs CV, Suon S, Sá JM, Dondorp AM, van der Pluijm RW, Wellems TE, Simeonov A, Eastman RT. Modulation of triple artemisinin-based combination therapy pharmacodynamics by Plasmodium falciparum genotype. ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science. 2020;3:1144–1157. doi: 10.1021/acsptsci.0c00110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ariey F, Witkowski B, Amaratunga C, Beghain J, Langlois A-C, Khim N, Kim S, Duru V, Bouchier C, Ma L, Lim P, Leang R, Duong S, Sreng S, Suon S, Chuor CM, Bout DM, Ménard S, Rogers WO, Genton B, Fandeur T, Miotto O, Ringwald P, Le Bras J, Berry A, Barale J-C, Fairhurst RM, Benoit-Vical F, Mercereau-Puijalon O, Ménard D. A molecular marker of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Nature. 2014;505:50–55. doi: 10.1038/nature12876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ashley EA, Dhorda M, Fairhurst RM, Amaratunga C, Lim P, Suon S, Sreng S, Anderson JM, Mao S, Sam B, Sopha C, Chuor CM, Nguon C, Sovannaroth S, Pukrittayakamee S, Jittamala P, Chotivanich K, Chutasmit K, Suchatsoonthorn C, Runcharoen R, Hien TT, Thuy-Nhien NT, Thanh NV, Phu NH, Htut Y, Han K-T, Aye KH, Mokuolu OA, Olaosebikan RR, Folaranmi OO, Mayxay M, Khanthavong M, Hongvanthong B, Newton PN, Onyamboko MA, Fanello CI, Tshefu AK, Mishra N, Valecha N, Phyo AP, Nosten F, Yi P, Tripura R, Borrmann S, Bashraheil M, Peshu J, Faiz MA, Ghose A, Hossain MA, Samad R, Rahman MR, Hasan MM, Islam A, Miotto O, Amato R, MacInnis B, Stalker J, Kwiatkowski DP, Bozdech Z, Jeeyapant A, Cheah PY, Sakulthaew T, Chalk J, Intharabut B, Silamut K, Lee SJ, Vihokhern B, Kunasol C, Imwong M, Tarning J, Taylor WJ, Yeung S, Woodrow CJ, Flegg JA, Das D, Smith J, Venkatesan M, Plowe CV, Stepniewska K, Guerin PJ, Dondorp AM, Day NP, White NJ, Tracking Resistance to Artemisinin Collaboration (TRAC) Spread of artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2014;371:411–423. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1314981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Banerjee R, Liu J, Beatty W, Pelosof L, Klemba M, Goldberg DE. Four plasmepsins are active in the Plasmodium falciparum food vacuole, including a protease with an active-site histidine. PNAS. 2002;99:990–995. doi: 10.1073/pnas.022630099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Baumgärtner F, Jourdan J, Scheurer C, Blasco B, Campo B, Mäser P, Wittlin S. In vitro activity of anti-malarial ozonides against an artemisinin-resistant isolate. Malaria Journal. 2017;16:45. doi: 10.1186/s12936-017-1696-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Biot C, Taramelli D, Forfar-Bares I, Maciejewski LA, Boyce M, Nowogrocki G, Brocard JS, Basilico N, Olliaro P, Egan TJ. Insights into the mechanism of action of ferroquine: relationship between physicochemical properties and antiplasmodial activity. Molecular Pharmaceutics. 2005;2:185–193. doi: 10.1021/mp0500061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Birnbaum J, Scharf S, Schmidt S, Jonscher E, Hoeijmakers WAM, Flemming S, Toenhake CG, Schmitt M, Sabitzki R, Bergmann B, Fröhlke U, Mesén-Ramírez P, Blancke Soares A, Herrmann H, Bártfai R, Spielmann T. A Kelch13-defined endocytosis pathway mediates artemisinin resistance in malaria parasites. Science. 2020;367:51–59. doi: 10.1126/science.aax4735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bridgford JL, Xie SC, Cobbold SA, Pasaje CFA, Herrmann S, Yang T, Gillett DL, Dick LR, Ralph SA, Dogovski C, Spillman NJ, Tilley L. Artemisinin kills malaria parasites by damaging proteins and inhibiting the proteasome. Nature Communications. 2018;9:3801. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06221-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cabrera M, Paguio MF, Xie C, Roepe PD. Reduced digestive vacuolar accumulation of chloroquine is not linked to resistance to chloroquine toxicity. Biochemistry. 2009;48:11152–11154. doi: 10.1021/bi901765v. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Combrinck JM, Mabotha TE, Ncokazi KK, Ambele MA, Taylor D, Smith PJ, Hoppe HC, Egan TJ. Insights into the role of heme in the mechanism of action of antimalarials. ACS Chemical Biology. 2013;8:133–137. doi: 10.1021/cb300454t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Combrinck JM, Fong KY, Gibhard L, Smith PJ, Wright DW, Egan TJ. Optimization of a multi-well colorimetric assay to determine haem species in Plasmodium falciparum in the presence of anti-malarials. Malaria Journal. 2015;14:253. doi: 10.1186/s12936-015-0729-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Coulibaly B, Pritsch M, Bountogo M, Meissner PE, Nebié E, Klose C, Kieser M, Berens-Riha N, Wieser A, Sirima SB, Breitkreutz J, Schirmer RH, Sié A, Mockenhaupt FP, Drakeley C, Bousema T, Müller O. Efficacy and safety of triple combination therapy with artesunate-amodiaquine-methylene blue for falciparum malaria in children: a randomized controlled trial in Burkina Faso. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2015;211:689–697. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cumming JN, Ploypradith P, Posner GH. Antimalarial activity of artemisinin (qinghaosu) and related trioxanes: mechanism(s) of action. Advances in Pharmacology. 1997;37:253–297. doi: 10.1016/s1054-3589(08)60952-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Davis TME, Hamzah J, Ilett KF, Karunajeewa HA, Reeder JC, Batty KT, Hackett S, Barrett PHR. In vitro interactions between piperaquine, dihydroartemisinin, and other conventional and novel antimalarial drugs. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2006;50:2883–2885. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00177-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Demarta-Gatsi C, Andenmatten N, Jiménez-Díaz MB, Gobeau N, Cherkaoui-Rabti MH, Fuchs A, Díaz P, Berja S, Sánchez R, Gómez H, Ruiz E, Sainz P, Salazar E, Gil-Merino R, Mendoza LM, Eguizabal C, Leroy D, Moehrle JJ, Tornesi B, Angulo-Barturen I. Predicting optimal antimalarial drug combinations from a standardized Plasmodium falciparum humanized mouse model. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2023;67:e0157422. doi: 10.1128/aac.01574-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. de Villiers KA, Egan TJ. Heme detoxification in the malaria parasite: a target for antimalarial drug development. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2021;54:2649–2659. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Dhingra SK, Redhi D, Combrinck JM, Yeo T, Okombo J, Henrich PP, Cowell AN, Gupta P, Stegman ML, Hoke JM, Cooper RA, Winzeler E, Mok S, Egan TJ, Fidock DA. A variant PfCRT isoform can contribute to Plasmodium falciparum resistance to the first-line partner drug piperaquine. mBio. 2017;8:e00303-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00303-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Dorn A, Vippagunta SR, Matile H, Jaquet C, Vennerstrom JL, Ridley RG. An assessment of drug-haematin binding as a mechanism for inhibition of haematin polymerisation by quinoline antimalarials. Biochemical Pharmacology. 1998;55:727–736. doi: 10.1016/s0006-2952(97)00510-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Duru V, Khim N, Leang R, Kim S, Domergue A, Kloeung N, Ke S, Chy S, Eam R, Khean C, Loch K, Ken M, Lek D, Beghain J, Ariey F, Guerin PJ, Huy R, Mercereau-Puijalon O, Witkowski B, Menard D. Plasmodium falciparum dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine failures in Cambodia are associated with mutant K13 parasites presenting high survival rates in novel piperaquine in vitro assays: retrospective and prospective investigations. BMC Medicine. 2015;13:305. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0539-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Eastman RT, Khine P, Huang R, Thomas CJ, Su XZ. PfCRT and PfMDR1 modulate interactions of artemisinin derivatives and ion channel blockers. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:25379. doi: 10.1038/srep25379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Egan TJ, Mavuso WW, Ross DC, Marques HM. Thermodynamic factors controlling the interaction of quinoline antimalarial drugs with ferriprotoporphyrin IX. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry. 1997;68:137–145. doi: 10.1016/s0162-0134(97)00086-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Egan TJ, Combrinck JM, Egan J, Hearne GR, Marques HM, Ntenteni S, Sewell BT, Smith PJ, Taylor D, van Schalkwyk DA, Walden JC. Fate of haem iron in the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. The Biochemical Journal. 2002;365:343–347. doi: 10.1042/BJ20020793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Egan TJ. Interactions of quinoline antimalarials with hematin in solution. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry. 2006;100:916–926. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2005.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Famin O, Ginsburg H. The treatment of Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes with chloroquine leads to accumulation of ferriprotoporphyrin IX bound to particular parasite proteins and to the inhibition of the parasite’s 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase. Parasite. 2003;10:39–50. doi: 10.1051/parasite/2003101p39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Fidock DA, Nomura T, Talley AK, Cooper RA, Dzekunov SM, Ferdig MT, Ursos LM, Sidhu AB, Naudé B, Deitsch KW, Su XZ, Wootton JC, Roepe PD, Wellems TE. Mutations in the P. falciparum digestive vacuole transmembrane protein PfCRT and evidence for their role in chloroquine resistance. Molecular Cell. 2000;6:861–871. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(05)00077-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Fitch CD. Ferriprotoporphyrin IX, phospholipids, and the antimalarial actions of quinoline drugs. Life Sciences. 2004;74:1957–1972. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2003.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Fivelman QL, Walden JC, Smith PJ, Folb PI, Barnes KI. The effect of artesunate combined with standard antimalarials against chloroquine-sensitive and chloroquine-resistant strains of Plasmodium falciparum in vitro. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 1999;93:429–432. doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(99)90147-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Francis SE, Sullivan DJ, Goldberg DE. Hemoglobin metabolism in the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Annual Review of Microbiology. 1997;51:97–123. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.51.1.97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Gansane A, Lingani M, Yeka A, Nahum A, Bouyou-Akotet M, Mombo-Ngoma G, Kaguthi G, Barceló C, Laurijssens B, Cantalloube C, Macintyre F, Djeriou E, Jessel A, Bejuit R, Demarest H, Marrast AC, Debe S, Tinto H, Kibuuka A, Nahum D, Mawili-Mboumba DP, Zoleko-Manego R, Mugenya I, Olewe F, Duparc S, Ogutu B. Randomized, open-label, phase 2a study to evaluate the contribution of artefenomel to the clinical and parasiticidal activity of artefenomel plus ferroquine in African patients with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Malaria Journal. 2023;22:2. doi: 10.1186/s12936-022-04420-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Gao P, Wang J, Qiu C, Zhang H, Wang C, Zhang Y, Sun P, Chen H, Wong YK, Chen J, Zhang J, Tang H, Shi Q, Zhu Y, Shen S, Han G, Xu C, Dai L, Wang J. Photoaffinity probe-based antimalarial target identification of artemisinin in the intraerythrocytic developmental cycle of Plasmodium falciparum. iMeta. 2024;3:e176. doi: 10.1002/imt2.176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Gligorijevic B, Purdy K, Elliott DA, Cooper RA, Roepe PD. Stage independent chloroquine resistance and chloroquine toxicity revealed via spinning disk confocal microscopy. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology. 2008;159:7–23. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2007.12.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Gutman J, Green M, Durand S, Rojas OV, Ganguly B, Quezada WM, Utz GC, Slutsker L, Ruebush TK, II, Bacon DJ. Mefloquine pharmacokinetics and mefloquine-artesunate effectiveness in Peruvian patients with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Malaria Journal. 2009;8:58. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-8-58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Hamilton WL, Amato R, van der Pluijm RW, Jacob CG, Quang HH, Thuy-Nhien NT, Hien TT, Hongvanthong B, Chindavongsa K, Mayxay M, Huy R, Leang R, Huch C, Dysoley L, Amaratunga C, Suon S, Fairhurst RM, Tripura R, Peto TJ, Sovann Y, Jittamala P, Hanboonkunupakarn B, Pukrittayakamee S, Chau NH, Imwong M, Dhorda M, Vongpromek R, Chan XHS, Maude RJ, Pearson RD, Nguyen T, Rockett K, Drury E, Gonçalves S, White NJ, Day NP, Kwiatkowski DP, Dondorp AM, Miotto O. Evolution and expansion of multidrug-resistant malaria in southeast Asia: a genomic epidemiology study. The Lancet. Infectious Diseases. 2019;19:943–951. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30392-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Hasan MM, Polino AJ, Mukherjee S, Vaupel B, Goldberg DE. The mature N-termini of Plasmodium effector proteins confer specificity of export. mBio. 2023;14:e0121523. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01215-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Hoglund RM, Workman L, Edstein MD, Thanh NX, Quang NN, Zongo I, Ouedraogo JB, Borrmann S, Mwai L, Nsanzabana C, Price RN, Dahal P, Sambol NC, Parikh S, Nosten F, Ashley EA, Phyo AP, Lwin KM, McGready R, Day NPJ, Guerin PJ, White NJ, Barnes KI, Tarning J. Population pharmacokinetic properties of piperaquine in falciparum malaria: an individual participant data meta-analysis. PLOS Medicine. 2017;14:e1002212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ismail HM, Barton VE, Panchana M, Charoensutthivarakul S, Biagini GA, Ward SA, O’Neill PM. A click chemistry-based proteomic approach reveals that 1,2,4-trioxolane and artemisinin antimalarials share a common protein alkylation profile. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2016a;55:6401–6405. doi: 10.1002/anie.201512062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Ismail HM, Barton V, Phanchana M, Charoensutthivarakul S, Wong MHL, Hemingway J, Biagini GA, O’Neill PM, Ward SA. Artemisinin activity-based probes identify multiple molecular targets within the asexual stage of the malaria parasites Plasmodium falciparum 3D7. PNAS. 2016b;113:2080–2085. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1600459113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Jourdan J, Matile H, Reift E, Biehlmaier O, Dong Y, Wang X, Mäser P, Vennerstrom JL, Wittlin S. Monoclonal antibodies that recognize the alkylation signature of antimalarial ozonides OZ277 (Arterolane) and OZ439 (Artefenomel) ACS Infectious Diseases. 2016;2:54–61. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.5b00090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Jourdan J, Walz A, Matile H, Schmidt A, Wu J, Wang X, Dong Y, Vennerstrom JL, Schmidt RS, Wittlin S, Mäser P. Stochastic protein alkylation by antimalarial peroxides. ACS Infectious Diseases. 2019;5:2067–2075. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.9b00264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Kaiser M, Wittlin S, Nehrbass-Stuedli A, Dong Y, Wang X, Hemphill A, Matile H, Brun R, Vennerstrom JL. Peroxide bond-dependent antiplasmodial specificity of artemisinin and OZ277 (RBx11160) Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2007;51:2991–2993. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00225-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Kapishnikov S, Staalsø T, Yang Y, Lee J, Pérez-Berná AJ, Pereiro E, Yang Y, Werner S, Guttmann P, Leiserowitz L, Als-Nielsen J. Mode of action of quinoline antimalarial drugs in red blood cells infected by Plasmodium falciparum revealed in vivo. PNAS. 2019;116:22946–22952. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1910123116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Kawai K, Hirayama T, Imai H, Murakami T, Inden M, Hozumi I, Nagasawa H. Molecular imaging of labile heme in living cells using a small molecule fluorescent probe. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2022;144:3793–3803. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c08485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Kim J, Tan YZ, Wicht KJ, Erramilli SK, Dhingra SK, Okombo J, Vendome J, Hagenah LM, Giacometti SI, Warren AL, Nosol K, Roepe PD, Potter CS, Carragher B, Kossiakoff AA, Quick M, Fidock DA, Mancia F. Structure and drug resistance of the Plasmodium falciparum transporter PfCRT. Nature. 2019;576:315–320. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1795-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Kofoed P-E, Poulsen A, Có F, Hedegaard K, Aaby P, Rombo L. No benefits from combining chloroquine with artesunate for three days for treatment of Plasmodium falciparum in Guinea-Bissau. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2003;97:429–433. doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(03)90078-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Kuter D, Streltsov V, Davydova N, Venter GA, Naidoo KJ, Egan TJ. Solution structures of chloroquine-ferriheme complexes modeled using MD simulation and investigated by EXAFS spectroscopy. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry. 2016;154:114–125. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2015.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Leang R, Taylor WRJ, Bouth DM, Song L, Tarning J, Char MC, Kim S, Witkowski B, Duru V, Domergue A, Khim N, Ringwald P, Menard D. Evidence of Plasmodium falciparum malaria multidrug resistance to artemisinin and piperaquine in western cambodia: dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine open-label multicenter clinical assessment. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2015;59:4719–4726. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00835-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Leed A, DuBay K, Ursos LMB, Sears D, De Dios AC, Roepe PD. Solution structures of antimalarial drug-heme complexes. Biochemistry. 2002;41:10245–10255. doi: 10.1021/bi020195i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Liu H, Xu JW, Deng DW, Wang HY, Nie RH, Yin YJ, Li M. Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine efficacy in Plasmodium falciparum treatment and prevalence of drug-resistant molecular markers along China-Myanmar border in 2014-2023. Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance. 2023;35:271–278. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2023.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Macintyre F, Adoke Y, Tiono AB, Duong TT, Mombo-Ngoma G, Bouyou-Akotet M, Tinto H, Bassat Q, Issifou S, Adamy M, Demarest H, Duparc S, Leroy D, Laurijssens BE, Biguenet S, Kibuuka A, Tshefu AK, Smith M, Foster C, Leipoldt I, Kremsner PG, Phuc BQ, Ouedraogo A, Ramharter M, OZ-Piperaquine Study Group A randomised, double-blind clinical phase II trial of the efficacy, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of a single dose combination treatment with artefenomel and piperaquine in adults and children with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. BMC Medicine. 2017;15:181. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0940-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Mahamar A, Vanheer LN, Smit MJ, Sanogo K, Sinaba Y, Niambele SM, Diallo M, Dicko OM, Diarra RS, Maguiraga SO, Youssouf A, Sacko A, Keita S, Samake S, Dembele A, Teelen K, Dicko Y, Traore SF, Dondorp A, Drakeley C, Stone W, Dicko A. Artemether-lumefantrine-amodiaquine or artesunate-amodiaquine combined with single low-dose primaquine to reduce Plasmodium falciparum malaria transmission in Ouélessébougou, Mali: a five-arm, phase 2, single-blind, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. Microbe. 2025;6:100966. doi: 10.1016/j.lanmic.2024.100966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Mairet-Khedim M, Leang R, Marmai C, Khim N, Kim S, Ke S, Kauy C, Kloeung N, Eam R, Chy S, Izac B, Mey Bouth D, Dorina Bustos M, Ringwald P, Ariey F, Witkowski B. Clinical and in vitro resistance of Plasmodium falciparum to artesunate-amodiaquine in cambodia. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2021;73:406–413. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Matz JM. Plasmodium’s bottomless pit: properties and functions of the malaria parasite’s digestive vacuole. Trends in Parasitology. 2022;38:525–543. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2022.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Melo MM, Costa MRF, Filho FSS, Brito-Sousa JD, Almeida ACG, Monteiro WM, Melo GC, Vieira JLF, Alecrim MDG. Pharmacokinetics of chloroquine in patients with malaria by P. vivax from the Western Brazilian Amazon basin. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & Pharmacotherapie. 2022;149:112874. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.112874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Meshnick SR, Taylor TE, Kamchonwongpaisan S. Artemisinin and the antimalarial endoperoxides: from herbal remedy to targeted chemotherapy. Microbiological Reviews. 1996;60:301–315. doi: 10.1128/mr.60.2.301-315.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Meunier B, Robert A. Heme as trigger and target for trioxane-containing antimalarial drugs. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2010;43:1444–1451. doi: 10.1021/ar100070k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Muangnoicharoen S, Johnson DJ, Looareesuwan S, Krudsood S, Ward SA. Role of known molecular markers of resistance in the antimalarial potency of piperaquine and dihydroartemisinin in vitro. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2009;53:1362–1366. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01656-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Mutabingwa TK, Anthony D, Heller A, Hallett R, Ahmed J, Drakeley C, Greenwood BM, Whitty CJM. Amodiaquine alone, amodiaquine+sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, amodiaquine+artesunate, and artemether-lumefantrine for outpatient treatment of malaria in Tanzanian children: a four-arm randomised effectiveness trial. Lancet. 2005;365:1474–1480. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66417-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Nguyen DVH, Nguyen QP, Nguyen ND, Le TTT, Nguyen TD, Dinh DN, Nguyen TX, Bui D, Chavchich M, Edstein MD. Pharmacokinetics and ex vivo pharmacodynamic antimalarial activity of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine in patients with uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Vietnam. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2009;53:3534–3537. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01717-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Nguyen TD, Gao B, Amaratunga C, Dhorda M, Tran TNA, White NJ, Dondorp AM, Boni MF, Aguas R. Preventing antimalarial drug resistance with triple artemisinin-based combination therapies. Nature Communications. 2023;14:4568. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39914-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Nkhoma SC, Ahmed AOA, Zaman S, Porier D, Baker Z, Stedman TT. Dissection of haplotype-specific drug response phenotypes in multiclonal malaria isolates. International Journal for Parasitology. Drugs and Drug Resistance. 2021;15:152–161. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2021.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Olafson KN, Ketchum MA, Rimer JD, Vekilov PG. Mechanisms of hematin crystallization and inhibition by the antimalarial drug chloroquine. PNAS. 2015;112:4946–4951. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1501023112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Olafson KN, Nguyen TQ, Rimer JD, Vekilov PG. Antimalarials inhibit hematin crystallization by unique drug-surface site interactions. PNAS. 2017;114:7531–7536. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1700125114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Packard RM. The origins of antimalarial-drug resistance. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2014;371:397–399. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1403340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Palmer KJ, Holliday SM, Brogden RN. Mefloquine: a review of its antimalarial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy. Drugs. 1993;45:430–475. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199345030-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Papakrivos J, Sá JM, Wellems TE. Functional characterization of the Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine-resistance transporter (PfCRT) in transformed Dictyostelium discoideum vesicles. PLOS ONE. 2012;7:e39569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Peto TJ, Tripura R, Callery JJ, Lek D, Nghia HDT, Nguon C, Thuong NTH, van der Pluijm RW, Dung NTP, Sokha M, Van Luong V, Long LT, Sovann Y, Duanguppama J, Waithira N, Hoglund RM, Chotsiri P, Chau NH, Ruecker A, Amaratunga C, Dhorda M, Miotto O, Maude RJ, Rekol H, Chotivanich K, Tarning J, von Seidlein L, Imwong M, Mukaka M, Day NPJ, Hien TT, White NJ, Dondorp AM. Triple therapy with artemether-lumefantrine plus amodiaquine versus artemether-lumefantrine alone for artemisinin-resistant, uncomplicated falciparum malaria: an open-label, randomised, multicentre trial. The Lancet. Infectious Diseases. 2022;22:867–878. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00692-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Phuc BQ, Rasmussen C, Duong TT, Dong LT, Loi MA, Ménard D, Tarning J, Bustos D, Ringwald P, Galappaththy GL, Thieu NQ. Treatment failure of Dihydroartemisinin/Piperaquine for Plasmodium falciparum Malaria, Vietnam. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2017;23:715–717. doi: 10.3201/eid2304.161872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Phyo AP, Ashley EA, Anderson TJC, Bozdech Z, Carrara VI, Sriprawat K, Nair S, White MM, Dziekan J, Ling C, Proux S, Konghahong K, Jeeyapant A, Woodrow CJ, Imwong M, McGready R, Lwin KM, Day NPJ, White NJ, Nosten F. Declining efficacy of artemisinin combination therapy against P. falciparum malaria on the thai-myanmar border (2003-2013): the role of parasite genetic factors. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2016a;63:784–791. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Phyo AP, Jittamala P, Nosten FH, Pukrittayakamee S, Imwong M, White NJ, Duparc S, Macintyre F, Baker M, Möhrle JJ. Antimalarial activity of artefenomel (OZ439), a novel synthetic antimalarial endoperoxide, in patients with Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax malaria: an open-label phase 2 trial. The Lancet. Infectious Diseases. 2016b;16:61–69. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00320-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Ribbiso KA, Heller LE, Taye A, Julian E, Willems AV, Roepe PD. Artemisinin-based drugs target the Plasmodium falciparum heme detoxification pathway. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2021;65:e02137-20. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02137-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Rijken MJ, McGready R, Phyo AP, Lindegardh N, Tarning J, Laochan N, Than HH, Mu O, Win AK, Singhasivanon P, White N, Nosten F. Pharmacokinetics of dihydroartemisinin and piperaquine in pregnant and nonpregnant women with uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2011;55:5500–5506. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05067-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Rohrbach P, Sanchez CP, Hayton K, Friedrich O, Patel J, Sidhu ABS, Ferdig MT, Fidock DA, Lanzer M. Genetic linkage of pfmdr1 with food vacuolar solute import in Plasmodium falciparum. The EMBO Journal. 2006;25:3000–3011. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Rosenthal MR, Ng CL. Plasmodium falciparum artemisinin resistance: the effect of heme, protein damage, and parasite cell stress response. ACS Infectious Diseases. 2020;6:1599–1614. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.9b00527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Rosenthal MR, Ng CL. A proteasome mutation sensitizes P. falciparum Cam3.II K13(C580Y) parasites to DHA and OZ439. ACS Infectious Diseases. 2021;7:1923–1931. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.0c00900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Rosenthal PJ, Asua V, Bailey JA, Conrad MD, Ishengoma DS, Kamya MR, Rasmussen C, Tadesse FG, Uwimana A, Fidock DA. The emergence of artemisinin partial resistance in Africa: how do we respond? The Lancet. Infectious Diseases. 2024a;24:e591–e600. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(24)00141-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Rosenthal MR, Vijayrajratnam S, Firestone TM, Ng CL. Enhanced cell stress response and protein degradation capacity underlie artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum. mSphere. 2024b;9:e0037124. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00371-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Ross LS, Dhingra SK, Mok S, Yeo T, Wicht KJ, Kümpornsin K, Takala-Harrison S, Witkowski B, Fairhurst RM, Ariey F, Menard D, Fidock DA. Emerging Southeast Asian PfCRT mutations confer Plasmodium falciparum resistance to the first-line antimalarial piperaquine. Nature Communications. 2018;9:3314. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05652-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Rossi G, De Smet M, Khim N, Kindermans JM, Menard D. Emergence of Plasmodium falciparum triple mutant in Cambodia. The Lancet. Infectious Diseases. 2017;17:1233. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30635-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Sanchez CP, McLean JE, Rohrbach P, Fidock DA, Stein WD, Lanzer M. Evidence for a pfcrt-associated chloroquine efflux system in the human malarial parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Biochemistry. 2005;44:9862–9870. doi: 10.1021/bi050061f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Saunders DL, Vanachayangkul P, Lon C, Parasitology E, Malaria C, Royal Cambodian Armed F. Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine failure in Cambodia. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2014;371:484–485. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1403007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Siddiqui G, Srivastava A, Russell AS, Creek DJ. Multi-omics based identification of specific biochemical changes associated with PfKelch13-mutant artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2017;215:1435–1444. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Siddiqui G, Giannangelo C, De Paoli A, Schuh AK, Heimsch KC, Anderson D, Brown TG, MacRaild CA, Wu J, Wang X, Dong Y, Vennerstrom JL, Becker K, Creek DJ. Peroxide antimalarial drugs target redox homeostasis in Plasmodium falciparum infected red blood cells. ACS Infectious Diseases. 2022;8:210–226. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.1c00550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Sidhu ABS, Uhlemann A-C, Valderramos SG, Valderramos J-C, Krishna S, Fidock DA. Decreasing pfmdr1 copy number in Plasmodium falciparum malaria heightens susceptibility to mefloquine, lumefantrine, halofantrine, quinine, and artemisinin. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2006;194:528–535. doi: 10.1086/507115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Sigala PA, Crowley JR, Henderson JP, Goldberg DE. Deconvoluting heme biosynthesis to target blood-stage malaria parasites. eLife. 2015;4:e09143. doi: 10.7554/eLife.09143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Sirima SB, Tiono AB, Konaté A, Diarra A, Castelli F, Pinoges L, Mugittu K, Taylor WRJ, Olliaros PL. Efficacy of artesunate plus chloroquine for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in children in Burkina Faso: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2003;97:345–349. doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(03)90166-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Spring MD, Lin JT, Manning JE, Vanachayangkul P, Somethy S, Bun R, Se Y, Chann S, Ittiverakul M, Sia-ngam P, Kuntawunginn W, Arsanok M, Buathong N, Chaorattanakawee S, Gosi P, Ta-aksorn W, Chanarat N, Sundrakes S, Kong N, Heng TK, Nou S, Teja-isavadharm P, Pichyangkul S, Phann ST, Balasubramanian S, Juliano JJ, Meshnick SR, Chour CM, Prom S, Lanteri CA, Lon C, Saunders DL. Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine failure associated with a triple mutant including kelch13 C580Y in Cambodia: an observational cohort study. The Lancet. Infectious Diseases. 2015;15:683–691. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)70049-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Stokes BH, Yoo E, Murithi JM, Luth MR, Afanasyev P, da Fonseca PCA, Winzeler EA, Ng CL, Bogyo M, Fidock DA. Covalent Plasmodium falciparum-selective proteasome inhibitors exhibit a low propensity for generating resistance in vitro and synergize with multiple antimalarial agents. PLOS Pathogens. 2019;15:e1007722. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Straimer J, Lee MCS, Lee AH, Zeitler B, Williams AE, Pearl JR, Zhang L, Rebar EJ, Gregory PD, Llinás M, Urnov FD, Fidock DA. Site-specific genome editing in Plasmodium falciparum using engineered zinc-finger nucleases. Nature Methods. 2012;9:993–998. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Straimer J, Gnädig NF, Witkowski B, Amaratunga C, Duru V, Ramadani AP, Dacheux M, Khim N, Zhang L, Lam S, Gregory PD, Urnov FD, Mercereau-Puijalon O, Benoit-Vical F, Fairhurst RM, Ménard D, Fidock DA. Drug resistance: K13-propeller mutations confer artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum clinical isolates. Science. 2015;347:428–431. doi: 10.1126/science.1260867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Straimer J, Gnädig NF, Stokes BH, Ehrenberger M, Crane AA, Fidock DA. Plasmodium falciparum K13 mutations differentially impact ozonide susceptibility and parasite fitness in vitro. mBio. 2017;8:e00172-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00172-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Sullivan DJ, Gluzman IY, Russell DG, Goldberg DE. On the molecular mechanism of chloroquine’s antimalarial action. PNAS. 1996;93:11865–11870. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.21.11865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Sullivan DJ, Matile H, Ridley RG, Goldberg DE. A common mechanism for blockade of heme polymerization by antimalarial quinolines. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1998;273:31103–31107. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.47.31103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Summers RL, Dave A, Dolstra TJ, Bellanca S, Marchetti RV, Nash MN, Richards SN, Goh V, Schenk RL, Stein WD, Kirk K, Sanchez CP, Lanzer M, Martin RE. Diverse mutational pathways converge on saturable chloroquine transport via the malaria parasite’s chloroquine resistance transporter. PNAS. 2014;111:E1759–E1767. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1322965111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Supan C, Mombo-Ngoma G, Kombila M, Ospina Salazar CL, Held J, Lell B, Cantalloube C, Djeriou E, Ogutu B, Waitumbi J, Otsula N, Apollo D, Polhemus ME, Kremsner PG, Walsh DS. Phase 2a, Open-Label, 4-escalating-dose, randomized multicenter study evaluating the safety and activity of ferroquine (SSR97193) plus artesunate, versus amodiaquine plus artesunate, in african adult men with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2017;97:514–525. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Sutherland CJ, Drakeley CJ, Obisike U, Coleman R, Jawara M, Targett GAT, Milligan P, Pinder M, Walraven G. The addition of artesunate to chloroquine for treatment of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Gambian children delays, but does not prevent treatment failure. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2003;69:19–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Tumwebaze PK, Conrad MD, Okitwi M, Orena S, Byaruhanga O, Katairo T, Legac J, Garg S, Giesbrecht D, Smith SR, Ceja FG, Nsobya SL, Bailey JA, Cooper RA, Rosenthal PJ. Decreased susceptibility of Plasmodium falciparum to both dihydroartemisinin and lumefantrine in northern Uganda. Nature Communications. 2022;13:6353. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33873-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Uwimana A, Legrand E, Stokes BH, Ndikumana JLM, Warsame M, Umulisa N, Ngamije D, Munyaneza T, Mazarati JB, Munguti K, Campagne P, Criscuolo A, Ariey F, Murindahabi M, Ringwald P, Fidock DA, Mbituyumuremyi A, Menard D. Emergence and clonal expansion of in vitro artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum kelch13 R561H mutant parasites in Rwanda. Nature Medicine. 2020;26:1602–1608. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1005-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Uwimana A, Umulisa N, Venkatesan M, Svigel SS, Zhou Z, Munyaneza T, Habimana RM, Rucogoza A, Moriarty LF, Sandford R, Piercefield E, Goldman I, Ezema B, Talundzic E, Pacheco MA, Escalante AA, Ngamije D, Mangala JLN, Kabera M, Munguti K, Murindahabi M, Brieger W, Musanabaganwa C, Mutesa L, Udhayakumar V, Mbituyumuremyi A, Halsey ES, Lucchi NW. Association of Plasmodium falciparum kelch13 R561H genotypes with delayed parasite clearance in Rwanda: an open-label, single-arm, multicentre, therapeutic efficacy study. The Lancet. Infectious Diseases. 2021;21:1120–1128. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00142-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Vanaerschot M, Lucantoni L, Li T, Combrinck JM, Ruecker A, Kumar TRS, Rubiano K, Ferreira PE, Siciliano G, Gulati S, Henrich PP, Ng CL, Murithi JM, Corey VC, Duffy S, Lieberman OJ, Veiga MI, Sinden RE, Alano P, Delves MJ, Lee Sim K, Winzeler EA, Egan TJ, Hoffman SL, Avery VM, Fidock DA. Hexahydroquinolines are antimalarial candidates with potent blood-stage and transmission-blocking activity. Nature Microbiology. 2017;2:1403–1414. doi: 10.1038/s41564-017-0007-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. van der Pluijm RW, Imwong M, Chau NH, Hoa NT, Thuy-Nhien NT, Thanh NV, Jittamala P, Hanboonkunupakarn B, Chutasmit K, Saelow C, Runjarern R, Kaewmok W, Tripura R, Peto TJ, Yok S, Suon S, Sreng S, Mao S, Oun S, Yen S, Amaratunga C, Lek D, Huy R, Dhorda M, Chotivanich K, Ashley EA, Mukaka M, Waithira N, Cheah PY, Maude RJ, Amato R, Pearson RD, Gonçalves S, Jacob CG, Hamilton WL, Fairhurst RM, Tarning J, Winterberg M, Kwiatkowski DP, Pukrittayakamee S, Hien TT, Day NP, Miotto O, White NJ, Dondorp AM. Determinants of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine treatment failure in Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam: a prospective clinical, pharmacological, and genetic study. The Lancet. Infectious Diseases. 2019;19:952–961. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30391-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. van der Pluijm RW, Tripura R, Hoglund RM, Pyae Phyo A, Lek D, Ul Islam A, Anvikar AR, Satpathi P, Satpathi S, Behera PK, Tripura A, Baidya S, Onyamboko M, Chau NH, Sovann Y, Suon S, Sreng S, Mao S, Oun S, Yen S, Amaratunga C, Chutasmit K, Saelow C, Runcharern R, Kaewmok W, Hoa NT, Thanh NV, Hanboonkunupakarn B, Callery JJ, Mohanty AK, Heaton J, Thant M, Gantait K, Ghosh T, Amato R, Pearson RD, Jacob CG, Gonçalves S, Mukaka M, Waithira N, Woodrow CJ, Grobusch MP, van Vugt M, Fairhurst RM, Cheah PY, Peto TJ, von Seidlein L, Dhorda M, Maude RJ, Winterberg M, Thuy-Nhien NT, Kwiatkowski DP, Imwong M, Jittamala P, Lin K, Hlaing TM, Chotivanich K, Huy R, Fanello C, Ashley E, Mayxay M, Newton PN, Hien TT, Valecha N, Smithuis F, Pukrittayakamee S, Faiz A, Miotto O, Tarning J, Day NPJ, White NJ, Dondorp AM, Tracking Resistance to Artemisinin Collaboration Triple artemisinin-based combination therapies versus artemisinin-based combination therapies for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria: a multicentre, open-label, randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 2020;395:1345–1360. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30552-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. van der Pluijm RW, Amaratunga C, Dhorda M, Dondorp AM. Triple artemisinin-based combination therapies for malaria - a new paradigm? Trends in Parasitology. 2021;37:15–24. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2020.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Vippagunta SR, Dorn A, Ridley RG, Vennerstrom JL. Characterization of chloroquine-hematin mu-oxo dimer binding by isothermal titration calorimetry. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2000;1475:133–140. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4165(00)00058-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. von Seidlein L, Jawara M, Coleman R, Doherty T, Walraven G, Targett G. Parasitaemia and gametocytaemia after treatment with chloroquine, pyrimethamine/sulfadoxine, and pyrimethamine/sulfadoxine combined with artesunate in young Gambians with uncomplicated malaria. Tropical Medicine & International Health. 2001;6:92–98. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2001.00683.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Walz A, Leroy D, Andenmatten N, Mäser P, Wittlin S. Anti-malarial ozonides OZ439 and OZ609 tested at clinically relevant compound exposure parameters in a novel ring-stage survival assay. Malaria Journal. 2019;18:427. doi: 10.1186/s12936-019-3056-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Wang J, Huang L, Li J, Fan Q, Long Y, Li Y, Zhou B. Artemisinin directly targets malarial mitochondria through its specific mitochondrial activation. PLOS ONE. 2010;5:e9582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Wang J, Zhang CJ, Chia WN, Loh CCY, Li Z, Lee YM, He Y, Yuan LX, Lim TK, Liu M, Liew CX, Lee YQ, Zhang J, Lu N, Lim CT, Hua ZC, Liu B, Shen HM, Tan KSW, Lin Q. Haem-activated promiscuous targeting of artemisinin in Plasmodium falciparum. Nature Communications. 2015;6:10. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Wang Z, Cabrera M, Yang J, Yuan L, Gupta B, Liang X, Kemirembe K, Shrestha S, Brashear A, Li X, Porcella SF, Miao J, Yang Z, Su X, Cui L. Genome-wide association analysis identifies genetic loci associated with resistance to multiple antimalarials in Plasmodium falciparum from China-Myanmar border. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:srep33891. doi: 10.1038/srep33891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Wang J, Xu C, Wong YK, Ma N, Liao FL, Jiang T, Tu Y. Triple artemisinin-based combination therapies for malaria: proceed with caution. Lancet. 2021;396:1976. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32400-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Warhurst DC, Craig JC, Adagu IS, Guy RK, Madrid PB, Fivelman QL. Activity of piperaquine and other 4-aminoquinoline antiplasmodial drugs against chloroquine-sensitive and resistant blood-stages of Plasmodium falciparum: role of beta-haematin inhibition and drug concentration in vacuolar water- and lipid-phases. Biochemical Pharmacology. 2007;73:1910–1926. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2007.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Wicht KJ, Mok S, Fidock DA. Molecular mechanisms of drug resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Annual Review of Microbiology. 2020;74:431–454. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-020518-115546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Wiser MF. The digestive vacuole of the malaria parasite: a specialized lysosome. Pathogens. 2024;13:182. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13030182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Witkowski B, Amaratunga C, Khim N, Sreng S, Chim P, Kim S, Lim P, Mao S, Sopha C, Sam B, Anderson JM, Duong S, Chuor CM, Taylor WRJ, Suon S, Mercereau-Puijalon O, Fairhurst RM, Menard D. Novel phenotypic assays for the detection of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Cambodia: in-vitro and ex-vivo drug-response studies. The Lancet. Infectious Diseases. 2013;13:1043–1049. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70252-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Witkowski B, Duru V, Khim N, Ross LS, Saintpierre B, Beghain J, Chy S, Kim S, Ke S, Kloeung N, Eam R, Khean C, Ken M, Loch K, Bouillon A, Domergue A, Ma L, Bouchier C, Leang R, Huy R, Nuel G, Barale J-C, Legrand E, Ringwald P, Fidock DA, Mercereau-Puijalon O, Ariey F, Ménard D. A surrogate marker of piperaquine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria: a phenotype-genotype association study. The Lancet. Infectious Diseases. 2017;17:174–183. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30415-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Wong W, Bai XC, Sleebs BE, Triglia T, Brown A, Thompson JK, Jackson KE, Hanssen E, Marapana DS, Fernandez IS, Ralph SA, Cowman AF, Scheres SHW, Baum J. Mefloquine targets the Plasmodium falciparum 80S ribosome to inhibit protein synthesis. Nature Microbiology. 2017;2:17031. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. World Health Organization . World malaria report 2024. World Health Organization; 2024. [Google Scholar]
  122. Yang T, Yeoh LM, Tutor MV, Dixon MW, McMillan PJ, Xie SC, Bridgford JL, Gillett DL, Duffy MF, Ralph SA, McConville MJ, Tilley L, Cobbold SA. Decreased K13 abundance reduces hemoglobin catabolism and proteotoxic stress, underpinning artemisinin resistance. Cell Reports. 2019;29:2917–2928. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.10.095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Yayon A, Cabantchik ZI, Ginsburg H. Identification of the acidic compartment of Plasmodium falciparum-infected human erythrocytes as the target of the antimalarial drug chloroquine. The EMBO Journal. 1984;3:2695–2700. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb02195.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Zhang J, Krugliak M, Ginsburg H. The fate of ferriprotorphyrin IX in malaria infected erythrocytes in conjunction with the mode of action of antimalarial drugs. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology. 1999;99:129–141. doi: 10.1016/s0166-6851(99)00008-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Zhang S, Gerhard GS. Heme activates artemisinin more efficiently than hemin, inorganic iron, or hemoglobin. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry. 2008;16:7853–7861. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2008.02.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

eLife Assessment

Dominique Soldati-Favre 1

This is an important study with direct implications for the rational selection of antimalarial drug combinations. The authors present data demonstrating antagonism between 4-aminoquinoline antimalarials and peroxide drugs under physiologically relevant conditions, including robust effects at the trophozoite stage and for chloroquine at the ring stage. While the conclusions are based on in vitro assays and further work will be needed to fully resolve the underlying mechanism, the findings are convincing and provide a strong rationale for evaluating drug combinations in relevant preclinical models prior to clinical testing.

Reviewer #1 (Public review):

Anonymous

Summary:

This study set out to investigate potential pharmacological drug-drug interactions between the two most common antimalarial classes, the artemisinins and quinolines. There is strong rationale for this aim, because drugs from these classes are already widely-used in Artemisinin Combination Therapies (ACTs) in the clinic, and drug combinations are an important consideration in the development of new medicines. Furthermore, whilst there is ample literature proposing many diverse mechanisms of action and resistance for the artemisinins and quinolines, it is generally accepted that the mechanisms for both classes involve heme metabolism in the parasite, and that artemisinin activity is dependent on activation by reduced heme. The study was designed to measure drug-drug interactions associated with a short pulse exposure (4 h) that is reminiscent of the short duration of artemisinin exposure obtained after in vivo dosing. Clear antagonism was observed between dihydroartemisinin (DHA) and chloroquine, which became even more extensive in chloroquine-resistant parasites. Antagonism was also observed in this assay for the more clinically-relevant ACT partner drugs piperaquine and amodiaquine, but not for other ACT partners mefloquine and lumefantrine, which don't share the 4-aminoquinoline structure or mode of action. Interestingly, chloroquine induced an artemisinin resistance phenotype in the standard in vitro Ring-stage Survival Assay, whereas this effect was not as extensive for piperaquine.

The authors also utilised a heme-reactive probe to demonstrate that the 4-aminoquinolines can inhibit heme-mediated activation of the probe within parasites, which suggests that the mechanism of antagonism involves the inactivation of heme, rendering it unable to activate the artemisinins. Measurement of protein ubiquitination showed reduced DHA-induced protein damage in the presence of chloroquine, which is also consistent with decreased heme-mediated activation, and/or with decreased DHA activity more generally.

Overall, the study clearly demonstrates a mechanistic antagonism between DHA and 4-aminoquinoline antimalarials in vitro. It is interesting that this combination is successfully used to treat millions of malaria cases every year, which may raise questions about the clinical relevance of this finding. However, the conclusions in this paper are supported by multiple lines of evidence and the data is clearly and transparently presented, leaving no doubt that DHA activity is compromised by the presence of chloroquine in vitro. It is perhaps fortunate the that the clinical dosing regimens of 4-aminoquinoline-based ACTs have been sufficient to maintain clinical efficacy despite the non-optimal combination. Nevertheless, optimisation of antimalarial combinations and dosing regimens is becoming more important in the current era of increasing resistance to artemisinins and 4-aminoquinolines. Therefore, these findings should be considered when proposing new treatment regimens (including Triple-ACTs) and the assays described in this study should be performed on new drug combinations that are proposed for new or existing antimalarial medicines.

Strengths:

This manuscript is clearly written and the data presented is clear and complete. The key conclusions are supported by multiple lines of evidence, and most findings are replicated with multiple drugs within a class, and across multiple parasite strains, thus providing more confidence in the generalisability of these findings across the 4-aminoquinoline and peroxide drug classes.

A key strength of this study was the focus on short pulse exposures to DHA (4 h in trophs and 3 h in rings), which is relevant to the in vivo exposure of artemisinins. Artemisinin resistance has had a significant impact on treatment outcomes in South-East Asia, and is now emerging in Africa, but is not detected using a 'standard' 48 or 72 h in vitro growth inhibition assay. It is only in the RSA (a short pulse of 3-6 h treatment of early ring stage parasites) that the resistance phenotype can be detected in vitro. Therefore, assays based on this short pulse exposure provide the most relevant approach to determine whether drug-drug interactions are likely to have a clinically-relevant impact on DHA activity. These assays clearly showed antagonism between DHA and 4-aminoquinolines (chloroquine, piperaquine, amodiaquine and ferroquine) in trophozoite stages. Interestingly, whilst chloroquine clearly induced an artemisinin-resistant phenotype in the RSA, piperaquine only had a minor impact on the early ring stage activity of DHA, which may be fortunate considering that piperaquine is a currently recommended DHA partner drug in ACTs, whereas chloroquine is not.

The evaluation of additional drug combinations at the end of this paper is a valuable addition, which increases the potential impact of this work. The finding of antagonism between piperaquine and OZ439 in trophozoites is consistent with the general interactions observed between peroxides and 4-aminoquinolines, and it may be interesting to see whether piperaquine impacts the ring-stage activity of OZ439.

The evaluation of reactive heme in parasites using a fluorescent sensor, combined with the measurement of K48-linked ubiquitin, further support the findings of this study, providing independent read-outs for the chloroquine-induced antagonism.

The in-depth discussion of the interpretation and implications of the results are an additional strength of this manuscript. Whilst the discussion section is rather lengthy, there are important caveats to the interpretation of some of these results, and clear relevance to the future management of malaria that require these detailed explanations.

Overall, this is a high quality manuscript describing an important study that has implications for the selection of antimalarial combinations for new and existing malaria medicines.

Weaknesses:

This study is an in vitro study of parasite cultures, and therefore caution should be taken when applying these findings to decisions about clinical combinations. The drug concentrations and exposure durations in these assays are intended to represent clinically relevant exposures, although it is recognised that the in vitro system is somewhat simplified and there may be additional factors that influence in vivo activity. This limitation is reasonably well acknowledged in the manuscript.

It is also important to recognise that the majority of the key findings regarding antagonism are based on trophozoite-stage parasites, and one must show caution when generalising these findings to other stages or scenarios. For example, piperaquine showed clear antagonism in trophozoite stages, but minimal impact in ring stages under these assay conditions.

A key limitation is the interpretation of the mechanistic studies that implicate heme-mediated artemisinin activation as the mechanism underpinning antagonism by chloroquine. This study did not directly measure the activation of artemisinins. The data obtained from the activation of the fluorescent probe are generally supportive of chloroquine suppressing the heme-mediated activation of artemisinins, and I think this is the most likely explanation, but there are significant caveats to consider. Primarily, the inconsistency between the fluorescence profile in the chemical reactions and the cell-based assay raise questions about the accuracy of this readout. In the chemical reaction, mefloquine and chloroquine showed identical inhibition of fluorescence, whereas piperaquine had minimal impact. On the contrary, in the cell, chloroquine and piperaquine had similar impacts on fluorescence, but mefloquine had minimal impact. This inconsistency indicates that the cellular fluorescence based on this sensor does not give a simple direct readout of the reactivity of ferrous heme, and therefore, these results should be interpreted with caution. Indeed, the correlation between fluorescence and antagonism for the tested drugs is a correlation, not causation. There could be several reasons for the disconnect between the chemical and biological results, either via additional mechanisms that quench fluorescence, or the presence of biomolecules that alter the oxidation state or coordination chemistry of heme or other potential catalysts of this sensor. It is possible that another factor that influences the H-FluNox fluorescence in cells also influences the DHA activity in cells, leading to the correlation with activity. It should be noted that H-FluNox is not a chemical analogue of artemisinins. It's activation relies on Fenton-like chemistry, but with a N-O rather that O-O bond, and it possesses very different steric and electronic substituents around the reactive centre, which are known to alter reactivity to different iron sources. Despite these limitations, the authors have provided reasonable justification for the use of this probe to directly visualise heme reactivity in cells, and the results are still informative.

Another interesting finding that was not elaborated by the authors is the impact of chloroquine in the DHA dose-response curves from the ring stage assays. Detection of artemisinin resistance in the RSA generally focuses on the % survival at high DHA concentrations (700 nM) as there is minimal shift in the IC50 (see Fig 2), however, chloroquine clearly induces a shift in the IC50 (~5-fold), where the whole curve is shifted to the right, whereas the increase in % survival is relatively small. This different profile suggests that the mechanism of chloroquine-induced antagonism may be different to the mechanism of artemisinin resistance. Current evidence regarding the mechanism of artemisinin resistance generally points towards decreased heme-mediated drug activation due to a decrease in hemoglobin uptake, which should be analogous to the decrease in heme-mediated drug activation caused by chloroquine. However, these different dose response curves suggest different mechanisms are primarily responsible. Additional mechanisms have been proposed for artemisinin resistance, involving redox or heat stress responses, proteostatic responses, mitochondrial function, dormancy and PI3K signalling among others. Whilst the H-FluNox probe generally supports the idea that chloroquine suppresses heme-mediated DHA activation, it remains plausible that chloroquine could induce these, or other, cellular responses that suppress DHA activity.

Impact:

This study has important implications for the selection of drugs to form combinations for the treatment of malaria. The overall findings of antagonism between peroxide antimalarials and 4-aminoquinolines in the trophozoite stage are robust, and the this carries across to the ring stage for chloroquine.

The manuscript also provides a plausible mechanism to explain the antagonism, although future work will be required to further explore the details of this mechanism and to rule out alternative factors that may contribute.

Overall, this is an important contribution to the field and provides a clear justification for the evaluation of potential drug combinations in relevant in vitro assays before clinical testing.

Reviewer #2 (Public review):

Anonymous

Summary:

This manuscript by Rosenthal and Goldberg investigates interactions between artemisinins and its quinoline partner drugs currently used for treating uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. The authors show that chloroquine (CQ), piperaquine, and amodiaquine antagonize dihydroartemisinin (DHA) activity, and in CQ-resistant parasites, the interaction is described as "superantagonism," linked to the pfcrt genotype. Mechanistically, application of the heme-reactive probe H-FluNox indicates that quinolines render cytosolic heme chemically inert, thereby reducing peroxide activation. The work is further extended to triple ACTs and ozonide-quinoline combinations, with implications for artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) design, including triple ACTs.

Strengths:

The manuscript is clearly written, methodologically careful, and addresses a clinically relevant question. The pulsing assay format more accurately models in vivo artemisinin exposure than conventional 72-hour assays, and the use of H-FluNox and Ac-H-FluNox probes provides mechanistic depth by distinguishing chemically active versus inert heme. These elements represent important refinements beyond prior studies, adding nuance to our understanding of artemisinin-quinoline interactions.

Weaknesses:

Several points warrant consideration. The novelty of the work is somewhat incremental, as antagonism between artemisinins and quinolines is well established. Multiple prior studies using standard fixed-ratio isobologram assays have shown that DHA exhibits indifferent or antagonistic interactions with chloroquine, piperaquine, and amodiaquine (e.g., Davis et al., 2006; Fivelman et al., 2007; Muangnoicharoen et al., 2009), with recent work highlighting the role of parasite genetic background, including pfcrt and pfmdr1, in modulating these interactions (Eastman et al., 2016). High-throughput drug screens likewise identify quinoline-artemisinin combinations as mostly antagonistic. The present manuscript adds refinement by applying pulsed-exposure assays and heme probes rather than establishing antagonism de novo.

The dataset focuses on several parasite lines assayed in vitro, so claims about broad clinical implications should be tempered, and the discussion could more clearly address how in vitro antagonism may or may not translate to clinical outcomes. The conclusion that artemisinins are predominantly activated in the cytoplasm is intriguing but relies heavily on Ac-H-FluNox data, which may have limitations in accessing the digestive vacuole and should be acknowledged explicitly. The term "superantagonism" is striking but may appear rhetorical; clarifying its reproducibility across replicates and providing a mechanistic definition would strengthen the framing. Finally, some discussion points, such as questioning the clinical utility of DHA-PPQ, should be moderated to better align conclusions with the presented data while acknowledging the complexity of in vivo pharmacology and clinical outcomes.

Despite these mild reservations, the data are interesting and of high quality and provide important new information for the field.

Editor's Review of the Revision: The authors have provided a well-reasoned rebuttal to the comments of the three reviewers. Most of the changes were incorporated in their revised Discussion. Their data with the active heme probe H-FluNox are novel and the authors reveal interesting interactions between peroxide and 4-aminoquinoline-based antimalarials that open new avenues of research especially when considering antimalarial combinations that combine these chemical scaffolds. This study will be of broad interest to investigators studying and developing antimalarial drugs and combinations and the impact of Plasmodium falciparum resistance mechanisms. A minor recommendation would be that the authors state H-FluNox when referring to their small molecule probe in the abstract, so that it is captured in PubMed searches.

Reviewer #3 (Public review):

Anonymous

Summary:

The authors present an in vitro evaluation of drug-drug interactions between artemisinins and quinoline antimalarials, as an important aspect for screening the current artemisinin-based combination therapies for Plasmodium falciparum. Using a revised pulsing assay, they report antagonism between dihydroartemisinin (DHA) and several quinolines, including chloroquine, piperaquine (PPQ), and amodiaquine. This antagonism is increased in CQ-resistant strains in isobologram analyses. Moreover, CQ co-treatment was found to induce artemisinin resistance even in parasites lacking K13 mutations during the ring-stage survival assay. This implies that drug-drug interactions, not just genetic mutations, can influence resistance phenotypes. By using a chemical probe for reactive heme, the authors demonstrate that quinolines inhibit artemisinin activation by rendering cytosolic heme chemically inert, thereby impairing the cytotoxic effects of DHA. The study also observed negative interactions in triple-drug regimens (e.g., DHA-PPQ-Mefloquine) and in combinations involving OZ439, a next-generation peroxide antimalarial. Taken together, these findings raise significant concerns regarding the compatibility of artemisinin and quinoline combinations, which may promote resistance or reduce efficacy.

With the additive profile as the comparison and a lack of synergistic effect in any of the comparisons, it is hard to contextualize the observed antagonism. Including a known synergistic pair (e.g., artemisinin + lumefantrine) would have provided a useful benchmark to assess the relative impact of the drug interactions described.

Strengths:

This study demonstrates the following strengths:

• The use of a pulsed in vitro assay that is more physiologically relevant over the traditional 48h or 72h assays

• Small molecule probes, H-FluNox, and Ac-H-FluNox to detect reactive cytosolic heme, demonstrating that quinolines render heme inert and thereby block DHA activation.

• Evaluates not only traditional combinations but also triple-drug combinations and next-generation artemisinins like OZ439. This broad scope increases the study's relevance to current treatment strategies and future drug development.

• By using the K13 wild-type parasites, the study suggests that resistance phenotypes can emerge from drug-drug interactions alone, without requiring genetic resistance markers.

Weaknesses:

• The study would benefit from a future characterization of the molecular basis for the observed heme inactivation by quinolines to support this hypothesis - while the probe experiments are valuable, they do not fully elucidate how quinolines specifically alter heme chemistry at the molecular level.

• Suggestion of alternative combinations that show synergy could have improved the significance of the work. The invitro study did not include pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling, hence it leaves questions about how the observed antagonism would manifest under real-world dosing conditions, necessitating furture work based on these findings.

eLife. 2026 Mar 23;14:RP108976. doi: 10.7554/eLife.108976.3.sa4

Author response

Melissa Rosenthal 1, Daniel E Goldberg 2

The following is the authors’ response to the original reviews.

eLife Assessment

We appreciate the positive assessment. We recognize that since all of the work in this manuscript was done in vitro, there are reasonable concerns about the translatability of these data to clinical settings. These results should not directly inform malaria policy, but we hope that these data bring new considerations to the approach for choosing strategic antimalarial combinations. We have modified the manuscript to clarify this distinction.

Public Reviews

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

We thank the reviewer for their thoughtful summary of this manuscript. It is important to note that DHA-PPQ did show antagonism in RSAs. In this modified RSA, 200 nM PPQ alone inhibited growth of PPQ-sensitive parasites approximately 20%. If DHA and PPQ were additive, then we would expect that addition of 200 nM PPQ would shift the DHA dose response curve to the left and result in a lower DHA IC50. Please refer to Figure 4a and b as examples of additive relationships in dose-response assays. We observed no significant shift in IC50 values between DHA alone and DHA + PPQ. This suggests antagonism, albeit not to the extent seen with CQ. We have modified the manuscript to emphasize this point. As the reviewer pointed out, it is fortunate that despite being antagonistic, clinically used artemisinin-4-aminoquinoline combinations are effective, provided that parasites are sensitive to the 4-aminoquinoline. It is possible that superantagonism is required to observe a noticeable effect on treatment efficacy (Sutherland et al. 2003 and Kofoed et al. 2003), but that classical antagonism may still have silent consequences. For example, if PPQ blocks some DHA activation, this might result in DHA-PPQ acting more like a pseudo-monotherapy. However, as the reviewer pointed out, while our data suggest that DHA-PPQ and AS-ADQ are “non-optimal” combinations, the clinical consequences of these interactions are unclear. We have modified the manuscript to emphasize the later point.

While the Ac-H-FluNox and ubiquitin data point to a likely mechanism for DHA-quinoline antagonism, we agree that there are other possible mechanisms to explain this interaction. We have addressed this limitation in the discussion section. Though we tried to measure DHA activation in parasites directly, these attempts were unsuccessful. We acknowledge that the chemistry of DHA and Ac-H-FluNox activation is not identical and that caution should be taken when interpreting these data. Nevertheless, we believe that Ac-H-FluNox is the best currently available tool to measure “active heme” in live parasites and is the best available proxy to assess DHA activation in live parasites. These points are now addressed in the discussion section. Both in vitro and in parasite studies point to a roll for CQ in modulating heme, though an exact mechanism will require further examination. Similar to the reviewer, we were perplexed by the differences observed between in vitro and in parasite assays with PPQ and MFQ. We proposed possible hypotheses to explain these discrepancies in the discussion section. Interestingly, our data corelate well with hemozoin inhibition assays in which all three antimalarials inhibit hemozoin formation in solution, but only CQ and PPQ inhibit hemozoin formation in parasites. In both assays, in-parasite experiments are likely to be more informative for mechanistic assessment.

It remains unclear why K13 genotype influences RSA values, but not early ring DHA IC50 values. In K13WT parasites, both RSA values and DHA IC50 values were increased 3-5 fold upon addition of CQ. This suggests that CQ-mediated resistance is more robust than that conferred by K13 genotype. However, this does not necessarily suggest a different resistance mechanism. We acknowledge that in addition to modulating heme, it is possible that CQ may enhance DHA survival by promoting parasite stress responses. Future studies will be needed to test this alternative hypothesis. This limitation has been acknowledged in the manuscript. We have also addressed the reviewer’s point that other factors, including poor pharmacokinetic exposure, contributed to OZ439-PPQ treatment failure.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

We appreciate the positive feedback. We agree that there have been previous studies, many of which we cited, assessing interactions of these antimalarials. We also acknowledge that previous work, including our own, has shown that parasite genetics can alter drug-drug interactions. We have included the author’s recommended citations to the list of references that we cited. Importantly, our work was unique not only for utilizing a pulsing format, but also for revealing a superantagonistic phenotype, assessing interactions in an RSA format, and investigating a mechanism to explain these interactions. We agree with the reviewer that implications from this in vitro work should be cautious, but hope that this work contributes another dimension to critical thinking about drug-drug interactions for future combination therapies. We have modified the manuscript to temper any unintended recommendations or implications.

The reviewer notes that we conclude “artemisinins are predominantly activated in the cytoplasm”. We recognize that the site of artemisinin activation is contentious. We were very clear to state that our data combined with others suggest that artemisinins can be activated in the parasite cytoplasm. We did not state that this is the primary site of activation. We were clear to point out that technical limitations may prevent Ac-H-FluNox signal in the digestive vacuole, but determined that low pH alone could not explain the absence of a digestive vacuole signal.

With regard to the “reproducibility” and “mechanistic definition” of superantagonism, we observed what we defined as a one-sided superantagonistic relationship for three different parasites (Dd2, Dd2 PfCRTDd2, and Dd2 K13R539T) for a total of nine independent replicates. In the text, we define that these isoboles are unique in that they had mean ΣFIC50 values > 2.4 and peak ΣFIC50 values >4 with points extending upward instead of curving back to the axis. As further evidence of the reproducibility of this relationship, we show that CQ has a significant rescuing effect on parasite survival to DHA as assessed by RSAs and IC50 values in early rings.

Reviewer #3 (Public Review):

We thank the reviewer for their positive feedback. We acknowledge that no combinations tested in this manuscript were synergistic. However, two combinations, DHA-MFQ and DHA-LM, were additive, which provides context for contextualizing antagonistic relationships. We have previously reported synergistic and additive isobolograms for peroxide-proteasome inhibitor combinations using this same pulsing format (Rosenthal and Ng 2021). These published results are now cited in the manuscript.

We believe that these findings are specific to 4-aminoquinoline-peroxide combinations, and that these findings cannot be generalized to antimalarials with different mechanisms of action. Note that the aryl amino alcohols, MFQ and LM, were additive with DHA. Since the mechanism of action of MFQ and LM are poorly understood, it is difficult to speculate on a mechanism underlying these interactions.

We agree with the reviewer that while the heme probe may provide some mechanistic insight to explain DHA-quinoline interactions, there is much more to learn about CQ-heme chemistry, particularly within parasites.

The focus of this manuscript was to add a new dimension to considerations about pairings for combination therapies. It is outside the scope of this manuscript to suggest alternative combinations. However, we agree that synergistic combinations would likely be more strategic clinically.

An in vitro setup allows us to eliminate many confounding variables in order to directly assess the impact of partner drugs on DHA activity. However, we agree that in vivo conditions are incredibly more complex, and explicitly state this.

We agree that in the future, modeling studies could provide insight into how antagonism may contribute to real-world efficacy. This is outside the scope of our studies.

Recommendations for the Authors:

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the Authors):

The key weaknesses identified in this manuscript are described in the 'weaknesses' section of the public review. The major one is the inconsistency around the H-FluNox response in the chemical vs biological experiments. I can't think of a simple experiment to resolve this issue, but it is good that this data is openly provided in the manuscript. I believe there could be more discussion to clarify this limitation with the current study, and the conclusions, and particularly the title, should be softened regarding the mechanism of antagonism being based on heme reactivity.

We have softened the title and conclusions to take into account the limitations of our studies.

(1) Please double-check the definitions for isobologram interpretation. In most antimicrobial interaction studies, I see the threshold for antagonism at sumFIC50 of 1.5, or even 2. 1.25 is often interpreted as additive in many studies.

We acknowledge that different studies use various cutoff values. Our interpretations for additive versus antagonistic versus superantagonistic were based not only on mean ΣFIC50 values, but also isobologram shape. For example, the flat isoboles for MFQ-DHA were clearly distinct from the curved isoboles of PPQ-DHA. It is unclear what cutoff value(s) would be most clinically relevant.

(2) For the MFQ-PPQ interaction study, please make it clear that these drugs have very long half-lives (weeks), so the 4 h pulse assay isn't really relevant to their overall activity. It probably shows a slower onset of action, but there is plenty of drug remaining for many days in the clinical scenario, so perhaps the data from the traditional 48h assay is more relevant. The same consideration applies to OZ439, which may impact the interpretation of that data.

We have now included the half-lives of these compounds in the discussion section. Our intent was to use a pulsing format to make these isobolograms comparable with the other assays. It is important to note that pulses can reveal stronger phenotypes that might be missed with traditional methods. Thus, while 48 h assays may better mimic in vivo conditions, they could also mask important phenotypes.

Reviewer #3 (Recommendations for the Authors):

I have included most of my concerns in the public review. Below are some additional specific points for consideration:

(1) It is expected to include a synergistic combination as a control (e.g., artemisinin + lumefantrine) to contextualize the degree of antagonism observed. The experimental design should show some synergistic profiles in comparison. Adding a few experiments by including a synergistic control is needed.

Both MFQ-DHA and LM-DHA combinations were additive, which provides context for antagonistic combinations. This is now stated in the results section pertaining to Figure 1. We have also included a reference to our previous publication in which we demonstrated that proteasome inhibitor-peroxide combinations are synergistic to additive using this same pulsing format.

(2) Consider in vivo validation or pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling to strengthen the translational relevance of the findings when it comes to doses and the IC50 correlations.

We agree that this would be useful to do in future, but it is outside the scope of the current study.

(3) It would be beneficial to include a discussion section on how the findings are generalizable to different Plasmodium falciparum genotypes (3D7, Dd2, MRA-1284) and their relevance.

Findings were consistent across three parasite backgrounds depending on PfCRT genotype. This point has been included in the discussion section. The background of these parasites is also provided in Table 1.

(4) Potential evaluation criteria to understand where certain combinations should be reconsidered can be included as a suggestion for the wider audience.

Our in vitro studies suggest that pulsing isobolograms would be a useful assay to include when evaluating combination therapies. While we believe that synergistic combinations would be more strategic than antagonistic combinations, we cannot provide evaluation criteria or make recommendations for reconsidering currently used combinations.

(5) Further elaborate on the mechanistic basis of heme inactivation by quinolines. If data are available, please include more data on the specificity of the process.

Despite our best efforts, we were unable to evaluate quinoline-heme interactions in parasites. Even in vitro, this interaction has remined elusive for decades. We agree that this would be an important future step towards supporting a specific mechanism for quinoline-DHA antagonism.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Figure 1—source data 1. Isobologram analysis.
    Figure 1—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Chloroquine (CQ), dihydroartemisinin (DHA), piperaquine (PPQ), and mefloquine (MFQ) IC50 values.
    Figure 2—source data 1. Ring-stage survival assay (RSA) dose-response assays.
    Figure 3—source data 1. Mean sum FIC50 values used to generate the heat map.
    Figure 3—source data 2. H-FluNox relative fluorescence units (RFU) with chloroquine (CQ), piperaquine (PPQ), and mefloquine (MFQ).
    Figure 3—source data 3. Ac-H-FluNox parasite fluorescence with chloroquine (CQ), piperaquine (PPQ), and mefloquine (MFQ).
    Figure 3—source data 4. Ac-H-FluNox fluorescence of Dd2 PfCRTDd2 and Dd2 PfCRT3D7 parasites.
    Figure 3—source data 5. Uncropped, labeled western blots.
    Figure 3—source data 6. Western blot raw images.
    Figure 3—source data 7. Western blot quantifications.
    Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 1. H-FluNox pH titration relative fluorescence units (RFU).
    Figure 3—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Ac-H-FluNox fluorescence for 10 μM chloroquine (CQ), 10 μM piperaquine (PPQ), 10 μM mefloquine (MFQ) treatment.
    Figure 4—source data 1. Dose response analyses for TACTs.
    Figure 4—source data 2. Isobologram analyses.
    Figure 4—source data 3. Ac-H-FluNox fluorescence for ADQ, FQ, and LM.
    Figure 4—source data 4. Values for FIC50 and Ac-H-FluNox correlation.
    Figure 4—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Isobologram analysis.
    Figure 4—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Amodiaquine (ADQ), lumefantrine (LM), ferroquine (FQ), IC50 values.
    MDAR checklist

    Data Availability Statement

    All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files; source data files have been provided.


    Articles from eLife are provided here courtesy of eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

    RESOURCES